maamm S mi T ,vCttAt'. 9 v ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA. CncptlopaeUta Brttanmta: OR, A DICTIONARY ARTS, SCIENCES, AND MISCELLANEOUS LITERATURE; ENLARGED AND IMPROVED. THE SIXTH EDITION. Sllustratrt Until marip sir Inmtirrt) dfngiabings. VOL. XVII. INDOCTI DISCANT; AMENT MEMINISSE PERITI. EDINBURGH: PRINTED FOR ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE AND COMPANY; AND HURST, ROBINSON, AND COMPANY, 90, CHEAPSIDE, LONDON. 1823. frs Encyclopedia Britannica POETRY, Part II. Sect. 2. continued. Of Lytic r | i HE variety of subjects, which are allowed the lyric , Foetry- , JL poet, makes it necessary to consider this species of poetry under the following heads, viz. the sublime ode, the lesser ode, and the song. We shall begin with the 120 lowest, and proceed to that which is more eminent. The song. I. Songs are little poetical compositions, usually set to a tune, and frequently sung in company by way of entertainment and diversion. Of these we have in our language a great number j hut, considering that num¬ ber, not many which are excellent; for, as the duke of Buckingham observes, Though nothing seems more easy, yet no part Of poetry requires a nicer art. The song admits of almost any subject ; but the greatest part of them turn either upon love, contentme?it, or the pleasures of a country life, and drinking. Be the subject, however, what it will, the verses should be easy, natural, and flowing, and contain a certain harmony, so that poetry and music may be agreeably united. In these compositions, as in all others, obscene and profane ex¬ pressions should be carefully avoided, and indeed every thing that tends to take olT that respect which is due to religion and virtue, and to encourage vice and im¬ morality. As the best songs in our language are al¬ ready in every hand, it would seem superfluous to in¬ sert examples. For further precepts, however, as well as select examples, in this species of composition, we may refer the reader to the elegant Essay on Sons: m Writing, by Mr Aikin. The distin- II. T he lesser ode. The distinguishing character of gnishing this is sweetness ; and as the pleasure we receive from “er^3 S?rt Poen\arises principally from its soothing and ode. a fleeting the passions, great regard should he paid to the language as well as to the thoughts and numbers. Th’ expression should be easy, fancy high j Yet that not seem to creep, nor this to fly : No words transpos’d, but in such order all, As, though hard wrought, may seem by chance to fall. D. Buckingham’s Essay. The style, indeed, should be easy 1: but it may be also florid and figurative. It solicits delicacy, but disdains aflectation. I he thoughts should be natural, chaste, and elegant; and the numbers various, smooth, and harmo¬ nious. A few examples will sufficiently explain what we mean. Vol. XVII. Part I. + _ Longinus has preserved a fragment of Sappho, an an- Of Lyric cient Greek poetess, which is in great reputation amongst Foetry- the critics, and has been so happily translated by Mr Philips as to give the English reader a just idea of theT] I*2 spirit, ease, and elegance of that admired author; and ph;® ode." show how exactly she copied nature. To enter into the beauties of this ode, we must suppose a lover sitting by his mistress, and thus expressing his passion : Blest as th’ immortal gods is he, The youth who fondly sits by thee, And sees and hears thee all the while Softly speak, and sweetly smile. ’Twas this depriv’d my soul of rest, And rais’d such tumults in my breast; For while I gaz’d, in transport tost, My breath was gone, my voice was lost. My bosom glow’d, the subtle flame Ran quick through all my vital frame: O’er my dim eyes a darkness hung; My ears with hollow murmurs rung. In dewy damps my limbs were chill’d. My blood with gentle horrors thrill’d ; My feeble pulse forgot to play; I fainted, sunk, and dy’d away. After this instance of the Sapphic ode, it may not Tlie^na- be improper to speak of that sort of ode which is called creontic Anacreontic; being written in the manner and taste of0^* Anacreon, a Greek poet, famous for the delicacy of his wit, and the exquisite, yet easy and natural, turn of his poesy. We have several of his odes still extant, and many modern ones in imitation of him, which are most¬ ly composed in verses of seven syllables, or three feet and a half. We shall give the young student one or two examples of his manner from Mr Fawkes’s excellent translation. The following ode on the power of gold, which had been often attempted but with little success, this gentle¬ man has translated very happily. Love’s a pain that works our wo ; Not to love is painful too ; But, alas ! the greatest pain Waits the love that meets disdain. What avails ingenuous worth, Sprightly wit, or noble birth ? All these virtues useless prove ; Gold alone engages love. A May Of lijric Poetry. POE May he be completely curst, ■Who the sleeping mischief first Wak’d to life, and, vile before, Stamp’d with worth the sordid ore. Gold creates in brethren strile ; Gold destroys the parent’s life ; Gold produces civil jars, Murders, massacres, and wars 5 But the worst effect of gold, Love, alas ! is bought and sold. His ode on the vanity of riches is of a piece with the above, and conveys a good lesson to those who are over anxious for wealth. If the treasur’d gold could give Man a longer term to live, I’d employ my utmost care Still to keep, and still to spare ; And, when death approach’d, would say, ‘ Take thy fee, and walk away.’ But since riches cannot save Mortals from the gloomy grave, Why should I myself deceive, Vainly sigh, and vainly grieve ? Death will surely be my lot, Whether I am rich or not. Give me freely while I live Generous wines, in plenty give Soothing joys my life to cheer, Beauty kind, and friends sincere j Happy ! could I ever find Friends sincere, and beauty kind. R Y. « Think, O think! what cruel pains ‘ He that’s stung by thee sustains. . # Among the most successful of this peel’s English um tutors mfy he reckoned Dr Johnson mtdMtl nor. .ih; Part IT. Of Lyric Poetry. 124 The Imitation tators may be reckoned Ur jomm.u — • tersof Anacre, following ode on Eveningby the former of these wute ^ has, if we mistake not, the very sptnt and atrof Anacreon. Evening now from purple wings Sheds the grateful gifts she brings ■, Brilliant drops bedeck the mead j Cooling breezes shake the reed } . Shake the reed and curl the stream Silver’d o’er with Cynthia’s beam j Near the chequer’d’lonely grove Hears, and keeps thy secrets, Love. Stella, thither let us stray ! Lightly o’er the dewy way. Phoebus drives his burning car Hence, my lovely Stella, tar . In his stead the queen of night Piound us pours a lambent light 5 Lieht that seems but just to show Let us now, in whisper’d joy, Evening’s silent hours employ 5 Silence best, and conscious shades, Please the hearts that love invades : Other pleasures give them pain 5 Lovers all but love disdain. But of all the imitations of the playful bard of Greece that we have ever met with, the most perfect is the fol¬ lowing Anacreontic by the ^regent duke of Orleans. But two of the most admired, and perhaps the most imitated, of Anacreon’s odes, are that of Mars wounded by one of the darts of Love, and Cupid stung by a Bee } both which are wrought up with fancy and deli¬ cacy, and are translated with elegance and spirit.—lake that of Cupid stung by a bee. Once as Cupid, tir’d with play, On a bed of roses lay, A rude bee, that slept unseen, The sweet breathing buds between, Stung his finger, cruel chance ! With its little pointed lance. Straight he fills the air with cries, Weeps, and sobs, and runs, and flies 5 ’Till the god to Venus came, Lovely, laughter-loving dame : Then he thus began to plain } “ Oh ! undone 1 die with pain— “ Dear mamma, a serpent small, “ Which a bee the ploughman call, « Imp’d with wings, and arm’d with dart, « Oh !—has stung me to the heart.” Venus thus reply’d, and smil’d : « Dry those tears for shame ! my child j ‘ If a bee can wound so deep, ‘ Causing Cupid thus to weep, Je suis ne pour les plaisirs ; Bien fou que s’en passe : Je ne veux pas les choisir j Souvent le choix m’embarrasse : Aime t’on ? J’aime soudain*, Bois t’on ? J’ai la verre a la main •, Je tiens par tout ma place. II. Dormir est un temps perdu ; Faut il qu’on s’y livre ? Sommeil, prends ce qui t’est du; Mais attends que je sois yvre : Saisis moi dans cet instant j Fais moi dormir promptement; Je suis presse de vivre. III. Mais si quelque objet charmant,_ Dans un songe aimable, Vient d’un plaisir seduisant M’ofirir 1’image agreable *, Sommeil, aliens doucement j L’erreur est en ce moment Un bonheur veritable. Translation of the Regent's Anacreontic (e). Frolic and free, for pleasure born, The self-denying fool I scorn. The (e) We give this translation, both because of its excellence, and because it is said to have been the production «f no less a man than the late Lord Chatham. Part II. Of Lyric The proffer’d joy I ne’er refuse j Poetry. ’Tis oft-times troublesome to chuse* u“-—v ’ Lov’ st thou, my friend ? I love at sight: Drink’st thou ? this bumper does thee right. At random with the stream I flow, And play my part where’er I go. Great God of Sleep, since we must be Oblig’d to give some hours to thee, Invade me not till the full bowl Glows in my cheek, and warms my soul. Be t/iat the only time to snore, When I can love and drink no moi-e : Short, very short, then be thy reign j For I’m in haste to live again. But O ! if melting in my arms, In some soft dream, with all her charms, The nymph belov’d should then surprise, And gx'ant what waking she denies j Then prithee, gentle Slumber, stay j Slowly, ah slowly, bring the day : Let no rude noise my bliss destroys Such sweet delusion’s real joy. 3 Thy breath to Eliza’s no fragrance hath in’t, Of Lyric And but dull is thy bloom to her cheek’s blushing tint. Poetry. Yet, alas 1 my fair flow’r, that bloom will decay, u“~\ " J And all thy lov’d beauties soon wither away j Tho’ pluck’d by her hand, to whose touch we must own, Harsh and rough is the cygnet’s most delicate down Thou too, snowy hand $ nay, I mean not to preach j But the rose, lovely moralist, suffer to teach. “ Extol not, fair maiden, thy beauties o’er mine ; They too are short-liv’d, and they too must decline 5 And small, in conclusion, the diff’rence appears, In the bloom of few days, or the bloom of few years ! But remember a virtue the rose hath to boast, —Its fragrance remains when its beauties are lost!” iztf We come now to those odes of the more florid and Odes more figurative kind, of which we have many in our language j!or^ that deserve particular commendation. Mr Wax ton’s loula-i,c' Ode to Fancy has been justly admired by the best judges j for though it has a distant resemblance of Milton’s 1’Allegro and II Penseroso, yet the work is original; the thoughts are mostly new and various, and the language and numbers elegant, expressive, and harmonious. POETRY. We have mentioned Prior as an imitator of Anacreon j but the reader has by this time had a sufficient specimen of Anacreontics. The following Answer to Closjealuus, which was written when Prior was sick, has much of the elegant tenderness of Sappho. Yes, fairest proof of beauty’s power, Dear idol of my panting heart, Nature points this my fatal hour : And I have liv’d : and we must part. While now I take my last adieu, Heave thou no sigh, nor shed a tear j Lest yet my half-clos’d eye may view On earth an object worth its care. From jealousy’s tormenting strife For ever be thy bosom freed j That nothing may disturb thy life, Content I hasten to the dead. Yet when some better-fated youth Shall with his am’rous parly move thee, Reflect one moment on his truth Who, dying, thus persists to love thee. There is much of the softness of Sappho, and the Sweetness of Anacreon and Prior, in the following ode, which is ascribed to the unfortunate Dr Dodd j and was written in compliment to a lady, who, being sick, had sent the author a moss x-ose-bud, instead of making his family a visit. This piece is particularly to be esteemed for the just and striking moral with which it is pointed. The slightest of favours besttw’d by the fair, With rapture we take, and with triumph we wear 5 But a moss-woven rose-bud, Eliza, from thee, A well-pleasing gift to a monarch would be. —Ah ! that illness, too cruel, forbidding should stand, And refuse me the gift from thy own lovely hand ! With joy I receive it, with pleasure will view, Reminded of thee, by its odour and hue : “ Sweet rose, let me tell thee, though charming thy bloom, Tho’ thy fragrance excels Seba’s richest perfume $ O parent of each lovely muse, Thy spirit o’er my soul diffuse ! O’er all my artless songs preside, My footsteps to thy temple guide ! To offer at thy turf-built shrine In golden cups no costly wine, No mui'der’d fatling of the flock, But flow’rs and honey fx-om the rock. O nymph, with loosely flowing hair, With buskin’d leg, and bosom bare ; Thy waist with myrtle-girdle bound, Thy brows with Indian feathers crown’d ; Waving in thy snow'y hand An all-commanding magic wand, Of povv’r to bid fresh gardens blow ’Mid cheerless Lapland’s barren snow : Whose rapid wings thy flight convey, Through air, and over earth and sea } W hile the vast various landscape lies Conspicuous to thy piercing eyes. O lover of the desert, hail ! Say, in wdiat deep and pathless vale. Or on what hoary mountain’s side, ’Midst falls of water, you reside ; ’Midst broken rocks, a rugged scene, With green and grassy dales between j ’Midst forests dark of aged oak, Nt’er echoing with the woodman’s stroke j Where never hxmian art appear’d, Nor ev’n one straw-roof’d cott was rear’d ; Where Nature seems to sit alone, Majestic on a craggy throne. Tell me the path, sweet wand’rer ! tell, To thy unknown sequester’d cell, Where woodbines cluster round the dooi', Where shells and moss o’^rlay the floox-, And on xvhose top an hawthorn blows. Amid whose thickly-woven boughs Some nightingale still builds her nest, Each ev’ning warbling thee to rest. Then lay me by the haunted stream, Wrapt in some wild poetic dream * A 2, Tn Of Lyric lJoetrv. POE In converse while metliinks I rove With Spenser through a fairy grove j Till suddenly awak’d, I hear Strange whisper’d music in my ear j And my glad soul in bliss is drown d By the sweetly soothing sound ! Me, goddess, by the right-hand lead, Sometimes through the yellow mead 5 Where Joy and white-rob’d Peace resort, And Venus keeps her festive court} Where Mirth and Youth each ev’ning meet, And lightly trip with nimble feet, Nodding their lily-crowned heads, Where Laughter rose-lip’d Hebe leads *, Where Echo walks steep hills among, List’ning to the shepherd’s song. Yet not these flow’ry helds of joy Can long my pensive mind employ } Haste, Fancy, from the scenes of Folly, To meet the matron Melancholy ! Goddess of the tearful eye, That loves to fold her arms and sigh. Let us with silent footsteps go To charnels, and the house of wo} To Gothic churches, vaults, and tombs, Where each sad night some virgin comes, With throbbing breast and faded cheek, Her promis’d bridegroom’s urn to seek. Or to some abbey’s mould’ring tow rs, Where, to avoid cold wint’ry show’rs, The naked beggar shivering lies, While whistling tempests round her rise, And trembles lest the tott’ring wall Should on her sleeping infants fall. Now let us louder strike the Ijre, For my heart glows with martial fire } I feel, I feel, with sudden heat, My big tumultuous bosom beat $ The trumpet’s clangors pierce ray ear, A thousand widows shrieks I hear . Give me another horse, I cry j Lo, the base Gallic squadrons fly _! Whence is this rage ?—what spirit, say. To battle hurries me away ? ’Tis Fancy, in her fiery car, Transports me to the thickest war j There whirls me o’er the hills of slain, Where tumult and destruction reign ; Where, mad with pain, the wounded steed. Tramples the dying and the dead ; Where giant Terror stalks around, With sullen joy surveys the ground, And, pointing to th’ ensanguin’d field, Shakes his dreadful gorgou shield ! O guide me from this horrid scene To high arch’d walks and alleys green, Which lovely Laura seeks, to shun The fervors of the mid-day sun. The pangs of absence, O remove, For thou can’st place me near my love j Can’st fold in visionary bliss. And let me think I steal a kiss ; While her ruby lips dispense Luscious nectar’s quintessence! T R Y. When yonng ey’d Spring profusely throws From her green lap the pink and ro , When the soft turtle of the dale To Summer tells her tender tale j When Autumn cooling caverns seeks,. And stains with wine his jolly cheeks *, 'ITT- i. „ wmrvr TuloTim old. At ev’ry season let my ear Thy solemn whispers, Fancy, hear. O warm enthusiastic maid . Without thy powerful, vital aid, That breathes an energy divine, That gives a soul to ev’ry line, Ne’er may I strive with lips profane, To utter an unhallow’d strain j _ Nor dare to touch the sacred string, _ Save when with smiles thou bid’st me sing. O hear our pray’r, O hither come From thy lamented Shakespeare s tomb, On which thou lov’st to sit at eve, Musing o’er thy darling’s grave. O queen of numbers, once again Animate some chosen swain, Who, fill’d with unexhausted fire, May boldly smite the sounding lyre ; Who with some new, unequall’d song, May rise above the rhyming throng : O’er all our list’ning passions reign, O’erwhelm our souls with joy and pain *, With terror shake, with pity move, Bouze with revenge, or melt with love. O deign t’attend his evening walk. With him in groves and grottoes talk ; Teach him to scorn, with frigid art, Feebly to touch th’ enraptur’d heart J Like lightning, let his mighty verse The bosom’s inmost foldings pierce •, With native beauties win applause, Beyond cold critics studied laws : O let each muse’s fame increase ! O bid Britannia rival Greece ! Part II. Of Lyric Poetry. The following ode, written by Mr Smart on the 5th of December (being the birth-day of a beautiful young ladv), is much to be admired for the variety and har¬ mony of the numbers, as well as for the beauty of the thoughts, and the elegance and delicacy of the compli¬ ment. It has great fire, and yet great sweetnegs, and is the happy issue of genius and judgment united. Hail eldest of the monthly train, Sire of the winter drear, December ! in whose iron reign Expires the chequer’d year. Hush all the blust’ring blasts that blow, And proudly plum’d in silver snow, Smile gladly on this blest of days j The livery’d clouds shall on thee wait, And Phoebus shine in all his state With more than summer rays. Though jocund June may justly boast Long days and happy hours} Though August be Pomona’s host, And May be crown’d with flow’rs : Tell Part II. POE Tell June Ills fire and crimson dies, Bv Harriot’s blush, and Harriot’s eyes, Eclips’d and vanquish’d, fade away j Tell August, thou canst let him see A richer, riper fruit than he, A sweeter flow’r than May. The ensuing ode, written by Mr Collins on the death anil elegiac 0f ]\fr Thomson, is of the pastoral and elegiac kind, and °^e' both picturesque and pathetic. To perceive all the beau¬ ties of this little piece, which are indeed many, we must suppose them to have been delivered on the river Thames near Richmond. Of Lyric Poetry. 127 A pastoral * The harp of iEolus. f Rich¬ mond church. 128 The hymn. In yonder grave a Druid lies, Where slowly winds the stealing wave ; The year’s best sweets shall duteous rise To deck its poet’s silvan grave ! In yon deep bed of whisp’ring reeds His airy harp * shall now be laid, That he, whose heart in sorrow bleeds, May love through life the soothing shade. Then maids and youths shall linger here, And, while its sounds at distance swell, Shall sadly seem in pity’s ear To hear the woodland pilgrim’s knell. Remembrance oft shall haunt the shore, When Thames in summer wreaths is drest, And oft suspend the dashing oar, To bid his gentle spirit rest! And oft as ease and health retire To breezy lawn, or forest deep, The friend shall view yon whitening spire f, And ’mid the varied landscape weep. But thou, who own’st that earthy bed, Ah ! what will ev’ry dirge avail ? Or tears, which love and pity shed, That mourn beneath the gliding sail ? Yet lives there one, whose heedless eye, Shall scorn thy pale shrine glimm’ring near ? With him, sweet bard, may fancy die, And joy desert the blooming year. - But thou, lorn stream, whose sullen tide No sedge-crown’d sisters now attend, Now waft me from the green hill’s side, Whose cold turf hides the buried friend. And see, the fairy valleys fade, Dim night has veil’d the solemn view ! Yet once again, dear parted shade, Meek nature’s child, again adieu ! The genial meads, assign’d to bless Thy life, shall mourn thy early doom ; Their hinds, and shepherd girls, shall dress, With simple hands, thy rural tomb. Long, long, thy stone and pointed clay Shall melt the musing Briton’s eyes $ O vales and wild woods, shall he say, In yonder grave your Druid lies ! Under this species of the ode, notice ought to be ta^ ken of those written on divine subjects, and which are usually called hymns. Of these we have many in our language, but none perhaps that are so much admired as Mr Addison’s. The beauties of the following hymn are too well known, and too obvious, to need any commen¬ dation ; we shall only observe, therefore, that in this hymn (intended to display the power of the Almighty) TRY. 5 he seems to have had a psalm of David in his view, Of Lyric which says, that “ the heavens declare the glory of God, Poetry, and the firmament sheweth his handywork.” * The spacious firmament on high, With all the blue ethereal sky, And spangled heav’ns, a shining frame, Their great original proclaim : Th’ unwearied sun, from day to day, Does his Creator’s pow’r display, And publishes to ev’ry land The work of an Almighty hand. Soon as the ev’ning shades prevail, The moon takes up the wond’rous tale, And nightly to the list’ning earth Repeats the story of her birth : While all the stars that round her burn,. And all the planets in their turn, Confirm the tidings as they roll, And spread the truth from pole to pole. What tho’ in solemn silence all Move round the dark terrestrial ball ? What tho’ no real voice or sound Amid their radiant orbs be found ?. In reason’s ear they all rejoice, And utter forth a glorious voice, For ever singing, as they shine, “ The hand that made us is divine.” The following pastoral hymn is a vei’sion of the 23d Psalm by Mr Addison ; the peculiar beauties of which have occasioned many translations ; but we have seen none that is so poetical and perfect as this. And in justice to Dr Boyce, we must observe, that the music he has adapted to it is so sweet and expressive, that we know not which is to be most admired, the poet or the musician. The Lord my pasture shall prepare, And feed me with a shepherd’s care j His presence shall my wants supply, And guard me with a watchful eye } My noon-day walks he shall attend, And all my midnight hours defend. When in the sultry glebe I faint, Or on the thirsty mountain pant, To fertile vales and dewry meads My weary wand’ring steps he leads j Where peaceful rivers soft and slow Amid the verdant landscape flow. Tho’ in the paths of death I tread, With gloomy horrors overspread, My stedfast heart shall fear no ill : For thou, O Lord, art with me still j Thy friendly crook shall give me aid, And guide me through the dreadful shade. Tho’ in a bare and rugged way, Through devious lonely wilds I stray, Thy bounty shall my pains beguile : The barren wilderness shall smile, With sudden greens and herbage crown’d } And streams shall murmur all around. III. We are now to speak of those odes which arexhe sub- of the sublime and noble kind, and distinguished from lime od#, others by their elevation of thought and diction, as well by the variety or irregularity of their numbers as the frequent Of Lyric Poetry P O K T frequent transitions anti bolt! excursions with tvlut!; tnty are enriched. ., , To give the young student an idea of the sudden and frequent transitions, digressions, and excursions, whicn are admitted into the odes of the ancients, tve cannot do better than refer him to the celebrated song or ode of Moses j which is the oldest that we know of, and was penned by that divine author immediately alter the children of Israel crossed the Red sea. At the end of this song, we are told, that Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel m her hand, and all the women went out after her with tim¬ brels and with dances. And Miriam answered them, Sing ye to the Lord, for he hath triumphed glori¬ ously j the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the From this last passage it is plain, that the ancients very early called in music to the aid of poetry, and that their odes were usually sung, and accompanied with their lutes, harps, lyres, timbrels, and other instruments: nay, so essential, and in such reputation, was music held by the ancients, that we often find in their lyric poets, addresses or invocations to the harp, the lute, or the lyre •, and it was probably owing to the frequent use made of the last-mentioned instrument with the ode, that this species of writing obtained the name of Lyric poetry. . This ode, or hymn, which some believe was composed by Moses in Hebrew verse, is incomparably better than any thing the heathen poets have produced of the kind, and is by all good judges considered as a master-piece of ancient eloquence. The thoughts are noble and sub¬ lime: the style is magnificent and expressive: the figures are bold and animated : the transitions and excursions are sudden and frequent: hut they are short, and the poet, having digressed for a moment, returns immedi¬ ately to the great object that excited his wonder, and elevated his soul with joy and gratitude. Ihe images fill the mind with their greatness, and strike the imagi¬ nation in a manner not to be expressed. If there be anything that in sublimity approaches to it, we must look for it in the east, where perhaps we shall find nothing superior to the following Hindoo hymn to Narrayna, or “ the spirit of God,” taken, as Sir'William Jones informs us, from the writings of the ancient Bramins. Spirit of spirits, who, through every part Of space expanded, and ol endless time, Beyond the reach of lab’ring thought sublime, Bad’st uproar into beauteous order start 5 Before heav’n was, thou art. Fre spheres beneath us roll’d, or spheres above, Ere earth in firmamental aether hung, ' Thou sat’st alone, till, through thy mystic love, Things unexisting to existence sprung, And grateful descant sung. Omniscient Spirit, whose all-ruling pow’r Bids from each sense bright emanations beam j Glows in the rainbow, sparkles in the stream, \{ Y. Smiles in the hud, and glistens m thc^iWr That crowns each vernal bow r •, , Sighs in the gale, and warbles in the throat Of every bird that hails the bloomy spring, Or tells his love in many a liquid note, _ Whilst envious artists touch the rival string, Till rocks and forests ring •, Breathes in rich fragrance from the sandal grove, Or where the precious musk-deer playiiu rove j In dulcet juice, from clust’ring fruit distils, And burns salubrious in the tasteful clove : Safe banks and verd’rous lulls Thy present influence fills : In air, in floods, in caverns, woods, and plains, Thy will inspirits all, thy sovereign Maya reigns. Blue crystal vault, and elemental fires, That in th’ ethereal fluid blaze and breathe ; Thou, tossing main, whose snaky branches wreathe This pensile orb with intertwisting gyres j Mountains, whose lofty spires, Presumptuous, rear their summits to the skies, And blend their em’rald hue with sapphire light j Smooth meads and lawns, that glow with varying dyes Of dew-bespangled leaves and blossoms bright, Hence ! vanish from my sight _ Delusive pictures ! unsubstantial shows . My soul absorb’d one only Being knows, Of all perceptions one abundant source, Whence ev’ry object, ev’ry moment flows : Suns hence derive their force, Hence planets learn their course 3 But suns and fading worlds I view no more 3 Hnd rmlv T nerceivc ; God only I adore (f). Part II. Or Lyric Poet')-. I3« We come now to the Pindaric ode, which (if we ex-The Pm- cept the hymns in the Old Testament, the psalms ofdallC 0 ’ King David, and such hymns of the Hindoos as that just quoted) is the most exalted part of lyric poetry ; and was so called from Pindar, an ancient Greek poet, who is celebrated for the boldness of his flights, the im¬ petuosity of his style, and the seeming wildness and ir¬ regularity that runs through his compositions, and which are said to be the effect of the greatest art. See PlN- DAR. The odes of Pindar were held in such high estima¬ tion by the ancients, that it was fabled, in honour of their sweetness, that the bees, while he was in the cradle, brought honey to his lips : nor did the victors at the Olympic and other games think the crown a sufficient reward for their merit, unless their achievements \yere celebrated in Pindar’s songs 3 most wisely presaging, that the first would decay, but the other would endure for ever. This poet did not always write his odes in the same measure, or with the same intention with regard to their being sung. For the ode inscribed to Diagoras (the concluding stanza of which we inserted at the beginning of this section) is in heroic measure, and all the stanzas are equal: there are others also, as Mr West observes, made (f) For the philosophy of this ode, which represents the Deity as the soul of the world, or rather as the only Being (the ra «v of the Greeks), see Metaphysics, N° 269. and Philosophy, N° 6. 2 Part II. POE Of Lyric made up otstrophes aad antistrophes, without any epodc; Poatry and some composed of strophes only, of different lengths ’■ 1 * and measures : but the greatest part of his odes are di¬ vided into strophe, antistrophe, and epode ,• in order, as Mr Congreve conjectures, to their being sung, and ad¬ dressed by the performers to different parts of the au¬ dience. “ They were sung (says he) by a chorus, and adapted to the lyre, and sometimes to the lyre and pipe. They consisted oi tenest of three stanzas. The lirst was called the strophe, from the version or circular motion of the singers in that stanza from the right hand to the left. The second stanza was called the antistrophe, from the contra version of the chorus j the singers in performing that, turning from the left hand to the right, contrary al¬ ways to their motion in the strophe. The third stanza was called theepocfe (itmay be as being the after-song), which they sung in the middle, neither turning to one hand *Vid.Prr/.n°r the other. But Dr West’s * friend is of opinion, to West's that the performers also danced one way while they were Pindar. singing the strophe, and danced back as they sung the an¬ tistrophe, till they came to the same place again, and then standing still they sung the epode. He has translated a passage from the Scholia on Hcphcestion, in proof of his opinion ; and observes, that the dancing the strophe and antistrophe in the same space of ground, and we may sup¬ pose the same space of time also, shows why those two parts consisted of the same length and measure. As the various measures of Pindar’s odes have been the means of so far misleading some of our modern poets, as to induce them to call compositions Pindaric odes, that were not written in the method of Pindar, it is ne¬ cessary to be a little more particular on this head, and to give an example from that poet, the more effectually to explain his manner; which we shall take from the translation of Dr West. The eleventh Nemean Ode. This ode is ascribed to Aristagoras, upon occasion of his entering on his office of president or governor of the island of Tenedos : so that, although it is placed among the Nemean odes, it has 110 sort of relation to those games, and is indeed properly an inauguration ode, composed to he sung by a chorus at the sacrifices and the feasts made by Aristagoras and his colleagues, in the town-hall, at the time of their being invested with the magistracy, as is evident from many expressions in . the fii’St strophe and antistroplu. Argument. Pindar opens this ode with an invocation to Vesta (the goddess who presided over the courts of justice, and whose statue and altar were for that reason placed in the town-halls, or Prytanceums, as the Greeks called them), beseeching her to receive favourably Aristagoras and his colleagues, who were then coming to offer sacrifices to her, upon their entering on their office of Prytans or magistrates of Tenedos , which office continuing for a year, he begs the goddess to take Aristagoras under her protection during that time, and to conduct him to the end of it without trouble or disgrace. From Ari¬ stagoras, Pindar turns himself in the next place to his father Arcesilas, whom he pronounces happy, as well upon account of his son’s merit and honour, as upon Ills own great endowments and good fortune : such as T R Y. beauty, strength, courage, riches, and glory, resulting or JVnic irom his many victories in the games. But lest he Poetry. should be too much puffed up with these praises, he re- ' v—^ minds him at the same time of his mortality, and tells him that his clothing of flesh is perishable, that he must e’er long be clothed with earth, the end of all things ; and yet, continues he, it is but justice to praise and celebrate the worthy and deserving, who from good citizens ought to receive all kinds of honour and com¬ mendation ; as Aristagoras, for instance, who hath ren¬ dered both himself and his country illustrious by the many victones he hath obtained, to the. number of six¬ teen, over the neighbouring youth, in the games ex¬ hibited in and about his own country. From whence, says the poet, I conclude he would have come off vic¬ torious even in the Pythian and Olympic games, had he not been restrained from engaging in those famous lists by the too.timid and cautious love of his parents. UPon which he falls into a moral reflection upon the vanity ot man’s hopes and fears ; by the former of which they are oftentimes excited to attempts beyond their suength, which accordingly issue in their disgrace ; as, on the other hand, they are frequently restrained, by unreasonable and ill-grounded fears, from enterprises, in which they would in all probability have come off with honour. Ibis reflection he applies to Aristagoras, by saying it was very easy to foresee what success he was like to meet with, who both by father and mother was descended from a long train of great and valiant men. But here again, with a very artful turn of flattery to his lather Arcesilas, whom he had before represented as strong and valiant, and famous for his victories in the games, he observes that every generation, even of a great and glorious family, is not equally illustrious any more than the fields and trees are every year equally fruitful ; that the gods had not given mortals any cer¬ tain tokens by which they might foreknow when the rich years of virtue should succeed; whence it comes to pass, that men, out of self-conceit and presumption, are perpetually laying schemes, and forming enterprises, without previously consulting prudence or wisdom, whose streams, says he, lie remote and out of the com¬ mon road. From all which he infers, that it is better to moderate our desires, and set bounds to our avarice and ambition; with which moral precept he concludes the ode. Strophe I. Daughter of Rhea ! thou, whose holy fire Before the awful seat of justice flames ! Sister of heaven’s almighty sire ! Sister of Juno, who coequal claims With Jove to share the empire of the gods ! O virgin Vesta ! to thy dread abodes, Do ! Aristagoras directs his pace ! Receive and near thy sacred sceptre place Him, and his colleagues, who, with honest zeal, O’er Tenedos preside, and guard the public weal. Antistrophe I. * it was And lo ! with frequent off’rings, they adore iokm^sa-1 Thee first invok’d in everv solemn pray’r ! crifices ami To thee unmix’d libations pour, prayers to And fill with od’rous fumes the fragrant air. kvokin ^1 Around Yesta^& 8 V o E T B t. Of Lyric Poetry. Around in festive songs the hymning choir Mix the melodious voice and sounding lyre, While still, prolong’d with hospitable love, Are solemniz’d the rites of genial Jove: Then guard him, Vesta, through his long career, And let him close in joy his ministerial year. Epode I. But hail, Arcesilas ! all hail To thee, bless’d father of a son so great. Thou whom on fortune’s highest scale The favourable hand of heav’n hath set. Thy manly form with beauty hath rehn d,. And match’d that beauty with a valiant mind. Yet let not man too much presume, Tho’ grac’d with beauty’s fairest bloom *, Tho’ for superior strength renown d; Tho’ with triumphal chaplets crown d: Let him remember, that, in flesh anay t, Soon shall he see that mortal vestment fade 3 Till lost, imprison’d in the mould ring urn, To earth, the end of all things, he return. Strophe II. Yet should the worthy from the public tongue Receive their recompense of virtuous praise , Bv ev’ry zealous patriot sung, And deck’d with ev’ry flow’r of heav nly lays. Such retribution in return for fame, Such, Aristagoras, thy virtues claim, > Claim from thy country 3 on whose glorious brow The wrestler’s chaplet still unfaded blows 3 Mix’d with the great Pancratiastic crown, Which from the neighboring youth thy early valour wo . Antistrophe II. And (but his timid parents’ cautious love, Disturbing ever his too forward hands, Forbade their tender son to prove The toils of Pythia or Olympia’s sands), . f A river, Now by the Gods I swear, his Valorous might upon whose Had ’scap’d victorious in each bloody fight , banks the And from Castalia f, or where dark with shade Pythian TJle monnt 0f Saturn t rears its olive head, games were illustrious home had he return’d 3 rrrii mte,^ V,S farce ed;pS’a, Ins va^uisU’d foesUd hill planted L with olives, that over- EpODE II. stadium at Then his triumphal tresses bound _ Olympia. With the dark verdure of th’ Olympic grove, With joyous banquets had he crown d The great quinquennial festival ot Jove ; And cheer’d the solemn pomp with choral lays, Sweet tribute, which the muse to virtue pays. But, such is man’s prepost’rous fate . Now, with o’er-weening pride elate, Too far he aims his shaft to tliro\V, And straining bursts bis feeble bow. Now pusillanimous, depress’d with fear, He checks his virtue in the mid career 3 And of his strength distrustful, coward flies The contest, tho’ empow’rd to gain the prize. 3 Part II. Of Lyric Poetry. Strophe HI. But who could err in prophesying good Of him, whose undegenerating breast Swells with a tide of Spartan blood, From sire to sire in long succession trac d Up to Pisander; who in From old Amyclse to the Lesbian shore And Tenedos, colleagu’d m high command With great Orestes, led th iFohan band . Nor was his mother’s race less st7n.g;^mb^se,’wave> * Wnus Sprung from a stock that grew on fair was a rive. ^ ttT ^ Hneotia. Antistrophe III. Tho’ for long intervals obscur’d, again Oft-times the seeds of lineal worth appear. For neither can the furrow’d plain Full harvests yield with each returning year 3 Nor in each period will the pregnant bloom Invest the smiling tree with rich perfume. So, barren often, and inglorious, pass The generations of a noble race 3 While nature’s vigour, working at the root, In after-ages swells, and blossoms into fruit. a river of Boeotia, of which country was Menalip- pus, the an¬ cestor of A- ristagoras by the mo¬ ther’s side. 131 Epode III. Nor hath Jove giv’n us to foreknow When the rich years of virtue shall succeed: Yet bold and daring on we go. Contriving schemes of many a mighty deed 3 While hope, fond inmate of the human mind, And self-opinion, active, rash, and blind, Hold up a false illusive ray, That leads our dazzled feet astray Far from the springs, where, calm and slow, The secret streams of wisdom flow. Hence should we learn our ardour to restrain, And limit to due hounds the thirst of gain. To rage and madness oft that passion turns, Which with forbidden flames despairing burns. From the above specimen, and from what we have Distia already said on this subject, the reader will perceive, that odes of this sort are distinguished by the happy ofit< transitions and digressions which they admit, and the surprising yet natural returns to the subject. 11ns re¬ quires great judgment and genius 3 and the poet who would excel in this kind of writing, should draw the plan of his poem, in manner of the argument we have above inserted, and mark out the places where those elegant and beautiful sallies and wanderings may be made, and where the returns will be easy and proper. Pindar, it is universally allowed, had a poetical and fertile imagination, a warm and enthusiastic genius, a hold and figurative expression, and a concise and sen¬ tentious st>le : but it is generally supposed that many of those pieces which procured him such extravagant praises and extraordinary testimonies of esteem firim the ancients are lost 3 and if they were not, it would be perhaps impossible to convey them into our language 3 for beauties of this kind, like plants of an odoriferous and delicate nature, are not to he transplanted into an¬ other clime without losing much of their fragrance or essential quality. W ith Part II. POE Of Lrric Poetry. With regard to those compositions which are usually called Pindaric odes, (but which ought rather to be di¬ stinguished by the name of irregular odes'), we have many in our language that deserve particular commen¬ dation r the criticism which Mr Congreve has given us nionly cal- on that subject, has too much asperity and too great led Pinda- latitude j for if other writers have, by mistaking Pin¬ dar’s measures, given their odes an improper title, it is a crime, one would think, not so dangerous to the (commonwealth of letters as to deserve such severe re¬ proof. Besides which, we may suppose that some of these writers did not deviate from Pindar’s method through ignorance, but by choice ; and that as their odes were not to be performed with both singing and dan¬ cing, in the manner of Pindar’s, it seemed unnecessary to confine the first and second stanzas to the same exact number as was done in his strophes and antistrophes. The poet therefore had a right to indulge himself with more liberty : and we cannot help thinking, that the ode which Mr Drvden has given Us, entitled, Alexan¬ der's Feast, or the Pother of Music, is altogether as valuable in loose and wild numbers, as it could have been if the stanzas were more regular, and written in the manner of Pindar. In this ode there is a wonder¬ ful sublimity of thought, a loftiness and sweetness of expression, and a most pleasing variety of numberst ’Twas at the royal feast, by Persia won By Philip’s warlike soil, Aloft in awful state, The god-like hero sate On his imperial throne : H is valiant peers were plac’d around $ Their brows with roses and with mVrtles bound, (So should desert in arms be crown’d) : The lovely Thais bv his side Sat like a blooming eastern bride, In flo w’r of youth and beauty’s pride. Happy, happy, happy pair ! None but the brave, None but the brave, None but the brave deserve the fair. Chor. Happy Happy, &c. Timotheus, plac’d on high Amid the tuneful quire, With flying fingers touch’d the lyre i The trembling notes ascend the sky, And heavenly joys inspire^ The song began from Jove, Who left his blissful stats above, (Such is the pow’r of mighty love !) A dragon’s fierv form bely’d the god: Sublime on radiant spires he rode, When he to fair Olympia pressed j And while he sought her snowy breast: Then round her slender waist he curl’d, And stamp’d an image of himself, U sovereign of the world. -The list’ning crowd adrtitre the lofty sound. A present deity, they sh-.ut around; A present deity, the vaulted roofs rebound : With ravish’d ears The monarch hears, Vol. XVII. Part I. T B Y. Assumes the god, Affects to nod, And seems to shake the sphered. Chor. With ravish'd cars, &c. 9 Of Lyric Poetry. The praise of Bacchus then the sweet musician sung $ Of Bacchus ever fair and ever young: The jolly god in triumph comes j Sound the trumpets, heat the drums : Flush’d with a purple grace, He shows his honest face : Now give the hautboys breath j he comes, he comes ! Bacchus, ever fair and young, Drinking joys did first ordain : Bacchus’ blessings are a treasure, Drinking is the soldier’s pleasure i •Rich the treasure, Sweet the pleasure : Sweet the pleasure after pain. Chor. Bacchus' blessings, &c. Sooth’d with the sound, the king grew vain, Fought all his battles o’er again j And thrice he routed all his foes, and thrice he slew the slain. The master saw the madness rise j His glowing cheeks, his ardent eyes ; And while he heav’n and earth defy’d, Chang’d his hand, and check’d his pride. He chose a mournful muse Soft pity to infuse : He sung Darius great and good, By too severe a fate, Fallen, fallen, fallen, fallen, Fallen from his high estate, And welt’ring in his blood 5 Deserted at his utmost need, Py those his former bounty fed, On the bare earth expos’d he lies, With not a friend to close his eyes. With downcast looks the joyless victor sat, Revolving in his alter’d soul The various turns of chance below j And now and then a sigh be stole, And tears began to flow. Chor. Revolving, &c. The mighty master smil’d to see That love was in the next degree: *Twas but a kindred sound to move For pity melts the mind to love. Softly sweet, in Lydian measures. Soon he sooth’d his soul to pleasures. War, he sung, is toil and trouble J Honour but an empty bubble, Never ending, still beginning, Fighting still, and still destroying. If the world be worth thy winning, Think, O think, it worth enjoying. Lovely Thais sits beside thee, Take the good the gods provide thee. The many rend the skies with loud applause ; So love was crown’d, but music won the cause. The prince, unable to conceal bis pain, Gaz’d on the fair. Who caus’d his care, B And IO Of Lyric Poetry. POE Anti sigli’d and look’d, sigh’d and look’d, Sigh’d and look’d, and sigh’d again : i At length, with love and wine at once oppress d, The vanquish’d victor sunk upon her breast. 1 Chor. The prince, &c. Now strike the golden lyre again j _ A louder yet, and yet a louder strain. Break his bands of sleep asunder, And rouse him, like a rattling peal of thunder. Hark ! hark ; the horrid sound, Has rais’d up his head, As awake from the dead, And amaz/d he stares around. Bevenge, revenge, Timotheus cries. See the furies arise : See the snakes that they rear, How they hiss in their hair, _ And the sparkles that flash from their eyes . Behold a ghastly band, Each a torch in his hand ! Those are Grecian ghosts that in battle were slain, And unbury’d remain, Inglorious on the plain : Give the vengeance due To the valiant crew. Behold how they toss their torches on high, How they point to the Persian abodes, And glkt’ring temples of their hostile gods. The princes applaud with a furious joy And theking seiz’d a flambeau, with zeal to destroy} Thais led the way To light him to his prey, And, like another Helen, she fir’d another Tioy. Chor. And the king sei% d, &c. Thus long ago, Ere heaving bellows learnt to blow. try. Whose palms, new-pluck’d from Paradise, In spreading branches more sublimely rise, Bich with immortal green above the rest, Whether, adopted to some neighb ring star, Thou roll’st above us, in thy wand ring race, Or in procession fix’d and regular, Mov’d with the heav’n’s majestic pace ; Or call’d to more superior bliss, Thou tread’st with seraphims the vast abyss Whatever happy region is thy place, Cease thy celestial song a little space j . Thou wilt have time enough for hymns divine, Since heaven’s eternal year is thine. Hear then a mortal muse thy praise rehearse In no ignoble verse •, But such as thy own voice did practise here, When thy first fruits of poesy were giv n To make thyself a welcome inmate there, While yet a young probationer, And candidate of heav’n. n. If by traduction came thy mind, Our wonder is the less to find A soul so charming from a stock so good *3 Thy father was transfus’d into thy blood, So wert thou born into a tuneful strain, An early, rich, and inexhausted vein. But if thy pre-existing soul Was form’d at first with myriads more, It did through all the mighty poets roll, Who Greek or Latin laurels wore, And was that Sappho last which once it was before. If so, then cease thy flight, O heaven-born mind ! Thou hast no dross to purge from thy rich ore, Nor can thy soul a fairer mansion find, Than was the beauteous frame she left behind . Beturn to fill or mend the choir of thy celestial kind. Fart IT. Of Lyric Poetry. While organs yet were mute ; Timotheus, to his breathing flute, And sounding lyre, . Could swell the soul of rage, or kindle soft desire. At last divine Cecilia came, Inventress of the vocal frame j The sweet enthusiast, from her sacred store, Enlarg’d the former narrow bounds, And added length to solemn sounds, With nature’s mother-wit, and arts unknown before. Let old Timotheus yield the prize, Or both divide the crown : He rais’d a mortal to the skies j She drew an angel down. Grand chor. At last, &c. * Dr John¬ son. There is another poem by Dryden, on the death of Mrs Anne Killegrew, a young lady eminent for her skill in poetry and painting, which a great critic has pronounced to be “ undoubtedly the noblest ode that our language has ever produced.” He owns, that as a whole it may perhaps be inferior to Alexander $ Meast ; but he affirms that the first stanza of it is superior to any single part of the other. This famous stanza,hesays, flows with a torrent of enthusiasm : Fervet immensusque ruit. How far this criticism is just, the public must determine. Thou youngest virgin-daughter of the skies, Made in the last promotion of the bless’d ; 4 m. May we presume to say, that, at thy nirth, New joy was sprung in heav’n, as well as here on earth . For sure the milder planets did combine "I On thy auspicious horoscope to shine, . Y And e’en the most malicious were in trine. J Thy brother angels at thy birth Strung each his lyre, and tun’d it high, That all the people of the sky Might know a poetess was born on earth. And then, if ever, mortal ears Had heard the music of the spheres. And if no clust’ring swarm of bees On thy sweet mouth distilTd their golden dew, ’Twas that sueh vulgar miracles Heav’n had not leisure to renew : For all thy bless’d fraternity of love Solemniz’d there thy birth* and kept thy holy day above. IV. O gracious God ! how far have we Profan’d thy heav’nly gift of poesy ? Made prostitute and profligate the Muse, Debas’d to each obscene and impious use, Whose harmony was first ordain’d above For tongues of angels, and for hymns of love ? O wretched me ! why were we hurry’d down This lubrique and adult’rate age, (Nay Part II. POETRY. 11 ,} Of Lyric (Nay ackkcl fat pollutions of our own) Poetry. T’increase the streaming ordures of the stage ! 1 What can we say t’excuse our second fall ? Let this thy vestal. Heaven, atone for all: Her Arethusian stream remains unsoil’d, •Unmix’d with foreign filth, and undefil’d ; Her wit was more than man, her innocence a child V. Art she had none, yet wanted none j For nature did that rvant supply : So rich in treasure of her own, She might our boasted stores defy : Such noble vigour did her verse adorn, That it seem’d borrow’d where ’twas only born. Her morals, too, were in her bosom bred, By great examples daily fed, What in the best of books, her father’s life, she read And to be read herself, she need not fear} Each test, and every light, her Muse will bear, Tho’ Epictetus with his lamp were there. Even love (for love sometimes her Muse express’d) Was but a lambent flame which play’d about her breast, Light as the vapours of a morning dream, So cold herself, while she such warmth express’d, ’Twas Cupid bathing in Diana’s stream. VI. Born to the spacious empire of the Nine, One would have thought she should have been content To manage well that mighty government } But what can young ambitious souls confine ? To the next realm she stretch’d her sway, For PaintUT'e near adjoining lay, A plenteous province and alluring prey. A Chamber of dependencies Avas fram’d. (As conquerors Avill never Avant pretence, When arm’d, to justify th’ offence) And the Avhole fief, in right of poetry, she claim’d. The country open lay without defence : For poets frequent inroads there had made, And perfectly could represent The shape, the face, Avith ev’ry lineament, And all the large domains Avhich the dumb sister sway’d. All bow’d beneath her government, Receiv’d in triumph Avheresoe’er she went. Her pencil drew Avhate’er her soul design’d, And oft the happy draught surpass’d t he i mage in her mind. The sylvan scenes of herds and flocks, And fruitful plains and barren rocks, Of shallow brooks that flow’d so clear, The bottom did the top appear} Of deeper, too, and ampler floods, Which, as in mirrors, shoiv’d the Avoods : Of lofty trees, with sacred shades, And perspectives of pleasant glades, W here nymphs of brightest form appear, And shaggy satyrs standing near,: Which them at once admire and fear. The ruins too of some majestic piece, Boasting the power of ancient Rome or Greece, Whose statues, friezes, columns, broken lie, And, though defac’d, the Avonder of the eye } What nature, art, bold fiction, e’er durst frame, Her forming hand gave feature to the name. So strange a concourse ne’er Avas seen before, But Avhen the peopl’d ark the Avhole creation bore. VII. } 1 The scene then chang’d, Avith bold erected look Our martial king the sight with rev’rence struck : For not content t’express his outward part, Her hand call’d out the image of his heart : His Avar like mind, his soul devoid of fear, His high-designing thoughts were figur’d there, As when, by magic, ghosts are made appear. Our phoenix queen was pourtray’d too so bright, Beauty alone could beauty take so right : Her dress, her shape, her matchless grace, Were all observ’d, as Aveli as heav’nly face. W ith such a peerless majesty she stands, As in that day she took the crown from sacred hands j Before a train of heroines was seen, In beauty foremost, as in rank, the queen. Thus nothing to her genius was denied, But like a ball of fire the further throAvn, Still with a greater blaze she shone, And her bright soul broke out on ev’ry side. W hat next she had design’d, Heaven only knoivs : To such immod’rate growth her conquest rose, That fate alone its progress could oppose. VIII. Now all those charms, that blooming grace, The Avell-proportion’d shape, and beauteous face, Shall never more be seen by mortal eyes 5 In earth the much lamented virgin lies. Nor Avit nor piety could fate prevent } Nor Avas the cruel Destiny content To finish all the murder at a blow, To SAveep at once her life and beauty too } But like a harden’d felon, took a pride To Avork more mischievously sIoav, And plunder’d first, and then destroy’d. O double sacrilege on things divine, lo rob the relick, and deface the shrine ! But thus Orinda died : Heav’n, by the same disease, did both translate } As equal were their souls, so equal was their fate. IX. Meantime her warlike brother on the seas His waving streamers to the winds displays, And vows for his return, Avith vain deAotion, pays. Ah generous youth ! that wish forbear, The Avinds too soon Avill Avaft thee here ! Slack all thy sails, and fear to come, Alas, thou knoAv’t not, thou art Avreck’d at home ! No more shalt thou behold thy sister’s face, Thou hast already had her last embrace. But look aloft, and it thou kenn’st from far, Among the Pleiads a new kindled star, If any sparkles than the rest more bright, ’Tis she that shines in that propitious light. When in mid-air the golden trump shall sound, To raise the nations under ground 5 When in the valley of Jehoshaphat, The judging God shall close the book of fate 5 And there the last assises keep For those who Avake and those Avho sleep: When rattling bones together fly From the four corners of the sky } W hen sinews o’er the skeletons are spread. Those cloth’d with flesh, and life inspires the dead } B 2 The Of Lyrif PQ-'try. ! 1 I 2 Of Lyric Poetry. POE The sacred poets first shall hear the sound, 1 And foremost from the tomb shall bound, r For they are cover’d with the lightest ground *, J And straight with in-born vigour, on the wing, Like mounting larks to the new morning sing. There thou, sweet saint, before the quire shalt go 1 As harbinger of heav’n, the way to show, > The way which thou so well hast learnt below. J That this is a fine ode, and not unworthy of the ge¬ nius of Dryden, must be acknowledged ; but that it is the noblest which the English language has produced, or that any part of it runs with the torrent ot enthusi¬ asm which characterizes Alexander's Feast, are posi¬ tions which we feel not ourselves inclined to admit. Had the critic by whom it is so highly praised, inspect¬ ed it with the eye which scanned the odes ot Gray, we cannot help thinking that he would have perceived some parts of it to be tediously minute m description, and others not very perspicuous at the first perusal. It mav perhaps, upon the whole, rank as higi as t .e following ode by Collins on the Popular Superstitions of the Highlands of Scotland j but to a higher place it lias surely no claim. Home, thou return’s! from Thames, whose Naiads long Have seen thee ling’ring with a fond delay, Mid those soft friends, whose heart some future day, Shall melt, perhaps, to hear thy tragic song, Go, not unmindful of that cordial youth (c) Whom, long endear’d, thou leav’st by Lavant’s sidej Together let us wish him lasting truth, And joy untainted with his destin’d bride. Go ! nor regardless, while these numbers boast My short-liv’d bliss, forget my social name j But think, far off, how, on the southern coast, I met thy friendship with an equal flame ! * whose. Fresh to that soil thou turn’st, where * ev’ry vale Shall prompt the poet, and his song demand : To thee thy copious subjects ne’er shall lail ; Thou need’st but take thy pencil to thy hand, And paint what all believe who own thy genial land. n. There must thou wake perforce thy Doric quill vpjs tancy’s land to winch thou sett st thy feet y Where still, ’tis said, the Fairy people meet, Beneath each birken shade, on mead or hill. There, each trim lass, that skims the milky store, To the swart tribes their creamy bowl allots ; By night they sip it round the cottage-door, While airy minstrels warble jocund notes. Part 1L Of Lyric Poetry. TRY. There ev’vv h( r moss, They see the gliding ghosts unbodied % troop. t embodied. Or, if in sports, or on the festive green, Their destin'd § glance some fated youth descry, § piercing;. Who now, perhaps, in lusty vigour seen, And rosy health, shall soon lamented die. For them the viewless forms of air obey ; Their bidding heed, and at their heck repair. They know what spirit brews the stormful day* And heartless, oft like moody madness, stare To see the phantom train their secret work prepare. To monarchs dear (it), some hundred miles astray, Oft have they seen Fate uive the fatal blow ! The seer in Sky shriek’d as the blood did flow When headless Charles warm on the scaffold lay ! As fc'l A gentleman of the name of Barrow, who introduced Home to Collins. , . (h) A summer hut, built in the high part of the mountains, to tend their flocks in the warm season, when t e pasture is fine. _ Waiting in winterv cave his wayward fits. . . . . , (K) Of this beautiful ode two copies have been printed : one by Dr Carlyle, from a manuscript which he ac¬ knowledges to he mutilated * another by an editor who seems to hope that a nameless somebody will be >e ieve , when he declares, that “ he discovered si perfect ropy of this admirable ode among some old papers in the concealed drawers of a bureau left him by a relation ” The present age has been already too much amused with pretend¬ ed discoveries of poems in the bottoms of old chests, to pay full credit to in assertion of this kind, even though the scene of discovery he laid in a bureau. As the ode of the an nymnus editor diflers, however, very little from that of Dr Carlyle, and as what is affirmed by a GENTLEMAN may be Lue, though “ he chooses not at Part TI. P O Of Lvric As Boreas threw his youn|T Aurora (l) forth, Poetiy. In the first year of the first George’s reign, v * 'Ami battles rag’d in welkin of the North, They mourn’d in air, fell, fell rebellion, slain ! And as of late they joy’d in Preston’s fight, Saw at sad Falkirk all their hopes near crown’d ! They rav’d divining through their second-sight (m), Pale, red Culloden, where these hopes were drown’d ! Illustrious William (n) ! Britain’s guardian name ! One William sav’d us from a tyrant’s stroke $ He, for a sceptre, gain’d heroic fame, But thou, more glorious, Slavery’s chain hast broke, To reign a private man, and how to Freedom’s yoke ! VI. These, too, thou’lt sing! for well thy magic muse Can to the topmost heav’n of grandeur soar ! Or stoop to w'ail the swain that is no more! Ah, homely swains ! your homeward steps ne’er lose j Let not dank Will (o) mislead you to the heath : Dancing in mirky night, o’er fen and lake, He glows, to draw you downward to vour death, In his bewitch’d, low, marshy, willow brake ! What though far off, from some dark dell espied, His glimm’ring mazes cheer th’ excursive sight, Yet turn, ye wiind’rers, turn your steps aside, Nor trust the guidance of that faithless light j For watchful, lurking, ’mid th’ unrustling reed, At those mirk hours the wily monster lies, And listens oft to hear the passing steed, And frequent round him rolls his sullen eyes, If chance his savage wrath may some weak wretch surprise. VI I. Ah, luckless swain, o’er all unblest, indeed ! Whom late bewilder’d in the dank, dark fen, Far from his flocks, and smoking hamlet, then ! liis way- To that dark spot * where hums the sedgy weed. ward fate shall lead. E T n Y. On him, enrag’d, the fiend, in angry mood, Shall never look with pity’s kind concern, But instant, furious, raise the whelming flood O’er its drown’d hanks, forbidding all return ! Or, if he meditate his wish’d escape, To some dim hill that seems uprising near, To his faint eye, the grim and grisly shape, In all its terrors clad, shall wild appear. Meantime the wat’ry surge shall round him rise, Pour’d sudden forth from ev’ry swelling source ! What now remains but tears and hopeless sighs ? His fear-shook limbs have lost their youthly force, And down the waves he floats, a pale and breathless corse! VIII. For him in vain his anxious wife shall wait, Or wander forth to meet him on his way 5 For him in vain, at to-fall of the day. His babes shall linger at th’ unclosing gate ! Ah, ne’er shall he return ! Alone, if night Her traveli’d limbs in broken slumbers steep I With drooping willows drest, his mournful sprite Shall visit sad, perchance, her silent sleep: Then he, perhaps, with moist and wat’ry hand, Shall fondly seem to press her shudd’ring cheek, And with his blue-swoln face before her stand, And, shiv’ring cold, these piteous accents speak: “ Pursue, dear wife, thy daily toils pursue, “ At dawn or dusk, industrious as before ; “ Nor e’er of me one * helpless thought renew, * hapless. “ While 1 lie welt’ring on the ozier’d shore, “ Drown’d by the kelpie’sf wrath, nor e’er shall aid f- the water IX. [thee more !” Unbounded is thy range ; with varied skill % j style* Thy muse may, like those feath’ry tribes which spring From their rude rocks, extend her skirting wing Round the moist marge of each cold Hebrid isle, To 13 Of Lyric Poetry. present to publish his name,” we have inserted into our work the copy which pretends to he perfect, nothing at the bottom or margin of the page the different readings of Dr Carlyle’s edition. In the Doctor’s manuscript, which appeared to have been nothing more than the prima cur a, or first sketch of the poem, the fifth stanza and half of the sixth were wanting; and to give a continued context, he prevailed with Mr M‘Kenzie, the ingenious author of the Man of Feeling, to fill up the chasm. This he did by the following beautiful lines, which we can¬ not help thinking much more happy than those which occupy their place in the copy said to he perfect: “ Or on some bellying rock that shades the deep, They view the lurid signs that cross the sky, Where in the west the brooding tempests lie; And hear their fir*t, faint, rustling pennons sweep. Or in the arched cave, where deep and dark The broad unbroken billows heave and swell, In horrid musingS wrapt, they sit to mark The lab’iing moon ; or list the nightly yell Of that dread spirit, whose gigantic form The seer’s entranced eye can well survey, Th rough the dim air who guides the driving storm. And points the wretched bark its destin’d prey. Or him who hovers on his flagging wing, O’er the dire whirlpool, that in ocean’s waste, Draws instant down whate’er devoted thing The falling breeze within its reach hath plac’d- — The distant seaman hears, and flies with trembling haste. Or if on land the fiend exerts his sway, Silent he broods o’er quicksand, bog, or fen. Far from the shelt’ring roof and haunts of men, When witched darkness sh> ts the eye of day. And shrouds each star that wont to cheer the night; Or if the drift d snow perplex the way. With treach’rons gleam he lures the fated wight And leads him llound’ring on and quite astray.” (l) Bv voting Aurora, Collins undoubtedly meant the first appearance of the northern lights, which is com¬ monly said to hav e happened about the year 17 >5. (m) Second-sight is the term that is used for the divination of the Highlanders. (v) The late duke of Cumberland, who defeated the Pretender at the •tattle of Culloden. (01 \ fi rv meteor, called by various names, such as Will with the Wisp, Jack with the Lanthorn, &c. It hovers in the air over marshy and fenny places. POE To that hoar pile (i') which still its rain shows : „ In whose small vaults a pigmy-folk is found. Whose bones the delver with his spade upthrow , ( And culls them, wond’ring, from the hallow d ground. Or, thither ( obiects of the country ; by interrogat.ons to thmgs m- animate ; bv short ami beautiful digressions; and by elegant turns on the words, which render the numbers 3 sweet and pleasing. To tins let ns add, that the connections must be negligent, the narrations and des scriptions short, and the periods concise. Riddles, parables, proverbs, antique phrases, and su¬ perstitious fables, are fit materials to be intermixed with tills kind of poem. They are here, when properly ap¬ plied very ornamental ; and the more so, as they give our modern compositions the air of the ancient manner ^ °f The1 style of the pastoral ought to be humble, yet st>1Cj pure ; neat, but not florid ; easy, and yet lively : and the numbers should be smooth and flowing. This poem in general should be short, and oug it never much to exceed 100 lines ; for we are to consi¬ der that the ancients made these sort of compositions their amusement, and not their business : but however short they are, every eclogue must contain a p 0 r fable, which must be simple and one ; but yet so ma¬ naged as to admit of short digressions. Virgil has al¬ ways observed this. We shall give the plot or ar¬ gument of his first pastoral as an example. Melibceus, an unfortunate shepherd, is introduced with 1 ityrus, one in more fortunate circumstances ; the former addresses the complaint of his sufferings and banishment to the latter, who enjoys his flocks and folds in the midst of the public calamity, and therefore expresses his gratitude to the benefactor from whom this favour flowed: but Meliboeus accuses fortune, civil wars, and bids adieu to his native country. This is therefore a dialogue. But we are to observe, that the poet is not always obliged to make his eclogue allegorical, and to have real persons represented by the fictitious characters intro¬ duced ; but is in this respect entirely at his own li- 6 Nor does the nature of the poem require it to be al¬ ways carried on by way of dialogue ; tor a shepherd may with propriety sing the praises of his love, com¬ plain of her inconstancy, lament her absence, her death, &c. and address himself to groves, hills, rivers, and and such like rural objects, even when alone. We shall now give an example from each ot those authors who have eminently distinguished themselves by this manner of writing, and introduce them m the order of time in which they were written. . 139 Theocritus, who was the father or inventor of this Examples kind of poetry, has been deservedly esteemed by best critics ; and by some, whose judgment we cannotTbeocrimfc dispute, preferred'to all other pastoral writers, with per- haps the single exception of the tender and delicate Gesner. We shall insert his third idyllium, not because it is the best, but because it is within our compass. To Amaryllis, lovely nymph, I speed, Meanwhile my goats upon the mountains feed. O Tityrus, tend them with assiduous care, Lead them to crystal springs and .pastures fair, And of the ridgling’s hutting horns beware. Sweet Amaryllis, have you then forgot Our secret pleasures in the conscious grott, 5 Part H. P O Pastoral. Where in my folding arms you lay reclin’d ? Y——' Blest was the shepherd, for the nymph was kind. I whom you call’d your Dear, your Love, so late, Say, am I now the object of your hate ? Say, is my form displeasing to your sight ? This cruel love will surely kill me quite. To! ten large apples, tempting to the view, Pluck’d from your favourite tree, where late they grew. Accept this boon, ’tis all my present store 5 To-morrow will produce as many more. Meanwhile these heart-consuming pains remove, And give me gentle pity for my love. Oh ! was I made by some transforming power A bee to buzz in your sequester’d bow’r ! To pierce your ivy shade with murmuring sound, And the light leaves that compass you around. I know thee, Love, and to my sorrow find, A god thou art, but of the savage kind $ A lioness sure suckled the fell child, And with his brothers nurst him in the wild $ On me his scorching flames incessant prey, Glow in my bones, and melt my soul away. Ah, nymph, whose eyes destructive glances dart, Pair is your face, but flinty is your heart: With kisses kind this rage of love appease j Por me, fond swain ! ev’n empty kisses please. Your scorn distracts me, and will make me tear The flow’ry crown I wove for you to wear, Where xoses mingle with the ivy-wreath, And fragrant herbs ambrosial odours breathe. Ah me ! what pangs I feel $ and yet the fair Nor sees my sorrows nor will hear my pray’r. I’ll doff my garments, since I needs must die, And from yon rock that points its summit high, Where patient Alpis snares the finny fry, I’ll leap, and, though perchance I rise again. You’ll laugh to see me plunging in the main. By a prophetic poppy-leaf I found Your chang’d affection, for it gave no sound, Though in my hand struck hollow as it lay, But quickly wither’d like your love away. An old witch brought sad tidings to my ears, She who tells fortunes with the sieve and sheers 5 Por leasing barley in my fi< Ids of late, She told me, I should love, and you should hate 1 For you my care a milk-white goat supply’d. Two wanton kids run frisking at her side j Which oft the nut-brown maid, Erithacis, Has begg’d and paid before-hand with a kiss j And since you thus my ardent passion slight, Her’s they shall be before to-morrow night. My right eye itches ; may it lucky prove, Perhaps I soon shall see the nymph I love ; Beneath yon pine I’ll sing distinct and clear, Perhaps the fair my tender notes shall hear j Perhaps may pity my melodious moan $ She is not metamorphos’d into stone. Hippomenes, provok’d by noble strife, To win a mistress, or to lose his life, Threw golden fruit in Atalanta’s way: The bright temptation caus’d the nymph to stay j She look’d, she languish’d, all her soul took fire, She plung’d into the gulf of deep desire. To Pyle from Othrys sage Melampus came, He drove the lowing herd, yet won the dame 3 E T R Y. Fair Pero blest his brother Bias* arms, And in a virtuous race diffus’d unfading charms. Adonis fed his cattle on the plain, And sea-born Venus lov’d the rural swain ; She mourn’d him wounded in the fatal chace, Nor dead dismiss’d him from her warm embrace. Though young Endymion was by Cynthia blest, I envy nothing but his lasting rest. Jasion slumb’ring on the Cretan plain Ceres once saw, and blest the happy swain With pleasures too divine for ears profane. My head grows giddy, love affects me sore 3 Yet you regard not j so I’ll sing no more—— Here will I put a period to my care— Adieu, false nymph, adieu ungrateful fair j Stretch’d near the grotto, when I’ve breath’d my last,! My corse will give the wolves a rich repast, > As sweet to them as honey to your taste. J Fawkes. T4« Virgil succeeds Theocritus, from whom he has xn^sA- some places copied, and always imitated with success. As a specimen of his manner, we shall introduce his first pastoral, which is generally allowed to be the most perfect. Melib(Eus and Tityrus. Mel. Beneath the shade which beechen boughs diffuse, You, Tityrus, entertain your sylvan muse. Bound the wide world in banishment we roam, Forc’d from our pleasing fields and native home 5 While stretch’d at ease you sing your happy loves, And Amaryllis fills the shady groves. Tit. These blessings, friend, a deity bestow’d For never can I deem him less than god. The tender firstling of my woolly breed Shall on his holy altar often bleed. He gave me kine to graze the flow’ry plain, And so my pipe renew’d the rural strain. Mel. I envy not your fortune 3 hut admire. That while the raging sword and wasteful fire Destroy the wretched neighbourhood around. No hostile arms approach your happy ground. Far diff’rent is my fate 3 my feeble goats With pains I drive from their forsaken cotes; And this you see I scarcely drag along, Who yeaning on the rocks has left her young. The hope and promise of my falling fold. My loss by dix-e portents the gods foretold 3 For, had I not been blind, I might have seen Yon riven oak, the fairest on the green, And the hoarse raven on the blasted bough By croaking from the left presag’d the coming blow. But tell me, Tityrus, what heav’nly pow’r Preserv’d your fortunes in that fatal hour P Tit. Fool that I was, I thought imperial Rome T Like Mantua, where on market-days we come, > And thither drive our tender lambs from home. j So kids and whelps the sires and dams express 3 And so the great I measur’d by the less: But country-towns, compar’d with her, appear Like shrubs when lofty cypresses are near. Mel. What great occasion call’d you hence to Rome ? Tit. Freedom, which came at length, tho’ slow to come; C 2 Noi POE "Nor did my search of liberty begin Till my black hairs were chang’d upon my chin 3 Nor Amaryllis would vouchsafe a look, Till Galatea’s meaner bonds I broke. Till then a helpless, hopeless, homely swain, I sought not freedom, nor aspir’d to gain : Tho’ many a victim from my folds was bought, And many a cheese to country markets brought, Yet all the little that I got I spent, And still return’d as empty as 1 went. J\lel. We stood amaz’d to see your mistress mourn, Unknowing that she pin’d for your return 3 We wonder’d why she kept her fruit so long, For whom so late th’ ungather’d apples hung : But now the wonder ceases, since I see She kept them only, Tityrus, for thee : For thee the bubb’ling springs appear’d to mourn, And whisp’ring pines made vows for thy return. Tit. What should I do ? while here I was enchain’d, No glimpse of godlike liberty remain’d 3 Nor could I hope in any place but there To find a god so present to my pray’r. There first the youth of heav’nly birth I view’d, For whom our monthly victims are renew’d. He heard my vows, and graciously decreed My grounds to be restor’d my former docks to feed. Mcl. O fortunate old man ! whose farm remains 1 For you sufficient, and requites your pains, > Though rushes overspread the neighb’ring plains, j Tho’ here the marshy grounds approach your fields, And there the soil a stony harvest yields. Your teeming ewes shall no strange meadows try, Nor fear a rot from tainted company. Behold yon bord’ring fence of sallow trees Is fraught with flow’rs, the flow’rs are fraught with bees: The busy bees, with a soft murm’ring strain, Invite to gentle sleep the lab’ring swain : While from the neighb’ring rock with rural songs The pruner’s voice the pleasing dream prolongs 3 Htock doves and turtles tell their am’rous pain, And, from the lofty elms, of love complain. Tit. Th’ inhabitants of seas and skies shall change, And fish on shore and stags in air shall range, The banish’d Parthian dwell on Arar’s brink, And the blue German shall the Tigris drink 3 Ere I, forsaking gratitude and truth, Forget the figure of that godlike youth. Mel. But we must beg our bread in climes unknown, Beneath the scorching or the freezing zone 3 And some to far Oaxis shall be sold, Or try the Libyan heat or Scythian cold 3 The rest among the Britons be confin’d, * A race of men from all the world disjoin’d. O ! must the wretched exiles ever mourn i Nor after length of rolling years return P Are we condemn’d by Fate’s unjust decree, No more our houses and our homes to see ? Or shall we mount again the rural throne, And rule the country, kingdoms once our own ? Did we for these barbarians plant and sow, On these, on these, our happy fields bestow ? Good heav’n,what dire effects from civil discords flow Now let me graft my pears, and prune the vine 3 The fruit is theirs, the labour only mine. } T It Y. Farewel my pastures, my paternal stock. ^ My fruitful fields and my more fruitful flock . No more, my goats, shall 1 behold you climb The steepy cliffs, or crop the flow’ry thyme ; No more extended in the grot below, Shall see you browzing on the mountain’s brow The prickly shrubs, and alter on the hare ^ Lean down the deep abyss and hang in air ! No more my sheep shall sip the morning dew 3 No more my song shall please the rural crew : Adieu, my tuneful pipe ! and all the world, adieu Tit. This night, at least, with me forget your care 3 Chesnuts and curds and cream shall be your fare : The carpet-ground shall be with leaves 0 erspread, And boughs shall weave a cov’ring for your head : For see yon sunny hill the shade extends, And curling; smoke from cottages ascends. Dryden Spenser was the first of our countrymen who acquired any considerable reputation by this method of writing. We shall insert his sixth eclogue, or that for June, which is allegorical, as will be seen by the Argument. “ Hobbinol, from a description of the pleasures of the place, excites Colin to the enjoyment of them. Colin declares himself incapable of delight by reason of his ill success in love, and his loss of Ro¬ salind, who had treacherously forsaken him for Menal- cas another shepherd. By Tityrus (mentioned before in Spenser’s second eclogue, and again in the twelfth) is plainly meant Chaucer, whom the author sometimes professed to imitate. In the person of Colin is repre¬ sented the author himself 3 and Hobbinol’s inviting him to leave the hill country, seems to allude to his leaving the north, where, as is mentioned in his life, he had for some time resided.” Hob. Lo ! Colin, here the place, whose pleasant sight From other shades hath wean’d my wand’ring mind : Tell me, what wants me here, to work delight ? The, simple air, the gentle warbling wind, So calm, so cool, as nowhere else I find : The grassy ground with dainty daisies dight, The bramble-bush, where birds of every kind To th’ water’s fall their tunes attemper right. Col. O ! happy Hobbinol, I bless thy state, That paradise hast found which Adam lost. Here wander may thy flock early or late, Withouten dread of wolves to been ytost 3 Thy lovely lays here mayst thou freely boast: But I, unhappy man ! whom cruel fate, And angry gods, pursue from coast to coast, Can nowhere find to shroud my luckless pate. Hob. Then if by me thou list advised be, Forsake the soil that so doth thee bewitch : Leave me those hills, where harbroughnis to see. Nor holly bush, nor brere, nor winding ditch 3 And to the dales resort, where shepherds rich, And fruitful flocks been everywhere to see : Here no night-ravens lodge, more black than pitch. Nor elvish ghosts, nor ghastly owls do flee. But friendly fairies met with many graces, And light-foot nymphs can chace the ling’ring night, With heydeguies, and trimly trodden traces 3 Whilst sisters nine, which dwell on Parnass’ height, Da Part II. Pastoral. :} 21 Part II. P O E T R Y. Pastoral. Do make them music, for their more delight} And Fan himself to kiss their crystal faces, Will pipe and dance, when Phoebe shineth bright: Such peerless pleasures have we in these places. Col And I whilst youth, and course of careless years, Did let me walk withouten links of love, In such delights did joy amongst my peers : But riper age such pleasures doth reprove, My fancy eke from former follies move To strayed steps : for time in passing wears (As garments doen, which waxen old above) And draweth new delights with hoary hairs. Though couth I sing of love, and tune my pipe Unto my plaintive pleas in verses made : Though would I seek for queen-apples unripe To give my Rosalind, and in sommer shade Dight gawdy girlonds was my common trade, To crown her golden Ipcks : but years more ripe. And loss of her, whose love as life I wayde, Those weary wanton toys away did wipe. Hob. Colin, to hear thy rhymes and roundelays. Which thou wert wont on wasteful hills to sing, I more delight, than lark in sommer days : Whose echo made the neighbour groves to ring, And taught the birds, which in the lower spring Did shroud in shady leaves from sunny rays, Frame to thy song their cheerful cheriping, Or hold their peace, for shame of thy sweet lays. I saw Calliope with muses moe, Soon as thy oaten pipe began to sound, Their ivory lutes and tamburins forego, And from the fountain, where they sate around, Ren after hastily thy silver sound. But when they came, where thou thy skill didst show. They drew aback, as half with shame confound, Shepherd to see, them in their art outgo. Co/. Of muses, Hobbinol, 1 con no skill. For they been daughters of the highest Jove, And holden scorn of homely shepherds quill : For sith I heard that Pan with Phoebus strove Which him to much rebuke and danger drove, I never list presume to Parnass’ hill, But piping low, in shade of lowly grove, I play to please myself, albeit ill. Nought weigh I, who my song doth praise or blame, Ne strive to win renown, or pass the rest : With shepherds fits not follow flying fame, But feed his flocks in fields, where falls him best. I wot my rimes been rough, and rudely drest j The fitter they, my careful case to frame : Enough is me to paint out my unrest. And pour my piteous plaints out in the same. The God of shepherds, Tityrus, is dead, Who taught me homely, as I can, to make : Fie, whilst he lived, was the sov’reign head Of shepherds all, that been with love ytake. Well couth he wail his woes, and lightly slake The flames which love within his heart had bi’ed, And tell us merry tales to keep us wake, The while our sheep about us safely fed. Now dead he is, and lieth wrapt in lead, (O why should death on him such outrage show !) And all his passing skill with him is fled, The fame whereof doth daily greater grow. But if on me some little drops would flow 4 Pastoral. 142 Of that the spring was in his learned hed, I soon would learn these woods to wail my woe, And teach the trees their trickling tears to shed. Then would my plaints, caus’d of discourtesee, As messengers of this my painful flight, Fly to my love, wherever that she be, And pierce her heai*t with point of worthy wight; As she deserves, that wrought so deadly spight. And thou, Menalcas, that by treachery Didst underfong my lass to wax so light, Should’st well be known for such thy villany. But since I am not, as I wish I were, Ye gentle shepherds, which your flocks do feed, Whether on hills or dales, or other where, Bear witness all of this so wicked deed : And tell the lass, whose flower is woxe a weed, And faultless faith is turn’d to faithless seere, That she the truest shepherd’s heart made bleed. That lives on earth, and loved her most dear. Hob. O ! careful Colin, I lament thy case, Thy tears would make the hardest flint to flow ! Ah ! faithless Rosalind, and void of grace, That art the root of all this rueful woe ! But now is time, I guess, homeward to go j Then rise, ye blessed flocks, and home apace Lest night with stealing steps do you foreslo, And wTet your tender lambs that by you trace. By the following eclogue the reader will perceive that philips. Mr Philips has, in imitation of Spenser, preserved in his pastorals many antiquated words, which, though they are discarded from polite conversation, may naturally be supposed still to have place among the shepherds and other rustics in the country. We have made choice of his second eclogue, because it is brought home to his own business, and contains a complaint against those who had spoken ill of him and his writings. Thenot, Colinet. TL Is it not Colinet 1 lonesome see Leaning with folded arms against the tree ? Or is it age of late bedims my sight ? ’Tis Colinet, indeed, in woful plight. Thy cloudy look, why melting into tears, Unseemly, now the sky so bright appears ? Why in this mournful manner art thou found, Unthankful lad, when all things smile around ? Or hear’st not lark and linnet jointly sing, Their notes blithe-vvarbling to salute the spring ? Co. Tho’ blithe their notes, not so my wayward fate j Nor lark would sing, nor linnet, in my state. Each creature, Thenot, to his task is born ) As they to mirth and music, I to mourn. Waking, at midnight, I my woes renew. My tears oft mingling with the falling dew. Th Small cause, I ween, has lusty youth to plain j Or who may then the weight of eld sustain. When every slackening nerve begins to fail, And the load presseth as our days prevail P Yet though with years my body downward tend, As trees beneath their fruit in autumn bend, Spite of my snowy head and icy veins, My mind a cheerful temper still retains ; And why should man, mishap what will, repine, Sour every sweet, and mix with tears his wine ? But tell me then ; it may relieve thy woe, To let a friend thine inward ailment know. Co. j POE Co. Tilly ’twill waste thee, Thenot, the whole day, Should’st thou give ear to all my grief can say. Thine ewes will wander j and the heedless lambs, In loud complaints, require their absent dams. T/i. See Ligbtfoot; he shall tend them close : and 1, ’Tween whiles, across the plain will glance mine eye. Co. Where to begin T know not, where to end. Does there one smiling hour my youth attend ? Though few my days, as well my follies show. Yet are those days all clouded o’er with wo : No happy gleam of sunshine doth appear, My low’ring sky and wint’ry months to cheer. My piteous plight in yonder naked tree, Which bears the thunder scar too plain, I see : Quite destitute it stands of shelter kind, . The mark of storms, and sport of every wind j The riven trunk feels not the approach of spring j Nor birds among the leafless branches sing: No more, beneath thy shade, shall shepheids throng With jocund tale, or pipe, or pleasant song. Ill-fated tree ! and more ill-fated I! From thee, from me, alike the shepherds fly. Th. Sure thou in hapless hour of time was born, When bljghtning mildews spoil the rising corn. Or blasting winds o’er blossom’d hedge-rows pass, To kill the promis’d fruits, and scorch the grass, Or when the moon, by wizard charm’d, foreshows, Elood-stain’d in foul eclipse, impending woes. Untimely born, ill luck betides thee still. Co. And can there, Thenot, be a greater ill ? T/i. Nor fox, nor wolf, nor rot among our sheep : From these good shepherd’s care his flock may keep j Against ill luck, alas! all forecast fails $ Nor toil by day, nor watch by night, avails. Co. Ah me, the while ! ah me, the luckless day . Ah luckless lad '. befits me more to say. Unhappy hour! when fresh in youthful bud, 1 left, Sabrina fair, thy silv’ry flood. Ah silly I! more silly than my sheep, Which on thy flow’ry banks I wont to keep. Sweet are thy banks j oh, when shall I once more With ravish’d eyes review thine amell’d shore ? When in the crystal of thy waters, scan Each feature faded, and my colour wan ? ■When shall I see my hut, the small abode Myself did raise and cover o’er with sod ? Small though it be, a mean and humble cell, Yet is there room for peace and me to dwell. T/i. And what inticement charm’d thee far away From thy lov’d home, and led thy heart astray ? Co. A lewd desire strange lands and swains to know. Ah me ! that ever I should covet woe. With wand’ring feet unblest, and fond of fame, I sought I know not what besides a name. T/i. Or, sooth to say, didst thou not hither rome In search of gains more plenty than at home ? A rolling stone is ever bare of moss ; And, to their cost, green years old proverbs cross. _ Co. Small need there was, in random search ol gain, To drive my pining flock athwart the plain To distant Cam. Fine gain at length, I trow, To hoard up to myself such deal of woe ! My sheep quite spent through travel and ill fare, And like their keeper ragged grown and bare. Part It Pastoral. TRY. The damp cold green sward for my nightly bed, And some slaunt willow’s trunk to rest my head. v Hard is to bear of pinching cold the pain j And hard is want to the unpractis’d swam j But neither want, nor pinching cold, is hard, To blasting storms of calumny, compar d : Unkind as hail it falls j the pelting show’r. Destroys the tender herb and budding flow r. Th. Slander we shepherds count the vilest wrong And what wounds sorer than an evil tongue ? Co. Untoward lads, the wanton imps of spite Make mock of all the ditties I endite. In vain, O Colinet, thy voice so shrill, Charms every vale, and gladdens every hill: In vain thou seek’st the coverings of the grove, In the cool shade to sing the pains of love : Sing what thou wilt, ill-nature will prevail 5 And every elf hath skill enough to rail. But yet, though poor and artless be my vein, Menalcas seems to like my simple strain ; And while that he delighteth in my song, Which to the good Menalcas doth belong, Nor night nor day shall my rude music cease *, I ask no more, so 1 Menalcas please. Th. Menalcas, lord of these fair fertile plains, Preserves the sheep, and o’er the shepherds reigns j For him our yearly wakes and leasts we hold, And choose the fairest firstlings from the fold j He, good to all who good deserves, shall give Thy flock to feed, and thee at ease to live, Shall curb the malice of unbridled tongues, And bounteously reward thy rural songs. Co. First then shall lightsome birds forget to fly, The briny ocean turn to pastures dry, And every rapid river cease to flow, Ere I unmindful of Menalcas grow. Th. This night thy care with me forget, and fold Thy flock with mine, to ward th’ injurious cold. New milk, and clouted cream, mild cheese and curd, With some remaining fruit of last year’s hoard, Shall be our ev’ning fare j and, for the night, Sweet herbs and moss, which gentle sleep invite : And now behold the sun’s departing ray, O’er yonder hill, the sign of ebbing day : With songs the jovial hinds return from plow j And unyok’d heifers, loitering homeward, low. Mr Pope’s Pastorals next appeared, but in a different Pope, dress from those of Spenser or Philips $ for he has dis¬ carded all antiquated words, drawn his swains more mo¬ dern and polite, and made his numbers exquisitely har¬ monious : his eclogues therefore may be called better poems, but not better pastorals. We shall insert the ec¬ logue he has inscribed to Mr Wycherly, the beginning of which is in imitation of Virgil’s first pastoral. Beneath the shade a spreading beech displays, Hylas and iEgon sung their rural lays : This mourn’d a faithless, that an absent love, And Delia’s name and Doris fill’d the grove. Ye Mantuan nymphs, your sacred succour bring j Hyl as and -.Egon’s rural lays I sing. Thou, whom the nine, with Plautus’ wit inspire, The art of Terence, and Menander’s fire : Whose sense instructs us, and whose humour charms, Whose judgment sways us, and whose spirit warms ! Part II. POE Pastoral Oil, skill’d in nature ! see the hearts of swains, Their artless passions, and their tender pains. Now setting Phoebus shone serenely bright. And fleecy clouds were streak’d with purple light 5 When tuneful Hylas, with melodious moan, Taught rocks to weep, and made the mountains groan. Go, gentle gales, and bear my sighs away ! To Delia’s ear the tender notes convey. As some sad turtle his lost love deplores, And with deep murmurs fills the sounding shores j Thus, far from Delia, to the winds I mourn, Alike unheard, unpity’d, and forlorn. Go, gentle gales, and bear my sighs along! For her the feather’d quires neglect their song j For her, the limes their pleasing shades deny j For her, the lilies hang their head and die. Ye flow’rs, that droop forsaken by the spring $ Ye birds, that left by summer cease to sing; Ye trees, that fade when autumn’s heats remove; Say, is not absence death to those who love ? Go, gentle gales, and bear thy sighs away ! Curs’d be the fields that cause my Delia’s stay: Fade ev’rv blossom, wither ev’ry tree, Die ev’ry flow’r, and perish all but she. What have I said ? where’er my Delia flies, Fet spring attend, and sudden flovv’rs arise ; Fet opening roses knotted oaks adorn, And liquid amber drop from ev’ry thorn. Go, gentle gales, and bear my sighs along! The birds shall cease to tune their ev’ning song, The winds to breathe, the waving woods to move,. And streams to murmur ere I cease to love. Not bubbling fountains to the thirsty swain. Not balmy sleep to lab’rers faint with pain, Not show’rs to larks, or sunshine to the bee, Are half so charming as thy sight to me. Go, gentle gales, and bear my sighs away ! Come, Delia, come ! ah, why this long delay ? Through rocks and caves the name of Delia sounds; Delia, each cave and echoing rock rebounds. Ye pow’rs, what pleasing frenzy soothes my mind ! Do lovers dream, or is my Delia kind ? She comes, my Delia comes !—now cease, my lay; And cease, ye gales, to bear my sighs away ! Next AEgon sung, while Windsor groves admixed; Rehearse, ye muses, what yourselves inspir’d. Resound, ye hills, resound my mournful strain ! Of perjur’d Doris, dying, I complain : Here where the mountains, less’ning as they rise, Fose the low vales, and steal into the skies; While lab’ring oxen, spent with toil and heat, In their loose traces from the field retreat; While curling smoke from village-tops are seen. And the fleet shades glide o’er the dusky green. Resound, ye hills, resound my mournful lay! Beneath yon poplar oft we pass’d the day; Oft on the rind I carv’d her am’rous vows, While she with garlands hung the bending boughs: The garlands fade, the boughs are worn away; So dies her love, and so my hopes decay. Resound, ye hills, resound my mournful strain ! Now bright Arcturus glads the teeming grain ; Now golden fruits in loaded branches shine. And grateful clusters swell with floods of wine ; T R Y. 23 Now blushing berries paint the yellow grove: Pastoral. Just gods ! shall all things yield return but love? -y —i.rf Resound, ye hills, resound my mournful lay ! The shepherds cry, “ Thy flocks are left a prey.” Ah ! what avails it me the flocks to keep, Who lost my heart, while I preserv’d my sheep ? Pan came, and ask’d, what magic caus’d my smart, Or what ill eyes malignant glances dart ? What eyes but fxers, alas ! have pow’r to move ? And is there magic but what dwells in love ? Resound, ye hills, resound my mournful strains ! I’ll fly from shepherds, flocks, and flow’ry plains.-—- From shepherds, flocks, and plains, I may remove, Fox-sake mankind, and all the world—but love! I know thee, Fove ! wild as the i-aging main, Mox-e fell than tygers on the Fibyan plain : Thou wert from Aetna’s burning entx-ails torn. Got by fierce whirlwinds, and in thunder born. Resound, ye hills, resound my mournful lay ! Farewel, ye woods, adieu the light of day ! One leap fi’om yonder cliff shall end my pains. No more, ye hills, no more resound my strains ! Thus sung the shepherds till th’ approach of night, The skies yet blushing with departing light, When falling dews with spangles deck the glade, And the low sun had lengthen’d ev’ry shade. 144 To these pastoi’als, which are written agreeably to the Gay. tasteof antiquity,and the rules above prescribed, we shall beg leave to subjoin another that may be called burlesque pastoral, wherein the ingenious author, Mr Gay, has ventured to deviate from the beaten road, and described the shepherds and ploughmen of our own time and coun¬ try, instead of those of the golden age, to which the modern critics confine the pastoral. His six pastorals, which he calls the Shepherd's Week, are a beautiful and livelyrepi-esentation ofthe manners, customs, and notions- of our rustics. We shall insert the first of them, intitled The Squabble, wherein two clowns try to outdo each other in singing the praises of their sweethearts, leaving it to a third to determine the controversy. The persons named are Lobbin Clout, Cuddy, and Cloddipole. Lob. Thy younglings, Cuddy, are but just awake ; No throstle shrill the bramble-bush forsake ; No chirping lark the welkin sheen * invokes ; No damsel yet the swelling udder strokes ; O’er yonder bill does scant f the dawn appear ; Then why does Cuddy leave his cott so rear | ? Cud. Ah Fobbin Clout! I ween § my plight is guest For he that loves, a stranger is to rest. If swains belye not, thou hast proved the smart, And Blouzalinda’s mistress of thy heart. This rising tear betokeneth well thy mind ; Those arms are folded for thy Blouzalind. And well, I trow, our piteous plights agree ; Thee Blouzalinda smites, Buxoma me. Lob. Ah Blouzalind ! I love thee more by half* Than deer their fawns, or cows the new-fall’n calf. Woe worth the tongue, may blisters sore it gall, That names Buxoma Blou%alind withal. Cud. Hold, witless Fobbin Clout, I thee advise, Fest blisters sore on thy own tongue ai'ise. Fo yonder Cloddipole, the blithsome swain, The wisest lout of all the neighb’ring plain ! * Shining or bright sky. f Scarce, j Early, j § Conceive, From 24 POE p From Cloddipole we learnt to read the skies, u-Lv—' To know when hail will fall, or winds arise. * Formerly. Pie taught us erst * the heifer’s tail to V,e'J’ When stuck aloft, that show’rs would straight en. He first that useful secret did explain, That pricking corns foretold the gath nn^ rai • When swallows fleet soar high and spoit , He told us that the welkin would be clear. Let Cloddipole then hear us twain rehearse, And praise his sweetheart in alternate verse. I’ll wager this same oaken stall with thee, That Cloddipole shall give the prize , . Lob. See this tobacco-pouch, that’s hn d with ban, Made of the skin of sleekest fallow-deer : This pouch, that’s tied with tape ol reddest hue, I’ll wager, that the prize shall be my due. 6W.° Begin thy carrols, then, thou vaunting slouch Be thine the oaken staff, or mine the pouch. Lob. My Blouzalinda is the blithest lass, Than primrose sweeter, or the clover-grass. Fair is the king-cup that in meadows blows ; Fair is the daisy that beside her grows ; Fair is the gilly-flow’r of gardens sweet •, Fair is the marygold, tor pottage meet. But Blouzalind’s than gilly-flower more lair, Than daisy, marygold, or king-cup rare. . Cud. My brown Buxoma is the featest maid That e’er at wake delightsome gambol play’d j Clean as young lambkins, or the goose s down, And like the goldfinch in her Sunday gown. The witless lamb may sport upon the plain, The frisking kid delight the gaping swain The wanton calf may skip with many a bound, ' tNimblest. And my cur Tray play deftest! feats around : But neither lamb, nor kid, nor calt, nor liay, Dance like Buxoma on the first of May. Lob. Sweet is my toil when Blouzahnd is near j Of her bereft, Vis winter all the year. With her no sultry summer’s heat I know *, In winter, when she’s nigh, with love I glow. Come, Blouzalinda, ease thy swain’s desire My summer’s shadow, and my winter 8 lire • £W. As with Buxoma once I work d at hay, E’en noon-tide labour seem’d an holiday ; And holidays, if haply she were gone, Like worky-days I wish’d would soon be done, t very Eftsoons t, O sweetheart kind, my love repay, soon. And all the year shall then be holiday. Lob. As Blouzalinda, in a gamesome mood, Behind a hay-cock loudly laughing stood, I slily ran and snatch’d a hasty kiss ; . She wip’d her lips, nor took it much amiss. Believe me, Cuddy, while I’m bold to say. Her breath was sweeter than the ripen d hay. Cud. As my Buxoma, in a morning fair, With gentle finger streak’d her milky care, § Wa^- I quaintly § stole a kiss •, at first, ’tis true, |ishlyr She frown’d, yet after granted one or two. Bobbin, I swear, believe who will my vows, Her breath by far excell’d the breathing cows. Lob. Leek to the Welsh, to Dutchmen butter s dear, Of Irish swains potatoes are the cheer •, Oats for their feasts the Scottish shepherds grind, Sweet turnips are.the food of Blouzalind . t n y. . Fprt!i' While she loves turnips, butter I I! despise, y.J!!*0.!.1.' i The capon fat delights his dainty wife , . Pudding our parson eats, the squire loves hare , But white-pot thick is my Buxoma s tare. While she loves white-pot, capon ne er shall be, Nor hare, nor beef, nor pudding, food for me. Lob. As once I play’d at blind man s bull, it hapt About my eyes the towel thick was wrapt : I miss’d the swains, and seiz’d on Blouzalind True speaks that ancient proverb, Love is blind. Cud. As at hot-cockles once I laid me doun, And felt the weighty hand of many a clown ; Buxoma gave a gentle tap, and I Quick rose, and read soft mischief in her eye. Lob. On two near elms the slacken d cold I g , Now high, now low, my Blouzalinda swung; With the rude wind her rumpled garment rose. And show’d her taper leg and scarlet hose. _ Cud. Across the fallen oak the plank I laid, And myself pois’d against the tott’ring maid . . High leapt the plank, and down Buxoma tell , X Spy’d—but faithful sweethearts never tell. Lob. This riddle, Cuddy, if thou canst, explain, Tliis wily riddle puzzles every swain : What flow'r is that which bears the virgin s name, * The richest metal joined with the same / goid. Cud. Answer, thou carle, and judge this riddle right, I’ll frankly own thee for a cunning wight: Whatjlow'r is that which royal honour craves. Adjoin the virgin, and His strown on graves 11 Clod. Forbear, contending louts, give o’er strains •, An oaken staff each merits for his pains. But see the sun beams bright to labour warn, And gild the thatch of goodman Hodge’s barn. Your herds for want of water stand a-dry } They’re weary of your songs—and so am 1. your f Rose¬ mary. r4S We have given the rules usually laid down for pasto- Shenstone, ral writing, and exhibited some examples written on tins plan; hut we have to observe that this poem may take very different forms. It may appear either as a comedy or as a ballad. As a pastoral comedy, there is perhaps nothing which possesses equal merit with Ramsay s Gentle Shepherd, and we know not where to find in any language a rival to the Tdastoral Ballad ol Shenstone. That the excellence of this poem is great can hardly be questioned, since it compelled a critic, who was never lavish of his praise, and who on all occasions was ready . to vilify the pastoral, to express himself in terms of high encomium. “ In the first part (says he) are two passages, to which if any mind denies its sympathy, it has no acquaintance with love or nature: I priz’d every hour that went by, Beyond all that had pleas’d me before; But now they are past, and l sigh, And I grieve that I priz’d them no more. When forc’d the fair nymph to forego, What anguish I felt in my heart ! Yet I thought—but it might not be so, ’Twas with pain that she savr .Wan- Part II. POE Pastoral. Site gaz’d, as I slowly withdrew, y——' My path I could hardly discern j So sweetly she bade me adieu, I thought that she bade me return. “ In the second (continues the same critic) this pas- * sage has its prettiness, though it be not equal to the former I have found out a gift for my fair j I have found where the wood pigeons breed: But let me that plunder forbear, She would say ’twas a barbarous deed : For he ne’er could be true, she averr’d, Who could rob a poor bird of its young j And I lov’d her the more when I heard Such tenderness fall from her tongue. 145 Origin and nse of di dactic poe- ery. *47 Rules to be observ¬ ed in its oomposi- fion. Sect. V. Of Didactic or Preceptive Poetry. The method of writing precepts in verse, and embel¬ lishing them with the graces of poetry, had its rise, we may suppose, from a due consideration of the frailties and perverseness of human nature J and was intended to engage the affections, in order to improve the mind and amend the heart. Didactic or preceptive poetry, has been usually em¬ ployed either to illustrate and explain our moral duties, our philosophical inquiries, our business and pleasures j or in teaching the art of criticism or poetry itself. It may be adapted, however, to any other subject j and may in all cases, where instruction is designed, be em¬ ployed to good purpose. Some subjects, indeed, are more proper than others, as they admit of moi’e poe¬ tical ornaments, and give a greater latitude to genius $ hut whatever the subject is, those precepts are to be laid down that are the most useful j and they should follow each other in a natural easy method, and be de¬ livered in the most agreeable engaging manner. What the prose writer tells yon ought to be done, the poet often conveys under the form of a narration, or shows the necessity of in a description *, and by representing the action as done, or doing, conceals the precept that should enforce it The poet likewise, instead of tell¬ ing the whole truth, or laying down all the rules that are requisite, selects such parts only as are the most pleasing, and communicates the rest indirectly, with¬ out giving us an open view of them ; yet takes care that nothing shall escape the reader’s notice with which he ought to be acquainted. He discloses just enough to lead the imagination into the parts that are conceal¬ ed $ and the mind, ever gratified with its own disco¬ veries, is complimented with exploring and finding them out j which, though done with ease, seems so conside¬ rable, as not to be obtained but in consequence of its own adroitness and sagacity. But this is not sufficient to render didactic poetry al¬ ways pleasing: for where precepts are laid down one af¬ ter another, and the poem is of considerable length, the mind will require some recreation and refreshment by the way, which is to be procured by seasonable moral reflec¬ tions, pertinent remarks, familiar similies, and descrip¬ tions naturally introduced, by allusions to ancient his¬ tories or fables, and by short and pleasant digressions and excursions into more noble subjects, so aptly bi ought in, that they may seem to have a remote relation, and Vol. XVII. Part I. t TRY. ,25 be of a piece with the poem. By thus varying the form Didwtie. of instruction, the poet gives life to his precepts, and -v——' awakens and secures our attention, without permitting us to see by what means we are thus captivated : and his art is the more to be admired, because it is so con¬ cealed as to escape the reader’s observation. The style, too, must maintain a dignity suitable to the subject, and every part be drawn in such lively colours, that the things described may seem as if presented to the reader’s view. But all this will appear more evident from example ; and though entire poems of this kind are not within the compass of our design, we shall endeavour to select such passages as will be sufficient to illustrate the rules we have here laid down. We have already observed, that, according to the usual divisions, there are four kinds of didactic poems, viz. those that respect our moral duties, our philosophi¬ cal speculations, our business and pleasures, or that give precepts for poetry and criticism. I. Oa the first subject, indeed, we have scarce any thing that deserves the name of poetry, except Mr Pope’s Essay on Man, his Ethic Epistles, Blackmore’s Creation, and part of Young’s Night Thoughts; t* which therefore we refer as examples. II. Those preceptive poems that concern philosophi¬ cal speculations, though the subject is so pregnant with matter, affords such a field of fancy, and is so capable of every decoration, are but few. Lucretius is the most considerable among the ancients who has written in this manner j among the moderns we have little else but small detached pieces, except the poem called Anti-Lu¬ cretius, which has not yet received an English dress $ Dr Akenside’s Pleasures of the Imagination, and Dr Darwin’s Botanic Garden; which are all worthy of our admiration. Some of the small pieces in this depart¬ ment are also well executed ; and there is one entitled the Universe, written by Mr Baker, from which we shall borrow an example. The author’s scheme is in some measure coincident with MrPope’s, so far especially as it tends to restrain the pride of man, with which design it was professedly written. The passage we have selected is that respecting the planetary system. Unwise ! and thoughtless ! impotent! and blind ! Can wealth, or grandeur, satisfy the mind ? Of all those pleasures mortals most admire, Is there one joy sincere, that will not tire ? Can love itself endure ? or beauty’s charms Afford that bliss we fancy in its arms?— Then let thy soul more glorious aims pursue : Have thy Creator and his works in view. Be these thy study: hence thy pleasures bring : And drink large draughts of wisdom from its springs That spring, whence perfect joy, and calm repose, And blest content, and peace eternal, flows. Observe how regular the planets run, In stated times, their courses round the Sun. Diff’rent their bulk, their distance, their career. And diff’rent much the compass of their year : Yet all the same eternal laws obey, While God’s unerring finger points the way. First Mercury, amidst full tides of light, Rolls next the sun, through his small circle bright. D AH 14? Example* in didactic poetry. 26 p ° • All that dwell here must be refin’d and pure : BmUesVike our, ,uch ardour can’t endure : Oar earth would blaze beneath so fierce a tav, And all its marble mountains melt away. A Fair Venus, next, fulfils her larger round, With softer beams, and milder glory crown . Friend to mankind, she glitters from afar, _ Now the bright ev’mng, now the morning ^ More distant still, our earth comes rolling on, And forms a wider circle round the sun. W,th her the moon, companion ever dear . Her course attending through the fining year. See Mars, alone, runs his appointed ia.ee, And measures out, exact, the destin d space. Nor nearer does he wind, nor farther stray, But finds the point whence first he roll’d away. More yet remote from day’s all-cheenug source, Vast Jupiter performs bis eonstaut course: Four friendly moons, with borrow d lustre, rise, Bestow thei/beams divine, and , Farthest and last, scarce warm d by Fhcelms ), Through his vast orbit Saturn wheels away- ( How great the change could we be wafted there . How slow the seasons ! and how ^^gtheyear • One moon, on us, reflects its cheerful light There, five attendants brighten up the night. Here, the blue firmament bedeck’d with stars , There over-head, a lucid arch appears. . , , in From hence,how large, how strong, the soo s taghUjan. But seen from thence, how languul and how small. When the keen north with all its finy b , Congeals the floods, and forms the fleecy snows, ’Tis beat intense to what can there be know . Warmer our poles than is its burning zone.^ Who there inhabits must have other pow is, Tuices and veins, and sense, and file, than ours. One moment’s cold, like theirs, would pierce^the bone Freeze the heart-blood, and turn us all to stone. Strange and amazing must the diff ience ’Twixt this dull planet and bright Mercury . Yet reason says, nor can we doubt at al , Millions of beings dwell on either ball, With constitutions fitted for the spot. Where Providence, all wise, has fix d their lot Wondrous art thou, O God, in all thy ways . Their eves to thee let all thy creatures raise Adore thy grandeur, and thy goodness praise. Ye sons of men ! with satisfaction know’, God’s own right hand dispenses all below : Nor good nor evil does by chance befall , He reigns supreme, and he directs it all. At his command, affrighting human-kind, Comets drag on their blazing lengths behind : Nor as we think, do they at random rove. But,’in determin’d times, through long ellipses move And tho’ sometimes they near approach the sun j Sometimes beyond our system’s orb.t cm, i Throughout their race they act their Maher s mil. His pow’r declare, Ins purposes fulfil. E T rt Y. Part II. HI. Of those preceptive poems that treat of the business and pleasures of mankind W s Geotgms claim our first and principal attention. In these he has laid down the rules of husbandry m all its branches ^ith the utmost exactness and perspicuity, and at the , .1 •II the beauties and Didactic. same time embellished t 'j'” "1. husbandry, ’ graces of poetry. . 1 ^^. ‘'^r Addison observes, he has delivered his but with the not with the simplic. y of a idougM ^^^^ ^ ^ address of a poet. “ and he hreaks the clods, down with a kind < g ■ . rp-racefulness. and tosses about the dung, trui, t„ the valuable lba'* ,’t lbe edlfo” the "young student’s imitation in this man- proposed lor the 50 g ^ b.s Gmrgks 1S wrought rpwfth wondgerfnl art, and decorated with all the flowers °f ^Of those poems which give P^epts for the re¬ creations and pleasures of a conntr? life, « ^ ^ ral in our own language th»t »ne J^ y are tiy treSt Mr cl; irtis S^ts, we par- tlC\Verl"hrooldrhe0iehtrert)of those preceptive poems that S deserve partLla/attention •, hut we have antic,- mated on. design, and rendered an, larther notice ot SI m y-- “tihib?r" We^ ”aedretonrem”k“St Horace was the only poet among the ancients who wrote precepts for poetry in verse, at east his epistles to the Pisos is the only piece of the kind that has been handed down to us ; and that is so uerfect it seems almost to have precluded the necessi¬ ty of any other. Among the moderns we have sever that are justly admired •, as Boileau, I ope, e • Poets who write in the preceptive should take care to choose such subjects as are worthy of then muse, and of consequence to all mankind ; f«‘' to est°W ° oarts and pains to teach people trifles that " worthy of their attention, is to the last degree ridic - ^'Among poems of the useful and interesting kind, Dr Armstrong’s Art of Preserving Health deserves par i- cular recommendation, as well in consideration ol be subject, as of the elegant and masterly manner in which he has treated it *, for he has made those things, which are in their own nature dry and unentertaining, pei tec - ]y agreeable and pleasing by adhering to the rules ob¬ served by Virgil and others in the conduct ot these P0With regard to the style or dress of these poems, Its proper it should be so rich as to hide the nakedness of the stjle. subject, and the barrenness of the precepts should be lost in the lustre of the language. “ It ought to a- PaHm ™ bound in the most bold and forcible metaphors the most glowing and picturesque epithets *, it ought to be elevated and enlivened by pomp of numbers and ma¬ jesty of words, and by every figure that can htt a lan¬ guage above the vulgar and current expressions. One may add, that in no kind of poetry (not even in the sublime ode) is beauty of expression so much to be re¬ garded as in this. For the epic writer should be very cautious of indulging himself in too florid a manner ot expression. Part II. POE Didactic expression, especially in the dramatic parts of his fable, —v * where he introduces dialogue ; and the writer ot tra¬ gedy cannot fall into so nauseous and unnatural an af¬ fectation, as to put laboured descriptions, pompous epi¬ thets, studied phrases, and high-flown metaphors, into the mouths of his characters. But as the didactic poet speaks in his own person, it is necessary and pro¬ per for him to use a brighter colouring of style, and to be more studious of ornament. And this is agree¬ able to an admirable precept of Aristotle, which no writer should ever forget,—“ That diction ought most to be laboured in the unactive, that is, the descrip¬ tive, parts of a poem, in which the opinions, manners, and passions of men are not represented j for too gla¬ ring an expression obscures the manners and the senti¬ ments.” We have already observed that any thing in nature may be the subject of this poem. Some things, how¬ ever, will appear to more advantage than others, as they give a greater latitude to genius, and admit of more poetical ornaments. Natural history and philo¬ sophy are copious subjects. Precepts in these might be decorated with all the flowers in poetry; and, as Dr Trapp observes, how can poetry be better employ¬ ed, or more agreeably to its nature and dignity, than in celebrating the works of the great Creator, and de¬ scribing the nature and generation of animals, vege¬ tables, and minerals j the revolutions of the heavenly bodies; the motions of the earth •, the flux and reflux of the sea ; the cause of thunder, lightning, and other meteors j the attraction of the magnet; the gravitation, cohesion, and repulsion of matter j the impulsive mo¬ tion of light; the slow progression of sounds j and other amazing phenomena of nature ? Most ot the arts and sciences are also proper subjects for this poem j and none are more so than its two sister arts, painting and music. In the former, particularly, there is room for the most entertaining precepts concerning the disposal of colours ; the arransrement of lights and shades ; the secret attract! ves of beauty *, the various ideas which make up the one •, the distinguishing between the atti¬ tudes proper to either sex, and every passion ; the re¬ presenting prospects of buildings, battles, or the coun¬ try } and, lastly, concerning the nature of imitation, and the power of painting. What a boundless field of • invention is here ? What room for description, compa¬ rison, and poetical fable ? How easy the transition, at any time, from the draught to the original, from the shadow to the substance ? and from hence, what noble excursions may be made into history, into panegyric upon the greatest beauties or heroes of the past or pre¬ sent age ? Sect. VI. Of the Epistle. This species of writing, if we are permitted to lay down rules from the examples ot our best poets, admits of great latitude, and solicits ornament and decoration ; yet the poet is still to consider, that the true character of the epistle is ease and elegance 5 nothing therefore should he forced or unnatural, laboured or affected, but every part of the composition should breathe an easy, polite, and unconstrained freedom. It is suitable to every subject •, for as the epistle takes place of discourse, and is intended as a sort of distant T R Y. 27 conversation, all the affairs of life and researches into Epistle, nature may be introduced. Those, however, which are -—v— fraught with compliment or condolence, that contain a description of places, or are full of pertinent remarks, and in a familiar and humorous way describe the man¬ ners, vices, and follies of mankind, are the best; be¬ cause they are most suitable to the true character of epistolary writing, and (business set apart) are the usual subjects upon which our letters are employed. All farther rules and directions are unnecessary j for this kind of writing is better learned by example and practice than by precept. We shall, therefore, in con¬ formity to our plan, select a few epistles for the read¬ er’s imitation j which, as this method of writing lias of late much prevailed, may be best taken, perhaps, from our modern poets. The following letter from Mr Addison to Lord Ha¬ lifax, contains an elegant description of the curiosities and places about Rome, together with such reflections on the inestimable blessings ot liberty as must give pleasure to eveiy Briton, especially when he sees them thus placed in direct opposition to the baneful influence of slavery and oppression, which are ever to be seen among the miserable inhabitants of those countries. While you, my lord, the rural shades admire, And from Britannia’s public posts retire, Nor longer, her ungrateful sons to please, For their advantage sacrifice your ease j Me into foreign realms my fate conveys, Through nations fruitful of immortal lays, Where the soft season and inviting clime Conspire to trouble your repose with rhime. For wheresoe’er I turn my ravish’d eyes, Gay gilded scenes and shining prospects rise, Poetic fields encompass me around, And still I seem to tread on classic ground j For here the muse so oft her harp has strung. That not a mountain rears its h^ad unsung, Renown’d in verse each shady thicket grows, And ev’ry stream in heav’nly numbers flows. How am I pleas’d to search the hills and woods For rising springs and celebrated floods ; To view the Nar, tumultuous in his course, And trace the smooth CUtumnus to his source ; To see the Mincia draw its wat’rv store Through the long windings of a fruitful shore. And hoary Albula’s infected tide O’er the warm bed of smoking sulphur glide ! Fir’d with a thousand raptures, I survey Eridanus thro’ flow’ry meadows stray, The king of floods ! that, rolling o’er the plains, The tow’ring Alps of half their moisture drains, And, proudly swoln with a whole, winter’s snows, Distributes wealth and plenty where he flows. Sometimes, misguided by the tuneful throng, I look for streams immortaliz’d in song, That lost in silenc; and oblivion lie, P umb are their fo ntains and their channels dry i Yet run for ever by the muse’s skill, And in the smooth description murmur still. Sometimes to gentle Tiber I retire, And the fam’d river’s empty shores admire, That, destitute of strength, derives its course From thirsty urns, and ao unfruitful source \ D 2 Yet . 150 The cha¬ racter of the epistle. IS! Examples in episto¬ lary poetry from Addi¬ son. POE Yet suns: so often in poetic lays, With scorn the Danube and the Nile surveys , So hi°'h the deathless muse exalts her theme . Such was the Boyn, a poor inglorious stream, That in Hibernian vales obscurely stray d, And unobserv’d in wild meanders play d *, Tilf by your lines, and Nassau’s sword renown d, Its rising billows through the world resound, Where’er the hero’s godlike acts can pierce, Or where the fame of an immortal verse. . oT. con’d the muse my ravisbM breast msptre With warmth like yours, and ra.se •>" V.'ire* Unnumber’d beauties m my verse should shine, And Virgil’s Italy should yield to mine . See how the golden groves around me smile, That shun the coasts of Britain s stormy isle, Or when transplanted and presery d with care. Curse the cold clime, and starve in northern air. Here kindly warmth their mounting juice ferments To nobler tastes, and more exalted scents . Ev’n the rough rocks with tender myrtles bloom, And trodden weeds send out a rich pei.ume. Bear me, some god, to Bail’s gentle seats, Or cover me in Umbria’s green retreats, Where western gales eternally reside. And all the seasons lavish all their p- u e . _ Blossoms, and fruits, and flow’rs together rise, And the whole year in gay confusion lies. Immortal glories in my mind revive, And in my soul a thousand passions strive, When Rome’s exalted beauties I descry Magnificent in piles of ruin lie. An amphitheatre’s amazing height Here fills my eye with terror and delight, That on its public shows unpeopled Rome, And held uncrowded nations in its womb *, # Here pillars rough with sculpture pierce the skies. And here the proud triumphal arches rise. Where the old Romans deathless acts display d, Their base degenerate progeny upbraid : Whole rivers here forsake the fields below. And wond’ring at their height thro’ airy channels flow. Stilt to new scenes my wand’ring muse retires j And the dumb show of breathing rocks admires j Where the smooth chissel all its force has shown. And soften’d into flesh the rugged stone.. In solemn silence, a majestic band. Heroes, and gods, and Roman consuls stand. Stern tyrants, whom their cruelties renown, And emperors in Parian marble frown : While the bright dames, to whom they humbly su d. Still show the'charms that their proud hearts subdu d. Fain would I Raphael’s godlike art rehearse, And show th’ immortal labours in my verse, Where from the mingled strength of shade and light A new creation rises to tny sight, Such heavenly figures from his pencil flow, So warm with life his blended colours glow. From theme to iheme with secret plea-uie tost, Amidst the soft var.ety I’m lost. Here pleasing airs my ravish’d soul confound With circling notes and labyrinths of sound •, Hire domes and temples rise in distant views, And opening palaces invite my muse. TRY. , . . Hmt has kind heav’n adorn’d the happy la"cl, And scatter’d blessings with a wasteful hand . But what avail her unexhausted stoics, Her blooming mountains, and her sunny s 01 , With all the gifts that heav n and earth impa , The smiles of nature, and the charms of ait, While proud oppression in her valleys reig , And tyranny usurps her happy plains . The poor inhabitant beholds in vain . The red’ning orange and the swelling grain - Joyless he sees the growing oils and wines, And in the myrtle’s fragrant shade repines . Starves, in the midst of nature s bounty curst, And in the loaded vineyard dies tor thirst. O liberty, thou goddess heav nly bright ( Profuse of bliss, and pregnant with deligh • Eternal pleasures in thy presence reign, And smiling plenty leads thy wanton train J Eas’d of her load, subjection grows more light, And poverty looks cheerful in thy sight ; Thou mak’st the gloomy face of nature gay, - Giv’st beauty to the sun, and pleasure to the d j. Thee, goddess, thee, Britannia’s isle adores*, How has she oft exhausted all her stores, How oft in fields of death thy presence sought. Nor thinks the mighty prize too dearly bought. On foreign mountain may the sun rtime The grape’s soft juice, and mellow it to wine, With citron groves adorn a distant soil. And the fat olive swell with floods of oil: We envy not the warmer clime, that lies In ten degrees of more indulgent skies,. Nor at the coarseness of our heav’n repine, Tho’ o’er our heads the frozen Pleiads shine : ’Tis liberty that crowns Britannia’s isle, LsraVe* And makes her barren rocks and her bleak mountains Others with tow’ring piles may please the sight, And in their proud aspiring domes delight j A nicer touch to the stretch’d canvas give, Or teach their animated rocks to live : ’Tis Britain’s care to watch o’er Europe’s late, And hold in balance each contending state, To threaten bold presumptuous kings with war. And answer her afflicted neighbour’s pray’r. The Dane and Swede, rous’d up by fierce alarms. Bless the wise conduct of her pious arms : Soon as her fleets appear, their terrors cease, And all the northern world lies hush’d in peace. Th’ ambitious Gaul beholds with secret dread Her thunder aim’d at his aspiring head. And fain her godlike sons would disunite By foreign gold, or by domestic spite; But strives in vain to conquer or divide, Whom Nassau’s arms defend and counsels guide. Fir’d with the name, which l so oft have found The distant climes and diff’rent tongues resound, I bridle in my struggling muse with pain, That longs to launch into a holder strain. But i’ve already troubled you too long. Nor dare attempt a more advent’rous song : My humble verse demands a softer theme, A painted meadow, or a purling stream ; Unfit for heroes; whom immortal lays, And lines like Virgil’s, or like yours, should praise. They® Part XT. POE Epistle. There is a fine spirit of freedom, and love of liberty, displayed in the following letter from Lord Lyttleton to Mr Pope ; and the message irotn the shade of Virgil, which is truly poetical, and justly preceptive, may prove an useful lesson to future baids. 152 Lyttleton. From Rome, 1730. Immortal bard ! for whom each muse has wove The fairest garlands of the Aonian grove $ Preserv’d, our drooping genius to restore, When Addi«on and Congreve are no more} After so many stars extinct in night, The darken’d age’s last remaining light! To thee from Latian realms this verse is writ, Inspir’d by memory of ancient wit: For now no more these climes their influence boast, Fall’n is their glory, and their virtue lost j From tyrants, and from priests, the muses fly, Daughters of reason and of liberty. Nor Baiae now nor Umbria’s plain they love, Nor on the banks of Nar or Mincia rove j To Thames’s flow’ry borders they retire, And kindle in thy breast the Roman fire. So in the shades, where cheer’d with summer rays Melodious linnets warbled sprightly lays, Soon as the faded, falling leaves complain Of gloomy winter’s inauspicious reign, No tuneful voief' is heard of joy or love, But mournful silence saddens all the grove. Unhappy Italy ! whose alter’d state Has felt the worst severity of fate : Not that barbarian hands her fasces broke, And bow’d her haughty neck beneath their yokej Nor that her palaces to earth are thrown, Her cities desert, and her fields unsown j But that her ancient spirit is decay’d, That sacred wisdom from her bounds is fled,. That there the source of science flows no more, Whence its rich streams supply’d the world before. Illustrious names! that once in Latium shin’d, Born to instruct and to command mankind j Chiefs, by whose virtue mighty Rome was rais’d,. And poets, who those chiefs sublimely prais’d ! Oft I the traces you have left explore, Your ashes visit, and your urns adore ; Oft kiss, with lips devout, some mould’ring stone,. With ivy’s venerable shade o’ergrown j Those hallow’d ruins better pleas’d to see, Than all the pomp of modern luxury. As late on Virgil’s tomb fresh flow’rs I strow’d. While with th’ inspiring muse my bosom glow’d, Crown’d with eternal bays, my ravish’d eyes Btheld the poet’s awful form arise: Stranger, he said, whose pious hand has paid These grateful rites to my attentive shade. When thou shall breathe thy happy native air. To Pope this message from his master bear. Great bard, whose numbers I myself inspire,. To whom I gave my own harmonious lyre, If high exalted on the throne of wit, Near me and Homer thou aspire to sit,1 No more let meaner satire dim the rays That flow majestic from thy noble bays. In all the flow’ry paths of Pindus stray : But shun that thorny, that unpleasing way j 5 TRY. Nor, when each soft engaging muije is thine, Address the least attractive of the nine. Of thee more worthy were the task to raise A lasting column to thy country’s praise, To sing the land, which yet alone can boast That liberty corrupted Rome has lost j W here science in the arms ol peace is laid, And plants her palm beneath the olive’s shade. Such wras the theme for which my lyre I strung, Such was the people whose expipits 1 sung j Brave, yet refin’d, for arms and arts renown’d, With diff’rent bays by Mars and Phoebus crown’d,.. Dauntless opposers of tyrannic sway, But pleas’d a mild Augustus to obey. If these commands submissive thou receive. Immortal and unblam’d thy name shall live j Envy to black Cocytus shall retire, And howl with furies in tormenting fire ; Approving time shall consecrate thy lays, And join the patriot’s to the poet’s praise. The following letter from Mr Philips to the earl of Dorset is entirely descriptive j but is one of those de¬ scriptions which will be ever read with delight. Copenhagen, March 9. 1709. From frozen climes, and endless tracts of snow, From streams which northern winds forbid to flow, What present shall the.muse to Dorset bring, Or how, so near the pole, attempt to sing ? The hoary winter here conceals from sight All pleasing objects which to verse invite. The hills and dales, and the delightful woods, The flow’ry plains, and silver-streaming floods, By snow disguis’d, in bright confusion lie, And with one dazzling waste fatigue the eye. No gentle breathing breeze prepares the spring,. No birds within the desert region sing : The ships, unmov’d, the boist’rous winds defy, While rattling chariots o’er the ocean fly. The vast Leviathan wants room to play, And spout his waters in the face of day : The starving wolves along the main sea sprowl, And to the moon in icy valleys howl. O’er many a shining league the level main Here spreads itself into a glassy plain : There solid billows of enormous size, Alps of green ice, in wild disorder rise. And yet but lately have I seen ev’n here, The winter in a lovely dress appear. Ere yet the clouds let fall the treasur’d snow. Or winds began through hazy skies to blow, At ev’ning a keen eastern breeze arose, And the descending rain unsully’d froze j Soon as the silent shades of night withdrew, The ruddy morn disclos’d at once to view The face of nature in a rich disguise, And brighten’d every object to my eyes: : For ev’ry shrub, and ev’rv blade of grass, And ev’ry pointed thorn, seem’d wrought in glass j In pearls and rubies rich the hawthorns show. While through the ice the crimson berries glow. The thick sprung reeds, which watery marshes yield/. Seem’d polish’d lances in a hostile field. The stag in limpid currents with surprise, Sees crystal branches on-his forehead rise: THi', 153 Philips,, and *54 Pope. POE 3Lmc The spreading oak, the heeeh, and Wring pine, Glaz’d over, in the freezmg eether slnne. The frighted birds ihe rattling branches shun, "Which wave and glitter in the distant sun. When if a sudden gust ot wind arise, The brittle forest into atoms flies, The crackling wood beneath the tempest bends, And in a spangled shower the prospect ends : Or, if a southern gale the region warm, And by degrees unbend the wmt ry charm, The traveller a miry country sees, _ And journeys sad beneath the dropping trees : Like some deluded peasant Merlin leads Thro’ fragrant bow’rs and thro’ delicious meads, "While here enchanted gardens to him rise, And airy fabrics there attract his eyes, His wandering feet the magic paths pursue, And while he thinks the fair illusion true, The trackless scenes disperse in fluid air, And woods, and wilds, and thorny ways appear J A tedious road the weary wretch returns, And, as he goes, the transient vision mourns. The great use of medals is properly described in the ensuing elegant epistle from Mr Pope to Mr Addison , and the extravagant passion which some people entei4 only for the colour of them, is very agreeably and very justly ridiculed. See the wild waste of all devouring years . How Rome her own sad sepulchre appears. ^ With nodding arches, broken temples sPread • The very tombs now vanish like their dead. Imperial wonders rais’d on nations spoil d, , Where mix’d with slaves the groaning martyr toil • Huge theatres, that now unpeopled woods, ^ Now drain’d a distant country of her floods . Fanes, which admiring gods with pride survey, Statues.of men, scarce less alive than they . Some felt the silent stroke of mould ring age, Some hostile fury, some religious rage_ Barbarian blindness, Christian zeal conspire, And papal piety, and Gothic fire. Perhaps, by its own ruin sav’d from flame, Some bury’d marble half preserves a name : That name the learn’d with fierce disputes pursue, And give to Titus old Vespasian’s due. Ambition sigh’d : She found it vain to trust The faithless column and the crumbling bust 5 Huge moles, whose shadow stretch’d from shore to shore, Their ruins perish’d, and their place no more •, Convinc’d, she now contracts her vast design, And all her triumphs shrink into a coin. A narrow orb each crowded conquer keeps, Beneath her palm here sad Judaea weeps 5 Now scantier limits the proud arch confine. And scarce are seen the prostrate Nile or Rhine 5 A small Euphrates through the piece is roll’d, And little eagles wave their wings in gold. The medal, faithful to its charge of fame, Through climes and ages bears each form and name: In one short view subjected to our eye, Gods, emp’rors, heroes, sages, beauties, lie. With sharpen’d sight pale antiquaries pore, Th’ inscription value, but the rust adore. TRY- , TUis Uie blue varnish,.that the The sacred rust of twice ten hundred y(alb • To gain Pescennius one employs his scheme , One erasps a Cecrops in ecstatic dreams. Poor VatTius, long with learned ^'"^“our’d : Can taste no pleasnre since his shield was And Curio, restless by the fair one s side, Sighs for an Otho, and neglects his bride. Their’s is the vanity, the learning thine . Touch’d by thy band, again Home s glories shine , Her god' and god-like heroes rise to view, And all her faded garlands bloom anew. Nor blush these studies thy regard engage ; These pleas’d the fathers of poetic rage *, The verse and sculpture bore an equal part, And art reflected images to art._ Oh when shall Britain, conscious of her claim, Stand emulous of Greek and Roman fame ? In living medals see her wars enroll d, And vanquish’d realms supply recording gold . Here, rising bold, the patriot’s honest face •, There, warriors frowning in historic brass . Then future ages with delight shall see How Plato’s, Bacon’s Newton’s, looks agree 5 Or in fair series laurell’d bards be shown, A Virgil there, and here an Addison. Then shall thy Craggs (and let me call him mine; On the cast ore, another Pollio shine ; With aspect open shall erect his head, And round the orb in lasting notes be read,. « Statesman, yet friend to truth ! of soul sincere, “ In action faithful, and in honour clear *, “ Who broke no promise, serv’d no private end, “ Who gain’d no title, and who lost no friend j Ennobled by himself, by all approv’d, si Prais’d, wept, and honour’d, by the muse he lov d. Part II. Epistle. We have already observed, that the essential, and indeed the true characteristic of epistolary writing, is ease ; and on this account, as well as others, the iol- lowing letter from Mr Pope to Miss Blount is to be admired. To Miss Blount, on her leaving the Town after the Coronation. As some fond virgin, whom her mother’s care Drags from the town to wholesome country air *, Just when she learns to roll a melting eye, And hear a spark, yet think no danger nigh, From the dear man unwilling she must sever, Yet takes one kiss before she parts for ever $ Thus from the world fair Zephalinda flew, Saw others happy, and with sighs withdrew: Not that their pleasures caus’d her discontent; She sigh’d, not that they stay’d, but that she went. She went, to plain work, and to purling brooks, Old-fashion’d halls, dull aunts, and croaking rooks : She went from op’ra, park, assembly, play, To morning walks, and pray’rs three hours a-day $ To part her time ’twixt reading and bohea, To muse, and spill her solitary tea, Or o’er cold coffee trifle with the spoon, Count the slow clock, and dine exact at noon j Divert Part T. FOE Epistle. Divert lier eyes with pictures in the fire, P* - ‘ * Hum half a tune, tell stories to the ’squire $ Up to her godiy garret after seven, There starve and pray, for that’s the way to heav’n. Some ’squire, perhaps, you take delight to rack j Whose game is whisk, whose treat’s a toast in sack } Who visits with a gun, presents you birds, Then gives a smacking buss, and cries,—no words ! Or with his hound comes hollowing from the stable, Makes love with nods, and knees beneath a table ; Whose laughs are hearty, tho’ his jests are coarse, And loves you best of all things—but his horse. In some fair ev’ning, on your elbow laid, You dream of triumphs in the rural shade j In pensive thought recal the fancy’d scene, See coronations rise on every green ; Before you pass th’ imaginary sights Of lords, and earls, and dukes, and garter’d knights, While the spread fan o’ershades your closing eyes : Then give one flirt, and all the vision flies. Thus vanish sceptres, coronets, and balls, And lea%e you in lone woods, or empty walls ! So when your slave, at some dear idle time, (Not plagu’d with headachs, or the want of rhyme) Stands in the streets, abstracted from the crew, And while he seems to study, thinks of you : Just when his fancy points your sprightly eyes, Or sees the blush of soft Parthenia rise, Gay pats my shoulder, and you vanish quite, Streets, chairs, and coxcombs, rush upon my sight j Vex’d to be still in town, I knit my brow, Look sour, and hum a tune, as you may now. Sect. VII. Of Desci'iptive Poetry. I 15s . . . . Descriptive DESCRIPTIVE poetry is of universal use, since there poetry. nothing in nature but what may be described. As poems of this kind, however, are intended more to de¬ light than to instruct, great care should be taken to make them agreeable. Descriptive poems are made beautiful by similies properly introduced, images of feigned persons, and allusions to ancient families or his¬ torical facts ; as will appear by a perusal of the best of these poems, especially Milton’s l?Allegro and 11 Peiise- roso, Denham’s Cooper Hill, and Pope’s Windsor Forest. Every body being in possession of Milton’s works, we forbear inserting the two former *, and the others are too long for our purpose. That inimitable poem, Ihe Seasons, by Mr Thomson, notwithstanding some parts of it are didactic, may be also with propriety referred to this head. Sect. VIII. Of Allegorical Poetry. 156 ... Origin of Could truth engage the affections of mankind in allcgorica' her native and simple dress, she would require no orna- /)pctry. ments or aid from the imagination ; but her delicate light, though lovely in itself, and dear to the most dis¬ cerning, does not strike the senses of the multitude so as to secure their esteem and attention : the poets there¬ fore dressed her up in the manner in which they thought Ishe would appear the most amiable, and called in alle¬ gories and airy disguises as her auxiliaries in the cause ef virtue. An allegory is a fable or story, in which, under the TRY. 31 disguise of imaginary persons or things, some real action Allegorical. or instructive moral is conveyed to the mind. Every v allegory therefore has two senses, the one literal and the other mystical ’, the first has been aptly enough com¬ pared to a dream or vision, of which the last is the true meaning or interpretation. J57 From this definition of allegorical poetry the readerTts c^arac“ will perceive that it gives great latitude to genius, andL affords such a boundless scope for invention, that the poet is allowed to soar beyond all creation j to give life and action to virtues, vices, passions, diseases, and natu¬ ral and moral qualities; to raise floating islands, en¬ chanted palaces, castles, &c. and to people them with the creatures of his own imagination. The poet’s eye, in a fine frenzy rolling, Doth glance from heav’n to earth, from earth to heav’n j And, as imagination bodies forth The forms of things unknown, the poet’s pen Turns them to shape, and gives to airy nothing A local habitation and a name. Shakespeare. But whatever is thus raised by the magic of his mind must be visionary and typical, and the mystical sense must appear obvious to the reader, and inculcate some, moral or useful lesson in life j otherwise the whole will be deemed rather the effects of a distempered brain, than the productions of real wit and genius. The poet, like Jason, may sail to parts unexplored, but will meet with no applause if he returns without a golden fleece : for these romantic reveries would be unpardonable but for the mystical meaning and moral that is thus artfully and agreeably conveyed with them, and on which account only the allegory is indulged with a greater liberty than any other sort ot writing. The ancients justly considered this sort of allegory as the most essential part of poetry *, for the power of rai¬ sing images of things not in being, giving them a sort of life and action, and presenting them as it were before the eyes, was thought to have something in it like cre¬ ation •, but then, in such compositions, they always ex¬ pected to find a meaning couched under them of conse¬ quence j and we may reasonably conclude, that the al¬ legories of their poets would never have been handed down to us, had they been deficient in this respect. i _8 As the fable is the part immediately offered to the EsseiniaIs reader’s consideration, and intended as an agreeable ve-0f a just hide to convey the moral, it ought to be bold, lively, fable, and surprising, that it may excite curiosity and support attention ; for if the fable be spiritless and barren ot in¬ vention, the attention will be disengaged, and the mo¬ ral, however useful and important in itself, will be little regarded. There must likewise be a justness and propriety in the fable, that is, it must be closely connected with the subject on which it is employed ; for notwithstanding the boundless compass allowed the imagination in these writings, nothing absurd or useless is to be introduced. In epic poetry some things may perhaps be admitted for no other reason but to surprise, and to raise what is called the wonderful, which is as necessary to the epic as ihe probable; but in allegories, however wild and ex¬ travagant the fable and the persons introduced, each must correspond with the subject they are applied to, and, like the members of a well-written simile, bear a due proportion and relation to each other: for we are POE at, to consider, tliat tlu- allegory is a sort of extended or rather multiplied simile, and therelore, like that should never lose the subject it is intended to illustrate. Whence it will appear, that genius and fancy are here insufficient without the aid of taste and judgment . these first, indeed, may produce a multitude oi orna¬ ments, a wildernesss of sweets j but the last must >e employed to accommodate them to reason, and to ar- raive them so as to produce pleasure and profit. But it is not sufficient that the falile be correspondent with the subject, and have the properties above descri¬ bed ; for it mur,t also be consistent with itselt. 1 he ■noet may invent what story he pleases, and form any imaginary beings that his fancy shall suggest •, but here, as in dramatic writings, when persons are once intro¬ duced, they must be supported to the end, and all spea ' and act in character: for notwithstanding the general licence here allowed, some order must be observed •, and however wild and extravagant the characters, they should not be absurd. To this let me add that the whole must be clear and intelligible; for t ie tube fas Mr Hughes observes) being designed only to clothe and adorn the moral, but not to hide it, should re¬ semble the draperies we admire in some ol the ancient statues, in which the folds are not too many nor too thick, but so judiciously ordered, that the shape and beauty of the limbs may be seen through them. — But this will more obviously appear from a perusal ol the best compositions of this class ; such as Spenser s Fairv Queen, Thomson’s Castle of Indolence, Addison and Johnson’s b- autiful allegories in the Spectator and Bambler, &.c. &c. . The word al/cgonj has been used in a more extensive sense than that it. which we have here applied it : for all writings, where the moral is conveyed under the co¬ ver of borrowed characters and actions, by which oilier characters and actions (that are real) are represented, have obtained the name of allegories; though the table or story contains nothing that is visionary or romantic, but is made up of real or historical persons, and of ac¬ tions either probable or possible. But these writings should undoubtedly be distinguished by some other name, because the literal sense is consistent with right reason, and mav convey an useful moral, and satisfy the reader, without putting him under the necessity of seeking for another. Some of the ancient critics, as Mr Addison observes, were fond of giving the works of their poets this second or concealed meaning, though there was no apparent necessity for the attempt, and often but little show of reason in the application. I bus the Iliad and Odyssey of Homer are said to be fables of this kind, and that the gods and heroes introduced are only the affections of the mind represented in a visible shape and character. They tell us, says he, that Achilles in the first Iliad represents anger, or the irascible part of human nature : that upon drawing his sword against his superior, in a full assembly, Pallas (which, say they, is another name for reason) checks and advises him on the occasion, and at her first appearance touches him upon the head ; that part of the man being looked upon as the seat of reason. In this sense, as Mr Hughes has well observed, the whole TEneis of Virgil may be said to be an allegory, if you suppose /Eneas to represent Augustus Ceesar, and that his conducting the remains of his countrymen T R Y. Part 11, from the ruins of Troy, to a new settlement in Italy, is AlI^orK-al. an emblem of Augustus’s tornung -a new government v out of the ruins of the aristocracy, and establishing the Romans, after the conclusion of the civil w«i, in a peaceable and flourishing condition. However ingem !>ns this coincidence mav appear and whatever design Virgil had in view, he has avoided a P^^.dar and m- rect application, and ^conducted his poem, that it is per¬ fect without any allegorical mterpretation ; tor whether we consider ^Eneas or Augustus as the hero, themoial contained are equally instructive. And indeed it seems absurd to suppose, that because the epic poets have in¬ troduced some allegories into their works, every thing is to be understood in a mystical manner, where the sense is plain and evident without any such application. Nor is the attempt that Tasso made to turn his Jeru- s Jem into a mystery, any particular recommendation of the work : for notwithstanding he tel s us m what is called the allegory, printed with it, that the Christian army represents man, the city of Jerusalem civil happi¬ ness Codify the understanding, Rinaldo and l ancred the other powers of the soul, and that the body is ty¬ pified by the common soldiers and the like; yet the reader will find himself as little delighted as edified by the explication : for the mind has little pleasure in an allegory that cannot be opened without a key made by the hand of the same artist ; and indeed every allegory that is so dark, and, as it were, inexplicable, loses its very essence, and becomes an enigma or riddle, that is left'to he interpreted by every crude imagination. ^ This last species of writing, whether called an alle- The an- „orij or by any other name, is not less eminent and ci. nt para- useful ; for the introducing of real or historical persons bie. may not abridge or lessen either our entertainment or instruction. In these compositions we often meet with an uncommon moral conveyed by the fable in a new and entertaining manner; or with a known truth so artfully decorated, and placed in such a new and beau¬ tiful light, that we are amazed how any thing so charm¬ ing and useful should so long have escaped our obser¬ vation. Such, for example, are many of Johnson’s pieces published in the Rambler under the title of Eastern Stories, and by Hawkesworth in the Adven- turer. # . . . The ancient parables are of this species of writing: and it is to be observed, that those in the New Testa¬ ment have a most remarkable elegance and propriety ; and are the most striking, and the most instructive, for being drawn from objects that are familiar.—1 he more striking, because, as the things are seen, the moral con¬ veyed becomes the object of our senses, and requires lit¬ tle or no reflection: —the more instructive, because every time they are seen, the memory is awakened, and the same moral is again exhibited with pleasure to the mind, and accustoms it to reason and dwell on the subject. So that this method of instruction improves nature, as it were, into a book of life ; since every thing before us may be so managed, as to give lessons for our advantage. Our Saviour’s parables of the sower and the seed, of the tares, of the mustard-seed, and of the leaven (Matthew xiii ), are all of this kind, and were obviously taken from the harvest just ripening before him ; for /us clis- eiples plucked the ears of corn and did eat, rubbing them in their hands. See the articles Allygory, and Metaphor and Allegory, in the general alphabet. Sect- * ¥ O Part II. E Of Fables. 160 The apo¬ logue of fabie. i6t Rules for its con¬ struction. !3EcT. IX. Of Fables. No method of instruction has been more ancient, more universal, and probably none more effectual, than that by apologue or fable. In the first ages, amongst a rude and fierce people, this perhaps was the only method that would have been borne: and even since the pro¬ gress of learning has furnished other helps, the fable, which at first was used through necessity, is retained from choice, on account of the elegant happiness of its manner, and the refined address with which, when well conducted, it insinuates its moral. As to the actors in this little drama, the fabulist has authority to press into his service, every kind of exist¬ ence under heaven ; not only beasts, birds, insects, and all the animal creation*, but flowers, shrubs, trees, and all the tribe of vegetables. liven mountains, fossils, mi¬ nerals, and the inanimate works of nature, discourse ar¬ ticulately at his command, and act the part which he assigns them, The virtues, vices, and every property of beings, receive from him a local habitation and a name. In short, be may personify, bestow life, speech, and action, on whatever be thinks proper. It is easy to imagine what a source of novelty and Variety this must open to a genius capable of concei¬ ving and of employing these ideal persons in a proper manner*, what an opportunity it affords him to diver¬ sify his images, and to treat the fancy with changes of objects, while he strengthens the understanding, or regulates the passions, by a succession of truths. To raise beings like these into a state of action and intel¬ ligence, gives the fabulist an undoubted claim to that first character of the poet, a creator. When these persons are once raised, we must care¬ fully enjoin them proper tasks, and assign them senti¬ ments and language suitable to their several natures and respective properties. A raven should not be ex¬ tolled for her voice, nor a bear be represented with an elegant shape. It were a very obvious instance of ab¬ surdity, to paint a hare cruel, or a wolf compassion¬ ate. An ass were but ill qualified to be general of an army, though he may well enough serve, perhaps, for one of the trumpeters. But so long as popular opinion allows to the lion magnanimity, rage to the tiger, strength to the mule, cunning to the fox, and buffoonery to the monkey *, why may not they support the characters of an Agamemnon, Achilles, Ajax, Ulys¬ ses, and Thersites ? The truth is, when moral actions are with judgment attributed to the brute creation, we scarce perceive that nature is at all violated by the fabu¬ list. He appears at most to have only translated their language. His lions, wolves, and foxes, behave and argue as those ereatures would, had they originally been endowed with the human faculties of speech and reason. But greater art is yet required whenever we personify inanimate beings. Here the copy so far deviates from the great lines of nature, that, without the nicest care, reason will revolt against the fiction. However, beings of this sort, managed ingeniously and with address, re¬ commend the fabulist’s invention by the grace of no¬ velty and of variety. Indeed the analogy between things natural and artificial, animate and inanimate, is often so Very striking, that we can, with seeming propriety, give Vol. XVII, Part I. I* T rt Y. ' 3 passions and sentiments to every individual part of exist- Of Fables ence. Appearance favours the deception. The vine may ' v he enamoured of the elm j her embraces testify her pas¬ sion. The swelling mountain may, naturally enough, be delivered of a mouse. The gourd may reproach the pine, and the sky-rocket insult the stars. The axe may solicit a new handle of the forest; and the moon, in her female character, request a fashionable garment. Here is nothing incongruous j nothing that shocks the reader with impropriety. On the other hand, were the axe to desire a periwig, and the moon petition for a new pair of boots, probability would then be violated, and the ab¬ surdity become too glaring. The most beautiful fables that ever were invented may be disfigured by the language in which they are 162 clothed. Of this poor ^sop, in some of his English The pra- dresses, affords a melancholy proof. The ordinary style of fable should be familiar, but also elegant. The familiar, says M. La Motte, is the general tone or accent of fable. It was thought sufficient, on its first appearance, to lend the animals our most common lan¬ guage. Nor indeed have they any extraordinary pre¬ tensions to the sublime*, it being requisite they should speak with the same simplicity that they behave. The familiar also is more proper for insinuation thati the elevated j this being the language of reflection, as the former is the voice of sentiment. We guard ourselves against the one, but lie. open to the other*, and instruction will always the most effectually sway us, when it appears least jealous of its rights and pri¬ vileges. The familiar style, however, that is here required, notwithstanding that appearance of ease which is its character, is perhaps more difficult to write than the more elevated or sublime. A writer more readily per¬ ceives when he has risen above the common language, than he perceives, in speaking this language, whether he has made the choice that is most suitable to the oc<- casion : and it is nevertheless, upon this happy choice that all the charms of the familiar depend. Moreover, the elevated style deceives and seduces, although it be not the best chosen 5 whereas the familiar can procure itself no sort of respect, if it he not easy, natural, just, delicate, and unaffected. A fabulist must therefore be¬ stow great attention upon his style j and even labour it so much the more, that it may appear to have cost him no pains at all. The authority of Fontaine justifies these opinions in regard to style. His fables are perhaps the best ex¬ amples of the genteel familiar, as Sir Boger 1’Estrange affords the grossest of the indelicate and low. When we read, that “ while the frog and the mouse were dis¬ puting it at swords-point, down comes a kite powder ing upon them in the interim, and gobbles up both to¬ gether to part the fray; and “ where the fox reproaches a bevy of jolly gossipping wenches making merry over a dish of pullets, that if he but peeped into a hen-roost, they always made a bawling with their dogs and their bastards ; while you yourselves (says he) can lie stuffing your guts with your hens and capons, and not a word of the pudding.” This may he familiar ; but it is also coarse and vulgar, and cannot fail to disgust a reader that has the least degree of taste or delicacy. The style of fable then must be simple and familiar; and it must likewise be correct and elegant. By the E former, ,, POE «. * i former we mean, that it should not be loaded with ^^Lfumre Lnd metaphor; that the disposition of words be natural, the turn of sentences easy, and their construction unembarrassed. By elegance, we would exclude all coarse and provincial terms; all affected and puenle conceits , all obsolete and pedantic phrases, lo this we would ad join, as the word perhaps implies, a certain finishing po¬ lish, which gives a grace and spirit to the 'vhole and which, though it have always the appearance ol nature, is almost ever the effect of art. But notwithstanding all that has been said, there are some occasions on which it is allowable, and even expe¬ dient, to change the style. The language of a fable must rise or fall in conformity to the subject A lion, when in¬ troduced in his regal capacity, must hold discourse in a strain somewhat more elevated than a country mouse. The lioness then becomes his queen, and the beasts ot the forest are called his subjects ; a method that oflers at once to the imagination both the animal and the per¬ son he is designed to represent. Again, the buftoon- monkey should avoid that pomp of phrase, which the owl employs as her best pretence to wisdom. Unless the style be thus judiciously varied, it will be impossible to preserve a just distinction of character. Descriptions, at once concise and pertinent, add a grace to fable ; but are then most happy when inclu¬ ded in the action : whereof the fable of Boreas and the Sun affords us an example. An epithet well chosen is often a description in itself; and so much the more agreeable, as it the less retards us in our pursuit ot the catastrophe. Lastly, little strokes of humour when arising natu¬ rally from the subject, and incidental reflections when kept in due subordination to the principal, add a value to these compositions. These latter, however, should be employed very sparingly, and with great address ; be very few, and very short : it is scarely enough that they naturally spring out of the subject ; they should be such as to appear necessary and essential parts ot the fable. And when these embellishments, pleasing in themselves, tend to illustrate the main action, they then afford that nameless grace remarkable in Fontaine and some few others, and which persons of the best discernment will more easily conceive than they can explain. Sect. X. Of Satire. Origin of Tuts kind of poem is of very ancient date, and (if satire. ^ bej;eve Horace) was introduced, by vyay of inter¬ lude, by the Greek dramatic poets in their tragedies, to relieve the audience, and take off the force of those strokes which they thought too deep and affecting. In these satirical interludes, the scene was jaid in the country ; and the persons were rural deities, satyrs, country peasants, and other rustics. The first Tragedians found that serious style Too grave for their uncultivated age, And so brought wild and naked satyrs in (Whose motion, words, and shape were all a farce) As oft as decency would give them leave; Because the mad, ungovernable rout. Full of confusion and the fumes of wine, Lov’d such variety and antic tricks. Roscommon's Horace T H Y. Part II. The satire we now have is generally allowed to he °f OtSaUw. Roman invention. It was first introduced v decorations of scenes and action ; but written n ver e of dXrent measures by Ennius, and afterwards mould- fdintoThe form we now have it by Luc.l.us, whom Horace has imitated, and mentions with esteem. Ibis “re opinion of most of the critics, and particularly of Boileau, who says, Lucilius led the way, and bravely bold, To Roman vices did the mirror hold ; Protected humble goodness from reproach, Show’d worth on foot, and rascals in a coach. Horace his pleasing wit to this did add, . That none, uncensur’d, might be fools or mad . And Juvenal, with rhetorician’s rage, Scourg’d the rank vices of a wicked age ; Tho’ horrid truths thro’ all his labours shine, In what he writes there’s something of divine. Our satire, therefore, maybe distinguished into two kinds; the jocose, or that which makes sport with vice and folly, and sets them up to ridicule ; and the serious, or that which deals in asperity, and is severe and acri¬ monious. Horace is a perfect master of the tirst, and Juvenal much admired for the last. The one is face¬ tious, and smiles : the other is angry, and storms. Hie foibles of mankind are the object of one ; but crimes of a deeper dye have engaged the other. 1 hey both agree, however, in being pungent and biting : and from a due consideration of the writings of these authors, who are our masters in this art, we may define satire to be, 164 A free, (and often jocose), witty, and sharp poem, Definition wherein the follies and vices of men are lashed and ri¬ diculed in order to their reformation. Its subject is whatever deserves our contempt or abhorrence, (includ¬ ing every thing that is ridiculous and absurd, or scanda¬ lous and repugnant to the golden precepts of religion and virtue). Its manner is invective; and its end, shame. So that satire may be looked upon as the phy¬ sician of a distempered mind, which it endeavours to cure by bitter and unsavoury, or by pleasant and salu¬ tary, applications. 165 A good satirist ought to be a man ot wit and ad- Qualities dress, sagacity and eloquence. He should also have a of a good great deal of good-nature, as all the sentiments which are beautiful in this way of writing must proceed from that quality in the author. It is good-nature produces that disdain of all baseness, vice, and folly, which prompts the poet to express himself with such smartness against the errors of men, but without bitterness to their persons. It is this quality that keeps the mind even, and never lets an offence unseasonably throw the satirist out of his character. In writing satire, care should be taken that it be true and general ; that is, levelled at abuses in which num¬ bers are concerned : for the personal kind of satire, or lampoon, which exposes particular characters, and af¬ fects the reputation of those at whom it is pointed, is scarcely to be distinguished from scandal and defamation. The poet also, whilst lie is endeavouring to correct the guilty, must take care not to use such expressions as may corrupt the innocent: he must therefore avoid all obscene words and images that tend to debase and mis¬ lead the mind, Horace and Juvenal, the chief satirists among part II. £ 0 E 166 Proper stjle of satire. Of Satire, among the Itomahs, ai’e faulty in tins respect, and ought to be read with caution. The style proper for satire is sometimes grave and animated, inveighing against vice with warmth and ear¬ nestness } but that which is pleasant, sportive, and, with becoming raillery, banters men out of their bad disposi¬ tions, has generally the best effect, as it seems only to play with their follies, though it omits no opportunity of making them feel the lash. The verses should be smooth and flowing, and the language manly, just, and decent. Of well-chose words some take not care enough, And think they should be as the subject rough : But satire must be more exactly made, And sharpest thoughts in smoothest words convey’d. Duke of Bucks’s Essay. Satires, either of the jocose or serious kind, may be written in the epistolary manner, or by way of dialogue. Horace, Juvenal, and Persius, have given us examples of both. Nay, some of Horace’s satires may, without incongruity, be called epistles, and his epistles satires. But this is obvious to every reader. Of the facetious kind, the second satire of the se¬ cond book of Horace imitated by Mr Pope, and Swift’s verses on his own death, may be referred to as ex¬ amples. As to those satires of the serious kind, for which Ju¬ venal is so much distinguished, the characteristic pro¬ perties of which are, morality, dignity, and severity j a better example, cannot be mentioned than the poem entitled London, written in imitation of the third satire of Juvenal, by Dr Johnson, who has kept up to the spirit and force of the original. Nor must we omit to mention Dr Young’s Loiie of Fame the Universal Passion, in seven satires ; which* though characteristical, abound with morality and good sense. The characters are well selected, the ridicule is high, and the satire well pointed and to the pur¬ pose. We have already observed, that personal satire ap¬ proaches too near defamation, to deserve any counte¬ nance or encouragement. Dryden’s Alack F/ecknoe is For this reason exceptionable, but as a composition it is inimitable. feenefits of We have dwelt thus long on the present subject, be* well con- cause there is reason to apprehend, that the benefits ari- ^te<^ Sa~ sing from well-conducted satire have not been sufficient¬ ly considered. A satire may often do more service to the cause of religion and virtue than a sermon ; since it gives pleasure, at the same time that it creates fear or indignation, and conveys its sentiments in a manner the most likely to captivate the mind. Of all the ways that wisest men could find To mend the age and mortify mankind, Satire well writ has most successful prov’d, And cures, because the remedy is lov’d. Huke of Bucks’s Essay. But to produce the desired effect, it must be jocose, free, and impartial, though severe. The satirist should always preserve good humour} and, however keen he cuts, should cut with kindness. When he loses temper, liis weapons will be inverted, and the ridicule he threw at others will retort with contempt upon himself j tor TRY. 55 the reader will perceive that he is angry and hurt, and Of Satire, consider his satire as the effect of malice, not of judge¬ ment } and that it is intended rather to wound persons than reform manners. Rage you must hide, and prejudice lay down : A satyr’s smile is sharper than his frown. The best, and indeed the only, method to expose vice and folly effectually, is to turn them to ridicule, and hold them up for public contempt} and as it most of¬ fends these objects of satire, so it least hurts ourselves. One passion frequently drives out another; and as we cannot look with indifference on the bad actions of men (for they must excite either our wrath or contempt), it is prudent to give way to that which most ofl’ends vice and folly, and least affects ourselves; and to sneer and laugh, rather than be angry and scold. Burlesque poetry, which is chiefly used by way of®urles(lue drollery and ridicule, falls properly to be spoken ofP0^try.“r under the head of satire. An excellent example of\;|^jjjn^ th is kind is a poem in blank verse, intitled Jhe Splendidww&ihv&t. Shilling, written by Mr John Philips, which, in the opi¬ nion of one of the best judges of the age, is the finest burlesque in the English language. In this poem the author has handled a low subject in the lofty style and numbers of Milton } in which way of writing Mr Phi¬ lips has been imitated by several, but none have come up to the humour and happy turn of the original. When We read it, we are betrayed into a pleasure that we could not expect} though, at the same time, the subli¬ mity of the style, and gravity of the phrase, seem to chastise that laughter which they provoke. There is another sort of verse and style, which is most frequently made use of in treating any subject in a lu¬ dicrous manner, vix. that which is generally called Ilu- dibrastic, from Butler’s admirable poem intitled liucTi- bras. Almost every one knows, that this poem is a sa¬ tire upon the authors of our civil dissensions in the reign of King Charles I. wherein the poet has, with abundance of wit and humour, exposed and ridiculed the hypocrisy Or blind zeal of those unhappy times. In short, it is a kind of burlesque epic poem, which, for the oddity of the rhymes, the quaintness of the similies, the novelty of the thoughts, and that fine raillery which runs through the whole performance, is not to be paralleled. Sect. XI. Of the Epigram* The epigram is a little poem, or composition in verse, Character treating of one thing only, and whose distinguishing of t^e epi- characters are, brevity, beauty, aild point. gram. The word epigram signifies “ inscription }” for epi¬ grams derive their origin from those inscriptions placed by the ancients on their statues, temples, pillars, triumphal arches, and the like ; which, at first, were very short, liv ¬ ing sometimes no more than a single tvord j but after¬ wards, increasing their length, they made them in verse, to be the better retained by the memory. This short way of writing came at last to be used upon any occa¬ sion or subject} and hence the name of epigram has been given to any little copy of verses, Without regard to the original application of such poetns. Its usual limits are from two to 20 verses, though sometirrtes it extends to 50 ; but the shorter, the better it is, and the more perfect, as it partakes more of the £2 nature 3^ Epigram, POE nature and character of this kind of poem: besides, the epigram, being only a single thought, ought o e expressed in a little compass, or else it loses its and strength. . . The beauty required in an epigram is an harmony and apt agreement of all its parts, a sweet simplicity, TRY. ’Tis Chloe’s eye, and cheek, and lip, and breast: Friend Howard’s genius fancy’d ail the rest. Most of Mr Prior’s epigrams are of this delicate cast, and have the thought, like those pt Catullus, ditlused through the whole. Of this kind is his address Part II. Epigram. 170 Of what Mibjf ts it admits. 171 Examples, of English epigi ams remarkable fjr their delicacy, and and polite language. „ . The point is a sharp, lively, unexpected turn of wit, with which an epigram ought to be concluded. 1 here are some critics, indeed, who will not admit tie poin in an epigram*, but require that the thought be ef pauses. On this subject it is meant to confine our inquiry to Latin or Greek hexameters, and to French and Eng¬ lish heroic verse j as the observations we shall have oc¬ casion to make, may, with proper variations, be easily transferred to the composition of other sorts @f verse. Before entering upon particulars, it must be premised in general, that to verse of every kind five things are of importance. 1st, The number of syllables that compose a line. 2d, the different lengths of syllables, i. e. the dift’erence of time taken in pronouncing. 3d, The arrangement of these syllables combined in words. 4th, The pauses or stops in pronouncing. 5th, Pro¬ nouncing syllables in a high or a low tone. The three first mentioned are obviously essential to verse : if any of them be wanting, there cannot be that higher degree of melody which distinguisheth verse from prose. To give a just notion of the fourth, it must be observed, that pauses are necessary for three different purposes : one, to separate periods, and members of the same period, according to the sense : another, to improve the melody of verse : and the last to afford opportunity for drawing breath in reading. A pause of the first kind is variable, being long or short, frequent or less frequent, as the sense requires. A pause of the second kind being de¬ termined by the melody, is in no degree arbitrary. The last sort is in a measure arbitrary, depending on the reader’s command of breath. But as one cannot read with grace, unless, for drawing breath, opportunity be taken of a pause in the sense or in the melody, this pause ought never to be distinguished from the others; and for that reason shall be laid aside. With respect then to the pauses of sense and of melody, it may be affirmed without .hesitation, that their coincidence in verse is a capital beauty: but as it cannot be expected, in a long work especially, that every line should be so perfect; we shall afterward have occasion to see, that unless the read¬ er be uncommonly skilful, the pause necessary for the sense must often, in some degree, be sacrificed to the verse-pause, and the latter sometimes to the former. The pronouncing syllables in a high or low tone con¬ tributes also to melody. In reading, whether verse or prose, a certain tone is assumed, which maybe called the key-note i and in that tone the bulk of the words are sounded. Sometimes to humour the sense, and some¬ times the melody, a particular syllable is sounded in a higher tone, and this is termed accenting a syllable, or gracing it with an accent. Opposed to the accent is the cadence, which, however, being entirely regulated by the sense, hath no peculiar relation to verse. The ca¬ dence is a falling of the voice below the key-note at the close of every period j and so little is it essential to verse, that in correct reading the final syllable of every line is accented, that syllable only excepted which closes the period, where the sense requires a cadence. Though the five requisites above mentioned enter the composition of every species of verse, they are however governed by different rules, peculiar to each species. Upon quantity only, one general observation may be Quantity- premised, because it is applicable to every species of verse. That syllables, with respect to the time taken in pro¬ nouncing, are long or short j two short syllables, with respect to time, being precisely equal to a long one. These two lengths are essential to verse of all kinds 5 and to no verse, it is believed, is a greater variety of time necessary in pronouncing syllables. The voice indeed is frequently made to rest longer than usual upon a word that bears an important signification ; but this is done to humour the sense, and is not necessary for melody. A thing not more necessary for melody occurs with re¬ spect to accenting, similar to that now mentioned: A word signifying any thing humble, low, or dejected, is naturally, in prose as well as in verse, pronounced in a tone below the key-note. w e are now sufficiently prepared for particulars 5 be¬ ginning with Latin or Greek hexameter, which are the same. The observations upon this species of verse will come under the four following heads : number, arrange¬ ment, pause, and accent ; for as to quantity, what is ob¬ served above may suffice. I. HEXAMETER POE I. HEXAMETER Tines, as to time, are all of the same length •, being equivalent to the time taken m pronouncing twelve long syllables or twenty tour short. An hexameter line may consist of seventeen sylahles; verses Of and when regular and not spondaic it never has tewer the Greeks than thirteen > whence it follows, that where the syl- and Ito- lables are many, the plurality must be short j where tew, Mils eon- tjie plurality must be long, st of what , mans eon- , sist feet. £lem. of Criticism, This line is susceptible of much variety as to the suc¬ cession of long and short syllables. It is, however, sub¬ jected to laws that confine its variety within certain limits : and for ascertaining these limits, grammarians have invented a rule by dactyles and spondees, which they denominate /eyre | tu patu]!ae reeu|bans sub | tegirune ] fiLt. "But though to pronounce it in this manner rvith the voice dwelling on the vowel of each long syllable would undoubtedly be correct, and preserve the true movement of the verse, yet to an English ear, prejudiced in behalf of a different movement, it sounds so very uncouth, that Lord Kames has pronounced the true feet of the Greek and Roman verses extremely artificial and complex *, and has substituted in their stead the following rules, which he thinks more simple and of more easy ap¬ plication. 1st, The line must always commence with a long syllable, and close with two long preceded by two abort. 2d, More than two short can never be found together, nor fewer than two. And, 3d, Two long syllables which have been preceded by two short cannot also be followed by two short. These few rules fulfil all the conditions of a hexameter line with relation to order or arrangement. For these again a single rule may be substituted, which has also the advantage of re¬ gulating more affirmatively the construction of every part. To put this rule into words with perspicuity, a hint is taken from the twelve long syllables that com T R Y. I3art ^ w or two short.” Or to excess the thing still more Verdf.ca- shortly, ” The 2d, 4^, 6th, and 8th portions may be one long syllable or two short •, the 10th must be two short syllables ; all the rest must consist each of one long svllahle.” This fulfils all the conditions of an hexame¬ ter line, and comprehends all the combinations of dactyles and spondees that this line admits. >81 Next in order comes the pause. At the end of every Pause- hexameter line, every one must be Sensible 0 a complete close or full pause } the cause ot which follows. lhewithre_ two long syllables preceded by two short, which always sp,ct t0 close an hexameter line, are a fine preparation for anudod) and pause: for long syllables, or syllables pronounced slow, resembling a slow and languid motion tending to rest, naturally incline the mind to rest, or, which is the same, to pause •, and to this inclination the two preceding short syllables contribute, which, by contrast, make the slow pronunciation of the final syllables the. moie conspicu^..-. Beside this complete close or full pause at the end, others are also requisite for the sake of melody ; ot which two are clearly discoverable, and perhaps there may be more. The longest and most remarkable succeeds the 5th por¬ tion : the other, which, being shorter and more faint, may be called the semipause, succeeds the 8th portion. So striking is the pause first mentioned, as to be distin¬ guished even by the rudest ear : the monkish rhymes are evidently built upon it} in which, by an invariable rule, the final word always chimes with that which im¬ mediately precedes the pause clmp. xviii. pose an hexameter line, to divide it into twelve equal parts sect. 4. or portions, being each of them one long syllable or two short. The rule then is: “ 1 he 1st, 3^* 7^b 9^» jith, and 12th portions, must each of them be one long syllable-, the 10th must always be two short syl¬ lables ) the 2d, 4th, 6th, and 8th, may either be one He planctu cudo || metrum cum carmine nudo Mingere cum bumbis || res est saluberrima lumbis. The difference of time in the pause and semipause oc¬ casions another difference not less remarkable j that it is lawful to divide a word by a semipause, but never by a pause, the had effect of which is sensibly felt in the following examples: Effusus labor, at||que inmitis rupta Tyranni Again: Observans nido im||plumes detraxit j at ilia Again : Loricam quam De||moleo detraxerat ipse The dividing a word by a semipause has not the same bad effect: Jamque pedem referens || casus ejvaserat omnes. Again : Quails populea |J moerens Philojmela sub umbra Again : Ludere qme vellem || calamo per|misit agresti. Lines, however, where words are left entire, without being divided even by a semipause, run by that means much the more sweetly. Nec gemere aerea j| cessahit |turtur ah ulmo. Again: "Quadrupedante putrem|j sonitu quatit’ungula campum. Again: Eurydicen toto || referebant | flumine ripse. The reason of these observation* will be evident upon the slightest reflection. Between things so intimately connected Part III. POE Versifica- connected in reading aloud as are sense and sound, every tion. degree of discord is unpleasant: and for that reason it is a matter of importance to make the musical pauses coincide as much as possible with those of sense j which is requisite more especially with respect to the pause, a deviation from the rule being less remarkable in a semi¬ pause. Considering the matter as to melody solely, it is indifferent whether the pauses be at the end of words or in the middle j but when we carry the sense along, it is disagreeable to find a word split into two by a pause, as if there were really two words : and though the dis- ii agreeableness here be connected with the sense only, it is by an easy transition of perceptions transferred to the sound ; by which means we conceive a line to be harsh and grating to the ear, when in reality it is only so to the understanding. To the rule that fixes the pause after the 5th portion there is one exception and no more. If the syllable succeeding the 5th portion be short, the pause is some¬ times postponed to it. Pupillis quos dura j| premit custodia matrum Again : In terras oppressa || gravi sub religione Again : Et quorum pars magna || fui j quis talia fando This contributes to diversify the melody; and, where the words are smooth and liquid, is not ungraceful; as in the following examples : Eormosam resonare || doces Amaryllida sylvas Again : Agricolas, quibus ipsa j| procul discordibus armis. If this pause, placed as aforesaid after the short syl¬ lable, happen also to divide a word, the melody by these circumstances is totally annihilated. Witness the fol¬ lowing line of Ennius, which is plain prose : ^ Romae moenia terru||it impiger Hannibal armis. Sense. Hitherto the arrangement of the long and short syl¬ lables of an hexameter line, and its different pauses, have been considered with respect to melody: but to have a just notion of hexameter verse, these particulars must al¬ so be considered with respect to sense. There is not per¬ haps in any other sort of verse such latitude in the long and short syllables; a circumstance that contributes greatly to that richness of melody which is remarkable in hexameter verse, and which made Aristotle pronounce that an epic poem in any other verse would not suc- * Poet. ceed *. One defect, however, must not be dissembled, etqi. 35. that the same means which contribute to the richness of the melody render it less fit than several other sorts for a narrative poem. There cannot be a more artful con¬ trivance, as above observed, than to close an hexameter line with two long syllables preceded by two short : but unhappily this construction proves a great embarrassment to the sense ; which will thus be evident. As in gene¬ ral there ought to be a strict concordance between the thought and the words in which it is dressed ; so, in par¬ ticular, every close in the sense ought to be accompanied with a clo^e in the sound. In prose this law may he strictly observed, but in verse the same strictness would Vol. XVII. Part I. f T R Y. 41 occasion insuperable difficulties. Willing to sacrifice to Vemfica- the melody of verse some share of the concordance be- tion. tween thought and expression, we freely excuse the se- l—v—-J paration of the musical pause from that of the sense dur¬ ing the course of a line; but the dose of an hexameter line is too conspicuous to admit this liberty ; for which reason there ought always to he some pause in the sense at the end of every hexameter line, were it but such a pause as is marked by a comma ; and for the same rea ¬ son there ought never to be a full close in the sense but at the end of a line, because there the melody is closed. An hexameter line, to preserve its melody, cannot well admit any great relaxation ; and yet, in a narrative poem, it is extremely difficult to adhere strictly to the rule even with these indulgences. Virgil, the chief of poets for versification, is forced often to end a line with¬ out any close in the sense, and as often to close the sense during the running of a line ; though a close in the me¬ lody during the movement of the thought, or a close in the thought during the movement of the melody, can¬ not be agreeable. lS^ The accent, to which we proceed, is not less essential ribserva- than the other circumstances above noticed. By a good t‘ons on ^ ear it will be discerned, that in every line there is ()neacceut* syllable distinguishable from the rest by a capital ac¬ cent : That syllable, being the seventh portion, is inva¬ riably long. Nec bene promeritis || capitfir nee | tangitur ira Again: Mon sibi sed toto || genitum se | credere mundo Again: Qualls spelunca || subitd com’mota columba In these examples the accent is laid upon the last syl¬ lable of a word ; which is favourable to the melody in the following respect, that the pause, which for the sake of reading distinctly must follow every word, gives op¬ portunity to prolong the accent. And for that reason, a line thus accented has a more spirited air than when the accent is placed on anv other syllable. Compare the foregoing lines with the following. Alba neque Assyrio || fucatur | lana veneno Again : Panditur interca || domus omnipojtentis OJympi Again: Olli sedato j| respondit | corde Latinus. In lines where the pause comes after the short syllable succeeding the 5th portion, the accent is displaced, and rendered less sensible : it seems to he split into two, and to be laid partly on the 5th portion, and partly on the 7th, its usual place ; as in Nuda genu, nod6que || sinus coljlecta fluentes. Again : Formosam resonare || doces Ainarjyllida sylvas. Beside this capital accent, slighter accents are laid upon other portions ; particularly upon the 4th, unless where it consists of two short sy llables ; upon the 9th, which is always a long syllable; and upon the nth, I’ where 42 IS4 Order and arrange¬ ment do not consti¬ tute the whole me¬ lody of an hexameter verse. POE where the line concludes with a monosyllable. Such conclusion, by the by, impairs the melody, and tor that ’ reason is not to be indulged unless where it is expressive of the sense. The following lines are marked with all the accents. Ludere quae vellem calamo permisit agresti Again : Et duroe quercus sudabunt roscida mella Again : Parturiunt montes, nascitur ridiculus mus. Reflecting upon the melody of hexameter ver*e, we find, that order or arrangement doth not constitute ie whole of it: for when we compare different lines, equally regular as to the succession 01 long and short sy - lables; the8melody is found in very different degrees of perfection ; which is not occasioned by any particular combination of dactyles and spondees, or of long and short syllables, because we find lines where daetyles pre¬ vail and lines where spondees prevail, equally melodi¬ ous. Of the former take the following instance : iEneadum genitrix hominum divumque voluptas. Of the latter: Molli paulatim flavescet campus arista. What can be more different as to melody than the two following lines, wind,, however, as to the succession ot long and short syllables, are constructed precisely in the same manner ? SponL Daet. Spond. Spend. Dact. Spoud. Ad tales stola dimissa et circumdata palla. Spond. Dact. Spond. Spond. Dact. Spond. Placatumque nitet diffuso lumine coelum. Hor. Lucret. In the former, the pause falls in the middle of a word, which is a great blemish, and the accent is disturbed by a harsh elision of the vowel a upon the particle et In the latter, the pauses and the accent are all of them distinct and full: there Is no elision: and the words are more liquid and sounding. In these particulars con¬ sists the beauty of an hexameter line with respect to me¬ lody ; and by neglecting these, many lines in the satires and epistles of Horace are less agreeable than plain prose ; for they are neither the one nor the other in per¬ fection. To draw melody from these lines, they must be pronounced without relation to the sense : it must not be regarded that words are divided by pauses, nor that harsh ellisions are multiplied. To add to the account, prosaic low-sounding words are introduced •, and, which is still worse, accents are laid on them. Of such faulty lines take the following instances. Candida rectaque sit, munda hactenus sit neque longa. Jupiter exclamat simul atque audirit j at in se Custodes, lectica, ciniflones, parasitae Optimus est modulator, ut Alfenus Aafer omni Nunc illud tantum quaeranq meritone tibi sit. These observations on pauses and semi-pauses, and 011 the structure of an hexameter line, are doubtless ingeni- 4 try. Part IIL ous • hut it is l,y no means certain that a strict attention Versifies, “ then, would List any man in.the wr.tmg of sue , verses as would have been pleasing to a Roman ear. Many of bis lordship’s rules have no other foundation than'what rests on our improper mode of accenting L tin words j which to Virgil or Lucretius would proba¬ bly have been as offensive as the Scotch accent is to a native of Middlesex. II. Next in order comes English heroic verse y which shall be examined under the heads of number, ac¬ cent, quantity, movement, ^ pause. Ihese have been treated in so clear and masterly a manner by Shendan in his Art of Reading, that we shall have little more to do than abridge his doctrine, and point out the few in¬ stances in which attachment to a system and partiality to his native tongue seem to have betrayed him into er¬ ror, or at least made him carry to an extreme what is just only when used with moderation. , * 0f “ Numbers in the strict sense of the word - , whet tie? Rettd;rtgt with regard to poetry or music, consist in certain impres-vol iu sions made on the ear at stated and regular distances. The lowest species of numbers is a double stroke or tlie same note or sound, repeated a certain number of times, at equal distances. The repetitionof the same single not-e in a continued series, and exactly at equal distances, like the ticking of a clock, has in it nothing numerous j but the same note, twice struck a certain number of times, with a pause between each repetition of double the time of that between the strokes, is numerous. The reason is, that the pleasure arising from numbers, consists in the observation oiproportion ; now the repetition of the same note, in exactly the same intervals, will admit of no proportion. Rut the same note twice struck, with the pause of one betiveen the two strokes, and repeated again at the distance of a pause equal to two, admits of the proportional measurement in the pauses of tivoto one, to-which time can be beaten, and is the lowest and sim¬ plest species of numbers. It may be exemplified on the drum, as tu'm-tu'm—tu'm-tu'm—tu'm-tu'm, &c. “ The next progression of numbers is, when the sam« note is repeated, but in such a way as that one makes a more sensible impression on the ear than the other, by being more forcibly struck, and therefore having a great¬ er degree of loudness 5 as ti-tuhn—ti-tuhn } or, tu m-ti —tu'm-tr: or when two weak notes precede a more forcible one, as ti-ti-tu'm-ti-ti-tu'm •, or when the weak notes follow the forcible one, tu'm-ti-ti—tu'm-ti-ti. “ In the first and lowest species of numbers which we have mentioned, as the notes are exactly the same in every respect, there can be no proportion observed but in the time of the pauses. In the second, which rises in a degree just above the other, though the notes are still the same, yet there is a diversity to be observed in their respective loudness and softness, and therefore a mea¬ surable proportion of the quantity of sound. In them we must likewise take into consideration the order of the notes, whether they proceed from strong to weak, or from weak to strong j for this diversity of order occa¬ sions a great difference in the impressions made upon the ear, and in the effects produced upon the mind. To ex¬ press the diversity of order in the notes in all its several kinds, the common term movement may be used, as the term measure will properiy enough express the dif¬ ferent proportions of time both in the pauses and in the notes,” For Fart TIT. POE Versiiica- For it is to be observed, that all notes are not of the tion. same length or on the same key. In poetry, as well as "v™--' in music, notes may be high or low, flat or sharp and some of them may be prolonged at pleasure. “ Poetic numbers are indeed founded upon the very same prin¬ ciples with those of the musical kind, and are governed by similar laws (see Music). Proportion and order are the sources of the pleasure which we receive from both ; and the beauty of each depends upon a due observation of the laws of measure and movement. The essential difference between them is, that the matter of the one is articulate, that of the other inarticulate sounds: but syllables in the one correspond to notes in the otlierj po¬ etic feet to musical bars } and verses to strains ; in a word, they have all like properties, and are governed by laws of the same kind. ” “ From what has been said, it is evident, that the es- sence of numbers consists in certain impressions made on the mind through the ear at stated and regular distances of time, with an observation of a relative proportion in those distances; and that the other circumstances of long or short in syllables, or diversity of notes in uttering them, are not essentials but only accidents of poetic num¬ bers. Should this be questioned, the objector might be silenced by having the experiment tried on a drum, on which, although it is incapable of producing long or short, high or low notes, there is no kind of metre which may not be beat. That, therefore, which regulates the series and movement of the impressions given to the ear by the recitation of an English verse, must, when pro¬ perly disposed, constitute the essence of English poetic numbers ; but it is the accent which particularly im¬ presses the sound of certain syllables or letters upon the ear; for in every word there is a syllable or letter ac¬ cented. The necessity and use of the accent, as well in prose as in verse, we shall therefore proceed to ex¬ plain. “ As words may be formed of various numbers of syl- * Art of lables, from one up to eight or nine*, it was necessary Reading, t|iat tj,ere should be some peculiar mark to distinguish words from disjointed syllables, otherwise speech would be nothing but a continued succession of syllables con¬ veying no ideas. This distinction of one word from an¬ other might be made by a perceptible pause at the end of each in speaking, analogous to the distance made be¬ tween them in writing and in printing. But these pauses would make discourse disgustingly tedious; and though they might render words sufficiently distinct, they would make the meaning of sentences extremely confused. Words might also be distinguished from each other, and from a collection of detached syllables, by an elevation or depression of the voice upon one syllable of each word; and this, as is well known to the learned, was the prac¬ tice of the Greeks and Romans. But the English tongue has for this purpose adopted a mark ol the easiest and simplest kind, which is called accent. By accent is meant, a certain stress of the voice, upon a particular letter of a syllable, which distinguishes it from the rest, and at the same time distinguishes the syllable itself to which it belongs from the other syllables which compose the word. Thus, in the word hub'it, the accent upon the b distinguishes that letter from the others, and the first syllable from the last; add more syllables to it, and it will still do the same, as hab'itable. In the word ac¬ cept, the is the distinguished letter, and the syllable T R Y. 43 which contains it the distinguished syllable ; but if we Versifka- arid more syllables to it, as in the word ac'ceptible, the tion. seat of the accent is changed to the first syllable, of which c is the distinguished letter. Every word in our language of more syllables than one has one of the syl¬ lables distinguished from the rest in this manner, and every monosyllable has a letter. Thus, in the word hat' the t is accented, in hate the vowel a, in cub' the b, and in cube the u: so that as articulation is the essence of syllables, accent is the essence of words; which with¬ out it would be nothing more than a mere succession of syllables.’’ We have said, that it was the practice of the Greeks and Romans to elevate or depress their voice upon one syllable of each word. In this elevation or depression consisted their accent; but the English accent consists in the mere stress of the voice, without any change of note. “Among the Greeks, all syllables were pronounced ei¬ ther in a high, low, or middle note ; or else in a union of the high and low by means of the intermediate. The middle note, which was exactly at an e-qual distance be¬ tween the high and the low, was that in which the un¬ accented syllables were pronounced. But every word had one letter, if a monosyllable ; or one syllable, if it consisted of more than one, distinguished from the rest; either by a note of the voice perceptibly higher than the middle note, which was called the acute accent; or by a note perceptibly, and in an equal proportion, lower than the middle one, which was called the grave accent; or by an union of the acute and grave on one syllable, which was done by the voice passing from the acute, through the middle note, in continuity down to the grave, which was called the circumjlex.'1'1 “ Now in pronouncing English words, it is true that one syllable is always distinguished from the rest; but it is not by any perceptible elevation or depression of the voice, any high or low note, that it is done, but merely by dwelling longer upon it, or by giving it a more forcible stroke. When the stress or accent is on the vowel, we dwell longer on that syllable than on the rest; as, in the words glory, father, holy. When it is on the consonant, the voice, passing rapidly over the vowel, gives a smarter stroke to the consonant, which distinguishes that syllable from others, as in the words bai’tie, hah'it, bar'row.'1’1 Having treated so largely of accent and quantity, the next thing to be considered in verse ivill be quickly discussed ; for in English it depends wholly on the seat of the accent. “ When the accent or stiess is on the vowel, the syllable is necessarily long, because the ac¬ cent cannot be made without dwelling on the vowel a longer time than usual. When it is on the consonant, the syllable is short; because the accent is made by pas¬ sing rapidly over the vowel, and giving a smart stroke of the voice to the following consonants. Thus the words ad'd, led', bid', cub', are all short, the voice pas¬ sing quickly over the vowel to the consonant; but for the contrary reason, the words dll, laid, bide, cube, are long ; the accent being on the vowels, on which the voice dwells some time before it takes in the sound of the consonant.” “ Obvious as this point is, it has wholly escaped the observation of many an ingenious and learned writer. Lord Karnes affirms*, that accenting is confined in * E/. of English heroic verse to the long syllables ; for a short OvY. vol ii» F 2 syllable 44 * Art of Heading, ■vol. ii. Versifica- syllable (says lie) is not capable of an accent: and Dr Forster, who ousrlit to have understood the nature ot 'the English accent better than his Lordship, asks, whe¬ ther we do not ‘ employ more time in uttering the first syllables of heavily, hastily, quickly, slowly; and 'the second in solicit, mistaking, researches, delusive, than in the others V To this question Mr Sheridan re¬ plies * that “ in some of these words we certainly do as the Doctor supposes •, in hastily, slowly, mistaking, delusive, for instance; where the accent being on the vowels renders their sound long •, but m all the others, heartily, quickly, solis'-it, re-sear'ches, where the accent is on the consonant, the syllables heart, quick, hsl, sert, are pronounced as rapidly as possible, and the vowels are all short. In the Scotch pronunciation (continues he) they would indeed be all reduced to an equal quan¬ tity, as thus; hai-vily, hdis-tily, queek-ly, slow-ly, so-lee-cit, resdir-ches, de-lu-sive. But here we see that the four short syllables are changed into four long ones of a different sound, occasioned by their placing the seat of the accent on the vowels instead of the consonants : thus instead of fiert they szy hdiv; for quick, queetc ; for Us, leece ; and for sert, sdir. . It appears, therefore, that the quantity of English syllables is adjusted by one easy and simple rule 5 which is, that when the seat of the accent is on a vowel, the syllable is long", when on a consonant, short 5 and that all unaccented syllables are short. Without a due ob¬ servation of quantity in reciting verses there will be no poetic numbers •, yet in composing English verses the poet need not pay the least attention to the quantity ot his syllables, as measure and movement tvill result trom the observation of other laws, which are now to be ex¬ plained. . „ ... It has been affirmed by a writer + of great authority among the critics, that in English heroic verse every line consists often syllables, five short and five long ; from which there are but two exceptions, both of them rare. The first is, where each line of a couplet is made eleven syllables, by an additional short syllable at the end. There heroes wit's are kep't in pond’rous v&ses, And beaus' in snuff-boxes and tweezer-cases. The other exception, he says, concerns the second line of a couplet, which is sometimes stretched out to twelve syllables, termed an Alexandrine line. A needless Alexandrine ends the song, That, like a wounded snake, drags its slow length along. After what has been just said, it is needless to stop for the purpose of pointing out the ingenious author’s mi¬ stake respecting long and short syllables. Every atten¬ tive reader of what has been already laid down, must perceive, that in the first line of the former couplet, though there are no fewer than six accented syllables when it is properly read, yet of these there are but three that are long, viz. those which have the accent on the vowel. Our business at present is, to show the falsity of the rule which restrains the heroic line to ten syllables 5 and this we shall do by producing lines of a greater number. tion. f hord Karnes. _ ^ Ar Part III. p o E T It Y. And the shrill sounds ran echoing through the trood. ^ This line, though it consists of eleven syllables, and has Z last of those accented, or, as Lord Karnes «ould say lonjr is yet undoubtedly a heroic verse ot very tine sound. Lhaps the advocates for the rule n,ay con- tend, that the vowel o in echoing ought to be struct out by an apostrophe; but as no one read s, And the shrill sounds ran ech’ing through the wood, it is surely very absurd to omit in writing what cannot be omitted in utterance. The two following lines have each eleven syllables, of which not one can be suppres¬ sed in recitation. Their glittering textures of the filmy dew. The great hierarchal standard was to move. Mr Sheridan quotes as a heroic line, O’er many a frozen, many a fiery Alp j and observes what a monstrous line it would appear, if pronounced, O’er man’ a frozen, man’ a fi’ry Alp, instead of that noble verse, which it certainly is, when all the thirteen syllables are distinctly uttered. He then produces a couplet, of which the former line has. fourteen, and the latter twelve syllables. And many an amorous, many a humorous lay, Which many a bard had chaunted many a day. That this is a couplet of very fine sound cannot be con¬ troverted } but wc doubt whether the numbers of it or of the other quoted line of thirteen syllables be truly he¬ roic. To our ears at least there appears a very percep¬ tible difference between the movement of these verses and that of the verses of Pope or Dryden ; and we think, that, though such couplets or single lines may, for the sake of variety or expression, be admitted into a heroic poem, yet a poem wholly composed of them would not be considered as heroic verse. It has a much greater resemblance to the verse of Spenser, which is now broke into two lines, of which the first has eight and the second six syllables. Nothing, however, seems to be more evident, from the other quoted instances, than that a heroic line is not confined to the syllables, and that it is not by the number of syllables that an English verse is to be measured. But if a heroic verse in our tongue be not composed, as in French, of a certain number of syllables, how is it formed ? We answer by feet, as was the hexameter line of the ancients; though between their feet and ours there is at the same time a great difference. The poetic feet of the Greeks and Romans are formed by quantity, those of the English by stress or accent. “ Though these terms are in continual use, and in the mouths of all who treat of poetic numbers, very confused and erro¬ neous ideas are sometimes annexed to them. Yet as the knowledge of the peculiar genius of our language with regard to poetic numbers and its cbaracteristical differ¬ ence from others in that respect, depends upon our hav¬ ing clear and precise notions of those terms, it will be necessary to have them fully explained. The general nature of them has been, already sufficiently laid open, and Partlll. POE YersiSca- anti \re have now only to make some observations on tioU* their particular efi’ects in the formation of metre. a ]\yf0 scholar is ignorant that quantity is a term which relates to the length or the shortness of syllables, and that a long syllable is double the length of a short one. Now the plain meaning of this is, that a long syllable takes up double the time in sounding that a short one does j a fact of which the ear alone can be the j.ulge. When a syllable in Latin ends with a consonant, and the subsequent syllable commences with one, every school-boy knows that the former is long, to use the technical term, by the law of position. This rule was in pronunciation strictly observed by the Romans, who always made such syllables long by dwelling on the vowels •, whereas the very reverse is the case with us, because a quite contrary rule takes place in English words so constructed, as the accent or stress of the voice is in such cases always transferred to the consonant, and the preceding vowel being rapidly passed over, that syllable is of course short. “ The Romans had another rule of prosody, that when one syllable ending with a vowel, was followed by another beginning with a vowel, the former syllable was pronounced short 5 whereas in English there is ge¬ nerally an accent in that case on the former syllable, as in the word pious, which renders the syllable long. Pronouncing Latin therefore by our own rule, as in the former case, we make those syllables short which were sounded long by them ; so in the latter we make those syllables long which with them were short. We say ar'mu and virum'que, instead of arma and virumque ; scio and tuus, instead of sew and tuns'. “ Having made these preliminary observations, we proceed now to explain the nature of poetic feet. Feet in verse correspond to bars in music : a certain number of syllables connected form a foot in the one, as a cer¬ tain number of notes make a bar in the other. They are called feet, because it is by their aid that the voice as it were steps along through the verse in a measured pace j and it is necessary that the syllables which mark, this regular movement of the voice should in some measure be distinguished from the others. This di¬ stinction, as we have already observed, was made among the ancient Romans, by dividing their syllables into long and short, and ascertaining their quantity by an exact proportion of time in sounding them; the long being to the short as two to one; and the long syllables, being thus the more important, marked the movement of the verse. In English, syllables are divided into accented and unaccented ; and the accented syllables being as strongly distinguished from the unaccented, by the pe¬ culiar stress of the voice upon them, are as capable of marking the movement, and pointing out the regular T It Y. 45 paces of the voice, as the long syllables were by their Yerufioa- quantity among the Romans. Hence it follows, that tlon- our accented syllables corresponding to their long ones,—v——J and our unaccented to their short, in the structure of poetic feet, an accented syllable followed by one unac¬ cented in the same foot will answer to their trochee ; and preceded by an unaccented one, to their iambus ; and so with the rest. “ All feet used in poetry consist either of two or three syllables 5 and the feet among the ancients were denominated from the number and quantity of their syllables. The measure of quantity was the short syllable, and the long one in time was equal to two short. A foot could not consist of less than two times, because it must contain at least two syllables j and by a law re¬ specting numbers, which is explained elsewhere (see Music), a poetic foot would admit of no more than four of those times. Consequently the poetic feet were necessarily reduced to eight j four of tivo syllables, and four of three. Those of two syllables must either con¬ sist of two short, called a pyrrhic ; two long, called a spondee ; a long and a short, called a trochee ; or a short and a long, called an iambus. Those of three syllables were, either three short, a tribrach ; a long and two short, a dactyl; a short, long, and short, an amphibrach ; or two short and a long, an anapaest (y). We are now sufficiently prepared for considering what feet enter into the composition of an English heroic verse. The Greeks and Romans made use of but two feet iu the structure of their hexameters j and the English he¬ roic may be wholly composed of one foot, viz. the iam¬ bic, which is therefore the foot most congenial to that species of verse. Onr poetry indeed abounds with verses into which no other foot is admitted. Such as, The pow’rs | gave ear and granjted half | his prayV, The rest' | the winds [ dispers’d J in emp'|ty Sir. Our heroic line, however, is not wholly restrained to the use of this foot. In the opinion of Mr Sheridan, it ad¬ mits all the eight before enumerated 5 and it certainly excludes none, unless perhaps the tribrach. It is known to every reader of English poetry, that some of the finest heroic verses in our language begin with a trochee; and that Pope, the smoothest of all our versifiers, was remarkable for his use of this foot, as is evident from the following example, where four succeeding lines out of six have a trochaic beginning, Her lively looks a sprightly mind disclose, Quick as | her eyes | and as unfix’d as those: Favours | to none j to all she smiles extends, O'ft she j rejects J but never once offends. Bright as ] the sun | her eyes the gazers strike, And like the sun she shines on all alike. The (y) For the convenience of the less learned reader we shall here subjoin a scheme of poetic feet, using the marks (- o ) in use among the Latin grammarians to denote the genuine feet by quantity ; and the following marks (' « ) to denote the English feet by accents, which answer to those. Roman English Trochee — o r o Iambus o ■* o' Spondee — — ' ' Pyrrhic 00 00 Roman Dactyl -00 Amphibrach o — w Anapaest o « — Tribrach 000 • English r o o 00 ; a « 0 POE \emfica- The use of this foot, however ^s "“eSSf“ J tiou. filled to the beginning «f ^ ‘”e- 0?whiI V—' introduces it into other parts ot the vei , take the following instances : That all I was lost' | hack' to | the thick'|et slunk— Of E've I whose ey'e | dirted conta|g.ous fire. The last line of the following couplet begins with a pyrrhic : She said, | and mel ting as in tears she lay, . In a | soft siljver stream dissolv’d away. But this foot is introduced likewise with very good ef- feet into other parts of the verse, as Pant on { thy lip' | and to J thy heart | be prest. The phantom flies me | as unjkind as you. Leaps o’er the fence with ease | into | the fold. A.nd the | shrill' sounds | ran echoing through the wood. In this last line we see that the first foot is a pyrrMc^ and the second a spondee; but m the next feet are spondees. Hill's peep | o’er hill's \ and Alps j on Alps | arise. In the following verse a trochee is succeeded by two spon¬ dees, of which the former is a genuine spondee by quan¬ tity, and the latter equivalent to a spondee by accent. See the j bold yoilth | strain up' | the threatening steep. We shall now give some instances of lines containing both the pyrrhic and the spondee, and then proceec the consideration of the other four ieet. That on I weak wings | from far pursues your flight. Thro’ tl J | fair scene | roll slow | the hng’rmg streams. On her \ white breast' | a sparkling cross she wore. Of the four trisyllabic feet, the first, of which we shall give instances in heroic lines, is the dactyl; as " Mur'mnring, | and with | him' fled] the shades) of night. Hov'ering | on wing | un'der | the cape | of hell. Tim'orous | and slothful yet he pleas d the ear. Of truth | in word | mightier \ than they | m arms. Of the anapeest a single instance shall suffice *, for ex¬ cept by Milton it is not often used. The great | hierarjchal standard was to move. The amphibrach is employed in the four following ver¬ ses, and in the three last with a very fine ellect. . With wheels | yet hoverjing o’er the ocean brim. Kous’d from their slumber on | that hejry | couch. While the J promis'cu'ous crowd stood yet aloof. Throws his steep flight \ in many | an ai|ry whirl. Having thus sufficiently proved that the English heroic verse admits of all the feet except the tribrach, it may he proper to add, that from the nature of our accent we have duplicates of these feet, viz. such as are formed by quantity, and such as are formed by the mere ot the voice; an opulence peculiar to our tongue, and which may be the source of a boundless variety. But as feet formed of syllables which have the accent or ictus on the conson¬ ant are necessarily pronounced in less time than similar feet formed by quantity, it may be objected, that the TRY- . , f measure of a whole line, constructed in the former man¬ ner must be shorter than that of another line construct¬ ed iu the latter •, and that the intermixture of verses of such different measures in the same poem must have a bad effect on the melody, as being destructive of propor¬ tion. This objection would be well-founded, weie not the time of the short accented syllables compensated by a small pause at the end of each word to which they , - long, as is evident in the following verse : Then rus'ltling crackling crashjing thunder down. This line is formed of iambics by accent upon conso¬ nants, except the last syllable 5 and yet jy means o these soft pauses or rests, the measure of the uhole is equal to that of the following, which consists of pure iambics by quantity. O’er heaps ! of r5|in strik’d \ the state|ly hind. Part III. Movement, of so much importance in versification, re¬ gards the order of syllables in a foot, measure their quan¬ tity. The order of syllables respects their progress from short to long or from long to short, as in the Greek ami Latin languages 5 or from strong to weak or weak to strong, i. e. from accented or unaccented syllables, as in our tongue. It has been already observed, that an Eng¬ lish heroic verse may he composed wholly of iambics ; and experience shows that such verses have a fine me¬ lody. But as the stress of the voice in repeating verses of pure iambics, is regularly on every second syllable, such uniformity would disgust the ear in any ong suc¬ cession, and therefore such changes were sought fox as might introduce the pleasure of variety without preju¬ dice to melody 5 or which might even contribute to its improvement. Of this nature was the introduction ot the trochee to form the first foot of an heroic verse, which experience has shown us is so far from spoiling the melody, that in many cases it heightens it. x lns foot, however, cannot well he admitted into any other part of the verse without prejudice to the melody, be¬ cause it interrupts and stops the usual movement by an¬ other directly opposite. But though it be excluded with regard to pure melody, it may often be admitted into any part of the verse with advantage to expression, as is well known to the readers of Milton. “ The next change admitted for the sake of variety, without prejudice to melody, is the intermixture of pyrrhics and spondees in which two impressions m tht one foot make up for the want ot one in the other •, and two long syllables compensate two short, so as to make the sum of the quantity of the two feet equal to two iambics. That this may be done without prejudice to the melody, take the following instances : On her | white breast | a sparkling cross she wore.— Nor the | deep tract | of hell—say first what cause.— This intermixture may be employed ad libitum, in any part of the line \ and sometimes two spondees may be placed together in one part of the verse, to he compen¬ sated by two pyrrhics in another •, of which Mr Sheri¬ dan quotes the following lines as instances: Stood rul’d | sto5d vast | infinjitude j confined. She all j night long | her amojious desjeant sung. That the former is a proper example, will not perhaps be questioned $ but the third foot in the latter is certain- ' f ijjt&i'i mm PartHI. POE Versiiica- ly no pyrrhic. As it is marked here and by him, it is tion. a tribrach ; hut ive appeal to our English readers, if it “v 1 ought not to have been marked an amphibrach by ac¬ cent, and if the fourth foot be not an iambus. To us the feet of the line appear to be as follow : She all j night long her am'ojrous des'cant sun'g. It is indeed a better example of the proper use of the amphibrach than any which he has given, unless per- !haps the two following lines. Up to ] the fiejry conjc&ve tow'erjing high Throws his | steep flight j in man'y | an ai|ry whirl. That in these three lines the introduction of the amphi¬ brach does not hurt the melody, will be acknowledged by every person who has an ear j and those who have not, are not qualified to judge. But ive appeal to every man of taste, if the two amphibrachs succeeding each other in the last line do not add much to the expression of the verse. If this be questioned, we have only to change the movement to the common iambic, and we shall discover how feeble the line will become. Throws his | steep flight j in man|y airy whirls. This is simple description, instead of that magical power, of numbers which to the imagination produces the ob¬ ject itself, whirling as it were round an axis. Having thus shown that the iambus, spondee, pyr¬ rhic, and amphibrach, by accent, may be used in our measure with great latitude; and that the trochee may, at all times begin the line, and in some cases with ad¬ vantage to the melody j it now remains only to add, that the dactyl, having the same movement, may be in¬ troduced in the place of the trochee; and the anapaest in the place of the iambus. In proof of this, were not the article swelling in our hands, we could adduce many instances which would show what an inexhaustible fund of riches, and what an immense variety of materials, are prepared for us, “ to build the lofty rhyme.” But we hasten to the next thing to be considered in the art of versifying, which is known by the name of pauses. “ Of the poetic pauses there are two sorts, the ce- sural and the final. The cesural divides the verse into equal or unequal parts ; the final closes it. In a verse there may be two or more cesural pauses, but it is evi¬ dent that there can be but one final. As the final pause concerns the reader more than the writer of verses, it has been seldom treated of by the critics, li et as it is this final pause which in many cases distinguishes verse from prose, it cannot be improper in the present article to show how it ought to be made. Were it indeed a law of our versification, that every line should terminate with a stop in the sense, the boundaries of the measure would be fixed, and the nature of the final pause could not be mistaken. But nothing has puzzled the bulk of readers, or divided their opinions, more than the manner in which those verses ought to be recited, w here the sense does not close with the line j and whose last words have a necessary connection with those that begin the subsequent verse. “ Some (says Mr Sheridan) wrho see the necessity of pointing out the metre, pronounce the last word of each line in such a note as usually accom¬ panies a comma, in marking the smallest member of a sentence. Now this is certainly improper, because it makes that appear to be a complete member of a sen? TRY. 4.7 tence which is an incomplete one ; and by disjoining Versifica- the sense as well as the words, often confounds the ti011- meaning. Others again, but these fewer in number, v~r" ’ and of the more absurd kind, drop their voice at the end of every line in the same note which they use in. marking a full stop; to the utter annihilation of the. sense. Some readers (continues our author) of a more enthusiastic kind, elevate their voices at the end of all verses to a higher note than is ever used in the stops which divide the meaning. But such a continued re¬ petition of the same high note becomes disgusting by its- monotony, and gives an air of chanting to such recita¬ tion. To avoid these several faults, the bulk of readers have chosen what they think a safer course, which is that of running the lines one into another without the least pause, where they find none in the sense j but by this^ mode of recitation they reduce poetry to something worse than prose, to verse run mad. But it may be asked, if this final pause must be mark¬ ed neither by an elevation nor by a depression of the voice, how is it to be marked at all ? To which Mr Sheridan replies, by making no change whatever in the. voice before it. This w'ill sufficiently distinguish it from the other pauses, the comma, semicolon, &c. because some change of note, by raising or depressing the voice, always precedes them, whilst the voice is here only sus¬ pended. Now this pause of suspension is the very thing want¬ ing to preserve the melody at all times, without inter¬ fering with the sense. For it perfectly marks the bound of the metre : and being made only by a suspension, not by a change of note in the voice, it can never affect the sense j because the sentential stops, or those which affect the sense, being all made with a change of note, where there is no such change the sense cannot be affected. Nor is this the only advantage-gained to numbers by this stop of suspension. It also prevents the monotony at the end of lines; which, however pleasing to a rude, is disgusting to a delicate ear. For as this stop has no peculiar note of its own, but always takes that which belongs to the preceding word, it changes continually with the matter, and is as various as-the sense. PXaving said all that is necessary with regard to the final, wTe proceed now to consider the cesural, pause. To these two pauses it will be proper to give the denomi¬ nation of musical, to distinguish them from the comma, semicolon, colon, and full stop, which may be called sen¬ tential pauses; the office of the former being to mark the melody, as that of the latter is to point out the sense. The cesural, like the final pause, sometimes co¬ incides with the sentential j and sometimes takes place w here there is no stop in the sense. In this last case, it is exactly of the same nature, and governed by the same laws with the pause of suspension, which wTe have just described. The cesure, though not essential, is however a great ornament to verse, as it improves and diversifies the melody, by a judicious management in varying its situ¬ ation 5 but it discharges a still more important office than this. Were there no cesure, verse could aspire to no higher ornament than that of simple melody ; but by means of this pause there is a new source of delight opened in poetic numbers, correspondent in some sort to harmony in music. This takes its rise from that act of the mind which compares the relative proportions that! 48 P O E _r that the memhcrs of a verse thus divided bear to each ^ etl-S1?C other as well as to those in the adjoining lines. In or- der to see tins matter in a clear light, let us examine what efleet the cesure produces in single lines, an afterwards in comparing contiguous lines with eacii ^With regard to the place of the cesure, Mr Pope and others have expressly declared, that no line appeared musical to their ears, where the cesure was not alter the fourth, fifth, or sixth syllable of the verse, borne have enlarged its empire to the third and seventh y lables • whilst others have asserted that it may be ad¬ mitted into any part ol the line. “ There needs but a little distinguishing (says Mr Sheridan), to reconcile these different opinions. It me¬ lody alone is to be considered, Mr Pope is in the right when he fixes its seat in or as near i,e to t.lie middle of the verse. To form lines o the first melody, the cesure must either he at the end of the second or of the third foot, or in the middle of the third between the two. Of this movement take the following exam¬ ples : 1. Of the cesure at the end of the second foot. Our plenteous streams ]] a various race supply ", The bright-ey’d per'ch || with fins of Tyrian dye j The silver ee*l || in shining volumes roll’d ; The yellow carp' !| in scales bedrop’d with gold. 2. At the end of the third foot. With tender billet-doux || he lights the pyre, And breathes three amorous sighs || to raise the fare. 3. Between the two, dividing the third foot. The fields are ravish’d || from the industrious swains, Prom men their cities, || and from gods their fanes. These lines are certainly all of a fine melody, yet they are not quite upon an equality in that respect. 1 hose which have the cesure in the middle are of the first or¬ der ; those which have it at the end of the second foot are next; and those which have the pause at the end ot the third foot the last. The reason of this preference it may not perhaps be difficult to assign. In the pleasure arising from comparing the proportion which the parts of a whole bear to each other, the more easily and distinctly the mind perceives that proportion, the greater is the pleasure. Now there is nothing which the mind more instantaneously and clearly discerns, than the division of a whole into two equal parts, which alone would give a superiority to lines of the first order over those of the other two. But this is not the only claim to superiority which such lines possess. The cesure be- iim in them always on an unaccented, and the final pause on an accented syllable, they have a mixture of variety and equality of which neither of the other orders can boast, as in these orders the cesural and final pauses are both on accented syllables. In the division of the other two species, if we respect quantity only, the proportion is exactly the same, the one being as two to three, and the other as three to two 5 but it is the order or movement which here makes the difference. In lines where the cesure bounds the second foot, tht smaller portion of the verse is first in order, the greater last; and this order is reversed in lines which pave the cesure at the end of the third foot. Now, as try. , the latter part of the verse leaves the strongest anJ most Ver.ilic,. last „ t impression on the ear, where the larger portton belongs to the latter part of the limb th- tmpress.onV—' must h, proportion be greater; the eflect in sound be- the same as that produced by a chmax ,n sense, where one part rises above another. Having shown in what manner the cesure improve and diversifies the melody of verse we shall now treat of its more important office, by which it is the chief source of harmony in numbers. But, first, it will b necessary to explain what we mean by the term /iar- monu, as applied to verse. „ . , , Mdody in music regards only the effects produced by successive sounds *, and harmony, strictly speaking, the effects produced by different co-existing sounds which are found to be in concord. Harmony, therefore, m this sense of the word, can never be applied to poetic numbers, of which there can be only one reciter, and consequently the sounds can only be in succession. YV hen therefore we speak of the harmony of verse, we mean nothing more than an effect produced by an action ot the mind in comparing the different members of verse already constructed according to the laws of melody with each other, and perceiving a due and beautiful proportion between them. P r u The first and lowest perception of this kind ot har¬ mony arises from comparing two members of the sam* fine with each other, divided in the manner to be seen in the three instances already given; because the beauty of proportion in the members, according to each ot these divisions, is founded in nature. But there is a percep¬ tion of harmony in versification, which arises from the comparison of two lines, and observing the relative pro¬ portion of their members ; whether they correspond ex¬ actly to each other by similar divisions, as in the couplets . already quoted ; or whether they are diversified by ce- sures in different places. As, See the bold youth || strain up the threatening steep. Rush thro’ the thickets |j down the valleys sweep. Where we find the cesure at the end of the second foot of the first line, and in the middle of the third foot of the last. Hang o’er their coursers heads |j with eager speed, And earth rolls back j| beneath the flying steed. Here the cesure is at the end of the third foot in the former, and of the second in the latter line --The perception of this species of harmony is far superior to the former; because, to the pleasure ol comparing the members of the same line with each other, there is su- peradded that of comparing the different members of the different lines with each other; and the harmony is enriched by having four members of comparison instead of two. The pleasure is still increased in comparing a greater number of lines, and observing the relative pro¬ portion of the couplets to each other in point of simila¬ rity and diversity. As thus, Thy forests, Windsor, || and thy green retreats, At once the monarch’s || and the muse’s seats, Invite my lays. || Be present sylvan maids, Unlock your springs || and open all your shades. Here we find that the cesure is in the middle of the verse in each line of the first couplet, and at the end of the Part III. POE Versifica- the second foot in each line of the last; which gives a tion. similarity in each couplet distinctly considered, and a '''' ^ L_' diversity when the one is compared with the other, that has a very pleasing effect. Nor is the pleasure less where we find a diversity in the lines of each couplet, and a similarity in comparing the couplets themselves. As in these, Not half so swift || the trembling doves can fly, When the fierce eagle || cleaves the liquid sky j Not half so swiftly || the fierce eagle moves, When thro’ the clouds || he drives the trembling doves. There is another mode of dividing lines well suited to the nature of the couplet, by introducing semipauses, which with the cesure divide the line into four portions. By a semipause, we mean a small rest of the voice, dur¬ ing a portion of time equal to half of that taken up by the cesure j as will be perceived in the following fine couplet: Warms | in the sun || refreshes | in the breeze, Glows | in the stars || and blossoms | in the trees. That the harmony, and of course the pleasure, result¬ ing from poetic numbers, is increased as well by the se- mipause as by the cesure, is obvious to every ear j be¬ cause lines so constructed furnish a greater number of members for comparison : but it is of more importance to observe, that by means of the semipauses, lines which, separately considered, are not of the finest harmony, may yet produce it when opposed to each other, and compared in the couplet. Of the truth of this observa¬ tion, the following couplet, especially as it succeeds that immediately quoted, is a striking proof: Lives | thro’ all life || extends | thro’ all extent, Spreads | undivided || operates | unspent. What we have advanced upon this species of vei’se, will contribute to solve a poetical problem thrown out by Dryden as a crux to his brethren : it was to account for the peculiar beauty of that celebrated couplet in Sir P O G p0„ge POGGE, the Mailed or Armed Gurnard, or |j Cottus Cataphractus. See Cottus, Ichthyolo- Poggy gy, p. 89. is^U^’ ■ POGGIUS Bracciolinus, a man of great parts and learning, who contributed much to the revival of knowledge in Europe, ivas born at Terranuova, in the territories of Florence, in 1380. His first public em¬ ployment was that of writer of the apostolic letters, which he held 10 years, and was then made apostolic secretary, in which capacity he officiated 40 years, un¬ der seven popes. In 1453, when he was 72 years of age, he accepted the employment of secretary to the re¬ public of Florence, to which place he removed, and died in I459- He visited several countries, and searched many monasteries, to recover ancient authors, numbers of which he brought to light: his own works consist of moral pieces, orations, letters, and A History of Flo¬ rence from 1350 1455, which is the most consider¬ able of them. POGGY islands, otherwise called Nassau islands, Vol. XVII. Part I. f T K Y. 49 John Denham’s Cooper's Hill, where he thus describes Versifica- the Thames: tion. Tho’ deep | yet clear | tho’ gentle J yet not dull. Strong | without rage | without o’erflowing | full. This description has great merit independent of the harmony of the numbers j but the chief beauty of the versification lies in the happy disposition of the pauses and semipauses, so as to make a fine harmony in each line when its portions are compared, and in the couplet when one line is compared with the other. Having now said all that is necessary upon pauses and semipauses, we have done the utmost justice to our sub¬ ject which the limits assigned us will permit. Feet and pauses are the constituent parts of verse; and the proper adjustment of them depends upon the poet’s knowledge of numbers, accent, quantity, and movement, all of which we have endeavoured briefly to explain. In con¬ formity to the practice of some critics, we might have treated separately of rhime and of blank verse ; but as the essentials of all heroic verses are the same, such a division of our subject would have thrown no light upon the art of English versification. It may be just worth while to observe, that the pause at the end of a couplet ought to coincide, if possible, with a slight pause in the sense, and that there is no necessity for this coin¬ cidence of pauses at the end of any particular blank verse. We might likewise compare our heroic line with the ancient hexameter, and endeavour to appretiate their respective merits ; but there is not a reader capable of attending to such a comparison who will not judge for himself; and it may perhaps be questioned, whether there be two ivho will form precisely the same judge¬ ment. Mr Sheridan, and all the mere English critics, give a high degree of preference to our heroic, on ac¬ count of the vast variety of feet which it admits : whilst the readers of Greek and Latin poetry prefer the hexa¬ meter, on account of its more musical notes and ma¬ jestic length. P O G form part of a chain of islands which stretch along the whole length of Sumatra, in the East Indies, and lie at the distance of twenty or thirty leagues from the west coast of that island. The northern extremity of the northern Foggy lies in latitude 2° 18' S. and the southern extremity of the southern island in latitude 30 16' S. The two are sepa¬ rated from each other by a very narrow passage called the strait of See Cockup, in latitude 30 40' S. and lon¬ gitude about ioo° 38' east from Greenwich.—The number of inhabitants in these islands amounts to no more than 1400. Mr Crisp, who staid about a month among them, carefully collected many particulars re¬ specting their language, customs, and manners. He ad¬ verts to one circumstance relative to this people, which may be considered as a curious fact in history : “ From the proximity of the islands (says he), to Su¬ matra, which, in respect to them, may be considered as a continent, we should naturally expect to find their in¬ habitants to be a set of people originally derived from G 1 the Peggy islands. Pogsy islands. the Sumatra stoclT and look for some affinity In their ances in the entra.ls of the oietrm. ent and whose customs and habits of life indicate a verv distinct origin, and bear a striking resemb ance to those of the inhabitants of the late discovered islands in ,l1 tC'u s“fe rXgfor ships of any size in the straits whlh hVve no other defect as a harbour than t e depth nf the water (2C fathoms close in shore). I he tace ot 1 conn.rv, and its vegetable and an.mal productrons, are described in the following words : . “ The mountains are covered with trees to * |eir bI™' mits among which are found species of excellent tin - nuts, amo g Mdavi;. hmtaneoor. and C' the^ree^11*called by the Malays, MtUrngtor, ami thi’h in the hither India, is called po/won, abounds here *Of this tree are made masts, and some au ou of^fficient dimensions for the lower mast o a " Ship of war. During my stay here I did not d^er single plant which we have not on Sumatia. 1 he • g trees grows in plenty, and constitutes the chief ai tide of food to the inhabitants, who do not cultivate rice , the cocoa-nut tree and the bamboo two most use ul plants, are found here in great plenty. They have a variety of fruits, com“»n ‘a ‘hese chma es s„ But they have no ances in the entrails °[ “,c . ir to have form of re igious worship, nor uo y jt'F the most distant idea of a future state ot rewards and punishments. They do not practise circumcision. ^"etame by which the inhabitants of the Philippine islands distinguish their quail, uhmh hc«|h smaller than ours, is in every other respect very ike it. POICT1ERS, an ancient, large, and considerable town of France, capital of the department of Bienne It was a bishop’s see, and contained four abbeys, a mint an university famous for law, 22 parishes, 9 conven for men and 12 nunneries. There are here several Roman ’antiquities, and particularly an amphitheatre, but partly demolished, and hid by the houses Ihere is also a tnumphal arch, which serves as a gate to the reut street. It is not peopled in proportion to its ex- St Near this place Edward the Black Prince gamed a decisive victory over the French, taking King John and his son Philip prisoners m 1356, ^oni he after¬ wards brought over into England, bee E.-ance^ N ;!, &c _It is seated on a hill, on the river Clam, 52 miles south-west of Tours, and 120 north by east ot Bour- deaux. E. Long. O. 25. N. Eat. 46. 35. POICTOU, a province of ! ranee, lying south of the * 1 .1! +1.^ w.-occnt rlpnartmentS OI Foggy islands 11 Point. S of S com,non0in tlmse ciima.ee, S»ch ns ^e‘^^d^the present departments of mangosteens, pine-apples, plantains, baa/, chapah &.C. I. ^ J Sevres and Vienne. The principal r.veis 0 kU..-‘ state, are impervious to Vendee, Lieu Gartenme, and mangosteens,pine-app,., ^ . . n e‘vious to The woods, in their present state, are 11 F man * the species of wild animals which inhabit them are but few*, the large red deer, some hogs, and several kinds of monkeys are to be found here, but neither buf¬ faloes nor goats-, nor are these forests infested like those of Sumatra, with tigers or any other beast of prey Of domestic poultry, there is only the common fow , Avhich probably has been originally brought from Si.... tra but pork and fish constitute the favourite animal food of the natives. Fish are found here in consider. ^TJm^lturff^inhabitants of these islands seldom exceeds five feet and a half-, their colour is like that of the Malays j they practise tattooing, and file their teeth to a pointf-, and though of a mild disposition, hey have some1 of the filthy customs of savages, particularly that of picking vermin from their heads and eating them. Their mode of tattooing, as well as the treatment of their dead, is represented to be very similar to the prac- tic6S of tli6 Otaheitans. • \ 'i. “ The religion of this people, (says can be said that they have any, may tru y be called t ic religion of nature. A belief of the existence of some Jjoire, anu compiein-umug r . Vendee, Deux Sevres and Vienne. 1 he principal rivets are the Vienne, the Deux Sevres, the Gartempe, and tbe l av It is divided into the Upper and Lower j and is fertile in corn and wine, and feeds a great num¬ ber of cattle, particularly mules. It was m possession of the kings of England tor a considerable time, till it was lost by the unfortunate Henry A I. I oictieis is the capital town. Colic of PoiCTOU. See MEDICINE, N 303. POINCIANA, Barbadoes Flower fence ; a genus of plants belonging to the decandna class ; an in the natural method ranking under the 33d order, Ao- mentacece. See Botany Index.—this genus there is only one species, the pulchernma which is a nati e of both Indies, and grows to the height of 10 or 12 feet, producing flowers of a very agreeable odour In Barbadoes it is planted in hedges to divide the land., whence it has the name of Jlower-fence. In the M est Indies, its leaves are made use of as a purgative insteai of senna -, and in Jamaica it is called senna. POINT, a term used in various arts. Point, in Grammar, a character used to mark the divisions of discourse. See Comma, COLON, &c. . religion of nature A *1“^ Twllt we otherwise kll a full s,«p or -nnwers more thfin liurns-n cannot laiL ^ o # o l^nvcTn atton# the most uncultivated of mankind, from the o seTyations in Gc(mctr]h according to Euclid, is that .roi-imis striking natural phenomena, such .... , • i i nm- mncrnitude. the most uncuitivaieu Oi ..— of various striking natural phenomena, such as the d i nal revolution of the sun and moon ; thunder and lig - ning-, earthquakes, &e. &c.: nor will here ever be wanting among them some, of superior talents and cun¬ ning, who will acquire an influence over weak minds, by assuming to themselves an interest with, or a power of controuling those super-human agents -, and such no¬ tions constitute the religion of the inhabitants of the Poggys. Sometimes a fowl, and sometimes a hog, is sacrificed to avert sickness, to appease the wrath ol the offended power, or to render it propitious to some pro- iected enterprise -, and Mr Best was mlormed that omens of good or ill fortune were drawn from certain appear- rioa. Dee x uxciuAiiv/n. _ . , Point, in Geometry, according to Euclid, is that which has neither parts nor magnitude. _ Point, in Music, a mark or note anciently used to distinguish the tones or sounds ; hence we still call it simple counter-point, when a note of the lower part an¬ swers exactly to that of an upper; zm\ figurative coun¬ ter point, when any note is syncopated, and one ol the parts makes several notes or inflexions of the voice, while the other holds on one. We still use a point, to raise the value of a note, and prolong its time by one half, e. g. a point added to a semibreve, instead of two minims, makes it equal to three ; and so of the other notes. See the article Time.. Point Points. P O I [ 5i ] tern) applied to certain PgIn'T, in Astronomy, a points or places marked in the heavens, and distin¬ guished by proper epithets. The four grand points or divisions of the horizon, viz. the east, west, north, and south, are called the car¬ dinal points. The zenith and nadir are the vertical points ; the points wherein the orbits of the planets cut the plane ot the ecliptic are called the nodes: the points wherein the equator and ecliptic intersect are called the equinoctial points: particularly, that whence the sun ascends towards the north pole, is called the vernal point; and that by which he descends to the south pole, the autumnal point. The points of the ecliptic, where the sun’s ascent above the equator, and descent below it, terminate, are called the solstitial points; particularly the former of them, the estival or summer point ; the latter, the brumal or winter point. Point is also used for a cape or headland jutting out into the sea : thus seamen say, two points of land are in one another, when they are so in a right line, against each other, as that the innermost is hindered from be¬ ing seen by the outermost. Point, in Perspective, is used for various poles or places, with regard to the perspective plane. See Per- SPECTIVE. Point is also an iron or steel instrument, used with some variety in several arts. Engravers, etchers, cut¬ ters in wood, &c. use points to trace their designs on the copper, wood, stone, &c. See the articles Engra¬ ving, &c. Point, in the Manufactories, is a general term, used for all kinds of laces wrought with the needle j such are the point de Venice, point de France, point de Genoa, &c. which are distinguished by the particular economy and arrangement of their points.—Point is sometimes used for lace woven with bobbins ; as English point, point de Malines, point d’Havre, &.c. Point, in Poetry, denotes a lively brisk turn or con¬ ceit, usually found or expected at the close of an epi¬ gram. See Poetry, N° 169. PoiNT-Blank, in Gunnery, denotes the shot of a gun levelled horizontally, without either mounting or sink¬ ing the muzzle of the piece.—In shooting point-blank, the shot or bullet is supposed to go directly forward in a straight line to the mark; and not to move in a curve, as bombs and highly elevated random-shots do.— W hen a piece stands upon a level plane, and is laid level, the distance between the piece and the point where the shot touches the ground first, is called the point-blank range of that piece ; but as the same piece ranges more or less, according to a greater or less charge, the point blank range is taken from that of a piece loaded with such a charge as is used commonly in action. It is therefore necessary that these ranges of all pieces should be known, since the gunner judges from thence what elevation he is to give to his piece when he is either farther from or nearer to the object to be fired at; and this he can do pretty nearly bv sight, after considerable practice. POINTING, in Grammar, the art of dividing a dis¬ course by points, into periods and members of periods, in order to show the proper pauses to be made in read¬ ing, and to facilitate the pronunciation anti understand¬ ing thereof. See the article PUNCTUATION. POINTS, ix\ Heraldry, are the several different parts P O I of an escutcheon, denoting the local positions of any fi¬ gure. See Heraldry. Points, Poison Points, in Electricity, are those acute terminations '■ of bodies which facilitate the passage of the electrical fluid from or to such bodies. See Electricity. Points, or Vowel Points, in the Hebrew language. See Philology, Sect. 1. N° 31, &c. POISON, is any substance which proves destructive to the life of animals in a small quantity, either taken by the mouth, mixed with the blood, or applied to the nerves. See Medicine, N° 261, 269, 303, 322, 408, &c. &c. Of poisons there are many different kinds, which are exceedingly various in their operations. The mineral poisons, as arsenic and corrosive mercury, seem to at¬ tack the solid parts of the stomach, and to produce death by eroding its substance : the antimonial seem rather to attack the nerves, and to kill by throwing the whole system, into convulsions; and in this manner also most of the vegetable poisons seem to operate. All of these, however, seem to be inferior in strength to the poisons of some of the more deadly kinds of serpents, which operate so suddenly that the animal bit by them will be dead before another that had swallowed arsenic would be affected. Much has been written concerning a poison made use of by the African negroes, by the Americans, and by the East Indians. To this very strange effects have been ascribed. It has been said, that by this poison, a man might be killed at any certain time ; as, for in¬ stance, after the interval of a day, a wreek, a month, a year, or even several years. These wonderful effects, however, do not seem worthy of credit; as the Abbe Fontana has given a particular account of an American poison called ticunas, which in all probability is the same with that used in Africa and the East Indies ; and from his account it is extremely improbable that any such effects could be produced with certainty. With this poison the Abbe was furnished by Hr He- berden. It was closed and sealed up in an earthen pot inclosed in a tin-case. Within the tin-case was a note containing the following words: “ Indian poison, brought from the banks of the river of the Amazons by Hon Pedro Maldonado. It is one of the sorts mentioned in the Philosophical Transactions, vol. xlvii. N° 1 2.” In the volume of the Philosophical Transactions here quoted, mention is made of two poisons little different in their activity ; the one called the poison of lamas, and the other of ticunas. The poison in the earthen ves¬ sel used by the Abbe Fontana was that of the ticunas; he was also furnished with a number of American ar¬ rows dipped in poison, but whether that of the lamas or ticunas he could not tell. Our author begins his account of the nature of this poison with detecting some of the mistakes which had been propagated concerning it.—It bad been asserted, that the ticunas poison proves noxious by the mere ef¬ fluvia, but much more by the steam which exhales from it in boiling or burning : that, among the Indians, it is prepared only by women condemned to die ; and that the mark of its being sufficiently prepared, is when the attendant is killed by its steam. All these assertions are by the Abbe refuted in the clearest manner. He ex¬ posed a young pigeon to the smell of the poison when the vessel was opened, to the steam of it when boiling, G ? and P O I [52 Poison. ani? ^ie vaPour °f it when burning to the sides of the _—v-~—) vessel, without the animal’s being the least injured j on which, concluding that the vapours of this poison were not to be dreaded, he exposed himself to them without any fear. This poison dissolves very readily even in cold water, and likewise in the vegetable and mineral acids. With oil of vitriol it becomes as black as ink, but not with the rest of the acids. In oil of vitriol it also dissolves more slowly than in any of the rest. It does not effervesce with acids or alkalies; neither does it alter milk, nor tinge it, except with the natural colour of the poison ; nor does it tinge the vegetable juices either red or green. When examined by the microscope, there is no appear¬ ance of regularity or crystallization ; but it for the most part appears made up of very small, irregular, roundish bodies, like vegetable juices. It dries without making any noise, and has an extremely bitter taste when put upon the tongue. The ticunas poison is harmless when put into the eyes ; nor is it fatal when taken by the mouth, unless the quan¬ tity is considerable. Six grains of the solid poison, dis¬ solved in water, killed a young pigeon which drank it in less than 20 minutes. Five grains killed a small Gui¬ nea-pig in 25 minutes. Eight grains killed a rabbit in an hour and eight minutes, &c. In those experiments it was observed, that much less poison was required to kill an animal whose stomach was empty than one that had a full stomach. Three rabbits and two pigeons were killed in less than 35 minutes, by taking a dose of three grains each on an empty stomach; but when the expe¬ riment was repeated on five animals with full stomachs, only one of them died. The most fatal operation of this poison is when mixed with the blood. The smallest quantity, injected into the jugular vein, killed the animal as if by a stroke of light¬ ning. When applied to wounds in such a manner that the flowing of the blood could not wash it away, the ani¬ mal fell into convulsions and a train of fatal nervous symptoms, which put an end to its life in a few minutes. Yet, notwithstanding these seeming affections of the nerves, the poison proved harmless when applied to the naked nerves themselves, or even to the medullary sub¬ stance of them slit open. The strength of this poison seems to be diminished, and even destroyed, by mineral acids, but not at all by alkalies or ardent spirits; but if the fresh poison was applied to a wound, the application of mineral acids im¬ mediately after could not remove the pernicious effects. ] P O I So far, indeed, was this from being the case, that the ap- p0iSOD, plication of nitrous acid to the wounded muscle of a pigeon, killed the animal in a short time rvithout any poison at all.—The effects of the arrows were equally fatal with those ot the poison itself (a). The poison of the viper is analogous in its effects to that of ticunas, but inferior in strength ; the lat¬ ter killing more instantaneously when injected into a vein than even the poison of the most venomous rattle snake. The Abbe has, however, observed a difference in the action of the two poisons upon blood taken out of the body. He cut off the head of a pigeon, and received its blood into warm conical glasses, to the amount of about 80 drops into each. Into the blood contained in one porringer, he put four drops of water; and into the other four drops of the poison dissolved in water as usual, The event of this experiment was, that the blood, with which the water only was mixed, coagulated in a short time ; but that in which the poison was mixed did not coagulate at all. The poison of the viper also hinders the blood from coagulating, but gives it a much blacker tinge than the poison of the ticunas. The poison of the viper also proves certainly fatal when injected into the veins, even in very small quantity ; but it produces a kind of grumous coagulation and blackness in the blood when drawn from a vein, though it prevents the proper coagulation of that fluid, and its separation into crassa- mentum and serum as usual. In the Philosophical Transactions, N° 335. we have a number of experiments which show the effects of ma¬ ny different poisons upon animals ; from whence it ap¬ pears, that many substances which are not at all account¬ ed poisonous, yet prove as certainly fatal when mixed with the blood as even the poison of rattlesnakes, or the ticunas itself.—An ounce of emetic wine, being inject¬ ed into the jugular vein of a large dog, produced no effect for a quarter of an honr. At the expiration of that space he became sick, had a continual vomiting, and evacuation of some hard excrements by stool. By these evacuations he seemed to be somewhat relieved ; but soon grew uneasy, moved from place to place, and vomited again. After this he laid himself down on the ground pretty quietly ; but his rest was disturbed by a return of his vomiting, and his strength greatly decrea¬ sed. An hour and a half after the operation he ap¬ peared half dead, but was greatly revived by having some warm broth poured down his throat with a funnel. This, however, proved only a temporary relief; for in (a) Mr Paterson, in his travels in Africa, in the years 1777-8-9, fell in with an European woman who had been wounded with a poisoned arrow. Great pains had been taken to cure her, but in vain; for at different pe¬ riods of the year an inflammation came on which was succeeded by a partial mortification. She told him that the wound was easily healed up; but in two months afterwards there was a certainty of its breaking out again, and this had been the case for many years. The Hottentots poison their arrows with a species of euphorbia. The amaryllis disticha, a large bulbous plant growing about the Cape of Good Hope, called mad poison, is used for the same purpose. The natives take the bulbs when they are putting out their leaves, cut them transversely, extract a thick fluid, and keep it in the sun till it acquires the consistence of gum, when it is fit for use. With arrows poisoned with this gum, they kill antelopes and other small animals intended for food. After they are wounded, the animals Generally run for several miles, and are frequently not found till next day. When the leaves of this plant are young, the cattle are very fond of them, though they occasion instant death. Mr Paterson mentions another shrubby plant producing a nut, called by the Hutch wool/ gift or wolf poison, the only poison useful to the European inhabitants. The nuts are roasted like coffee, pulverized, and stuffed into some pieces of meat or a dead dog, which are thrown into the fields. By this means the voracious hyenas are generally killed. P O I [ S3 ] P O I Poison, a short time the vomiting returned, he made urine in great quantity, howled miserably, and died in convul¬ sions.—A dram and a half of sal ammoniac dissolved in an ounce and a half of water, and injected into the jugular vein of a dog, killed him with convulsions al¬ most instantly.—The same effect followed from inject- ina: a dram of salt of tartar dissolved in an ounce of warm water; but a dram and a half of common salt injected into the jugular produced little other bad conse¬ quences than a temporary thirst.—A dram of purified white vitriol, injected into the crural vein of a dog, killed him immediately.—Fifteen grains of salt of urine dissolved in an ounce of w?ater, and injected into the crural vein of a dog, threw him into such violent con¬ vulsions that he seemed to be dying; nevertheless he re~ covered from a second dose, though not without a great deal of difficulty: but an ounce of urine made by a man fasting produced no bad effect. Diluted aqua¬ fortis injected into the jugular and crural vein of a dog killed him immediately by coagulating the blood. Oil of sulphur (containing some quantity of the volatile vi¬ triolic aid) did not kill a dog after repeated trials. On the contrary, as soon as he Avas let go, he ran into all the corners of the room searching for meat; and hav¬ ing found some bones, he fell a gnawing them with strange avidity, as if the acid, by injection into his veins, had given him a better appetite.—Another dog, who had oil of tartar injected into his veins, swelled and died, after suffering great torment. His blood was found florid and not coagulated.—A dram and a half of spirit of salt diluted with water, and injected into the jugular vein of a dog, killed him immediately. In the right ventricle of the heart the blood was found partly grumous and concreted into harder clots than ordinary, and partly frothy. Warm vinegar was injected with¬ out doing any manifest harm.—Two drams of sugar dissolved in an ounce of water were injected into the jugular vein of a dog without any hurt. These are the results of the experiments where saline substances were injected into the veins. Many acrids proved equally fatal. A decoction of two drams of white hellebore, injected into the jugular vein of a dog, killed him like a stx-oke of lightning. Another dog was killed in a moment by an injection of an ounce of rectified spirit of wine in which a dram of camphor was dissolved.—Ten drams of highly rectified spirit of wine, injected into the crural vein of a dog, killed him in a very short time : he died quietly, and licking his jaws with his tongue, as if with pleasure. In the vena cava and right ventricle of the heart the blood was coagula¬ ted into a great many little clots.—Three drams of rec¬ tified spirit of wine, injected into the crural vein of a small dog made him apoplectic, and as it were half dead. In a little time he recovered from the apoplexy, and be¬ came giddy j and when he endeavoured to go, reeled and fell down. Though his strength increased by de¬ grees, yet his drunkenness continued. His eyes were red and fiery j and his sight so dull that he scarce seem¬ ed to take notice of any thing: and when he was beat, he would scarce move. However, in four hours he be¬ gan to recover, and would eat bread when offered him 5 the next day he was out of danger.—Five ounces of strong white wine injected into the crural vein of a dog made him very drunk for a few hours, but did not pro¬ duce any other consequences. An ounce of strong de¬ coction of tobacco injected into a vein killed a dog in Poison, a very short time in terrible convulsions. Ten drops of oil of sage rubbed with half a dram of sugar, and thus dissolved in water, did no harm by being injected into the blood. Mercury, though seemingly void of all acrimony, proves also fatal when injected into the blood. Soon alter the injection of half an ounce of this mineral into the jugular vein of a dog, he was seized with a dry short cough which came by intervals. About two days after, he was troubled with a great difficulty of breath¬ ing, and made a noise like that of a broken-winded horse. There was no tumour about the root of the tongue or the parotid glands, nor any appearance of a salivation. In four day^ he died ; having been for two days before so much troubled with an orthopnoea, that he could sleep only when he leaned his head against something. When opened, about a pint of bloody se¬ rum was found in the thorax, and the outside of the lungs in most places was blistered. Some of the blisters were larger and others smaller than a pea, but most of them contained mercurial globules. Several of them were broken 5 and upon being pressed a little, the mer¬ cury ran out with a mixture of a little sanies ; but upon stronger pressure, a considerable quantity of sanies issued out. In the right ventricle of the heart some particles of quicksilver were found in the very middle of the coa¬ gulated blood lodged there, and the same thing also was observed in the pulmonary artery. Some blood also was found coagulated in a very strange and unusual manner between the columnseof the right ventricle of the heart, and in this a greater quantity of quicksilver than any¬ where else. In the left ventricle was found a very tena¬ cious blood coagulated, and sticking to the great valve, including the tendons of it, and a little resembling a po¬ lypus. No mercury could be found in this ventricle by the most diligent search 5 whence it appears that the mercury bad passed no farther than the extremities of the pulmonary artery, where it had stuck, and occasion¬ ed fatal obstructions.—In another dog, which had mer¬ cury injected into the jugular, it appears to have passed the pulmonary artery, as part of it was found in the ca¬ vity of the abdomen, and part also in some other ca¬ vities of the body. All the glandules were very tur¬ gid and full of liquor, especially in the ventricles of the brain, and all around there was a great quantity of serum. In like manner, oil of olives proves certainly fatal when injected into the blood. Half an ounce of this injected into the crural vein of a dog, produced no ef¬ fect in half a quarter of an hour: but after that, the animal barked, cried, looked dejected, and fell into a deep apoplexy ; so that his limbs were deprived of all sense and motion, and were flexible any way at plea¬ sure. His respiration continued very strong, wXh a snorting and wheezing, and a thick humour sometimes mixed with blood flowing out of his mouth. He lost all external sense : the eyes, though they continued open, W’ere not sensible of any objects that were put to them $ and even the cornea could be touched and rubbed, without bis being the least sensible of it; his eyelids, however, had a convulsive motion. The hearing was quite lost; and in a short time the feeling became so dull, that his claws and ears could be bored with red- hot pincers without his expressing the least sense of pain. Sometimes Poison. P O I [ 54 1 Sometimes lie was seized with a convulsive motion ot i the diaphragm and muscles subservient to respiration } upon which he would bark strongly, as it he had been awake : but this waking was only in appearance ; for all the time of this barking he continued as insensible as ever. In three hours he died ; and on opening his body, the bronchiae were filled with a thick froth.— An "ounce of oil of olives injected into the jugular of another dog killed him in a moment ; but a third lived an hour after it. He was seized with great sleepi¬ ness, snorting, and wheezing, but did not bark like the first. In ail of them a great quantity of thick froth was found in the lungs. We come now to speak of those poisons which prove mortal (b) when taken by the mouth. Hie principal of these are, arsenic, corrosive sublimate or.muriate of mercury, glass of antimony, and lead. What the ef¬ fects of these substances are when injected into the blood, cannot lie related, as no experiments seem to have been made with them in that way, excepting antimony, whose effects have been already mentioned. Hie effects^ of opium,-when injected into the veins, seem to be similar to its effects when taken by the mouth. I ilty grains of opium, dissolved in an ounce of water, were injected into the crural vein of a cat. Immediately after the operation she seemed much dejected, but did not cry only made alow, interrupted, and complaining noise. Ibis wras succeeded by trembling of the limbs, convulsive motions of the eyes, ears, lips, and almost all parts of the body, with violent convulsions of the breast. Sometimes she would raise up her head, and seem to look about her j but her eyes were very dull, and looked dead. 1 hough she was let loose, and bad nothing tied about her neck, yet her mouth was so filled with froth, that she was almost strangled. At last, her convulsive motions con¬ tinuing, and being seized with stretching of her limbs, she died in a quarter of an hour. Upon opening the body, the blood was found not to he much, altered from its natural state. A dram and a half of opium was dissolved in an ounce and a half of water, and then in¬ jected into the crural vein of a lusty strong dog. He struggled violently; made a loud noise, though his jaws were tied ; had a great difficulty of breathing, and palpitation of the heart, with convulsive motions of almost all parts of his body. These symptoms were succeeded by a profound and apoplectic sleep. Having untied him, be lay upon the ground without moving •or making any noise, though severely beaten. About half an hour after he began to recover some sense, and would move a little when beaten. The sleepiness still decreased so that in an hour and a half he would make P O I a noise, and walk a little when beat. However, be died in four days, after having voided a quantity of fe- tid excrements, in colour resembling the diluted opium he had swallowed. The oil of tobacco has generally been reckoned a very violent poison when introduced into the blood ; but from the abbe Fontana’s experiments, it appears to be far inferior in strength to the poison ot ticu- nas, or to the bite of a viper. A drop of oil of to¬ bacco was put into a small incision in the right thigh of a pigeon, and in two minutes the animal could not stand on its right foot. The same experiment was repeated on another pigeon, and produced exactly the same effect. In another case, the oil was applied to a slight wound in the breast ; three minuteS after which, the animal could not stand on the left foot. This expe¬ riment was also repeated a second time, with the same success. A tooth-pick, steeped in oil of tobacco, and introduced into the muscles of the breast, made the animal fall down in a few seconds as if dead. Ap¬ plied to two others, they threw up several times all the food they had eaten. Two others treated in the same manner, but with empty stomachs, made many efforts to vomit.—In general, the vomiting was found to be a constant effect of this poison : but the loss of motion in the part to which the poison is applied, was found to be only accidental. None of the animals died by the application of oil of tobacco. Dr Leake, however, as¬ serts the contrary ; saying, that this oil, which is used by the Indians in poisoning arrows, when infused into a fresh wound, besides sickness and vomiting, occasions convulsions and death. See Practical Essay on Dis¬ eases ojlhe Viscera, p. 67. The pernicious effects of laurel-water are taken no¬ tice of under the article Medicine, N° 261. The ac¬ count is confirmed by the experiments of the Abl:6 Fontana ; who tells us, that it not only kills in a short time, when taken by the mouth, but that, when given in small doses, the animal writhes so that the head joins the tail,,and the vertebrae arch out in such a manner as to strike with horror every one who sees it. In order to ascertain the effects of this water when taken into the blood, our author opened the skin of the lower belly of a pretty large rabbit, and make a wound in it about an inch long ; and having slightly wounded the muscles under it in many parts, applied two or three tea spoon¬ fuls of laurel-water. The animal fell down convulsed in less than three minutes, and died soon after. The experiment was repeated with similar success in other animals : but was always found to act most powerfully, and in the shortest time, when taken by the mouth, or Pni'ion. * See (b) Of all poisons * those which may be called culinary are perhaps the most destructive, because they are Leake'S generally the least suspected. All copper f vessels, therefore, and vessels of bell metal, which contains copper, | See Po^ Practical sjloujd b'e ]a;d £ven tiie COmmon earthen ware, when they contain acids, as in pickling, become very per-sow of Cop '^tiisTases of nicious, as they are glazed with lead, which in the smallest quantity, when dissolved, is very fatal ; and even thevLe/a. the least exceptionable of the metals for culinary purposes except iron, is not always quite free of poisonous quali¬ ties, it having been found to contain a small portion of arsenic. Mushrooms and the common laurel are also very fatal. The bitter almond contains a poison and its antidote likewise. The cordial dram ratafia, much used in France, is a slow poison, its flavour being procured from the kernels of peach, black cherry stones, &c.— The spirit of kmro-cerasus is peculiarly fatal. The adulteration of bread, beer, wine, porter, &c. produces very fatal consequences, and merits exemplary punishment. Next to culinary poisons, the abuse of medicines deserves par¬ ticular attention. p O I [55 Poison, injected hy way of clyster. From these experiments, —-V however, he concluded, that laurel-water would kill by being injected into the blood : but in tills he was deceived ; for two rabbits had each of them a large tea-spoonful injected into the jugular vein, without any inconvenience, either at the time of injection or after¬ wards. It proved innocent also when applied to the bare nerves, and even when introduced into the medul¬ lary substance. We ought now to give some account of the proper antidotes for each kind of poison j but from wh it has been related concerning the extreme activity of some of them, it is evident that in many cases there can be but very little hope. People are most apt to be bit by serpents in the legs or hands; and as the poison, from the Abbe Fontana’s experiments, appears to act only in consequence of being absorbed into the blood, it is plain, that to prevent this absorption is the chief indi¬ cation of cure. We have recommended several methods for this purpose under the article,Medicine, N° 408.; but the Abbe Fontana proposes another not mentioned there, namely, ligature. This, if properly applied be¬ tween the wounded part and the heart, must certainly prevent the bad effects of the poison; but then it tends to produce a disease almost equally fatal; namely, a gan¬ grene of the part; and our author gives instances of animals being thus destroyed after the effects of the jioison were prevented ; for which reason he prefers am¬ putation. But the good effects of either of these me¬ thods, it is evident, must depend greatly on the nature of the part wounded, and the time when the ligature is applied, or the amputation performed. If the teeth of the serpent, or the poisoned arrow, happens to strike a large vein, the only possibility of escaping instant death is to compress the trunk of the vein above the wounded place, and to enlarge the wound, that the blood may flow freely, and in large quantity, in order to wash away the poison, and discharge the infected parts of the blood itself. If this be neglected, and the person falls into the agonies of death, perhaps strongly stimulating medicines given in large doses, and continued for a length of time, may enable nature to counteract the vi¬ rulence of the poison. For this purpose volatile alkalies seem most proper, as acting soonest, (see Medicine); and perhaps a combination of them with ether might be advantageous, as by the volatility of that medicine the activity of the alkali would probaoly be increased. In the Philosophical Transactions, we have an account of the recovery of a dog seemingly by means of the volatile alkali, when probably he was in a dying condition. This dog indeed seems to have had a remarkable strength * of constitution. The poor creature had first got two ounces of the juice of nightshade, which he bore without any inconvenience. An equal quantity of the juice of hemlock was then given him without effect. He then got a large dose of the root of wolfsbane with the same suc¬ cess. Two drams of white hellebore root were next given. These caused violent vomitings and purgings, but still he outlived the operation. He was then made to swallow five roots of the colchicum, or meadow-saffron, dug fresh out of the earth. The effect of these was simi¬ lar to that of the white hellebore, but still he did not die. Lastly, he got two drams of opium ; and he even outlived this dose. Fie was first cast into a deep sleep by it; but soon a\vaked, and was seized with violent ] P O I vomitings and purgings, which carried off the effect of Poison. the opium. Seeing then that the animal had resisted the ' v— most violent poisons, it was resolved to try the effects of the bite ot a viper; and he was accordingly bit three or four times on the belly a little below the navel by one enraged. The immediate consequence of this was an in¬ cipient gangrene in the parts adjoining to the wound, as appeared by the rising of little black bladders filled with a sanious matter, and a livid colour which propagated itself all around. 1 he motion of the heart became very faint and irregular, and the animal lay without strength or sensation, as it he had been seized with a lethargy or apoplexy. In this condition his wound was cupped and scarified, and Venice treacle (a famous antidote) ap¬ plied to it. In two hours after this all the symptoms were increased, and he seemed to be neatly dead ; upon which halt a dram ot volatile salt ol heartshorn mixed with a little broth was poured down his throat; and the consequence was, that in a short time he was able to stand on his leet and walk. Another dose entirely dis¬ pelled his lethargy, and the heart began to recover its strength. However, he continued very iveak; and though he ate no solid meat for three days, yet at the end of that time his strength was evidently increased. 1 lie first day he drank W'ater plentifully and greedily, and on the second day he drank some broth. On tlie third day he began to eat solid meat, and seemed out of danger ; only some large and foul ulcers remained on that part ot the belly which was bit, and before these were healed he was killed by another dog. From comparing this with some other observations, indeed, it would seem that volatile alkali is the best an¬ tidote against all poisons which suddenly kill by a mix¬ ture with the blood, and even of some others. Indeed its effects in curing the bite of snakes seems to be put beyond all doubt, by a paper in the 2d volume of the Asiatic Researches, p. 323. “From the effect of a ligature applied between the bitten part and the heart (says Mr Williams, the author of the paper), it is evident that the poison diffuses itself over the body by the re¬ turning venous blood ; destroying the irritability, and rendering the system paralytic. It is therefore pro¬ bable, that the volatile caustic alkali, in resisting the disease of the poison, does not act so much as a specific in destroying its quality, as by counteracting the effect on the system, by stimulating the fibres, and preserving that irritability which it tends to destroy.” But whatever be the mode of its operation, the me¬ dicine is unquestionably powerful. Mr Williams used either the volatile caustic alkali or eau-de-luce ; the for¬ mer of which he seems to have preferred. Of it he gave 60 drops as a dose in water, and of the eau-de-luce he gave 40, at the same time applying some of the me¬ dicine to the part bitten, and repeating the dose as he found occasion. Of seven cases, some of which were apparently very desperate, only one died, and that appears to have been occasioned by bad treatment after the cure. Many of the patients were perfectly recovered in seven or eight minutes, and none of them required more than two hours: On the whole, Mr Williams says, that he “ never knew an instance of the volatile caustic alkali failing in its effect, where the patient has been able to swallow it.” Hr Mead asserts, that the alkali counter¬ acts the deadly effects of laurel-water: we have seen its effects in curing the bite of a viper, and of snakes ; and from P O I [ 56 ] P O I Poison, from Dr Wolfe’s experiments on liydropliobous patients, '-■""'v it may even claim some merit there. Still, hovvevei, there is another method of attempting a cure in such deplorable cases 5 and that is, by injecting into the veins any thing which will not destroy life, but will destroy the effects of the poison. It is much to be re¬ gretted, that in those cruel experiments which we have already related, the intention seems almost always to have been to kill the animal at all events 5 whereas, it ought to have been to preserve him alive, and to ascer¬ tain what medicines could be safely injected into the blood, and what could not, with the effects which fol¬ lowed the injection of different quantities, none of which were sufficient to destroy life. But in the way they were managed, scarce any conclusion can be drawn from them. Indeed it appears that little good is to be expected from.this mode; it is mere speculation, and future experiments must show whether it ever shall be used for the cure of poisons, or for any other purposes : its being now totally laid aside, seems to militate strong¬ ly against the efficacy of it; besides, the extreme cruel¬ ty of the operation will ever be a strong bar to its gene¬ ral introduction. See Injection. There still remains another method of cure in despe¬ rate cases, when there is a certainty that the whole mass of blood is infected; and that is, by the bold attempt of changing the whole diseased fluid for the blood of a sound animal. Experiments of this kind have also been tried ; and the method of making them, together with the consequences of such as are recorded in the Philo¬ sophical Transactions, we shall notice under the article Transfusion. Dr Mead, finding that many pretenders to philoso¬ phy have called the goodness of the Creator in question, for having created substances whose manifest and obvi¬ ous qualities are noxious and destructive, remaiks, by way of answer, that they have also salutary virtues. But, besides their physical effects, they are likewise food for animals which afford us good nourishment, goats and quails being fattened by hellebore, starlings by hemlock, and hogs innocently eating henbane; besides, some of those vegetables, which were formerly thought poison¬ ous, are now used in medicine, and future discoveries may probably increase the number. The poison of many vegetables is their only defence against the ra¬ vages of animals ; and by means of them we are often enabled to defend useful plants from the destroying in¬ sect ; such as by sprinkling them with essential oil of turpentine ; and by means of some substances poisonous to them, we are enabled to destroy those insects which in¬ fest the human body, and the bodies of domestic animals, &C,—As for poisonous minerals, arsenic for example, Dr Mead observes, that it is not a perfect mineral, but only an active substance, made use of by nature in pre¬ paring several metals in the earth, which are of great service to mankind ; and, after confirming this by se¬ veral instances, he concludes by saying, the case will be found much the same in all natural productions of this kind. As for poisonous animals, &c. their noxious qua¬ lities may easily be accounted for, by reflecting that it is their only mode of self-defence. Poison of Copper. This metal, though when in an undissolved state it produces no sensible effects, becomes exceeding active when dissolved; and such is the faci¬ lity with which the solution is effected, that it becomes a matter of some consequence to prevent the metal fiom being taken into the human body even m its proper'— form. It doth not, however, appear that the poison of copper is equally pernicious with those of arsenic or lead ; much less with some others treated of in the last article. The reason of this is, that it excites vomiting so speedily as to be expelled, even though taken incon¬ siderable quantity, before it has time to corrode the sto¬ mach. Roman vitrol, which is a solution of copper in the vitriolic acid, has been used as a medicine in some diseases with great success. Verdigrise also, which is another very active preparation of the metal, has been by some physicians prescribed as an emetic,especially in cases where other poisons had been swallowed, in order to procure the most speedy evacuation of them by vomit. Where copper is not used with this view, it has been employed as a tonic and antispasmodic., with which it has been admitted into the Edinburgh Dispensatory un¬ der the title of Cuprum Ammoniacale. The effects of the metal, however, when taken in a pretty large quan¬ tity, and in a dissolved state, or when the stomach abounds with acid juices sufficient to dissolve it, are veiy disagreeable and even dangerous; as it occasions violent vomitings, pains in the stomach, faintings, and some¬ times convulsions and death. I he only cuie foi these symptoms is to expel the poison by vomiting as soon as possible, and to obtund its acrimony ; for which purpose drinking warm milk will probably be found the most ef¬ ficacious remedy. In order to prevent the entrance of the poison into the body, no copper vessels should be used in preparing food but such as are either well tinned or kept exceedingly clean. The practice of giving a fine blue or green colour to pickles, by preparing them in copper vessels, ought not to be tolerated ; for Dr Falconer, in a treatise on this subject, assures us, that these are sometimes so strongly impregnated by this me¬ thod of preparing them, that a small quantity of them will produce a slight nausea.—Mortars of brass or bell- metal ought for the same reason to be avoided, as by this means a considerable quantity of the pernicious me¬ tal may be mixed with our food, or with medicines. In other cases, an equal caution ought to be used. The custom of keeping pins in the mouth, of giving copper halfpence to children to play with, &c. ought .to be avoided ; as thus a quantity of the metal may be insen¬ sibly taken into the body, after which its effects must be uncertain.—It is proper to observe, however, that cop¬ per is much more easily dissolved when cold than when hot ; and therefore the greatest care should be taken ne¬ ver to let any thing designed for food, even common wa¬ ter, remain long in copper vessels when cold ; for it is observed, that though the confectioners can safely pre¬ pare the most acid syrups in clean copper vessels without their receiving any detriment whilst hot, yet if the same syrups are allowed to remain in the vessels till quite cold, they become impregnated with the pernicious qualities of the metal. To what has now been said relative to the effects of mineral poisons, we shall add an account of some experi¬ ments, showing that amineral poison mayproducesudden and violent death, although the noxious matter cannot be detected by chemical tests in the contents of the sto¬ mach. As the subject of this investigation is of great importance in many points of view, we shall make no apology for laying the whole detail before our readers without Poison. P O I Poison, without abridgement. The experiments were made by ■— Dr Bostock of Liverpool, and the account of them is given by the author in a letter to the editor of the Edin¬ burgh Med. and Surg. Journal, v. 14. “ In compliance with your request, I send you an ac¬ count of some of the experiments which I made to il¬ lustrate the question, which was proposed to me at the late memorable trial at Lancaster, whether it was pos¬ sible that a mineral poison might produce a sudden and violent death, and yet be afterwards incapable of detec¬ tion in the contents of the stomach ? You have already seen, in the pamphlet that was published by Drs Gerard and Rutter, Mr Hay, and myself, the effect which was produced upon dogs by corrosive sublimate. We there relate the result of two experiments, in which it was given to dogs in solution *, vomiting, purging, and the symptoms of violent pain ensued, which after some hours were terminated by death. The contents of the stomach, it is there stated, were analysed by me, but none of the sublimate could be detected. In the first experi¬ ment, i|- grains of the salt were given, and in the second 4 grains ; this latter being the larger quantity, and also the one in which the process was conducted with the most accuracy, I shall confine myself to relate the cir¬ cumstances of this alone. “ When the stomach of the dog was opened, a small quantity of water was added to wash out its contents more completely, making the whole somewhat less than one ounce. It was deeply tinged with blood, and I let it remain at rest for 30 hours, in order that the colour¬ ing matter might subside from it. It had then acquired a very foetid smell, and not being much clearer than at first, I added to it about an equal quantity of water, and passed it, first through a linen strain, and afterwards through a paper filter. It was now nearly transparent, but slightly tinged with blood. “ A solution of corrosive sublimate was prepared, containing ?^0-g of its weight of the salt. Into a quan¬ tity of this solution the recently prepared muriate of tin was dropped, which produced an immediate and very copious precipitation. Caustic potash also threw down a precipitate, although in small quantity. The same tests were then added to the fluid taken from the sto¬ mach, but no effect was produced by the muriate of tin for some hours, when at length it became, in some de¬ gree, opake. The effect here, both as to time and the nature of the appearance, was quite different from the precipitate in the solution of corrosive sublimate, and I considered it as depending upon the action of the mu¬ riate of tin upon the mucus. In proof of this, when the stomach fluid had potash added to it, instead of having a precipitate thrown down, it was rendered more trans¬ parent than before the experiment. The solution of corrosive sublimate Was subjected to the action of gal¬ vanism, by having a piece of gold placed in it, clasped by zinc wire ; in an hour the gold w'as obviously wdii- tened by the precipitation of the mercury upon it. The fluid taken from the stomach was submitted to the same process for three hours, but no effect was produced (c). The fluid from the stomach did not exhibit either acid or alkaline properties ; it was copiously precipitated Vol. XVII. Part I. [ 57 1 P O I Poison. by the nitrate of silver, shewing that it contained muri¬ atic acid. 1 ii..-y On the foliowing day, a slight brown precipitate had subsided from the stomach fluid, and the whole had become very opake. The precipitate was dissolved by potash, at the same time that the fluid was rendered more transparent. It was become extremely putrid. The putridity increased : and, in two days more, a scum was formed on the surface, and the sides of the glass were also encrusted with a gray matter. The experiments were performed between the 17th and 22d of August. “ The following experiments were then made on the corrosive sublimate, with every possible attention to accu¬ racy. Two grains of the salt were dissolved in 600 grains of distilled water. This I call solution N° 1. Ten grains of N° 1. were then added to 90 grains of water, forming solution N° 2. in which the fluid would con- ta^n T5“5"o'o' °f its weight of the sublimate. Into 10 drops of N° 2. two drops of the muriate of tin were add¬ ed, and caused a very obvious precipitate. Ten grains of N° 2. were added to 90 grains of distilled water, ma¬ king the fluid to contain TooWo-o^ of its weight of the salt. Into 10 drops of this solution, two drops of the muriate of tin were added, and an immediate gray cloud was perceptible in the fluid, although no precipitate was thrown down. The galvanic process was repeated with the solution N° 3. 5 it remained six hours, and I thought I perceived a whiteness on one part of the gold; but it was not very distinctly visible. “ I rom these experiments, we may draw the follow¬ ing conclusions :— “ 1. I he fluid taken from the dog’s stomach contain¬ ed muriatic acid, probably in the form of common salt, and animal matter, probably mucus, in considerable quantity. “ 2. I he tests that were employed to discover the corrosive sublimate, were capable of detecting it in a fluid, when it composed only -^o^cToo of its weight. “ 3’ "Ihese tests did not detect any corrosive sublimate in the fluid taken from the dog’s stomach ; it may there¬ fore be concluded, “ 4. That an animal may be suddenly killed by re¬ ceiving a metallic poison into the stomach, and yet that the nicest tests may not be able to detect any por¬ tion of the poison after death, in the contents of the stomach. “ This conclusion appears incontrovertible ; and though some analogous facts had occasionally been no¬ ticed*, it is so different from tbe generally received * opinion upon the subject, that I think it must have con-rcus lie Ve- siderable influence on all future judicial proceedings, \aneT,i dati which the question of poisoning is agitated.” Poison of Lead. See Medicine, N° 303. PoisoN-Tree. See Rhus, Botany Index. PoisoN-Tree of Java, called in the Malayan lan¬ guage bohun upas, is a tree which has often been de¬ scribed by naturalists ; but its existence has been very generally doubted, and the descriptions given of it, con¬ taining much of the marvellous, have been often treated as idle fictions, N. P. Foersch, however, in an account o f it, written in Dutch, asserts that it does exist; and H tells Accuea- tione. (c) This experiment was performed at the suggestion of Dr Wollaston. P O I [ Voiron tells us, thatl)e once doubted it as much as any person j y—- but, determined not to trust general opinions, he made the most particular inquiries possible *, the result ol whic i was, that he found that it is situated in the island ot Java, about 27 leagues from Batavia, 14 °.ura Charta, the emperor’s seat, and about 19 from linkjoe, the residence of the sultan of Java. It is surrounded on all sides by hills and mountains, and the adjacent country for 12 miles round the tree is totally barren. Our author says he has gone all round the spot at about 18 miles from the centre, and on all sides he found the country equally dreary, which he ascribes to its noxious effluvia. The poison procured from it is a gum, issuing from between the bark and the tree ; and it is brought by malefactors who have been condemned to death, but who are allowed by this alternative to have a chance tor their life. An old ecclesiastic, our author informs us, dwelt on the outside of the surrounding hills, whose bu¬ siness it was to prepare the criminals tor their late, it death should he the consequence of their expedition. And indeed so fatal are its effluvia, that he acknow¬ ledged that scarcely two out of 20 returned trom above *700 whom he had dismissed. Mr Foersch farther tells us, that he had seen several of the criminals who had returned, and who told him, that the tree stands on the borders ot a rivulet, is ot a middling size, and that five or six young ones ot the same kind stand close to it. They could not, however see any other plant or shrub near it •, and the ground was of brownish sand, full of stones and dead bodies, and difficult to pass. The Malayans think this tract was thus rendered noxious and uninhabitable by the juc ge- ment of God, at Mahomet’s desire, on account ot the sins of the inhabitants. No animal whatever is ever seen there •, and such as get there by any means never return, but have been brought out dead by such ol the criminals as have themselves escaped death. Our author relates a circumstance which happened in the vear 1775, to about 400 families (1600 souls), who refused to pay some duty to the emperor and who were inconsequence declared rebels and banished ; they petitioned for leave to settle in the uncultivated parts round Upas : the consequence of which was, that in less than two months their number was reduced to about 300 souls, who begged to he reconciled to the emperor, and were again received under his protection. Many of these survivors Mr Foersch saw, and they had just the appearance of persons tainted with an infecti¬ ous disorder. , , , With the juice of this tree arrows, lancets, and other offensive weapons, are poisoned. With lancets thus poi¬ soned Mr Foersch observes, that he saw 13 ot the em¬ peror’s concubines executed for infidelity to his bed in February 1776- They were lanfd in, .th,e ™ddle °f their breasts •, in five minutes after which they were ueh/ed with a tremor and subsultus tendinum, and m 1 c minutes they were dead. Their bodies were full of livid spots, like those of petechia, their faces swelled, colour blue, and eyes yellow, &x. Soon after he saw seven Malayans executed in the same way, and saw the same effects follow j on which he resolved to try , it on other animals, and found the operation similar on three puppies, a cat, and a fowl, none of which sur¬ vived more than 13 minutes. He also tried its effects 58 ] p o 1 internally on a iog seven montlis oil! ; tlie animal lie- came delirious, was seized with convulsions, and die in half an hour. From all which our author concludes, that it is the most violent of all vegetable poisons, and that it contributes greatly to the unhealthiness ot the island in which it grows. By means ot it many cruel and treacherous murders are perpetrated. lie adds, that there exists a sort of cajoe-upas on the coast of Macassar, the poison of which, though not near so violent or malignant, operates nearly in tae same m Most of our readers will prol/ably consider this whole account as highly incredible j but we have to add, that it has been directly controverted in all its parts in a memoir of Lambert Nolst, M. D. fellow ol the Ba¬ tavian Experimental Society at Rotterdam, (see Gcw- tkman's Meg. May 1 794, P- 4330; Thls, memoir was procured from John Matthew'a Rnyn, who had been 23 years, from 1763 to 1786, resident in the island, and therefore had every opportunity of informing himself on the spot. In this memoir we are told, that i oerscti s account of the tree is extremely suspicious, from a vari¬ ety of circumstances : 1. Though he had letters of in¬ troduction, he went to no considerable house, and atter- wards privately withdrew among the English. 2. hen the emperor was asked respecting Foersch, and the lacts he relates, he answered, that he had never heard either of him or of the tree. 3. The distances given to mark the situation of the tree are not accurate. 4. I he exe¬ cution of criminals is different from what he represents, c. The circumstance of several criminals returning when Foersch was there, has a suspicious appearance. 6.1 here exists no such tradition, as that the tree was placed there by Mahomet. 7. There were no such disturb¬ ances in 1775 as Foersch represents, the tract to which he alludes having submitted to the Dutch East India Company as early as 17 56. 8. The island is not un¬ healthy, as Foersch asserts ; nor are violent or prema¬ ture deaths frequent. 9. The Javanese are a curious and intelligent people, and of course could not be so ignorant of this tree if it had any existence. 10. Ihe assertions and pretended facts of Foersch have no col¬ lateral evidence ; and every thing which we gather from the accounts of others, or from the history of the people, invalidates them. For these and other reasons, Dr, Nolst concludes, that very little credit is due to the re¬ presentations of Foersch, and that the island of Java produces no such tree, which, if it really grew there, would he the most remarkable of all trees. We must notice also, that the account of this very re¬ markable tree has been still farther controverted by Sir George Staunton, who, during his stay at Batavia, made the most particular inquiries concerning it, and found, that the existence of such a tree had never been known there. {Embassy to China). The fabulous his¬ tory of this tree, however, has produced a most beauti¬ ful description from the muse of Dr Darwin, whose harmonious verses on the subject we shall present to our readers. Poison. Where seas of glass with gay reflections smile Round the green coasts of Java’s palmy isle, A spacious plain extends its upland scene, Rocks rise on rocks, and fountains gusli between; Soft: POL f 59 ] P 0 L Poisoa Soft zephyrs blow, eternal summers reign, || And showers prolific bless the soil, in vain ! Poland. —No spicy nutmeg scents the vernal gales, * ’v Nor towering plantain shades the mid-day vales ; No grassy mantle hides the sable hills. No flowery chaplet crowns the trickling rills $ Nor tufted moss, nor leathery lichen creeps In russet tapestry o\r the crumbling steeps, v—No step retreating, on the sand impress’d, Invites the visit of a second guest ; No refluent fin the unpeopled stream divides, No revolant pinion cleaves the airy tides j Nor handed moles, nor beaked worms return, That mining pass the irremeable bourn.— Fierce in dread silence on the blasted heath Fell Up as sits, the Hydra-tree of deatln Lo ! from one root, the envenom’d soil below, A thousand vegetative serpents grow ; In shining rays the scaly monster spreads O’er ten square leagues his far-diverging heads ; Or in one trunk entwists his tangled form, Uooks o’er the clouds, and hisses in the storm. Steep’d in fell poison, as his sharp teeth part, A thousand tongues in quick vibration dart ; Snatch the proud eagle towering o’er the heath, Or pounce the lion, as he stalks beneath j Or strew, as marshall’d hosts contend in vain, With human skeletons the whiten’d plain. —Chain’d at his root two scion-demons dwell, Breathe the faint hiss, or try the shriller yell } Rise fluttering in the air on callow wings, And aim at insect-prey their little stings. Loves of the Plants^ canto iii. POLACRE, a ship with three masts, usually navi¬ gated in the Levant and other parts of the Mediterra¬ nean. These vessels are generally furnished with square sails upon the mainmast, and lateen sails upon the fore¬ mast and mizenmast. Some of them, however, carry square sails upon all the three masts, particularly those of Provence in France. Each of their masts is com¬ monly formed of one piece, so that they have neither topmast nor top-gallant mast $ neither have they any horses to their yards, because the men stand upon the topsail-yard to loose or furl the top-gallant-sail, and on the lower yard to reef to loose, or furl, the topsail, whose yard is lowered sufficiently down tor that pur¬ pose. POLAND, a country of Europe, in its largest ex¬ tent bounded by Pomerania, Brandenburg, Silesia, and Moravia, to the west 5 and, towards the east, by part of Russia and the Lesser Tartary •, on the north, it has the Baltic, Russia, the grand province of Livonia, and Sa- mogitia $ and on the south, it is bounded by Bessarabia, Transylvania. Moldavia, and Hungary. Geographers generally divide it into the provinces of Poland Proper, Lithuania, Samogitia, C- urland, Prussia, Massovia, Poluchia, Polesia, Little Russia, called likewise Russia Rubra or Red Russia, Podolia, and the Ukraine. The present kingdom of Poland, however, lately the duchy of Warsaw, occupies but a small part of these territories. F t a mapof Poland and Prussia, see PI. CCCCXXX1V. With regard to the history of Poland, we are not to gather the early part of it from any accounts transmit¬ ted to us by the natives. The early histories of all na¬ tions indeed are involved in fable ; but the Poles never Poland, had even a fabulous histo'-y of their own nation. The —• reason of this is, that it was not the custom with that nation to entertain itinerant poets for the amusement of the great ; for to the songs of these poets entertained among other nations we are obliged for the early part of their history ; but this assistance being deficient in Po¬ land, we must have recour-e to what is recorded con¬ cerning it by the historians of other nations. The sovereigns ot Poland at first had the title of duces, Polish s#. dukes or generals, as it their office had been only to vereigns at lead the armies into the field. The first of these is'‘rslon*y universally allowed to have been Lechus or Lecht;^^ and to render him more illustrious, he is said to have 2 be n a lineal descendant from Japbet the son of Noah. Jkechus the According to some writers, he migrated at the head of first duke, a numerous body ot the descendants of the ancient Sola- vi from some of the neighbouring nations j and, to this dav, Poland is called by the Tartars the kingdom of Lechus. Busching, however, gives a different account of the origin of the Poles. Sarmatia, he observes, was an extensive country, inhabited by a variety of nations of different names. He supposes the Poles to be the descendants of the ancient Lazi, a people who lived in Colchis near the Pontus Euxinus j whence the Poles are sometimes called Po/azi. Crossing several rivers, they entered Posnania, and settled on the borders of the Warta, while their neighbours the Zechi settled on the Elbe, in the 550th year of Christ. As to the name of Poland, or Polska, as it is called by the natives, it comes from the Sclavonic word Pole, or Poln, which signifies a country adapted to hunting, because the Derivation whole country was formerly covered with vast forests, of the diffe- exceedingly proper for that employment rtnt names Of the transactions of Lechus during the time that ^ he enjoyed the sovereignty, we have no certain ac¬ count. His successor was named Viscimer, who is ge- Viscimer nerally supposed to have been the nephew of Lechus. tk stooaS He was a warlike and successful prince, subduing many duke, provinces of Denmark, and building the city of Wis- mar, so called from the name of the sovereign. But the Danish historians take no notice of his wars with their country ; nor do they even mention a prince of this name. However, he is said to have reigned for a long time with great glory ; but to have left the people in gr^at distress, on account of the disputes which arose about a successor. ' ^ After the death of Viscimer, the nobility were on the Form of go* point of electing a sovereign, when the people, harassed vernment by the grievous burdens occasioned by the wars of Vis-c^aI18e^.'n*, cimer, unanimously demanded another form of govern- ment, that they might no longer be liable to suffer from ambition and tyranny. At first the nobility pretended to vield to this humour of the people with great reluc¬ tance ; however, they afterwards determined on such a form of government as threw all the power into their own hands. Twelve palatines, or vaivodes, were cho¬ sen ; and thf Polish dominions divided into as many provinces. These palatines exercised a despotic autho¬ rity within their several jurisdictions, and aggravated the misery of the people by perpetual wars among themselves j upon which the Poles, worn out with op¬ pression, resolved to return to their old form of govern¬ ment. Many assemblies were held lor this purpose $ but, by reason of the opposition of the vaivodes, they H % cam© POL [ Poland. Again abo lished. 8 Restored a second time. came to nothing. At last, however, they cast their eyes upon Cracus, or Gracus, whose wealth ami popula¬ rity had raised him to the highest honours among his countrymen. The Poles say that he was a native of Poland, and one of the 12 vaivodes ; hut the Bohemi¬ ans affirm that he was a native of their country : how¬ ever, both agree in maintaining, that he was descended from the ancient family of the Gracchi in Borne ; who, they say, were banished to this country. He is said to have signalized himself against the Franks, whom he overthrew in some desperate engagements, and after¬ wards built the city of Cracow with their spoils. He did not enlarge his dominions, but made his subjects happy by many excellent regulations. At last, alter a long and glorious reign, he expired, or, according to some, was assassinated by a nobleman who aspired to the crown. . , Cracus left three children •, Cracus, Cechus, and a daughter named Vanda. The first succeeded to the dukedom in virtue of his birthright; but was soon alter murdered by his brother Lechus. However, it seems the thoughts of the crime which he had committed so disturbed his conscience, that the secret could not be kept. When it was known that he had been the mur¬ derer of his late sovereign, he was deposed with all pos¬ sible marks of ignominy and contempt, and his sister Vanda declared duchess. She was a most beautiful and accomplished lady ; and soon after she had been raised to the sovereignty, one Bithogar, a Teutonic prince, sent an ambassador demanding her in marriage, and threatening war if his proposals were refused. Vanda marched in person against him at the head of a numer¬ ous army, and the event proved fatal both to Bithogar and herself. The troops of Bithogar abandoned him without striking a blow, upon which he killed himself in despair ; and Vanda, having become enamoured of him, was so much concerned lor his death, that she drowned herself in the river Vistula or Wessel. From this unfortunate lady the country of Vandalia takes rts name. . The family of Cracus having become extinct by the death of Vanda, the Poles were again left at liberty to choose a new sovereign or a new form of government. Through a natural levity, they changed the form of go¬ vernment, and restored the vaivodes notwithstanding all that they had formerly-suffered from them. The conse¬ quences were the same as before: the vaivodes abused their power'; the people were oppressed, and the state was distracted between foreign wars and civil conten¬ tions. At that time the Hungarian^ and Moravians had invaded Poland with a numerous army, and were oppo¬ sed only by a handful of men almost ready to surrender at discretion, when one ■ Premislaus, a private sol¬ dier, contrived a stratagem by which the numerous for¬ ces of the enemy were overthrown : and for his valour was rewarded with the dukedom. M e are ignorant of the other transactions of his reign ; but all historians inform us that he died deeply regretted, and without issue ; so that the Poles had once more to choose a so¬ vereign. On the death of Premislaus several candidates appear¬ ed for the throne ; and the Poles determined to prefer him who could overcome all his competitors in a horse¬ race. A stone pillar was erected near the capital, on which were laid all the ensigns of the ducal authority ; 4 6o ] POL and a herald proclaimed, that he who first arrived at Poland, that pillar from a river at some distance, named i oudenc,' v was to eniov them. A Polish lord named Lechus was resolved to secure the victory to himself by a stratagem; for which purpose he caused iron spikes to be driven ad over the course, reserving only a path for his own horse. The fraudulent design took effect in part, all the rest of the competitors being dismounted, and some severely hurt by their fall. Lechus, in consequence of this vic¬ tory, was about to be proclaimed duke ; when, unlucki- ly for him, a peasant who had found out the artifice opposed the ceremony; and upon an examination of the fact, Lechus was torn in pieces, and the ducal authority conferred upon the peasant. The name of the new- monarch was also Lechus. He attained the sovereignty in the year 774> and conducted himself with great wisdom and moderation. Though he possessed the qualities of a great warrior, and extended his dominions on the side of Moravia and Bohemia, yet his chief delight was to make his subjects happy by peace. In the decline of life he was obliged to engage in a war with Charlemagne, and is said by some to have fallen in battle with that powerful monarch ; though others assert that he died a natural death, having lived so long that the springs of life were quite worn out. Lechus HI. was succeeded by his son Lechus H „ who inherited all his father’s virtues. He suppressed an insurrection in the Polish provinces, by which he acquired great reputation ; after which he led his army against the Greek and Italian legions who had overrun Pannonia. He gained a complete victory over his ene¬ mies. Nor was his valour more conspicuous in the bat¬ tle than his clemency to the vanquished: for he dismis¬ sed all his prisoners without ransom ; demanding no other conditions than that they should never again, di¬ sturb the peace of Poland, or the allies of that king¬ dom. This duke is said to have been endowed with many virtues, and is charged only with the vice of in¬ continence. He left 20 natural children, and only one legitimate son, named Popiel, to whom he left the so¬ vereignty. Popiel was also a virtuous and pacific prince, who never had recourse to arms but through necessity. He removed the seat of government from Cracow to Gnesna, and was succeeded by his nephew Popiel II. a minor. The young king behaved with propriety as long as he was under the tuition of others ; but as soon as he had got the reins of government into his own hands the face of affairs was altered. Lechus III. who, as hath been already mentioned, had 20 illegitimate children, had promoted them to the government of different provinces ; and they had discharged the duties of their offices in such a manner as showed that they were worthy of the confidence reposed in them. But as soon as Po¬ piel came of age, being seduced by the advice of his wife, an artful and ambitious woman, he removed them from their posts, treated them with the utmost contempt, and at last found means to poison them all at once at an entertainment. A dreadful punishment, however, ac¬ cording to the historians of those times, attended his treachery and cruelty. The bodies of the unhappy go¬ vernors were left unburied; and from them issued a swarm of rats, who pursued Popiel, his wife, and chil¬ dren, wherever they went, and at last devoured them. The nation now became a prey to civil discord at the same POL [ Poland. same t*ni€ ^iat ^ was liarasse<^ by a foreign enemy 5 and, i_ “ ‘ in short, the state seemed to be on the verge of dissolu- 9 tion, when Piastus was proclaimed duke in 830, from Why the wl10m the natives of ducal or regal dignity were called SfVpolandS Piastes‘ See Piastus. This excellent, monarch died are called in 861, and was succeeded by his son Ziemovitus, who Piastes. was of a more warlike disposition than his father, and who first introduced regular discipline among the Po¬ lish troops. He maintained a respectable army, and took great pains to acquire a perfect knowledge in the art of war. The consequence of this was, that he was victorious in all his battles j and retook from the Ger¬ mans and Hungarians not only all that they had gained, but enlarged his dominions beyond what they had been. After his death nothing remarkable happened in Poland till the time of Mieczslaus [. who attained the ducal au¬ thority in 964. He was born blind, and continued so for seven years ; after which he recovered his sight with¬ out using any medicine 5 a circumstance so extraordina- 10 ry, that in those times of ignorance and superstition it Christiani- was accounted a miracle. In his reign the Christian re- * ty introdu- ligion was introduced into Poland. The most probable ced by Mi-account of the manner in which Christianity was intro- eczlaus I. tjucej ;s> t|iat Mieczslaus having by ambassadors made his addresses-to Daborwka daughter to the duke of Bo¬ hemia, the lady rejected his ofi'er unless he would suffer himself to be baptized. To this the duke consented, and was baptized, after having been instructed in the principles of Christianity. He founded the archbishop¬ rics of Gnesna and Cracow ; and appointed St Adal¬ bert, sent by the pontiff to propagate Christianity in Po¬ land, primate of the whole kingdom. On the birth of his son Boleslaushe redoubled his zeal 5 founding seve¬ ral bishoprics and monasteries •, ordering likewise that, when any part of the. Gospel was read, the hearers should half draw their swords, in testimony of their rea¬ diness to defend the faith. But he was too superstitious to attend to the duties of a sovereign; and therefore suffered his dominions to be ravaged by his barbarous neighbour the duke of Kussia. Yet, with all his devo¬ tion, he could not obtain the title- of king from the pope, though he had warmly solicited it. That title was afterwards conferred on his son, who succeeded to all his dominions. Boleslaus Boleslaus I. the first king of Poland, surnamed C/iro- the first bry, succeeded to the sovereignty in 999. He also pro- ! king of Fo- fessed and cherished Christianity, and was a man of great land. valour and prudence. However, the first transaction of his reign savoured very much of the ridiculous piety of those times. He removed from Prague to Gnesna the remains of a saint which he had purchased at a consider¬ able price. The emperor Otho III. made a pilgrimage, on account of a vow, to the tomb of this saint. He was hospitably received by Boleslaus, whom, in return, he invested with the regal dignity; an act which was con¬ firmed by the pope. This new dignity added nothing to the power of Boleslaus, though it increased his con¬ sequence with his own subjects. He now aflected more state than before: his body-guards were considerably augmented ; and he was constantly attended by a nu¬ merous and splendid retinue whenever he stirred out of his palace.. Thus he inspired his people with an idea of his greatness, and consequently of their own import¬ ance ; which no doubt was necessary for the accomplish¬ ment of a design he had formed, namely, an offensive 1] POL war with Russia : but when he was upon the point of Poland, setting out on this expedition, he was prevented by the l—v—— breaking out of a war with the Bohemians. The ele¬ vation of Boleslaus to the regal dignity had excited the envy of the duke of Bohemia, who had solicited the same honour for himself, and had been refused. His jealousy was further excited by the connection between Boleslaus and the emperor, the former having married Rixa the emperor’s niece. Without any provocation, therefore, or without giving the least intimation of his design, the duke of Bohemia entered Poland at the head of a numerous army, committing everywhere dreadful 12 ravages. Boleslaus immediately marched against him, He con- and the Bohemians retired with precipitation. Scarcity |tuers £»• of provisions, and the inclemency of the season, prevent¬ ed Boleslaus at that time from pursuing ; but as soon as these obstacles were removed, he entered Bohemia at the head of a formidable army, with a full resolution of tak¬ ing ample revenge. The Bohemians were altogether unable to resist; neither indeed had they courage to venture a battle, though Boleslaus did all in his power to force them to it. So great indeed was the cowardice of the duke or his army, that they suffered Prague, the capital of the duchy, to be taken after a siege of two years ; having never, during all that time, ventured to relieve it by fighting the Polish army. The taking of this city was quickly followed by the reduction of all the places of inferior note : but though Boleslaus was in possession of almost all the fortified places in Bohemia, he could not believe his conquests to be complete until he became master of the duke’s person. This unfortu¬ nate prince had shut himself up with his son in his only remaining fortress of Wissogrod, where he imagined that he should be able to foil all the attempts of the Polish monarch. In this, however, he found himself disap¬ pointed. Boleslaus invested the place, and made his ap¬ proaches with such rapidity, that the garrison, dreading a general assault, resolved to capitulate, and persisted in their resolution notwithstanding all the entreaties and promises of the duke. The consequence was, that the unhappy prince fell into the hands of his enemies, and had his eyes put out by Boleslaus ; after which, his son Jaremir was put iato perpetual and close confinement. From Bohemia Boleslaus marched towards Moravia ; and Mora- and no sooner did he arrive on the frontier than thevia- whole province submitted without a blow. He then re¬ sumed his intention of invading Russia ; for which he had now a very fair opportunity, by reason of a civil Avar which raged Avith violence among the children of Duke Volodomir. The chief competitors were Jarislaus and Suantepolk. The latter, having been defeated by his brother, was obliged to take refuge in Poland, Avhere he used all the arguments in his poAver with King Bole¬ slaus in order to induce him to rev'enge his cause. Bo¬ leslaus having already an intention of invading that country, needed but little intreaty ; and therefore mo¬ ved towards Russia at the head of a very numerous ar¬ my : giving out, that he had no other design than to revenge the injustice done to Suantepolk. He was met on the banks of the river Bog by Jarislaus at the head of an army much superior in number to his oAvn ; and for some days the Polish army Avas kept at bay by the Rus- Gains a sians. At last Boleslaus, groAving impatient, resolved Sreat 'ic- to pass the river at all events ; and therefore forming his cavalry in the best manner for breaking the torrent, he g;ans> exposed POL [ 62 Poland 15 Places Su intepolk on the throne of ■Russia, 16 who at- tt mj iK to cut him off wr h nis whole ar¬ my, but is defeated. 17 A dreadful battle be¬ tween the .Russians 18 Saxony * conquered b> Bole- -&laus, exposed his 6wh person to tlie utmost ofiis force. F.n- couraged by his example, the Poles advanced breast- high in the water to the opposite shore } from whence the enemy gave them all the annoyance in their power. In spite of all opposition, however, the Poles reached the bank, and soon gained a complete victory, Parisians being obliged to fly to Kiovia. This city was immedi¬ ately invested •, but Jarislaus retired farther into the country in order to recruit his army, leaving the city to its fate. The garrison made a brave defence, but were at last compelled to surrender at discretion. A vast trea¬ sure wras found in the place} great part of which was distributed by Boleslaus among the soldiers. Though the king of Poland had now become master of the greatest part of Russia, he knew that the only possible means of keeping the country in subjection was by placing a natural sovereign overthe inhabitants. For this reason lie reinstated Suantepolk, though his preten¬ sions were still disputed by Jarislaus, I lie latter had formed a flying camp, and meditated a scheme of sur¬ prising and carrying off his rival brother ^ hut ha'mg failed In his attempt, he retired to Novogorod, where the attachment of the inhabitants enabled him to make some resistance, till at last he was attacked and defeated by Boleslaus, which seemed to give the finishing stroke to his aflairs. The king of Poland, however, now met with a more dangerous enemy in the perfidious and un¬ grateful Suantepolk than he had experienced in Jarislaus. The Russian prince, imagining himself a dependent on Boleslaus, formed a conspiracy against him •, by which he projected nothing less than the destruction of him and his whole army. The massacre was already begun when Boleslaus received intelligence. The urgency of the case admitted of no delay: the king therefore mounted his horse ; and having with the utmost haste assembled part of his army, fell upon the traitors with such fury, that tiny were obliged to betake themselves to -flight, and Boleslaus got safe into Poland. But in the mean time Jarislaus having assembled fresh forces, pursued the Polish army j and having come up with them just as one half had crossed the river Bori-thenes, attacked them with the utmost fury. Boleslaus defend¬ ed himself with the greatest resolution *, but, by reason of his forces being divided, victory was dubious for a long time. At last, when the army had wholly crossed, the Russians were entirely put to the rout, and a terrible carnage ensued. The victory, however, though com¬ plete,°was not decisive; for which reason Boleslaus thought prop* r to continue his retreat, without attempt¬ ing to conquer a country too extensive for him ever to keep in subjection. Still, however, his martial inclina¬ tion continued, and he ltd his army into Saxony. The inhabitants i f this country had hitherto resisted all at¬ tempts that had been made on their freedom, and still made a violent struggle for liberty •, though, in spite of their utmost efforts, they were obliged at last to submit to the yoke. On his withdrawing the troops from Saxonv, however, the king thought proper to leave the people to their liberty, contenting himself with a rich booty. The boundaries of his empire he now fixed at the river Elbe •, where be erected two iron columns, in order to transmit the memory of his conquest to pos- rtenty. Boleslaus, still unsated with victory, now meditated S ] ' POL the conquest of Prussia and Pomerania j tli6 latter of Poland. which provinces had, in the former civil wars, been dis¬ membered from Poland. His arms were attended with 9 — - f | • with P ms- equal success against both : indeed the very terror or bis Sla an(j iJ(^ name seemed to answer all the purposes of a formidable meraiiia. These, however, he seems to have designed to army. be the last of his warlike enterprise^ $ for he now applied himself wholly to the enacting of wholesome laws for the benefit of his people. But in the midst of this tran¬ quillity Jarislaus assembled the most numerous army that had ever been beai d of in Russia, with which he appear- 20 ed on the frontiers of Poland. Boleslaus, though now Gains ano- advanced in years, marched out against his adversaries,t! ei and met them on the banks of the Boristhenes, rendered famous by the victory he had lately gamed there. J he ryUssians, Poles crossed the river by swimming j and attacked the011 w.iich enemy before they had time to draw up in order ofiht "“ole battle with such impetuosity, that a total rout soon sued. The Russians were seized with a panic, and Ja¬ rislaus was hurried away, and almost trampled to death by the fugitives. Many thousand prisoners were taken, but BoleslauM released them upon very easy conditions j contenting himself with an inconsiderable tribute, and endeavouring to engage the affections of the people by his kindness. This well-timed clemency produced such a happy effect, that the Russians voluntarily submitted to his jurisdiction, and again became his subjects. Soon Bokslauj after this he died in the year 1025, a*t,“r having great dies, ly extended bis dominions, and rendered his subjects happy. Boleslaus was succeeded by his son Mieczlaus II. but he possessed none ot the great qualities of Ins fattier, being indolent and debauched in his behaviour. In the verv beginning of his reign, the Russians, bohe¬ mians, and Moravians, revolted. However, as the spirit and discipline introduced by Boleslaus still remained in the Polish army, Mieezslaus found no gnat difficulty in reducing them ayain to obedience, after which, de¬ voting himself entirely to voluptuousness, he was seized with a frenzy, which put an end to his life in the year 22 1034. The bad qualities of this pro ce proved very Hixa, a ty- detrimental to the interest of his son Casimir ; thoughrannical the latter had received an excellent education, and 'vasdriven out possessed of many virtues. Insreacl ofe eet.ng him king, wjth her they chose Rixa his mother queen re gent. She proved son Casimil? tyrannical, and so partial to her countrymen the Ger¬ mans, that a rebellion ensued, and she was forced to fly to Germany; where she obtained the protection ot the emperor by means of the immense treasures ot Boleslaus, which she had caused to be transported thither before her. Her bad behavimirand expulsion proved still more fatal to the aflairs of ( asimir than even that of his fa¬ ther. He was immediately driven out of the kingdom ; and a civil war taking p'ace, a great many pretenders to 23 the crown appeared at once. To the oi’series occasioned ! 0l0,1d |b- bv this were adch d those of a foreign war; for the Bo- (01^ ;lI^ hemians and Russians invaded the kingdom in d 1 Acrentdomestic p ices, commiiting the most dreadful ravages. The wars, consequence of the>e accumulated distresses was, that the nobility came at last to the resolution of recalling Casi- mir, and electing him sovereign. However, beiore they took this measure, it was thought proper to send to Rome to complain of *he behaviour of the duke of Bo¬ hemia. The uepulies were at first received favourably : but POL [ 63 ] P u Poland. 24 Casimir re¬ called and elected Ung. 25 Poland sub jected to the tax cal led Peter- gence. 26 BoleslausII, a valiant and sue cessful prince. 37 Entertains three un¬ fortunate princes. 28 Affords effectual succour to Jacomir prince of Bohemia. but the Influence of the fluke’s golfl prevailing, no re¬ dress tvas obtained j so that at last, without farther struggle, it was resolved to recal Casimir. The only difficulty was where to find the fugitive prince ; for he had been gone five years from the king¬ dom, and nobody knew the place of his retreat. At last, by sending an embassy to bis mother, it wras found out that he had retired into France, where he applied closely to study at the university of Paris. Afterwards he went to Italy j where, for the sake of subsistence, be took upon him the monastic habit. At that time he had returned to Fiance, and obtained some preferment in the abbey of Clugni. Nothing now obstructed the prince’s return but the sacred function with which be was invested. However, a dispensation was obtained from the pope, by which he was released from his ec¬ clesiastical engagements, on condition that he and all the kingdom should become subject to the capitation tax called Peter-pence. Some other conditions of less con¬ sequence were added j such as, that the Poles should shave their heads and beards, and wear a white linen robe at festivals, like other pi'ofessors of the Catholic religion. Great preparations were made for the recep¬ tion of the young prince : and he was met on the fron¬ tier by the nobility, clergy, and forces of the nation ; by whom he was conducted to Gnesna, and crowned by the primate with more than usual solemnity. He proved a virtuous and pacific prince, as indeed the distracted situation of the kingdom would not admit of the carry¬ ing on of wars. However, Casimir proved his courage in subduing the banditti by which the country was over¬ run ; and by m arrying the princess Mary, sister to the duke of Russia, all quarrels with that nation were for the present extinguished. Upon the whole, the king¬ dom flourished during his reign 5 and became more re¬ spectable from the wisdom and stability of the admini¬ stration than it could have been by many victories. After a happy reign of 16 years, he died beloved and regretted by all his subjects. By the happy administration of Casimir the kingdom recovered sufficient strength to carry on successful wars against its foreign enemies. Boleslaus II. the son of Ca¬ simir, an enterprising and valiant prince, succeeded to the throne j and soon made himself so famous, that three unfortunate princes all took refuge at his court at once, having been expelled from their own dominions by their rebellious subjects. These were, Jacomir, son of Brite- slaus duke of Bohemia •, Bela, brother to the king of Hungary 5 and Zaslaus duke of Kiovia, eldest son to Jarislaus duke of Russia, and cousin to the king of Po¬ land. Boleslaus determined te redress all their grievances; but while he deliberated upon the most proper means for so doing, the duke of Bohemia, dreading the conse¬ quences of Jacomir’s escape, assembled an army, and, without any declaration of war, marched through the Hercynian forest, desolated Silesia, and laid waste the frontiers of Poland with fire and sword. Boleslaus marched against him with a force greatly inferior; and, by mere dint of superior capacity, cooped up his adver¬ sary in a wood, where he reduced him to the greatest distress. ]n this extremity the duke sent proposals for accommodation ; but they were rejected with disdain by Boleslaus; upon which the former, ordering fires to be kindled in his camp, as if he designed to continue there, removed with the utmost silence in the night-time ; and marching through narrow defiles, had advanced several Poland. leagues before Boleslaus received advice of his retreat. —v * The king pursued him, but in vain; for which reason he returned, after having ravaged the frontiers of Mo¬ ravia. The next year he entered Bohemia with a nu¬ merous army; but the duke, being unwilling to en¬ counter such a formidable adversary, submitted to such terms as Boleslaus thought proper to impose. In these the king of Poland stipulated for certain conditions in favour of Jacomir, which he took care to see punctu¬ ally executed ; after which he determined to march to¬ wards Hungary, to assist the fugitive prince Bela. 29 This prince had been for some time solicited by a and to Bek party of disaffected nobility to return, as his brother, P^nce of the reigning king, had alienated the hearts of his sub-^un°aIJ jects by his tyrannical behaviour: as soon therefore as Boleslaus bad finished the war in Bohemia, he was so¬ licited by Bela to embrace so favourable an opportunity, and put him in possession of the kingdom of Hungary. This the king readily complied with, as being agreeable to his own inclination ; and both princes entered Hun¬ gary by different routes, each at the head of a numer¬ ous body. The king of that country, however, was not disconcerted by such a formidable invasion; and be¬ ing largely assisted by the emperor, advanced against his antagonists with a vast army ; among whom was a nu¬ merous body of Bohemians, who had come to his assist¬ ance, though in direct violation of the treaty subsisting between the duke and the king of Poland. At last a decisive battle was fought, in which the Germans be¬ haved with the greatest valour, but were entirely de¬ feated through the treachery of the Hungarians, who in the heat of the battle deserted and went over to Bela. Almost all the foreign auxiliaries were killed on the spot ; the king himself was seized, and treated with such insolence by his perfidious subjects, that lie died in a short time of a broken heart; so that Bela was placed on the throne without further opposition, except from a revolt of the peasants, which was soon quelled by the Polish army. Boleslaus, having succeeded so happily in these two He projects enterprises, began to look upon himself as invincible ; the con- and, instead of designing only to assist Zaslaus, as l)e had first intended, now projected no less than the sub¬ jection of the whole country. He had indeed a claim to the sovereignty by virtue of his descent from Mary, queen of Poland, sister to Jarislaus ; and this lie endea¬ voured to strengthen by marrying a Russian princess himself. Having therefore assembled a very numerous and well-disciplined army, he entered the duchy of Kiovia, where he was opposed by Wisseslaus, who had usurped the sovereignty, with a vast multitude of forces. Boleslaus, however, continued to advance ; and the Meets witKi Russian prince being intimidated by the number and surprising good order of his enemies, deserted his own troops, and success‘ fled away privately with a slender retinue; upon which i his force dispersed themselves for want of a leader. The inhabitants of the city of Kiovia now called to their assistance Suamoslaus and Wszevold two brothers of Wisseslaus; but these princes acting the part of media¬ tors, procured pardon for the inhabitants from Zaslaus their natural sovereign. With the same facility the two princes recovered all the other dominions belonging to Zaslaus ; only one city venturing to stand a siege, and that was soon reduced. But in the mean time the king *iV 'oland. enervates himself there. ■pox. L of Hungary dying, a revolt ensued, and the two sons ^ ' of Bela were on the point of being deprived of their paternal dominions. This Boleslaus no sooner heard of than he marched directly into Hungary j where by the terror of his name only, he re-established tranquillity, and confirmed the princes in the enjoyment of then- kingdom. In the time that this was doing, Zaslaus was again driven from his territories, all the conquests that had been formerly made were lost, and Suantoslaus and Wszevold more powerful than ever. _ The king’s vigour, however, soon disconcerted all their measures. He ravaged all those territories which composed the palatinates of Lusac and Chelm, reduced the strong city of Wolyn, and transported the booty to Poland. The campaign was finished by a battle with Wszevold j which proved so bloody, that though Boleslaus was victorious, his army was weakened in such a manner that he could not pursue his conquests. In the winter he made nu¬ merous levies j and returning in the spring to Kioyia, reduced it, after several desperate attacks, by famine. On this occasion, instead of treating the inhabitants with cruelty, he commended their valour, and strictly prohibited his troops from pillaging or insulting them j distributing provisions among them with the utmost li- berality. Reduces This clemency procured the highest honour to the Kid via, hut king of Poland } but his stay here produced a most ter- ’ rible disaster. Kiovia was the most dissolute, as well as the richest city, in the north $ the king and all his sol¬ diers gave themselves up to the pleasures of the place. Boleslaus himself affected all the imperious state of an eastern monarch, and contracted an inclination for the grossest debaucheries. The consequence had almost proved fatal to Poland. The Hungarian and Russian wars had continued for seven years, during all which time the king had never been at home excepting once for the short space of three months. In the mean time the Polish women, exasperated at hearing that their husbands had neglected them and connected themselves with the women of Kiovia, raised their slaves to the beds of their masters ■, and in short the whole sex conspired in one general scheme of prostitution, in or¬ der to be revenged of the infidelity of their husbands, excepting one single woman, namely, Margaret, the wife of Count Nicholas of Demboisin, who preserved her fi¬ delity in spite of all solicitation. Advice of this strange revolution was soon received at Kiovia, where it excited terrible commotions. The soldiers blamed the king for their dishonour j forgetting how much they had to ac¬ cuse their own conduct in giving their wives such ex¬ treme provocation. The effect of these discontents was a general desertion, and Boleslaus saw himself suddenly left almost alone in the heart of Russia; the soldiers having unanimously resolved to return home to take vengeance of their wives and their gallants. A dreadful kind of war now ensued. The women knew that they were to expect no mercy from their enraged husbands, and therefore persuaded their lovers to take arms in their defence. They themselves fought by the side of their gallants with the utmost fury, and sought out their husbands in the heat of battle, in or¬ der to secure themselves from all danger ot punishment by their death. They were, however, on the point of being subdued, when Boleslaus arrived with the few re¬ maining Poles, but assisted by a vast army of Russians, Poland. 35 33 Universal defection of the Po lish wo¬ men. 34 A terrible civil war ensues. 64 ] POJ- with whom he intended to take equal vengeance on the women, their gallants, and his own soldiers who had deserted him. This produced a carnage more dreadful than ever. The soldiers united with their former wives and their gallants against the common enemy, and fought against Boleslaus and the Russians with the lury of lions. At last, however, the fortune of the king prevailed j the rebels were totally subdued, and the lew who escaped the sword were tortured to death, or died in prison. * To add to the calamities of this unhappy kingdom, Religious the schisms which for some time had prevailed in the church ol Rome found their way also into Poland 5 and the animosity of parties became aggravated in propor¬ tion to the frivolousness of their differences. By per¬ verse accident the matter came at last to be a contention for wealth and power between the king and clergy. ,5 This soon gave occasion to bloodshed j and the bishop Boleslans of Cracow was massacred in the cathedral while he was deposed^y performing the duties of his office. This and some other enormous crimes in a short time brought on the most wj10ie king, signal vengeance of the clergy. Gregory VII. the pope dom put at that time, thundered out the most dreadful anathe-under an mas against the king, released his subjects from theirmter lct‘ .allegiance, deprived him of the titles of sovereignty, and laid the kingdom under a general interdict, which the archbishop of Gnesna saw punctually enforced. To this terrible sentence Boleslaus in vain opposed his au¬ thority, and recalled the spirit which had formerly ren¬ dered him so formidable to the neighbouring states. The minds of the people were blinded by superstition, so that they deemed it a less heinous crime to rise in rebellion against their sovereign than to oppose the tyranny of the holy see. Conspiracies were daily formed against the per¬ son and government of Boleslaus. The whole kingdom became a scene of confusion, so that the king could no longer continue with safety in his own dominions. He fled therefore with his son Mieczslaus, and took refuge in Hungarybut here also the holy vengeance of the clergy pursued him, nor did they cease persecuting him 37 till he was brought to a miserable end. Authors differ Tlie king’s widely with respect to the manner of his death. Some extreme say that he was murdered by the clergy as he was hunt-^^^8^ ing } others, that he killed himself in a fit of despair j and one author tells us, that he wandered about in the woods of Hungary, lived like a savage upon wild beasts, and was at last killed and devoured by dogs. The great¬ est number, however,tell us, that being driven from place to place by the persecutions of the clergy, he was at last obliged to become a cook in a monastery at Carinthia, in which mean occupation he ended his days. The destruction of Boleslaus was not sufficient to al- The inter¬ lay the papal resentment. It extended to the whole king- diet remo- dom of Poland. Mieczlaus, the son of Boleslaus, was not suffered to ascend the throne j and the kingdom trfevous continued under the most severe interdict, which could impositions, be removed only by the force of gold, and the most ab¬ ject concessions. Besides the tax called Peter-pence, new impositions were added of the most oppressive nature till at length the pontift, having satiated his avarice, and impoverished the country, consented that the bro¬ ther of the deceased monarch should be raised to the sovereignty, but only with the title of duke. This prince, named Uladislaus, being of a meek disposition, with little ambition, thought it his duty to acquiesce implicitly POL Poland. 39 Uladislaus becomes sovereign, but is al¬ lowed on¬ ly the title of duke. 40 Boleslaus III. divides his domi¬ nions be¬ twixt Sbig- neus his illegitimate brother and himself. .4I A civil 42 _ Generosity of Bole¬ slaus, and ingratitude ofSbigneus, implicitly in the will of the pope j and therefore accept¬ ed the terms offered, sending at the same time an embas¬ sy to Rome, earnestly intreating the removal of the in¬ terdict. The request was granted j but all his endea¬ vours to recover the regal dignity proved fruitless, the pope having in conjunction with the emperor of Ger¬ many, conferred that honour on the duke of Bohemia. This was extremely mortifying to Uladislaus, but it was absorbed in considerations of the utmost consequence to himself and his dominions. Russia took the opportunity of the late civil disturbances to throw off the yoke 5 and this revolt drew after it the revolt of Prussia, Pomerania, and other provinces. The smaller provinces, however, were soon reduced •, but the duke had no sooner returned to Poland, than they again rebelled, and hid their fami¬ lies in impenetrable forests. Uladislaus marched against them with a considerable army 5 but was entirely defeat¬ ed, and obliged to return back with disgrace. Next year, however, he had better fortune j and, having led against them a more numerous army than before, they were content to submit and deliver up the ringleaders of the revolt to be punished as the duke thought proper. No sooner were the Pomeranians reduced, than civil dissensions took place. Sbigneus, the son of Uladislaus by a concubine, was placed at the head of an army by the discontented nobility, in order to subvert his father’s government, and dispute the title of Boleslaus, the legi¬ timate son of Uladislaus to the succession. The war was terminated by the defeat and captivity of Sbigneus 3 who was at first confined, but afterwards released on condition that he should join his father in punishing the palatine of Cracow. But before this could be done, the palatine found means to effect a reconciliation with the duke; with which the young princes being displeased, a war took place between them and their father. The end of all was, that the palatine of Cracow was banished, and the princes submitted j after which, Uladislaus, having chastised the Prussians and Pomeranians who had again revolted, died in the year 1103, ^ie 59^5 Uladislaus was succeeded by bis son Boleslaus III. who divided his dominions equally betwixt his brother Sbigneus and himself. The former being dissatisfied with his share, raised cabals against his brother. A civil war was for some time prevented by the good offices of the primate : but at last Sbigneus, having privately stirred up the Bohemians, Saxons, and Moravians, against his brother, made such formidable preparations as threatened the conquest of all Poland. Boleslaus, being unprovided with forces to oppose such a formidable power, had re¬ course to the Russians and Hungarians j who readily em¬ braced his cause, in expectation of turning it to their own advantage. The event was, that Sbigneus was entirely defeated ; and might easily have been obliged to surren¬ der himself at diseretion, had not Boleslaus generously left him in quiet possession of the duchy of Mazovia, in order to maintain himself suitably to the dignity of bis birth. This kindness the ungrateful Sbigneus repaid by entering into another conspiracy; but the plot being dis¬ covered, he was seized, banished, and declared a traitor if ever he set foot again in Poland. Even this severity did not produce the desired effect: Sbigneus persuaded the Pomeranians to arm in his behalf 5 but he was de¬ feated, taken prisoner, and again banished. Almost all the nobility solicited the king to put such an ungrateful traitor to death ; however, that generous prince could Vol. XVII. Part I. + [ 55 ] POL 43 not think of polluting his hands with the death of his Poland, brother, notwithstanding all he had yet done. Nay, he ' even took him back to Poland, and appointed him a maintenance suitable to his rank : but he soon had rea¬ son to repent of his kindness j for his unnatural brother wj)0 in a short time began to raise fresh disturbances, in last put to consequence of which he soon met with the death which death, he deserved. Boleslaus was scarcely freed from the intrigues of his brother, when he found himself in greater danger than 44 ever from the ambition of the emperor Henry IV. The War with emperor had attacked the king of Hungary, yvith whom1*10 ernPc" Boleslaus was in close alliance, and from whom he badly *lxm' received assistance when in great distress himself. The king of Poland determined to assist his friend 5 and there¬ fore made a powerful diversion in Bohemia, where he re¬ peatedly defeated the Imperialists: upon which, the em¬ peror collecting all his forces, ravaged Silesia, and even entered Poland, where he laid siege to the strong town of Lubusz ^ but was at last obliged to abandon the en¬ terprise, after having sustained much loss. However, Henry was not discouraged, but penetrated still farther into Poland, and was laying waste all before him, when the superior skill of Boleslaus compelled him to retire, after having almost destroyed his army with fatigue and famine, without once coming to action. Enraged at this disappointment, Plenry laid siege to Glogaw, in hopes of drawing the Poles to an engagement before he should be obliged to evacuate the country. The fortifications of the place were weak; but the spirit of the inhabitants supplied their deficiencies, and they gave the Imperialists a most unexpected and vigorous reception. At last, how¬ ever, they were on the point of surrendering to superior force ) and actually agreed to give up the place, provi¬ ded they did not receive any succours during that time. Boleslaus determined, however, not to let such a brave garrison fall a sacrifice to their loyalty *, and therefore prevailed on the besieged to break the capitulation ra¬ ther than surrender when they were on the point of be¬ ing delivered. All this was transacted with the utmost secrecy 5 so that the emperor advanced, without thoughts of meeting with any resistance, to take possession of the city •, but, being received by a furious discharge of ar¬ rows and javelins, he w'as so incensed, that be resolved to storm the place, and give no quarter. On the ap¬ proach of the army, the Imperialists were astonished to see not only the breaches filled up, but new walls, se¬ cured by a w'et ditch, reared behind the old, and erect¬ ed during the suspension of hostilities by the industry of the besieged. The attack, however, went on 5 but the inhabitants, animated by despair, defended themselves who is with incredible valour, and at last obliged the Imperia-worsted, lists to break up the siege with precipitation. Next day Boleslaus arrived, and pursued the emperor with such vigour, that he obliged him to fly with disgrace into his own country. This soon brought on a peace, which was confirmed by a marriage between Boleslaus and the emperor’s sister. 45 Hitherto the glory of Bnleslaus had equalled, or even Boleslaus eclipsed, that of his namesake and predecessor Boleslaus the Great j but about the year 1135 he was brought”^^^ into difficulties and disgrace by his own credulity. He his own was imposed upon by an artful story patched up by a credulity certain Hungarian ; who insinuated himself so far intoullij Scne- his affections, that he gave him the government of Wi-roslty‘ I slica, POL Poland, slica, a strong town on the river Nitla. —y, ) tor gave up the place to the Russians, who pillaged and burnt it } carrying the inhabitants at the same time into slavery. Boleslaus was incensed, and entered im¬ mediately upon a war with Russia, by which means he only heaped one calamity upon another. He received a deputation from the inhabitants ot Halitz, to implore his assistance in favour of a young prince, who had been banished into Poland. Boleslans marched to their re¬ lief with a choice body of troops } but as he was pre¬ paring to enter the town, he was attacked by the whole Russian army, and, after a most violent conflict, entirely defeated. By this disgrace the duke was so much af¬ flicted, that he died in a short time, after having reign¬ ed 36 years. _ _ Boleslaus, by his will, left his dominions equally di Poland; A8 A civil war. 47 Poland di , — 7 _ - - vided a- vided among his four sons. Uladislaus, the eldest, had mons the provinces of Cracow, Sirad, Lencici, Silesia, and iolcskus" Pomerania. Boleslaus, the second son, had for his share the palatinates of Culm and Cujavia, with the dueny ot Mazovia. The palatinates of Kaleszh and Posnama fell to Mieczslaus the third son-, and to Henry, the fourth son, were assigned those of Lublin and Sando- mir. Casimir the youngest child, then an infant in the cradle, was entirely forgotten, and no provision made for him. There have been but very few instances where dominions were thus divided, that the princes remain¬ ed satisfied with their respective shares j neither did the sons of Boleslaus long continue at peace with one ano¬ ther. By the will of the late duke, all the brothers were obliged to own the supremacy of Uladislaus, who was declared duke of all Poland : they were restrained from forming alliances, declaring war, or concluding peace, without his approbation : they were obliged to take the field with a certain number of troops, whenever the duke required it-, and they were forbid to meddle with the guardianship of the infant prince Casimir,^ his education being left entirely to the sovereign. The harmony of the princes was first disturbed by the am¬ bition of Christina, the wife of Uladislaus, who formed a scheme to get possession of all Poland, and deprive the younger children of the benefit of their father s will. Having obtained her husband’s concurrence, she assembled the states of Poland, and made a long speech, showing the dangers which might arise irom a parti¬ tion of the ducal dominions among so many j and con¬ cluded with attempting to show the necessity of revoking the ratification of the late duke’s will, in order to en¬ sure the obedience of the princes and the tranquillity of the republic. Many of the nobility expressed their resentment against this speech, and fully refuted every article in it j but they were all afterwards gained over, or intimidated by Uladislaus so that none appeared to take the part of the young princes except a noble Dane, who lost his life fur so doing. Uladislaus now having got the nobifity on his side, .unc*. first drove Boleslaus out of his territories j next, he ail the rest, marcliefl against Henry, and dispossessed him al»o, lor- ciugboth to take refuge with Mieczsiaus in Posnania, where all the three brothers were besieged. Several of the nobility interposed, and used all their influence to effect a reconciliation, hut in vain *, for Uladislaus was as inexorable as if be had received an injury ; and there¬ fore insisted that the besieged princes slionld surrender at discretion, and submit to the will of the conqueror. [ G6 ] POL But tlie trai- Thus driven to despair, the brothers sained attacked the duke’s army with such impetuosity, that they obtained a complete victory, and took all las bag¬ gage and valuable effects. The brothers improved their victory, and laid siege to Cracow. The Russians, who had assisted Uladislaus at first, now entirely abandoned him, and evacuated Poland, which obliged him to shut himself up in Cracow *, but, finding the inhabitants att e disposed to stand a siege, he retired into Germany in or¬ der to solicit assistance from his wife’s friends. But here he found himself mistaken, and that these friends were attached to him only in his prosperity 5 while in the mean time the city of Cracow surrendered, the unfor- tunate Uladislaus was formally deposed, and his brother and u 0" p0ian(j in. land was invaded by the emperor Frederic Barbarossa, vatje(j by who was persuaded to this by the solicitations of Uta-theempe- dislaus and his wife Christina. The number of the Im- ror Barba- perialists was so great, that Boleslaus and his brothers ’ did not think proper to oppose them in the field 5 they contented themselves with cutting off the convoys, pla¬ cing ambuscades, harassing them on their march, and keeping them in perpetual alarms by false attacks and skirmishes. With this view the three brothers divided their forces, desolated the country before the enemy, and burnt all the towns and cities which were in no condition to stand a siege. Thus the emperor, advan¬ cing into the heart of a desolated country where he could not subsist, was at last reduced to such a situation that he could neither go forward nor retreat, and was 5J6 obliged to solicit a conference with Boleslaus. The lat- who is ob- ter vvas too prudent to irritate him by an unseasonable liged t« haughtiness, and therefore went to the German camp attended only by his brothers and a slight guard. This1*' instance of confidence was so agreeable to the emperor, that a treaty was soon entered upon, which was con¬ firmed by a marriage between Adelaide, niece to the emperor, and Mieczslaus duke of Posnania. Boleslaus having thus happily escaped from so great a danger, took it into his head to attempt the conquest of Prussia, for no other reason but because the inhabi¬ tants were heathens. Having unexpectedly invaded the country with a very numerous army, he succeeded in his enterprise j great numbers of infidels were converted, and many churches set up : but no sooner was Boleslaus gone, POL [ 67 ] POL Poland. B°ne, Ilian tlie inhabitants returned to their old religion. U ■ y—i > Upon this Boleslaus again came against them with a formidable power j but being betrayed by some Prus¬ sians whom he had taken into his service and raised to posts of honour, his army was led into defiles and almost entirely cut off, Duke Henry was killed, and Boleslaus and Mieczslaus escaped with great difficulty. This misfortune was quickly followed by another $ for now the children of Uladislaus laid claim to all the Polish dominions which had been possessed by their fa- s, ther, most of which had been bestowed upon young Ca- A civil simir. They were supported in their pretensions by a war. great number of discontented Poles, and a considerable body of German auxiliaries. Boleslaus, finding him¬ self unable to withstand his enemies by force, had re¬ course to negotiation, by which means he gained time to recruit his army and repair his losses. An assembly of the states was held, before which the duke so fully lefuted the claims of the children of Uladislaus, that it was almost unanimously voted that they bad kindled an "unjust war-, and to take away every pretence for renew- iog the civil discords of Poland, they were a second time invested with the duchy of Silesia, which for the present put an end to all disputes. After this, Boleslaus appli¬ ed himself to promote, by all means, the happiness of his 8ubjects, till his death, which happened in the year J174. On the death of Boleslaus, the states raised his bro¬ ther Mieczslaus to the ducal throne, on account of the great opinion they had of him. But the moment that Mieczslaus ceased to be a subject, he became a tyrant, and a slave to almost every kind of vice •, the conse¬ quence of which was, that in a very short time he was 54 deposed, and his brother Casimir elected in his stead. € a simir, an Casimir was a prince of the greatest justice and bene- oxcellent vo]encej insomuch that he scrupled to accept of the ho- jnnnce, nour wl1ich the states had conferred upon him, lest it should be a trespass against the laws of equity. How¬ ever, this scruple being soon got over, he set himself a- bout securing peace and tranquillity in all parts of his dominions. He redressed all grievances, suppressed ex¬ orbitant imposts, and assembled a general diet, in which it was proposed to rescue the peasants from the tyranny of the nobility j an aflair of such consequence, that the duke could not enter upon it by his own authority, even though supported by the clergy. Yet it proved less difficult than had been imagined, to persuade the nobi¬ lity to relinquish certain privileges extremely detrimen¬ tal to natural right. They were influenced by the ex¬ ample of their virtuous sovereign, and immediately granted all that he required ; and to secure this decla¬ ration in favour of *he peasants, the archbishop of Gnes- na thundered out anathemas against those who should endeavour to regain the unjust privileges which they had now renounced ; and to give still greater weight to this decision, the acts of the diet were transmitted to Rome, and were confirmed by the pope. But though the nobility in general consented to have their power somewhat retrenched, it proved matter of discontent to some, who for this reason immediately be¬ came the partisans of the deposed Mieczslaus. This un¬ fortunate prince was now reduced to such indigence, that he wrote an account of his situation to his brother Casimir $ which so much affected him, that in an as¬ sembly of the diet he proposed to resign the sovereignty in favour of his brother. To this the states replied in the most peremptory manner : they desired him never Poland, more to mention the subject to them, lest they should —v"— '; be under the necessity of deposing him and excluding his brother, who, they were determined, should never more have the dominion of Poland. Casimir, however, was so much concerned at the account of his brother’s misfortunes, that he tried every method to relieve him, and even connived at the arts practised by some discon¬ tented noblemen to restore him. By a very singular generosity, he facilitated the reduction of Gnesna and Lower Poland, where Mieczslaus might have lived in peace and splendour, had not his heart been so corrupt¬ ed that it could not be subdued by kindness. The con¬ sequence was, that he used all his art to wrest from his brother the whole of his dominions, and actually con¬ quered the provinces of Mazovia and Cujavia ; but of these he was soon dispossessed, and only some place sin Lower Poland were left him. After this he made an¬ other attempt, on occasion of a report that Casimir had been poisoned in an expedition into Russia. He sur¬ prised the city of Cracow; but the citadel re fused to surrender, and his hopes were entirely blasted by the re¬ turn of Casimir himself; who, with an unparalleled ge¬ nerosity and magnanimity, asked peace of his brother whom he had vanquished and had m a manner at his 55 mercy.—The last action ot this amiable prince was the conquers conquest of Russia, which he effected rather by the re- ^USiiii' putation of his wisdom and generosity than by the force of his arms. Those barbarians voluntarily submitted to a prince so famed for bis benevolence, justice, and hu¬ manity. Soon after his return, he died at Cracow, la¬ mented as the best prince in every respect who had ever filled the throne of Poland. Casimir left one son, named Lechus, an infant; and the states, dreading the consequences of a long mino¬ rity, hesitated at appointing him sovereign, considering how many competitors he must necessarily have, and how dubious it must be whether he might be fit for the $6 sovereignty after he had obtained it. At last, however,(war Lechus was nominated, chiefly through the interest he had obtained on account of the reputation of his father’s ^ j,ose(j virtues. The consequence of his nomination was pre- Mieczslaus. cisely what might have been expected. Mieczslaus formed an alliance against him with the dukes of Op- pelen, Pomerania, and Breslau ; and having raised all the men in Lower Poland fit to bear arms, took the road to Cracow with a very numerous army. A bloody battle was fought on the banks of the river Mozgarva ; in which both sides were so much weakened, that they were unable to keep the fit id, and consequently were forced to retire for some time in order to repair their forces. Mieczslaus was first ready for action, and there¬ fore had the advantage : however, he thought proper to employ artihee rather than open force; and therefore having attempted in vain to corrupt the guardians of Lechus, he entered into a treaty with the duchess-dow¬ ager his mother. To her hr represented in the strong¬ est manner the miseries which would ensue from her re¬ fusal of the conditions he proposed. He stipulated to adopt Lechus and Conrade, her sons, for his own ; to surrender the province of Cujavia for their present sup¬ port ; and to declare them heirs to all his dominions. The principal nobility opposed this accommodation, but 57 it was accepted bv tbe duchess in spite of all their re- Mieczslaus monstrances; and Mieczslaus was once more put in pos-ltstore*' I 2 session Poland. 58 Poland ra¬ vaged by the Tar¬ tars. POL [ session of the capital, after having taken a solemn oath to execute punctually every article of the treaty. It is not to be supposed that a prince of such a per¬ fidious disposition as Mieczslaus would pay much regard to the obligations of a simple contract. It was a max¬ im with him, that a sovereign is no longer obliged to keep his oath than while it is neither safe nor beneficial to break it. Having therefore got all the power into his hands, he behaved in the very same manner as if no treaty with the duchess had subsisted. The duchess, perceiving herself duped, formed a strong party, and excited a general insurrection. The rebellion could not be withstood : Mieczslaus was driven out of Cracow, and on the point of being reduced to his former circum¬ stances, when he found means to produce a variance be¬ tween the duchess and palatine of Cracow and thus once more turned the scale in his favour. The forces of Mieczslaus now became superior, and he, in conse¬ quence, regained possession of Cracow, but did not long enjoy his prosperity, falling a victim to his intempe¬ rance 5 so that Lechus was restored to the sovereignty in the year 1206. The government of Lechus was the most unfortunate of any of the sovereigns of Poland. In his time the Tartars made an irruption, and committed everywhere the most cruel ravages. At last they came to an en¬ gagement with the Poles, assisted by the Russians j and after an obstinate and dreadful conflict, obtained a com¬ plete victory. This incursion, however, terminated as precipitately as it commenced 5 for without any appa¬ rent reason they retired, just as the whole kingdom was ready to submit ; but the devastations they had com¬ mitted produced a famine, which was soon followed by a plague that depopulated one of the most populous countries of the north. In this unhappy situation of affairs, death ended the misfortunes of Lechus, who was murdered by his own subjects as he was bathing. A civil war took place after his death 5 and the history for some time is so confused, that it is difficult to say with certainty who was his successor. During this un¬ fortunate state of the country, the Tartars made a se¬ cond irruption, laid all desolate before them, and were advancing to the capital, when they were attacked and defeated with great slaughter by the palatine of Cra¬ cow with only a handful of men. The power of the enemy, however, ivas not broken by this victory ; for, next year, the Tartars returned, and committed such barbarities as can scarce be imagined. Whole provinces were defeated, and every one of the inhabitants mas¬ sacred. They were returning, laden with spoil, when the palatine fell upon them a second time, but not with the same success as before : for, after an obstinate en¬ gagement, he -was defeated, and thus all Poland was laid open to the ravages of the barbarians 5 the nobility fled into Hungary, and the peasants sought an asylum among rocks and impenetrable forests. Cracow, being left entirely defenceless, was soon taken, pillaged, and burnt', after which the barbarians, penetrating into Si¬ lesia and Moravia, desolated these countries, destroying Breslau and other cities. Nor did Hungary escape the fury of their barbarity: the king gave battle to the Tartars, but was defeated with vast slaughter, and had the mortification to see his capital laid in ashes, and above 100,000 of his subjects perish by fire and sword. The arms of the Tartars were invincible j nothing Poland. 68 ] POL could withstand the prodigious number of forces which they brought into the field, and the fury with which they fought. They fixed their head-quarters on the frontiers of Hungary; and spread their devastations on every side with a celerity and success that threatened the destruction of the whole empire, as well as oi the neighbouring kingdoms. In this dreadful situation was Poland when Boleslaus, surnamed the Chaste^ was raised to the sovereignty j but this, so far' from putting an end to the troubles, only superadded a civil war to the rest of the calamities. Boleslaus was opposed by his uncle Conrade the bro¬ ther of Lechus, who was provoked at becoming the subject of his own nephew. Having assembled a power¬ ful army, he gained possession of Cracow j assumed the title ot duke of Poland; and might possibly have kept possession of the sovereignty, had not his avarice and pride equally offended the nobility and peasants. In consequence of their discontents, they unanimously in¬ vited Boleslaus, who had fled into Hungary, to come and head the insurrection which now took place in every ^ quarter. On his arrival, he was joyfully received into Knight 0f the capital : but Conrade still headed a powerful party > the Teuto- and it is reported that on this occasion the knights of the Teutonic order were first called into I oland, f°jnt0 po. dispute the pretensions of Boleslaus. All the endea-j^j, vours of Conrade, however, proved unsuccessful : he was defeated in two pitched battles, and forced to live in a private situation; though he never ceased to ha¬ rass his nephew, and make fresh attempts to recover the crown. However, of the reign ot Boleslaus we have little account, except that he made a vow of perpetual continency, and imposed the same on his wife j that he founded near 40 monasteries ; and that he died after a long reign in 1 279, after having adopted Lechus duke of Cujavia, and procured a confirmation of his choice by the free election of the people. died Augustus III. elector of Saxony, and king of Poland. He was succeeded by Count Poniatowski, a Polish grandee, who was proclaimed Sept. 7th I7^4> the name of Stanislaus Augustus, and crowned on the 25th of November the same year.—During the inter¬ regnum which took place between the death of Augus¬ tus III. and the election of Stanislaus, a decree had been made by the convocation-diet of Poland, with regard to the dissidents, as they were called, or dissenters from the Polish religion. Ev this decree they were prohibited from the free exercise of their religion, much more than they had formerly been, and totally excluded from all posts and places under the government. On this several of the European powers interposed, at the application ol the dissidents for their good offices. Hie courts of Rus¬ sia, Prussia, Great Britain, and Denmark, made remon¬ strances to the diet *, but notwithstanding these remon¬ strances, the decree was confirmed by the coronation- diet held after the king’s election. October 6. 1766, an ordinary diet was assembled. Here declarations from the courts above mentioned were presented to his Polish majesty, requiring the re-estab- lishment of the dissidents in their civil rights and privi¬ leges, and the peaceable enjoyment of their modes of worship secured to them by the laws of the kingdom, which had been observed for two centuries. These pri¬ vileges, it was alleged, had been confirmed by the treaty of Oliva, concluded by all the northern powers, which could not be altered but by the consent of all the con¬ tracting parties. The Popish party contended strongly for a confirmation of some decrees made against the dis¬ sidents in 1717, 1723, and 1736. The deputies from the foreign powers replied, that those decrees bail passed in the midst of intestine troubles, and were contradicted by the formal protestations and express declarations of foreign powers. At last, after violent contests, the mat¬ ter was referred to the bishops and senators for their opinion. Upon a report from them, the diet came to a resolution, That they would fully maintain the dissi¬ dents in all the rights and prerogatives to which they were entitled by the laws of then country, particularly by the constitutions of the year 17 >7, &c. and by trea¬ ties j and that as to their complaints with regard to the exercise of their religion, the college of archbishops and bishops, under the direction ol the prince primate, would endeavour to remove those difficulties in a manner con¬ formable to justice and neighbourly love.—By this time, 6 ] POL however, the court of Russia seemed determined to make her remonstrances more effectual, and a small body ol' Russian troops marched to within two miles ol the ca¬ pital of Poland. These resolutions of the diet were by no means agree¬ able to the dissidents. They dated the beginning of their sutferings from the year 17I7- ^ie re^eriinS gi10'- antes to the archbishops and bishops was looked upon as a measure the most unreasonable that could he imagined, as that body ot men had always been their opposers, and in fact the authors of all the evils which had befallen them.—Shortly after matters were considered in tins view, an additional body of Russians, to the number of about 15,000, entered Poland. Poland. The dissidents, being now pretty sure of the protec- Com9e7qiieI), tion of foreign powers, entered, on the 20th ol I\iarch cts 0f jJbjc I 1767, into two confederacies, at Hiovn and Sluck. One of them was signed by the dissidents ol Great and Little Poland, and the other by those of the Great Duchy of Lithuania. The purpose of these confede¬ racies was, an engagement to exert themselves in the defence of their ancient privileges, and the tree exercise ot their religion professing at the same time, however, the utmost loyalty to the king, and resolving to send a deputation to him to implore his protection. I hey even invited those of the Gatholic communion, and all tiue patriots, to unite with them in maintaining the funda¬ mental laws of the kingdom, the peace ot religion, and the right of each one jointly with themselves. They claimed, by virtue of public treaties, the protection of the powers who were guarantees of then rights and li¬ berties j namely, the empress ef Russia, and the kings of Sweden, Great Britain, Denmark, and Prussia. Lastly, they protested, that they had no intention of acting to the detriment of the Roman Catholic religion, which they duly respected : and only asked the liberty of their own, and the re-establishment of their ancient rights. The three, cities of Thorn, Llbing, and Dant- zic, acceded to the confederacy ol Thorn on the 10th of April ", as did the duke and nobles of Courland to that of Stuck on the 15th of May. The empress ol Russia and king of Prussia, in the mean time, continued to issue forth new declarations in favour of the dissidents 5 and the Russian troops in Po¬ land were gradually augmented to 30,000 men. Great numbers of other confederacies were also formed in dif¬ ferent parts of the kingdom. These at first took little part in the affairs of the dissidents : they complained only of the administration of public allairs, in which they alleged that innovations had been introduced, and were therefore for some time called confederations of malcontents. All these confederacies published mani¬ festoes, in which they recommended to the inhabitants to quarter and treat the Russian troops as the defenders of the Polish liberties. The different confederacies of malcontents formed in General the 24 districts of Lithuania united at Wilna on theeonisdera- 22d of June j and that general confederacy re-established cy’ Prince Radzivil, who had married th. king’s sioter, in his liberty, estates, and honour, ot which he had been deprived in 1764 by the states of that duchy. On the 23d of June Prince Radzivil was chosen grand marshal of the general confederacy of all Poland, which then be¬ gan to be called the notional confederacy, and was said to be composed of 72,000 noblemen and gentlemen. The POL [ 77 ] POL Poland. The general confederacy took such measures as ap- —y-—' peared most proper for strengthening their party. They sent to the several waywodes of the kingdom, requiring their compliance with the following articles: I. That all the gentlemen who had not signed the confederacy should do it immediately j 2. That all the courts of justice should subsist as formerly, but not judge any of the confederates *, 3. That the marshals of the crown should not pass any sentence without the participation of at least four of the confederates ; and, 4. That the marshals of the crown and the treasurers should be im¬ mediately restored to the possession of their respective rights. The Catholic party in the mean time were not idle. The bishop of Cracow sent a very pathetic and zealous letter to the dietines assembled at ’Warsaw on the 13th of August, in *hich he exhorted them to arm their nuncios with courage, by giving them orthodox and patriotic instructions, that they might not grant the dissidents new advantages beyond those which were se¬ cured to them by the constitutions of the country, and treaties with foreign powers, &c. The pope also sent briefs to the king, the great chancellor, the noblesse, bishops of the kingdom, and to the prince primate, with such arguments and exhortations as were thought most proper to ward ofi' the impending danger. Coun¬ cils in the mean time were frequently held at the bishop of Cracow’s palace, where all the prelates at Warsaw 99 Tumults in the diet. assembled. On the 26th of September 1767 the confederacy of dissidents was united with the general confederacy of malcontents in the palace of Prince Radzivil, who on that occasion expressed great friendship for the dissidents. In a few days after, the Russian troops in the capital were reinforced, and a considerable body of them was posted at about five miles distance. On the 5th of October an extraordinary diet was held : but the affair of the dissidents met with such op¬ position, that it was thought necessary to adjourn the meeting till the 12th j during which interval, every ex¬ pedient w7as used to gain over those who opposed Prince Radzivil’s plan. This rvas, to appoint a commission, furnished with full power to enter into conference with Prince Repnin, the Russian ambassador, concerning the affairs of the dissidents. Notwithstanding all the pains taken, however, the meeting of the 12th proved exceed- ingly tumultuous. The bishops of Cracow and Kiow, with some other prelates, and several magnats, declar¬ ed, that they would never consent to the establishment of such a commission ; and at the same time spoke with more vehemence than ever against the pretensions of the dissidents. Some of the deputies answered with . great warmth j which occasioned such animosities, that the meeting W'as again adjourned till the 16th. On the 13th the bishops of Cracow and Kiow, the palatine of Cracow, and the staroste of Domski, were Russians^ carr^e^ ^’7 Russian detachments. The crime alleged against them, in a declaration published next day by Prince Repnin, was, that they had been wanting in respect to the dignity of the empress of Russia, by at¬ tacking the purity of her intentions towards the repu¬ blic j though she was resolved to continue her protec¬ tion and assistance to the general confederacy united for preserving the liberties of Poland, and correcting all the abuses which had been introduced into the go- ■vernment, &c. too Violent procee li¬ lt was probably owing to this violent proceeding of Poland. the Russians, that Prince Radzivil’s plan was at last adop- v—^ ted, and several new regulations were made in favour of the dissidents. These innovations, however, soon pro¬ duced a civil war, which at last ended in the ruin of the kingdom. In the beginning of the year 1768, a new confederacy was formed in Podolia, a province border- ICT ing on Turkey, which was afterwards called the confc- Confedera- deracy nf Bar. The intention of it was, to abolish, by cy ®ar' force of arms, the new constitutions, particularly those in favour of the dissidents. The members of the new confederacy likewise expressed great resentment against the carrying away the bishops of Cracow', &c. and still detaining them in custody. Podoiia was reckoned the fittest place for the purpose of the confederates, as they imagined the Russians could not attack them there without giving umbrage to the Ot¬ toman court. SimiliarconfederacieSjbowever, were quick¬ ly entered into throughout the kingdom : the clergy ex¬ cited all ranks of men to exert themselves in defence of their religion ; and so much were their exhortations re¬ garded, that even the king’s troops could not be trusted to act against these confederates. The empress of Rus¬ sia threatened the new confederates as disturbers of the public tranquillity,and declared that her troops would act against them if they persisted. It was, however, some time before the Russian troops were considerably reinfor¬ ced : nor did they at first seem inclined to act with the vigour which they might have exerted. A good many skirmishes soon happened between these two contending parties, in which the confederates were generally defeat¬ ed. In one of these the latter being worsted, and hardly pressed, a number of them passed the Niester, and took refuge in Moldavia. This province had formerly belong¬ ed to Poland, but was now subject to the Grand Signior: the Russians, however, pursued their enemies into Mol¬ davia ; but in order to prevent any offence being taken by the Porte, Prince Repnin wrote to the Russian resi¬ dent at Constantinople, to intimate there, that the con¬ duct of the Russian colonel who commanded the partv was quite contrary to the orders of his court, and that therefore he would be turned out of his post. Great cruelty in the mean time wras exercised against the dissidents where there were no Russian troops to pro¬ tect them. Towards the end of October 1769, Prince Martin Lubomirski, one of the southern confederates, who had been driven out of Poland, and had taken shel¬ ter with some of his adherents among the mountains of Hungary, got a manifesto posted up on several of the churches of Cracow, in which he invited the nation to a general revolt, and assuring them of the assistance of the Ottoman Porte, with whom he pretended to have concluded a treaty. This was the beginning of hosti¬ lities between the Turks and Russians, which were not terminated but by a vast effusion of blood on both , sides. 102 The unhappy kingdom of Poland was the first scene War be- of this war, and in a short time was reduced to the moat twe(e” deplorable situation. In the end of the year 1768, the™ and the peasants of the Greek religion in the Polish Ukraine, Russian». and province of Kiow, took up arms, and committed the greatest ravages, having, as they pretended, been threat¬ ened with death by the confederates unless they would turn Roman Catholics. Against these insurgents the Russians employed their armsj and made great numbers POL t 78 ] POL Poland, of them prisoners. The rest took refuge among the i,,..—Haidamacks •, by whom they were soon joined, and in the beginning of 1769 entered the Ukraine in conjunc¬ tion with them, committing every where the most horrid massacres. Here, however, they were at last defeated by the Polish troops, at the same time that several oi the confederacies in Poland were severely chastised. Soon after, the chan of the Grim Tartars, having been repulsed with loss in an attempt on New Seryia, entered the Polish territories, where he left frightful marks of his inhumanity upon some innocent and defenceless per¬ sons. This latter piece of conduct, with the cruelties exercised by the confederates, induced the Polish Cos¬ sacks of Braclau and Kioria, amounting to near 30,000 effective men, to join the Russians, in order to defend their country against these destroyers. Matters conti¬ nued much in the same way during the rest of the year 1769 and m 1770, skirmishes frequently happened be¬ tween the Russians and confederates, in which the lat¬ ter were almost always worsted *, but they took care to revenge themselves by the most barbarous cruelties on the dissidents, wherever they could find them. In I77°» a considerable number of the confederates of Bar, who had joined the Turks, and been excessively ill used by them, came to an accommodation with the Russians, who took them under their protection on very moderate terms. Agriculture in the mean time had been so much ne¬ glected, that the crop of 1770 was very deficient. This encouraged a number of desperadoes to associate undei the denomination of confederates, who were guilty of still greater excesses than those who had been under some kind of regulation. Thus a great part of the country was at last reduced to a mere desert, the inhabitants be¬ ing either exterminated, or carried off to stock the re¬ mote Russian plantations, from whence they never could 10, return. New confe- In the year 1771, the confederacies, which seemed to deracies. have been extinguished, sprang up afresh, and increased to a prodigious degree. This was occasioned by then having been secretly encouraged and supplied with mo¬ ney by France. A great number of French officers en¬ gaged as volunteers in their service 5 who having intro¬ duced discipline among their troops, they acted with much greater vigour than formerly, and sometimes prov¬ ed too°hard for their enemies. These gleams of success proved at last their total ruin. The Russians were rein¬ forced and properly supported. The Austrian and Prus¬ sian troops entei'ed the country, and advanced on dif¬ ferent sides *, and the confederates found themselves in a short time entirely surrounded by their enemies, who seemed to have nothing less in view than an abso¬ lute conquest of the country, and sharing it among them- Scl V6S# Attempt to Before matters came to this crisis, however, the assassinate confederates formed a design of assassinating the king, the king. 011 account of his supposed attachment to the dissi¬ dents. Of this singular occurrence wre have the fol¬ lowing account in the travels of Mr Coxe, communi¬ cated to the author by Mr Wraxall “ A Polish noble¬ man, named Pulaski, a general in the army of the con¬ federates, was the person who planned the atrocious enterprise j and the conspirators who carried it into execution were about 40 in uumber, and were headed by three chiefs, named Lukawski, Strawenski, and Ko- sinski. These three chiefs had been engaged and hired 3 Polancf. *°5 for that purpose by Pulaski, who in the town of Ciets- chokow in Great Poland obliged them to swear in the 1 most solemn manner, by placing their hands, between his, either to deliver the king alive into his hands, or, in case that was impossible, to put him to death. Ihe three chiefs chose 37 persons to accompany them. On the second of November, about a month alter they had quitted Czetschokow, they obtained admission into W ar¬ saw, unsuspected or undiscovered, by the following stra¬ tagem. They disguised themselves as peasants who came to sell hay, and artfully concealed their saddlesr arms, and clothes, under the loads of hay which they brought in waggons, the more eflectually to escape de¬ tection. “ On Sunday night, the third of September I77I> a few of these conspirators remained in the skirts ol the town} and the others repaired to the place ol ren¬ dezvous, the street of the Capuchins, where his maje¬ sty was expected to pass by about his usual hour of re¬ turning to the palace. The king had been to visit his uncle Prince Czartoriski, grand chancellor ol Lithuania, and was on his return from thence to the palace be¬ tween nine and ten o’clock. He was in a coach, ac¬ companied by at least 15 or 16 attendants, beside anwhoi aid-de-camp in the carriage: scarce was he at the di- ^en * stance of 200 paces from Prince Czartoriski’s palace, when he was attacked by the conspirators, who com¬ manded the coachman to stop on pain ol instant death. They fired several shot into the carriage, one of which passed through the body of a heyduc, who endeavoured to defend his master from the violence ol the assassins. Almost all the other persons who preceded and accom¬ panied his majesty were dispersed 5 the aid-de-camp abandoned him, and attempted to conceal himself by flight. Meanwhile the king had opened the door of his carriage with the design of effecting his escape un¬ der shelter of the night, which was extremely dark. He had even alighted, when the assassins seized him by the hair,exclaiming in Polish, with horrible execrations, ‘ We have thee now ; thy hour is come.’ One ol them discharged a pistol at him so very near, that he felt the heat of the flesh ; while another cut him across the ^ head with his sabre, which penetrated to the h0116*andwoond- They then laid hold of his majesty by the collar, and^ mounting on horseback, dragged him along the ground between their horses at full gallop for near 500 paces through the streets of Warsaw. “ Soon finding, however, that he was incapable of following them on loot, and that he had already almost lost his respiration from the violence with which they had dragged him, they set him on horseback; and then redoubled their speed for fear of being overtaken. W hen they came to the ditch which surrounds Warsaw, they obliged him to leap his horse over. In the attempt the horse fell twice, and at the second lall broke its leg. They then mounted his majesty upon another, all cover¬ ed as he was with dirt. 107 “ The conspirators had no sooner crossed the ditch, and rifled, than they began to rifle the king, tearing off the order of the Black Eagle of Prussia which he wore round his neck, and the diamond cross hanging to it. He request¬ ed them to leave his handkerchief, which they consented to : his tablets escaped their rapacity. A great number of the assassins retired after having thus plundered him, probably with intent to notify to their respective leaders the POL [ Poland, the success of their enterprise; and the king’s arrival as —-v1 a prisoner. Only seven remained with him, of whom Kosinski was the chief. The night was exceedingly dark j they were absolutely ignorant of the way j and, as the horses could not keep their legs, they obliged his majesty to follow them on foot, with only one shoe, the other being lost in the dirt. “ They continued to wander through the open mea¬ dows, without following any certain path, and with¬ out getting to any distance from Warsaw. They again mounted the king on horseback, two of them holding him on each side by the hand, and a third leading his horse by the bridle. In this manner they were pro¬ ceeding, when his majesty, finding they had taken the road which led to a village called Burakow, warned them not to enter it, because there were some Russians stationed in that place who might probably attempt to rescue him (a), finding himself, however, incapable of accompanying the assassins in the painful posture in which they held him kept down on the saddle, he re¬ quested them, sinoe they were determined to oblige him to proceed, at least to give him another horse and a boot. This request they complied with ; and conti¬ nuing their progress through almost impassable lands, without any road, and ignorant of their way, they at length found themselves in the wood of Bielany, only a league distant from Warsaw. From the time they had passed the ditch they repeatedly demanded of Ko¬ sinski their chief, if it was not yet time to put the king to death 5 and these demands wrere reiterated in proportion to the obstacles and difficulties they encoun¬ tered, till they were suddenly alarmed by a Russian pa- trole or detachment. Instantly holding council, four of them disappeared, leaving him with the other three, who compelled him to walk on. Scarce a quarter of an hour after, a second Russian guard challenged them anew. Two of the assassins then fled, and the king remained alone with Kosinski the chief, both on foot. His majesty, exhausted with all the fatigue which he bad undergone, implored his conductor to stop, and suffer him to take a moment’s repose. Kosinski refu¬ sed it, menacing him with his naked sabre ; and at the same time informed him, that beyond the wood they should find a carriage. They continued their walk, till they came to the door of the convent of Bielany. Ko¬ sinski appeared lost in thought, and so much agitated by his reflections, that the king perceiving his disorder, and observing that he tvandered without known’ng the road, •aid to him, ‘ I see you are at a loss which wray to pro¬ ceed. Let me enter the convent of Bielany, and do you provide for your own safety.’ ‘ No (replied Kosinski) I have sworn.’ “ They proceeded till they came to Mariemont, a small palace belonging to the house of Saxony, not above half a league from Warsaw : here Kosinski be- 79 ] POL trayed some satisfaction at finding where he was, and the Poland, king still demanding an instant’s repose, he consented at length. They sat down together on the ground, 109 and the king employed these moments in endeavouring to soften his conductor, and induce him to favour orc0i1£incto, permit his escape. His majesty represented the atro-effects hi« city of the crime he had committed in attempting tocscaPeiand murder his sovereign, and the invalidity of an oath ta¬ ken to perpetrate so heinous an action : Kosinski lent attention to this discourse, and began to betray some marks of remorse. But (said he), if I should consent and reconduct you to Warsaw, what will be the conse¬ quence P I shall be taken and executed! I give you my word (answered his majesty), that you shall suffer no barm j but if you doubt my promise, escape while there is yet time. I can find my wray to some place of secu¬ rity j and I will certainly direct your pursuers to take the contrary road to that which you have chosen. Ko¬ sinski could not any longer contain himself, but, throw¬ ing himself at the king’s feet, implored forgiveness for the crime he had committed; and sw'ore to protect him against eveiy enemy, relying totally on his generosity for pardon and preservation. His majesty reiterated to him his assurances of safety. Judging, however, that is was prudent to gain some asylum without delay, and recollecting that there was a mill at some considerable distance, he immediately made towards it. Kosinski knocked, but in vain ; no answer was given : he then broke a pane of glass in the window, and intreated for shelter to a nobleman who had been plundered by robbers. The miliar refused, supposing them to be banditti, and continued for more than half an hour to persist in his denial. At length the king approached, and speaking through the broken pane, endeavoured to persuade him to admit them under his roof, adding, ‘ If we were robbers, as you suppose, it would be very easy for us to break the whole window, instead of one pane of glass.’ Tliis argument prevailed. They at length opened the door and admitted his majesty. He im¬ mediately wrote a note to General Coccei, colonel of the foot-guards, informing him of his danger and mi¬ raculous escape. “ When the messenger arrived with the note, the astonishment and joy was incredible. Coccei instantly rode to the mill, followed by a detachment of the guards. He met Kosinski at the. door with his sabre drawn, who admitted him as soon as he knew him. The king had sunk into a sleep, caused by his fatigue; and was stretched on the ground, covered with the miliar’s cloak. Coccei immediately threw himself at his majes¬ ty’s feet, calling him his sovereign, and kissing his hand. It is not easy to paint or describe the astonishment of the miller and his family, who instantly imitated Coccei’s example, by throwing themselves on their knees (b). The king returned to Warsaw in General Coccei’s car¬ riage, (a) “ This intimation, which the king gave to his assassins, may at first sight appear extraordinary and un¬ accountable, but,was really dictated by the greatest address and judgment. He apprehended with reason, that, on the sight of a Russian guard, they would instantly put him to death with their sabres, and fly ; where¬ as by informing them of the danger they incurred, he in some measure gained their confidence : in effect, this behaviour of the king seemed to soften them a little, and made them believe he did not mean to escape from them.” (is) “ I have been (says Mr Wraxall) at this mill, rendered memorable by so deplorable an event. It is a wretched POL [ Poland. riage, and reached the palace about five in the morning. His wound was found not to be dangerous 5 and he soon recovered from the bruises and injuries which he had suffered during this memorable night. So extraordinary an escape is scarce to be paralleled in history, and affords ample matter of wonder and surprise. “ It is natural to inquire what is become of Kosinski, the man who saved his majesty’s life, and the other con¬ spirators. He was horn in the palatinate of Cracow, and of mean extraction •, having assumed the name of Ao- sinsht (c), which is that of a noble family, to give him¬ self credit. He had been created an officer in the troops of the confederates under Pulaski. It would seem as if Kosinski began to entertain the idea of preserving the king’s life from the time when Luskawski and Stra- wenski abandoned him 5 yet he had great struggles with himself before he could resolve on this conduct, after the solemn engagements into which he had entered, liven after he had conducted the king back to W arsaw, he expressed more than once his doubts of the propi lety of what he had done, and some remorse for having decei¬ ved his employers. He was detained under a very strict confinement, and obliged to give evidence against his two companions Lukawski and Strawenski, who were beheaded, his majesty having obtained tor them from the diet a mitigation of the horrible punishment which the laws of Poland inflicts upon regicides. About a week after the execution of these conspirators, Kosinski was sent out of Poland, after the king had settled upon him an annual pension, which he enjoyed at Semigallia, in the papal territories.” Is rereived Upon the king’s return to Warsaw he was received at Warsaw with the utmost demonstrations of joy. Every one ex- with de- claimed with rapture, “The king is alive!” and all strug- moHstra- , ^ t(j get near i1;mj t0 kiss his hand, or even to touch tions ot joy. j\g clotjies> gut neJther the virtues nor the popularity of the sovereign could allay the factious spirit of the ITt Poles, nor prevent the dismemberment of his kingdom. Partition of “ The partition of Poland was first projected by the Poland pro ^ng 0f Prussia. Polish or Western Prussia had long jec ed by an 0j,ject: 0f his ambition : exclusive, of its fertility, Suss£g0f commerce, and population, its local situation rendered it highly valuable to that monarch $ it lay between his German dominions and Eastern Prussia, and while pos¬ sessed by the Poles, cut off at their tvill all communi¬ cation between them.” The period was now arrived when the situation of Poland seemed to promise the easy acquisition of this valuable province. Frederic pur¬ sued it, however, with all the caution of an able poli¬ tician. On the commencement of the troubles, he showed no eagerness to interfere in the affairs ot this country 5 and although he had concurred with the em¬ press of Russia in rai-ing Stanislaus Augustus to the tin-one of Poland, yet he declined taking any active part in his favour against the confederates. Afterwards, when the whole kingdom became convulsed throughout with civil commotions (1769), and desolated likewise by the plague, he, under pretence of forming lines to prevent the spreading of the infection, advanced his Poland. 80 ] POL troops into Polisli Prussia, and occupied that whole dt- strict. 1 Though now completely master of the country, an“wll in# by no means apprehensive ot any formidable resistance ovei. t]le from the disunited and distracted Poles, yet, as he was enij)eror well aware that the security of his new acquisition de-aiiJ the pended upon the acquiescence of Russia and Austria, planned the partition of Poland. He communicated the project to the emperor, either upon their interview at Niess in Silesia in 1769, or in that of the following year at Newstadt in Austria •, from whom the overture met with a ready concurrence. To induce the empress of Russia to acquiesce in the same project, he dispatch¬ ed his brother Henry to Petersburg, who suggested to the empress that the house of Austria was forming an alliance with the Porte, with which she was then at war-, that if such alliance took place, it would create a most formidable combination against her j that, nevei- theless the friendship of that house was to be purchased by acceding to the partition , that, upon this condition, the emperor was willing to renounce his connection with the Grand Signior, and would sufier the Russians to prosecute the war without interruption. Catharine, anxious to push her conquest against the T urks, and dreading the interposition of the emperor in that quar¬ ter j perceiving likewise, from the intimate union be¬ tween the courts of Vienna and Berlin, that it would not be in her power, at the present juncture, to prevent the intended partition-closed with the proposal, and selected no inconsiderable portion of the Polish territo¬ ries tor herself. The treaty was signed at 1 etersbui g in the beginning of February 1772> the Russian, Austrian, and Prussian plenipotentiaries. It would be tedious to enter into a detail of the pleas urged by the three powers in favour of their several demands 5 it would be no less uninteresting to lay before the reader the answers and remonstrances of the king and senate, as well as the appeals to the other states which had guaran- II3 teed the possessions of Poland. T-he courts ot Eondon, Poland dis^ Paris,Stockholm, and Copenhagen, remonstrated against memberei the usurpations but remonstrances without assistance could be of no effect* Poland submitted to the dismem¬ berment not without the most violent struggles j and now for the first time felt and lamented the fatal effects of faction and discord. A diet being demanded by the partitioning powers, in order to ratify the cession of the provinces, it met on the 19th of April 1773 and such was the spirit of the members, that, notwithstanding the deplorable situation of their country, the threats and bribes of the three powers, the partition-treaty was not carried through without much difficulty. For some time the majo¬ rity of the nuncios appeared determined to oppose the dismemberment, and the king firmly persisted in the same resolution. The ambassadors of the three courts enforced their requisitions by the most alarming menates, and threatened the king with deposition and imprison¬ ment. They also gave out by their emissaries, that in case the diet continued refractory, Warsaw should be pillaged. wretched Polish hovel, at a distance From any house. The king rewarded the miller to the extent of his wishes* in building him a mill upop the Vistula, and allowing him a small pension. (c) His real name was John Kutsma, J POL [ Si ] POL Poland. H4 The kintcs ef Poland originally hereditary, ”5 afterwards elective. Universal History. n5 Place and manner of the elec¬ tion. pillaged. This report was industriously circulated, and / made a sensible impression upon the inhabitants. By menaces of this sort, by corrupting the marshal of the diet, who was accompanied with a Russian guard; in a word, by bribes, promises, and threats, the members of the diet were at length px-evailed on to ratify the dis¬ memberment. The partitioning powers, however, did less injury to the republic by dismembering its fairest provinces, than in perpetuating the principles of anarchy and confu¬ sion, and establishing on a permanent footing that exor¬ bitant liberty which is the parent of faction, and has proved the decline of the republic. Under pretence of amending the constitution, they confirmed all its defects, and took effectual precautions to render this unhappy country incapaple of emerging from its present deplor¬ able state, as was seen in the failure of the most patri¬ otic attempt that was perhaps ever made by a king to reform the constitution of his kingdom. The kings of Poland were anciently hereditary and ab¬ solute; but afterwards became elective and limited. In the reign of Louis, towards the end of the 14th century, several limitations were laid on the royal prerogative. In that of Casimir IV. who ascended the throne in 1446, representatives from the several palatinates were first called to the diet; the legislative power till then hav¬ ing been lodged in the states, and the executive in the king and senate. On the decease of Sigismund August¬ us, it was enacted by law “That the choice of a king for the future should perpetually remain free and open to a!) the nobles of tbe kingdom;” which law was ac¬ cordingly observed to the great injury of the kingdom. “ As soon as the throne is vacant, ail the courts of justice, and other ordinary springs of the machine of go¬ vernment, remain in a state of inaction, and all the au¬ thority is transferred to the primate, who, in quality of interrex, has in some respects more power than the king himself; and yet the republic takes no umbrage at it, because lie has not time to make himself formidable. He notifies the vacancy of the throne to foreign prin- ce«, which is in effect proclaiming that a crown is to be disposed of; he issues the universalia, or circula-r letters for the election ; gives orders to the starosts (a sort of military officers who have great authority, and whose proper business it L to levy the revenue) to keep a strict guard upon the fortified places, and to the grand-gene¬ rals to do the same upon the frontiers, towards which the army marches. “ The place of election is the field of Wola, at the gates of Warsaw. All the nobles of the kingdom have a right of voting. The Poles encamp on the left side of the Vistula, and the Lithuanians on the right, each under the banners of their respective palatinates, which makes a sort of civil armv; consisting of between a hun¬ dred and fifty and two hundred thousand men, assem¬ bled to exercise the highest act of freedom. Those who are not able to provide a horse and a sabre stand behind on foot, armed with scythes, and do not seem at all less proud than the rest, as they have the same right of voting. “ The field of election is surrounded by a ditch with three gates, in order to avoid confusion, one to the east for Great Poland, another to the south for Little Poland, and a third to the west for Lithuania. In the middle of the field, which is called Kolau, is erected a VOL. XVII. Part I. f great building of wood, named the szopa or hall for Poland, the senate, at whose debates the deputies are present,v—/ and carry the result of them to the several palatinates. The part which the marshal acts upon this occasion is very important; for, being the mouth of the nobility, he has it in his power to do great service to the candi¬ dates ; he is also to draw up the instrument of election, and the king elect must take it only from his hand. “ It is prohibited, upon pain of being declared a pu¬ blic enemy, to appear at the election with regular troops, in order to avoid all violence. But the nobles, who are always armed with pistols and sabres, commit violence against one another, at the time that they cry out ‘ liberty !’ “ All who aspire openly to the crown are expressly excluded from the field of election, that their presence may not constrain the voters. The king must be elect¬ ed nemine contradicente, by all the suffrages without ex¬ ception. The law is founded upon this principle, that when a great family adopts a lather, all the children, have a right to be pleased. Tbe idea is plausible in spe¬ culation ; but if it was rigorously kept to, Poland could have no such thing as a lawful king. They therefore give up a real unanimity, and content themselves with the appearance of it; or rather, if the law, which pre¬ scribes it, cannot be fulfilled by means of money, they call in the assistance of the sabre. “ Before they come to this extremity, no election can possibly be carried on with more order, decency, and appearance of freedom. The primate in few words recapitulates to the nobles on horseback the respective merits of the candidates ; he exhorts them to choose the most worthy, invokes heaven, gives his blessing to the assembly, and remains alone with the marshal of the diet, while the senators disperse themselves into the several palatinates, to promote an unanimity of senti¬ ments. If they succeed, the primate goes himself to collect the votes, naming once more all the candidates. ‘ Szoda (answer the nobles), that is the man we choose ;’ and instantly the air resounded with his name, with cries of vivat, and the noise of pistols. If all the palatines agreed in their nominations, the primate got on horse¬ back; and then the profoundest silence succeeding to the greatest noise, he asked three times if all were satisfied? and after a general approbation, three times proclaim¬ ed the king; and the grand-marshal of the crown re¬ peated the proclamation .iiree times at the three gates of the camp. How glorious a king this, if endued with royal qualities! and how incontestable his title in the suffrages of a whole people ! But this sketch of a free and peaceable election is by no means a representation of what usually happened. The corruption of the great, the fury of the people, intrigues and factions, the gold and the arms of foreign powers, frequently filled the scene with violence and blood.” Before the king was proclaimed, the pacta convent a The facta was read aloud to him, which on his knees at the altar he swore to observe. As this contract, which was drawn up, methodized, and approved, by the senate and no¬ bility, was deemed the great charter of Poland, we shall enumerate the principal articles of which it consisted. These are, that the king should not attempt to en¬ croach on the liberty ot the people, by rendering the crown hereditary in his family ; but that he should pre¬ serve all the customs, laws, and ordonnances, respecting L the Poland. ■pOT [” 82 1 POL ^^ . , T. , • _ T,r„a QR.rpPfi that every third diet Poland the freedom of election: that he should ratify all treaties ^ Qr0(jn0< “When it is proposed to 1 v subsisting with foreign powers which were approver iy > o-pnernl diet the king, or, in case of an inter- the diet: that it shodd be his chief study to culttvate issued t’eits’to the palatines of the peace, preserve the public tranquillity, and promo ^ 1 ’ r0vinces specifying the time and place ot the interest of the realm: that he should not coin money £1: ^eJc/likewise was sent of the business to except in the name of the republic, or appropriate to meeting.. A siverci . — himself the advantages arising from coinage : that in 1 1 • 1 rv-»oL 1 nrr Ipvii II LlIloCl L Lilt; rttVi V Wj - ^ ' 1 • * declaring war, concluding peace, making levies, lining auxiliaries, or admitting foreign troops upon any pre¬ text within the Polish dominions, the consent oi the diet and senate should be necessary: that all offices and preferments should be given to the natives of Poland and Lithuania-, and that no pretence should excuse or palli¬ ate the crime of introducing foreigners into the king s council or the departments of the republic : that the of¬ ficers of his majesty’s guards should be Poles or Lithu¬ anians and that the colonel should absolutely he a na¬ tive of Poland, and of the order of nobility: that all the officers should he subordinate to the authority of the mareschal : that no individual should he vested with more employments than the law allows : that the king should not marry without the approbation oi the senate and that the household of the queen should be determin¬ ed and regulated by the republic : that the sovereign should never apply his private signet to acts and papers of a public nature : that the king should dispose or the offices both of the court and of the republic 5 and re¬ gulate with the senate the number of forces necessary for the defence of the kingdom: that he should ad¬ minister justice by the advice of tjie senate and Ins coun¬ cil : that the expences of his civil list should be the same with those of his predecessors : that he should nil up all vacancies in the space of six weeks : that this should be his first business in the diet,, obliging the chancellor to publish his appointments in due form : that the king should not diminish the treasure kept at Cracow but, on the contrary, endeavour to augment that and the number of the crown-jewels : that he should borrow no money without the consent of the diet: that he should not equip a naval force without the consent and full approbation of the republic : that he should profess the Roman Catholic faith, promote, maintain, and defend it, through all the Polish do¬ minions : and finally, that all their several liberties, rights, and privileges, should be preserved to the Polan- ders and Lithuanians in general, and to all the di¬ stricts and provinces contained within each of these great divisions, without change, alteration, or the small¬ est violation, except by the consent of the republic, l o these articles a variety of others were added, accord¬ ing to circumstances and the humour of the diet; but what we have recited formed the standing conditions, which were scarcely ever altered or omitted. The diet of The diet of Poland was composed of the king, the Poland, and senate> bishops, and the deputies of the nobility or gen¬ try of every palatinate, called, in their collective capa¬ city, comitia togata, that is, when the states assembled in the city without arms and horses; or comitia paluda- ta when they met in the fields armed, as dining an in¬ terregnum, at the diet of election. It was a prerogative of the crown to assemble the diet at any particular place, except on occasion of a coronation, which the custom of the country required should be celebrated at the ca¬ pital. For a number of years, indeed, the diet regu¬ larly assembled at Warsaw j but, on complaint made by 119 11S meeting.. he deliberated on by the assembly j the senate was con¬ sulted in this particular, and six weeks were allowed the members to prepare themselves for the intended session. It is remarkable, that the diet never sat more than six weeks in the most critical conjunctures and pressing emergencies : they have been known to break up in tiie middle of an important debate, and to leave the business to a future meeting. This custom has been justly es¬ teemed one of the greatest defects of the 1 ohsh consti¬ tution, which probably owed its origin to convenience, but was afterwards superstitiously observed from whim and caprice. On receipt of the king’s writ, the pala¬ tine communicated the meeting of the diet to all the castellans, starostas, and other inferior officers and gen¬ try within his jurisdiction, requiring them to assemble on a certain day to elect deputies and take into considera- tion the business specified in the royal summons, i bese Dwtine*. meetino s were called petty diets, dwtines, or lantage, m the language of the country J every gentleman possessing three acres of land having a vote, and matters being de¬ termined by a majority; whereas in the general diet de¬ crees were only valid when the whole body was unaui, mous. Every palatinate had three representatives, thouoh the business devolved on one called a nuncio*, who was elected for his ability and experience; and the other two were added only to give weight to this leading member, and do honour by their magnificent appearance to the palatinate they represented. As these deputies, since the reign of Casimir III. had seats in the diet, it naturally divided the general assembly into two bodies, the upper and lower j the one being composed ot the senate, the superior clergy, and the great officers 5 the other of the representatives of the palatinates, who pre¬ pared all business tor the superior body. The first business of the assembly was to choose a mareschal 5 upon which occasion the debates and tu¬ mults ran so high, that the whole time tor the session of the diet was often consumed in altercation and wrang¬ ling about the election of a speaker, who had now no¬ thing farther to do than return quietly to his own home. After his election, he kissed the king’s hand} and the chancellor, as the royal representative, reported the mat¬ ters to be deliberated by the diet. Then the mareschal acquainted the king with the instructions of the deputies from their constituents, the grievances which they would have redressed, and the abuses they required to be reme¬ died. He likewise requested of his majesty to fill up the vacant offices and benefices, according to law' 5 and he was answered by a set speech from the chancellor, who reported the king’s inclination to satisfy his people, as soon as he had consulted his faithful senate. Iheie was i%o something very peculiarly absurd in some of the customs Absurd cro- ohserved by the Polish diet : one in particular merits at-“^ tention. Not only an unanimity of voices was necessary ^ diet to pass any bill, and constitute a decree of the diet, hut every bill must likewise he assented to unanimously, or none can take effect. Thus, if out of twenty bills one I2I happened to be opposed by a single voice, called li- The HU- berum veto,, all the rest were thrown out, and the diet ram met, POL [ 83 ] POL Poland, met, deliberated, and debated, for six weeks, to no pur- V ' poso. “ To add to the other inconveniences that attended the constitution of the diet of Poland, a spirit of venali¬ ty in the deputies, and a general corruption, had seized all ranks and degress in that assembly. There, as in some other countries, the cry of liberty was kept up for the sake of private interest. Deputies came with a full resolution of profiting by their patriotism, and not lowering their voice without a gratification. Deter¬ mined to oppose the most salutary measures of the court, they either withdrew from the assembly, protested against all that should be transacted in their absence, or else excited such a clamour as rendered it necessary lor the court to silence them by some lucrative pension, do¬ nation, or employment. Thus not only the business of the assembly was obstructed by its own members, but frequently by largesses from neighbouring powers, and sometimes by the liberality of an open enemy, who had I22 the art of distributing his money with discretion. The senate “ Perhaps the most respectable department of the of Poland. Polish government was the senate, composed of the bi¬ shops, palatines, castellans, and ten officers of state, who derived a right from their dignities of sitting in that as¬ sembly j in all amounting to 144 members, who were styled senators of the kingdom or counsellors of the state, and had the title of excellency, a dignity supported by no pension or emoluments necessarily annexed. The se¬ nate presided over the laws, was the guardian of liberty, the judge of right, and the protector of justice and equity. Ail the members, except the bishops, who were senators ex officio, were nominated by the king, and they took an oath to the republic before they were per¬ mitted to enter upon their functions. Their honours continued for life : at the general diet they sat on the right and left of the sovereign, according to their dig¬ nity, without regard to seniority. They were the me¬ diators between the monarch and the subject, and, in conjunction with the king, ratified all the laws passed by the nobility. As a senator was bound by oath to main¬ tain the liberties of the republic, it -was thought no dis¬ respect to majesty that they reminded the prince of his duty. They were his counsellors, and this freedom of speech was an inseparable prerogative of their office.” Such was the constitution of Poland before it rvas new-modelled by the partitioning powers. That it was a very bad constitution needs no proof; but those fo¬ reign reformers did not improve it. For two centuries at least, the Poles had with great propriety denomina¬ ted their government a republic, because the king was so exceedingly limited in his prerogative, that he resem¬ bled more the chief of a commonwealth than the sove- ThJperma-reign °f a powerful monarchy. That prerogative, al- aent coun- ready too confined to afford protection to the peasants, -il. groaning under the aristocratic tyranny of the nobles, was, after the partition treaty, still further restrained by the establishment of the permanent counsel, which was vested with the whole executive authority, leaving to the sovereign nothing but the name. The permanent council consisted of 36 persons, elected by the diet out of the different orders of nobility; and though the king, when present, presided in it, he could not exert a single act of power but with the consent of the majority of per¬ sons, who might well be called his colleagues. That the virtuous and accomplished Stanislaus should labour to extricate himself and the great body of the Poland, people from such unparalleled oppression, and that the J more respectable part of the nation should wish to give to themselves and their posterity a better form of go¬ vernment, was surely very natural and very meritorious. The influence of the partitioning powers was indeed ex¬ erted to make the king contented with his situation. His revenues, which before did not exceed ioo,oook Were now increased to three times that sum. The re¬ public likewise agreed to pay his debts, amounting to upwards of 400,000k It bestowed on him also, in hereditary possession, four starosties, or governments of castles, with the districts belonging to them; aud re¬ imbursed him of the money he had laid out for the state. It was also agreed, that the revenues of the republic should be enhanced to 33 millions of florins (near two millions sterling), and the army should consist of 30,000 men. Soon after the conclusion of the peace with Tur¬ key, the empress of Ilussia also made the king a present of 250,000 rubles, as a compensation lor that part of his dominions which fell into her hands. 124 These bribes, however, were not sufficient to blind A new c°n- the eyes of Stanislaus, or to cool the ardour of his Pa" ^.^inied triotism. He laboured for posterity, and with such ap-jn parent success, that on the 3d of May 1791, a new con¬ stitution of the government of Poland was established by the king, together with the confederate states as¬ sembled in double number to represent the Polish nation. That this was a perfect constitution, we are far from thinking; but it was probably as perfect as the invete¬ rate prejudices of the nobles would admit of. It devi¬ ated as little as possible from the old forms, and was drawn up in 11 articles, respecting the government of the republic; to which were added 21 sections, regula¬ ting the dietines or primary assemblies of Poland. 125 Of this constitution, the first article established the Substance Homan Catholic faith, with all its privileges and immu-°f ^Jjrst • • • ' • . live articles mties, as the dominant national religion ; granting to0fjt all other people, of whatever persuasion, peace in mat¬ ters of faith, and the protection of government. The second article guaranteed to the nobility or the equestri¬ an order, all the privileges which it enjoyed under the kings of the house of Jagellon. The third and fourth articles granted to the free royal towns internal jurisdic¬ tions of their own ; and exempted the peasants from sla¬ very, declaring every man free as soon as he set his foot on the territory of the republic. The fifth article, after declaring, that in civil society all power should be deriv¬ ed from the will of the people, enacted that the govern¬ ment of the Polish nation should be composed of three ^distinct powers, the legislative, in the states assembled ; the executive, in the king and the council of inspection ; and doe. judicial power, in the jurisdictions existing, ot¬ to be established. The sixth and seventh articles, as being of more importance, we shall give in the tvords of the constitution itself. 126 VI. The Diet, or the legislative power, shall be divid- r^ie diet t0 ed into two houses, viz. the house of nuncios, or deputies, and the house of senate, where the king is to preside, vjZt ^ The former being the representative and central point house of of supreme national authority, shall possess the pre-emi-nuacios» nence in the legislature ; therefore all bills are to be decided first in this house. 1. All General Laws, viz. constitutional, civil, cri¬ minal, and perpetual taxes ; concerning which maters, L 2 the \ POL [ Poland. 127 and the house of senate. 12S The libe¬ rum veto abolished. the king is to issue Ins propositions t>y the circular let¬ ters sent before the dietines to every palatinate and to every district for deliberation, which coming before the house with the opinion expressed in the instructions given to their representatives, shall be taken the first for decision. 2. I* articular Laws, viz. temporal taxes-, regulations of the mint; contracting public debts •, creating nobles, and other casual recompenses; reparation of public ex¬ pellees, both ordinary and extraordinary j concerning war 5 peace *, ratification of treaties, both political and commercial •, all diplomatic acts and conventions rela- tive to the laws of nations-, examining and acquitting different executive departments, and similar subjects ari¬ sing from the accidental exigencies and circumstances ot the state -, in which the propositions, coming directly from the throne into the house of nuncios, are to have preference in discussion before the private bills. In regard to the house of senate, it is to consist of bishops, palatines, castellans, and ministers, under the presidency of the king, who shall have hut one vote, aiid the casting voice in case of parity, which he may give either personally, or by a message to the house. Its power and duty shall be, 1. Every general law that passes formally through the house of nuncios, is to be sent immediately to this, ■which is either accepted, or suspended till further nation¬ al deliberation, by a majority of votes, as prescribed by ]awr. If accepted, it becomes a law in all its force -, 11 suspended, it shall be resumed at the next diet; and if it is then agreed to again by the house of nuncios, the senate must submit to it. 2. Every particular law or statute of the diet in mat¬ ters above-specified, as soon as it has been detei mined bv the house of nuncios, and sent up to the senate, the votes of both houses shall be jointly computed, and the majority, as described by law, shall be considered as a decree and the will of the nation. Those senators and ministers who, from their share in executive power, are accountable to the republic, cannot have an active voice in the diet, but may be present, in order to give neces¬ sary explanations to the states. These ordinary legislative diets shall have their unin¬ terrupted existence, and be always ready to meet-, re¬ newable every two years. The length of sessions shall be determined by the law concerning diets. If conven¬ ed out of ordinary session upon some urgent occasion, they shall only deliberate on the subject which occasion¬ ed such a call, or on circumstances which may arise out °f it* No law or statute enacted by such ordinary diet can be altered or annulled by the same. The complement of the diet shall be composed of the number of persons in both houses to be determined hereafter. The law concerning the dietines or primary elections, as established by the present diet, shall be regarded as a most essential foundation of civil liberty. The majority of votes shall decide every thing, and everywhere j therefore we abolish, and utterly annihi¬ late, veto, all sorts of confederacies and confede- rate’ diets, as contrary to the spirit of the present con¬ stitution, as undermining the government, and as being ruinous to society. Willing to prevent, on one hand, violent and fre- Poland. . ] p 0 L . quent changes in the national constitution, yet, consider-1 ing on the other, the necessity ol perfecting it, alter experiencina; its effects on public prosperity, we deter- l^|) mine the period of every 2S years for an extraordinary Extraordi- constitutional diet, to be held purposely for the revision naiy diet and such alterations of the constitution as may be *ound‘or reding requisite : which diet shall be circumscribed by a sepa- tuliou rate law hereafter. VII. The most perfect government cannot exist or last without an effectual executive power. The happi¬ ness of the nation depends on just laws, but the good effects of laws flow only from their execution. Ex¬ perience has taught us, that the neglecting this essen¬ tial part of government has overwhelmed Poland with disasters. Having, therefore, secured to the free Polish nation the right of enacting laws for themselves, the supreme I30 inspection over the executive power, and the choice of Powers 0f their magistrates, we entrust to the king and Ins coun-t^king^^ cil the highest power of executing the laws. _ Ihis of inspec- council shall be called straz, or the council of inspec-tioiu tion. The duty of such executive power shall be to watch over the laws, and to see them strictly executed accord¬ ing to their import, even by the means ol public force, should it be necessary. All departments mid magistra¬ cies are bound to obey its directions. I 0 this power we leave the right ot controlling such as are refractory, or of punishing such as are negligent in the execution of their respective offices. This executive power cannot assume the right of ma¬ king laws, or of their interpretation. It is expressly forbidden to contract public debts -, to alter the repar¬ tition of the national income, as fixed by the diet j to declare war; to conclude definitively any treaty, or any diplomatic act; it is only allowed to carry on negoeia- tions with foreign courts, and facilitate temporaly oc¬ currences, always with reference to the diet. ^ . i3t The crown of Poland we declare to be elective in re- Crown e- gard to families, and it is settled so for ever. lectivein Having experienced the fatal effects of interregna, periodically subverting government, and being desirous of preventing for ever all foreign influence, as vvell as of I 32 insuring to every citizen a perfect tranquillity, we have,but here¬ from prudent motives, resolved to adopt hereditary suc-dnaryin cession to our throne : therefore vye enact and declare, that, after the expiration of our life, according to the tmetien, gracious will of the Almighty, the present elector of Saxony shall reign over Poland, and in his person shall the dvnasty of future kings of Poland begin. AVe re¬ serve to the nation, however, the right of electing to the throne any other house or family, after the extinc¬ tion of the first. 133 Every king, on his accession to the throne, shall take Coronation a solemn oath to God and the nation, to support the oath, present constitution, to fulfil tbe pacta conventa, which will be settled with the present elector of Saxony, as ap¬ pointed to tbe crown, and which shall bind him in the same manner as former ones. 134 The king’s person is sacred and inviolable ; as no act King's pej- can proceed immediately from him, be cannot be in any on sacie ’ manner responsible to the nation; he is not an absolute monarch, but the father and the head of the people ; bis revenues, as fixed by the pacta conventa, shall be sacred- ]y POL [ 3 Poland. lion. 137 Powers of the mar¬ shal. ly preserved. All public acts, the acts of magistracies, -v—1 ' and the coin of the kingdom, shall bear his name. I35_ The king, who ought to possess every power of doing liar^ovms ^00C*’ Iiave the right of pardoning those that are ai pimci . con(jemne(| dejul^ except the crimes be against the state. In time of war, lie shall have the supreme com¬ mand of the national forces: he may appoint the com¬ manders of the army, however, by the will of the states. It shall be his province lo patentee officers in the army, and other dignitaries, consonant to the regulations here¬ after to be expressed, to appoint bishops, senators, and ministers, as members of the executive power. Members of The king’s council of inspection is to consist, x. Of the council the primate, as the head of the clergy, and the president of mspec- 0f t.|ie commission of education, or the first bishop in or- dine. 2. Of five ministers, viz. the minister of police, minister of justice, minister of war, minister of finances, and minister for the foreign affairs. 3. Of two secreta¬ ries to keep the protocols, one for the council, another for the foreign department ; both, however, without de¬ cisive vote. The hereditary prince coming of age, and having taken the oath to preserve the constitution, may assist at all sessions of the council, but shall have no vote therein. The marshal of the diet, being chosen for two years, has also a right to sit in this council, without ta¬ king any share in its resolves; for the end only to call together the diet, always existing, in the following case : should he deem, from the emergencies hereunder speci¬ fied, the convocation of the diet absolutely necessary, and the king refusing to do it, the marshal is bound to issue bis circular letters to all nuncios and senators, ad¬ ducing real motives for such meeting. The cases demanding such convocation of the diet are the following : 1, In a pressing necessity concerning the law of nations, and particularly in case of a neighbour¬ ing war. 2. In case of an internal commotion, mena¬ cing with the revolution of the country, or of a collision between magistrates. 3. In an evident danger of gene¬ ral famine. 4. In the orphan state of the country, by demise of the king, or in case of the king’s dangerous illness. All the resolutions of the council of inspection are to be examined by the rules above mentioned. The king’s opinion, after that of every member in the coun¬ cil has been heard, shall decisively prevail. Every re¬ solution of this council shall be issued under the king’s signature, countersigned by one of the ministers sitting therein ; and thus signed, shall be obeyed by all execu¬ tive departments, except in cases expressly exempted by the present constitution. Should all the members refuse their countersign to any resolution, the king is obliged to forego his opinion •, but if he should persist in it, the marshal of the diet may demand the convocation of the diet 5 and if the king will not, the marshal himself shall send his circular let¬ ters as above. Ministers composing this council cannot he employed at the same time in any other commission or department. If it should happen that two-thirds of secret votes in both houses demand the changing of any person, either in the council, or anv executive department, the king is bound to nominate another. Willing that the conn cil of inspection shru'd be responsible to the nation for their actions, we decree, that when these ministers are denounced and accused before tl e diet (bv the special committee appointed for examining their proceedings) S J i W ^ of any transgression of positive law, they are answerable Poland, with their persons and fortunes. Such impeachments be- ing determined by a simple majority of votes, collected jointly from both houses, shall be tried immediately by the comitial tribunal, where the accused are to receive their final judgment and punishment, if found guilty j or to be honourably acquitted on sufficient proof of in¬ nocence. r,g In order to form a necessary organization of the exe-Commis- cutive power, we establish hereby separate commissions, sions of e* connected with the above council, and subjected to obey ^"^ation’ its ordinations. These commissions are, 1. Of educa- ° lce’ c“ tion ; 2. Of police; 3. Of war ; 4. Of treasury. It is through the medium of these four departments that all the particular orderly commissions, as established by the present diet, in every palatinate and district, shall de¬ pend on, and receive all orders from, the council of in¬ spection, in their respective duties and occurrences. 139 The eighth article regulates the administration of jus- Admini- tice, beginning with a very sensible declaration, that the ?u'V“a 0 judicial power is incompatible with the legislative, and' that it cannot be administered by the king. It there¬ fore constitutes primary courts of justice for each palati¬ nate or district, composed of judges chosen at the die- tine ; and appoints higher tribunals, erected one in each of the three provinces into which the kingdom is di¬ vided, with which appeals may be lodged from the pri¬ mary courts. It appoints likewise for the trial of per¬ sons accused of crimes against the state, one supreme ge¬ neral tribunal for all classes, called a comitial tribunal or court, composed of persons chosen at the opening 140 of every diet. The ninth article provides a regency Regency on during the king’s minority, in case of his settled alie-cerf!Un oc“ nation of reason, or upon the emergency of his being Ct‘bl011S' made a prisoner of war. This regency was to be com¬ posed of the council of inspection, with the queen at their head, or, in her absence, the primate of the king¬ dom. The tenth article enjoins, that the education of the king’s sons shall be entrusted to the king with the council, and a tutor appointed by the states ; and the eleventh regulates the army in such a manner, as to prevent it from being employed to overturn the constitu¬ tion. The regulation of the dietines contains nothing that can be interesting to a British reader, except what re¬ lates to the election and duties of nuncios or represen- ^ tatives to the general diet. A id here it is enacted, that The elec- persons having a right to vote are all nobles of the^on and_ equestrian order; i. e. 1. All hereditary proprietors of^^j^ landed property, or possessed of estates by adjudication for a debt, paying territorial tax to government: sons also of such proprietors dining the life of their parents, before the ex-division of patrimony. 2. Brothers inhe¬ riting estates before they have shared their succession. 3. All mortgages who pay 100 florins ("50 shillings) of territorial tax per year from their possessions. 4. All life-holders of lands paying territorial tax to the same amount. 5. All nobles in the army possessed of such qualifying estates have a vote in their respective districts in time of peace, and properly furloughed by their com¬ manders. 6. Legal possession is understood to lie quali¬ fying when it has been formerly acquired and actually enjoyed for twelve calendar months previously. Persons who have no right to vote are, 1. Those of the equestrian order that are not actually possessed of a property h!e. POL [ »6 Poland. property, as described in tile foregoing article. 2. Such v—— as hold royal, ecclesiastical, or noble lands, even with right of inheritance, but on condition ot some duty or payment to their principals, consequently dependent thereon. 3. Gentry possessing estates on feudal tenure, called ordynackie, as being bound to certain personal ser¬ vice thereby. 4. All renters of estates that have no other qualifying property. 5. Those that have not ac¬ complished 18 years of age. 6. Crimine notati, and those that are under a decree passed in default, even in the first instance, for having disobeyed any judicial I<2 court. Persons e- Every person of the equestrian order that pays terri- ligible and torial tax to government for his freehold, let it be ever not eliai- sraall, is eligible to all elective offices in his respective district. Gentlemen actually serving in the army, even posses¬ sed of landed hereditary estate, must have served sixcom- plete years before they are eligible to the office of a nuncio only. But this condition is dispensed with in favour of those that have filled before some public function. Whoever is not personally present at the dietine ; whoever has not completed 23 years of age ; whoever has not been in any public function, nor passed the bien¬ nial office of a commissary in the orderly commission *, those that are not exempted by law from obligations of scarta bellatus, which subjects all newly-nobilitated per¬ sons to certain civil restrictions until the next genera¬ tion ; and, lastly, all those against whom may be ob¬ jected a decree in contumaciam in a civil cause j are not eligible. During the business of election, the president who opened the meeting, with the rest of the committee, except those who are assessors, shall prepare instructions for procedure 5 and in regard to the propositions sent by the king and the council of inspection, these instructions shall be worded thus: “ Our nuncios shall vote ajjirma- to^lie^iun8 ^ve to t*ie art‘c^e or> “ Gur nuncios shall vote ne- cios^ UU yative to the article A7,” in case it is found contrary to the opinion of the dietine : and should any amendment or addition be deemed necessary and agreed on, it may be inserted in the instructions at the end of the relative proposition. At the meeting of the dietines, after the diet has sat, the nuncios are bound to appear before their constitu¬ ents, and to bring their report of the whole proceedings of that assembly, first, respecting the acts of legislature j next, with respect to the particular projects of their pa¬ latinate or district recommended to them by the instruc¬ tions. It is at these dietines that nuncios, after they have rendered to their constituents a clear account ot their proceedings and of the diet, may be either confirmed or changed, and new ones elected in their steael till the general election for the following ordinary diet. New nuncios are chosen, 1. In the room of the de¬ ceased. 2. In the room of those that are become sena¬ tors or ministers of state. 3. In case of resignation. 4. In the room of such as are disqualified by the diet. 3. When any of the assembly desires a new election, to substitute another nuncio in the room of one expressly pointed out •, which request must be made in writing, signed by 12 members besides, and be delivered to the -marshal of the dietine. In this last case, the marshal is i43 144 who are accountable, to their constitu¬ ents. ] POL to read the name of the nuncio objected to, and to make Polana. the following proposition : “ Shall the nuncio JN be v J j confirmed in his function ? or, shall there be a new election made in his stead?” I be opinion of the meet¬ ing being taken by a division, the majority shall decide the question, and be declared by the marshal. If the majority approves the conduct ot the nuncio, the mai- shal and the assessors shall certify this confirmation on the diploma j and in case of disapprobation, the marshal shall declare the vacancy, and begin the form of a new election. _ . . 145 Such are the outlines of the Polish constitution esta-This Con- blished by the king and the confederates in 1791. ItstituUon will not bear a comparison with fhat under which Bri- ^eI^r t0 tons have the happiness to live} but it is surely infinite-^yie f01Tner) ly superior to that motley form of government which, protested for a century past, rendered Poland a perpetual scene of against by | war, tumult, tyranny, and rebellion. Many of the corrupt nobles, however, perceiving that it would curb their ambition, deprive them of the base means which they had long enjoyed of gratifying their avarice by set¬ ting the crown to sale, and render it impossible for them to continue with impunity their tyrannical oppiession of the peasants, protested against it, and withdrew from the confederates. rIhi8 was nothing more than what , might have been expected, or than what the king and his friends undoubtedly did expect. But the malcon¬ tents rvere not satisfied with a simple protest} they pie- ferred their complaints to the empress of Russia, who, ready on all occasions, and on the slightest pretence, to invade Poland, poured her armies into the republic, and surrounding the king and the diet with ferocious ^ soldiers, compelled them, by the most furious and inde- aI1(j0pp0S€(] cent menaces, to undo their glorious labour of love, and by theltus- to restore the constitution as settled after the partition sians. treaty. Of the progress of the Russians in this work of dark¬ ness, our readers will he pleased with the following manly and indignant narrative, taken from a periodical ^ work* of acknowledged merit. _ * “ It was on the 21st of April 1792, that the diet re-™" ^ | ceived the first notification from the king, of the inimi¬ cal and unjust intentions of Russia. He informed them that, without the shadow of pretence, this avowed ene¬ my of the rights of mankind had determined to invade the territory of the republic with an army of 60,coo men. This formidable banditti, commanded by gene¬ rals Soltikow, Michelson, and*Kosakowski, was after¬ wards to he supported by a corps of 20,000, and by the troops then acting in Moldavia, amounting to 70,00c. The kine:, however, professed that he was not discoura¬ ged, and declared his readiness to put himself at the head of the national troops, and to terminate his exist¬ ence in a glorious contest for the liberties of his country. Then, and not before, the diet decreed the organization of the army, and its augmentation to 100,000. The king and the council of inspection were invested with unlimited authority in every thing that regarded the de¬ fence of the kingdom. Magazines were ordered to be constructed when it was too late, and quarters to be pro¬ vided for the army. 147 “ The diet and the nation rose as one man to main-The nation tain their independence. All private animosities were™*^.^ obliterated, all private interests were sacrificed } thc^depend- greatest encouragements were held forth to volunteers cnce. to P O L [ By ] POL Poland, to enroll themselves under the national standard, and it —v was unanimously decreed by the diet, that all private losses should be compensated out of the public trea¬ sury. “ On the 18th of May, the Russian ambassador deli¬ vered a declaration, which was worthy of such a cause. It was a tissue of falsehood and hypocrisy. It asserted, that this wanton invasion, which was evidently against the sense of almost every individual Polander, was meant entirely for the good of the republic. It censured the precipitancy with which the new constitution was adopt¬ ed, and ascribed the ready consent of the diet to the in¬ fluence of the Warsaw mob. It represented the consti¬ tution as a violation of the principles on which the Po¬ lish republic was founded—complained of the licen¬ tiousness with which i\\e sacred name of the empress was treated in some speeches of the members ; and con¬ cluded by professing, that on these accounts, and in be¬ half of the emigrant Poles, her imperial majesty had ordered her troops to enter the territories of the re¬ public. “ At the moment this declaration was delivered to the diet, the Russian troops, accompanied by Counts Po- tocki, Rzewuski, Branicki, and a few Polish apostates, appeared upon the frontiers, and entered the territories of the republic in several columns, before the close of irk of ^ month* The spirit manifested by the nobility was he nobles, truly honourable. Some of them delivered in their plate to the mint. Prince Radzvil engaged voluntarily to furnish 10,000 stand of arms, and another a train of ar^ tillery. The courage of the new and hastily embodied soldiers corresponded with the patriotism of their nobles. Prince Poniatowski, nephew to the king, was appointed commander in chief 5 and though his force was greatly inferior to the enemy, it must be confessed that he made a noble stand. On the 24th of May, the enemy’s Cos¬ sacks were repulsed, and pursued by the patroles of the republic to the very entrenchments. On the 26th, about one o’clock, the piquets of the republic discover¬ ed a large body of Don Cossacks approaching the out¬ posts ; and a squadron of cavalry, commanded by Lieu¬ tenant Kwasniewski, supported by Lieutenant Golejow- ski with two squadrons more, in all about 300, march¬ ed out to meet them. They attacked the Cossacks with success, but pursued them with more valour than pru¬ dence to the side of a wood, where they found them¬ selves drawn into an ambuscade, and surrounded by 2000 horse, two battalions of chasseurs, and six pieces of cannon. The intrepid Poles bravely fought their way through the Russian line, and killed upwards of 200 of the enemy. The Poles in this engagement lost too men and two officers ; one of whom, Lieutenant Kwasniew¬ ski, was wounded and made prisoner. The remainder of the detachment reached their quarters in safety, duct of “ Perhaps the history of man can scarcely furnish an e court ol ^stance 0f perfi(ly^ meanness, and duplicity, equal to that which was manifested by Prussia on this occasion. By the treaty of defensive alliance, solemnly contracted between the republic of Poland and the king of Prus¬ sia, and ratified on the 23d of April 179°’ ex> pressly stipulated, ‘ That the contracting parties shall do all in their power to guarantee and preserve to each other reciprocally the whole of the territories which they respectively possess : That, in case of menace or invasion from any foreign power, they shall assist each Poland. other with their whole force, if necessary :—and by the ^ sixth article, it is further stipulated, ‘ that if any fo¬ reign power whatever shall presume to interfere in the internal affairs of Poland, his Prussian majesty shall consider this as a case falling within the meaning of the alliance, and shall assist the republic according to the tenor of the fourth article,” that is, with his whole force. What then is the pretext for abandoning this treaty ? It is, that the empress of Russia has shown a decided opposition to the order oj things established in Poland on the third of May 1791, and is provoked by Poland presuming to put herself into a posture to de¬ fend it.—It is known, however, by the most authentic documents, that nothing was effected on the 3d of May 1791, to which Prussia had not previously assented, and which she did not afterwards sanction j and that Prussia, according to the assertion of her own king, did not intimate a single doubt respecting the revolu¬ tion till one month (and according to the Prussian mi¬ nister till six months) after it had taken place j in short, to use the monarch’s own words as fully expla¬ natory of bis double politics, ‘ uot till the general tran- cjuillity of Europe permitted him to explain himself.’— Instead, therefore, of assisting Poland, Prussia insult¬ ingly recommended to Poland to retrace her steps ; in which case, she said that she would be ready to attempt an accommodation in her favour. This attempt was never made, and probably never intended 5 for the em¬ press pursued her measures.. 1^0 The duchy of Lithuania was the great scene of action War with in the beginning of the war j but the Russians had made Russia, little progress before the middle of the month of June. On the 10th of that month. General Judycki, who com¬ manded a detachment of the Polish troops, between Mire and Swierzna, was attacked by the Russians j but, after a combat of some hours, he obliged them to re¬ tire with the loss of 300 men dead on the field.—The general was desirous of profiting by this advantage, by pursuing the enemy, but was prevented by a most vio¬ lent fall of rain. On the succeeding day, the Russians rallied again to the attack ; and it then too fatally ap¬ peared, that the Poles were too young and undisciplined to contend with an inferior force against experienced troops and able generals. By a masterly manoeuvre, the Russians contrived to surround their antagonists, at a mo¬ ment when the Polish general supposed that he had obliged the enemy to retreat j and though the field was contested with the utmost valour by the troops ot the republic, they were at length compelled to give way, and to retire towards Nieswiesz. On the 14th another engagement took place near Lubar, on the banks of the river Sluez, between a de¬ tachment of the Russian grand army and a party of Polish cavalry dispatched by Prince Joseph Poniatow¬ ski, to intercept the enemy. The patriotic bravery ot the Poles wras victorious in this contest 5 but upon re¬ connoitring the force of the enemy, the prince found himself incapable of making a successful stand against such superior numbers. He therefore gave orders to strike the camp at Lubar, and commenced a precipi¬ tate retreat. During their march, the Polish rear was harassed by a body of 4000 Russians, till arriving at Boruskowee, the wooden brjdge unfortunately gaVe way POL [ 83 Poland, way, umler the weight of the cavalry. The enemy, m * the mean time, brought their artillery to play upon the rear of the fugitives, who lost upwards of 250 men. The Polish army next directed its course towards Lieh- me, where meeting, on the 17th, with a reintorcement from Zaslow, it halted to give battle to the enemy. The Russians were upwards of 17,000 strong, with 24 pieces of cannon, and the force of the republic much inferior. After a furious contest from seven m the morning till five in the afternoon, the Russians were at length obliged to retreat, and leave the field of battle in possession of the patriots. The Russians were com¬ puted to have lost 4000 men in this engagement, and the Poles about 1100. Notwithstanding these exertions, the I oles were obli¬ ged giadually to retire before their numerous and disci¬ plined enemies. Nieswez, Wilna, Minsk, and several other places of less consequence, tell into their hands one after another. On a truce being proposed to the Russian general Kochowski, the proposal was haughtily rejected; while the desertion of \ ice-brigadier Kud- nicki and some others, who preferred dishonour to per¬ sonal danger, proclaimed a tottering cause. 1 he pro¬ gress of the armies of Catharine was marked with de¬ vastation and cruelty, while, such was the aversion ot the people both to the cause and the manner of conduc¬ ting it, that, as they approached, the country all around became a wilderness, and scarcely a human being was to be seen. , ... In the mean time, a series of little defeats, to wine 1 the inexperience of the commanders, and the intempe¬ rate valour of new raised troops appear to have greatly contributed, served at once to distress and to dispirit these defenders of their country. Prince Poniatowski continued to retreat, and on the 17th ol July, his rear being attacked by a very superior force, it suftered a considerable loss, though the skill and courage ol Gene¬ ral Kosciusko enabled him to make a most respectable defence. On the 18th, a general engagement took place between the two armies. 1 he Russian line ex¬ tended opposite Dubienka, alonn the river Bog, as far as Opalin. The principal column, consisting ol 14,000 men, was chiefly directed against the division of Gene¬ ral Kosciusko, which consisted of 5000 men only. Af¬ ter a most vigorous resistance, in which the Russians lost upwards of 4000 men, and the troops ol the republic only some hundreds, the latter was compelled to give way before the superior numbers of the enemy, and to retire further into the country. This unequal contest was at last prematurely termi- 11 ated. The king, whose benevolent intentions were submission, perhaps, overpowered by his mental imbecility, and -whose age and infirmities, probably, rendered him un¬ equal to the difficulties and dangers which must attend a protracted war, instead of putting himself, according to his resolve, at the head ol his army, determined^ at once to surrender at discretion. On the 23d ot July, he summoned a council of all the deputies at that moment in Warsaw. He laid before them the last dispatches from the empress, which insisted upon total and unreserved submission. He pointed out the dan¬ ger of a dismemberment of the republic, should they delay to throw themselves upon the clemency of the empress, and to entreat her protection. He mentioned the fatal union of Austria and Prussia with Russia; I5I The king proposes ] POL and the disgraceful supineness manilested by eveiy oilier , J court in Europe. . . _ , Four citizens, the intrepid and patriotic malachow- ski, the princes Sapieha, Radzvil, and Soltan, vehement¬ ly protested against these dastardly proceedings; and the following evening a company of gentlemen from the different provinces attended lor the same pm pose. . H*e assembly waited immediately on these four distinguished patriots, and returned them their acknowledgements lov the spirit and firmness with which they had resisted the usurpations of despotism. The submission of the king to the designs of Russia was no sooner made known, than Poland was bereft of all her best and most respectable citizens. Malachowski as marshal of the diet, and Prince Sapieha, grand marshal ol Lithuania, entered strong protests on the journals ot the diet against these hostile proceedings, and declared solemnly that the diet legally assembled in 1788 was not dissolved. 152 On the second of August a confederation was form-Confedera- ed at Warsaw, of which the grand apostate, 1 otocki, W"rsaw ^ was chosen marshal. The acts ot this confedeiation r9We(j ^ were evidently the despotic dictates ol Russia, and were Russia, re¬ calculated only to restore the ancient abuses, and to store* ihe place the country under the aggravated oppression ol foreign yoke. It is remarkable, that at the very moment when Po¬ land was surrendering its liberties to its despotic inva¬ ders, the generous sympathy ol Great Britain was evin¬ ced by a liberal subscription, supported by all the most respectable characters in the nation, of every party and of every sect, for the purpose of assisting the king and the republic to maintain their independence. Though the benevolent design was frustrated, the lactiemains on record as a noble testimony of the spirit of Britons in the cause of freedom, of the indignation which fills every British heart at the commission of injustice, and of the liberality with which they are disposed to assist those who suffer from the oppression ot tyrants. . 153 Not satisfied with restoring the old wretched consti- The ein tution, the empress of Russia seized upon part of the press seizi territory which, at the last partition, she and her coad-“P™ jutors had left to the republic; and her ambassador terri- tering into the diet with a crowd of armed ruffians, com-tory. pelled the king and that assembly to grant the form of legality to her usurpations. The nation, however, did not submit. In Februrary 1794 General Kosciusko appeared in the neighbourhood of Cracow with a small lorce of arm¬ ed peasants. He beat some detachments ol Russians and Prussians, compelled them to evacuate Cracow, and proclaimed there the constitution of 1791’ Every where the people and the nobles flew to arms. 1 lie Russians, who occupied Warsaw with 15,000 men, be¬ gan to seize suspected persons, and demanded possess sion of the arsenal. But at that moment the news ar¬ rived of a defeat sustained by a corps ol 6000 Russians, with the loss of 1000 killed, and their general Woron- zovv made prisoner. Encouraged by this event, the people rose on the garrison, and after 48 hours hard fighting, drove them out, with the loss ol 6000 killed, 3000 pri¬ soners, and 50 pieces of cannon. The whole country was now in arms. Russia and Prussia, however, sent 110,000 men into Poland. Kosciusko, pressed by su¬ perior forces, made an able retreat upon Warsaw. 1 he king of Prussia, after besieging this city during three months. J’hMis/u Jty-d.ConstaMe£-c'?EJint’iini/i /x/.o POL Poland, months, was compelled to retire towards his own terri- —Y—tories, with the loss of 20,000. Here he was harassed for some time by Madalinsky with a small corps of ca¬ valry. Kosciusko, relieved from the Prussians, march- ed against the new Russian armies, which, during the [ 89 ] POL Poland. perate in the other parts both in summer and winter, and the weather in both more settled than in many other conn-1 tries. The face of the country is for the most part level 155 and the hills are but few. The Crapack or Carpathian Air> cii* mountains separate it from Hungary on the south. The mate’ &c' soil is verv frniif'iil IiAtL In ^ t . Poland. . 0 p vrr , , , I . , ». Hum xaungary on tUe south. The siege of Warsaw had reconquered Lithuania and Vol- so.l is very fruitful both in corn and pasturage, hemn and hynia. But the battle of Noezylac, on the 10th Oc- flax. Such is the luxuriance of the pastures in Podolia tober 1794, in which the Poles fought with heroic re solution against overpowering numbers, proved fatal to that unhappy country. Kosciusko was made prisoner, and carried to Petersburgh, where he remained confined in a dungeon till the death of Catherine. The Russians, af¬ ter this event, united their forces and marched upon War¬ saw, where the Poles had named Wavvrzecky general in chief. Though he had only 10,000 men to oppose 50,000, an obstinate resistance was made. At length the suburb named Prague was taken by assault, and the city surrendered. Nine thousand Poles fell in the fight j 30,000 persons of all ages and either sex were destroyed in cold blood; and 30,000 more, who still re¬ fused to submit, were suffered to leave the place, and afterwards hunted down by the soldiery on every side. The most distinguished chiefs were carried away to distant provinces; the wretched king was sent to Russia, where he soon after died, not without suspicious circumstances. The two powers were proceeding to divide between them the remaining provinces, when Austria interfered, and declared thatshecould not permit the destruction of Poland unless she received a share. At that moment it was not thought prudent to raise up a new enemy; and Austria obtained a considerable ad¬ dition of territory without having struck a blow or ex¬ pended a florin. The negociations continued till 1795, when the definitive treaty of partition was signed, which closed a series of transactions unparalleled, for perfidy, cruelty, and infamy, in the annals of Europe. The to¬ tal acquisitions of each power, from the first dismem¬ berment in 1772 the final partition in 1795, were as follows :—(Mentelle et Malte Brun, Geog. iv. 402.) Sq. miles, Inhabitants. Poland when entire contained, 290,000 12,000,000 Russia obtained Prussia obtained Austria obtained At the peace of Tilsit in 1807, Prussia lost three- fourths of her Polish conquests, which were erected in¬ to a principality, under the name of the Duchy of War¬ saw. The sovereignty of this duchy was given to the king of Saxony. At the peace of Presburg in 1809, Austria was also compelled to cede a portion of her ac- q-uisitions to the duchy of Warsaw. After the peace of Paris in 1814, Prussia recovered a part of what she had lost; and, at the congress of Vienna in 1815, the duchy was raised to the rank of a kingdom, under the name of the kingdom of Poland, the crown of which was annexed to that of Russia. No part of the origi¬ nal acquisitions of Russia is included in this kingdom, which consists entirely of the parts ceded by Prussia and Austria. It contained in 1815 about 47,000 square English miles, and 2,793,000 inhabitants. In 1818 the kingdom of Poland received from the empe¬ ror Alexander a representative constitution, founded on principles similar to those of the constitution of 1791. The air of this country is cold in the north, but tem- Vol. XVII. Part I. t 176,000 51,000 63,000 5.764.400 2.596.400 3,600,000 that it is said one can hardly see the cattle that are graz¬ ing in the meadows. Vast quantities of corn are yearly sent down the Vistula to Dantzic, from all parts of Po¬ land, and bought up chiefly by the Dutch. The eastern part of the country is full of woods, forests, lakes, mar¬ shes, and rivers ; of the last of which, the most consider¬ able in Poland are the Vistula, Nieper, Niester, Duna Bog, Warta, and Memel. The metals found in this country are iron and lead, with some tin, gold, and sil¬ ver; but there are no mines of the two last wrought at present. The other products of Poland are most sorts of precious stones, ochre of all kinds, fine rock-crystal Muscovy glass, talc, alum, saltpetre, amber, pitcoal’ quicksilver, spar, sal-gem, lapis calaminaris, and vitriol. In Lesser Poland are salt mines, which are the chief riches of the country, and bring most money into the exchequer. In the woods, which consist mostly of oak beech, pine, and fir-trees, besides the more common wild beasts, are elks, wild asses,wild oxen or uri, lynxes wild horses, wild sheep with one horn, bisons, hnenas’ wild goats, and buffaloes. In the meadows and fenny ground is gathered a kind of manna ; and the kermes- bernes produced in this country are used both in dye¬ ing and medicine. } The inhabitants consist of nobles, citizens, and pea-Different sants. 1 lie first possess great privileges, which they en- classes of joy partly by the indulgence of their kings, and partly byinhabi- ancient custom and prescription. Some of them have the title q[prince, count, or baron; but no superiority or pie-eminence on that account over the rest, which is only to be obtained by some public post or dignity. Formerly they had the power of life and death over their vassals ■ paid no taxes; were subject to none but the king; had a mines and salt-works on their estates; to all offices and employments, civil, military, and eccle¬ siastic ; could not be cited or tried out of the kingdom ; might choose whom they will for their king, and lay him under what restraints they please by the Pacta Conyenta; and none but they and the burghers of some particular towns can purchase lands. 1 he Polish tongue is a dialect of the Sclavonic : fsee DanSuage. philology, N 222.). It is neither copious nor har¬ monious. Many of the words, as they are written, have not a single vowel in them; but the High Dutch and La¬ tin are understood, and spoken pretty commonly, though incorrectly. The language in Lithuania differs much from that of the other provinces. True learning, and the study of the arts and sciences, have been little at¬ tended to 111 Poland, till of late they began to be re¬ garded with a more favourable eye, and to be not only patronized, but cultivated, by several of the nobles and others, both laymen and ecclesiastics. ^9 There are few or no manufactures in the kingdom, if Maautac. we except some linen and woollen cloths and hardwares •tuies* and the whole trade is confined to the city of Dantzic’ and other towns on the Vistula or Baltic. ’ ' Before the troubles, the king’s revenue was all clear ReTenw* to himself, for he paid no troops, not even his own ^ guards; 160 Order of knight¬ hood. 161 Forces. 162 Character of the people. POL [ 9° 3 „uards • but all the forces, as well as the officers of state dean of Exeter, fere paid by the republic. The public revenues arose chiefly from the crown-lands, the salt-nnnes in ic pa tinate of Cracow, from the rents of Manenbnrg Dw- shau, and Regenhus, from the government of C acow and district of Niepolom.ea, and from ancmn oUs customs, particularly those ot Elbrng and OanUrc. The order of the White Eagle was instituted b> A Ihe order 0 6 Its ensign is a cross of gustos 11. m tne yeai x / o 2 ; o Llnp rib- " Id enamelled with red, and appendant to a blue bon. The motto, Pro fide, rege, et lege. The standing forces of Poland were divided rnto the crown-army, and that of Lithuania, consisting of hor 1 fnnt and amounting to between 20,000 and 30,00 fen Ke tro=7>vere mostly cantoned on the crown- lands and in Poland were paid by a capitation or pol - ^inLithna^er^we^levredffir^ Snf ndtm7n"r. the whole body of the no bi'itv with their vassals, was obliged to appear in the fiekUn horseback j and the cities and towns furnished a certain number of foot-soldiers, w.ti cairia^ •, military stores : but for want of proper arms, piovismns, subordination, and discipline, and by being at liberty after afew weeks to return I-c this body prove bo of little advantage to the republic. Dantz.,cis only place in the Polish dominions that deserve ^ f for-tress and it fell to the possession ot 1 rus- name ot a fortress, anu u. ici r llto sia Foreign auxiliaries were not to be biou the* kingdom, nor the national troops to march on of without he consent of the states. Such wa the military establishment of Poland before the partrt.on without dissim'flatron, and «ceedingl yjosp.U^ - without dissimulation, aim cAvre- & ^ 1 ,| th clnthe themselves in furs in winter, and over all y throw a short cloak. No people keep g^-der eqn.pages than the gentry. .They ^ t'ds77^ SrmSTpU imns'r hu't theg,ower’sort of of the world, or the poles of artificial globes. Polar Regions, those parts of the world which he near the north and south poles. See the article 1 ole. POLARITY, the quality of a thing considered a i _ frirn itselt into one cer- POL dean ol r-xeter. We are not surprised at this young nobleman’s early preferments, wire,, we consider him as u the kinsman of Henry VIII. and that he was bred to the church by the king’s special command. Being now about the age of 19, ^ -f ,sPnt; a1CC°;d' ing to the fashion of the times, to finish his studies at Padua in Italy, where he resided some time in great splendour, having a handsome pension from the king. He returned to England in 1525, where he was most graciously received at court, and universally admired for his talents and address ; hot preferring study and seqnes- tration to the pleasures ot a court, he retired to the Car¬ thusian convent at Shene, where he had continued about Lo years, when the pious king began to divulge h„ scruples of conscience concerning Ins marriage with C a- barine of Spain. Pole foresaw that this affair would necessarily involve him in difficulties ; he therefore de¬ termined ^0 quit the kingdom, and accordingly ob ain- ed leave to visit Paris. Having thus avoided the storm for the present, he returned once more to his convent at Shene; but his tranquillity was again interrupted by the king’s resolution to shake off the pope^s supremacy, of which Pole’s approbation was thought indispensably necessary. How lie managed in this affair, is not very clear. However, he obtained leave to revisit Italy, and his pension was continued tor some time. . The king, having now divorced Queen Catharine, married Anne Boleyn, and being resolved to throw oft the papal yoke, ordered Dr Richard Sampson to wr.te a book in justification of his proceemngs, which he sent to Pole for his opinion, io this 1 ole, secure in t pope’s protection, wrote a scurrilous answer, ent.tled Pro Unitate Ecclesiastica, and sent it to the king ; w1h> was so offended with the contents, that he withdrew his pension, stripped him of all his preferments and pro¬ cured an act of attainder to be passed against him. In i.- .. t»~i0 xvoq created a cardinal, and Pt cured an actor auamuci 0 j 0 the mean time, Pole was created a cardinal, and sent nuncio to different parts of Europe. King Henry made several attempts to have him secured and brought to England, but without effect. At length the pope fix¬ ed him as legate at Viterbo, where he continued till the year 1C43, when he was appointed egate at the council of Trent, and was afterwards employed by the pope as his chief counsellor. Pope Paul III. dying m 1540, Pole was twice elect¬ ed his successor, and, we are told, twice refused the pa- nal dignity : first, because the election was made in too great haste •, and the second time, because it was done in the night. This delicacy in a cardinal is truly won¬ derful : but the intrigues of the French party seem to have been the real cause of his miscarriage j they start- • • ,• _i_x>„i„ Exrilxnt mpnns o-ained time near tne norm mnsidered as have been the real cause u. , POLARITY, the quality of a ‘W col,S1“enrce cer_ ed mairy objections to Pole, and by that means gained time having poles, or a tendency to turn » to nrocure a maiority against him. Cardinal Maria de Having po , , • a nse2 :n sneaking of the magnet, to procure a major y ? SS hr„.acS; -ffnpeaking of the magnet POLE, Reginald, cardinal, and archbishop o an terbury, a younger son of Sir Rich. Pole Lord Mon- taguei’was born at Stovertou castle, in Staffordsh.re m he year I too. At seven years of age be rvas sent to a Carthusian monaster, at Shene, near Richmond in Surry and thence, when he was about .2 years old removed ami lucu , bv the instruc- to procure a majority against him. Gardina Maria do Monte obtained the triple crown; and Pole, having kissed his slipper, retired to the convent of Magazunc near Verona, where he continued till the death ot Ed¬ ward VI. in the year 1553. On the accession of Queen Mary, Pole was sent legate to England, where lie was received by her majesty with great veneration and con- , . .1 _i_i • .1 !nnc ot- l.nmiieth. noor ^aiuiuarctu ^ . 11 rf-mfivcd received ov uer majcsi-y vrit.i and thence, when he was about 12 1°^ instruc. ducted to the archbishop’s palace at Lambeth, poor to Magdalen college m Oxford, wh ^ made Cranmer be;ng at that time prisoner m the 1 ower. He tions of the celebrated Linacre a h’ t k tbe immediately appeared in the House ot Lords, where he =: iSirSiS'tirKSr-i; £;TSiS.‘Si.'..r .......n- POL [ 91 ] POL They presented it on their knees to the setting of the sun, without any sensible twilight j Pole, the see of Rome. —v ■1 her majesty, who interceded with the cardinal, and he graciously condescended to give them absolution. This business being over, the legate made his public entry into London, and immediately set about the extirpation of heresy. The day after the execution of Cranmer, which he is said, though we believe falsely, to have ad¬ vised, he was consecrated archbishop of Canterbury. In the same year, 1556, he was elected chancellor of the university of Oxford, and soon after of Cambridge ; both which he visited, by his commissioners. He died of a double quartan ague in the year 1558, about 16 hours after the death of the queen ; and was buried in the cathedral of Canterbury. As to his character, the Romish writers ascribe to him every virtue under heaven: even Bishop Burnet is extremely lavish in his praise, and attributes the cruel¬ ties of Mary’s reign to the advice of Gardiner. In this Mr Hume agrees with the bishop, and represents Pole as the advecate of toleration. By every impartial ac¬ count, he seems to have been a man of mild manners, and of real worth, though undoubtedly a zealous mem¬ ber of the church of Rome.—He wrote, Pro imitate ec- clesiastica, De ejusdem potestate, A treatise on Justifi¬ cation, and various other tracts. Mr Philips published a very well written, though a very partial account, of Pole’s life, to which Glocester Ridley replied. This last rvork, which is entitled a Review of Mr Philips'1 s Life of Reginald Pole, was published in 1766. It is a complete confutation of the former, and is a very learned and temperate vindica¬ tion of the doctrines of the Reformation. Pole, in Astronomy, that point in the heavens round which the whole sphere seems to turn. It is also used for a point directly perpendicular to the centre of any circle’s plane, and distant from it by the length of a ra¬ dius. Pole, in Geography, one of the points on which the terraqueous globe turns j each of them being 90 de¬ grees distant from the equator, and, in consequence of their situation, the inclination of the earth’s axis, and its parallelism during the annual motion of our globe round the sun, having only one day and one night throughout the year. It is remarkable, that though the north in Hebrew, Gx-eek, Latin, and French, derives its name from gloom, obscurity, and darkness, the poles enjoy more light than T any other part of the world. The ancients believed the north to be covered with thick darkness : Strabo tells Pole. 'he poles njoy much us, that Homer, by the word which properly sig- ght; nifies obscurity or darkness, meant the north ; and thus Tibullus, speaking of the north, says, lllic ct densa tellus absconditur umbra, Paneg. ad Missel. The Arabians call the northern ocean the dark sea ; the Latins gave the name of Aquilo to the north wind, be¬ cause aquilus signifies black ; and the French call it la bise, from bis, “ black.” According to the ancients, the Cimmerians lived in darkness, because they were placed near the north. But all this is mere prejudice j for there are no places in the world that enjoy light longer than the arctic and antarctic poles j and this is accounted lid ^ ^°r ^7 considering the nature of twilight. In the tor- rid zone, and under the line, night immediately follows whereas the twilight begins and continues increasing in -v-—- proportion as places are distant from the equator, or ap¬ proach the pole. To this long twilight we must add the aurora borealis, which appears in the northern re¬ gions, Greenland, &c. in clear nights, at the beginning of the new moon, casting a light equal to that of full moon. See Gassendi, in the Life of Peyresc, book iii. and La Perere in his Account of Greenland. There is also long moonlight at the poles during winter. See Astronomy. But though there is really more light in the polar regions than elsewhere, yet owing to the obliquity with which the rays of the sun fall upon them, and the great length of winter night, the cold is so intense, that those parts of the globe which lie near the poles have never been fully explored, though the at¬ tempt has been repeatedly made by the most celebrated navigators. Indeed their attempts have chiefly been confined to the northern regions ; for with regard to the south pole, there is not the same incitement to at¬ tempt it. The great object for which navigators have ventured themselves in these frozen seas, was to find out a more quick and more ready passage to the East In¬ dies*; and this hath been attempted three several ways : * See Cook, one by coasting along the northern parts of Europe and fife 0l< Asia, called the north-east passage ; another, by sailing round the northern part of the American continent, called the north-west passage ; and the third, by sailing directly over the pole itself. We have already given a short account of several un¬ successful attempts which have been made from Eng¬ land to discover the first two of these. See Nobth- West Passage, and ISoRTii-East Passage. But before we proceed to the third, we shall make a few further observations on them, and mention the attempts of some other nations. ^ During the last century, various navigators, Dutch- Attempts men particularly, attempted to find out the wo/T/z-eosH0 fe'd out passage, with great fortitude and perseverance. They nort^-east always found it impossible, however, to surmount the PasSA&e' obstacles which nature had thrown in the way. Sub¬ sequent attempts are thought by many to have demon¬ strated the impossibility of ever sailing eastward along the northern coast of Asia ; and this impossibility is ac¬ counted for by the increase of cold in proportion to the extent of land. See America, N° 3—5. This is in¬ deed the case in temperate climates ; but much more so in those frozen regions where the influence of the sun, even in summer, is but small. Hence, as the continent of Asia extends a vast way from west to east, and has besides the continent of Europe joined to it on the west, it follows, that about the middle part of that tract of land the cold should be greater than anywhere else. 4 Experience has determined this to be fact; and it now Why it is appears that about the middle part of the northern ,niP°ssible coast of Asia the ice never thaws ; neither have even i°nt,a tire hardy Russians and Siberians themselves been able nonli-east to overcome the difficulties they met with in that part coast of of their voyage. In order to make this the more plain, and the following accounts more intelligible, we shall observe, that from the north-western extremity of Eu¬ rope, called the North Cape, to the north-eastern extre- * See mity of Asia, called the Promontory of the Tschutski*, ^ooi''8 is a space including about 160 degrees of longitude, vim. from 40 to 200 east from Ferro: the port of Archan-and’11S. 9 M 2 gel Pole. POL [ 92 pel lies in about 57 degrees east longitude, Nova Zem- Pole. Voyage of Morzo- vieft’, &-c. 6 Of Pront- tliistclieff. bla between 70 and 95 , which last is also the situation of the mouth of the great river Oby. Still farther east¬ ward are the mouths of the rivers Jenisey in 100 Pi- asida in 105°; Chatanga in 124°', Lena, which has many mouths, between 134° an(i I42° • Indigirka in 162° and the Kovyma in I75°' The coldest place in all this tract, therefore, ought to be that between the mouths of the Jenisey and the Chatanga ^ and indeed here the unsurmountable difficulty has always been, as will appear from the following accounts of the voyages made by the Russians with a view to discover the north¬ east passage. In 1734, Lieutenant MorzoviefF sailed from Arch¬ angel towards the river Oby, but could scarce advance 20 denrees of longitude during that season. The next summer he passed through the straits of Wyegatz into the sea of Kara j but he did not double the promontory which separates the sea of Kara from the bay or mouth of Oby. In 1738, the lieutenants Malygin andShura- koff doubled that promontory with great difficulty, and entered the bay of Oby. Several unsuccessful attempts were made to pass from the bay of Oby to the Jenisey j which was at last effected, in 1738, by two vessels com¬ manded by lieutenants Offzin and Koskeleff. The same, year the pilot Feodor Menin sailed eastward from the Jenisey to the mouth of the Piasida: but here he was stopped by the ice ; and finding it impossible to force a passage, he returned to the Jenisey. In July 1735, Lieutenant Prontshistcheff sailed down the river Lena, in order to pass by sea to the mouth of the Jenisey. The western mouths of the Lena were so choked up with ice, that he was obliged to pass through the most easterly one j and was prevented by contrary winds from getting out till the 13th of August. Ha¬ ving steered north-west along the islands which lie scat¬ tered before the mouths of the Lena, he found himself in lat. 70. 4.} yet even here he saw pieces of ice from 24 to 60 feet in height, and in no place was there a free channel left of greater breadth than 100 or 200 yards. His vessel being much damaged, he entered the mouth of the Olenek, a small river near the western mouth of the Lena-, and here he continued till the ensuing season, when he got out in the beginning of August. But before he could reach the mouth of the Chatanga, he was so entirely surrounded and hemmed in with ice, that it was with the utmost difficulty he could get loose. Observing then a large field of ice stretching into the sea, he was obliged to sail up the Chatanga. Getting free once more, he proceeded north¬ ward, doubled the cape called Taimura, and reached the bay of that name, lying in about 1150 east from Ferro ; from thence he attempted to proceed westward along the coast. Near the shore were several small islands, between which and the shore the ice was immoveably fixed. He then directed his course towards the sea, in order to pass round the chain of islands. At first he found the sea more free to the north of these islands, but observed much ice lying between them. At last he arrived at what he took to be the last of the islands lying in lat. 77. 25. Between this island and the shore, as well as on the other side of the island which lay most to the north, the ice was firm and immoveable. He attempted, however, to steer still more to the north ; and having advanced about six miles, he was prevented 3. ] POL by a thick fog from proceeding: this fog being dis¬ persed, he saw nothing everywhere but ice, which at > last drove him eastward, and with much danger and dif¬ ficulty he got to the mouth of the Olenek on the 29th of August. 7 Another attempt to pass by sea from the Lena to the Ckari- Jenisey was made in 1739 ^7 Lhariton Laptieft, but *7^ p with no better success than that just mentioned. This voyager relates, that between the river Piasida and Tai¬ mura, a promontory stretches into the sea, which he could not double, the sea being entirely frozen up before he could pass round. g Besides the Russians, it is certain that some English Mr Coxe’s and Dutch vessels have passed the island of Nova Zem-®t>serva- bla into the sea of Kara: “But (says Mr Coxe in hist,ons- Account of the Russian voyages) no vessel of any na¬ tion has ever passed round that cape which extends to the north of the Piasida, and is laid down in the Russian charts in about 78° lat. We have already seen that no Russian vessel has ever got from the Piasida to the Cha¬ tanga, or from the Chatanga to the Piasida and yet some authors have positively asserted that this promon¬ tory has been sailed round. In order therefore to elude the Russian accounts, which clearly assert the contrary, it is pretended that Gmelin and Muller have purposely concealed some part of the Russian journals, and have imposed on the world by a misrepresentation of facts. But without entering into any dispute upon this head, I can venture to affirm, that no sufficient proof has been as yet advanced in support of this assertion ; and therefore, until some positive information shall be pro¬ duced, we cannot deny plain facts, or give the preference to hearsay evidence over circumstantial and well attested accounts.” _ p The other part of this north-east passage, viz. from Of the na- the Lena to Kamtschatka, though sufficiently difficult ligation and dangerous, is yet practicable 5 as having been once performed, if we may believe the accounts of the Hus-Kamts- sians. According to some others indeed, says Mr Coxe, chatka. this navigation has been open a century and a half j and several vessels at different times have passed round the north-eastern extremity of Asia. But if we consult the Russian accounts, we shall find that frequent expe¬ ditions have been unquestionably made from the Lena to the Kovyma, but that the voyage from the Kovyma round Tschutskoi Noss into the Eastern ocean has been performed but once. According to Mr Muller, this formidable cape was doubled in the year 1648. The material incidents of this remarkable voyage are as fol¬ low. 1-0 “ In 1648 seven kotches, or vessels, sailed from the Voyage of mouth of the river Kovyma, in order to penetrate into Deshneff, the Eastern ocean. Of these, four were never more heard of: the remaining three were commanded by Si- ’ mon Deshneff, Gerasim Ankudinoff, and Fedot Alex- eeff. Deshneff and Ankudinoff quarrelled before their departure concerning the division of profits and honours to be acquired by their voyage ; which, however, was not so easily accomplished as they had imagined. Yet. Deshneff in his memorials makes no mention of obstruc¬ tions from the ice, nor probably did he meet with any j for he takes notice that the sea is not every year so free from ice as it was at that time. The vessels sailed from the Kovyma on the 20th of June, and in September they reached the promontory of the Tschutski, where Ankudinoff’st ! ’ POL [ 93 ] POL Pole. * See Cook’s Discover ti lusar- monntable obstacles in the north-east passage. AnkudinofTs vessel was wrecked, and the crew distri¬ buted among the others two. Soon after this the two vessels lost sight of each other, and never joined again. Deshneff was driven about by tempestuous winds till October, when he was shipwrecked considerably to the south of the Anadyr. Having at last reached that ri¬ ver, he formed a scheme of returning by the same way that he had come, but never made the attempt. As for AlexeefF, after being also shipwrecked, he had died of the scurvy, together with AnkudinolF; part of the crew were killed by the savages, and a few escaped to Ivamtschatka, where they settled. From Captain * Cook’s voyage twards the north¬ eastern part of Asia, it appears that it is possible to double the promontory of Tschutski without any great ries, N° 95 difficulty *, and it now appears, that the continents of I0°' Asia and America are separated from one another but by a narrow strait, which is free from ice ; but, to the northwards, that experienced navigator was everywhere stopped by the ice in the month of August, so that he could neither trace the American continent fai’ther than to the latitude of 70*, nor reach the mouth of the river Kovyma on the Asiatic continent; though it is pro¬ bable that this might have been done at another time, when the situation of the ice was altered either by "winds or currents. On the whole, therefore, it appears that the insur¬ mountable obstacle in the north-east passage lies between the rivers Piasida and Chatanga 5 and unless there be in that space a connection between the Asiatic and Ame¬ rican continents, there is not in any other pax-t. Ice, however, is as effectual an obstruction as land : and though the voyage were to be made by accident for once, it never could be esteemed a passage calculated for the purposes of trade, or any other beneficial pux*- I2 pose whatever. Of the With regard to the north-west passage, the same dif- Hortb-west ficulties occur as in the other. Captain Cook’s voyage passage. jias now assured us, that if there is any strait which di¬ vides the continent of America into two, it must lie in a higher latitude ^han 70°, and consequently be perpe¬ tually frozen up. If a north-west passage can be found then, it must be by sailing round the whole American continent, instead of seeking a passage through it, which some have supposed to exist at the bottom of Baffin’s bay. But the extent of the American continent to the northward is yet unknown ; and there is a possibility of its being joined to that part of Asia between the Piasida and Chatanga, which has never yet been circumnavi- * See gated*. It remains therefore to consider, whether there Cook's is any possibility of attaining the wished-for passage by Ducove- sailing directly north, between the eastern and western ries. N° 11. .• , ^ continents. Barring- Of the practicability of this method, the Honourable ton’s argu- Haines Barrington is very confident, as appeai-s by se- ments in veral tracts which he published in the years 1775 and favour of in consequence of the unsuccessful attempts made of reachin" ky Captain Phipps, afterwards Loi'd Mulgrave. See the pole. NoRTH-East Passage.—In the tracts now alluded to he instances a great number of navigators who have reached very high northern latitudes ; nay, some who have been at the pole itself, or gone beyond it.— These instances are 1., One Captain Thomas Robertson assured our author, that he had been in latitude 82^, that the sea was open, and he was certain that he could have reached the latitude of 83°.—2. From the testi¬ mony of Captain Cheyne, who gave answers to ceidain queries drawn up by Mr Halrymple concerning the po¬ lar seas, it appears that he had been in the latitude of 82°.—3. One Mr Watt informed our author, that when he was 17 years of age, at that time making his first voyage with Captain M‘Callam, a bold and skilful na¬ vigator, who commanded a Scotch whale-fishing ship, as during the time that the whales are supposed to copu¬ late no fishing can be carried on, the captain resolved to employ that interval in attempting to reach the north pole. He accoi'dingly pi'oceeded without the least ob¬ struction to 834-, when the sea was not only open to the northward, but they had seen no ice for the last three degrees ; but while he still advanced, the mate complained that the compass was not steady, and the captain was obliged with reluctance to give over his attempt.—4. Hr Campbell, the continuator of Harris’s voyages, informed Mr Barrington, that Dr Dallie, a na¬ tive of Holland, being in his youth on board a Dutch ship of war which at that time was usually sent to su¬ perintend the Greenland fishery, the captain determined, like the Scotchman above mentioned, to make an attempt to reach the pole during the interval between the first and second fisheries. He penetrated, according to the best of Dr Campbell’s recollection, as far as 88° $ when the weather was warm, the sea free from ice, and rolling like the bay of Biscay. Dallie now pressed the captain to proceed : but he answered, that he had already gone too fax', and should be blamed in Holland for neglecting his station; upon which account he would suffer no journal to be kept, but returned as soon as possible to Spitsbergen.—5. In the year 1662-3, Mr Oldenburg, then secretary of the Roval Society, was ordered to re¬ gister a paper, entitled “ Several Inquiries concerning Greenland, answered by Mr Gray, xvho had visited these parts.” The 19th of these queries is the follow¬ ing: How near hath any one been known to approach the pole P—The answer is, “ I once met upon the coast of Greenland a Hollander that swore he had been half a degree from the pole, showing me his journal, which was also attested by his mate j where they had seen no ice or land, but all watei\”—6. In Captain Wood’s ac¬ count of a voyage in quest of the north-east passage, wre have the following account of a Dutch ship which reached the latitude of 89°. “ Captain Goulden, xvho had made above 30 voyages to Greenland, did relate to his majesty, that being at Greenland some 20 years be¬ fore, he was in company with two Hollanders to the eastward of Edge’s island 5 and that the whales not ap¬ pearing on the shore, the Hollanders were determined to go farther northward ; and in a fortnight’s time return¬ ed, and gave it out that they had sailed into the lati¬ tude 89°, and that they did not meet with any ice, but a free and open sea, and that there run a very hollow grown sea like that of the bay of Biscay. Mr Gouk. den being not satisfied xvith the bare relation, they pro¬ duced him four journals out of the txvo ships, xvhich testified the same, and that they all agreed within four minutes.”—7. In the Philosophical Transactions for 1675 we have the following passage : “ For it is well known to all that sail northward, that most of the north¬ ern coasts are frozen up for many leagues, though in the open sea it is not so, no nor under the pole itself, unless by accident.” In which passage the having reached thi pole POL t 9 Pole. "Why we, Cannot sup pose the sea all round the pole to be frozen. pole is alluded to as a known fact, and as such stated to the Royal Society.—S. Mr Miller, in his Gardener s Dictionary, mentions the voyage of one Captain John¬ son, who reached 88 degrees ol latitude. Mr Barring¬ ton was at pains to find a full account of this voyage but met only with the following passage rn Billion’s Natural History, which he takes to he a confirmation of it. “ I have been assured by persons ol credit, that an English captain, whose name was Monson, instead of seeking a passage to China between the northern coun¬ tries, had directed his course to the pole, and had ap¬ proached it within two degrees, where there was an open sea, without any ice.” Here he thinks that M. Buffon has mistaken Johnson for Monson.—-9. A map of the northern hemisphere, published at Berlin (under the direction of the academy of Sciences and. Belles Lettres), places a ship at the pole, as having arrived there according to the Dutch accounts.—10. Moxon, hydrographer to Charles IT. gives an account of a Dutch ship having been two degrees beyond the pole, which was much relied on by Wood. Ihis vessel found the weather as warm there as at Amsterdam. Besides these, there are a great number of other tes¬ timonies ofships which have reached the latitude of 81,82, 83, 84 (a), &c.; from all which our author concludes, that if the voyage is attempted at a proper time of the year, there would not be any great difficulty of reaching the pole. Those vast pieces of ice which commonly obstruct the navigators, he thinks, proceed from the mouths of the great Asiatic rivers which run northward into the frozen ocean, and are driven eastward and west¬ ward by the currents. But though we should suppose them to come directly from the pole, still our author thinks that this affords an undeniable proof that the pole itself is free from ice •, because, when the pieces leave it, and come to the southward, it is impossible that they can at the same time accumulate at the pole. The extreme cold of the winter air on the continents of Asia and America has afforded room for suspicion, that at the pole itself, and for several degrees to the southward of it, the sea must be frozen to a vast depth in one solid cake of icej but this Mr Barrington refutes from several considerations. In the first place, he says, 4 1 POL that on such a supposition, by the continual intensity of the cold, and the accumulation of snow and frozen v' vapour, this cake of ice must have been increasing in thickness since the creation, or at least since the de¬ luge ; so that now it must be equal in height to the highest mountains in the world, and be visible at a great distance. Besides, the pieces broken off from the sides of such an immense mountain must be much thicker than any ice that is met with in the northern ocean ; none of which is above two yards in height above the surface of the water, those immense pieces called ice mountains being always formed on land. Again, the system of nature is so formed, that all parts of the earth are exposed for the same length of tune, or nearly so, throughout the year to the rays of the sun. But, by reason of the spheroidal figure of the teiraque- ous globe, the poles and polar regions enjoy the sun somewhat longer than others $ and hence the Dutch who wintered in Nova Zembla in 1672 saw the sun a fortnight sooner than they ought to have done by astro¬ nomical calculations. By reason of this flatness about the poles, too, the sun not only shines for a greater space of time on these inhospitable regions, but with less obliquity in the summer-time, and hence the efiect of his rays must be the greater. Now Mr Barrington considers it as an absurd supposition, that this gloiious luminary should shine for six months-on a cake of bar¬ ren ice where there is neither animal nor vegetable. He says that the polar seas are assigned by nature as the habitation of the whales, the largest animals in the creation; but if the greatest part of the polar seas are for ever covered with an impenetrable cake of ice, these huge animals will be confined within very narrow bounds *, for they cannot subsist without frequently coming to the top of the water to breathe. - I5 Lastly, the quantity of water frozen by different de- Quantity of grees of cold is by no means directly in proportion to ice fanned the intensity of the cold, but likewise to the duration ^ of it. Thus, large bodies of water are never frozen in ^portion any temperature of short duration, though shallow bo- to the de¬ dies often are. Our author observes, that as much ofgree of a given mass of water was frozen in five hours of a tern- cold, perature 12° below the freezing point, as was frozen in one caJ See Jf. Bauche'ls Observations on the North or Ice Sea, where he gives an account of various attempts made to reach the pole, from which he is convinced that the sea is there open, and that the thing is practicable. M. de Pages, in his Travels, vol. ill. informs us, that he wished to take a voyage to the north seas, tor the pur¬ pose of bringing under one view the various obstacles from the ice, which have impeded the researches of navi¬ gators in those seas; and for this purpose he was prepared to continue his voyage to as high a latitude as pos¬ sible and that he might be able to say whether any land actually exists north from the coast of Greenland, lie sailed without any encouragement from his court (France) on the 16th of April 1776 from the Texel, in a Dutch vessel bound to Spitsbergen. On the 16th of May she was a little way north of 8l°, the highest latitude she “ Beinw now Gays the author) less than 180 leagues from the pole, the idea of so small a distance served effectually to awaken my curiosity. Had I been able to inspire my fellow-voyagers with sentiments similar to my own, the winds and currents which at this moment carried us fast towards the pole, a region hitherto deem¬ ed inaccessible to the eye of mortals, would have been saluted with acclamations of joy. This quarter, however, is not the most eligible for such an enterprise : here the sea lying in the vicinity of those banks of ice, so frequent a little farther to the west, is much too confined. Nevertheless, when I consider the very changeable nature of the shoals under whatever form, even in their most crowded and compact state } their constant changes and con¬ cussions which break and detach them from one another, and the various expedients that may be employed for freeing the ship from confinement, as well as for obviating impending danger—I am far from viewing a voyage to the pole as a chimerical idea.” POL [ 95 ] POL Pole. 16 Mr Fors¬ ter’s argu¬ ment* a- sgainst the possibility )>f reach¬ ing the pole. one hour of the temperature 50° below it; and that ' long duration of the temperature between 20 and 32 is, with regard to the congelation of water, equivalent to intensity of cold such as is marked o and below o in Fahrenheit, but of short duration. See Cold and Con¬ gelation. On the other hand, PvTr Forster, in bis Observations, takes the contrary side of the question with no little vehemence. “ I know (says he) that M. de Buffon, Lomonosof, and Crantz, were of opinion, that the ice found in the ocean is formed near the lands only, from the fresh water and ice carried down into the sea by the many rivers in Siberia, Hudson’s bay, &c.; and there¬ fore, when we fell in with such quantities of ice in De¬ cember 1772, I expected we should soon meet with the land from whence these ice masses had been detached. But being disappointed in the discovery of this land, though we penetrated beyond the 67° twice, and once beyond 710, south latitude, and having besides some other doubts concerning the existence of the pretended southern continent, I thought it necessary to inquire what reasons chiefly induced the above authors to form the opinion that the ice floating in the ocean must be formed near land, or that an austral land is absolutely requisite *for that purpose : and having looked for their arguments, I find they amount chiefly to this : ‘ That the ice floating in the ocean is all fresh : that salt water does not freeze at all; or if it does, it contains briny particles. They infer from thence, that the ice in the ocean cannot be formed in the sea far from any land : there must therefore exist austral lands; because, in or¬ der to form an idea of the original of the great ice masses agreeably to what is observed in the northern hemisphere, they find that the first point for fixing the high ice- islands is the land ; and, secondly, that the great quan¬ tity of flat ice is brought down the rivers.’ I have im¬ partially and carefully considered and examined these arguments, and compared every circumstance with what we saw in the high southern latitude, and with other known facts ; and will here insert the result of all my inquiries on this subject. “ First, they observe the ice floating in the ocean to yield, by melting, fresh water: which I believe to be true. However, hitherto it has by no means been ge¬ nerally allowed to be fresh : for Crantz says expressly, that ‘ the flat pieces (forming what they call the ice¬ fields') are salt, because they were congealed from sea¬ water.’ The ice taken up by us for watering the ship was of all kinds, and nevertheless we found it constant¬ ly fresh : Which proves, either that the principle of analogy cannot be applied indiscriminately in both hemispheres ; and that one thing may be true in the northern hemisphere which is quite otherwise in the southern, from reasons not yet known or discovered by us; or we must think that Crantz and others are mistaken, who suppose the ice floating in the ocean to be salt. “ The next remark is, That salt water does not freeze at all; or if it does, it contains briny particles. M. de Buffbn tells us, ‘ that the sea between Nova Zembla and 1 Spitzbergen, under the 790 north latitude, does , not freeze, as it is there considerably broad : and that it is not to be apprehended to find the sea frozen not even under the pole itself; for indeed there is no example of having ever found a sea wholly frozen over, and at a considerable distance from tbe shores ; that the only in¬ stance of a sea entirely frozen is that of the Black sea, which is narrow and not very salt, and receives a great many rivers coming from northern regions, and bring- rng down rce : that this sea therefore sometimes freezes to such a degree, that its whole surface is congealed to a considerable thickness; and, if the historians are to be credited, was frozen, in the reign of the emperor Con¬ stantine Copronymus, 30 ells thick, not including 20 ells of snow which was lying on the ice. This fact, continues M. de Bufi'on, seems to be exaggerated : but it is true, however, that it freezes almost every winter ; whilst the high seas which are 1000 leagues nearer to- wards the pole do not freeze; which can have no other cause than the difference in saltness, and the little quan¬ tity of ice carried out by rivers, if compared to the enormous quantity of ice which the rivers convey into the Black sea.’ M. de Buffon is not mistaken when be mentions that the Black sea frequently freezes. Strabo- informs us, that the people near the Bosphorus Cimme- rius pass this sea in carts from Panticapaeum to Phana- gorea ; and that Neoptolemus, a general of Mithridates Eupator, won a battle with his cavalry on the ice on the very spot where he gained a naval victory in the summer. Marcellinus Comes relates, that under tire consulship of Vincentius and Fravita, in the year 401 after Christ, the whole surface of the Pontuswas cover¬ ed with ice, and that the ice in spring was carried through the Propontis, during 30 days, like mountains. Zonaras mentions the sea between Constantinople and Scutari frozen to such a degree in the reign of Constan¬ tine Copronymus, that even loaded carts passed over it. The prince Demetrius Cantemir observes, that in the year 1620-1 there happened so intense a frost, that tbe people walked over the ice from Constantinople to Isko- dar. All these instances confirm M. de Buffon’s asser¬ tion. But as this great natural historian says that the Black sea is the only instance of a sea being entirely frozen (b), I must beg leave to dissent from him; for it is equally well attested that the Baltic is sometimes en¬ tirely frozen, according to Caspar Schutz’s account. In the year 1426, the winter was so severe, that people travelled over the ice across the Baltic from Dantzic to Lubeck ; and the sea was likewise passable from Den¬ mark to Mecklenburg: and in the year 1459 the whole Baltic was entirely frozen, so that persons travel¬ led both on foot and on horseback, over ice, from Den¬ mark to tbe Venedick Hans-towns, csWeA Lubeck, Wis- mar, Rostock, and Stralsund, which had never happened before ; people likewise travelled across the Baltic over (b) In the year 86q the Mediterranean was covered with ice, so that people travelled in carts and horses across the Ionian sea to Venice; (LLernuennus Contractus ap. Pistor. Script, tom. ii. p. 236.). And in 1234 the Me¬ diterranean was again thus frozen, that the Venetian merchants travelled over the ice with their merchandise to what place they chose ; Matt. Paris, p. 78. Pol*. Pole. POL t 9s ice from Revel in Estland to Denmark and to Sweden, 1 and back again, without the least danger (c). But, ac¬ cording to Ssemund Erode, even the great German ocean between Denmark and Norway was frozen in the year 1040, so that the wolves frequently ran over the ice from one country to the other. The great northern ocean is likewise most certainly sometimes frozen to a great distance from any land : for Muller relates, that in the year 1715 a Cossack called Markoff, with some other persons, was sent by the Russian government to explore the north sea ; but finding it next to impossible to make any progress during summer on account of the vast quantities of ice commonly filling this ocean, he at last determined to try the experiment during winter. He therefore took several sledges drawn according to the custom of the country by dogs, which commonly go about 80 or 10O versts per day, 105 of which make a degree j and on March the 15th, old style, with this caravan of nine persons, he left the shores of Siberia at the mouth of the river Yana, under the 710 of north latitude, and proceeded for seven days together north¬ ward, so that he had reached at least the 770 or 78 north latitude, when he was stopped by the ice, which there began to appear in the shape of prodigious moun¬ tains. He climbed up to the top of some of these ice- mountains: but seeing from thence no land, nor any thing except ice a# far as the eye could reach, and hav¬ ing besides no more food for his dogs left, he thought it very necessary to return ; which he with great difficulty performed on April the 3d, as several of the dogs, which had perished for want, were employed to sup¬ port those that remained alive. These facts, I believe, will convince the unprejudiced reader, that there are other seas besides the Black sea which really do freeze in winter, and that the ice carried down the rivers could not at least freeze the German ocean between Norway and Denmark, because the rivers there are so small, and bear a very inconsiderable proportion to the immense ocean, which, according to experiments made by Mr Wilkie, is very salt, though near the land, in the Swe¬ dish harbour of Landscrona. “ Now, if six or seven degrees of latitude, containing 3 POL from 360 to 420 sea-miles, are not to be reckoned a great distance from the land, I do not know in vyfiat manner to argue, because no distance whatsoever will jo reckoned far from any land. Nay, if the Cossack Mar¬ koff, being mounted on one of the highest ice-moun- tains may be allowed to see at least to the distance ot 20 leagues, the extent alluded to above must then be increased to 480 English sea-miles j which ceitainly is very considerable, and makes it more than probable that the ocean is frozen in winter, in high northern latitudes, even as far as the pole. Besides, it invalidates the ar-* gument which these gentlemen wish to infer from thence, that the ocean does not Jree%e in high latitudes, espe¬ cially where there is a considerably broad sea ; for we have shown instances to the contrary. “ But M. de Buffon speaks of ice carried down the rivers into the northern ocean, and forming there these immense quantities of ice. “ And in case, says he, wa would suppose, against all probability, that at the pole it could be so cold as to congeal the surface ot the sea, it would remain equally incomprehensible how these enormous floating ice-masses could be formed, if they had not land for a point to fix on, and from whence they are severed by the heat of the sun. The two ships which the India Company sent in 1739 upon the disco¬ very of the austral lands, found ice in 470 or 48° south latitude, but at no great distance from land •, which they discovered, without being able to appioach it. This ice, therefore, must have come from the interior parts of the lands near the south pole j and we must conjecture, that it follows the course of several large rivers, washing these unknown lands, in the same manner as the rivers Oby, the Yenisea, and the other great rivers which fall into the northern sea, carry the ice-masses, which stop up the straits of Waigats for the greater part of the year, and render the artanan sea inaccessible upon this course.’ Before we can allow the analogy between the rivers Oby, Yenisea, and the rest which fall into the northern ocean, and those coming from the interior parts of the austral lands, let us compare the situation of both countries, supposing the austral lands really to ex¬ ist. The Oby, Yenisea, and the rest of the Siberian rivers, Pole. Incerti auctoris Annales Dcnor. in Ji estphahi (c) In 1296 the Baltic was frozen from Gothland to Sweden. monument. Cimbr. tom. i. p. I392- ... , ,, 1 • 1 jo r 1 • 1 In 1306 the Baltic was, during fourteen weeks, covered with tee between all the Danish and Swedish islands. CLudwig, reliquiee, MSS tom. ix. p. I7°')» . 1 t> i.- j • • 1 In 1323 there was a road for foot passengers and horsemen over the ice on the Baltic during six week.8. ^’n 1349 people walked over the ice from Stralsund to Denmark. {Incerti auct. cit. ap. Ludwig, tom. ix. P* In 1408 the whole sea between Gothland and Oeland, and likewise between Rostock and Gezoer, was frozen. ^11/1423 the ice bore riding from Prussia to Lubec. {Crantxii Vandal, lib. x. c. 40.). The whole sea was covered with ice from Mecklenburg to Denmark. {Incert. auct. cit. ap. Ludwig, tom. ix. p. 125.). In 1461 (says Nicol. Marschallus in Annul. Herul. ap. Westphal. tom. i. p. 261.), “ tanta erat hyems, ut con- creto gelu oceano, plaustris millia passuum supra CCC merces ad ultimam Thylen {Iceland') et Orcades veheren- tur e Germania tota pene bruma.” ... ^ c In 1545 the sea between Rostock and Denmark, and likewise between Fionia and Sealand, was thus frozen, that the people travelled over the ice on foot, with sledges to which horses and oxen were put. {Anonym, ap. Ludwig, tom. ix. p. 176.). In 1294 the Cattegat or sea between Norway and Denmark was frozen j that from Oxslo in Norway, they could travel on it to Jutland. {Strelow Chron. Juthiland, p. 148.). POL [ 97 1 POL Pole, rivers, falling down into the northern ocean, have their ^sources in 48° and 50® north latitude, where the cli¬ mate is mild and capable of producing corn of all kinds. All the rivers of this great continent increasing these great rivers have likewise their sources in mild and tem¬ perate climates, and the main direction of their course is from south to north ”, and the coast of the northern ocean, not reckoning its sinuosities, runs in general west and east. The small rivers which are formed in high la¬ titudes have, properly speaking, no sources, no springs, but carry oft’ only the waters generated by the melting of snow in spring, and by the fall of rain in the short summer, and are for the greatest part dry in autumn. And the reason of this phenomenon is obvious, after considering the constitution of the earth in those high northern climates. At Yakutsk, in about 62° north la¬ titude, the soil is eternally frozen, even in the height of summer, at the depth of three feet from the surface. In the years 1685 and 1686, an attempt was made to dig a w'ell; and a man, by great and indefatigable labour, continued during two summer seasons, and succeeded so far in this laborious task, that he at last reached the depth of 91 feet 5 but the whole earth at this depth was frozen, and he met with no water ; which forced him to desist from so fruitless an attempt. And it is easy to infer from hence how impossible it is that springs should 17 be formed in the womb of an eternally frozen soil. Of the “ The argument, therefore, is now reduced to this, “■--g That salt water does not freeze at all; or, if it does, the water" con^a^ns briny particles. But we have already pro¬ duced numberless instances, that the sea does freeze ; nay, Crantz allows, that the flat pieces of ice are salt, be¬ cause they were congealed from sea-water. We beg leave to add a few decisive facts relative to the freezing of the sea. Barentz observes in the year 1596, Septem¬ ber the 16th, the sea froze two fingers thick, and next night the ice was as thick again. This happened in the middle of September; what effect then must the intense frost of a night in January not produce? When Captain James wintered in Charleton’s isle, the sea froze in the middle of December 1631. It remains, therefore, only to examine, whether the ice formed in the sea must ne¬ cessarily contain briny particles. And here I find my¬ self in a very disagreeable dilemma; for during the in¬ tense frost of the winter in 1776, two sets of experi¬ ments were made on the freezing of sea-water, and pub¬ lished, contradicting one another almost in every mate¬ rial point. The one by Mr Edward Nairne, F. B. S. an ingenious and accurate observer; the other by Dr Higgins, who reads lectures on chemistry and natural philosophy, and consequently must be supposed to be well acquainted with the subject. I will therefore still venture to consider the question as undecided by these experiments, and content myself with making a few ob¬ servations on them: but previously I beg leave to make this general remark, that those who are well acquainted with mechanics, chemistry, natural philosophy, and the various arts which require a nice observation of minute circumstances, need not be informed, that an experiment or machine succeeds often very well when made upon a smaller scale, but will not answer if undertaken at large; Vol. XVII. Part I. and, vice versa, machines and experiments executed up- Pole, on a small scale will not produce the ellect which they ‘ -1 v “ 1 certainly have when made in a more enlarged manner. A few years ago an experiment made on the dyeing of scarlet, did not succeed when undertaken on a small scale, whereas it produced the desired effect when tried at a dyer’s house with the large apparatus; and it evi¬ dently confirms the above assertion, which I think I have a right to apply to the freezing of salt water. It is therefore probable, that the ice formed in the ocean at large, in a higher latitude, and in a more intense de¬ gree of cold, whereof we have no idea here, may be¬ come solid, and free from any briny particles, though a few experiments made by Dr Higgins, in his house, on the freezing of salt water, produced only a loose spongy ice filled with briny particles. 18 “ The ice formed of sea-water by Mr Nairne rvas Result of very hard, three inches and a half long, and two inches MrNaimc’s in diameter : it follows from thence, that the washing the outside of this ice in fresh water, could not aflect the this subject, inside of a hard piece of ice. This ice when melted yielded fresh water, which was specifically lighter than water which was a mixture of rain and snow water, and next in lightness to distilled water. Had the ice thus obtained not been fresh, the residuum of the sea-water, after this ice had been taken out, could not have been specifically heavier than sea-water, which, however, was the case in Mr Nairne’s experiment. It seems, there¬ fore, in my opinion, evident from hence, that salt rvater does freeze, and has no other briny particles than what adhere to its outside. All this perfectly agrees with the curious fact related by Mr Adanson (d), who had brought to France two bottles of sea water, taken up in different parts of the ocean, in order to examine it, and to compare its saltness, when more at leisure ; but both the bottles containing the salt water were burst by being frozen, and the water produced from melting the ice proved perfectly fresh. This fact is so fairly stated, and so very natural, that I cannot conceive it is necessary to suppose, without the least foundation for it, that the bottles were changed, or that Mr Adanson does not mention the circumstance by which the sea water was thus altered upon its being dissolved: for as he express¬ ly observes the bottles to have been burst, it is obvious that the concentrated briny parts ran out, and were entirely drained from the ice, which was formed of the fresh water only. “ The ice formed by Dr Higgins from sea water, con¬ sisted of thin laminae, adhering to each other weakly. Dr Higgins took out the frozen ice from the vessels wherein he exposed the sea water, and continued to do so till the remaining concentrated sea rvater began to form crystals of sea salt. Both these experiments, therefore, by no means prove what the Doctor intended to infer from thence ; for it was wrong to take out such ice, which only consisted of thin laminae, adhering to each other weakly. Had he waited with patience, he would have obtained a hard ice as well as Mr Nairne, which, by a more perfect congelation, would have excluded the briny particles intercepted between the thin laminae, adhering to each other weakly; and would have connected the la- I N min a?, (d) Second Supplement to the Probability of reaching the North Pole, p. 119. POL [98 minse, hy others formed by fresh water. The Doctor found afterwards, it is true, thicker and somewhat more solid ice : but the sea water had already been so much concentrated by repeated congelations, that it is no wonder the ice formed in it became at last brackish : it should seem, then, that no conclusive arguments can be drawn from these experiments. “ There are two other objections against the tor- mation of the ice in the great ocean. Thejirst is taken from the immense bulk and size of the ice masses form¬ ed in the ocean, which is the deepest mass of water we know of. But it has been experimentally proved^that in the midst of summer, in the latitudes ol 550, J5° 26', and 64° south, at 100 fathoms depth, the thermometer stood at 340, 34i°, and 32° j and that in all instances, the difference between the temperature at top and 100 fathoms depth never exceeded four degrees of Fahren¬ heit’s thermometer, or that the temperature of the air did not differ five degrees from that of the ocean at IOO fathoms deep. If we now add to this, that be¬ yond the 710 south the temperature of the air and ocean must be still colder, and that the rigours of an antarctic winter are certainly more than sufficient to cool the ocean to 28which is requisite for congeal¬ ing the aqueous particles in it 5 if we moreover con¬ sider, that these severe frosts are continued during six or eight months of the year, we may easily conceive that there is time enough to congeal large and extensive masses of ice. But it is likewise certain, that there is more than one way by which those immense ice masses are formed. We suppose very justly, that the ocean does freeze, having produced so many instances of it j we allow likewise, that the ice thus formed in a calm, perhaps does not exceed three or four yards in thickness j a storm probably often breaks such an ice-field, which Crantz allows to be 200 leagues one way and 80 the other j the pressure of the broken fragments against one another frequently sets one upon the other piece, and they freeze in that manner together j several such double pieces, thrown by another pressure upon one another, form at. last large masses of miles extent, and of 20, 40, 60, and more fathoms thickness, or of a great bulk or height. Martens, in his description ol Spitz- bergen, remarks, that the pieces of ice cause so great a noise by their shock, that the navigators in those re¬ gions can only with difficulty hear the words of those that speak •> and as the ice-pieces are thrown one upon another, ice-mountains are formed by it. And I ob¬ served very frequently, in the years 1772 and 1773> when we were among the ice, masses which had the most evident marks of such a formation, being compo¬ sed of strata of some feet in thickness. This is in some measure confirmed by the state in which the Cossack Markoff found the ice at the distance of 420 miles north from the Siberian coasts. The high masses were not found formed, as is susp. cted in the Second supplement to the probability of reaching the north pole, p. 143 145, near the land, under the high cliffs, but tar out at sea j and when these ice mountains were climbed by Markoff, nothing but ice, and no vestiges of land, appeared as far as the eye could reach. The high climates near the poles are likewise subject to heavy falls o* snow, of several yards in thickness, which grow more and rijorc compact, and by thaws and ram are formed into ]' POL solid ice, which increase the stupendous size of the float- Pole, ing ice mountains. —y— “ The second objection against the freezing of the ocean into such ice as is found floating in it, is taken from the opacity of ice formed in salt water j because the largest masses are commonly transparent like cry¬ stal, with a fine blue tint, caused by the reflection of the sea. This argument is very specious, and might be deemed unanswerable by those who are not used to cold winters and their effects. But whosoever has spent several winters in countries which are subject to intense frosts, will find nothing extraordinary or diffi¬ cult in this argument : for it is a wrell-known fact in cold countries, that the ice which covers their lakes and rivers is often opaque, especially when the frost sets in accompanied by a fall of snow ; for, in those instances, the ice looks, before it hardens, like a dough or paste, and when congealed it is opaque and white \ however, in spring, a rain and the thaw, followed by frosty nights, change the opacity and colour of the ice, and make it quite transparent and colourless like a cry¬ stal : but, in case the thaw continues, and it ceases entirely to freeze, the same transparent ice becomes soft and porous, and turns again entirely opaque. This I believe may be applicable to the ice seen by us in the ocean. The field-ice was commonly opaque \ some of the large masses, probably drenched by rain, and fro¬ zen again, were transparent and pellucid j but the small fragments of loose ice, formed by the decay of the large masses, and soaked by long-continued rains, we found to be porous, soft, and opaque. “ It is likewise urged as an argument against the formation of ice in the ocean, that it always requires land, in order to have a point upon which it may be fixed. First, I observe, that in Mr Nairne’s experi¬ ments, the ice was generated on the surface, and was seen shooting crystals downwards : which evidently evinces, in my opinion, that ice is there formed or ge¬ nerated where the intensest cold is 5 as the air sooner cools the surface than the depth of the ocean, the ice shoots naturally downwards, and cools the ocean more and more, by which it is prepared for further conge¬ lation. I suppose, however, that this happens always during calms, which are not uncommon in high lati¬ tudes, as we experienced in the late expedition. Nor does land seem absolutely necessary in order to fix the ice j for this may be done with as much ease and pro¬ priety to the large ice mountains which remain undis¬ solved floating in the ocean in high latitudes; or it may* perhaps, not be improper to suppose, that the whole polar region, from 82° and upwards, in the southern hemisphere, remains a solid ice for several years toge¬ ther, to which yearly a new circle of ice is added, and of which, however, part is broken off by the winds and the return of the mild season. Wherever the ice floats in large masses, and sometimes in compact bo¬ dies formed of an infinite number of small pieces, there it is by no means difficult to freeze the whole into one piece ; for amongst the ice the wind has not a power of raising high and great waves. This circumstance was not entirely unknown to the ancients ^ and it is probable they acquired this information from the natives of ancient Gaul, and from the Britons and other north¬ ern nations, who sometimes undertook long voyages. The V Pole. POL [ 99 ] The northern ocean was called by the ancients the fro- penetrate ,hy the \Cimbri. to (Observa¬ tion' O' ]\ir Fors¬ ter's rea- > ‘Zen, the dead, the lazy, and immoveable sea : sometimes they give it the name ?nare croninm, the concrete sea, * So called and morimorusum *, the dead sea. And, what is very remarkable, in all the northern cold countries the frost sometimes is so intense, that ail the waters become sud¬ denly coagulated into a kind of paste or dough, and thus at once congeal.” On this reasoning of Mr Forster’s, however, we must observe, that it cannot possibly invalidate anv fact which Mr Barrington has advanced. The best concerted and most plausible theory in the world must yield to expe¬ rience ; for this is in fact what must judge ail theories. Now, from what we have already related, it is demon¬ strated, that in the space between the mouths of the rivers Piasida and Chatanga more ice must be formed, -and more intense colds generated, than in any other part of the world •, consequently, for a considerable space both on the east and west side of that, the sea must be more full of ice than anywhere else. Now, between these two rivers there is the promontory of Taimura, which runs out to the latitude of 78°, or near it. and which of necessity must obstruct the disper-ion of the ice; and that it actually does so is in some de¬ gree probable, because in one of the Russian voyages above mentioned the eastern mouth of the Lena was quite free, when the western ones were entirely choked tip with ice. Now the mouth of the Yana lies several degrees to the eastward of the Lena: consequently, v. hen the ice comes eastward from the cape of Taimura, it must necessarily fill all that sea to the latitude of 78° and upwards ; but the Cossack Markoff, if he proceeded directly north, could not be farther than the promonto¬ ry of Taimura, and consequently still enveloped among the ice. Besides, we are certain, that the sea in 78° is not at all frozen into a solid cake in some places, since Lord Muljrrave, in 177-5, reached 8l°. Mr Forster’s argument, therefore, either proves nothing, or it proves too much. If it proves, that about the middle of the eastern continent the cold is so intense that a sufficient quantity of ice is formed to obstruct the navigation for several hundred miles round, this proves nothing ; be¬ cause we knew before that this must be the case: But if it proves, that the sea must be unnavigable by reason of ice all round the globe at 78° north latitude, this is too much1, because we certainly know, that in 1773 Lord Mulgrave reached the latitude of 81°. However, though it should be allowed that the sea is quite clear all the way to the pole, it must be a very great uncer¬ tainty whether any ship could by that way reach the East Indies; because we know that it must sail down between the continents of Asia and America, through that strait whose mouth must often be blocked up with ice driving eastward along the continent of Asia. The south pole is still more inaccessible than the north pole; for the ice is found in much lower south¬ ern than northern latitudes. This superior degree of cold has by many been supposed to proceed from a greater quantity of land about the south than the north pole *; and the notion of a vast con¬ tinent in these regions prevailed almost universally, mi cTok’ inSOmUch many have sought for it, but hitherto p scove- vain* See the articles Cook's Discoveries, N° iet. 38—49, and N0 68, and 69 ; South Sea, and Terra 2,%, &(!• Australis. A new attempt was made in 1818 to POL into the polar seas. Two expeditions were fitted out at Deptford, the one under Captain Ross, bay, the other under Captain Buchan for for Baffin’ ( See A.- (ekica 3—S' the polar seas beyond Spitzbergen. They sailed in April. Captain Buchan returned in October, having been unable to penetrate beyond the latitude of 8o° 30" on account of the ice. Captain Ross also jailed in his attempt to find a passage out of Baffin’s bay to the westward, and returned in November. The result of Captain Ross’s investigation seems not to have been considered decisive, as a new expedition has since been fitted out for the same object. Magnetic Pole. See Magnetism. North Pole. See Bole. Pole-Axe, a sort of hatchet nearly resembling a battle-axe, having an handle about 13 inches in length, and being furnished with a sharp point or claw, bend¬ ing downwards from the back of its head ; the blade whereof is formed like that of any other hatchet. It is principally employed in sea-fights to cut away and destroy the rigging of any adversary who endeavours to board. Pole-axes are also said to have been successfully used on some occasions in boarding an enemy, whose sides were above those of the boarder. This is executed by detaching several gangs to enter at different parts of the ship’s length, at which time the pole-axes a-'e for¬ cibly driven into her side, one above another, so as to form a sort of scaling-ladders. Pole Cat. See Mustela, Mammalia Index. Pole Star. See Astronomy, N° 3, 17, and 39. POLE IN, in English antiquity, is a sort of shoe, sharp or piked at the point. This fashion took its rise in the time of King William Rufus ; and the pikes were so long, that they were tied up to the knees with silver or golden chains. They were forbidden by stat* an. 4. Ed w. IV. cap. 7. Tunc fliixus crinium, tunc luxus vestium, tunc usus calceorum cum arevatis acu- leis inventus est. Malmesb. in Will. ii. POLEMARCHUS was a magistrate at Athens, wh« had under his care all the strangers and sojourners in the city, over whom he had the same authority^ that the archon had over the citizens. It was his duty to offer Potter't a solemn sacrifice to Enyalus (said to be the same with^0^ Mars, though others will have it that he was only of his attendants), and another to Diana, surnamed Aygorsgaf, in honour of the famous patriot Harmodius. It was also his business to take care that the children of those that had lost their lives in the service of their country should be provided for out of the public trea¬ sury. POLEMICAL, in matters of literature, an appella¬ tion given to books of controversy, especially those in divinity. POLEMO, who succeeded Xenocrates in the direc¬ tion of the academy, was an Athenian of distinguished birth, and in the earlier part of his life a man of loose morals. The manner in which he was reclaimed from the pursuit of infamous pleasures, and brought under the discipline of philosophy, affords a memorable example of the power of eloquence employed in the cause of virtue, His history is thus related by Dr Enfield: “ As he was, one morning about the rising of the sun, returning home from the revels of the night, clad in a loose robe, crowned with garlands, strongly perfumed, and intoxi- N 2 catyd POL C 1 Pokmo cated with wine, he passed by the school of Xenocvates, H and saw him surrounded with his disciples.. Unable to Pokttburg. rpuUf- —J fortunate ?'1 ^nporfenity of indulging his spor- 'tive humour, he^rushed without ceremony into the school, and took his place among- the plnlosoph^s. The whole assembly was astonished at this rnde and decent intrusion, and all but Xenocrates cHscovered signs of resentment. Xenocrates, however, preserv ed the per^ feet command of his countenance *, and with great 1 sence of mind turned his discourse from the subject on which he was treating to the topics ot temperance anj. modesty which he recommended with such stieng argument, and energy of language, lolemo vva constrained to yield to the force oi conv.ction Instead of turning the philosopher and his doc nne to ridicule, as be at first intended, he became sensible of the folly ot his former conduct; was heartily ashamed of the con¬ temptible figure which he had made in so respectable an assembly *, took his garland from Ins head ; concealed his naked arm under his cloak', assumed a sedate and thoughtful aspect 5 and, in short, resolved from that hoiw to relinquish his licentious pleasures, and devote himself to the pursuit of wisdom. Thus was this young man by the powerful energy of truth and eloquence, in an instant converted from an infamous libertine to a re- spectable philosopher. In such a sudden change ot dia¬ meter it is difficult to avoid passing from one to another. Polemc^ after his reformation, xn order to brace up his mind to the tone of rigid virtue, cptantl} practised the severest austerity and most hardy foititu de. From the thirtieth year of his age to Ins death he drank nothing hut water. When he suffered violent pain, he showed no external sign of anguish. In on er to preserve his mind undisturbed by passion, he habi¬ tuated himself to speak in an uniform tone of voice, without elevation or depression. The austerity ot l is manners was, however, tempered with urbanity and ge¬ nerosity. He was fond of solitude, and passed much ot his time in a garden near his school. He died, at an advanced age, of a consumption. Of Ins tenets it tie is said by the ancients, because he strictly adhered to the doctrine of T POLEMONIUM, Greek Valerian, or Jacob s Ladder ; a genus of plants belonging to the pentandria class ; and in the natural method ranking under the 2nth order, Campanacece. See Botany Index FOLEMOSCOPE, in Optics, the same with Ope¬ ra-glass. See Dioptrics. POLENBURG, Cornelius, an excellent painter of small landscapes and figures, was born at Utrecht in i c86 and educated under Blomaert, whom he soon quitted to travel into Italy and studied for a long time in Home and Florence, where he formed a style en¬ tirely new, which, though preferable to the Flemish, js unlike any Italian, except in his having adorned Ins landscapes with ruins. There is a varnished smoothness and finishing in his pictures, that render them always pleasing, though simple and too nearly resembling one another. The Roman cardinals were charmed with the neatness of his works, as was also the great duke j but could not retain him. He returned to Utrecht, and pleased Rubens, who had several of his performances. Kimj Charles I. invited him to London, where he ge¬ nerally painted the figures in Steenvyyck’s perspectives : but the king could not prevail on him to fix here j tor 00 ] POL after staving only four years, ami being handsomely re- Poieaborg warded by 1.1s majesty for several pieces '» ueb he formed for him, he returned to Utrecht, and died ^ there at the age of 74. His works are very scarce and VapOLERON, one of the Banda or Nutmeg islands In the East Indies. This was one of those spice islands which put themselves under the protection ot the Eng¬ lish, and voluntarily acknowledged James 1. king of England for their sovereign •, for which reason the na¬ tives of this and the rest of the islands were murdered or driven thence by the Dutch, together with the Eng- POLESIA, a province of Poland, hounded by Po~ lachia and Proper Lithuania on the north, and by Vol- hinia on the south. It is one ot the palatinates ot Li¬ thuania, and is commonly called Brescia, and its capi¬ tal is of this name. It is lull ot torests and lakes. P0LE81N0 DE Rovigo, a province of Italy, in the republic of Venice, lying to the north of the river Po • and bounded on that side by the Paduan, on the south by the Eerrarese, on the east by Degado, and on the west by the Veronese. It is 45 miles in length, and 17 in breadth, and is a fertile country. Rovigo is the capital. _ . POLETiE were ten magistrates of Athens, who, witli three that had the management of money allowed for public shows, were empowered to let out the tri¬ bute-mom v snd Other public revenues, and to sell con¬ fiscated estates} all which bargains were ratified by their president, or in his name. They were by their office also bound to convict such as had not paid the tribute called and sell them in the market by auction. The market where these wretches were sold was called ffwAuliigiov ra fteloixm. POLIANTHES, the Tuberose-, a genus ot plants belonging to the hexandria class j and in the natural method ranking under the 10th order, Coronarue. bee Botany Index. The varieties are the common tube¬ rose with single flowers,—double-flowered,—dwarf- stalked,—variegated leaved. They all flower here in June, July, and August. • . All the varieties being exotics from warm countries, although they are made to flower in great perfection in our gardens by assistance of hot-beds, they will not prosper in the open ground, and do not increase freely in England j so that a supply of the roots is imported hither annually from Genoa, and other parts of Italy, by most of the eminent nursery and seedsmen, and the Italian warehouse-keepers5 generally arriving in Febru¬ ary or March, time enough for the ensuing summer s bloom -, and are sold commonly at the rate of twelve or fifteen shillings per hundred, being careful always to procure as large roots as possible, for on this depends the success of having a complete blow. Requiring artifi¬ cial heat to blow them in this country, they are planted in pots, and plunged in a hot-hed, under a deep frame furnished with glass lights j or placed m a hot-house, where they may be blowed to great perfection with little trouble. The principal season for planting them is March and April: observing, however, that in order to continue a long succession ot the bloom, it is proper to make two or three different plantings, at about a month interval j one in March, another in April, and a third the beginning of May, whereby, the blow may be r.nn tinned POL [ ianthes continued from June until September j observing, as |] above mentioned, they may be flowered either by aid of olidoro. a common dung or bark, hot-bed, or in a hot-house. 'Vvitii respect to the propagation of these plants, it is principally by offsets of the roots. The blowing roots that are brought annually from abroad for sale are often furnished with offsets, which ought to be separated previous to planting. Those also that are planted here in our gardens frequently furnish offsets fit for separation in autumn when the leaves decay: they must then be preserved in sand all winter in a dry sheltered place 5 and in the beginning of March, plant them either in a bed of light dry earth in the full ground ; or, to for¬ ward them as much as possible, allow them a moderate hot-bed : and in either method indulge them with a shelter in cold weather, either of a frame and lights, or arched with hoops and occasionally matted j but let them enjoy the full air in all mild weather, giving also plenty of water in dry weather during the season of their growth in spring and summer. Thus let them grow till their leaves again decay in autumn: then take them up, clean them from earth, and lay them in sand till spring 5 at which time such roots as are large enough to blow may be planted and managed as al¬ ready directed, and the small roots planted again in a nursery-bed, to have another year’s growth 5 afterwards plant them for flowering. The Egyptians put the flowers of tuberose into sweet oil j and by this means give it a most excellent flavour, scarce inferior to oil of jasmine. POLICANDRO, a small island in the Archipelago, seated between Milo and Morgo. It has no harbour, but has a town about three miles from the shore near a huge rock. It is a rugged stony island, but yields as much corn as is sufficient for the inhabitants, who con¬ sist of about 120 Greek families, all Christians. The only commodity is cotton: of which they make napkins, a dozen of which are sold for a crown. E. Long. 35. 25. N. Lat. 36. 36. P0L1CASTR0, an episcopal town of Italy, in the kingdom of Naples, and in the Hither Principato j but now almost in ruins, for which reason the bishop resides in another town. E. Long. 15. 46. N. Lat. 40. 26. POLICY, or Polity, in matters of government. See Polity. Policy of Insurance, or Assurance, of ships, is a con¬ tract or convention, whereby a person takes upon him¬ self the risks of a sea-voyage j obliging himself to make good the losses and damages that may befal the vessel, its equipage, tackle, victualling, lading, &c. either from tempests, shipwrecks, pirates, fire, war, reprisals, in part or in wdiole j in consideration of a certain sum of seven, or eight, or ten per cent, more or less according to the risk run j which sum is paid down to the assurer by the as- suree upon his signing the policy. See Insurance. POLIDORO da Caravaggio, an eminent painter, born at Caravaggio in the Milanese in 1492. tie went young to Rome, where he worked as a labourer in preparing stucco for the painters ; and was so animated by seeing them at work in the Vatican, that he solicited some of them to teach him the rules of designing. He attached himself particularly to Maturino, ayoungtlo- rentine j and a similarity in talents and taste producing a disinterested affection, they associated like brothers, iqi ] POL laboured together, and lived on one common purse, un- Polidoro til the death of Maturino. He understood and practised II the chiaro-scuro in a degree superior to any in the Ro- /‘obslnn^ man school: and finished an incredible number of pic- tures both in fresco and in oil, feiv of the public build¬ ings at Rome being without some of his paintings. Be¬ ing obliged to fly from Rome when it was stormed and pillaged, he retired to Messina, where he obtained a large sum of money with great reputation, by painting the triumphal arches for the reception of Charles V. af¬ ter his victory at Tunis : and when he was preparing to return to Rome, he was murdered, for the sake of his riches, by his Sicilian valet with other assassins, in the year 1543. POLIFOLIA. See Andromeda, Botany In¬ dex. POLIGNA, Melchier de, an excellent French genius and a cardinal, was born of an ancient and noble family at Puy, the capital of Velay, in 1662. He was sent by Louis XIV. ambassador extraordinary to Poland, where, on the death of Sobieski, he formed a project of procuring the election of the prince of Conti. But failing, he returned home under some disgrace j but when restored to favour, he was sent to Rome as auditor of the Rota. He was plenipotentiary during the congress at Utrecht, at which time Clement I. created him a cardinal; and upon the accession of Louis XV. he was appointed to reside at Rome as minister of France. He remained there till the year 1732, and died in the year 1741. He left behind him a MS. poem entitled Anti-Lucretius, seuDeDeo et Natura; the plan of which he is said to have formed in Holland in a con¬ versation with Mr Bayle. This celebrated poem was first published in the year 1749, and has since been seve¬ ral times printed in other countries besides France. He had been received into the French Academy in I704> into the Academy of Sciences in 1715, into that of the Belles Lettres in 1717: and he would have been an ornament to any society, having all the accomplish¬ ments of a man of parts and learning. POLISHER, or Burnisher, among mechanics, an instrument for polishing and burnishing things proper to take a polish. The gilders use an iron-polisher to prepare their metals before gilding, and the blood-stone to give them the bright polish after gilding. The polishers, among cutlers, are a kind of wooden wheels made of walnut-tree, about an inch thick, and of a diameter at pleasure, which are turned round by a great wheel; upon these they smooth and polish their work with emery and putty. The polishers for glass consist of two pieces of wood; the one flat, covered with old hat; the other long and half-round, fastened on the former, whose edge it ex¬ ceeds on both sides by some inches, which serves the workmen to take hold of, and to work backwards and forwards by. The polishers used by spectacle-makers are pieces of wood a foot long, seven or eight inches broad, and an inch and a half thick, covered with old beaver hat, whereon they polish the shell and horn frames their spectacle-glasses are to be set in. POLISHING, in general, the operation of giving a gloss or lustre to certain substances, as metals, glass, marble, See. The c? W I £ * TolM i'p;. 1 0 i'ClK S', * DrK.no. f Beauties ilf History VOL The operat ion of polishing optiC-glaRses, properly ground, is one ot the most difficult points of the whole process. See 1 rxESCOFE. POLITENKSS means elegance of manners or good breeding: Lord Chesterfield calls it the art ol pleasing. It has also been called an artificial good nature ; and in¬ deed good nature is the foundation of true politeness j without which art will make but a very indifferent fi¬ gure, and will generally defeat its own ends. “ Where compliance and assent, caution and candour, says an .elegant essayist *, arise from a natural tenderness ot dis¬ position and softness of nature, as they sometimes do, they are almost amiable and certainly excusable j but as the effects of artifice, they must be despised. The persons who possess them are, indeed, often, themselves dupes of their own deceit, when they imagine others are deluded by it. For excessive art always betrays itself*, and many, who do not openly take notice of the deceiver, from motives of delicacy and tenderness foi his character, secretly deride and warmly resent his ineffec¬ tual subtilty.” “ True politeness (says another authorf) is that con¬ tinual attention which humanity inspires us with, both to please others, and to avoid giving them offence. The surly plain-dealer exclaims loudly against this virtue, and prefers his own shocking bluntness and Gothic freedom. The courtier and fawning flatterer, on the contrary, substitute in its place insipid compliments, cringings, and a jargon of unmeaning sentences. The one blames polite¬ ness, because he takes it for a vice } and the other is the occasion of this, because that which he practices is really ■ so.” Both these characters act from motives equally absurd, though not equally criminal. The conduct of the art- fu flatterer is guided by self-love, while that of the plain-dealer is the effect of ignorance : for nothing is more certain, than that the desire of pleasing is found¬ ed on the mutual wants and the mutual wishes of man¬ kind ; on the pleasure which we wish to derive from so¬ ciety, and the character which we wish to acquire. Men having discovered that it was necessary and agreeable to unite for their common interests, they have made laws to repress the wicked, they have settled the duties of so¬ cial life, and corrmcted the idea of respectability with the practice of those duties*, and after having prescribed the. regulations necessary to their common safety, they have endeavoured to render their commerce with one another agreeable, by establishing the rules of politeness and good breeding. “ Indeed,” as an elegant author al¬ ready quoted remarks, “ the philosopher who in the au¬ sterity of his virtue, should condemn the art of pleasing as unworthy cultivation, would deserve little attention from mankind, and might be dismissed to his solitary tub, like bis brother Diogenes. It is the dictate of hu¬ manity, that we should endeavour to render ourselves agreeable to those in whose company we are destined to travel in the journey of life. It is our interest, it is the source of perpetual satisfaction ; it is one of our most important duties as men, and particularly required in the professor of Christiantty.,, It is needless to particularize the motives which have induced men to practise the agreeable virtues j for, from whatever source the desire of pleasing proceeds, it has always increased in proportion to the general civili- Aatioo «f mankind. In a rude stale of society, pleasure 5 [ io2 ] POL after being is limited in its sources and its operation. _r When the Politeness, wants of mankind, and the means of attaining them, are —y— few, personal application is necessary to gratify them, and it is generally sufficient; by which means an indivi¬ dual becomes more independent than can possibly be the case in civilized life, and ot course less disposed to jn'O or receive assistance. Confined to tiie solitary wish of furnishing means tor his own happiness, he is little in¬ tent on the pleasures of conversation and society. His desire of communication is equal to the extent of his knowledge. But as soon as the natural wants of’hfe are filled up, we find unoccupied time, and we labour hard to make it pass in an agreeable manner. It is then we perceive the advantage of possessing a rational nature, and the delights of mutual intercourse. When vVe con¬ sider society in that -tate of perfection which enables great part of the members of it to pursue at leisure the pleasures of conversation, we should expect, both from the ease of acquitting ourselves to the satisfaction ol our associates, and from the advantages arising from this conduct, that the art of pleasing might be reduced to a few plain and simple rules, and that these might be de¬ rived from a slight attention to general manners. The art of pleasing, in our intercourse with mankind, is indeed so simple, that it requires nothing more than the constant desire to please in all our words and actions ; and the practice of it can neither wound a man’s self- love, nor be prejudicial to his interest in any possible situation. But though this be certain, it is doubtless less attend¬ ed to than in reason it ought to be. Each particular man is so zealous to piomote his own ends or his own pleasure, as to forget that his neighbour has.claims equal to his own; that every man that enters into com¬ pany gives up for the time a great many of his peculiar rights j and that he then forms part of an association, met together not for the particular gratification of any one, but for the purpose of general satisfaction. See Brfeuixg, Conversation, and Good Manners. The qualities essential in the art of pleasing, are vir¬ tue, knowledge, and manners. All the virtues which form a good and respectable character in amoral sense are essential to the art of pleasing. This must be an established principle, because it depends on the wants and mutual relations of society. In all affairs of com¬ mon business, we delight in transacting with men in whom we can place confidence, and in whom we find integrity ; but truth is so naturally pleasing, and the common affairs of life are so interwoven with social in¬ tercourse, that we derive abundantly more satisfaction from an honest character than from specious manners. “ Should you be suspected (says Chesterfield) of injus¬ tice, malignity, peifidy, lying, &c. all the parts and knowledge of the world will never procure you esteem, friendship, and respect.” The first of virtues in our commerce with the world, and the chief in giving pleasure to those with whom we associate, is inviolable sincerity of heart. We can never be too punctual in the most scrupulous tenderness to our moral character in this respect, nor too nicely affected in preserving our integrity. The peculiar modes, even of the fashionable world, which are founded in dissimulation, and which on this account have induced several to recommend the prac¬ tice, would not prevent a man of the highest integrity from POL eliteness, from being acceptable in the very best company. Ac¬ knowledged sincerity gives the same ornament to cha¬ racter that modesty does to manners. It would abun¬ dantly atone for the want of ridiculous ceremony, or false and unmeaning professions ; and it would in no re¬ spect diminish the lustre of a noble air, or the perfection of an elegant address. If integrity be the foundation of that character which is most generally acceptable, or which, in other Avoids, possesses the power of pleasing in the highest degree, hu¬ manity and modesty are its highest ornaments. The whole art of pleasing, as far as the virtues are concerned, may be derived from the one or other of these sources. Humanity comprehends the display of every thing amiable to others *, modesty removes or suppresses every thing offensive in ourselves. This modesty, however, is not inconsistent with firm¬ ness and dignity of character ; it arises rather from the knowledge of our imperfection compared with a certain standard, than from conscious ignorance of what we ought to know. We must therefore distinguish be¬ tween this modesty and what the French call mauvaise honte. The one is the unaffected and unassuming prin¬ ciple which leads us to give preference to the merit of others, the other is the awkward struggling of nature over her own infirmities. The first gives an additional lustre to every good quality ; while some people, from feeling the pain and inconveniency of the mauvaise honte, have rushed into the other extreme, and turned impudent, as cowards sometimes grow de-perate from excess of danger. The medium between these two ex¬ tremes marks out the well-bred man ; he feels himself firm and easy in all companies, is modest without being bashful, and steady without being impudent. A man possessing the amiable, virtues is still farther prepared to please, by having in his own mind a perpe¬ tual fund of satisfaction and entertainment. He is put to no trouble in concealing thoughts which it would be disgracef ul to avow, and he is not anxious to display vir¬ tues which his daily conversation and his constant looks render visible. The next ingredient in the art of pleasing, is to pos¬ sess a correct and enlightened understanding, and a fund of rational knowledge. With virtue and modesty, we must be able to entertain and instruct those with whom we associate. The faculty of communicating ideas is peculiar to man, and the pleasure which he derives from the inter¬ change alone is one of the most important of his bles¬ sings. Mankind are formed with numberless wants, and with a mutual power of assisting each other. It is a beautiful and happv part of the same perfect plan, that they are likewise formed to delight in each other’s com¬ pany, and in the mutual interchange of their thoughts. The different species of communication, in a highly po¬ lished age, are as numerous as the different ranks, em¬ ployments, and occupations of men j and indeed the knowledge which men wish to communicate, takes its tinge from their peculiar profession or occupation. Thus commercial men delight to talk of their trade, and of the nature of public business j men of pleasure, who wish merely to vary or quicken their amusements, are in conversation light, trifling, and insincere 5 and the literati delight to dwell on new books, learned men, and important discoveries in science or in arts. But as POL thedilferent classes of men null frequently meet together, p ail parties must so contrive matters, as to combine the useful and agreeable together, so as to give the, greatest delight at the time, and the greatest pleasure on reflec¬ tion. An attention to these principles would make the man of pleasure and the man of learning meet together on equal terms, and derive mutual advantage from their different qualifications. With due attention to such ideas, we proceed to mention the kinds of knowledge which are most fitted for conversation. Those who wish to please should particularly endeavour to be in¬ formed in those points which most generally occur.. An accurate or extensive knowledge on learned subjects is by no means sufficient: we must also have an accurate and extensive knowledge of the common occurrences of life. It is the knowledge of mankind, of governments, of history, of public characters, and of the springs which put the great and the little actions of the world in motion, which give real pleasure, and rational instruc¬ tion. The knowledge which we communicate must in some shape be interesting to those to whom we com¬ municate it } of that nature, that the desire of recei¬ ving it may overbalance every kind of disgust, excited too often on the score of envy and self-love, against those who happen to possess superior endowments, and at the same time of that importance, as to elevate the thoughts somewhat above the actions and the faults of the narrow circle formed in our own immediate neigh- bourhood On this account it is recommended by an author who fully knew mankind, as a maxim of great importance in the art of pleasing, to be acquainted with the private character of those men who, from their sta¬ tion or their actions, are making a figure in the world. We naturally wish to see such men in their retired and undisguised moments ; and he who can gratify us is highly acceptable. History of all kinds, fitly introdu¬ ced, and occasionally embellished with pleasing anec¬ dotes, is a chief part of our entertainment in the inter¬ course of life. This is receiving instruction, without exciting much envy $ it depends on memory, and me¬ mory is one of those talents the possession of which we least grudge to our neighbour. Our knowledge of his¬ tory, at the same time, must not appear in long and te¬ dious details \ but in apt and well chosen allusions, cal¬ culated to illustrate the particular subject of conversa¬ tion. But the knowledge most necessary is that of the human heart. This is acquired by constant observation on the manners and maxims of the world, connected with that which passes in our own minds. This leads us from the common details of conduct, from slander and defamation, to the sources and principles of action, and enables us to enter into what may be called the philoso¬ phy of conversation. We may see both the practicability of this kind of discourse, and the nature of it, in the fol¬ lowing lines of Horace : Sermo oritur, non de villis domibusve alienis j Nec male necne Lepos saltet: sed quod magis ad noa^ Pertinet, & nescire malum est, agitamus r utrumne Hivitiis homines, an sint virtute beati ? Quidve ad amiekias, u-us rectumne, trahat nos ? Et quae sit natura boni, summumque quid ejus? &c<. By this means constant materials are supplied for free, easy, and spirited communication. The restraints which are Ic3 'ulilmrs*!. ——v POL .[I04] POL . , . i -(i r i ! tiie;r own contrary to the bienseances: they should seldom seem Pohtenea, are imposed on mankmd etth r Horn "hat ^ use s„me softe.mngm.trgatmg ex- character may suffer, or tom the apprehension ol There is a bienseance also with regard to people ot the lowest degree : a gentleman observes it with his foot- ° , , .1 .1 1 • cl oCccof No cnaraeiei mcty - - ri offence to others, are entirely taken oft, and they ha a sufficient quantity of current coin for all the common PUIn°addition to virtue and knowledge, which are the chief ingredients in the art of pleasing, we have to con¬ sider graceful and easy manners. Lord Chesterfield in¬ deed considers these as the most essential and important part; as if the diamond received its whole value irom the polish. But though he is unquestionably mistaken, there is yet a certain sweetness of manners which is par¬ ticularly engaging in our commerce with the world. It is that which constitutes the character which the French, under the appellation of Paimable, so much talk ol, and so lastly value. This is not so easily described as felt. It is the compound result of different things ; as com¬ plaisance, a flexibility but not a servility ol manners, an air of softness in the countenance, gesture, and expres¬ sion, equally whether you concur or differ with the per¬ son you converse with. This is particularly to be studi¬ ed when we are obliged to refuse a favour asked ot us, or to say what in itself cannot be very agreeable to the person to whom we say it. It is then the necessary gi <- inO- of a disagreeable pill. But this, which may be call- ed°the suaviter inmodo, would degenerate and sink into a. mean and timid complaisance and passiveness, it not supported by firmness and dignity of character. Hence the Latin sentence, suaviter in modo, for titer in re, be¬ comes a useful and important maxim in life. Genuine easy manners result from a constant attention to the relations of persons, things, time, and places. Were we to converse with one greatly our superior, we are to be as easy and unembarrassed as with our equals ; but yet every look, word, and action, should imply, with¬ out any kind of servile flattery, the greatest respect. In mixed companies, with our equals, greater ease and i- berty are allowed : but they too have their pioper i- mits. There is a social respect necessary. Our words, vestures, and attitudes, have a greater degree of latitude, though not an unbounded one. That easiness of car¬ riage and behaviour which is exceedingly engaging, widely differs from negligence and inattention, and by no means implies that one may do whatever he pleases 5 it only means, that one is not to be stiff, formal, and em¬ barrassed, disconcerted and ashamed; but it requires great attention to, and a scrupulous observation of, what the French call ies bienseances ; a word which implies “ de¬ corum, good-breeding, and propriety.” W hatever ive ought to do, is to be done with ease and unconcern ; whatever is improper, must not he done at all. In mix¬ ed companies, also, different ages and sexes are to be dif¬ ferently addressed. Although we are to he equally easy with all, old age particularly requires to he treated Avith a degree of deference and regard. It is a good general rule, to accustom, ourselves to have a kind feeling to every thing connected with man, and when this is the case’ Ave shall seldom err in the application. Another important point in the bienseances is, not to run our oavii present humour and disposition indiscriminately against every body, but to observe and adopt theirs. And if we cannot command our present humour and disposition, it is necessary to single out those to converse Avith aa'Iio hap¬ pen to be in the humo.ur the nearest to our own. Pe« remptoriness and decis'on, especially in young people, is 4 man, and e\ren indeed Avith the beggar in the street. 1 e considers them as objects of compassion, not ot insult j he speaks to neither in a harsh tone, but corrects the one coolly, and refuses the other with humanity. The following observations perhaps contain the sum of the art of pleasing: X. A fixed and habitual resolution of endeavouring to please, is a circumstance which Avill seldom fah of effect, and its effect will every day become more visible as this habit increases in strength. 2. This resolution must be regulated by a very consi¬ derable degree of good sense. 3. It is a maxim of almost general application, that what pleases us in another will also please others in us. 4. A constant and habitual attention to the difteient dispositions of mankind, to their ruling passions, and to their peculiar or occasional humours, is absolutely ne¬ cessary. 5. A man Avho Avould please, must possess a firm, equal, and steady temper. And, 6. An easy and graceful manner, as distant from bash¬ fulness on the one hand as from impudence on the other. “ He who thinks himself sure of pleasing (says Lord Chesterfield), and he who despairs of it, are equally sure to fail.” And he is undoubtedly m the right. 1 he one, by his assuming vanity, is inattentive to the means of pleasing •, and the other from fear, is rendered mcapaole of employing them. > , A variety of excellent rules for acquiring politeness, "with strictures on particular kinds of impoliteness, maj be found in the Spectator, Rambler, Idler, Lounger, Mirror, and other periodical Avorks of that kind j in Knox's Essays, and among Swift's Works ; see Good Manners, Chesterfield's Art ofi Fleasing, and h\s Letters, are also worthy of perusal, provided the reader be on his guard against the insincerity and other vices which those hooks are calculated to infuse, and provided he always bear in mind, what Ave have endeavoured to show in this article, that true politeness does not consist in specious manners and a dissimulating address, but that it must always be founded on real worth and intrinsic viitue. FOLITIAN, Angelo, Avas born at Monte Pulciano in Tuscany in 1454* learned the Greek tongue, of Avhich he became a complete master, under Andronicus of Thessalonica. He is said to have written verses both in Greek and Latin when he was not more than 12 years of age. He studied also the Platonic philosophy under Marsilius Ficinus, and that of Aristotle under Argyro- pylus. He Avas one of the most learned and polite Avri- ters of his time. The first Avork which gained him a reputation Avas a poem on the tournament of Julian de Medicis. The account he Avrote some time after of the conspiracy of the PazzPs Avas very much esteem¬ ed. He Avrote many other pieces Avhich have merited approbation j and had he lived longer, he Avould have enriched the republic of letters Avith many excellent Avorks 5 but he died at the age of 40 years. His mo¬ rals ansAvered the homeliness of his face rather than the beauty of Ins genius, for Paul Joauus informs us, that “ he was a man of awkAvard and perverse manners, ot POL [ 105 ] POL Politian a countenance by no means open and liberal, a nose re- [| markably large, and squinting eyes. He was crafty, Political satirical, and full of inward malice : for his constant \nthuietic. way waSj t0 sneer an(j ridicule the productions of other men, and never to allow any criticism, however just, upon his own.” He was, nevertheless, as all acknowledged, a man of most consummate erudition j and not only so, but a very polite and elegant writer. Erasmus, in his Ciceronianus, calls him a rare miracle of nature, on account of his ex¬ celling in every kind of writing ; his words are remark¬ able : “ Fateor Angelum prorsus angelica fuisse mente, rarum natures miraculum, ad quodcunque scripti genus applicaret animum. Some of his poems were so much admired, that several learned men have made it their business to comment on them. It has been often report¬ ed that he spoke of the Bible with great contempt j and that, having read it but once, he complained he had ne¬ ver spent his time so ill. But this is not probable, for it must be remembered that he was a priest and canon of Florence \ and we learn from one of his Epistles that he preached a whole Lent. It does not indeed follow hence, that he did not think contemptuously of the Bible, because many of his church, especially among the better sort, have not been very good believers, and he might be one ot them : but it is not likely he would speak out so freely. “ I could (as Bayle says) much more easily believe the judgment he is said to have made on the Psalms of David and the Odes of Pindar: he did not deny that there are many good and fine things in the Psalms j but he pretended that the same things appear in Pindar with more brightness and sweetness. The two Scaligers have spoken highly of Politian : the elder has preferred a consolatory elegy of his to that which Ovid sent to Livia upon the death of Drusus, and says, he had rather have been the author of it : the younger calls him an excellent poet, but thinks the style of his epistles too elate and declamatory. His works have been printed at various times, and in various jdaces: his epistles have probably been most read, because these are things which the generality of people are best pleased with. POLITICAL, from ttoXis, “ a city,” signifies any thing that relates to policy or civil government. Political Arithmetic, is the art of reasoning by fi¬ gures upon matters relating to government, such as the revenues, number of people, extent and value of land, taxes, trade, &c. in any nation. These calculations are generally made with a view to ascertain the comparative strength, prosperity, &c. of any two or more nations. With this view, Sir William Petty, in his Political Arithmetic, p. 74, &c. computes the land of Holland and Zealand to be about 1,000,000 acres, and that of France to be 8,000,000 j and yet the former is one-third part as rich and strong as the lat¬ ter. The shipping of Europe he computes to be about 2,ooo,oco: of which Britain has 500,000; Plolland 900,000; France 100,000; Hamburgh, Denmark, Sweden, and Dantzic 250,000 ; and Spain, Portugal, Italy, &c. the rest. The exports of France he com¬ putes at 5,000,000!. of which one-fourth came to Britain; of Holland i8,ooo,oool. of which 300,000!. came to Britain. The money raised yearly by the king of France was about 6,500,000!. Sterling ; that of all the Dutch provinces 3,000,000!. of which 2,100,000 VOL. XVII. Part. I. f was raised in Holland and Zealand. The number of political people in England he computed to be six millions, and Arithmetic. their expences, at 7I. per annum a head, 42,000,000k ; 1 v 1 the rent of land 8,000,000k and the interests, &c. of personal estates as much; the rents of houses 4,000,000k and the profits of labour 26,000,000k The people of Ireland he reckoned 1,200,000. The corn spent in England, at 5s. a bushel for wheat, and 2s. 6d. for bar¬ ley, amounts to 10,000,000k a-year. The navy of England then required 36,000 men to man it, and other trade and shipping 48,000. In France, to manage the whole shipping trade, there were then required only 1500 men. The whole people of France were 13,500,000; and those of England, Scotland, and Ireland, about 9,500,000. In the three kingdoms are about 20,000 churchmen, and in France more than 270,000. In the dominions of England were above 40,000 seamen, and in France not more than 10,000. In England, Scotland, and Ireland, and all their dependencies, there was then about 60,000 ton of shipping, worth about 4, ^00,000k in money. The sea line round England, Scotland, and Ireland, and the adjacent isles, is about 3800 miles. In the whole world he reckoned about 350,000,000 of peo¬ ple ; and those with whom the English and Dutch have any commerce, not more than eighty millions ; and the value of commodities annually traded for in the whole not above 45,000,000k That the manufactures ex¬ ported from England amounted to about 5,000,000k per annum; lead, tin, and coals, to 500,000k per annum. The value of the French commodities then brought into England did not exceed 1,200,000k per annum; and the whole cash of England in current money was then about 6,000,000k Sterling. With these calculations Dr Davenantwas dissatisfied; and therefore, from the observations of Mr Greg. King, he advanced others of his own. He reckons the land of England 39 millions of acres : the number of people 3 millions and a half, increasing 9000 a-year, making al¬ lowance for wars, plagues, and other accidents. He reckons the inhabitants of London 530,000 : of other cities and market-towns in England 870,000 ; and those of villages, &c. 4,100,000. The yearly rent of land he reckons 10,000,000k; of houses, &c. 2,000,000k ; the produce of all kinds of grain in a tolerable year 9,075,000k ; the annual rent of corn lands 2,200,0001. and the net produce 9,000,000k; the rent of pa¬ sture, meadows, woods, forests, commons, heaths, &c. 7,000,000k ; the annual produce by cattle in butter, cheese, and milk, about 2,500,000k ; the value of the wool yearly shorn about 2,000,000k ; of horses yearly bred about 250,000k; of the flesh yearly spent as food about 3,350,000k; of the tallow and hides about 600,000k; of the hay yearly consumed by horses about 1,300,000k; of the hay consumed by other cattle 1,000,000k ; of the timber yearly felled for build¬ ing 500,000k ; and of the timber yearly felled for fir¬ ing, &c. about 500,000k The proportion of the land of England to its inhabitants is now about 7^ acres per head ; the value of the wheat, rye, and barley, necessary for the sustenance of England, amounts to at least 6,000,000k Sterling per annum ; of the woollen ma¬ nufacture about 8,000,000k per annum ; and exports of all kinds of the woollen manufacture amount to above 2,ooo,oook per annum ; the annual income of England, on which the whole people subsist, and out of which all O taxes POL [ ic t;i vps are paid, is reckoned to be about 43,000,000). t.iat of France 8i,000,000l. and of Holland 18,250,000). See Davenant’s Essay on Trade, in vol. vi. of his works. For calculations respecting mortality, see Major Grant s Observations on the Bills of Mortality) and our aiticle Bills of Mortality. In vol, xlix. of the Philosophical Transactions we have an estimate of the number of people in England by Dr Brakenridge, from considering the number of houses and quantity of bread consumed. On the former principle he computes the number of people to be 6,257,410 of all ages, counting in England and Wales 911,310 houses, and allowing six persons to a house. I rom a survey of the window-lights after the year 1750, the number of houses charged in England and Wales was 690,000, besides 200,000 cottages that pay nothing j the whole number therefore was 890,000, and the number ol peo¬ ple, allowing six to a house, 5,340,000. On the latter principle, he estimates the number of quarters of wheat consu med at home to be 2,026,100 J and allowing a quarter for three persons in a year, or seven ounces a day for each person, he concludes the number of people to be 6,078,300. Of this number, according to Dr Hal¬ ley’s rule^he supposes about 1,500,000 men able tocarry arms. The country he supposes capable of supporting one half more inhabitants, or 9,000,000 •, for, accor ding to Mr Templeman’s survey, England contains 49,450 square miles,thatis,3 r,648,oooacres,of which 23,000,000 POLITICAL MAY be defined the science which relates to the pro¬ duction, multiplication and distribution of Wealth. HISTORY. The acquisition of wealth must at all times have been an object of interest and attention to mankind. Yet it •was not for a long time reduced into a science, but was left merely to the industry and practical observation of men engaged in the different branches of industry. We find little or nothing in the ancient writers which can be considered as belonging to this department of science. Among them agriculture appears to have been more honoured and attended to, than either trade or manufac¬ tures. The latter especially were considered as unworthy of freemen, and were abandoned entirely to slaves. Yet the ancient world had its commercial states ; and per¬ haps had the monuments of Phenician or Carthaginian literature come down to us, they might in some measure have supplied this blank. During the middle ages, the reign of disorder and violence checked the practical, and still more the theo¬ retical pursuit of these important objects. The feudal system, in which the lordly baron ruled with licentious sway over his little territory, and carried on almost per¬ petual war with his neighbours, was hostile to all im¬ proved agriculture, and absolutely precluded any pro¬ gress in manufactures and commerce. These took re¬ fuge in the large maritime towns, where fortifications secured the inhabitants from lawless inroads, and a regu- x 5 ] POL acres are proper to be cultivated j and allowing three p0]xtiCiri acres, well manured, for the maintenance of one person, Arithmetic, there will be maintenance in England for 8,430,000 people ; to which add the produce of fishing, and it will enable the country to support 9,000,000. In Ireland, Mr Temple man reckons 17,536,000 acres, of which Dr Brakenridge thinks 12,000,000 are capable of cultiva¬ tion •, and allowing four acres to each person, and the number of inhabitants to be only 1,000,000, Ireland could maintain 2,000,000 more people than it has now. In Scotland, containing 1,500,000 people, and 17 728,000 acres ol land, of which there are x 1,000,000 good acres, allowing five for each person, he supposes there may be provision for 2,200,000 people, or for 700,000 more than there are at present. Hence he infers, that were both the British isles properly cultivat¬ ed, there is a provision for 6,000,000 inhabitants beyond the present number. Extending his survey to the whole globe, he supposes the whole surface to be to the quan¬ tity of land as 8 to 3,?. e. as 1971^19,550 to 74,182,331 square miles ; out of which deducting one-third tor waste-ground, there will be 49,454,887 square miles, or 31,651,127,680 good acres. And stating the whole number of inhabitants on the globe to be 400,000,000, there will be 79 good acres to each person. See Dr Halley’s Calculations on the same subject,andH/'P/'/ce 5 (for a list of whose works see his life at the word Price), and King on the National Debt. ECONOMY lar police placed person and property in safety. The gradual growth of these cities constituted tlm grand cause winch induced the civilization of modern Europe. The models of beautiful workmanship which were pro¬ duced, and the various means which ingenuity discover¬ ed for multiplying the accommodations of life, gradual¬ ly brought about a complete change in the habits of landed proprietors. Power, not wealth, had foimerly been their object; and to promote this power, they spent almost all their revenues in maintaining a crowd of idle retainers. But when, by the improvement of arts, they had got a taste for luxury, the gratification of which re¬ quired an augmentation of wealth, their object came to be, how to turn their estates to the best account. This could only be done by granting the farmer a longer lease, which, enabling him to make improvements, led to a better system of agriculture. The same tastes drew them to large cities, and thus led them into extravagant habits, which often brought their estates to market, and placed them in the hands of the commercial and industrious. Thus the im¬ provement of modern Europe, contrary to the natural course of things, began with the manufacturing and com¬ mercial classes, anil was from them reflected to the agri¬ cultural part of the community. The consequence was, that commerce and manufactures were long looked upon as the grand source of wealth, and were the objects of pe¬ culiar favour to the legislator. Hence arose the mercantile system, which, till about the middle of the last century,^ was completely predominant in Europe. A sketch ol its leading principles will be introduced in the course of Dhap. I. POLITIC AI History, the present treatise, and they are fully detailed and sup- ":v- ' ported in the writings of Davenant, Petty, Child, and other writers by whom its tenets were adopted. This system had a powerful influence on the legislation of the different European nations, England not except¬ ed. But in France, above all, it reigned with absolute sway. Colbert, the celebrated minister of Lewis XIV. in his zeal for the promotion of trade and manufactures, not only neglected, hut even depressed agriculture, by laving absurd restraints on the exportation of corn. One extreme leads to another. Thinking men in France, observing the pernicious consequences of this system, were led to the adoption of one directly opposite. Ac¬ cording to them, agriculture formed the only real source of wealth. This opinion was first advanced by M. Ques- nay, a physician of Paris •, he was followed by a multi¬ tude of philosophers, who espoused his opinion with all the union and zeal of a sect. Accordingly they went under the name of Economists, and the Economical Sect. The Encyclopedic of Diderot and D’Alembert was con¬ ducted entirely upon their principles, and tended to give them a wide circulation. Turgot, in the reforms which he undertook during his short administration, was chief¬ ly guided by the principles of the Economists. Soon after this, Scotland had the honour of produ¬ cing a system, which has obtained the general approba¬ tion of thinking men, and has gradually superseded all others. Adam Smith, being professor in the first com¬ mercial city of Scotland, had his attention naturally drawn to these subjects. In his class he had already begun to illustrate the true principles of political econo¬ my. Travelling afterwards in France, he became ac¬ quainted with the leading members of the Economical school. On his return he spent nine years in maturing his ideas, and preparing his great work “ On the Wealth of Nations,” which was published in 1776. Here, like the Economists, he shewed the errors of the mercantile system, but in a much more solid and satisfactory man¬ ner. He shewed also their own principles to be in many respects erroneous *, and he investigated the effects of the division of labour, and various other circumstances which had not occurred to any former writer. Although the system of Smith gave general satisfac¬ tion to all who were able to investigate the subject, and though it was even adopted by Mr Pitt as the basis of his financial and commercial arrangements, yet it did not for a long time acquire a very general currency with the public. It was adopted by the learned only, and not always by them (a). In this respect, the publication of the Edinburgh Review may be considered as forming an era in the history of this science. This celebrated journal, by illustrating in a popular manner the leading subjects of political economy, and by beating down, with its keen powers of ridicule, the opinions of those who still adhered to the obsolete system, has done more towards diffusing the true principles of the science, than any for¬ mer publication. Lord Lauderdale also has recently published a work, in which, with some paradoxes, he has ECONOMY. 107 made also some important additions and corrections to Nature of the doctrine of Smith. Wealth, In the following sketch, considering Smith as the fa- ^•c* ther of political economy, we shall closely follow his steps, adopting however a somewhat different arrange¬ ment, and including such improvements as the science has received since his time. The subject, it appears to us, may be treated with advantage under the following heads : I. The nature and different species of wealth. II. The sources of wealth. III. The manner in which wealth is produced and distributed. IV. Views of the mercantile and economical systems, V. Public revenue. These topics will form the subjects of the following chapters. Chap. I. On the Nature and different Species of Wealth. Sect. I. Of the Definition of Wealth; and of Price. Wealth has been defined to consist of every thing which can be exchanged for another. Lord Lauder¬ dale gives a more general definition, and considers it as consisting of every thing which is useful or agreeable to man*. We conceive, however, that this must be limit-* Lauder. ed to objects of external accommodation ; for knowledge on and mental qualifications of every kind, though mostc^' useful and agreeable, cannot be said to constitute wealth, fSUi ,r,a nor to form the subject of political economy. Again,view s° external accommodations, which are in complete andviii art. 8. universal abundance, the air wTe breath, the light of hea¬ ven, are not wealth. To constitute this, the article must exist in some degree of scarcity. It is then only that it can possess an exchangeable value, that its possessor can procure other commodities in return for it. Thus there are two circumstances to be considered in any commo¬ dity ; its value in list, and its value in exchange. Water, air, &c. are of the greatest use ; but from their great abundance, nothing can be got in exchange for them. Diamonds, on the contrary, are of very little use, but from their great rarity, their exchangeable value, or price, is beyond that of any other substance. The price of an article depends entirely upon two circumstances. 1. The demand, or the number of per¬ sons who desire to possess it, and have something to give in exchange, 2. The supply, or the quantity brought to market. The price is directly as the demand, and inversely as the supply $ the former raises, the latter sinks it. Where there are many bidders, and where the quantity is small, the competition must be increased, each must seek to outbid the other, and the price of the commodity must rise. On the contrary, if the bidders are few, and the commodity in great abundance, the possessor, in order to dispose of it, will be under the ne¬ cessity of oft’ering it at a low price. O 2 Sect (a) In the scarcity of 1799 or 1800, the university of Cambridge was announced in the newspapers as having subscribed 50I. to be employed in the apprehension of regraters and fore stallers ! ! io8 POLITICAL ECONOMY. Chap. I. Nature of Wealth, &C. * Book ii. ch. iii. f Lauder¬ dale on Wealth. Sect. II. Of Capital. Every man’s wealth is of two kinds } the one which he lays aside for immediate consumption 5 the other which he reserves for the supply oi luture wants, or employs in such a manner as to make it produce new wealth. The former is called his income, the latter his capital. In proportion as he devotes his property to the former of these purposes, his wealth is diminished j in proportion as he devotes it to the latter, it is increas¬ ed. This evidently takes place in the case of an indi¬ vidual ; and Smith seems to consider it as taking place equally in the case of a nation *. Later inquirers, how¬ ever, seem to have proved, that there is here a difler- ence. Extreme parsimony throughout a nation, by preventing the production ot all articles but those of the first necessity, would induce general poverty f. Still, however, it is essential to the prosperity of a people, that their annual produce should not be all consumed, but that a considerable portion should be set aside and converted into capital. Capital is divided into fixed and circulating. Fixed capital consists of all those articles, which, without be¬ ing themselves calculated for exchange or consumption, tend to increase the production of those articles which are so. Such are all kinds of machinery, farming stock, erections for the purpose of mining or manufacture, ships, &c. These form a most valuable part of the property of the nation, and make its revenue much greater than it would otherwise be. At the same time, as they are of no use in themselves, provided the same effects can be produced without them, or by cheaper instruments, their disuse, by saving expence, forms a real addition to the national wealth. Circulating capital consists of all those commodities which are produced or purchased for the purpose of be¬ ing wrought upon, or transported elsewhere, and again sold. It comprises almost all the wealth not included under fixed capital. The seed corn of the farmer, the materials of the manufacturer, the goods purchased by the merchant, come all under this description. Lands, mines, and fisheries, are the sources from which circu¬ lating capital originally proceeds 5 whence, after passing through various hands, it arrives at length, and is lost, in those of the consumer. Sect. III. Of Money %. Iv.'ti'.Book Barter, or tlie exchange of one thing for another ii. cli.’ii. of equal value, is essential to the supply of the varied wants of man, and is the grand principle on which com¬ merce depends. Thus it is that men, while merely consulting their own interests, minister to each others necessities. It is attended, however, with an obvious inconvenience. A man may have goods to exchange, which do not suit his neighbour. The farmer has a sheep, and is in want of cloth 5 but the cloth merchant may not be in want of mutton, or at least may not wish so large a quantity. Hence the necessity of finding some commodity which may at all times be in demand, and which every one may be ready to receive in ex¬ change for every other article. This commodity-ought evidently to possess some quality which may render it an object of universal estimation ; it ought also to pos¬ sess great value in a small compass, so as to be portable, Nature of and not to encumber its possessor } it ought to be dm- ’Wealth, sible into the smallest portions ; and it ought to be du- rable, so as to be capable of being treasured up till wanted. All these qualities are united in the precious metals. Their beauty, their durability, their very scar- = city, render them better fitted than any other commo¬ dity for being the standard of value and the medium of exchange. All nations, accordingly, after a trial ot some ruder expedients, have finally had recourse t» them for this purpose. _ / . Money is in one view a fixed, and in another a cir¬ culating capital. rI 0 the individual it stands m the lat¬ ter capacity, for no one receives money unless for the purpose of sooner or latter exchanging it for something else. To the nation, however, it is a fixed capital } being not destined for consumption, but merely an in¬ strument for transacting business with greater facility and advantage. As the facility of exchanging the precious metals tor every other commodity, renders the demand for them constant and universal, their price depends almost whol¬ ly on the supply. This, too, is more uniform than that of most other commodities. A great revolution, how¬ ever, took place at the beginning of the 16th century, in consequence of the discovery of America. lor some time before, the value of silver seems rather to have been rising. But the immense mines of Mexico and Peru furnished such a copious supply, as soon reduced it to about one-third of its former value. Smith is ot opinion, that since that time there has been rather a rise in the value of these metals. The East Indies, where they still continue scarcer than in Europe, forms a constant drain. The mines, in the course of working, approach nearer to an exhaustion; accordingly, the king of Spain, who originally levied a tax amounting to half the produce of silver, has found it necessary to reduce it successively to one-third, one-fifth, and at last, to one-tenth. The tax on gold is reduced to one-twen- tieth. The annual importation of gold and silver into Spain is estimated at about six millions. It has been a frequent practice with sovereigns to re¬ duce the quantity of bullion in any given denomination of coin, and thus to pay their debts with a smaller amount of gold and silver-. To such an extent has this practice been carried, that in England the pound ster¬ ling is not quite a third of the real pound of silver, and in France the depreciation is far greater. This practice is completely fraudulent and dishonourable. No power of the sovereign can really make this debased coin pass for as much as it formerly did ; the consequence is, an immediate rise in the nominal or money price of every commodity. All those, however, who are in the pay of government, suffer, and so do all creditors both public and private ; for though the law cannot compel the na¬ tion to set the same value on the new- coin as on the old, it can compel the creditor to accept it in payment of the sums wbicl} he has previously advanced in good coin. All states reserve to themselves the privilege of coin¬ ing money. Some, as England, perform this office gratis; while others, as France, impose a small seigno¬ rage at the mint. The latter mode seems rather pre¬ ferable : for when the circulating coin, as frequently happens, is reduced by long use and attrition, beneath its real "hap. I. POLITICAL ECONOMY. I09 Mature of 'Wealth, &c. Smith, ook ii. Kdin- '.rgh Re- ew, N° i, it 25- real value in bullion, the issuing of new coin which pos¬ sesses that value a fiords a temptation to melt it down and recoin it. Sect. IV. Of Paper Money *. Money, we have had occasion to observe, considered in a national point of view, is fixed capital. Like other fixed capitals, therefore, although its functions be most essential to the maintenance of trade, yet if any less costly substitute can be found, by which the same func¬ tions may be equally Well performed, the public is de¬ cidedly a gainer. Such a substitute is paper money. By employing it, a nation saves the expence of gold and silver, and at the same time derives all the commercial advantages which money can afford. It is even in some respects more convenient, as being more easily transport¬ ed, and less liable to accident. There are, however, extraordinary dangers attending the excessive and incautious use of this instrument, and no cause perhaps has been productive of more signal commercial disasters. The apparent facility of thus creating wealth, as it were, tempts banks and other pub¬ lic bodies to an excessive issue of it. The circulation of the country, however, can absorb only a certain quanti¬ ty 5 and as soon as more is thrown in, it immediately re¬ turns upon the issuer, in a quantity for which he is pro¬ bably unprepared. As soon as he shows any hesitation in discharging the demand, the whole rushes in, and bankruptcy and ruin ensue. Where the paper indeed has been issued by the government, payment may be re¬ fused •, but in this case an immediate depreciation takes place in the value of the notes, and a deep injury is sustained by all who are possessed of them. From this cause it was that the French assignats fell so far below their original value j and for the same reason the Ame¬ rican currency is considerably beneath its nominal value. Where, however, peculiar circumstances have produced an accidental scarcity of money, a temporary suspension of payment may become necessary, and with due cau¬ tion may be productive of no serious bad consequen¬ ces 5 such has been lately the case of the bank of Eng¬ land f. Banks can with no propriety advance to merchants the whole capital on which they trade, but only that part of it which they would otherwise be obliged to keep bv them for the purpose of answering occasional demands. This they do in two ways. 1. By discount¬ ing bills. 2. By granting cash accounts. The former only of these is practised in England. The latter is pe¬ culiar to Scotland. It is managed thus. Two persons of respectable, commonly of landed, property, becoming caution to the extent of a certain sum, the merchant is allowed to draw to the extent of that sum. Merchants, however, do not always content themselves with the de¬ gree of assistance above pointed out. They endeavour to carry on extensive speculations merely on paper money. For this purpose they draw fictitious bills for the mere purpose of having them discounted 5 and by drawing a se¬ cond before the first becomes due, they delay still farther the repayment of the original advance. Banks ought always, if possible, to avoid the discounting of fictitious bills 5 and should take care, in cash accounts, that the ad¬ vances and repayments nearly keep pace with each other. tVealtl), &e. In this case there is little danger of an over issue of Nature of notes. It does not appear eligible, however, that gold and silver should be entirely supplanted by paper money. In v all transactions with foreign nations, the former be¬ comes necessary ; and even domestic inconveniences would arise from its absolute exclusion. For the preven¬ tion of this, it is adviseable not to isue notes below a certain value. In England, this, till of late was fixed at five or ten pounds ; though in a recent scarcity, notes for twenty shillings began to be issued. In Scotland these have long been in circulation 5 and notes even for five shillings were some time ago introduced, though these, as soon as the pressure of necessity admitted, have been discontinued. Sect. V. Of the Variations in the Prices oj Commo¬ dities. The price of commodities fundamentally depends on the capacity which they possess, of ministering to the use and pleasure of man. Great variations, however, are seen to take place ; and in this country particularly, in consequence of national prosperity, a great rise has occurred in a variety of articles. This is vulgarly as¬ cribed to the greater plenty of money; an assertion eve¬ ry way vague, and which has no foundation in fact. Had the increase taken place in consequence of any re¬ markable increase in the supply of gold and silver, through the discovery of new mines, the assertion would have been just. No such general increase, however, has taken place, at least to any very sensible degree. The increase in this particular country has been owing to the augmentation in the number and value of all other commodities, for the circulation of which a great¬ er quantity of this instrument of exchange becomes ne¬ cessary. The relation, however, between it and other commodities, continues unaltered ; and the quantity of any particular commodity, for which a certain quantity of it can be exchanged, remains the -same. Indeed the augmentation has taken place, not so much in gold and silver, as in paper money, the substitute of those metals. The same arguments would hold against a rise occasion¬ ed by the use of this instrument, which can happen only where it is depreciated, as in some government paper, by the refusal of payment on demand. This case, how¬ ever, would be indicated by a difference between its va¬ lue and that of gold and silver \ a difference which has no place in this country. Smith has illustrated*, in a most able and satisfac-* Book i. tory manner, the source of those variations of price, chap. xi. which take place in consequence of advancing cultiva¬ tion. He divides commodities into three kinds, which are as follows: The first consists of those productions of nature which human efforts have no power of multiplying. Such are a variety of rare birds and fishes, most kinds of game, and particularly birds of passage. The growth of wealth and population has a natural tendency to increase the demand for these articles $ and as the supply cannot be made to meet this demand, the price must conse¬ quently rise. Accordingly, in a highly opulent state of society, it becomes, in some instances, enormous. The Roman epicures are said sometimes to have given 60I. or Sol. for a single bird. The no Nature, of Wealth, Ste. POLITICAL The second sort Is of those which human industry can multiply in proportion to the demand. Where the commodity, as corn, is such as cannot be produced but by human industry, the price is more uniform than m almost any other case. The increasing scarcity ami consequently value oi land, tends indeed to imst it} hut this is counteracted by the invention of machinery, and improved methods of labour. The opposite agency of these two causes has a constant tendency to preserve uniformity in the value of grain ; though we cannot, with Smith, consider this uniformity as likely to be so complete, as to render the prim of grain a sure standard for the value of silver. There are other commodities, however, which nature produces in abundance, or which, where land is plenti¬ ful, can be multiplied with little or no cultivation. these the principal is butcher meat. Lands can be co¬ vered with cattle or sheep by the labour of lew hands, and sometimes without any labour at all. Hence, m rude times, butcher meat is always cheaper than corn *, in improved periods, the reverse is the case. I or a long time the price continues constantly to rise, as we have seen it do throughout Great Britain, the pasture lands being more and more converted into arable. At last, however, it becomes so high as to make it an object tor the farmer to stall his cattle, and to cultivate ground for the purpose of feeding them. After this era, the price is likely to experience a certain diminution, irom the improved modes of feeding and rearing, which, in consequence of this newr attention, aie likely to he t is covered and adopted. There are certain animals, as hogs, poultry, otc. which are fed on mere ollals, and in a rude state, there¬ fore, are still cheaper than butcher meat. In an im¬ proved state they are dearer j for they have not as yet, at least in this country, become an object of separate cultivation. . , . . .. i. The third sort consists of those, in the multiplication of which the power of man is either limited or uncer¬ tain. In these the rule is various. Some commodities are not cultivated on their own account, but are appen¬ dages to others •, as wool and hides to the carcase of the ox*or sheep. Both these commodities are much more portable, and more easily preserved, than the flesh of the animals from which they are taken ; the market for them is thus much more extensive, and the demand more equal at all times. Hence, in rude periods, when the flesh of animals, from its abundance, is of small va¬ lue, these appendages equal or surpass it in price. At Buenos Ayres frequently, and sometimes even in Spain, an ox is killed for the sake of the hide and tallow. In an improved state of society, on the contrary, the hide and fleece become considerably inferior in value to the Fish is an article, the supply of which is considerably limited, as man has no power of production in respect to it, though, by the exertion of industry, he can col¬ lect a greater quantity. Shoals of fish are generally co¬ pious, but uncertain. Metals and minerals are articles, the supply of which is not precisely limited, hut extremely uncertain. The discovery of new mines, or the continuance of fertility in the old, are equally beyond the reach of calcula¬ tion. ECONOMY. Chap. II. Of the Sources of Wealth. Chap. II. Source of W ealth. All wealth arises from three sources •, it is either produced by the spontaneous bounty of nature, or it is the fruit of human industry, or it is generated by the judicious employment of a quantity of wealth previously accumulated. To these three heads then ot land, la¬ bour, and capital, all national wealth may be re¬ ferred. Smith has treated of the revenue derived from these three sources as forming the constituent parts of the price of commodities j and with regard to labour in particular, repeatedly considers it as the only souice of wealth *. According to the view, however, given above, ^ ^ the price of ali commodities depends entirely on the pro¬ portion between the demand and the supply. Labour, therefore, (and the same may he said ol land and capi¬ tal), is only a means of furnishing or increasing a supply of those articles for which there already exists a demand, and unless it be successful in so doing, the most severe labours will meet with no remuneration whatever. Me shall therefore proceed to consider the revenue which arises from these different sources, and the circumstances by which it is increased or diminished. Sect. I. Land. All land which is not naturally barren, and is culti¬ vated with any ease, affords something more than is necessary to pay the expence of labouring it. Ibis sur¬ plus goes as a rent to the landlord, who, in considera¬ tion of receiving it without risk or trouble, relinquishes to the farmer the profits of cultivation. The proportion of the produce ol a field which is to go for rent, varies with different circumstances. T-he chief of these is the fertility ol the soil, the extent ol the market, which enables the produce to he disposed of to greater advantage, the prosperity or poverty oi the country, which causes a greater or less demand for that produce, and the average skill and activity ol the far¬ mers, which will enable them to turn the fertility ot the ground to better account. It is almost needless to observe, were it not for the vague language often made use of upon this subject, that the rate at which farms let, must, like all other commodities, depend altogether upon the demand and the supply. 11 much is to be made by farming, many will bid for larms, and the rent will be raised by their competition, and vice versa. The idea that all the landlords of an extensive country may combine to raise their rents, is altogether chimeri¬ cal. Even could it take place, it could he accomplished only by a certain number ol them allowing their lands to lie waste, which diminishing the supply, would doubtless raise the rent ol the cultivated lands. But we need not fear that any landlord should leave his lands in this condition, from a culpable scheme of ag¬ grandizing the rest ot his body at his own expence, as well as that of the public. Land which produces food for man will at all times afford rent to the landlord, in proportion to its fertility, and the other circumstances mentioned above. Men multiply in proportion to the means of subsistence j they have even a constant tendency to multiply beyond these means j hence there is always a full demand for this Chap. II. POLITICAL [Nature of species of produce. The rent, therefore, afforded by Wealth, the ground which is employed in cultivating whatever is the staple food of the community, regulates the rent ' y of all other ground. No one, unless forced to it by pe¬ culiarities of soil, would cultivate any article which af¬ forded less rent than this. There may be soils indeed which are only fit for the production of an inferior ar¬ ticle, and there are others which are fitted for the pro¬ duction of those of higher value. In vine countries, the rent of an ordinary vineyard seems to be nearly on a le¬ vel with that of corn. But there are others, whose wines being regarded as superior, make them yield a much higher rent. The West India islands, before the late depreciation of their produce, seem to have been nearly in the same predicament. These observations, however, apply chiefly to that produce of land which is the result of human labour. In regard to the spontaneous produce of land, it depends upon circumstances, whether or not it yields any rent at all. In a rude state of society, above all, the demand is often so slender, that, unless through the intervention of foreign commerce, this produce will bear scarcely any value. Such countries are often covered with im¬ mense natural woods, the cutting down of which is a burden instead of an advantage. In an improved coun¬ try this wood would afford a large revenue. Most of the materials of clothing and lodging are of this nature. In the infancy of society, the great object is food ; and provided men can procure that, they are satisfied with very moderate accommodations in other respects. The hides and furs of their cattle, and of the wild animals whom they kill in hunting, are more than sufficient to supply them with coverings. But as society becomes opulent, and luxury is introduced, clothes are among the favourite objects on which this luxury is vented. A great increase therefore takes place in the demand for its materials. The same may be said of those of lodg¬ ing and furniture. Mines, in political economy, may be considered in the same light as land. Like it, they yield a rent, which, however, from the difficulty of working, is generally less than that of land. Coal, an important article, is kept down both by its great bulk, which narrows the market, and by its relation to the price of wood, which price it cannot exceed, otherwise wood would be preferred as fuel. A fifth of the whole produce is reckoned a great rent for a coal mine j a tenth is the most common. Metals, even the coarse, and still more the fine, will bear very extensive carriage. In general, however, their rent is not very high. The tin mines of Cornwall, said to be the richest in the world, yield on an average only a sixth part of their gross produce. The king of Spain’s tax of a fifth on the silver mines in America, formed indeed the rent of those mines ; but this tax he was oh- Smith lige(l 1° reduce to one tenth. It is said to be ill paid *. | ok i. ch. Fisheries form another source of wealth similar to land and mines. The sea, however, has never yet been appropriated, nor a rent exacted for its use. The right of fishing, however, in some seas of peculiar fertility, has been claimed as national property. River fisheries let frequently at a very high rent. Sect. II. Labour. The great source of exchangeable commodities, is the labour ol man. Even those powers of nature for which ECONOMY. in rent is paid, rarely afford any thing valuable unless aid- yjatare of ed by human efforts. Capital, however powerful an in- Wealth, strument, consists merely of accumulated labour. Ori- &c- ginally the fruit of every man’s industry would belong 'V— entirely to himself. Soon, however, the proprietor of the land from which he drew food, would claim a share. As the structure of society became more complicated, and markets more remote, something more would be found requisite. It would be necessary to have subsistence while the article was producing and carrying to market, to be able to purchase materials on which to work, and to command machinery or fixed capital in order to ren¬ der labour more productive. For all these purposes, capital would become necessary \ and the person who had accumulated a portion ot it would be able to com¬ mand tbe services of several others, to whom he rvould advance subsistence and the materials of working, and would receive in return the fj-uits of their labour. As capitals accumulate, this becomes almost universally the case j in a commercial state, few independent workmen are to be found. The price of labour or wages is regulated, like every thing else, by the demand and the supply. If there arc many who want and can employ workmen, and if few can be found, the competition of the masters will raise the wages, until the whole capital, not otherwise employ¬ ed, is distributed among that small number. In the op¬ posite circumstance, workmen, glad to work for any thing rather than starve, will bid against each other till all are employed, at however small a recompense. The combinations among workmen, so much complained of, can never have any permanent effect, unless accompanied by those circumstances which necessarily lead to a rise. The combination of masters, though less heard of, is more to be feared. Their numbers are smaller, and from their greater command of property, they can hold out for a longer time. From the above causes, however, there is no reason whatever to dread any serious or last¬ ing consequences from such a measure. The supply of labour, or the population, has a natural tendency to suit itself to the demand. High wages, by encouraging early marriage, and enabling the labourer to take better care of his children, soon cause an addi¬ tion to the numbers of a state, which, in its turn, brings down the wrages. Hence uncommonly high wages take place chiefly in an advancing state of society, when a number of employments are open, for which a sufficiency of labourers cannot be found. When the wealth of a country is stationary, the wages will be moderate, suffi¬ cient to admit of the rearing of such a number of child¬ ren, as may keep up the population, but not sucli as to admit of any increase. When the country is in a de¬ clining state, the wages will fall even below this. They will scarcely enable the labourer to subsist j compara¬ tively few will be able to rear families, and population will decline f. \ Smith, From what has been said above, there will appear no^!l?^ l' reason to suppose, that the price of subsistence has any immediate influence on the wages of labour j an idea which even Smith seems strangely to have entertained f lb. book The demand for labour, the funds by which it is paid,”*' and the number of labourers continuing the same, no al¬ teration in its price can take place. For masters to give higher wages on account of scarcity, is, we suspect, a very injudicious benevolence. The funds for the main¬ tenance 1I2 POLITICAL Sources of tenance of labour, far from being increased by a dearth, Wealth, are rather diminished ; so that the giving a greater pio- ‘ r-—' portion of them than before to some, must be the means of throwing others altogether onto! employment', and to this cause we suspect that the want ol work usually com¬ plained of at these periods, is very much to be ascribed. Where the rise of provisions is permanent, however, that of labour though not immediate, takes place ultimately, in consequence of a diminution of the supply. The diffi¬ culty of subsistence prevents labourers from rearing such numerous families j population is thinned j and the di¬ minished competition causes a rise in the price of wages. Wages in general are nearly the same over a coun¬ try } for if they are higher in any one place, this proves a natural attraction to those of other districts, who soon reduce the rate to its proper level. This free circulation of labour, however, may be prevented by artificial re¬ straints, as was the case, till of late, in England, by means of the poor laws. I hese authorized the parish officers to prevent any one who was ever likely to be¬ come a burden on the parish from settling in it. Ihe most obnoxious part of these laws,however, has been done away, chiefly through the exertions of Mr Rose. Wages are generally higher in cities than in the coun¬ try. The capitals there are greater. The country too is more prolific, while few towns keep up their own numbers. Many indeed migrate from the former to the latterbut the predilection for their native spot, and to more wholesome and cheerful occupations, prevents this migration from being so great as completely to equalize the rate. Another cause arises, in modern Europe, from the corporation system which has generally pre¬ vailed. Almost every trade has some regulations^ to limit the number of its members, and thus by restraining competition, to increase their wages. The principal of these regulations are those regarding the duration of ap¬ prenticeship. Ry the fifth of Elizabeth, no trade can be exercised in England, till after an apprenticeship of seven years 5 and the only freedom from this statute is in the case of those trades which were at that tune un¬ known. In Scotland, apprenticeships are in general much shorter. Wages, however, vary not only from local causes, but from others connected with the nature of the trades by which they are earned. There seem to be five cir¬ cumstances which tend to raise the wages of any class of men above the ordinary level. First, When any employment is of an unwholesome and disagreeable nature. Thus miners, blacksmiths, butchers, and innkeepers, earn higher wages than those •whose occupation is not liable to the same objections. On the other hand, hunting and fishing, being naturally agreeable, and pursued by many for mere amusement, are by no means profitable. Secondly, Where a profession is difficult to learn, as in the fine arts and liberal professions, which require many years study before a man is qualified to exercise them. , Thirdly, Where employment is precarious. Ihus masons whose employment depends on the weather, and all workmen wdio are liable to be called upon and dis¬ missed at a moment’s warning, receive higher wages to compensate for this uncertainty m the means of their sub- ■ sistence. Fourthly, Where great trust is reposed in the work- ECONOMY.- Chap. II. man. On this ground, goldsmiths and physicians are Sources of entitled to higher gains than others, m order that such Jtealtk important trusts may be reposed m persons who have something to lose. „ Fifthly, Where there is any peculiar risk, either of failure, or of other disasters. Thus in the case of phy¬ sicians, and still more of lawyers, it is only a m those who apply to the profession to whom it ever yields a subsistence. Those who rise to eminence, therefore have gained prizes in a lottery, which ought to be high in proportion to the number of blanks. * effect of this circumstance, however, is diminished by the natural confidence which every one has in his talents and good fortune, and by the brilliant reputation which accompa¬ nies success in these departments. Ihe same remark ap¬ plies to those professions which present a life of danger and adventure, as the naval and military service, for¬ tunately for the public, notwithstanding the danger, the hardship, and the slender emolument with which these professions are accompanied, no want is found of persons who are ready to engage in them. Lastly, There are some circumstances, to which ad trades are occasionally liable. In a new trade, the wages are generally higher. The success, and conse¬ quently the duration, of such must be more or less un¬ certain j and men will not be inclined, without some extraordinary temptation, to quit tbeirold and established occupations, in order to engage in it. An extraordinaiy demand too sometimes arises for the commodities fur¬ nished by some particular trade ; more labourers than usual will consequently be wanted ; and these must be allured by the offer of higher wages. Sometimes, on the other hand, work is done cheaper than usual, from be¬ ing taken up as a bye-employment, by those who derive their subsistence from a different source ^ as, for instance, stockings in the north of Scotland. Ibis takes place, however, only where the demand for labour is slender, as otherwise the whole of a man’s time may be advanta¬ geously employed. . , . . In considering the effects of labour in the proouction of wealth, Smith divides it into twokinds, which he calls productive and unproductive. Productive labourers aie those whose industry produces a commodity which re¬ mains and can be exchanged for another. 1 bus the farmer produces corn, the manufacturer cloth or hard¬ ware. The unproductive, on the contrary, are those whose services perish in the moment of performance, and never produce any commodity to which value can be attached. These include a variety of professions both the most respectable and the least so. It includes, on one hand, all those employed in the executive govern¬ ment, officers of the army and navy, officers of justice, public teachers of every descriptionon the other, me¬ nial servants, players, musicians, &c. The more a man maintains of the former kind of labourers, the richer he becomes the more he maintains of the latter, he be¬ comes the poorer. The most eminent writers on this subject, in the pre¬ sent age, seem disposed to treat this distinction as nuga¬ tory. They urge, that wealth consists merely in the abun- danceof conveniences and pleasures of life} and thatwho- evercontributestoaugmentthese is a productive labourer, although he may not present us with any tangible com¬ modity. The professor who gives me a lecture, and the musician who gives me a tune, give something subser¬ vient Chap. II. POLITICAL ECONOMY. 1 Sources of Wealth. Smith, i >ook iii. iL-hap. 3. Lauder- dale ; Edin. Re¬ view, N° viii. art. S. Fay, Ele- \ mens d' I Economic Politique, book i. ch. 42. vient to use or pleasure, and for which other articles t may he had in exchange. We are rather disposed, however, to adhere to the doctrine of Smith, and to doubt how far these perishing and immaterial commodi¬ ties, however valuable they may be, can, strictly speak¬ ing, be considered as wealth *. Sect. III. Of Capital. Capital or stock, as already hinted, is merely the pro¬ duce of land and labour accumulated, and employed in such a manner as to cause an augmentation of the wealth of the community. It acts, however, too important a part, not to deserve separate consideration. We have already, considering it as one of the divisions of wealth, explained, at some length, its nature and office. We shall now consider it in the relation which it bears to revenue, which, when arising from this source, is usual¬ ly called the profits of stock. It is difficult to obtain direct information with regard to the rate of profit in any particular country •, but it may be inferred with considerable certainty from the rate of interest, which always bears a certain relation to these profits. The more advantageously a man can em¬ ploy stock, the more will he be inclined to pay for the use of it. Profit is generally supposed to be about double of the interest. In poor but advancing communities profits are high. There is a great demand for stock, and little to he had ; lienee men are glad to pay a high premium for the use of it. In North America interest is from six to eight per cent. New colonies afford almost the only in¬ stances in which both profit and wages are high at the same time. The employment is so ample as to demand at once more men, and more stock, than can be supplied to it. As the country advances in wealth, stock be¬ comes more abundant, and the competition of different stocks lowers the profit of each. Hence, in a rich coun¬ try, profits are low. In England the current rate of interest is (or at least was, before the immense loans of the present war) from four to four and a half per cent. In Holland, the richest country perhaps in the world, interest is two or three per cent, and the Hutch are observed to trade on lower profits than any other peo¬ ple. But when a country is in a state of decline, in consequence of its property being plundered or destroy¬ ed, stock, from its scarcity, acquires often an enormous value. In Bengal money is said to be lent to the far¬ mer at forty per cent, and upwards. We must observe, however, that even in opulent countries the opening of new channels of employment, by increasing the demand, tends to raise the profits of stock, while the shutting of former channels has the contrary effect. Profit does not vary nearly so much as labour, ac¬ cording to the different modes in which it is employed. Scarcely any of the five circumstances mentioned under that head, except the last, affect it at all. Smith seems indeed to consider the first, viz. the agreeableness or disagreeableness of the employment, as somewhat affect- ing it *, but this it appears to us to do, only from the la¬ bour with which it is accompanied. It is by the drud¬ gery and inconvenience of constant attendance on his guests that the employment of an inn-keeper is render¬ ed disagreeable. The safety or risk, however, attendant on the differ- Vol. XVII. Part I. t 113 ent modes of employing a capital, is a most serious con- Sources of sideration. A man will not, without some temptation Wealth, of extraordinary profit, embark in a concern where a '-—v~—' part or the whole of his capital may be lost. We are disposed, indeed, to consider this as the only circum¬ stance which raises the profits of stock above the market rate of interest. In almost all modes of employing ca¬ pital, there is some risk j and it may be supposed, that where that risk is greatest, the profit should be greatest also. Yet employments attended with very great risk, provided that risk be compensated by the chance of very great gains, are the most crowded. Such is the sanguine and adventurous spirit of men, that specula¬ tion, as it is called in trade, as well as such uncertain trades as that of the corn-merchant or the smuggler, are always overstocked j and though productive of occasion¬ al gains, prove commonly ruinous in the end. In some of the Asiatic countries, where property is remarkably insecure, the accumulation of capital is thereby so much discouraged as to render it scarce, even w here the annual produce of the land and labour is con¬ siderable. Even the quantity which is accumulated, in¬ stead of being employed in trade, is concealed or bu¬ ried in the earth. The same w'as the case anciently in European kingdoms, before the establishment of law and order; accordingly, at that time, treasure-trove formed an important part of the revenue of the sovereign. It may be observed, that what goes under the deno¬ mination of profit is often merely wages. A merchant or shopkeeper who conducts his own business, besides the profit of his stock, must receive some remuneration for the portion of time and attention he devotes to the employment. Thus, especially in a country town, a grocer or apothecary will, on a small stock, make 50 or 100 per cent. 5 but this may be no more than sufficient to repay him for that skill and knowdedge which are equally necessary for conducting these employments on a small as on a great scale. Although, however, the variations in the profits of stock occasioned by the nature of the employment be not cbnsiderable, it is otherwise with those which have been occasioned by the policy of modern Europe. As the improvements introduced into it have been chiefly by cities, and by the mercantile part of the community, that part has been extravagantly favoured. The interest of the agriculturist and of the consumer has, till of late, been uniformly sacrificed to theirs. The regulations prompted by this system have not indeed been of any real service to trade; but, by narrowing the competition, they have secured to some commercial bodies a certain monopoly of the articles in which they dealt, and there¬ by enabled them to raise their profits above the natural level. This they do sometimes directly, by vesting the privilege of conducting certain trades altogether in the hands of an exclusive company, who can set their own price on commodities which are produced or imported by them alone. At other times, they impose prohibi¬ tions or high duties on the importation of certain arti¬ cles from abroad. Bounties are given for the encourage¬ ment of certain favourite branches of agriculture, or manufactures. These regulations form what is called the mercantile system, which we shall have occasion hereafter to consider at large, and to show its entire fal¬ lacy. The exclusive privileges of corporations operate to raise the profits of stock, as well as the wages of la- P hour. II4 POLITICAL HoW hour. They exclude all sitcli as have not certain qua- Wealth is locations from employing their stock within t ie corp - produced, ration. Those, therefore, who possess these qua 1 < tions enjoy some degree of monopoly against the rest ot ^ the society. From all these causes the profits derived from manufactures and commerce have been on th whole greater than those of agriculture. The instan¬ ces of o-reat fortunes raised out of nothing in the foi- mer lines are frequent; in the latter they are rare. We may observe, however, that smce the genera diffu¬ sion of the writings of Smith anti of the economists, this svstem has, in a great degree, ceased to influence the legislatures of Europe ; and what remains of it arises rather from the force of habit than from design. 1 er- haps there is now a tendency to the opposite error , to undervalue trade too much, and to grant to agriculture those exclusive privileges which were formerly lavished on manufactures and commerce. The profits of stock are equally, with the wages of labour, liable to be affected by the introduction of new trades and by alterations in the demand. 1 hese varia¬ tions, ’however, like the causes winch produced them, will be only of a temporary nature. Sect. IV. The Interest of Money. It may often happen, that persons are possessed of stock who want inclination or talents for engaging m trade. On the other hand, some may possess this incli¬ nation and capacity, who have no stock. In this case a natural arrangement takes place. 1 he person pos¬ sessed of the stock, which he does not employ, lends it to the other who is in want of it, and who, in consi¬ deration of the profit he derives from its use is willing to give an annual premium to the lender. 1 his is call¬ ed the interest of money; for money, being the com¬ mon exchangeable medium is the form in winch stock generally appears, when it is collected by its possessor for the purposes either of hoarding or lending. In order to prevent the ignorant or necessitous from being imposed upon, governments have generally fix¬ ed a certain rate, which the interest of money shou d not be allowed to exceed. This rate ought always to be regulated by the market rate. An attempt to keep down the interest below that rate, tends only to raise it hio-her. The consideration given for the use of money must still be regulated, like every such transaction, by the supply and the demand: and the borrower must give a compensation to the lender, not only for the use of his money, but also for the risk which he incurs by the violation of the law. The regulated rate, however, ought to be somewhat above the market rate ; though, were it too much so, its operation would become nuga¬ tory. Chap. III. Of the manner in which Wealth is produced and distributed. Among the three sources of wealth above enumerat¬ ed, labour is pre-eminent, not only as the most abun¬ dant but as necessary in order to give efficacy to the rest; neither land nor stock, unless in some rare in¬ stances, being of any value, unless labour be added. The result, however, of rude and unassisted labour is ECONOMY. chaP-m- exceedingly small, ,vl,en compaved wilh wbat « b jme, ^. by means ot certain artificial aids, wine s ? produced, fceives in an opulent andfimproved society. Ibese aids &c are chiefly the division of labour, and machinery. Sect. I. The division of Labour. The division of labour, by which one employment, or one branch of that employment, forms the sole occu¬ pation of one man, produces the most wondeiful effect in augmenting the productive powers of labour, ihe oftenfr that a man performs any operation, the grea ei power he acquires of performing it ski fully and rapi ly. Ld when his whole life is spent in the performance ot any single process, this power becomes a most incre¬ dible. Thus, too, he saves the time which is spent in passing from one work to another. He saves more in¬ deed than the mere time, for at first beginning t e new one, he commonly saunters and trifles a little, and does not at first go on heartily and vigorously. A striking instance of the effects of division of labour is afforded in the manufacture oipm-making. 1 he im¬ portant occupation of making a pin affords employment to eighteen persons ; one man draws out the wire, an¬ other straights it, a third cuts it, a ourth points it, a fifth grinds it at the top to receive the head, which two or three are employed in making. Io put it on, to whiten the pin, to put it into the paper, form all dis¬ tinct occupations. Smith saw a manufactory where on¬ ly ten were employed, and where some consequently performed two or three operations yet they made foi- ty-eight thousand pins a day, or four thousand eight hundred each ; whereas a single man, performing the whole process by himself, would not probably make twenty. These effects would be equally perceptible in manufactures of greater consequence, were all their pro¬ cesses ca pable of being brought as close to each other as in this small one. • a c „ The division of labour is capable of being carried far¬ ther in manufactures than in agriculture. In the lat¬ ter, a change of employment is dictated by the change of seasons; the same man must successively sow, reap, and thrash out the grain. Although, therefore, an im¬ proved society excels a rude one in agriculture, it does not, in general, excel so much as in manufactures, where man, making all the arrangements himself, can carry the division of labour as far as the extent ot Ins undertaking will admit ol. Sect. II. Machinery. As improvement advances, and the invention of man exerts itself in every direction, the labour of man is more and more seconded by the aid of machinery, inis source of improvement is classed by Smith under the head of the division of labour, to which he conceives it to he indebted for its origin. We rather incline, however, to agree with Lord Lauderdale, m judging it worthy of ranking as a separate and independent prin¬ ciple. Some rude machinery for domestic and agricul¬ tural purposes must have been invented prior to any considerable division of labour ; while those wonderful machines which have excited the admiration of the pie- sent age, the cotton mill, the steam engine, &c. are the hap. III. POLITICAL ECONOMY. How the invention of ingenious men, not the casual discovery Veaith is 0f workmen j though they may have received some im- l>r^cca’ provement from tlie latter source. Machinery is, in many instances, not less powerful than the division of labour, in multiplying the produc¬ tions of human industry. It has besides this advantage, that there are many operations to which it is essential, and which, without it, cannot, in any degree, be per¬ formed. Without the plough or spade, the saw, the flour-mill, or some instruments corresponding to these, the unassisted efforts of man would be of no avail to ef¬ fect the purposes for which they are intended. When any machine is first introduced, the immediate consequence is, that a number of labourers are thrown out of employment $ hence, according to the idea of the vulgar, which has been hastily adopted bv some phi¬ losophers, such innovations are pernicious, tending to distress the poor, and to check population. There seems no good reason for this complaint. The popula¬ tion of a country must always depend upon the abun¬ dance of the means of subsistence j while, therefore, im¬ proved machinery has no tendency to diminish these, it cannot be injurious to population. The manufacturer, being enabled to produce the same quantity of goods, with only part of the stock before employed, will em¬ ploy the other part in extending his concerns, either in the same or in other branches of industry ; and even the part of his stock which is spent in the purchase of ma¬ chinery, will give employment to workmen in framing that machinery. The only effect, therefore, will be that of adding, in proportion to the power of this ma¬ chinery, to the comforts and conveniences of the socie¬ ty. A certain degree of inconvenience may no doubt be experienced by those workmen who have been ac¬ customed to this species of employment, and are less qualified for any other. But this is merely a temporary disadvantage, such as may be expected to accompany all changes, however beneficial. Machinery, like the division of labour, can be intro¬ duced to a much greater extent in manufactures than in agriculture. Nothing on a great scale, seems hitherto to have been introduced into the latter, except the threshing machine. Sect. III. Of the different Employments of Labour and Stock. All these seem to be included under four heads : agri¬ culture, including mines and fisheries ; manufactures j trade by wholesale *, and trade by retail. Each of these will present some objects for our consideration. Sect. IV. Agrictdture. Of all modes of employing labour and stock, this is the most productive. It is not here, as in other em¬ ployments where every thing is to be done by man. Nature labours along with him. His object is to direct rather than to augment those powers of vegetation which the earth already possesses and exercises. No other employment yields that surplus produce obtained without labour or effoi’t, which is called rent. Where- ever, therefore, things are allowed to take their natural course, agriculture is the first object to which the la¬ bour ol the society is directed. Till it has made con¬ siderable advances, manufactures are either rudely exe- How cuted as a by-work, or, where opportunity oilers, are Wealth is imported from abroad, in exchange for the rude pro- Pro—_■ vets. women of that country seem to be as tree and as happy as those of Europe possibly can be. Polygamy is per¬ mitted, indeed, among Mahometans, and the delicacy of our ladies is shocked at this idea •, but the Arabians rarely avail t themselves of the privilege of marrying} See J four lawful wives, and entertaining at the same time any does, N number of female slaves. None but rich voluptuaries marry so many wives, and their conduct is blamed by all sober men. Men of sense, indeed, think this privi¬ lege rather troublesome than convenient. A husband . is by law obliged to treat his wives suitably to their con¬ dition, and to dispense his favours among them with perfect POL [ Polygamy, perfect equality : but these are duties not a little dis- -v“—agreeable to most Mussulmans; and such modes of luxury are too expensive to the Arabians, who are seldom in easy circumstances. I must, however, except one case ; for it sometimes happens that a man marries a number of wives in the way of commercial speculation. J know a Mullah, in a town near the Euphrates, who had mar¬ ried four wives, and was supported by the profits of their labour.” See a curious kind of polygamy under the article Nayres. The ancient Britons, too, had a kind of polygamy among them, 12 women being common to 12 men. Selden has proved, in his Uxor Hebraica, that plura¬ lity of wives was allowed of, not only among the He¬ brews, but also among all other nations, and in all ages. It is true, the ancient Romans wTere more severe in their morals, and never practised it, though it was not forbid among them : and Mark Antony is mentioned as the first who took the liberty of having two wives. Irom that time it became pretty frequent in the em¬ pire till the reigns of i heodosius, Honorius, and Arca- dius, who first prohibited it by express law in 393. After this the emperor Valentinian, by an edict, per¬ mitted all the subjects of the empire, if they pleased, to marry several wives : nor does it appear, from the ec¬ clesiastical history of those times, that the bishops made any opposition to the introduction of polygamy. In effect, there are some even among the Christian casuists who do not look on polygamy as in itself criminal. Ju- rieu observes, that the prohibition of polygamy is a po¬ sitive law, but from which a man may be exempted by sovereign necessity. Baillet adds, that the example of the patriarchs is a powerful argument in favour of poly¬ gamy : of these arguments we shall speak hereafter. It has been much disputed among the doctors of the civil law whether polygamy be adultery. In the Ro¬ man law it is called stuprum, and punished as such, that is, in some cases capitally. But a smaller punishment is more consistent with the Jewish law, wherein the pro¬ hibition of adultery is perpetual, but that of polygamy temporary only. In Germany, Holland, and Spain, this offence is dif¬ ferently punished. By a constitution of Charles V. it was a capital crime. By the laws of ancient and modern Sweden it is punished with death. In Scotland it is punished as perjury. In England it is enacted by statute I Jac. I. cap. 11. that if any person, being married, do afterwards marry again, the former husband or wife being alive, it is fe- lony, but within the benefit of clergy. The first wife, in this case, shall not be admitted as an evidence against her husband, because she is the true wife ; but the se¬ cond may, for she is indeed no wife at all; and so vice versa of a second husband. This act makes an exception to fives cases, in which such second marriage, though in the three first it is void, is however no felony. 1. Where either party hath been continually abroad for seven years, whether the party in England had notice of the other’s being living or not. 2. Where either of the parties hath been absent from the other seven years within this kingdom, and the remaining party hath had no notice of the other’s being alive within that time. 3. Where there is a divorce or separation £ mensa et thoro by sen- Vol. XVII. Part I. + 29 ] POL tence in the ecclesiastical court. 4. Where the first Polygamy. marriage is declared absolutely void by any such sentence, ’ and the parties loosed a vinculo. Or, 5. Where either of the parties was under the age of consent at the time of the first marriage ; for in such case the first marriage was voidable by the disagreement of either party, which this second marriage very clearly amounts to. But if at the age of consent the parties had agreed to the mar¬ riage, which completes the contract, and is indeed the real marriage, and afterwards one of them should marry again, Judge Blackstone apprehends that such second marriage would be within the reason and penalties of the act. Bernardus Ochinus, general of the order of Capu¬ chins, and afterwards a Protestant, published, about the middle of the 16th century, Oialogues in favour of Po- lygamy, which were answered by Theodore Beza. And about the conclusion of the last century we had at Lon¬ don an artful treatise published in behalf of a plurality of wives, under the title of Polygamia Triumphatrix ; the author whereof assumes the name of Theophilus Aletheus; but his true name was Lyserus. He was a native of Saxony. It has been answered by several. A new argument in favour of polygamy has been adduced by Mr Bruce, on this principle, that in some parts of the world the proportion of female children is much greater than that of the males. “ From a dili¬ gent inquiry (says he) into the south and scripture part of Mesopotamia, Armenia, and Syria, from Mousnl or Nineveh to Aleppo and Antioch, I find the proportion to be fully two women to one man. There is indeed a fraction over, but it is not a considerable one. From Latikea, Laodicea ad mare, down the coast of Syria to Sidon, the number is nearly three, or two and three- fourths, to one man. Through the Holy Land, the country called Horan, in the isthmus of Suez, and the parts of the Delta unfrequented by strangers, it is some¬ thing less than three. But from Suez to the straits of Babelmandel, which contains the three Arabias, the proportion is fully four women to one man ; which I have reason to believe holds as far as the line, and 30° beyond it. The Imam of Sama was not an old man when I was in Arabia Felix in 1769 ; but he had 88 children then alive, of whom 14 only were sons. The priest of the Nile had 70 and odd children: of whom, as I remember, above fifty were daughters. “ It may be objected, that Dr Arbuthnot, in quo¬ ting the bills of mortality for 20 years, gave the most unexceptionable grounds for his opinion ; and that my single exception of what happens in a foreign country, without further foundation, cannot be admitted as equivalent testimony : and I am ready to admit this ob¬ jection, as there are no bills of mortality in any of these countries. I shall therefore say in what manner I at¬ tained the knowledge which I have just mentioned. Whenever I went into a town, village* or inhabited place, dwelt long in a mountain, or travelled journeys with any set of people, I always made it my business to inquire how many children they had, or their fathers, their next neighbours or acquaintance. I then asked my landlord at Sidon, suppose him a weaver, how many children he has had ? He tells me how many sons and how many daughters. The next I ask is a tailor, a smith, &c. in short every man who is not a stranger, R from POL from whom I can get the proper information. . therefore, that a medium of both sexes, arising irom three or four hundred families, indiscriminately taken, shall be the proportion in which one differs from the other : and this, I am confident, will give the result to be three women in 50° of the 90° under every meridian of the globe.” Our author corroborates this argument by supposing that Mahomet perceived this disproportion, and that upon it he founded his institution allowing one man to have four wives. “ With this view he enacted, or ra ther revived, the law which gave liberty to every indi vidual to marry four wives, each of whom was to be equal in rank and honour, without any preference but what the predilection of the husband gave her. Having thus established, as he supposes, the necessity of polygamy in the East, Mr Bruce proceeds to consider whether there is not some other reasons why it should uot be practised in Britain farther than the mere equa¬ lity in numbers of the sexes to one another. This rea¬ son he finds in the difference between the constitutions of the Europeans and eastern nations. “ Women in England (says he) are capable of child-bearing at 14 j let the other term be 48, when they bear no more j 34 years therefore an English woman bears children. At the age of 14 or 15 they are objects of our love ; they are endeared by bearing us children after that time) and none, I hope, rvill pretend, that at 48 and qo an Englishwoman is not an agreeable companion. The Arab, on the other hand, if she begins to bear children at 11, seldom or never has a child after 20. The time, then, of her child-bearing is nine years j and four wTomen, taken altogether, have then the term of 36. So that the English woman that bears children for 34 years has only two years less than the term en¬ joyed by the four wives whom Mahomet has allowed j and if it be granted that an English wife may bear at 50, the terms are equal. But there are other grievous differences. An Arabian girl at 11 years old, by her youth and beauty, is the object of man’s desire : being an infant, however, in understanding, she is not a ra¬ tional companion for him. A man marries there, say at 20 j and before he is 30, his wife, improved as a companion, ceases to be the object of his desires and a mother of children : so that all the best and most vigo¬ rous of his days are spent with a woman he cannot love j and with her he would be destined to live 40 or 45 years, without comfort to himselt by increase of family, or utility to the public. The reasons, then, a- irainst polygamy, which subsist in England, do not by any means subsist in Arabia j and that being the case, it would be unworthy of the wisdom of God, and an unevenness in his ways, which we shall never see, to subject two nations under such different circumstances absolutely to the same observances.” To all this argumentation, however, it may be re¬ plied, that whatever we may now suppose to be the constitution of nature in the warmer parts of the globe, it certainly was different at the beginning. We cannot indeed, ascertain the exact position of the Garden of Eden ; but it is with reason supposed not to have been far from the ancient seat of Babylon. In that country, therefore, where Mr Bruce contends that four women are necessary to the comfort of one man, it pleased God to grant only one to the first man j and that, too, 3 [ 13° ] POL I say when there was more occasion for population than ever Polygamy. - there has been since, because the whole earth was to be ' peopled from a single pair. Matters were not altered at the flood; for Noah had but one wife. And this is the very argument used by our Saviour himself when speakipg of divorce without any sufficient cause, and then marrying another woman, which is a species of polygamy.—Again, with respect to the alleged multi¬ plicity of females in the eastern part of the world, it is by no means probable that the calculations of Mr Biuce or any other person can be admitted in this case. His¬ tory mentions no such thing in any nation ; and consi- dering the vast destruction among the male part of the human species more than that of the females by war and other accidents, we may safely say, that iifour women children were born for every single male, there would in such countries be five or six grown up women for every man* a proportion which we may venture to affirm does not, nor ever did, exist anywhere in the world. That it was not so in former times, we can only judge from the particular examples recorded in history, and these are but few. We read in the Greek history, indeed, of the fifty daughters of Hanaus 3 but these were matched by as many sons of another man. Job had only one wife, yet had seven sons and but three daughters. Jacob had two wives, who bore twelve sons, and only one daughter. Abraham had only one child by his first wife, and that was a son. By his se¬ cond wife Keturah he had six sons * and considering his advanced age at the time he married her, it is by no means probable that he could have 24 daughters * nay, if, as Mr Bruce tells us, the women in the eastern countries bear children only for nine years, it was im¬ possible she could have so many. Gideon, who had many wives, had no fewer than seventy sons by these wives, and even his concubine had a son * so that if all these women had produced according to Mr Bruce’s proportion, of nearly three females to one male, he must have had almost 284 children ; a better family than any of Mr Bruce’s eastern acquaintance can pro¬ bably boast of. With regard to the subject, however, it must be ob¬ served, that the procreation of male or female children depends in some degree on the health and vigour of the parents. It is by no means improbable, therefore that the eastern voluptuaries, whose constitutions are debili¬ tated by their excesses, may have many more female than male children born to them. The women themselves, by premature enjoyment, will also be inclined to pro¬ duce females instead of males * but neither of these cir¬ cumstances can prove this to be an original law of na¬ ture. Something like this may be gathered from sacred history. Gideon above mentioned, who was a hardy and active warrior, had many sons. The same was the case with David, who led an active and laborious life * while Solomon, who was a voluptuary, had only one son, notwithstanding his multitude of wives. The most barefaced defence of polygamy that has ap¬ peared in modern times is by the Kev. Mr Madan, who published a treatise, artfully vindicating, and strongly recommending it, under the title of Thelyphthora * or A Treatise 011 Female Ruin, in its Causes, Effects, Conse¬ quences, Prevention, and Remedy, &c. Marriage, ac¬ cording to this writer, simply and wholly consists in the act of personal union, or actus coitus. Adultery, he says. POL Polygamy. says> is never used in the sacred writings but to denote '—■'v •* the defilement ot a betrothed or married woman, and to this sense he restricts the use of the term ; so that a mar¬ ried man, in his opinion, is no adulterer, if his commerce with the sex he confined to single women, who are un¬ der no obligations by espousals or marriage to other men: but, on the other hand, the woman who should dare to have even but once an intrigue with any other man besides her husband, (let him have as many wives as Solomon), would, ipso Jacto, be an adulteress, and ought, together with her gallant, to be punished with immediate death. This, he boldly says, is the law of God : and on this foundation he limits the privilege of polygamy to the man 5 in support of which he refers to the polygamous connections of the patriarchs and saints of the Old Testament, and infers the lawfulness of their practice from the blessings which attended it, and the Jaws which were instituted to regulate and superintend it. He contends for the lawfulness of Christians having, like the ancient Jews, more wives than one j and labours much to reconcile the genius of the evangelical dispen¬ sation to an arrangement of this sort. With this view he asserts, that there is not one text in the New Testa¬ ment that even hints at the criminality of a polygamous connection j and he would infer from St Paul’s direc¬ tion, that bishops and deacons should have but one wife, that it was lawlul for laymen to have more. Christ, he says, was not the giver of a new law ; but the business of marriage, polygamy, &c. had been settled before his appearance in the world, by an authority which could not be revoked. Besides, this writer not only thinks polygamy lawful in a religious, but advantageous in a civil light, and highly politic in a domestic view. In defence of his notion of marriage, which, he says, consists in the union of man and woman as one body, the effects of which in the sight of God no outward forms or ceremonies of man’s invention can add to or detract from, he grounds his principal argument on the Hebrew words made use of in Gen. ii. 24. to express the primi¬ tive institution of marriage, viz. tnuuo pm, rendered by the LXX. t>jv yvnaixx ccvjis, which translation is adopted by the evangelist (Mat. xix. c.) with the omission only of the superfluous preposition (w-ge?) after the verb. Our translation, “ shall cleave to his wife,” doth not, he says, convey the idea of the He- biew, which is literally, as Montanus renders the words, W shall be joined or.cemented in his woman, and they shall become (i. e. by this union) one flesh.” But on this criticism it is well remarked, that both the Hebrew and Greek terms mean simply and literally attachment or adherence; and are evidently made use of in the sa¬ cred writings to express the whole scope of conjugal fi¬ delity and duty, though he would restrain them to the grosser part of it. With respect to the Mosaic lawr, for which Mr Ma- dan is a warm advocate, it was certainly a local and temporary institution, adapted to the ends for which it was appointed, and admirably calculated, in its rela¬ tion to marriage, to maintain and perpetuate the sepa¬ ration of the Jewish people from the Gentiles. In at¬ tempting to depreciate the outward forms of marriage, this writer would make his readers believe, that became none are explicitly described, therefore none existed 5 and consequently that they are the superfluous ordinances ol human policy. But it is evident, from comparing [ 131 ] POL Ruth iv. 10, 13. with Tobit vii; 13, 14. and from the Polygamy. case of Dinah, related Gen. xxxiv. that some forms were »-■■■ v ‘ deemed essential to an honourable alliance by the patri¬ archs and saints under the Old Testament, exclusive of the carnal knowledge of each other’s persons. It is al¬ so evident in the case of the woman of Samaria, whose connection with a man not her husband is mentioned in John iv. that something besides cohabitation is neces¬ sary to constitute marriage in the sight of God. Having stated his notion of marriage, he urges, in de¬ fence of polygamy, that, notwithstanding the seventh commandment, it was allowed by God himself, who made laws for the regulation of it, wrought miracles in support of it by making the barren woman fruitful, and declared the issue legitimate to all intents and purposes. God’s allowance of polygamy is argued from Exod. xxi. 10. and particularly from Deut. xxi. 15. which, he says, amounts to a demonstration, f his passage, however, at the utmost, only presupposes that the practice might have existence among so hard-hearted and fickle a people as the Jews $ and therefore wisely provides against some of its more unjust and pernicious consequences,such as tend¬ ed to affect the rights and privileges of heirship. Laws enacted to regulate it cannot be fairly urged in proof of its lawfulness on the author’s own hypothesis j because laws were also made to regulate divorce, which Mr Ma- dan condemns as absolutely unlawful, except in cases of adultery. Besides, it is more probable that the “ ha¬ ted wife” had been dismissed by a bill of divorcement, than that she was retained by her husband s and, more- ov®r> it is not certain but that the two wives, so far from living with the same husband at the same time, might he dead ; for the words may be rendered thus, “ if there should have been to a man twro wives, &c.” The words expressing the original institution of marriage, Gen.ii. 24. compared with Matt. xix. 4, 5, 8. affords insuperable objections against Mr Madan’s doctrine of polygamy. If we appeal, on this subject, from the authority of Scripture to the writings of the earliest fathers in the Christian church, there is not to be found the faintest trace of any thing resembling a testimony to the lawful¬ ness ol polygamy ; on the contrary, many passages oc¬ cur, in which the practice of it is strongly and explicit¬ ly condemned. We shall close this article with the words of an excel- Monthly lent anonymous writer already quoted, and to whose cri- Review, tique on Mr Madan’s work we are indebted for theY0'* 'x“*' above remarks : “ In a word, when we reflect that the See aLo primitive institution of marriage limited it to one man voL Ixix. and one woman ; that this institution was adhered to by Noah and his sons, amidst the degeneracy in which they lived, and in spite of the examples of polygamy which the accursed race of Cain had introduced ; when we consider how very few (comparatively speaking) the examples of this practice were among the faithful; how much it brought its own punishment with it; and how dubious and equivocal those passages are in which it ap¬ pears to have the sanction of divine approbation ; when to these reflections we add another, respecting the limit¬ ed view's and temporary nature of the more ancient dis¬ pensations and institutions of religion—how often the imperfections and even vices of the patriarchs and peo¬ ple of God, in old time, are recorded, without any ex¬ press notification of their criminality—how much is said to be commanded, which our reverence for the holiness K 2 of POL [ PoWamv of God and his law will only suffer us to suppose, were, Polygars- for wise ends, permitted—how frequently the messengers ‘ v 1 of God adapted themselves to the genius ot the people to whom they were sent, and the circumstances ot the times in which they lived above all, when we consi¬ der the purity, equity, and benevolence of the Christian law *, the explicit declarations of our Lord, and his a- postle St Paul, respecting the institution of marriage, its design and limitation 5—when we reflect, too, on the testimony of the most ancient fathers, who could not possibly be ignorant of the general and common prac¬ tice of the apostolic church •, and, finally, when to these considerations we add those which are founded on jus¬ tice to the female sex, and all the regulations of domestic economy and national policy—we must wholly condemn the revival of polygamy ; and thus bear our honest tes¬ timony against the leading design of this dangerous and ill-advised publication.” We would advise our readers to peruse the whole cri¬ ticisms on Madan’s book in the Monthly Review, toge¬ ther with their account of the several answers to it. The reverend author of the Thelyphthora has there met with a most able antagonist, who traces him through all his deceitful windings, and exposes the futility and falsehood of his arguments with singular ability, bee Monthly Review, vol. Ixiii. p. 273, &c. j see also Pa/ey’i- Moral Philosophy, zjto. p. 262. POLYGARS, are natives of Hindostan. Ihey in¬ habit almost impenetrable woods, and are under the ab¬ solute direction of their own chieftains. In time of peace they are professionally robbers, but in times ot war are the guardians of the country. ^ he general name of these people is Polygar. Their original insti¬ tution, for they live in distinct clans, is not veiy we 1 understood. It probably took its rise from the munici¬ pal regulations relative to the destruction of tygers and ' other ferocious beasts. Certain tracts of woodland were indisputably allotted as rewards to those who should slay a certain number ot those animals j and those lands approximating, probably laid the founda¬ tion of the several confederacies of Polygars. . “ The Pollams, or woods, from which is derived the word Polygar, lying in profusion through all the south¬ ern parts of Hindostan, the ravages committed m the open countries by these adventurous clans, are both fre¬ quent and destructive. Cattle and grain are the con¬ stant booty of the Polygars. They not unfrequently even despoil travellers of their property, and sometimes murder, if they meet with opposition ; yet these very Polygars are the hands into which the aged and infirm, the wives, children, and treasure, of both Hindoos and others are entrusted, when the circumjacent country un¬ fortunately happens to be the seat of war. The protec¬ tion they afford is paid for j but the price is inconsi¬ derable, when the helpless situation of those who fly to them for shelter is considered, and especially when their own very peculiar character is properly attended to. The native governments of Hindostan are under the ne¬ cessity of tolerating this honourable banditti. Many of them are so formidable as to be able to bring 15,000 and 20,000 men into the field. “ The Hindoo code of laws, in speaking of robbe¬ ries, hath this remarkable clause, ‘ The mode of shares amongst robbers shall be this If any thief or thieves, by the command of the magistrate, and with his assist- 132 ] POL ance, have committed depredations upon, and brought Polygars away any booty from, another province, the magistrate I! shalf receive a share of one-sixth part of the whole. If FoIZ_Snot^' they received no command or assistance from the ma¬ gistrate, they shall give the magistrate in that case one- tenth part for his share, and of the remainder their chief shall receive four shares ; and whosoever among them is perfect master of his occupation, shall receive three shares: also, whichever of them is remarkably strong and stout, shall receive two shares, and the rest shall receive each one share.’ Here, then, we see not only a sanction, but even an inducement, to fraudulent prac¬ tices, Another singular inconsistency among a people who,' in many periods of their history, have been pro¬ verbial for innocency of manners, and for uncommon ho¬ nesty in their conduct towards travellers and strangers. “ At the first sight, it would appear that the tolera¬ tion of the Polygars is owing to their great numbers, and to the security of their fortresses, which are in general impenetrable but to Polygars : that the govern¬ ment licence, in this manner given to them, to live on the spoils of the industrious, might have originally oc¬ casioned the formal division, and encouragement to perseverance, which we have just quoted: but the cause I should rather suppose to lie in the nature of certain governments, than to have arisen from any ac¬ cidental circumstance afterwards : and I am the more inclined to this opinion, from the situation of the north¬ ern parts of Hindostan, which are, and always have been, uninfested by these freebooters. “ The dominion of the East was, in former days, most probably divided and subdivided into all the various branches of the feodal system. The vestiges of it re¬ main to this hour : rajahs and zemindars are nothing more than chieftains of a certain degree of consequence in the empire. If, then, experience has shown, in other parts of the world, that clans have always been observed to commit the most pernicious acts of depredation and hostility on each other, and that the paramount lord has seldom been able effectually to crush so general and so complicated a scene of mischief —may we not reason¬ ably venture to suppose, that the Hindoo legislature passed this ordinance for the suppression of such pro¬ vincial warfare, and for the Avholesome purpose of draw¬ ing the people, by unalarming degrees, more immediate¬ ly under the controul of the one sovereign authority ? The conclusion, I own, appears to me satisfactory. Moreover, Polygars cannot but be of modern growth £ for the law relative to thefts is antecedent to the men¬ tion of Polygars in history.” Sullivan’s Philosophical Rhapsodies. POLYGLOTT, among divines and critics, chiefly denotes a Bible printed in several languages. See Bible and Printing. POLYGLOTTUS, a species of bird, belonging to the genus turdus. See Turdus, Ornithology In- dax, POLYGNOTUS, a famous painter of Thasos, flou¬ rished about 422 years before the Christian era, and was the son and scholar of Aglaophon. He adorned one ot the public porticoes of Athens with his paintings, in which he had represented the most striking events of the Trojan war. The Athenians were so pleased with him, that they offered to reward his labours with whatever he pleased to accept j but he declined the offer 5 and the Amphictyonic POL [ olygnotus Ampliictyonic council which was composed of the re- || presentatives of the principal cities of Greece, ordered olymnes- tliat Polygnotus should be maintained at the public ex- tor‘ , pence wherever he went. Of the talents of Polygnotus much honourable men¬ tion is made by many of the best authors of antiquity, as Aristotle and Plutarch, Dionysius Halicarnassensis, &c. Pausanis speaks of his pictures of the events of the Trojan war, and, in his Tenth Book, introduces a very long description of other pictures by the same ar¬ tist, painted also from Homer in the temple at Delphos. The passage, however, gives but a confused and imper¬ fect idea of the painter’s performance. How much the art is indebted to this ancient master, what grace and softness he gave to the human countenance, what em¬ bellishments he added to the female figure and dress, are much more happily described by Pliny. “ Primus mu- lieres lucida veste pinxit, capita earum mitris versicolo- ribus operuit, plurimumque picturae primus contulit: siquidem instituitos adaperire, dentes ostendere, vultum ab antique rigore variare.”—The same author likewise bears honourable testimony to the liberal spirit of this great artist, who refused any reward for his ingenious la¬ bours in the portico.—“Porticum gratuito, cum partem ejus Mycon mercede pingeret.” Plin. lib. xxxv. cap. 8. POLYGON, in Geometry, a figure with many sides, or whose perimeter consists of more than four sides at least •, such are the pentagon, hexagon, heptagon, &c. POLYGONUM, Knot-grass ; a genus of plants belonging to the octandria class ; and in the natural method ranking under the 12th order, Holoracece. See Botany Index. POLYGRAPHY, Polygraphia, or TolygrapMce, the art of writing in various unusual manners or cyphers 5 as also of decyphering the same. The word is formed from the Greek, multum, and scriptura, “ writing.” Hie ancients seem to have been very little acquaint¬ ed with this art, nor is there any mark of their having gone beyond the Lacedaemonian scytala. Trithemius, Porta, Vigenere, and Father Niceron, have written on the subject of polygraphy or ciphers. See Cipher. POLA HA MNIA, in the pagan mythology, one of the nine muses, thus named from the Greek words weAvs, “ much,” and ptiix, “ memory.” She presided over hi¬ story, or rather rhetoric j and is represented with a crown ot pearls and a white robe j her right hand in action as if haranguing, and holding in her left a caduceus or sceptre to show her power. POLYHEDRON, in Geometry, denotes a body or solid comprehended under many sides or planes. Polyhedron, in Optics, is a multiplying glass or lens, consisting of several plane surfaces disposed into a convex form. See Optics. POLYMATHY, denotes the knowledge of many arts and sciences. The word is derived from the Greek, wo\v, midtum, and pav&ctw, disco. 1 OLYMNES TOR, was a king of the Thracian Chersonesus. He married Ilione, Priam’s eldest daugh¬ ter j and for the sake of the treasure with which he was entiusted by Priam during the siege of Troy, he mur¬ dered Polydorus, (see Polydorus). The fleet in which the victorious Greeks returned, together with their Tro¬ jan captives, among whom was Hecuba, stopped on the coast of Thrace, where one of the female captives dis- 33 ] p o' L covered on the shore the body of Polydorus, whom Po- Polymne*- lymnestor had thrown into the sea. The dreadful in- tor telligence was immediately communicated to Hecuba li his mother, who recollecting the frightful dreams she PolyPhe' had the preceding night, did not doubt but Polymne- m>1S‘ ■ stor was the cruel assassin. Resolved to revenge her son’s death, she immediately called out Polymaestor, as if to impart to him something of importance. He was drawn into the snare; and no sooner wTas he introduced into the apartment of the Trojan princess, than the fe¬ male captives rushing upon him, put out his eyes with their pins, while Hecuba murdered his two children, who had accompanied him. Euripides informs us, that the Greeks condemned Polymnestor to be banished into a distant island for his perfidy. Hyginus, however, relates the whole differently, and tells us, that when Polydorus was sent to Thrace, Ilione his sister took him instead of her son Deiphilus, who was of the same age, being fearful of her husband’s cruelty. The mo¬ narch, unacquainted with the imposition, looked upon Polydorus as his own son, and treated Deiphilus as her brother. After the destruction of Troy, the con¬ querors wished the house and family of Priam to be ex¬ tirpated, and therefore offered Electra the daughter of Agamemnon to Polymnestor, if he would destroy Ilione and Polydorus. He accepted the offer, and immedi¬ ately dispatched his own son Deiphilus, whom he took for Polydorus. Polydorus, who passed as the son of Polymnestor, consulted the oracle after the murder of Deiphilus, and being informed that his father was dead, his mother a captive in the hands of the Greeks, and his country in ruins, he communicated the answer to Ilione, whom he had always regarded as his mother. She told him the measures she had pursued to save his life, upon which he avenged the perfidy of Polymnestor by putting out his eyes. POLYMNIA, a genus of plants belonging to the syngenesia class, and in the natural method ranking un¬ der the 49th order, Ccmpositce. See Botany Index. POLYNICES, the son of Oedipus by his mother Jocasta. See Jocasta, Oedipus, andETEOCLEs. POLYPE. See Polypus. POLYPETALOUS, among botanists, an epithet applied to such flowers as consist of several petals or flower-leaves. POLYPHEMUS (fab. hist.), a celebrated Cyclops, and king of all the Cyclops in Sicily, was the son of Neptune and Thoosa the daughter of Phorcys. He is said to have been a monster of great strength, very tall, and with one eye in the middle of the forehead. He ate human flesh, and kept his flocks on the coasts of Sicily, when Ulysses, at his return from the Trojan war, was driven there. Ulysses, together with 12 of his com¬ panions, visited the coast, and with them was seized by the Cyclops, who confined them in his cave, and daily devoured two of them. Ulysses would have shared the fate of the rest, had he not intoxicated the Cyclops, and put out his eye with a firebrand when he was asleep. Polyphemus was awakened by the sudden pain, and stopped the entrance of his cave; but Ulysses escaped, by creeping between the legs of the rams of the Cyclops, as they were led out to feed on the mountains. Poly¬ phemus became enamoured of Galatsea; but his addresses were disregarded, and the nymph shunned his presence. The Cyclops was still more earnest; and when he saw Galateea Polyphe¬ mus II Polypus. POL [ 1 GalatEea surrender lierself to tlie pleasures of Acts, lie crushed his rival with a piece of a broken rock. . POLYPODIUM, a genus of plants belonging to the cryptogamia class. See Botany Index. POLYPHEMUM, a genus of plants belonging to the tetrandria class, and in the natural method ranking under the 22d order, Caryophittei. See Botany Index. POLYPUS, a species of fresh-water insects, be¬ longing to the genus of hydra, of the order of zoo¬ phytes, and class of vermes. See Helminthology. The name of hydra was given them by Linnseus, on account of the property they have of reproducing them¬ selves when cut in pieces, every part soon becoming a perfect animal. Dr Hill called them biota, on account of the strong principle of life with which every pait of them is endowed. These animals were first discovered by Leeuwenhoeck, who gave some account ot them in the 1 hilosophica Transactions for 1703 j but their wonderful properties were not thoroughly known till the year ^4°’ w'ien Mr Trembley began to investigate them. Previous to his discoveries, indeed, Leibnitz and Boerhaave,. by reasonings a priori, had concluded that animals might be found which would propagate by slips like plants. Their conjectures have been verified. Marine Polypus, is different in form from the fresh¬ water polype already described} but is nourished, in¬ creases, and may be propagated, after the same manner : Mr Ellis having often found, in his inquiries, that small pieces cut off from the living parent, in order to view the several parts more accurately, soon gave indications that they contained not only the principles of life, but likewise the faculty of increasing and multiplying into a numerous issue. It has been lately discovered and suf¬ ficiently proved by Peyssonel, Ellis, Jussieu, Reaumur, Donati, &c. that many of those substances which had formerly been considered by naturalists as marine vege- 34 3 P 0 L tables or sea-plants, are in reality animal productions; Polype and that they are formed by polypes of different shapes 11 and sizes, for their habitation, defence, and propagation. ^ To this class may be referred the corals, corallines, ke- i ratophyta, eschara, sponges, and alcyonium: nor is it improbable, that the more compact bodies, known by the common appellations of star-stones, brain-stones, pe¬ trified fungi, and the like, brought from various parts of the East and West Indies, are of the same origin. To this purpose Mr Ellis observes, that the ocean, in all the warmer latitudes, near the shore, and wherever it is pos¬ sible to observe, abounds so much with animal life, that no inanimate body can long remain unoccupied by some species. In those regions, ships bottoms are soon co¬ vered with the habitations of thousands of animals: rocks, stones, and every thing lifeless, are covered with them instantly ; and even the branches of living vege¬ tables that hang into the water are immediately loaded with the spawn of different animals, shell-fish of various kinds : and shell-fish themselves, when they become im¬ potent and old, are the basis of new colonies of animals, from whose attacks they can no longer defend them¬ selves. See Corallina, Helminthology Index. Polypus of the Heart. See Medicine, N° 97, 98, 274, and 290. POLYSARCIA, or Corpulency. See Medicine, N° 335. POLYSPERMOUS (from ncXv and seed), in Botany, is applied to such plants as have more than four seeds succeeding each flower, without any certain order or number. POLYSYLLABLE, in Grammar, a word consist¬ ing of more than three syllables : for when a word con¬ sists of one, two, or three syllables, it is called a mono* syllable, a dissyllable, and trisyllable. POLYSYNDETON. See Oratory, N° 97. POLYTHEISM, 1 Definition. # Sketches of the Hist, of Man. a Source of religious principle* traced. THE doctrine of a plurality of gods or invisible powers superior to man. “ That there exist beings, one or many, powerful above the human race, is a proposition (says Lora Karnes*) universally admitted as true in all ages and among all nations. I boldly call it universal, notwith¬ standing what is reported of some gross savages ; for reports that contradict what is acknowledged to be ge¬ neral among men, require more able vouchers than a few illiterate voyagers. Among many savage tnoes, there are no words but for objects of external sense, is it surprising that such people are incapable of express¬ ing their religious perceptions, or any perception of in¬ ternal sense ? The conviction that men have of superior powers, in every country where there are words to ex¬ press it, is so well vouched, that in fair reasoning it ought to be taken for granted among the few tribes where language is deficient.” These are judicious observations, of which every man will admit the force who has not some favourite system to build upon the unstable foundation which his Lord- ship overturns. Taking it for granted, then, that our conviction of superior powers has long been universal, the important question is, From what cause it proceeds ? The same ingenious author shows, with great strength of reasoning, that the operations ot nature and the go¬ vernment of this world, which to us loudly proclaim the existence of a Deity, are not sufficient to account for the universal belief of superior beings among savage tribes. He is therefore of opinion, that this universali¬ ty of conviction can spring only from the image of Dei¬ ty stamped upon the mind of every human being, the ignorant equally with the learned. “ Nothing less (he says) is sufficient: and the original impression which we have of Deity, must proceed (he thinks) from an inter¬ nal sense, which may be termed the sense of Deity f . We have elsewhere expressed our opinion of that phi¬ losophy which accounts for every phenomenon in human nature,, bv attributing it to a particular instinct (see In¬ stinct) ; but to this instinct or sense of Deity, con¬ sidered as complete evidence, many objections, more than usually powerful, force themselves upon us. All nations, except the Jeivs, ivere once polytheists and ido¬ laters. If therefore his Lordship’s hypothesis be ad¬ mitted, P O L Y T | 'heisoi. mitted, either the doctrine of polytheism must be true I •—v""—^ theology, or this instinct or sense is of such a nature as to have at different periods of the world misled all man¬ kind. All savage tribes are at present polytheists and idolaters 5 but among savages every instinct appears in greater purity and vigour than among people polished by arts and sciences ; and instinct never mistakes its ob¬ ject. The instinct or primary impression of nature, which gives rise to self-love, affection between the sexes, love of progeny, &c. has in all nations, and in every pe¬ riod of time, a precise and determinate object which it inflexibly pursues. How then comes it to pass, that this particular instinct, which if real is surely of as much im¬ portance as any other, should have uniformly led those who had no other guide to pursue improper objects, to fall into the grossest errors and the most pernicious practices? To no purpose are we told, that the sense of Deity, like the moral sense, makes no capital figure among savages. There is reason to believe that the feeling or perception, which is called the moral sense, is not wholly instinctive 5 but whether it be or not, a single instance cannot be produced in which it multiplies its objects, or makes even a savage express gratitude to a thousand persons for benefits which his prince alone had power to confer. For these, and other reasons which might easily be assigned, we cannot help thinking, that the first religi¬ ous principles must have been derived from a source dif¬ ferent as well from internal sense as from the deductions of reason j from a source which the majority of man¬ kind had early forgotten : and which, when it was ba¬ nished from their minds, left nothing behind it to pre¬ vent the very first principle of religion from being per¬ verted by various accidents or causes, or, in some extra¬ ordinary concurrence of circumstances, from being per¬ haps entirely obliterated. This source of religion every consistent theist must believe to be revelation. Reason, it is acknowledged, and we shall afterwards show (see Religion), could not have introduced savages to the knowledge of God 5 and we have just seen, that a sense of Deity is an hypothesis clogged with insuperable dif¬ ficulties. Yet it is undeniable, that all mankind have believed in superior invisible powers : and if reason and instinct he set aside, there remains no other origin of this universal belief than primeval revelation, corrupted, indeed, as it passed by oral tradition from father to son, in the course of many generations. It is no slight sup- -ifs o/P°rt to t^s ^octrine» that if there really be a Deity*, ofti highly presumable that he would reveal himself to M1 the first men—creatures whom he had formed with fa¬ culties to adore and to worship him. To other ani¬ mals, the knowledge of a Deity is of no importance ; to man, it is of the first importance. Were we totally ignorant of a Deity, this world would appear to us a mere chaos. Under the government of a wise and be¬ nevolent Deity, chance is excluded j and every event appears to be the result of established laws. Good men submit to whatever happens without repining, knowing that every event is ordered by Divine Providence : they submit with entire resignation j and such resignation is a sovereign balsam for every misfortune or evil in life. Admitting, then, that the knowledge of Deity was ^]] Pul'e originally derived from revelation, and that the first men professed pure theism, it shall be our business in the j 3 t< tvcla- tiu di H E I S M. 133 present article to trace the rise and progress of polytheism^ Theism, and idolatry ; and to ascertain, if we can, the real opi- nions of the Pagan world concerning that multitude of gods with which they filled heaven, earth, and hell. In this inquiry, though we shall have occasion to appeal to the writings of Moses, we shall attribute to them no other authority than what is due to records of the ear¬ liest ages, more ancient and authentic than any others which are now extant. Whether we believe, with the author of the book of Genesis, that all men have descended from the same progenitors; or adopt the hypothesis of modern theo¬ rists, that there have been successive creations of men, and that the European derives his origin from one pair, the Asiatic from another, the woolly-headed African from a third, and the copper-coloured American from a fourth—polytheism and idolatry will be seen to have arisen from the same causes, and to have advanced near¬ ly in the same order from one degree of impiety to an¬ other. On either supposition, it must be taken for grant¬ ed, that the original progenitors were instructed by their Creator in the truths of genuine theism : and there is no room to doubt, but that those truths, simple and sublime as they are, would be conveyed pure from fa¬ ther to son as long as the race lived in one family, and were not spread over a large extent of country. If any credit be due to the records of antiquity, the primeval inhabitants of this globe lived to so great an age, that they must have increased to a very large number long before the death of the common parent, who would of course be the bond of union to the whole society, and whose dictates, especially in what related to the origin of his being and the existence of his Creator, would be listened to with the utmost respect by every individual of his numerous progeny. Many causes, however, would conspire to dissolve this family, after the death of its ancestor, into separate and independent tribes, of which some would be driven by violence, or would voluntarily wander, to a distance from the rest. From this dispersion great changes would take place in the opinions of some of the tribes respect¬ ing the object of their religious •worship. A single fa¬ mily, or a small tribe banished into a desert wilderness (such as the whole earth must then have been), would find employment for all their time in providing the means of subsistence, and in defending themselves from beasts of prey. In such circumstances they would have Circiim- little/mw/v? for meditation, and being constantly con-stances versant with objects of sense, they would gradually losewl“c!1 le hut with what particular rites he H E I S M. was worshipped, or where he was supposed to reside, iSMagiani,, not so evident. Certain it is, that the worshippers heldv v— him in destestation; and when they had occasion to write his name, they always inverted it {uviuvJi[y), to denote the malignity of his nature. . The principles of the Magi, though widely distant from pure theism, were much less absurd than those ot other idolaters. It does not appear that they ever worshipped their gods by the medium of graven ima¬ ges or bad any other emblems ol them than light and darkness. Indeed we are told by Diogenes Laertius and Clemens Alexamlrinus, that they condemned all statues and images, allowing fire and water to be the only proper emblems or representatives of their gods. And we learn from Cicero*, that at their instigation* De Xerxes was said to have burnt all the temples of Greece, bm,hl because the builders of those edifices impiously presuA med to inclose within walls the gods, to whom all things ought to be open and free, and whose proper temple is the whole world. To these authorities we may add that of all the historians, who agree, that when magi- anism was the religion of the court, the Persian ,110- narchs made war upon images, and upon eveiy emblem of idolatrv different from their own. The Magi, however, were but one sect, and not the largest sect of ancient idolaters. The worship of the sun, as the source of light and heat, soon introduced into the calendar of divinitifes the other heavenly bodies the moon, the planets, and the fixed stars. Men could J not but experience great benefit from those luminaries SaH in the absence of their chief god ; and when they hadl ) I proceeded so far as to admit two divine principles a good and an evil, it was natural for minds clouded with such prejudices to consider the moon and the stars as benevolent intelligences, sent to oppose the power ol darkness whilst their first and greatest divinity was ab¬ sent or asleep. It was thus, as they imagined that he maintained (for all held that he did maintain) a con¬ stant superiority over the evil principle. 1 hough 0 astronomers the moon is known to be an opaque body of very small dimensions when compared with a planet or a fixed star, to the vulgar eye she appears much more magnificent than either. By those early idola¬ ters she was considered as the divinity second m rank and in power ; and whilst the sun was worshipped as the king, she was adored as the queen, of heaven. The earth, considered as the common mother of all things ; the ocean, whose waters are never at rest; the air the region of storms and tempests, and indeed a the elements-were gradually added to the number of divinities ; not that mankind in this early age had so far degenerated from the principles of their ancestors as to worship brute matter. If such worship was ever practised, which to us is hardly conceivable, it was at a later period, when it was confined to the very lowest of the vulgar, in nations otherwise highly civilized. The polytheists, of whom we now treat, conceived every thing in motion to be animated, and animated by an intelligence powerful in proportion to the mag¬ nitude of the body moved. t This sect of idolaters, which remains in some parts ot the east to this day, was known by the name oi Sabi- ans, which they pretended to have derived from babius a son of Seth ; and among the books in which their sa¬ cred doctrines are contained, they have one which t ey call Sabiisu: tf Dent- 9' ii ilrose in 'haldea. P O L Y T call the book of Sct/i. We need hardly observe that — these are senseless and extravagant fables. The name Sc/bian is undoubtedly derived from the Hebrew word Tsuba, which signifies “ an host or armyand this class of polytheists was so called, because they worshipped the host of heaven the 1'saba hesennm, against iv* which Moses so pathetically cautions the people of Is¬ rael *. The species of idolatry is thought to have first pre¬ vailed in Chaldea, and to have been that from which Abraham separated himself, when, at the command of the true God, he “ departed from his country, and from his kindred, and from his father’s house.” But as it nowhere appears that the Chaldeans had fallen into the savage state before they became polytheists and ido^ laters, and as it is certain that they were not savages at the call of Abraham, their early Sabiism may be thought inconsistent "with the account which we have given of the origin of that species of idolatry. If a great and civilized nation was led to worship the host of heaven, why should that worship be supposed to have arisen among savages ? Theories, however plausible, cannot be admitted in opposition to facts. Irue : but we beg leave to reply, that our account of the origin of polytheism is opposed bv no fact 5 be¬ cause we have not supposed that the worship of the host of heaven arose among savages only. That savages, be¬ tween whom it is impossible to imagine any intercourse to have had place, have universally worshipped, as their first and supreme divinities, the sun, moon, and stars, is a fact evinced by every historian and bv every travel¬ ler j and we have shown how their rude and uncultivat¬ ed state naturally leads them to that species of idolatry. But there may have been circumstances peculiar to the Chaldeans, which led them likewise to the worship of the heavenly host, even in a state of high civilization.— We judge of the philosophy of the ancients by that of ourselves, and imagine that the same refined system of metaphysics was cultivated by them as by the follow¬ ers of Descartes and Locke. But this is a great mistake ; for so gross were the notions of early antiquity, that it may be doubted whether there was a single man, unin¬ spired, who had any notion of mind as a being distinct and entirely separated from matter (see Metaphysics, Part III chap. iv.). From several passages in the books of Moses, we learn, that when in the first ages of the world the Supreme Being, condescended to manifest his presence to men, he generally exhibited some sensible emblem of his power and glory, and declared his will from the midst of a preternatural Jire. It was thus that he appeared to the Jewish lawgiver himself, when he spoke to him from the midst of a bush ; it was by a pil¬ lar of cloud and Jire that he led the Israelites from Egypt to the Land of Promise 5 and it was in the midst of smoke, wnAJire, and thunderings, that the law was delivered from Mount Sinai.—That such manifestations of the Divine Presence would be occasionally made to the descendants of Noah who settled in Chaldea soon af¬ ter the deluge, must appear extremely probable to every one who admits the authority of the Hebrew Scriptures j and he who questions that authority, has no right to make the objection to which we now reply ; because it is only from the book of Genesis that we know the Chaldeans to have been a civilized people when they fell into idolatry. All histories agree in representing the in- Vol. XVII. Part I. f H E I S M. habitants of Chaldea as at a very early period corrupted by luxury and sunk in vice. When this happened, we must suppose that the moral Governor of the universe would withdraw from them those occasional manifesta¬ tions of himself, and leave them to their own inventions. In such circumstances, it was not unnatural fora people addicted to the study of astronomy, who had been taught to believe that the Deity frequently appeared to their ancestors in a flame of fire, to consider the sun as the place of his permanent residence, if not as his body. But when either opinion was firmly established, polv- • theism would be its inevitable consequence, and the pro- giess of Sabiism would, in the most polished nation, be such as we have traced it among savage tribes. Irom Chaldea the idolatrous worship of the host of heaven spread itself over all the east, passed into Egypt, and thence into Greece ; for Plato affirms f, that “ thl\lnCratvh first inhabitants of Greece seemed to him to have wor- 12 shipped no other gods but the sun, moon, earth, stars, (>assed into and heavens, as most barbarous nations (continues he) still do. ’ I hat Sabiism, or the worship of the host of heaven, was the first species of idolatry, besides the pro¬ bability of the thing, and the many allusions to it in sa¬ cred Scripture, we have the positive evidence of the most ancient pagan historians of whose writings any part has been transmitted to us. Herodotus *, speaking * Lib. i. of the religion of the Persians, says, that “ they worship caP- 1V‘ the sun, moon, and earth, Jire, water, and the winds; and this adoration they have all along paid from the beginning.” He testifies the same thing of the savage Africans, of whom he affirms f, that they all worship-1 Lib- ir- ped the sun and moon, and no other divinity. Diodo-cai>‘ lSS' rus Siculus, writing of the Egyptians J, tells us, thatfLib.i. “ the first men looking up to the world above them, and terrified and struck with admiration at the nature of the universe, supposed the sun and moon to be the principal and eternal gods.” And Sanchoniathon the Phoenician, a more ancient writer than any of these, informs us’ in the fragment of his history preserved by Eusebius’ that “ the two first mortals were i£on and Protogonus; and their children were Genus and Genea, who inha¬ bited 1 hoenicia ; and when they were scorched with the heat, they lifted up their bands to the sun, whom they believed to be the Lord of Heaven, and called him Baal-samen, the same whom the Greeks call Ztvi” Hitherto those divinities were worshipped in person, or, as Dr Prideaux expresses it, in their sacclla, or sa- cied tabernacles; for the votaries of each directed their devotions towards the planet which they supposed to be animated by the particular intelligence whom they meant to adore. But these orbs, by their rising and setting, being as much below the horizon as above it, and their grossly ignorant worshippers not supposing it possible that any intelligence, however divine, could j, exert its influence but in union with some body, statues and pnafit- or pillars were soon thought of as proper emblems of thecet* statue absent gods. Sanchoni^thon, in the fragment already vrors^1l>‘ quoted, informs us, that “ Hyspouranios and his brother Ousous, Phoenician patriarchs, erected two pillars, the one to Jire and the other to air or wind, and worshipped those pillars, pouring out to them libations of the blood of tbe wild beasts hunted down in the chace.” As these early monuments of idolatry were called /3xI\vXm, a word evidently derived from the Hebrew Bethel, the $ probability 8 p O L Y T f B-oliaUlity is, that they were altars of loose stones, such w X- ai that which was built by Jacob *, and iron! hint re- ceived the same name. As his was consecrated to the * GJtvsis, true Ood, theirs were consecrated to the host ol nea- ch. xxxv. ven . and tl)e fornl of consecration seems to have been nothing more than the anointing of the stone or pillar with oil (a), in the name of the divinity whom it wa intended to represent. When this ceremony was per¬ formed, the ignorant idolaters, who fancied that their gods could not hear them but when they were visible, supposed that the intelligences by which the sun and planets were animated, took possession, in some inexpli¬ cable manner, of the consecrated pillars, and were as well pleased with the prayers and praises offered up be¬ fore those pillars, as with the devotions which were ad¬ dressed towards the luminaries themselves.—lieneeban- choniathon calls them animated or living stones hdovs ilChWovs, from the portion of the Divine .pint which was believed to reside in them 5 and as they were dedi¬ cated to the host of heaven, they were generally erected on the tops of mountains ; or in countries which, i^e Egypt, were low and level, they were elevated to a 14 great height by the labour ot men. > „ . . with the It has been supposed, that this practice 01 raising ic idolatry of on /„>/, places proceeded from a desire to make high places. H ob. c(.g of ^31^ conspicuous and magnificent: but we are strongly inclined to believe, that the erectors o /Ba/W had something farther in view, and that they thought of nothing less than to bring the sacred stone or pillar as near as possible to the god whom it represented. Whatever be in this, we know that the practice itself prevailed universally through the east; and that there was nothing which the Jewish legislator more strictly enioined his people to destroy, than the altars, statues, and pillars, erected for idolatrous worship upon moun- tains and high places. “ Ye shall utterly destroy (says lie) all the places wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, yyyontixz high mountains, upon the hills, and under every green tree. And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break-down their pil- + Deut.\u.lars, and burn their groves with fire r. 23 The mention of groves by the Hebrew lawgiver, brings to our recollection another species ot idolatry, which was perhaps the second in order, as men devia¬ ting from the principles of pure theism were more and more entangled in the labyrinths of error. I he Chal¬ deans, Egyptians, and all the eastern nations who be¬ lieved in a superintending providence, imagined that the government of this world, the care of particular na¬ tions, and even the superintendence of groves, rivers, and mountains, in each nation, was committed by the gods to a class of spirits superior to the soul of man, but inferior to those heavenly intelligences which animated the sun, the moon, and the planets. These spirits were by the Greeks called elxipovn, deemons, and by the lio- mans genii. Tim sens the Locrian, who flourished before i De Anima Plato, speaking of the punishment of wicked men, saysj, Mundi, in- ^ these things hath Nemesis decreed to. be executed ter script, the seconJ period, by the ministry of vindictive ter- Simsle restrial demons, who are overseers of human affairs j to H E I S M, which daemons the Supreme God, the ruler over all, Banrcm hath committed the government and administration of * this world, which is made up of gods, men, and am- ^Concerning the origin of these intermediate beings, Origin of scholars ami philosophers have framed various hypothe- ses. The belief of their existence may have been de¬ rived from five different sources. 1 It seems to have been impossible for the limited capacities of those men, who could not form a notion ot a God divested of a body and a place, to conceive how the influence and agency of such a being could every instant extend to every point of the universe. Hence, as we have seen, they placed the heavenly regions un¬ der the government of a multitude of heavenly gods the mj7, the moon, and the stars. But as the nearest of those divinities was at an immense distance from the eait 1, and as the intelligence animating the earth itself had sufficient employment in regulating the general affairs of the whole globe, a notion insinuated itself into, the untutored mind, that these superior governors 0 univer¬ sal nature found it necessary, or at least expedient, to employ subordinate intelligences or deemons as ministers to execute their behests in the various parts of their widely extended dominions. 2. Such an universal and uninterrupted course of ac¬ tion, as was deemed necessary to administer the affairs of the universe, would be judged altogether inconsistent with that state of indolence, which, especially.in the east, was held an indispensable ingredient in periect felicity. It was this notion, absurd as it is, which made Epicu¬ rus deny the providence, whilst he admitted the existence, of gods. And if it had such an effect upon a philoso¬ pher who in the most enlightened ages had many fol¬ lowers, we need not surely wonder if it made untaught idolaters imagine that the governor or governors of the universe had devolved a great part of their trouble on deputies and ministers. , 3. When men came to reflect on the infinite distance between themselves and the gods, they would naturally form a wish, that there might somewhere exist a class of intermediate intelligences, whom they might employ as mediators and intercessors with their far distant divi¬ nities. But what men earnestly wish, they very readily believe. Hence the supposed distance of their gods, would, among untutored barbarians, prove a fruitful source of intermediate intelligences, more pure and more elevated than human souls. 4. These three opinions may he denominated popu¬ lar } but that which we are now to state, wherever it may have prevailed, was the offspring of philosophy.— On this earth we perceive a scale of beings rising gradu¬ ally above each other in perfection, from mere brute matter through the various species of fossils, vegetables, insects, fishes, birds, and beasts, up to man. But the distance between man and God is infinite, and capable of admitting numberless orders of intelligences, all supe¬ rior to the human soul, and each rising gradually above the other till they reach that point, wherever it may be, at which creation stops. Part ot this immense (A) stone ; Hence the proverb of a superstitious man, which Arnobius calls lubricatam lapidem, notvlct XiSov XiTTce^av Tr^etrxvnt, he kisses or adores every anointed ct ex olivi unguine sordidatum.—Stillingfleet’s Ongines Sacree, P O L Y T tenons Timaus, t mio- m chasm the philosophers perceived to be actually filled by J the heavenly bodies ; for in philosophical polytheism there was one invisible God supreme over all these: but still there was left an immense vacuity between the hu¬ man species and the moon, which was known to be the lowest ol the heavenly host: and this they imagined must certainly be occupied by invisible inhabitants of different orders and dispositions, which they called good and evil dcemons. 5. There is yet another source from which the uni¬ versal belief of good and evil daemons may be derived, with perhaps greater probability than from any or all of these. If the Mosaic account of the creation of the world, the peopling of the earth, and the dispersion of mankind, be admitted as true (and a more consistent ac¬ count has not as yet been given or devised), some know¬ ledge of good and evil angels must necessarily have been transmitted from father to son by the channel of oral tradition. This tradition would be corrupted at the same time, and in the same manner, with others of greater importance. When the true God was so far mistaken as to be considered, not as the sole governor of the universe, but only as the self-extant power of light and good, the Devil would be elevated from the rank of a rebellious created spirit to that of the inde¬ pendent power of darkness and evil ; the angels of light would be transformed into good daemons, and those of darkness into daemons that are evil. This ac¬ count ol the origin of daemonology receives no small support from Tlato, who derives one branch of it whol¬ ly from tradition. “ W ith respect to those daemons (says he *) who inhabit the space between the earth and the moon, to understand and declare their generation is a task too arduous for my slender abilities. In this case we must credit the report of men of other times, who, according to their own account, were the descendants oi the gods, and had, by some means or other, gained exact intelligence of that mystery from their ancestors. We must not question the veracity of the children of the gods, even though they should transgress the bounds of probability, and produce no evidence to support their assertions. We must, I say, notwithstanding, give them credit, because they profess to give a detail of facts with which they are intimately acquainted, and the laws of our country oblige us to believe them.” Though these daemons were generally invisible, they were not supposed to be pure disembodied spirits. Proclus, in his Commentary upon Plato’s Timseus, tells us, that “ every daemon superior to human souls con¬ sisted of an intellectual mind and an ethereal vehicle.” Indeed it is very little probable, that those who gave a body and a place to the Supreme God, should have thought that the inferior orders of his ministers were spirits entirely separated from matter. Plato himself di¬ vides the class of daemons into three orders-f-; and whilst he hoids their souls to be particles or emanations from the divine essence, he affirms that the bodies of each or¬ der of daemons are composed of that particular element in which they for the most part reside. “ Those of the first and highest order are composed of pure ether; those of the second order consist of grosser air ; and daemons of the third or lowest rank have vehicles extracted from the element of water. Daemons of the first and second orders are invisible to mankind. The aquatic daemons, being invested with vehicles of grosser materials, are H E I S M. sometimes visible and sometimes invisible. When they do appear, though faintly observable by the human eye, they strike the beholder with terror and astonishment.1* Daemons of this last order were supposed to have pas¬ sions and affections similar to those of men ; and though all nature was full of them, they were believed to have local attachments to mountains, vivcvs^ and groves^ where their appearances Avere most frequent. The rea¬ son 01 these attachments seems to be obvious. Poly¬ theism took its rise in countries scorched by a burn¬ ing^ sun ; and daemons by their composition being neces-jn proves sanly subject in some degree to the influence of heatandonthe and cold, it Avas natural to suppose that they, like men banks of wouhl delight in the shady grove and in the purling,ivers' stream. Hence the earliest altars of paganism Avere ge¬ nerally built in the midst oi groves, or on the banks of rivers ; because it was believed that in such places were assembled multitudes of those intelligences, Avhose office it Avas to regulate the affairs of men, and to carry the prayers and oblations of the devout to the far distant re¬ sidence of the celestial gods. Plence too are to be de¬ rived the mountain and river gods, Avith the dryads and hamadryads, the satyrs, nymphs, and fauns, which held a place m the creed of ancient paganism, and make so conspicuous a figure in the Greek and Roman poets. These different orders of intelligences, which, though worshipped as gods or demigods, Avere yet believed "to partake of human passions and appetites, led the Avay to the deification of departed heroes and other eminent benefactors of tl,e human race. By the philosophers Dein/ation . 30ul^ were believed to be emanations from the divi-of departed mty ; but “ gratitude f and admiration, the warmest ^eroes) and most active affections of our nature, concurred to ^ JVarblP’- enlarge the object of religious worship, and to make man^” * Dw' regard the inventors of arts and the founders of society ^ as having in them more than a common ray of the di¬ vinity. So that god-like benefits, bespeaking as it were a god-like mind, the deceased parent of a people Avas ea¬ sily advanced into the rank of adtemon. When the re¬ ligious bias was in so good a train, natural affection Avould have its share in promoting this new mode of ado¬ ration. Piety to parents Avould naturally take the lead, as it was supported by gratitude and admiration, the pritnum mobile of the whole system : and in those early ages, the natural father of the tribe often hap¬ pened to be the political father of the people, and the founder of the state. F ondness for the offspring Avould next have its turn ; and a disconsolate father, at the head of a people, would contrive to soothe his grief for the untimely death of a favourite child, and to gratify iiis pride under the Avant of succession, by paying divine honours to its memory.” “ For a father J afflicted with + Wisdomof untimeJy mourning, when he had made an image of his Sol/mion, child soon taken aivay, hoav honoured him as a god, x*v* I5- who Avas then a dead man, and delivered to those that were under him ceremonies and sacrifices.” That this was the origin and progress of the worship of departed souls, avc have the authority of the famous fragment of Sanchoniathon already quoted, where the various mo¬ tives for this species of idolatry are recounted in express words. “ After many generations (says he) came Chry. sor; and he invented many things useful to civil life fer Avliich, after his decease, he was Avorshipped as a god. Then flourished Ourunos and his sister Ge, who deified and offered sacrifices to their father Hypsistos, S 2 when 14© Hero- Worship. iS a political i ivention, which in¬ troduced P O L Y T when lie had been torn in pieces by wild beasts. Af¬ terwards Cronos consecrated Muth bis son, and was him¬ self consecrated by his subjects.” In the reign of Cronos flourished a personage ot great reputation for wisdom, who by the Egyptians was call¬ ed Tholh, by the Phoenicians Taautos, and by the Greeks Hermes. According to Plutarch, he was a profound politician, and chief counsellor to Osiris, then the king, and afterwards the principal divinity, ot Egypt: and we are told by Philo Byblius, the transla¬ tor of Sanchoniathon, “ that it was this Thoth or Her¬ mes who first took the matters of religious worship out of the hands of unskilful men, and brought them into due method and order.” His object was to make reli¬ gion serviceable to the interests of the state. With this view he appointed Osiris and other departed princes to be joined with the stars and worshipped as gods; and heino- by Cronos made king of Egypt, he was, after his death, worshipped himself as a god by the Egyptians. To this honour, if what is recorded of him he true, he had indeed a better title than most princes *, for he is said to have been the inventor of letters, arithmetic, •■•eometry, astronomy, and hieroglyphics, and was there¬ fore one of the greatest benefactors of the human race which any age or country has ever produced. _ That the gods of Greece and Rome were derived from Egypt and Phoenicia, is so universally known, that it is needless to multiply quotations in order to prove that the progress of polytheism among the Greeks and Ro¬ mans was the same with that which we have traced m more ancient nations. The following translation, how¬ ever, of the account given by Hesiod of the deification of departed heroes, with which we have been favoured by a learned and ingenious friend, is so just, and in our opinion so beautiful, that we cannot deny ourselves the pleasure of giving it to our readers. “ The gods who dwell on high Olympus’ hill, First fram’d a golden race of men, who liv’d Under old Saturn’s calm auspicious sway. Like gods they liv’d, their hearts devoid of care, Beyond the reach of pain and piercing woes ; Th’ infirmities of age nor felt, nor fear’d. Their nerves with youthful vigour strung, their days In jocund mirth they past, remote from ills. Now when this godlike race was lodg’d in earth, By Jove’s high will to demi-gods they rose, And airy daemons, who benign on earth Converse—the guides and guardians of mankind. In darkness veil’d, they range earth’s utmost bound, Dispensing wealth to mortals. This reward ^ 1 xu, From bounteous Jove awaits illustrious deeds J.” libi. vers. The deification of departed heroes and statesmen was 10®, &lc. tjiat in all probability introduced the universal ■191 belief of national and tutelar gods, as well as the practice and tutelar of worshipping those gods through the medium ol statues gods. cut into a human figure. W hen the founder of a state or any other public benefactor was elevated to the rank of a god, as he was believed still to retain human pas- sions and affections, it was extremely natural to suppose that he would regard with a favourable eye that nation for which he had done so much upon earth 5 that he would oppose its enemies, and protect the laws and in¬ stitutions which he himself had given it. By indul- H E I S M. cing the same train of sentiment, each city, and even Hero- every family of consequence, found Lares and Penates among their departed ancestors, to whom they paid the warmest adoration, and under whose protection they believed their private afthirs to be placed. A.s those national and household gods were believed to he in their deified state clothed with airy bodies, so those bodies were supposed to retain the form which their grosser bodies had upon earth. The image of a departed Iriend might perhaps be formed by the hand of sorrowful af¬ fection, before the statue or the shrine of a deity was thought of > but when that friend or benefactor became the object of religious adorations, it was natural for his votaries to enliven their devotion by a view ot his si- niuitude. Maximus Tyrius tells us ||, that “ there is no W^rt. ,ace of men, whether barbarian or Grecian, living on the sea-coast or on the continent, wandering in deserts or living in cities, which hath not consecrated some kind of symbol or other in honour of the gods.” This is certainly true; but there is no good evidence that the first symbols of the gods were statues of men and women. Whilst the sun and other heavenly bodies con¬ tinued to be the sole objects of religious worship, the symbols consecrated to them were pillars ol a conical or pyramidal figure *, and if such pillars are ever called graven images by Moses and other ancient writers, it was probably on' account of the allegoric figures and characters, or hieroglyphic writing, with which they were inscribed. , p j j Hitherto we have considered the souls ot departed heroes as holding the rank only of dgemons or demigods *, 20 but they generally rose in the scale of divinities, till ^ ® rn_ they dethroned the heavenly bodies, and became them- gra^€(j 0[ selves the diimajorumgentium. This revolution was ef- tjlc plane fected by the combined operation of the prince and the tary, priest; and the first step taken towards it seems to have been the complimenting of their heroes and public be¬ nefactors with the name of that being which was most esteemed and worshipped. “ Thus a king for his be¬ neficence was called the sun, and a queen lor her beau¬ ty the moon. Diodorus relates, that Sol first reigned in Egypt, called so from the luminary of that name 111 the heavens. This will help us to understand an odd passage in the fragment of Sanchoniathon, where it is said that Cronus had seven sons by Rhea, the youngest of whom was a god as soon as born. The meaning pro¬ bably is, that this youngest son was called after some luminary in the heavens to which they paid divine ho¬ nours •, and these honours came in process of time to be transferred to the terrestrial namesake. 'I he same his¬ torian had before told us, that the sons of Genos, mortals like their father, were called by the names of the ele¬ ments—a\u\ fiame, of which they had disco¬ vered the use.” “ As this adulation advanced into an established wor¬ ship, they turned the compliment the other wray, and called the planet or luminary after the hero, the better to accustom the people, even in the act of Planet-wor- ;r ship, to this new adoration. Diodorus, in the passage tjme it s already quoted, having told us, that by the first inha-planted bitants of Egypt the sun and moon were supposed to be the principal and eternal gods, adds, that the former was called Osiris, and the latter Isis. This was in¬ deed the general practice 5 for we learn from Macro- bins, that the Ammonites called the sun Moloch; the Syrians P O L Y T Hero Syrians Adad; tlie Arabs Dionysus; the Assyrians Be- Worsbij). lus; the Phoenicians Saturn; the Carthaginians Her- rules; ami the Palmyrians .E/ega&o/ws. Again, by the Phrygians the moon was called Cybele, or the mother of the gods ; by the Athenians Minerva; by the Cy¬ prians Venus; by the Cretans Diana; by the Sicilians Proserpine; by others Hecate, Bellona, Vesta, Urania, Lucina, &c. Philo Byblius explains this practice: “ It is remarkable (says he) that the ancient idolaters im¬ posed on the elements, and on those parts of nature which they esteemed gods, the names of their kings ; for the natural gods which they acknowledged were only the sun, moon, planets, elements, and the like ; they being now in the humour of having gods of both classes, the mortal and the immortal.'''1 “ As a farther proof that Aero-worship was thus su¬ perinduced upon the planetary, it is worthy of observa¬ tion, that the first statues consecrated to the greater hero-gods—those who were supposed to be supreme— were not of a human form, but conical ox pyramidal, like those which in the earliest ages of idolatry were dedicated to the sun and planets. Thus the scholiast on the Vespoe of Aristophanes tells us, that the statues of Apollo and Bacchus w'ere co7iic pillars or obelisks ; and Pausanias, that the statue of Jupiter Meilichius re¬ presented & pyramid; that of the Argive Juno did the same, as appears from a verse of Phoronis quoted by Strom.Li. Clemens Alexandrinus* j and indeed the practice was universalas well amongst theearly barbarians as amongst the Greeks. But it is well known that the ancients represented the rays of light by pillars of a conical or pyramidal form ; and therefore it follows, that when they erected such pillars as representatives of their hero- gods, these latter had succeeded to the titles, rights, and Warhur- honours of the natural and celestial divinities ns Div. But though it seems to be certain that Aero-worship was t*,us engrafted on the planetary, and that some of those heroes in process of time supplanted the planets themselves, this was such a revolution in theology as 22 could not have been suddenly effected by the united in- brevohf ^UenCe ^ Pr‘nce ant^ ^ie Priest' We doubt not jniatheo-^16 ^iat S0L was f)e^eved t° have reigned in Egypt, )ry. and was afterwards worshipped under the name Osiris; but it was surely impossible to persuade any nation, however stupid or prone to idolatry, that a man, whom they remembered discharging the duties of their sovereign and legislator, was the identical sun whom they beheld in the heavens. Osiris, if there was in Egypt a king of that name, may have been deified immediately after his death, and honoured with that worship which was paid to good daemons ; but he must have been dead for ages before any attempt was made to persuade the na¬ tion that he w7as the supreme God. Even then great address would be requisite to make such an attempt suc¬ cessful. The prince or priest who entered upon it would probably begin with declaring from the oracle, that the divine intelligence which animates and governs the sun had descended to earth and animated the person of their renowned legislator j and that, after their laws were framed, and the other purposes served for which the descent was made, the same intelligence had re¬ turned to its original residence and employment among the celestials. The possibility of this double transmi¬ gration from heaven to earth and from earth to heaven, would without difficulty be admitted in an age when H E I S M. the pre-existence of souls was the universal belief. Ha¬ ving proceeded thus far in the apotheosis of dead men, the next step taken in order to render it in some degree probable that the early founders of states, and inventors of arts, were divine intelligences clothed with human bodies, was to attribute to one such benefactor of man¬ kind the actions of many of the same name. Vossius, who empl 7yed vast erudition and much time on the sub¬ ject, has proved, that before the mra of the Trojan wars most kings who were very powerful, or highly re¬ nowned for their skill in legislation, &c. were called Jove; and when the actions of all these were attributed to one Jove of Crete, it would be easy for the crafty priest, supported by all the power and influence of the state, to persuade an ignorant and barbarous people, that he whose wisdom and heroic exploits so far surpassed those of ordinary men must have been the supreme God in human form. 141 Hero- Worship. This short sketch of the progress of polytheism and Vices ofthe idolatry will enable the reader to account for many cir-PaSang°d^ cumstances recorded of the pagan gods of antiquity, which at first view seem very surprising, and which at last brought the whole system into contempt among the philosophers of Athens and Rome. The circumstances to which we allude are the immoral characters of those divinities, and the abominable rites with which they were worshipped. Jupiter, Apollo, Mars, and the whole rabble of them, are described by the poets as ra- vishers of women and notorious adulterers. Hermes or Mercury wTas a thief, and the god of thieves. Venus was a prostitute, and Bacchus a drunkard. The malice and revenge of Juno were implacable; and so little re gard was any of them supposed to pay to the laws of honour and rectitude, that it was a common practice of the Romans, when besieging a town, to evocate the tutelar deity, and to tempt him by a reward to betray bis friends and votaries $. In a word, they were, in it t the language of the poet, ' lib.‘v.c.2r. “ Cods partial, changeful, passionate, unjust, Sat^r.^05' “ Whose attributes were rage, revenge, and lust.” lib. iii. c. 9. . This was the natural consequence of their origin. Ha-Accounted ving once animated human bodies, and beingYipposed fw. still to retain human passions and appetites, they were believed, in their state of deification, to feel the same sensual desires which they had felt upon earth, and to pursue the same means for their gratification. As the men could not well attempt to surpass the gods in purity and virtue, they were easily persuaded by art¬ ful and profligate priests, that the most acceptable wor¬ ship which could be rendered to any particular deity was to imitate the example of that deity, and to indulge in the practices over which he presided. Hence the worship of Bacchus was performed during the night by men and women mixing in the dark after intemperate eating and drinking. Hence too it was the practice in Cyprus and some other countries to sacrifice to Ve¬ nus. the virginity of young women some days before their marriage, in order, as it was pretended, to secure their chastity ever afterwards; and, if Herodotus may be credited, every woman among the Babylonians was’ob¬ liged once in her life to prostitute herself in the temple of the goddess Mylitte (Venus), that she might thence forward be proof against all temptation. The progress of polytheism, as far as we have traced it, - 142 POLYTHEISM. Hero- Worship. Progress of idolatry re¬ gular and universal. f Asiatic Researches 26 Indian ido latry. it, has been regular-, and after tlie enormous error of forsaking the Worship of the true God was ajnntte ^ every subsequent step appears to be naturah It would be no difficult task to prove that t has hkew.se been universal. Sir William Jones, the learned president ot the Asiatic Society, has discovered such a striking re¬ semblance between the gods ot Ancient Greece am these of the pagans of Hindostanf, as puts it beyom doubt that those divinities had the same origin. 1 ie Ganesa of the Hindoos he has clearly proved to be the Janus of the Greeks and Romans. As the latter was represented with two and sometimes with four faces, as emblems of prudence and circumspection, the former is painted with an elephant’s head, the well-known sym¬ bol among the Indians of sagacious discernment. 1 he Saturn of Greece and Rome appears to have been the same personage with the Menu or Satyavrata of Hindostan, whose patronymic name is V aivaswata, or child of the snn ; which sufficiently marks Ins origin. Among the Romans there were many Jupiter?, of whom one appears from Ennius to have been nothing more than the firmament personified Aspice hoc sublime candens, quern invocant omnes JOVEM. * Plate ccccxxxv. '27 Scandina¬ vian and Saxon ido¬ latry. f Plate ccccxxxv But this Jupiter had the same attributes with the Indian god of the visible heavens called Indra or the king, and Divespetir or the lord of the sky, whose consort is Sachi, and whose weapon is vajra or the thunderbolt. Indra is the regent of winds and showers j and though the east is peculiarly under his care, yet his Olympus is the north-pole, allegorically represented as a mountain of gold and gems. With all Ins power he is considered as a subordinate deity, and far inferior to the Indian triad Brahma, Vishnou, and Mahadeva or Siva , who are three forms of one and the same godhead. The president having traced the resemblance between the idolatry of Rome and India through many other gods, observes, that “ we must not be surprised at hnd- ino- on a close examination, that the characters of all the pagan deities melt into each other, and at last into one or two *, for it seems a well-founded opinion, that the whole crowd of gods and goddesses m ancient Rome, and likewise in Hindostan, mean only the powers of na¬ ture, and principally those of the sun expressed m a va¬ riety of ways, and by a multitude of fanciful names. Nor is it only in Greece, Rome, Egypt, and India, that the progress of idolatry has been from planetary to hero-worship. From every account which modern tra¬ vellers have given us of the religion of savage nations, it appears that those nations adore, as their first and great¬ est gods, the sun, moon, and stars-, and that such of them as have any other divinities have proceeded in the same road with the celebrated nations of antiquity, from the worship of the heavenly bodies to that of celestial dae¬ mons, and from celestial daemons to the deification of dead men. It appears likewise that they universally believe their hero gods and demigods to retain the passions, appetites, and propensities of men. That the Scandinavians and our Saxon ancestors had the same notions of the gods with the other pagans whose opinions we have stated, is evident from their calling the days of the week by the names of their divi¬ nities, and from the forms of the statues by which those divinities were represented f. 1. The idol of the sun, from which Sunday is derived, among the Latins (lies Hero. Solis, was placed in a temple, and adored and sacrificed | Yt or?hip, to • for they believed that the sun did co-operate with v this idol. He was represented like a man half naked, with his face like the sun, holding a burning wheel with both hands on his breast, signifying his course round the world ; and by its fiery gleams the light and heat with which he warms and nourisheth all things. 2. The idol of the moon, from which cometh our mon- day, dies Luna, anciently Moonday, appears strangely singular, being habited in a short coat like a man. Hei holding a moon expresses what she is; but the reason of her short coat and long-eared cap is lost m oblivion.— 2. Tuisco, the most ancient and peculiar god of the Germans, represented in his garment of a skm according to their ancient manner of clothing, was next to the sun and moon, the idol of highest rank in the calendar of northern paganism. To him the third day in the week was dedicated-, and hence is derived the name Tuesday, anciently Tuisday, called in Latin dies Martis, though it must be confessed that Mars does not so much resemble this divinity as he does Odin or Woden. 4. Woden was a valiant prince among the Saxons. His image was prayed to for victory over their ene¬ mies ; which, if they obtained, they usually saenheed the prisoners taken in battle to him. Our Wednesday is derived from him, anciently Wodensday. The north¬ ern histories make him the father of Thor, and Inga to be his wife. , . Thor was placed in a large hall, sitting on a bed c. xrwr was m * 7 o canopied over, with a crown of gold on his head, and 12 stars over it, holding a sceptre in his right hand. To him was attributed the power over both heaven and earth -, and that as he was pleased or displeased he could send thunder, tempests, plagues, &c. or fair, seasonable weather, and cause fertility. From him our Thursday dz- rives its name, anciently Thors day; among the Romans dies Jovis, as this idol may be substituted for Jupiter. 6. Friga represented both sexes, holding a drawn sword in the right hand and a bow in the left} denoting that women as well as men should fight in time of need. She was generally taken for a goddess", and was repu- ted the giver of peace and plenty, and causer of lo^ and amity. Her day of worship was called by the Saxons Frigedeag, now Friday, dies Veneris; but the habit and weapons of this figure have a resemblance of Diana rather than Venus. . . 7. Seater, or Crodo, stood on the prickly back of a perch. He was thin-visaged and long-haired, with a long beard, bare-headed and bare-footed, carrying a pail of water in his right hand wherein are fruit and flowers, and holding up a wheel in his left, and his coat tied with a long girdle. His standing on the sharp fins of this fish signified to the Saxons, that by worshipping him they should pass through all dangers unhurt: by his o-irdie flying both ways was shown the Saxons free¬ dom0} and by the pail with fruit and flowers, was de¬ noted that he would nourish the earth. From him, or from the Roman deity Saturn, comes Saturday. Such were the principal gods of the northern nations: but these people had at the same time inferior deities, who were supposed to have been translated into heaven for their heroic deeds, and whose greatest happiness consisted in drinking' ale out of the skulls of their ene- mies in the hall of Woden. But the limits prescribed POLYTHEISM. Brute- to the present article do not permit us to pursue this Worship, subject 5 nor is it necessary that we should pursue it. * The attentive reader of the article Mythology, of the histories given in this work of the various divinities of paganism, and of the different nations by whom those divinities were worshipped, will perceive that the pro¬ gress of polytheism and idolatry has been uniform over the whole earth. There is, however, one species of idolatry more won- derful than any thing that has yet been mentioned, of i Brute wor- which our readers will certainly expect some account. It ^ is the worship of brutes, reptiles and vegetables, among ians the Egyptians. To the Greeks and liomans, as well as to us, that superstition appeared so monstrous, that to enumerate every hypothesis, ancient and modern, by which philosophers have endeavoured to account for it, would swell this article beyond all proportion. Brute- worship prevailed at so early a period in Egypt, that the philosophers of antiquity, whose writings have de¬ scended to us, had little or no advantage over the mo¬ derns in pursuing their researches into its origin ; and among the modern hypotheses those of Mosheim and JFirburton appear to us by much the most probable of any that we have seen (b). The former of these learned writers attributes it wholly to the policy of the prince and the craft of the priest. The latter contends, with much earnestness and ingenuity, that it resulted from the use of hieroglyphic writing. We are strongly in¬ clined to believe that both these causes contributed to the production of so portentous an effect; and that the use of hieroglyphics as sacred symbols, after they were laid aside in civil life, completed that wonderful super¬ stition which the craft of the priest and the policy of the prince had undoubtedly begun. Lib. ii. We learn from Herodotus *, that in his time the ! number of useful animals in Egypt was so small as troduced harc% to ^e sufficient for tillage and the other pur- tth a poli-Poses °f civil life j whilst serpents and other noxious :alview; animals, such as the crocodile, wolf, bear, and hippo¬ potamus, abounded in that country. From this fact ^0Si‘eim very naturally concludes +, that the founders L capiv society anti government in Egypt would by every Jl1 158, art endeavour to increase the number of useful animals as the number of inhabitants increased; and that with this view they would make it criminal to kill or even to hurt sheep, cows, oxen, or goats, &c. whilst they would wage perpetual war upon the noxious animals and beasts of prey. Such animals as were assisting to them in the carrying on of this warfare would be justly considered as in a high degree useful to society. Hence the most grievous punishments were decreed against the killing, or so much as the wounding, of the ichneumon and ibisi because the former was looked upon as the instinctive enemy of the crocodile, and the latter of every species of serpents. The learned writer, however, observes, that in Egypt as in other countries, people would be tempted to sacrifice thegood of the publicto the gratification of their own appetites, and sometimes even to the indulgence of a momentary caprice. He thinks it was found necessary to strengthen the authority of the laws enacted for the preservation of useful animals by the sanctions of reli¬ gion : and he says, that with this view the priests decla¬ red that certain animals were under the immediate pro¬ tection of certain gods ; that some of those animals had a divine virtue residing in them ; and that they could not be killed without the most sacrilegious wickedness incurring the highest indignation of the gods. When once the idolatrous Egyptians were persuaded that certain ani¬ mals were sacred to the immortal gods, and had a di¬ vine virtue residing in them, they could not avoid view¬ ing those animals with some degree of veneration ; and the priests, taking advantage of the superstition of the people, appointed for each species of sacred animals ap¬ propriated rites and ceremonies, which were quickly followed with building shrines and temples to them, anil approaching them with oblations and sacrifices, and other rites of divine adoration. To corroborate this hypothesis, he observes, that, besides the animals sacred over all Egypt, each pro¬ vince and each city had its particular animal to which the inhabitants paid their devotions. This arose from the universal practice among idolaters of consecrating to themselves Laves and Penates y and as the animals which were worshipped over the whole kingdom were considered as sacred to the Dii majorum gentium, so the animals whose worship was confined to particular cities or provinces, were sacred to the Lares of those cities and provinces. Hence there was in Upper Egypt a city 143 Brute- Worship. (b) There is, however, another hypothesis worthy of some attention, if it were only for the learning and ingenuity of its author. The celebrated Cudworth infers, from the writings of Philo and other Platonists of the Alexandrian school, that the ancient Egyptians held the Platonic doctrine of ideas existing from eternity, and constituting, in one of the persons of the godhead, the intelligible and archetypal world. (See Platonism). Philo, he observes, did not himself consider those ideas as so many distinct substances and animals, much less as gods; but he mentions others who deified the whole of this intelligible system as well as its several parts. Hence, when they paid their devotions to the sensible sun, they pretended only to worship the divine idea or archetype of that luminary : and hence, thinks our learned author, the ancient Egyptians, by falling down to bulls, and cows, and crocodiles, meant at first to worship only the divine and eternal ideas of those animals. He allows, indeed, that as few could entertain any thoughts at all of those eternal ideas, there were scarcely any who could persuade themselves that the intelligible system had so much reality in it as the sensible things of nature; and hence he thinks the devotion which was originally paid to the divine ideas had afterwards no higher object than the brutes and vegetables of which those ideas were the eternal patterns. This hypothesis is ingenious, but not satisfactory. There is no evidence that the mysterious doctrine of Plato concerning ideas had anywhere been thought of for ages after brute-worship was established in Egypt. Of the state of Egyptian theology at that early period, Philo, and the other philosophers of the Alexandrian school, had no better means of forming a judgment than we have ; and they laboured under many Grecian prejudices, whicli must have prevented them from judging with our impartiality. 144 * Did. Leg book iv sect. 4- P O L Y t city called lympttlis, because its inhabitants worshipped the wolf, wltile the inhabitants of Thebes, or Heliopolis, paid their devotions to the eagle, which was probably looked upon as sacred to the sun. Our author, how¬ ever, holds it as a fact which will admit of no dispute, that there was not one noxious animal or beast of prey worshipped by the Egyptians till after the conquest of their country by the Persians. That the earliest gods of Egvpt were all benevolent beings, he appeals to the testimony of Diodorus Siculus ; but he quotes Herodotus and Plutarch as agreeing that the latter Egyptians worshipped an evil principle under the name dTnphon. This Typhon was the inveterate enemy of Osiris, just as Ahraman was of Onnu%d; and therefore he thinks it in the highest degree probable that the Egyptians derived their belief of two self-existent prin¬ ciples, a good and an evil, from their Persian conquer¬ ors, among whom that opinion prevailed from the ear- Erom whatever source their belief was derived, Ty¬ phon was certainly worshipped in Egypt, not with a view of obtaining from him any good, for there was nothing good in his nature, but in hopes of keeping him quiet, and averting much evil. As certain animals had long been sacred to all the benevolent deities, it was natural for a people so besotted with superstition as the Egyptians to consecrate emblems of the same kind to their god Typhon. Hence arose the worship of ser¬ pents, crocodiles, bears, and other noxious animals and beasts of prey. It may indeed seem at first sight very inconsistent to deify such animals, alter they had been in the practice for 'ages of worshipping others for being their destroyers ; but it is to be remembered that long before the deification of crocodiles, &c. the real origin of brute worship was totally forgotten by the people, if they were ever acquainted with it. rI he crafty priest who wishes to introduce a gainful superstition, must at iirst employ some plausible reason to delude the multi¬ tude •, but after the superstition has been long and firm¬ ly established, it is obviously his business to keep its origin out of sight. _ , Such is Mosheim’s account of the origin and pro¬ gress of that species of idolatry which was peculiar to Egypt *, and with respect to the rise of worship, it appears perfectly satisfactory. But the Egyptians worshipped several species of vegetables; and it surely could be no part of the policy of wise legislators to pre¬ serve them from destruction, as vegetables are useful only as they contribute to animal subsistence. We are therefore obliged to call in the aid of Warburton’s hy¬ pothesis to account for this branch of Egyptian super¬ stition. . That learned and ingenious author having proved , with great clearness and strength of argument, that hie¬ roglyphic writing was prior to the invention of alpha¬ betic characters ; and having traced that kind of wri- H E 1 S M. ting from such rude pictures, as those which were in use finite- among the Mexicans, through all the different species Worship, of what he calls euriologic, tropical, and symbolic hiero- Jq glyphics ('see Hieroglyphics)—shows, by many quo-continued tations from ancient authors, that the Egyptian priests by the wrapt up their theology in the symbolic hieroglyphics, means of after alphabetic characters had banished from the trans- actions of civil life a mode of communicating informa-ting) auJ tion necessarily so obscure. These symbols were the fi¬ gures of animals and vegetables, denoting, from some imaginary analogy, certain attributes of their divinities ; and when the vulgar, forgetting this analogy, ceased to understand them as a species of writing, and were yet taught to consider them as sacred, they could not well view them in any other light than as emblems of the divinities whom they adored. But if rude sculptures upon stone could be emblematical of the divinities, it was surely not unnatural to infer, that the living ani¬ mals and vegetables which those sculptures represented must be emblems of the same divinities more striking and more sacred. Hence the learned author thinks arose that wonderful superstition peculiar to the Egyp¬ tians, which made them worship not only animals and vegetables, but also a thousand chimeras of their own creation ; such as figures with human bodies and the heads or feet of brutes, or with brutal bodies and the heads and feet of men. These two hypotheses combined together appear to us to account sufficiently for the idolatry of Egypt, mon¬ strous as it was. We are persuaded that with respect to the origin of brute-worship Mosheim is in the right (c); and it was a very easy step tor people in so good train¬ ing to proceed upon the crutches of hieroglyphics to the worship of plants and those chimeras, which, as they never had a real existence in nature, could not have been thought of as emblems of the divinity, had they not been used in that symbolic writing which Warbur- ton so ably and ingeniously explains. To this account of the origin of brute-worship, we are fully aware that objections will occur. From a learned friend, who perused the article in manuscript, we have been favoured with one which, as it is exceed- ingly plausible, we shall endeavour to obviate. “ Brute- worship was not peculiar to Egypt. The Hindoos, it is well known, have a religious veneration for the cow and the alligator ; but there is no evidence that in In¬ dia the number of useful animals was ever so small as to make the interference of the prince and the priest necessary for their preservation ; neither does it appear that the Hindoos adopted from any other people the worship of a self-existent principle of evil.” Such is the objection. To which we reply, 3* That there is every reason to believe that brute- worship was introduced into India by a colony of ^J"gjptintr gyptians at a very remote period. That between these jn4iai two nations there was an early intercourse, is universal¬ ly (c) To prove that it was merely to preserve and increase the breed of useful animals in Egypt, that the prince and the priest first taught the people to consider such animals as sacred, he argues thus : “ H sec it a esse, non ex eo tantum liquet, quod paulo ante obsei vavi, nullas bestias universo iEgyptiorum populo sacras tuisse praeter eas, quse manifestam region’, utilitatem comparent; sed hide quoque apparet, quod longe major ratio habita tint ta- •mellarum inter animalia, quam marium. Boves diis immolare hcebat, vaccas nullo mode. Canes toemime con- timiulabantur, non item mates,” Lege Herodot. Histor. lib. ii. cap. 41. & cap. 67. 5 POLYTHEISM. PLATE CCCCJTJCJCV. INDIA?? GODS THE PRINCIPAL. IDOLS OF THE SAXONS WORSHIPPED IN HIUTAIN llllll POLYTHEISM. Theoyony. Iy allowed i and though the learned president of the A- -—'siatic Society has laboured to prove, that the Egyptians derived all that wisdom for which they were famed, as well as the rudiments of their religious system, from the natives of Hindostan, he does not appear to us to have laboured with success. rIo examine his arguments at length would swell this article beyond its due propor¬ tion ; and we have noticed some of them elsewhere (see Philology, N° 33 and 39). At present we shall on¬ ly observe, that Sesostris undoubtedly made an inroad into India, and conquered part of the country, whilst we h nowhere read of the Hindoos having at any time con¬ quered the kingdom of Egypt. Now, though the vic- Itors have sometimes adopted the religion of the van¬ quished, the contrary has happened so much more fre¬ quently, and is in itself a process so much more natu¬ ral, that this single circumstance affords a strong pre¬ sumption that the Egyptian monarch would rather im¬ pose his gods upon the Hindoos than adopt theirs and carry them with him to Egypt. Brute-worship might likewise be introduced into Hindostan by those vast co¬ lonies of Egyptians who took refuge in that country from the tyranny and oppression of the shepherd kings. That such colonies did settle on some occasion or other in India, seems undeniable from monuments still remain¬ ing in that country, of forms which could hardly have occurred to a native of Asia, though they are very na¬ tural as the workmanship of Africans. But we need not reason in this manner. We have seen a manuscript letter from Mr Burt, a learned surgeon in Bengal, and a member of the Asiatic Society, which puts it beyond a doubt that great numbers of Egyptians had at a very early period not only settled in Hindostan, but also brought with them writings relating to the history of their country. As the shepherd-kings were enemies to the arts and to literature, it is probable that this settle¬ ment took place on their conquest of Egypt. Mr Burt’s words are : “ Mr Wilford, lieutenant of engi¬ neers, has extracted most wonderful discoveries from the Shanscrit records: such as the origin and history of the Egyptian pyramids, and even the account of the ex¬ pence in their building.” Upon our hypothesis there is nothing incredible in this account j upon the hypo¬ thesis of Sir William Jones, it is not easy to be con¬ ceived- how the history of Egyptian pyramids could have found a place in the Shanscrit records. We may admit that the Hindoos have never adopted from the Persians or Egyptians the worship of an inde¬ pendent principle of evil, and yet dispose of the other- part of the objection with very little difficulty. It will be seen by and bye, that the bramins believe a kind of triad of hypostases in the divine nature, of whiih one is viewed as the destroyer, and known by several names, such as Siva and Iswara. When brute-worship was in¬ troduced into Hindostan, it was not unnatural to con¬ sider the alligator as emblematical oi Iswara; and hence in all probability it is that the Hindoos believe that a man cannot depart more happily from this world than by falling into the Ganges, and being devoured by one of those sacred animals. Upon the whole, the brute- worship of the Hindoos, instead of militating against our account of that monstrous superstition as it prevail¬ ed in Egypt, seems to lend no smalFsupport to that ac¬ count, as there was unquestionably an early intercourse between the two nations, and as colonies of Egyptians VOL. XVII. Part I. + ^ . H5 settled in India. To him who'is not satisfied with our Theogony. reasoning on this subject, we beg leave to recommend —v~—^ an attentive perusal of Maurice’s Indian Antiquities, where he will find many facts brought together, which tend to prove that Egypt has a just claim to a higher antiquity than India. ^ Having thus traced the rise and progress of poly- Polytheists theism and idolatry as they prevailed in the most cele-acknow" brated nations of antiquity, we now proceed to inquire su^rem^110 into the real opinions of those nations concerning the God, nature of the gods whom they adored. And here it is evident from the writings of Homer, Plesiod, and the other poets, who were the principal theologians among the Greeks and Homans, that though heaven, earth, hell, and all the elements, were filled with divinities, there was yet one who, whether called/ow, Osiris, Or- tnwzd, or by any other title, was considered as supreme over all the rest. “ W hence each of the gods was ge¬ nerated (says Herodotus *), or whether they have all * I-*13 “* existed from eternity, and what are their forms, is ac' 5U thing that was not known till very lately ‘, for Hesiod and Homer were, as I suppose, not above four hundred years my seniors 5 and these were they who introduced the theogony among the Greeks, and gave the gods their several names.” Now Hesiod-f, towards the be-f Vere. ginning of his theogony, expressly invokes his muse to I04—II2' celebrate in suitable numbers the generation of the im¬ mortal gods who had sprung from the earth, the dark night, the starry heavens, and the salt sea. He calls up- from33 on her likewise to say, “ in what manner the gods, the whom the earth, the rivers, ocean, stars, and firmament, were ge-°d>yr divi¬ nerated, and what divine intelligences had sprung from nitaes 'vere them of benevolent dispositions towards mankind.”Seaerated: Irom this invocation, it is evident that the poet did not consider the gods of Greece as self-existent beings : neither could he look upon them as creatures; for of creation the ancient Greeks had no conception (see Metaphysics, N° 264.) ; but he considered them afe emanations coeval with the earth and heavens, from some superior principles ; and by the divine intelligen¬ ces sprung from them, there cannot be a doubt but that he understood benevolent daemons. The first principles of all things, according to the same Hesiod, were Chaos, and 1 artarus and Love ; of which only the last being active, must undoubtedly have been conceived by this father of Grecian polytheism to be the greatest and on¬ ly self-existing god. This we say must undoubtedly have been Hesiod’s belief, unless by Tartarus we here ’ understand a sell-existent principle of evil j and in that case his creed will be the same with that of the ancient Persians, who, as we have seen, believed in the self-ex¬ istence as wrell of Ahraman as of Qrmu%d. Hesiod is supposed to have taken his theology from Orpheus 5 and it is evident that his doctrine concerning the generation of the gods is the same with that taught in certain verses * usually attributed to Orpheus, in * Ar%°- which Love and Chaos are thus brought together.1* l7’ “ We will first sing (says the poet) a pleasant and de-edlt’Steplu lightful song concerning the ancient Chaos, how the heavens, earth, ahd seas, were formed out of it 5 as also concerning that all-wise Love, the oldest and self-per¬ fect principle, which actively produced all these things, separating- one from another.” In the original passage’ Love is said not only to be ttoXv^th;, of much wisdom or sagacity, and therefore a real intelligent substance ; but T also i+6 ' POLYT Theoo-ony. also to be ^ Cudworth, wishes to persuade his readers, that by Plato and Plutarch nothing active was understood by them evil principle, but only that tendency to confusion which was then deemed inseparable Irom matter. £ut that something more was meant seems undeniable: for immediately after the words which we have quoted, Plutarc proceeds to affirm that the wisest men declare 0s*t>s that there are two gods as it were, of contrary trades or crafts, of which one is the author of all good and the other of all evil. See Mosheim. e . ‘Cudworth. System. Intellect, lib. i. cap. 4. § 13. 3^ iaian Bra- ims. Plate P O L Y T i0he0g»tiy. ^iese several professions, a painter, a statuary, a poet, —V—^ and a philosopher, and all of them were required to de¬ clare their sense concerning the God; do you think that the painter would say one thing, the statuary another, tire poet a third, and the philosopher a fourth ? No; nor the Scythian neither ; nor the Greek, nor the Hy¬ perborean. In other things we find men speaking very discordantly, all men as it were differing from all. But amidst this war, contention, and discord, you may find everywhere, throughout the whole world, one uniform law and opinion, that there is one God, the king and father OF ALL, and many gods, the sons OF God, who reign with God. These things both the Greek and Barbarian affirm, both the inhabitants of the continent and of the sea-coast, both the wise and the unwise.” This account of philosophical polytheism receives no small support from the Asiatic Researches of Sir Wil¬ liam Jones. “ It must always be remembered (says that accomplished scholar), that the learned Indians, as they are instructed by their own books, acknowledge only one supreme Being, whom they call Brahme, or cccxxxv. the GREAT ONE, in the neuter gender. They believe his essence to be infinitely removed from the compre¬ hension of any mind but his own ; and they suppose him to manifest his potver by the operation of his di¬ vine spirit, whom they name Vishnou thepervader, and Ne'ra'yaN or moving on the waters, both in the mas¬ culine gender 5 whence he is often denominated \\w first male. When they consider the divine power as exerted in creating or giving existence to that which existed not be¬ fore, they call the deity Brahma'j when they view him in the light of destroyer, or rather changer of forms, they give him a thousand names, of which Siva, Is- Wara, and Mahadeva, are the most common j and when they consider him as the preserver of created things, they give him the name of Vishnou. As the soul of the world, or the pervading mind, so finely de¬ scribed by Virgil, we see Jove represented by several Roman poets ; and with great sublimity by Lucan in the well-known speech of Cato concerning the Ammo- man oracle, 44 Jupiter is wherever we look, wherever we move.’ This is precisely the Indian idea of Vishnou: for since the power of preserving created things by a Superintending providence belongs eminently to the god¬ head, they hold that power to exist transcendently in the preserving member of the triad, whom they sup¬ pose to be everywhere always, not in substance, hut in spirit and energy.” This supreme god Brah ME, in his tuple form, is the only self-existent divinity acknowledged by the philosophical Hindoos. The other divinities Genesa, Indra, Cuvera, &c. are all looked upon either as his creatures or his children ; and of course are worshipped only with inferior adora¬ tion. It was upon this principle of the generation of the gods, and of their acting as ministers to the supreme H E I S M. r47 Numen, that all the philosophers of Greece, who were Theogony, not atheists, worshipped many divinities, though they ' either openly condemned or secretly despised the tradi¬ tions of the poets respecting the amours and villanies of Jupiter, Venus, Mercury, and the rest of the tribe. It was the same principle sincerely admitted, and not an ill-timed jest, as has been absurdly supposed, that made Socrates, after he had swallowed the poison, request his friend to offer a votive cock for him to Esculapius. But a theogony was not peculiar to the Greeks, Ro¬ mans, and the Hindoos j it made part of every system of polytheism. Even the Egyptians themselves, the grossest of all idolaters, believed in one self-existing God, from whom all their oth« r divinities descended by gene¬ ration. This appears probable from the writings ofHo- rus Apollo, Jamblicus, Porphyry, and many other an¬ cient authors ; but if the inscription on the gates of the temple of Neith in Sais, as we have it from Plutarch and Prod us, be genuine, it will admit of no doubt. This famous inscription, according to the last of these writers, was to this purpose : “ I am whatever is, what¬ ever shall be, and whatever hath been. My veil no man hath removed. The offspring which I brought forth was the sun (e).” The Persian magi, as we have seen, believed in two self existent principles, a good and an evil: but if Dio¬ genes Laertius deserves to be credited, they held that fire, earth, and water, which they called gods, were ge¬ nerated of these two. It was observed in the beginning of this article, that the first object of idolatrous worship was probably the sun, and that this species of idolatry took its rise in Chaldea or Persia. But when it became the practice of eastern monarchs to conceal themselves wholly from their people, the custom, as implying dig¬ nity, was supposed to prevail as well in heaven as on earth *, and Zoroaster, the reformer of the Persian theo¬ logy, taught*, that “Ormuzd was as far removed from * pilltarc7. the sun as the sun is removed from the earth.” Accord de hide et? ing to this modification of magianism, the sun was one Osiride. of the generated gods, and held the office of prime mi¬ nister or vicegerent to the invisible fountain of light and good. Still, how'ever, a self-existent principle of evil was admitted j but though he could not be destroyed or annihilated by any power, it was believed that he would at last be completely vanquished by Ormuzd and his ministers, and rendered thenceforwrard incapable of producing any mischief. From this short view of polytheism, as w'e find it de¬ lineated by the best writers of antiquity, we think our¬ selves warranted to conclude, that the whole pagan world believed in but one, or at most two, self-exist¬ ent GODS, from whom they conceived all the other di¬ vinities to have descended in a manner analogous to hu¬ man generation. It appears, however, that the vulgar pagans considered each divinity as supreme and unac¬ countable within his own province, and therefore intit- led to worship, which rested ultimately in himself. The f 2 philosophers. (e) Tac ovlcc, xxi Ta itrouwx xxi rx yiyoroTX, lyu up.i. Tov tgov -girwvx xmxx'Kv\tv. 'Ov lyu xxpituv, tjAioc mi/elo. I he ■'i': •- i i ■ ^ i ......... • • •« • - - antiquity of this inscription is admitted by Cudworth, denied by Ylosheim, and doubted by Jablonkski. The reader who wishes to know their arguments may consult Mosheim’s edition of the Intellectual System, and Jablon- Eki’s Pantheon JEgyptiorum. 148 Theogony. "Is” Vulgar po¬ lytheists less cul¬ pable than the philoso¬ phers. * Varro apud D. August, de Civ. Dei. P O L Y T philosophers, on the other Imn.t, seem to have viewed the inferior gods as accountable for every part ot tlitir conduct to him who was their sire and sovereign and to have paid to them only that inferior kind ot devotion which the church of Rome pays to departed saints. 1 he vulgar pagans were sunk in the grossest ignorance, irom which statesmen, priest?, and poets, exerted their utmost influence to keep them from emerging j lor it was a maxim which, however absurd, was universally received, that “ there were many things true in religion , which it was not convenient for the vulgar to know j and some H E I S M. things which, though false, it was yet expedient that Theogony. they should believe. The polytheism and idolatry ot v the vulo-ar, therefore, was their misfortune rather than their fault. Rut the philosophers were wholly “ with¬ out excuse * ; because that when they knew God, they * Rom. i. glorified him not as God, neither were tlianktul, but 20, 21, n. became vain in their imaginations, and theirfoohsh heart 5- was darkened. Professing themselves wise, they became fools, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is God blessed tor ever. POL POM Polylri- chum Polyxo. POLYTRIGHUM, a genus of plants belonging to the cryptogamia class. See Botany Index. The an- thera is operculated, and placed upon a very small apo- , physis or articulation *, the calyptra villous •, the star of the female is on a distinct individual. There are 16 species $ the most remarkable ot which, natives ot Bri¬ tain, is the commune, or great golden maiden-hair, tie- quently to be met with in bogs and wet places. It grows in patches ; the stalks erect, generally single and un¬ branched, from three inches to a foot or even a yard hi oh. The leaves are numerous, stiff, lanceolate, acute, growing round the stalk without order, and, if viewed with a microscope, appear to have their edges finely ser¬ rated. There are two varieties of this moss : the first has much shorter stalks than the preceding, and often branched j the leaves stiffer, erect, and more crowded 5 in other respects the same. The other has a stalk scarce¬ ly more than half an inch high, terminated with a clus¬ ter of linear, erect, rigid leaves, for the most part entire on the edges, and tipped each with a white hair. I he filament is about an inch high, and the capsule quad¬ rangular. The female flower, or gem, is of a bright red colour. . r ,, The first kind, when it grows long enough tor the purpose, is sometimes used in Bngland and Holland to make brooms or brushes. Ot the female sort the Lap¬ landers, when obliged to sleep in desert places, frequent¬ ly make a speedy and convenient bed, in the following manner : Where the moss grows thick together, they mark out, with a knife, a piece of ground, about two yards square, or of the size of a common blanket j then beginning at one coiner, they gently sever the turf from the ground, and as the roots of the moss are closely in-, terwoven and matted together, they by degrees strip off the whole circumscribed turf in one entire piece j after¬ wards they mark and draw up another piece, exactly corresponding with the first', then, shaking them both with their hands, they lay one upon the ground, with the moss uppermost, instead of a matress, and the other over it, with the moss downwards, instead ot a rug; and between the two pieces they enjoy a comfortable sleep. ^ „ POLYX ff.NUS, or PoLYiENus. See Polyalnus. PO LYXO, a priestess of Apollo’s temple in Lemnos. She was likewise nurse to Queen Hypsipyle. It was by her advice that the Lemnian women murdered all their husbands There was another Polyxo, a native of Ar- o-os, who married Tlepolemus son of Hercules. She fol- fowed him to Rhodes after the murder of his uncle Li- __ cymnius j and when he departed tor the Irojan war with the rest of the Greek princes, she became the sole mistress of the kingdom. After the Trojan war, Helen fled from Peloponnesus to Rhodes, where Polyxo reigned. Polyxo detained her; and to punish her as being the cause of a war in which Tlepolemus had perished, she ordered her to be hanged on a tree by her female servants, disguised in the habit of Furies. PQMACEiE, (pomum, “ an apple,”) the name of the 36th order in Linnmus’s Fragments of a Natural Method, the genera of which have a pulpy esculent fruit, of the apple, berry, and a cherry kind. See Botany, Natural Orders. POMATUM, an unguent generally used in dressing the hair. It is also employed as a medicine. POMEGRANATE. See Punica, Botany Index. POMERANIA, a province in Germany, in the circle of Upper Saxony, having formerly the title ot a duchy. It is bounded on the north by the Baltic sea, on the east by Prussia and Poland, on the south by the marquisate of Brandenburg, and on the west by the duchy of Mecklenburg; and is about 250 miles in length, and in some places 75 miles and in others 50 in breadth. It is watered by several rivers, the most con- "siderable of which are the Oder, the Pene, the Rega, the Persant, the Wipper, the Stolp, the Lupo, and the Lobo. The air is cold; but the soil abounds in pas¬ tures, and produces corn, of which a great deal is ex¬ ported. It is a flat country, containing many lakes, woods, and forests, and has several good harbours. It is divided into the Hither and Farther Pomerania. 'I he small part of this province held by Sweden, was given to Denmark in exchange for Norway, and by Denmark was ceded to Prussia, in 1814. POMFRET, John, an English poet, son of the rec¬ tor of Luton in Bedfordshire, was born in 1667, and educated at Cambridge ; after which he took orders, and was presented to the living of Malden in Bedford¬ shire. About 1703 he went to London for institution to a larger and very considerable living ; but was stop¬ ped some time by Compton, then bishop of London, on account of these four lines of his poem, entitled the Choice : . . Polyxo Pom fret POM [ H9 ] POM omfret “ Artd as I near approach’d the verge of life, n. Some kind relation (for I’d have no wife), J Should take upon him all my worldly care, While I did tor a better state prepare.” The parentheses in these lines were so maliciously re¬ presented, that the good bishop was made to believe that Pom fret preferred a mistress to a wife. But he was soon convinced that this representation was the mere effect of malice, as Pomfret at that time was actually married. The opposition, however, which his slanderers had-made to him had its effect ", for, being by this obliged to stay in London longer than he intended, he catched the small¬ pox, and died of it, aged 35. He published a volume of his poems in 1699, with a very modest and sensible preface. Two pieces of bis were published after his death by his friend Philalethes ; one intitled Reason, and written in 1700, when the dis¬ putes about the Trinity ran high ; the other sima, or the “ Last Epiphany,” a Pindaric ode. His versification is not unmusical 5 but there is not the force in his writings which is necessary to constitute a poet. A dissenting teacher of his name, and who published some rhimes upon spiritual subjects, occasioned fanati¬ cism to be imputed to him ; but his friend Philalethes has justly cleared him from the imputation. Pomfret had a very strong mixture of devotion in him, hut no fa¬ naticism. “ The Choice (says Dr Johnson) exhibits a system of life adapted to common notions, and equal to common expectations j such a state as affords plenty and tran¬ quillity, without exclusion of intellectual pleasures. Per¬ haps no composition in our language has been oftener perused than Pomfret’s Choice. In his other poems there is an easy volubility ; the pleasure of smooth metre is afforded to the ear, and the mind is not oppressed with ponderous, or intangled with intricate, sentiment. He pleases many ; and he who pleases many must have me¬ rit.” POMME, or PoMMETTE, in Heraldry, is a cross with one or more balls or knobs at each of the ends. POMMEL, or Pummel, in the Manege, a piece of brass or other matter at the top and in the middle of the saddle-bow. POMMERULLIA, a genus of plants belonging to the triandria class, and in the natural method rank¬ ing under the 4th order, Gramina. See Botany In¬ dex. POMOERIUM, in Roman antiquity, was, according to Livy, that space of ground, both within and without the walls, which the augurs, at the first building of ci¬ ties, solemnly consecrated, and on which no edifices were alloivcd to be raised. Plutarch gives this account of the ceremony of drawing the pomcerium : “ They dug a trench, and threw into it the first-fruits of all things, ei¬ ther good by custom, or necessary by nature j and every man taking a small turf of earth of the country from whence he came, they cast them in promiscuously. Then making this trench their centre, they described the city in a circle round it. After this, the founder yoking a bull and a cow together, ploughed a deep furrow, with a brazen ploughshare, round the hounds. The attend¬ ants took care that all the clods fell inwards, i. e. toward the city. This furrow they called Pomazrium, and built the wall upon it.”—Plutarch, in this account, is to be Pomcenum understood as speaking of Rome. |j PoMERiun Prof erre, signifies to extend or enlarge I’omP€11- a city, which could not be done by any, but those who '"““''v"'"' 1 had taken away Some part of an enemy’s country in war. But this qualification was sometimes dispensed with. Po- moerium is quasi pone moznia, “ behind the Avails.” POMONA, in fabulous history, the tutelar deity of orchards and fruit-trees. See Vertumnus. POMPEII (anc. geog.) a town of Campania near Herculaneum, and destroyed along with it by the great eruption of Vesuvius in the time of Titus. See Her¬ culaneum. It is about 15 miles from Naples, and six or seven from Portici—So much has been said and writ¬ ten on the discovery of this place, as makes it unneces¬ sary for us to say much : we shall therefore only give a short extract on the subject from an anonymous work lately published, apparently of considerable merit. “ On entering the city (says our author*), the first object is a * Compa- pretty square, with arcades, after the present manner of native Italy. This was, as it is imagined, the quarter of th*3 ^n^land soldiers ; numbers of military weapons being found here, and Italy “ A narrow, but long street, with several shops on with Dis- each side, is now perfectly cleared of its rubbish, and in quisitiom good preservation. Each house has a court. In some 071 of them are paintings al fresco, principally in chiaro- scuro ; and their colours not the least injured by time. ° The few colours which the ancients knew were extract¬ ed only from minerals j and this may be a sufficient rea¬ son for their freshness. The street is paved with irregu¬ lar stones of a foot and a half or two feet long, like the Appian way. “ In discovering this city, it was at first doubted whe¬ ther it were actually Pompeii : but the name inscribed over the gateway put it beyond all doubt. The skele¬ tons found were innumerable. It is said that many had spades in their hands, endeavouring, probably at first, to clear away the torrent of ashes with which they were de¬ luged. Indeed the satisfaction which is felt at the view of ancient habitations, is much allayed by inevitable re¬ flections on this frightful scene of desolation, though at the distance of so many centuries. “ An ancient villa is also seen entire at a little dis¬ tance from Pompeii. The house is really elegant and spacious, but only two stories high. The pavement of the chambers is composed of tesselated marble, and, when polished, displays the design perfectly well.— There is some at the museum of Portici brought from this place, which the eye would really mistake for paint¬ ing. Under the house is a fine triangular cellar, of which each part is 100 feet long, well filled with am¬ phorae. The skeletons of 29 persons were found here, supposed to have fled to it for safety. Each house is filled with ashes : they have almost penetrated through every crevice j and it is incredible how such a volume of them could have been thrown out by Vesuvius with sufficient force to have reached so far.” It has been observed by some travellers that spoons were found among the ruins of Pompeii, but no forks, from which it is concluded, that table utensils of the latter descrip¬ tion were not known to the Romans at that period. Forks, it is supposed, were invented at Constantinople, and were not in use in Italy till about the year 1000 of the Christian era. In . 'Pompeii. POM In concluding our account of Herculaneum stated that the means attempted lor unrolling the ma¬ nuscripts found among the ruins, had been unsuccess¬ ful, and that the plan had been dropped. It will not, we presume, be a little gratifying to the admirers ot an¬ cient literature, to be informed that this difficult labour has been resumed under the auspices of his Royal HmJ ness the Prince of Wales *, and that six volumes of 1 a- pyri presented to his Royal Highness by the king o •Naples have reached London. In the year iS.'O the Rev. Mr Hayter, an excellent scholar, with a liberal provision from the prince, and with permission of the king of Naples, went to Italy tor the purpose of unrolling and transcribing the Papyri. The following narrative extracted from a letter address¬ ed to his royal patron by Mr Hayter, will, we doubt not, be interesting to our readers: ii The numerous settlements fsays the authoi) of the Greeks in Italy received the name of Magna Graecia, because their mother country was of a size considerably less than that in which they were planted : among these were nearly all the cities in the province ot Campania, including Naples, the capital of his Sicilian majesty, and also Herculaneum, and Pompeii, which are supposed to boast a foundation coeval with Hercules himself, three thousand and fifty years ago, or twelve hundred and fifty years before the Christian era. This province, more than any other part of Magna Graecia, was always celebrated for the studious and successful cultivation ol the aits and sciences. The two cities of Herculaneum and Pompeii ranked next to that of Naples in every respect, as places of considerable note j they had their public theatres, with every other attendant of great population, splen¬ dour, opulence, and general prosperity. These, in com¬ mon with all the rest of Campania, became the elegant and favourite resort of the Romans, for the dillerent purposes of health, luxury, repose, and erudition. “ In the ninth year of Nero’s reign, these two cities experienced a most formidable shock from an earthquake, which overthrew a great part of them. Nor had they recovered altogether from the effects of this calamity by their own exertions, and the aid of imperial munificence, when a second calamity, of a diffex-ent nature, but equal ly unexpected, consigned them both at once to the most complete oblivion. This calamity was the great erup¬ tion of Vesuvius, which happened on the 24th day of August, two full months from the accession ol the em¬ peror Titus Vespasian. Herculaneum was buried under a mass of lava, and volcanic matter, to the depth of 24 feet. Pompeii, being more distant from the mountain, was overwhelmed principally with a shower of ashes, nor in any place more than half the depth of the other city. But the fate of both was sudden and inevitable j and yet it appears that almost all of the inhabitants, and, what is an equally surprising circumstance, more of the Her- culaneans than the Pompeians, escaped. By the few skeletons which have been found in either place, the re¬ lation of Dio Cassius, who states the destruction ot the people while assembled at the theatre, is proved to be totally erroneous. It may he proper to remark, that before this eruption the whole of Vesuvius was in a state of cultivation and fertility, from the top to the bottom } and though the form and soil of the mountain in one particular spot seemed to denote the traces of some for- [ 150 ] P O M it was mer explosion, yet no extant memorial of any kind had Pompeii. recorded it. , ’ “ Neither of these two cities was discovered again till a long period of sixteen hundred and thirty-four years had^elapsed. It was in the year 1713, that some labourers, in sinking a well, struck their tools against a statue, which was on a bench in the theatie of Her¬ culaneum. Forty years afterwards Pompeii was exca¬ vated with much less difficulty, as the incumbent stra¬ tum was neither so hard nor so deep as that of the for¬ mer city. “ The number of the manuscripts saved from both those cities is said to he about 500 j hut, if I am light¬ ly informed by those whose official situation must gi\e them a competent knowledge ot the subject, your royal highness, by facilitating the deveiopement of these vo¬ lumes, will probably be the means of further excava¬ tion, and of rescuing from their interment an infinite quantity of others. About thirty years ago, his Sicilian majesty ordered the developement, the transcription, and the printing of the volumes which had then been saved, to be undertaken. This operation was accordingly be¬ gun, anil has never been discontinued till the late inva¬ sion’of the French. But its mode, however excellent, was extremely slow 5 it has been performed by a single^ person, with a single frame only, under the direction ot the marquis del Vasto, chamberlain to the king, and president of the royal academy. “The frame consists of several taper and oblong pieces of wood, with parallel threads of silk that run on each side, the length of each piece: when the frame is laid on any volume, each piece of wood must be fixed pre¬ cisely over each line of the page, while the respective threads being worked beneath each line, and assisted by the corresponding piece of wood aoove, raise the line upwards, and disclose the characters to view. “ The operation seems ingenious, and well adapted to the purpose : it was, 1 believe, invented by a capuchia at Naples. The fruits of it are said to he two publica¬ tions only, one on music, by the celebrated Phiiodemus, who was a cotemporary ol Cicero : and the other on cookery. The first is in his majesty’s library, at tne queen’s palace. Through the obliging politeness ot Mr Barnard, the king’s librarian. I have had the advantage of perusing it. indeed 1 hope your royal highness will not disapprove my acknowledging in this place the very warm and respectful interest which both this gentleman and the right honourable the president ot the Royal So¬ ciety have expressed for the furtherance of your royal highness’s great and good design. Meanwhile, b)' this specimen of Philodemus, I am convinced that, if the frames should be multiplied to the proposed extent, seve¬ ral pages of thirty different manuscripts might he dis¬ closed and transcribed within the space of one week. “ But the very period at which the manuscripts were, buried, serves to point out to your royal highness that you may expect the recovery of either the whole, or at least parts, of the best writers of antiquity, hitherto deemed irrecoverable. All of these, in truth, had writ¬ ten before that period, if we except Tacitus, whose in¬ estimable works were unfortunately not composed till twenty years afterwards, during the reign ol Trajan. “ Nor can it be imagined for a moment, that among five or six hundred manuscripts, already excavated, and especially POM [ i especially from the numberless ones which further exca¬ vations may supply, lost at such a period in two of the most capital cities, in the richest, most frequented, and most learned province in Italy, each of them an establish¬ ed seat of the arts and sciences, each of them the resort of the most distinguished Romans, not any part of those illustrious authors should be discovered. “ But the manuscript of Philodemus itself makes the reverse of such an idea appear much more probable. To the moderns, who have “ Untwisted all the chains that tie The hiddeo soul of harmony,” his Treatise on Music cannot, indeed, be supposed to communicate much information j yet the subject is scien¬ tific, and scientifically treated. The author himself, too, was one of the most eminent men in his time for wit, learning, and philosophy. But in the rest of the arts and sciences, in history, in poetry, the discovery of any lost writer, either in whole or part, would be deemed a most valuable acquisition and treasure, and form a new era in literature. “ It is extremely fortunate that the characters of these manuscripts, whether they should be Greek or Latin, must be very obvious and legible. Before the year of our Lord 79, and some time after it, the Majusculmor Unciales Litteroe, capital letters, were solely used. A page, therefore, in one of these manuscripts, w'ould pre¬ sent to your royal highness an exact image of some mu¬ tilated inscription in those languages on an ancient co¬ lumn, statue, or sepulchre. “ There cannot remain a doubt, even omitting the as¬ surances from men of official situation to that effect, that your royal highness’s superintendant will receive every possible assistance from the marquis del Vasto ; and in that case it seems improbable that the object of this mis¬ sion can be altogether fruitless. “ W ith such a termination of it, however, your royal highness, by having proposed to concur with his Sicilian majesty in the quicker and more effectual developement, transcription, and publication of these manuscripts, will reap the satisfaction of having made a most princely at¬ tempt in behalf of knowledge and literature, on an oc¬ casion where their interests might be affected most ma¬ terially, and in a manner of which no annals have afford¬ ed, or can hereafter afford, an example. Your very in¬ terposition will be your glory : your want of success will only make the learned world feel with gratitude what you would have done.” The interposition of his royal highness has had the happiest effect. 1 he splendid encouragement which he gave to the work revived the drooping spirits of the Ita¬ lian literati; and the consequence has been, that the bu¬ siness of unrolling and transcribing the manuscripts now proceeds with an alacrity which promises the most bril¬ liant success. In forty-six years not more than eighteen rolls were de veloped before the interference of our prince. Under his encouragement, ninety have been recovered in two years ! W hat new facilities may not now be ex¬ pected when all the vigour of British intelligence is ex¬ erted on the subject!—See Swinburne’s Travels in the Two Sidles, vol. ii. p. 98, &c.; Lady Miller’s Letters, or T)e la Lande; Captain Sutherland’s Tour up the Straits, from Gibraltar to Constantinople, p. 7 ?, &c.; Dr Smith’s Sketch of a Tour on the Continent, in 1786 and 51 ] POM 1787, vol. ii. p. tx8, See.; and Watkin’s Tour through Swisserland, Italy, Sec. See also Lemaistre’s Travels through Trance, Italy, Sec. POMPEY the Great, Cneius Pompeius Mag¬ nus, the renowned rival of Julius Ctesar. Bein«- defeat¬ ed by him at the battle of Pharsalia, owing t(f the de¬ fection of his cavalry, he fled to Egypt by sea, where Im was basely assassinated by order of Theodotus, prime minister to Ptolemy the Younger, then a minor, 48 B. C. See Rome. ^ POMPEYS, Cnetus and- Sextus, his sons, com¬ manded a powerful army when they lost their illustrious father. Julius Ctcsar pursued them into Spain, and de¬ feated them at the battle of Munda, in which Cneius vvas slain, 45 B C. Sextus made himself master of Si¬ cily 5 hut being defeated in the celebrated naval en¬ gagement at Actium by Augustus and Lepidus, he fled to Asia with only seven ships, the remains of his fleet, which consisted of more than 350 ; and from thence^ unable to continue the war, he was obliged to retire to Lesbos, where renewing the war by raising an army, and seizing on some considerable cities, Marcus Titius’ in the interest of Mark Antony, gave him battle, de¬ feated him, took him prisoner, and basely put him to death, 35 B. C. See Rome. Pompey's Pillar, a celebrated column near Alex¬ andria in Egypt, 114 feet high, and of which the shaft, composed of a single piece of granite, is 90 feet. For an account of different opinions concerning the origin and design of this pillar, see Alexandria, p. eng*3 POMPONATIUS, Peter, an eminent Italian phi¬ losopher, xvas born at Mantua in 1462. He was of so small a stature, that he was little better than a dwarf; yet he possessed an exalted genius, and was considered as one of the greatest philosophers of the age in which he lived. He taught philosophy, first at Padua, and after¬ wards at Bologna, with the highest reputation. He had frequent disputations with the celebrated Achillini, whose puzzling objections would have confounded him^ had it not been for his skill in parrying them by some joke. His book De Immortalitate Animce, published in 1516, made a great noise. He maintained, that the immortality of the soul could not be proved by philoso¬ phical reasons ; but solemnly declared his belief of it as an article of faith. This precaution did not, however, save him ; many adversaries rose up against him, who did not scruple to treat him as an atheist; and the monks procured his book, although he wrote several apologies for it, to be burnt at Venice. His book upon Incantations was also thought very dangerous. He shows in it, that he believed nothing of magic and sor¬ cery ; and he lays a prodigious stress on occult virtues in certain men, by which they produced miraculous ef¬ fects. He gives a great many examples of this ; but his adversaries do not admit them to be true, or free from magic.—Paul Jovius says, that he died in 1525, in his grand climacteric. He was three times married ; and had but one daughter, to whom he left a large sum of money. He used to apply himself to the solution of difficulties so very intensely, that he frequently forgot to eat, drink, sleep, and perform the ordinary functions of nature : nay, it made him almost distracted, and a laushing-stock to every one, as he himself tells us. POMPONIUS MELA. See Mela. POMUM, an Apple ; a species of seed-vessel, com¬ posed H i'onumi. PON [ „„„„„„ „„sea of a succulent fleshy pulp; In the miiWle of evhlch pr”ra f ,i„ f. 1 .. mpnihranous cansulc. with a num- posea or a sucuuiem. ^ M — • t is senerally found a membranous capsule, vwtn ber of cells, or cavities, for containing the seeds, beed- vessels of this kind have no external opening or valve. At the end opposite to the footstalk is frequently a smal cavity, called by the gardeners the eye cj thejrvit, ant by botanists umbilicus, the “ navel,” from its fancied resemblance to the navel in animals. Gourd, cucum¬ ber, melon, pomegranate, pear, and apple, furnish in¬ stances of the fruit seed-vessel in question. POND, or Fish-Pond. Sec Fisii-Pond. Pond, is a small pool or lake of water from whence no stream issues. In the Transactions of the Society in¬ stituted at London for the Encouragement of Arts, M a¬ nufactures, and Commerce, vol. via. and printed in the year 1700, there is a short account of a machine tor draining ponds without disturbing the mud. It was communicated to the society, together with a drawing and model of the machine, by Lieutenant-colonel Uan- sey. The model was made from the description of a machine used by a gentleman near Taunton for many vears before, for supplying a cascade in his pleasure- qrounds.—The colonel’s regiment was then lying at Windsor 5 and thinking that the invention might be useful to supply the grand cascade at Virginia water, he made the model, and presented it to the king, who was graciously pleased to approve of it. In consequence ot tvhich, by his majesty’s desire, a penstock on that prm- cipie-was constructed from the model at one of the ponds in the neighbourhood.—The colonel thinks the machine may be useful in the hands of men of science, and ap¬ plicable to silk, cotton, and other mills, where a steady and uniform velocity of water is wanted *, which might be regulated at pleasure, occasioning no current to di¬ sturb the mud or fish, as the stream constantly runs from the surface. He says he has often made the experiment by the model in a tub of water. Of this machine the following is a description. In fig. 1. A is the pipe, loaded with a rim of lead, of Plate in ng. 1. a is uic -- - > occexxxvii. such weight as serves to sink it below the surface ot tne r- water. B is the discharging pipe, laid through the bank HI. C is .the joint on which the pipe A turns rig. a. its form, which is shown fig. 2. D is the ball or float, which, swimming on the surface of the pond, prevents the pipe A from descending deeper than the length of the chain by which they are connected. E is a chain winding on the windlass F, and serving to raise the tube A above the surface ot the water, when the machinery is not in use. G is a stage. HI is the bank, repre¬ sented as if cut throught at I, to show the tube B lying within it. K is a post to receive the tube A when lowered, and to prevent its sinking in the mud. In fi .. complaining of the behaviour of the kmg of Pontus but Pharnaces was so far from being intimidated by their threats, that he invaded the territories of Lumenea their great ally. The latter sent ambassadors to Rome, and entered into an alliance with Anarathes king oi Cappadocia •, Pharnaces, in his turn, sent ambassadors to Rome, complaining of Eumenes and Anarathes 5 up¬ on which some Romans were sent into Asia to inquire into the state of matters. These found Eumenes and his associates willing to accommodate the difference, but Pharnaces in a quite opposite disposition, which they accordingly reported at Rome. In the mean time a war was commenced between Eumenes and Pharnaces j but the latter being disap¬ pointed of assistance from Seleucus king of Syria, whom the Romans would not allow to join him, was at last forced to sue for peace •, which was granted hira UP°“ the following conditions 5 1 hat he si [10old a most dk withdraw his forces from Galatia, and disannul all t'11' advantage gagements and alliances with the inhabitants of that ous peace, country; that he should in like manner evacuate Pa¬ phlagonia, and send back such as he had from thence carried into slavery, that he should restore to Ariarathes all the places which he had taken during the war, the hostages of both kings, all their prisoners without ran¬ som, and moreover should deliver up to them such of their subjects as from the first breaking out of the war had fled to him •, that he should return to Morzias, a petty king in these parts, and to Ariarathes, 900 ta¬ lents which he had seized in the war, and pay down 300 more to Eumenes as a fine for invading his dominions without provocation. Mithridates, king of Armenia, having in this war joined Pharnaces, was, by the articles of the treaty, obliged to pay 300 talents to Ariarathes for having assisted his enemy contrary to an alliance at thatltime subsisting between them. Soon after Phar¬ naces died, and left the kingdom to his son Mithn- dates VI. more weakened by this peace than by the most destructive war. . . . „ Tr- 7 The new king entered into an alliance with the It0-His son mans, and proved such a faithful friend that he was re' warded, by the senate with Phrygia Major, and honour-^ the ed with the title of the friend and ally of the people otRomans. Rome. After a long and prosperous reign, he was mur¬ dered by some of his intimate acquaintance, and was succeeded by his son Mithridates VII. surnamed the Great. . , 8. The new prince, though not exceeding 13 years age, began his reign with most inhuman acts of cruelty to his mother and nearest relations. His father, by hiscniei last will, had appointed him and his mother joint heirspVjnce. to •.n, Medes and Persians ; the last of whom divided Cappadocia into satrapies or governments, and bestowed Ed^S-^wards called on one of the ancestors of Mitln dates This regulation was effected in the reign of Darius the son of Hystaspes, and has been regarded as the date of the kn gc . k PON [ Pofltus. 9 His extra- a-dinary ;nalitie«. to | onqners i tveral | jnntries. ii mses the |ig of ppado- i to be irdered. to the kingdom j but he, claiming the whole, threw J her into prison, where she soon died through the bard usage she met with. Those to whom the care of his education was committed, observing him to be of a cruel and unruly temper, made various attempts on his life, but could never effect their design, as the king was always on his guard, and armed, in that tender age, against all kind of treachery, without showing the least diffidence. In his youth Mithridates took care to inure himself to hardships, passing whole months in the open air, em¬ ployed in the exercise of hunting, and often taking his . rest amidst the frozen snow. When he came of age, he married his sister named Laodice, by whom he had a son named Pharnaces. After this he took a journey through many different kingdoms of Asia, having nothing less in view than the whole continent. He learned their different languages, of which he is said to have spoken 22 took an estimate of their strength ; and above all viewed narrowly their strong holds and fortified towns. In this journey he spent three years j daring which time, a report being spread abroad that he was dead, his wife Ijaodice had a criminal conversation with one of the lords of her court, and had a sou by him. When her husband returned, she presented him with a poison¬ ed bowl; but Mithridates had accustomed himself to take poison from his infancy, so that it had now no other effect than to hasten the destruction of his wife, which very soon took place, together with all those who had been any way accessory to her disloyalty and incontinence. The king now began to put in execution his schemes of conquest. However, he certainly took the wrong method, by attacking first those nations which were immediately under the protection of Rome, and thus at once provoking that powerful people to fall upon him. He began with Paphlagouia, which the Romans had declared a free state. This country he easily reduced, and divided between himself and Nicomedes king of Bitbynia, at that time his ally. The Romans remon¬ strated j but Mithridates, instead of paying any regard to their remonstrances, invaded Galatia, which was im¬ mediately under their protection. This he also reduced, and then turned his eves on Cappadocia. But as the kingdom of Cappadocia was at that time held by Aria- rathes, who was a great favourite of the Romans, and married to the sister of Mithridates, the latter hired an assassin to dispatch Ariarathes, after which he thought he might succeed better in his designs. After the death of Ariarathes, Cappadocia was invaded by Nicomedes king of Bithynia, who drove out the son, and married the Avidow of Ariarathes. This gave Mithridates a plausible pretence for invading Cappadocia; which he instantly did, and drove Nicomedes quite out of the country. Thus Mithridates gained considerable repu¬ tation, not only as a warrior, but as a just and good- natured prince ; for as it vvas not knoivn that he had any hand in the murder of Ariarathes, every one imagined that he had undertaken the Avar against Nicomedes, merely to revenge the quarrel of his nephew, and to re¬ store him to his right. To keep up the farce a little longer, Mithridates actually Avithdrew his troops out of the country, and left the young prince master of the kingdom. In a short time, hoAvever, he began to press the young king of Cappadocia to recal the assassin Gor- 55 1 PON dius, Avho had murdered his father: hut this the king Pontas. of Cappadocia refused Avith indignation ; and Mithri- —v~— dates, being determined on a quarrel at all events took the field with an army of 80,000 foot, 10,000 horse, and 6oo chariots armed with scythes. With this force he imagined he should carry all before him : but find¬ ing the king of Cappadocia ready to oppose him Avith a force no way inferior to his oavii, he had recourse to I2 treachery, and inviting his nepheAV to a conference, Assassin- Stabbed him, in the sight of both armies, with a daggerates liis Avbich he had concealed in the plaits of his garment. °jvn no~ This barbarous and unexpected piece of treachery had^ ie'V‘ such an effect on the Cappadocians that they threAV down their arms, and suffered Mithridates, without op¬ position, to seize upon all their strongholds. He re¬ signed the kingdom, hoAvever, to his son, a child of eight years of age. The care of the young prince, and of the Avhole kingdom, he committed to Gordius; but the Cappadocians, disdaining to be ruled by such a scandalous assassin, placed on the throne the brother of Ariarathes, who had kept himself concealed in some part ot Asia. His reign, hoAvever, Avas of short dura¬ tion ; he being soon after driven out by Mithridates, and the Cappadocians again reduced. The unhappy prince died of grief; and in him ended the family of Pharnaces, who had ruled Cappadocia from the time of Cyrus the Great. ^ Nicomedes, king of Bithynia, being now greatly a-Nicomedes fraid of Mithridates, and supposing that his OAvn domi-king of Bi¬ llions would next fall a prey to the ambitious conqueror, thynia at- suborned a youth of a comely and majestic aspect to^ccdvVthe pretend that he was a third son of Ariarathes, to go to Romans. Rome, and demand the kingdom of Cappadocia as his just right. He Avas received by the senate with the greatest kindness, and Laodice the wife of Nicomedes I4 even confirmed the deceit by her oath. But in the The deceit mean time Mithridates having got intelligence of the exI)0Se(i by plot, sent notice of it by Gordius to the Romans, so^^1*' that the imposture Avas soon known at Rome also. The consequence of this Avas, that the senate commanded Mithridates to relinquish Cappadocia, and Nicomedes that part of Paphlagonia which he possessed ; decla¬ ring both these countries free. The Cappadocians pro¬ tested that they could not live without a king; upon. Avhich they Avere alloived to choose one of their own nation. Mithridates used all his interest in favour of Gordius ; but he being excluded by the Romans, one Ariobarzanes was chosen by the majority of votes. To enforce this election, Sylla Avas sent into Cappa-Ariobar- docia. He had the character of an ambassador, but thezanes set- real intent of his coming was to disappoint the ambitious tje^ on t}ie designs of Mithridates. With a handful of forces he (jappadocia defeated a numerous army of Cappadocians and Arme-by the Ro¬ mans commanded by Gordius, and settled Arioharzanes mans, but on the throne. But no sooner was Sylla gone than ^“ven out Mithridates stirred up Tigranes king of Armenia against Ariobarzanes, Avho, Avithout making any resistance, fled ’ to Rome, and Tigranes restored the kingdom to Aria¬ rathes the son of Mithridates. At the same time died the king of Bithynia ; upon which Mithridates imme¬ diately invaded that country, and drove out Nicome¬ des the natural son of the late king. But the expel¬ led prince, having fled to Rome, and being assisted by thaP"pOAverful republie, the king of Pontus Avas soon obliged to abandon Bithynia and Cappadocia. U 2 Th o P O N [ 156 ] PON Poiitus. The Romans now being exceedingly jealous of the power and ambition of Mithridates, resolved to humble him at all events. For this purpose they sent ambas¬ sadors to the kings of Bithyuia and Cappadocia, de¬ siring them to make frequent inroads into the neigh¬ bouring territories of Mithridates, and behave there as they pleased ; assuring them of powerful assistance in case they should have occasion. Ariobarzanes could not by any means be induced to provoke so powerful a neighbour $ but Nicomedes being induced, partly by promises and partly by menaces, to comply, entered Fontus, where he laid waste whole provinces with hie and sword. Mithridates complained to the, Roman le¬ gates : but they replied, that be himselt had been the first aggressor j that Nicomedes bad only paid him in his own coin, and that they would not adovv him to Defeats A- hurt their friend and ally. Upon this Mithrioaies, en- riobarzanes tering Cappadocia with a numerous army, put to flight aad Alti- j.|ie united forces of Ariobaritanes and Altinius the Ro- 1UUS’ man legate ; thus making himself once more master of this kingdom. In the mean time he sent ambassadors to Rome, complaining of the proceedings ot iN icomedes. but his ambassadors met with a very indifferent recep¬ tion } being enjoined to tell their master, that he must either restore the kingdom of Cappadocia to Ariobai- zanes, and make peace with Nicomedes, or be account¬ ed an enemy of the Roman people. With this answer they were commanded to depart the city that very day, and told that no more ambassadors could he admitted till such time as their commands were obeyed. In the mean time botli parties prepared for war. The Roman legates in Asia drew together all the forces they could muster in Rifhynia, Cappadocia, Rapnlago- nia, and Galatia •, and, being joined by Cassius governor of Asia, took the field against Mithridates in the year 89 B. C. They divided their army into several small bodies : Cassius encamped on the confines ol Bithynia and Galatia j Manias Aquilius with his body possessed himself of the avenues leading from Pontus into Bithy¬ nia ; Quintus Oppius secured the entrance into Cappa¬ docia ; and the admirals Minucius Rufus and C. Popi- lius lay with a fleet of 3®1-5 sa^ By7-antium, to pre¬ vent the enemy from entering the Euxine sea. Each of the generals had under his command an army of 40,000 men j besides a body of $0,000 foot and 6000 horse brought to their assistance by Nicomedes. On the other hand, Mithridates having invited several of the neighbouring nations to join him, collected an lS army of 250,000 foot, 50,000 horse, 130 chariots armed and Nico- with scythes ; besides 300 ships and 100 galleys. Part medcs and of this force he detached against Nicomedes ; and ut- Manius A- ter]y defeated him, though much superior in number, as he was taking possession of an advantageous post by order of Cassius. Another pai't he detached against Manias Aquilius, whom he also defeated with the loss of 10,000 killed on the spot, and 3000 taken prisoners; on which the other Roman generals abandoned their posts, the fleet also dispersed, and most of the ships were either taken or sunk by the admirals of Mithridates. The king of Pontus now resolving to improve the opportunity, and drive the Romans entirely out of A- sia, overran all Phrygia, Mysia, Asia Proper, Caria, Lycia, Pamphylia, Paphlagonia, and Bithynia, with all the rest of the countries which had either belonged to ox sided with the Romans, as far as Ionia. He was re- Pontiidi quilius. Overruns Asia Mi¬ nor. ceived everywhere with the greatest demonstration;) 01 joy •, the inhabitants flocking to him in white garments, and calling him their father, deliverer, their god, and the great and sole lord of all Asia. V* hat gained him the affections of the people was his kind usage to toe prisoners he had taken in the two engagements above mentioned ; for he not only sent them all home with¬ out ransom, but furnished them with plenty of provi¬ sions, and money sufficient to defray their expences by the way. Ambassadors flocked to him from all parts ; and among others, from Laodicea on the Rycus, to whom the king promised his protection, provided they delivered up to him Q. Oppius governor ot I amphylia, who had fled thither for protection. This request was readily complied with; Oppius was sent to him in chains, with lictors walking before him in derision ot the Roman pride and ostentation. Mithridates was overjoyed to see a Roman general and proconsul in his power; and his joy was soon after increased by the ar¬ rival of Manias Aquilius, whom the Lesbians, revolting from the Romans, sent to him in fetters, together with many other Romans of distinction who had taken shel¬ ter among them. As he had been the chief author of the war, Mithridates leu him about with him wherever he went, either hound on an ass, or on loot coupled with one Bastarnes a public malefactor, compelling him to proclaim to the crowds who came to see him, that he was Manius Aquilius the Roman legate. Vr hen he pBts Aquh came to Pergamus, lie caused him first to he publicly bus to whipped, then to be put 'on the rack, and lastly melteddeaUu gold to be poured down his throat. Mithridates being now looked upon as invincible, all the free cities of Asia received him as their sovereign, contributing large sums towards the defraying the ex¬ pences of the war j by which means he became possessed of such treasures as enabled him to keep several nume¬ rous armies in the field for five years without levying any taxes on his subjects. As many Roman citizens were dispersed in the provinces which Mithridates had subdued, he considered these as so many spies, who would not fail to send an account of his proceedings to Rome : ^ for which reason he resolved to cut them all oft at once Cruelly by a general massacre j which barbarous policy, it is massacres said, had never been heard of till his time, but has been all thejt since practised by other nations. He dispatched private letters to all the governors and magistrates of the cities where the Romans resided, enjoining them on pain of death, and the entire destruction of their country, to cause all the Italian race, women anil children not ex¬ cepted, to be murdered on the 3^th day from the date of his letters, and to let their bodies lie unburied in the open fields. One moiety of their goods was to be for¬ feited to the king, and the other bestowed as a reward on the assassins. Whatever slave murdered his master was to receive his liberty, and one half ol the debt was to be remitted to the debtor that should kill his credi¬ tor. Whoever concealed an Italian, under any pretence whatever, was to be punished with immediate death. On the fatal day, all the gates of the cities being shut, and the avenues kept with soldiers, the king’s orders were proclaimed, which caused an universal horror, not only among the unhappy victims themselves, but among those who had any feelings of humanity, at seeing them¬ selves obliged either to betray and murder their inno¬ cent guests^ friends, and relations, or to become liable 4 t0: :?ontu*. Hluces t [island Wlails in «F Riles. PON [ j to a cruel death. However, as most of the Asiatics *' bore a mortal hatred to the Romans, and vvei’e more¬ over animated by the promise of an ample reward, the orders were without delay put in execution. The in¬ habitants of Ephesus, where Mithridates then resided, dragged such as had taken sanctuary in the temple of Diana from the very statue of the goddess, and put them to the sword. The Pergamenians discharged showers of darts upon them as they embraced the statues in the temple 01 Escuiapius. At Adramyttium in Mysia many were murdered in the water, while they were attempting, with their children on their backs to swim over to the island of Lesbos. The Caunians, who not long before had been delivered from the yoke of the Rhodians, and restored to their ancient privileges, excelled all the rest in cruelty: for, as if they had apo¬ statised from human nature, they took pleasure in tor¬ menting and butchering the innocent children before their mothers eyes 5 some of them running distracted, and others dying with grief at a sight which nature could not bear. The Trallians were the only people on the continent who would not have the cruelty to imbrue their hands in the blood of the innocent Italians. However, as the king’s orders were peremptory, they hired one Iheophilus a Paphlagonian to dispatch the few Romans that lived among them. He, having shut them all up together in the temple of Concord, first cut olF their hands as they embraced the statues of the gods, and then hacked them in pieces. Alany Romans were saved on the floating islands ot Lydia called Calamince^ where they concealed themselves till such time as they found an opportunity of escaping out of Asia. Never¬ theless, according to Plutarch and Dion, 150,000 Ro¬ man citizens were massacred on that day; but, accordr ing to others, only 80,000. Alithridates having now got rid of those whom he was in dread of on the continent, embarked great part of his forces in order to reduce the islands of the Archipelago. At Cos he was gladly received, and had delivered up to him the young Alexander, son of Alexander king of •^Syptj who being driven out of that country, was kil¬ led by Chareas a sea-captain as he was retiring in a small vessel to Cyprus. With the young prince, they put into the king’s hands vast sums of money, with all the golden vessels and jewels, to an immense value, which his grandmother Cleopatra had been amassing for many years. To the young prince Alithridates gave an education suitable for a king’s son, but kept the treasures to himself. Here likewise he found 800 talents in ready money, which, at the first breaking out of the war, had been deposited by the Jews of Asia, and were designed for the temple of Jerusalem. Irom Cos Alithridates steered his course for Rhodes, where at that time all the Romans who had escaped the massacre above mentioned found a sanctuary, and, amongst others, L. Cassius the proconsul. The Rho¬ dians, however, being very expert in maritime affairs, Arithridates did not think proper to venture an engage¬ ment. As the enemy’s fleet advanced, therefore, he retired ; but six or the Rhodian ships coming up with 25 of his, a sharp action ensued, in which the Rhodians &unk two of the king’s ships, and put the rest to flight. In this encounter, though Mithridates had never seen a sea-fight before, he behaved with great intrepidity; but one of the ships of his own squadron falling foul of that 57 1 PON which carried him, he was very near being taken pri- Pontus. soner. From this time forth he abhorred the sea, and 1 v—1 took an aversion to all the Chians, because the pilot of that ship was a Chian. However, he again appeared before the island ; but was forced anew to leave it with disgrace, and to give over all thoughts of reducing Mithridates now retired into Asia, with a design toHis Sne- settle the civil government of the countries which he rals reduce had conquered, committing the care of the war to hisad Greece, geneials. . Archelaus, his generalissimo, was sent into Greece with an army of 120,000 men ; where, by treachery, he made himself master of Athens, and either put to the sword or sent to Alithridates all those who favoured or were suspected to favour the Romans. From Aiiiens he dispatched parties to reduce the neighbour¬ ing castles and the island of Delos, which they did ac¬ cordingly ; but Orobius, a Roman general hearing that the enemy kept no guards, but passed their time in carousing and debauchery, fell upon them unexpect¬ edly, and cut off the whole party, except Apellicon the commander.. In the mean time Metrophanes, another of the king’s generals, entering Euboea, laid waste the wdiole country, exerting his rage chiefly against the cities of Demetrias and Alagnesia, which refused to open their gates to him. But as he was sailing off with a great booty, Bryttius, the praetor or governor of Macedonia, coming up with him, sunk some of his ships, and took others, putting all the prisoners to the sword. Alithridates, upon the news of this loss, sent his son Ariarath.es with a powerful ar¬ my to invade Macedonia ; which he soon reduced, to¬ gether with the kingdom of Thrace, driving the Ro¬ mans everywhere before him. The generals whom he sent into other quarters were no less successful; so that Mithridates had, according to Aldus Gellius, 25 diffe¬ rent nations wrho paid him homage. ’I he same author adds, that he was skilled in every one of their various languages, so that he could converse with the natives without an interpreter. Among these nations we find the Rhoxani, now the Russians or Muscovites, whom Deiphontus, one of the king’s generals, brought under subjection, after having slain in an engagement co,ooo of the barbarians. All this time the Romans had been too much taken up with their own domestic quarrels to take such effec¬ tual measures as they otherwise would have done for checking the progress of Alithridates. But at last, ha-Sylla sent ying received certain advice that the king designed to against invade Italy, and that he had even been solicited to dohim> so by some of the revolted Italians, they sent against him- Lucius Sylla, who had already given sufficient proofs of his courage, conduct, and experience in war. He had with him only five legions and a few cohorts. Avith this inconsiderable force he landed in Attica, and in a short time made himself master of the capital; Ar¬ chelaus not daring, or, according to others, through treachery, nor caring, to engage him. As Sylla had but a few frigates, he sent Lucullus to the island of Rhodes, with orders to the Rhodians to join him with their fleet. Jhe undertaking was very dangerous, as the king’s fleet in a manner covered the sea. However, Lucullus, despising all danger, ventured out, and sailed’ without meeting with any perverse accident, to Syria, Egypt, Libya, and Cyprus; from whence he returned with . PON [ iS8 ] PON Pontus. *6 who total¬ ly defeats but his rival Flaccus also, whom the senate, out of op- position to him, had appointed governor of that pro- ' ^ vince. But before he arrived, some differences having arisen between Flaccus and Fimbria, the latter was by ^ the consul deprived of his command. Upon this bria, having gained over the soldiery to his su.e, madepUls war’on the consul, took him prisoner, put him to death, cus to and assumed the command of all the lloman forces mdeath. Asia. In this station, he behaved with the greatest cruelty, insomuch that his name became more odious than even that of Mithridates himself. This hatred the kino- of Pontus endeavoured to improve to his own ad¬ vantage *, and therefore commanded his son, by name also Mithridates, to join Taxiles, Diophantes, and Me¬ nander, three of his most experienced commanders, to return at the head of a numerous army into Asia ; not doubtino- but the inhabitants, thus harassed by I*im- p r , Minima a sena- bria, would shake off the Roman yoke when they saw a man of no experience in war, U. i imtm , ’ erful army in the field ready to protect them, tor of great repute among the soldiery, was app ^ Fimbria distrusting the Asiatics, marched out to to attend him with the character of ^gate and Ueute- them battle before they 3o nant-general. Sylla was at that time in < , - 7 entere,i the province. As the king’s army was greatly Defeats hearing what had happened at Rome, he ma • t tl Romans in number, the latter suffer- forces of all expedition into Thessaly, with a design to meet s"Peri;rt'0. bllt 1 eld out till night ftbri- Flaccus, who, he expected, was to land in that province. ed grea y m ^to the opposite side**"’ But no sooner had he left Boeotia, than the country [listance from the field was overrun by an army of Asiatics, un er J t ’ H } designed to entrench themselves: mand of Dorylaus the king’s chief favourite. On this o^battle^ Jtler ^ ^ ^ with such supplies of ships and experienced manners as enabled Sylla, after their conjunction with the Uhoi - ans, to act offensively by sea also. Archelaus now dis¬ patched messengers to Taxiles, who commanded in Thrace and Macedon, desiring him to join him with alt bis forces j which the other readily did, and between both mustered an army of 120,000 men. by! a met iy ucivcils them near Cheronsea with only 15,000 foot and 1500 bis generals j10rge . but „ave them a most dreadful overthrow, no ia Greece. fewer tl] an 110,000 of the Asiatics being slaughtere , while the Romans lost only 12 men. . This success having raised envy and jealousy against Sylla in Rome, the senate sent Lucius A alenus ilaccus, the consul of that vear, with two legions into Asia, m appearance to attack Mithridates on that side, but with »7 private instructions to fall upon Sylla himself, if they Flaceus f0Und him disaffected to the senate. As Flaccus was and Fim- a man 0f no experience in war, C. F imbna, a sena- bria sent ■' lj: —" into Asia. maim 01 j^urylaus the king . , advice Sylla returned into Bceotia, where he gained two s signal victories, which put an end to the war in Greece. Syllag.™ In the first of theoe Dovylaus lost 150,000 of 1m men two other according to some, or 200,000 according ? victories in alu| ;n the next all the rest. In this last engagement Greece* 20,000 were driven into a river, where they all perish¬ ed ; an equal number were pursued into a marsh, and entirely cut off*, the rest were killed in the heat of the battle, the Romans giving no quarter to men who had treated their fellow-citizens after such a barbarous man¬ ner in Asia. Plutarch tells us, that the marshes were dyed with blood ; that the course of the river was stop¬ ped by the dead bodies j and that even in Ins time, that is, near 200 years after, a great number of bows, hel¬ mets, coats of mail, and swords, were found buried m the mud. Archelaus, who had joined Dorylaus with a body of 10,000 men a few days before the battle, lay three days stripped among the slain till he found a small vessel which carried him to Euboea, where be gathered what forces he could, but was never again able to ap¬ pear in the field. Indeed Livy tells us, that Archelaus betrayed the king’s cause ; and Aurelius v ictor, that the king’s fleet was intercepted by Sylla through the treachery of Archelaus : adding, that there was a good understanding between the two commanders, as was plain from Sylla’s bestowing upon Archelaus 10,000 acres of land near the city of Chalcis in Euboea. Stia- bo also informs us, that Archelaus was afterwards greatly esteemed and caressed by Sylla and tlie ^e' nate -/hut Sylla himself in his commentaries, and Dio, endeavour to clear Archelaus from all suspicion of trea¬ chery. . In the mean time, Sylla having given up boeotia to be plundered by Ins soldiers, marched into Ihessaj, where he took up his winter-quarters, caused his old fillips to be refitted and several new ones built, in ol der to pass over into Asia in the beginning of the spiing, that he might drive from thence not only Mithridates, laid hold of that opportunity to repass the river and surprise the enemy : of whom he made such havock a9 they lay in their tents, that only the commanders and 3I some few troops of horse escaped. Among these was an(jbe- the kind’s son 5 who, attended by a few horse, got safe sieges to Pergamus, where his father resided. But Fimbria, pursuing him night and day without intermission, en¬ tered Pergamus sword in hand ; and hearing that both Mithridates and his son had fled from thence a few hours before, he continued his pursuit, and would have taken the king himself, had he not entered Pitane with a considerable body of horse. The place was closely invested by Fimbria; but as he had no ships to block it up by sea also, he sent a messenger to Lucullus, who commanded the Roman navy in Asia, intreating him, as he tendered the welfare of the republic, to make what haste he could to Pitane, and assist him in taking 32 the most inveterate enemy the Romans had. But Lu-^^ cull us, preferring the gratification of a private pique toLuculll the good of his country, refused to come : and thus al-^e^a lowed the fleet of Mithridates to carry him in safety to Mitylene. . Soon after the king’s departure, Fimbria took Pitane by storm, and reduced most of the cities of Asia, parti¬ cularly Troy, which he also took by storm in eleven days, and put most of the inhabitants to the sword, because they had sent an embassy to Sylla, ofiering to sub¬ mit to him rather than to Fimbria.— lo add to the misfortunes of Mithridates, his fleet was entirely de¬ feated in two engagements by Lucullus •, so that he be¬ gan to be weary of the war, and therefore desired Ar- chelaus to conclude a peace upon as honourable teims ^ as he could. The king himself had afterwards also apgace conference with Sylla, and a peace was concluded included 85 B. C. on the following terms, viz. I bat Mithri¬ dates should relinquish all his conquests, and content himself with his paternal dominions, which were confin¬ ed ! ’offtus. I 34 ? hri- flfcs re- 4!iss tlie n(:ons ch had Hted li him. 33 ito- s iu- hig lories 'out ica- PON [ j ed within the limits of Pontus : that he should immedi- J ately resign Bithynia to Nieomedes, and Cappadocia to Ariobarzanes, and release without ransom all the priso¬ ners he had taken during the war: that he should pay to the Romans 2000, or as others will have it 3000, talents, and deliver up to Sylla 80 ships with all their arms and ammunition, and 500 archers ; and lastly, that he should not molest such cities or persons as l/ad du¬ ring the war revolted from him and sided with the Ro¬ mans. Sylla, having thus concluded the war with great glo¬ ry to himself and advantage to the republic, turned his army against Fimbria 5 but the latter, finding himself in no condition to oppose his rival by force, had recourse to treachery, and attempted to get Sylla murdered. The plot miscarried, and Fimbria put an end to his own life ; upon which Sylla, having now an uncontrouled power in Asia, declared the Chians, Rhodians, Lyci- ans, Magnesians, and Trojans, free, and friends of the people of Rome, by way of reward for their having sided with the Romans : but on the other cities he laid heavy fines 5 condemning them in one year to pay 20,000 ta¬ lents, and quartering his soldiers in the houses of those who had shown disaffection to the Romans. Each pri¬ vate man was to receive from his landlord 16 drachms a-day, and each officer 50 5 and besides, both were to be supplied with provisions, not only for themselves, but for such of their friends as they thought proper to in¬ vite. By these impositions most of the people of Asia were reduced to beggary j especially the inhabitants of Ephesus, who had above all others shown their hatred to the Romans. Sylla then, having collected immense treasure, set sail for Italy j leaving behind him Lucullus with the character of qucestoi-, and Muraena with that of pi'cetor. The two legions which Fimbria had commanded were given to Muraena, because Sylla suspected them of an inclination to the faction of Marius, whose party he was going to crush at Rome. Mithridates in the mean time no sooner returned into Pontus, than he set about the reduction of those nations which had revolted from him during the'war. He be¬ gan with the Colchi; who immediately submitted, up¬ on condition that Mithridates would give his sou for a king over them. This was complied with 5 but the old king had thenceforward a jealousy of his son, and there¬ fore first imprisoned and then put him to death. Soon alter this, the king having made great preparations un¬ der pretence of reducing the Bosphori, a warlike nation who had revolted from , him, the Romans began to be jealous. Their jealousy rvas further increased by Arche- laus, who fled to them, and assured them that the prepa¬ rations of Mithridates were not at all designed against the Bosphori. On hearing this, Muraena invaded Pon¬ tus without any farther provocation. The king put him in mind of the articles of peace concluded with Sylla : but Muraena replied that he knew of no such articles ; for Sylla had set nothing down in writing, but contented himself with the execution of what Lad been agreed upon. Having given this answer, the Roman general began to lay waste and plunder the country, without sparing even the treasures or temples consecra¬ ted to the gods. Having put all to fire and sword on the frontiers of Pontus towards Cappadocia, he passed the river Halys, and on that side possessed himself of 3 Poutua. S9 1 PON 400 villages without opposition 5 for Mithridates was unwilling to commit any hostilities before the return of an ambassador whom he had sent to Rome to complain of the conduct of Muraena. At last the ambassador re¬ turned, and with him one Callidius ; who, in public as¬ sembly, commanded Muraena to forbear molesting a friend and ally of the Roman people 5 but afterwards, calling him aside, he had a private conference with him, in which it is supposed, as he brought no decree of the senate, that he encouraged him to pursue the war. Whatever might be in this, it is certain that Murcena still continued to practise the same hostilities, and even made an attempt on Sinope, where the king resided and the loyal treasures were kept. But as the town was well fortified, he was forced to retire with some loss. In the mean time Mithridates himself taking the field, but are tie- appeared at the head of a powerful army, drove thefeated- Romans out of their camp, and forced them with great slaughter to save themselves over the mountains into Phyrgia ; which sudden victory again induced many cities to join Mithridates, and gave him an oppor¬ tunity once more of driving the Romans out of Cappa¬ docia. In the mean time, Sylla, being created dictator at Rome, sent a messenger to Muraena, charging him in his name not to molest Mithridates, whom he had ho¬ noured with the title of a friend and ally of Rome. Muraena did not think proper to disregard this message ; and therefore immediately abandoned all the places he had seized, and Mithridates again renounced Cappado- cia, giving his own son as an hostage of lus fidelity. Being then at leisure to pursue his other plans, Mithri¬ dates fell upon the Bosphori; and, having soon subdued them, appointed Macbares one of his sons king of the country. But leading his army from thence against the Achaeans, a people bordering on the Colchi, and origi¬ nally descended from the Greeks, who returning from Troy had mistaken their way into Greece, and settled there, he wras defeated with the loss of three-fourths of his men. On his return to Pontus, however, he recruit- Engages ed his army, and made vast preparations to invade them in a new anew j but, in the mean time-, hearing of Sylla’s death,vvar with he came to the imprudent resolution of entering into athe B'0' second war with the Romans. Having therefore indu¬ ced his son-in-law Tigranes, king of Armenia, to invade Cappadocia, he himself entered Paphlagonia at the head of 120,000 foot disciplined after the Roman manner, 16,000 horse, and 100 chariots armed with scythes. This country readily submitted j after which the king marched into Bithynia, which also submitted without opposition ; the province of Asia followed the example of the rest 5 for these countries being oppressed with ex¬ orbitant taxes, locked upon him as their deliverer, in entering the cities of Asia, he caused M. Marius or Va¬ ries, whom Sertorius had sent him out of Spain to dis¬ cipline his troops, walk before him with the ensigns of consular dignity as if he was the chief magistrate ; the king following as one of bis attendants. He made se¬ veral cities free ; but at the same time acquainted the inhabitants, that they ivere indebted to Sertorius for their liberty ; and thus, by the connivance of that ge¬ neral, many cities revolted from the Romans without knowing that they had done so. But in the mean time Julius Caesar, being at that time at Rhodes, whether he had gone to study oratory, and hearing what havoek the PON t the kins’3 officers made in the adjacent countries, he collected what troops he could, and tailing unexpectei - ly upon them, drove them quite out of tne province A The Roman senate, now finding a war unavoidable, and Cotta appointed Lncullus tl manage it. The other consul sent against Cotta having solicited an employment m th13 war, v llim- sent with a fleet to guard the Propontis and defend l>i- ' ‘ Lucullus having raised one legion m Ita y, PoiHusi Pontus. 3S laucullus 39 thynia. juucunuo -- a . . , p passed over with it into Asia, where he was joined by four others, two of which, as they had served under Fimbria, proved at first very mutinous aud retractoiy, nor were the other two much better, haying been im¬ mersed in the Asiatic luxuries. The disciplining of these troops took up a considerable time, which was pre¬ judicial to the Roman affairs ; for almost all the Asiatics were ready to revolt, and Mithridates was making the greatest preparations. One of his armies was ordered to march into Cappadocia, under the command of JJio- nhantus Matharus, in order to oppose Lucullus it he should attempt to enter Pontus on that side } another commanded by Mithridates in person, consisted oc i co,ooo foot, 12,000 horse, and too chariots armed with scythes j a third army, commanded by Marius and Eumachus, two generals of great experience m war, was encamped in the neighbourhood of Heraclea in The beginning of the war proved favourable to Mi- faS thridates. Cotta being desired by Lucullus to keep Ins Successful; fleet within the harbour, as being interior to that of Mithridates, resolved to take the first opportunity ot fighting the king by land, not doubting of an easy vic¬ tory. Having for this purpose collected all the forces he could, Cotta dispatched his legate, P. Rutiluis with a considerable body to observe the motions of the ene¬ my This commander being met by Marins and Fu- machus, an engagement ensued, in which the Romans were defeated, and the greatest part of them, together with their commander, cut in pieces. The same mis¬ fortune befel several other officers of distinction sent out to'oppose Mithridates-, who, being elated with success, ordered his admiral to sail into the very har¬ bour, and fire the Roman fleet. This was according¬ ly performed without the least opposition from Coda , and 6o ships were taken, sunk, or burnt, on that occa- 1 These victories having increased the rebellious dispo¬ sition of the Asiatics, made Lucullus hasten his march in order to stop the progress of the enemy. Rut finding the king’s army much more numerous than he expected, he thought proper to decline an engagement. How¬ ever, several skirmishes happened, in which the Romans had always so much the advantage, that they became impatient for a general engagement. But Lucullus did not at this time choose to run so great a risk and there¬ fore Mithridates, seeing he could not force the Romans to a battle, decamped in the night-time, and by day¬ break reached Cyzicum, a most important city, and oreatly attached to the Romans. Lucullus pursued him; and, falling on fils rear, killed io,ooo, and took 12,000 prisoners. After this, the Roman general, by a duceato manoeuvre, gained an important pass, which enabled great straits to cut 0lY all communication between the army ot by Lucul- jyi^hridates and the neighbouring country. The king, seeing himself thus in danger of famine, redoubled his 4i 40 but is re¬ duced to ius, 160 ] PON efforts to gain the city *, but finding that he could not batter down the walls, he resolved to undermine them. In this also he was unsuccessful ; the besieged sunk countermines, and had very near taken the king himself in one of his own mines. In the mean time, winter coming on, the army of Mithridates was so di¬ stressed for want of provisions, that many died of hun¬ ger while the survivors were forced to feed on the flesh of their dead companions. The famine was io.lowed by a plague ; which destroyed such numbers, that Mith¬ ridates was obliged to think of aretieat; and even this was become very dangerous. However, he laid liolu ct the opportunity when Lucullus went away to besiege a neighbouring castle, and sent off the greatest part ot his cavalry in the night j ordering them not to halt till _ the, were out of the teach of the enemy. But Lucul- who ct, lus having got intelligence of them march, suddenly re-jfjg turned, and pursued them so close, that he came up !lis men with them as they were passing a river, took 600 horse, all their beasts of burden, 15,000 men, and put the rest to the sword. On his return he fell m with Aristom- cus the king’s admiral, whom he took, just as he was ready to sail with a large sum of money designed to bribe the Roman army. In the mean time, Mithri¬ dates, finding himself reduced to the last extremity, embarked in the night time with the greatest part ot the forces, while Marius and Eumachus, with 30,000 , men, made the best'of their way to Lampsacus. Rut being closely pursued by the Romans, they were over¬ taken at the river JEsopus, which at that time was not fordable, by reason of its having been swelled by heavy rains. Twenty thousand were killed on the spot} nor could a single man have escaped, had not the Asiatics scattered great quantities of gold and silver in the way, that the march of the Romans might be retar¬ ded by their stopping to gather it up. Lucullus on his return entered Cyzicum amidst the acclamations 01 tne citizens j who afterwards instituted public sports in ho¬ nour of him, which they called Lucullea. The city was declared free, and all the privileges, exemptions, and immunities, bestowed upon the citizens which were en¬ joyed by the inhabitants of Rome itself. 4: From Cyzicum, Lucullus marched along the coast of Lucnliu the Hellespont till he came to 'lioas ; where he equip- great ^ ped his fleet, and put to sea in quest of Marius, Alex- ander, and Dionysius, three of the king’s generals, who had a fleet of 50 ships, with 10,000 land forces on board. Lucullus came up with them near the island of Lemnos, took 32 of their ships, and put a great num¬ ber of their land forces to the sword. The day alter the engagement the three generals were discovered in a cave where they had concealed themselves, and dragged from thence to Lucullus j who, after having severely upbraided Marius for fighting against his country, cau¬ sed him to be put to death. Alexander and Dionysius were reserved for the triumph ; but the latter poisoned himself to avoid that disgrace. Lucullus then steered his course for Bithynia, 011 receiving intelligence that Mithridates had appeared with his fleet on those coasts: but the king having notice of his approach, made what haste he could to gain Pontus, and arrived at Heraclea on hoard a pirate named Selemus; with whom ha was obliged to trust himself, his fleet being dispersed by a violent storm, and the ship that carried him cast away. In Pontus. PON f i , 1° mean time Mithridates was no less unfortu- 43 tIlan sea< Triarius, one of the officers •other °t Lucullus, reduced the cities of Apamea, Prusa, Pru- uccesses ofsias, and Nicaea. From thence he marched with all ex- 'iwihus. pedition to Nicomedia, where the king himself was, and near which place Cotta lay encamped. But before the two armies could be joined, Mithridates escaped, first to Heraclea, which was betrayed to him, and from thence to Sinope. Nor was Lucullus himself all this time inactive. Having reduced all Paphlagonia and Bithyma, he marched into Cappadocia, and joined Cotta and Triarius at Nicomedia, with a design to in¬ vade Pontus; but hearing that Heraclea was in the hands of Mithridates, he despatched Cotta to reduce that city. Triarius was ordered with the fleet to the Hellespont and Propontis, to intercept the king’s fleet, which was daily expected from Spain with supplies from Sertorius. Lucullus himself, with the main strength of the army, pursued his march into Pontus. His army was greatly harassed, especially in the narrow passes be¬ tween Cappadocia and Pontus, by flying parties of the enemy. But the greatest inconvenience was the want ef provisions, as the king’s troops had laid waste all the country around ; insomuch that Luculius having lost al¬ most all his beasts of burden, was obliged to take along with the army 30,000 Galatians, each of them carrying a sack of corn on his back. At last, however, he gain¬ ed the plains ot Pontus ; where provisions were so plen¬ tiful, than an ox was sold for a drachma, and every thing ®lse in proportion. The Roman general having now carried the war into tne enemy’s country, divided his forces, and at the same time invested a very strong town named Amisus; ano¬ ther called Evpatona, built by Mithridates, and made the place of his residence; and another, named Themis- cyrai.situated on the banks of the Thermodoon. Eu- patoria was soon taken, but Themiscyra made a vigo¬ rous resistance. The townsmen galled the Romans to such a degree, that, not daring to approach the w'alls openly, they contented themselves with undermining them : but in this too they met with no small difficulty ; tor the enemy countermined, and often engaged them under ground, letting into the mines bears and other wild beasts, with swarms of bees, which obliged them to abandon their works. However, the town was at last obliged to surrender for want of provisions. As for Amisus, Lucullus himself sat down before it: but find- mg it strongly fortified and garrisoned with the flower of the king’s troops, the Roman general thought proper to reduce it by famine; and on this occasion his coun¬ trymen first complained of him as protracting the war ior his own advantage. In the mean time Mithridates having recruited his Shattered army, advanced to Cabirre, a city not far di¬ stant from Amisus. Lucullus, leaving part of the army to continue the siege, marched at the head of the rest to oppose Mithridates. But the king having drawn his cavalry into a general engagement, defeated them with considerable loss, and drove them back to the moun¬ tains, through the passes of which Lucullus had lately marched to at tack him. This check obi ged the Ro- man general to retire to a rising ground near the city of Labirse, where the enemy could'not force him to an -mgagement. Here provisions beginning to grow scarce, Xucullus sent out strong parties from his army into Cap- VOL. XVII. Part I. J ^ 61 ] PON Pen Uis, padocia, the only place from whence he could have sup- pfies. One of these parties entirely defeated Taxiles v—^ and Diophantes, two of the king’s generals, who had been stationed there to prevent Lucullus from having any communication with the country. The king no¬ on the news of this defeat, resolved to break up his camp and retire, not questioning but that Luculius would attack him as soon as his forces returned. This™ 44 resolution he no sooner imparted to his nobles, thanof Mitlm- they began privately to send away their most valuable dates mutf- goods ; which being found out by the soldiers theynics'which took it in such bad part that no intelligence had been f-bliges lJ,e 0*1 v*»r» tlic.™ 1 king tony . . * MiLciiiotnce nact beeni* * CkS;.',! tl ^ |)lu"dered !lleir l-WW, >«»m‘8sed t^ aries resigned his legions to Lucullus, and put to sea SHu order ,o return to Rome But he a scar e y cot out of the harbour, when part of his ships, bei overloaded with the spoils of the city, others driven by a violent north wind, were dasheu • A „ shore which occasioned the loss ol a giet S of the toA; On his return to Rome however he was highly applauded by the senate, and honoured "itcullu?i>avTng,-» reduced Pontus marched aoainst the Chaldeans, Tibarcmans, and inaahilants o Armenia Minor; 'S s'tJgholds’. FrornArnrenia'1 he’Artorned before ofhis own contriving, that they had gtven over their assaults, and contented themselves W'th block,ng >t P by land, though the garrison was at the same tune plentifully supplied with provisions by sea. Luc" ’ n his an-ival, summoned the city to surrender offer¬ ing the inhabitants very honourable terms *, but, being refused be made a general assault at the time when knew that Callimachus used to draw off ^ P^o bis troops to give them some respite. The home. armlTinsf their scaling ladders, got over the be¬ fore Callimachus could come to the assistance of d ose , i i orl Irvft in o-uard it; however, by setting ;t°cUy on fire, he fn'nd means in that confusion to make his escape. X.ocdlos commanded h,s men to use their utmost endeavours to save the city , but being intent only upon plundering, they regarded nothing but the furniture. At last the fire was extinguished hA violent shower; and Lncnllus, having w.th d.ffi- caltv restrained his soldiers from committing any farther AccsS repaired the city in some measure before he left it, and suffered the inhabitants to enjoy then pos- “To f,in‘; waAow wanting hut the captivity of Mi- ■hridates himself to pot a final per.od to the war; and therefore Wins demanded is sonun- aw 62 1 uculius aeimtimcu ..a... - Tio-vanes. But though that prince could not be pre- vailed on to see Mi.hrida.es on account .fhj» vailed on to see munriuaico . . ,luet he could as little be induced to deliver him up to his enemies. After this refusal, however, he for the first time condescended to see his father-in-law, af- lei he had resided a year and eight months ,s do minions In a private conference held by the two k Z° it was agreed, that Tigranes should march S t the Romans, and Mithrida.es w,th 10,000 horse X™ into Pontns, where he sbonld make what levies be could, and rejoin Tigranes, before Lucullus, who was then employed in the siege of Smope, could enter Jtums Armenia, lint, in the mean time, Sinope having sor v- rendered, Lucullus with ail possible expedition marched against Tigranes, and, having drawn him into a ge»era defeaud engagement, gave him an entire defeat, as is related LucuUuS| under the article Armenia. i i Mithridates was marching to his assistance, uhen l met his son-in-law flying with a small retinue to shel¬ ter himself in some remote corner of the kingdom. 46 He encouraged him to raise fees, no o^ngbuiresob, but that another campaign would icpaii all tor^1 ther taBf losses provided he would commit to Ins management . evefy tiling relating to the war. To . us 1 .panes1' agreeing, as he thought him more lit to deal with the Romans than himself, orders were issued out for raising a new army, and all the Armenians able to bear aims summoned to meet at the place of the general rendez- ' vous Out of these Mithridates chose 70,000 loot and 35,000 horse, and having trained them up during the winter, after the Roman discipline, in the begin¬ ning of the spring he left part ot them ^uth ligranes amf matched himself with the rest into Bontus where he recovered many important places, and overcame in a pitched battle M.Fabius, whom Lueullus had appom- ed governor of that province. Being flushed wi.h his success, as soon as the wounds he received in the en¬ gagement suffered him to rno-te, he pursuec fcabius, and besieged him in the city of Cabiree, whither he had retired, hut in the mean time 1 nanus, who was march¬ ing out of Asia to join Lucullus, hearing what distress the Romans were in, hastened to their ,relf ’ a"d f ‘ pearing unexpectedly on the neighbouring hill, struck fuch terror into the enemy, that they raised the siege, and made the best of their way into Cappadocia. In arius pursued them, and got so near them as to be p irted^only by a river. Here be baited, with a design Tpass the Jiver after he had allowed his men some rest, for they were tired out w.th long marches. But Mithridates was before-hand with him, and crossing 4j river on a bridge, where he had placed a strong guard’Mithnu attacked the Romans with great ^solution before theydefeate had time to refresh themselves. The battle was bloody, and the event doubtful, till the bridge breaking do n with the weight of the multitude that passed, the king’s troops, who had engaged relying chiefly on their numbers, began to lose courage, seeing they could receive no farther assistance, and the Romans charging them with fresh vigour, they betook themselves to a precipitate flight. After this engagement, as winter came on, both armies were glad to retire to their win tr qn Durbin the winter, Mithridates raised new forces: and having received considerable supplies from T.granes, took the field early in the spring, in hopes ot driving the Romans quite out of Pontus, before Lucullus, who had work enough on his hands in Armenia, could come to their assistance. With this view he marched straight against Triarius and Sornatius, to whom Lucullus had committed the care and defence of that province 5 and finding them encamped near the city of Gaziursa, prol- fered them battle; which they declining, lie set a strong detachment to besiege a castle where the Ho¬ mans had left all their baggage, hoping they would rather venture an engagement to relieve the place, than PontuS. 43 (efeats ci^rius. 49 the Ro¬ ns in the vice of thri- tes mas¬ ked. P O M [ lose all they had got with so much toll and labour du- ' ring the war ; neither was he disappointed in his hopes •, for though Triarius was keeping close in his camp till the arrival of Lucullus, whom he daily expected, ha¬ ving acquainted him with the danger, the soldiers hear¬ ing that the castle was besieged, declared in a tumultu¬ ous manner, that if he did not lead them they would march to the relief of the place without his leave. Triarius being thus forced by his own men to light, drew out his forces against the king, whose army was three times his number; but while they were upon the point ol engaging, both armies were by a violent storm forced to retire to their respective camps ; but Triarius receiving that very day intelligence of the approach of Lucullus, and fearing he would snatch the victory out of his hands, resolved to make a bold push, and next morning by break of day attack the king in his camp. If he conquered, the glory he thought would be entire¬ ly bis own ; if he were overcome, the enemy could reap no great advantage from his victory, Lucullus being at hand with a powerful army. The king, in that sur¬ prise, putting himself at the head of a few troops of his guards, sustained the brunt of the Romans, till the rest of bis army drawing up came to his relief, and attacked the enemy with such fury, that the Roman foot were forced to give way, and were driven into a morass, where they were surrounded and great numbers of them cut in pieces. Their horse were likewise put to flight, and pursued with great slaughter, till a Roman centurion in the king’s service, pitying his countrymen, attempted to kill him. The king’s life was saved by his breastplate; but as lie received a deep wound in the thigh, be was ob¬ liged to give over the pursuit himself, and those that were about him caused the retreat to be sounded, which, as it was unexpected, occasioned a great confusion in the whole armv. The centurion was immediately cut in pieces ; hut the Roman horse in the mean time get¬ ting1 the start of the enemy, found means to make their escape. Above 7000 of the Romans were killed in that battle : and among them 190 centurions, and 24 tribunes, the greatest number of officers that had been lost in any engagement to that dav. Mithridates being cured of bis wound, that be might not for the future be exposed to such dangers, caused all the Romans that served in his army to be formed into one body, as it they were to be sent out on a party, and then ordered them to retire to their tents, where they were all to a man cut in pieces. 1 he king, however elated with success, yet would not engage Lucullns ; but with long marches hastened in¬ to Armenia Minor, and encamped on a hill near the town of Talura, expecting Tigranes, who was advan¬ cing with a strong army to join him. Lucullus, in pur¬ suit of Mithridates, marched over the field of battle, leaving those unburied who had fallen in the engage¬ ment, which alienated the minds of the soldiery from him, and they began to be very mutinous ; being stir¬ red up by Appius Claudius, whom Lucullus had turned out of his command for his vile behaviour, notwith¬ standing he Avas nearly related to him, Lucullns having married his sister. The discontent that prevailed in the army came to such a height, that Lucullus rvas ob¬ liged to lie still ip his camp all that summer; the sol- 1 <5.3 J PON diers declaring in a mutinous manner, that they would p011;us, not follow him any longer, nor serve under a general1 v ' who refused to share the booty Avith them. 50 These complaints, and the general discontent that Cucullus reigned in the army, obliged the senate to recal Lu~rec.alle abandon his own dominions, and fly for shelter to the [d from most remote parts of Scythia. Pompey having conclud- ence into led a peace with Tigranes, as we have related in the hi- hcr conn-story of Armenia, and settled the affairs of that king- ‘es‘ gom, began his march in pursuit of Mithridates through those countries that lie about Mount Caucasus. The bar¬ barous nations through which he passed, chiefly the Alba¬ nians and Iberians, attempted to stop his march, but were soon put to flight. However, he was obliged, by the ex¬ cessive cold and deep roads, to pass the winter near the river Cyrus. Early in the spring he pursued his march; but meeting with great opposition from the Iberians, a warlike nation, and entirely devoted to Mithridates, he was employed most part of the summer in reducing them. In the mean time, Mithridates, who had wintered at Dioscurias, on the isthmus between the Euxine and Caspian seas, and had been joined there by such of his troops as had made their escape from the late unfortu¬ nate battle, continued his flight through the countries of the Achseans, Zygians, Heniochians, Cercetans, Moschi, and Colchians. Of these nations some recei¬ ved him kindly, and even entered into alliance with him ; through others he was forced to fight his way with the sword. Pompey took the same route, directing his course by the stars, especially in the northern parts of Scythia, and carrying with him even a supply of water for the army in the vast deserts through which he marched. He spent two years in warring with these nations, and ~iv • j r i_ * i i_• i• /* * i • r i6s j PON PontiB. 5« fhpey' f tier con its. was often in danger of losing both his life and his army : but at last he overcame them all; and believing Mithri¬ dates, of whom he could have no account, to be dead, he marched back into Armenia Minor, where he allow¬ ed some rest to his soldiers, who were quite worn out with the hardships they had endured in that expedition. Having refreshed his army, he marched into Pontus, to reduce some strongholds which were still garrisoned by the king’s troops. While he was at Aspis in Pontus, many of the king’s concubines were brought to him ; hut he sent them all home to their parents, without of¬ fering them the least injury, and thereby gained the affection of the chief lords of Pontus, whose daughters they were. The strong castle of Symphori was delivered up to him by Stratonix, one of the king’s concubines, upon no other terms than that he would spare her son Xiphares, who was with the king, in case he should fall into his hands. She likewise discovered to him great treasures hid under ground, which he, with great gene¬ rosity, bestowed upon her, reserving for himself only some vessels to set off his triumph. Having taken an¬ other fort, called the New Castle, and to that time look¬ ed upon as impregnable, he found in it great store of gold, silver, and other valuable things, which he after¬ wards consecrated to Jupiter Capitolinus. Here, in look¬ ing over the king’s manuscripts, he came to discover where the rest of his treasures were concealed, what ^—v 1 troops he could raise and maintain, what sums were yearly paid him by his subjects and tributaries, &c. whereby he could make a true estimate of his whole power and wealth. Amongst other manuscripts he found some books of physic, wrote by Mithridates himself, which he commanded Lenaeas, a learned grammarian, to translate into Latin. Pompey, having this reduced all Pontus, marched into Syria, with a design to recover that kingdom, and passing through Arabia to penetrate as farasthelled sea. rf) Put while he was employed in this expedition, news was Mitlnidates brought him that Mithridates, whom he believed deati, aPl,tais a- had appeared unexpectedly in Pontus at the head of a;iai1’ Ht.the considerable army, andsurprisedPanticapaeum, a famous empory at the mouth of the Euxine sea. He had tamable aruip all this time concealed in the territories of a Scythian prince, adjoining to the Pains Moeotis ; but hearing tiiat 1 ompey had lelt Pontus, and was engaged in other wars, he ventured out of his hiding-place, resolved either to recover his paternal kingdom, or die in the attempt. He returned privately into Pontus, and managed mat¬ ters there so dexterously, that the Roman garrisons knew nothing of his arrival till he appeared with a considerable army in the field. Pie advanced first to the castle of Symphori ; and understanding that Stratonix had deli¬ vered it up to Pompey, on condition he would save the life of her son in case he should take him prisoner, the king immediately caused the youth, who was in his army, to be put to death, and his body to be left un¬ buried, Stratonix beholding from the walls the cruel and unnatural murder, for he was her son by Mithri¬ dates, and had served him with great fidelity. At tlie same time he sent ambassadors to Pompey to treat of a peace, offering to pay a yearly tribute to' the republic, on condition he restored to him his kingdom. Pompey replied, that he would hearken to no proposals whatso¬ ever, without the king came to treat with him in person, as Tigranes had done. This Mithridates looked upon as nowise consistent with his dignity, and therefore lay¬ ing aside all thoughts of an accommodation, began to make what preparations he could for renewing the war. He summoned all his subjects that were able to bear Recovers arms to meet at an appointed place; and having chosenseveral out of the whole multitude 6o cohorts, each consisting of ioo men, he incorporated them with the regular troops that were already on foot. Being now in a con¬ dition to act offensively, for Pompey had left but a small number of troops in Pontus, he possessed himself of Pha- nagorium, Chersonesus, Theodosia, Nymphteum, and se¬ veral other important places. But, in the mean time, Castor, whom Mithridates had appointed governor of Phanagorium, falling out with Tripho, one of the king’s favourite eunuchs, killed him, and dreading the king’s re¬ sentment, stirred up the inhabitants to a revolt: by which means Phanagorium was again lost; but the castle, which was defended by fourof the king’ssons, Artaphernes, Da¬ rius, Xerxes, and Oxathres, held out for some time. The king hastened to their relief; but the castle being set on fire by the rebels, they were forced to surrender them¬ selves to Castor before his arrival. These four sons, with one of the king’s daughters, by nameC/cojo«^ a,Castorsent to the Romans; and fortifying himself in the town, per¬ suaded Fcntus. 61 His sub ject s dis- sign Tadmj Italy. P O N [ suaOcil must of tlie neigbboai'mg cities, winch were op- pressed with heavy taxes, and strangely harassed by the king’s collectors, to join in the rebellion. Mithndates finding that he could neither rely upon jeers uis- the soldiery, most of them being forced into the service, contented. nor on bis other subjects, who were dissatisfied by reason of the exorbitant taxes, sent ambassadors to invite the princes of Scythia to his relief, and with them Ins daugh¬ ters to be bestowed in marriage on such as showed themselves most inclined to assist him. Bnt as the am¬ bassadors he employed on this occasion were eunuchs, a race of men no less abhorred by the army than favoured by the kino-, over whom they had a great ascendant, especially in his old age, the soldiers who were sent to attend them on their journey, put them all to the sword as soon as they were out of the king’s reach, and de¬ livered his daughters up to the Romans. Mithndates, finding himself thus deprived of his children, betrayed by his army, and iorsaken even by those on whom he chiefly relied, could not yet be induced to submit to the Romans, though Pompey promised him honourable con¬ ditions, provided he came to treat with him in person. In this desperate condition, he left no stone unturned to stir up the princesof Asia against the Romans,especially 62 the Paithians ; but finding them awed by the great opi- SnTrvde- nion they all had of Pompey, he had recourse at last to s,,,n 0rin- the European Gauls, whom he understood to be at w.u with the Romans ; and having sent before some ot his trusty friends to engage them in his favour, taking leave pf his own kingdom, he began his long march design¬ ing to pass through Bosphorus Cimmerius, Scythia, Pa- nonia, &.e. and joining the Gauls, pass the Alps, and invade Italy. . , . This design was no sooner known in the army, but the soldiers openly began to complain and mutiny •, ex¬ aggerating the boldness of the attempt, the length of the march, and the unsurmountable difficulties that must necessarily attend such a desperate enterprise. The chief commanders did all that lay in their power to divert him from it", representing to him, that if he was not able to cope with the Romans in his own king¬ dom, much less would he he a match for them in Ita¬ ly or Gaul, where they could daily receive new sup¬ plies ; whereas he would lose the greatest part ot his army in so long and difficult a march, and the rest, per- - haps in the first engagement, without any possibility of repairing the loss. But all was to no purpose •, for they found him so unalterably fixed in his resolution, that he caused those to b* put to death who with most warmth remonstrated against it, not sparing even his own son Exipodras, for dropping some unguaided expressions on that occasion. Thus they were forced to let him pur¬ sue his own measures, till they found a more proper op¬ portunity to oppose them, which soon after offered, a.s thev were encamped at Bosphorus (Jimmeiius, on their march into Scythia. J11S suu Here Pharnaces, the king’s favourite son, whom he Pharnaces had appointed to succeed him, observing the general re volts. discontent that reigned in the army, began to entertain thoughts of placing the crown on his own head ; and not doubting but the soldiery would stand by him, if he declared against the; intended expedition into Ita- ]y, openly protested among the Roman deserters, who were a considerable part of the army, that it they ^vould follow him he would return into Pontus. 1 he 5 Pontic 63 His son 166] t* O ’ N Romans, who were well apprised of the danger that attended such an undertaking, and had most ot ail ex- u” claimed against it, promised to support him to the ut¬ most of their power, and even encouraged him, upon some expressions which he purposely dropped, to as¬ sume the title of fo'ng, a title which his father seemed determined to hold till he had destroyed, by his rash and desperate attempts, himself, his friends, and his army. Pharnaces, finding he could depend on the Ro¬ mans, engaged the same night most of the chief com¬ manders in his party, and by their means the greater part of the soldiery. It was agreed, that next morn¬ ing by break of day all those who had declared in his favour should appear in arms, and with a loud shout proclaim Pharnaces king j which was done according¬ ly, and the shout returned even by those whom Phar¬ naces had not thought fit to let into the secret. Ihe king, who had taken up his quarters in the city, being awakened by the noise, sent out some of his domestics to know what had happened in the army. Neither did the officers or soldiers dissemble the matter, but boldly answered, that they had chosen a young king instead of an old dotard governed by eunuchs. Hereupon Mithridates mounting on horseback, and attended by his guards, went out to appease the tu¬ mult: but his guards forsaking him, and his horse be¬ ing killed under him, he was obliged to fly back into the city ■, from whence he sent several of his atten¬ dants one after another to desiie of his son a sale con¬ duct for himself and his friends. But as none of the. messengers returned, some being slain, and others siding with the new king, Mithridates endeavoured to move his son to compassion by signifying to him from the walls the distressed condition he was reduced to by a son whom he had favoured above the rest of his chil¬ dren *, but finding him nowise affected by his speech, turning to the gods, he beseeched them with ,niany tears to make his son know one day by experience the grief and agony which a father must feel in seeing Ins love and tenderness requited with such ungrateful and monstrous returns. Having thus spoken, he thank¬ ed in a very obliging manner those who had stood by him to the last, and exorted them to make their sub¬ mission to the new king on the best terms they could procure, adding, that as for himself, he was determi ned not to outlive the rebellion of a son whom lie had always distinguished with particular marks of paternal affection. _ _ c 1 - ^ After this, he withdrew into the apartment of his yfithr wives and concubines, where he first took poison him-dates self, and then presented it to them, and to his favou ^nlPtJ rite daughters Mithridatis and Nissa, who not long^imst! before had been betrothed to the kings oi Egypt and Cyprus. To the women it proved immediate death ; bui on the king, who from his infancy had inured Ins constitution to poisonous potions, it had so slow an operation, that he was forced, through fear of falling into the rebels hands, to recur to his sword. Neither did the wound, as he was greatly weakened by the poison, prove mortal : so that the rebels, having in the mean time stormed the town, and broke into the house, found the king wallowing in his blood, but still alive, and in his senses •, which Pharnaces hearing, sent sotne of those that were about him to dress his wounds, with a design to deliver him up to the Ro¬ mans, PON r 167 ] pon "eatus. mans, anil thereby ingratiate himself with Pompey.— —\r—“; But, in the mean time, a Gaul, who served in the ar- my, by name Bitcetus, or Bit hocus, entering the king’s Ih an endroom *n(lueSt booty, and being touched with com- | is life passion in seeing him forsaken by all his friends, and of com struggling on the bare ground with the pangs of death, I i011, drawing his sword, put an end to his present agonies, and prevented the insults which he chiefly apprehend¬ ed if he should fall alive into his son’s hands. The barbarian is said, when he first saw the king, to have been so awed with the majesty of his countenance, that, forgetful of his booty, he fled out of the room ; but being called back, and earnestly intreated by the dy¬ ing prince to put an end to his misery, he summoned all his courage to perform, as he did, with a trembling hand, that office *, and immediately retired without touching any thing that belonged to the king, though the hope of a rich booty was the only motive that had led him thither. Pompey, who was at that time engaged in a war with the Jews, received the first notice of the death of Mith- ridates as he was on his march to Jerusalem. The mes¬ senger who brought the joyful tidings was sent by Phar- naces, and appeared unexpectedly before Pompey with ^ the branch of a laurel, as was customary on the like oc- jjesgive casions, twisted round the head of his javelin. When he jjoftiie heard what had happened at Panticapseum, he was so pians at impatient to impart it to the soldiery, that be could not jWtenth. even wajt j.j]| jiac] ra[sed him a mount of turf from whence to speak to the army, according to the custom of the camp ; but ordered those who were by him to form a kind of mount with their saddles, and from thence acquainted the soldiery that Milhridates had laid violent hands on himself, and his son Pharnaces was ready to acknowledge the kingdom as a gift of the people of Pome, or resign it if they were unwilling he should reign. This news was received with joyful shouts of the whole army, and the day solemnized with feasts and sacrifices throughout the camp, as if in Mithridates alone all the enemies of the republic had died. Poinpey dispatched ■without delay a messenger with letters to the senate, ac¬ quainting them with the death of Mithridates, and the submission of his son Pharnaces. When his letters were read, the senators were so overjoyed, that they appoint¬ ed at the proposal of Cicero, then consul, 12 days for returning due thanks to the gods, who had delivered them from such an insulting and powerful enemy; and the tribunes of the people enacted a law, whereby Pom¬ pey, in consideration of his eminent service in the Mi- thridatic war, was to wear a crown of laurel, with the triumphal gown at the Circensian sports, and a purple gown at the scenical plays. Pharnaces, when he heard of his father’s death, caus¬ ed his body to be preserved in brine, proposing to pre¬ sent it to Pompey, who bad promised to return into Pon- tus after the reduction of Judsea, and there settle matters to his satisfaction. And accordingly having taken the city and temple of Jerusalem, he set out with two le¬ gions for Pontus ; and being arrived at Sinope, he was lissive there met by ambassadors from Pharnaces, acquainting PI him, that their master had forebore assuming the title of impey. king till his will and pleasure were known ; that be put both himself and the kingdom entirely into his hands; and that he was willing to attend him at what time or place he thought fit to appoint. The same ambassadors Su»ii delivered up (0 Pompey those who had taken Mama's Poutus. Aquilius the iioman legate, whom Mithridates had putl— toacruel death, all the prisoners, hostages,and deserters, whether Homans, Greeks, or Barbarians, and (he body of Mithridates, with his rich apparel and arms, which were greatly admired by Pompey and the other Homans. Both soldiers and officers flocked to see the king’s body ; but Pompey declined that sight j and, saying that all enmity between that great prince and the "people of Home was ended with his life, he returned the body to the ambassadors, and caused it to be interred with the utmost pomp and magnificence among his ancestors in the burying-place of the kings of Pontus, Pompey de¬ fraying all the charges o( that ceremony, which was the most costly and pompous that ever had been seen in those parts. With the body Pompey restored his wear- ing apparel and armour ; but the scabbard of bis sword, which cost 400 talents, was stolen by Hublius a Homan, and sold to Ariarathes king of Cappadocia ; and bis cap or turban, which was a very curious piece of workman¬ ship, was privately taken by one Cains, who presented it to J austus the son of Sylla, in whose house it was kept, and shown for many years after among the many rari¬ ties which Sylla had brought out of Asia. 6S Pompey bestowed the kingdom of Bosphorus on Phar-Mio be- naces, and honoured him with the title of a friend and f.ows upott ally of the people of Home. Pharnaces being thus ac- kinodom 0f knowledged king of Bosphorus, sent orders to all the Bosphorus, garrisons of Pontus to submit themselves, with the cas¬ tles and treasures with which they were entrusted, to Pompey, who by that means amassed an immense booty. In the city of Talaura, which Mithridates used to call his wardrobe, he found 20C0 cups of onyx set in gold, with such store of gold and silver vessels, of costly furniture, of saddles, bridles, and trappings, set with jewels and precious stones, that the Homan commissaries spent 30 days in taking the inventory of the whole. In another castle he found three large tables with nine salvers of massy gold, enriched with precious stones to an inestim¬ able value ; the statues of Minerva, Mars, and Apollo, of pure gold and most curious workmanship} and a pair of gaming-tables of two precious stones, three feet broad, and four feet long, on which was a moon of gold weigb- ing 30 pounds, with their men, all of the same precious stone. In a fort situated among the mountains, were de¬ livered up to him the king’s statue of massy gold, eight cubits high, his throne and sceptre, and the bed of Da¬ rius the son of Hystaspes. Most of these treasures had been transmitted to him from his ancestors, chiefly from Darius king of Persia } some belonged to the Ptolemies of Egypt, and bad been deposited by Cleopatra, as w6 have hinted above, in the hands of the Coans, who de¬ livered them to Mithridates ; and great part of them had been collected by the king himself, who was very fond of rich and stately furniture. Pompey having thus got entire possession of Pontus,. and reduced it to the form of a Roman province, march¬ ed into properly so called} and having wintered at Ephesus, early in the spring set out for Italy, with a fleet of 700 ships. As he brought over his army with him, the senate was under no small apprehension lest he should make himself absolute, and rule without controul. But he no sooner landed at Brundusium, than he disbanded the army, without waiting for any decree either of the senate or people} what neither his friends nor his ene¬ mies. ' t PontUSv 69 Pharnaces falls out with the Romans, 70 and defeats them. P O N t lilies bad believed. His triumph lasted two whole days; and though he was attended in his triumphal chariot iy Q2A captives of distinction, among whom were live sons and two daughters of Mithridates, yet he would not suf¬ fer any of them to be put to death, as had been done >y others 5 but sent them all back, except such as were o royal extraction, to their respective countries, and even supplied them with money to defray the charges of their journey. After his triumph he delivered into the trea_ sury 20,000 talents, though, at the dismissing ot the army he had divided 16,000 talents among the tribunes and centurions, 2000 sestertiums among the qutestors, and had given to each soldier 5° sestertiums. Pompey had no sooner left Asia, hut Pharnaces fell unexpectedly upon the Phanagorenses, a people ol Bos¬ phorus, whom Pompey had declared free, because they had revolted the first of all from Mithridates, and by their example induced others to abandon the king’s party. Pharnaces besieged their chief city Phanagoria,and kept them blocked up till, for want of provisions, they were forced to sally out, and put all to the. issue ol a battle ; which proving unsuccessful, they delivered up themselves and the city to the conqueror. Some years a her, the civil war breaking out between Caesar and Pompey, he laid hold of that opportunity to recover the provinces which his father had formerly possessed 5 and having raised a considerable army, overran Pontus, Colchis, Bi- thynia, Armenia, and the kingdom of Moschis, where he plundered, as Strabo observes, the temple of the god¬ dess Leucothea. He took the strong and important city of Sinope, hut could not reduce Amisus. But, in the mean time, Caesar having got the better of Pompey and his party, appointed Cn. Domitius Calvinus gover¬ nor of Asia, enjoining him to make war upon Pharnaces with the legions that were quartered in that province. Domitius immediately dispatched ambassadors to 1 har- naces, commanding him to withdraw his troops from Ar¬ menia and Cappadocia. The king returned answer, that he was willing to abandon Cappadocia j hut as lor the kingdom of Armenia Minor, it was part of his hereditary dominions, and therefore he would not resign it till he had an opportunity of laying his pretensions before Ctesar himself, whom he was ready to obey in all things. Here¬ upon Domitius drawing together what forces he could, marched into Cappadocia, which he recovered without opposition, Pharnaces having abandoned it to make a stand in Armenia, which lay ne.arer his own dominions. Thither Domitius pursued him) and having overtaken him near Nicopolis, found his army drawn up in battle- array, and the king ready to come to an engagement) which Domitius not declining, both armies advanced. The king, at the head of a choice body of men, fell upon the Bomans left wing, consisting mostly of raw and undisciplined Asiatics) and having with little diffi¬ culty put them to flight, penetrated to the centre, where the thirty-fifth legion, the only one which Domitius had, after a faint resistance, gave ground, and, retir¬ ing to the neighbouring mountains, left their allies to&shift for themselves, who were all cut off. Domi¬ tius with the remains of his scattered army marched back into Cappadocia ) and from thence, winter draw¬ ing on, into the province of Asia. The king being puffed up with this victory, and hearing that Ctesar, with the flower of the Homan forces, was engaged at ^tbe siege of Alexandria, appointed one Asander gover- 168 ] - P O N nor of Bosphorus, and marched himself into Cappado- Pomi- cia in pursuit of Domitius, with a design to invade Asia, and recover all the provinces which had been once sub¬ dued by his father. Bithynia and Cappadocia readily submitted ) hut Armenia the Lesser, which was held by Dejotarus, made so vigorous a resistance, that he was forced to give over the enterprise lest the Homans should in the mean time strengthen themselves in Asia, whither he was in haste to march, in hopes of meeting there with the same success as Ins lather Mithridates had done. But before he reached that province, he was informed that Asander had revolted, in hopes of gaining thereby the siood will of the Romans, and obtaining of them the kingdom of Bosphorus for himself. At the same time, he received intelligence that Caesar, having at last re¬ duced Alexandria, and settled the afiairs ol Syria, was marching into Armenia. 71 He was not a little dismayed at this news, and there-Atteni]! fore without delay dispatched ambassadors to sue for ^ out*: peace ; hoping that Caesar, who was hasting into Italy™8 - with a design to pass over into Africa, would willingly give ear to any proposals ol that nature —Caesar cour¬ teously entertained the ambassadors) and though he did not propose to agree to then' conditions, yet, that he might come upon Pharnaces unawares, he shewed him¬ self very desirous ot entering into a treaty ol peace. But, in the mean time, he pursued his march with all possible expedition ) and arriving on the confines of Pontus, or¬ dered all the troops that were quartered in the neigh¬ bouring provinces to join him ) ior he had brought fioni Alexandria but one legion, namely, the sixth, and that consisting of 1000 men only, the rest having been kill¬ ed at the siege of Alexandria. Besides this veteran le¬ gion, he found at the place of general rendezvous three others, but all of them very indifferently armed, and worse disciplined. With these forces, however, such as they were, he advanced against Pharnaces ) who being greatly frightened at his approach, by reason of the suc¬ cess that had attended him in all his expeditions, again dispatched ambassadors to him with a crown of gold, offering him his daughter in marriage, and promising to do whatever he should require. The ambassadors took care, to let him know, that their master, though highly obliged to Pompey, yet had never been prevailed upon to send him any supplies during the civil war, which Dejotarus, king of Armenia the Lesser, whom he had honoured with his friendship, had done. Caesar return¬ ed for answer, that he was willing to conclude a peace with Pharnaces, provided he retired without delay from Pontus, returned all the captives and hostages whether Roman or their allies, and restored the goods of the Ro¬ man citizens and publicans which he had siezed since he first took up arms. He added, that as to his not send¬ ing supplies to Pompey, they ought rather to have con¬ cealed such an ungrateful proceeding of their master, than alleged it as any merit, since the forsaking of one to whom he was indebted lor his crown, bespoke him a man of mean, selfish, and unworthy piinciples. Pharnaces, upon the return of his ambassadors, ac¬ quainted Caesar that he agreed to the conditions ) but finding that Caesar’s affairs called him into Italy, he re¬ quired a longer term of time for the performance of what was stipulated between them, starting daily new difficulties, in hopes that Caesar would in the mean time he obliged to depart, and leave the affairs of Pontus in the PON ’ontas. 7i 1 whom 1 is en- 1 y de¬ nted. 73 -led in * er en sent. the same posture he had found them, Cresar seeing himself disappointed, and put off from day to day, could not longer brook the king’s deceitful behaviour. Where¬ fore he determined to put himself at the head of his small army, and attack the enemy in his camp, when he least expected it. And accordingly, marching out in the night, he came by break of day in sight of the king’s army 5 and uttering these words, Shall this treacherous parricide go unpunished? broke into the camp at the head of 1000 horse. The king’s chariots, which were armed with scythes, caused some small disorder among Ckesar’s horse ; hut in the mean time the rest of his army coming up, he put the enemy to flight, and obtained a complete victory. This battle was fought near the place where Mithridates had routed with great slaughter the Roman army under the command of Triarius. Most of the king’s army were either taken or cut in pieces; but Pharnaces himself had the good luck to make his escape while the Romans were busy in plundering the camp. This victory was so quick, that Csesar, in a letter to his friend Aminitius, or Anitius, at Rome, expressed it in three words, thus : “ I came, I saw, T conquered.” He ever afterwards used to call Pompey a fortunate rather than a great commander, since he had gained his chief glory in the Mithridatic war, fighting with so cowardly an enemy. He divided the rich booty and the spoils of the camp among his soldiers ; and because Mithridates had erected a trophy near that plaee as a monument of his victory over Triarius, which Caesar, as it was conse¬ crated to the gods, did not think lawful to pull down, he set up another over against it to transmit to posterity his victory over Pharnaces. After this victory he re¬ covered and restored to the allies of the people of Rome all the places which Pharnaces had possessed himself of during the war, declared Amisus a free city, and ap¬ pointed Mithridates Pergamenus king of Bosphorus in the room of Pharnaces. Having thus settled the affairs of Pontus, he set sail for Italy ; leaving Domitius Calvinus to pursue the war against Pharnaces, if he should appear again in the field. Pharnaces had retired after the battle to Sinope with 1000 horse, where he was quickly besieged by Domitius, to whom he surrendered the town, upon no other cdndi- tian than that he should be suffered to retire into Bos¬ phorus with the small body that attended him. This Domitius willingly granted ; but caused all the king’s horses to be killed, since he had asked a safe conduct on¬ ly for his horsemen. With these and a band of Scythians and Sarmatians he attempted to recover the kingdom of Bosphorus, hut being met between Theodocia and Pan- ticapeum, both which cities he had reduced, by Asander, who was still in possession of the kingdom, a sharp en¬ gagement ensued, wherein the king’s men, as not being used to fight on foot, were put to flight, and Pharnaces himself, who remained alone in the field, was surround¬ ed by the enemy, and cut in pieces, after having reigned in Bosphorus Cimmerius, the kingdom which Pompey had bestowed upon him, according to Appian, fifteen years, according to others, seventeen. Upon the death of Pharnaces the kingdom of Pontus was again reduced to the form of a province, and so con¬ tinued to the triumvirate of Mark Antony, who after the battle at Philippi conferred it upon Darius the son of Pharnaces for his services during the civil war. He Vol. XVII. Part I. f N but did no thins du* Poutus. [ 169 ] P o continued faithful to the Romans ring his reign worth mentioning. Darius was succeeded in the kingdom by Polemon, likewise preferred to that honour by Mark Antony! He was the son of Zeno, a famous orator of Laodicea, and greatly favoured by Antony. From him that part of Pontus which borders on Cappadocia borrowed the name of Polemonaicus. He attended Mark Antony in lus expedition against the Parthians: and being taken prisoner in that unsuccessful battle fought by Statianus, be was sent by the king of the Medes, an ally of the Parthians, to conclude a peace with the Romans. In Avhich embassy he acquitted himself so well, that Anto¬ ny added the kingdom of Armenia to his own domi¬ nions. In the war between Antony and Augustus he joined the former: but after the battle of Actium he was received into favour by the latter; and being- sent by Agrippa against Scribonius, who upon the death of Asander nad usurped the kingdom of Bosphorus, he overcame him, and reduced the kingdom of Colchis, which was bestowed upon him by Agrippa, who like¬ wise honoured him with the title oi friend and ally of the people of Pome. He afterwards waged war with the neighbouring barbarians refusing to live in subjec¬ tion to the Romans; but was overcome, taken, and put to death, by the Aspungitani, a people bordering, according to Strabo, on the Palus Mceotis. Upon his death his son Polemon II. was by the em¬ peror Caligula raised to the throne of Bosphorus and Pontus. But the emperor obliged him to exchange the kingdom of Bosphorus with part of Cilicia ; and Nero, w'lth his consent, reduced that part of Pontus which he enjoyed to the form of a province. He fell in love with Berenice, daughter to Agrippa king of Judtea ; and in order to marry her embraced the Jewish religion. But as she soon became tired of his riotous way of living, and icturned to her father; so he renounced his new reli¬ gion, and again embraced the superstitions of Paganism. Polemon dying without issue, the ancient kingdom of Pontus was parcelled out into several parts, and added Is parcelled to the provinces of Bithynia, Galatia, and Cappadocia, °ut.into only that part of it which was called Pontus Polemonai- 8!veral ino- cus retaining the dignity of a distinct and separate pro- VmCeS‘ vince. During the civil discords between Vespasian and Vitellius, one Anicetus, first a slave, afterwards freed- man to King Polemon, and lastly commander of the royal navy, took up arms with a design to rescue the kingdom from the Roman bondage ; and being joined by great multitudes drawn together with the prospect of spoil, overran the country, and possessed himself of 1 rapesund, a city founded by the Grecians on the ut¬ most confines of i ontus. Here he cut in pieces a cohort made up of the inhabitants, but which had been former- ly presented with the privilege of Roman citizens. He likewise burnt the fleet, and with scorn and insults scoured the sea ; Mucianus having called to Byzantium most of the Roman galleys. Hereupon Vespasian, who was at that time in Syria, sent Verdius Gemnius into Pontus with a choice body of auxiliaries from the le¬ gions. He assailing the enemy while they w-ere in dis¬ order, and roaming asunder in pursuit of prey, drove them into their vessels ; then with some galleys chased Anicetus into the mouth of the river Chobus, where he thought himself safe under the protection of Sedochus Y kins; PON t i?0 ] POO kiiiF nf tlin Laiians, whose alliance he had purchased, ■with lar^e sums ami rich presents. Sedochus at rs refused to deliver him up to the Romans; hut was soon prevailed upon, partly by threats, partly by presents to surrender both him and all the other fugitives who had taken sanctuary in his dominions. Thus ended that servile war j and the kingdom of Pontus continued o be a province of the empire till the time of David and Alexis Comneni, who being driven from Constantinople bv the French and Venetians A. D. 1204, under the command of Baldwin earl of Flanders settled the one at Heraclea, the other at Trebisond. Ihe troubles that arose among the Latins gave Alexis Comnenus an op¬ portunity of erecting here a new empire, which com¬ prehended great part of Pontus, and was known by the name of the empire of Trebisond. I he Comneni held it about 2 years, till the time of Mohammed II. who carried David Comnenus, the last emperor of Trebisond, prisoner to Constantinople, A. D. 1462, with all his family, and subjected his empire to that of Constanti¬ nople ; in which abject slavery Trebisond and all Pon¬ tus have continued ever since. PONTYPOOL, a town of Monmouthshire in Lng- land, seated between two hills. It is a small place 5 but _ _ . . • 11 i 1. -10 nnp»n acid vapour converts all which it penetrates, whether lavas, tufas, volcanic ashes, or pumice-stones, into a pure clay, mostly white, or with a tint of red, blue, green, or yellow. In one part of this island there is a soit of tufa i@- markably good for the purpose of building. It is. as hard as Bath-stone, and nearly of the same colour, with¬ out any mixture of lava or pumice-stone, which usually abound in the tufas of Naples, Raise, and X uz7.oli. The island of Palmarole, which is about four miles from Ponza, is not much more than a mile in circum¬ ference. It is composed of the same volcanic matter, and probably was once a part of Ponza ; and in our author’s opinion it looks as if the island of Zannone, which lies about the same distance from Ponza, was once likewise a part of the same ; for many rocks of lava rise above water in a line betwixt the two last-mention¬ ed islands, and the water there is much more shallow than in the gulf of Terracina. Zannone is much larger and higher than Palmarole; and that half of it next" the continent is composed of a lime-stone similar to that of the Apennines near it j the other half is composed of lavas and tufas, resembling in every other respect the soil of the islands just described. land, seated between two hills. It is a small place 5 but ^ry ornei^^ ^ . but the noted for its iron-mi'ls^nd^eat manu ac ^c 0 >lI_a latter furnishes abundance of brushwood for the use of notea 101 its* ^ xt r vessels, called Pontypool. W.Long. 3. 6. N.Rat. 51.42. PONZA, or PoNTlA, is a small island of the Luscan sea well known to be the place to which many illustri¬ ous5 Romans were formerly banished. It is situated on the coast of Italy near Terracina, and in the neighbour¬ hood of other small islands or rocks named Palmarole, Zannone, &.c. between the island of Ventotienne and Monte Circello. All these islands were visited by Sir William Hamilton in the year 1781;.; and an account of his journey is given in a letter to Sir J. Banks, which appeared in the Phil. Trans, vol. Ixxvi. p. 365. Sir William arrived at Ponza on the 20th August •, and, according to his account, it lies about 30 miles from Ventotienne, On the 2ist he went round it in a boat. Its length is about five miles, but its breadth is nowhere above half a mile, and in some places not more than 500 feet. It is surrounded by a multitude of detached rocks, some of them very high, and most of them composed of a compact lava. There are many irregularly formed basaltes, but none in large columns. In some places they have a reddish tinge from iron ochre, are very small, and irregularly laid over one another. Some stand perpendicularly, others obliquely, and some he horizontally. The rocks themselves in which these masses are found are lava of the same nature with the basaltes. At first sight they appear like tlie ruins of ancient Roman brick or tyle buildings. . One rock is composed of large spherical basalts, and m other places our author found the lava inclined to take the like spherical form, though on a much smaller scale, some of the former basalts being near two feet in diameter. All these rocks, in our author’s opinion, have been detached i y the sea from this island, which is entirely composed of volcanic matter, lavas, and tufas of various qualities and colours, as green, yellow, black, and white, borne of these matters are more compact in their texture than others 5 and in some parts great tracts seem to have un¬ dergone similar operations, which still subsist at a spot called the Pisciarelli, on the outside of the Solfatara, near Puzzole, and where a hot sulphureous vitriolic a latter furnishes abundance of brushwood for the use of the inhabitants of Ponza, whose number, including the garrison,amounts to near 1700. Ihe uninhabited island of St Stefano in like manner furnishes wood for the peo¬ ple of Ventotienne. It is probable that all these islands and rocks may in time be levelled by the action of the sea. Ponza, in its present state, is the mere skeleton of a volcanic island 5 little more than its hard or vitufied parts remaining, and they seem to be slowly and gradu¬ ally mouldering away. The governor of the castle of Ponza, who had resided there 53 years, told our author that the island was still subject to earthquakes 5 that there had been one violent shock there about four years before j but that the most violent one he.ever felt was on the very day and at the hour that Lisbon was de¬ stroyed. Two houses out of three which were then on the island were thrown down. “ I his (says our author) seems to prove that the volcanic matter which gave birth to these islands is not exhausted.” Fig. 1. is a plan of the island of Ponza as it is given piat« in the Philosophical Transactions. Fig. 2. is a view of 9cccm the inside of the harbour ef the island. A. in the same I*a figure is a rock of lava. In many parts it is formed in¬ to regular basaltes of a reddish colour, tinged in all pro¬ bability with some ochre. Most of the detached rocks of the island resemble this. BB represents a tract.of volcanic country, converted by a hot sulphureous vitrio¬ lic acid vapour into a pure clay, the ground colour of which is mostly white.—Fig. 3. is a view from the out-1^- 2 side of the harbour, near the lighthouse. G is a rock of volcanic matter converted to pure clay j D is a rock of the same kind, with strata of pumice-stone. E is a rock of lava, inclining to take basaltic forms ; and F is p rock composed of spherical basaltes. POOD is a Russian weight, equal to 40 Russian or 36 English pounds. POOL is properly a reservoir of water supplied with springs, and discharging the overplus by sluices, defen¬ ders, weirs, and other causeways. I'OOL, a sea-port town of Dorsetshire in England. It /?/:///?/ ,i- SrupureJ fiv M'A' 7J.fa'ziiiv film/run/h. ■ IS LANDofPONZA . PLATE CCCCXXXVI. Fig.]. Saifa Jifit/sj-irffm/ij/io XiprteftL POO [ J Pool It is surrounded on all sides by the sea, except on the U north, where there is an entrance through a gate. It Poor‘ _f was formerly nothing but a place where a few fisher- men lived j but in the reign of Henry VI. it was greatly enlarged, and the inhabitants had the privilege to wall it round. It was also made a county of itself, and sent two members to parliament. It is governed by a mayor, a senior bailill, four other justices, and an indeterminate number of buigesses. Ihe number of inhabitants in t8i i was estimated at 4816 } and the number of vessels belonging to this port is stated at 230. It is 47 miles west-south-west of Winchester, and no west-by-south of London. W. Long. 2. o. N. Lat. 50. 42. POOLE, Matthew, a very learned writer in the 17th century, was born at York in 1624. He was educated at Emmanuel-college, Cambridge, and after¬ wards incorporated in the university of Oxford. He succeeded Dr Anthony Tuckney in the rectory of St Michael de Quern, in London, about 1648. In 1658 he set on foot a project for maintaining youths of great parts at the universities, and had the approbation of the heads of houses in both of them. He solicited the affair with so much vigour, that in a short time 900I. per annum was procured for that purpose ; but this de¬ sign was laid aside at the Restoration. In 1662 he was ejected from his living for nonconformity. He was ten years employed in composing his Synopsis Criticorum, &c. Besides this great work he published several other pieces. When Dr Oates’s depositions concerning the popish plot were printed, onr autlior found his name m the list of those who were to be cut off, on the ac¬ count (as was supposed) of what he had written against the papists in his Nullity of the Romish Faith. So that he was obliged to retire to Holland, where he died in 1679, and left behind him the character of a very able critic and casuist. J POOL , the stern of a ship ; or the highest, upper¬ most, and hinder part of a ship’s hull. See Stern. POOR, in law, an appellation given to all those who are in such a low and mean condition, that they either are or may become a burden to the parish. They who rank pity amongst the original impulses of our nature rightly contend, that when it prompts us to the relief of human misery, it indicates sufficiently the Divine intention, and our duty. Indeed, the same con¬ clusion is deducible from the existence of the passion whatever account be given of its origin. Whether it be instinct, or a habit founded in association (see Pas¬ sion), it is in fact a property of our nature which God appointed : and the final cause for which it was appoint- 1 •1%tM t0 t!ie rn*serahle, in the compassion of their fellow-creatures, a remedy for those inequalities am distresses to which many are necessarily exposed under every possible rule for the distribution of proper ¬ ty. . That the poor have a claim upon the rich, found¬ ed in the law of nature, can be questioned by no man who admits the benevolence of the Deity, and con¬ siders his purpose in creating the world (see Theolo- ^Y’ ^ ar.t ^ect* u-)> and upon this claim the Chris¬ tian benptures are more explicit than almost upon any 1 lie rights of the poor, however, to be relieved by e rich, as they originate in nature, and are sanctioned by Christianity, are evidently of that kind which is call¬ ed imperfect (See Moral Philosophyy N° 13r,). It is 'I ] POO surely needless to warn our readers in this place, that imperfect rights are in themselves as sacred, and the duties resulting from them as obligatory in foro conscien- ticty as the most rigid claims of justice. Every ono knows, that they are called imperfect only because the extent of them in particular instances cannot he ascer¬ tained by positive laws, nor the breach of them be pu¬ nished by the civil magistrate. Hence the apostle, though he enjoins a weekly contribution to be made for the poor in the church of Corinth, yet leaves the sum to be contributed by each individual wholly undetermined. ‘ Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I have given order to the churches of Galatia, even so do ye. Upon the first day of the w'eek let every one of you lay by him in store as God hath prospered him.''1 By winch St Paul certainly recommends to every man to contribute, not a fixed sum, hut as much as, from a de¬ liberate comparison of his fortune, with the reasonable expences and expectations of his family, he finds he can spare for charitable purposes. It is well known that those weekly contributions were laid at the feet of the apostles, who transferred the management of the fund thence arising to deacons elect¬ ed by the people, and ordained by them to see that the money was properly distributed. Hence, under Chri¬ stianity, the maintenance of the poor became chiefly an ecclesiastical concern ; and when that holy and benevo¬ lent religion was established in the Roman empire, a fourth part of the tithes was in some countries of Eu¬ rope, and particularly in England, set apart for that purpose. Afterwards, when the tithes of many parishes, were appropriated to the monasteries, these societies were the principal resource of the poor, who were far¬ ther relieved by voluntary contributions. Judge Black- stone observes, that till the statute 26 Hen. VJII. cap. 26. he finds no compulsory method for providing for the poor; hut upon the total dissolution of the mona¬ steries, abundance of statutes were made in the rei78 ] made a term of communion with the cliurcli of Kome. Clinstenciom, Some Catholic divines, indeed, especially among the Je¬ suits, are universally known to have held this extrava¬ gant and dangerous opinion ; but by far the. greater part ol them condemn and abhor it as absurd and im¬ pious : and surely it is but fair and just to allow them to know best what they themselves believe. And here, to conclude, we shall add, that it is very desirable that Christians of all denominations endeavour to understand one another better than they have often done ; and in¬ stead of supposing imaginary differences, strive to re¬ move real ones, for the general good of mankind, lor the glory of God, and honour of religion •, and that all vie with one another to excel in just and charitable sen¬ timents, language, and behaviour. The reader, who wishes to know what can be urged for and against the supremacy of the pope, and who is fitted by his knowledge of ecclesiastical history to un¬ derstand the nature of the question at issue, may con¬ sult, on the one hand, the works of Bellarmine, toge¬ ther with a small tract lately published in English, un¬ der the title of I'he Divine Economi/ oj Christ in his Kingdom or Church ; and on the other, Barrow’s trea¬ tisethe Pope's Supremacy, together with Chilling- worth’s Religion of Protestants, &c. Pope, Dominions of, or Ecclesiastical States, a coun¬ try of Italy, bounded on the north by the gulf of Ve¬ nice and the Venetian dominions, on the south by the Mediterranean, on the east by the kingdom of Naples and the Adriatic, and on the west by Tuscany and Mo¬ dena. It is 200 miles long on the coast ot the Adria¬ tic from Naples to the Venetian territory. Its breadth from sea to sea is about 130 miles, and the area of the whole 15,500 square English miles. The population in 1815 was estimated at 2,424,000. The. soil, in general, of the pope’s dominions is very fertile, but ill cultivated ; and there are many fens and marshy grounds which are very prejudicial to the air. That the lands are badly cultivated and inhabited, the air bad, and the inhabitants poor, idle, lazy, and grossly superstitious, is owing to a variety of causes. With respect to the accommodations ol life, this country is but in a very indifferent condition j for, notwithstand¬ ing the fertility of its soil, its advantageous situation for traffic, the large sums spent in it by travellers, or re¬ mitted to it from foreign countries, and its having, for its ruler, the successor of St Peter, the prince of the apostles, and the vicar of Jesus Christ j yet it is poor and thin of inhabitants, ill cultivated, and without trade and manufactures. This is partly owing to the great number of holidays, of sturdy beggars called pilgrims, and of hospitals and convents, with the amazing but perhaps useless wealth of churches and convents,, and the inquisition : but the chief cause is the severity of the government, and the grievous exactions and hard¬ ships to which the subjects are exposed. The legates, though mostly clergymen, whose thoughts should be chiefly employed about laying up treasures^ in heaven, and who ought to set an example to the laity of disin¬ terestedness and a contempt ol this world, too often, it is said, scruple no kind of rapaciousness : even the holy father himself, and the cardinals, frequently make the enriching of their nephews and other relations, and the aggrandizing their families, too much the business of their lives. The extensive claims and great pretensions of the pope are well known, and, by a large part of 4 POP are now treated with 'contempt and mockery. The Keformation gave a great blow to his ' spiritual power 5 and tne French involution has lessen¬ ed it still more. His temporal dominions, however, still continue much the same-, though how long this may be the case, considering how much he hath lost, and is daily losing, of his ghostly empire, and the vene¬ ration in which he was formerly held, it is difficult to say. See Pope.—The Campania of Borne is under the pope’s immediate government but the other provinces are governed by legates and vice legates, and there is a commander in chief ot the pope’s ioices in eveiy pio- The pope is chosen by the cardinals in the con- vince. — — j # rpj clave: See this particularly described above, ihe pope holds a consistory of cardinals on ecclesiastical af¬ fairs but the cardinals do not meddle with his civil government. The pope’s chief minister is the cardinal- patron, usually his nephew, who amasses an immense estate, if the reign be of any long duration. The car¬ dinal that is chosen pope must generally be an Italian^ and at least 55 years of age. 'ihe spiritual power or the pope, though far short of what it was before the Reformation, is still considerable. It was formerly computed that the monks and regular clergy, who were absolutely at his devotion, amounted to 2,000,000 of people, dispersed through all the Roman Catholic coun¬ tries, to promote the interest of the church. 1 he re¬ venues of these monks were supposed not to fall short of 20,000,000!. sterling, besides the casual profits ari¬ sing from offerings, and the people’s bounty to the church, who are taught that their salvation depends on this kind of benevolence. The number of monks is now much reduced. The pope’s revenues, including contributions from Catholic countries, were estimated at 8oc,oool. in 1815. The vast sums which formerly flowed into the- papal treasury Irom all the Roman Catholic countries, for dispensations, indulgences, canonizations, annates, the pallia, and investitures of archbishops and bishops, are now much diminished. The pope has a considerable body of regular forces, well clothed and paid j but his fleet consists only ot a few galleys. His life guards are 40 Switzers, 75 cui¬ rassiers, and as many light horse. Since the beginning of the French revolutionary war he had at one time a guard of English horse. In 1797 the northern part of the states of the church was annexed to the Cisalpine republic, and in 1 808 the remainder of the states east of the Apennines. In 1810 the shadow of independence which the western part of the pope’s territories had enjoyed disappeared, and it was formally annexed to the French empire, forming two departments, Rome and Thrasimene. The suc¬ cesses of the allies in 1814 and 1815 restored the pope to the full possession of his dominions. Pope, Alexander, a celebrated English poet, descend¬ ed from a respectable family, was born the 8th of June 1688, at London, where his father was then a considerable merchant. He was taught to read very early by an aunt j and learned to write without any as¬ sistance, by copying printed books. The family being of the Romish religion, he was- put, at eight years ol age, under one Taverner, a priest, who taught him the rudiments of the Latin and Greek tongues together and soon after was sent to a Popish seminary at*Win¬ chester, from whence he was removed to a school at Hvde- Hyde-Park Corner. He discovered early an inclination —'to versifying; and the translation of Ggilby and San- dys from Virgil and Ovid first falling in'his"way, they were his favourite authors. At twelve he retired with his parents to Binfield, in Windsor Forest ; and there became acquainted with the writings of Spenser Wal¬ ler, and Dryden. Dry den struck him most, probably because tne cast of that poet was most congenial with his own; and therefore he not only studied^his works intensely, but ever after mentioned him with a kind of rapturous veneration. He once obtained a sight of him at a coffee-house, but never was known to him : a mis¬ fortune which he laments in these short but expressive words, Virgil in m tantum vidi. Though Pope had been under more tutors than one, yet it seems they were so insufficient for the purpose of teaching, that he had learn¬ ed very littlefromthem: so that,beingobligedafterwards to begin all over again, he may justly be considered as one of the etvlo^xxjoi or self-taught. At fifteen he had acquired a readiness in the two learned languages ; to which he soon after added the French and Italian. He had already scribbled a great deal of poetry in various ways ; and this year set about an epic poem called Al- cander. He long after communicated it to Atlerbury, with a declared intention to burn it; and that friend concurred with him : “ Though (adds he) I would liave interceded for the first page, and put it, with your leave, among my curiosities.” What the poet himself observes upon these early pieces is agreeable enough ; and shows, that though at first a little intoxicated with the waters of Helicon, he afterwards arrived to great sobriety of thinking. “ I confess (says he) there was a time when 1 was in love with myself; and my first productions were the children of Self-love upon Inno¬ cence. I had made an epic poem, and panegyrics on all the princes ; and I thought myself the greatest ge¬ nius that ever was. I cannot but regret these delight¬ ful visions of my childhood, which, like the fine colours we see when our eyes are shut, are vanished for ever.” His pastorals, begun in 1704, first introduced him to the wits of the time ; among whom were Wycherly and Walsh. This last gentleman proved a sincere friend to him ; and soon discerning that his talent lay, not so much in striking out new thoughts of his own, as in improving those of other men, and in an easy versifica¬ tion, told him, among other things, that there was one way left open for him to excel his predecessors in, which was correctness : observing, that though we had seve¬ ral great poets, yet none of them were correct. Pope took the hint, and turned it to good account; for no doubt the distinguishing harmony of his numbers was in a great measure owing to it. The same year, 1704, he wrote the first part of his Windsor Forest, though the whole was not published till 1710. In 1708, he wrote the Essay on Criticism; which production was justly esteemed a masterpiece in its kind, and showed not only the peculiar turn of his talents, but that those talents, young as he was, were ripened into perfection. He was not yet twenty years old ; and yet the matu- rity of judgment, the knowledge of the world, and the penetration into human nature, displayed in that piece, were such as would have done honour to the greatest abilities and experience. But whatever may be the merit of the Essay on Criticism, it was still surpassed, in a poetical view, by the Kape of the Lock, first com- 79 ] POP pletely published in 1712. The former excelled in the didactic way, forwhich wewas peculiarly formed, aclear head, strong sense, and a sound judgment, being his cha- 1 acteristical qualities ; but it is the creative power of the imagination that constitutes what is properly called a poet; and therefore it is in the llape of the Lock that Pope principally appears one, there being more vis imhginandi displayed in this poem than perhaps in all his other works put together. In 1713, he gave out proposals for publishing a translation of Homer’s Iliad by subscription ; in which all parties concurred so hear¬ tily, that he acquired a considerable fortune by it 1 he subscription amounted to 6000I. besides i2ocl. which Lintot the bookseller gave him for the copy.’ i ope’s finances being now in good condition, he pur¬ chased a house at Twickenham, whither he removed with Ins father and mother in 1715: where the for¬ mer died about two years after. As he was a Papist he could not purchase, nor put his money to interest on real security ; and as he adhered to the cause of ing James, he made it a point of conscience not to lend it to the new government; so that, though he was worth near 20,000!. when belaid aside business, yet, li¬ ving afterwards upon the quick stock, he left but a slen¬ der subsistence to his family. Our poet, however, did not fail to improve it to the utmost: he had already acqui¬ red much by Ins publications, and he was all attention to acquire more. In 1717, he published a collection of ail he had printed separately; and proceeded to give a new edition of Shakespeare: which, being published in 1721, discovered that he had consulted his fortune more than his fame in that undertaking. The Iliad being finished, he engaged upon the like footing to undertake the Odyssey. Mr Broome and Mr Fenton did part of it, and received 500I. of Mr Pope for their 1 a hours. It was published in the same manner, and on the same conditions to Lintot; excepting that, instead of 1200I. he had but 600I. for the copy. This work being finished in 1725, he was afterwards emploved With Swift and Arbuthnot, in printing some volumes °* Hiscellaiues. About this time he narrowly escaped losing his life, as he was returning home in a friend’s chariot ; which, on passing a bridge, happened to be overturned, and thrown with the horses into the river. 1 be glasses were up, and he was not able to break them : so that he had immediately been drowned, if the po¬ stilion had not broke them, and dragged him out to the hank. A fragment of the glass, however, cut him so desperately, that he ever after lost the use of two of his fingers. In 1727 his Dunciad appeared in Ireland ; and the year after in England, with notes by Swift, under the name of Sci'iblcrus. ' This edition was pre¬ sented to the king and queen by Sir Robert Walpole ; who, probably about this time, offered to procure Pope a pension, which however he refused, as he had for¬ merly done a proposal of the same kind made him by Lord Halifax. He greatly cultivated the spirit of in¬ dependency ; and “Unplac’d, unpension’d, no man’s heir or slave,” was frequently his boast. He some¬ where observes, that the life of an author is a state of wax fare. he has shewn himself a complete general in this way of warring. He bore the insults and injuries of his enemies long; but at length, in the Dunciad, made an absolutely universal slaughter of them : for even Cibber, who was afterwards "advanced to be the Z 2 hero POP [ hero of it, could not forbear owning, that nothing u-l> ever more perfect and finished in its kind than tins poem. In 1720, by the advice oi Lord Bolingbroke, u tUi'' ed his pen to subjects of morality ; and according y we find him, with the assistance of that noble triend, who furnished him with the materials, at work thisyeai upon the Essay on Man. The following extract oi a letter to Swift discovers the reason or Ins lordships advice : Bid him (says Bolingbroke) talk to you ot the work he is about, l hope in good earnest 5 it is a fine one, and will be, in his hands, an original. His sole complaint is, that he finds it too easy in the exe¬ cution. This flatters his laziness ; it flatters my judge- ment •, who, always thought, that, universal as his ta¬ lents are, this is eminently and peculiarly Ins, above ail the writers I know, living or dead •, J do not excep Horace ” Pope tells the dean in the next letter, that “ the work Lord Bolingbroke speaks _ of with such abundant partiality, is a system ol ethics, in the iio- ratian way.” In pursuing the same design, he wrote his Ethic Epistles: the lourth of which, upon laste, giving great offence, as he was supposed to ridicule the duke of Chandos under the character of limon, is said to have put him upon writing satires, which lie continued til! 1739. He ventured to attack persons 0 the highest rank, and set no bounds to his satirical rage. A genuine collection of his letters were publish¬ ed in 1737. In 1738, a French translation of the Essay on Man, by the Abbe Resnel, was printed at Paris ; and Mr Crousaz.the German professor, animad¬ verted upon this system of ethics, which he represented as nothin'f else but a system of naturalism. Mr YV arburton, afterwards bishop 'of Gloucester, wrote a commentary upon the Essay in which he defends it against Grou- saz whose objections he supposes owing to the faulti- ness of the Abbe Resnel’s translation. The poem was republished in 1740, with the commentary. Our au¬ thor now added a fourth book to the Duncaul, which •was first printed separately in 1742 •, but the year al¬ ter, the whole poem came out together, as a specimen of a more correct edition of his works. lie had made some progress in that design, hut did not live to com¬ plete it. ' He had all his life long been subject to the headach 5 and that complaint, which he derived from his mother, was now greatly increased by a dropsy m his breast, under which he expired the 30th ot May 1744, in the 56th year of his age. In his will, dated December it. 1743* Miss Blount, a lady to whom he was always devoted, was made his heir during her life : and among other legacies, he bequeathed to Mr War- burton the property of all such of his works, already printed, as he had written, or should write commenta¬ ries upon, and which had not otherwise been disposed oi or alienated •, with this condition, that they were pub¬ lished without future alterations. In discharge o this trust, that gentleman gave a complete edition ot all Mr Pope’s works, 1751, in nine vols. 8vo. A work, enti¬ tled, An Essay on the Writings and Genius oj tope, by Mr Warton, two vols. 8vo, will be read with pleasuie by those who desire to know more of the person, charac¬ ter, and writings of this excellent poet. Lord Orrery s account of him is very flattering : “ It we may judge qf him by his works (says this noble author), bis chief aim was to be esteemed a man of virtue. His letters u>-e written in that style j his last volumes are all of the xSo ] POP moral kind 5 he has avoided trifles, and consequently has escaped a rock which has proved very injurious to Swift’s reputation.' He has given Ins imagination full scope, and yet lias preserved a perpetual guard upon his conduct. The constitution ot his body and mind mi'dit really incline them to the habits ot caution and reserve. The treatment which he met with afterwards, from an innumerable tribe of adversaries, confirmed this habit •, and made him slower than the dean m pronoun¬ cing his judgment upon persons and things. His prose- writings are little less harmonious than his verse j and his voice in common conversation was so naturally mu¬ sical, that I remember honest Tom Southern used to call him the little nightingale. His manners were dedi¬ cate, easy, and engaging \ and he treated bis friends with a politeness that charmed, and a generosity that was much to his honour. Every guest was made happy within his doors ; pleasure dwelt under his roof, and elegance presided at his table.” Yet, from Dr Johnson’s account of his domestic ha¬ bits we have reason to doubt the latter part ot this character. His parsimony (he informs us) appeared in very petty matters, such as writing his compositions on the hacks of letters, or in a niggardly reception of his friends, and a scantiness of entertainment—as the setting a single pint on the table to two friends, when, havino- himself taken two small glasses, he would retire, saying I leave you to your wine. He sometimes, however, the Doctor acknowledges, made a splendid dinner •, but this happened seldom. He was very full of his fortune, and frequently ridiculed poverty *, and he seems to have been of an opinion not very uncom¬ mon in the world, that to want money is to want every thinox He was almost equally proud of las connection witli the great, and often boasted that he obtained their notice by no meanness or servility. 1 his admiration of the great increased in the advance of life j yet we must acknowledge, that he could derive but little honour from the notice of Cobham, Burlington, or Boling- By natural deformity, or accidental distortion, his vital functions were so much disordered, that his life was a long disease j and from this cause arose many of his peculiarities and weaknesses. He stood constantly in need of female attendants 5 and to avoid cold, of which he was very sensible, he wore a fur doublet under his shirt, See. The indulgence and accommodation which his sickness required, had taught him all the un¬ pleasing and unsocial qualities ol a valetudinary man. When he wanted to sleep, he nodded in company •, and once slumbered at his oivn table when the prince of Males was talking of poetry. He was extremely trou¬ blesome to such of his friends as asked him out, which many uf them frequently did, and plagued the servants beyond description. His love ot eating is another fault, to which he is said to have fallen a sacrifice. In all his intercourse with mankind, he had great delight m artifice, and endeavoured to attain all his purposes by indirect and unsuspected methods. In familiar conversation it is said he never excelled j and he was so fietful and so easily displeased, that he would sometimes leave Lord Oxford’s silently without any apparent reason, and was to be courted back by more letters and messages than the servants w'ere will¬ ing to carry. ^ POP 1 ope, : pery Dr JohriSftn also crives a view of the intellectual cha¬ racter of Pope, and draws a parallel between Dryden " and him. For particulars, however, we must refer our readers to Johnson'*a Lives of the Poets. POPERY, in ecclesiastical history, comprehends the religious doctrines and practices adopted and maintain¬ ed by the church of Rome. The following summary, extracted chiefly from the decrees of the council of Trent, continued under Paul III. Julius III. and Pius IV. from the year 1545 to 1563, by successive sessions, and the creed of Pope Pius IV. subjoined to it, and bearing date November 1564, may not be unacceptable to the reader. One of the fundamental tenets, stre¬ nuously maintained by Popish writers, is the infalli¬ bility of the church of Rome ; though they are not agreed whether this privilege belongs to the pope or a general council, or to both united ; but they pretend that an infallible living judge is absolutely necessary to determine controversies, and to secure peace in the Christian church. However., Protestants allege, that the claim of infallibility in any church is not justified by the authority of Scripture ; much less does it per¬ tain to the church of Rome ; and that it is inconsistent with the nature of religion, and the personal obliga¬ tions of its professors; and that it has proved ineffec¬ tual to the end for which it is supposed to be granted, since popes and councils have disagreed in matters of importance, and they have been incapable, with the advantage of this pretended infallibility, of maintaining union and peace. Another essential article of the popish creed is the supremacy of the pope, or his sovereign power over the universal church. See Pope. Farthei-, the doctrine of the seven sacraments is a pe¬ culiar and distinguishing doctrine of the church of Rome; these are baptism, confirmation, the eucharist, penance, extreme unction, orders, and matrimony. The council of Trent (sess. 7. can. 1.) pronounces an anathema on those who say, that the sacramepts are more or fewer than seven, or that any one of the above number is not truly and properly a sacrament. And yet it does not appear that they amounted to this num¬ ber before the 12th century, when Hugo de St Vie- tore and Peter Lombard, about the year 1144, taught that there were seven sacraments. The council of Florence, held in 1438, was the first council that de¬ termined this number. These sacraments confer grace, according to the decree of the council of Trent, (sess. 7. can. 8.) exopere operato, by the mere administration of them ; three of them, viz. baptism, confirmation, and orders, are said, (can. 9.) to impress an indelible character, so that they cannot be repeated without sa¬ crilege ; and the efficacy of every sacrament depends on the intention of the priest by whom it is admini¬ stered (can. 11.). Pope Pius expressly enjoins, that all these sacraments should be administered according to the received and approved rites of the Catholic church. With regard to the eucharist in particular, we may here observe, that the church of Rome holds the doctrine of transuhstantiation ; the necessity of paying- divine worship to Christ under the form of the conse¬ crated bread, or host ; the propitiatory sacrifice of the mass, according to their ideas of which Christ is truly and properly offered as a sacrifice as often as the priest says taass; it practises likewise solitary mass, in which the [ .81 1 POP priest alone, who consecrates, communicates, and allows communion only in one kind, viz. the bread, to the laity. ' Sess. 14. The doctrine of merits is another distinguishing tenet of popery; with regard to which the council of"Trent has expressly decreed (sess. 6. can. 32.) that the good woi ks or justified poisons are truly meritorious ; deserv- ing not only an increase of grace, but eternal life, and an increase of glory ; and It has anathematized all who deny this doctrine. Of the same kind is the doctrine of satisfaction ; which supposes that penitents may truly satisfy, by the afflictions they endure under the dispen¬ sations of Providence, or by voluntary penances to which they submit, for the temporary penalties of sin, to which they are subject, even after the remission of their eternal punishment. Sess. 6. can. 30. and sess. 14. can. 8. :ind 9. In this connection we may mention the* popish distinction of venial and mortal sins : the greatest evils arising'from the former are the temporary pains of purgatory ; but no man, it is said, can obtain the par¬ don of the latter without confessing to a priest, and per¬ forming the penances which he imposes. 1 he council of Trent (sess. 14. can. 1.) has expressly decreed, that every one is accursed, who shall affirm that penance is not truly and properly a sacrament, instituted by Christ in the universal church, for reconciling those Christians to the divine majesty, who have fallen into sin after baptism : and this sacrament, it is declared, con¬ sists of two parts, the matter and the form ; the matter is the act of the penitent, including contrition, confes¬ sion, and satisfafction ; the form of it is the act of abso¬ lution on the part ot the priest. Accordingly it is en¬ joined, that it is the duty of every man, who hath fallen after baptism, to confess his sins, once a year at least, to a priest: that this confession is to be secret; for public confession is neither commanded nor expedient; and that it must he exact and particular, including every kind and act ot sin, with all the circumstances attending it. When the penitent has so done, the priest pronounces an absolution ; which is not conditional or declarative on¬ ly, but absolute and judicial. This secret or auricular confession was first decreed and established in the fourth council of Lateran, under Innocent III. in 1215, (cap. 21.). An cl the decree of this council was afterwards confirmed and enlarged in the council of Florence, and in that of Trent; which ordains, that confession was in¬ stituted by Christ, that by the law of God it is necessary to salvation, and that it has been always practised in the Christian- church. As for the penances imposed on the penitent by way of satisfaction, they have been common¬ ly the repetition of certain forms of devotion, as pater¬ nosters, or ave-marias, the payment of stipulated sums, pilgrimages, fasts, or various species of corporal discip¬ line. But the most formidable penance, in the estimation of many who have belonged to the Romish communion, has been the temporary pains of purgatory. But under all the penalties which are inflicted or threatened in the Romish church, it has provided relief by its indulgences, and by its prayers or masses for the dead, performed professedly lor relieving and rescuing the souls that arc detained in purgatory. Another article that has been long authoritatively en¬ joined ami observed in the church of Rome, is the celi- baev^ of her clergy. This was first enjoined at Rome by Gregory ^ II. about the year 1074, and established Pope it. Popery- POP [ in England by Anselm archbishop of Canterbury about the year 1175; though his predecessor Lanfranc had imposed' it upon the prebendaries and clergy 1 ^ ive in towns. And though the council of-Trent was ie- peatedly petitioned by several princes and states to abo¬ lish this restraint, the obligation of cehbacv was rather established than relaxed by this council ; for they de¬ creed, that marriage contracted after a vow o co ence, is neither lawful nor valid 5 and thus deprived the church of the possibility of ever restoring marriage to the clergy. For if marriage, after a vow, be m risen unlawful,' the greatest authority upon earth cannot dis¬ pense with it, nor permit marriage to the clergy, who have already vowed continence. . To the doctrines and practices above recited may be farther added the worship of images, of which Protest¬ ants accuse the Papists. But to this accusation the Pa- Papist mis- pist replies, that he keeps images by him to preserve in represented^ m;n(] tjie rnernory of the persons represented by them ; as people are wont to preserve the memory ot their deceased friends by keeping their pictures. He is taught (he says) to use them so as to cast Ins eyes upon the pictures or images, and thence to raise his heart to the things represented, and there to employ it in meditation, love, and thanksgiving, desire ot imita¬ tion, &c. as the object requires. These pictures or images have this advantage, that they inform the mind by one glance of what 111 reading mierht require a whole chapter. There being no other difference between them, than that reading represents leisurely and by degrees j and a picture, all at once. Hence he finds a convenience in saying ins prayers with some devout pictures before him, he being no sooner distracted, hut the sight of these recals his wandering thoughts to the right object 5 and as certainly brings something good into his mind, as an immodest picture and repre sented 182 ] pO P he be possessed of the divine attribute of omnipresence•, p0pen and he who gives that attribute to any creature is un- Pophaiw questionably guilty of idolatry. And as this decree is4- contrary to one of the first principles ot natural religion, so does it receive no countenance from Scripture, 01 any Christian writer of the three first centuries. Other practices peculiar to the Papists are the religious honour and respect that they pay to sacred relicks 5 by which they understand not only the bodies and parts oj. the bodies of the saints, but any of those tilings that apper¬ tained to them, anti which they touched ; and the cele¬ bration of divine service in an unknown tongue: to which purpose the council of Irent hath denounced an anathe¬ ma on any one who shall say that mass ought to he cele¬ brated only in the vulgar tongue; sess. 25. and scss. 22. can. 9. Though the council of Lateran under Innocent III. in 1215 (can. 9.) had expressly decreed, that be¬ cause in many parts within the same city and diocese there are many people of different manners and rites mixed together, but of one faith, the bishops of such ci¬ ties or dioceses should provide fit men foi celebrating divine offices, according to the diversity of tongues and rites, and for administering the sacraments. We shall only add, that the church of Rome main¬ tains, that unwritten traditions ought to be added to the holy Scriptures, in order to supply their derect, and to be regarded as of equal authority; that the books of the Apocrypha are canonical scripture 5 that the vulgate edition of the Bible is to be deemed authentic ; and that the Scriptures are to be received and interpreted according to that sense which the hoiy mother chuich, to whom it belongs to judge of the true sense, hath held, and doth hold, and according to the unanimous consent of the fathers. Such are the principal and distinguishing doctrines 01 Popery, most of which have received the sanction of the disturbs his heart with filthy thoughts. And because he is sensible that these holy pictures and images repre¬ sent and bring to his mind such objects as in Ins heart he loves, honours, and venerates *, he cannot but upon that account love, honour, and respect, the images them- Ibid. ^The council of Trent likewise decreed that all bishops and pastors who have the cure of souls, do diligently in¬ struct their flocks, that it is good and profitable to desire the intercession of saints reigning with Canstin hfifivc"- And this dedree the Papists endeavour to defend by the following observations. They confess that we have but one Mediator of redemption ; hut affirm that it is ac¬ ceptable to God that we should have many mediators ot intercession. Moses (say they) was such a mediator for the Israelites j Job for his three friends; Stephen for ms persecutors. The Romans were thus desired by St 1 aul to be bis mediators ; so were the Corinthians, so the Ephesians, Ep. ad Rom. Cor. Eph. so almost every sick man desires the congregation to be bis mediators, by re¬ membering him in their prayers. And so the Papist desires the blessed in heaven to be h.s mediators *, that is, that they would pray to God for him. But between these living and dead mediators there is no similarity : the living mediator is present, and certainly hears the request of those who desire him to intercede for them j the dead mediator is as certainly absent, and cannot pos¬ sibly hear the requests of all those who at the same in¬ stant may be begging him to intercede for them, unless council of Trent, and that of the creed of Pope Pius 1\ . which is received, professed, and sworn to by every one who enters into holy orders in the chuich of Rome ; and at the close of this creed, we are told that the faith contained in it is so absolutely and indispensably neces¬ sary, that no man can be saved without it. Many of the doctrines of Popeiy were relaxed, and very favourably interpreted by M. de Meaux, bishop of Condom, in his Exposition of the Doctrine of the Ca¬ tholic Church, first printed in the year 1671 but this edition, which was charged with perverting, in endea¬ vouring to palliate, the doctrine of the church, was cen¬ sured by the doctors of the Sorbonne, and actually sup¬ pressed; nor does it appear that they ever testified tLeii approbation in the usual form of subsequent and alter¬ ed editions. It has, however, been published in tins country, by a clergyman of the Romish church, whose integrity, piety, and benevolence, would do honour to any communion. POPHAM, Sir John, lord chief justice of the com¬ mon pleas in the reign ol Queen Elizabeth, was the eldest son of Edward Popham, Esq. of Huntworth in Somersetshire, and horn in the year 1531’ was so.llie time a student of Baliol college in Oxford ; “ being then (says Ant. Wood) given at leisure hours to many sports and exercises.” After quitting the university, li£ fixed in the Middle Temple ; where, during his noviti¬ ate, he is said to have indulged in that kind of dissipa¬ tion to which youth and a vigorous constitution more POP [ ! ,liam naturally Incline than to the study of voluminous re- [| ports: but, satiated at length with what are called the pleasures of the tow?i, he applied sedulously to the study ^ of his profession, was called to the bar, and in 1568 be¬ came summer or autumn reader. He was soon after made serjeant at law, and solicitor-general in 1579. In 1581 he was appointed attorney-general, and treasurer of the Middle Temple. In 1592 he was made lord chief justice of the king’s bench, and the same year re¬ ceived the honour of knighthood. In the year 1601 his lordship was one of the council detained by the unfor¬ tunate earl of Essex, when he formed the ridiculous pro¬ ject of defending himself in his house: and, on the earl’s trial, he gave evidence against him relative to their de¬ tention. He died in the year 1607, aged 76; and was buried in the south aisle of the church at Wellington in Somersetshire, where he generally resided as often as it was in his power to retire. He was thought somewhat severe in the execution of the law against capital offen¬ ders : but his severity had the happy effect of reducing the number of highway robbers. He wrote, x. Reports and cases adjudged in the time of Queen Elizabeth. 2. Resolutions and judgments upon cases and matters agitated in all the courts at Westminster in the latter end of Queen Elizabeth’s reign. POPLAR. See Populus, Botany Index. POPLITzEUS, in Anatomy, a small muscle 0- bliquely pyramidal, situated under the ham. See Ana¬ tomy, Table of the d luscles. POPPY. See Papaver, Botany Index, and O- pium, Materia Medica Index. POPULAR, something that relates to the common1 people. POPULATION, means the state of a country with respect to the number of people. See Bills of Mor¬ tality, and Political Arithmetic. The question concerning the number of men existing upon earth has been variously determined by different writers. Riccioli states the population of the globe at 1000 millions, Vossius at 500 •, the journalists of Tre- voux at 720 5 and the editor (Xavier de Feller) of the small Geographical Dictionary of Vosgien, reprinted at Paris in 177^* 37° millons. This last estimate is perhaps too low, although the writer professes to have taken considerable pains to ascertain the point with as much accuracy as the nature of the subject will admit.. It may, perhaps, not be deemed unworthy the attention of the curious sgeculatist to observe, that assuming the more probable statement of the learned Jesuits of Tre- voux, and that the world has existed about 6006 years in its present state of population, then the whole number of persons who have ever existed upon earth since the days of Adam amounts only to about one hundred and thirty thousand millions; because 720,000,000 X 182(the number of generations in 6006 years)=13 1,040,000,000. See on this subject the authors above mentioned, as like¬ wise Beausobre’s Etude de la Politique. With regard to the population of England, the rea¬ der may consult, together with our article Political Arithmetic, An Inquiry into the present State of Popu¬ lation, &c. by W. Wales, F. R.S. ; and Mr Hewlett’s Examination of Dr Price’s Essay on the same subject. But for a later account of the population of England, see the different counties under their proper names j for 83 ] P O Jl that of Scotland, see the different counties, and for the population general population, see Scotland. POPULUS, the Poplar, a genus of plants belong- Porcelain, ing to the dioecia class; and in the natural method ranking under the 50th order, Amentacece. See Bo¬ tany Index. The poplar, one of the most beautiful of the aquatic trees, has frequently been introduced into the poetical descriptions of the ancients •, as by Virgil, Eel. vii. 66. ix. 41. Georg, ii. 66. iv. 511. JEn. viii. 31. 276. j by Q\i&,Amo?n. Parid. 27.5 by Horace, Carm. ii. 3. and by Catullus, jVtf/it. Phil, et Thet. 290, &c. &c. POQUELIN, or Pocqdelin, John Baptist. See Moliere. PORANA, a genus of plants belonging to the pent- andria class. See Botany Index. T PORCELAIN, in its more general signification, Nature of comprehends all kinds of earthen ware, which are white, l,orcelain* semitransparent, and have some degree of a vitreous texture. lienee, in this extensive meaning of the term, it includes all kinds of pottery, stoneware, delft ware, &c. : but in a more limited sense, the word Porcelain is employed to denote only the finer kinds of earthen ware ; and because this kind of ware has been, from time immemorial, manufactured in the greatest degree of perfection in China, it has obtained the name of Chinese Porcelain, or China Ware. In the Chinese language, porcelain is denoted by the Derivation, word tse-ki, so that the derivation of the term is not to of the be sought for in that language ; and hence it is suppos-name, ed to be of European extraction, and to be derived from the Portuguese language ; for in this language the word porcellana signifies a cup or vessel. - The first porcelain which was seen in Europe was Porcelain brought from Japan and China. Its whiteness, trans- fh'st br°uglit parency, fineness of texture, with its elegance and aiXchTa” beautiful colours, soon introduced it as an ornament of and after-’ the tables of the rich and powerful, while at the same wards made time it excited the admiration and industry of the Eu-in EuroPe‘ ropean manufacturer. Accordingly attempts were made to imitate this kind of ware, in different countries of Europe. These attempts have succeeded so well, that the produce of the manufacture has acquired the name of Porcelain. The first European porcelains were made in Saxony 5 the manufacture was afterwards introduced into France, and successively into England, Germany, and Italy, where it has arrived at various degrees of perfection, according to the nature of the materials which can be obtained, and the industry and ingenuity of the artist who superintends and directs it 5 but after all, to whatever degree of perfection the manufacture of this ware has reached in Europe, it must still yield, in excellence and perfection, to the porcelain of eastern countries. ^ Of the antiquity of the manufacture of porcelain in Antiquity Ch ina, little precise information can be expected from a °* ^le people.who have always shown themselves so extremely {r?es.e manu' averse, to the freedom of intercourse with other nations5 Iy’ but it is said that the village or town of King-te-ching has furnished the emperors of China with porcelain since the year 442 of the Christian era, and that it is an ob¬ ject of so much attention to the Chinese government, that the manufacture is carried on under the superin¬ tendance of one or two mandarins sent from court. P O R t Poi'ce'ain. Or osier's general descript, of China. i. History of the Manufacture of Porcelain in China. and liistovy ot it. The fullest account which has yet been received in Europe of the manufacture of Chinese porcelain, has been piven by Father D’Entrecolles, a Romish mission- nry> who lived for some time in the village or town wdiere the principal manufactory is established. The ac¬ count which is given of this village, and ot the manu¬ facture of porcelain, by this author, is the following : This village or town, which is celebrated as producing the best porcelain of China, is in the province of Kiang- si, and it is said to be a league and a half in length, con¬ taining not less than 1,000,000 of inhabitants. Other manufactories, indeed, have been established in different narts of the Chinese empire, and particularly in those places which are convenient for the European trade, as in the provinces of Fo-kien and Canton 5 but the por- ctlain produced at these manufactories is said to be held in inferior estimation. A Chinese emperor wishing to have a manfacture of porcelain under his own inspec¬ tion at Pekin, ordered workmen to he collected for the purpose, with all the necessary materials and implements; hut after erecting furnaces and other expensive opera¬ tions, the attempt failed, so that King-te-tchimr. in the time of our author, continued to be the most celebrated place in China for beautiful porcelain, and from this it was transported to all parts of the world. _ % Materials The chief ingredients which enter into the composition •employed in of fine porcelain are petuntse and kaolin, two kinds of its composi-eaitb fYoni the mixture of which the paste is obtained, tion. The petuntse is of a pure white, and, when fully pre¬ pared, is in the form of an impalpable powder, so that it is very fine to the touch. rIhe kaolin, he observes, is intermixed with small shining particles. These materi¬ als are carried to the manufactory in the shape of bricks. The petuntse is originally the fragments of rock dug out from certain quarries, and reduced to powder, and the eolour of the stone which answers the purpose best, ac¬ cording to the Chinese, inclines somewhat to green. The fragments of rock are broken to pieces with a large iron club ; they are then put into mortars, and by means of levers headed with hard stone, strongly secured with iron, they are reduced to the state of fine powder. The levers, it is scarcely necessary to observe, are moved ei¬ ther by the labour of men, or by water. ri he powder, which is afterwards collected, is thrown into a large vessel of water, which is strongly agitated with an iron shovel. When this mixture has been allowed to settle for some time, a substance resembling cream rises to the top, which is skimmed oil, and poured into another ves¬ sel also filled with water. The water in the first vessel is again agitated, and the frothy substance which rises to the surface is collected as before, and the same ope¬ ration is repeated till it appear that nothing remains but a coarse sediment which falls to the bottom by its own weight. This sediment is carefully collected, and a- gain subjected to the process of pulverization. The fluid in the second vessel is allowed to remain at rest till a sediment is produced, forming a kind of crust .at the bottom ; and when the water above seems to be quite transparent, it is poured off by gently inclining the vessel, that the sediment may not be disturbed. I he .paste is then put into large moulds, and allowed to dry slowly j hut before it becomes quite bard, it is divided 5 Prepara¬ tion of pS iuntse, 184 J FOR into small Square cakes, which are sold by the hundred. Porcelaj This is the substance which is called by the Chinese —-y* petuntse, and the name is said to be derived from the colour and form of this paste. _ S The kaolin, the other substance which is employed and of in the fabrication of porcelain, requires fewer opera- tions in its preparation than the former, as it is found in nature in a state almost ready for the manufacturer. Of this substance it is said, that there are extensive mines in certain mountains; the external strata of which are composed of a kind of redearth. The kaolin is found in these mines in small lumps, and it is formed into bricks by being subjected to a similar process with the petuntse, &c. , , . v„. 9 The fine porcelain, it has been observed, derives its Nature fabric and texture from the kaolin. It is to this that the qualities which it possesses of resisting the most power¬ ful agents is owing; and it has been remarked as an extraordinary circumstance, that a soft earth snould communicate strength and consistency to the petuntse, which is obtained from some of the hardest rocks. Ihe author relates an anecdote which he received frotR * rich Chinese merchant, that the English and Dutch ha¬ ving purchased a quantity of petuntse, conveyed it to Europe for the purpose of manufacturing porcelain ; but having procured none of the kaolin, the attempt failed They wanted, added the Chinese with a smile, to form a body, the flesh of which would support itself 'V1 It^is"said that the Chinese have discovered of hte years a new substance which may be employed in the composition of porcelain. This stone is called hoa-che, the first part of the word signifies glutinous, because it is of a saponaceous quality. Porcelain made with this substance is very rare, and bears a much higher price than anv other. ‘The grain is extremely fine, and the painting with which it is ornamented, when compared with that of common porcelain, seems to exceed it as much as vellum surpasses paper. This variety oi porce¬ lain, it is added, is also remarkable for its lightness. Jt is besides much more brittle, and it is found difficult to hit upon the proper degree of heat for tempering it. This substance, we are farther informed, is but rarely employed in the fabrication of the body of the porce¬ lain ; the reason of this perhaps is, the scarcity and high price of this precious article, in consequence of which the workman is contented with making it into a fine size, into which the vessel is immersed when it is dry, that it may receive a coat before it is painted and glazed ; and by this process he finds that he can com¬ municate to the war* a high degree of beauty. ^ lue previous processes in the preparation of this substance are similar to those which are followed in the prepara¬ tion of kaolin. When hoa-che is dug out from the mine, it is washed in rain or river water, tor the purpose of separating a yellowish earth with which it is con¬ taminated. It is then reduced to powder, thrown into a vessel filled with water, and then formed into cakes. The hoa-ehe prepared in this manner, without the ad¬ dition of any other earth, is said to be alone sufficient in the fabrication of porcelain. It is employed, as has been already noticed, as a substitute for kaolin ; but, on account of its scarcity, is much dearer. Ihe price ot the former is three times that ot the latter, and from this circumstance the value of porceffiin made with hoa- che P O R [ rceliiin. teiial fflazin celain. die is nnich higher than that which is manufactured with kaolin. The principal ingredients in the fabrication of porce¬ lain are petuntse and kaolin ; but to these must be added the glaze 01 varnish^ or? as it is called in the account given of Chinese porcelain, the oil, on which depend its splendour and whiteness. This varnish is of a whitish colour, and is obtained from the same kind of stone which yields the petuntse-, but for this purpose the whitest stone is always preferred. The glaze is ob¬ tained by a process similar to that which ^followed in the preparation of petuntse. This stone is first washed and reduced to powder ^ it is then thrown into a vessel with water, and alter being purified, a frothy matter rises to the surface. lo 100 pounds of this matter, one pound of a substance called che-kao, is added. This latter is a saline substance, somewhat like alum, which is put into the fire, and allowed to remain till it become red hot, when it is reduced to powder. By the addition of this substance the glaze acquires a greater degree of consistence, but at the same time a proper degree of fluidity must be preserved. The glaze prepar¬ ed in this manner is not employed alone. Another glaze is mixed with it, which is obtained from lime and ashes ; to 100 pounds weight of which is also added one pound of che-kao, or the aluminous substance men¬ tioned above. W ben the two substances are mixed, it is necessary to attend that they be nearly of the same con¬ sistence, and the workman ascertains this point by dip¬ ping into each of them some cakes of petuntse ; and by a close examination of their surfaces after they are drawn out, he is able to judge of the consistence of the fluids. The proportions of the two which are usually employed, are 10 parts of the glaze obtained from the stone, to one of that which is prepared from the lime and from ashes. In the manufacture of the Chinese porcelain, the first process after the separate preparation of the mate¬ rials, is a second purification of the petuntse and kao¬ lin 5 and when they are found to be in a state of suffi- 2 cient purity, the workmen proceed to mix the two in- ortion gredients together. The proportions employed for the nix- finer kinds of porcelain are equal parts of kaolin and »fthe petuntse j for an inferior kind, four parts of kaolin to llents- six of petuntse are employed -, and in some kinds of por¬ celain, only one part of the former is added to three of the latter. This is the smallest proportion of kaolin which is employed in the Chinese manufactories. When the proportions are fixed, and the mixture finished, the mass is thrown into a large pit, which is well paved and ce¬ mented. It is then trodden upon, and kneaded till it become hard. This is the most fatiguing part of the labour, for it must be continued without intermission. From the mass prepared in this manner the workmen detach different pieces, which they spread out upon large slates, where they knead and roll them in all directions, taking care that no vacuum be left, and that there be no mixture of any foreign body. The whole work would be entirely spoiled by the addition of a hair, or a particle of sand. When the paste has been properly prepared, the porcelain, when exposed to heat in the furnace, retains its form without becoming soft, or en¬ tering into fusion, and becomes semitransparent, with- mit exhibiting cracks or superficial fissures; but when there is any defect in the mixture or preparation, the ^ ol. XVII. Part I. + 85 ] P O R porcelain cracks, and becomes warped, or melts in the Porcek.nn furnace. < v— The paste being thus prepared, the next operation is ^ to form the vessels for which it is designed. All kinds ^let!lod of of plain ware are formed with the wheel. When a cup, poredain for instance, has undergone this operation, the outside ware, of the bottom is quite round. The workman first gives it the requisite height and diameter, and it comes from his hands almost the moment he has received it. Great dexterity and expedition are absolutely necessary, on ac¬ count of the low price of labour in these manufactories. A workman, it is said, scarcely receives a farthing per board, each board containing no less than 26 pieces. The cup then passes to a second workman, by whom the base is formed; it is then delivered to a third, who applies it to the mould, and gives it the proper form. When it is taken off the mould, it must be turned care¬ fully, and not pressed more to one side than the other; for without ibis necessary precaution it would become warped or disfigured. The business of the fourth work¬ man is to polish it with the chisel, especially round the edges, and diminish the thickness, to give it the proper degree of transparency. Having at length passed through the different hands from whom it receives its form and various ornaments, it then comes to the last workman, who forms the bottom with a chisel. It is wonderful, it is said, to see with how much dexterity and expedi¬ tion the workmen convey the vessels from one to an¬ other ; and it is added, that a single piece of porcelain, before it is completely finished, must pass through the hands of no fewer than 70 different workmen. It is indeed, we may observe, to this minute division of la¬ bour that its low price is owing; and on the same circum¬ stance the remarkable dexterity and expedition which have been noticed, depend. In the execution of large works of porcelain, different on/rtc parts are first formed individually; and when all the pieces work's^ are finished, and nearly dry, they are put together and cemented with a paste formed of the same substance, and softened with water. Some time after, the seams are po¬ lished with a knife on both sides of the vessel, so that when it is covered with a varnish, or glazed, they are so com¬ pletely concealed, that the least trace of them is not per¬ ceptible. It is in this way that spouts, handles, rings, and other parts of a similar nature, are united. In this way particularly are fabricated those pieces which are formed upon moulds, or by the hand, such as embossed works, grotesque images, idols, figures of trees or animals, and busts. All these are formed of four or five pieces joined together, which are afterwards brought to perfection by means of instruments proper for carving, polishing, and finishing the different traces which the mould has left imperfect. Flowers and ornaments which are not in re¬ lief, are either engraved, or the impression is made by means of a stamp ; but ornaments in relief are prepared separately, and added to the pieces of porcelain to which they are destined. The piece of porcelain being prepared according to the operations now described, is next conveyed to the painter: and in this art it is observed that the Chi¬ nese workmen follow no certain rule, and seem to be unacquainted with any of the principles of perspective. Their knowledge is the effect of practice, guided often by a whimsical imagination. The labour of painting porcelain in the Chinese manufactories is also divided A a among FOB. ■Porcelain. [ 1 among a great number of bands. The business ol one man, for instance, is solely limited to tracing out the first coloured circle with which the brim of the vessel is adorned ; another designs the flowers, and a third paints One delineates waters and mountains, while it them. rtf Veined por¬ celain and fret-work. I? "Singular ki nd of porcelaia. Chinese furnaces. is the province of another to draw and paint birds and other animals. Of the painting on Chinese porcelain, it has been observed, that the human figure is often most indifferently executed , A peculiar kind of glaze or varnish, we are informed, is obtained from white flint. This glaze, it is said, has the singular property of making the pieces ol porcelain to which it is applied exhibit the appearance ol veins distributed in all directions. Vessels glazed with this material seem as if the surface were cracked, without the fragments being separated or displaced. . The colour of this glaze is whitish gray •, and when it is applied to porcelain having an azure blue ground, it communi¬ cates a beautifully variegated appearance. Vasesof Chi- 11 esc porcelain are sometimes fabricated in a different manner. They are ornamented with a kind of fret¬ work, which has something ol the appearance of fine lace, in the middle of which is placed a cup proper lor holding any liquid j which constitutes one body with the surrounding fret-work. We are informed that the Chinese workmen formerly possessed the secret of fabricating a kind of porcelain of a more singular nature. On the sides of the vessel thus formed were painted the figures ol fishes, insects, and other animals, which could not be seen unless the vessel was filled with water. It is said that this secret is in a great measure lost j hut the following is given as part of the process of preparing this kind ot porcelain. Ihe vessel which is to be painted, for the purpose ol produ¬ cing this peculiar effect, must be extremely thin and de¬ licate. When it is dry, the colour is laid on, not on the outside, however, as is usually the case, but on the inside of the vessel, and it is laid on pretty thick. The figures winch are painted upon it are usually fishes, as being more characteristic oi the element in which they live. When the colour is perfectly dry, it is coated over with a kind of glaze, composed of porcelain eaith, 80 that the azure is thus inclosed between two layers of earthy matter *, and when the glaze becomes dry, the workman pours some oil into the vessel, and putting it upon a mould, applies it to the lathe. Porcelain lain i- cated in this manner, having received its consistence and body within, it is the object of the workmen to make it as thin as possible on the outside, without penetrating to the colour. The external surface is then dipped into a mixture for glazing, and when it is dry it is baked in a common furnace. This kind of porcelain is known by the name of kia-tsing, signifying pressed azure. It is supposed that the Chinese do not at present possess the art of making porcelain of this description, which re¬ quires a great deal of dexterity and delicate manage¬ ment *, and it is added, that they have imperfectly suc¬ ceeded in the attempts which have been occasionally made to discover the secret of this curious process. The next process in the manufacture of porcelain is baking ; but before we describe the method of arranging and managing the furnaces employed for this purpose, we shall give a short account of their construction. 1 he Chinese furnaces for baking porcelain are furnished with a long porch, for the purpose of conveying air, and in 36 1 FOB some measure as a substitute for bellows. This porch Porcelain answers the same purpose as the arch of a glass-lioU"ej v~— but the furnaces which, as the author from whom the account is taken observes, were formerly only six leet in height, and the same in length, are now constructed upon a much more extensive plan. Tdiey are 12 leet hi ah, and nearly four broad ; and the rool and sides are so^thick, that the powerful heat which is applied inter¬ nally does not penetrate to the outside, at least so much as to be inconvenient to bear it on the application ol the hand. The dome or roof is in the form of an inverted funnel, having a large aperture at the top by which the smoke escapes. Beside the principal aperture, there are five others of smaller dimensions, which are covered with broken pots in such a manner that the workman can in¬ crease or diminish the heat as he finds it necessary. Through these apertures also he is able to see the pro¬ gress of the baking of the porcelain, and can judge when it is completed. By uncovering the hole which is nearest the principal opening, he opens with a pair ot pincers one of the cases containing the pieces ol porce¬ lain, and if he perceives a bright fire in the lurnace, and all the pieces brought to a red heat, as well as the co¬ lours of the porcelain appearing with a full lustre, he concludes that the process is finished. He then dimi¬ nishes the fire, and entirely shuts up the mouth ot the furnace for some time. In the bottom of the furnace there is a deep hearth about two feet in breadth, over which a plank is laid, in order that the workman may enter to arrange the porcelain. V\ hen the fire is kin¬ dled on the hearth, the mouth of the furnace is imme¬ diately closed up, and an aperture is left only sufficient for the admission of faggots, about a foot in length, but very narrow. The furnace is first heated lor a day and a night, after which two men keep continually thioviing wood into it, and relieve each other by turns. One hundred and eighty loads are consumed for one baking. As the porcelain is burning hot, the workman employs for the purpose of taking it out, long scarfs or pieces of cloth, which are suspended from his neck. 1* Having thus given a concise account of the con struction of the Chinese furnaces, we proceed now lay before our raaders the method of baking porcelain which is followed in that country. After the porcelain has received its proper lorm, its colours, and all the in¬ tended ornaments, it is transported from the manufac¬ tory to the furnace, which is sometimes situated at the other end of the village already mentioned. In a kind of portico, which is erected before it, may be seen vast numbers of boxes and eases made of earth, lor the pur¬ pose of inclosing the porcelain. Bach piece, however inconsiderable it may be, has its own case and the Chi¬ nese workman, by means of this procedure, imitates na¬ ture, which, in order to bring the fruits of the earth to maturity, clothes them in a covering, to defend them from the excessive heat of the sun during the day, and from the severity of the cold during the night. A layer of fine sand is put into the bottom of these boxes, which is covered over with the powder ol kaolin, to prevent the sand from adhering too closely to the bot¬ tom of the vessel. The piece of porcelain is then pla¬ ced upon this bed of sand, and pressed gently down, in order that the sand may take the form ot the bottom of the vessel, which does not touch the sides of its case: the case has no cover. A second, prepared in the same manner, FOR [ i ircelain. manner, and containing its vessel, is fitted into the first, so that it entirely shuts it, without touching the porce¬ lain which is below } and thus the furnace is filled up with piles of cases, which defend the pieces they con¬ tain from the direct action of the fire. With regard to small pieces of porcelain, such as tea-cups, they are inclosed in common cases about four inches in height. Each piece is placed upon a saucer of earth about twice as thick as a crown-piece, and equal in breadth to its bottom. These small cases are also sprinkled over with the dust of the kaolin. When the cases are large, the porcelain is not placed in the middle, because it would be too far removed from the sides, and consequently from the action of the fire. These piles of cases are put into the furnace, and pla¬ ced upon a bed of coarse sand six inches thick $ those by which the middle space is occupied are at least seven feet high. The two boxes which are at the bottom of each pile remain empty, because the lire acts too feebly upon them, and because they are partly covered by the sand. For the same reason, the case which is placed at the top of each pile is also allowed to remain empty. The piles containing the finest porcelain are placed in the middle part of the furnace $ the coarsest are put at its farthest extremity j and those pieces which have the most body and strongest colouring are near its mouth. These different piles are placed very closely in the furnace ; they materially support each other by pieces ©f earth, which bind them at the top, bottom, and middle, but in such a manner, that a free passage is left for the flame to insinuate itself everywhere around them. The Chinese divide their porcelain into several kinds or classes, distinguishing each according to the different pc.:lam. degrees of beauty and fineness The whole of the first or most perfect kind is reserved for the emperor; none of it, we are assured, ever comes into the hands of the public, unless, on account of blemishes or imperfections, it is unworthy of being presented to the sovereign. Many have doubted whether at any time the largest and finest porcelain of China has ever been brought to Eu¬ rope. None of that kind, at least, is offered to sale at Canton. I he Chinese, who are apt to undervalue the productions of other countries, entertain a favourable opinion of the Dresden porcelain, and hold in still high¬ er estimation the porcelain which is produced in the French manufactories. :“,orge TJie following is a short account of the Chinese por- Sty ton’s celain manufactures by Sir George Staunton. “ From went of the river,” says he, “ were seen several excavations made in extracting from the sides of the adjoining hills, the petuntse useful in the manufacture of porcelain. This material is a species of fine granite, or compound of quartz, feldspar, and mica, in which the quartz seems to bear the largest proportion. It appears from several experiments, that it is the same as the growan stone of the Cornish miners. The micaceous part, in some of this granite from both countries, often contains some particles of iron, in which ease it will not answer the potter’s purpose. This material can be calcined and ground much finer by the improved mills of Enoland, than by the very imperfect machinery of the Chinese, and at a cheaper rate than the prepared petuntse of their own country, notwithstanding the cheapness of la hour there. 20 1) rent ki , of 87 3 FOR “ Ihe kaolin, or principal matter mixed with the pe« tuntse is the growan clay also of the Cornish miners. Ihe wha-she of the Chinese is the English soap-rock; and the she-kan is asserted to be gypsum. It was relat¬ ed by a Chinese manufacturer in 'that article, that the asbestos, or incombustible fossil stone, entered also into the composition of porcelain. A village, or unwalled town, called Kin-te-chin, was not very far distant from this part of the present traveller’s route, in which 3000 furnaces for baking porcelain were said to be lighted at a time, and gave to the place at night the appearance of a town on hre. The genius or spirit of that element is indeed, with some propriety, the principal deity wor¬ shipped there. The manufacture of porcelain is said to be pit-carious, from the want of some precise method of ascertaining and regulating the heat within the furnaces, in consequence of which their whole contents are baked sometimes into one solid and useless mass. Mr Wedg¬ wood’s thermometer, founded on the quality observed by him, of clay contracting in proportion to the degree of fiie to which it is exposed, might certainly be of use to a Fhinpsp nnff-pi'* 21 PorecIafM. * Kmbassy to China, to a Chinese potter*. 2. Inquiries of Reaumur into the Nature of Porcelain.ili* The first scientific investigation which was made into the nature of porcelain, was undertaken by the celebra¬ ted Reaumur; and the result of his researches was com¬ municated to the Fiench Academy of Sciences in the years 1727 and 1729. It was not the external form or appearance, nor was it the decorations of painting and uon gilding, which are by no means essential to porcelain, cXin t that constituted the object of his inquiries. His exami-amiued nation was particularly directed to the peculiar texture and fabric of this substance, with the view of ascer¬ taining the nature and proportions of its constituent parts. For this purpose, he broke to pieces some of the Japanese, the Saxon, and the French porcelains, and carefully noted the peculiarities and differences in their texture. The grain or texture of the Japanese porcelain appeared to possess a considerable degree of closeness and compactness, with a smooth and somewhat shining as¬ pect. He found that the Saxon porcelain was still more compact, and that it was smooth, and shining like ena¬ mel, but had nothing of the granular texture. In Iris examination of the French porcelain, he observed that it had much of the shining appearance, and that its grain was not so close and fine as that of the oriental porcelain, having some resemblance to the grain or tex¬ ture of sugar. Such were the observations which oc¬ curred to the I’ rench philosopher at the commencement of his inquiries into the nature of porcelains, and hence he justly concluded, that they were characterised by very marked differences. Proceeding in Iris investigation, the same philosopher Eff 23 subjected different porcelains to the action of heat; and heaTon' the result of his experiments with this powerful agent porcelain* proved, that they might he distinguished by still more decisive characters; for it appeared that the porcelain of the east suffered no change from the action of the greatest heat, whereas that of European manufacture underwent fusion at no very high temperature. This remarkable difference between the Chinese and Euro¬ pean porcelains, suggested to Reaumur an ingenious thought, which at last led him to the discovery of the A a 2 true por- t*x- FOR matter. d „ true nature of the composition of porcelain ■ 01-Cy u ') served that all porcelains have some resemblance to g ass in some of their general properties, although they axe less compact, he considered them as in the state ot a se¬ mi vitrified substance. An earthy substance, he obser¬ ved, may be iu a semivitrified state in two ways, it may, in the first place, be entirely composed ot vxtrih- able or fusible matters ; and this being the case, when it is exposed to the action of fire, provided the heat be sufficiently strong and long continued, it will be melted or vitrified. But as this clxange is not efiected instantly, particularly where a violent degree of heat is not ap¬ plied ; and as it passes through different degrees, the progress of which may be more easily observed accord¬ ing as the heat is managed and regulated •, it followed, that by stopping in proper time the application ot the heat to porcelain prepared in this way, the ware may be obtained in an intermediate state between those ot crude earths and completely vitrified substances, while, at the same time, it possesses the semitransparency and other distinguishing properties ot porcelain. Porcelain of this nature, it is well known, being exposed to a stronger degree of heat, undergoes perfect fusion and compfete vitrification. All the European porcelains which were subjected to experiment by Reaumur, weie found to be of this fusible nature. 24 But on the other hand, porcelain may be composed Porcelai.n f0f fusible or vitrifiable matter, mixed in certain propor- . fusTblfTand tions with another matter, which is absolutely infusible infusible in the strongest heat to which it can be exposed in the furnace 5 and hence, if a mixture of this kind be sub¬ jected to a heat sufficient to melt entirely the vitrifiable part of its composition, this will enter into fusion ; but being mixed with another matter which is infusible, and which consequently retains its consistency and opacity, the whole will form a compound, partly opaque, and partly transparent, or, in other words, a semitransparent mass j that is, a semivitrified substance, or porcelain, but possessing qualities totally distinct from those of the former. For as the fusible part of the latter has been brought to its utmost degree of fusibility during the pro¬ cess of baking, although the compound may be exposed a second time to a still stronger degree of heat, it will not approach nearer to complete vitrification, that is, it will retain all the qualities of perfect porcelain. Reau¬ mur found that the porcelain of the east was distinguish¬ ed by the properties now described 5 and hence he con¬ cluded, that its component parts were arranged on the principle above alluded to. Ibis opinion was afteiwards confirmed by the most incontrovertible facts, deduced from a train of the most satisfactory and well directed experiments. . , The ingredients which enter into the composition of the Chinese porcelain, namely, the petuntse and kaolin, were the next object of Reaumur’s inquiries. Having- obtained quantities of each, he subjected them separate¬ ly to a strong heat, and he found that the petuntse en¬ tered into fusion, without addition but it appeared that the kaolin was absolutely infusible. Pie then mix¬ ed the two ingredients, formed them into cakes, and exposed them in a furnace to the proper degree of heat; so that by baking they were converted into porcelain exactly similar to that of the Chinese. From these ex¬ periments it appeared, that the petuntse of the Chinese was a vitrifiable substance, and that the kaolin was of a 25 . The kaolin infusible, the pe¬ tuntse a' vitrifiable matter. [ 188 ] FOR Havino- ob- different nature, quite refractory, and totally infusible, [.reels,, After this discovery Reaumur, it would seem, entertain- ed hopes that he might find materials in France, capable of making porcelain, possessing the same valuable quali¬ ties as that of China ; but whether his researches in the discovery of proper materials in his own country, par¬ ticularly that which corresponds to the petuntse of the Chinese, or whether he was prevented by other avoca¬ tions from prosecuting his inquiries, it does not appear. But in his second memoir upon porcelain, we find, that he afterwards attempted to compose an artificial pe¬ tuntse, by mixing vitrifiable stones with such saline bo¬ dies as were capable of rendering them fusible, or even by substituting for this artificial preparation glass ready formed, with the addition of such matters as he supposed might be successfully employed in the place of kaolin j but it would appear that he did not at the time prose¬ cute his inquiries, for the subject was not resumed till the year when he announced the discoveiy ol a process for converting common glass to a peculiar kind of porcelain, which has been since known by the name of Reaumur's ‘porcelain. > 26 Although it must appear, from the detail now given, Mistakes that Reaumur was directed in his researches by the trueReaumui spirit of philosophical inquiry, he seems to have been misled in certain points. One of his errors was relative to the Saxon porcelain, which he confounded with the other fusible porcelains of European manufacture, unless it be supposed that the porcelain of Saxony was formerly composed of entirely fusible or vitrifiable matters, and that it ivas porcelain of this description which he ex- mined } for it is now certain, that all the porcelain of that country is capable ol resisting the most powerful heat, and is therefore equally infusible with that of China or Japan. The appearance of the internal tex¬ ture of the Saxon porcelain may have led the philoso¬ pher ta this erroneous conclusion \ for when it is bro¬ ken, the internal surface does not exhibit a granular texture, but is uniform, smooth, shining, and compact, having much resemblance to white enamel. Ibis ap¬ pearance, however, so far from proving that the porce¬ lain of Saxony is a fused or vitrified substance, shews, that it is not entirely composed of fusible matters.. J he internal surface ol the most lusible porcelains, it is well known to those who are acquainted with the subject, is also the least dense, and the least compact; for no vi¬ treous matter can be internally smooth and dense, with- ^7^ out having been in a state of complete fusion. But fftheSaM the density and shining appearance ol the porcelain ofp0rceiaii Saxony depended only on the effects of the fusion ol a vitreous matter, how is it to be supposed, that vessels formed of that fusible matter should have sustained the necessary degree of heat for producing the density and shining appearance, without having entirely lost their shape ? .... This peculiar quality of the Saxon porcelain, it is in¬ ferred, must then depend on another cause. Like every other porcelain, especially that of China and Japan, it contains a fusible substance, which has been in a state of complete fusion during the process of baking. I he density and the internal lustre depend chielly on this fused matter •, but it is also certain, that the Saxon por¬ celain contains a large proportion of a substance which is absolutely infusible, and from which it derives its beautiful white appearance, its firmness and solidity, during it: P O R [I ]|t;elain. during the process of baking. It is this infusible sub- stance which is to be considered as the substitute for the kaolin of China, and which possesses the property of con¬ siderably contracting its dimensions, while it unites with the fusible material. According to the observation of Macquer, if it be subjected to the most decisive trial, namely, the action of a violent fire, which is capable of melting every porcelain composed only of fusible mate¬ rials, it appears as the result of numerous experiments, that it remains infusible, unless it be exposed to a heat which is also capable of melting the best and most per¬ fect porcelain of Japan. The Saxon porcelain, there¬ fore, is not to be confounded with porcelain manufac¬ tured of vitreous and fusible materials ; for it seems to be equally excellent as that of Japan, and in some of its properties perhaps superior, as will appear from an ex¬ amination of the qualities which constitute the peculiar |8 excellence of porcelain. aruvitli Reaumur seems also to have taken an erroneous view re. J to of the nature of the Chinese kaolin. According to his tb hmeseaccountj tjjjg matter is a fine talky powder, from the mixture of which with petuntse, the porcelain of the east is manufactured. It is not impossible, it has been observed, that a porcelain similar to the Chinese might be produced from a talky substance of this nature mixed with petuntse 5 but it is well known to those who are at all familiar with the manufacture of any porcelain, that no vessels can be formed, unless the paste of which they are made possess that degree of ductility and tenacity which renders them fit for being worked upon the lathe, or fashioned in the mould. But substances of a talky nature, to whatever degree of fineness they may he re¬ duced, never acquire the requisite ductility and tenacity which clays of all earthy substances only possess. But as it appears that the Chinese porcelain has been turned upon the lathe, it is obvious that they must have been formed of a very tenacious paste ; and hence it is con¬ cluded, that kaolin is not purely a talky matter, but mixed with clay, otherwise the petuntse and kaolin, ac¬ cording to the supposition of Reaumur, are not the only ingredients which enter into the composition of Chinese porcelain 5 but the addition of a certain proportion of some matter of a tenacious quality is absolutely requi¬ site. 3. Peculiar Properties of Porcelain. 'ore It maybe worth while now to consider the properties which constitute the perfection of porcelain j and here it is necessary, carefully to discriminate between the qualities which are to be regarded as only contributing 5 to the external decoration, and the intrinsic and essential ial properties in which the fabric and perfection of porce- ?s of lain consist. Those who have been occupied in experi- im' ruents on this subject, have not found it difficult to form compositions which are very white, beautifully semi¬ transparent, and covered with a shining glazing ; but which are extremely deficient in the more essential pro¬ perties, as it appears they cannot be subjected to the ne¬ cessary operations for want of a proper degree of tena¬ city ; are not sufficiently compact ; are quite fusible, subject to break by the sudden application of heat or cold, and from the softness of the glazing, which cracks and becomes rough, are soon deprived of their lustre. Bn the other hand, it is by no means difficult to form 89 ] FOR compositions of pastes, which are very tenacious, and porcelain. which are capable of being easily worked and well 1 baked, and in the process of baking which acquire the requisite degree of hardness and density; which are in¬ fusible, and capable of resisting the effects of sudden changes of heat and cold, and, in short, which possess all the qualities of the most excellent porcelain, except¬ ing its whiteness and beauty. Materials fit for the com¬ position of such porcelains, it will appear, may be found abundantly in most countries 5 but the difficulty in the manufacture of this ware is to unite beauty and good¬ ness in one composition. The materials fit for the ma¬ nufacture of the finer and more perfect porcelains, seem to be sparing productions of nature ; and therefore the best kind of porcelain, it is presumed, will always be re¬ garded as a valuable and high-priced commodity. 80 It may be observed, that the potteries called stone- Nature of ware, possess all the essential qualities of the Japanesestoneware* porcelain ; for, excepting the whiteness, on which alone the semitransparency depends, if we compare the pro¬ perties of Japanese porcelain with those of our stone¬ ware, little difference is found to exist between them. Both seem to possess the same granular texture 5 both have the same sonorous quality, when struck with a hard body ; both have the same density ; they possess also the same hardness, by which they strike fire with steel ; they can resist the effects of the heat of boiling liquors without breaking, and are equally infusible when subjected to violent heat. Hence it is inferred, that if the earth which enters into the composition of stoneware, were free from foreign coloimng matters, which prevent the whiteness and semitransparency, and if the vessels were carefully formed and coloured with a fine glaze, they would not be less perfect than the por¬ celain of the east. Earths fit for the production of the more perfect kinds of porcelain, are supposed to he more rare in Europe than in Japan and China ; and hence probably it has happened, that, from the want of these earths, the first manufacturers of the porcelain in Eu¬ rope confined themselves to an external imitation, by employing only vitrifiable matters with fusible salts, and a small quantity of white earth, from which fusible and vitreous porcelains were composed. Such might not improperly be denominated false porcelains ; but great improvements have taken place since the first introduc¬ tion of the manufacture of porcelain into Europe. Ge¬ nuine white porcelains have been long ago produced in Germany, and especially in Saxony. These porcelains are in no respect inferior to those of China or Japan. I hey are found even to be considerably superior in beauty and whiteness to the productions of the eastern manufactories of modern times 5 for in these qualities the porcelains of the latter have greatly degenerated. And in one of the most valuable qualities of porcelain, namely, the property of resisting the effects of sudden changes of heat and cold, the European porcelain ex¬ ceeds that of China or Japan. The quality of porce¬ lain, it is to be observed, is not to be judged of by a slight trial ; for as numerous circumstances concur to render a piece of porcelain capable or incapable of re¬ sisting the effects of heat or cold, boiling water may he at the same time poured into two vessels, one of which is good porcelain, and the other of an opposite quality, it is not impossible that the former may break, and the latter may remain entire. The true method of discover- 2 ing FOR [ i9° ] FOR 'frfl'celain. 31 Japanese porcelain reckoned the most perfect, 34 hut not superior that of Saxony. mg tvliat Is good porcelain, is to examine several piece, of it which are in daily use*, and it has been found, that in many such pieces of porcelain of oriental manu¬ facture, which have been long used, cracks are always seen in the direction of their height, which are never perceived in the more perfect porcelains of European manufacture. . . • . . ,1 „ t„ It has long been a very general opinion, that the Ja¬ panese porcelain is the most perfect *, it has indeed con¬ tinued to be the object of admiration and emulation, and has been held up as a model for the European ma¬ nufacturer *, a model which has not yet been equal ed, and which, according to the opinion of some, cannot be equalled. In deciding on this subject, the Saxon porce¬ lain is considered as inferior to the Japanese, on account of its greater smoothness, lustre, and less granular aspect of its Internal texture, qualities in which it ought rea y to he regarded as superior to the porcelain from Japan. This surface has a near resemblance to that of glass, and it is supposed that this similarity has suggested the opi¬ nion ; and it would be well founded, if the density and lustre of the European porcelain depended on the fusible and vitreous property of the ingredients of which it is composed : but this not being the case, and the baxon porcelain being equally fixed and infusible as that of Ja¬ pan, its superior density must be admitted as a valuable property. For in the comparison of different porcelains which are equal in other properties, that which is most firm and compactcertainlyclaims the superiority. Hence it is that the internal texture of the Japanese porcelain is held in greater estimation, because it possesses a great¬ er degree of density, compactness and lustre, than the European porcelain, which is composed only of vitreous sand or fritt. For a similar reason the superior density of the Saxon porcelain ought to obtain for it a prefer¬ ence to that which is imported from the east. It is sup¬ posed besides, that it would be no difficult matter to communicate to the Saxon porcelain the granular tex¬ ture of the Japanese, by mixing with the paste a certain proportion of sand or siliceous earth. But in this point, in producing by these means a nearer resemb ance to the Japanese porcelain, those who conducted and brought to some of the pieces of this porcelain. Statues, and even Porcelain, groups of figures half as large as nature, and modelled' r- from some of the finest antiques, were formed of it. The furnaces, he observed, in which the porcelain was subjected to the process of baking, were constructed with a great deal of ingenuity, and were lined with bricks made of the same materials as those which entered into the composition of the porcelain itself*, and hence they were able to resist the effects of high degrees of heat. The paste of the porcelain manufactured at Florence appeared to be extremely beautiful, and to possess all the qualities of the best oriental porcelain. 1 he glazing employed in this manufactory seemed to be interior 111 whiteness, a circumstance which is supposed to be owing to the desire of using those materials only which aie found in the country. 33 In France a greater number of manufactories of por- Mamifac. celain has been established than in any other country and it must be allowed that the French have had won- fl.ancC( derful success in the improvement and perfection of this manufacture. Some time even before Reaumur commu¬ nicated the result of his inquiries, porcelain was manu¬ factured at St Cloud, and in the suburb of St Antoine at Paris. This porcelain indeed was of the vitreous or fusible kind, but at the same time possessed no inconsi¬ derable degree of beauty. Since the period to which we allude, extensive manufactories of porcelain have been established at Villenoy, Chantilly, and Orleans, and at those places the manufacture has been brought to a great degree of,,perfection. But the productions of the cele¬ brated porcelain manufactory at Sevres, on account of the pure shining white, the fine glazing and coloured grounds, the splendour and magnificence of the gilding, and the elegance and taste displayed in the shape and figures, are universally allowed to surpass every thing of the kind which has yet appeared. In speaking of the French porcelain, we may notice the result of some researches which were made on this subject by Guettard, and of which an account appeared in the Memoirs of the Academy of Sciences for the year 1765. In the neighbourhood of Alen^on, M. Guettard discovered a whitish argillaceous eaitb, in This earth he XO peiiUGLIAJIl *• # ' . ble that their porcelain would sink m its valuable pro¬ perties. 4. Porcelain Manufactories in different parts of Europe. Manufactories of porcelain have been long established in almost every country of Europe. Besides that of Saxo¬ ny, which was the first established in Europe, porcelain is made to a considerable extent at V ienna, at I ranken- dal and in the neighbourhood of Berlin, and in other places of the German states. The German porcelains are similar to those of Saxony, and are composed of simi¬ lar materials, although from differences in the propor¬ tions, or in the modes of managing the manufactories, considerable differences arise in the porcelains manufac¬ tured at different places. Italy also is celebrated for its porcelain manufactures, the chief of which, it is said, are carried on at Naples. When M. de la Condamine travelled into Italy, he visited a manufacture of porce¬ lain established at Florence, by the marquis de la Ginor, who wa* then governor of Leghorn. I he French tra¬ veller was particularly struck with the large size of 2 employed as a substitute for kaolin. The substance which he used in place of the petuntse, he obtained from a hard stone, which is described as a quartzose gritt stone, very abundant in that country, and with which the streets of Alen^on are paved. \\ ith these materials Guettard instituted a series of experiments on porcelain, previous to the vear 1751, and was associated in his in quines with the duke of Orleans. For many years the count de Lauraguais, a member of the Academy of Sciences, was keenly engaged in prosecuting experi¬ ments to discover the true nature of porcelain, and the means by which the manufacture might be improved and perfected. To obtain the object of his researches, which was to produce porcelain that in its essential qua¬ lities might be equal to that of eastern countries, he spared no trouble or expence j and it would appear that he was not unsuccessful in his labours j for in the year 1766, when he exhibited some species of porcelain from his manufactory to the members of the Academy of Sciences, the persons who were appointed by that learn¬ ed body to examine their properties, delivered it as their opinion, that of all the porcelain made in France, that 34 ‘4ng- P O R [ T rcelain. of the count de Lauraguais approached most nearly in -v—' the essential properties of solidity, texture and infusibi. lity, to tiiat of China and Japan< ft is, said, however that it was considerably deficient in whiteness and lustre* when compared with the ancient porcelain of Japan. * The manufacture of porcelain has been brought to a great degree of perfection in England. In many of the essential qualities, and particularly in the beauty and richness of the paintings, as well as in the elegance of the forms, the English porcelain is little inferior to that of any other country. Manufactories of this ware have been established in different parts of England. This manufacture was first established at Derby about the year 1750, by a Mr Duesbury, who is said to have been a very ingenious artist. Since bis death the manufacto¬ ries received very considerable improvement, and chiefly in the judicious methods pursued in the preparation of the paste, and increasing the beauty of the ornaments. I he ware itself is said not to equal in fineness that which is manufactured in Saxony and France, although it is greatly superior in respect of decoration and workman¬ ship. The paintings in general are rich, and executed with taste, and the gilding and burnishing are extremely beautiful. rIhe body of the semi-vitreous kind, which is formed of a fine white clay, in combination with va¬ rious proportions of different fusible matters, has obtain¬ ed the name of porcelain. The best kind is wholly in¬ fusible, and i? glazed with a vitreous substance which |5 has not a single particle of lead in its composition. In .afford- The most famous manufactory of stone-ware, as well as of other kinds of pottery, is at Burslem in Stafford¬ shire. This can be traced with certainty at least two centuries back 5 but of its first introduction no tradition remains. In 1686, as we learn from Dr Plot’s Natural History of Staflordshire published in that year, only the coarse yellow, red, black, and mottled wares, were made in this country ; and the only materials employed for them appear to have been the different coloured clays which are found in the neighbourhood, and which form some of the measures or strata of the coal-mines. These clays made the body of the ware, and the glaze was pro¬ duced by powdered lead-ore, sprinkled on the pieces be¬ fore firing, with the addition of a little manganese for some particular colours. The quantity of goods manu¬ factured was at that time so inconsiderable, that the chief sale of them, the Doctor says, was “ to poor crate- men, who carried them on their backs all over the coun¬ try.” About the year 1690, two ingenious artisans from Germany, of the name of Eller, settled near Burslem, and carried on a small work for a little time. They brought into this country the method of glazing stone¬ ware, by casting salt into the kiln while it is hot, and some other improvements of less importance ; but find¬ ing they could not keep their secrets to themselves, they left the place rather in disgust. From this time various kmds of stone-ware, glazed by the fumes of salt in the manner above mentioned, were added to the wares be¬ fore made. I he white kind, which afterwards became, and for many succeeding years continued, the staple bi anch of pottery, is said to have owed its origin to the following accident. A potter, Mr Astbury, travelling to London, perceived something amiss with one of his torse’s eyes 3 an hostler at Dunstable said he could soon 91 ] POR cure him, and for that purpose put a common black Porcelain. flint stone into the fire. The patter observing it, when taken out, to be of a fine white, immediately conceived the idea of improving his ware by the addition of this mateiial to the whitest clay he could procure : accord¬ ingly he sent home a quantity of the flint stones of that country, where they are plentiful among the chalk, and by mixing them with tobacco-pipe clay, produced a white stone-ware much superior to any that had been seen before. Some of the other potters soon discovered the source of this superiority, and did not fail to follow his example. For a long time they pounded the flint stones in private rooms by manual labour in mortars 3 but many of the poor workmen suffered severely from the dust of the flint getting into their lungs, and producing dreadful coughs, consumptions, and other pulmonary disorders. These disasters, and the increased demand for the flint powder, induced them to try to grind it by mills of va¬ rious constructions ; and this method being found both effectual and safe, has continued in practice ever since. M ith these improvements, in the beginning of the pre¬ sent century, various articles were produced for tea and coffee equipages. Soon after attempts were made to furnish the dinner table also 3 and before the middle of the century, utensils for the table were manufactured in quantity as well for exportation as home consumption. But the salt glaze, the only one then in use for this purpose, is in its own nature so imperfect, and the pot¬ ters, from an injudicious competition among themselves for cheapness, rather than excellence, had been so inat¬ tentive to elegance of form and neatness of workman¬ ship, that this ware was rejected from the tables of per¬ sons of rank 3 and about the year 1760, a white ware, much more beautiful and better glazed than ours, be¬ gan to be imported in considerable quantities from France. „6 The inundation of a foreign manufacture, so much Improved superior to any of our own, must have had very^had ef-^ VVedtf- fects upon the potteries of this kingdom, if a new^ibe, w00‘i" still more to the public taste, had not appeared soon af¬ ter. In the year 1763, Mr Josiah Wedgwood, who bad already introduced several improvements into this art, invented a species of earthen ware for the table quite new in its appearance, covered with a rich and brilliant glaze, bearing sudden alternations of heat and cold, ma¬ nufactured with ease and expedition, and consequently cheap, and having every requisite for the purpose in¬ tended. To this new manufacture the queen was ^ pleased to give her name and patronage, commanding Queen’s it to be called Queen's ware, and honouring the inven- ware* tor by appointing him her majesty’s potter. The common clay of the country is used for the ordi¬ nary sorts 3 the finer kinds are made of clay from De¬ vonshire and Dorsetshire, chiefly from Biddeford; but the flints from the Thames are all brought rough by sea, either to Liverpool or Hull, and so by Burton. The convenience of plenty of coals, which abound in that part of the country, is supposed, and with good reason, to be the chief cause of the manufacture having been established here. The flints are first ground in mills, and the,clay pre¬ pared by breaking, washing, and sifting, and then they are mixed in the requisite proportions. The flints are bought FOR [ bought first by the people about the countiy, and by them burnt and ground, and sold to the manufactuieis by the peck. . . • i m c The mixture is then laid in large quantities in kilns to evaporate the moisture; but this is a nice ivoik, as i must not be too dry : next it is beaten with large woo en hammers, and then is in order for throwing, and is moulded into the forms in which it is to remain •, this is the most difficult work in the whole manutacture. A boy turns a perpendicular wheel, which by means of thongs turns a small horizontal one, just before the thrower, with such velocity, that it twirls round the lump of clay he lays on it into any form he directs it with his fingers. There are 300 houses, which are calculated to em¬ ploy upon an average twenty hands each, or 6000 m the whole ; but of ill the variety of people that work in what may be called the preparation lor the employ- ixient of the immediate manufacturers, the total number cannot be much short of 10,000, and it is increasing every day. Large quantities are exported to Germany, Ireland, Holland, Russia, Spain, the East Indies, and much to America j some of the finest sorts to France. 5. Different Processes in the Manufacture of Porcelain. The basis of those porcelains which are known by the r- name of vitreous or fusible, and sometimesya/.vc porce¬ lain, is denominated by the workmen n fritt. This is a mixture of sand or powdered flints, with a saline sub¬ stance, capable of bringing it to a state of fusion when the mixture is exposed to a sufficient degree of heat. The fritt is then mixed with a proper proportion of clay or argillaceous earth, so that it may have such a degree of tenacity as to make it capable of being worked upon the wheel. The whole mixture is, after being well ground in a mill, to be made into a paste, which is to be formed, either upon the wheel or in moulds, into pieces of such forms or figures as may be required. Each of the pieces, when it is sufficiently dried, is put into a case made of earthen ware, and placed in the furnace, that it may be subjected to the process of baking. These cases are known among the English potters by the name of seggars or saggars, and they are generally formed of a coarser kind of clay, but this clay must possess the property of resisting the. action of heat necessary for the baking of porcelain, without being fused. The porce¬ lain contained in the cases is thus protected from the smoke of the burning fuel: the whiteness of the porce¬ lain depends greatly on the purity of the clay of which it is made, so that being of a more compact texture, the smoke is more effectually excluded. These cases are arranged in the furnace or kiln in piles, one upon the other, to the very top of the furnace. The furnaces are chambers or cavities of various forms and sizes, and they are so constructed that the fire-place is situated on the outside, opposite to one or more openings, which have a communication with the furnace internally. The flame of the fuel is^ drawn within the furnace, the air of which being rarefied, de¬ termines a strong current of air to the inside, as is the case in other furnaces. A small fire is first made, that the furnaces may be gradually heated, and it is. to be increased more and more, till the process of baking is completed ; that is, till the porcelain shall have acquir- 2 ] FOR ed a proper degree of hardness and transparency. To Porcelair ascertain this point, a good deal of attention is neces- sary ; and this is done by taking out of the furnace from time to time, and examining, small pieces of porcelain placed for that purpose in the cases, which have late¬ ral openings to render them accessible. When it ap¬ pears from the examination of those pieces, that the porcelain is sufficiently baked, the fire is no longer to be supplied with fuel 5 the furnace is allowed to cool gradually, and the porcelain is afterwards taken out. In this state the porcelain has the appearance of white marble, having nothing of that shining surface which it acquires by covering it with a vitreous compo¬ sition known by the name of glaring, a process which is afterwards to lie described; but in the mean time we shall speak of the infusible porcelains. . < The materials which enter into the composition of the infusible porcelains, and such as approach to the na¬ ture of stone ware, are first to be ground m a mill, and the earths or clays being well washed, are next to be carefully mixed and formed into a paste. The pieces at first receive a rude form from the wheel or lathe ot the potter, according to their nature and magnitude. As the wheel and lathe are the principal machines emp ey¬ ed in the manufacture of porcelain or pottery, we shall here give a short description of their construction. I he potter’s wheel, which is used for larger works, consists principally in the nut, which is a beam or axis, whose foot or pivot plays perpendicularly on a .free-stone sole ^ or bottom. From the four corners of this beam, which Potter's does not exceed two feet in height, arise four iron bars,wheel, called the spokes of the wheel; which forming diagonal lines with the beam, descend, and are fastened at bottom to the edges of a strong wooden circle, lour feet in dia- meter, perfectly like the felloes of a coach-wheel, ex¬ cept that it has neither axis nor radii, and is only joined to the beam, which serves it as an axis, by the iron bars. The top of the nut is flat, of a circular figure, and a foot in diameter and on this is laid the clay which is to be turned and fashioned. The wheel thus disposed is encompassed with four sides of four different pieces of wood fastened on a wooden frame ; the hind-piece, which is that on which the workman sits, is made a little inclining towards the wheel on the fore-piece is placed the prepared earth j on the side pieces he rests his feet, and these are made inclining to give him more or less room. Having prepared the earth, the potter lays a round piece.of it on the circular head of the nut, and sitting down turns the wheel with his feet till it has got the proper velocity ; then, wetting his hands with water, he presses his fist or his finger-ends into the middle of the lump, and thus forms the cavity of the vessel continuing to widen it from the middle 5 and thus turning the inside into form with one hand, while he proportions the outside with the other, the wheel constantly turning all the while, and he wetting ns hands from time to time. When the vessel is too thick, he uses a flat piece of iron, somewhat sharp on the edge, to pare off what is redundant •, and when it is finished, it is taken off from the circular head by a wire passed under the vessel. 4C The potter’s lathe is also a kind of wheel, but more potter simple and slight than the former : its three chief mem kthe- bers are an iron beam or axis three feet and a ha high, and two feet and a half diameter, placed horizon- & tally P O R [ , Tcelain. tally at the top of the beam, and serving to form the vessel upon: and another large wooden wheel, all of a piece, three inches thick, and two or three feet broad, fastened to the same beam at the bottom, and parallel to the horizon. The beam or axis turns by a pivot at the bottom of an iron stand. The workman gives the motion to the lathe with his feet, by pushing the great wheel alternately with each foot, still giving it a great¬ er or lesser degree of motion as his work requires. He works with the lathe with the same instruments, and after the same manner, as with the wheel. The mould¬ ings are formed by holding a piece of wood or iron cut in the form of the moulding to the vessel, while the wheel is turning round ; but the feet and handles are made by themselves and set on with the hand ; and if there be any sculpture in the work, it is usually done in wooden moulds, and stuck on piece by piece on the outside of the vessel. The lathe is employed for smaller works in porcelain. After the first application of the pieces of porce¬ lain to the wheel or lathe, they are allowed to become nearly dry; and to give the requisite form, or a greater degree of accuracy and perfection, they are again sub¬ jected to the same operation. They are afterwards in¬ troduced into the furnace, not, however, for the pur¬ pose of baking them completely, but only to apply a sufficient heat, to give them that firmness and solidity that they may undergo the various necessary manipula¬ tions without being disfigured or broken. In this state they are ready for the process of glazing. As the pieces of porcelain, after being subjected to this moderate de¬ gree of heat, are very dry, they readily imbibe water, and it is this property of absorbing water, which greatly assists in the application of the glazing; and having re¬ ceived this covering, the pieces of porcelain are again put into the furnace, to complete the process of baking. The heat is gradually raised, and at last brought to that degree that all the objects within the furnace shall be white, and the cases shall be scarcely distinguished from the flame. To ascertain when the porcelain is sufficient¬ ly baked, small pieces are taken out in the manner al¬ ready described, after which the fire is withdrawn, and the furnace allowed to cool gradually. If the process of baking have succeeded properly, the pieces of porce¬ lain will, after this operation, be sonorous, compact, ha¬ ving a moderate degree of lustre, and covered exter¬ nally with a fine coat of glaze. If this porcelain is de¬ stined to receive the ornaments of painting and gilding, these operations are performed in the manner to be af- t terwards described. Uft tzed After the porcelain has been subjected to the process baking, and before it is glazed, it is said to be in the :uij state ot biscuit, in which it possesses various degrees of beauty and perfection, according to the nature and pro¬ portions of the materials employed. For particular pur¬ poses, the porcelain is sometimes allowed to remain in this state, and particularly when it is employed in smaller and finer pieces of sculpture, where the fineness of the workmanship and the sharpness of the figures are wished to be preserved, as it is well known that these Vol. XVII. Part I. f 93 1 FOR will be greatly injured by being covered with a coat of Porcelain, glazing. The celebrated manufactory of Sevres in w—v——' France has been long distinguished for figures or small statues, and even for larger works, as ornamental vases, &c. which are left in the state of biscuit. The English manufactories, and particularly that of Mr Wedgwood, are probably not inferior in the delicacy and accuracy of execution of ornamental productions of this kind. 42 The next operation in the manufacture of porcelain Method of is the process of glazing. This process consists in cover- glazing ing the porcelain with a thin coat of vitreous or fusible t)0rceIain‘ matter, which adds greatly to its beauty, by its lustre or shining appearance. In preparing and applying the materials fit for glazing porcelain, it has been found that the same kind of glass will not admit of general application ; for it appears that a glass which forms a fine glazing for one kind of porcelain, will not answer the same purpose when applied to another. In the former it may have all the necessary requisites, but in the latter it may crack in many places, may have no lustre, and may contain bubbles or be apt to scale off. The first thing then is to prepare a glass which shall be suited to the nature of the porcelain for which it is in¬ tended. The glazing must be appropriated to each kind of porcelain, that is, to the ingredients which enter into its composition, or to the degree of hardness or den¬ sity of the ware. The materials of which the glazing is composed are prepared by previously fusing together all the substances of which they consist, and thus form¬ ing a vitreous mass (a). This mass of vitrified matter is to be finely ground in a mill, and the vitreous powder thus obtained is to be mixed with a sufficient quantity of water, so that the liquor shall have the consistence of cream of milk. The pieces of porcelain are to be cover¬ ed with a thin coating of this matter, which is done by immersing them hastily in the liquid, and as they greedily imbibe the water, there remains on the surface a uniform covering of the glazing materials. This co¬ vering, which, it is necessary to observe, should be very thin, in a short time becomes so dry, that it does not adhere to the fingers when the pieces are handled. When they are sufficiently dry, they are replaced in the furnace in the same manner as in preparing the biscuit, and the heat is continued till the glazing be completely fused ; but the degree of heat necessary for that pur¬ pose is far inferior to that which is requisite in baking the paste. The pieces of porcelain which are intended to remain white, are now finished, but those which are to be ornamented with painting and gilding must go through various other operations, of which the follow¬ ing is a general account. The colours which are employed in painting porce-of paint- lain are similar to those which are applied in the paint-ing. ing of enamel. They are all composed of metallic oxides or calces, combined with a very fusible, vitreous matter. The different colours are obtained from differ¬ ent metals. The oxides of iron afford a red colour; gold precipitated by means of tin, furnishes a purple and violet colour ; copper precipitated from its solution in acids by means of an alkali, gives a fine green ; cobalt, 13 b or (a) The proportion of the materials employed for common white pottery-ware are 6o parts of litharge, 10 of c’ay# and 20 of ground flint. Porcelain. P O R ov when combined with vitreous matter, ®#/, called, vields a fine bine. Earthy matters wtoch ure slightly ferruginous, produce a yellow colour, an „nn vjLle colours are obtained from iron in diUeren “tes and tom manganese. A coloured glazmg has ’ ii i.. O’lfeillv * which may he ap- * Essay “ I have said that in the baking of these colours, the crust, softened by the fire, suffers itself to be easi y pe¬ netrated by them. This is the first cause of the change which they experience. By mixing with the crust they become weaker, and the first heat changes a hgure which appeared to be finished into a very light sketch. The two principal causes of the changes which co¬ lours on enamel and soft porcelain are susceptible ot ex¬ periencing do not depend in any manner on the compo¬ sition of these colours, but on the nature of the glass to which they are applied. It follows from what has been said, that painting on soft procelain has need ot being several times retouched, and of several heats, in ore er that it maybe carried to the necessary degree ot strength. These paintings have always a certain faintnessj but they are constantly more brilliant, and they never are attended with the inconvenience of detaching themselves 111 “CHard porcelain, according to the division which I have established, is the second sort of excipient ol metal¬ lic colours. This porcelain, as is well known has tor its base a very white clay called kaolin, mixed with a silicious and calcareous flux, and for its covering teld- 6 spar fused without an atom of lead. Colours ap- “ This porcelain, which is that of Saxony, plied to netver at Sevres than the soft porcelain. H hard Porce'applied to it are of two kinds : the first, destined to re- lain* present different objects, are baked in a heat very inte¬ rior to that necessary for baking porcelain. 1 hey are exceedingly numerous and varied. The others, destined to be fused in the same heat as that which bakes porce¬ lain, lav themselves flat, and are much less numerous. The colours of painting are made nearly like those des¬ tined for soft porcelain ; they only contain more flux. Their flux is composed of glass ol lead and borax. 'When porcelain is exposed to heat in order to hake the colours, the covering of feldspar dilates itself and opens its pores, but does not become soft; as the colours do not penetrate it, they experience none of those changes which they undergo on soft porcelain. It must how¬ ever be said that they lose a little of their intensity by acquiring that transparency which is given to them by fusion. . „ . , “ One of the greatest inconveniences ot these colours, especially in the manufactory of Sevres, is the facility with which they scale off when exposed several times in the fire. , , . . .. “ To remedy this defect without altering the quality of the paste, I was of opinion that the crust only ought 4 is much The colours 198 ] FOR to be softened by introducing into it more siliceous or Porcelain calcareous flux, according to the nature ot the feldspai. This method has succeeded ; and for about a year past the colours might he exposed two or three times to the fire without scaling, if not overcharged with flux, and if not laid on too thick. _ ..on “ The third sort ot excipient of vitrifiable metallic colours is glass without lead. _ 64 “ The application of these colours to glass constitutes andtogks painting on glass ; an art very much practised some cen¬ turies ago, and which was supposed to be lost because out of fashion j but it has too direct a dependence on painting in enamel and porcelain to be entirely lost. « The matters and fluxes which enter into the com¬ position of the colours employed on glass are in general the same as those applied to porcelain. Neither of them differ but in their proportions 5 but there are a great number of enamel or porcelain colours which cannot be applied to glass, where they are deprived of the white ground which serves to give them relief. Of Colours in particular. “ After collecting the general phenomena exhibited by each class of vitrifiable colours, considered in regard to the body on which they are applied, I must make known the most interesting particular phenomena exhi¬ bited by each principal kind of colours employed on soft porcelain and glass in a porcelain furnace. Of Beds, Purples, and Violets, made from Gold. “ Carmine red is obtained by the purple precipitate of cassias : it is mixed with about six parts of its flux •, and this mixture is employed directly, without being fused. It is then of a dirty violet, but by baking it acquires a beautiful red carmine colour: it is, however, exceed- ino-lv delicate; a little too much heat and carbonaceous vapours easily spoil it. On this account it is more beau¬ tiful when baked with charcoal than with wood. “ This colour and the purple, Avhich is very little dif¬ ferent, as well as all the shades obtained from it, by mixing it with other colours, really change on all por- celain^and in every hand. But it is the only one that changes on hard porcelain. Its place may be supplied by a rose-colour from iron which does not change •, so that by suppressing the carmine made with gold, and substituting for it the rose oxide of iron here alluded to, you may exhibit a palette composed of colours none of which change in a remarkable manner. Ihis rose-co¬ loured oxide of iron has been long known ; but it was not employed on enamel, because on that substance it changes too much. As the painters on enamel, how¬ ever, have become the painters on porcelain, they have preserved their ancient method. “ It might be believed that, by first reducing to a vitreous matter the colour called carmine already mixed with its flux, it might be made to assume its last tint. But the!heat necessary to fuse this vitreous mass destroys the red colour, as I have experienced. Besides, it is remarked that, to obtain this colour very beautiful, it must be exposed to the fire as few times as possible. it The carmine for soft porcelain is made with fulmi¬ nating gold slowly decomposed, and muriate ol silver no tin enters into it 5 which proves that the combination of the oxide of this metal with that of gold is not neces¬ sary to the existence of the purple colour. “ Violet FOB [ i i celain. “ Violet is made also with purple oxide of gold. A greater quantity of lead in the flux is what gives it this colour, which is almost the same crude or baked. “ These three colours totally disappear when exposed to a great porcelain heat. “ Carmine and purple have given us in glass tints only of a dirty violet. The violet, on the other hand, produces on glass a very beautiful effect, but it is liable to turn blue. I have not yet been able to discover the cause of this singular change, which I saw for the first time a few days ago. Red, Rose, and Brown Colours, extractedfrom Iron. “ These colours are made from red oxide of iron pre¬ pared with nitric acid. These oxides are further cal¬ cined by keeping them exposed to the action of heat. If heated too much, they pass to brown. “ Their flux is composed of borax, sand, and minium, in small quantity. “ These oxides give rose and red colours capable of supplying the place of the same colours made with oxide of gold. When properly employed on hard porcelain, they do not change at all. I have caused roses to be painted with these colours, and found no difference be¬ tween the baked flower and that not baked, except what might be expected to result from the brilliancy given to colours by fusion. “ These colours may be employed indiscriminately, either previously fused or not fused. “ In a great heat they in part disappear, or produce a dull brick red ground, which is not agreeable. “ The composition of them is the same both for soft porcelain and for glass. They do not change on the latter ; but on soft porcelain they disappear almost en¬ tirely on the first exposure to heat, and to make any thing remain they must be employed very deep. “ This singular effect must be ascribed to the pre¬ sence of lead in the crust or glazing. I assured myself of this by a very simple experiment. I placed this co¬ lour on window glass, and having exposed it to a strong baking, it did not change. “ I covered several parts of it with minium ; and again exposing it to the fire, the colour was totally re¬ moved in the places where the red oxide of lead had been applied. “ By performing this operation on a larger scale in close vessels, a large quantity of oxygen gas was disen¬ gaged. “ It appears to me that this observation clearly proves the action of oxidated lead on glass as a destroyer of colour : it is seen that it does not act, as was believed, by burning the combustible bodies, which might tarnish the glass, but by dissolving, discolouring, or volatilizing with it the oxide of iron, which might alter its trans¬ parency. Yellows. 99 ] FOB when it is required to have them livelier, and nearer Porcelain, the colour du souci, red oxide of iron is added, the too v—-y—- great redness of which is dissipated in the previous fu¬ sion to which they are exposed by the action of the lead contained in this yellow. These colours, when once made, never change : they disappear, however, almost entirely when exposed to a porcelain heat. “ These yellows cannot be applied to glass : they are too opake and dirty. That employed by the old painters on glass has, on the contrary, a beautiful trans¬ parency, is exceedingly brilliant, and of a colour which approaches near to that of gold. The processes which they gave clearly showed that silver formed part of their composition ; but, when exactly followed, nothing sa¬ tisfactory was obtained. C. Miraud, whom I have al¬ ready had occasion to mention, has found means to make as beautiful paintings on glass as the ancients, by em¬ ploying muriate of silver, oxide of zinc, white argil, and yellow oxide of iron. These colours are applied on glass merely pounded, and without a flux. The oxide of iron brings the yellow to that colour which it ought to have after baking, and contributes with the argil and oxide of zinc to decompose the muriate of silver without de¬ oxidating the silver. After the baking, there remains a dust which has not penetrated into the glass, and which is easily removed. “ This yellow, when employed thicker, gives darker shades, and produces a russet. Blues. “ It is well known that these are obtained from the oxide of cobalt. All chemists are acquainted with the preparation of them. T.hose of Sevres, which are justly esteemed for their beauty, are indebted for it only to the care employed in manufacturing them, and to the qua¬ lity of the porcelain, which appears more proper for re¬ ceiving them in proportion to the degree of heat which it can bear. “ I remarked respecting the oxide of cobalt a fact which is perhaps not known to chemists : it is volatile in a violent heat : it is to this property we must ascribe the blueish tint always assumed by white in the neigh¬ bourhood of the blue. I have placed expressly on pur¬ pose, in the same case, a white piece close to a blue one, and found that the side of the white piece next the blue became evidently blueish. “ The blue of hard porcelain, destined for what is called the ground for a great heat (les fonds au grand feu) is fused with feldspar ; that of soft porcelain has for its flux silex, potash, and lead : it is not volatilized like the preceding •, but the heat it experiences is very inferior to that of hard porcelain. “ These colours, when previously fused, do not change at all in the application. “ Blues on glass exhibit the same phenomena as those on soft porcelain. “ Yellows are colours which require a great deal of care in the fabrication on account of the lead which they contain, and which, approaching sometimes to the me¬ tallic state, produces on them black spots. w The yellows for hard and soft porcelain are the same : they are composed of the oxide of lead, white oxide of antimony, and sand. “ Oxide of tin is sometimes mixed with them j and Greens. “ The greens employed in painting are made with green oxide of copper, or sometimes with a mixture of yellow or blue. They must be previously fused with their flux, otherwise they will become black ; but after this first fusion they no longer change. “ They cannot stand a strong heat, as it would make them disappear entirely. Green grounds for a strong heat t P O R Porcelain, heat are composed with the oxides of .cohalt and me- '““"■V"—-' kel. but a brownish green only is obtained. “ Blueish greens, called celestial blues, winch were formerly colours very much in vogue, can be applied only upon soft porcelain j on hard porcelain they con stantly become scaly, because potash enters in C°“ These greens cannot be applied on glass: they trive a dirty colour. To obtain a green on g ass, it is necessary to put yellow on one side, and blue, more or less pale, on the other. This colour may be made also by a mixture of blue with yellow oxide of iron. I hope to obtain from oxide of chrome a direct green colour. The trials I have made give me reason to hope for success. Pure chromate of lead, which I applied to porcelain in a strong heat, gave me a pretty beautiful green of great intensity and very fixed. Bistres and Russets. « These are obtained by mixtures in different pro¬ portions of manganese, brown oxide of copper, and ox¬ ide of iron from ombre earth. They are also previously fused with their flux, so that they do not change in any manner on soft porcelain, as lead has not the same ac¬ tion on oxide of manganese as on that of iron, as 1 as¬ sured myself by an experiment similar to that already mentioned. “ This colour fades very speedily on glass. « Russet grounds in a great heat, known under the name of tortoise-shell grounds, are made in thesomeman- ner. Their flux is feldspar : no titanium enters into their composition, though said so in all printed works. Titanium was not known at the manufactory of bevres when I arrived there. I treated this singular metal m various ways, and never obtained but grounds of a pale dirty yellow, and very variable in its tone. Blacks. “ Blacks are the colours most difficult to be obtained very beautiful. No metallic oxide gives alone a beauti¬ ful black. Manganese is that which approaches nearest to it. Iron gives an opake, dull, cloudy black, which changes very easily to red : the colour-makers, there¬ fore, to obtain a black which they could not hope for from the best theorist, have united several metallic ox¬ ides which separately do not give black, and have ob¬ tained a very beautiful colour, which, however, is liable to become scaly and dull. «These oxides are those of mangenese, the brown oxides of copper, and a little of the oxide of cobalt. The gray is obtained by suppressing the copper, and in¬ creasing the dose of the flux. « The manufactory of Sevres is the only one which has hitherto produced beautiful blacks in a strong heat. This is owing rather to the quality of its paste than to any peculiar processes, since it does not conceal them. It is by darkening the blue by the oxides of manganese and iron that they are able in that manufactory to ob¬ tain very brilliant blacks. “ Having here made known the principles of the fa¬ brication of each principal colour, it may be readily conceived that by mixing these colours together all the shades possible may be obtained. It is evident also that care in the preparation, choice in the raw materials, and a just proportion of doses, must produce in the results 3 200 ] P O R differences very sensible to an eye accustomed to paint- Porcela, ing. A mere knowledge of the composition of the co-y-' lours does not give the talent of executing them well. “ In recapitulating the facts above mentioned, to pre¬ sent them under another general point of view, it is seen, ^ “ ist, That among colours generally employed onFacts5r, hard porcelain one only is susceptible of changing, viz. tire to« carmine, and the tints into which it enters: that its lours ree place may be supplied by the reds of iron, and that no Pltulat"- colour then changes. “ I have presented to the Institute ahead not baked, executed according to this method : and the painting of two roses, that of the one baked, and that of the other not baked. It has been seen that there was no differ¬ ence between them. “ 2d, That among the colours for soft porcelain and enamel^ several change in a considerable degree. These are principally the reds of gold and iron, the yellows, the greens, the browns. They have not been replaced by others, because this kind of painting has been almost abandoned. “ 3d, That several of the colours on glass change also by acquiring complete transparency. These in par¬ ticular are the yellows and greens. “ 4th, That it is neither by calcinating the colours in a higher degree, nor previously fusing them, as supposed by some, that they are prevented from changing, since these means really alter the changing colours, and pro¬ duce no effect on the rest. The change which several colours experience on soft porcelain and on glass does not then depend on the nature of their composition, but rather on that of the body on which they are applied. “ Consequently, by suppressing from the colours of hard porcelain the carmine of gold, which is not indi¬ spensably necessary, we shall have a series of colouis which do not change.” • , „ l6 As it must be of no small importance to the chemical Result manufacturer to be acquainted with the results of ex-^J periments on the effects of heat, when applied to ajs for, t. 1 * — -I ..4“x.-**...If' 1 xt&e 1 111 msiL: 1 no* ^ ferent proportions of the materials employed m making ceiain ii porcelain, or other analogous ware, we shall insert the portant following tables, exhibiting those results. The first ta¬ ble contains the results of the numerous experiments of Achard and Morveau on the vitrification of earths with saline bodies. The mixture of the earths and salts was made in a clay crucible, and, in the experiments of Mor¬ veau, the crucible was exposed for two hours to a heat from 22° to 26° of Wedgwood’s pyrometer j but in those of Achard, the crucible was kept for three hours in the heat of a strong wind furnace, in which the tempera¬ ture was probably higher than the former. The second table presents a view of the effects of the vitrification of earths by means of metallic oxides. The mixtures were exposed in earthen crucibles to the heat of a porcelain furnace during the whole time required to bake porcelain ware. In the third table are exhibited the curious results of the effects of vitrifying materials on the crucibles in ■which the vitrification takes place. It is to be observ¬ ed, that the effects of the same materials, and in the same proportions, are very different, in different vessels j and without attending to this circumstance, very erro¬ neous conclusions will be drawn in estimating the action of vitrifiable substances on each other. This diversity of the effects of the same materials in different crucibles, was P O R [20 elain. was first noticed by Pott. The subject was still farther ry-—' prosecuted by Gerrard, who made a number of experi¬ ments, from which he obtained the results expressed in the table. He exposed various natural minerals to a de¬ gree of heat sufficient to melt cast iron for an hour, un- 1 ] P O R der precisely the same circumstances, with this differ¬ ence only, that one specimen of each mineral was in¬ closed in a crucible of elay, another in one of chalk, and a third in one of charcoal. The difference of the result which is given in the tables was particularly noticed. Porcelain. Table I. Shewing the Results of the Vitrification of Earths with Saline Bodies. Mixture. Results. 1! V A yellow glass> not hard enough to give sparks with steel. * ^ colourless transparent glass, but deliquescent from the excess of alkali, A yellow glass, not scintillant. A vitriform mass, yellow, hard, and scintillant. 2*1 A beautiful transparent glass, not at all soluble in water. j’^-A white porcellanous mass, scarcely scintillant. ^ A hard transparent glass—scintillant. ^ ^ A white opake melted porous mass—scintillant. A. Silex Carbonate of potash M. Silex Carbonate of soda (dry) A. Silex Carbonate of potash A. Silex Carbonate of potash M. Silex Borax (calcined) A. Silex Boracic acid A, Silex Boracic acid ;} ?;}a transparent glass —hard and scintillant. j ] \ A mass resembling agate—but perfectly fused and scintillant. jj- A green scintillant glass. A soft green transparent glass. * ‘ ^ Scoria—the crucible entirely destroyed. A. Silex Box-acic acid A. Silex Calcined borax A. Silex Calcined borax A. Silex Sulphate of soda A. Silex Nitre * A. Silex Common salt M. Silex - - - I.?a,S irr- Phosphate of soda and ammonia 2. A W Ute 0pake’ puffy’ Vltre0us mass> dehquescent, and reddening litmus. A white spongy opake mass, crumbling between the fingers. 1 M. Lime Carbonate of soda A. Chalk Carbonate of potash A. Chalk Carbonate of potash A. Chalk Carbonate of potash M. Lime Borax A. Chalk . Borax A. Chalk Borax A. Chalk Boracic acid Vol. XVII. Part I. ^-Partly, fused—the rest pulverulent—the crucible strongly corroded. **^-A well-fused, polished, black scintillant glass, j ‘ Remained a white powder. 2 ^ A fine transparent yellowish glass—the crucible strongly corroded. A well-fused, black, scintillant, polished mass, j- A yellow scintillant glass. A yellow glass—run through the crucible. Poreclalft. P O B Mixture. [ 202 ] P O K Result. Poroelai' A. A. A. A. M. M. A. A. M. A. A. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. 3'| A hard yellow sclntillant glass. I-7 A hard brown scoria—the crucible totally destroyed. 4- j A hard yellow glass. J-1A yellow sclntillant glass—the crucible entirely destroyed. . ,*1.A white opake crumbly mass. Phosphate of soda and ammonia 2. § Alumine - - i- 7 A gray opake ill-fused fritt, not cohering to the crucible and deliquescent. Carbonate of soda - 2. 3 Carbonate of soda and potash in \ Remained unmelted and uncohering, all proportions from 1 to 12.3 Chalk Sulphate of soda Chalk Sulphate of soda Chalk Nitrate of soda Chalk Common salt Lime ^ ^ Partially melted, but soft and friable. ^ A fine transparent clear green glass. Remained pulverulent. I,|. Part unfused and remaining pulverulent, the rest partially melted. Alumine Carbonate of potash A1 umine Borax Alumine Borax Alumine Boracic acid Alumine Phosphate of soda and ammonia 2 Magnesia Carbonate of soda Magnesia - i ^ r . w Borax - “ J very hard and brilliant on the surface. Magnesia - - . I,7. A white mass a little agglutinated but not adhering to the crucible. Phosphate of soda and ammonia 2. j Barytes (pure) Carbonate of soda Barytes - Borax - - - * ^ A green fritt easily friable. ^ A white opake uncohering mass. I'T A semi-transparent somewhat milky glass of a gelatinous appearance, but 2 J vpw hard and brilliant on the surface. " A very hard semi-vitrified mass, of a clear green* i.T A beautiful transparent glass with a faint yellow tinge, strongly adhering 2.3 to the crucible. Barytes - - - . 1’7. A remarkably fine transparent glass. Phosphate of soda and ammonia 2. 3 Table II. Containing the Results of the Vitrification of Earths by Metallic Oxides. Mixture.. Silex Oxide of iron Silex Oxide of iron Silex Oxide of iron Silex Oxide of copper Silex Oxide of copper. Result. 1. !. 3 J- Scoria Not fused * * ^ Scoria run through the crucible Not fused. 4*^ Not fused* Colour and Texture. Black and polished—hard, giving sparks with steel. Black and friable. Black and hard—scintillantv Site* PlMlaia. Silex Mixture, Oxide of lead Silex Oxide of lead Silex Oxide of lead Silex Oxide of tin Silex Oxide of tin Silex Oxide of bismuth Silex Oxide of bismuth Silex Oxide of antimonj Silex mass I5 0 R [ 203 j Result. solid mass but not fused ^ Fused, porous, and semi-vitrified Perfect glass j' A coherent 2’ ^ Vitrified j ^Remained in powder. ^ Perfect glass « Glass - - - Oxide of antimony 1.^ •^ot melte^ " " Oxide of zinc - Remained in powder. Oxide of zinc - 2!} Melted Gnly where touching the crucible. Oxide of zinc - 3.'| Perfectly fused Lime (carbonated) I. 7 a Oxide of iron - 1. J A melted Porou3 mass “ I. 7 Melted, polished in the fracture, part of the Oxide of copper 1.3 copper reduced ^-Melted, but porous . „ i ^-Part only melted, the rest pulverulent Glass j ^ Glass run through the crucible - j Remained in powder. Semi-vitrified j Glass - » Melted only where touching tlie crucible 4-|Glas3 Lime . j Oxide of bismuth 2‘| vitriform mass ^ Glass penetrating the crucible Lime Oxide of copper Lime Oxide of copper Lime Oxide of copper Lime Oxide of lead Lime Oxide of lead Lime Oxide of lead Lime Oxide of tin Lime Oxide of tin Lime Oxide of tin Lime . Oxide of tin Lime Oxide of antimon FOR Colour and Textfir^ Pewlaia, White and bard. v ‘ Yellow—not scintillant* Green—not scintillant* Gray—easibly friable. Greenish yellow—not scintilla*!* Deep yellow—not scintilla*t. Colourless—scintillanU Gray and friable. White—hard. Gray—scintillant. Black—scintillant. Red—scintillant. The same. Gray. Greenish yellow—sciutilla&V Yellow—scintillant* Yellow—scintillafft. Greenish yellow—scintillawt. Gray. Greenish yellow—scintillamt. Green. Yellow—scintillant. C c 2- Li mt / P O R Porcelain. Mixture. v Lime Oxide of antimony Lime Oxide of antimony Lime Oxide of antimony Lime Oxide of zinc Alumine Oxide of iron [ 204 ] Result. Alumine Oxide of iron Alumine Oxide of copper - Alumine Oxide of copper - Alumine Oxide of lead Alumine Oxide of lead Alumine Oxide of lead Alumine Oxide of tin Alumine Oxide of bismuth Alumine Oxide of antimony Alumine Oxide of zinc Magnesia Oxide of iron Magnesia Oxide of copper - Magnesia Oxide of lead Magnesia Oxide of lead Magnesia Oxide of antimony j- Remained in powder. ^ Glass penetrating the crucible ^ A semi-transparent polished mass Glass 1 ‘ Only partially fused. 1 * ^ A melted porous mass I* Only partially fused. x‘ J-The same. 4- J x’^- Remained in powder. 1‘ (-The same. P O B Colour and Texture. Deep yellow-—scintillant. f Gray yellow—scintillant. Deep- yellow—scintillant. Black—scintillant. Porcelain 3-3 4:} Glass Deep yellow—scintillant. A melted porous mass, not polished in the ^ Gray—scintillant. fracture X* ^Partially fused. 1 ‘ Only partially fused, x‘ ^ Remained in powder. I'l Half fused, but not cohering. 3 3 1 ^ A porous half-fused mass X* ^Not fused. Gray—scintillant. i.l A porous melted mass, part of the oxide re- 4-3 4. 3 duced. X' ^ Beginning to fuse Gray—scintillant. Table III. Shewing the Action of the Vitrifying matters on the Cruellies that contain them. Substances used. Common flint. Marble. Gypsum. Result in the Clay crucible Result in the Chalk crucible Result in the Charcoal < (A). (B). r '' _ crucible Opake and milk-white, but Opake and white, but with As in A. without fusion. beginning fusion where in . contact with the cruci¬ ble. Run into a green glass. No change. No change. Run into a radiated green No change. No change. glass- Fluor r r 205 i p Result in the Clay crucible (A.) Melted and ran through the crucible. Compact, white and no signs of fusion. A compact mass partially melted. A black, glass covered with a crust of reduced iron. No fusion, but the colour changed to brown. A black glass with inter¬ spersed grains of iron. Result in the Chalk cruci¬ ble (B). Melted down with the cru¬ cible to a tough slag. Run into a hard blue clear glass. A perfectly black glass. Only hardened. Brown-yellow glass with a crust of iron. For an account of some valuable experiments of a si¬ milar nature, which were made by the celebrated Kla¬ proth, in crucibles of clay and charcoal, in which the dift’erences of the results are very striking, the reader is referred to his Analyt. Essays, or to Aikin’s Dictionary of Chemistry and Mineralogy. PoRCELAiN-Shell, a species of Cyprjea. See Cy- PR^a, Conchology Index. PORCH, in Architecture, a kind of vestibule sup¬ ported by columns 5 much used at the entrance of the ancient temples, halls, churches, &c. A porch, in the ancient architecture, was a vestibule, or a disposition of insulated columns usually crowned with a pediment, forming a covert place before the principal door of a temple or court of justice. Such is that before the door of St Paul’s, Covent-Garden, the work of Inigo Jones. When a porch had four columns in front, it was called a tetrastyle when six, hexastyle ; when eight, octostyle, &c. Porch, in Greek e-W, a public portico in Athens, adorned with the pictures of Polygnotus and other emi¬ nent painters. It was in this portico that Zeno the phi¬ losopher taught; and hence his followers were called Stoics. See Stoics and Zeno. PORCUPINE. See Hystrix, Mammalia Tnde.v. PoiicupiNE-Man, the name by which one Edward Rambert, who had a distempered skin, w’ent in Lon¬ don. We have the following account of him in the Philosophical Transactions for 1755, by Mr Henry Baker, F. R. S. “ He is now (says he) 40 years of age, and it is 24 years since he was first shown to the socie¬ ty. The skin of this man, except on his head and face, the palms of his hands, and the soles of his feet, is co¬ vered with excrescences that resemble an innumerable company of warts, of a brown colour and cylindrical fi¬ gure ; all rising to an equal height, which is about an inch, and growing as close as possible to each other at their basis; but so stiff and elastic as to make a rust¬ ling noise when the hand is drawn over them. These excrescences are annually shed, and renewed in some of the autumn or winter months. The new ones, which are of a paler colour, gradually rise up from beneath as the old ones fall off; and at this time it has been found necessary for him to lose a little blood, to prevent a slight A semitransparent apple- green glass. Completely fused in the parts touching the crucible. The whole crucible was pe¬ netrated with a scoria so as not to fall to powder on exposure to air. Agraysemitransparentglass A green scoria, also with a crust of iron. sickness which he had been used to suffer before this pre¬ caution was taken. He has had the small-pox, and he has been twice salivated, in hopes to get rid of this disagree¬ able covering; but though just when the pustules of the smallpox had scaled oft’, and immediately after his sali¬ vations, his skin appeared white and smooth, yet the excrescences soon returned by a gradual increase,and his skin became as it was before. His health, during his whole life has been remarkably good ; but there is one particular of his case more extraordinary than all the rest; this man has had six children, and all of them had the same rugged covering as himself, which came on like his own about nine weeks after the birth. Of these children only one is now living, a pretty boy, who wras shown with his father. It appears therefore, as Mr Baker remarks, that a race of people might be propagated by this man, as different from other men as an African is from an Englishman ; and that if this should have happened in any former age, and the acci¬ dental original have been forgotten, there would be the same objections against their being derived from the same common stock with others: it must therefore be admitted possible, that the differences now subsisting between one part of mankind and another may have been produced by some such accidental cause, long af¬ ter the earth had been peopled by one common proge¬ nitor.” PORE, in Anatomy, a little interstice or space be¬ tween the parts of the skin, serving for perspiration. PORELLA, a genus of plants belonging to the sryptogamia class. See Botany Index. PORENTRU, a town of Switzerland, in Elsgaw, and capital of the territory of the bishop of Basle, which is distinguished only by its castle and cathedral. The bishop was formerly a prince of the empire. It is seated on the river Halle, near Mount Jura, 22 miles south of Basle. E. Long. 7. 2. N. Lat. 47. 34. PORISM, in Geometry, is a name given by the an-, cient geometers to two classes of mathematical proposi¬ tions. . Euclid gives this name to propositions which are involved in others which he is professedly investiga¬ ting, and which, although not his principal object, are yet obtained along with it, as is expressed by their name porismata, “ acquisitions.” Such propositions are now called jelaitt f5 o Substances used. upme- spar. an. Porcelain clay. Ditto, another kind. Reddle. Jasper. Muscovy talc. Spanish chalk. Basalt. O R Result in the Charcoalcru- Porcelain cible (C). 1! Scarcely altered, except ^ slight fusion at the ‘ v_1" edges. As in A. As in A. A brown scoria containing grains of iron. As in A. As in A. As in A. A green glass with many grains of iron. called corollaries. But he gives the same name, by way of eminence, to a particular class of propositions which he collected in the course of his researches, and selected from among many others on account of then great su serviency to the business of geometrical investigation m general. These propositions were so named by him, either from the ivay in which he discovered them, while he was investigating something else, by which means they might be considered as gains or acquisitions, or from their utility in acquiring farther knowledge as steps in the investigation. In this sense they are pons- mata •, for signifies both to investigate and to ac¬ quire by investigation. These propositions formed a collection, which was familiarly known to the ancient geometers by the name of Euclid’s porisms; and Pap¬ pus of Alexandria says, that it was a most ingenious col¬ lection of many things conducive to the analysis or so¬ lution of the most difficult problems, and which afforded great delight to those who were able to understand and to investigate them. Unfortunately for mathematical science, this valua¬ ble collection is now lost, and it still remains a doubtful question in what manner the ancients conducted their researches upon this curious subject. We have, how¬ ever, reason to believe that their method was excellent both in principle and extentfor their analysis led them to many profound discoveries, and was restricted by the severest logic. The only account we have of this class of geometrical propositions, is in a fragment of Pappus, in which he attempts a general description of them as a set of mathematical propositions, distinguishable in kind from all others ; but of this description nothing remains, except a criticism on a definition of them given by some geometers, and with which he finds fault, as defining them only by an accidental circumstance, “ A Porism is that which is deficient in hypothesis from a local theorem Pappus then proceeds to give an account of Euclid’s porisms •, but the enunciations are so extremely defec¬ tive, at the same time that they refer to a figure now lost, that Dr Halley confesses the fragment in question to he beyond his comprehension. The high encomiums given by Pappus to these pro¬ positions have excited the curiosity of the greatest geo¬ meters of modern times, who have attempted to dis¬ cover their nature and manner of investigation. M. Fermat, a French mathematician of the 17th century, attaching himself to the definition which Pappus cri¬ ticises, published an introduction (for this is its modest title) to this subject, which many others tried to eluci¬ date in vain. At length Dr Simson, Professor of Ma¬ thematics in the University of Glasgow, was so fortu¬ nate as to succeed in restoring the Porisms ol Euclid. The account he gives of his progress and the obstacles be encountered will always be interesting to mathema¬ ticians. In the preface to his treatise De Porismatibus, he says, “ Postquam vero apud Pappum legeram Poris- mata Euclidis Collectionem iuisse artificiosissimana mul- tarum verum, qute spectant ad analysin difficiliorum et generalium problematum, magno desiderio tenebar, all- quid de iis cognoscendi} quare siepius et multis variisque viis turn Pappi propositionem generalem, mancam et im- perfectam, turn primumlib. I. porisma, quod, ut dictum fuit, solum ex omnibus in tribus libris integrum adhuc xaauctj iutelligere et restituere conabar j frustra tamen, 5 nihil enim proficiebam. Cumque cogitationes de hac re multum mihi temporis consumpserint, atque tandem mo-v- lestie admodum evaserint, firmiter animum induxi nun- quam in posterum investigare } prsesertim cum optimus Geometra Halleius spem omnem de iis Intelligendis ab- jecisset. Unde quoties menti occurrebant, toties eas arcebam. Postea tamen acciditut improvidum et pro¬ positi immemorem invaserint, meque detinuerint donee tandem lux quaedam effulserit quae spem mihi faciebat inveniendi saltern Pappi propositionem generalem, quam quidem multa investigatione tandem restitui. Haecau- tem paulo post una cum Porismate primo lib. 1. impressa est interTransactionesPhilosophicasanni 1723,^ Dr Simson’s Restoration has all the appearance of being just ; it precisely corresponds to Pappus’s de¬ scription of them. All the lemmas which Pappus has given for the better understanding of Euclid’s proposi¬ tions are equally applicable to those of Dr Simson, which are found to differ from local theorems precisely as Pappus affirms those of Euclid to have done. They require a particular mode of analysis, and are of im¬ mense service in geometrical investigation j on which account they may justly claim our attention.^ While Dr Simson was employed in this inquiry, he carried on a correspondence upon the subject with the late Dr M. Stewart, professor of mathematics in the university of Edinburgh \ who, besides entering into Dr Simson’s views, and communicating to him many curi¬ ous porisms, pursued the same subject in a new and very different direction. He published the result of his in¬ quiries in 1 746, under the title of General Theorems, not wishing to give them any other name, lest he might appear to anticipate the labours of his friend and for¬ mer preceptor. The gieatest part of the propositions contained in that work are porisms, but without de¬ monstrations j therefore, whoever wishes to investigate one of the most curious subjects in geometry, will there find abundance of materials, and an ample field for dis¬ cussion. Dr Simson defines a porism to be “ a proposition, is which it is proposed to demonstrate, that one or more things are given, between which, and every one of in¬ numerable other things not given, but assumed accord¬ ing to a given law, a certain relation described in the proposition is shown to take place.” This definition is not a little obscure, hut will be plainer if expressed thus : “ A porism is a proposition affirming the possibility of finding such conditions as will render a certain problem indeterminate, or capable of innumerable solutions.” This definition agrees with Pappus’s idea of these propositions, so far at least as they can be understood from the fragment already men¬ tioned ; for the propositions here defined, like those which hq describes, are, Strictly speaking, neither theo¬ rems nor problems, but of an intermediate nature be¬ tween both •, for they neither simply enunciate a truth to be demonstrated, nor propose a question to be resol¬ ved, but are affirmations of a truth in which the deter¬ mination of an unknown quantity is involved. In as far, therefore, as they assert that a certain problem may become indeterminate, they are of the nature of theo¬ rems 5 and, in as far as they seek to discover the condi¬ tions by which that is brought about, they are of the nature of problems. We shall endeavour to make our readers understand this P O R [ 207 ] P O R considenncr them in the of an intermediate nature between problem-? and theo- p0VjstIx. rems j and tliat they admitted ot being enunciated in a T .* manner peculiarly elegant and concise. It was to such propositions that the ancients gave the name of porisms. This deduction requires to be illustrated by an example: suppose, therefore, that it were required to resolve the following problem. A circle ABC (fig. 1.), a straight line DE, and a Plate point I, being given in position, to find a point G in the C, that is, the half of two right angles, therefore LF M is a right angle; and since the points L, M, are given, the point F is in the circumference of a circle described upon LM as a diameter, and therefore given in position. Now the point F is also in the circumference ot the given circle ABC, therefore it is in the intersection ot the two given circumferences, and there!ore is found, lienee this construction : Divide ED in L, so that EL may be to LD in the given ratio of a, to /3, and pro¬ duce ED also to M, so that EM may be to MD in the same given ratio of « to /3 ; bisect LM in N, and from the centre N, with the distance NL, describe the semi¬ circle LF'M •, and the point F, in which it intersects the circle ABC, is the point required. The synthetical demonstration is easily derived kom the preceding analysis. It must, however, he remarked, that the construction fails when the circle LFM tails either wholly within or wholly without the circle ABC, so that the circumferences do not intersect j and in these cases the problem cannot be solved. It is also obvious that the construction will tail in another ease, viz., when the two circumferences LFM, ABC, entirely coincide. In this case, it is farther evident, that every point in the circumference ABC will answer the conditions ot the problem, which is therefore capable of numberless solu¬ tions, and may, as in the former instances, be converted into a porism. We are now to inquire, therefore, in what circumstances the point L will coincide with A, and also the point M with C, and of consequence the circumference LFM with ABC. If we suppose that they coincide, FA : AD : : « : /3 : : EC : CD, and EA : EC : : AD : CD, or by conversion, EA : AC : : AD : CD AD : : AD : 2.DO, O being the centre of the circle ABC-, therefore, also, F.A: AO : : AD : DO, and by composition, EO : AO : : AO : DO, theretore EO X OD~ AO2. Hence, if the given points E and F'ig 3- D ffig. 3*) he so situated that EOxODxAO , and at the same time a : : : EA : AD : : EC : C.D, the problem admits of numberless solutions j and li either ot the points D or E be given, the other point, and also the ratio which will render the problem indeterminate, may be found. Hence we have this poi ism : “ A circle ABC, and also a point D being given, another point E may be found, such that the two lines ; 1 208 ] p O R inflected from these points to any point in the circum- Porism, ference ABC, shall have to each other a given ratio,' ^ which ratio is also to be found.” Flence also we have an example of the derivation of porisms from one ano¬ ther j for the circle ABC, and the points D and E re¬ maining as before (fig. 3.), if, through D we draw any line whatever F1L)B, meeting the circle in B and H and if the lines EB, EH be also drawn, these lines will cut off equal circumferences BF. HG. I^et FC he drawn, and it is plain from the foregoing analysis, that the angles DFC, CFB, are equal-, therefore if OG, OB, be drawn, the angles BOC, COG, are also equal 5 and consequently the angles DOB, DOG. In the same manner, by joining AB, the angle DBF be¬ ing bisected by BA, it is evident that the angle AOF is equal to AOH, and therefore the angle FOB to HOG hence the arch F'B is equal to the arch HG. It is evident that if the circle ABC, and either of the points DE were given, the other point might be found. Therefore we have this porism, which appears to have been the last but one of the third book of Euclid’s For- isms. “ A point being given, either within or without a circle given by position. If there be drawn, anyhow through that point, a line cutting the circle in two paints -, another point may be found, such, that it two lines be drawn from it to the points in which the line already drawn cuts the circle, these two lines will cut off from the circle equal circumferences.” The proposition from which we have deduced these two porisms also affords an illustration of the lemaik, that the conditions of a problem are involved in one another in the porismatic or indefinite case} for here se¬ veral independent conditions are laid down, by the help of which the problem is to be resolved. Two points D and E are given, from which two lines are to be inflect¬ ed, and a circumference ABC, in which these lines are to meet, as also a ratio which these lines are to have to each other. Now these conditions are all independent of one another, so that any one may be changed without any change whatever in the rest. I his is true in gene¬ ral } but yet in one case, viz,, when the points are so re¬ lated to another that the rectangle under their distances from the centre is equal to the square ot the radius of the circle} it follows from the preceding"analysis, tnat the ratio of the inflected lines is no longer a matter of choice, but a necessary consequence ot this disposition of the points. ’ From what has been already said, we may trace the imperfect definition ot a porism which Fappus ascribes to the later geometers, viz. that it differs from a local theorem, by wanting the hypothesis assumed in that theorem.—Now, to understand this, it must be observed, that if we take one of the propositions called loci, and make the construction of the figure a part of the hypo¬ thesis, we get what was called by the ancient geometers, a local theorem. If, again, in tlve enunciation pf the theorem, that part of the hypothesis which contains the construction be suppressed, the proposition thence arising will he a porism, tor it will enunciate a trutn, and will require to the full understanding and investigation of that truth, that something should be tound, viz. the cir¬ cumstances in the construction supposed to be omitted. Thus, when we say, if from two given points E, D, (fig. 3.) two straight lines EF', ID, are inflected to a pig, 3 third'point F, so as to be to one another in a given ra¬ tio, Fn/. 2 PORISM . Fla t/2 crccrxxxv/i i < * FOR Ponsm. tio, tlie point F is in the circumference of a given circle we have a locus. But when conversely it is said if a circle ABC, of which the centre is O, be given by po¬ sition, as also a point E; and if D be taken in the line EO, so that EOxOD—AO*j and if from E and D the lines EF, DF be inflected to any point of the cir¬ cumference ABC, the ratio of EF to DF will be given, viz. the same with that of EA to AD, we have a local theorem. Easily, when it is said, if a circle ABC be given by position, and also a point E, a point D may be found such that if EF, FD be inflected from E and D to any point F in the circumference ABC, these lines shall have a given ratio to one another, the proposition be¬ comes a porism, and is the same that has just now been investigated. Hence it is evident, that the local theorem is changed into a porism, by leaving out what relates to the deter¬ mination of D, and of the given ratio. But though all propositions formed in this way from the conversion of loci, are porisms, yet all porisms are not formed from the conversion of locij the first, for instance of the pre¬ ceding cannot by conversion be changed into a locus ; therefore Fermat’s idea of porisms, founded upon this circumstance, could not fail to be imperfect. To confirm the truth of the preceding theory, it may be added, that Professor Dugald Stewart, in a paper read r considerable time ago before the Philosophical Society of Edinburgh, defines a porism to be “ A proposition affirming the possibility of finding one or more condi¬ tions of an indeterminate theorem where, by an in¬ determinate theorem, he means one which expresses a relation between certain quantities that are determinate and certain others that are indeterminate ; a definition which evidently agrees with the explanation which has been here given. If the idea which we have given of these propositions be just, it follows, that they are to be discovered by considering those cases in which the construction of a problem fails, in consequence of the lines which by their intersection, or the points which by their posi¬ tion, were to determine the problem required, happen¬ ing to coincide with one another. A porism may there¬ fore be deduced from the problem to which it belongs, just as propositions concerning the maxima and minima of quantities are deduced from the problems of which they form limitations j and such is the most natural and obvious analysis of which this class of propositions ad¬ mits. The following porism is the first of Euclid’s, and the first also which was restored. It is given here to ex- emplify the advantage which, in investigations of this kind, may be derived from employing the law of conti¬ nuity in its utmost extent, and pursuing porisms to those extreme cases where the indeterminate magnitudes increase ad infinitum. This porism may be considered as having occurred in the solution of the following problem: Two points A, B, {fig. 4.) and also three straight lines DE, FK, KL, be- ing given in position, together with two points H and M in two of these lines, to inflect from A and B to a point in the third line, two lines that shall cut off from KF and KL two segments, adjacent to the given points H and M, having to one another the given ratio of ec to Now, to find whether a porism be connected with this Vol. XVII. Part I. f [ 209 2 for problem, suppose that there is, and that the following proposition is true. Two points A and B, and two ' straight lines DE, FK, being given in position, and also a point H in one of them, a line LK may be found and also a point in it M, both given in position, such that AE and BE inflected from the points A and B to any point whatever of the line DE, shall cut off from the other lines FK and LK segments HG and MN ad¬ jacent to the given points H and M, having to one an¬ other the given ratio of « to FiS,let AE'’ ^ be inflected t0 the E', so that AE may be parallel to FK, then shall E'B be pa- ra 6 t0 St’ ^ lin.e to be found > . hi.’ ..at, ™ PE=AF BS therefore FG : LN , and AP: PE ::AF: FG= PE x AF SE X BL AP PExAF AP ' BS X BS : SE X BL X AP ; wherefore the ratio of FG to LN is compounded of the ratios of AF to BL PE to ES, and BS to AP ; but PE : SE :: AE' • BE' and BS : AP :: DB : DA, for DB : BS :: DE' E'E :; DA : AP ; therefore the ratio of FG to LN is com¬ pounded of the ratios of AF to BL, AE' to BE', and DB to DA. In like manner, because E" is a point in the line DE and AE", BE" are inflected to it, the ratio of IH to LM is compounded of the same ratios of AF to BL, AE' to BE', and DB to DAj there¬ fore FH ; LM :: FG : NL (and consequently) :: HG . ININ j but the ratio of HG to MN is given, being by supposition the same as that of « to /S; the ratio of FH to LM is therefore also given, and FH being given, LM is given in magnitude. Now LM is parallel to BE', a line given in position j therefore M is in a line QM, parallel to AB, and given in position 5 therefore the point M, and also the line KLM, drawn through it parallel to BE', are given in position, which were to be found. Hence this construction : From A draw AE' parallel to FK, so as to meet DE in E'j join BE', and take in it BQ, so that cc : :: HF : BQ, and through Q draw QM parallel to AB. Let HA be drawn, and produced till it meet DE in E", and draw BE", meet¬ ing QM in M ; through M draw KML parallel to BE', then is KML the line and M the point which were to be found. There are two lines which will an¬ swer the conditions of this porism j for if in QB, produ¬ ced on the other side of B, there be taken B rprBQ, and if ^ m be drawn parallel to AB, cutting MB in m] and if m A be drawn parallel to BQ, the part m n, cut ^ d off Porisna. P O R [ 210 ] Porta., off by EB produced, will be equal to MN, and Jiave V t to HG the ratio required. It is plain, that whatever be the ratio of « to /3, and whatever be the magnitude of FH, if the other things given remain the same, the lines found will be all parallel to BE. But if the ratio of es to/3 remain the same likewise, and if only the poin H vary, the position of KL will remain the same, and the point M will vary. _ , a a Another general remark which may be made on the analysis of porisms is, that it often happens, as in the last example, that the magnitudes required may all, or a part of them, be found by considering the extreme cases i but for the discovery of the relation between them, and the indefinite magnitudes, we must have re¬ course to the hypothesis of the porism in its most gene¬ ral or indefinite form •, and must endeavour so to con¬ duct the reasoning, that the indefinite magnitudes may at length totally disappear, and leave a proposition as¬ serting the relation between determinate magnitudes 011 For this purpose Dr Simson frequently employs two statements of the general hypothesis, which he compares together. As for instance, in his analysis ol the laslP“* rism, he assumes not only E, any point in the line DF, but also another point O, anywhere in the same line, to both of which he supposes lines to be inflected from the points A, B. This double statement, however, cannot be made without rendering the investigation long and complicated ; nor is it even necessary, lor it may be avoided by having recourse to simple pormws, or to lou, or to propositions of the data. The following porism is given as an example where this is done, with some diffi¬ culty hut with considerable advantage both with re¬ gard to the simplicity and shortness of the demonstration. It will be proper to premise the following lemma. Fet Fig. 7. AB (fit?- 7-) fie a straight line, and D, L any two points in it, one of which D is between A and B; also let CL fie any straight line. Then shall ^adh^bd^-av+IAbe’+^dia ~ j FOR the first, second, and fifth of these propositions, it is ma- Porismi nifest that Y ^LA*+~LB*+^5lD,=AB xLE+EKxGH. JLC CIj Again, because CL : LA :: (LB : LE::DB : DG::)DB*: DB X DG, therefore DB X DG——£-’DB*. And because CL: LB:: (LA: LE :: DA: DH ::)DA*: DA x DH, IjB therefore DA X Dflrz-^r^DA*. From the result of these two last propositions we have ^•DA’ + ~-DB2=DA x DII + BD x DG j CL CL but DAxDH= twice tnan. ADH, and DB X DG= twice trian. BDG, and therefore DAxDH + DBx DC — 2 {trian. ADH-fi- trian. BDG) = 2 {tnun. AEB trian. HEG)=AB x LE + EK x HG. Now it has been proved, that DA XDII + DB X DG~^Tj-j"DA +IAbi, and that AB X LE+EK X HCJ— LB LB CL la-bd-= lb therefore •ALl+#-BL2 CL AB CL AD2 + CL DLl, as For place CL perpendicular to AB, and through the points A, C, B describe a circle, and le* CL meetJ.p circle again in E, and join AE, BE. > Also draw DG parallel to CE, meeting AE and BE in H and G, and draw EK parallel to AB. Then, from the elements of geometry, CL : LB :: (LA : LE ::) LA2: LAxLE, LB x k t and hence LB xLEn^rj-'LA . Also CL : LA:: (LB : LE LB* : LB x LE, and hence LBxIJE= Now CL : LB :: LA : LE :: EK or LD : KH, and CL : LA :: LB : LE :: EK or LD ; KG, therefore, (Geom. Sect. III. Theor. 8.) CL : AB :: (LD: GH ::) LD1: EKxGH, AB and hence EK X GH:= ^rj-^LD2. From the three equations which we have deduced from CL CL was to be demonstrated. _ . _ Porism. Let there be three straight lines AB, AC, CB given in position (fig. 5.) 5 and from any point whatever in one of them, as D, let perpendiculars be drawn to the other two, as DF, DE, a point G may be found, such, that if GD be drawn from it to the point D, the square of that line shall have a given ratio to the sum of the squares of the perpendiculars DF and DE, which ratio is to be found. ™ ^ Draw AH, BK perpendicular to BC and AC ; and in AB take L, so that AL : LB : : AH* : BK* : : AC* : CB*. The point L is therefore given j and if a line N be taken, so as to have to AL the same ratio that ABa has to AH*, N will be given in magnitude. Also, since AH*: BK* :: AL : LB, and AH . AB .. AL : N, ex equo, BK* : AB*:: LB : N. Draw LO, LM perpendicular to AC, CB j LO, LM are there¬ fore given in magnitude. Now, because AB* : " AD* : DF*, N : LB :: AD2 : DF*, and DF*=-^ AL •AD2; and for the same reason DE*=-^-‘BD but, LB , LB , .p, AL -pT-vj by the preceding lemma, -^--AH -j—•15U — .AL-+A.BL-+A.DE’ that is, DE*-fDF*= FO*-l-LM* + :^-‘DL*. Join LG, then by hypothe¬ sis LO*4-LM* has to LG*, the same ratio as DE* has to DG2 j let it fie that of R to N, then L0* + P O R [2 r',y'vl . LM1—and therefore X)EJ-{-DFI=z^-LG!!+ ^■DL“i botDE- + DP=ADGM therefore, •LG'+2i'Dl/=| DG=a„cl ^- DL-=|- (DG>- LG1) ; therefore DG1—LG1 has to DL* a constant ratio, viz. that of AL to II. The angle DLG is there¬ fore a right angle, and the ratio of AB to R that of equality, otherwise LD would be given in magnitude, contrary to the supposition. LG is therefore given in position : and since R f N :: AB : N :: LO? + LMa : LG1; therefore the square of LG, and consequently LG, is given in magnitude. The point G is there¬ fore given, and also the ratio of DE,-f.DF* to DG1, which is the same with that of AB to N. The construction easily follows from the analysis, but it may be rendered more simple ; for since AH1 : AB1 :: AL : N, and BK2: ABS :: BL : N ; therefore AH* -f-Biv3: AB1 :: AB : N. Likewise, if AG, BG, be joined, AB : N :: AH1 : AG1, and AB : N :: BK1: BG1; wherefore AB : N :: AfR-j-BX1 : AG*-j-BG*, but it was proved that AB : N :: AH?+BK* : AB1, therefore AG2-j-BG1=AB1 •, theretore the angle AGB is a right one, and AL : LG :: LG : LB. If there- fore AB be divided in L, so that AL : LB :: AH1 • BK3; and if LG, a mean proportional between AL and LB, be placed perpendicular to AB, G will be the point required. The step in the analysis, by which a second intro¬ duction of the general hypothesis is avoided, is that in which the angle GLD is concluded to be a right angle j which follows from DG1—GL* having a given ratio to LD1, at the same time that LD is of no determinate magnitude. For, if possible, let GLD he obtuse (fig, 6.), and let the perpendicular from G to AB meet it in V, therefore V is given : and since GD1—LG2=;LD14- 2DL X LVj therefore, by the supposition, LD3-j-2DL X LV must have a given ratio to LD1; therefore the ratio of LD1 to DLx VL, that is, of LD to VL, is given, so that VL being given in magnitude, LD is al¬ so given. But this is contrary to the supposition ", for LD is indefinite by hypothesis, and therefore GLD cannot be obtuse, nor any other than a right aggie. The conclusion that is here drawn immediately from the indetermination of LD would be deduced, according to Dr Simson’s method, by assuming another point IT any how, and from the supposition that GD'1—GL1 : LD'1 :: GD1—GL* : LD1, it would easily appear that GLD must be a right angle, and the ratio "that of equa¬ lity. These porisms facilitate the solution of the general problems from which they are derived. For example, let three straight lines AB, AC, BC (fig. 50> l)e given in position, and also a point R, to find a point D in one of the given lines, so that DE and DF being drawn perpendicular to BC, AC, and DR, joined} DE^DF* may have to DR3 a given ratio. It is plain, that hav¬ ing found G, the problem would he nothing more than to find D, such that the ratio of GD1 to DR2, and therefore that of GD to DR, might, be given, from which it would follow, that the point D is in the cir¬ cumference of a given circle, as is well known to geo¬ meters. b ir ] FOR The same porism also assists in the solution of another rorism. problem. For if it were required to find Dsucli thatDE* v -fDF* might be a given space } having found G, DG1 would have to DE3-j-DF1 a given ratio, and DG would therefore he given } whence the solution is obvi¬ ous. The connection of this porism with the impossible case of the problem is evident } the point L being that from which, if perpendiculars be drawn to AC and CB, the sum of their squares is the least possible. For since DF’+DE1 : DG3 :: LO + LM1: LG1} and since LG is less than DG, LCT + LM3 must be less than DF34-DE1. It is evident from what has now appeared, that in some instances at least there is a close connection be¬ tween these propositions and the maxima or minima, and of consequence the impossible cases of problems. The nature of this connection requires to be farther investi¬ gated, and is the more interesting because the transition from the indefinite to the impossible case seems to be made with wonderful rapidity. Thus in the first propo¬ sition, though there be not properly speaking an impos¬ sible case, but only one where the point to be found goes of! ad infinitum, it may be remarked, that if the given point F be anywhere out of the line HD (fig. i.), the pioblem of drawing GB equal to GF is always pos¬ sible, and admits of just one solution } but if F be in DH, the problem admits of no solution at all, the point being then at an infinite distance, and therefore impossi¬ ble to be assigned. There is, however, this exception, that if the given point be at K in this same line, DH is determined by making DK equal to DL. Then every point in the line DE gives a solution, and may be taken for the point G. Here therefore the case of numberless solutions, andof no solution at all, are as it were cowte?’- minal, and so close to one another, that if the given point be at K the problem is indefinite } but if it re¬ move ever so little from K, remaining at the same time in the line DH, the problem cannot be resolved. This affinity might have been determined a priori: for it is, as we have seen, a general principle, that a problem is converted into a porism when one or when two of the conditions of it necessarily involve in them some one of the rest. Suppose, then, that two of the conditions are exactly in that state which determines the third } then while they remain fixed or given, should that third one vary or differ ever so little from the state required by the other two, a contradiction will ensue : therefore if, in the hypothesis of a problem, the conditions be so re¬ lated to one another as to render it indeterminate, a po¬ rism is produced } but if, of the conditions thus related to one another, some one be supposed to vary, while the others continue the same, an absurdity follows, and the problem becomes impossible. Wherever, therefiore, any problem admits both of an indeterminate and an impossi¬ ble case, it is certain, that these cases are nearly relat¬ ed to one another, and that some ofi the conditions by which they are produced are common to both. It is supposed above, that two of the conditions of a problem involve in them a third} and wherever that happens, the conclusion which has been deduced will invariably take place. But a porism may in some cases be so simple as to arise from the mere coincidence of one condition with another, though in no case whatever any inconsistency can take place between them. There are, D d 2 however. . P O R [21 however, comparatively few porisms so simple in their origin, or that arise from problems where the conditions are but little complicated ; lor it usually happens that a problem which can become indefinite may also become impossible j and it so, the connection already explain¬ ed never fails to take place. Another species of impossibility may frequently arise from the porismatic case of a problem which will aftect in some measure the application of geometry to astrono¬ my, or any of the sciences depending on experiment or observation. For when a problem is to be resolved by means of data furnished by experiment or observation, the first thing to be considered is, whether the data so obtained be sufficient for determining the thing sought j and in this a very erroneous judgment may be formed, if we rest satisfied with a general view of the subject; for though the problem may in general be resolved from the data with which we are provided, yet these data may be so related to one another in the case under con- aideration, that the problem will become indeterminate, and instead of one solution will admit of an indefinite number. This we have already found to be the case in the foregoing propositions. Such cases may not indeed occur in any of the practical applications of geometry 5 but there is one of the same kind which has actually oc¬ curred in astronomy. Sir Isaac Newton, in his Prm- cipia, has considered a small part of the orbit of a comet as a straight line described with an uniform motion. From this" hypothesis, by means of four observations made at proper intervals of time, the determination of the path of the comet is reduced to this geometrical problem : Four straight lines being in position, it is re¬ quired to draw a fifth line across them, so as to be cut by them into three parts, having given ratios to one an¬ other. Now this problem had been constructed by Dr Wallis and Sir Christopher Wren, and also in three dif¬ ferent ways by Sir Isaac himself in diflerent parts of his works ; yet none of these geometers observed that there was a particular situation of the lines in which the pro- idem admitted of innumerable solutions : and this hap¬ pens to be the very case in which the problem is appli¬ cable to the determination of the comet’s path, as was first discovered by the abbe Boscovich, who was led to it by finding, that in this way he could never deter¬ mine the path of a comet with any degree of cer¬ tainty. . i 1 • 1 Besides the geometrical there is also an algebraical analysis belonging to porisms j which, however, does not belong to this place, because we give this account of them merely as an article of ancient geometry, and the ancients never employed algebra in their investigations. Mr Playfair, formerly professor of mathematics,^ and now of natural philosophy in the university of Edin¬ burgh, has written a paper on the origin and geometri¬ cal investigation of porisms, which is published in the third volume of the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, from which this account of the subject is taken. He has there promised a second part to his pa¬ per, in which the algebraical investigation of porisms is to be considered. This will no doubt throw consider¬ able light upon the subject, as we may readily judge from that gentleman’s known abilities, and from the specimen he has already given us in the first part. Such as are desirous of knowing more of this subject piay consult Dr Simson’streatiseDePomwalf^, which 3 2 ] P O R is contained in his Opera Pehqua, published after hia Porisnt death at the sole expence ol the earl of Stanhope. Me II have already mentioned Dr Stewart’s General 1 heorems . .. ^ which contain many beautiful porisms, but without de¬ monstrations. A considerable number of them, how¬ ever, have been demonstrated by the late Dr R. Small, of Dundee, in the Trans. R. S. Edin. vol. ii. There is also a paper upon the subject of porisms by Mr W. Wallace, now of the Royal Military College, in the fourth volume of the same work, entitled borne Geome¬ trical Porisms, with examples of their application to the Solution of Problems. FORK, the flesh of swine killed for the purposes of food. See Sus. The hog is the only domestic animal that we know of no use to man when alive, and therefore seems pro¬ perly designed for food. Besides, as loathsome and ugly to every human eye, it is killed without reluctance. The Pythagoreans, whether to preserve health, or on account of compassion, generally forbade the use of ani¬ mal food ; and yet it is alleged that Pythagoras reserved the use of hog’s flesh for himself. I he Jews, th# Egyptians, &c. and other inhabitants of warm countries, and all the Mahometans at present, reject the use of pork. It is difficult to find a satisfactory reason for this, or for the precept given to the Jews respecting it, though unquestionably there was some good one for it. The Greeks gave great commendations to this foodj and Galen, though indeed that is suspected to be from a particular fondness, is everywhere full of it. The Ro¬ mans considered it as one of their delicacies j and if some of the inhabitants of the northern climates have taken an aversion to it, that probably arose from the un¬ cultivated state of their country not being able to rear it. Pork is of a very tender structure ; increased perhaps from a peculiarity in its economy, viz. taking on fat more readily than any other animal. Pork is a white meat even in its adult state, and then gives out a jelly in very great quantity. On account of its little perspirability and tenderness it is very nutritious, and was given for that intention to the athletes. With regard to its alka- lescency, no proper experiments have yet been made 5 but as it is of a gelatinous and succulent nature, it is probably less so than many others. Upon the whole, Cutlen] it appears to be a very valuable nutriment; and the rea¬ son is not very obvious why it was in some countries forbid. It is said that this animal is apt to be diseased j but why were not inconveniences felt on that account in Greece ? Again, it has been alleged, that as Pale¬ stine would not rear these animals, and as the Jew shad learned the use of them in Egypt, it was necessary they should have a precept to avoid them. But the Egyp¬ tians themselves did not use the meat*, and this reli¬ gious precept, indeed, as well as many others, seems to have been borrowed from them. Possibly, as pork, is not very perspirable, it might increase the leprosy , which was said to be epidemic in Palestine j though this is far from being certain. _ PORLOCK, in the county of Somerset in Eng¬ land, is a small sea-port town six miles west from Minehead. This whole parish, including hamlets, contained 633 inhabitants in 1811. Tfhe situation of the town is very romantic, being nearly surrounded on all sides, except towards the sea, by steep and lofty hills, intersected by deep vales and hollow glens. Some F U ii [2 'podock of the hilts are beautifully wooded, and contain numbers g of wild deer. The valleys are very deep and picturesque; ^y17', the sides being steep, scarred with wild rocks, and patch- v ed with woods and forest shrubs. Some of them are well cultivated and studded with villages or single farms and cottages, although agriculture here is very imperfectly understood. Most of the roads and fields are so steep, that no carriages of any kind can be used ; all the crops are therefore carried in with crooks on horses, and the manure in wooden pots called dossels. Many of the poor are employed in spinning yarn for the Dunster manufactory. W. Long. 3. 32. N. Lat. ci. 14. PORO. See Calauria. PORPESSE. See Delphinus, Cetology Index. PORPHYR1US, a famous Platonic philosopher^ was born at Tyre in 233, in the reign of Alexander Seve- rus. He was the disciple of Longinus, and became the ornament of his school at Athens; from thence he wrent to Rome, and attended Plotinus, with whom he lived six years. After Plotinus’s death he taught phi¬ losophy at Rome with great applause ; and became well skilled in polite literature, geography, astronomy, and music. He lived till the end of the third century, and died in the reign of Dioclesian. There are still extant his book on the Categories of Aristotle ; a Treatise on Abstinence from I'lesh ; and several other pieces in Greek. He also composed a large treatise against the Christian religion, wnich is lost. That work was an¬ swered by Methodius bishop of Tyre, and also by Eu¬ sebius, Apollinarius, St Augustin, St Jerome, St Cyril, and Iheodoret. 'Ibe emperor Theodosius the Great caused Porphyrius’s book to be burned in 338. Those of his works that are still extant were printed at Cam¬ bridge in 1655, Svo, with a Latin version. “ Porphyrins (says Dr Enfield) was, it must be own¬ ed, a writer of deep erudition ; and had his judgment and integrity been equal to his learning, he would have deserved a distinguished place among the ancients. But neither the splendour of his diction, nor the va¬ riety of his reading, can atone for the credulity or the dishonesty which filled the narrative part of his works with so many extravagant tales, or interest the judici¬ ous reader in the abstruse subtilties and mystical flights I of his philosophical writings.” PORPH1RY, a compound rock, essentially consist¬ ing of some base or ground, in which are interspersed crystals of some other substance, as when an argillace¬ ous stone, or a pitchstone, has crystals of feldspar or quartz interspersed in it, and hence is denominated an argillaceous or pitchstone porphyry. See Geology Index. Porphyry is still found in immense strata in Egypt. Die hard red-lead coloured porphyry, va¬ riegated with black, white, and green, is a most beauti¬ ful and valuable substance. It lias the hardness and all tlie other characters of the oriental porphyry ; and even greatly excels it in brightness, and in the beauty and variegation of its colours. It is found in great plenty in the island of Minorca ; and is well worth importing, being greatly superior to all the Italian marbles. The hard, pale-red porphyry, variegated with black, white, and green, is ot a pale-flesh colour; often approaching to white. It is variegated in blotches from half an inch to an inch broad. It takes a high polish, and emu¬ lates all the qualities of the oriental porphyry. It is found in immense strata in Arabia Petroea, and in the 13 J P O R Upper Egypt; and in separate nodules in Germany, Porphyry. England, and Ireland. i ^,1 ^. I icoioni takes notice of two exquisitely fine columns of black porphyry in a church at Rome. In Egypt there are three celebrated obelisks or pillars of porphy¬ ry, one near Cairo and two at Alexandria. The French call them aguglias, and in England they are called Cleo- patru\s needles. I he ait of cutting porphyry, practised by the an¬ cients, appears now to be lost. Indeed it is difficult to conceive what tools they used lor fashioning those huge columns and other porphyry works in some of the ancient buildings in Rome. One of the most consider¬ able ol these, still entire, is a tomb of Constantia, the emperor Constantine’s daughter. It is in the church of St Agnes, and is commonly called the tomb of Bacchus. In the palace ot the Ihuilleries there is also a bust of Apollo and of twelve emperors, all in porphyry. Some ancient pieces seem to have been wrought with the chis- sel, others with the saw, others with wheels, and others gradualiyjground down with emery. Yet modern tools will scarcely touch porphyry. Dr Lister therefore thinks *, that the ancients had the secret of tempering steel better than we ; and not, as some imagine, that Transact. they had the art of softening the porphyry ; though it is N° 203* 01 probable that time and air have contributed to increase its hardness. Mr Addison says, he saw a workman at;^ n, it9o. ’ Rome cutting porphyry; but his advances were extreme- y slow and almost insensible. The Italian sculptors work the pieces of old porphyry columns still remaining (for the porphyry quarries are long since lost) with a brass saw without teeth. With this say, emery, and water, they rub and wear the stone with infinite patience. Many persons have endeavoured to retrieve the ancient art, and particularly Leon Baptista Alberti; who, searching lor tne necessary materials for temper, says, he found goats blood the best of any; but even this avails not much ; for in working with chissels temper¬ ed with it, sparks of fire came much more plentifully than pieces of the stone. The sculptors were thus, however, able to make a flat or oval form ; but could never attain to any thing like a figure. In the year I555j Cosmo de Medicis is said to have distilled a water from certain herbs, with which his sculp¬ tor Francesco Tadda gave bis tools such an admirable hardness and so fine a temper, that he performed some very exquisite works with them ; particularly our Sa¬ viour’s head in demi-relievo, and Cosmo’s head and his duchess’s. The very hair and beard, how difficult so¬ ever, are here well conducted ; and there is nothing of the kind superior to it in all the works of the ancients; but the secret appears to have died with him. The I rench have discovered another mode of cutting por- phyry, viz. with an iron saw without teeth, and gre%, a kind of free stone pulverized, and water. The au¬ thors of this invention say that they could form the whole contour of a column hereby if they had matter to work on. Others have pi'oposed to harden tools so as to cut porphyry, by steeping them in the juice of the plant called bear’s breech or brankursine. See Birch’s Hist. R. S. vol. i. p. 238. vol. ii. p. 73, &c. Mr Boyle says, that he caused porphyry to be cut by means of emery, steel saws, and water; and observes, that in his time the English workmen were ignorant of the man¬ ner of working porphyry, and that none of them would undertake P O R [ 21 Porphyry undertake to cut or polish it. See his Works ahr. vol.i. 4 ] P O R II. Port. | Da Costa supposes, anti perhaps with reason, that ' the method used by the ancients in cutting and engra¬ ving porphyry was extremely simple, and that it was per¬ formed without the aid of any scientific means that are now lost. He imagines, that, by unwearied diligence, and with numbers of common tools at great expence, they rudely hewed or broke the stone into the intended figure, and by continued application reduced them into more regular designs ; and that they completed tlm work by polishing it with great labour, by the aid of particular hard sands found in Egypt. And he thinks, that in the porphyry quarries there were layers of grit or loose disunited particles, analogous to the porphyry, which they carefully sought for, and used for this work. See Hist. Nat. of Fossils, p. 285. ForphyjiY-Shell. SccMurex, Conchology Index, PORPITES, the Hair-button Stone, in Natural History, a name given by some authors to a small species of fossil coral •, which is usually of a rounded figure con¬ siderably flattened, and striated from the centre to the circumference. TLhese are of different sizes and of dif¬ ferent colours, as grayish, whitish, brownish, or bluish, and are usually found immersed in stone. PORRUM, the Leer •, a species of plants belong¬ ing to the genus of Allium. See Allium, Botany Index ; and for an account of the method of cultiva¬ tion, see Gardening. PORT, a harbour, river, or haven, formed either by nature or art to receive and shelter shipping from the storms and waves of the open sea. Artificial ports are those which are either formed by throwing a strong mound or rampire across the har¬ bour’s mouth to some island or rock, or erecting two long barriers,- which stretch from the land on each side like arms or the horns of a crescent, and nearly inclose the haven ; the former of these are called mole-heads and the latter piers. Port, is also a name given on some occasions to the larboard or left side of the ship, as in the following in¬ stances. Thus it is said, “ the ship heels to port,” z. e. Stoops or inclines to the larboard-side. “ lop the yard to port ?” the order to make the larboard extremity of a yard higher than the other. “ Port the helm !” the order to put the helm over to the larboard-side of the vessel. In all these senses this phrase appears intended to prevent any mistakes happening from the similarity of sounds in the words starboard and larboard, particu¬ larly when they relate to the helm, where a misappre¬ hension might be attended with very dangerous conse¬ quences. t t Ports, the embrasures or openings in the side of a ship of war, wherein the artillery is ranged in battery upon the decks above and below. The ports are formed of a sufficient extent to point and fire the cannon, without injuring the ship’s side by the recoil; and as it serves no end to enlarge them be¬ yond what is necessary for that purpose, the shipwrights have established certain dimensions, by which they are cut in proportion to the size of the cannon. The ports are shut in at sea by a sort of hanging- doors called the port-lids ; which are fastened by hinges to their upper edges, so as to let down when the can¬ non are drawn into the ship. By this means the water 2 is prevented from entering the lower decks in a turbu- p0rt lent sea. The lower and upper edges of the ports are Port R« always parallel to the deck, so that the guns, when le- v"' veiled in their carriages, are all equally high above the lower extremity of the ports, which is called the port- cells. Port, is also a strong wine brought from 1 ort-a-port, and also called Porto and Oporto. Port of the Voice, in Music, the faculty or habit of making the shakes, passages, and diminutions, in which the beauty of a song or piece of music consists. FORT-Crayon, a pencil case, which is usually four or five inches long, and contrived so as that the pencil may slide up and down. Its inside is round, and its outside is sometimes-filed into eight sides or faces, on which aie drawn the sector-lines ; sometimes it is made round both with-side and within, and has its length divided into inches and parts of inches. PoRT-Fire, a composition for setting fire to powder, &e. Port-fires are frequently used by artillery people in preference to matches •, and they are distinguished into wet and dry port-fires. The composition of tlie former is saltpetre four, sulphur one, and mealed powder four. When these materials are thoroughly mixed and sifted, the whole is to be moistened with a little linseed oil, and rubbed between the hands till all the oil is im¬ bibed by the composition. The preparation for dry port¬ fires is saltpetre four, sulphur one, mealed powder two, and antimony one. These compositions are driven into small paper cases, to be used when necessary. _ PoRT-aux-Pnme, so called by the French, is a coun¬ try on the coast of Africa, to the north of the island of Madagascar. It is a rich country, and fertile in rice and pastures •, it is inhabited only by the negroes, who are an industrious good sort of people, but very super¬ stitious. There are no towns, but several villages, and they have some customs which seem to incline to Ju¬ daism. PoRT-Iackson, in New Holland. See FiewHolland, N® 7, &c. < . PoRT-Foyal, a sea-port town in the island of Jamaica. It was once a place of the greatest riches and importance in the West Indies $ but in 1692 it was destroyed by an earthquake, in 1702 by fire, in 1722 by an inundation of the sea, and in 1744 it suffered greatly by a hurri¬ cane. It is now reduced to three streets, a tew lanes, and about 200 houses. It contains the royal navy-yard for heaving down and refitting the king’s ships; the navy-hospital, and barracks for a regiment of soldiers. The fortifications, which are very extensive, being in excellent order, and having been lately strengthened with many additional works, it may be said to vie m point of strength with any fortress in the king’s domi¬ nions. The harbour is one of the best in the world, and 1000 ships may ride therein, secure from every wind that can blow. It is six miles east of Spanisli- town, and as much by water south-east of Kingston. W. Long. 76. 40. N. Lat. 18. o. Fort-Royal, an island in North America, on the coast of South Carolina, which, with the neighbouring con¬ tinent, forms one of the most commodious harbours in the state. It is 15 miles in length •, and the town on the north shore is called Beaufort. W. Long. 80. 20. N. Lat. 31. 40. FoRT-RoyaL the name of two monasteries of Cister- tian Portia P O R [2 jrt Reyaltian nuns in the diocese of Paris 5 the one near Chev- reuse, at the distance of five leagues from Paris, called , Port Royal of the Fields ; and the other in Paris, in the suburbs of St James. The nuns of the former of these monasteries proving refractory were dispersed; when many ecclesiastics, and others, who were of the same sentiments as these reli¬ gious, retired to Port-Royal, took apartments there, and printed many books. Hence the name of Pot't- Royalists was given to all their party, and their books were called books of Port-Royal: from hence we say the writers of Port-Royal, Messieurs de Port-Royal, and the translations and grammars of Port-Royal. PORTA, or Vena Porta, in Anatomy, a large vein distributed through the liver in the manner of an ar¬ tery. See Anatomy, N° 96. Port A-Augusta, in Ancient Geography, mentioned only by Ptolemy ; a town of the Vaccsei in the Hither Spain ; thought by some to be Torre Quemada, in Old Castile ; by others Los Valvases, a village between Burgos and Torre Quemada. PORTiE-RoMANvE, in Ancient Geography. Accord¬ ing to Pliny, Romulus left but three, "or at most four, gates of Rome : afterwards, on enlarging the Pomoeria, or compass of the city, they amounted to 37. PORTAL, in Architecture, a little gate where there are two gates of a different bigness ; also a little square corner of a room cut off from the rest by the wainscot, and forming a short passage into the room. The same name is also sometimes given to a kind of arch of join¬ ers work before a door. PORT ATE, or a Cross Port ate, in Heraldry, a cross which does not stand upright, as crosses generally do ; but lies across the escutcheon in bend, as if it were carried on a man’s shoulder. PORTCULLICE, in Fortification, is an assemblage of several large pieces of wood, joined across one an¬ other like a harrow, and each pointed with iron at the bottom. They are sometimes hung over the gate-way of old fortified towns, ready to let down in case of sur¬ prise, when the gates could not be shut. PORTER, a kind of malt-liquor which differs from ale and pale beer, in its being made with high-dried malt. See Ale, Beer, and Brewing. PORT-Glasgow. See Glasgow, N° 12. PORTGREVE, or Portgrave, was anciently the principal magistrate in ports and other maritime towns. Jhe word is formed from the Saxon port, “ a port or other town and geref, “ a governor.”—It is some¬ times also written port-reve. Camden observes, that the chief magistrate of Lon¬ don was anciently called port-greve ; instead of whom, Richard I. ordained two baihjs ; and soon afterwards King John granted them a mayor for their yearly ma¬ gistrate. PORTICt, a palace of the king of Naples, six miles from that capital. It has a charming situation on the sea-side, near Mount Vesuvius. It is enriched with a vast number of fine statues, and other remains of anti- quity, taken out of the ruins of Herculaneum. The museum consists of 16 rooms, in which the dif¬ ferent articles are arranged with very great taste. The floors are paved with mosaic, taken from the recovered towns, and the walls of the court are lined with inscrip¬ tions. Besides busts, statues, medals, intaglios, lamps, 3 for and tripods, there is scarcely an article used by the an¬ cients of which a specimen may not be seen in this mu¬ seum. “ But the most valuable room is the library, from the numerous manuscript rolls which it contains! What a field is here for conjecture ! what room for hope ! Among this inestimable collection, how many great works are there, of which even the names are now unknown ! how many unbroken volumes, whose very fragments, preserved in the writings of the ancient scholiasts, convey to us moral improvement, informa¬ tion, and delight ! perhaps, all the dramatic pieces of Menander and Philemon; perhaps, nay, certainly, the lost Decades of Livy ; for it is impossible to suppose, that among so many rolls, the most admired history of the people who possessed them is not to be found: what private library in Britain is without the best histories of England ? But how I tremble for their situation, as 1 ortici is built on the lava that overwhelmed Hercula¬ neum ! How I tremble too for the indifference of the king of Naples towards this invaluable treasure, in which all the most enlightened people ofEurope^re deeply interested ! When I first saw them, I had no idea of what they were, as they resemble wooden trun¬ cheons burnt almost to charcoal. They are so hard and brittle, that the greatest caution must be used in re¬ moving them, lest they crumble to dust; nevertheless, an ingenious friar of Genoa, named Raggi, undertook to unroll them ; and by a most curious, though tedious process, so far succeeded, as to transcribe three Greek Treatises on Philosophy and Music; but finding (as I hear) no other encouragement than his salary,°which was but little more than you pay some of your servants, the work was unhappily discontinued. Were these ma¬ nuscripts in England, they would not long remain a se¬ cret to the world.” See Pompeii, PORTICO, in Architecture, a kind of gallery on the ground ; or a piazza encompassed with arches sup¬ ported by columns, where people walk under covert. The roof is usually vaulted, sometimes flat. The an¬ cients called it lacunar. Though the word portico be derived from porta, “ gate, door ;” yet it is applied to any disposition of columns which form a gailerv, without any immediate relation to doors or gates. The most celebrated porticoes of antiquity were, those of So¬ lomon’s temple, which formed the atrium or court, and encompassed the sanctuary ; that of Athens, built for the people to divert themselves in, and wherein the philoso¬ phers held their disputes and conversations, (see Porch ); and that of Pompey at Rome, raised merely for magni¬ ficence, consisting of several rows of columns support¬ ing a platform of vast extent; a draught whereof, Serlio gives us in his antique buildings. Among the modern porticoes, the most celebrated is the piazza of St Peter of the Vatican.—That of Covent-Garden, London, the work of Inigo Jones, is also much ad*- mired. PORTII. See Pompeii. PORTLAND, a peninsula in Dorsetshire, of great strength both by nature and art, being surrounded with inaccessible rocks, except at the landing-place, where there is a strong castle, called Portland castle, built by King Henry VIII. There is but one church in tire island : and that stands so near the sea, that it is often in danger from it. It is now chiefly noted for the build¬ ing stone which is found there, and which is greatly em¬ ployed. Portici' Portland. Walkin't Tra/vekt through Swisser- land, Italy, fin St Viv the Porto, 1 Ports-; moutli Llie eastern the government of Rio-dos-Hilios, on the east by the North sea, on the south by the government oj Spmtu- Santo, and on the west by the Tupicks. It is a very ^ fertile country, and the capital town is of the same name. It is built on the top of a rock, at the mouth of a river, on the coast ol the North sea, and is in¬ habited by Portuguese. W. Long. 38. 50. S. LaU 1 ^ Eon TO ■ Vecchio, is a sea-port town of Corsica, in the Mediterranean sea, seated on a bay on the eastern coast of the island. It is 12 miles from Bonifacio, and 40 north of Sardinia. E. Long. 9. 20. N. Lat. 41. 42. P or to- Venereo, is a town of Italy, on the coast ot Oe- 110a, at the entrance of the gulf of Spetia. It is seated on the side of a hill, at the top of which there is a fort. It has a very good harbour, and is 45 miles.south-east of Genoa. E. Long. 9. 38. N. Lat. 44. 5*. . PORTRAIT, or Portraiture, in painting, the representation of a person, and especially of a face, done from the fife. In this sense we use the term portrait- painting, in contradiction to history-painting, vihevt a resemblance of persons is usually disregarded. Por¬ traits, when as large as the life, are usually painted in oil-colours sometimes they are painted in miniature with water-colours, crayons, pastils, &x. See Painting, P PORTREE, is a small village, containing a church and a very few houses, with an excellent bay and a good harbour, 'in the isle of Skye. “ The entrance of the hay (Mr Knox tells us) represents agreeable landscapes prwx on both sides, with excellent pasture. Tour' ‘ The bay of Portree (says Mackenzie), oft the houses, is an exceeding good harbour for a few ships of any size j it is well sheltered, the ground good, the depth from five to 14 fathoms, and nothing to fear coming in but a rock, about half a cable’s length from Airderaciug Point, on the starboard as you enter the anchorage, part of which is always above water.’ It is the only port or harbour to a very considerable division of Skye, on the east side. From this opening to the northern extremity, a course of 20 miles, the shove is one continued line 0 loft rocks, where no ship can find refuge in the mildest weather, and where inevitable dangers await the man¬ ners in rough weather. , „ , . , .... « James V. of Scotland and several of lus nobility landed here, when they made the tour of the Hebrides in 1535 from which circumstance, this fine bay has got the honourable name of Portree." Mr Knox tells us, “ that the country round this vil¬ lage, though mountainous, is well inhabited j it raises much grain and many cattle. Here the late Sir James Macdonald had marked out the lines of a town; and government, it is said, promised to assist him 111 the work ■with cool.: but the death of that gentleman put an end to these promising appearances.” We have to add, that Lord Macdonald, the present (1809) proprietor, has re¬ sumed the undertaking j and, we understand, has made some progress in building a new town, besides introdu¬ cing various other important improvements m this and other parts of the island. PORTSMOUTH, a sea-port town in Hampshire, with one of the most secure and capacious harbours in England, being defended by a numerous artillery, both on the sea and land side, and very good fortifications. A. POR [ 2 Lrtsmocth. ^ ^rcat pait of the royal navy is built here 5 and here < mbell't | ilical m*y> are some of the finest docks, yards, and magazines of naval stores, in Europe. It is seated in the isle of Port- sea, being surrounded by the sea except on the north side, where there is a river which runs from one arm of it to the other. It is much resorted to on account of the royal navy, whose usual rendezvous is at Spithead, which is at the east end of the isle of Wight, and oppo¬ site to Portsmouth. There is a draw-bridge over the river, and it has always a good garrison. It is governed by a mayor, 12 aldermen, and burgesses, and sends two members to parliament. It has one church, and two chapels, one in the garrison, and one in the Common, for the use of the dock, and others, besides several meeting-houses of the dissenters. Portsmouth contain¬ ed 32,166 inhabitants in 1801, and 40,1:67 in 1811. W. Long. 1. 1. N. Lat. 50. 47. Ihe town is supposed to receive its name from Port, a famous Saxon chieftain, who, A. D. 501, landed here with his two sons. It made a considerable figure in the time of the Saxons ; and from the utility of its situation, was highly favoured by all our monarchs of the Norman line. It was incorporated, and became also a parliamen¬ tary borough. In the reign of Edward III. it was in a very flourishing state ; but A. 13. 133in the very same reign, was burned by the French, when that monarch, which was afterwards ratified by King Richard II. for¬ gave the inhabitants a debt, and remitted their fee-farm for 10 years; within which space they so recovered themselves, as to equip a squadron, which sailed into the Seine, sunk two ships, and brought away a great booty. The singular excellence of its port, and the convenience of fitting out fleets from thence in the time of a French war, induced Edward IV. to think of fortifying it, as he actually, in some measure, did ; which fortifications were farther carried on by Richard III. But King Henry \ II. was the first who settled a garrison therein ; which was increased, and the place made still stronger, in the reign of Henry V III. who had a great dock there, wherein was built the Henry Grace de Dieu, which was the largest ship in the navy of his time. The same mo- narch, remarkably attentive to the security of all mari¬ time places, built what is now called Smt/i Sea Castle, for the protection of this.—The improvements made here m the reign of Queen Elizabeth were much supe¬ rior to all these. King Charles II. after his restoration, directed great alterations, established new docks and yards, raised several forts, and fortified them after the modern manner ; which works were augmented under ns brother’s reign. _ Notwithstanding this, King Wil¬ liam directed likewise fresh alterations and additions ; and succeeding princes, following his example, have, at a large expence, extended these fortifications, and taken m a vast deal of ground : so that it is at present, as the importance of the place deserves, the most regular for¬ tress in Britain ; and, as it cannot be effectually attack- ed by sea, may be justly esteemed impregnable. Portsmouth, the largest town in the state of New Hampshire in North America. It stands on the south¬ east side of Piscataqua river, about two miles from the »ea, and contains about 600 houses, and 4400 inhabi¬ tants. Ihe town is handsomely built, and pleasantly situated. Its public buildings are, a court-house, two churches for Congregationalists, one for Episcopalians, and one other house for public worship. Its harbour '9 ] for is one of the finest on the continent, having a sufficient rortsmootl, depth of water for vessels of any burthen. It is defend- f! ed against storms by the adjacent land, in such a man- Portugal, net, as that ships may securely ride there in any season v ~ 1 of the year. Besides, the harbour is so well fortified by nature, that very little art will be necessary to render it impregnable. Its vicinity to the sea renders it verv convenient for naval trade. A light-house, with a single light, stands at the entrance of the harbour.- I OKI S03 , is a handsome sea-port town, situated on a small promontory running into the sea, on the south side of the Murray frith, in Scotland, about six miles from Cullen, and seven west from Banff. It sends out several fishing vessels, particularly for the Hebride white fishery, and exports a considerable quantity of grain. It contained 599 inhabitants in 1811. A manufacture of stocking and sewing thread is also carried on to a con¬ siderable amount for the London and Nottingham mar¬ kets. In the neighbourhood is a stratum of marble, of a dark greenish colour, in which, it is said, the curious substance called asbestos, or earth-flax, has been found. Iheie is also a remarkable mineral production found here, viz. a granite of a flesh colour, and found no where else in Europe. It contains a quantity of feldspar, and shews a brilliancy like the Labrador spar. When view¬ ed in a particular tight, it shews a purple and bluish tint; and when polished, the figures upon it assume the ap¬ pearance of Arabic characters. It is described by Dr Hutton, Edin. irans. vol. i. From the asbestos a sort of incombustible cloth is made, which is purified by throwing it into the fire. Wr. Long. 2. c. N. Lat <7 5°* T * EORTUGAL, the most westerly kingdom of Eu¬ rope, bounded on the west and south by the Atlantic ocean, and on the east and north by Spain; extending See Map of about 310 miles in length, and 150 in breadth. Spain and By modern writers, we find this country constantly Bortugal- styled in Latin Lusitania ; and it is certain, that an- B j .• c ciently a country of Spain went by that name ; but it ^ alle?, does not by any means appear that the country called by the ancients Lusitania had the same boundaries with the modern kingdom of Portugal. Before Augustus Cresar, Lusitania seems to have been bounded on the north by the ocean, and on the south by the river Tagus ; by which means it comprehended all Galicia, and excluded two of the six provinces of Portugal. But in the more strict and restrained sense of the word, it was bounded on the north by the Durius, now the Douro, and on the south by the river Anas, now the Guadiana ; in which sense it was not quite so long as modern Portugal, but considerably broader. The commonly received opinion with regard to the Etymoloo-y etymology of the word Portugal, is, that a great num-ofthe her of Gauls landed at Porto, or Oporto, whence it re- name, ceived the name of Portus Gallorum, or the Port of the Gauls; and in process of time that name gradually ex¬ tended over the whole country, being softened, or rather shortened, into Portugal. But the time when this event happened, the reason why these Gauls came thither, and what became of them afterwards, are all particulars which lie buried in oblivion. It is alleged, however, that, upon an eminence which overlooks the mouth of the river Douro, there stood an ancient town called Cale, strong and well peopled, but ill suited for trade ; and this occasioned the construction of a lower town or ham- E e 2 let, Pwlucral. p O R t 220 3 p ° let, ivWch tvas called Portus Cole, that is, the haven of subjection of their neighbours — - ' • (**• -- T3—tn At length, R Porlugi; v ■— >' Cale ; and, in process of time, Portucaha. . becoming so considerable as to merit an episcopal chair, the bishops subscribed themselves, as the records ot an- bient councils testify, Portucalenses, and the name ot the Vity was transferred to the diocese. It is true, that these bishops afterwards changed their title, and subscriber themselves Portuenses, that is, bishops of Portu. .But the facts just mentioned are actually recorded in authentic histories •, and as the diocese of Portucaha contained in a great measure that little country in which the sove¬ reignty originally began, the name extended itselt, to¬ gether with the acquisitions of the sovereigns, and has remained in the kingdom, though the diocese itselt has 3 changed its name, and possibly on that very account. Originally Portugal, though even yet hut a small kingdom, was only a small ori ;nai,i much smaller. The Spanish and Portuguese kingdom. arree> tliat Don Alonso, King of Leon and Castile, and son to Don Ferdinand the Great, bestowed his daughter Donna Theresa in marriage upon an illus¬ trious stranger, Don Henry and gave him with her he frontier province which he had conquered from the Moors, small indeed in extent, but excellently situated, and so pleasant and fertile, that it has sometimes been styled Medulla Hispanica, or the marrow of Spain, lo this territory was added the title of Count ; but authors are much divided about the time that this stranger came into Spain, and who he was. However, the authors of the Universal History make it pretty evident that he was a grandson of llobert the first duke of Burgundy. The manner in which he obtained the principality above mentioned is related as follows : . ,. The king, Don Alonso, apprehensive that his success in taking the city of Toledo would bring upon him the whole force of the Moors, sent to demand assistance h orn Philip I. of France, and the duke of Burgundy, whose daughter he had married. His request was granted by both princes ; and a numerous body of troops was speedi¬ ly collected for his service, at whose head went Raymond count of Burgundy, Henry, younger brother of Hugh duke of Burgundy, Raymond count of 1 h°!ous*’ an many others. They arrived at the court of Don Alonso in the year 1087, where they were received and treated with all possible marks of esteem *, and having in the course of two or three years given great proofs of their courage and conduct, the king resolved to bestow his only daughter named Urraca, then a mere child, being at most in her ninth year, upon Raymond count of Bur ^ gundy, and assigned them the province of Galicia tor the support of their dignity. About four years after Don Alonso being very desirous to express his gratitude to Henry of Burgundy, gave him in marriage a natural daughter of his, born while he remained in exile at 10- ledot whose name was Donna Theresa S and upon this marriage, he gave up in full property the country which has been already mentioned. . ... - The new sovereign, with his consort, fixed their re - deuce in the town of Guimaraez, pleasantly situated on the banks of the river Ave. The remains of an ancient palace belonging to their successors are still to be seen , and on account of its having been anciently the capital, the king, Don Denis, granted the inhabitants an immu¬ nity from taxes, which they still enjoy. The Portuguese, nn\v finding themselves mdependen , immediately began, like other nations, to attempt the 4 Henry of Burgundy the first xoiint of Portugal. suoiecuou 01 uien ncigiiuuuic. Hemy is said to have performed great exploits against the Moors j but the ac¬ counts of them are so indistinct, that they cannot be taken notice of here. He died in 1112 j and was suc¬ ceeded by his son Don Alonso, then an infant in the third year of his age. In his minority, the kingdom was governed by his mother Donna Theresa, assisted by two s able ministers. During the first nine years of their ad- Differm ministration, nothing remarkable happened; but after wit 1 Cm that period some differences took place between the queen regent (for she had assumed the title of queen af¬ ter her father’s death) and Urraca queen of Castile. Theresa insisted, that some part of Galicia belonged to her in virtue of her father’s will ; and therefore seized on Toy, an episcopal town, and a place ot some conse¬ quence. Urraca, having assembled a numerous army, went in person into Galicia; upon which Theresa was obliged to abandon Tuy, and take shelter in one of her own fortresses. The consequence, in all probability, would have been fatal to the new kingdom, had not the archbishop of Compostella, without whose assistance Ur¬ raca could do nothing, demanded leave ta retire with bis vassals. This offended the queen to such a degree, that she threw him into prison ; which act of violence excited such a commotion among her own subjects, that the Portuguese were soon delivered from their appre¬ hensions. Queen Theresa fell immediately after into a similar error, by throwing into prison the archbishop of Brr out of the hands of the Moors ; and concerning this 9 expedition there are such numbers of fables, that it is Rfduces almost impossible to come at the truth. What can be nd gathered from these accounts is, that he undertook the cities, siege with a small army, and was able to make but little progress in it, partly from the strength of the place, and partly from the numerous garison by which it was defended. At length, fortunately for Don Alonso, a fleet of adventurers, French, English, Germans, and Flemings, that were going to the Holy Land, anchored at the mouth of the river Tagus, whose assistance he de¬ manded, as not altogether foreign to their design of mak¬ ing war on the infidels. His request was readily grant¬ ed ; and, with their assistance, Lisbon was speedily re¬ duced 5 which conquest so much raised the reputation of this monarch, and brought such numbers to recruit his army, that before the end of the year 1147 he had reduced 12 other considerable cities. ro For many years after this, Don Alonso was success-Has his re- ful in all his undertakings. He settled the internal go- Sai dignity vernment of his kingdom, procured a bull from Pope f01,{jnned Alexander III. confirming his regal dignity, undertook ^ eP°pe* many successful expeditions against the Moors, and be¬ came master of four of the six provinces which compose the present kingdom of Portugal. In all his undertak¬ ings he was assisted by the counsels of his queen Ma¬ tilda, who was a woman of great capacity, and suffi¬ cient for the government of the kingdom in her hus¬ band’s absence. By her he had a numerous offspring, particularly three daughters ; the eldest of whom Don¬ na Mafalda or Mathilda, was married to the king of Arragon ; the second, Urraca, to Don Ferdinand king of Leon ; and the third, Theresa, to Philip earl of Flanders. In 1166, however, the king thought pro-j^ 11 per, from what provocation we know not, to invade celsfb” war the dominions of his son-in-law Don Ferdinand j and with Don possessed himself of Limmia and Turon, two cities of f'er . The Jot In 14x4, King John undertook an expedition against Ccut,, fn the Moors in Barbary, where he commanded in person Jfromi hut before he set out, his queen (Philippa the daugh-Moor ter of John duke of Lancaster) died of grief at the thoughts of his absence. The expedition, however, proved successful, and the city of Ceuta was taken from the Moors almost at the first assault 5 but scarcely had the king left that country, when the princes of Barbary formed a league for the recovery of it j and though they were defeated by the young princes of Portugal, whom John again sent into Barbary, yet the trouble ol keeping it was so great, that some of the king’s coun¬ cil were of opinion that the town should be demolished. But FOR [22 . But Jolin, having considered the arguments on both sides, determined to keep the city j and therefore en¬ larged and strengthened the fortifications, augmenting his forces there to 6000 foot and 2500 horse, which he hoped would be sufficient for keeping oft' the attacks of the Moors. King John died in 1428, and was succeeded by his eldest son Edward. He undertook an expedition against Tangier in Barbary : but the event proved very unfor¬ tunate ; the Portuguese being so shut up by the Moors, that they were obliged to offer Ceuta back again, in order to obtain leave to return to Portugal. The king’s son, Don Ferdinand, was left as a hostage for the delivery of Ceuta ; but was, with the utmost cruel¬ ty and injustice, left in the hands of the infidels, by the king and council of Portugal, who constantly refused to deliver up the place. Many preparations indeed were made for recovering the prince by force ; but be¬ fore any thing could be accomplished the king died in 1430, which put an end to all these designs. ""See Pe¬ dro, Doji. The war with Barbary continued at intervals, but with little success on the part of the Portuguese 5 and til! the year 1497, there is no event of any consequence recorded in the history of Portugal. This year was re¬ markable for the discovery of the passage to the East Indies by the Cape of Good Hope. The enterprising spirit of the Portuguese had prompted them to under¬ take voyages along the coast of Africa for a consider¬ able time before ; but when they undertook their first * voyage of discovery, it is probable that they had no¬ thing farther in view than to explore those parts of the coast of Africa which lay nearest to their own country. But a spirit of enterprise, when roused and put in mo¬ tion, is always progressive ; and that of the Portuguese, though slow and timid in its first operations, gradually acquired vigour, and prompted them to advance along the western shore of the African continent far beyond the utmost boundary of ancient navigation in that di¬ rection. Encouraged by success, it became more ad¬ venturous, despised dangers which formerly appalled it, and surmounted difficulties which it once deemed in¬ superable. When the Portuguese found in the torrid zone, which the ancients had pronounced to be unin¬ habitable, fertile countries, occupied by numerous na¬ tions ; and perceived that the continent of Africa, in¬ stead of extending in breadth towards the west, ac¬ cording to the opinion of Ptolemy, appeared to contract itself, and to bend eastwards, more extensive prospects opened to their view, and inspired them with hopes of reaching India, by continuing to hold the same course which they had so long pursued. After several unsuccessful attempts to accomplish what they had in view, a small squadron sailed from the Tagus, under the command of Vasco de Gama, an of¬ ficer of rank, whose abilities and courage fitted him to conduct the most difficult and arduous enterprises. From unacquaintance, however, with the proper season and route of navigation in that vast ocean through which he had to steer his course, his voyage was long and dangerous. At length he doubled that promon¬ tory, which, for several years, had been the object of terror and of hope to his countrymen. From that, af¬ ter a prosperous navigation along the south-east of A- frica, he arrived at the city of Melinda, and had the 4 3 3 FOR satisfaction of discovering there, as well as at other porl„.al. places where he touched, people of a race very different from the rude inhabitants of the western shore of that continent, which alone the Portuguese had hitherto vi¬ sited. These he found to be so far advanced in civili¬ zation and acquaintance with the various arts of life, that they carried on an active commerce, not only with the nations on their own coast, but with remote coun¬ tries of Asia. Conducted by their pilots, who held a course with which experience had rendered them well acquainted, he sailed across the Indian ocean, and land¬ ed at Calecut, on the coast of Malabar, on the 22d of May 1498, ten months and two days after his departure from the port of Lisbon. ^ The samorin, or monarch ol the country, astonished The king at this unexpected visit of an unknown people, whose ofl^e aspect, and arms, and manners, bore no resemblance to any of the nations accustomed to frequent his harbours, his new vi. and who arrived in his dominions by a route hitherto sitors. deemed impracticable, received them at first with that fond admiration which is often excited by novelty 5 but in a short time, from whatever motives, lie formed va¬ rious schemes to cut off Gama and his followers. The I oituguese admiral, however, was not to be overreach¬ ed by such politics as his. From every danger to which he was exposed, either by the open attacks or secret machinations of the Indians, he extricated himself with singular prudence and dexterity, and at last sailed from \ Calecut with his ships, loaded not only with the com¬ modities peculiar to that coast, but with many rich pro¬ ductions of the eastern parts of India. He returned to 1 ortugal in two years after his sailing from the Tagus, but with a great loss of men ; for out of 148 persons whom he took out with him, only 55 returned. The king received him with all possible testimonies of re¬ spect and kindness j created him count of Videgueira ; and not only declared him admiral of the Indies, but made that office hereditary in his family. 20 On tlie first intelligence of Gama’s successful voy-The Yene- age, the Venetians, with the quick-sighted discernmenttians dread of merchants, foresaw the immediate consequence of it tJie.ru*n to be the ruin of that lucrative branch of commerce niercc!0m* which had contributed so greatly to enrich and aggran¬ dise their country j and they observed this with more poignant concern, as they were apprehensive that they did not possess any effectual means of preventing, or even retarding, its operation. ^ Hie hopes and fears of both were well-founded. T’he^cco^t Portuguese entered upon the new career opened to them of the with activity and ardour, and made exertions, both com- settlement mercial and military, far bey ond what could have beenofthe P?F_ expected from a kingdom of such inconsiderable extent. m All these were directed by an intelligent monarch, ca¬ pable of forming plans of the greatest magnitude with calm systematic wisdom, and of prosecuting them with unremitting perseverance. The prudence and vigour of his measures, however, would have availed little without proper instruments to carry them into execution. Hap¬ pily for Portugal, the discerning eye of Emanuel select¬ ed a succession of officers to take the supreme command in India, who, by their enterprising valour, military skill, and political sagacity, accompanied with disinte¬ rested integrity, public spirit, and love of their country, have a title to be ranked with the persons most eminent for virtue and abilities in any age or nation. Greater things, FOR r 224 1 P o p Por'di^al. 22 Opposition made l»y the Vene¬ tians. «3 . Inquisition introduced into Portu¬ gal. tlunp* perlmps were achieved by them than were ever accomplished in so short a time. W‘thin 24 }e‘irs after the voyage of Gama, the Portuguese had rendered themselves masters of the city of Malacca ,n winch the great staple of trade carried on among the inhab.tan s of all those regions in Asia, winch Europeans have di¬ stinguished by the general name ot the East Inches, was then established. The conquest secured to them grea influence over the interior commerce of India, while, at the same time, by their settlements at Goa a^Dm thev were enabled to engross the trade ot the Malabar coast and to obstruct greatly the long established inter¬ course of Egypt with India by the Red sea. In every part of the east they were received with re*Peci> many they had acquired the absolute command. They carried on trade there without rival or controul j they prescribed to the natives the terms of their mu ual in¬ tercourse i they often set what price they pleased on the goods which they purchased •, and were thus enabled to import from Indostan and the regions beyond it, what¬ ever is useful, rare, or agreeable, in greater abundan , and of more various kinds, than had been known for- Ilie^lot'satisfic'd with this ascendant which they had ac¬ quired in India, the Portuguese early formed a scheme no less bold than interested, of excluding all other na- Rons from participating of the advantages of commerce with the east *, and they accomplished one halt of what their ambition had planned. , , In consequence of this, the \enetians soon began to feel that decrease of their own Indian trade which they had foreseen and dreaded. In order to prevent the far¬ ther progress of this evil, they incited the sol dan of tl^ Mameluks to fit out a fleet in the Red sea, and to at¬ tack those unexpected invaders of a gainful monopoly, of which he and his predecessors had long enjoyed un¬ disturbed possession. The Portuguese, however, en¬ countered his formidable squadron with undaunted cou- rase entirely defeated it, and remained masters of the Indian ocean. They continued their progress in the east almost without obstruction, until they established there a commercial empire-, to which, whether we consider its extent, its opulence, the slender power by winch it was formed, or the splendour with which the government it was conducted, there had hitherto been nothing comparable in the history of natrons Entanne who laid the foundation of tins stupendous fabric, had the sa¬ tisfaction to see it almost completed. Every part of E - rone was supplied by the Portuguese with the produc- Rons of the east and if we except some inconsiderable quantity of them, which the Venetians still continued to receive by the ancient channels of conveyance, om quai ter of the globe had no longer any commercial inter¬ course with India, and the regions of Asia beyond it, hut bv the Cape of Good Hope. . f In September 1522, King Emanue died of an epi¬ demical fever, and was succeeded by Ins son John I . The most remarkable transaction of this prince s reign was the introduction of the inquisition into his domi¬ nions. This happened in the year 1525. aS sav in 1535. A famine happening to cease in a shoit time after it was introduced, the priests persuaded the •Inorant multitude that it was a blessmg from heaven on account of the erecting such an holy tribunal. How ever, it was not long before the bulk of the nation per¬ ceived what kind of a blessing the inquisition was : hut por their discernment was too late-, tor by that time the in-~ quisitors had acquired such power, that it became equal¬ ly dangerous and ineffectual to attempt disclosing any ot their mysteries. In the mean time Solyman the Magnificent, the most enlightened monarch of the Ottoman race, observing the "power and the opulence of the Portuguese rising, and attributing it to its proper cause, and eager to sup¬ plant them, sent orders to the bashaw of Egypt to em¬ ploy his whole strength against the Christians in the East Indies. The bashaw, in obedience to these orders, sailed out from the Red sea with a greater naval force than ever the Mohammedans had employed before j having 4000 Janizaries, and 16,000 other land troops on board. Yet, by the courage and conduct ot the Por¬ tuguese officers and soldiers, all this mighty armament was defeated,and their East India possessions saved from the danger which threatened them. In Africa likewise the king of Fez was baffled before the town of Safi, and fresh quarrels breaking out among the princes gave great relief to the Christians, who had long been obliged to carrv on a defensive war, and had more than once been on the very brink of ruin. For a long time indeed their safety had been derived only from the quarrels of the Moors among themselves; for such was the envy and jealousy which reigned among the Portuguese, that they could never unite heartily in opposing the common ene¬ my j and therefore, had their enemies united against them, they must certainly have been cut oif. But when¬ ever the cheriffs quarrelled with each other, one party was sure to have recourse to the. Portuguese; who, by sending them a small supply, secured quiet to themselves, and had the pleasure of seeing their enemies destroy one r another. Yet in the end even this had bad consequences; Bad, for on one hand, it kept up a martial spirit among theaffili,| Moors, and on the other it made them acquainted with Bart the Portuguese discipline; so that alter every shoit in¬ terval of repose they not only found them as much ene¬ mies as before, but much more formidable than ever. The consequence of all this was, that King John began to apprehend that the conquest of Barbary was impos¬ sible, and therefore to limit his desires to the keeping of those few fortresses which he had already; which, though a necessary and prudent measure, displeased the genera¬ lity of his subjects. King John exerted himself much in the settlement of Brazil in South America, which he brought into a very good state, caused several strong towns to be erect¬ ed there, and took all possible methods to encourage the conversion of the natives to Christianity. He also made many regulations for the welfare and happiness of his subjects. The disputes of the nobility about precedency were frequently attended with very disagreeable conse¬ quences, which made the king resolve once for all to settle them by established rules ; and the rules establish¬ ed by him on this occasion have subsisted ever since, and in a great measure prevent these altercations. He had other great designs in his mind, particularly with regard to the reformation, which he had pushed very far with respect to religious persons of both sexes; but, on a close examination of his affairs, he found his sub¬ jects in general to have been so much injured by In® leaving their concerns to the inspection of his council, that he was thrown by the grief of it into a kind ot apoplexy, al. PGR [2 apoplexy, from which he never recovered. His death ,!aPI»®ne(,o in Jufle 'SSI 5 and he was succeeded by his son Don Sebastian H I. an infant of three years of aye. After t!ie death of king John, the administration re- niained in the hands of the queen, grandmother to Se¬ bastian, who behaved with great prudence and circum¬ spection. The Moors, however, supposing that under a minority they might be able to dispossess the Chri¬ stians of such places as they held in Barbary, laid close siege to Masagan. But the queen-regent sent such speedy succours, and promised such rewards to those who distinguished themselves, that the Moors, though they brought 80,000 men into the field, were obliged to abandon the enterprise. This was at first magnified as a high instance of the queen’s capacity and wisdom: but in a short time the natural aversion which the .Por¬ tuguese had to the government of women, together with the prejudice they had against her country, as be¬ ing a Castilian, appeared so plainly, and gave her so much uneasiness, that of her own accord she resigned her authority into the hands of Cardinal Hon Henry the king’s brother. By him Dor. Alexis de Moneses was appointed the king’s governor, and Gonsales de Gomera with two other priests his preceptors. By means of these instructors the king’s education was to- a-tally marred. His governor assiduously inculcated up- e on him that the chief virtue of a king was courage : * tl,at finger was never to be avoided, but always sur¬ mounted, let the occasion be what it would. His otner tutors, instead of instructing him in the true reli¬ gion, only inspired him with an abhorrence of professed infidels; the consequence of all which was, that he be¬ came rash, inconsiderate, and obstinate; all which qua¬ lities conspired to draw upon him the catastrophe which ruined both him and the kingdom. . After tIie J^g wf18 grown up to man’s estate, his de¬ sire was to distinguish himself against the infidels. He himself chose an expedition to the East Indies ; but the prime minister Alco^ova, who did not choose to attend . 1118 ™onarch to such a distance, substituted Africa in its v.stead. This expedition the kingentered into in the most inconsiderate and absurd manner. He first sent over Don Antonio prior of Crato, with some hundreds of soldiers ; carried his principal courtiers over with him from a hunting match, and without equipages ; he then sent for the duke of Aveyro, with such troops as he could collect on the short warning he had got; and when all these were assembled, the king spent his time in hunting, and slight excursions against the enemy, without doing any thing of consequence, except expo¬ sing his person upon all occasions. At length he re¬ turned to Portugal in such tempestuous weather, that ins subjects had given him up for lost; when they were agreeably surprised by his unexpected arrival in the ri- ver of Lisbon, which they celebrated with the greatest rejoicings. _ The little success which attended the king in this ex¬ pedition served only to inflame him more with desire for another ; so that from the time he returned he seemed to think on nothing else. He was highly delighted also with an accident which at this time furnished him with a pretence for war, though of that he stood in no great need. Muley Hamet, king of Fez and Morocco, had Jeen dispossessed of his dominions by his unde Muley aioloch. At the beginning of this war Don Sebastian Vob. XVII. Part I. f Portiijal. 25 ] p O R had offered him his troops in Africa, which offer was rejected with contempt: but now being a fugitive, and having m vain applied for assistance to Philip of Spain, Muley Hamet applied to the king of Portugal ; and, that he might the more easily succeed, caused the for¬ tress of Arzila, which his father had recovered, to be restored to the Portuguese. The king was in Capture tl -n ^ that llis g]<”7 would exceed hat of all his predecessors. He was advised against this expedition, however, by all his friends. King Phi- ip of Spam having done every thing to dissuade him In U Pei'SOnal C0|nfe™ce, sent Francisco Aldana, an old and experienced officer, to Morocco ; and at his return ordered him to attend Don Sebastian, in order to give him an account of the state of affairs in that coun- try 1 his he performed with the greatest fidelity, hut u„ ed T- ^ lhe T^een dowager and cardinal united m their endeavours to divert him from this unfor¬ tunate enterprise ; but he treated them both with so little respect, that his grandmother broke her heart; and the cardinal, to show his distaste at the measure, retired to Fvora without comingeither to court or council; which xample was followed by many of the nobles. Many of these, however, sent very free remonstrances to the king on the impropriety of his conduct; and King Phi- «P sent to him the duke de Medina Celi, once more to mnrtrreMm 1 ^ he tho^ ^ scheme practicable, and to put him in mind that he had no hand m pushing him upon his destruction, or of con¬ cealing from him the dangers into which he seemed de¬ termined to plunge himself and his subjects. Lastly he received a letter on the subject from Muley Moloch himself, wherein that prince explained to him his own right to the crown of Fez, and showed that he had only dispossessed a tyrant and a murderer, who had therefore no right to Ins friendship or assistance. He next assured him that he had no reason to fear either the power or neighbourhood of the Portuguese ; as a proof of which, and as a mark of his esteem, he was content to make him a present of ten miles of arable ground round each of the fortresses he possessed in Africa, and winch indeed were no more than four, viz. Tangier Ceuta, Masagan, and Arzila. At the same time he addressed himself to King Philip of Spain, with whom he was on good terms, desiring him to interpose with his nephew Sebastian, that things might be yet adjusted without the effusion of human blood. But the king of 1 oitugal was deaf to all salutary advice ; and therefore 27 paid no regard to this letter, nor to the remonstrances of^T"1 °f his uncle. On the 24th of June 1577, therefore, lle lus fo,CC4- set sail from the bar of Lisbon with a fleet of co ships and five galleys, 12 pieces of cannon, and transports and tenders, making near 1000 sail. His troops consisted of 9000 Portuguese foot; 3000 Germans; 700 Italians commanded by Sir Thomas Stukeley, an English exile but remarkably brave ; 2000 Castilians and 300 volun¬ teers commanded by Don Christopher de Tuvara mas- ter of the horse, a man of courage, but without either conduct or experience. He touched first at Lagos bay in the kingdom of Algarve, where he remained for four days : thence he proceeded to Cadiz; where he was magnificently feasted for a week by the duke de Medina Sidonia, who took the opportunity once more by order of Philip, of dissuading him from proceeding further m person. But this exhortation proved as fruit! Ff less ¥OTl [22 Portugal, less as the rest-, ami the king having sailecl with a strong ——v ' detachment for Tangier, ordered Don Diego de Souza, his commander in chief, to follow with the remaining part of the army. The troops landed on the coast of Africa without any bad accident, and joined at Aizila. Here toe king was met by the clieriff Muley Flamet, on whose account he had undertaken the war, who delivered him his son Muley, a boy of 12 years of age, as a hostage, and brought a reinforcement of 300 Moors, ihe boy was sent to Masagan under a strong guaid j but the fa¬ ther remained in the Portuguese camp. Here it was resolved in a council of war to reduce the town of La- rache, hut it was disputed whether the troops should proceed thither by land or sea. Don Sebastian, who espoused the former opinion, finding himself opposed by Muley Hamet, gave him such a rude answer, that he left his presence in discontent-, after which the king’s opinion prevailed, and the army began its march on the 29th of July. As they proceeded, the king received a letter from the duke of Alba, requesting him to attempt nothing beyond the taking of the town of Larache. Along with the latter was sent an helmet which had 2g been worn by Charles V. Movements On the other hand MuTey Moloch, having intelu- snd dispo- gcnce of this formidable invasion, took the field, though at that time so ill of a fever that he could not sit on horseback, with 40,000 foot and 60,000 horse. He con¬ ducted every thing, notwitstanding his distressed situa¬ tion, with the greatest prudence. Finding some rea¬ son to suspect that part of his army were desirous of go- in-in£f to the house of Bragan'/.a embai t a ^"“Rdsbon, for the Brasils, under the escort of a Br.ttsli famflym fleet. Jn consequence of this measure, the emperor of tlie iirasils. France declared that the throne was abdicated, an n- the kingdom should henceforth be considered as a consti¬ tuent part of the French dominions. He dissolved the regency formed by the prince, sequestered all the pro- 43 perty belonging to the crown, and that of all the nobles The French vvl10 followed him into exile. General Junot, who soon after this, entered Lisbon at the head of 14,000 men, issued a proclamation to the people of I ortugal, in which he promised the due administration ot justice, the preservation of tranquillity, and declared that then future happiness should be attended to with the utmost punctuality. These pretensions, however, did not ap¬ pear to reconcile the subjects ot Portugal to their new masters; for when Junot seated himself in the prince a box at the opera, all the Portuguese then present put on their hats, and instantly withdrew. Ihe evils attending this French invasion were such as might have been ex¬ pected. The lower classes were dying of absolute want; and more than two-thirds of the mercantile houses in Lisbon were plunged into the gulf of bankruptcy. . The army of Sir Arthur Wellesley, sent by Great Bri¬ tain to act against the French troops under Junot, amount¬ ed to about 20,000 men, with an equal number of Portu¬ guese soldiers, which were to be joined by a Spanish force 49 of 10,000 men, under the command of General Jones. French de- Xhe British and French had a desperate action near v 1- feated at mier0[ on tj)e 2Ist 0f August 1808, which terminated in ofViSera ^ total defeat of the French forces, who were to eva¬ cuate Portugal on certain conditions, the cinef of which was, that they were to be carried home with all their plunder, in vessels belonging to Great Britain. Sir Hew Hairy m pie, who succeeded Sir Arthur Wellesley as com- 50 mander in chief of the British forces, agreed to what is Convention called the convention of Cintra, by which indeed the of Cintra. kino Jorn of Portugal was freed in the mean time from the'ravagesof an unfeeling enemy, but it has been sup¬ posed that such a convention might have been much more honourable to Britain, and the French troops compelled to an unconditional surrender. Dishonourable as this convention was deemed by some, it had the sanction of Sir Charles Cotton, the admiral of the British fleet; and the freeing the Portuguese from the oppression and tyranny ot France by this means became a justification of the ’measure. This convention was strongly repro¬ bated in Britain •, a board of general officers was ap¬ pointed by his majesty to form a court for the purpose of inquiring into the circumstances which led to it j and the result of the investigation was a decision, by a ma¬ jority of the court, that the armistice and convention were necessary, and that nothing dishonourable or im- proper attached to any ot the officeis concerned in it. Every thing at the’ Brasils proceeded in a tranquil and prosperous manner under the auspices of the new government. The highest veneration was shewn by the colonists of all descriptions for the prince regent, and prompt obedience paid to his ordinances and commeicial regulations. The most enthusiastic attachment prevailed in Rio Janeiro and Bahia towards the English settlers-, and the happiest consequences were expected to result from the enterprises of their new friends in South Ame¬ rica. The consequences resulting to the Portuguese, P O R from the convention of Cintra, were ot the most bcftefi- pftr^f!, cial nature. The whole country was not only in a state v-* of subordination, but the effects of the ene rgy displayed by the government began to be felt ail over the king¬ dom. The disaffected and suspected were everywhere taken into custody *, and the people were making the most active exertions for their own defence, and for the common cause. The Portuguese government issued a proclamation calling upon the whole nation, from 15 bo, to lise en masse for the defence of their country, and to oppose an insurmountable barrier against the French. A his order met with more prompt obedience than a similar command experienced when issued by the emperor ot Germany. , . .. . , During the wars in the Peninsula which followed the general rising of the Spaniards in 1808, the Portuguese continued firm in the common cause, and theii hoops, which generally acted with the British, shared some of the victories gained by the latter. Ihe peace in 18 j 4 restored the Portuguese government to the peaceable possession of the country but the Prince Regent has shewn no disposition to return from the Lrasils. Jn 1817 a plot was discovered among the military at Lisbon, the the object of which was believed to be the subversion ot the existing government. Some ot the ringleaders were executed, and others banished. . 51 The air of Portugal, in the southern provinces, would Air, di- be excessively hot, "if it were not refreshed by the sea-mate, & breezes -, but in the northern, it is much cooler, and the weather more subject to rains. I he spring is ex¬ tremely delightful here j and the air, in general more j temperate than in Spain. Lisbon has been much resort¬ ed to of late by valetudinarians and consumptive persons from Great Britain, on account of its air. The soil is very fruitful in wine, oil, lemons, oranges, pomegra¬ nates, figs, raisins, almonds, chesnuts, and other fine fruits \ but there is a want of corn, owing, it is said, in a great measure to the neglect of agriculture. There is plenty of excellent honey here and also of sea and river fish, and sea salt. The horses in Portugal are brisk lively animals, as they are in Spain, but of a slight make : but mules being surer-footed, are more used for carriage and draught. By reason of the scarcity of pa¬ sture, there are not many herds of cattle or flocks of sheep j and what they have are small and lean, though the flesh is tolerably good : their best meat is said to be that of hogs and kids. The country in many parts is mountainous: but the mountains contain all kinds of ores-, particularly of silver, copper, tin, and iron, with a variety of gems, beautifully variegated marble, mill¬ stones, and many curious fossils. Not far from Lisbon is a mine of saltpetre \ but none of the metal mines are here worked, the inhabitants being supplied with metals of all kinds from their foreign settlements. Ihe princi¬ pal rivers are the Minho, in Latin Minius; the Limia, anciently the fomed Lethe , the Cavado the Douro j the Guadiana, anciently Anas ; and the Tajo, or T agus, which is the largest river in the kingdom, carrying some gold in its sands, and falling into the sea a little be¬ low Lisbon. There are several mineral springs in the kingdom, both hot and cold, which are much fre* quented. ,5? The only religion tolerated in Portugal is that of theRelig11 church of Rome j yet there are many concealed Jews, and those too even among the nobility, bishops, pre¬ bends. P O R srtagft!. aufao- bend?, monks, and nuns, and tlie very inquisitors them- selves. If a Jew pretend to be a Christian and a Ro¬ man Catholic, while he is really a Jew, by going to mass, confession, &c. or if after being converted, or pretending to be converted and pardoned, he relapses into Judaism and is discovered, the inquisition lays hold of him. In the first case, if he renounce Judaism, he is only condemned to some corporal punishment or public shame, and then ordered to be instructed in the Christian religion. In the second, he is condemned to the flames without mercy. Besides Jews and heretics, who broach or maintain any doctrines contrary to the religion of the country, the inquisition punishes all so¬ domites, pretenders to sorcery and the black art, apo¬ states, blasphemers, perjured persons, impostors, and hypocrites. The burning of those condemned by the inquisition, is called an auto da fc, or “ act of faith.” There are several tribunals of the inquisition, one of which is at Goa in the East Indies ; but there are none in Brasil. The number of convents in Portugal is said to be 900. The order of Jesuits hath been suppressed in this country, as they have been in others. Here is a patriarch, several archbishops and bishops : the pa¬ triarch is always a cardinal, and of the royal family. The archbishops rank with marquises, and the bishops with counts. The Portuguese have archbishops and bi¬ shops in the other quarters of the world as well as in Europe. The sums raised by the popes here, by vir¬ tue of their prerogatives, are thought to exceed the revenues of the crown, and the nuncio's never fail of ac¬ quiring vast fortunes in a short time. Though there are two universities and several academies, yet while the papal power, and that of the ecclesiastics, continues at such a height, true learning is like to make but a small progress. The language of the Portuguese does not differ much from that of Spain: Latin is the ground¬ work of both ; but the former is more remote from it, and harsher to the ear, than the latter. The Portu¬ guese tongue is spoken on all the coast of Africa and Asia as far as China, but mixed with the languages of the several nations in those distant regions. With regard to manufactures, there are very few in Portugal, and those chiefly coarse silks, woollen cloths, and some linen; but their foreign trade is very consider¬ able, especially with England, which takes a great deal of their wine, salt, foreign commodities, and fruits, in return for its woollen manufactures, with which the Portuguese furnish their colonies and subjects iu Asia, Africa, and America. Their plantations in Brasil are very valuable, yielding gold, diamonds, indigo, copper, tobacco, sugar, ginger, cotton, hides, gums, drugs, dye¬ ing woods, &c. From their plantations in Africa, they bring gold and ivory, and slaves to cultivate their sugar and tobacco plantations in Brasil. They have still se¬ veral settlements in the East Indies, but far less consi¬ derable than formerly. The Azores or Western isles, Madeira, and the Cape de Verde islands, also belong to them ; but a great part of the riches and merchandise brought from these distant countries becomes the pro¬ perty of foreigners, for the goods they furnish the Por¬ tuguese with to carry thither. The king’s fifth of the gold brought from Brasil amounts commonly to about 300,000!. sterling; so that the whole annual produce sd gold in Brasil may be estimated at near 2,000.000!. Vol. XVII. Part I. ' f [ 233 ] P O R sterling. Lisbon is the greatest port in Europe next to Portusal. London and Amsterdam. t.._.-v—..j Before the late revolution, the government of Portu- 54 gal was an absolute hereditary monarchy. For the ad- ministration ot the civil government, there was a conn-o0vein- cil of state, and several secretaries ; for military affairs, meat, a council of war ; for the finances, a treasury court ; and for the distribution of justice several high tribunals, with others subordinate to them, in the several districts into which the kingdom is divided. The cities have their particular magistracy. The proceedings of the courts are regulated by the Roman law, the royal edicts, the canon law, and the pope’s mandates. Like the Spaniards, they transact most of their business in the mornings and evenings, and sleep at noon. The nobility are very numerous, and many of them are de¬ scended from natural sons of the royal family. They are divided into high and low. The high consists of the dukes, marquises, counts, viscounts, and barons, who are also grandees, but of different classes, being suffered to be covered in the king’s presence, and ha¬ ving the title of Dons, with a pension from the royal treasury, to enable them the better to support their dignity : the king styles them Illustrious in bis letters, and treats them as princes. A duke’s sons are also grandees, and bis daughters rank as marchionesses. Ihe inferior nobility or gentry are termed Hidalgos, 1. e. gentlemen : they cannot assume the title of Don without the king’s license. ^- The revenues of the crown, since the discovery ofRevenu«* the Brasil mines, are very considerable; but the realoftlie kin»’ amount can only be guessed at. Some have said that it&e’ amounts, clear of all salaries and pensions, to upwards of 3,000,000!. sterling ; others make it a great deal less. Besides the royal demesnes, the hereditary estates of the bouse of Braganza, the monopoly of Brasil snuff, the coinage, the money arising from the sale of indul¬ gences granted by the pope, the fifth of the gold brought from Brasil, the farm of the Brasil diamonds, the mas¬ terships of the orders of knighthood, and other sources, yield very large sums. The population of Portugal in 1815, was estimated at 3,680,000 ; the army at 25,000, besides 33,000 militia ; the navy, 8 ships of the line and 16 frigates. There are several orders of knighthood here, viz. the Orders of order of Christ, the badge of which is a red cross within kwiuht- a white one, and the number of the commanderies 454.^0°d- 2. The order of St James, the badge of which is a red sword in the shape of a cross. A great number of towns and commanderies belong to this order. 3. The order.of Aviz, whose badge is a green cross in form of a lily, and the number of its commanderies 49. Though these three orders are religious, yet the knights are at liberty to marry. 4. The order of St John, which haa also several commanderies. The king’s titles are, King of Portugal and the Al¬ garve.?, on this side and the other side the sea of Africa ; Lord of Guinea, and of the navigation, conquests, and commerce, in Ethiopia, Arabia, Persia, India, &r. The king’s eldest son is styled Prince of Brasil. In the year 1749, Pope Benedict XIV. dignified the king with the title of Ills most faithful majesty. Portugal has recently become the scene of an extra¬ ordinary revolution. The Portuguese had long been G g dissatisfied P O R [ 234 ] P o s ost possession. that he never had any fits while he was at St George’s If he that is out of possession of land brings an ac- Hospital in London ; nor when visitors were excluded tion, he must prove an undeniable title to it ; and when from his lodgings, by desire of the, author of the Nar- a person would recover any thing of another, it is not rative j and that he was particularly careful never to sufficient to destroy the title of the person in possession, hurt himself by his exertions during the paroxysm, without he can prove that his own right is better than “ Is it for the credit of this philosophical age, that so his. bungling an imposture should deceive seven clergymen, In order to make possession lawful upon an entry, the into a public act of exorcism? This would not have pas- former possessor and his servants are to be removed from sed even on the authors of the MaS/eus Malificarum ; off the premises entered on : but a person by lease and for they required signs of supernatural agency, such as release is in possession without making any entry upon . the suspension of the possessed in the air, without any the lands. . visible support, or the use of different languages, un- POSSESSIOV, in Scots Law. See Law, Part III. known to the demoniac in his natural state.” ^ N° clxii. 11. &c. Dcemoniacal Possessiox. (See Daemon and De¬ moniacs). In the third volume of the Manchester Transactions, there is a paper on popular illusions, or medical demonology, by Dr Ferriar. He informs us in a note, that on the 13th of June 1788, George Lukins af Yatton in Somersetshire was exorcised in the Temple church at Bristol, and delivered from the possession of seven devils by the efforts of seven clergymen. An ac¬ count of his deliverance was published in several of the public papers, authenticated by the Rev. Mr F.aster- brook, vicar of the Temple church in Bristol.—Dr Fer¬ riar gives us the following particulars, extracted from this account, which we shall here insert. Lukins was first attacked by a kind of epileptic fit, when he was going about acting Christmas plays, or mummeries: this he ascribed to a blow given by an in¬ visible hand. He was afterwards seized by fits $ during which he declared, with a roaring voice, that he was the devil, and sung different songs in a variety of keys. The fits always began and ended with a strong agita¬ tion of the right hand. He frequently uttered dreadful e*ecrations during the fits. The whole duration of his disorder was 18 years. “At length, viz. in June 1788, he declared that he was possessed by seven devils, and could only be freed by the prayers {in faith) of seven clergymen. Accord¬ ingly the requisite force was summoned, and the patient sung, swore, laughed, and barked, and treated the com¬ pany with a ludicrous parody on the Te Dcurn. These astonishing symptoms resisted both hymns and prayers, til! a small faint voice admonished the ministers to ad¬ jure. The spirits, after some murmuring, yielded to the adjuration, and the happy patient returned thanks for im wonderful cure. It is remarkable, that during this solemn mockery, the fiend swore ‘ by his infernal den,’ that he would not quit his patient ; an oath, I believe, nowhere to be found but in the Pilgrim’s Progress, from which Lukins probably got it. “ Very soon after the first relation of this story was published, a person, well acquainted with Lukins, took the trouble of undeceiving the public with regard to bis pretended disorder, in a plain sensible narrative of his conduct. Pie asserts that Lukins’s first seizure was nothing else than a fit of drunkenness j that he always foretold his fits, and remained sensible during their con¬ tinuance j that he frequently saw Lukins in his fits, ‘ in every one of which, except in singing, he per¬ formed not more than most active young people can POSSESSIVE, in Grammar, a term applied to pro¬ nouns, which denote the enjoyment or possession of any thing either in particular or in common : as mens, “ mine and tuns, “ thine.” POSSESSORY action, in Scots Laiv. See Lavt N° clxxxiii. 18. POSSIBILITY, in Law, is defined to be any thing that is altogether uncertain, or what may or may not be. Possibility, also denotes a non-repugnance to ex¬ isting, in any thing that does not any way exist. POSSIBLE, is sometimes opposed to real existence, and is understood of a thing, which, though it actually does not exist, yet may exist ; as a new star. POSSIDONIA, in Ancient Geography. See PoE- STUM. POST, a word derived from the 'L%i\n positus, “ set or placed.” It is used in several different meanings, but all of them referring either immediately or remote¬ ly to this primitive sense of position. Thus the word Post signifies, I. A stake or piece of timber set upright j 2. A station, particularly a military station ; 3. An of¬ fice or employment j 4. An operation in book-keeping ; 5. A conveyance for letters or dispatches j 6. A parti¬ cular mode of travelling. Post, a stake or piece of timber set upright. Posts are used both in building and in fencing ground. In brick-buildings much of the strength of the fabric de¬ pends on the nature of the posts •, as it is through them, that the several parts are sustained and held together. The corner posts arecalled the principal posts ; thoseform- ed into bressummers between principal posts for strength¬ ening the carcase of the house are called the prick-posts. Posts which are to be set in the ground ought to be well seasoned and coated to preserve them from rotting; burning the downward end has been recommended as an excellent preservative, but a coating of pitch or tar, particularly the late invented coal-tar, can be most safe¬ ly relied upon. For the various uses to which posts may be applied, and the form and species of them fittest to be employed in each case, see the articles ARCHI¬ TECTURE, Joining, Gardening, House, Fence, &c. In architecture and sculpture, posts are a term used to denote certain ornaments formed after the manner of rolls or wreathings. Post, a station, particularly a military station. Any place where persons are set or placed upon parti¬ cular occasions may he termed a post: but the word in this view is now chiefly restricted to military operations, G g 2 and P O S [ anil means any place or situation where soldiers are sta¬ tioned. Thus the detachments established in front of the army are termed the out-posts, the stations on the wings of the army are said to be the posts of honour, as being the most conspicuous and most exposed. But m the ope¬ rations of a campaign, a post properly signifies any spot ot ground capable of lodging soldiers, or any situation, whe¬ ther fortified or not, where a body of men may make a stand and engage the enemy to advantage, ihe g'eat advantages oV good posts, in carrying on war, as well as the mode of securing them, are only learned by experi¬ ence. Barbarous nations disdain the choice of posts, or at least are contented with such as immediately fall in their way 5 they trust solely or chiefly to strength and courage : and hence the fate of a kingdom may be de¬ cided bv the event of a battle. But enlightened am experienced officers make the choice of posts a principal object of attention. The use of them is chiefly felt in a defensive war against an invading enemy j as by car¬ rying on a war of posts in a country where this can be done to advantage, the most formidable army may be so harassed and reduced, that all its enterprises may be rendered abortive. In the choice of a post, the general rules to be attended to are, that it be convenient for sending out parties to reconnoitre, surprise, or inter- cept the enemy ; that it possible it have some natural defence, as a wood, a river, or a morass in front or flank, or at least that it be difficult of access, and susceptible of speedy fortification •, that it be so situated as to pie- serve a communication with the main army, and have covered places in the rear to favour a retreat ; that it command a view of all the approaches to it, so that the enemy cannot advance unperceived and rest concealed, while the detachment stationed in the post are forced to remain underarms-, that it be not commanded by any neighbouring heights and that it be proportioned in extent to the number of men who are to occupy and defend it. It is not to be expected that all these ad¬ vantages will often be found united ; but those posts ought to be selected which offer the greatest number of them. See War. Post, an office or employment. This use of the word is 'probably derived immediately from the idea of a military station ; a post being used to express such offices or employments as are supposed either to ex¬ pose the holder to attack and opposition, or to require abilities and exertion to fill tfiem. Hence the term is used only for public offices and employments under the government j and were strict propriety of speech al¬ ways attended to, posts would denote those stations only in which duty must be performed. In common language, however, every public office or appointment, even though nominal and sinecure, goes under the name of a post. Post, an operation in book-keeping. Posting in book¬ keeping means simply the transferring an article to the place in which it should he put, and arranging each under its proper head. It is upon this that the whole theory of book-keeping is founded. The Waste-book, which is the ground work of all subsequent operations, records every transaction exactly in the order in which it oc¬ curs! Prom this the several articles are posted, or transferred into the Journal, which in fact is but a kind of supplementary book to the Waste-book. From the Journal they are posted anew into the Ledger; in which a separate place is appropriated for each person with P o s 236 ] whom transactions are carried on, and frequently for post( every separate article about which the business is con- ^ cerned. The particular mode according to which such transferences are made, may vary according to the na¬ ture of the trade carried on ; the object is the same in all, to place every article so as that its operations on the* general state of the business may be certainly known and distinctly traced. For a full account ol the way in which this is done, see BoOK-Keeping. Posr, a conveyance lor letters or dispatches. In the early periods of society, communication be¬ tween the different parts of a country is rare and diffi¬ cult, individuals at a distance having little inclination or opportunity for mutual intercourse : when such commu¬ nication is at any time found necessary, a special mes¬ senger must be employed. As order and civilization ad¬ vance, occasions of correspondence multiply. In parti¬ cular, the sovereign finds it requisite frequently to trans¬ mit orders and laws to every part of the kingdom; and for doing so he makes use of couriers or messengers, to whom he commits the charge of forwarding his dispatches. But without stations in the way, where these couriers can he certain oi finding refreshment for themselves and supplies of what may Ire necessary for carrying them forward, the journey, however urgent and important, must always be retarded, and in many cases altogether stopped. Experience, therefore, soon pointed out the ne¬ cessity of ensuring such accommodations, by erecting upon all the great roads houses or stations at convenient intei vals, where the messengers might stop, as occasion required, and where too, for the greater convenience, relays of fresh horses should always be in readiness, to enable them to pursue their journey with uninterrupted dispatch. These houses or stations were with great pro¬ priety termed posts, and the messenger who made use of them a post. Though at first, it is probable, the institu¬ tion was intended solely for the sovereign, and the ne¬ cessities of the state ; yet by degrees individuals, seeing the benefit resulting from it, made use of the opportunity to carry on their own correspondence ; for which they were willing to pay an allowance to the sovereign. Thus a post-office, of some kind or other, gradually came to be established in every civilized country. Without tak¬ ing notice of the different means of carrying on corres¬ pondence said to have been attempted by pigeons, dogs, and otheranimals, we can at least trace with certainty the invention ol something like regular posts as far back as the ancient Persians. Xenophon assures us, that they were invented by Ljrus on his Scytman expedition, about 500 years before Christ ; that the houses at the several stations were sumptuously built, and large enough to contain a number ot men and horses ; and that every courier on his arrival was obliged to commu¬ nicate his dispatches to the postmaster, by whom they were immediately forwarded. From the shore o( the iEgean sea to Susa the capital, there were, according Herodotus, 111 stages for posts, each a day’s journey distant from the preceding. In what manner posts were established and conduct¬ ed among the Greeks does not clearly appear; but liom the extended commerce carried on, and the frequent communications enjoyed among the different states, there can be no doubt that a regular conveyance, in some form or other, was established. Though posts were well known among the Romans* P O S [2; yet it is difficult to trace with certainty the period of their introduction. Some writers carry it back to the times of the republic ; posts and post-offices, under the names of statores and stationes, having been then, it is said, established bv the senate. Whether this was the case or not, Suetonius assures us that Augustus institu¬ ted posts along all the great roads of the empire. At first the dispatches were conveyed from post to post by young men who run on foot, and delivered the dispatch to others at the next stage. By and by Augustus sub¬ stituted, in room of these, horses and chariots, both for the conveyance of dispatches and the convenience of tra¬ velling. His successors con tinned the same establishment; to the maintenance of which every subject of the em¬ pire was obliged to contribute. Post horses are men¬ tioned in the Theodorian code de cur.supublico; but these were only the public horses appointed to be kept there for the use of the public messengers, who before this in¬ stitution seized any that came in their way. At each post station, according to Procopius, 10 horses and as many postilions were kept, and the usual rate of their travelling was from five to eight stations a-day. It is to be observed, however, that all these establish¬ ments of posts in ancient times were formed as much, if not more, for travelling stations, as for the mere conveyance of letters and dispatches. This latter ob¬ ject, it is true, was thereby secured j but the episto¬ lary correspondence of antiquity was probably at no time so extensive as to require or maintain post-offices on the footing of modern posts, for the mere convey¬ ance of letters. It is in later times only, when the ex¬ tension of commerce and diffusion of literature give oc¬ casion to frequent communication, that these establish¬ ments are to be looked for. The earl iest institution of posts that occurs in modern history is about the year 807 by the emperor Charle¬ magne; who, having reduced under his dominion Italy, Germany, and a part of Spain, established three public posts at the public expence, to carry on the communi¬ cation with these three provinces. The institution of posts however, like many other institutions of that em¬ peror, dropped at his death, and for a considerable time afterwards no traces of any such establishments are to be found. We cannot indeed discover them with certainty sooner than 1464, when that restless and suspicious prince Louis XL established posts in France, that he might be the sooner advertised of all that passed in his own or the neighbouring kingdoms. He employed in this service 230 couriers, who delivered the letters at the different stations, and in the various towns through which they passed in their course. Succeeding mo- narchs created at different times certain offices for the express purpose of superintending the posts ; but the frequent changes to which these offices were exposed, prevented for a long time the establishment of any regu¬ lar system of posts in that kingdom $ insomuch that in 1619 the author of the life of the duke d’Epernon says the packet or letter office was not yet set up in France. Former establishments, it is probable, were solely for the use of the court, not for the general good of the nation. From France, the institution gradually spread through several other parts of Europe. In Ger¬ many, Lewis Hornig assures us they were first intro¬ duced by Count Taxis, who settled them at his own expence j in acknowledgement for which the emperor 7 ] p o s Matthias, in 1616, gave as a fief the office of postmaster to him and his descendants. In England, the establishment of posts in some form or other appears as early as the reign of Edward III. but the notices concerning them are so vague, that no account can be given of them. In the reign of Ed¬ ward VI. however, some species of posts must have been set up, as an act of parliament passed in l 548, fixing the rate of post-horses at one penny per mile: The post- horses here referred to were, it is probable, chiefly for travelling, and the carriage of letters or packets only an occasional service. In 1581, we find in Camden’s Annals mention made of a chief postmaster for Eng¬ land being appointed.—How his office was managed, does not clearly appear 5 the limited state of the corre¬ spondence of the country probably rendered it of tri¬ fling consequence. King James I. originally erected a post-office, under the controul of one Matthew de Quester or de I’Equester, for the conveyance oi letters toand from foreign parts; which office was afterwards claimed by Lord Stanhope ; but was confirmed and continued to William Frizel and Tho. Witherings, by King Charles I. in 1632. Previous to this time, it would appear that private persons were in use to convey letters to and from foreign parts; all such interference with the post¬ master’s office is therefore expressly prohibited. King Charles, in 1635, erected a letter office for England and Scotland, under the direction of the above Thomas Witherings. The rates of postage then established were, twopence for every single letter for a distance under 80 miles; fourpence from 80 to 140 miles; six¬ pence above 140 miles. The allowance to the post¬ masters on the road for horses employed in these posts %vas fixed at twopence halfpenny per mile for every single horse. All private inland posts wrere discharged at this time ; and in 1637 all private foreign posts were in like manner prohibited. The posts thus established, however, extended only to a few of the principal roads j and the times of transmission were not in every case so certain as they ought to have been. Witherings was superseded for abuses in the execu¬ tion of his offices in 1640, and they were sequestrated into the hands of Philip Burlamachy, to be exercised under the care and oversight of the king’s principal se¬ cretary of state. On the breaking out of the civil war great confusions and interruptions were necessarily oc¬ casioned in the conduct of the letter-office ; but it was about that time that the outline of the present more extended and regular plan seems to have been concei¬ ved by Mr Edmond Prideaux, who was afterwards ap¬ pointed attorney-general to the commonwealth. He was chairman of a committee in 1642 for considering the rate of postage to be set upon inland letters; and some time after was appointed postmaster by an ordi¬ nance of both houses of parliament; in the execution of which office he first established a weekly conveyance of letters into all parts of the nation. In 1653, ,^'8 reve“ nue was farmed for lo,oool. for England, Scotland, and Ireland ; and after the charge of maintaining postmasters, to the amount of 7000.I per annum was saved to the public. Prideaux’s emoluments being considerable, the common council of London endeavoured to erect another post-office in opposition to his ; but they were checked by a resolution of the house of commons, declaring that the office of postmaster is, and ought to be, in the sole power and P O S [ 238 ] P o s and disposal of the parliament. T-liis office was laimed by one Mauhey in 1654. In 1656 a new and regular general post-office was erected by the authority ot the protector and his parliament, upon nearly the same mo¬ del that has been ever since adopted, with the following rates of postage : For 80 miles distance, a single letter twopence; for a greater distance, not out of England, threepence ; to Scotland, fourpence. By an act ol parlia¬ ment passed soon after the restoration in 1660, the regu¬ lations settled in 1656 were re-established, and a general post-office similar to the former, but with some improve¬ ments, erected. In 1663 the revenue of the post-office was found to produce 21,500!. annually. In 1685 it was made over to the king as a branch ot bis private income, and was then estimated at 65,000!. per annum. The year after the revolution the amount of the post-office revenue was 90,504!. I os. 6d. At the union the produce of the English post-office was stated to be I0i,i0il. In I'yil the former establishments of separate post-offices tor Eng¬ land and Scotland were abolished ; and by the stat. 9. Anne, c. 10. one general post-office, and one postmaster- general, was established for the whole united kingdom j and this postmaster was empowered to erect chief letter- offices at Edinburgh, at Dublin, afiVVie York, and other proper places in America and the West Indies. rlhe rates of postage were also increased at this time as fol¬ lows.—In England, for all distances under 80 miles 3d. j above 80 miles 4d. From London to Edinburgh 6d. In Scotland, under 50 miles 2d. j from 50 to 80 miles 3d. ; above 80 miles 4d. In Ireland, under 40 miles 2d.; above 40 miles 4d.—By the above act all persons, except those employed by the postmaster, were strictly prohibited from conveying letters. That year the gross amount of the post- office was 111,46x1. 17s. lod. Thenett amount, on a me¬ dium, of the three preceding years, was, in the printed re¬ port of the commissioners for the equivalent, stated to be for England, 62,000!. and for Scotland 2000I. In 1754 the gross revenue of the post-office for Great Britain a- mounted to 210,6631.5 in 1764 10281,5351.5 and in 1774 to 345,421!.—I'he privilege of franking letters had been enjoyed by members of parliament from the first erection of the post-office 5 the original design of this exemption was, that they might correspond freely with their consti¬ tuents on the business of the nation. By degrees the pri¬ vilege came to be shamefully abused, and was carried so far, that it wasnotuncommon for the servantsof members of parliament to procure a number of franks for the pur¬ pose of selling them; an abuse which was easily practised, as nothing more was required for a letter’s passing free than the subscription of a member on the cover. To restrain these frauds, it was enacted, in 1764, that no letter should pass free unless the whole direction was of the member’s writing, and his subscription annexed. Even this was found too great a latitude ; and by a new regulation in 1784, no letter was permitted to go free unles the date was marked on the cover in the mem¬ ber’s own hand writing, and the letter put into the post- office the same day. That year the rates of postage were raised in the following proportions: an addition of id. for a single stage 5 id. from London to Edinburgh 5 id. for any distance under, and 2d. for any distance above, 150 miles. An addition to the revenue of 120,000!. was estimated to arise from these regulations and additional rates. The rates now mentioned are those upon single letters: double letters pay double, treble letters treble, an ounce weight quadruple post- pfl!t age 5 all above are charged by the weight in the same —y», proportion. The rates of postage have since that time been again increased. About the year 1784, a great improvement was made in the mode of conveying the mails, upon a plan first suggested in 1782 by Mr John Palmer. Diligences and stage-coaches, be observed, were established to every town of note in the kingdom : and he proposed that government, instead of sending the mails in the old mode, by a boy on horseback, should contract with the masters of these diligences to carry the mail, along with a guard for its protection. This plan, he showed, could not fail to ensure much more expeditious convey¬ ance, the rate of travelling in diligences being far quicker than the rate of the post 5 and it was easy to carry it into execution with little additional expeece, as the coach owners would have a strong inducement to contract at a cheap rate for conveying the mail, on ac¬ count of the additional recommendation to passengers their carriages would thereby acquire in point of secu¬ rity, regularity, and dispatch. Though government heartily approved of this plan, and the public at large were satisfied of its utility ; yet, like all new schemes, however beneficial, it met with a strong opposition : it was represented by a number of the oldest and ablest officers in the post-office, not only as impracticable, but dangerous to commerce and the reve¬ nue. Notwithstanding of this opposition, however, it was at last established, and gradually extended to many different parts of the kingdom 5 and, upon a fair com¬ parison, it appeared that the revenue was improved, and the plan itself executed for 20,OOol. per annum less than the sum first estimated by Mr Palmer. The present establishment of the general post-office for Great Britain, consists of two postmasters-general, a secretary, surveyor, comptroller-general, and upwards of 150 assistants and clerks for the head letter office in London 5 the number of deputy postmasters and other officers through the kingdom is very considerable, but not easy to ascertain with accuracy, as it must frequent¬ ly vary with the changes made in the establishment of country posts. The total expence of this branch of the revenue in 1778 was 149,029!, 17s. 2d. 5 the gross pro¬ duce may be reckoned at 650,000!. The first accounts we have of the establishment of a post-office in Scotland reach no farther back than 1635, when Charles I. erected one both for Scotland and England. The post to Scotland by that appointment was to run night and day, to go from London to Edin¬ burgh and to return in six days, taking with it all lei- ters intended for any post town in or near the road 5 the rate of postage from London to Edinburgh was 8d. for a single letter. The expedition with which the post went from London to Edinburgh at this time, is indeed surprising, considering the nature of the roads 5 perhaps, however, though the king made the regulation that it should go and return in six days, the journey was not always performed in the specified time. Du¬ ring the government of Cromwell, the public post con¬ veyed letters to Scotland as well as England 5 the post¬ age from London to Scotland was only 4d. After the Restoration, when the post-office was erected for Eng¬ land, mention is made in the act of parliament of the conveyance of letters to Scotland 5 and the postage to Berwick P O S [2 >t6t< Berwick is fixed at 3d. For some time after, however, ^ we find no establishment by act of parliament of an in¬ ternal post in Scotland. In 1662, a post between Ire¬ land and Scotland was first established 5 and the privy council gave Ilobert Main, who was then postmaster- general for Scotland, an allowance of 200I. sterling to build a packet-boat for conveying the mail between Fort pa trick and Donaghadee : the postage to Ireland was 6i. In 1669, a post was established to go between Edinburgh and Aberdeen twice a-week } and between Edinburgh and Inverness once a-week : the rate of postage was fixed, for 40 Scots miles 2d. and for every 20 miles farther an additional penny. These appear to have been the only public posts in Scotland at that time; hut as they could not suffice for the correspond¬ ence of the country, there must have been more, ei¬ ther under the direction of the postmaster, or in the hands of private persons ; probably there might he of both kinds. In 1690, an act for the security of the common post was passed, subjecting robbers of the mail to capital punishment. It was not till 1695 that the establishment of the post-office in Scotland received the sanction of parliament : posts were then appointed for all parts of Scotland the rates of postage were fixed, for any place within 50 miles of Edinburgh 2d. between 5° and 100 miles 3d. all places above 100 miles 4d. By the same act, a weekly packet to Ireland was esta¬ blished, and 60I. sterling annually allowed for that ser¬ vice. Though posts were established in consequence of this act, yet such was their mode of travelling, that they hardly deserved the name. Thus, for instance, the person who set out to carry the mail from Edinburgh to Aberdeen, in place of stopping at the first interme¬ diate stage from Edinburgh, and delivering over the mail to another to he carried forward, went on with it himself the whole journey, resting two nights by the way, first at Dundee, and next at Montrose. In this manner the mail was conveyed thrice a-week from Edinburgh to Aberdeen ; but between most parts of Scotland the post went only twice, and between some only once a-week. The post-boy generally travelled on foot. Horses were but little used in the service of the post-office. At the Union the Scots post-office was farmed for 1194I.: in 1710, the nett amount for Scotland was reckoned to be 2000I. The epistolary correspondence of Scotland must have been small indeed, when even the rates of postage then established proved so very un¬ productive. This may perhaps, however, be in part accounted for, by conjecturing, that as private posts had probably prevailed pretty much before 1695, it was lopg before these were entirely suppressed, the people still adhering to their old conveyances, and difficulties occurring in strictly enforcing the law ; the amount of the post-office revenue, therefore, at the two periods above mentioned, probably exhibits a view of only a part of the correspondence of Scotland. In 1711, it has been already mentioned, one general post-office was established for the whole united king¬ dom ; but the postmaster-general was authorised to ftrect at Edinburgh a chief letter office for Scotland.— 'is vvas accordingly done, and a postmaster-general or North Britain, with other necessary officers, ap¬ pointed. AH the deputy postmasters in Scotland are nnder his immediate direction, but he himself is under .19 ] P O S the controul of the postmaster-general for Great Bri¬ tain. From this head letter-office posts were establish¬ ed to the different parts of Scotland. For many years the post-boys generally travelled on foot* or, if on horseback, without a change of horses. It was not till about 1750 that the mail began to be conveyed from stage to stage by d life rent post-boys and Iresb horses to the principal places in Scotland, and by foot runners to the rest. The communication between London and Edinburgh was at first but thrice a-vveek and so slow, that the mail from London to Edinburgh vvas upon the road 85 hours, and from Edinburgh to London 131 hours. In 1757, upon a representation from the royal boroughs, regulations were fallen upon, by which the time vvas shortened to 82 hours in the one case, and 85 in the other. By the extension of Mr Palmer’s plan to Scotland, the time has been still far¬ ther shortened to about 60 hours in each case. I he establishment of the Scots post-office consists at present of a postmaster-general, secretary, solicitor, and accountant, with a number of other clerks and a®, sistants for the head office at Edinburgh j under its management are about iSo deputy postmasters for the different post-towns through Scotland. I lie nett produce of the post-office for Scotland in 1733 was 5399I. in 1757 10,623!. in 1766 31,103!. In 1788 the gross produce was 55,836!. the expence 22,636k ; in 1793 the gross amount was about 64,0001. the nett produce about ^OfOOol. y in 1803 the gross produce was above I20,oool. the nett revenue about 97,000k; in 1807 the gross produce vvas above 145,000!. the nett revenue towards I 20,000b Pexny Post, a post established for the benefit of London and other parts adjacent, whereby any letter or packet under four ounces weight, is speedily and safe¬ ly conveyed to and from all places within the hills of mortality, or within 10 miles of the city. It is managed by particular officers; and receiving houses are esta¬ blished in most of the principal streets, for the more convenient transmission of the letters. Some other large towns have instituted similar establishments. About the year 1776, a penny-post was set up in Edinburgh by Mr YVilliamson, unconnected with the general post-office. It met with hut indifferent encou¬ ragement for some years, doubts being entertained as to its punctuality in delivering the letters ; by degrees, however, it seemed to be advancing in estimation, and was more frequently employecT. Twenty years after, the general post-office, in virtue of the act of parlia¬ ment prohibiting the conveyance of letters by any hut those employed under the postmaster-general, took the penny-post entirely into its own hands; and Mr Wil¬ liamson was allowed an annuity during life equal to what his private establishment yielded. Letters are now transmitted to the different quarters of Edinburgh, and the suburbs, three times a-day. Post, a particular mode of travelling. A person is said to travel post in contradistinction to common jour¬ ney travelling, when in place of going on during his whole journey in the same vehicle, and with the same horses, he stops at different stages, to provide fresh horses or carriages for the sake of greater convenience and expedition. As he thus uses the same mode of tra¬ velling that is employed for the common post, he is said to travel post, or in post, i. e. in the manner of a post. la Post. 240 ] P o s and either the distance in miles to he travelled, or that the horses are hired by the day, as the case happens to '■ be. These tickets must he delivered to the har-keeper at the first turnpike through which the traveller passes; and the turnpike-keeper gives, if demanded, what is termed an exchange ticket, to be produced at the next turnpike. The stamp-office issues to the person licen¬ ced to let post-horses such a number of these tickets as is required, and these must he regularly accounted for bv the person to whom they are issued. As an effec¬ tual check upon his account, the turnpike-keeper is obliged to return hack to the stamp-office all the tickets he takes up from travellers. Evasions are by these means rendered difficult to be practised without running a great risk of detection. In 1787, for the more effec¬ tually levying the post-horse duties, a law was passed, authorising the commissioners of the stamp office to let them to farm by public auction, for a sum not less than the produce in the year ending first August 1786. In the advertisement published by the commissioners in consequence ot this law, previous to the receiving P O S T In tracing tlie origin of posts, it lias already been re- marked, that the more ancient establishment kind were fully as rand, fur travelling statmns as the conveyance of letters. The relays ot horses prov W at these public stations for the messengers of the prince were occasionally, by special license, allowed to be ns d by other travellers who had sufficient interest at oour . Frequent demands of this nature would suggest the ex¬ pedient of having in readiness supplies of I resh horses carriages over and above what the public service requir¬ ed, to'be hired out to other travellers on payment of a adequate price. We find, therefore, that in former times the postmasters alone were in use to let out horses oi riding post, the rates of which were fixed in 154B by statute of Edward VI. at one penny per mile. In what situation the state of the kingdom was with regard to travelling post for more than a century alter this pe¬ riod, we cannot now certainly discover ; but in the s a- tute re-establishing the post-office in 1660, it »s enact¬ ed, that none but the postmaster, his deputies, cr as¬ signs, shall furnish post-horses lor trave trs , w* 1 * * j1 for farming them, the total amount of the proviso, however, that if he has them - * ^e dutWor Great Britafn is stated to have been, at the an hour after being demanded, he traveller shall be at dut^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ for which liberty to provide himselt elsewhere. ,. 1 . j . wa, farmed in 1794 amounted in all to The same prohibition is contained m the act es abl.sh- that duty was .aimed 1 794 rr * , ^ as m tne sub Pom X lie artiuv, pi v/i.i ,1 . . 1 ing the Scots post-office in 1695, as well as in the su o- sequent act of Queen Anne, erecting the general office for the united kingdom. It is doubtful, however, whe¬ ther it was ever strictly enforced. By an explanatory act of 26 Geo. II. the prohibition is confined to post horses only, and every person declared to he at liberty to furnish carriages of every kind for riding post. 1 his regulation has, in fact, done away the prohibition, as hardly any person now thinks ot travelling post, ex¬ cept in a carriage. . 0 .1 j r The rate fixed by the act 1695, in Scotland, for a horse riding post, was threepence per Scotch mile, lly the act 9 Anne, c. 10. threepence a mile without, and fourpence a mile with, a guide, was the sum fixed lor each horse riding post. The increase of commerce, and necessity for a speedy communication between dinerent parts of the kingdom, have brought the mode of tia- velling post so much into use, that upon every great road in the kingdom post-chaises are now in readiness at proper distances ; and die convenience of posting is enjoyed in Britain to a degree far superior to what is to be met with in any other country whatever. Posting at last appeared to the legislature a proper object of taxation. In 1779 the first act was passed, imposing duties on horses hired either by themselves or to run in carriages travelling post ; the duties were, one penny per mile on each horse it hired by the mile or stage, and one shilling per day if hired by the day. Eve¬ ry °per!ion luting out such horses was also obliged to take out a license at five shillings per annum. These duties were next year repealed, and new outies impo¬ sed, of one penny per mile on each horse hired by the mile or stage, and is. 6d. on each if hired by the day. A number of additional regulations were at the same time enacted for securing these duties. An addition of one halfpenny per mile, or threepence per day, for each horse riding post, was imposed in 17^5* 25 Geo. III. c. 51. The duty is secured, by obliging every letter of horses to deliver to the person hiring them a ticket, expressing the number of horses hired, 140,030!. of which the district of North Britain was Soon after the tax was imposed, considerable diffi¬ culties were raised about the meaning ol the teim^os?- ing, and what mode of journey should subject travel¬ lers to duty. The old law, Stat. 9 Anne, c. 10. ex¬ plained posting to he “ travelling several stages, and changing horses j” hut the acts imposing the posting duties expressly declare, that “ every horse hired by the mile or stage shall he deemed to be hired to travel post, although the person hiring the same doth not go several stages upon a post road, or change horses j and^ that “ every horse hired lor a day or less period ot time, is chargeable with the duty of three halfpence per mile, if the distance be then ascertained ; and if the di¬ stance be not then ascertained, with is. 6d. each horse.” Horses hired for any less time than two days are by these acts to he deemed to he hired for a day. An action was brought in 1788, in the court of exche¬ quer at Edinburgh, to determine whether several dis¬ puted cases fell under the meaning of the act, and were liable to duty, when the following decisions were gi- ven : Saddle-horses both hired and paid by the mile, aud saddle-horses hired originally for an excursion, but af¬ terwards paid by the mile, were found liable to duty according to the number of miles paid for *, carriage- horses, where the carriage is hired and paid lor only at the usual rate of outgoing carriages, and no more, whe¬ ther the person hiring it does or does not return in it, were found liable to duty only for the number of mile* out; but if the carriage he hired and paid lor, or ac¬ tually paid for, though not originally hired, at the usual rate of carriages employed both to carry out and bring back the same company, the duty was found to be exi¬ gible according to the number of miles both out and home taken together. Hackney-coaches in Edinburgh, hired and paid for less than two miles, were found liable to duty for one mile. No duty was found to be exigible on saddle-horses hired p o S [24t] P O Ti '0.t Iiired for a mere excursion, and paid for accordingly, || where the distance neither is nor can be ascertained ; on tulate hackney-coaches employed in the streets for less than a mile, or for an excursion or round of visits merely ; and on horses or carriages hired for a journey of three days or more, and paid for accordingly, or paid for at the rate of three days, though the journey should actually be performed in two full travelling days. The gene¬ ral rule of these decisions rvas, that in every case, except unascertainable distance, or journeys exceeding two days, the mode of travelling fell under the legal defi¬ nition of posting. The only point that may seem doubt¬ ful in the judgments here stated, is that where the duty is found chargeable by the number of miles both going and returning. Yet as the law expressly declares, that horses hired by the mile or stage are to be deemed post¬ ing, and as tbe number of miles for which they are hired can only be ascertained by tbe number paid for, it is clear, that where an addition to tbe outgoing charge is made on account of bringing back, the person hiring the carriage, the carriage in that case is actually hired and paid for according to the number of miles both out and home, and the duty must fall to be rated accord¬ ingly. The doubtful points being now settled by the above decisions, tbe mode of levying the duty in Scot¬ land has been regulated agreeably to them ever since the matter was thus determined. POSTERIOR, a term of relation, implying some¬ thing behind, or that comes after, another. In which sense it is used in opposition to prior and anterior. The back and hips are tbe posterior parts of man. Aristotle has given prior and posterior analytics. A date is posterior to another when it is later or fresher. POSTERN, in fortification, a small gate, usually ipade in the angle of the flank of a bastion, or in that of the curtain, or near the orillon, descending into the ditch ; whereby the garrison can march in and out, un¬ perceived by the enemy, either to relieve the works, or to make private sallies, &c. The word is also used in general for any private or back door. POSTHUMOUS, a child born after tbe death of his father, or taken out of the body of a dead mother j from whence it is frequently applied to the works of an author not published till after his decease. POSTIL, a name anciently given to a note in the margin of the Bible, and afterwards to one in any other book posterior to the text. POSTING, among merchants, the putting an ac¬ count forward from one book to anether, particularly from the journal or waste-book to the ledger. See Post and Book-Keeping. POSTLIMINIUM, among the Romans, the return of one who had gone to sojourn elsewhere, or had been banished, or taken by an enemy, to his own country or state. POSTPONING, putting any thing after or behind anether, with regard to time. POSTSCRIPT, an article added to a letter or me¬ moir containing something learnt or recollected after the piece was written. POSTULATE, in mathematics, &c. is described to be such an easy and self-evident supposition, as needs no explication or illustration to render it intelligible ; Vol. XVII. Part I. f as that a right line may be drawn from one point to an- Postulate other. |j POSTURE, in painting and sculpture, the situa- Potamon tion of a figure with regard to the eye, and of the se-' veral principal members thereof with regard to one an¬ other, whereby its action is expressed. A considerable part of tbe art of a painter consists in adjusting the postures, or in giving the most agreeable ones to bis figures, in accommodating them to the characters of the respective figures, and the part each has in tbe ac¬ tion, and in conducting and in pursuing them through¬ out. Postures are either natural or artificial. Natural postures are such as nature seems to have had a view to in the mechanism of the body, or rather such as the ordinary actions and occasions of life lead us to exhibit while young, and while the joints, muscles, li¬ gaments, &c. are flexible. Artificial postures, are those wbichseme extraordinary view's or studies occasion us to learn j as those of dan- fencing, &c. buch also are thos/e of our balance and posture masters. A painter would be strangely puzzled with the figure of Clark (a late famous posture-master in London) in a history-piece. This man, we are told in the Phil. "I rans. had such an absolute command of his muscles, &c. that he could disjoint almost his whole body j so that be imposed on the great surgeon Mullens, who looked upon him as in such a miserable condition, be would not undertake his cure. Though a well-made man, he would appear with all the deformities imagina¬ ble $ hunch-backed, pot-bellied, sharp-breasted, ^ &c. He disjointed bis arms, shoulders, legs, and thighs; and rendered himself such an object of pity, that he has fre¬ quently extorted money, in quality of a cripple, from the same company in which he had the minute before been in quality of a comrade. He would make his hips stand a considerable way out from his loins, and so high as to invade the place of his back. Yet bis face was the most changeable part about him, and showed more pos¬ tures than all the rest. Of himself he could exhibit all the uncouth odd faces of a quakers meeting. POTAMOGETON, Pond-weed ; a genus of plants belonging to the tetrandria class ; and in the na¬ tural method ranking under the 15th order, Inundatce. See Botany Index. 101AMON, or Potamo, was a philosopher of Alexandria. He kept a middle course between the scepticism of the Pyrrhonians and the presumption of the dogmatists ; but attached himself to none of the schools of philosophy of his time. He was the first projector, of the Eclectic sect; for though the mode of philosophising had been pretty common before, he was tbe first that attempted to institute a new sect on this principle. Diogenes Laertius relates, that not long be¬ fore he wrote his Lives of the Philosophers, an Eclec¬ tic sect, vtXixlixij rig ttifga-tg, had been introduced by Po- F.njiel these advantages may, by properly regulating school upon the Eclectic plan pi over SlliJas tlieoperation,begiventoEnglishpotashes,soasper- The time when Potamo flourished is uncertain, buidas tne operation, t fa V. at._r u... Potask Dr Shaw’s method of making potash. 1 lie lime vvucn a places him under Augustus; but it is more probable, from the account of Laertius, that he began his undei- taking about the close of the second century. POTASH, the lixivious ashes of certain vegetables, used in making glass, soap, &c. _ See Glass, Soap, &c. For an account of the properties and combinations of potash, see Chemistry. Potash was till lately con¬ sidered as a simple substance ; but it appears from the unexpected discoveries of Mr Davy in galvanism to be a compound of a peculiar metallic substance and oxy- e-en. Soda is also a compound of a similar nature. Tor an account of Mr Davy’s discoveries, see Zinc. Here - we treat only of the manufacture of potash. The method of making potash is directed by Dr Shaw as follows. Burn a quantity of billet-wood to gray ashes ; and taking several pounds of these ashes, boil them in water, so as to make a very strong lixivium, or ley. Let this ley be strained through a coarse linen cloth, to keep out any black parts of the half-burnt wood that might happen to remain in the ashes ; then evaporate this strained lye in an iron pan over a quick fire almost to dryness: then taking out the matter xe- maining at the bottom, and putting it into an iron crucible, set it in a strong fire till the matter is melted, and then immediately pour it out upon an iron plate, where it soon cools, and appears in the form of a solid lump of potash *. Much after this manner is potash made in the large way, for the service of the soap-boiler, glass-maker, fuller, &c. but according to the diflerence actions of of the wood, or combustible matter employed, with the Royal the manner of turning it, and conducting the process, Irish Aca- different kinds of potash are prepared. Ihere are cer- dcmi/,1789, ta|n galine piants that yield this potash to great advan- Sci'encf^tage, as particularly the plant kali; there are others that afford it in less plenty, and of an inferior quality, as bean-stalks, &c.: but in general, all vegetable sub¬ jects afford it of one kind or other, and may most of them he made to yield it tolerably perfect after the manner of the process already laid down, even the lop¬ pings, roots, and refuse parts of ordinary trees, \111e clippings, &c. The fixed salts of all vegetables, except¬ ing the kali and marine plants, when reduced to abso¬ lute purity, or entirely separated from the other prin¬ ciples, appear to be one and the same thing: whence it should seem, says Dr Shaw, that by a suitable manage¬ ment good saleable potash might be made in all places Plate * See Pearl- Ash, and Trajis- haps to render the latter as good as the former : hut where the potash of any remarkable saline vegetable 13 to be imitated, that of the kali, for example, the doctor recommends a prudent sprinkling of the subject with salt, or sea-water, in the burning; and by these ways, properly diversified, any principle that is naturally want¬ ing might he artificially introduced so as to perfect the art of potash. ^ 1 a * 1 Above half a century ago, Mr Stephens, encouraged Account c;’j by the Society of Arts, &c. and by a parliamentary^,^ grant of 3OC0I. established a manufacture of potash in nufact^, North America, which produced such as was so per¬ fectly good as to answer in bleaching and other uses the purposes of pearl-as/i ,* and which at the same time af¬ forded a very large produce. But the very great heat which his process required, occasioned the destruction of a very extensive apparatus ; and other circumstances concurred to disappoint the hopes and check the spirit of the proprietors. The manufacture wTas, however, afterwards undertaken and prosecuted by others. _ Mr Stephens’s apparatus was as follows : Fig. 1. A is the bed of the kiln, which flies off about four feet by two ^ from the grate, more or less according to the size ; C is the ash-hole, 2^ or 3 feet deep, Fig. 2. B repre-Fig.i. sents quadrangular bars of iron, with their opposrte 3 angles placed upwards and downwards, not a*30ve an paratTls inch asunder. Fig. 3* B, and C, are three sleepers five feet deep, and of any width from four to eight feet square, of the best white pine or cypress plank, with square joints and strong oak frames, placed each over a receiver, with a cock to let off the ley, and a vent just beneath the surface of the grating. F represents three receivers, standing each under, and projecting out, from its steeper. They must be made of the best stuff, care¬ fully put together, and laid in tough clay, well rammed within the ground, their tops being level with the sur¬ face : they need not be so large as the sleepers by six, eight, or twelve inches. Fig. 4. E represents a false Fig. 4< bottom or lattice of boards, eight inches deep and five square, with a hole in the under edge of every partition ^ for the ley to pass into the steeper. Fig 5. A is the Fig- 5* vessel over the furnace in which the ley and ashes are mixed; B is a hole or funnel a few inches from the back of the furnace, with an iron socket to let the pipe through the hinder part of the arch, to reach down within two inches of the floor of the furnace. C is a (a) According to Sir Peter Warren, the best woods for making Russian potash are, oak, ash, poplar, luccory, elm, hazel, and beech. They must be cut in November, December, January, and February, split and stacked to div After 12 months, in warm open weather, it must be burnt on a brick hearth by a slow fare in a kiln, or close place ; the ashes must be sifted through two sieves, one finer than the other, and then put up in brick troughs or wooden backs, covered with rain or river water, and must remain well mashed and incorporated five months. Brick furnaces shaped like bakers ovens must be heated with a strong fire of oak or ash, burning night and day ; the prepared ashes must he gradually thrown on the fire, when they will run into metal like lead : the hre must not go out till the furnace is nigh filled with potashes. rihe ashes must then be broken to be taken out, mt ie larger the pieces the better; they must be preserved from the air in tight casks, tue huge pieces >y tumse ves, and the dust by itself. POT potash. 4 irocess | ithout :,ing a jla. f i with cast-iron cauldron for boiling the ley to dryness when pearl-ash is made. D is a vessel whence the liquor is let into the cauldron as it evaporates. The mortar for building the furnace should be made of loam ; the arch should be 18 inches thick, and the floor should be laid with tyles on a layer of sand an inch thick, with neat joints. Mr Stephens’s process, both with and without the kiln, was as follows. Cut timber, felled at any season, into lengths of about eight feet: lay from three to ten of them lengthwise in a heap upon dry ground, and fill the vacancies between with smaller wood : the sooner it is burnt after felling, the better. Set fire to it by lay¬ ing embers on the bottom logs at each end ; and for burning the brush and lappings, with other smaller woods, lay them lengthwise on the ground, top to top, lapping over a little, with the butt ends outwards, and as close as a faggot; laying the larger woods on top till the heap is full four feet high j the length of the brush set against each other making the breadth of the heap. As to the choice of the timber, old hollow trees, if not dead, are best: pine, cypress, and cedar, are to be total¬ ly rejected. As soon as the pile is burnt down, rake such ashes as lie round the outside a little in towards the middle ; add no fresh fuel, nor throw on any brands. Let the ashes lie without stirring till you can just bear your hand in them $ then carry them to a house, or under a shed, on a plank floor raised a little from the earth and well jointed j there wet them till brought nearly to the con¬ sistence of mortar in the first mixture of lime and sand, and ram them in a heap, in which they must lie full 20 days, or some months if you please ; observing to be more sparing of water in winter, and ramming them closer, and sometimes wetting the top that it may never grow quite dry. Wood may also be burnt in a kiln, as fig. i. and 2. j and then it must be cut into such lengths as may be most convenient for carriage, and best suit the size of the kiln. The mouth of the ash-hole must be close stopped by daubing the joints of the lid with loam, or throwing a bank of sand or earth against it: keep the bed ot the kiln filled with wood up to the surface, but not above it, and let it burn incessantly till the ashes rise within six or eight inches of the grate. Draw them out whilst red-hot, and in that state sprinkle them with ley, from four to six caracts weight j weigh a small phial which holds about four ounces very exactly ; then fill it with water and weigh that also : divide the weight of water into equal parts till you come to of the whole, which is called a caract, ^ two caracts, &c. until you have a weight equal to ^ of the whole water, which is called 32 caracts: all which small weights, together with one equal to the phial filled with water, are to he kept for weighing the ley in the said phial till they are made damp ; then ram them as before in a heap, but se¬ parate from the ashes made as above. N. B. By kiln¬ burning a stronger ley may be more certainly procured than by the other way, where rain may chance to fall on the ashes before they can be removed. Ihe ashes thus prepared are to be put into vats or sleepers, fig. 3. with a false latticed bottom, as fig. 4. ; first putting coarse wheat or rye straw about a foot thick on the lattice or grating ; on which put ashes to with¬ in four or five inches of the top, ramming them all the C 243 ] POT way up, especially at the sides, with a small light ram- Fota*h. mer, as tight as you can, without bursting the vat. 1— Form on the top of the steeper a hollow bason in the ashes four or five inches deep leaving the ashes four or five inches thick on the sides, by raising a small bank round the sides, so that the liquor may not overflow the edges ot the ashes at top j keep this bason constantly filled with soft water in the steeper A, until the ashes will imbibe no more, which will be in 24 hours or more, according as it is rammed; then turn the cock, and let oft’ what shall be soaked through into the receiver or lower chamber of the steeper, and no more ; for if the several runnings are not kept separate, the ley will not be brought to its due strength. Follow that steeper with fresh water on the same ashes for several other run¬ nings, which will each come off in a few days, till the liquor has neither smell nor taste j then heave out the ashes, and charge the steeper afresh. Upon drawing off the first running from the steeper 3* fi^ ^le steeper B with ashes as before, and put into its hollow at the top the ley so first run off, and the smaller or half leys also, till full, and draw off as directed for the steeper A : if this weighs 18 caracts or more, pump it into the cistern F as fit for use ; if it be short of that, pass it off as half ley to the steeper C, and through fresh ashes till strong enough. With kiln- ashes only, from water passing through the first steeper, it will be strong enough for the cistern, if the ashes are well prepared. If your water be hard, let it stand two or three days exposed to the air and sun in a shallow back, and it will be soft. When you use kiln-ashes with others, lay them at bottom. The ley must be conveyed from the cistern F, as it is wanted to the vessel A fig. 5. j where with every gal¬ lon of proof ley mix three ounces of fine light wood ashes; and to the ley that is one-fourth over-proof put six ounces of ashes ; and if two-fifths over-proof 1 2 ounces, increasing or lessening according to the strength of the ley. For evaporating the ley and melting the salt, heat a furnace till you bring it very near a white heat, of which the side-doors being red-hot is a mark. This will take 48 hours or more if the furnace be quite cold : when thorough hot, a little fuel keeps it so. Then, through the cock of the vessel A, pass the mixture by the funnel B into the furnace, not so as to reach much beyond the middle of the floor, before it changes from dark to bright red, letting the heat prevail towards front or back as you see necessary. When the mass be¬ gins to gather about the flues or in heaps, run in no more till the furnace is cleared by driving the fire back¬ ward. You must have two funnels, one soon choking; in an hour or less will issue out a red-hot stream of melted salt, which is potash, to be broken to pieces as soon as cold, and packed in tight close casks, being in no respect inferior to the best foreign ash whatever. The best potash is made from barilla, and comes from Spanish Spain. The plants from whic h it is procured are found potash the in great plenty about Carthagena, where they are indi-best. genous, and may be collected in a swamp called Almojar east of that place \ the Sciyoncs barilla is the best. They are found, besides all along that coast, on the borders of the Mediterranean for 60 leagues in length, and 8 in breadth. About 150,000 quintals of it are annually exported from Spain. It produces a revenue of 25,500!. FI h 2 a-year j Potash. Dr ferci- val’s ac¬ count of making potash. Other at tempts. POT C a-year; each quintal paying a duty of 17 rca,s 2J'jf Don Bernardo de Ulloa, A. D. 1740, says it ws farm- cd at 1822!. 4s. 3d. M. Macdonnell haa brought the manufacture of potash to its present pette-tl'™ j|> ^ ’ but its exportation is materially injured In t y tax on it. See Townshend’s 1 ravels, vol. m- ?• j S”in'the^0* volume of the Philosophical Transactions \ve have an account of a method of Procuring this salt from the putrid water which runs from dung nils. Ihe process is very easy, consisting only in s,ml,la ' tion of the fluid, and calcinating the impure salt till mo t of the foulness Is burnt ont. From 24 wine-pipe full of this muck-water were obtained 9 cwl. I q. 1 2 lb- saleable potash, valued at 42s. per ewt : the expence of manufacturing them being only valued at 4 •9s- The potash thus made is ot a grayish white appear¬ ance 5 deliquesces a little in moist air; but il kept in a dry room, near the fire, acquires a powdery surface, is hard and of a spongy texture when broken, ^h ma¬ ny small crystals in its substance. 1 h%col°ur - ternal parts is dusky and variegated, lo tliet^te ^ aCrid saline, and sulphureous. It emits no smell of vo¬ latile’alkali, either in a solid form, dissolved, or when added to lime-water; neither does it communica e the sapphire-colour to a solution ot blue vitno . > 1 ve . quickly tinged black by it ; a proof that it contains much phlogiston. Ten grains of this potash lequned 11 drops of the weak spirit of vitriol to separate it. The like quantity of salt of tartar required 24 drops . a strong effervescence occurred, in both mixtures ; an a sulphureous vapour exhaled from the former. A tea spoonful of the syrup of violets, diluted with an ounce of water, was changed into a bright green colour by five grains of the salt of tartar; but ten grains ot this potash were necessary to produce the same hue in a simi¬ lar mixture. Halfan ounce of the salt dissolved entire¬ ly in half a pint of hot water ; and when the liquor was cold, a large purple sediment subsided to the bottom ; and it was found that this sediment amounted to about two-thirds of the whole quantity of ashes used. Dr Percival, the author of this paper, concludes with observing, that this potash is a true fixed vegetable al¬ kali, produced by putrefaction ; that the quantity of alkali contained in it may be estimated at one-third ot its weight, whereas the white Muscovy ashes are said to yield only one eighth part; that no quicklime appears to he contained in this potash, for a solution of it pour¬ ed from its sediment remained clear though long ex¬ posed to the air ; that it would be worth trying, whe¬ ther the large purple sediment, which subsides when this potash is lixiviated, might not be applied to the manu¬ facture of Prussian blue, or used in the manner recom¬ mended by Macquer for dyeing wool and silks ; and that this manufacture will furnish the farmer with top- dressino- for his garden and land, of great fertilizing powers. See Phil. Trans, vol. Ixx. p. 345; These are the processes most essentially different irom one another which have appeared concerning the manu¬ facture of this useful salt. Some indeed have attempt¬ ed to compose it on the supposition that alkali consisted of an earth combined in a peculiar manner with a cer¬ tain acid. But the little success of all these attempts show that they have been built on a false principle. I he on¬ ly method of producing alkaline salts originally is from POT 244 ] the ashes of vegetables; and the vegetable substances Potash, which yield the largest quantity of them are tartar and v— marine plants. From the former the purest and strongest vegetable alkali is obtained, and from the latter the mi¬ neral alkali. From other vegetables, as fern, broom, bean-stalks, &c. an alkaline salt is produced, but so im¬ pure, and in such small quantity, that no manutacture ot it can be established in this country with any reasonable expectation of profit. „ 9 Dr Watson (the present bishop of Landau) suggests, On extra) that the investigation of a method of extracting it» line part from rock salt would lie a most serviceable dts-^^ coverv We have inexhaustible mines ot rock-salt insa- this country, which (he observes) the proprietors can afford at ten shillings a ton. A ton o rock-salt con¬ tains about half a ton of mineral alkali, which is for most nurposes far preferable to potash, lo those who have leisure to attempt such a discovery, he gives the following hint: whether the alkaline part of rock-salt may not be obtained by calcining it in conjunction with charcoal in open fires ? His reason for this conjecture is founded upon the following experiment: upon binn¬ ing sea-wreck to a black coal, and stopping the process at that point, he has obtained great plenty of common salt but no mineral alkali from the black ashes; though we are certain, that when the black ashes are thorough¬ ly calcined, or reduced to white ashes, mineral alka i may be obtained from them. This makes it probable that the common salt contained m the black ashes ot sea-wreck is decomposed, and changed into a mineral al¬ kali, during the burning of the black ashes. 1 here aie reasons to suppose, that the cinder of pit-coal would an¬ swer the purpose better than charcoal. Chem. Tss. vol. 1. p. 136, &c. I k/* bi p. 13b, C£C. . , . 10 The potashes of different countries vary much m qua-Dr Hod litv * an(f the experiments of Dr Home, in his Treatiserxperi- my , aim uic ! nrnnpr-D'eltsa ties in the clearest point of view. Ihe different kinds^o| tried bv him were, differeD 1. Blue pearl-ashes.—These appear to he a pure al-countn kaline salt, mixed with a small quantity of vitriolated tartar and earth. Half a pound of this, filtered and eva¬ porated, yielded yl ounces of pure salt.—Here, however, we must observe, that though the quantity was so tar di¬ minished by this operation, yet we are not to imagine that the whole of this diminution was owing to impuri¬ ties ; for all salts are destroyed in some measure by so¬ lution in water and exsiccation. 2. White pearl-ashes are nearly of the same quality with the former; half a pound of them giving hve ounces and sever drams of pure salt, with some vitriola¬ ted tartar and earth. 3. Russia or Muscovy ashes have very much the ap¬ pearance of slaked lime, and are, like it, friable betwixt the fingers. They adhere to the tongue : and their al¬ kaline taste soon goes away, leaving m the mouth a strong taste of lime. Some small bits ot charcoal are observable in their composition, and they never turn moist in the air. Half a pound of the salt lixiv.ated with water, and evaporated, gave only 10 drams 15 grains of very caustic salt. T hese consist therefore 0 a small quantity of alkaline salt united with a large quantity of lime. , 4. Cashub-ashes are of the colour of iron-stone, ant extremely hard, with many shining particles of thai coa^ ii tail- bi; 0f fcn Lii- POT [ 245 ] POT ash in them. They have a saline taste, with a considerable y—< decree of pungency •, feel gi itty in the mouth when broke in pieces by the teeth, and will dissolve in water. To extract the pure salt, half a pound of the ashes were boiled in a pint of water ; then that water poured off, and half a pint put on the ashes again 5 and so on, till the ashes tasted no more salt. This boiling took. 24 hours, and the last water that came oft' had a strong taste of sulphur, apd was blackish. A piece of silver put in the decoction was in a few minutes turned al¬ most black ; but though the decoction was evaporated considerably, it did not turn silver black more speedily than before. The whole, when totally evaporated, yield¬ ed only 10 drams of a brown salt having a strong caustic alkaline taste. Some Cashub-ashes powdered, and often washed in water, so that the salts were all carried olf, were infused in water. After standing sonffe time, there was a weak lime-water, with something of a saline taste, but no pellicle. Some of this residuum was put into a reverberatory furnace for two hours $ after which it af¬ forded good lime-water. Cashub-ashes then appear to contain an earth half vitrified, some lime, alkaline salts, and a quantity of sulphur. 5. Marcoft ashes are of a paler colour than the for¬ mer, with some small pieces of charcoal in their compo¬ sition. They have a strong saline taste j and so great pungency, that they cannot be held long in the mouth. Haifa pound dissolved in water, filtered and evaporated, yielded 11 drams one scruple and two grains of alkaline residuum. The decoction blackened silver, but not so strongly as the former ; and by evaporation it quickly • I lost that quality. nanu- Our author next proceeds to consider the probability ‘dug of manufacturing these ashes in this country. On which in subject he has the following observations.—“ The blue and white pearl-ashes we have discovered to be pure al¬ kaline salts, without any considerable mixture of hetero¬ geneous bodies. Their purity shows the lixive to have been strained through some close substance, such as linen or flannel. The blue ashes show by their colour that they have su-tained the most fire. But both of them are so much alike, that the one may be substituted for the other; and therefore we shall consider them in one view. “ Every one knows that alkaline salts, such as these, are got from all plants except the alkalescent, and from all trees except the most resinous, which afford them in very small quantity. These plants or trees, when sound, are pulled or felled in the spring, dried, and burnt to ashes. By the affusion of warm water the salts are dissolved, and, by straining, separated from the earth along with the water. This saline liquor, which is called a lixive, is evaporated over a fire 5 and what remains is an alkaline salt of the same kind with the pearl-ashes. “ I was informed by a skilful bleacher in Ireland, that he practised a more expeditious way of extracting the salts. He bought the ashes of different vegetables from the commonalty for 9s. a bushel. From these a very strong ley was made, into which dry straw was dipped until it sucked up all the ley. This straw was afterwards dried and burnt, and gave him salts which he showed me, almost as good and pure as the pearl- ashes. This method I have several times tried ; but could never burn the straw to white ashes, the salts di¬ minishing the inflammability of the straw. It is a very expeditious method if it can be practised. But I can see no occasion for bringing the ley into a solid form, as the salts must again be dissolved in water before they can be used. The strength of the ley can easily be de¬ termined by the hydrostatical balance. “ Though I make no question, that the quantity of salt in plants of the same species, will vary in different soils and climates $ yet it would be of advantage to have the proportion ascertained in general. Some trials of this kind I have made. “ Two pounds of fern which had been pulled Au¬ gust 16. were dried, and burnt to white ashes. These weighed 7 dr. and tasted very salt. When lixiviated, strained, and evaporated, they gave me 49 gr. of salt, about the eighth part of the ashes. If the fern had been pulled in April, it would have afforded more salt. Why then should we not prepare salts from this vege¬ table ? There is more of it growing on our hills than would serve all our bleachfields. The Irish make great use of it. “ From 11 oz. of tobacco-ashes I had I oz. of salt. Two ounces of peat-ashes afforded half a drachm of salt. Nettles, I am informed, afford much salt. Furze and broom, natives of this country, are very fit for this purpose. “ But the kelp, as it grows in such plenty along our shore, and contains more salt than any other vegetable I know, would be the most proper, were it not for a mixture of some substance that renders it unfit for bleaching, at least of fine cloths, after they have ob¬ tained a tolerable decree of whiteness. It is observed by bleachers, that in these circumstances, it leaves a great yellowness in the linen. As these ashes are much used in Ireland, and as it is not uncommon to bleach coarse cloths with them in Scotland, a disquisition into their nature, and some attempts to purify them, may not be improper. There are no ashes sold so cheap as these ; for the best gives but 2I. the 2000 weight (b). They may, therefore, allow of more labour to be expended on them, and come cheaper at long-run than the foreign salts. “ I dried some sea-w'are, and burnt it, though I found that last operation very difficult. When I had kept it fused in the fire for two hours, it weighed 3! oz. I poured on the ashes an English pint and a halfa of cold water, that I might have as little of the sulphur as pos¬ sibly. Thisley,afterithad stood for some hours, was pour¬ ed off clear, and had but a slight tendency to a green co¬ lour. I made a second infusion with milk-warm water, and poured it off from the sediment. This had a darker colour than the former; was kept separated from it, and evaporated by itself. There was a third infusion made 5 Potash (b) “ Since this treatise was written, however, the price of kelp has been advanced to yl. or upwards the 2000 weight j so that those who would now attempt any thing of this kind, must also manufacture the kelp them¬ selves.” POT [ H6 3 POT Potash. made j but having no salt taste, it was thrown away. 1 The second infusion seemed to contain more sulphur than the first; and a piece of white linen kept in it halt an hour, while it was boiling, was tinged yellow, and could not be washed white again. The earthy part remaining, weighed, when well dried, I oz. 2 dr. I he saline de¬ coction evaporated by degrees, and set at different times in a cellar to crystallize, afiorded me 5 dr. 46 gr. 1 he liquor, when entirely evaporated, left 4!- dr. of a yellow salt, which appeared to be a strong alkaline, x he salts which crystallized seemed to be mostly sea-salt, with a considerable quantity of sulphur, and some alkaline salt. There appeared no signs of the bittern in these salts, as their solution did not turn turbid with the oil of tartar. Nor is any of the bittern to be expected in kelp-ashes, although it probably is to be found in the recent vege¬ table j because the alkaline salts formed by the fire must have changed it into a neutral. The ley made warm with water, being evaporated, left 4 dr. of a blacic bit¬ ter salt, which, from its quantity of sulphur, appeared unfit for bleaching. These ashes, then, seem to be a composition of somewhat less than the fourth of sulphur, the same quantity of sea-salt, about a fourth of alkaline salt, and somewhat more than a fourth 01 earth, ihe alkaline salt contained in kelp ashes amounts to one penny a pound. Tlhis cheapness makes it worth our pains to bestow some labour on them. “ If the bad effects in bleaching with kelp-ashes arise from the sea-salt, as some of the most knowing bleachers think, they can be freed from it in an easy manner. Let a lixive of kelp-ashes be made with cold water, for that does not extract so much of the sulphur j it must stand but for a short time, for these salts dissolve easily } de¬ cant it, and evaporate the ley. As the boiling conti¬ nues, the sea-salt will crystallize. When that is all separated, the remaining ley will contain alkaline salt with some sulphur. This operation every master of a bleachfield may learn and oversee, without taking up much of his time. A similar process is carried on by common servants in the alum-works, who have by prac¬ tice learned it from others. “ I had some hopes that the sulphur might be car¬ ried off by long roasting, such as these salts undergo before they are fused in order to be turned into glass ; because I had observed, that the longer time they were kept in the fire, the freer were they from this sulphu¬ reous part. “ I ordered a quantity of kelp-ashes to be kept in the furnace of a glasshouse, where the heat was just below the vitrifying point, for 24 hours. During this time they had lost almost four-fifths of their weight. They were now much freer from their sulphur, and were of a light colour *, but much of the alkaline salt had been driven off' with the oils. If a ley is much impregnated with this sulphureous matter, it appears to be carried off in a great measure by long boiling. “ We come now to explain the method of manufac¬ turing the white Muscovy ashes. We have shown, by undoubted experiments, that the greatest part of these ashes consists of lime ; and yet we have several acts of parliament which forbid the use of that material under severe penalties. The parliament were in the right to dischargeits use, upon the disadvantageous reports which were made to them. We shall immediately see how dangerous a material it is when used improperly, or with- 3 out the mixture of alkaline salts, which render it safe, pota; and more soluble in water. But I will venture te say, L-v that experiment will not support the prejudice enter¬ tained with regard to it, if carried any further. “ Since bleaching, then, cannot be carried on with¬ out it (for those ashes which contain it are quite neces¬ sary in that operation), and since we import them from foreign countries, let these prejudices against it cease, and let us only consider how we may render our own lime as safe as the foreign. If we can do that, the wisdom of the legislature will be as ready to abrogate these acts as they were to make them. tl By my experiments on the white Muscovy ashes, I got about the eighth part of alkaline salts from them. This made me expect, that, by mixing in the same pro¬ portion quicklime and alkaline salts, I should be able to produce Muscovy ashes. “ To an ounce of quicklime and a dram of white pearl-ashes, I added about a gill of water, and boiled them together till the water was all evaporated. I he taste of this substance was little different from lime. To recover the salts again from the lime, I dissolved it in water, strained off the liquor, and evapoiated it. Instead of the dram of salts, I had but two grains of a substance which was more earthy than saline. “ To 3 drams of quicklime, and as much potashes, I added a mutchkin of water, and kept it boiling for two hours till it was evaporated. I dissolved it again in water, which being filtered and evaporated, gave ms 14- dram of a caustic salt, that liquefied in the air when it had been but four minutes from the fire. It appears, then, that the alkaline salts are destroyed by lime, and that a great part of them can never be again recovered. From the remaining lime, after the salts were extracted, I got strong lime-water, but without a pellicle. Ihis shows, that a quantity of alkaline salts, equal to th# lime, boiled with it for two hours, are not able to fix all the soluble part of the lime. “ From these experiments we may draw some corol¬ laries with regard to the present subject. 1st, That evaporating the water from the lime and salts by boil¬ ing, is a most unfrugal way of preparing these white ashes. 2dly, That these ashes ought to be kept close shut up in casks •, for if exposed to the open air, though in a room, the alternate moisture and drought must fix their most useful parts. This I have found to be fact: for the salts that I made became less pungent by keep¬ ing ; and I have observed, that the surface of the Mus¬ covy ashes lost all pungency by being exposed to the air, while their internal parts still retained it. 3^)^ That all boiling is prejudicial to these Muscovy ashes, as it fixes, and that quickly, their most subtile and pro¬ bably their most serviceable parts. “ Let us now proceed to another method of making these white ashes. I imagined, that if the salts were dissolved in water, and the quicklime slaked with that, the mass would soon dry without the assistance of fire. In this way I added equal parts of both } but the com¬ position was so strong, that it blistered my tongue if it hut touched it. When the fourth part was alkaline salt, it blistered my tongue when kept to it a few se¬ conds. I could taste the salts plainly in the composi¬ tion, when they made but the thirty-second part of the whole. “ I thought, when composed with the eighteenth part POT ish. part of salt, it had, when fresh made, just the taste and —Jlook of the Muscovy ashes ; nor could any person have distinguished them. This I once imagined was the pro¬ portion } but when I found that the saline pungency goon turned weaker by keeping, and that this compo¬ sition would not afford the same quantity of salts that the Muscovy ashes did, I saw that a much greater quan¬ tity of salts was necessary. The proportion appears to be one of salts to four of lime, prepared in this last way. Three drams of ashes prepared in this way, and kept for a fortnight, gave me but 15 grains of salt; which is but the half of what the Muscovy would have af¬ forded. I find, if the quicklime is first quenched, it does not fix the salts so much ; and therefore is better and cheaper. One dram of potashes dissolved in a little water, and added to three drams of quenched lime, gave me 44 grains of a very caustic salt. I prefer this method as the best. “ The manufacturers of this salt probably pour the lixive upon the lime, as they can know by its specific gravity what quantity of salts is in the water, and so save themselves the expence of procuring the salts in a dry form. “ The manufacture of the Marcoft and Cashub ashes remains yet to be explained. We have discovered that both of them contained sulphur, earth, alkaline salts, and lime ; and differ ia nothing but in the Cashub’s having more sulphur than the Marcoft ashes. We shall there¬ fore consider them together. “ Whether these two species of ashes are of any use in bleaching, may be, and has already been, disputed. I find they contain no other principles, the sulphureous part excepted, than the former ashes combined together. Why then should we expect any other effects from the same ingredients in the Marcoft and Cashub ashes, than what we have from either of the pearl and Mus¬ covy ashes mixed together P The sulphureous principle in the former must have very bad effects; as I find by experiment, that it leaves a yellowness on cloth that is very hard to be washed out. It is owing to this sul¬ phureous principle that linen, after it has been washed with soap, and is pretty well advanced in whiteness, is apt to be discoloured by ley which is brought to boil : for, by boiling, the sulphureous part is extracted from the ashes, and the ley becomes of a deep brown colour. Daily practice, then, shows the disadvantage of this sul¬ phureous principle. Besides, as sulphur unites itself quickly and firmly with alkaline salt-, it must weaken or altogether destroy a great quantity of these in the Marcoft and Cashub ashes, and so render them of no ef¬ fect in bleaching. These two reasons seem to me suffi¬ cient to exclude them from the bleachfield ; especially as, by increasing the other materials, we can attain per¬ haps more speedily the same ends. “ However, as custom has introduced them into ge¬ neral practice, we shall consider how they are to be ma¬ nufactured. Dr Mitchell has, in a very ingenious and useful paper, contained in the Philosophical Transac¬ tions for the year 174^> delivered an account transmit¬ ted to him by Linnaeus of the method of making potashes in Sweden. 1 his account was contained in an academical dissertation of one Lundmark upon this sub¬ ject at Aboe in Sweden. The substance of this account JS, ‘ I hat birch or alder is burnt by a slow fire to ashes, -nil made into a paste with water. This paste is plas- P O T tered over a row of green pine or fir logs. Above that Potash. is laid transversely another row of the same ; and that1——v likewise is plastered over. In this way they continue building and plastering till the pile be of a considerable height. This pile is set on fire ; and whenever the ashes begin to run, it is overturned, and the melted ashes are beat with flexible sticks, so that the ashes incrust the logs of wood, and become as hard as stone.’ This, in the Doctor’s opinion, is the method of making the potashes that come from Sweden, Russia, and Dantzic : and that there is no other difference bewixt the ashes made in those different countries, but that the Russian, containing more salt, must be made into a paste with a strong ley. “ There would appear, by my experiments, a greater difference than this betwixt the Swedish ashes, if that is the true process, and those I have examined. I had discovered the greatest part of the Muscovy ashes to be lime. I suspected it might enter into the composition of the Marcoft and Cashub; and have accordingly dis¬ covered it there. Without the same grounds, none would ever have searched for it. Whence then comes this lime ? It must either enter into its composition, or arise from the materials managed according as the pro¬ cess directs. u I have tried the birch ashes made into a paste with water. I have tried common charcoal made into a paste with a third part of potashes, and kept them in a strong reverberatory heat for some hours, and yet no such cau¬ stic substance appeared. I have kept earth and salts of kelp ashes fused together for 24 hours in the furnace of a glasshouse, where the heat was just below the degree of vitrification ; and yet no remarkable causticity ap¬ peared afterwards in the concreted mass. But supposing that there did, will ever this account for the generation of lime ? These chemists do not assert that it is a calca¬ reous causticity. The earth of vegetables kept in fusion with their salts, is so far from turning into a quicklime, that the mass takes the opposite course, and becomes glass. Bodies that, by the laws of nature, are vitres- cible, can never, so far as we know, become calcareous. In one or other of these two substances all bodies termi¬ nate that are changeable by fire ; and vegetables are of the former kind. Piece it may be asked, Why then, since they endure such a fire, are they not vitrified ? the objection would be just, did they contain nothing else but what was found in vegatables. But if we once al¬ low that lime is one of the materials, the difficulty is easily solved : for lime, we know, in proportion as it is mixed, hinders the vitrification of all bodies. In effect, the earthy part in these ashes is almost vitrified: and I think that I have carried the vitrification yet farther in that part; but I never was able, with the utmost heat of a reverberatory furnace, continued for six hours, to produce any tiling like a thorough vitrification in these ashes. The heat of the fire used in the process would seem to he very great ; and must, if it were not very difficult, reduce them to glass. The invitrescible na¬ ture of these salts, so far from being an objection, be¬ comes a strong proof of mv opinion. “ These salts have a remarkable pungency. This we have already seen is the natural effect of quicklime on salts. “These salts are found to he the fittest for making soap, and to incorporate soonest and best with oils. Salts, [ 247 ] Potash, Potato. 72 'otashes ,nd pearl- ^lies ob- ained from leutral POT [248 Salts, we know, of themselves do P* oil ; but when once mixed with quickUm , 7 ^^Ktse ashes are more easily Haa ed than charcoal made into a paste with the thir p salt; 1 which is much more than the ashes contain. Now it is observed that quicklime increases the flux- ino power of alkaline salts; for the common caustic S of quicklime and alkaline salts is sooner fused tli'in the latter alone* # -i . -i* “ From these reasons, and the expenments that d.s- cover lime in these ashes, I am led to think, that , ,s not oenerated hy the process, but mixed with the ashes when they are made alto a paste. The following expe¬ riment isya convincing proof of what I have been endea V°"tSbld tm^ase straw In a strong ley of pearl- ashes burnt into a black coal, and made it into a paste wUh water. Another quantity of straw was boiled m a lev made of one part of quicklime and four parts of pearl salts, the ley being poured off turbid from the lime. This straw was likewise burnt when dry, and made into a paste. These two substances were put into separate crucibles, and fluxed in a reverberatory furnace. Ihe latter appeared to resemble the Marcoft and Cashub ashes more than the former, which seemed to want their I>UTfhough the only method of preparing the alkaline salt originally is by the combustion of vegetables, yet there are some neutral salts from which if it were pos¬ sible to expel the acid, we should have it in our power to procure the finest pearl-ashes in vast quantity. I hese are violated tartar, nitre, &c. But there are objec¬ tions to all those. The vitriolated tartar, or any other salt in which the vitriolic acid enters, cannot be decom¬ posed without converting the acid nito sulphur by char¬ coal dust 5 in which case it is as difficult to get free of the sulphur as of the acid. With respect to nitre, though its acid may be expelled by fire, yet it is 00 high-priced, and too much used in other manufactures, to be thought of for this purpose. POTATO. See Solanum, Botany Index.' _ Potatoes, it is generally thought, came originally from North America, where they were not reckone o-ood for food. They were first (we are told) introdu¬ ced into Ireland in the year 1565, and from thence into England hy a vessel wrecked on the western coast, call¬ ed North Meols, in Lancashire, a place and soil even now famous for producing this vegetable 111 great per¬ fection. It was 40 years after their introduction, how¬ ever, before they were much cultivated about London j and then thev were considered as rarities, without any conception of the utility that might arise from bringing them into common use. At this time they were distin¬ guished from the Spanish by the name of Virginia po¬ tatoes or battatas, which is the Indian name of the Spanish sort. At a meeting of the Loyal Society, March 18. 1662-3, a letter was read from Mr Buck- land, a Somerset gentleman, recommending the planting of potatoes in all parts of the kingdom to prevent fa¬ mine. This was referred to a committeeand, in con¬ sequence of their report, Mr Buckland had the thanks of the society, such members as had lands were intreat- ed to plant them, and Mr Evelyn was desired to men¬ tion the proposals at the close of his Sylva. ] P 0 T . . In Sweden, notwithstanding the indefatigable industry | pot of Linnaeus, the culture of potatoes was only introduced 1 i in 1764, when a royal edict was published to encourage their general cultivation. They were known there however, at an earlier period ; for in the Memoirs of the Royal Academy of Sciences in Sweden, 1747, M. Charles Skytse proposed to distil brandy from them, in order to save corn, which in that country is very dear. He found bv experience, that an acre of land set with potatoes will yield a much greater quantity of brandy than when sown with barley. For a full account of the methods of cultivating and preserving this valuable root, see Agriculture Index. We have already mentioned a cheap preparation by means of potatoes for the poor, see Agriculture, N° 288 • we shall here introduce a receipt to make a potato harrico, which may bo equally useful to those whose circumstances are not such as to make them re¬ gardless of economy. We take it Item the Gentleman s Magazine, and give it in the words of a person who had made the experiment. j r i “ Scrape the skin clean off four pounds of good raw potatoes, then wash them clean in fair water : take two pounds of beef, one of mutton, and one of pork 5 or, as you like best, four pounds of any of these meats ; cut them into pieces of three or four ounces each, season them very well with pepper and salt and a good onion chopped very small: have ready a strong wide-mouthed stone-iar, such as hares are usually jugged in ; slice thin a layer of the potatoes into the jar, then a ayer of the seasoned meat over them, and so alternately layers of potatoes and meat*, let your uppermost layer be pota¬ toes, so that your jar be about three quarters full, but put no water into your jar j then close or stop the mouth of it with a large well-fitted piece of cork, co¬ vering the same with a strong piece of canvas and tying it down with packthread, so as only a little of the steam may escape in the stewing •, for a little should constantly evaporate from the side of the cork to save the jar from bursting. Then place your jar upright in a kettle of cold water on the fire, so as the mouth of the jar may be always two inches above the water in the kettle when boilimr. The harrico in the jar will begin to boil some minute* sooner than the water in the kettle, and that for obvious reasons. In about an hour after the water in the kettle begins to boil, your harrico will be fully stewed. Then take out and open the jar, pour out the harrico into a deep dish, and serve it up. “ This excellent, wholesome, and economical dish supplies an agreeable dinner twice a week to a family consisting of three grown people, and three children under 14 years of age, where neither health nor good stomachs are wanting, thanks to God : and, in point 0 economy, we must observe, that here is the whole ar¬ ticle of butter saved, as also the whole article of bread, or nearly so ; nor does there require so large or so con¬ tinued a fire, nor so much time or trouble as is necessary for the dressing of many other dishes that by no means deserve the preference to this excellent harrico. “ We have also (hy way of change) made it with pow¬ dered beef, sometimes with powdered pork, sometimes with half fresh beef or mutton and half pick ed pork, and found it good in all these ways, particularly w>fh three pounds of fresh beef and one of pickled pork, have left off sending pies and stews to the bakers, we POT jtato II . 3tOSl sometimes (in a larger kettle) boil a small piece of pow¬ dered beef along-side of the jar, by continuing the boil¬ ing an hour and a half longer, and this serves us to eat cold the next day, with hot garden-stuff or a pudding.” PoTATO-Bread. See Bread of Potatoes. Spanish Potato. See Convolvuvus, Botany Index. POTENT, or Potence, in Heraldry, a term for a kind of cross, whose ends all terminate like the head of a crutch. It is otherwise called the Jerusalem cross, See Heraldry. POIEN11A (power), that whereby a thing is ca¬ pable either of acting or being acted upon. POTENTIAL, in the schools, is used to denote and distinguish a kind of qualities, which are supposed to exist in the body in potentia only $ by which they are capable in some measure of affecting and impressing on us the ideas of such qualities, though not actually inhe¬ rent in themselves j in which sense we say, potential heat, potential cold, &c. Potential Cautery, in Medicine, denotes the con¬ suming, or reducing to an eschar, any part of the hu¬ man body by a caustic alkaline or metallic salt, &c. in¬ stead of a red-hot iron, which last is called the actual cautery. Potential, in Grammar, an epithet applied to one of the moods of verbs. The potential is the same in form with the subjunctive, and is, according to Kuddi- man, implied in that mood, for which reason that gram¬ marian rejects it •, but others will have it to dift'er from the subjunctive in this, that it always implies in it either [ 249 1 POT to 36,450,000 livres § per annum. But this abun¬ dance of metals soon decreased. From 1564 to 1585, the annual fifth part amounted to no more than 15,187,489 livres four sols f. From 1585 to 1624, it amounted to 12,149,994 livres 12 sols From 1624 to 1633, to 6,074,997 livres six sols ||. From this last period, the produce of these mines hath so evidently de¬ creased, that in 1763 the fifth part, belonging to the king, did not exceed 1,364,682 livres 12 sols Situ¬ ated in \V. Long. 67. S. Lat. 22. See Peru. POISDAM, or Postdam, a town of Germany, in the circle of Upper Saxony, with a palace, belonging to the king of Prussia. It is seated in an island 10 miles in circumference, formed by the rivers Sprae and Havel. The palace is finely built, delightfully situated on a spot 12 miles west of Berlin. E. Long. 13. 42. N. Lat. 52. 34. Riesbeck in his Travels informs us, that the houses in Potsdam are still finer than those of Berlin 5 but like them they are inhabited only by per¬ sons of the lotver and middling ranks. The population of Potsdam is stated at 26,000. PC) IT, Percival, was born in London in 1713. He received the fiiNt rudim< nt- of bis education at a pri¬ vate school at Darne in Kent ; and became an appren¬ tice to Mr Nourse, one of the surgeons of St Bartholo¬ mew’s hospital; of which hospital, in 174;-!:, be was elected an assistant surgeon, and in 1740 appointed one of the principal surgeons. In 1746, he married the daughter of Robert Cruttenden, E-q. His first pub¬ lication is said to have been planned in 17 >6, during his confinement in con-iquence of a compound fracture of Potosi Potter. £ 1, .,13,7501 f 632,812!. is. t 506,249!. I ;s 6d. II - 53.-24,> 17 s. pd. § -,6,86il, i^s. pd. possum, volo, or debeo. It is sometimes called the per- the leg: from that tinu, his pen was seldom long un- 1 cei J lyyinnsf rw-»r»• j 11 e« 11 rv f t■ rv-i rH 1 1 11 * . • 1 1 • • missive mood, because it often implies a permission or concession to do a thiuy. See Grammar POTENTILLA, Silver weed, Wild Tansey, or Cinquefoil; a genu* of plants belonging to the icosandria class ; and in the natural method ranking under the 35th order, Senticosce. See Botany Index. POTERIUM. G arden Burnet ; a genus of plants belonging to the monoecia class ; and in the natural me¬ thod ranking under the 54th order, Miscellanea;. See Botany Index. POTHOS, a genus of plants belonging to the gy- nandria class. See Botany Index. POTION, a liquid medicine, consisting of as much as can be drunk at one draught. POTLPHAR, or Putiphar, an officer of the court of Pharaoh king of Egypt, and general of his troops, according to our translation, Le Clerc, and the version of the vulgate ; but according to the Hebrew and Sep- tuagint, the chief of his butchers or cooks. The He¬ brew text, the Septuagint, and vulgate, call him Eu¬ nuch. But it is probable it in this place means only an officer of the king’s court, for he was certainly married and had children. We have no other accounts of him but what appears in scripture ; and that account is too generally known to require to be enlarged on in this place. See Genesis xxxviii. xxxix, &c. POTOSI, a city of Peru in South America, situated at the bottom of a mountain of that name, in which is the richest silver mine ever discovered. To give an idea of its richness, we shall mention its produce at different times. Exclusive of what was not registered, says Abbe Raynal, and wTas smuggled away, the fifth part belong- mg to the government from J545 to 1564, amounted VOL. XVII. Part I. f employed His practice and his reputation were now rap dlv increasing: in 1764, he was elected a fellow of the Royal Society; and afterwards was complimented with honorary diplomas from the Royal Colleges of Sur¬ geons at Edinburgh and in Ireland. In 1787, be re¬ signed the office of surgeon to St Bartholomew’s hospi¬ tal, “ after having served it (as he used to say), man and boy, half a century and on the 2 2d of December 1788, after an illness of eight days, he expired. “ The labours of the greatest part of his life (says Mr Earle, who published his Chirurgical works), were without relaxation ; an increasing family required his utmost exertion: of late years he had a villa at Neas- den ; and in the autumn usually passed > month at Bath or at the sea-side. Thus, though he gathered, as he ex¬ pressed it, some of the fruit of the garden which be had planted as he went along, and always lived in a gene¬ rous and hospitable manner, at the same time bestowing on four sons and four daughters a liberal and necessarily expensive education, and applying large sums to their establishment during his lifetime, he left an ample pro¬ vision for them at his decease. Among his papers was found, what lie had often mentioned, a small box, con¬ taining a few pieces of money, being the whole which he ever received from the wreck of his father’s fortune. With this was deposited an exact account of every indi¬ vidual fee which a long life of business had produced abundant evidence of well spent time, and the industri¬ ous application of abilities, to which the res unsusta do- mi, at the commencement, probably acted more power¬ fully as an incentive than as an obstacle.” POTTER, Christopher, a learned English divine, was born in J591, and bred at Oxford. In 1633. he I i publishett P O V [ 2i Polt'-r publialied his 11 Answer to a lale Popish Plots” ontitleh \\ Charity mistaken, which he wrote by special order ot Poverty. Kimv Charles T. whose chaplain he was. In 1634, ne was promoted to the deanery of Worcester; and, in 1640, was constituted vice-chancellor of the university of Oxford, in the execution of which office he met with some trouble from the members of the long parliament. Upon the breaking out of the civil wars, he sent a! his plate to the king, declaring, “ that he would rather, like Diogenes, drink in the hollow of his hand, than that his majesty should wantand he afterwards suf¬ fered much for the royal cause. In consideration of this he was nominated to Hie deanery of Durham in 1646, but was prevented from being installed by his death, which happened about two months alter. He was a person learned and religious, exemplary in his conversa¬ tion, courteous in his carriage, ot a sweet and obliging nature, and of a comely presence. He was remark¬ able in his charity to the poor. POTTER, Dr John, archbishop of Canterbury, was the son of a linen draper at Wakefield in Yorkshire, where he was born about tbe year 1674. He studied at University college, Oxford ; and at 19 published A «- riantes Icctiones ct noire ad Plutarchi librum de audien- dis poet is ; et ad Basilii magni orationcm ad juvenes, quomodo cum fructu legere possint^ Grrecorum hbros, 8vo, 1693. In 1697, came out his edition of Lyco- phron, in folio -, which is reckoned the best of that ob¬ scure writer: soon after, he published his antiquities of Greece, 2 vols. 8vo. These works established his lite¬ rary reputation, and engaged him in a correspondence with Grtevius and other learned foreigners. In 1706, lie was made chaplain to the queen ; in I7I5’ bishop of Oxford ; and in 17^7, he succeeded Archbishop Wake in the see of Canterbury, which high station he support¬ ed with much dignity until his death in 1747- He was a learned and exemplary churchman but not of an amiable disposition, being but too strongly tinctured with the pride of office nor is it to his credit that he disinherited his eldest son for marrying below his rank in life. His “ Theological works, containing sermons, charges, discourses on church-government, and divinity jec' iires,” were printed at Oxford, in 3 vols. 8vo, 1753- POTTERY, the manufacture of earthen-ware, or the art of making earthen vessels. See Delft-U are, and Porcelain. POTTLE, an English measure containing two quarts POVERTY signifies indigence or wrant of riches, and has been the lot of a large portion ot men in every age. Whether, on the whole, it has been productive of good or had consequences, has been disputed. In a moral view, perhaps it has been, on the uhole, useful, as adversity is in general more conducive to virtue than prosperity, which too often leads to luxury and vice.— Sometimes, however, poverty has had a baneful effect upon the mind, and has prompted men to commit very inhuman actions ; hut this in civilized communities very seldom occurs. In a political view, poverty is thought by some to be burtful : Raynal thinks it is a check to population (see his History, vol. vi. p. 471-) i and Dr Smith so far agrees with him -, for though he asserts, and indeed proves, that poverty is no check to the pro¬ duction of children, he allows it to be very unfavour¬ able. to raising them. See Political Economy ; and o ] P O U also Smith’s Wealth of Nations, vol. i. p. H9> &c* Poverty See also Poor. . . p ^ POULADUFF, two large and remarkable cavities, , rouU( about a mile west of Ros4s, in the county of Cork, and province of Munster, in Ireland, 80 yards deep, in which the sea flows by subterraneous passages. They are called East and W est Pouluduff. POULES or Foulques, one of the chief nations on the banks of the Senegal. Their country extends more than 180 miles along the river, and they demand exorbitant customs from the Senegal traders with the interior of the country. They are of a copper colour, somewhat inclining to red, although their children, who reside for some years at Senegal, become much blacker. Their females are handsome, and many of them are procured by the white people of Senegal. They are, however, incapable of attachment, and then- dispositions are bad, requiring to be narrowly watched to prevent their infidelity : The dread ol the bastinado will often effect what attention and compliance can ne¬ ver bring about. Although the Poules inhabit one of the finest spots in Africa, they are nevertheless a wretched people -, they are base, cruel, thievish, and fanatic in the. extreme. They are commanded by a chief of their religion, which is a contemptible mixture ol Mahometanism anu idola¬ try. This chief is called the Almamy; he is always chosen from among the tampsirs, who are 12 in number. The tampsirs are the interpreters of the law, and are the most learned, or rather the most fanatical among them. The almamy has the power of life and death over his subjects ; yet he may be deposed by an assembly of tampsirs : it is therefore his interest to keep on good terms with them. The payment of customs is made to the almamy, and is afterwards distributed among the tampsirs ; and although a part belongs to the former, he nevertheless requires a separate present for himself. POULTICE, a sort of medicine, called also a ca/a- plasm. See Cataplasma. POULTRY, all kinds of domestic birds brought up in yards, as cocks, hens, capons, ducks, turkeys, &c. Almost, if not all the domestic birds of the poultry kind that we maintain in our yards are of foreign ex¬ traction : hut there are others to he ranked in this class that are as yet in a state^ of nature, and perhaps only wait till they become sufficiently scarce to be taken un¬ der the care of man to multiply their propagation. It will appear remarkable enough, if we consider how much the tame poultry which we have imported from distant climates has increased, and how much those wild birds of the poultry kind that have never yet been taken into keeping have been diminished and destroy¬ ed. They are all thinned ; and many of the species, especially in the more cultivated and populous parts of the kingdom, are utterly unseen. Under birds of the poultry kind may he ranked all those that have white llesh, and, comparatively to their heads and limbs, have bulky bodies. Iney are furnish¬ ed with short strong hills for picking up grain, which is their chief and often their onl y sustenance. Their wings, are short and concave -, for which reason they are not able to fly far. They lay a great many eygs *, and as they lead their young abroad, the very day they are hatched, in quest of food, which they are shown by the mother, and which they pick up for themselves, they P O U [ : nltry, tliey generally make their nests on the ground. The toes of all these are united by a membrane as far as the first articulation, and are then divided. Under this class we may therefore render the com¬ mon cock, the peacock, the turkey, thepintada or Gui¬ nea hen, the pheasant, the bustard, the grous, the par¬ tridge, and the quail. They all hear a strong simili¬ tude to each other, being equally granivorous, flesbv, and delicate to the palate. They are among birds what beasts of pasture are among quadrupeds, peaceable te¬ nants of the field, and shunning the thicker parts of the forest, that abound with numerous animals who carry on unceasing hostilities against them. As nature has formed the rapacious class for war, so she seems equally to have fitted these for peace, rest, and society. Their wings are but short, so that they are ill formed for wandering from one region to an¬ other : their bills are also short, and incapable of annoy¬ ing their opposers : their legs are strong indeed j but their toes are made for scratching up their food, and not for holding or tearing it. These are sufficient indi¬ cations of their harmless nature j while their bodies, which are fat and fleshy, render them unwieldy travel¬ lers, and incapable of straying far from each other. Accordingly, we find them chiefly in society: they live -together : and though they may have their dis¬ putes, like all other animals, upon some occasions •, yet, when kept in the same district, or fed in the same yard, they learn the art of subordination and, in proportion as each knows his strength, he seldom tries a second time the combat where he has once been worsted. In this manner, all of this kind seem to lead an in¬ dolent voluptuous life. As they are furnished internal¬ ly with a very strong stomach, commonlr called a g/xs- %ard, so their voraciousness scarce knows any bounds. If kept in close captivity, and separated from all their former companions, they have still the pleasure of eat¬ ing left j and they soon grow fat and unwieldy in their prison. To say this more simply, many of the wilder species of birds, when cooped or caged, pine away, grow gloomy, and some refuse all sustenance whatever ; none except those of the poultry kind grow fat, who seem to lose all remembrance of their former liberty, satisfied with indolence and plenty. The following method of raising poultry has been successfully practised by Mrs d’Oyley of Sion Hill near Northallerton, and seems worthy of being noticed. We shall extract the account of it, as it was given to the So¬ ciety for the Encouragement of Arts, &c. in her own words, “ I keep,” says she, “ a large stock of poultry, which are regularly fed in a morning upon steamed po¬ tatoes chopped small, and at noon they have barley; they are in high condition, tractable, and lay a very great quantity of eggs. Jn the poultry-yard is a small building, similar to a pigeon cote, for the hens to lay in, with frames covered with net to slide before each nest: the house is dry, light, and well ventilated, kept free from dirt by having the nests and w'alls white-washed two or three times a-year, and the floor covered once a- week with fresh ashes. When I wish to procure chick¬ ens, I take the opportunity of setting many hens toge¬ ther, confining each to her respective nest; a hoy at¬ tends morning and evening to let any oft' that appear i’estless, and to see that they return to their proper >5t ] P O U places : when they hatch, the chickens are taken away, Poultry, and a second lot of eggs allowed them to set again, by v— which means they produce as numerous a brood as be¬ fore. I put the chickens into long wicker cages, placed against a hot wall at the back of the kitchen lire, and within them have artificial mothers for the chickens to run under; they are made similar to those described by M. Reaumur, in his Art defaire eclorre ct d'elever cu tontes Saisons dcs Oiseaux domesiiques de toutes Especcs, &c. in two volumes, printed at Paris, 1751 : 'they ate made of boards about 10 inches broad, and 15 inches long, supported by two feet in the front four inches in height, and by a board at the back two inches in height. The roof and back are lined with lambs skins dressed with the wool upon them. The roof is thickly perforated with holes tor the heated air to escape; they are formed without bottoms, and have a flanael curtain in front and at the ends for the chickens to run under, which they do apparently by instinct. The cages are kept perfectly dry and clean with sand or moss. The above is a proper size for 50 or 60 new hatched chick¬ ens, but as they increase in size they of course require a larger mother. When they are a week old, and the weather fine, tiie hoy carries them and their artificial mother to the grass-plot, nourishes and keeps them warm, by placing a long narrow tin vessel filled with hot water at the back of the mother, which will retain its heat for three hours, and is then renewed fresh from the steamer. In the evening they are driven into their cages, and re¬ sume their station at the hot wall, till they are nearly three weeks old, and able to go into a small room ap¬ propriated to that purpose. The room is furnished with frames similar to the aitificial mothers, placed round the. floor, and with perches conveniently arranged for them to roost upon. “ W hen I first attempted to bring up poultry in the above way, I lost immense numbers by too great heat and suffocation, owing to the x'oofs of the mothers not being sufficiently ventilated; and when that evil was remedied, I had another serious one to encounter : I found chickens brought up in this way did not thrive upon the food I gave them, and many of them died, till I thought of getting coarse barley-meal, and steaming it till quite soft; the boy feeds them with this and minced potatoes alternately ; he is also employed rolling up pel¬ lets of dough, made of coarse wheat flour, which he throws to excite them to eat, thereby causing them to growr surprisingly. “ I was making the above experiments in the summer for about two months ; and during that time my hens produced me upwards of 50O chickens, 400 of which I reared fit for the table or market. I used a great manv made into pies for the family, and found them cheaper' than butcher’s meat. Were 1 situated in the neighbour¬ hood of London, or any very populous place, I am con¬ fident I could make an immense profit, by rearing dif¬ ferent kinds of poultry in the abovo method for the mar¬ kets, and selling them cn an average at the price of but¬ cher’s meat. “ A young person of 12 or 14 years of age might bring up in a season some thousands, and by adoptimr u fence similar to the improved sheep-fold, almost any number might be cheaply reared, and with little trouble. Hens kept as mine are, and having the same convenicu-. ces, will readily set four times a season, and by setting I i 2 \ twice p o u [ , fw;re pad, time, they would produce at the lowest cal- Fmjtry culation eighty chickens each, which would soon make Poundage them very plentiful. . , ,, ,, 1 “ The most convenient size of an artificial mother, continues the author, “ for 40 or 50 young cluckens is ahout T ? inches long, 10 deep, lour high in front, and two at the back •, it is placed in a long wicker cage against a warm wall, the heat at ahout 80 degrees! a lire nheits thermometer, till the chickens are a few days old, and used to the comfort of it, after which time they run un¬ der when th(‘y want rest, and acquire warmth by crow - imf together. I find it advisable to have two or three chic kirns among them of about a week old to teach them to peck and eat. The meat and water is given them in small troughs fixi d to the outside ol the cage, and a little is strewed along from the artificial mother, as a train to the main deposit. It would have given me great plea¬ sure to have been able to send a specimen ot my superior feed and management, if the season had been rather more advanced, for I think it is not possible for turkeys and chickens to weigh heavier, be whiter, or altogether better fed than mine are. “ After a certain age, they are allowed then liber¬ ty, living chiefly on steamed potatoes } and being si¬ tuated tolerably secure from the depredations ot men and foxes, are permitted to roost in trees near the “ To prevent trouble and prejudice in the first outset, I think it necessary to remark, that it the chickens do not readily run after the artificial mother for want ot some educated ones to teach them, it will be proper to have the curtain in front made of rabbit or haie skin, with the fur side outwards, for the warmth and comfort to attract them j afterwards they run under the flannel ones, similar to the one I sent, which are preferable for common use, on account of clean 1- ness, and not being liable to get into the mouths ot the 'frans. ©/“chickens i t. i the Society, POUNCE, gum sandarach pounded and sifted very fine, to rub on paper, in order to preserve it from sink¬ ing, and to make it more fit to write upon. Pounce, is also a little heap ot charcoal dust, in¬ closed in a piece of muslin or some other open stuff, to be passed over holes pricked in a work, in order to mark the lines or designs thereof on paper, silk, &c. placed underneath j which are to be afterwards finished with a pen and ink, a needle, or the like. 1 Ins kind ot pounce is much used by embroiderers, to transfer their patterns upon stuffs* by lace-makers, and sometimes al¬ so by engravers. f , Pounces, in falconry, the talons or claws ot a bud of prey. . , POUND, a standard-weight * for the proportion and subdivisions of which, see the article Weight. Pound also denotes a money of account* so called, because the ancient pound of silver weighed a pound Pound, among lawyers, denotes a place of strength, in which to keep cattle that are distrained or put in for trespass, until they are replevied or redeemed. POUNDAGE, a subsidy of lid. in the pound, granted to the crown on all goods and merchandises exported or imported * and if by aliens, one penny more. &c. for >1307. 2 ] P O U POUPtPHESTURE, in Law, is a wrongful inclo¬ sure, or incroacbment upon another person’s property. POURSUIVANT, or Pursuivant, in Heraldry, the lowest order of officers at arms.—They are proper¬ ly attendants on the heralds when they marshal pubhn ceremonies. Of these in England there were formerly many ; but at present there are only four, viz. blue- mantle, rouge-cross, rouge-dragon, and port-cullice. In Scotland there is only one king at arms, who is staled Lyon; and has under him no less than six heralds, as many pursuivants, and a great many messengers at arms. See Lyon. . r ,, POURVEYANCE, or Purveyance, in Law, the providing corn, fuel, victuals, &c. for the king’s house¬ hold 5 and hence the officer who did so was termed pourveyor. As several offences were committed by these officers, it was enacted by stat. 12. Car. IL that no person, under colour of pourveyance, shall take any timber, cattle, corn, &c. from any subject without his free consent, or without a just appraisement and paying for the same . . POUSSIN, Nicholas, an eminent Irench painter, horn in 1594, at Andel, a little city in Normandy, where his father was of noble extraction, but born to a small estate. He was instructed for a few months by one Ferdinand Elle, a portrait-painter, and afterwards spent a month with L’Ailemant * but finding these ar¬ tists not likely to improve him suitably to his desires he first studied the paintings of the best masters, and then hastened to finish a few pieces he was engaged in, and travelled to Italy. Here he devoted almost his whole attention to the study of antique statues and bas reliefs * which was probably the cause of his want ci knowledge in, and taste for, the art of' colouring. Le- ing invited back to Paris by Louis XIII. who assign¬ ed him a pension with lodgings in the Thuillenes, he painted for Prince Justiniani an historical picture re¬ presenting Herod’s cruelty * an admirable composition, in which he gave such expresion to every character, as could not fail to strike the behold-1 with terror and pity: he then laboured for several years on the cele¬ brated pictures of the seven sacraments ol the Romish church. But none of Poussin’s designs have been more generally admired than that of the death of Germa- nicus * which would have gained him immortal honour if he had never painted another picture. He began the labours of Hercules in the gallery of the Louvre * but tbe faction ofVouet’s school railing at him and Ins performances, put him so out of humour with his own country, that he returned to Rome, where he died in 1665/ He never went beyond easel-pieces, for which he had a perpetual demand, and his method was to fix the price he expected on the back of the canvas, which was readily paid. Poussin, Gaspar. This painter, whose real name was Duohet, was born at Paris in l6uO, and was in¬ duced to travel to Rome, not only from a love to the art of painting, but also to visit his sister, who was mar¬ ried to Nicholas Poussin. Sandi at says that Caspar was employed at first only to prepare the pallet, pencils, and colours, for Nicholas * but by the precepts and example of that excellent master, gradually rose to the highest re¬ putation, and is undoubtedly one ot the best landscape - painters that ever appeared. It is generally thought that Pourprex ture POW [ 253 1 P R A Mssift 110 painter ever studied natui’e to better purpose, or re- |{ presented the effects of land-storms more happily, than r* Caspar ; all his trees show a natural degree of agitation, “every leaf being in motion ; his scenes are beautifully chosen, as are the sites of his buildings. He designed human figures but very indifferently j for which reason he frequently prevailed on Nicholas to paint them for him ; and they were always introduced with the utmost propriety. W hile he continued at Home he dropped his own name, and assumed that of his brother-in-law and benefactor, by which only he is now known. He died in 1662. POWDER, in Pharmacy, a dry medicine well bro¬ ken, either in a mortar by grinding or by some chemi¬ cal operation. Gim-PolVDER. See Gunpowder. See also Obser¬ vations on Gunpowder in the Irish Transactions 1788, p. 97. class Science, by Mr Napier. PowDER-Ckests, certain small boxes charged with powder and a quantity of old nails or splinters of iron, and fastened occasionally on the deck and sides of a ship, in order to be discharged on an enemy who at¬ tempts to seize her by boarding. These cases are usu¬ ally from 12 to 18 inches in length, and about eight or ten in breadth, having their outer or upper part ter¬ minating in an edge. They are nailed to several places of the quarter-deck and bulk head of the waist, having a train of powder, which communicates with the inner apartments of the ship, so as to he fired at pleasure to annoy the enemy. They are particularly used in mer¬ chant-ships which are furnished with close quarters to oppose the boarders. Powder-Magazine, a bomb-proof arched building, to contain powder in fortified places. Powder for the Hair. The best sort is starch well pounded and sifted, and generally prepared with some perfume. James's Powder. See James's Powder. In the Philosophical Transactions for 1791, p. 217. there is a paper by Dr Pearson, containing experiments and ob¬ servations on James’s powder. Dr Pearson says, it was originally a patent medicine ; but it is well known that it cannot be prepared by following the directions of the specification in the court of chancery. His observations and experiments, therefore, he thinks, may explain the nature and manner of preparing this medicine, and per¬ haps may extend the history of antimony. The result of the whole, in Dr Pearson’s own words, is as follows : I. James’s powder consists of phosphoric acid, lime, and antimonial calx j with a minute quantity of calx of iron, which is considered to be an accidental substance. 2. Either these three essential ingredients are united with each other, forming a triple compound, or phospho¬ rated lime is combined with the antimonial calx, compo¬ sing a double compound in the proportion of about 57 parts of calx and 43 parts of phosphorated lime. 3. This antimonial calx is difi’erent from any other known calx . of antimony in several of its chemical qualities. About three-fourths of it are soluble in marine acid, and afford Algaroth powder, and the remainder is not soluble in this menstruum, and is apparently vitrified. It also ap¬ pears, that by calcining together bone-ashes, that is, phosphorated lime and antimony in a certain propor¬ tion, and afterwards exposing the mixture 10 a white beat, a compound was formed, consisting of antimonial calx, and phosphorated lime in the same proportion, powder and possessing the same kind of chemical properties as || James’s powder. Practice. POWDIKE, in the fens of Norfolk and Ely. By ' * ' stat. 22 Hen. VIII. c. 1 r. perversely to cut down and destroy the powdike in the fens of Noifolk and Ely is fe-" lony. See Blackstone's Commentaries, vol. iv. p. 243. POWER, has been defined the faculty of doing or suffering any thing. Power, therefore, fiTtwo-fold, viz. considered as able to make, or able to receive, anv change j the former whereof may he called active, and the latter passive,power: but this distinction is impro¬ per. See Metaphysics, N° 116. Power, in Mechanics, denotes any force, whether of a man, a horse, a spring, the wind, water, &c. which, being applied to a machine, tends to produce motion. Power, in Law, signifies in general a particular au¬ thority granted by any person to another to represent him, or to act in his stead. POWERS, in Arithmetic and Algebra, are nothing hut the products arising from the continual multiplica¬ tions of a number or quantity into itself. See Alge¬ bra and Arithmetic. POX, French-Pox, or Lues Venerea. See Medi¬ cine, N° 3 50. Small Pox. See Inoculation, and Medicine, N° 222—226. POYNING’s LAWr, an act of parliament made in Ireland under Henry VIE whereby all the statutes of force in England were made offeree in Ireland ; which before that time they were not.—Nor are any now in force there made in England since that time. The law took its name from Sir Edward Poyning, lord-lieutenant of that kingdom at the time of its ma¬ king. See Ireland, N° 46. POZZOLANA. See Puzzolana. PRACTICE, in Arithmetic. See there, N° 16. &c. G?/«-P^cr/CE, in military education. In thespring, as soon as the weather permits, the exercise of the great guns begins, with an intention to show the gentlemen cadets at the royal military academy at Woolwich, and private men, the manner of laying, loading, pointing, and firing the guns. Sometimes instruments are used to find the centre line, or two points, one at the breech, the other at the muzzle, which are marked with chalk, and whereby the piece is directed to the target: then a quadrant is put into the mouth to give the gun the required elevation, which at first is guessed at, accord¬ ing to the distance the target is from the piece. V hen the piece has been fired, it is sponged to clear it from any dust or sparks of fire that might remain in the bore, and loaded: then the centre line is found as be¬ fore } and if the shot went too high or too low, to the right or to the left, the elevation and trail are altered accordingly. This practice continues morning and evening for about six weeks, more or less according as there are a greater or less number of recruits. In the mean time others are shown the motions of quick-firing with field-pieces. Mortar-Practice, generally thus. A line of 1500 or 2000 yard>> is measured in an open spot of ground from the place where the mortars stand, and a flag fix¬ ed at about 300 or 500 yards : this being done, the ground where the mortars are to be placed is prepared and p ir m [ 23 and levelled with sand, so that they may lie at an ele¬ vation of 45 degrees; then they are loaded, with a small quantity of powder at first, which is increased afterwards hy an ounce every time, till they are load¬ ed with a full charge ; the times of the flights of the shells are observed, to determine the length ol the fuzes. The intention of this practice is, when a mortar bat¬ tery is raised in a siege, to know what quantity of powder is required to throw the shells into the works at a given distance, and to cut the fuzes ol a just length, that the shell may burst as soon as it touches tue ground. ~ PRAEMUNIRE, in Law, is taken either for a writ so called, or for the ofi’cnce whereon the writ is grant¬ ed ; the one may be understood by the other.— 1 he church of Rome, under pretence of her supremacy and the dignity of St Peter’s chair, took on her to be¬ stow most of the ecclesiastical livings of any woith in England, by mandates, before they were void ; pre¬ tending therein great care to see the church provided of a successor before it needed. Whence these man¬ dates or bulls were called gratia e.rpectativa, gyprovi¬ sion cs ; w hereof see a learned discourse in Duarenus de bemjiciis, lih. iii. cap. I. These provisions were so common, that at last Edward 1. not digesting so intole¬ rable an encroachment, in the 35th year of his reign made astatute against papal provisions,which,according to Sir Edward Coke, is the foundation of all the subse¬ quent statutes of praemunire : which is ranked as an ef- fence immediately against the king, because every en¬ couragement of the papal power is a diminution of the authority of the crown. In the weak reign of Edward II. the pope again endeavoured to enroach, but the parliament manfully withstood him ; and it was one of the articles charged against that unhappy prince, that he had given allow¬ ance to the hulls of the see of Rome. But Edw. III. was of a temper extremely different ; and, to remedy these inconveniences, first, by gentle means, he and bis nobility wrote an expostulation to the pope : but re¬ ceiving a menacing and contemptuous answrer, withal acquainting him, that the emperor (who a few years before at the diet of Nuremberg, A. 13. 1323, had established a law against provisions), and also the king of France, had lately submitted to the holy see ; the king replied, that if both the emperor and the French king should take the pope’s part, he was ready to give battle to them both, in defence of the liberties of the crown. Hereupon more sharp and penal laws were devised against provisors, which enact severally, that the court of Rome shall present or collate to no bishop¬ ric or living in England ; and that whoever disturbs any patron in the presentation to a living by virtue of a papal provision, such provisor shall pay fine and ran¬ som to the king at his will, and be imprisoned till he renounces such provision ; and the same punishment ia inflicted on such as cite the king, or any of his sub¬ jects, to answer in the court of Rome. And when the holy see resented these proceedings, and Pope Urban V. attempted to revive the vassalage and annualrent to which King John had subjected his kingdom, it was junanimously agreed by all the estates of the realm in parliament assembled, 40 Edw. III. that King John’s donation was null and void, being without the concur- xence of parliament, and contrary to his coronation-oath ; 4 ] PR and ail the temporal nobility and commons engaged, pr that if the pope should endeavour by process or other¬ wise to maintain these usurpations, they would resist and withstand him with all their power. In the reign of Richard II. it was found necessary to sharpen and strengthen these laws, and therefore it was enacted by statutes 3 Ric. II. c. 3- and 7 Eic. II# c. 1 2. first, that no alien shall be capable of letting his benefice to farm ; in order to compel such as had crept in, at least to reside on their preterments: and after¬ wards, that no alien should be capable to be presented to any ecclesiastical preferment, under the penalty of the statutes of provisors. By the statute 12 Ric. IT. c. 15. all liegemen of the king accepting of a living by any foreign provision, are put out of the king’s protec¬ tion, and the benefice made void. 'Io which the sta¬ tute 13 Ric. IE st. 2. c. 2. adds banishment and forfei¬ ture of lands and goods : and by c. 3. of the same sta¬ tute, any person bringing over any citation or excom¬ munication from beyond sea, on account of the execu¬ tion of the foregoing statutes of provisors, shall be im¬ prisoned ; forfeit his goods and lands, and moreover suf¬ fer pain of life and member. In the writ for the execution of all these statutes, the words preemumre facias being used to command a citation of the party, h*ve denominated in common speech, not only the writ, but the offence itself of main¬ taining the papal power, by the name of pramunire. And, accordingly, the next statute we shall mention, which is generally referred to by all subse,quent statutes, is qsually called \\w statute ofpreemunire. It is the sta¬ tute 16 Richard II. c. 5. which enacts, that whoever procures at Rome, or elsewhere, any translations, pro¬ cesses, excommunications, bulls, instruments, or other tilings which touch the king, against him, his crowm, and realm, and all persons aiding and assisting therein, shall lie put out of the king’s protection, their lands and goods forfeited to the king’s use, and they shall be at¬ tached by their bodies to answ’er to the king and his council ; or process of preemunire facias shall be made out against them as in other cases of provisois. By the statute 2 Henry IV. c. 3. all persons who ac¬ cept any provision from the pope, to be exempt from canonical obedience to their proper ordinary, are also subjected to the penalties of praemunire. And this is the last of our ancient statutes touching this offence ; the usurped civil power of the bishop of Rome being pretty w^ell broken down by these statutes, as bis usurp¬ ed religious power was in about a century afterwards: the spirit of the nation being so much raised against foreigners, that about this time, in the reign of Hen. V. the alien priories, or abbeys for foreign monks, were sup¬ pressed, and their lands given to the crown. And no farther attempts were afterwards made in supportof these foreign jurisdictions. This, then, is the original meaning of the offence which we call preemunire; viz. introducing a foreign power into this land, and creating imperium in wiperw, by paying that obedience to papal process which con¬ stitutionally belonged to the king alone, long before the Reformation in the reign of Henry \ HI. at which time the penalties of praemunire were indeed extended to more papal abuses than before; as the kingdom then entirely renounced the authority of the see of Rome, though not at all the corrupted doctrines of the Roman church. P R [ : .cliurch. And therefore, by the several statutes of 24 Hen. VI! f. c. 12. and 25 Hen. \ [LI. c. 19. & 21. to appeal to Rome from any of the king’s courts, which (though illegal before) had at times been connived at , to sue to Rome for any license or dispensation, or to obey any process from thence, are made liable to the pains ot praemunire. And, in order to restore to the king in edect the nomination of vacant bishoprics, and yet keep up the established forms, it is enacted by sta¬ tute 25 Hen. V!II. c. 20. that if the dean and chapter refuse to elect the person named by the king, or any archbishop or bishop to confirm or consecrate him, they shall fall within the penalties of the statutes of praemu¬ nire. ARo by statute 5 Eliz. c. I. to refuse the oath of supremacy will incur the pains of praemunire 5 and to defend the pope’s jurisdiction in this realm, is a praemu¬ nire for the first offence, and high treason for the se¬ cond. So, too, by statute 13 Eliz. c. 2. to import any agnus Di i, crosses, beads, or other superstitious things pretended to be hallowed by the bishop of Rome, and tender the same to be used j or to receive the same with sucli intent, and not discover the offender; or if a justice of the peace, knowing thereof, shall not within 14 days declare it to a privy-counsellor, they all incur a praemunire. But importing or selling mass-books, or other Popish books, is by stat. 3 Jac. I. c. 5. § 25. only liable to a penalty of 403. Lastly, to contribute to the maintenance of a Jesuit’s college, or any Popish semina¬ ry whatever beyond sea, or any person in the same, or to contribute to the maintenance of any Jesuit or Popish priest in England, is by statute 37 Eliz. c. 2. made lia¬ ble to the penalties of praemunire. Thus far the penalties of praemunire seem to have kept within the proper bounds of their original institu¬ tion, the depressing the power of the pope : but they being pains of no considerable consequence, it lias been thought fit to apply the same to other heinous olfences; some of which bear more, and some less, relation to this original offence, and some no relation at all. Thus, 1. By the statute I and 2 Ph. and Mar. c. 8. to molest the possessors of abbey-lands granted by parlia¬ ment to Henry VIII. and Edward VI. is a praemunire. 2. So likewise is the offence of acting as a broker or agent in any usurious contract where above 10 per cent, interest is taken, by statute 13 Eliz. c. 10. 3. To ob¬ tain any stay of proceedings, other than by arrest of judgment or writ of error, in any suit for a monopoly, is likewise a praemunire, by stat. 21 Jac I. c. 3. 4. To obtain an exclusive patent for the sole making or impor¬ tation of gunpowder or arms, or to hinder others from importing them, is also a praemunire by two statutes ; the one 16 Car. I. c. 21. the other 1 Jac. II. c. 8. 5. On the abolition, by stat. 12 Car, II. c. 24. of pur¬ veyance, and the prerogative of pre-emption, or taking any victual, beasts, or goods for the king’s use, at a stated price, without consent of the proprietor, the ex¬ ertion of any such power for the future was declared to incur the penalties of praemunire. 6. To assert, mali¬ ciously and advisedly, by speaking or writing, that both or either house ol parliament have a legislative authority without the king, is declared a praemunire by statute 13 Car. II. c. 1. 7 By the habeas corpus act also, 31 Car. ll, c. 2. it is a praemunire, and incapable of the king’s pardon, besides other heavy penalties, to send any subject ol this realm a prisoner into parts beyond the 55 ] P R seas. 8. By the statute 1 W. & M. st. x. c. 8. persons of 18 years of age refusing to take the new oaths of al¬ legiance as well as supremacy, upon tender by the pro¬ per magistrate, are subject to the penalties of a praemu¬ nire ; and by statutes 7 & 8 W. III. c. 24. Serjeants, counsellors, proctors, attorneys, and all officers of courts, practising without having taken the oaths of allegiance and supremacy, and subscribed the declaration against popery, are guilty of a praemunire whether the oaths he tendered or not. 9. Bv the statute 6 Ann. c. 7. to as¬ sert maliciously and directly, by preaching, teaching, or ad vised speaking, that the then pretended prince of Wales, or any person other than according to the acts of settlement and union, hath any right to the throne of these kingdoms, or that the king and parliament can¬ not make laws to limit the descent of the crown ; such preaching, teaching, or advised speaking, is a praemu¬ nire : as writing, printing, or publishing the same doc¬ trines amounted, we may remember, to high treason. 10. By statute 6 Ann. c. 23. if the assembly of peers of Scotland, convened to elect their 16 representatives in the British parliament, shall presume to treat of any other matter save only the election, they incur the penalties of a praemunire. ] 1. The stat. 6 Geo.I. c.,18. (enact¬ ed in the year after the infamous South Sea project had beggared half the nation) makes all unwarrant¬ able undertakings by unlawful subscriptions, then com¬ monly known by the name of bubbles, subject to the penalties of a praemunire. 12. The stat. 12 Geo. III. c. 11. subjects to the penalties of the statute of praemu¬ nire all such as knowingly and wilfully solemnize, assist, or are present at, any forbidden marriage of such of the descendants of the body of King Geo. II. as are by that act prohibited to contract matrimony without the con¬ sent of the crown. Having thus inquired into the nature and several spe¬ cies ol praemunire, its punishment may he gathered from the foregoing statutes, which are thus shortly summed up by Sir Edward Coke : “ That, from the conviction, the defendant shall be out of the king’s protection, and his lands and tenements, goods and chattels, forfeited to the king ; and that his body shall remain in prison at the king’s pleasure, or (as other authorities have it) during life ; both which amount to the same thing, as the king by his prerogative may at any time remit the whole, or any part of the punishment, except in the case> of transgressing the statute of habeas corpus. These for¬ feitures here inflicted do not (by the way) bring this offence within our former definition of Felony ; being inflicted by particular statutes, and not by the common law.” But so odious, Sir Edward Coke adds, was this offence of praemunire, that a man that was attainted of the same, might have been slain by any other man with¬ out danger of law; because it was provided by law,, that any man might do to him as to the king’s enemy ; and any man may lawfully kill an enemy. However, the position itself, that it is at any time lawful to kill an enemy, is bv no means tenable : it is only lawful, by the law of nature and nations, to kill him in the heat of battle, or for necessary self-defence. And to obviate such savage and mistaken notions, the statute 5 Eliz. c. 1. provides, that it shall not be lawful to kill any person attainted in a praemunire, any law, statute, opi¬ nion, or exposition of law to the contrary notwithstand-, ing. But still such delinquent, though protected as a pifvt r. Praemunire II Prague P R A I 25 part of the public from public wrongs, can bring no ac¬ tion for any private injury, bow atrocious soever ; e- ing so far out of the protection ot the law, that it will not guard his civil rights, nor remedy any grievance which he as an individual may suffer. And no man, knowing him to be guilty, can with safety give him comfort, aid, or relief. PRiENESTE, in Ancient Geography, a town ot Ea- tium, to the south-east of Rome, towards the territory of the /Equi } a place of great strength. Famous for the temple and oracle of Fortune, called Sortes Prcenes- tince (Strabo) which Tiberius wanted to destroy, but was deterred by the awful majesty of the place.. From a colony it was raised to a municipium by Tiberius (In¬ scriptions, Florus, A. Gellius), on the consideration of his recovery from a dangerous illness near this place. Thither the Roman emperors usually retired, on account of the agreeableness of the situation (Suetonius). It was 1 very ancient city, with a territory of large extent (Livy). The temple of Fortune was built in the most sumptuous manner by Sylla, and the pavement was mo¬ saic work (Pliny). Concerning the Sortes, there is a remarkable passage in Cicero } who says that it was all a mere contrivance, in order to deceive, either for the purposes of gain or superstition. T he town that has succeeded it stands low in a valley, and is called Pales¬ trina, in the Campania of Rome. E. Long. 13* 30, Lat. 42. o. PRiESIDIUM (Notitia), a town of the Cornavn m Britain. Now thought to be Warwick (Camden).— Another of Corsica (Antonine), 30 miles to the south of Aleria.—A third Presidium surnamcd Julium, in Baetica (Pliny). PR/ETORIA AUGUSTA (Ptolemy), a town of Da¬ cia. Now called Prassow by the natives, and Cronstat by the Germans (Baudrand) : a town of 1 ransylvania. E. Long. 250. N. Lat. 470.—Another of the Salassii, near the two gates or defiles of the Alps, the Grajae and Penninae (Pliny) ; a Roman colony settled by Augus¬ tus after the defeat of the Salassii by lerentius \arro, on the spot where he encamped (Strabo, Dio Cassius, Ptolemy), situated on the river Duria Major. ’Ihe town is now called Aosta or Aoust, in Piedmont. E. Long. 7. 14. N. Lat. 45. 19. PRyETORIUM (Antonine, Notitia Imperii), a town of the Brigantes. Now Paterington (Camden), near the mouth of the Humber in Yorkshire. Coventry (Talbot). PRAGMATIC SANCTION, in the civil law, is de¬ fined by Hottoman to be a rescript or answer of the sovereign, delivered by advice of his council, to some college, order, or body of people, upon consulting him on some case of their community. The like answer given to any particular person is called simply rescript. The term pragmatic sanction is chiefly applied to a settlement of Charles VI, emperor of Germany, who, in the year 1722, having no sons, settled his hereditary dominions on his eldest daughter the archduchess Maria Theresa, which was confirmed by the diet ot the em¬ pire, and guaranteed by Great Britain, France, the States-General, and most of the powers in Europe. The word pragmatic is derived from the Greek Tr^uypoc, ne- gotium, “ business.”—It is sometimes also called abso¬ lutely pragmatic, to Tr^aypxltKov. PRAGUE, a city of Bohemia, and capital of the 6 ] P R A whole kingdom, is situated in 140 40' of longitude* and pra^ 50° 5' of latitude. It stands on both sides the Moldau, over which there is a bridge 700 feet long, built of large freestone. The river, though of great breadth here, is nevertheless shallow, and not navigable. On both sides of the bridge are several statues, and among others that of St John of Nepomuck, whom King Wen- sei caused to be thrown from the bridge into the river, for venturing to reprove him upon some occasion j but in 1720, he was canonized as a saint, and is at present held in such veneration in Bohemia, that all other saints seem on his account to be forgotten. Near the bridge, which stands at the upper part of the city, the number of people is very great, but the farther you go from thence the more desolate you find every place. 'Die city is about three miles long and two broad ; the num¬ ber of it'. Christian inhabitants is said to be 70,000, and of Jews about 12,000. The principal branch of its trade consists in brewing beer. It is divided into the Old and the New Towns, and that called the Small side ; the former lying on the east side of the Moldau, and the latter on the west. The whole is about 12 miles in circumference. The fortifications are not of great importance, as it may be flanked and raked on all sides. However, the king of Prussia was not able to make himself master of it in the late war, though he almost destroyed it with his bombs, &c. See Prussia, N° 24, &c.—It has suffered greatly, by sieges, and has been often taken and plundered. Ihe university was founded by Charles IV in the year 1347* In 1409, when John Huss was rector of the unneisity, there were no less than 44,000 students j and when the emperor Charles V. would have retrenched then pii\i leges, 24,000 are said to have left it in one week, and 16,000 in a short time after. The Jews have the trade of this city almost entirely in their own hands. They deal in all sorts of commodities, especially the pre¬ cious stones found in the Bohemian mines, and,, by re¬ ceiving all old-fashioned things in payment, quite ruin the Christian handicraftsmen. In 1744, they narrowly escaped being expelled the kingdom, having been sus¬ pected of corresponding with the Prussians, when they made themselves masters ot the city. Ihe grand piior of the order of Malta, for Bohemia, Moravia, and Siie- sia, resides here ; and the church and hospital of the Holy Ghost is the seat of the general and grand masters of the holy order of knights of the cross with the red star, residing in the above mentioned countnes, and in Poland and Hungary. The houses of this city are all built of stone, and generally consist of three stories ; but there are very few good buildings in it, and almost every thing looks dirty. I he cathedral, which is de¬ dicated to St Veit, is an old building, in which there are some pieces of excellent architecture and many mag¬ nificent tombs of great men. There are 100 churches and chapels, and about 40 cloisters in the place. On Ratschin-hill, in Upper Prague, most of the nobility have houses, and the emperor a very magnificent palace, and a summer house commanding one ot the finest pro spects in the world. Here the tribunals oi the regency meet; and the halls, galleries, and other apartments, are adorned with a multitude ot noble pictures. Ihe great hall, where the coronation feast is kept, is said to be the largest of the kind in Europe next to that ot Westminster. The castle stands on the above-mention¬ ed FRA ague II itique e ^ ful forewarner of the overflowing of the Nile 5 and they* See Du- combined him with the star Fomelhaset * in their mysti-p,n!? sur cal kalendar. This knowledge is also involved in theq^1^1116 precepts of the Chinese astronomy, of much older date tiens,Mm. than the time of Hipparchus. de PAcad. But all these acknowledged facts are not sufficient^* ^mcrW' for depriving Hipparchus of the honour of the disco-r, f8, very, or fixing on him the charge of plagiarism. This ' the motion was a thing unknown to the astronomers of the Alexandrian school, and it was pointed out to them by Hipparchus in the way in which he ascertained every other position in astronomy, namely, as the ma¬ thematical result of actual observations, and not as a thing deducible from any opinions on other subjects re¬ lated to it. We see him on all other occasions, eager to confirm his own observations, and his deductions from them, by every thing he could pick up from other astro¬ nomers j and he even adduced the above-mentioned practice of the Egyptians in corroboration of his doc¬ trine. It is more than probable then that he did not know any thing more. Had he known the Indian precession of 54" annually, he had no temptation what¬ ever to withhold him from using it in preference to one which he acknowledges to be inaccurate, because de¬ duced from the very short period of 150 years, and from the observations of Timochares, in which he had no great confidence. I his motion of the starry heavens was long a matter Heavenly of discussion, as a thing for which no physical reason motions ac-* could be assigned. But the establishmrnt of the Co-counted for' pernican system reduced it to a very simple affair 5 theby thc Co" motion which was thought to affect all the heavenly system!11 bodies, is now acknowledged to be a deception, or a false judgment from the appearances. The earth turns round its own axis while it revolves round the sun, in the same manner as we may cause a child’s top to spin on the brim of a millstone, while the stone is turning slowly round its axis. It the top spin steadily, with¬ out any wavering, its axis will always point to the ze¬ nith of the heavens 5 but we frequently sec, that while it spins briskly round its axis, the axis itself has a slow conical motion round the vertical line, so that, if pro¬ duced, it would slowly describe a circle in the heavens round the zenith point. The flat surface of the top may represent the terrestrial equator, gradually turning itself round on all sides. If this top were formed like a ball, with an equatorial circle on it, it would represent the whole motion very prettily, the only difference being, that the spinning motion and this wavering motion are in the same direction ; whereas the diurnal rotation and the motion of the equinoctial points are in contrary di¬ rections. Even this dissimilarity may be removed, by making the top turn on a cap, like the card of a mari¬ ner’s compass. Tc It is now a matter fully established, that while the And the earth revolves round the sun from west to east, in theearth’*\ plane of the ecliptic in the course of a year, it turns round its own axis from west to east in 23I1 56' 4", which axis is inclined to this plane in au angle of nearly 230 28'j and that this axis turns round a line perpen¬ dicular to the ecliptic in 25,745 years from east to west, keeping nearly the same inclination to the ecliptic.— By this means, its pole in the sphere of the starry hea¬ vens describes a circle round the pole of the ecliptic at the [ P It E • the distance of 23° 28' nearly. The consequence of Preccpon. mugt be? that the terrestrial equator, "’hen produ¬ ced to the sphere of the starry heavens, will cut t ecliptic in two opposite points, throug 1 " J ^ must pass when he makes the day and night equa , and that these points must shift to the westward, at the rate of co4- seconds annually, which is the precession of the equinoxes. Accordingly this has been the received doctrine among astronomers for nearly three centuries, and it was thought perfectly conformable to appear- “ , anraa of observing being now prodigiously improved, Dr Brad¬ ley resumed this investigation. It will easily appeal, that if the earth’s axis keeps parallel to itself, its extre¬ mity must describe in the sphere ol the starry heavens a figure equal and parallel to its orbit round the sun j and°if the stars be so near that this figure is a visi 1 e 0 >- iect the pole of diurnal revolution will be in different distinguishable points of this figure. Consequently, it the axis describes the cone already mentioned, the pole will not describe a circle round the pole of the ecliptic, but will have a looped motion along this circumference, similar to the absolute motion of one of Jupiter s satel¬ lites, describing an epicycle whose centre describes the circle round the pole of the ecliptic. _ He accordingly observed such an epicyclical motion, and thought that he had now overcome the only diltx- _ ^ _ i_ . rviO I’ll 13 subject. Plate 264 ] . . - « ■ Let E (fig. I.), be the pole of the ecliptic, and SPQprec€S! a circle distant from it 230 28', representing the circle' y* described by the pole of the equator during one revolu- tion of the equinoctial points. Let P be the place otccc^x this last mentioned pole at some given time. Round P ^ describe a circle ABCD, whose diameter AC is 18". Matheu The real situation of the pole will be in the circum-ticaltlw ference of this circle; and its place, in this circum-^l* ference, depends 011 the place of the moon s ascendingror ^ ^ node. Draw EPF and GPL perpendicular to it; letposedtf GL be the colure of the equinoxes, and EF the colure scribe*, of the solstices. Dr Bradley’s observations showed thatcle< the pole was in A when the node was in L, the vernal equinox. If the node recede to H, the winter solstice, the pole is in B. When the node is in the autumnal equinox at G, the pole is at C; and when the node is in F, the summer solstice, the pole is in D. In all in¬ termediate situations of the moon’s ascending node, the pole is in a point of the circumference ABCD, three signs or 90° more advanced. Ic Dr Bradley, by comparing together a great number Morel of observations, found that the mathematical theory, and it'an eE the calculation depending on it, would correspond much better with the observations, if an ellipse were substitut-circle ed for the circle ABCD, making the longer axis AC 18", and the shorter, BD, 16". Mr d’Alembert deter¬ mined, by the physical theory of gravitation, the axes to be 18" and 13".4. n? These observations, and this mathematical theory, These, must be considered as so many facts in astronomy, andsemtk we must deduce from them the methods of computing““1 and thought that lie •>Vbut° o’n maturely 'con- “ir/u.im” ^ T, by z ^a„d d. . > ...uu rb. ^nnspmiences of the annual clmation. , . . .. f It is evident, in the first place, that this equation olobhqii the pole’s motion makes a change in the obliquity of of the the ecliptic. The inclination of the equator to the eclip-'W'1 tic is measured by the arch of a great circle intercep¬ ted between their poles. Now, if the pole be in O in¬ stead of P, it is plain that the obliquity is measured by EO instead of EP. If EP be considered as the mean obliquity of the ecliptic, it is augmented by 9" when the moon’s ascending node is in the vernal equinox, and consequently the pole in A. It is, on the contrary, di¬ minished 9" when the node is in the autumnal equinox, and the pole in C ; and it is equal to the mean when the node is in the colure of the solstices. Ihis change of the inclination of the earth’s axis to the plane of the ecliptic was called the nutation of the axis by Sir Isaac Newton ; who shewed, that a change of nearly a second must obtain in a year by the action of the sun on the prominent parts of the terrestrial spheroid. But he did not attend to the change which would be made in tins motion by the variation which obtains in the disturbing force of the MOON, in consequence of the different obli¬ quity of her action on the equator, arising from the mo¬ tion of her own oblique orbit. It is this change which now goes by the name nutation, and we owe its dis¬ covery entirely to Dr Bradley. The general change of the position of the earth’s axis has been termed DE¬ VIATION by modern astronomers. . _ 1 , The quantity of this change of obliquity is easily as-Qaan] certained. It is evident, from what has been already said, that when the pole is in O, the arch ADCO is^ equal to the node’s longitude from the vernal equinox. iiodill ^ j 1! tap- p e :fa JliilOf talif 11 quite inconsistent with the consequences of the annual parallax, and it puzzled him exceedingly. One day, while taking the amusement of sailing about on the Thames, he observed, that every time the boat tacked, the direction of the wind, estimated by the direction of the vane, seemed to chaqge. This immediately sug¬ gested to him the cause of his observed epicycle, and he found it an optical illusion, occasioned by a combi¬ nation of the motion of light with the motion of Ins telescope while observing the polar stars. 1 bus he un¬ wittingly established an incontrovertible argument tor the truth of the Copernican system, and immortalized his name by his discovery of the Aberration of the Hh further He now engaged in a series of observations foi as- iuvestiga- certaining all the circumstances of this discovery. n tion of the course of these, which were continued for 28 years, LUC 7 - _ . , IP he discovered another epicyclical motion ot the pole oi the heavens, which was equally curious and unexpected. He found that the pole described an epicycle, whose diameter was about 18", having for its centre that point of the circle round the pole of the ecliptic in which the pole would have' been found independent of this new motion. He also observed, that the period of this epi¬ cyclical motion was 18 years and seven months. It struck him, that this was precisely the period of the re¬ volution of the nodes of the moon’s orbit. He gave a brief account of these results to Lord Macclesfield, then president of the Royal Society, in 1747. Mr Machin, to whom he also communicated the observations,. gave ccccxsxviiibim in return a very neat mathematical hypothesis, by fig. 1. which the raotiou might be calculated. 3 ‘ 11 s<4i. P R E we <5f -qui- tial iU> [ 265 ] cession, ami that PM is its cosine ; and (on account of the small- theirs. ! SI, ness of AP in comparison of EP) PM may be taken for the change of the obliquity of the ecliptic. This is there¬ fore = 9" X cos. long, node, and is additive to the mean obliquity, while O is in the semicircle BAD, that is, while the longitude of the node is from 9 signs to 3 signs j but subtractive while the longitude of the node changes from 3 to 9 signs. But the nutation changes also the longitudes and right ascensions of the stars and planets, by changing the equi¬ noctial points, and thus occasioning an equation in the precession of the equinoctial points. It was this circum¬ stance which made it necessary for us to consider it in this place, while expressly treating of this precession. Let us attend to this derangement of the equinoctial points. The great circle or meridian which passes through the poles of the ecliptic and equator is always the solsti¬ tial colure, and the equinoctial colure is at right angles to it: therefore when the pole is in P or in O, F.P or EO is the solstitial colure. Let S be any fixed star or planet, and let SE be a meridian or circle of longitude ; draw the circles of declination PS, OS, and the circles M'EM", niE.m', perpendicular to PE, OE. If the pole were in its mean place P, the equinoctial points would be in the ecliptic meridian M'EM", or that meridian would pass through the intersections of the ' 20 S ation <0 lit' sol - slid and ei noctial C res. 41 motion olingi- tu from ® ii tlon of id*® ti sarUi s e4naror an(1 ecliptic, and the angle M'ES would mea- of* of Hi sure the longitude of the star S. But when the pole is in O, the ecliptic meridian mEm' will pass through the equinoctial points. The equinoctial points must therefore be to the westward of their mean place, and the equation of the precession must be additive to that precession : and the longitude of the star S will now be measured by the angle m ES, which, in the case here represented, is greater than its mean lonaitude. The difference or the equation of longitude, arising from the nutation of the earth’s axis, is the angle OEP, or^J. • O .fcj OM is the sine of the angle CPO, which, by what has been already observed, is equal to tbe longitude of the node : Therefore OM is equal to 9" X long, node, and OM . . o" x sin. long, node ^ . This equation is UM . , o' is equal to — sin. obliqy. eclip. additive to the mean longitude of the star when O is in tbe semicircle CBA, or while the ascending node is pas¬ sing backwards from the vernal to tbe autumnal equi¬ nox \ but it is subtractive from it while O is in the semi¬ circle ADC, or while the node is passing backwards from the autumnal to the vernal equinox j or, to express it more briefly, the equation is subtractive from the mean longitude of the star, while the ascending node is in the first six signs, and additive to it while the node is in the last six signs. This equation of longitude is the same for all the stars, for the longitude is reckoned on the ecliptic (which is here supposed invariable) ; and therefore is affected only by the variation of the point from which the longitude is computed. 1 he right ascension, being computed on the equator, ‘ *01 suf. suffers a double change. It is computed from, or be- 1/U~ ?J"ns at» a different point of tbe equator, and it termi- s. ‘ nates at a different point j because the equator having changed its position, the circles of declination also change Vol. XVII. Part I. f w P R E When the pole is at P, the right ascension of Precession. S from the solstitial colure is measured by the ancle ——-y -> SPE, contained between that colure and the star’s circle of declination. But when the pole is at O, the right ascension is measured by the angle SOE, and the dif¬ ference of SPE and SOE is the equation of right as¬ cension. The angle SOE consists of two parts, GOE and GOS ; GOE remains the same wherever the star S is placed, but GOS varies with the place of the star.— We must first find the variation by which GPE becomes GOE, which variation is common to all the stars. The triangles G1JE, GOE, have a constant side GE, and a constant angle G 5 the variation PO of the side GP is extremely small, and therefore the variation of the angles may be computed by Mr Cotes’s Fluxionary Theorems. See Simpson’s Fluxions, § 253, &c. As the tangent of the side EP, opposite to the constant angle G, is to the Sine of the angle EPG, opposite to ihc constant side EG, so is PO the variation of the side GP, adjacent to the constant angle, to the variation x ot the angle GPO, opposite to the constant side EG. This gives X sin. long, node 9 x~ — This is subtractive from the tang. obi. eclip. mean right ascension for the first six signs of the node’s longitude, and additive for the last six signs. This equa¬ tion is common to all the stars. ? The variation of the other part SOG of tbe angle, Other va- which depends on the different position of the hour r',!tions. circles PS and OS, which causes them to cut tbe eqiia-^0’ tion in different points, where tbe arches of right ascen¬ sion terminate, may be discovered as follows : The tri¬ angles SPG, SOG, have a constant sidi SG, and a constant angle G. Therefore, by the same Cotesian theorem, tan. SP sin. SPG = PO : y, ami y, or tbe second part ot the nutation in right ascension, ~ 9" X sin. dill. R. A of star and node cotan, declin. star The nutation also affects the declination of tbe stars : Nutation ForSP, the mean codeclination, is changed into SO. affet-t' the Suppose a circle described round S, with tbe distai dfclina- SO cutting SP in f; then it is evident that the equa- ^ tion of declin. is P/’= PO x cosine OP/ — 9'' x sign ion of the r. ascen. of star—long ol node. Such are the calculations in constant use in our astro-A more nomical researches, founded on Machin’s Theory. When ’T101 ni0<^c still greater accuracy is required, the elliptical theory |j01C1alcula' must be substituted, by taking (as is expressed by tbe dotted lines) O in that point of the ellipse described on the transverse axis AC, where it is cut by OM, drawn according to Machin’s Theory. All the change made here is the diminution of OM in the ratio of 18 to 1 3.4, and a corresponding diminution of the angle CPO The detail of it may be seen in De la Lande’s Astronomy, art. 2874 5 but is rather foreign to our present purpose of explaining the precession of tbe equinoxes. The cal¬ culations being in every case tedious, and liable to mis¬ takes, on account of the changes of tbe signs of the dif- ferentequations, tbe zealous promoters of astronomy have calculated and published tables of all these equations, both on the circular and elliptical hypothesis. And still more to abridge calculations, which occur in reducing every astronomical observation, when the place of a phe¬ nomenon is deduced from a comparison with known stars, there have been published tables of nutation and preces- L f sion. P It E [ 266 ] P Pt E Frefcssion. 16 Precession of the equi noctial points, See. 27 Observa¬ tions of Jfewton and others on tins sub ject. 2 3 Sketch of PI ewton’s investiga¬ tion of it. iig. 2. sion, for some hundreds of the principal stars, for every position of the moon’s node and of the sun. It now remains to consider the precession of the equi¬ noctial points, with its equations, arising from the nuta¬ tion of the earth’s axis as a physical phenomenon, am to endeavour to account for it upon those mechanical principles which have so happily explained all the other phenomena of the celestial motions. This did not escape the penetrating eye of bir Isaac Newton j and he quickly found it to be a consequence, and the most beautiful proof, of the universal gravitation of all matter to all matter j and there is no part of his immortal work where his sagacity and fertility of re¬ source shine more conspicuously than in this investiga¬ tion. ' It must be acknowledged, however, that ISew- ton’s investigation is only a shrewd guess, founded on as¬ sumptions, of which it would be extremely difficult to demonstrate either the truth or falsity, and which requi¬ red the genius of a Newton to pick out in such a com¬ plication of abstruse circumstances. rl he subject has oc¬ cupied the attention of the first mathematicians of Eu¬ rope since his time 5 and is still considered as the most curious and difficult of all mechanical problems. Hie most elaborate and accurate dissertations on the preces¬ sion of the equinoxes are those of Sylvabella and W alme- 5,1 y, in the Philosophical Transactions, published about the year 1754 J that of Thomas Simpson, published in his Miscellaneous Tracts ; that of Father Frisius, in the Memoirs of the Berlin Academy, and afterwards with great improvements, in his Cosmographia •, that of Eu- fer in the Memoirs of Berlin *, that of D’Alembert in a separate dissertation j and that of De la Orange on the Libration of the Moon, which obtained the prize in the Academy of Paris in 1769. We think the disserta¬ tion of Father Frisius the most perspicuous of them all, being conducted in the method of geometrical analysis*, whereas most of the others proceed in the fluxionary and symbolic method, which is frequently deficient in distinct notions of the quantities under consideration, and therefore does not give us the same perspicuous conviction of the truth of the results. In a work like ours, it is impossible to do justice to the problem, with¬ out entering into a detail which would be thought ex¬ tremely disproportioned to the subject by the genera¬ lity of our readers. Yet those who have the necessary preparation of mathematical knowledge, and wish to un¬ derstand the subject fully, will find enough here to give them a very distinct notion of it; and in the article Ro¬ tation, they will find the fundamental theorems, which will enable them to carry on the investigation. We shall first give a short sketch of Newton’s investigation, which is of the most palpable and popular kind, and is highly valuable, not only for its ingenuity, but also be¬ cause it will give our unlearned readers distinct and sa¬ tisfactory conceptions of the chief circumstances of the whole phenomena. Let S (fig. 2.) be the sun, F the earth, and M the moon, moving in the orbit NMCD n, which cuts the plane of the ecliptic in the line of the nodes N n, and has one half raised above it, as represented in the figure, the other half being hid below the ecliptic. Sup¬ pose this orbit folded down ; it will coincide with the ecliptic in the circle ~N ?n c dn. Let EX represent the axis of this orbit, perpendicular to its plane, and there¬ fore inclined to the ecliptic. Since the mccn gravi¬ tates to the sun in the direction MS, which is all above prems the ecliptic, it is plain that this gravitation lias a ten-^ dency to draw the moon towards the ecliptic. Sup¬ pose this force to he such that it would draw the moon down from M to i in the time that she would have mo¬ ved from M to t, in the tangent to her orbit. By the combination of these motions, the moon will desert her orbit, and describe the line M r, which makes the dia¬ gonal of the parallelogram 5 and if no farther action of the sun be supposed, she will describe another orbit M 'bn\ lying between the orbit MCD n and the eclip¬ tic, and she will come to the ecliptic, and pass through it in a point n\ nearer to M than n is, which was the former place of her descending node. By tins change of orbit, the line EX will no longer be perpendicular to it 5 but there will be another line E .r, which will now be perpendicular to the new orbit. Also the moon, moving from M to r, does not move as if she had come from the ascending node N, hut from a point N lying beyond itand the line of the nodes of the orbit in this new position is N' ?/. Also the angle MN'm is less than the angle MN/». Thus the nodes shift their places in a direction op¬ posite to that of her motion, or move to the westward ; the axis of the orbit changes its position, and the orbit itself changes its inclination to the ecliptic. These momentary changes are diflerent in different parts of the orbit, according to the position of the line of the nodes. Sometimes the inclination of the orbit is in¬ creased, and sometimes the nodes move to the eastward. But, in general, the inclination increases from the time that the nodes are in the line of syzigee, till they get into quadrature, after which it diminishes till the nodes are again in syzigee. The nodes advance only while they are in the octants after the quadratures, and while the moon passes from quadrature to the node, and they re¬ cede in all other situations. Therefore the recess ex¬ ceeds the advance in every revolution of the moon round the earth, and, on the whole, they recede. What has been said of one moon, would be true of each of a continued ring of moons surrounding the earth, and they would thus compose a flexible ring, which would never be flat but waved, according to the difference (both in kind and degree) of the disturbing forces acting on its different parts. But suppose these moons to cohere, and to form a rigid and flat ring, no¬ thing would remain in this ring hut the excess of the con¬ trary tendencies of its different parts. Its axis would be perpendicular to its plane, and its position in any moment will be the mean position of all the axes of the orbits of each part of the flexible ring 5 therefore the nodes of this rigid ring will continually recede, except when the plane of the ring passes through the sun, that is, when the nodes are in syzigee ; and (says Newton) the mor tion of these nodes will be the same with the mean mo¬ tion of the nodes of the orbit of one moon. The incli¬ nation of this ring to the ecliptic will be equal to the mean inclination of the moon’s orbit during any one revolution which has the same situation of the nodes. It will therefore be least of all when the nodes are in quadrature, and will increase till they are in syzigee, and then diminish till they are again in quadrature. Suppose this ring to contract in dimensions, the dis¬ turbing forces will diminish in the same proportion, and in this proportion will all their effects diminish. Sup- ■ pose r R E f 267 ] P R E pose its motion of revolution to accelerate, or the time of a revolution to diminish ; the linear effects of the dis¬ turbing forces being as the squares of the times of their action, and their angular effects as the times, those er¬ rors must diminish also on this account $ and we can compute what those errors will be for any diameter of the ring, and for any period of its revolution. We can tell, therefore, what would be the motion of the nodes, the change of inclination, and deviation of the axis, of a ring which would touch the surface of the earth, and revolve in 24 hours •, nay, we can tell what these mo¬ tions would be, should this ring adhere to the earth. They must be much less than if the ring were detached ; for the disturbing forces of the ring must drag along with it the whole globe of the earth. The quantity of motion which the disturbing forces would have pro¬ duced in the ring alone, will now (says Newton) be produced in the whole mass 5 and therefore the velocity must be as much less as the quantity of matter is greater : But still all this can be computed. Now there is such a ring on the earth : for the earth is not a sphere, but an elliptical spheroid. Sir Isaac Newton therefore engaged in a computation of the effects of the disturbing force, and has exhibited a most beautiful example of mathematical investigation. He first asserts, that the earth must be an elliptical spheroid, whose po¬ lar axis is to its equatorial diameter as 229 to 230. Then he demonstrates, that if the sine of the inclina¬ tion of the equator be called w, and if t be the num¬ ber of days (sidereal) in a year, the annual motion of 2 \/ x a detached ring will be 360° 4t He then shows that the effect of the disturbing force on this ring is to its effect on the matter of the same ring, dis¬ tributed in the form of an elliptical stratum (but still detached) as 3 to 2 5 therefore the motion of the nodes will be 36o°x^—or I6' 16" 24'" annually. He then proceeds to show, that the quantity of motion in the sphere is to that in an equatorial ring revolving in the same time, as the matter in the sphere to the mat¬ ter in the ring, and as three times the square of a qua- drantral arch to two squares of a diameter, jointly : Then he shows, that the quantity of matter in the ter¬ restrial sphere is to that in the protuberant matter of the spheroid, as 52900 to 461 (supposing all homo¬ geneous). From these premises it follows, that the mo¬ tion of 16' 24,,/, must be diminished in the ratio of X0717 to 100, which reduces it to 9'/ 07"' annually. And this (he says) is the precession of the equinoxes, occasioned by the action of the sun ; and the rest of the which is the observed precession, is owing to the action of the moon, nearly five times greater than that of the sun. This appeared a great difficulty j for the phenomena of the tides show that it cannot much exceed twice the sun’s force. ,r Nothing can exceed the ingenuity of this process. , Justly does his celebrated and candid commentator, Da- amniel Bernoulli, say (in his Dissertation on the Tides, ^ which shared the prize of the French Academy with l lc M‘Laurin and Euler,), that Newton saw through a veil ^jlmted w^at ot^ers could hardly discover with a microscope V'Lau- in the light of the meridian sun. His determination of the form and dimensions of the earth, which is the foundation of the whole process, is not offered as any preoesdo*. thing better than a probable guess, in re (lijficillima; and —~ y— it has since been demonstrated with geometrical rigour by MfLanrin. His next principle, that the motion of the nodes of the rigid ring is equal to the mean motion of the nodes of the moon, has been most critically discussed by the first mathematicians, as a thing which could neither be proved nor refuted. Frisius has at least shown it to be a mistake, and that the motion of the nodes of the ring is double the mean motion of the nodes of a single moon : and that Newton’s own principles should have produced a precession of 18^ seconds annually, which removes the difficulty formerly mentioned. His third assumption, that the quantity of motion of the ring must be shared with the included sphere, was acquiesced in by all Ins'commentators, till D’Alem¬ bert and Euler, in 1749, showed that it was not the quantity of motion round an axis of rotation which re¬ mained the same, but the quantity of momentum or ro¬ tatory eflort. The quantity of motion is the product of every particle by its velocity ; that is, by its distance from the axis ; while its momentum, or power of pro¬ ducing rotation, is as the square of that distance, and is to be had by taking the sum of each particle multiplied by the square of its distance from the axis. Since the earth differs so little from a perfect sphere, this makes no sensible difference in the result. It will increase Newton’s precession about three-fourths of a second. ^ We proceed now to the examination of this pheno-Examjni%. menon upon the fundamental principles of mechanics, tion oft e Because the mutual gravitation of the particles ofpbenome- matter in the solar system is in the inverse ratio of the squares of the distance, it follows, that the gravitations of the different parts of the earth to the sun or to the principle* moon are unequal. The nearer particles gravitate more than those that are more remote. Let PQ/?E (fig. 3.) be a meridional section of the Fi^. ji terrestrial sphere, and VOpy the section of the inscribed sphere. Let CS be a line in the plane of the ecliptic passing through the sun, so that the angle ECS is the sun’s declination. Let NCM be a plane passing through the centre of the earth at right angles to the plane of the meridian PQpE j NCM will therefore be the plane of illumination. In consequence of the unequal gravitation of the mat¬ ter of the earth to the sun, every particle, such as B, ia acted on by a disturbing force parallel to CS, and pro¬ portional to BD, the distance of the particle from the plane of illumination 5 and this force is to the gravita¬ tion of the central particle to the sun, as three times BD to CS, the distance of the earth from the sun. Let ABa be a plane passing through the particle B, parallel to the plane EQ of the equator. This section of the earth will be a circle, of which An is a diameter, and Qy will be the diameter of its section with the inscri¬ bed sphere. These will be two concentric circles, and the ring by which the section of the spheroid exceeds the section of the sphere, will have AQ for its breadth: Vp is the axis of figure. Let EC be represented by the symbol - a ~~ b d CL UC or r\j EO their difference, — a'—b* aJpb LI 2 precession. P R E CL QL - The periphery of a circle to radius I The disturbing force at the distance I from the plane NCM The sine of declination ECS The cosine of ECS n 268 ] P It E of an arch, and the sum of its square and the square of precessi* its corresponding cosine is equal to the square of the radius. Therefore the sum of all the squares of the sines, together with the sum of all the squares of the cosines, is equal to the sum of the same number of / vi It is evident, that with respect to the inscribed sphere, the disturbing forces are completely compensated, for every particle has a corresponding particle in the ad¬ joining quadrant, which is acted on by an equal and op¬ posite force. But this is not the case with the protube¬ rant matter which makes up the spheroid. The seg¬ ments NS sn and MT tm are more acted on than the segments NT t n and MS s m ; and thus there is produ¬ ced a tendency to a conversion of the whole earth, round an axis passing through the centre C, perpendicular to the plane PQ p E. We shall distinguish this motion from all others to which the spheroid may be subject, bv the name Libration. The axis of this libration is always perpendicular to that diameter of the equa¬ tor over which the sun is, or to that meridian in which he is. Prob I. To determine the momentum of libration corresponding to any position of the earth respecting the sun, that is, to determine the accumulated energy of the disturbing forces on all the protuberant matter of the spheroid. Let B and b he two particles in the ring formed by the revolution of AQ, and so situated that they are at equal distances from the plane NM •, but on opposite sides of it. Draw BD, b d, perpendicular to NM, and ELG perpendicular to LT. Then, because the momentum, or power of produ¬ cing rotation, is as the force and as the distance of its line of direction from the axis of rotation, jointly, the combined momentum of the particles B and b will be jf.BD.DC—(for the particles B and b are squares of the radius j and the sum of the squares of the sines is equal to the sum of the squares of the cor¬ responding cosines : therefore the sum of the squares of the radius is double of either sum. Therefore^*II . Q L .BL*—In.QL.QL*. In like manner the sum of the number 17.QL of CL*s' will he —II.QL.CL*. These sums, taken for the semicircle, are -Jn.QL.QL3, and ^n.QL.CL*, or n.QL.^QL1, and II.QL.4CL3: there¬ fore the momentum of the whole ring will be 2 m n f .AQ.QL.n(4QL2—^CL1) : for the momentum of the ring is the combined momentum of a number of pairs, and this number is ^n.QL. By the ellipse we have OC : QL~EO : AQ, and AQ—QL^-^, rrQL^; therefore the momentum of OC 4 the rings is 2 ni nf-^ QLJn QLln (4QL2—CL*): 4QL2—CL*=:£ b*— 4CL*), =m nfj but QL*=£*—x1 y therefore , - b1—3 x7, r.,2 X A* * V2 • X , TC/ , * therefore the momentum of the ring is m nf —a?*) d 2b (£4—4&\i*_|_3,r4). If we now suppose another paral¬ lel extremely near to A «, as represented by the dotted line, the distance L l between them being x, we shall have the fluxion of the momentum of the spheroid m n ff-Yl (b+x—4/2V.V -j- 3^), of which the fluent is ^ 2 0 J.UU.Ljyj -J.UU.Ul) V/U1 ll,C SJ Ciuu or d ( Xs urged in contrary directions). But the momentum of mnf — IT ( b*x—46* )• This expresses the B is/.BF.DC -f/.FD.DC, and that of b is fbQ.dQj— 26 V 3 5/ J.dG.dCy and the combined momentum is /iBF.Df/— /.FD.DC^pC, = 2/.BF.LF—2/LT.TC. Because m and n are the sine and cosine of the angle ECS or LCT, we have LT—m.CL, and CTzrw.CL, and LF=r?w.BL, and BFrrw.BL. This gives the mo- mentum — 2 /'m n BL2—CL*. The breadth AQ of the protuberant ring being very small, we may suppose, without any sensible error, that all the matter of the line AQ is collected in the point Q ; and, in like manner, that the matter of the whole ring is collected in the circumference of its inner circle, and that B and b now represent, not single particles, hut the collected matter of lines such as AQ, which terminate at B and b. The combined momentum of two such lines will therefore be 2 ni w/iAQ.BL*—CL2. Let the circumference of each parallel of latitude he divided into a great number of indefinitely small and equal parts. The number of such parts in the circum¬ ference of which Q q is the diameter, will be n-QL. To each pair of these there b< longs a momentum tmnf .AQ BL*—CL2. The sum of all the squares of BL> which can be taken round the circle, is one half of as many squares of the radius CL: for BL is the sine momentum of the zone EA a Q, contained between the equator and the parallel of latitude A a. Now let x become =3, and we shall obtain the momentum of the hemispheroid 11 (^5—ant^ the spheroid —in nf + n b\ This formula does not express any motion, but only a pressure tending to produce motion, and particularly tending to produce a libration by its action on the co¬ hering matter of the earth, which is aflected as a num¬ ber of levers. It is similar to the common mechanical formula w.d, where w means a weight, and d its di¬ stance from the fulcrum of the lever. It is worthy of remark, that the momentum of this protuberant matter is just one fifth of what it yvould be if it were all collected at the point O of the equator : for the matter in the spheroid is to that in the inscribed sphere as «* to Z>2, and the contents of the inscribed Therefore o* : o2—5*iz:4n53 : sphere a2—Id is ^n/>3. which is the quantity of protuberant matter. P R E t 269 ] P R E , t * f-l? * ■ ■ feetssio"- may} without sensible error, suppose =2 d; then the protuberant matter will be If all this were placed at O, the momentum would be 4 n ^OH.HC, =4W nfdb*, because QH.IlC—mnb*; now 4 is 5 times r%-. Also, because the sum of all the rectangles OII.HC round the equator is half of as many squares of OC, it follows that the momentum of the protuberant matter placed in a ring round the equator of the sphere or spheroid is one half of what it would be if collected in the point O or E j whence it follows that the momentum of the protuberant matter in its natural place is two- fifths of what it would be if it were disposed in an equa¬ torial ring. It was in this manner that Sir Isaac New¬ ton was enabled to compare the effect of the sun’s ac¬ tion on the protuberant matter of the earth, with his effect on a rigid ring of moons. The preceding inves¬ tigation of the momentum is nearly the same with Ins, and appears to us greatly preferable in point of perspi¬ cuity to the fluxionary solutions given by later authors. These indeed have the appearance of greater accuracy, because they do not suppose all the protuberant matter to he condensed on the surface of the inscribed sphere : nor were we under the necessity of doing this, only it would have led to very complicated expressions had we supposed the matter in each line AQ collected in its centre of oscillation or gyration. We made a compen¬ sation for the error introduced by this, which may amount to T4r °f ^ie "hole, and should not be neglect¬ ed, by taking d as equal to instead of ’ J b * 2a a+b The consequence is, that our formula is the same with that of the later authors. Thus far Sir Isaac Newton proceeded with mathema¬ tical rigour j but in the application he made two as¬ sumptions, or, as he calls them, hypotheses, which have been found to be unwarranted. The first was, that when the ring of protuberant matter is connected with the inscribed sphere, and subjected to the action of the dis¬ turbing force, the same quantity of motion is produ¬ ced in the whole mass as in the ring alone. The se¬ cond was, that the motion of the nodes of a rigid ring of moons is the same with the mean motion of the nodes of a solitary moon. But we are now able to demon¬ strate, tbat it is not the quantity of motion, but of mo¬ mentum, which remains the same, and that the nodes of a rigid ring move twice as fast as those of a single particle. We proceed therefore to Prob. 2. To determine the deviation of the axis, and the retrograde motion of the nodes which result from this libratory momentum of the earth’s protuberant matter. But here we must refer our readers to some funda¬ mental propositions of rotatory motions which are de- 311 tatter, monstrated in the article Rotation. If a rigid body is turning round an axis A, passing through its centre of gravity with the angular velocity «, and receives an impulse which alone would cause it to turn round an axis B, also passing through its centre of gravity, with the angular velocity b, the body will now turn round a third axis C, passing through its centre of gravity, and lying in the plane of the axes A and B, and the sine of the inclination of this third axis to the axis A will be to the sine of inclination to the axis B as the velocity b to the velocity a. it fcts of tli ib ra¬ te mo¬ rn nun of arth’s pr ber 32 33 When a rigid body is made to turn round any axis Precession, by the action of an external force, the quantity of mo- —v—*—' mentum produced (that is, the sum of the products of every particle by its velocity and by its distance from the axis) is equal to the momentum or similar product of the moving force or forces. If an oblate spheroid, whose equatorial diameter is a and polar diameter 6, be made to librate round an equa¬ torial diameter, and the velocity of that point of the equator which is farthest from the axis of Jibration be v, the momentum of the spheroid is —Ua'l/v. The two last are to be found in every elementary book of mechanics. Let AN an (fig 4.) be the plane of the earth’s equa-Fig. tor, cutting the ecliptic CNKra in the line of the nodes or equinoctial points N n. Let OAS be the section of the earth by a meridian passing through the sun, so that the line OCS is in the ecliptic, and CA is an arch of an hour-circle or meridian, measuring the sun’s de¬ clination. The sun not being in the plane of the equa¬ tor, there is, by prop. 1. a force tending to produce a libration round an axis ZO a at right angles to the dia¬ meter A a of that meridian in which the sun is situat¬ ed, and the momentum of all the disturbing forces is T3-w n f d FI b4. The product of any force by the mo¬ ment £ of its action expresses the momentary increment of velocity j therefore the momentary velocity, or the velocity of libration generated in the time t, is 74rm nf d nb4t. This is the absolute velocity of a point at the distance 1 from the axis, or it is the space which would be uniformly described in the moment \y with the velo¬ city which the point has acquired at the end of that moment. It is double the space actually described by the libration during that moment \ because this has been an uniformly accelerated motion, in consequence of the continued and uniform action of the momentum during this time. This must be carefully attended to, and the neglect of it has occasioned very faulty solutions of this problem. Let v be the velocity produced in the point A, the most remote fx-om the axis of libration. The momen¬ tum excited or produced in the spheroid *s tt W. ax bx v (as above), and this must be equal to the momentum of the moving force, ov to ^Tm nf d n b4 t; therefore we obtain f^mn f dub4 t A . r , . bx -~^U^x~br~i that 1S> v=:m nfdt — or IP very nearly mn f dt, because ~=l very nearly. Also, because the product of the velocity and time gives the space uniformly described in that time, the space de¬ scribed by A in its libration round Z s ismnf dtx, and the angular velocity is Let r be the momentary angle of diurnal rotation. The ai’ch A r, described by the point A of the equa¬ tor in this moment t will therefore hew, that is, ax?*, and the velocity of the point A is —, and the angular velocity of rotation is —• t Here then is a body (fig. 5.) turning round an axis OR, Fl* P R E C 27° 1 P R E Precession. perpendicular to the plane of the equator z oz, ami ’ v—— therefore situated in the plane ZP z; and it turns round ns 4. It has received this axis with the angular velocity — • an impulse, by which alone it would lihrate round the m nfd t axis Z 3, with the angular velocity It will therefore turn round neither axis (N° 31.)? round a third axis OP', passing through O, and lying in the plane ZPz, in which the other two are situated, and the sine P'lT of its inclination to the axis of libration Z $$ will be to the sine P p of its inclination to the axis m nfd t OP of rotation as - to t a Now A, in fig. 4. is the summit of the equator both of libiation and rotation j m nfdi1 is the space de¬ scribed by its libration in the time /; and ant^ a r '• m nf ^ 1 m nf d t1 which will be the tangent of the angle tn A r, or of the change of position ol the equatoi. But the axes of rotation aro perpendicular to their equator 5 and therefore the angle of deviation w is equal to this angle r A m. I his appears from fig. $• j for n P" : P'p=OP ; P'/j,=OP : tan. POP j and it is • * T* t m • evident that a r : m nfd — mnfd- , as is requir¬ ed by the composition of rotations. In consequence of this change of position, the plane of the equator no longer cuts the plane of tne ecliptic in the line N n. The plane of the new equator cuts the former equator in the line AO, and the part AN of the former equator lies between the ecliptic and the new equator AN', while the part A n of the former equator is above the new one A «'; therefore the new node N', from which the point A was moving, is removed to the westward, Or farther from A; and the new nodew', to which A is approaching, is also moved westward, or nearer to A j and this happens in every position of A. The nodes, therefore, or equinoctial points, continually shift to the westward, or in a contrary direction to the rotation of the earth ", and the axis of rotation always deviates to the east side of the meridian which passes through the sun. This account of the motions is extremely different from what a person should naturally expect. If the earth were placed in the summer solstice, with respect to us who inhabit its northern hemisphere, and had no rotation round its axis, the equator would begin to ap¬ proach the ecliptic, and the axis would become more upright j and this would go on with a motion conti¬ nually accelerating, till the equator coincided with the ecliptic. It would not stop here, hut go as far on the other side, till its motion were extinguished by the oppo¬ sing forces ", and it would return to its former position, and again begin to approach the ecliptic, playing up and down like the arm of a balance. On this account Prrrcss! this motion is very properly termed Ubration ; hut this very slow lihration, compounded with the incomparably swifter motion of diurnal rotation, produces a third mo¬ tion extremely different from both. At first the north pole of the earth inclines forward toward the sun ", after a long course of years it will incline to the left hand, as viewed from the sun, and he much more inclined to the ecliptic, and the plane of the equator will pass through the sun. Then the south pole will come into view, and the north pole w’ill begin to decline from the sun •, and this will go on (the inclination ol the equator dimi¬ nishing all the while) till, after a course of years, the north pole will he turned quite away from the sun, and the inclination of the equator will be restored to its ori¬ ginal quantity. After this the phenomena will have another period similar to the former, hut the axis will now deviate to the right hand. And thus, although both the earth and sun should not move from their places, the inhabitants of the earth would have a com¬ plete succession of the seasons accomplished in a period of many centuries. This would be prettily illustrated by an iron ring poised very nicely on a cap like the card of a mariner’s compass, having its centre of gravity co¬ inciding with the point of the cap, so that it may whirl round in any position. As this is extremely difficult to execute, the cap may he pierced a little deeper, which will cause the ring to maintain a horizontal posi¬ tion with a very small force. When the ring is whirl¬ ing very steadily, and pretty briskly, in the direction. of°the hours of a watch-dial, hold a strong magnet above the middle of the nearer semicircle (above the 6 bout point) at the distance of three or four inches. e shall immediately observe the ring rise from the 9 hour point, and sink at the 3 hour point, and gradually ac¬ quire a motion of precession and nutation, such as has been described. If tlie earth be now put in motion round the sun, or the sun round the earth, motions of hhratioi^and devia¬ tion will still obtain, and the succession of their different phases, if we may so call them, will be perfectly analo¬ gous to the above statement. But the quantity of de¬ viation, and change of inclination, will now be prodigi¬ ously diminished, because the rapid change of the sun’s position quickly diminishes the disturbing forces, annihi¬ lates them by bringing the siqi into the plane of the equator and brings opposite forces into action. We see in general that the deviation of the axis is always at right angles to the plane passing through the sun, and that the axis, instead of being raised from the ecliptic, or brought nearer to it, as the libration would occasion, deviates sidewise j and the equator, instead ox being raised or depressed round its east and west points, is twisted sidewise round the north and south points j or at least things have this appearance ; but we must now attend to this circumstance more minutely. The composition of rotation shows us that this change of the axis of diurnal rotation is by no means a translation of the former axis (which we may suppose to be the axis of figure) into a new position, in which it again becomes the axis of diurnal motion j nor does the equator of figure, that is, the most prominent sec¬ tion of the terrestrial spheroid, change its position, and in this new position continue to be the equator r0' tation. This was indeed supposed by Sir Isaac New¬ ton } it 1 Patioj l; Mltj. t«! fill P R K [2 (•cession, ton; fintl this supposition naturally resulted from the ^ train of reasoning which he adopted. It was strictly true of a single moon, or of the imaginary orbit attach¬ ed to it ■, and therefore Newton supposed that the whole earth did in this manner deviate from its former posi¬ tion, still, however, turning round its axis of figure. In this he has been followed by Walmesly, Simpson, and most of his commentators. D’Alembert was the first who entertained any suspicion that this might not be certain ; and both he and Euler at last showed that the new axis of rotation was really a new line in the body of the earth, and that its axis and equator of figure did not remain the axis and equator of rotation. They as¬ certained the position of the real axis by means of a most intricate analysis, which obscured the connection of the different positions of the axis with each other, and gave us only a kind of momentary information. Father Fri- sius turned his thoughts to this problem, and fortunate¬ ly discovered the composition of rotations as a general principle of mechanical philosophy. Few things of this kind have escaped the penetrating eye of Sir Isaac Newton. Even this principle had been glanced at by him. He affirms it in express terms with respect to a body that is perfectly spherical (cor. 22. prop. 66. JB. I.). But it was reserved for Frisius to demonstrate it to be true of bodies of any figure, and thus to enrich mechanical science with a principle which gives simple and elegant solutions of the most difficult problems. But here a very formidable objection naturally offers itself. If the axis of the diurnal motion of the heavens is not the axis of the earth’s spheroidal figure, but an imaginary line in it, round which even the axis of figure must revolve \ and if this axis of diurnal rotation has so greatly changed its position, that it now points at a star at least 12 degrees distant from the pole observed by Timochares, how comes it that the equator has the very same situation on the surface of the earth that it had in ancient times ? No sensible change has been ob¬ served in the latitude of places. The answer is very simple and satisfactory : Suppose that in 12 hours the axis of rotation has changed from Til). fIie position PR (fig. 6.) to pr, so that the north pole, instead of being at P, which we may suppose to be a particular mountain, is now at p. In this 12 hours the mountain P, by its rotation round p r, has acquired the position tt. At the end of the next 12 hours, the axis of rotation has got the position and the axis of figure lias got the position p r, and the mountain P is now at p. Ihus, on the noon of the following day, the axis of figure PR is in the situation which the real axis of ro¬ tation occupied at the intervening midnight. This goes on continually, and the axis of figure follows the posi¬ tion of the axis of rotation, and is never further re¬ moved from it than the deviation of 12 hours, which does not exceed T^g-th part of one second, a quantity altogether imperceptible. Therefore the axis of figure will always sensibly coincide with the axis of rotation, and no change can be produced in the latitudes of places ^ on the surface of the earth. Ap| ation We have hitherto considered this problem in the most , general manner ; let us now apply the knowledge we on ^ave gotten of the deviation of the axis or of the mo- eces-menfary action of the disturbing force to the explanation of the phenomena: that is, let us see what precession and 71 1 P R E waat nutation will be accumulated after any given time Precessfa* of action. -v- 1 For this purpose we must ascertain the precise devia¬ tion which the disturbing forces are competent to pro¬ duce. This we can do by comparing the momentum of libration with the gravitation of the earth to the sun, and this with the force which would retain a body on the equator while the earth turns round its axis. The gravitation of the earth to the sun is in the pro¬ portion of the sun’s quantity of matter M directly, and to the square of the distance A inversely, and may therefore he expressed by the symbol The disturbing force at the distance 1 from the plane of illumination is to tne gravitation of the earth’s centre to the sun as 3 to A, (A being measured on the same scale which mea¬ sures the distance from the plane of illuminatioiO. 3 M . ---- will be the disturbing force f of our Therefore formula. Let p be the centrifugal force of a particle at the distance x from the axis of rotation ; and let t and T be the times of rotation and of annual revolution, viz. sidereal day and year. Then p : : A Hence tx But since r was the angu- , ■ 3 M we derive —rz3 p A* T1 lar velocity of rotation, and consequently 1 X the i X r space described, and —— the velocity ; and since the centrifugal force is as the square of the velocity divided by the radius (this being the measure of the generated velocity, which is the proper measure of any accele •, i2 X /'2 r* . r_ 3 r rating force), we havep= t t Xtp- Now the formula f m ~ expressed the sine of the angle. This being extremely small, the sine may be considered as equal to the arc which measures the angle. Now, substitute for it the value now found, viz. 3 r* . ^r-Xrp, and we obtain an angle of deviation te=: * 3 t* d r -7p“ m n —, and this is the simplest form in which it can appear. But it is convenient, for other reasons, to o*—b* 2 a* express it a little differently: d is nearly equal to • • 3 ci* therefore wz=:r K-—mu —, and this is the form in which we shall now employ it. 3 1 The small angle r a*—b*. ,^pmn—-—is the angle in winch 21 /1 —x% tation for the moment when the sun’s longitude is S, and the fluent will be tbe whole nutation. The fluxion 3 t kp process is ~2"ry xx. of which the the momentary change of the position of the equator is the greatest possible j but being made at right angles to the plane in which the obliquity of the ecliptic is com¬ puted, it makes no change whatever in the obliquity, but the greatest possible change in the precession. In order to find C D the change of obliquity, observe that in the triangle CAD, R : sin. AC, or R : cos. AE=sin. A : sin. CD,=A : CD (because A and CD are exceedingly small). Therefore the change of ob¬ liquity (which is the thing commonly meant by nuta- „ • 3fkp 2 fluent is qr-tf 4 *- This is the whole change produ- 37 '3« yt x sin. declin. X cos. declin. X cos, R. ascens. But it is more convenient for the purposes of astro¬ nomical computation to make use of the sun’s longitude SE. Therefore make The sun’s longitude EB - - = Sine of sun’s long. “ ' " := Cosine - - " V^1 x*— Bine obliq. eclipt. - - - 23^= Cosine obliq. - - — In tbe spherical triangle EAS, right-angled at A (because AS is the sun’s declination perpendicular to the equator), we have R : sin. ES=sin. E : sin. AS, and sin. AS=jya’. Also R : cos. ASrzcos. AE : cos. 1 2 T -m n. 35 ES, and cos. ES or y— cos. AS X cos. AE. Therefore Precesd® pxy~ sin. AS x cos. AS X cos. AE,^:/« n X ccs. AE. j~~ Therefore the momentary nutation CD=r X~7^kpxy. We must recollect that this angle is a certain frac¬ tion of the momentary diurnal rotation. It is more convenient to consider it as a fraction of the sun’s an¬ nual motion, that so we may directly compare his mo¬ tion on the ecliptic with the precession and nutation corresponding to his situation in the heavens, ^hi* change is easily made, by augmenting the fraction in the ratio of the sun’s angular motion lo the motion of rotation, or multiplying the fraction by — ? therefore 4G ced on the obliquity of the eclipfic while the sun moves along the arch 25 ecliptic, reckoned from the vernal equinox. When this arch is 90°, is 1, and there- jfore is the nutation produced while the sun moves 4 T from the equinox to the solstice. The momentary change of the axis and plane of the , equator (which is the measure of the changing force) is lion) CD=A X cos.AE,=r^2 k m n, cos. A E'rrr 3^ 3 t% The momentary change of the obliquity of the eclip-The re , and me 3^- tic IS 2 T 3 tkp nuntu change greater the mh 2 X V P <1 The whole change of obliquity is ^ Hence we see that the force and the real momentary the p(|u change of position are greatest at the solstices, and di-”^ minish to nothing in the equinoxes. The momentary change of obliquity is greatest at the octants, being proportional to x x or to xy. . The whole accumulated change of obliquity is great¬ est at the solstices, the obliquity itself being then smallest. We must iu like manner find the accumulated quan¬ tity pum coccmr/n. i>ki:ci:ssio.'w m., liyiixoxics. PUB ^ 273 ,.ecession. tity of the precession after a given time, that is, the 'arch BE for a finite time. We have ER : CDzrsin. EA : sin. CA (or cos. 42 iiantity preces- >n in a ven time EA)=:tan. EA : 1, and EB : ER—1 fore EB : CD—tan. EA cos. E X tan- ES, = cos. E x sm. B. There¬ sia. B. Bat tan. EA— sin. long. qx cos. long.-^/TZ^T- Therefore EB : CD = sin. obliq. eclip. qx -p} and CD EB tan. long. © v/1—x* If we now substitute for CD its value found in N° 40. viz. —^xx. 2'V we obtain EBrz 2 # kq x1 x the fluxion of the precession of the equinoxes occasioned by the action of the sun. The fluent of the variable part — xy, of which the 1—a fluent is evidently a segment of a circle whose arch 1 • ,, . z—x^J 1—x~ is s and sine x, that is, zr > and the 2 whole precession, while the sun describes the arch *s Z|V X —x\/1—This is the precession of the equinoxes while the sun moves from the vernal equinox along the arch « of the ecliptic. In this expression, which consists of two parts, 4T *, and —xs/1 —^^, the first is incomparably greater than the second, which never exceeds 1", and is always compensated in the succeeding quadrant. The precession occasioned by the sun will be - ^ anj 4T from this expression we see that the precession increases uniformly, or at least increases at the same rate with $tkq T is con- 43 ■le of illlifi. the sun’s longitude because the quantity . . i 4 stant. In order to make use of these formulae, which are now reduced to very great simplicity, it is necessary to determine the values of the two constant quantities 3tkp 3 tkq —jTp-, which we shall call N and P, as factors of the nutation and precession. Now t is one sidereal day, and 1 is 3665. k is ^—, which according to Sir Isaac Newton is — --12.. = 23i are the sine and cosine of 23' O.91729. 5 P and 1 lS 28', viz. 0.39822 and These data give N and P — T4I03° ^61224’ which the logarithms are 4.85069 and 5.21308, viz. the arithmetical complements of 5.14931 and 4.78692. Ne of Let us, for an example of the use of this investiga- 'in- t110n’ comI)Ute the precession of the equinoxes when ationl16 Slm ^.as movcd from the vernal equinox to the sum¬ mer solstice, so that 2; is oo°, or 224000". ^ OL. XVII. Part. I. + 1 Log 324000'=^ Log P Log $".292 P li E ^51055 5.21308 Preceswo*. 0.72363 The precession therefore in a quarter of a year is 5.292 seconds j and, since it increases uniformly, it is 2i".i68 annually. J must now recollect the assumptions on which Assump- this computation proceeds. 'I he earth is supposed to tions on be homogeneous, and the ratio of its equatorial diame-wllich the tei to its polar axis is supposed to be that of 231 to^^^* 230. If the earth be more or less protuberant at the ceeds.10" equator, the precession will be greater or less in the ra¬ tio ol this protuberance. The measures which have been taken of the degrees of the meridian are very in¬ consistent among themselves 5 and although a compari¬ son of them all indicates a smaller protuberancy, nearly -j-T-g- instead ol ^-^T, their differences are too great to leave much confidence in this method. But "if this figure be thought more probable, the precession will be reduced to about 17" annually. But even though the figure of the earth were accurately determined, we have no authority to say that it is homogeneous. If it be denser towards the centre, the momentum of the protu¬ berant matter will not be so great as if it were equally dense with the inferior parts, and the precession will be diminished on this account. Did we know the propor¬ tion of the matter in the moon to that in the sun, we could easily determine the proportion of the whole*ob¬ served annual precession of yoj" which is produced by the sun’s action. But we have no unexceptionable data for determining this ; and we are rather obliged to in¬ fer it from the effect which she produces in disturbing the regularity of the precession, as will be considered immediately. So far, therefore, as we have yet pro¬ ceeded in this investigation, the result is very uncertain. We have only ascertained unquestionably the law w hich is observed in the solar precession. It is probable, how¬ ever, that this precession is not very different from 20" annually j for the phenomena of the tides show the di¬ sturbing force of the sun to be very nearly J- of the di¬ sturbing force of the moon. Now 20" is J- of But let us now proceed to consider the effect of the 0f moon’s action on the protuberant matter of the earth ; tile n oon’s and as w'e are ignorant of her quantity of matter, and action on consequently of her influence in similar circumstances the P,otl1- with the sun, we shall suppose that the disturbing force ' of the moon is to that of the sun as ??i to 1. Then earth, * (eceteris paribus) the precession w'ill be to the solar pre¬ cession %■ in the ratio of the force and of the time of its action jointly. Let t and 1 therefore represent a pe¬ riodical month and year, and the lunar precession will , miet . be — rp • I his precession must be reckoned on the plane of the lunar orbit, in the same manner as the so¬ lar precession is reckoned on the ecliptic. We must rrmt of also observe, that Tp- represents the lunar precession T only on the supposition that the earth’s equator is in¬ clined to the lunar orbit in an angle of 23^ degrees. This is indeed the mean inclination j but it is sometimes increased to above 28°, and sometimes reduced to x8°. Now in the value of the solar precession the cosine of the obliquity tvas employed. Therefore whatever is M m the P R E [ 274 ] P R E Precession ' 47 Fig. 8. the angle E contained between the equator and the lu- 1 m 7C t L/OS. i ‘ nar orbit, the precession will be = Cos> and it must be reckoned on the lunar orbit. Now let ^ B (fig. 8.) be the immoveab e plane oi the eclintic ‘Y' ED^kF the equator in its first situation, before it has been deranged by the action ot tbe niooo AGIIDBH the equator in its new ?r7 ® momentary action ot the moon. Let EGN moon’s orbit, of which N is the ascending node, and the angle 8' 46". z x y a b c d e in ■x t T n 48 Lunar pre¬ cession in a month reduced to the eclip¬ tic. Let N the long, of the node be Sine N^ Cosine Nfy Sine - - Sine N= 5.8.46 Cosine N - t ^ ~ Circumference to radius i,r=6.2o Force of the moon • - " Solar precession (supposed =I4^,/ by observa¬ tion) Revolution of J = 27df Revolution of ©= Revolution of N = 18 years 7 months In order to reduce the lunar precession to the ecliptic, we must recollect that tbe equator will have the same inclination at the end of every half revolution of the sun or of the moon, that is, when they pass through the equator, because the sum of all the momentary changes of its position begins again each revolution, .therefore if we neglect the motion of the node during one month, which is only degrees, and can produce hut an insen¬ sible change, it is plain that the moon produces 111 one half revolution, that is, while she moves from H to G, the greatest difference that she can in the position ot the equator. The point D, therefore, hall-way Irom G to H, is that in which the moveable equator cuts the pn- mitive equator, and DE and DF are each 90 . But S being the solstitial point, vS is also 9° • Therfore DSrr'Y'E. Therefore, in the triangle DGE, we have sin. ED : sin. G=sin. EG : sin. D, =EG : D. there¬ fore D=EG X sin. G, =EG X sin. E. nearly. Again, in the triangle D A we have sin. A : sin. •T (or cos. TE) = sin. D : sin. lyi A, =D : V A. llierefore D • cos. _ EG • sin. E • cos. in order that 11 may he 18.6, and substitute for t its va- lue in the fluxion of the nutation, by putting in place of y. (d b x x By this substitution we obtain m v ■acx x^. The flueat of this is m x n- m it t sin sin. A E * cos. E • cos. onE sin. 23^ ^ (l x* a <—^j. {Vide Simpson’s Fluxions, ^ 77.). But when x is —0, the nutation must he r=o, because it is from the position in the equinoctial points that all our deviations are reckoned, and it is horn this point that the period of the lunar action recommences. But if we make x — O in this expression, the term __aC*2 vanishes, and the term —dbji—x' becomes 2 , ——d b ; therefore our fluent has a constant part -f-rfft; and the complete fluent is m Trn-^J^db—dbJ i—x1— 49 T sin. We must find in like manner the nutation bit pro- diced in the same time, reckoned on the colnre of the .ame time, solstices HE. We have R : sin. DS=D : RS, and RS=D • sin.DS,=D • sin. tE. But D=LG • sin. L. mx t cos. L Therefore RS=EG • sin. E * sin. CY’E> = T . cos. X sin.E X sin.^E. In this expression we must substitute a c 2 sine r> Now this is equal to m x n—{d b X versed e u 8ine J«cX versed sine 22) : For the versed sine of s’is equal to (1—cos. z) *, and the square ot the sms of an arch is £ the versed sine of twice that arch. ^ This then, is the whole nutation while the moon s ascending node moves from the vernal equinox to the longitude orNrzs. It is the expression ot a certain, number of seconds, because x, one of its factors, is the solar precession in seconds \ and ail the other factors aie numbers, or fractions of the radius 1 ; even e is expres- sed in terms ot the rndius I* The fluxion of the precession, or the monthly preces- sion, P k E [27 gion, Is to that of the nutation as the cotangent of cy* E is to the sine of ‘y. This also appears by considering fig. 7. Pp measures the angle A, or change of position of the equator j but the precession itself, reckoned on the ecliptic, is measured by Po, and the nutation byp 0; and the fluxion of the precession is equal to the fluxion of nutation X ^ut ^ there- rerssion 55 5r P R E fore cot y E a d-\-b OtJi —,r* sine y c x the fluxion of the nutation, gives ’ h abe\ : This, multiplied into a b d% -x x (b*—a*) dc—abc2.^ 1—x for the monthly pre¬ cession. The fluent of this -----^ a d*b z -[-(b* a2) dcx—\abc%z—^abc%x Vi—x1^, or it is equal mv/i to —7—^ (J*—ic*) « i 25 -f (^*—a1) d c 2;—^ a b ). s^ne 2Z Let us now express this in numbers : When the node has made a half revolution, sve have 25=180°, whose versed sine is 2, and the versed sine of 22, or 360°, is ~0 j therefore, after half a revolution of the node, the nutation (N° 52.) becomes —2bd. If, in this ex¬ ec* pression, we suppose m=2^, and we shall find the nutation to be ipf". Now the observed nutation is about 18". This re¬ quires m to be 2rV, and But it is evident that no astronomer can pretend to warrant the accura¬ cy of his observations of the nutation within i". Te find the lunar precession during half a revolution of the node, observe that then z becomes = and the 2 sine of ss and of 22; vanish, cP becomes 1—c% and the pre- . , mien cession becomes ~(d*- 2 v mien (1—4 0, and the precession in 18 years vs mien x —^ c*. We see, by comparing the nutation and precession for nine years, that they are as to 1—c*, nearly as 1 to 1 This gives 313" of precession, correspond¬ ing to 18", the observed nutation, which is about 33" of precession annually produced by the moon. And thus we see, that the inequality produced by the moon in the precession of the equinoxes, and, more particularly, the nutation occasioned by the variable ob¬ liquity of her orbit, enables us to judge of her share in the whole phenomenon j and therefore informs us of her disturbing force, and therefore of her quantity of mat¬ ter. This phenomenon, and those of the tides, are the only facts which enable us to judge of this matter: and this is one of the circumstances which has caused this problem to occupy so much attention. Dr Bradley, by a nice comparison of his observations with the ma¬ thematical theory, as it is called, furnished him by Mr Machin, found that the equation of precession compu¬ ted by that theory was too great, and that the theory 5 ] would agree better with the observations, if an ellipse Precession were substituted for Mr Machin’s little circle. He Precise, thought that the shortei’ axis of this ellipse, lying in the 1 J colure of the solstices, should not exceed 16". Nothing can more clearly show the astonishing accuracy of Bradley’s observations than this remark: for it results from the theory, that the pole must really describe an ellipse, having its shorter axis in the solstitial colure, and the ratio of the axis must he that of 18 to 16.8 • for the mean precession during a half revolution of the , . mien, ^ node is C d1 2 v ■“) > and therefore, for the longi- ,1 .... zmirn, , tude z, it will be ( rp c- m~) i when this is taken from the true precession for that longitude (N° 54.), it leaves the equation of precession — (b* cjc a be \ K J sine 55 —\abc sine 22;^ j therefore, when the node is in the solstice, and the equation greatest, we have itzr viiencd \y—a=)’ here neglect the second term a b 1 as insignificant, . _ S9 This greatest equation of precession is to —T” c equation of c precession. the nutation of 18", as b'—a' to 20b { that is, as ra¬ dius to the tangent of twice the obliquity of the eclip- t.c ibis gives the greatest equation of precession 16 .8,. not diflenng half a second from Bradley’s ob¬ servations. J llms have we attempted to give some account of this curious and important phenomenon. It is curious, be¬ cause it affects the whole celestial motions in a very in¬ tricate manner, and received no explanation from the more obvious application of mechanical principles, which so happily accounted for all the other appearances. It is one of the most illustrious proofs of Sir Isaac New¬ ton s sagacity and penetration, which catched at a very remote analogy between this phenomenon and the li- bration of the moon’s orbit. It is highly important to t ie progress of practical and useful astronomy, because it has enabled us to compute tables of such accuracy, that they can be used with confidence for determining the longitude of a ship at sea. This alone fixes its im¬ portance : but it is still more important to the philoso¬ pher, affording the most incontestable proof of the uni¬ versal and mutual gravitation of all matter to all matter. It left nothing in the solar system unexplained from the theory of gravity but the acceleration of the moon’s mean motion ; and this has at last been added to the list of our acquisitions by M. de la Place. Quae toties animos veterum torsere Sophorum, Quaeque scholas frustra rauco certamine vexant, Obvia conspicimus, nube pellente Mathesi, Jam dubios nulla caligine praegravat eiTor Queis superum penetrare domos, atque ardua cceli Scandere sublimis genii concessit acumen. Nec fas est propius mortali attingere divos. Halley. PRECISE (precius, « early”), the name of the 21 st order in Linnaeus’s fragments ef a natural method • consisting of primrose, an early flowering plant, and a Mm2 few Precise II . -Pmiestina tion. The doc¬ trine stated Not pecu liar to t hiistia- aity. P R S [ few genera which agree with it in habit anil sti ucture, though not always in the character or circumstance ex¬ press'd in the title. See Botany, Natural Orders. PRECIPITANT, in Chemistry, is applied to any liquor, which, when poured on a solution, separates what is dissolved, and makes it precipitate, or fall to the bot¬ tom of the vessel. , PRECIPITATE, in Chemistry, a substance wlucn having been dissolved in a proper menstruum, is again separated from its solvent, and thrown down to the bot¬ tom of the vessel by pouring some other liquor upon PRECIPITATION, the process by which a preci¬ pitate is formed. c r t> <- PRECOGNITION, in Scots Law. See Law, iait III. N° CLXXXVI. 43. PRECORDIA, in Anatomy, a general name tor Uie parts situated about the heart, in the forepart ot the tho¬ rax •, as the diaphragm, pericardium, and even the heart itself, with the spleen, lungs, &c. PREDECESSOR, properly signifies a person who has preceded or gone before another in the same oitice or employment; in which sense it is distinguished trom ancestor. - „ , , PREDESTINATION, the decree of God where¬ by he hath from all eternity unchangeably appointed whatsoever comes to pass } and hath more especially fore ordained certain individuals of the human race to everlasting happiness, and hath passed by the rest, anil fore-ordained them to everlasting misery. Ihe ormer of these are called the elect, and the latter are called the 1 This doctrine is the subject of one of the most perplex¬ ing controversies that has occurred among mankind.' But it is not altogether peculiar to the Christian faito. Ihe opinion, that whatever occurs in the world at large, or in the lot of private individuals, is the result ol a previ¬ ous and unalterable arrangement by that Supreme Power which presides over nature, lias always been a favourite opinion among the vulgar, and has been believed by many speculative men. Thus, in that beautiful scene in the sixth book of the Iliad, Hector, taking leave of his wife and his child, speaks thus . Andromache ! my soul’s far better part, Why with untimely sorrows heaves thy heart . No hostile hand can antedate my doom, Till fate condemns me to the silent tomb. Fix’d is the term to all the race of earth, And such the hard condition of our birth. No force can then resist, no flight can save } All sink alike, the fearful and the brave. 1. 624. The ancient Stoics, Zeno and Chrysippus, whom the Jewish Essenes seem to have followed, asserted the ex¬ istence of a Deity, that, acting wisely, but necessarily, contrived the general system of the world *, from which, by a series of causes, whatever is now done in it una¬ voidably results. This series, or concatenation of causes, they held to be necessary in every part •, and that God himself is so much the servant of necessity, and of his own decrees, that he could not have made the smallest object in the world otherwise than it now is, much less is he able to alter any thing. According to the words of Seneca, Eaclem necessi- tns et Deos alligat. Jrrevocabilis clivina pariter atque 5 276 ] P R E humana cursus vclut. Ille ipse omnium conditor ac rec- Prcclcstin, torscripsit quidemfata sed sequitur. Semper par et,semel ^ tion jussit.” “ The same chain of necessity constrains both r gods and men. Its unalterable course regulates divine as well as human things. Even he who wrote the Fates, the Maker and Governor of all things, submits to them. He did but once command, but he always obeys.” The stoical fate, however, differs from the Christian predesti¬ nation in several points. They regarded the divine na¬ ture and will as a necessary part of a necessary chain of causes; whereas the Christians consider the Deity as the Lord and Ruler of the Universe, omnipotent and free, appointing all things according to his pleasure. Being doubtful of the immortality of the soul, the Stoics could have no idea of the doctrine of election and re¬ probation ; nor did they ever doubt their own freedom of will, or power of doing good as well as evil, as we shall presently see the Christian predestinarians have done. Mahomet introduced into his Koran the doctrine of an absolute predestination of the course of human af¬ fairs. He represented life and death, prosperity and adversity, and every event that befals a man in this world, as the result of a previous determination of the one God who rules over all ; and he found this opinion the best engine for inspiring his followers with that con¬ tempt of danger, which, united to their zeal, has ex¬ tended the empire of their faith over the fairest portion of the habitable globe. . _ 3 The controversy concerning predestination first made When firs its appearance in the Christian church about the ^,eSin‘l^e c|jHrc ning of the fifth century *. Pelagius a British, and Coe- * Moshea lestius an Irish monk, both lived at Rome during that7^. a period, and possessed great celebrity on account of their Eccl. piety and learning. They taught that the opinion is false, which asserts, that human nature is necessarily cor¬ rupted by a depravity derived from our first parents.— They contended, that men are born at present in a state as pure as that in which Adam was originally cre¬ ated ; and that they are not less qualified than he was for fulfilling all righteousness, and foy reaching the most sublime eminence ol piety and virtue : that the external grace ot God, which is given unto all, and at¬ tends the preaching of the gospel, is necessary to call forth the attention and exertions of men ; but that we do not want the assistance of any internal grace to pu¬ rify the heart, and to give it the first impulse towards what is good. Having fled into Africa on account of the Goths, who at that time invaded Italy, A. D. 410, Coelestius remained at Carthage as a presbyter; but Pe¬ lagius went into the East, where he settled, and pro¬ spered under the patronage of John bishop ol Jerusa¬ lem, to whom his sentiments were agreeable. On the ^ugustinj contrary, the celebrated Augustine, bishop of Hippo, a predest, strenuously asserted the depravity of human nature since nariafl, the fall of the first man, the necessity of a special inter¬ position of divine grace to enable us to do any one good action ; and consequently, that none could obtain salva- action excepting those whom God has thought fit to elect, and upon whom he bestows this grace. The dis¬ pute was carried on with great zeal. Zozimus bishop of Rome decided at first in favour of Pelagius and Coelestius, whose followers were called Pelagians ; but he afterwards altered his opinion ; and by the ac¬ tivity of Augustine, the council of Ephesus was called, at P R' E p Utina-at which the opinion of his antagonists was formally -,n- condemned. In the course of the same century, these opinions as¬ sumed a variety of forms and modifications. One par¬ ty, called Predestinariuns, carried Augustine’s doctrine fully farther than he himself had ventured to do in ex¬ press words ; and asserted, that God had not only pre¬ destinated the wicked to punishment, but also that he had decreed that they should commit those very sins on account of which they are hereafter to be punished.— Another party moderated the doctrine of Pelagius, and were called Semipelagians. Their peculiar opinion is expressed in a different manner by different writers j but all the accounts sufficiently agree. Thus, some re¬ present them as maintaining that inward grace is not necessary to the first beginning of repentance, but only to our progress in virtue. Others say, that they ac¬ knowledged the power of grace, but said that faith de¬ pends upon ourselves, and good works upon God 5 and it is agreed upon all hands, that these Semipelagians held that predestination is made upon the foresight of good works. The assistance of Augustine, though then far advanced in life, was called in to combat these te¬ nets, and he wrote several treatises upon the subject. In all these he strenuously maintained, that the pre¬ destination of the elect was independent of any foresight of their good works, but wras according to the good pleasure of God only ; and that perseverance comes from God, and not from man. Thereafter the doctrine of Augustine, or St Austin as he is often called, became general. He was the oracle of the schoolmen. They never ventured to differ from him in sentiment ; they only pretended to dispute about the true sense of his writings. find the The whole of the earliest reformers maintained these earlh. re- opinions of Augustine. They assumed under Luther a fornjs, but more regular and systematic form than they had ever cialKad" f°rmeIly exhibited. But as the Lutherans afterwards via. abandoned them, they are now known by the name of Calvinistic Doctrines, from John Calvin of Geneva. He asserted, that the everlasting condition of mankind in a future world was determined from all eternity by t 277 1 P It E ence of Maurice prince of Orange, the Arminians Were predestlna- condemned as heretics ; for by this time ambitious and tion. powerful men found themselves politically interested in v——■» this religious contest. The Arminians presented to this synod a remonstrance, containing a statement of their faith upon the subjects in dispute.; and from this they derived the appellation of Remonstrants. This statement contained the following five articles: 1. That God from all eternity predestinated those to everlasting salva¬ tion whom he foresaw would believe in Christ unto the end of their lives; and predestinated obstinate un¬ believers to everlasting punishment. 2. Jesus Christ died for the whole human race, and for every individual of it, but believers alone reap the benefit of his death. 3. No man can produce faith in his mind by his own free will, but it is necessary that man, who is by nature wicked and unfit for acting or thinking aright, should be regenerated by the grace of the Holy Spirit, impart¬ ed by God for Christ’s sake. 4. This divine grace constitutes the source, the progress, and the fulfilment, of all that is good in man ; but it is not irresistible in its operation. 5. Believers, by the assistance of the Holy Spirit, are abundantly fitted for every good work ; but whether it is possible for those who have once been truly such to fall away, and to perish finally, is not clear, and must be better inquired into by searching the sacred scriptures. In opposition to these, a counter-remonstrance was presented, containing the opinions of the Calvinists, which was approved of by the synod. The substance of it was afterwards adopted, and in nearly the same ex¬ pressions, into the Confession of Faith compiled by the assembly of divines which met at Westminster, A. I>. 1643, and which every clergyman and probationer for the ministry in Scotland is at present required to sub- 7 ’ scribe previous to his admission. rJ o give as clear and Calvinistic as fair an idea as possible of the Calvinistic doctrine up-doctrin.e of on this head, we transcribe the following passage from j)rcdeEtina~ that Confession: “God from all eternity did, by the 10n' most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence the unchangeable decree of the Deity, arising from offered'to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or his sole good pleasure or free will. Being a man of contingency of second causes taken away, but rather great ability, industry, and eloquence, Geneva, where he taught, and which was a free state, soon became the resort of all the men of letters belonging to the reform¬ ed churches, and was a kind of seminary from which misssionaries issued to propagate the Protestant doc¬ trines through Europe. Their success was such, that, excepting a part of Germany, the principles of all the reformed churches are professedly Calvinistic or Pre- destinarian. The opponents of the doctrine of predestination a- mong the Protestants usually receive the appellation of Arminians or Remonstrants. They derive the first of tip, ne ^iese spoliations from James Arminius, who was A. D. Co Z1^02’ appointed* professor of theology at Leyden. He ■ i~ Rise t»i» Ami g-* Re Histo. su die iins. no a and e- died A. D. 1609. After his death, the controversy p°was conducted with great eagerness on both sides. Calvinists, however, gradually prevailed. A synod __ ja Was called at Dort, A. D. 1618, to which the most Limb< f,. celebrated divines ol different countries were invited. ^here, in a great measure, by the authority and influ- vay, established. Although God knows whatsoever may or can come to pass upon all supposed conditions; yet hath he not decreed any thing because he foresaw it as future, or that which would come to pass upon such conditions. By the decree of God, for the manifesta¬ tion of his glory, some men and angels are predestina¬ ted unto everlasting life, and others are fore-ordained to everlasting death. These angels and men, thus pre¬ destinated and fore-ordained, are particularly and un¬ changeably designed ; and their number is so certain and definite, that it cannot be either increased or dimi¬ nished. 1 hose ot mankind that are predestinated unto life, God, before the foundation of the world was laid, according to his eternal and immutable purpose, and the secret counsel and good pleasure of his will, hath cho¬ sen, in Christ, unto everlasting glory, out of his mere free grace and love, without any foresight of faith, or good works, or perseverance in either of them, or any other thing in the creature, as conditions or causes mo¬ ving him thereunto ; and all to the praise of his glori¬ ous grace. As God hath appointed the elect unto glo- I 9 *7 ^ / P R E [ p....fi-stina-ry, so liatli lie, by tlie eternal and most free purpose oi tion his will, fore-ordained all the means tbereunto. iere ' fore, they who are elected, being fallen in Adam, are redeemed by Christ, are effectually called unto faith in Christ, by his spirit working in due season ; are ’ adopted, sanctified, and kept, by his power through faith unto salvation. Neither are any other redeemed by Christ effectually called, justified, adopted, sanctified, and saved, but the elect only. The rest of mankini, God was pleased, according to the unsearchable counsel of his own will, whereby he extendeth or withholdeth mercy as he pleaseth for the glory of his sovereign power over his creatures, to pass by, and to ordain them to dishonour and wrath for their sin, to the praise of g his glorious justice.” ^ . iSfapralap- There are two kinds of Calvinists or P^ede9t,"ar,a!lS’ saiians and vjz t^e Supralapsarians, who maintained that t iod did Sublapsari- • ;naiiy and expressly decree the fall of Adam, as a ^ foundation for the display of his justice and mercy-, while those who maintain that God only permitted the fall of Adam, are called Siiblapsarians, their system ot decrees concerning election and reprobation, being as it were, subsequent to that event. But as Dr Priestley justly remarks, if we admit the divine precience there is not, in fact, any difference between the two schemes } and accordingly that distinction is now seldom men- 9 • Nor was the church of Rome less agitated by the tlfe^church contest about predestination than the first Protestants 2 Rome on were. The council of Trent was much perplexed how the subject. settle the matter without giving offence to the Do¬ minicans, who were much attached to the doctrine of Augustine, and possessed great influence in the council. After much dispute, the great object came to be, how to contrive such a decree as might give offence to no¬ body, although it should decide nothing. Upon the whole, however, they seem to have favoured the bemi- pelagian scheme. Among other things, it was deter¬ mined, that good works are of themselves meritorious to eternal life ; but it is added, by way of softening, that it is through the goodness of God, that he makes his own gifts to be merits in us. Catarin revived at that council an opinion of some of the schoolmen that God chose a small number of persons, such as the blessed virgin, the apostles, &c. whom he was determined to save without any foresight of their good works ; and that he also wills that all the rest should be saved, pro¬ viding for them all necessary means, but they are at li¬ berty to use them or not. This is called the Baxtcnan scheme in England, from one of its promoters there. But at all events, the council of Trent seems to have been extremely anxious that any opinions entertained among them concerning predestination might have as little influence as possible upon practical morality. Let no man (say they), while he remains in this mortal state, presume that he is among the number of the elect, and S ] P It E that therefore he cannot sin, or sin without repentance; pr^(.rt^ for it cannot be known who are elected without a spe- tion. cial revelation from God.” Sect. 6. c. 13. The Jesuits at first followed the opinion of Augus¬ tine ; but they afterwards,, forsook it. Molina, one of their order, was the author of what is called the middle scheme, or the doctrine of a grace sufficient for all menr but subject to the freedom ot the human will. Jan~ senius, a doctor of Louvain, opposetl the Je.suits, with great vigour, and supported the doctrine of Augustine. He wrote in a very artful manner. He declared, that he did not presume to state his own sentiments upon the subject. He pretended only to explain and publish the sentiments ot that great father of the church bt Augustine. But the Jesuits, in consequence of that in¬ violable submission to the authority of the pope, which they always maintained, had sufficient interest at Rome to procure the opinion of Jansenius to be condemned there : but with this addition subjoined, that nothing was thereby intended to be done in prejudice of the doctrine of St Augustine. This produced an absurd dispute about the pope’s infallibility in matters of fact. The Jansenists affirmed, that the pope had made a mis¬ take in condemning the opinion ot Jansenius as difier- ent from those of Augustine ; whereas in truth they are the same, and the one cannot be condemned without the other. But the Jesuits affirmed, that the pope is no less infallible in points of fact than he is in questions of faith ; and he having decided, that the opinions of Jan¬ senius are different from those of St Augustine, every good catholic is bound to believe accordingly that they are different. These disputes have never been fully set¬ tled, and still divide the Roman catholic churches. Some of the ablest supporters of predestination have ap¬ peared among the Jansenists, and particularly among the gentlemen of Port-Royal. With regard to Great Britain, the earliest English reformers were in general Sublapsarians, although somej™ of them were Supralapsarians. But the rigid Predesti-pre(jeai narians have been gradually declining in number in thatriaw. church, although they still subscribe the 39 articles of their faith, which are unquestionably Calvinistic. The celebrated Scotch reformer John Knox having been edu¬ cated at Geneva, established in this country the doctrine of predestination in its strictest form : and it has proba¬ bly been adhered to with more closeness in Scotland than in any country in Europe. Of late years, however, the dispute concerning pre¬ destination has assumed a form considerably different from that which it formerly possessed. Instead of being considered as a point to be determined almost entirely by the sacred scriptures, in the hands of a number of able writers, it has in a great measure resolved itself into a question of natural religion, under the head of the philosophical liberty or necessity of the will (a) ; or, whether all human actions are or are not necessarily de¬ termined 10 (A-) Dr Priestley, the most celebrated Necessarian of the age, has written a whole section of bts lllustjatwn', with a view to show, that between “ the two schemes of Cal.imstic predestination and phdosoph.eal necessity, there is no sort of resemblance, except that the future happiness or misery of all men is “rta,nly,f“*”™“ “ aunointed by God. In all other respects (says he) they are most essentially different; and even where they a rf« J the end, file difference in the manner by which that end is accomplished is so very great, that the influence ot the P R E [ 279 ] P R E ijestina-termined by motives arising from the character which lion. God has impressed on our minds, and the train of cir- '-v””"' cumstances amidst which his providence has placed us ? We have already discussed this point (see Metaphy¬ sics) by giving a candid statement of the arguments on both sides of the question. We shall treat the sub¬ ject of predestination in the same manner, avoiding as far as possible any recapitulation of what has been ad- „ vanced under the head of Necessity and Liberty. 3 ats at From what has been already said, it will appear that j '3 be- the points chiefly at issue between the parties are the 1 destina : First, With what views and purposes did J ^and " C1'eate the world and frame his decrees concerning t ir oppo mankind P Did he contrive a great unalterable scheme r ts. of creation and providence only for the sake of mani¬ festing his own glory and perfections ? Or did he first consider the free motions of those rational agents whom he intended to create, and frame his decrees upon the consideration of what they might choose or do in all the various circumstances in which he intended to place them ?—The second and following questions are branches of this leading one. Did Christ die for a par¬ ticular portion of the human race, who shall therefore certainly be saved ? or was his death intended as a bene¬ fit to all, from which none are excluded excepting those who willingly reject it ? Is the divine grace certainly and irresistibly efficacious in all those minds to which it is given P or does its effect depend upon the good use which men may or may not make of it? Can any good action be done without it ? Do those who have once received it certainly persevere and obtain eternal-salva¬ tion ? or is it possible for any of them to fall away and perish finally ? 'meats 1 le doc We shall begin by stating the argument on the side of the predestinarians, and in the language which they commonly use. But it is necessary to make this pre- ini vious remark, that the general * objections to their doc- w. trine are, that it is hostile to all our ideas ot the justice God, representing him as a partial being, rewarding ]ib without merit, and punishing without sin j that it ren¬ ders him the author of evil, destroys moral distinctions, makes useless every effort on our part, makes every prayer absurd, and even the preaching of the gospel pre(ieStina vain ; seeing that all things are immutably fixed, and lion, none can believe or be saved excepting the elect, and —y-—' they must certainly and at all events be safe. Against all this they reason thus. The great and everlasting Author of all things ex¬ isted from eternity alone, independent and essentially perfect. As there was no other, he could only consider himself and his own glory. He must therefore have designed all things in and for himself. To make him stay his determinations till he should see what free crea¬ tures would do, is to make him decree with uncertain¬ ty, and dependency upon them, which falls short of infinite perfection. He existed alone, and his counsels could have no object excepting himself j he could only then consider the display of his own attributes and per¬ fection. In doing this, as the end is more important than the means, Divine Wisdom must begin its designs with that which is to come last in the execution of them 5 but the conclusion of all things at the last judge¬ ment will be the complete manifestation of the wisdom, the goodness, and justice ot God : we must therefore suppose, that in the order of things, he decreed that first, although with him, in the order of time, there is no first nor second, but all is from eternity. When this great design was laid, the means were next design¬ ed. Creation, and its inhabitants of every order, form the means by which the author and disposer of all things accomplishes his will. But creatures in his sight are nothing, and are figuratively said to be less than nothing. We may entertain proud and elevated conceptions of our own dignity if we please $ but if we in our designs regard not the dust on which we tread, or the lives of ants and insects, the omnipotent Lord ot all, from whom wre are more infinitely distant, must regard us as at least equally inconsiderable, and only valuable as we serve tbe accomplishment of his great and mysterious purposes, which cannot be us or our aggrandisement, but himself and his own glory. It is only by this view of the divine conduct thatasneces- some or the attributes of God can be explained, or theii Sill'y to ex¬ existence rendered possible. In the scriptures he claims S?,!lthe the attribute of prescience as his distinguishing prero-tr/|J^s at" gativej two systems on the minds of those that adopt and act upon them is the reverse of one another. The Calvinistic doctrine of predestination, according to a very authentic statement of the doctrine* is, that “God, for his own* s/iorfer glory, hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass''1 The scheme of philosophical necessity, as stated bv an in- Catechism tunate friend and warm admirer of Dr Priestley’s, is, “ That every thing is predetermined by the Divine"Bt-inu" fft,u' that whatever lias been, must have been j and that whatever will be, must be ; that all events are pre-ordained by sei7}bty of infinite wisdom and unlimited goodness j that the will, in all its determinations, is governed by the state of mind; Westmxn- that this state of mind is in every instance determined by the Deity; and that there is a continued chain oUter. causes and effects, of motives and actions, inseparably connected, and originating from the condition in which we aie brought into existence by the Author ol our being.” The author ox compiler of the same book affirms, “ That all motion indeed originates in the Deity; that the Deity is self-moved ; that he possesses the singular attribute underived of moving himself.” But it is added, in the very same paragraph from which this last sentence is quoted, that “ the very argument we employ to prove one underived source of motion and existence, is a gross solecism in logic; and that the ascription of this power to the Divine Being is in fact nothing else than tbe less of two palpable absurdities, or rather impossibilities, if these could admit of degrees f." f Essay on The piety of these assertions will be obvious, we are persuaded, to every one of our readers; but to some it Js Ptiilosophi- possible that their consistency may not he apparent. We would advise all such “ to peruse once and again j)vca^eccssi- Pnestley’s Illustrations,” which we have the best authority to say, will remove from their minds all libertarian ^nder^^' prejudices, convince them “that the hypothesis of necessity is incontrovertibiy true,” and show them that all the Crombie, defenders of that hypothesis are in perfect harmony with themselves and with one another! A. Ai. P R £ [ rrcdcs.ha-gative; but tliere can be no prescience ol future con- tion. tingencies ; for it involves a contradiction to say, t la things which are not certainly to be should be certain y foreseen. If they are certainly foreseen, they must cer¬ tainly be, and can therefore be no longer contingent. An uncertain foresight is also an imperfect act, as it may be a mistake, and is therefore inconsistent with di¬ vine perfection. On the other side the difficulty 1S ea" *ily explained. When God decrees that an event shall take place, its existence thenceforth becomes certain, and as such is certainly foreseen. For it is an obvious absurdity to say, that a thing happens freely, that is to say, that it may be or may not be, and yet t.iat it is cer¬ tainly foreseen by God. He cannot foresee things ut as he decrees them, and consequently gives them a fu¬ ture certainty of existence 5 and therefore any prescience antecedent to his decree must be rejected as impossible. Conditional decrees are farther absurd, inasmuch as they subject the purposes of God to the will and the actions of his creatures. Does he will or wish that‘all man¬ kind should be saved, and shall they not all be saved . Infinite perfection can wish nothing but what it can execute : and if it is fit to wish, it is also fit to execute its wishes. We are indeed certainly informed by the scriptures, that all shall not be saved j and we therefore as certainly conclude, that God never intended that they should be so } for the counsel of the Lord statideth fast, I4 and the thoughts of his heart,'to all generations Christ died We conclude, upon the same principles, that al- only for the though the blessings resulting from the death of Christ *lect• are offered to all, yet that intentionally and actually he only died for those whom the Father had chosen and given to him to be saved by him. That Christ should have died in vain is represented by the apostle Paul as a oreat absurdity (Gal. ii. 21.) : but it he died for all, fie must have died in vain with regard to the gi-eater part of mankind who are not to be saved by him. In so far as some inferior blessings are concerned, which through him are communicated, if not to all men, at least to all Christians, he may perhaps justly be said to have died for all : but with regard to eternal salvation, his design, to avoid rendering it fruitless, could go no farther than the secret purpose and election of God. This is implied in these words, all that are given me of my Father, thine they were, and thou gavest them me. To these his intercession is limited •, 1 pray not for the world, butfor those that thou hast given me, for they are thine, and all thine are mine, and mine arethinefio.xFu. o, io.). Universal words are indeed used with regard to the death of Christ: but the reason is obvious, the Jewish religion was confined to the family and descen¬ dants of Abraham. In contradiction to this, the gos¬ pel is said to be preached to every creature, and to all the world; because it is not limited to any one race or nation, and because the apostle received a general com¬ mission to teach it unto all who should be willing to receive it. These extensive expressions can only be un¬ derstood in this manner, because in their strict accepta¬ tion they have never been verified. Nor can their mean¬ ing be carried farther without an imputation upon the justice of God: for if he has received a sufficient satis¬ faction for the sins of the whole world, it is not just that all should not be saved by it, or at least have the offer of salvation made to them, that they may accept of it if they please. 280 ] PR E But to return to the divine purposes and attributes £'rejest. in general: it is in vain to assert that God is partial and iiCI1 unjust while he prefers without merit, and predestinates to punishment those who have not yet offended. The same error misleads men here that has so often seduced them from the true path of scientific research. Instead of submitting to the patient and humble observation of nature, they boldly form some plausible hypothesis of their own, and vainly attempt to reconcile every appear¬ ance to their favourite system. This mode of procedure never has proved, and never will prove, successful in any branch of true philosophy. We are not entitled to frame to ourselves certain notions of the justice of God, and from these to decide that thus he must act, and in no other manner. He takes no counsel from us concern¬ ing his conduct, and we have no right to rejudge his judgments. What he regards as just or unjust between himself and his creatures, is a question of fact not to be known by ingenious conjectures, but by the cautious observation of the manner in which he acts in the course of his providence, and by attending to what he has de¬ clared concerning himself in the sacred scriptures. If from these it shall appear that he does prefer where there is no merit, and reject where there is no crime 5 it will be in vain thereafter to assert that such conduct is un¬ just: the fact will be on our side of the question, and we shall leave those to account for it, who insist that their limited reason is capable of comprehending all the mys¬ terious ways ot an Infinite Being. I? In the course of providence, then, we see the great-Great: est inequalities take place, and such as appear alto-qualitie; gether contradictory to our ideas of justice. We see^^l die sins of the fathers punished in the persons of the children, who often derive debilitated bodies from the1 intemperance of their parents, and corrupted manners from the example of their vices. God frequently afflicts good men in this life for a great length of time, as in the case of Job, only for the manifestation of his own glory, that their faith and patience may be made mani¬ fest." Some sins are punished with other sins, and often with a course of severe miseries in the persons ot those who never committed them. We may transfer this from time to eternity *, for if God may do for a little time what is inconsistent with our notions, and with our rules of justice, he may do it fora longer duration: since it is as impossible that he can be unjust for a day as for all eternity: and the same inequality ot manage¬ ment appears in the great as in the private affairs ot this world. During many ages almost the whole human race were lost in the darkness of idolatry: even since the Christian religion came into the world, how few nations have received it ; and of these few, the number is still smaller of those who have enjoyed it in tolerable purity. I f we consider how many great nations remain under the delusion contrived by Mahomet •, it we reflect upon the idolatrv of the Indies and of China, and the su¬ perstition of the Greek church, and of the church of ]{ome—we shall find that very few nations have possessed the most ordinary means of grace. Even the blessings of civilization, of science, and of liberty, are so rarely scattered ever the face of the earth, that it is to be re¬ garded as a melancholy truth, that with a very few fa¬ voured exceptions the whole human race have hitherto been sunk in the depth of barbarism, ignorance, slavery, and idolatry. When the Arnunians think lit to assert, then, P R E tion. Jalvini 'rec|cst;n accounts us not incapable ot forming just notions at ^ u- least of these attributes. What then can we think ot1 a justice that shall condemn us tor a fact that we ne¬ ver committed ? that designs first of all to be glorified by our being eternally miserable, and which afterwards decrees that we shall commit sius lo justiiy this previous decree of our reprobation ? l or ii God originahy de¬ signs and determines all things, and if ail his decrees are certainly effected, it is inconceivable how there should he a justice in punishing that which he himself, b) an antecedent and irreversible decree, appointed to be done. Or, setting justice aside, is it possible that a being of infinite holiness, and who is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity, would by an antecedent decree fix our committing so many sius, in such a manner that it is not possible to avoid them ? He represents himself in the scriptures as gracious, merciful, slow to anger, and abundant in goodness and truth. It is often said, that he desires that no man should perish, but that all should come to the knowledge of the truth : this is even said with the solemnity of an oath, As L live, salth the Lord, I take no pleasure in the death of sinners. \\ hat sense can these words bear if we believe that God did by an absolute decree doom so many of them to everlasting frotn the attributes of Coil. misery t If all things that happen arise out of the ab¬ solute decree of God as their first cause, then we must believe that God takes pleasure both in his own decrees and in the execution of them, consequently that he doth take pleasure in the death of sinners; and this in ex¬ press contradiction to the most positive language ot scripture. Besides all this, what are we to think ot the truth of God, and of the sincerity of those ofters oi grace and mercy, with the exhortations and expostu¬ lations upon them that occur so frequently in scrip¬ ture, if we can imagine that by antecedent acts he e- termined that all these should be ineffectual i . In one word, are we to regard our existence as a blessing, and to look up with gratitude to that paternal goodness which has placed us in a land of hope, which lormed our nature, weak indeed and exposed to many imper¬ fections, but capable of rising by virtuous eftorts and by a patient continuance in well-doing to excellence and to high and immortal felicity ? or, are we to curse the hour in which we were born under the dominion ot a master, who is not only severe, but absurd, and even adds insult to cruelty who, after placing us in a good¬ ly habitation, binds us hand and foot, locks the door, blocks up the windows, sets fire to the fabric, and then very mercifully calls upon us to come forth lest we perish ? . . It is not true that rational beings are nothing in the sight of their Maker. Compared to his Almighty streno-th and uncreated existence, our powers do indeed diminish into weakness, and our years into a moment: yet although our interests may be unimportant in them¬ selves, the attributes of God with which they are con¬ nected are far from being so. There was no necessity for his calling us into existence but the instant he be¬ stowed upon us that gift, and conferred upon us facul¬ ties capable 0! rising to happiness by the contempla¬ tion of himself and of his works, he became our parent, and granted to us a right to look up to him tor protec¬ tion and mercy, and to hope that our existence an our faculties were not bestowed in yam. Willie P k' e lorrcs- . ndence tween •ice and ieitiey edestiiia-trample upon tliejust and reasonable hopes of the mean- tion est of his creatures. He is watchful over our interests; he hath sent his Son to die for us ; his providence has been exerted for no other purpose but to promote our welfare ; and there is joy in heaven even over one sin¬ ner that repenteth. Let it be allowed, that the universe was formed for no other purpose but to promote the glory of God ; that glory can surely be little promoted by the exertion of undistinguishing and blind acts of power, in the arbitrary appointment to eternal repro¬ bation of millions of unresisting and undeserving wretch¬ es*. Is it not more honourable to the Deity to con¬ ceive of him as the parent, ouide, governor, and judge of free beings, formed after the likeness of himself, with powers of reason and self-determination, than to con¬ ceive of him as the former and conductor of a system of conscious machinery, or the mover and controuler of an universe of puppets, many of whom he is pleased to make completely miserable ? The most important and fundamental point of religion considered as a spe¬ culative science, consists in our forming high and just ideas of God and of his attributes, that from them we may understand the maxims of true and perfect mora¬ lity. But were we to attempt to form our own natures upon the idea of the divine character that is given us by the doctrine of absolute decrees, we would certainly become imperious, partial and cruel ; at least we should not readily learn the virtues of kindness, mercy, and compassion. It is true that, setting aside predestination, it is not easy to show how future contingencies should be certainly foreseen ; but it is ohvious that such foresight involves no contradiction, (see Metaphysics, N° 308); and if the actions of men be free, we know from the train of prophecies, which in the sacred scriptures ap¬ pear to have been made in one a’1 1--— -r n.wi man possesses this power of acting originally and 01 lum- * self, or whether he is incapable of forming any resolu- l ion, or making any effort, without being acted upon by neceSH:ty,, a foreign cause, is not a point to be reasoned on or dis-question- puted about: it is a question of fact, which, as far as it'11^ can possibly be known, every man has it in his power to determine by the evidence of his own consciousness. We do aver, then, that every man is conscious that he is a free agent, and that it is not possible for the most staunch predestinarian that has ever yet appeared seriously and practically to convince himself of the contrary. It is not possible for a man in his senses to believe, that in all those crimes which men charge themselves with, and reproach themselves for, God is the agent j and that, properly speaking, they are no more agents than a sword is when employed to commit murder. We do indeed, on some occasions, feel ourselves hurried on so impetuously by vio¬ lent passions, that we seem for an instant to have lost our freedom ) but on cool reflection we find, that we both might and ought to have restrained that heat in its first commencement. We feel that we can divert our thoughts, and overcome ourselves in most instances, if we set seriously about it. We feel that knowledge, re¬ flection, and proper society, improve the temper and disposition) and that ignorance, negligence, and the so¬ ciety of the worthless and abandoned, corrupt and de¬ grade the mind. From all this we conclude, that man is free, and not under inevitable fate, or irresistible mo¬ tions to good or evil. This conclusion is confirmed by the whole style of scripture, which upon any other sup¬ position becomes a solemn and unworthy mockery. It is full of persuasions, exhortations, reproofs, expostulations, encouragements, and terrors. But to what purpose is it to speak to dead men, to persuade the blind to see, or the lame to run ? If we are under impotence till the ir¬ resistible grace comes, and if, when itcomes, nothing can withstand it, what occasion is there for these solemn dis¬ courses which can have no effect ? They cannot render us inexcusable, unless it were in our power to be im¬ proved by them ; and to imagine that God gives light and blessings, which can do no good, to those whom he before intended to damn, only to make them more in¬ excusable, and for the purpose of aggravating their condemnation, gives so strange an idea of his character as it is not fit to express in the language that naturally arises out of it. 27 Our antagonists seem to have formed ideas of the ( divine perfection and sovereignty that are altogether Go(1 ^ false. There is no imperfection implied in the suppo-j)end on sition that some of the acts of God may depend upon the condt the conduct of his creatures. Perfection consists inof 1116 cre| forming the wisest designs, and in executing them by U1 the most suitable means. The Author of Nature con¬ ducts the planets in their orbits with immutable preci¬ sion according to fixed rules : but it would he absurd to pretend to manage free agents, or their affairs, in the same manner by mathematical or mechanical prin¬ ciples. The providence that is exerted over material objects is fixed and steady in its operations, because it is fit that material objects which cannot move of them¬ selves should be moved in a regular manner : but free and intelligent beings enjoy a wider range, and ought O O J J ' not to be confined to a prescribed tram of exertions may :S T in?- qi ities of l'i idence ac :antcd fo\ P R k [2 may therefore be necessary that the providence which superintends them should accommodate itself to circum¬ stances. This, however, is not injurious to the divine sovereignty ; for God himself is the author of that free¬ dom of agency which he is pleased to watch over. He is not less the Lord of the universe ; and surely his wisdom and benevolence are more conspicuous when he brings good out of evil, and renders the perverse wan¬ derings of the human heart subservient to purposes of mercy, than when he burls into the immensity of space the most enormous mass of dead and passive matter sub¬ jected to unerring laws. As for the inequalities of moral situation that are to be observed in the world, and the giving to some na¬ tions and persons the means of improvement, and. the denying them to others, the Scriptures do indeed a- scribe these wholly to the riches and freedom of God’s grace. And we confess, that the ways of Providence are often dark and mysterious. In this world there are many things which are hard to be understood, and many which appear altogether unaccountable : we see the wicked man prospering in his wickedness, though it impose misery upon thousands ; we see truth hiding its head, and the world governed by fraud and absurdity. Still, however, we can venture to assert, that God be¬ stows upon all what is necessary to enable them to ful¬ fil the obligations expected from the state in which they are placed ; and it is elsewhere shown, that physical evil is among men the parent of moral good. (See Pro¬ vidence). God winketh at the times of ignorance j much is required of them to whom much is given ; and it shall be more tolerable in the day of judgment for the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah than for the en¬ lightened cities of Galilee. Thus God will be just when be judges; none will meet with condemnation ex¬ cepting those who are inexcusable. For although he grants more to some than may be absolutely necessary, yet he grants less to none ; and where he grants little, he will suit his judgments to the little which he gave. There is no injustice in this. If it was the intention of the great Creator, that his creation should contain within its ample bosom every possible variety of intelli¬ gent natures, it was necessary that there should be some¬ where such a being as man; and, in forming all possible varieties of human minds and situations, it was necessary that every particular individual should exist. Hence a man may as well complain that he was not formed one of the flaming seraphims that surround the throne of the Eternal, as that he is not placed in other circumstances in life than those which he now occupies j for if little is given, little will he required from him. Thus the designs of Providence go on according to the goodness and mercy of God. None can complain, though some have more cause for joy than others. What happens to individuals may happen to nations in a body ; some may have higher privileges, and be placed in happier circumstances than others 5 but none can complain of the wise and just disposer of all, who has given enough, 85 ] P R E although we may have good reason to complain of our-preck»tina- selves, for not using what was suflicient. tion. As to the case of those who are not blessed with the ' light of the gospel, we may consider, that if they have fewer and less advantages than others, their nature and capacities must likewise be inferior j to which their fu¬ ture state may be proportioned. God is not obliged to make all men equally perfect in the next world any more than in this ; and if their capacity be rendered less than that of an ordinary Christum, a lower degree of happiness may fill it. However, we need not be ex¬ tremely solicitous about their state, much less cast any ungrateful imputations on the Governor of the world for not having dealt so bountifully with them as he has with ourselves 5 since we know that Christ died for the whole race of mankind ; that everyone will at length be ‘ accepted according to that he lias, and not accord¬ ing to that he has not ; and that to whomsoever much is given, oi him shall much be required’ (b). 29 l pon these principles, we can easily explain all the ^cr'Ptural passages in the New Testament concerning the purpose, exPress*on* the election, the foreknowledge, and the predestination 0pexPlalncd- God. They relate to the design of calling the Gentile world to the knowledge of the Messias : This was kept secret, though hints had been given of it by several of the prophets, so that it was a mystery ; but it was re¬ vealed when the apostles, in consequence of Christ’s commission, to go and teach all nations, w'ent about preaching the gospel to the Gentiles. This was a stumbling block to the Jews, and it was the chief sub¬ ject of dispute betwixt them and the apostles at the time when the Epistles were written; so that it was necessary for them to clear up this point very fully, and to mention it frequently. Eut in the beginning of Christianity there was no need of amusing men with high and unsearchable speculations concerning the de¬ crees of God } the apostles therefore take up the point in dispute, the calling of the Gentiles, in a general man¬ ner. They show, that Abraham at first, and Isaac and Jacob afterwards, were chosen by a discriminating favour, that they and their posterity should he in cove¬ nant with God ; but that, nevertheless, it always was the intention of Providence to call in the Gentiles, though it was not executed till these later times. With this key we can explain coherently the whole of St Paul’s discourses upon this subject, without assert¬ ing antecedent and special decrees as to particular per¬ sons. 1 hings that happen under a permissive and direct¬ ing Providence, may, by a largeness of expression, be a- scribed to the will and counsel of God ; for a permissive will is really a will, though it is not the agent or cause of the effect. The hardening of Pharao/ds heart may he ascribed to God, though it is said that his heart har¬ dened itself, because he took advantage of the respites which God granted him from the plagues, to encou¬ rage himself to longer resistance. Besides this, he was a cruel and bloody tyrant, and deserved such judgments for his other sins j so that he may be considered as at that time (b) See Bishop Law’s Considerations on the Theory of Religion, where this question is treated in a very mas¬ terly manner. rIfie work, though less known than it ought to be, has great merit, and of the author we have given a biographical sketch. P R E [ 286 ] P R E . , r 1 1 „ n,-,,! m.lv nrrserved from that he hath done shall not be mentioned; in his sin that Predes 3° the first plagues, to afford a striking instance of the avenging justice of God. I hat this is the meaning o the passage, appears extremely probable from the man¬ ner in which Exod. ix. 16. is rendered in the Vatican and Aldus’s edit, of the LXX. Instead of saying, as m our translation, “ And in very deed for tins cause have I raised thee up, for to show in thee my power, &c. God is represented in that version as saying, “ And in very deed for this cause have I kept thee alive till now, foi 'to show.” Stc. tFhom he will he hardeneth, is an ex- pres-ion that can only be applied to such persons as this tyrant was. It is obvious that the woids of our Sav our concerning those whom his Father hadpiven him, are only meant of a dispensation oi 1 rovidence, and not oi a decree ; since he adds, And 1 have lost none of them except the son of perdition: for it cannot be said that Judas Iscariot was in the decree, and yet was lost. And in the same passage in which God is said to work in us both to will and to do, we are required to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling. The word ordained to eternal life also signifies fitted and disposed to eternal life. The question, Who made thee to differ? (1 Cor. iv. 7.) refers to those extraordinary gifts which, in different degrees and measures, were be¬ stowed upon the first Christians, in which they weie un¬ questionably passive. Grace not If the decrees of God are not absolute, neither can irresistible, his grace be so efficacious as absolutely and necessanly to determine our conduct, else why are we required not to grieve God's spirit? why is it said, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost; as your fathers did, so do ye? Hoiv often would 1 have gathered you under my wings, and ye would not? What could I have done in my vineyard that has not been done in it? These expressions indicate a power in us, by which we not only can, but often do, resist the motions of grace. But if the determining efficacy of grace be not acknowledged, it will be much harder to believe that we are efficaciously determined to sin. This supposition is so contrary both to the holi¬ ness of God, and to the whole style of the sacred wri¬ tings, that it is unnecessary to accumulate proofs of it. O Israel, thou hast destroyed thyself, but in me is thy help : ye will not come unto me that ye may have life: 3I Why will you die, O house of Israel? The great- As for perseverance, we may remark, that the ma- cst saint on ny promises made in the sacred scriptures to them earth may ^ overcome, tirat continue stedfast and faithful to the ,a ‘ death, do certainly insinuate that a man may fall from a good state. The words of the apostle to the Hebrews are very clear and pointed: I oi'it is impossible for those who were once enligh tened, and have tasted of the heaven¬ ly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance {Heb. vi.^-) It isalsosaid, Fhejust shall live by faith : but if he draw (c) back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him, (Heb x. 38.). And it is said by the prophet, When the righteousturneth away fromhis righ¬ teousness, and committeth iniquity, all his righteousness sages, with many others, give us every reason to believe that a good man may fall from a good state, as well as that a wicked man may turn from a had one. ^ We conclude the whole by observing, that the only All dift; difficulty which attends the question arises from the cutties mysterious, and apparently partial and unequal, course of the divine government in our present state j 'm^judgmc: there is an important day approaching, when God will condescend to remove these obscurities, and to vindicate the ways of his providence to man. On that great day, we are well assured, that the question will he decided in our favour j for we know that judgment will be gi¬ ven, not according to any absolute decree, but accord¬ ing to the deeds which avc ourselves shall have freely done in the body, whether they have been good, or whe¬ ther they have been evil. Thus have we stated, we hope with fairness and im¬ partiality, a summary of the arguments on both sides of this long-agitated question. We need hardly add, that it is a question involved in considerable difficulties.— Milton, who was an eminent philosopher and divine, as well as the first of poets, when he wished to exhibit the fallen angels themselves as perplexed by questions above their comprehension, set them to dispute about predestination. They reason’d high, of knowledge, will, and fate, Fix’d fate, free-will, fore-knowledge absolute And found no end, in wand’ring mazes lost. Paradise Lost. The weak side of the Calvinistic doctrine consists inT]je Vi: the impossibility of reconciling tbe absolute and uncon-sideofp ditional decree of reprobation with our ideas of thedoctri) justice and goodness of God I he weak side of the rminian scheme consists in the difficulty of account¬ ing for the certainty of the divine fore-knowledge, upon the supposition of a contingency of events, or an abso¬ lute freedom of will in man. To elude the former of these difficulties, some of the late writers upon philosophical necessity, and Dr Priest¬ ly is among the number, have given up the doctrine of reprobation, and asserted, that this world is only a state of preparation for another, in which all men, of every description and character, shall attain to final and ever¬ lasting happiness, when God shall be all, and in all. On the other side, some of the supporters of free agen¬ cy, and Montesquieu* is among the number, have*^ been disposed to deny the divine attribute of presci- Pen. ence. Whatever may be thought of the practical tendency of the trvo opinions, there is one remark Avliich avc think ourselves bound in justice to make, although it ap¬ pears to us to be someAvhat singular. It is this, that from the earliest ages down to our own days, if Ave con¬ sider the character of the ancient Stoics, the JeAvish Ls- senes, the modern Calvinists, and Jansenists, Avhen com¬ pared Avith that of their antagonists the Epicureans, the Sadducees, Arminians, and the Jesuits, we shall find that they (c) In our translation we r. ad, “ if any man draw back,” &e.; but the words any man are not in the original:, and if they do not make nonsense of the text, they must at least be acknowledged to obscure its meaning. re-n- m led th ■la the of Hi H»Ci p R E [ 2S7 ] P R E • Mtina- they hare excelled m no small degree in the practice of articles Creation and Earth. See also the n v. -. linm the most rigid and respectable virtues, and have been the phical Essays of Dr Isaac Watts, and the Principles of ‘encT^ lugoest honour 01 their own ages, and the best models mihtraland reveuiedReligion, by (he CiievalicrEam' -iv ^ for imitation to every age succeeding. At the same time, where the subject, of the world’s cternitv is discussed Mi h ume7s speculations also, on tins abstruse and ardu- ous subject, had a greater tendency to dissipate its gloom tnau that philosopher himself could imagine. i lb.- pie-existence of the human soul to its corporeal Pre-exist- vehicle had been from time immemorial a prevailing ence of opinion among the Asiatic sages, and from them was j5011' perhaps transferred by Pythagoras to the philosophy of Sa,.es.^10 the Greeks ; but his metempsychosis, or transmigration of souls, is too trivial either to he seriously proposed or refuted.. Nevertheless, from the sentiments of Socrates concerning the immortality of the soul, delivered in his last interview with his friends, it is obvious that the tenet of pre-existence was a doctrine of the Platonic school. If at any period of life, say these philosophers, you should examine a boy, of bow many ideas, of what a number of principles, of what an extent of knowledge will you find him possessed : these without doubt could neither be self derived nor recently acquired. With what avidity ami promptitude does he attain the knowledge of arts and sciences, which appear entirely new to him ! these rapid and successful advances in knowledge can only be the effects of reminiscence, or of a fainter and more indi- 3 . stmet species of recollection. Butin all the other opera- SoL‘raUc tions of memory, we find retrospective impressions at- tendingevery object or idea whic Ire merges to her viewjistence re* nor does she ever suggest any thought, word, or action,luted- without informing us, in a manner equally clear and evi¬ dent that those impressions had been made upon our senses, mind, or intellect, on some former occasion. VV hoever contemplates her progress, will easily disco¬ ver, that association is her most faithful and efficacious auxiliary ; and that by joining impression with impres¬ sion, idea with idea, circumstance with circumstance, in the order of time, of place, of similarity or dissimilarity, she is capacitated to accumulate her treasures and en¬ large her province even to an indefinite extent. But when intuitive principles, or simple conclusions, are eli¬ cited from the puerile understanding by a train of easy questions properly arranged, where is the retrospective act of memory, by which the boy recognises those truths as having formerly been perceived in his mind ? I •exist it must be confessed, that their virtues have in general been rendered unamiable by a tinge of gloomy and se¬ vere austerity. So far as the speculative foundation of their princi¬ ples is considered, however, neither party seems liable to censure in a moral point of view. Each of them wishes to support, though in a different manner from the other, the honour of the divine character. The Calvinists be¬ gin their argument with the notion of infinite perfection, independency, and absolute sovereignty, and thence de- 34 duce their opinions; making every difficulty yield to jilaal for-these first and leading ideas. Their opponents are more trance jealous of the respect due to the divine attributes of jus- r*1- tice, truth, holiness, and mercy, and deduce their senti¬ ments from the idea which they have formed of these. Each party lays down general maxims that are admitted by the other, and both argue plausibly from their first principles. I)i Burnet, whom we have here followed tv:st m verv closely, justly observes*, that “ these are great -fXrticles.grounds for mutual charity and forbearance.” PKEDE TE RMINATION, in Philosophy and The¬ ology, is that concurrence of God which makes men act, and determines them in all their actions, both good and evil, and is called by the schoolmen physical predeter¬ mination ox premotion. See Metaphysics, Part III. chap. v. and Predestination. PREDIAL slaves. See Predial Slaves. Predial Tithes, are those that are paid of things arising and growing from the ground only ; as corn, hay, fruit, &e. J ’ > PREDICABLE, among logicians,denotes a general quality which may be predicated or asserted of,several things: thus, animal is predicable of mankind, beasts, birds, fishes, &.c. PREDICAMENT, among logicians, the same with category. See Category and Philosophy. . I^EDICAl E, in Logic, that which, in a propo¬ sition,.is affirmed or denied of the subject. In these propositions, snow is white, ink is not white; white¬ ness is the predicate which is affirmed of snow, and de¬ nied of ink. # Tposi- tic 7>f the PRF FMPTIfYM • -i • i „ , , *3 naviug rormeriy Been perceived in his mind ? r . a Pnv'le?e a”c,entty allowed the Where are the crowds of the concomitant, antecedent, ~ g_P„U„rie7.Lr,_° ‘ i!6 c^oice and first buying or subsequent ideas, with which those recollections r -y J ' , r> — — M.ivi XXI ou UUJIUI' ol corn and other provisions for the king’s house :' but taken away by the statute 19 Car. II. PREENING, in Natural Histoiy, the action of birds cleaning, composing, and dressing their feathers, to en¬ able them to glide more easily through the air. For this purpose they have two peculiar glands on their rump, wind) secrete an unc tuous matter into a bag that is per¬ forated, out ol which the bird occasionally draws it with its bill. J PRE EXISTENCE, a priority of being, or tbe being of one thing before another. Thus a cause, if not in time, is yet in nature pre-existent to its effect. Anus God is pre existent to the universe. Thus a hu¬ man father is pre existent to his son. The Peripate- tlCS’ t,U'U^ t!it7 maintained the eternity of the world, nit) Were l^ewi;se dogmatical in their opinion, that the uni- Vl.Ise "as formed, actuated, and governed, by a sove¬ reign intelligence. See Aristotle on the Soul, and our ought naturally to have been attended ? In a word, where is the sense of personal identity, which seems ab¬ solutely inseparable from every act of memory? This hypothesis, therefore, will not support pre-existence. After the Christian religion had been considerably dif¬ fused, and warmly combated by its philosophical anta¬ gonists, the same doctrine was resumed and taught at Alexandria, by Platonic proselytes, not only as a topic 4, constituent of their master’s philosophy, but as an an- f>re'eflsV swer to those formidable objections which had been de- bycliristfan duced from the doctrine of original sin, and from the rlatonists. vices which stain, and from the calamities which dis¬ turb, human life: hence they strenuously asserted, that all the human race were either introduced to being prior to Adam, or pre-existent in his person ; that they were not, therefore, represented by our first parents, but actually concurred in their crime, and participated their ruin. The P R E [ p„ „js. The followers of Oiigen, and such as entertained .he cnee. notion of Pre-adamites *, might argue from the doc- ' ' trine of pre-existence with some degree ot plausibility. * See. Pre- For ti)e iiuman beings introduced by them to the theatre adamites' 0f probation had already attained the capacity or dig¬ ital no so- nity of moral agents*, as their crime therefore was so¬ lution of luntary, their punishment might be just. -But those woo original sin. believe the whole human race created in Adam to be only pre-existent in their germs or stamina, were even deprived of this miserable subteriuge j for in these ho¬ munculi we can neither suppose the moral nor rational constitution unfolded. Since, therefore, their degene¬ racy was not spontaneous, neither could their sutler mgs be equitable. Should it be said that the evil of original sin was penal, as it extended to our first parents alone and merely consequential as felt by their posterity, it will be admitted that the distinction between penal and con¬ sequential evil may be intelligible in human affairs, where other laws, assortments, and combinations than those which are simply and purely moral, take place. But that a moral government, at one et the most cardinal periods of its administration, should admit gratuitous or consequential evil, seems to us irreconcileable with the attributes and conduct of a wise and just legislator. Con¬ sequential evil taken as such, is misery sustained without demerit *, and cannot result from the procedure of wis¬ dom, benignity, and justice 5 but must flow from neces¬ sity, from ignorance, from cruelty, or from caprice, as its only possible sources. But even upon the supposition of those who pretend that man was mature in all his fa¬ culties before the commission of original sin, the objec¬ tions against it will still remain in full force: for it is admitted by all except the Samian sage, that the con¬ sciousness of personal identity which was felt in pre¬ existence, is obliterated in a subsequent state of being. Now' it may be demanded, whether agents thus resus¬ citated for punishment have not the same right to mur¬ mur and complain as if they had been perfectly innocent, and only created for that dreadful catastrophe ? It is upon this principle alone that the effects of punishment can be either exemplary or disciplinary *, for how is it possible, that the punishment of beings unconscious of a crime should ever be reconciled either to the justice or beneficence of that intention with which their suflerings are inflicted ? Or how can others be supposed to become wise and virtuous by the example of those who are nei¬ ther acquainted with the origin nor the tendency of their miseries, but have every reason to think themselves afflicted merely for the sake of afflicting? lo us it seems clear, that the nature and rationale of original sin lie inscrutably retired in the bosom of Providence} nor can we, without unpardonable presumption and arro- -gance, form the most simple conclusion, or attempt the minutest discovery, either different from or extraneous to the clear and obvious sense of revelation. This sense indeed may with propriety be extracted from the whole, or from one passage collated with another; but inde¬ pendent of it, as reason has no premisses, she can form no deductions. The boldness and temerity of philoso¬ phy, not satisfied with contemplating pre-existence as merely relative to human nature, has dared to try how far it was compatible with the glorious Persons of the sacred Trinity. The Arians, who allowed the subor- -dinate divinity of our Saviour, believed him pre-existent to all time, and before all worlds j but the Socinians, 288 ] PRE who esteemed his nature as well as his person merely prc Iiuman, insisted, that before bis incarnation he was only c pre-existent in the divine idea, not in nature or person. But when it is considered, that children do not begin rrefu to deduce instructions from nature and expeiience, at a period so late as we are apt to imagine 5 when it is ad¬ mitted, that their progress, though insensible, may be much more rapid than we apprehend j when the op¬ portunities of sense, the ardour of curiosity, the avidity of memory, and the activity of understanding, are re¬ marked—we need not have recourse to a pre-existent state for our account of the knowledge which young minds discover. It may likewise be added, that moral agents can only be improved and cultivated by moral discipline. Such effects therefore of any state, whether happy or miserable, as are merely mechanical, may be noxious or salutary to the patient, but can never enter into anv moral economy as parts of its own administra¬ tion. Pre-existence, therefore, whether rewarded or punished, without the continued impression of personal identity, affords no solution of original sin. PREFACE, something introductory to a hook, to inform the reader ot the design, method, &c. obser\ed therein, and generally whatever is necessary to the un¬ derstanding of a book. PREFECT, in ancient Rome, one of the chief ma¬ gistrates who governed in the absence of the kings, con¬ suls, and emperors. This power was greatest under the emperors. His chief care was the government of the city, taking cog¬ nizance of all crimes committed therein and within 100 miles. He judged capitally and finally, and even presided in the senate. He had the superintendence of the provisions, building, and navigation. The prefect of modern Rome differs little from the ancient prcefectns, his authority only extending to 40 miles round the city. Prefect of the Prcetorium, the leader of the preto- rian bands destined for the emperor’s guard, consisting, according to JDion, of 10,000 men. This officer, ac¬ cording to Suetonius, was instituted by Augustus, and usually taken from among the knights. By the favour of the emperors his power grew very considerable \ to reduce which, Constantine divided the prefecture of the prsetorium into four prefectures, and each of these he subdivided again into civil and military departments, though the name was only reserved to him who was invested with the civil authority, and that of comes A?///given him who commanded the cohorts. PREGAD I, in History, a denomination given to the senate of Venice, in which resides the whole authority of the republic. At its first institution, it was compo¬ sed of 60 senators, to whom 60 more have been added. See Venice. PREGNANCY, the state of a woman who has con¬ ceived, or is with child. See Midwifery. PREHNITE, a mineral first brought by Colonel Prehn from the Cape of Good Hope, whose name it bears. See Mineralogy Index. j PREJUDICE, or Prejudgment, from pree and Dean judicium, means a judgment formed beforehand, with¬ out examination j the preposition pree expressing an an¬ ticipation, not so much of time as of knowledge and due attention : and hence the schoolmen have called it an¬ ticipation and a preconceived opinion. Prejudice oin of ‘udice. P II fe r 2 •judice. Prejudice arises fi om the associating principle, wliich ! we have explained at large in another article (see Me¬ taphysics, Part 1. chap. 5.), and it is a weakness from which no human mind can be wholly free. Some are indeed much more than others under its influence j but there is no man who does not occasionally act upon principles, the propriety of which he never investigated ; or who does not hold speculative opinions, into the truth of which he never seriously inquired. Our pa¬ rents and tutors, yea, our very nurses, determine a mul¬ titude of our sentiments : our friends, our neighbours, the custom of the country where we dwell, and the esta¬ blished opinions of mankind, form our belief; the great, the pious, the learned, and the ancient, the king, the priest, and the philosopher, are characters of mighty efficacy to persuade us to regulate our conduct by their practice, and to receive as truth whatever they may dictate. The case cannot indeed be otherwise. The occa¬ sions of acting are so frequent, and the principles of ac¬ tion are so various, that were a man to investigate accu¬ rately the value of every single motive which presents itself to his mind, and to balance them fairly against each other, the time of acting would in most instances pass away long before lie could determine what ought to be done ; and life would be wasted in useless specula¬ tion. I he great laws ol religion and morality, which ought to be the general and leading principles of action, no man of science will take upon trust ; but in the course of a busy Hie a thousand circumstances will oc¬ cur in which rve must act with such rapidity, that, after being satisfied of the lawfulness of what we are about to do, we must, for the prudence of it, confide entirely in the general customs of our country, or in the practice of other individuals placed in circumstances similar to ours. In all such cases, though we may act properly, we act from prejudice. But the dominion of prejudice is not confined to the actions of the man of business : it extends over the spe¬ culations of the philosopher himself, one half of whose knowledge rests upon no other foundation. All hu¬ man sciences are related to each other (see Philo¬ sophy, jN° 2.), and there is hardly one of them in which a man can become eminent unless he has some general acquaintance with the whole circle; but no man could ever yet investigate for himself all those proposi¬ tions which constitute the circle of the sciences, or even comprehend the evidence upon which they rest, though he admits them perhaps as truths incontrovertible. He must therefore receive many of them upon the autho¬ rity of others, or, whie.h the same thing, admit them by 'prejudice. To this reasoning it may he objected, that when a man admits as true abstract propositions, which, though not sell-evident, he cannot demonstrate, he admits them not by prejudice, but upon testimony, which has been elsewhere shown to be a sufficient foundation for human belief (see Metaphysics, N° 138.). The objection is plausible, but it is not solid ; for testimony commands belief only concerning events which, falling under the cognizance of the senses, preclude all possibility of mis¬ take ; whereas abstract propositions, not self-evident, can be proved true only by a process of reasoning or by & series of experiments ; and in conducting both these, the most vigorous mind is liable to mistake. When Sir Vol. XVII. Part I. f 3 xten- donri- 89 ] P ft E Isaac Newton told the world that it was the fall of an Prejudice. apple which first suggested to him the general law of ‘ ~v~—' gi avitation, he bore testimony to a lact concerning which he could not be mistaken ; and we receive las testimony for the reasons assigned in the article referred to. . When he lays down the method of obtaining the fluxion or momentum of the rectangle or product of two indeterminate quantities, which is the main point in his doctrine of fluxions, he labours to establish that method on the basis of demonstration ; and whoever makes use ol it in piactice, without understanding that demonstra¬ tion, receives the whole doctrine ol the modern geome¬ trical analysis, not as a matter of fact upon the credit of Sir Isaac’s testimony, but as a system of abstract truth on the credit of his understanding ; in other words, he is a fluxionist by prejudice. In vain will it be said, that in mathematical demon¬ stration there is no room for mistake ; and that there¬ fore the man who implicitly adopts the method of fluxions may be considered as relying upon the veracity of its author, who had no inducement to deceive him, and whose comprehension was confessedly greater than his. In fluxionary mathematics, which treat of matters of which it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to have adequate and steady conceptions, the most compre¬ hensive mind is liable to mistake; and it is well known that the celebrated bishop ot Cloyne wrote his Analist to prove that the incomparable author of the method of fluxions had committed two mistakes in his fundamental proposition, which balancing one another, produced a ti ue conclusion by false reasoning. One or other of these great men, of whom the least was an eminent ma¬ thematician, must have been bewildered in liis reasoning, and have fallen into error; and therefore whoever fol¬ lows either of them implicitly without perceiving the error of the other, is unquestionably under the influence of prejudice. 'Ibis is the case with the writer of the present article. He perceives not the error of Bishop Berkeley’s reasoning, and yet he admits the doctrine of fluxions on the authority of bir Isaac’s demonstration, rl hat demonstration, however, he pretends not to un¬ derstand ; and therefore he admits the doctrine through prejudice. M e have made these observations, to point out the Impossib’e absurdity of the fashionable cry against the harbouringt0 eradicate of any prejudices. rIo eradicate all prejudices fromPrej'idi- the human mind is impossible ; and il it were possible, itCiCS would be very unwise 5 for we see that prejudice may thC exist on the side of truth as well as on that of falsehood ; and that principles professed and believed by any indi¬ vidual may be useful and true, though he was brought to them not by a train of fair and candid reasoning, but through the medium of prepossession or authority. Indeed such is our nature, and such are the laws of as¬ sociation, that many of our best principles, and our ob¬ ligation to perform many of the most amiable of our duties in common life, must evidently be acquired in this way. From endearing associations and authorita¬ tive instruction, we acquire a knowledge of our duty to our parents, and a facility in performing it, together with the first principles of religion, without a single ef¬ fort of our own reason. Even when reason has begun to assert its power, and shows us the propriety of such duties, we are wonderfully assisted in performing them by the amiable prejudices which we had before acquired, O 0 and 2£0 Prejudice. _ S which would not be wise if it were possible. 6 Good ef¬ fects of some preju dices. P It E t anti which now appear to be natural to us. He who has never had the advantage of such associations, and who acquires a knowledge of the duties suggested by them after he has come to the years of discretion, and chiefly by the efforts of his own reason, will seldom cce- leris paribus, perform these duties with an energy and delight equal to that of the person who has. This re¬ mark appears to be confirmed by experience ; for it is often found that the children of the great, who have been given out to nurse in their infancy, and who have seldom been in the company of their parents till their reasoning faculties have been far advanced, are much less dutiful and affectionate than those in the middle or lower stations of life, who have scarcely ever been out of their parents company. Would it then be wise, even if it were practicable, to dissolve all those associations which tend so powerfully to increase the mutual affections of parents and chil¬ dren ? We cannot think that it would j as we believe it might be easily shown that public spirit springs out of private affection. Plato indeed held an opinion very different from ours 5 for in order to extend that affec¬ tion which is usually lavished at home to the whole state, he proposed that children should be educated at the public expence, and never be permitted to know the authors of their being. But this is only one ol the many visionary projects of that great man, of which daily experience shows the absurdity. In modern times, we are certain that less dependence is to be had upon the patriotism of the man who, for the love which he pretends to his country, can overlook or forget his own partial connections in it, than on him who, at the same time that he wishes his country well, is feelingly alive to all the endearments of kindred affection. Such affection may be called partial, and very pro¬ bably has its foundation in that which is the source of all our prejudices : but if it be properly trained in early life, it will gradually extend from our nearest rela¬ tions to the persons with whom we associate, and to the place which not only gave us birth, but also fur¬ nished our youthful and most innocent enjoyments. It is th us that the amor patrice is generated (see Passion and Patriotism), which in minds unseduced by false principles is exceedingly strong \ and, though a partial affection, is of the most general utility. It is this pre¬ judice which reconciles the Laplander to his freezing snows, and the African to his burning sun j which at¬ taches the native of the Highlands or of W ales as much to his mountains and rocks, as the apparently happier inhabitant of the southern counties of England is to the more fertile and delightful spot where he drew his first breath. And we find in fact, that when a native of Kent and a Scotch Highlander have in some distant corner of the world gained a competent fortune without being coirnpted by luxury, they return, the one to his hop-gardens, and the other to his mountains. ^\eie this prejudice, for such it surely is, wholly eradicated from the human mind, it is obvious that large tiacts of country which are now full of inhabitants would be to¬ tally deserted ; and that the hungry barbarians, to make room for themselves, would exterminate the proprietors of more favourable climes. From an affection to our friends and to our country, we naturally contract an af¬ fection for that mode of government under which we live j and unless it be particularly oppressive to our- 4 ] P R E selves or any order of citizens, we come as naturally to prCjUjj prefer it to all other modes, whether it deserve that pre¬ ference or not. This no doubt is prejudice, but it is a beneficial prejudice j for were the multitude, who are wholly incapable of estimating the excellencies and de¬ fects of the various modes of government, to become dissatisfied with their own, and rise in a mass to change it for the better, the most horrible consequences might justly be dreaded. Of this truth the present state of Europe affords too melancholy and convincing a proof. The man therefore who, under the pretence of enlight¬ ening the public mind and extirpating prejudices, paints to the illiterate vulgar in aggravated colours the abuse of that government which has hitherto protected them from the ferocity of each other, is one of the greatest criminals if his view’s be selfish, and one of the worst reasoners if they be disinterested, that human imagina¬ tion can easily conceive. 7 With the selfish patriot we have at present no con-Danger cern 5 but we may with propriety ask the disinterested improper lover of truth, whether he thinks it possible, that in a^tanpu large community, of which nine-tenths of the members^ ar P H E [ ; •judice. (licerl in favoilr of republicanism. Bad as their govern- "v ' meat unquestionably was, the change that has now taken place is not the effect of calm reasoning and accurate in¬ quiry (for of that the bulk of mankind appears to be in¬ capable), nor are their prejudices less violent than they were before. They are changed indeed; but no one will deny that prejudice, and that of the most violent kind, leads them on at present; nor can any one assert that their new prejudices have rendered them more happy, or their country more flourishing, than their former ones, which made them cry Vive le Roi under the tyrannic government of Louis XIV. The influence of prejudice is not more powerful in fixing the political opinions of men, than in dictating their religious creed. Every child of a religious father receives his faith by inheritance long before he be ca¬ pable of judging w hether it be agreeable or disagreeable to the word of God and the light of reason. This ex¬ perience shows to be the fact; and sound philosophy de¬ clares that it cannot be otherwise. Parents are appoint¬ ed to judge for their children in their younger years, and to instruct them in what they should believe, and what they should practise in the civil and religious life. This is a dictate of nature, and doubtless would have been so in a state of perfect innocence. It is impossible that children should be capable of judging for them¬ selves before their minds are furnished with a compe¬ tent number of ideas, and before they are acquainted with any principles and rules of just reasoning ; and therefore they can do nothing better than run to their parents, and receive their directions what they should believe and what they should practise. This mode of tutoring the infant mind, and giving to our instructions the force of prejudice, before reason can operate with much effect, will, we know, be high¬ ly displeasing to many who challenge to themselves alone the epithet of liberal. With them it will be cramping the genius and perverting the judgment: but wre cannot help thinking, that such an objection, if it should be made, would be the offspring of ignorance ; for it re¬ quires but very little knowledge of human nature to be able to see, that if children be not restrained by autho¬ rity, and if we do not insinuate a love of good principles into their minds, bad ones will insinuate themselves, and a little time will give them the force of inveterate Abpdity of! ping chi .211 ig. nor ; of tel hi frofflhe dre of prej ice. Origi BlgOtl prejudice, which all the future efforts of reason and pL losophy will find it difficult to eradicate. The idea of keeping a child ignorant of the being of a God, and the grand duties of morality and religion, till he shall come to years of discretion, and then allowing him to reason them out For himself, is an absurd chimera ; it is an ex¬ periment which never has been tried, which to us it ap¬ pears impossible to try, and which, if it could be tried, could not possibly produce any good effect. For sup¬ pose we had a youth just arrived at years of discretion, totally ignorant of all these things, and unbiassed to any system of opinions, or rather possessed of no opi¬ nions at all—it would, in the first place, we suspect, be absolutely necessary to direct his thoughts into a parti¬ cular train, and for some person to lead him on from one idea to another, till he should arrive at some con¬ clusion : but in all this there is the influence of autho- nty, association, and of prejudice. It being therefore absolutely necessary that sentiments of religion be instilled into the minds of children before .91 ] P It E tiiey be capable of discovering by the use of their reason Pti jn-tire. whether those sentiments be just or not, it need net — excite wonder, nor is it any reflection upon religion, that most men adhere with bigotry to the creed of their fathers, and support that creed by arguments which could carry conviction to no minds but their own. The love and veneration which they bear to the memory of those from whom they imbibed their earliest opinions, do not permit them to perceive either the falsehood of those opinions, or their little importance, supposing them true. Hence the many frivolous dis¬ putes winch have been carried on among Christians ; and hence the zeal with which some of them maintain tenets which are at once contrary to scripture, to reason, and to common sense. A due reflection, however, 0.1 the source of all prejudices ought to moderate this zeal; for no man is wholly free from that bias which he is so ready to condemn in others : and indeed a man totally free from prejudice, would he a more unhappy being than the most violent bigot 011 earth. In science, he would aftlmit nothing which he could not himself ( emonstrate ; in business, he would be perpetually at a stand for want of motives to influence his conduct : he could have no attachment to a particular country ; and therefore must be without patriotism, and without the solaces of fiiendship ; and his religion, we are afraid, would be cold and lifeless. TV hat, it will be said, are the authors of a work °bjec- wlnch professes to enlighten the public mind by layingtion uu_ before it a general view of science and literature, be-SWeled* come at last the advocates ofprejudice, which is the bane of science, and the prop oi‘superstition9 No, we are ad¬ vocates for no prejudice which is either inimical to sci¬ ence or friendly to absurdity; but we do not think that the moralist would act wisely who should desert his pro¬ per business to make himself master of the higher ma¬ thematics, merely that he might not he obliged to trust occasionally to the demonstrations of others. The wri¬ ters of this article is not skilled in trade; but it is not his opinion that the merchant would soon grow rich, who should never make a bargain till he had'previously calculated with mathematical exactness all the probabi¬ lities of his gain or loss. That to dissolve all the associ¬ ations which are the source of partial attachments of kindred, aflection, and private friendship, would tend to promote the public happiness, we cannot possibly believe. And we think, that the experience of the present event¬ ful day abundantly confirms Mr Hume’s opinion, that far from endeavouring to extirpate the people’s prejudi¬ ces in favour of birth or family, we should cherish such sentiments, as being absolutely requisite to preserve a due subordination in society. That men would be better Christians if they were to receive no religious in¬ struction till they should be able by their own reason to judge of its truth, daily observation does not warrant us to conclude ; for we see those who have seldom heard of God when children, “ live without him in the world” when they are men. Pernicious prejudices we have traced to their source elsewhere, and shown how they may be best prevented by proper attention in the education of children (See Metaphysics, N° 98.). We shall only add here, that the earlier such attention is paid, the more effectual it will be found ; and that it is much easier to keep pre¬ judices out of the mind than to remove them after 0 0 2 they Prejudice. Proper me¬ thods of removing prejudices. P' R E [29 they have been admitted. This however must be some¬ times attempted j and where prejudices are strong, se¬ veral methods have been recommended tor rendering the attempt successful. The following are taken mostly from Dr Watts’s Improvement of the Mind. 1. Never attack the prejudice directly, but lead the person who is under its influence step by step to the truth. Perhaps your neighbour is under the influence of super¬ stition and bigotry in the simplicity of his soul; you must not immediately run upon him with violence, and show him the absurdity or folly of his own opinions, though you might be able to set them in a glaring light; but you must rather begin at a distance, and establish his assent to some familiar and easy propositions, which Pave a tendency to refute his mistakes, and to confirm the truth ; and then silently observe what impression this makes upon him, and proceed by slow degrees as he is able to bear, and you must carry on the work per¬ haps at distant seasons of conversation. The tender or diseased eye cannot bear a deluge of light at once. Overhastiness and vehemence in arguing is often¬ times the effect of pride ; it blunts the poignancy of the argument, breaks its force, and disappoints the end. It you were to convince a person of the falsehood ol the “doctrine of transubstantiution, and you take up the con¬ secrated bread before him and say, “ You may see, and taste, and feel, this is nothing but bread; therefore whilst you assert that God commands you to believe it is not bread, you most wickedly accuse God of com¬ manding you to' tell a lie.” This sort of language would only raise the indignation of the person against you, in¬ stead of making any impressions upon him. He will not so much as think at all on the argument you have brought, but he rages at yon as a profane wretch, siting up your own sense and reason above sacred authority j so that though what you affirm is a truth of great evi¬ dence, yet you lose 'the benefit of your whole argu¬ ment by an ill management, and the unreasonable use of it. 2. Where the prejudices of mankind cannot be con¬ quered at once, but will rise up in arms against the evidence of truth, there we must make some allow¬ ances, and yield to them for the present, as far as we can safely do it without real injury to truth ; and if we would have any success in our endeavours to convince the world, we must practise this complaisance for the benefit of mankind. Take a student who has deeply imbibed the principles of the Peripatetics, and imagines certain immaterial beings, called substantial forms, to inhabit every herb, flower, mineral, metal, fire, water, &c. and to be the spring of all its properties and operations 5 or take a Platonist, who believes an anima mundi, “ an universal soul of the world,” to pervade all bodies, to act in and by them according to their nature, and indeed to give them their nature and their special powers ; perhaps it may be very hard to convince these persons by arguments, and constrain them to yield up those fancies. Well then, let the one believe his uni¬ versal sold, and the other go on with his notion of sub¬ stantial forms, and at the same time teach them how by certain 'original laws of motion, and tue various sizes, shapes, and situations of the parts of matter, allowing a continued divine concourse in and with all, the sever¬ al appearances in nature may be solved, and the varie¬ ty of effects produced, according to the corpuscular 2 ] P R E philosophy, improved by Descartes, Mr Boyle, and Sir Prejudic<; Isaac Newton; and when they have attained a degree'— of skill in this science, they will see these airy notions of theirs, these imaginary powers, to be so useless and unnecessary, that they will drop them of then own ac¬ cord. The Peripatetic forms will vanish from the mind like a dream, and the Platonic soul of the world will expire. We may give another instance of the same practice, where there is a prejudicate fondness of particular words and phrases. Suppose a man is educated in an un¬ happy form of speech, whereby he explains some great doctrine of the gospel, and by the means of this phrase he has imbibed a very false idea of that doctrine ; yet he is so bigotted to his form of words, that he imagines if those words are omitted the form is lost. Now, if we cannot possibly persuade him to part with his improper terms, we will indulge them a little, and try to explain them in a scriptural sense, rather than let him go on in his mistaken ideas. A person wdio has been bred a Pa¬ pist, knows but little of religion, yet he resolves never to part from the Roman Catholic faith, and is obstinate¬ ly bent against a change. Now it cannot be unlawful to teach such an one the true Christian, i. e. the 1 rote- stunt religion out of the Epistle to the Romans, and show him that the same doctrine is contained in the Catholic Epistles of St Peter, James, and Jude; and thus let him live and die a good Christian in the belief of the religion taught him out of the New Testament, while he imagines he is a Roman Catholic still, because he finds the doctrine he is taught in the Catholic Epistles and in that to the Romans. Sometimes we may make, use of the very prejudices under which a person labours, in order to convince him of some particular truth, and argue with him upon his own professed principles as though they were true. Suppose a Jew lies sick of a fever, and is forbidden flesh by his physician ; but hear¬ ing that rabbits were provided for the dinner of the fa¬ mily, desired earnestly to eat of them *, and suppose he became impatient, because his physician did not permit , him, and he insisted upon it that it could do him no hurt surely rather than let him persist in that fancy and that desire, to the danger of his life, we might tell him that these animals were strangled, a sort of food forbidden by the Jewish law, though we ourselves might believe that law to be abolished. Where we find any person obstinately persisting in a mistake in opposition to all reason, especially if the mistake be very injurious or pernicious, and we know this person will hearken to the sentiment or authority of some favourite name ; it is needful sometimes to urge the opinion and authority of that favourite person, since that is likely to be regarded much more than mwo/i. We are almost ashamed indeed to speak of using any influence of authority in reasoning or argument ; but in some cases it is better that poor, silly, perverse, obsti¬ nate creatures, should be persuaded to judge and act right, by a veneration for the sense of others, than to be left to wander in pernicious errors, and continue deaf to all argument, and blind to all evidence, i hey are but children of a larger size •, and since they persist all their lives in their minority, and reject all true reason¬ ing, surely we may try to persuade them to practise what is for their own interest by such childish reasons as they will hearken to. We may overawe them from p R E [ 293 ] . P R E judice pursuing their own ruin by the terrors of a, solemn sha¬ ll dow, or allure them by a sugar plum to their own happi- emon- jieSs. But after all, we must conclude, that whereso- antes', ever it can be done, it is best to remove and root out those prejudices which obstruct the entrance of truth into the mind, rather than to palliate, humour, or in¬ dulge them ; and sometimes this must necessarily he done, before you can make a person part with seme be- lI2 loved error, and lead him into better sentiments, raal On the whole, we would recommend more mutual f.^arance forbearance and less acrimony than is commonly found r among writers on disputed subjects, as the only means by which our differences in religion, politics, and science, ever can be healed, and truth certainly discovered. If men were less violent in defending their particular opinions, they would always gain a more patient hear¬ ing, they would be less suspected of, and less liable to, prejudice, and of course more apt either to convince or to be convinced. They would likewise by so doing show, in the most unequivocal manner, their attention to sound philosophy, and above all to genuine Chri- stianity; which, though it is far from encouraging scep¬ ticism, or a temporizing spirit, recommends in the strongest, terms, among all its professors, universal cha¬ rity and mutual forbearance. See Probability, Truth, and Superstition. PRELATE, an ecclesiastic raised to some eminent and superior dignity in the church j as bishops, archbi¬ shops, patriarchs, &c. PRELIMINARY, in general, denotes something to be examined and determined before an affair can be treated of to the purpose. PRELUDE, in Music, is usually a flourish or irre¬ gular air, which a musician plays off-hand, to trv if his instrument be in tune, and to lead him into the piece to be played. PREMISES, in Logic, an appellation given to the two first propositions of a syllogism. See Logic. Premises, in Law, properly signifies the land, &c. mentioned in the beginning of a deed. PREMIUM, or Premium, properly signifies a re¬ ward or recompense: but it is chiefly used in a mer¬ cantile sense for the sum of money given to an insurer, whether of ships, houses, lives, &c. See Insurance. PREMNA, a genus of plants belonging to the didy- namia class. See Botany Index. PREMQNSTRANTES, or Pr/emonstratenses, a religious order of regular canons instituted in 1120, by S. Norbert 5 and thence also called Norbertines. The first monastery of this order was built by Nor¬ bert in the Isle of France, three leagues to the west of Laon 5 which lie called Prcemonstre, Prcemonstratum, and hence the order itself derived its name 5 though as to the occasion of that name, the writers of that order are divided. At first the religious of this order were so very poor, that they had only a single ass, which served to carry the wood they cut tlown every morning, and sent to Laon in oi'dtr to purchase bread. But they soon re¬ ceived so many donations, and built so many monaste- I'ies, that in 30 years after the foundation of the order, they had above IOO abbeys in France and Germany : and in process of time the order so increased, that it had monasteries in all parts of Christendom, amounting to 1000 abbeys, 300 provostships, a vast number of prio- nes, and 500 nunneries. But they are now greatly di¬ minished. The rule they followed was that of St An- Premon. gustine, with some slight alterations, and an addition of ft mutes certain severe laws, whose authority did not Ion')- survive II their founder. . ^ repara- The order was approved by Honorius II. in 1126, » l<>, ~ and again by several succeeding popes. At first the abstinence from flesh was rigidly observed. In 1 24 9 Innocent IV. complained of its being neglected to a general chapter. In 1 288, their general, William, pro¬ cured leave of Pope Nicholas IV. for those of the order to eat flesh on journeys. In 1460, Pius II. granted them a general permission to eat meat, excepting from Septuagesima to Easter. The dress of the religious of this order is white, with a scapulary before the cas¬ sock. Out of doors they wear a white cloak and white hat •, within, a little camail ; and at church, a surplice, &c. , In the first monasteries built by Norbert, there was. one for men and another for women, only separated by a wall. In 1137, by a decree of a general chapter, this practice was prohibited, and the women removed out of those already built, to a greater distance from those of the men. The Pracmonstratenses, or monks of Premontre, vul¬ garly called white canons, came first into England, A. D. 1146. Their first monastery, called New-house, w'as erected in Lincolnshire, by Peter de Sanlia, and dedicated to St Martial. In the reign of Edward I. this order had 27 monasteries in England. PRENANTHES, a genus of plants belonging to the syngenesia class} and in the natural method ranking under the 49th order, Composite. See Botany Index. PRENOMEN, Prjenomen, among the ancient Romans, a name prefixed to their family name, and an¬ swering to our Christian name : such as Cains, Lucius, Marcus, &c. PRENOTION, PrjENotio, or Prcecognitio, is a notice or piece of knowledge preceding some other in respect of time. Such is the knowledge of the antece¬ dent, which must precede that of the conclusion. It is used by Lord Bacon for breaking off’ an endless search, which he observes to be one of the principal parts of the art of memory. For when one endeavours to call any thing to mind, without some previous notion or perception of what is sought for, the mind exerts itself and strives in an endless manner: but if it hath any short notion before-hand, the infinity of the search is presently cut off, and the mind hunts nearer home, as in an enclosure. Thus verse is easier remembered than prose ; because if we stick at any w'ord in a verse, we have a previous notion that it is such a word as must stand in a verse. Hence also, order is a manifest help to memory} for here is a previous notion, that the thing sought for must be agreeable to order. Bacon’s Works Abr. vol. i. p. 136. and vol. ii. p. 473. PEEPARATION, in a general sense, the act of disposing things in such a manner as to render any fore¬ seen event more advantageous or less hurtful according to its nature. Preparation of Dissonances, in Music, is their dis¬ position in harmony in such a manner, that, by some¬ thing congenial to what precedes, they may be ren¬ dered less harsh to the ear than they would be without that precaution: according to this definition, every discord ought to be prepared. But when, in order to prepare P li E [ 294. ] P R E prepare a dissonance, it is exacted that the sound which forms it should before have formed a consonance, then there is fundamentally but one single dissonance which is prepared, viz. the seventh. Nor is even this prepa¬ ration necessary in the chord which contains the sensible note, because then the dissonance being charactenstical, both in its chord and in its mode, the ear has sufticient reason to expect it : it accordingly does expect it, and recognise it : nor is either deceived with respect to its chord nor its natural progress. But when the seventh is heard upon a fundamental sound which is not essential to the mode, it ought then to be prepared, in order to prevent all ambiguity •, to prevent the ear, whilst list¬ ening to this note, from losing its train: and as this chord of the seventh may be inverted and combined m several different manners, from this arise likewise a number of different ways by which it may seem to be prepared, which, in the main, always issue however in the same thing. In making use of dissonances, three things are to be considered j°viz. the chord which precedes the disso¬ nance, that in which it is found, and that which is im¬ mediately subsequent to it. Preparation only respects the two first j for the third, see Resolution. When we would regularly prepare a discord in or¬ der to arrive at its chord, we must choose such a ca¬ reer of the fundamental bass, that the sound which forms the dissonance may be a protraction into the perfect time of the same note which formed a conso¬ nance formerly struck in the imperfect in the preceding chord ; this is what we call sincopation. See SlNCOPA- TION. From this preparation two advantages result j viz. 1. That there is necessarily an harmonical connection between the two chords, since that connection is formed by the dissonance itself; and, 2. That this dissonance, as it is nothing else but the continuation of the same sound which had formed a consonance, becomes much less harsh to the ear than it would have been with any sound recently struck. Now this is all that we expect to gain by preparation. See Cadence, Discord, and Har¬ mony. By what has been just said, it will appear that there is no other part peculiarly destined for preparing the dissonance, except that in which it is heard ; so that it the treble shall exhibit a dissonance, that must be sin- copated ; but if the dissonance is in the bass, the bass must be sincopated. Though there is nothing here but what is quite simple, yet have masters of music miserably embroiled the whole matter. Some dissonances may be found which are never pre¬ pared : such is the sixth superadded : some which are very unfrequently prepared; such is the diminished se¬ venth. Preparations, in Pharmaaj, the medicines when mixed together in such a manner as to be fit for the use of the patient. See Pharmacy, under Materia Medica. Preparations, in Anatomy, the parts of animal bodies prepared and preserved for anatomical uses. ftdin. Med. ^^ie nranner of preserving anatomical preparations. Essays, is either by drying them thoroughly in the air, or put- vol. ii. p. 8. ting them into a proper liquor. In drying parts which are thick, when the wTeather is warm, care must be taken to prevent putrefaction, Prepay fly-blows, insects, &c. This is easily done by the use Lon. of a solution of corrosive sublimate in spirit of wine, ^ in the proportion of two drams ot sublimate to a pound of spirit: the part should be moistened with this liquor as it dries, and by this method the body of a child may be kept safe even in summer. Dried pre¬ parations are apt to crack and moulder away in keep¬ ing ; to prevent this, their surface should be covered with a thick varnish, repeated as often as occasion re¬ quires. Though several parts prepared dry are useful, yet others must be so managed as to be always flexible, and nearer a natural state. The difficulty has been to find a proper liquor for this purpose. Dr Monro says, the best he knows is a well rectified colourless spirit of wine, to which is added a small quantity of the spirit of vitriol or nitre. When these are properly mixed, they neither change their colour nor the consistence of the parts, except where there are serous or mucous liquors contained in them. The brain, even of a young child, in this mixture grows so firm as to admit of gentle handling, as do also the vitreous and cry¬ stalline humours of the eye. The liquor of the seba¬ ceous glands and the semen are coagulated by this spirituous mixture ; and it heightens the red colour of the injection of the blood-vessels, so that after the part has been in it a little time, several vessels appear which were before invisible. If you will compare these ef¬ fects with what Ruysch has said of his balsam, you will find the liquor above mentioned to come very near to it. The proportion of the two spirits must be changed according to the part prepared. For the brain and humours of the eye, you must put two drams of spirit of nitre to one pound of spirit of wine. In preserving other parts which are harder, 30 or 40 drops of the acid will be sufficient ; a larger quantity will make bones flexible, and even dissolve them. The part thus preserved should always be kept covered with the liquor: therefore great care should be taken to stop the mouth of the glass with a waxed cork and a blad¬ der tied over it, to prevent the evaporation of the spirit ; some of which, notwithstanding all this care, will fly off; therefore fresh must be added as there is occasion. When the spirits change to a dark tincture, which will sometimes happen, they should be poured off, and fresh put in their room; but with somewhat less acid that at first. The glasses which contain the preparations should be of the finest sort, and pretty thick for through such the parts may be seen very distinctly, and of a true colour, and the object will be so magnified as to show vessels in the glass which out of it were not be seen. As the glass when filled with the liquor has a cer¬ tain focus, it is necessary to keep the preparation at a proper distance from the sides of it, which is easily done by little sticks suitably placed, or by suspending it by a thread in a proper situation. The operator should be cautious of putting his finger in this liquor oftener than is absolutely necessary ; because it brings on a numbness on the skin, which makes the fingers unfit lor any nice operation. The best remedy for this is to wash them ■para ion II ■roga- ■ruy ve. P R E [295 them in water mixed with a few drops of oil of tartar per deliquium. Dr Christ. Jac. Trew prefers the rectified spirit of grain for preserving anatomical preparations to spirit of wine, or to compositions of alcohol, amber, camphor, &c. because these soon change int~ a brown colour whereas the spirit from malt preserves its limpid ap¬ pearance. When any part is to be preserved wet, wash it with water till it is no more tinctured. The water is next to be washed aw'ay with spirits, and then the pre¬ paration is to be put among spirits in a glass, the mouth of which is to be closely covered with a glass head, ever which a wet bladder and leaf-tin are to be tied. Com. Lit. Norimb. 173 r, semest. 1. specim. 9. See also Pole's Anatomical Instructor, and American Transactions, vol. ii. p. 366. PKEPENSED, in Law, denotes fore-thought. In which sense we say prepensed malice, &c. If, when a man is slain upon a sudden quarrel, there were malice prepensed formerly between them, it makes it mur¬ der; and, as it is called in some statutes, prepensed murther. PREPOSITION, in Grammar, one of the parts of speech, being an indeclinable particle which yet serves to govern the nouns that follow it; such as per, pro, propter ; and through, for, with, &c. I. Buffier allows it to be only a modificative of a part of speech, serving to circumstantiate a noun. PREPUCE, in Anatomy, the loreskin, being a pro¬ longation of the cutis of the penis, covering the glans. See Penis, Anatomy Index. PREROGATIVE, an exclusive or peculiar privi¬ lege. RoyalPREROGATIVE, that special pre-eminence which the king hath over and above all other persons, and out of the ordinary course of the common law, in right of his regal dignity. It signifies in its etymology (from pree and rogo) something that is required or demanded before, or in preference to, all others. And hence it follows, that it must be in its nature singular and eccen¬ trical; that it can only be applied to those rights and ca¬ pacities which the king enjoys alone in contradistinction to others, and not to those which he enjoys in common with any of his subjects : for if once any one prerogative of the crown could be held in common with the subject, it would cease to be prerogative any longer. And there¬ fore I inch lays it down as a maxim, that the preroga- tive is that law in case of the king, which is law in no case of the subject. Prerogatives are either direct or incidental. The di¬ rect are such positive substantial parts of the royal cha¬ racter and authority, as are rooted in, and spring from, the king’s political person, considered merely by itself, without reference to any other extrinsic circumstance; as, the right of sending ambassadors, of creating peers, and of making war or peace. But such prerogatives as are incidental bear always a relation to something else, distinct from the king’s person ; and are indeed only exceptions, in favour of the crown, to those gene- ia rules that are established for the rest of the commu- nity-.such as> that no costs shall be recovered against the king; that the king can never be a joint tenant; and that his debt shall be preferred before a debt to any of his subjects.. J P R E These substantive or direct prerogatives may again Preroca- be divided into three kinds : being such as regard, tiveg iirst, the king s royal character or dignity ; secondly 1—— his Toy A authority or power; and, lastly, his royal in- come. I hese are necessary, to secure reverence to his person, obedience to his commands, and an affluent supply for the ordinary expences of government; with¬ out all of which it is impossible to maintain the execu¬ tive power in due independence and vigour. Yet, in every branch of this large and extensive dominion, our tree constitution has interposed such seasonable checks and restrictions, as may curb it from trampling on those liberties which it was meant to secure and establish. 1 lie enormous weight of prerogative, if left to itself, (as in arbitrary governments it is), spreads havock and destruction among all the inferior movements : but when balanced and bridled (as with us) by its propel counterpoise, timely and judiciously applied, its opera¬ tions are then equable and regular; it invigorates the whole machine, and enables every part to answer the end of its construction. E Of the royal dignity. Under every monarchical establishment, it is necessary to distinguish the prince from his subjects, not only by the outward pomp and 1 ecorations of majesty, but also by ascribing to him ceitain qualities as inherent in his royal capacity, di¬ stinct from, and superior to, those of any other indivi- ( ual in the nation. lor though a philosophical mind will (says Sir William Blackstone) consider the loyal person merely as one man appointed by mutual consent to preside over many others, and will pay him that re¬ verence and duty which the principles of society de¬ mand ; yet the mass of mankind will be apt to grow in¬ solent and refractory, if taught to consider their prince as a man of no greater perfection than themselves. The law therefore ascribes to the king, in his high politi¬ cal character, not only large powers and emoluments, which form his prerogative and revenue, but likewise certain attributes of a great and transcendent nature ; by which the people are led to consider him in the light of a superior being, and to pay him that awful respect which may enable him with greater ease to carry on the business of government. This is what we understand by the royal dignity; the several branches of which we shall now proceed to enumerate. 1. And, first, the law ascribes to the king the attri¬ bute of sovereignty, or pre-eminency. See Sovereign¬ ty. ■ 2. “ The law also (according to-Sir William Black- stone) ascribes to the king, in his political capacity, ab¬ solute perfection. ‘ The king can do no wrong.’ Which ancient and fundamental maxim (says he) is not to be understood as if every thing transacted by the govern¬ ment was of course just and lawful; but means only two things. First, that whatever is exceptionable in the conduct of public affairs, is not to be imputed to the king, nor is he answerable for it personally to his people : for this doctrine would totally destroy that con¬ stitutional independence of the crown, which is neces¬ sary for the balance of power, in our free and active and therefore compounded, constitution. And, second¬ ly, it means that the prerogative of the crown extends not to do any injury; it is created for the benefit of the people, and therefore cannot be exerted to their prejudice.. P R E [ 296 prejudice.—“ The king, moreover, (be ohserveO, i» live" not'only incapable of doing wrong, but even o. :h’n. v ' ing wrong •, he can never mean to do an improper thing . in him is no folly or weakness. And, thereiore, it the crown should be induced to grant any franchise or pn- vilege to a subject contrary to reason, or in anywise pi e- iudicial to the commonwealth or a private person, ie law will not suppose the king to have meant cr, im an unwise or an injurious action, but declares that the king was deceived in his grant ; and thereupon such grant is rendered void, merely upon the foundation of frauu amt deception, either by or upon those agents whom the crown has thought proper to employ, i or the law will not cast an imputation on that magistrate whom it entrusts with the executive power, as if he was ca¬ pable of intentionally disregarding bis trust: but attri¬ butes to mere imposition (to which the most perfect of sublunary beings must still continue liable) those little inadvertencies, which, if charged on the will of the prince, might lessen him in the eyes of Ins sub- j But this doctrine has been exposed as ridiculous and absurd, by Lord Abingdon, in his Dedication to the collective Body of the People oj England. “ Let us see (says he) how these maxims and their comments agree with the constitution, with nature, with reason, with common sense, with experience, with fact, with precedent, and with Sir William Blackstone himself j and whether by the application of these rules of evi¬ dence thereto, it will not be found, that (from the want of attention to that important line of distinction which the constitution has drawn between the king of England and the crown of England) what was attri¬ buted to the monarchy has not been given to the wo«orc«, what meant for the kingship conveyed to the king, what designed for the thing transferred to the person, what in¬ tended for theory applied to practice ; and so in conse¬ quence, that whilst the premises (of the perfection of the monarchy) he true, the conclusion (that the king can do no wrong) be not false. “ And, first, in reference to the constitution: to which if this matter be applied (meaning what it expresses, and if it do not it is unworthy of notice), it is subversive of a principle in the constitution, upon which the preser¬ vation of the constitution depends j I mean the prin¬ ciple of resistance; a principle which, whilst no man will now venture to gainsay, Sir William Blackstone him¬ self admits, ‘ is "justifiable to the person of the prince; when the being of the state is endangered, and the public voice proclaims such resistance necessary j and thus, by such admission, both disproves the maxim, and oversets his own comment thereupon *, for to say that ‘ the king can do no wrong,’ and that 4 he is incapable even of thinking wrong,’ and then to admit that ‘ resistance to his person is justifiable,’ are such jarring contradictions in themselves, that, until reconci¬ led, the necessity of argument is suspended. “ With respect then, in the next place, to the agree¬ ment of this maxim, and its comment, with nature, with reason, and with common sense, I should have thought myself sufficiently justified in appealing to every man’s own reflection for decision, if 1 had not been made to understand that nature, reason, and common sense, bad had nothing to do with either. Sir William Black¬ stone says, ‘ That though a philosophical mind will con- 2 ] ? R E ' , suer the royal person merely as one man appointed fr.ro, bv mutual consent to preside over others, and will pay .Inm that reverence and duty which the principles of so¬ ciety demand, yet the mass ol mankind will be apt to grow insolent and refractory if taught to considei then prince as a man of no greater perfection than themselves j and therefore the law ascribes to the king, in his high political character, certain attributes of a great anii transcendent nature, by which the people aie led to consider him in the light of a superior being, and to pay him that awful respect which may enable him with greater ease to carry on the business of government.’ So that, in order to govern with greater ease (winch by the bye is mere assertion without any prooi), it is neces¬ sary to deceive the mass of mankind, by making them believe not only what a philosophical mind cannot be¬ lieve, but what it is impossible for any mind to believe* and therefore, in the investigation of this subject, ac¬ cording to Sir Vv illiam, neither nature, icason, no. com¬ mon sense, can have any concern.—— “ It remains to examine in how much this maxim and its comment agree with experience, with fact, with pre¬ cedent, and with Sir William Blackstone himseli. And here it is matter of most curious speculation, to observe a maxim laid down, and which is intended foi a iiue of government, not only without a single case in sup¬ port of it, but with a string of cases, that maj- be car¬ ried back to Egbert the first monarch of England, in direct opposition to the doctrine. Who is the man, that, reading the past history of this country, will show us any king that has done no wrong ? Who is the read¬ er that will not find that all the wrongs and injuries which the free constitution of this country has hitherto suffered, have been solely derived from the arbitrary measures of our kings ? And yet the mass of mankind are to look upon the king as a superior being * and the maxim, that ‘ the king can do no wrong,’ is to remain as an article of belief. But, without pushing this inquiry any farther, let us see what encouragement Sir William Blackstone himself has given for our credulity. Af¬ ter stating the maxim, and presenting us with a most lively picture, ‘ of our sovereign lord thus all perfect and immortal,' what does he make this all-perfection and immortality in the end to come to ? His words are these 4 For when Eintj Charles’s deluded brother at¬ tempted to enslave the nation,’ {no wrong tins, to be sure), 4 he found it was beyond his power : the people both could, and did, resist him * and in consequence of such resistance, obliged him to quit his enterprise and Ins throne together *Con, The sum of all is this : That the crown of England voU and the king of England are distinguishable, and notp. 43j synonymous terms: that allegiance is due to the crown, and through the crown to the king: that the attributes of the crown are sovereignty, perfection, and perpetuity; but that it does not therefore follow that the king can do no wrong. It is indeed to be admitted, that in high respect for the crown, high respect is also due to the wearer of that crown; that is, to the king : hut the crown is to be preferred to the king, for the first vene¬ ration is due to the constitution. It is likewise to be supposed that the king will do no wrong: and as, to prevent this, a privy council is appointed by the consti¬ tution to assist the king in the execution of the go¬ vernment; so if any wrong be done, ‘these men, as Montesquieu P R TS } ckst. i i/ncnt. Montesquieu expresses it, ‘may be examined and pu¬ nished (a).’ “ But if any future king shall think to screen these evil counsellors from the just vengeance of the people, by becoming d/s own minister ; and in so doing, shall take for his sanction the attribute of perfection, shall trust to the deception of bis being a superior being, and cloak •himself under the maxim that the king can do no wrong; I say, in such a case, let the appeal already made to the constitution, to nature, to reason, to common sense, to experience, to fact, to precedent, and to Sir William Blackstone himself, suffice ; and preclude the necessity ®f any further remarks from me (b).” To proceed now to other particulars : The law de¬ termines, tnat in the king can be no negligence or LACHES j and therefore no delay will bar his right. Nullum tempus occurrit regi, is the standing maxim upon all occasions : for the law intends that the king is al¬ ways busied for the public good, and therefore has not leisure to assert bis right within the times limited to subjects. In the king also can be no stain or corruption of blood : for if the heir to the crown were attainted of treason or felony, and afterwards the crown should des¬ cend to him, this would purge the attainder ipso facto. And therefore, when Henry VII. who as earl of Rich¬ mond stood attainted, came to the crown, it was not thought necessary to pass an act of parliament to reverse this attainder; because, as Lord Bacon in bis history of that prince informs us, it was agreed that the assumption of the crown had at once purged all attainders. Nei¬ ther can the king, in judgment of law, as king, ever be a minor or under age; and therefore his royal grants and assents to acts of parliament are good, though he has not in his natural capacity attained the legal age ef 21. By a statute, indeed, 28 Hen. VIII. c. 17. power w'as given to future kings to rescind and revoke all acts of parliament that should be made while they were under the age of 24 : but this was repealed by the statute 1 Edw. VI. c. 11. so far as related to that prince, and both statutes are declared to be determined by 24 Geo. II. c. 24. It hath also been usually thought pru¬ dent, when the heir apparent has been very young, to appoint a protector, guardian, or regent, for a limited time : but the very necessity of such extraordinary pro¬ vision is sufficient to demonstrate the truth of that maxim of common law, that in the king is no mino- 1 297 1 PEE rity ; and therefore he hath no legal guardian. See Re¬ gent. 3. A third attribute of the king’s majesty is \nsper- petuitij. The law ascribes to him, in bis political, capa¬ city, an absolute immortality. The king never dies. Henry, Edward, or George, may die; but the king sur¬ vives them all. For, immediately upon the decease of the reigning prince in his natural capacity, his kingship or imperial dignity, by act of law, without any interreg- vum or interval, is vested at once in his heir ; who is co vnstanti, king to all intents and purposes. And so ten¬ der is the law of supposing even a possibility of bis death, that his natural dissolution is generally called bis demise; dimissio regis vel coroner: an expression which signifies merely a transfer oi property; for, as is observed in Plow- den, when we say the demise of the crown, we mean only, that, in consequence of the disunion of llic king’s body-natural from his body-politic, the kingdom is trans¬ ferred or demised to his successor, and so the royal dig¬ nity" remains perpetual. Thus, too, when Edward IV. in the tenth year of bis reign, was driven from his throne for a few months by the house of Lancaster, this temporary transfer of bis dignity was denominated his demise; and all process was held to be discontinued, as upon a natural death of the king. II. We are next to consider those branches of the royal prerogative which invest this our sovereign lord W'lth a number of authorities -.wispowers; in the exertion whereof consists the executive part of government. This is wisely placed in a single hand by the British constitu¬ tion, for the sake of unanimity, strength, and despatch. W ere it placed in many hands, it would be subject to many wills: many wills, if disunited and draw'ing dif¬ ferent ways, create weakness in a government; and to unite those several wills, and reduce them to one, is a work of more time and delay than the exigencies of state will afford. The king of England is therefore not only the chief, but properly the sole, magistrate of the na¬ tion; all others acting by commission from, and in due subordination to, him: in like manner as, upon the great revolution in the Roman state, all the powers of the ancient magistracy of the commonwealth were con¬ centered in the new emperor; so that, as Gravina ex¬ presses it, m ejus unius persona veteris reipublico: vis atque majestas per cumulates magistratuum potestates ex*- primebutur. (a) Except the parliament, which is the great council of the nation, the judges, and the peers, who, beinr the hereditary counsellors of the crown, have not only a right, hut are hound in faro conscienliee to advise the kino- for the public good, the constitution knows of no other counsel than the privy council. Any other counsel, like Clif¬ ford, Arlington, Buckingham, Ashley, Lauderdale, and, as the initial letters of these names express, is a CAB AL and as such should be suppressed. Nat. Bacon, speaking of the loss of power in the grand council of lords, says’ llie sense of state once contracted into a privy-council, is soon recontracted into a cabinet-council, and last of all into a favourite or two; which many times brings damage to the public, and both themselves and kings into ex- tremeprecipices; partly for want of maturity, hut principally through the providence of God overruling irreo-ular courses to the hurt of such as walk in them.” Pol. Dis. part ii. p. 201. (n) For experience, fact, and precedent, see the reigns of King John, Henry III. Edward II. Richard II. Charles I. and James II. ^ See also Mirror of Justice; where it is said, “ that this grand assembly (meaning the now parliament, or then W’ittena-gemotte) is to confer the government of God’s people, how they may he kept from sin, live in quiet, and have right done them, according to the customs and laws; and more especially of wrong done by the king, quicn, or their children : to which Nat. Bacon adds this note : “At this time Vic king might do wrong, &c. and so say Bracton and Fleta of the kings in their time.” Disc, part i. p. 37. Vql. XML Part I. -f p p jn P H E [ 298 1 P R E BlacksL Comment. Tn tlie exertion of lawful prerogative the king is held to be absolute 5 that is, so far absolute, that there is no ' legal authority that can either delay or resist him. He mav reject what bills, may make what treaties, may com what money, may create what peers, may pardon what offences, he pleases: unless where the constitution hath expressly, or by evident consequence, laid down some exception or boundary j declaring, that thus far the pre¬ rogative shall go and no farther. For otherwise the power of the crown would indeed be but a name and a shadow, insufficient for the ends of government, it, where its jurisdiction is clearly established and allowed, anv man or body of men were permitted to disobey it, in the ordinary course of law: we do not now speak ot those extraordinary recourses to the first principles, which are necessary when the contracts of society are in danger of dissolution, and the law proves too weak a defence against the violence of fraud or oppression. And yet the want of attending to this obvious distinction has oc¬ casioned these doctrines, of absolute power in the prince and of national resistance by the people, to be much misunderstood and perverted, by the advocates lor slavery on the one hand, and the demagogues ot taction on the other. The former, observing the absolute so¬ vereignty and transcendent dominion of the crown laid down (as it certainly is) most strongly and emphatically in our law-books as well as our homilies, have denied that any case can be excepted from so general and posi¬ tive a rule ; forgetting how impossible it is, in any prac¬ tical system of laws, to point out beforehand those ec¬ centrical remedies, which the sudden emergence ot na¬ tional distress may dictate, and which that alone can jus¬ tify. On the other hand, over-zealous republicans, teel- ing the absurdity of unlimited passive obedience, have fancifully (or sometimes factiously) gone over to the other extreme : and, because resistance is justifiable to the person of the prince when the being ot the state is endangered, and the public voice proclaims such resist¬ ance necessary, they have therefore allowed to every in¬ dividual the right of determining this expedience, and of employing private force to resist even private oppres¬ sion. A doctrine productive of anarchy, and (in con¬ sequence) equally fatal to civil liberty as tyranny itself. For civil liberty, rightly understood, consists in protect¬ ing the rights of individuals by the united force of so- eietv : society cannot he maintained, and ot course can exert no protection, without obedience to some sove¬ reign power j and obedience is an empty name, if every individual has a right to decide how far he himselt shall obey. . ... In the exertion, therefore, of those prerogatives winch the law has given him, the king is irresistible and abso¬ lute, according to the forms of the constitution. And yet,’if the consequence of that exertion be manifestly to the grievance or dishonour of the kingdom, the parlia¬ ment will call his advisers to a just and severe account. F'or prerogative consisting (as Mr Locke has well de¬ fined it) in the discretionary power of acting for the public good where the positive laws are silent, if that discretionary power be abused to the public detnment, such prerogative is exerted in an unconstitutional man¬ ner. Thus the king may make a treaty with a foreign state, which shall irrevocably bind the nation j and yet, when such treaties have been judged pernicious, impeachments have pursued those ministers by whose Preroga agency or advice they were concluded. ^ tive. The prerogatives of the crown (in the sense under iT* which we are now considering them) respect either this nation’s intercourse with foreign nations, or its own do¬ mestic government and civil polity. With regard to foreign concerns, the king is the de¬ legate or representative of his people. It is impossible that the individuals of a state, in their collective capa¬ city, can transact the affairs of that state with another community equally numerous as themselves. Unanimity must be wanting to their measures, and strength to the execution of their counsels. In the king, therefore, as in a centre, all the rays of his people are united, and form by that union a consistency, splendour, and power* that make him feared and respected by foreign poten¬ tates > who would scruple to enter into any engagement, that must afterwards be revised and ratified by a popular assembly. What is done by the royal authority, with regard to foreign powers, is the act of the whole na¬ tion : what is done without the king’s concurrence, is the act only of private men. And so far is this point carried by our law, that it hath been held, that should all the subjects of England make war with a king in league with the king ot England, without the royal as¬ sent, such war is no breach ot the league. And, by the statute 2 Hen. V. c. 6. any subject committing acts of hostility upon any nation in league with the king, was declared to be guilty of high treason : and, though that act was repealed by the statute 20 Hen. VI. c. it. so far as relates to the making this offence high treason, yet still it remains a very great offence against the law of nations, and punishable by our laws, either capitally or otherwise, according to the circumstances of the case. 1. The king, therefore, considered as the representa¬ tive of his people, has the sole power of sending am¬ bassadors to foreign states, and receiving ambassadors at home. 2. It is also the king’s prerogative to make treaties, leagues, and alliances, with foreign states and princes. For it is, by the law of nations, essential to the goodness of a league, that it he made by the sovereign power 5 and then it is binding upon the whole community : and in Britain the sovereign power, quoad hoc, is vested in the person of the king. Whatever contracts, therefore, he engages in, no other power in the kingdom can le¬ gally delay, resist, or annul. And yet, lest this pleni¬ tude of authority should be abused to the detriment of the public, the constitution (as was hinted before) hath here interposed a check, by the means of parliamentary impeachment, for the punishment of such ministers as from criminal motives advise or conclude any treaty, which shall afterwards be judged to derogate from the honour and interest of the nation. 3. Upon the same principle the king has also the sole prerogative of making war and peace. For it is held by all the writers on the law of nature and nations, that the riirht of making war, which by nature subsisted in every individual, is given up by all private persons that enter into society, and is vested in the sovereign power : and this right is given up, not only by individuals, but even by the entire body of people that are under the do¬ minion of a sovereign. It would indeed be extremely improper, P R E improper, that any number of subjects should have the power of binding the supreme magistrate, and putting him against his will in a state of war. Whatever hosti¬ lities, therefore, may be committed by private citizens, the state ought not to be affected thereby ; unless that should justify their proceedings, and thereby become partner in the guilt. And the reason which is given by Grotius, why, according to the law of nations, a de¬ nunciation of war ought always to precede the actual commencement of hostilities, is not so much that the enemy may be put upon his guard (which is matter ra¬ ther of magnanimity than right), but that it may be certainly clear that the war is not undertaken by pri¬ vate persons, but by the will of the whole community; whose right of willing is in this case transferred to the supreme magistrate by the fundamental laws of society. So that, in order to make a war completely effectual, it is necessary with us in Britain that it be publicly de¬ clared and duly proclaimed by the king’s authority j and then, all parts of both the contending nations, from the highest to the lowest, are bound by it. And where- over the right resides of beginning a national war, there also must reside the right of ending it, or the power of making peace. And the same check of parliamentary impeachment, for improper or inglorious conduct, in beginning, conducting, or concluding a national war, is in general sufficient to restrain the ministers of the crown from a wanton or injurious exertion of this great prerogative. 4. But, as the delay of making war may sometimes "be detrimental to individuals who have suffered by de¬ predations from foreign potentates, our laws have in some respects armed the subject with powers to impel the prerogative j by directing the ministers of the crown to issue letters of marque and reprisal upon due demand: the prerogative of granting which is nearly related to, >and plainly derived from, that other of making war; this being indeed only an incomplete state of hostilities, and generally ending in a formal denunciation of war. These letters are grantable, by the law of nations, when¬ ever the subjects of one state are oppressed and injured by those of another, and justice is denied by that state to which the oppressor belongs. In this case, letters of marque and reprisal (words in themselves synonymous, and signifying a taking in return) may be obtained, in order to seize the bodies or goods of the subjects of the offending state, until satisfaction be made, wherever they happen to be found. And indeed this custom of repri¬ sals seems dictated by nature herself; for which reason 'We find in the most ancient times very notable instances of it. But here the necessity is obvious of calling in the Sovereign power, to determine when reprisals may be made; else every private sufferer would be a judge in his own cause. In pursuance of which principle, it is with us declared by the statute 4 Hen. V. c. 7. that if «ny subjects of the realm are oppressed in time of truce by any foreigners, the king will grant marque in due form to all that; feel themselves grieved. See Marque. 5- Upon exactly the same reason stands the preroga¬ tive of granting safe-conducts; without which, by the Jaw of nations, no member of one society has a right to intrude into another. And therefore Puffendorf very justly resolves, that it is left in the power of all states to take such measures about the admission of strangers as they think convenient; those being ever excepted wlto [ 299 1 P R E are driven on the coasts by necessity, or by any cause that deserves pity or compassion. Great tenderness is shown by our laws, not only to foreigners in distress ’ (see Mrkck), hut with regard also to the admission of strangers who come spontaneously : for so long as their nation continues at peace with ours, and they them¬ selves behave peaceably, they are under the king’s pro¬ tection ; though liable to he sent home whenever the king sees occasion. But no subject ot a nation at war with us can, by the law of nations, come into the realm, nor can travel himself upon the high seas, or send his goods and merchandise from one place to another, with¬ out danger of being seized by our subjects, unless he has letters of safe-conduct; which, by divers ancient sta¬ tutes, must he granted under the king’s great seal and inrolled in chancery, or else they are of no effect ; the king being supposed the best judge of such emergencies, as may deserve exception from the general law of arms.- But passports under the king’s sign-manual, or licenses-’ from his ambassadors abroad, are now more usually ob« tamed, and are allowed to be of equal validity Ihese are the principal prerogatives of the king re¬ specting this nation’s intercourse with foreign nations; in all of which he is considered as the delegate or re¬ presentative of his people. But in domestic affairs, he is considered in a great variety of character-, and from thence there arises an abundant number of other prero¬ gatives. I. lie is a constituent part of the supreme legislative power; and, as such, has the prerogative of rejecting such provisions in parliament as he judges improper to he passed. The expediency of which constitution has before been evinced at large under the article Parlia¬ ment. W e shall only farther remark, that the king is not bound by any act of parliament, unless he be named therein by special and particular words. The most ge- neial words that can be devised (any person or persons, bodies politic, or corporate, &c.) affect not him in the least, if they may tend to restrain or diminish any of his rights or interests. For it would be of most mischievous consequence to the public, if the strength of the execu¬ tive power were liable to be curtailed, without its own express consent, by constructions and implications of the subject. Yet, where an act of parliament is expressly made for the preservation of public rights and the sup¬ pression of public wrongs, and does not interfere with the established rights of the crown, it is said to he bind¬ ing as well upon the king as upon the subject: and, likewise, the king may take the benefit of any particular act, though he be not especially named. 2. The king is considered, in the next place, as the generalissimo, or the first in military command, within the kingdom. The great end of society is to protect the weakness of individuals by the united strength of the community; and the principal use of government is to direct that united strength in the best and most effectual manner, to answer the end proposed. Monarchical go¬ vernment is allowed to be the fittest of any for this pur¬ pose : it follows therefore, from the very end of its in¬ stitution, that in a monarchy the military power must be trusted in the hands of the prince. In this capacity, therefore, of general of the king¬ dom, the king has the sole power of raising and regulat¬ ing fleets and armies. The manner in which they are raised and regulated w explained under the article Mi- P 3 JS/TMIX Preroga¬ tive. p n e [ 3°° ] P H E LIT ary State. We are now only to consider the pre¬ rogative of enlisting and governing them : which in¬ deed was disputed and claimed, contrary to all reason and precedent, by the long parliament ol iving Ghas. 1. 5 but, upon the restoration ot his son, was solemnly de¬ clared by the statute 13 Charles II. c. 6. to be in the king alone : for that the sole supreme government and command of the militia within all his majesty s realms and dominions, and of all forces by sea and land, and of all forts and places of strength, ever was and is the undoubted right of his majesty, and his royal predeces¬ sors, kings and queens ot England J and that both or either house of parliament cannot, nor ought to, pretend to the same. , This statute, it is obvious to observe, extends not only to fleets and armies, hut also to forts and other places of strength within the realm ; the sole preroga¬ tive, as well of erecting, as manning and governing of which, belongs to the king in his capacity of general of the kingdom j and all lands were formerly subject to a tax, for building of castles wherever the king thought proper. This was one of the three things, from contri¬ buting to the performance of which no lands were ex¬ empted, and therefore called by the Anglo-Saxons the trim da necessitas ; so. pontis reparatio, arris const rue tio, et expeditio contra hostem. And this they were called upon to do so often, that, as Sir Edward Coke from M. Paris assures us, there was in the time of Henry IE 1115 castles subsisting in England. The inconvenien- cies of which, when granted out to private subjects, the lordly barons of those times, were severely felt by the whole kingdom ; for, as William of Newburgh remarks in the reign of King Stephen, erant in Anglia quodam- modo tot reges, velpotius tyranni, quot domini castello- rum ; but it was felt by none more sensibly than by two succeeding princes, King John and King Henry HI. And therefore, the greatest part of them being demo¬ lished in the barons wars, the kings of after times have been very cautious of suffering them to be rebuilt in a fortified manner: and Sir Edward Coke lays it down, that no subject can build a castle, or house of strength imbattled, or other fortress defensible, without the li¬ cense of the king ; for the danger which might ensue, if every man at his pleasure might do it. It is partly upon the same, and partly upon a fiscal foundation, to secure his marine revenue, that the king has the prerogative of appointing ports and havens, or such places only, for persons and merchandise to pass into and out of the realm, as he in his wisdom sees pro¬ per. By the feodal law, all navigable rivers and ha¬ vens were computed among the regalia, and were sub¬ ject to the sovereign of the State. And in England it hath always been held, that the king is lord of the whole shore, and particularly is the guardian of the ports and havens, which are the inlets and gates of the realm-, and therefore, so early as the reign of King John, we find ships seized by the king’s officers for putting in at a place that was not a legal port. These legal ports were undoubtedly at first assigned by the crown ; since to each of them a court of portmote is incident, the ju¬ risdiction of which must flow from the royal authority: the great ports of the sea are also referred to, as Well known and established, by statute 4 Hen. IV. c. 20. which prohibits the landing elsewhere under pain of con¬ fiscation : and the statute 1 Eliz. c, 1 K.recites, that ■ • -s *• * 5 the franchise of lading and discharging had been ire- ireroja. quently granted by the crown. tive. But though the king had a power of granting the v; v-' franchise of havens and ports, yet he had not the power of resumption, or of narrowing and confining their li¬ mits when once established 5 but any person had a right to load or discharge his merchandise in any part ol the haven : whereby the revenue ot the custom was much impaired and diminished, by fraudulent landings in ob¬ scure and private corners. 1 his occasioned the statutes of 1 Eliz. c. 11. and 13 and 14 Car. II. c. 11. § 14. which enable the crown by commission, to ascertain the limits of all ports, and to assign proper wharfs and quays in each port, for the exclusive landing and loading of merchandise. '1 he erection of beacons, light houses, and sea-marks, is also a branch of the royal prerogative : whereof the first was anciently used in order to alarm the country in case of the approach of an enemy •, and all of them are signally useful in guiding and preserving vessels at sea by night as well as by day. See Beacon. 3. Another capacity in which the king is considered in domestic affairs, is as the fountain of justice and ge¬ neral conservator of the peace of the kingdom. See the article fountain of Justice. 4. The king is likewise the fountain of honour, of of¬ fice, and of privilege : and this in a different sense from that wherein he is styled thefountain of justice ; for herb he is really the parent of them. See the articles Foun¬ tain of Justice and Fountain of Honour. g. Another light, in which the laws of England con¬ sider the king with regard to domestic concerns, is ai the arbiter of commerce. By commerce, we at present mean domestic commerce only j for the king’s preroga¬ tive with regard to which, see ^Regulation of If EIGHTS and Measures, Money, &c. 6. The king is, lastly, considered by the laws of Eng¬ land as the head "and supreme governor of the national church. # i To enter into the reasons upon which this prerogative is founded is matter rather of divinity than of law. We shall therefore only observe, that by statute 26 Hen. VIII. c. 1. (reciting that the king’s majesty justly and rightfully is and ought to be the supreme head of the church of England ; and so had been recognised by the clergy of that kingdom in their convocation) it is enact¬ ed, that the king shall be reputed the only supreme head on earth of the church of England; and shall have, annexed to the imperial crown of this realm, as well the title and style thereof, as all jurisdictions, authorities, and commodities, to the said dignity of supreme head of the church appertaining. And another statute to the same purport was made, I Eliz. c. 1. In virtue of this authority the king convenes, pro¬ rogues, restrains, regulates, and dissolves, all ecclesiasti¬ cal synods or convocations. This was an inherent prero¬ gative of the crown long before the time of‘Henry S III. as appears by the statute 8 Hen. VI. c. 1. and the many authors, both lawyers and historians, vouched by Sip Edward Coke. So that the statute 25 lien. VIII. c. 19. which restrains the convocation from making or putting in execution any canons repugnant to the king’s prero- eative, or the laws, customs, and statutes of the realm, was merely declaratory of the old common law: that part of it only being.new, "rthicljhmakes The king’s royal assent P B, E [ :oi ] P H E •oga- V Hen. VIII. c. 9. III. The king’s fiscal prerogatives, or such as regard his revenue. See the article Revenue. pREROGATiVE-Court, an English court established for the trial of all testamentary causes, where the deceas¬ ed hath left bona notabilia within two different dioceses. In which case the probate of wills belongs to the arch¬ bishop of the province, by way of special prerogative. And all causes relating to the wills, administrations, or legacies of such persons, are originally cognizable here¬ in, before a judge appointed by the archbishop, called the judge of the prerogative court; from whom an appeal lies by statute 25 Hen. VIII. c. 19. to the king in chan¬ cery, instead of the pope as formerly. PRESAGE, in Antiquity, denotes an augury, or sign of some future event; which was chiefly taken from the flight of birds, the entrails of victims, &c. See Augu¬ ry and Aruspices. PRESBURG, the capital of the kingdom of Lower Hungary, called by the inhabitants Posony and Prespo- ren, situated on the Danube, about 46 miles east from Vienna, and 75 from Buda. The castle, in which the regalia are kept, stands on a hill above the town. Here the states assemble; and in the cathedral, dedicated to St Martin, the king is crowned. The town is not very large, or well buifi; but is very ancient, pleasantly situ¬ ated, and enjoys a good air. The population is com¬ puted at 27,000. Its fortifications are only a double wall and ditch. In the lower suburbs is a hill, where the king, after his coronation, goes on horseback, and brandishes St Stephen’s sword towards the four cardinal points, intimating, that he will defend his country against all its enemies. Besides the cathedral, there are several other Popish and one Lutheran church, with a Jesuits college, three convents, and two hospitals. It gives name to a county, and is the residence of the archbishop of Gran, who is primate, chief secretary, and chancellor of the kingdom, legatus natus of the Papal see, and prince ot the holy Roman empire. E. Long. 17. 30. N. Lat. 48. £0. t ^' PRRSBYT2E, persons whose eyes are too flat to re¬ fract tire rays sufficiently, so.that unless the object is at fretbyt® some distance, the rays coming from it will pass through fl the retina before their union, consequently vision is con- Pr^byte- fusetl; old people are usually the subjects of this disease. , mns- ^ In order to remedy, or at least to palliate, this defect, the person should firstu.se glasses which do not magnify, and From them pass gradually to more convex spectacles, which shorten the focus. PRES BA TER,in the primitive Christian church, an elder, one of the second order of ecclesiastics ; the other two being bishops and deacons. ; See the article Bishop and Deacon. Presbyter, or elder, is a word borrowed from the Greek tran lation of the Old Testament, where it com¬ monly signifies ruler or governor; it being a note of of¬ fice and dignity, not of age ; and in this sense bishops are sometimes called presbyters in the New Testament. The presbyters might baptize, preach, consecrate, and administer the euebarist in the bishop’s absence, or in his presence if he authorised and deputed them; and the bishops did scarce any thing in the government of the j church without their advice, consent, and amicable con¬ currence. The grand dispute between the followers of the Ge¬ neva and Roman discipline, is about the sameness and difference of presbyters and bishops at the time of the apostles. See Episcopacy, Independents, and the following article. ' ' _ . PRESBYTERIANS, Protestants so called from Disciimi- their maintaining that the government of the churchnapng appointed in the New Testament was by Presbyteries, that is, by associations of ministers, and ruling elders, lcr;ansl ^ possessed all of equal powers, without any superiority among them either in office or in order. The Presbyterians believe, that the authority of their ministers to preach the gospel, to administer the sacra¬ ments of baptism and the Lord’s supper, and to feed the flock of Christ, is derived from the Holy Ghost by the imposition of the hands of the presbytery ; amj they op¬ pose the independent scheme of the common rights of Christians by the same arguments which are used for that purpose by the Episcopalians, (see Episcopacy). They affirm, however, that there is no order in the church as established by Christ and his apostles superior to that of presbyters; that all ministers being ambassadorsofChrist, are equal hytheir commission ; ih&tprdsbyteran&bishop, though different words, are of the same import; and that prelacy was gradually established upon the primi¬ tive practice of making the moderator or speaker of the presbytery a permanent officer. 2 These positions they maintain against the EpisCopa- Scriptural lians by the following scriptural arguments. They ob- arguments serve, that the apostles 'planted churches by ordaining aFainst bishops and deacons in every city ; that the ministers1 1 which in one verse are called bishops, are in the next perhaps denominated presbyters; that we nowhere read in the New Testament of bishops, presbyters, and dea¬ cons, in any one church; and that therefore we are un¬ der the necessity of concluding bishop andpresbytep to be two names for the. same church officer. This is ap¬ parent from Peter’s exhortation to the elders or presby¬ ters who were among the Jewish Christians. “ The elders (presbyters) which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be re¬ vealed L. : P It £ [ 3°2 3 P R E * i Peter *• i, a, 3- 3 Reasons for suppos¬ ing bishops and presy ters of tlie came order, f Cliap. I4* sealed : Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereot (jTria-KOTceviiii^ acting as n- shops thereof), not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind ; neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flocks*.” From this passage it is evident, that the pres¬ byters not only fed the flock of God, but also govern¬ ed that flock with episcopal powers ; and that the apostle himself, as a church officer, was nothing more than a presbyter or elder. The identity of the office oi bishop and presbyter is still more apparent from Tleb. xiii. 7. 17. and 1 Thess. v. 12.', for the bishops are there represented as governing the flock, speaking to them the word of God, watching for their souls, and dischar¬ ging various offices, which it is impossible for any man to perform to more than one congregation. From the last cited text it is evident, that the bishops (7rg$icflxgt*ivf^ of the Thessalonian churches had the pas¬ toral care of no more souls than they could hold perso¬ nal communion with in God’s worship ; tor they weie such as all the people were to know, esteem, and love, ' as those that not only were over them, but also “ closely laboured among them, and admonished them.” But diocesan bishops, whom ordinarily the hundredth part of their flock never hear nor see, cannot be tho-.e bishops by whom that flock is admoni-hed, nor can they lie, what Feter requires the bishops of the Jewish converts to be, ensamples to the flock. It is the opinion of Dr Ham¬ mond, who was a very learned divine, and a zealot for episcopacy, that the elders whom the apostle James de¬ sires + the sick to call for, were of the highest perma¬ nent order of ecclesiastical officers j but it is self-evident that those elders cannot have been diocesan bishops, otherwise the sick must have been often without the reach of the remedy proposed to them. There is nothing in Scripture upon which the Epis¬ copalian is more ready to rest his cause than the alleged episcopacy of Timothy and Titus j ol whom the former is said to have been bishop of Ephesus, and the latter bishop of Crete •, yet the Presbyterian thinks it as clear as the noon day sun, that the presbyters of Ephesus were supreme governors, under Christ of the Ephesian church¬ es, at the very time that Timothy is pretended to have been their proper diocesan. In Acts xx. 17, &c. we read, that “ from Miletus Paul sent to Ephesus, and called the elders (presbyters) of the church. And when they were come to him, he said unto them, Ye know, from the first day that I came into Asia, after what manner I have been with you, at all seasons. And now I know that ye all, among whom I have gone preaching the kingdom of God, shall see my face no more. Wherefore, I take you to record this day, that I am pure from the blood of all men. For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God. Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers (ime-KOTtvs, bishopsf) to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood. For I know this, that after my departure shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Al¬ so of your ownselves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years, ^ ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears. And now, brethren, I recommend you to God, and to Presbv the word of his grace,” &c. _ nans From this passage, it is evident that there was in the v city of Ephesus a plurality of pastors of equal authority ,^4 without any superior pastor or bishop over them; for the0f apostle directs his discourse to them all in common, and of equal gives them equal powrer over the whole flock. Dr Ham-authorii mond indeed imagines, that the elders whom Paul called to Miletus were the bishops ojAsia, and that he sent for them to Ephesus, because that city was the metro¬ polis of the province. But were this opinion well- founded, it is not conceivable that the sacred writer would have called them the elders of the church of Ephesus, but the elders of the church in general, or the elders of the churches in Asia. Besides, it is to be re¬ membered, that the apostle was in such haste to be at Jerusalem, that the sacred historian measures his time by days; whereas it must have required several months to call together the bishops or elders of all the cities of Asia ; and he might certainly have gone to meet them at Ephesus in less time than would be requisite for their meeting in that city and proceeding thence to him at Miletus. They must therefor* have been either the joint pastors of one congregation, or the pastors of dif¬ ferent congregations in one city ; and as it was thus in Ephesus, so was it in Philippi; for we find the apostle addressing his epistle “ to all the saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons.” From the passage before us it is likewise plain, that the presbyters of Ephesus had not only the name but the whole power of bishops given to them by the Holy. Ghost ; for they are enjoined to do the whole work of bishops—•xeip.xiwi r»» rav 0jav.—which signi¬ fies, to rule as well as feed the church of God. W hence we see, that the apostle makes the power of governing inseparable from that of preaching and watching j and that according to him, all who are preachers of God s word, and watchmen of souls, are necessarily rulers or governors of the church, without being accountable for their management to any prelate, but only to their Lord Christ from whom their power is derived. . j : It appears, therefore, that the apostle Paul left in theTimota church of Ephesus, which he had planted, no other suc-nobisli cessors to himself th&npresbyter-bishops, or Presbyterian ministers, and that he did not devolve his power upon any prelate, Timothy, whom the Episcopalians allege to have been the first bishop of Ephesus, was piesent when this settlement was made*; and it is surely not to#Acts be supposed, that, had he been their bishop, the apostle 5. would have devolved the whole episcopal power upon the presbyters before his face. If ever there was a sea¬ son fitter than another for pointing out the duty of this supposed bishop to his diocese, and his presbyters duty to him, it was surely when Paul was taking his final leave of them, and discoursing so pathetically concerning the duty of overseers, the coming of ravenous wolves, and the consequent hazard of the flock. In this farewel discourse, he tells them that “ he had not shunned to declare unto them all the counsel of God.” But with what truth could this have been said, if obedience to a diocesan bishop had been any part of their duty either at the time of the apostle’s speaking or at any future period ? He foresaw that ravenous wolves would enter in among them, and that even some of themselves should arise - jUl. 11A 1 i:Iii C :ki a; p n e shyte. arise speaking perverse things-, and if, as the Episcopa- ians. Hans allege, diocesan episcopacy was the remedy pro¬ vided for those evils, is it not strange, passing strange, that the inspired preacher did not foresee that Timothy, who was standing beside him, was destined to fill that important office } or if he did foresee it, that he omitted to recommend him to his future charge, and to give him proper instructions for the discharge of his duty ? m e- But if Timothy was not bishop of Ephesus, what, it rielist. may be asked, was his office in that city ? for that he resided there for some time, and was by the apostle in¬ vested with authority to ordain and rebuke presbyters* are facts about which all parties are agreed, and which indeed cannot he controverted by any reader of Paul’s epistles. rlo this the Presbyterian replies with confi¬ dence, that the power which Timothy exercised in the * Tim. church of Ephesus was that of an evangelist *, and not i' ■ a fixed prelate. But, according to Eusebius, the work of an evangelist was, “ to lay the foundations of the faith in barbarous nations, and to constitute among them pastors 5 after which he passed on to other coun¬ tries.” Accordingly we find, that Timothy was resi- t ’il.ii. dent for a time at Philippi and Corinth t as well as T' at Ephesus, and that he had as much authority over those churches as over that of which he is said to have t 3°3 T F R E 1 r, iv. i' ,vi. 10, been the fixed bishop. “ Now, if Timotheus come, see that he may be with you without fear, for he work- eth the work of the Lord, as I also do. Let no man therefore despise him.” This text might lead us to sup¬ pose, that I imothy was bishop of Corinth as well as of Ephesus ; for it is stronger than that upon which his episcopacy of the latter church is chiefly built. The t apostle says, “ I besought thee $ to abide'still at Ephe- 3' Vn rat( trig’ mar, fice elm sus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine.”" But had Timothy been the fixed bishop of that city, there would surely have been no necessity for beseeching him to abide with his flock. It is to be observed, too, that the first epistle to Timothy, which alone was written to him during his residence at Ephesus, was of a date prior to Paul’s meeting with the elders of that church at Mi¬ letus ; for in the epistle he hopes to come to him shortly, whereas he tells the elders at Miletus, that they should see his face no more. This being the case, it is evident that Timothy was left by the apostle at Ephesus only to supply his place during his temporary absence at Mace¬ donia, and that he could not possibly have been consti¬ tuted fixed bishop of that church, since the episcopal powers were afterwards committed to the presbyters by the Holy Ghost in his presence, yte- . ihe identity of the office of bishop and presbyter be- |c ing thus ciearly established, it follows, that the presby- »u£ terate ^ie highest permanent office in the church, the ani^ every faithful pastor of a flock is successor to . the apostles in every thing in which they were to have any successors. In the apostolic office there wTere in¬ deed some things peculiar and extraordinary, such as their immediate call by Christ, their infallibility, their being witnesses of our Lord’s resurrection, and their unlimited jurisdiction over the whole world. These powers and privileges could not be conveyed by imposi¬ tion of hands to any successors, whether called presby¬ ters or bishops 5 but as rulers or office-bearers in parti¬ cular churches, we have the confession of “ the very thiefest apostles,” Peter and John, that they were no¬ thing more than presbysters or parish ministers. This PresW- being the case, the dispute, which in the early part of nans, the passing century was so warmly agitated concerning 1 ■"" y■1 the validity of Presbyterian ordination, may he soon de^ cided ; for if the ceremony of ordination he at all essen¬ tial, it is obvious that such a ceremony performed bv presbyters must be valid, as there is no higher order of ecclesiastics in the church by whom it can be performed. Accordingly we find that Timothy himself, though said to he a bishop, was ordained by the laying on of the bands of a presbytery. At that ordination indeed St I aul presided, but he could preside only as pri¬ mus m paribus ; for we have seen that, as permanent officers in the church of Christ, the apostles themselves were no more than presbyters. If the apostles hands were imposed for any other purpose, it. must have been to communicate those charismata or miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit, which were then so frequent; but which no modern presbyter or bishop will pretend to give, unless his understanding be clouded by the grossest ignorance, or perverted by the most frantic entbusi- 8 But if the office of bishop and presbyter was origi-Rise of E- nally the same, how, it will be asked, came diocesan e-piscoPacy* piscopacy to prevail so universally as it is confessed to have done before the conversion of Constantine and the civil establishment of Christianity in the Konian em¬ pire ? To give a satisfactory answer to this question is certainly the most arduous task which the advocate for presbytery has to perform : but it is a task not insur¬ mountable. From many passages in the New Testament *, it is* Acts xT. evident, that when the apostles planted churches in dif- 29- *ui. t. ferent cities, they generally settled more than one pa-12;.^'.xv* stor in the same church, to feed and govern it with1*1'*’5' joint authority. The propriety of this constitution is obvious. In those days, when the disciples of Christ were persecuted for their religion, and often obliged to meet in the “ night for fear of the Jews,” they could not with any degree of prudence assemble in large num¬ bers j and therefore, had there been no more than one pastor in a city, the Christian converts, though, when assembled, they might have amounted to but a small congregation, could not all have enjoyed the benefit of public worship on the same day; at least it is obvious that they could not possibly have assembled for this pur¬ pose so often as their want of instruction, and the duty ol “ breaking ol bread and of prayer,” required them to meet. It was therefore with great wisdom that the apostles ordained several presbyters in the same church; hut as these presbyters would have occasion to meet fre¬ quently, and to deliberate on the state of the flock which it was their duty to feed, and over which they had all equal authority, they would he under the necessity of electing one of their own number to be president or mo¬ derator of the presbytery, that order might be preserved, and all things done with decency. At first there is rea¬ son to believe that those presidents held their office no longer than while the presbyteries sat in which they were elected. Among the apostles themselves there was no fixed president. Peter indeed appears to have been most frequently admitted to that honour ; hut there is one very memorable occasion on record f, when James the f Acts xy. Lord’s brother presided in an assembly of apostles, elders, and brethren, held at Jerusalem, to determine the ques¬ tion P R E [ 3°4 I P R- Er Pn-sbytc- ri.ms. According- to Jeisomc. tlon concerning the necessity of circumcising the Gen¬ tiles, and commanding them to keep the law o i loses. Upon this model were the primitive presbyteries formed. They consisted of several presbyters possessed of equal powers, who at their meetings appointee one of their own number to discharge the ofhee ot modern- tor or temporary president} but to this presi ent tney gave no prelatical powers or negative voice over the c,e- liberations of his brethren-, for, as Jerome informs us, the church was then governed communi presbyterorum concilia, “ by a common council of presbyters.” it ap¬ pears, however, that when an apostle, an apostolical man, or an evangelist, fixed his residence in any city, and took upon himself the pastoral care of part of the flock, Ins co-presbyters, from respect to his singular gifts, made him their constant and fixed moderator. Hence iimo- thv during his abode at Ephesus, was moderator of t ie presbytery ; and hence too Mark the evangelist, who resided many years in Alexandria, has been called the first bishop of'that church, though he appears to have been nothing more than permanent moderator. We both written by Mr Willison some time minister in Dun- dee, and both evincing considerable learning and great rians, ingenuity in their pious author. # 'Hf Of the churches at present formed upon this model, we believe, that without incurring the imputation ofoCS(J| national prejudice, we may safely affirm the church of Scotland to' be by much the most respectable. Her mode of worship is simple and solemn ; her established faith agreeable to the confessions of most other Pro¬ testant churches her judicatories are calculated to maintain the rights of the people j and her pastors are confessedly men of liberal and enlightened mindo. On these accounts it appears to us, that we cannot more properly conclude this article than with a short view of her constitution, as being that in which our Presbyte¬ rian readers are undoubtedly most interested. No one is ignorant, that from the first dawn of refor¬ mation among us, till the era of the revolution, uieie was a perpetual struggle between the court and the peo¬ ple for the establishment of an Episcopal or a Presby¬ terian form of church government: The former model of been nothing more than permanent nioaeraror ^ ^ j u ^ patronised by the house of Stu- <7? t!;e,:rurreaenr.irlP Sy ougTt Wcause it iXy' are nrhced ,ilh the clergy in church in the episcopal chan, without drean g X f hidiratories and the two orders, which under episco- ^ • .* L 4- Ao iU\c n! makincr turn episcopum nominubcnt. As this practice Or making the moderator of the presbytery ot Alexandria a per¬ manent officer, was thought a good expedient to guard the infant churches against schisms and divisions, those churches gradually adopted it. lor, as Jerome tells us, Postquamunusquisquecosquoshaptizaverat, suosputabet esse,non Christ i, in toto or be decretumest, itt umtsdcpres¬ byter is electus, superponcretvr cceteris, adqucmommsec- elesice cura perlineret, el schismatum seminct tollerentur. The advantages which, in displaying his talents and authority, the perpetual president nr speaker of any as¬ sembly has over his colleagues in office, are so obvious, that when the practice of electing their moderators for life became universal among the presbyteries of the pri¬ mitive church, it is easy to conceive how ambitious men m'mht so magnify the difficulties and importance of their station, as to'introduce the custom of filling it by a new consecration of the bishop elect. But when this was done, diocesan episcopacy, with all its powers and pre¬ rogatives, would follow as a thing ol course, until by little and little (as Jerome expresses himself) the whole pastoral care of the flock was devolved upon one man.” Our limits will not permit us to trace more minutely the rise and progress of this ecclesiastical usurpation, as the Presbyterian calls it; but the reader who wishes for fuller information, after studying the remains of the four first centuries of the Christian church, may consult An Inquiry into the Constitution, Discipline,and Worship 0f the Primitive Church, said to have been written by Sir Peter King, afterwards lord chancellor of England. As an impartial lover of truth, he will do well to con- salt also a book entitled, An original Draught of the Primitive Church, which was published as an answer to the Inquiry, and he may read with much advantage to himself A Letter from a parochial bishop to a prelatical jrentleman, with An apology for the Church of Scotland, one body. In the Scottish church, every regulation ot public worship, every act ot discipline, and every eccle- n siastical censure, which in other churches flows from thegoverna authority of a diocesan bishop, or from a convocation ol ^ J the clergy, is the joint work of a certain number iajmeii. clergymen and laymen acting together with equal au- thorilv, and deciding every question by a plurality of voices. The laymen who thus form an essential part of the ecclesiastical courts of Scotland, are called ruling elders; and hold the same office, as well as the same name, with those brethren * who joined with the apes-* Acts ties and elders at Jerusalem in determining the impor¬ tant question concerning the necessity of imposing upon the Gentile converts the ritual observances of the law ot Moses. These lay-elders Paul enjoined Timothy t tof i Tin account worthy of double honour, if they should rule well, 17- and discharge the duties for which they were separated from the multitude of their brethren. In the church of Scotland every parish has two or three ot these lay-e - ders, who are grave and serious persons, chosen from among the heads of families, of known orthodoxy and steady adherence to the worship, discipline, and govern¬ ment of the church. Being solemnly engaged to use their utmost endeavours for the suppression ot vice and the cherishing of piety and virtue, and to exercise dis¬ cipline faithfully and diligently, the minister, in the pre¬ sence of the congregation, sets them apart to their office by solemn prayer ; and concludes the ceremony, which is sometimes called ordination, with exhorting both el- j ders and people to their respective duties. ’ The kirk-session, which is the lowest ecclesiastical ju-AS dicatory, consists of the minister and those elders ot the congregation. The minister is cat officio moderator, but has^no negative voice over the decision ot the session 7 nor indeed has he a right to vote at all, unless when the voices of the elders are equal and opposite. J may PEE ■3 ie pres- .ery. may indeed enter his protest against their* sentence, if he think it improper, and appeal to the judgment of the presbytery; but this privilege belongs equally to every elder, as well as to every person who may believe him¬ self aggrieved by the proceedings of the session. The deacons, whose proper office it is to take care of the poor, may be present in every session, and offer their counsel on all questions that come before it ^ but except in what relates to the distribution of alms, they have no decisive vote with the minister and elders. The next judicatory is the presbi/tery, which consists of all the pastors within a certain district, and one ruling elder from each parish, commissioned by his brethren to represent, in conjunction with the minister, the session of that parish. The presbytery treats of such matters as concern the particular churches within its limits ; as the examination, admission, ordination, and censuring of ministers j the licensing of probationers, rebuking of gross or contumacious sinners, the directing of the sen¬ tence of excommunication, the deciding upon references and appeals from kirk-sessions, resolving cases of con¬ science, explaining difficulties in doctrine or discipline ; and censuring, according to the word of God, any he¬ resy or erroneous doctrine which hath either been pub¬ licly or privately maintained within the bounds of its jurisdiction. Partial as we may be thought to our own church, we frankly acknowledge that we cannot alto¬ gether approve of that part of her constitution which gives an equal vote, in questions of heresy, to an illite¬ rate mechanic and his enlightened pastor. W e are per¬ suaded that it has been the source of much trouble to many a pious clergyman 5 who, from the laudable de¬ sire of explaining the scriptures and declaring to his flock all the counsel of God, has employed a variety of expressions of the same import, to illustrate those articles of faith which may be obscurely expressed in the esta¬ blished standards. The fact however is, that, in pres¬ byteries, the only prerogatives which the pastors have over the ruling elders, are the power of ordination by imposition of hands, and the privilege of having the mo¬ derator chosen from their body. From the judgment of the presbytery there lies an appeal to the provincial synod, which ordinarily meets twice in the year, and exercises over the presbyteries within the province a jurisdiction similar to that which is vested in each presbytery over the several kirk-ses¬ sions within the bounds. Of these synods there are in the church of Scotland fifteen, which are composed of the members of the several presbyteries within the re¬ spective provinces which give names to the synods. The highest authority in the church of Scotland is the general assembly, which consists of a certain number of ministers and ruling elders delegated from each pres¬ bytery, and of commissioners from the universities and royal boroughs. A presbytery in which there are fewer than twelve parishes, sends to the general assembly two ministers and one ruling elder: if it contain between 12 and 18 ministers, it sends three of these, and one ru¬ ling elder : if it contains between 18 and 24 ministers, it sends four ministers and two ruling elders : and of 24 ministers, when it contains so many, it sends five with two rilling elders. Every royal borough sends one ruling rider, and Edinburgh two : whose election must be at¬ tested by the kirk-sessions of their respective boioughs. Fvery university sends one commissioner from its own Vol. XVII. Part I. -f, [ 305 ] P R E body. The commissioners are chosen annually six weeks Presbyie- btloie the meeting of the assembly ; and the ruling elders riaus are often men of the first eminence in the kingdom for II rank and talents. In this assembly, which meets once Pre!!cHP* a-year, the king presides by his commissioner, who is al- . Il0n' ■ ways a nobleman ; but he has no voice in their delibera- V tions. The order of their proceedings is regular, though sometimes the number of members creates a confusion, which the moderator, who is chosen from among the ministers, to be, as it were, the speaker of the house, has not sufficient authority to prevent. Appeals are brought from all the other ecclesiastical courts in Scot¬ land to the general assembly $ and in questions purely religious no appeal lies from its determinations.—In the subordination of these assemblies, parochial, presbyte- rial, provincial, and national, the less unto the greater consists the external order, strength, and stedfastness of the church of Scotland. PHESC1ENCE, in Theology, prevision or fore¬ knowledge ; that knowledge which God has ot things to come.—The doctrine of predestination is founded on the prescience of God, and on the supposition of all fu¬ turity’s being present to him. See Predestination. PRESCRIPTION, in Law, is a title acquired by use and time, and allowed by law ; as when a man claims any thing, because he, his ancestors, or they whose estate he hath, have had or used it all the time whereof no memory is to the contrary : or it is where for continuance of time, ultra mernoriam hominis, a par¬ ticular person hath a particular right against another. "There is a diflerence between prescription, custom, and usage. Prescription hath respect to a certain person’ who by intendment may have continuance forever ; as for instance, he and all they whose estate he hath in such a thing j this is a prescription: hut custom is local, and always applied to a certain place j as, time out oj mind there has been such a custom in su- h a place, &.c. And prescription belongeth to one or a jew only , hut cus¬ tom is common to all. Usage differs from both, for it may be either to persons or places ; as to inhabitants of a toivn to have a way, &tc. A custom and prescription are in the right; usage is in the possession; and a prescription that is good for the matter and substance, may he bad by the manner of set¬ ting it forth : but where that which is claimed as a cus¬ tom, in or for many, will be good, that regularly will be so when claimed by prescription for one. Prescription is to be time out of mind; though it is not the length of time that begets the right of prescription, nothing being done by time, although every thing is done in time > but it is a presumption in law, that a thing cannot con¬ tinue so long quiet, if it was against right, or injurious to another. Prescription, in Scots Law. See Law, p. 67 c. and 702. Prescription, in Theology, was a kind of argument pleaded by Tertullian and others in the 3d century against erroneous doctors. This mode of arguing has been despised by some, both because it has been used by Papists, and because they think that truth has no need of such a support. But surely in disputed points, if it can be shown that any particular doctrine of Christia¬ nity was held in the earliest ages, even approaching the apostolic, it must have very considerable weight; anti indeed that it has so, appears from the universal appeals Q ^ ] P R E p t? f r 3°^ j ~ « r ^ , nf tiieir such a man shall find any doctrine or interpretation to p preScrip- of all parties to those early times in support ottner ^ been universauy believed in the first ages, or as tion, tion. particular opinions. Besides, the thing is in i ,, Yincentius Lirinensis words it, semper ubique et ab om-' 1 . ' ral; for if a man finds a variety of opinions m the won ^ he wlu unque8ti0nably he disposed to think such upon important passages in scripture, where slia . early antl universal consent, or such prescription, of very so apt to get the true sense as from cotemporary considerable weight in determining his opinion, or others who lived very near the apostolic age ? and it consideia b PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. Nature of a medical prescrip¬ tion. A Prescription, in a medical sense, signifies much A the same with what in common language is called 1 a receipt, being “ a form of direction for the preparation and administration of some compound medicine. 1 he medical receipts are commonly called/ormw^e by phy - clans; and the term prescriptions applied _to what is written by a physician on seeing his patient, instructing the apothecary what medicines are to be prepared, how they are to be composed, and how administered to the patient. In this sense, a prescription may contain two or more formula!. . These prescriptions are almost always written in Latin, and are expressed in a peculiar style, which, though well known to physicians and apothecaries, may require the illustration of an example. The following is a specimen of a modern prescription, as it would be written by an Edinburgh and a London physician, ac¬ cording to the nomenclature of their respective college Pharmacopoeias. Edinburgh Prescription. will be examined hereafter ; and the numbers employed j' are usually the Ftoman numerals. After the ingredients tion I have been enumerated, and their quantities specified,' r there follows the title of the medicine, as Potto m the present instance, signifying poftirn or purging draught, with M f. prefixed to it, which stand for miscefat, or miscc ut fiat, mix to make *, and lastly the direction how the medicine is to be taken or administered *, sumnw mane sumenda; to be taken early in the morning. In England, these directions are always written in Latin, but in Scotland it is, we believe, more common to write For Mr Examples. ^ Pulv. Bad. Ehei palmati gr. xxv. Tartritis Potassse 5ij. Tincturae Sennse compositse, Syrupi Rosge centilolice aa Aquae Mentbse piperitae Jiss. M.f. Polio summo mane sumenda. Jan. 31. 1809. London Prescription. Pp Pulv. Rhei gr. xxv._ Kali Tartarisati 3ij. Tincturse Senae_ __ Syrupi Rosse aa oij. Aquae Menthae piperitidis Jiss. M. &c. Parts of a prescrip¬ tion. 4 Parts of a formula. From the above examples, it will be seen that a pre¬ scription, properly so called, contains several circum¬ stances beside the formula or receipts, os the name of the patient, for whom the prescription is written-, the signature of the physician, as G. F. for George f ordyce, &c. and the date of prescribing; none of which should be omitted, as the prescriptions are carefully preserved by the apothecary, for future reference. It may be proper to explain some circumstances re¬ specting the formula given in the above prescription. The 13o with which it commences signifies recipe or take; and is prefixed to all medical receipts. Then follow the several ingredients of which the medicine is to be com¬ posed, with the quantities of each. These quantities are usually marked by peculiar characters or symbols, which 4 DUl III 7 them in English. We shall consider the propriety of this latter mode in a future part of this article. The ingredients of which a formula is composed have been by writers on medical prescriptions, arranged un¬ der four heads : 1. The basis of the formula, which in the present instance is the rhubarb, constituting the prin¬ cipal ingredient, on whose action, modified where neces¬ sary the chief success of the medicine, in fulfilling there- quired indication, is to depend. 2. The adjuvant or auxiliary, added to the basis, for the purpose ot increas¬ ing its power, expediting its action, or rendering it more easily soluble in the juices of the stomach j in the above formula the tartrate of potash is the principal adjuvant. 3 The corrector, added to the basis, when we wish to moderate or delay its action, to correct some unpleasant or injurious property ot it, such as its odour, taste, acri- monv, &c. or to prevent it from acting on the body in a different manner from that which the indication requires: j; thus, in the present formula, the warm tincture of senna is added, rather to correct the griping quality of the rhubarb, than to increase its action, and the syrup of roses to correct the unpleasant taste of the medicine-, and the essential oil in the peppermint-water contributes to both these purposes: these, therefore, are to be con¬ sidered as the correctors. 4. The constituent, or that in¬ gredient which serves to reduce the rest into the form which is considered as most convenient for the exhibi¬ tion of the medicine -, in the present case the pepper¬ mint-water is the constituent, serving to reduce die me¬ dicine to the form of a potion or draught. < Medical formula are either officinal, or cxtcmporam- pwisiot ous; the former being such as are directed by authority formula of some public medical college to be kept in the shops of apothecaries, and the preparation ot which is de¬ scribed in their pharmacopoeias or dispensatories -, the latter such as are prescribed by the physician or sur¬ geon as occasion may require. . f Having explained the nature of a prescription, and Divisw' enumerated the several circumstances which are usually the* comprised in it, we propose, in the present article, to consider the importance of acquiring the habit of writing prescriptions with ease, elegance, and scientific accura. tftln Siljectj iioffl®- f 1 i fit si 1 PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. 3°7 ortatice cy J the previous information required by a physician, ploma, it is supposed that he is fully qualified to enter Importance »* 1. Iii rvi im 4- 1 ______ 1* !aI_ _ _ 1 i •.! ..1 7 i'anta- if the to enable him to prescribe properly in the several cases ibject which come under his care ; the general rules which we ''v deem it necessary to lay down for attaining the art of prescribing with neatness and accuracy ; and lastly, wre propose to give a brief historical view of the progress of pharmacy from the revival of literature to the present time, with a critical examination of some of the best writings on this subject. I. Before considering the importance of learning the of com- arf 0f prescribing, it may be proper to explain why such t1011' an art is required, or to point out the advantages to be expected from the composition of several simples in the same medicine. There are indeed a few drugs, which cannot be more efficacious in the generality of cases than when in their most simple state. Thus, crude opium in a pill, cinchona bark or ipecacuan in powder, mixed with some ordinary liquid, aft’ord the most effectual, as well as the most simple remedies. The same may be remarked of mustard seeds, white pepper, and garlic swallowed whole, and so of a few others. In general, however, it is much more convenient, and in many cases it is absolutely necessary, to have recourse to composition. Many remedies cannot be taken or ap¬ plied in their simple state, especially such as are used ex¬ ternally ; while others are rendered more certain, safe, -or expeditious, by being combined with others. Thus opium and tartrate of antimony and potash are both dia¬ phoretics, or sweating medicines ; but when combined, their effect in this way, is considerably increased. (See Kirby’s Tables, 27. and 28.). So oijalap and ca/ow/e/as purgatives (Ibid. yor/?z. 49.). Opium with many patients produces headach ; but if citric acid (le¬ mon juice) be added, this unpleasant symptom seldom takes place. (Tables,yorwzz/a 137.). Chemical me¬ dicines ax-e for the most part compound from their very nature; but even such of these as are contained in the catalogues of the materia medica can seldom be em¬ ployed except in composition. Mercurv in its native state is nearly inert, and yet how many valuable and powerful remedies are formed by its union with other bodies. Sulphuric acid and alcohol form cethcr, but aether cannot be swallowed except in combination. Thus we see, that independently of neatness and convenience, which, though they ought to have their weight, are se¬ condary considerations, there are many positive argu¬ ments to prove the utility of composition : and if com¬ position be of use, it must surely be of some consequence to know the scientific principles on which this is to be founded. Inlrtance f'he importance of acquiring a readiness at writing a neat and scientific prescription, seems not to be genei’ally understood. Indeed few parts of a medical education have been more neglected than this department of phar¬ macy, especially in Britain. In many of the continental medical schools, there is a professor appointed to give lectures on the art of writing prescriptions, while in our colleges this subject is at most confined to a single lec¬ ture from the professor of materia medica, and the stu¬ dent is left to learn the ai t as he can, by copying the prescriptions of the physicians whose clinical practice he *iiae has an opportunity of witnessing, or by attendance in j.ns c*ent an apothecary’s shop. When a gentleman has passed through the usual course of education at a medical school, and has received a di- Gdlral coi e ae¬ on his career with confidence, and proceed with success, of ti;o Let us for a moment consider what are his usual qualifi- Subject, cations. He has, we shall suppose, acquired a tolerably acurate knowledge of the structure and functions of the human body } he has been made acquainted with the na¬ ture, properties, and, so far as known, the mode of action of the various simple and compound bodies, which, as me¬ dicines, food, and poisons, exert an influence on the ani¬ mal economy } he has been instructed in the general na¬ ture of disease, the various symptoms or appearances by which its presence is indicated, and the general means to be employed for their removal. He has more particu¬ larly taken a view of many of the maladies to which the human frame is subject; has seen them exerting their influence on patients, and has frequently witnessed the effects of remedies in expelling them from the system, or in alleviating the distress which they occasioned. Here, it will be said, is a complete physician, and such, to a su¬ perficial observer, he may appear. With all this know¬ ledge, however, (and without all this no man is quali¬ fied for the active duties of the profession) many gentle¬ men are still deficient in a most important point, the ca¬ pacity of applying this knowledge to actual practice. A physician may be able to distinguish a disease at a glance j he may be prompt and accurate in forming his indications of cure, and may be well acquainted with the general nature of the remedies by which these indications are to he fulfilled, and still, if he be not master of the form and method in which these are to be exhibited 5 if he be not familiar with the practice of writing prescriptions, he will often be placed in a most unpleasant predicament, and will not unfrequently expose himself to the ridicule of those who are far his inferiors in knowledge and abi¬ lities, by writing prescriptions which, though they con¬ tain the essential means of cure, yet wanting the mode and fashion of the day, will be read with a smile, or per¬ haps be imperfectly understood, by the apothecary or the druggist to whom they are presented. Jo This, however, is an inconvenience which, as it may Necessity not be attended with serious effects, is trifling in com- of acquiring parison of some which he will encounter. a ot From a want of habit in prescribing, or from a want of some medical or chemical information, which we shall tions. presently explain, he will be often liable to jumble toge¬ ther substances which, though when single, they are pos¬ sessed of similar medical properties, may, when combin¬ ed, exert an action greater or less than he had intended to produce, or even altogether of an opposite nature. Ir By way of illustration let us suppose a young practi-illustration, tioner, at his first outset, called to a patient labouring under tetanus, or that disease of which a locked jaw is one of the most obvious symptoms. The patient is in the most distressing situation, and it is expected that every renewal of the spasm will end in those convulsions which most frequently bring on the fatal termination of this formidable disease. How is he to act ? The reme¬ dies to be employed are evidently antispasmodics, and of these he has heard opium and mercury highly recom¬ mended in this disease. Which of these is he to employ, or is he to make a trial of both ? He determines to give opium : in what form is he to order its administration ? That of pill is the most obvious ; but perhaps the patient cannot, in the ordinary state of his health, swallow pills, and every effort of the muscles of deglutition, increases Q q 2 the 338 PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. 12 Attendance in a shop necessary, hut not a- lone sufli- ei«nt. Importance the disease. He must then prescribe it in a liquid form, of the Shall he order it in the form of laudanum to be given by Subject. t!ie attendants, or shall he prescribe draughts or a. mix- v ' ture, with a certain proportion of tmctura opu ? W hat is the dose of the opium ? He knows that a person affected with this disease can bear a large dose. Is he to give this large dose at once, or is he gradually to increase it ? In a short time the patient can perhaps no longer swallow even liquids. Can he administer opium in any other form P He has heard of opiate clysters. What is the best formula for them ? Is the same quantity of opium as when taken by the mouth, sufficient for a clyster ? Again, if the patient cannot swallow, how is he to be supported ? By nutritive injections. How is the phy¬ sician to prescribe a nutritive injection ? Should it be large or small in quantity ? and is there any mode of making the bowels retain it for a sufficient time, to draw from it the proper nourishment ? We might carry this illustration, simple as it is, to a much greater length j but we forbear, that we may not be thought tedious. We need say little to persuade those who are at all ac¬ quainted with the practice of physic, that it is the duty of every physician who values the comfort and safety of his patient, or who has any regard for his own reputa¬ tion and respectability, to spare no pains in enabling himself to write a prescription with facility, perspicui¬ ty, and neatness. To those who, previous to their attending medical lectures, have been for some time in an apothecary’s shop, instructions for the writing of prescriptions may be thought useless or impertinent. In the daily habit of perusing and copying formulae from the hands of various physicians, it may be thought “ custom hath made it in them a property of easiness.” Certainly, with respect to form and method, doses and proportions, they can re¬ quire but little information. But after all, this know¬ ledge is merely imitative •, they have learned to write prescriptions as a parrot learns to speak, and unless they have added considerable chemical knowledge to their practical information, they can only copy what they have seen, and will often find themselves very much at a loss. This is considering the matter in the fairest point of view, taking it for granted that they have been under a master who had abilities, leisure, and inclination to give them all the necessary information j to point out to them how particular formal* were suited to particu¬ lar indications *, to shew them why one is preferable to another, and how they should distinguish a scientific from an empirical prescription. How seldom this is the case, and how easy it is for a young man to be several years in an apothecary’s shop, and learn but little, we leave to the judgment of others to decide. We trust it would not be difficult to show, that many of the formulae which they have wit¬ nessed, may be simplified or improved j that many of them are unscientific, and not a few absurd. We would, however, by no means be understood to consider attendance on a shop as an unnecessary part of a medical education j far from it. We are of opinion that every one who intends to practise medicine, whether it be as surgeon, apothecary, or physician, should for some time accustom himself to the preparing of medi¬ cines, and the keeping of an apothecary’s day-book: ami vve conceive that a young practitioner without this experience, will commence practice under considerable disadvantages. By perusing, copying, and preparing Previo* the formulae of various practitioners, the student cer- Requwit* tainly acquires a readiness at prescription, which he cannot so easily and imperceptibly attain in any other way. To those who have had little opportunity ol pro¬ fiting in this way, and their number is by no means small, the instruction intended to he conveyed in the following observations will be peculiarly adapted ; and probably such as have passed some time behind a compter, will learn something which had before escap¬ ed their notice, or will at least be convinced that the subject admits of considerable improvement by the ap¬ plication of recent chemical discoveries. 13 It may be thought, that such as have, during their 1IosPlta| residence at college, given diligent attention to hospi-™^*^ tal practice, will there have received all the informa-for prj,a tion on the subject of prescription which is necessarypractiee to qualify them for private practice. But those who are familiar with both will readily agree, that what is sufficient for the one, is by no means calculated for the other. The unexperienced physician, accustomed to the hospital routine, thinks it sufficient if he prescribe the proper quantities of the proper medicines in the most simple form. Is an emetic required ? He will order gr. xv. or 't} i of powdered ipecacuanha. Is a gentle di¬ aphoretic indicated ? He would prescribe 3>j °f fm- slura salina to be taken every four hours. Were his future practice to be confined to any infirmary, to the negroes of a West India plantation, or the crew of a man of war, this might be sufficient •, but if he aim at extensive or genteel practice, he will find it necessary to take a much wider range. II. The subject of extemporaneous prescription may 4 be considered as constituting the finishing part of a phy¬ sician’s education j so far, at least, as we can say, that the study of a profession, for the perfect attainment of •which the father of medicine has declared life too short, may admit of a completion. This is truly the practi¬ cal part of a physician’s dutyj it is this for which all his previous studies are intended to prepare him. Having acquired a knowledge ot diseases and their remedies, he is, when entering on the active duties of his profession, to apply that knowledge to the best advantage, so as to cure or relieve his patient in the easiest, safest, and most expeditious manner. It is not merely the mechanical business of penning a medical receipt, which he might copy from his memory or his vade mecum^ that we are here considering as the practical duty of a physician. It is the adapting of the means which he possesses to the peculiar case that is under his care 3 the modifying his prescription according to the circumstances of the pa¬ tient; the age, sex, temperament, peculiarity oi con¬ stitution, season, climate, and many other circumstan¬ ces ; the choice of remedies, and the necessary varia¬ tion of them 3 it is these which constitute the duty ol a practical physician, so far as relates to the business of prescription. } _ Before a physician can attempt to prescribe for his Prpv'oUl patient, it is requisite that he possess much previous (lul>llt;S■ information. jg In the first place, he must be well acquainted with the j^now!eii! nature and seat of the disease, the cure or alleviation ol 0 which he is about to attempt 3 with the symptoms which usually appear in similar cases, and the variations which are likely to take place, with the causes, so far as known, W7 # V19US isites :17 Wiria t ica. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. ?0 views are daily bec oming more fasbiomible, and are now Previous applied to almost every branch of science. It was with Requisites, the intention of assisting the youngpractitioner in writing v—V—-» prescriptions, that Dr Kirby, a few years ago, published TT .,.lS Ins tables of the Materia Medica, containing a concise Sir°f view of the most material circumstances respecting the view, various simple and compound medicines admitted into the catalogues of the London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Phaimacopoeias. In this volume the articles are ar¬ ranged under 18 classes ; the titles and order of which are much the same with those given in our article Ma¬ teria Medica j and of each article are given the systematic name, the synonymous pharmaceutical name the country in which it is produced, or from which it is brought ; the part employed in medicine; the form in which it is commonly administered, and the usual doses of the simple, and of the several officinal compounds. In the original draught of these tables, the circumstan¬ ces above mentioned were arranged in columns j but it was found, that the difficulty and consequent expence of printing the work in that form would be so great, as nearly to counterbalance the advantage which might be derived from it. We are, however, of opinion that the arrangement in columns is better adapted to strike the eye, and we shall here give a specimen of such an arrangement, taken from one of the shortest classes in the above work (a). —7 known, which predispose to the disease,or which remote¬ ly or immediately have a tendency to produce it j with the probable termination of such a case, and the gene¬ ral indications of cuie. I his knowledge presupposes an acquaintance with anatomy, physiology, and pathology, without a competent share of which a physician can^no more effect a cure of a disease, than an algebraist can accomplish the solution of an equation, while he is igno¬ rant of its terms. # The prescriber must also be familiar with the Mate¬ ria Medica and pharmacy, from which he learns the natural history, the chemical and medical properties of the various simple substances employed in medicine j their usual doses and their officinal compounds, as con¬ tained in the pharmacopoeia of the country in which he resides ^ as it is these articles that are to form the ingre¬ dients of which the medicines he prescribes are to he composed. As without considerable practical experi¬ ence few men are able to retain all the requisite in¬ formation respecting each article of the INIatena IVIedica, it would he of great advantage to the young prescriber to have by him a tabular sketch, which might, within a small compass, contain the information more immedi¬ ately necessary for writing a prescription. Nothing is found to assist the memory, or to facilitate the attainment of knowledge, more than these tabular views ; and so much is the learned world convinced of this, that such Table of EXPECTORANTS. r SIMPLES. I. VEGETABLES. tphaelis Ipecacuanha Ipecacuanha. Ed. Loml Dub. 6 JlCOTIANATABACUM.Ed Nicotiana. Lond. Dub. 5CILLA MARITIMA. Ed Scillu. Lond. Dub. Vllium Sativum. Ed Al/ium. Lond. Dub. •.MMONIACUM. Ed. Lond, Dub. sRUM Maculatum. Ed. Arum. Lond. OLCHICUM AutUMNALE. Colchicum. Lond. Country. E. Indies & Brazil. America. Part. South of Europe. Do. India. Britain. Britain. Root. Leaves. Root fresh or dried. Form. Powder. Dose. OFFICINAL PREPARATIONS. Smoke and extract. Fresh root. Gumresin Fresh root. Freshroot. Conserve, powder, pill, &c. Substance. gr.j. every 3 or 4 ' hours. Vinum Ipecacuanhce.Ed.Lond Dub. Grs. i to 2. Dr. i to 2 Pill, mix¬ ture. Grs. io to 20. a. Acetum Scillae Maritimae. Ed. Acetum Scillce. Lond. Dub. b. Syrupus Scillae Maritimae. Ed. c. Oxymel Scillae. Lond. Dub. d. Conserva Scillae. Lond. e. Tinctura Scillae. Lond. f. Pilulae Scilliticae. Ed. Pilulce Scillae. Lond. Dub. Syrupus Allii. Dub. Dose. Dr. i. or 2. D. 2 to 4. In comp 0- sition. Gts. 30 to 40. Lac Ammoniaci. Lond. Conserva Ari. Lond. a. Syrupus Colchici autumnalis. Ed. b. Oxymel Colchici. Lond. Dub. Gts. 10 to dr. I. Gr. 10 to 15 About a tabk- spoonful. Oz. 1 to 2. Cases. P eripneumo nia and asth ma. Consump¬ tion. Dr \ to 1. Dr 2 to 1 oz, Do. Peripneu¬ monia, asthma. !n-tlle firSt rlaT of abore tab,e have “‘"''h6" «o them. ToexpWn why these do are in t 0t'r at' “ ir.ser'es» 11 1S neC( ssary to mention, that the articles marked 5, 6, 8, if. and 12 ♦ m the tables of Materia Medica from which this specimen is altered, inserted in a former class, viz. emetics! 310 PRESCRIPTIONS, extemporaneous. Table continued. I. VEGETABLES. 17. Ferula Asafoetida.EcI Asafatida. Lond. Dub. x8. Hyssopus Officinalis. Hijssopus. Dub. 19. Marrubium Vulgare. L°nd. 20. Myrrha. Ed. Lond. Dub 21. FimpInella Anisum. Ed Anisum. Lond. Dub. 22. Folygala Senega. Ed. Seneka. Lond. Dub. 23. Styrax Benzoin. Ed Benzoinum. Dub. Ben- Myrrhae dr. j. Solve terendo in mortario cum Aquae Alexeteriae simp. unc. vi. ss. • cujuslibet Spirituosae dr. vi. vel unc. j. Dein adde Salis Absynthii, dr. ss. Martis, gr. xii. Syrupi simplicis, dr. ij. m *. 26 Griffith’s myrrh mix¬ ture. * Griffith From the gravity with which the author speaks oiFelllf* this composition, and the various proportions he allows of the salt of wormwood and the salt of steel, together with the different methods of mixing the ingredients, it is pietty clear that he had no idea that any of them were superfluous or unnecessary, nor probably was he aware that the two salts act on each other, and undergo a mu¬ tual decomposition. It seems therefore to be quite an empirical prescription. Analysing it according to our present chemical knowledge, we know that the prin¬ cipal part of it consists of an emulsion of myrrh, contain¬ ing in suspension a quantity of carbonate of iron, and having dissolved in it a small quantity of sulphate of potash, and perhaps a little subcarbonate of potash. Now, as there is no reason to believe that the two last are of any consequence in the medicine, it would surely be much more scientific to form a medicine of myrrh and carbonate of iron, with the addition of such cordials and syrups as may add to its tonic power, and render it palatable. A medicine of this kind is the following. Ijo Pulv. Myrrh, dr. i. Carbonat. Ferri prtecip. dr. Syrup. Citri Aurant. unc. -J. Simul terc, et adde Aquae Menth. piper, unc. 6. Tinctur. Cinchon. compos, unc. i. M f. \ Kiiby's In Dr Strother’s 19th lecture there is noticed a me-mal. xotf. V dicine which was then considered as a valuable nostrum 27 in the cure of smallpox. The principal ingredients are, spirit of salt {muriatic acid), and salt ol hartshorn {im- pure carbonate of ammonia). A tyro in modern che¬ mistry need not be told that this medicine contains mu¬ riate of ammonia, produced by the combination of the acid with the alkali. If, therefore, such a medicine is useful in smallpox, it would surely be much less labo¬ rious, and much more scientific, to employ the muriate of ammonia, commox\\y cviWtA. sal ammoniac, which we have prepared to our hands. As the secondary salts form a class of bodies which constitutes a considerable part of the materia medica, it is proper for the physician to be intimately acquainted with their nature and chemical properties. Here he will again find the advantage of systematic tables, con¬ taining 38 PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. . . , „4.:n(r tV.p com- view, only divided, for the sake of convenience, into prev;ff Previous taining the principal circumstances respe ^ ^ are two tabieS) the first containing the composition of the Ucqu,» Requisites position and decomposition of such of , printed salts, and the second the substances employed in medi- r «»,;by which they may he decompose... TABLE I. Salt. 1 SuPERSULPATE of ALUMINA and POTASH. 2. Sulphate of Magnesia. 3. Sulphate of Potash. 4. Sulphate of Soda. 5. Sulphate of Copper. 6. Green Sulphate of Iron. ‘7. Sulphate of Zinc. 8. Subsulphate of Mercury. 9. Nitrate of Potash. 10. Nitrate of Silver. 11. Muriate of Barytes. 12. Muriate of Lime. 13. Muriate of Soda. 14. Muriate of Ammonia. 15. Mild Muriate of Mercury, or Calomel. 16. Corrosive Muriate of Mercury. 17. Muriate of Antimony. 18. Phosphate of Lime. 19. Phosphate of Soda. 20. Carbonate of Barytes. 21. Carbonate of Lime. Solubility. At 6o° 20. 2120, 1. 6o°, 1. •75 Composition. Base. Cryst. 1 2. h>ry 63, 75' 17- Acid. 17.66 36-25 Water. 6o°, 16 212° 4-5 6o°, 2.6 212° .8 Efflorescent. Cryst. 18.48 Dry 44. 6o°, 4- 21 2°, 2. 6o°, 2. 212°, .75 29-35 54'8 32- 28. 6o°, 2.5 6o°, 2000 6o°, 7. 212°, 1. 6o°, 1. 6o°, 5. Cryst. 57 Deliquescent. 6o°, 5 6o°, 2 8 6o°, 3. 212°, I. Insoluble. 6o°, 20. 212°, 2. Deliquescent Insoluble. 6o°, 4- 212°, 2. 20. 87. 51.8 45-2 23-52 56- 33- 26. 40. 10. 44- Red hot, 5°- Dried 53. Sublimed. 25- 88.5 82. 49. Insoluble. Insoluble. 19. 32- 42. 38.88 42-75 ”•5 18. 51, 15- 22. 55- 78. 45- 70.24 o. 53-65 o. 58. o. 35- 46. 40. 4.2 11. 8. 8.12 32.25 o. 66. PR ESC Pil PTIONS, EXTE M PORANEOU S. ■cvious uisitcs. Ex na- tioi Salt. 22. Carbonate of Magnesia. 23. Carbonate of Potash. 24. Subcarbonate of Potash. 25. Carbonate of Soda. SOLUBIL TY. Composition. Base. Insoluble. 6d°, 4. 21 2°, 1.5 Ileliquescent. Efflorescent. 26. Carbonate of Ammonia. 27. Carbonate of Iron. 28. Carbonate of Zinc. 29. Acetate of Potash. 30. Acetate of Lead. Ph. Ed. 31. Subborate of Soda. 6o°, 2. Insoluble. Insoluble. Deliquescent. 45- 40. Dry 64. Cryot. 21.58 Dried 59.85. Acid. 34- 43- Water. O T -* Pievious Rcquisili's. 21. 30- 6o°, 4. 6o°, 18. 212°, 6. 32. Supertartrate of Potash. 33. Tartrate of Potash. 34. Tartrate of Potash and Soda. 35. Tartrate of Antimony and Potash, or Emetic Tartar. 6o°, 60. 212°, 13. 6o°, 4. Deliquescent. 58. I7- 14.42 40-°5 26. 39- 33- 67. 6o°, 5. Efflorescent. 6o°, 15. 212°, 3. Tart. Pot. 34- Ox. of Ant. o 38. Potash 16. In this first part of the table of secondary salts thei-e are five columns, in the first of which are set down the names of most of the secondary salts employed in medi¬ cine, according to the most approved chemical nomen¬ clature. The second column shews the degree of attrac¬ tion which subsists between each salt and water, name¬ ly, how many parts of water at the temperatures of 6o° and 2120 of Fahrenheit are required to dissolve one part of the salt, in the state in which it is usually employed, TAB Tart, of Soda. 46. 34- 17- 6. 64. o. 16. 44- o. o. 12. and whether the salt be deliquescent or efflorescent. The three remaining columns point out, as far as has been ascertained, the proportional quantities of the com¬ ponent parts of each salt, the third column shewing how many parts in the 100 consist of base; the fourth how many of acid, and the fifth how many of water of com¬ position. In some cases two proportions are Riven, and it is expressed in the third column under what state of the salt these proportions exist. LE II. Decomposition by Single Affinity. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Magnesia. Ammonia. Tannin. Gallic Acid. Oxalic Acid. Tartaric Acid. ~Vol. AMI. Part I. Salt. | Decomposition by Double Affinity. < % O K-l . K ^ in <—c 0 H W O X Q-t X D n Pi W Pa P CZ3 Nitrate of Potash. Silver. Muriate of Barytes. Lime. Soda. ■ 11 Ammonia. Carbonate of Barytes. Lime. — Magnesia. Potash. Soda. Ammonia. Acetate of Lead. Subborate of Soda. Kr PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. 3i + Previous Requisites. Decomposition by Single Affinity. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Ammonia. Barytes. Barytes. Potash. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Magnesia. Ammonia. Tartaric Acid. Muriatic Acid. Zinc. Iron. Tin. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Magnesia. Ammonia. Same as the last. k3ALT. w X cu X t) 02 < H O 9-i w H X o. s tl 02 o o 02 w H O X p. X D 02 Decomposition by Double Affinity. Nitrate of Silver. Muriate of Barytes. Lime. Corrosive Muriate of Mercury. Red Muriate of Iron. Carbonate of Lime. . Potash. Soda. . ■ — Ammonia. Acetate of Mercury. Lead. Subborate of Soda. Tartrate of Potash. Previotv Requisite Nitrate of Silver. Muriate of Barytes. Lime. Soda. Ammonia. Corrosive Muriate of Mercury. Phosphate of Soda. Carbonate of Barytes. Acetate of Mercury. Lead. Tartrate of Potash, partially. o w H X pH D 02 1 ^ X 0 02 X ~0 w w * < O x w H u ■< X p. N X X 02 Nitrate of Potash. — Silver. Muriate of Barytes. Lime. Corrosive Muriate of Mercury. Acetate of Mercury. — Lead. Tartrate of Potash. Subsulphate of Mercury. Nitrate of Potash. Silver. Muriate of Barytes. Lime. Soda. Ammonia. Corrosive Muriate of Mercury. Phosphate of Soda. Carbonate of Potash. Soda. Acetate of Mercury. Lead. Subborate of Soda. Nitrate of Silver. Muriate of Barytes. Lime. Corrosive Muriate of Mercury. Acetate of Mercury. - Lead. Subborate of Soda. Nitrate of Silver. Muriate of Barytes. Acetate of Lead. ’revious quisites. PRESCEIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. Decomposition by Single Affinity. Barytes. Sulphuric Acid. Heat. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Magnesia. Ammonia. Zinc. Muriatic Acid. Tin. Phosphoric Acid. Copper. Mercury. Sulphuric Acid. Barytes. Potash. Magnesia. Sulphuric Acid. Nitric Acid. Boracic Acid. Phosphoric Acid. Barytes. Potash. Sulphuric Acid. Nitric Acid. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Sulphuric Acid. Nitric Acid. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Magnesia. Ammonia. Copper. Salt. W E H % gs w w H H a05 w . H W < § E J o W . H ■< « CO w H < i-i M erf W W I^i > e*-i O w H Decomposition by Double Affinity. Supersulphate of Alumina and Potash. Sulphate of Magnesia. Soda. Muriate of Barytes. Lime. All the Sulphates employed in Medicine. Muriate of Barytes. Lime. Soda. Ammonia. Corrosive Muriate of Mercury. Red Muriate of Iron. Antimony^. Phosphate of Soda. All the Carbonates employed in Medicine. Subborate of Soda. All Sulphates more or less. Nitrate of Sil ver. Phosphate of Soda. Carbonate of Potash. * Soda. Ammonia. Subborate of Soda. All Sulphates. Nitrate of Silver. Phosphate of Soda. Carbonate of Ammonia. 315 Previous Requisites. Supersulphate of Alumina and Potash. Sulphate of Potash. Copper. Nitrate of Silver. Acetate of Mercury. ■"i Lead. Supersulphate of Alumina and Potash. Sulphate of Potash. - Copper. Nitrate of Silver. Carbonate of Barytes. Potash. Soda. Acetate of Potash. Subborate of Soda. Tartrate of Potash. Most Sulphates. Carbonate of Barytes. Lime. —— Magnesia. ———— Potash. Soda. Ammonia. R r 2 3 i u Previous Re quit lie s. prescriptions, extemporaneous. Decomposition by Single Affinity. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Phosphoric Acid. Nitric Acid. Muriatic Acid. Sulphuric Acid. Barytes. Oxalic Acid. Sulphuric Acid. Tartaric Acid. Phosphoric Acid. Nitric Acid. Muriatic Acid. Citric Acid. Boracic Acid. Acetic Acid. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Oxalic Acid. Sulphuric Acid. Nitric Acid. Muriatic Acid. Tartaric Acid. Citric Acid. Boracic Acid. Acetic Acid. Barytes. Lime. Oxalic Acid. Sulphuric Acid. Nitric Acid. Muriatic Acid. Tartaric Acid. Citric Acid. Boracic Acid. Acetic Acid. Barytes. Potash. Lime. Oxalic Acid. Sulphuric Acid. Nitric Acid, &c. as before. Barytes. Potash. Soda. Lime. Oxalic Acid. Sulphuric Acid, &c. as above. Salt. w % * X O £ o O S3 Ph W c/i H W P3 CQ Gallic, Sulphuric, Nitric, and Muriatic Acids. Salt. H ft ^ < < P H O H OC« pi Ph -C! ^-1 O rt tH ^ £ ^ 2 h ^ o H ^ "T3 W H <1 A £ ^ 1 Decomposition by Double Affinity. Carbonate of Soda. Ammonia. Previi. ReqHisa Explana- This second part of the table of secondary salts con- tioa- gists of three columns. In the middle column are set down the names of the secondary salts employed in me¬ dicine, in the same order as in the former table } and in the adjoining columns on each side are noted those sub- stances employed in medicine which are capable of ef- fecting a decomposition of each salt} those in the left- hand column being such as decompose the salt by what is called single affinity, in consequence of that substance having a superior attraction for the acid or the base of the salt; while the substances in the right-hand column are secondary salts, between which and the opposite salt in the middle column such an action may take place as -t to effect their mutual decomposition. Uses of the With tables of this kind before him, a prescriber will tables. avoid several mistakes into which he might be betrayed from a deficiency of chemical knowledge. 'I hus, knowing the solubility of any salt, he will not prescribe a greater quantity oHt than is capable of being retain¬ ed in solution in the watery part of any draught or mix¬ ture which he is to order. lor instance, knowing tha~ sulphate of potash requires sixteen parts of water at 6o° for its solution, he will, if he proposed to prescribe a draught containing two drams of this salt, be aware that such a quantity would require at least four ounces of waterbut this making the draught too large is a great objection to giving the medicine in that form. Or suppose that he wished to give half an ounce of super- tartrate of potash {crystals of tartar), by way of laxa¬ tive j he sees, that to dissolve this quantity it would re¬ quire at least two pounds of water, and therefore that he cannot order it in the form of solution, though, when mixed up with syrup into an electuary, it affords a good and efficacious cooling laxative. Again, knowing that sulphate of soda effloresces in the air, and thereby loses nearly half its weight, he will take care always to pre¬ scribe it in the form of crystals j and if he is to order a laxative draught containing one ounce of this salt, he must prescribe at least three ounces of liquid. The information conveyed in the second column re¬ specting the deliquescence or efflorescence of certain salts, or the readiness with which they imbibe water from the atmosphere, or part with their water of crystal¬ lization, is extremely useful in pointing out the proper forms of exhibition. Seeing, for instance, that acetate of potash {diuretic salt) is a deliquescent salt, no one would think of prescribing it in the form of pills } while, on the other hand, carbonate of soda being efflorescent, is well adapted to that form, and accordingly has been 3 so prescribed by Dr Beddoes j (see Kirby's Tables,for¬ mula 153.). Knowing the proportional quantities of the component part of any salt, we can, by calculation, ascertain pretty nearly how much of the one is required to decompose the other, and thus employ no more of either than is necessary. T. hus, suppose it were required to decom¬ pose 100 grains of green sulphate of iron by carbonate of soda, in order to procure the greatest possible quantity of carbonate of iron. We find by the first table, that 100 grains of the sulphate contain 28 grains of oxide of iron, and to saturate this, we find by computation, that there are required 9 grains of carbonic acid. Now, on examining the composition of carbonate of soda, we find that 100 grains of this salt contain about 14^ grains of carbonic acid, and consequently, that about 60 grains of carbonate of soda are sufficient to decompose 100 grains of green sulphate of iron. Further, knowing the substances that are capable of decomposing any particular salt, a prescriber will not order any of these substances in the same formula with that salt, unless some manifest advantage were to be the result of their mutual action. He knows that sulphate of-zinc and acetate of lead decompose each other, and that the acetate of %inc formed by their mixture, is a better remedy in cases of ophthalmia than either of the former salts. Here then is an advantage. Tartrate of antimony and potash is a good remedy in fever, so is decoction oj Peruvian bark; but we find by the tables, that this salt is decomposable by gallic acid, and we know that decoction of cinchona contains this acid, es¬ pecially after having stood for some time. It would therefore be improper to prescribe these remedies in con¬ junction, as has sometimes been recommended, because the salt would be so much altered by the decomposition as to be no longer the medicine we propose to admini¬ ster. A similar instance of unscientific prescription, aris¬ ing from a want of chemical knowledge, occurs in a formula attributed to Mr Coleman, and published in the fifth edition of the Phormacopcda Chirurgica, p. 58. under the title of Collyrium hydiargyri muriati cum cake. It is composed of a scruple of muriate of mer¬ cury dissolved in an English pint of boiling distilled water, with the addition of two drams of quicklime, and after the whole is completely mixed, we are direct¬ ed to filter the clear liquor through paper. The author of this Pharmacopoeia seems aware that “ the different elective attractions operating in the mixture of the lime with the solution of muriate of mercury, are such as produce PRESCRIPTIONS, E “views B lisites D' r"5 pc cr. Bur «P#c Eire ii re. idB speet coa ni- s*stc. ir I a produce a new chemical arrangement, in which the acti vity of the ingredients is mutually diminished. The fact is, that the large quantity of lime here directed will completely decompose the muriate of mercury, so that the clear liquor will contain nothing but uncombined lime, and muriate of lime. Hence the muriate of mer¬ cury is an unnecessary ingredient, and if the medicine be efficacious as a collyrium, it would be better to form it at once by the addition of a small quantity of muriate of lime to lime-water. A physician who is familiar with the principles of chemistry will not direct a chemical medicine to be pre¬ pared of more ingredients, or in a more operose manner than is requisite to produce the desired effect. When Dr Dover first gave to the public the composition of liis sudorific powder, he ordered it to be prepared in the following manner. Four ounces of nitre, and the same quantity of vitriolated tartar (sulphate of potash), are to be thrown into a red-hot crucible, and kept stirring till the deflagration ceases. To the mixture, while hot, is to be added an ounce of sliced opium. The whole is then to be reduced to powder and well mixed with an ounce of powdered ipecacuanha, and the same quantity of powdered liquorice root. It is well known to the chemists of the present day, that nitrate of potash, when thrown on an ignited combustible body, deflagrates, and is decomposed ; but that it does so when thrown into an ignited crucible, with an incombustible body, such as the sulphate of potash, we can scarcely conceive. If it does, the effect must be, that the nitric acid is car¬ ried off, and there remains the potash, which is an un¬ necessary ingredient in the composition. Again, the only use of heating the salt, would be to dry the opium and thus render it more easily pulverised j but as dried opium is always kept in the shops, and by means of sul¬ phate of potash, is very easily reduced to powder, that part of the operation is superfluous. Accordingly, a powder equally efficacious, and much less operose, is prepared by rubbing X.ogzdcwx sulphate of potash, opium, and ipecacuanha, forming the presentpulvis ipecacuanha: et opu, Ed. or pulvis ipecacuanha compositus, Lond. From the same want of chemical knowledge, some medicines have been extolled as efficacious remedies from not knowing their real nature. Thus burnt sponge has long been celebrated for the cure of scrofula. We do not altogether deny its efficacy in this complaint; but as burnt sponge is composed almost entirely of char¬ coal, with the addition of a little carbonate of soda, a powder composed of these ingredients must be equally efficacious. Under this head we may notice an error which is fre- -quently made by prescribers who have not been ac¬ customed to see and prepare the remedies which they prescribe. We have often seen a mass for pills ordered to be prepared of such ingredients as are naturally too hard to form into pills, as for instance, extract of cin¬ chona, and extract of liquorice, and yet there has been directed a quantity of liquorice powder, to form the mass of a proper consistence. Sometimes again, the matters directed are already too soft, or become too soft by mixture, as when aloes and extract of gentian are directed to be beaten together with a proper quan¬ tity of syrup, to form a mass for pills. See the Edin. Phar. edit. 1783. We shall conclude this part of our subject with re- 3* XTEMPOK ANEOUS. 3 T g marking, that it is of consequence in a chemical point Previous o yitu, to piescnbe as the constituent of a liquid me- Requisite*, dicine, suen water as will not decompose any of the v" •' other ingredients. It is common to order the water by the name of aqua pura, or aqua fontana. Now, if this water be hard, i. e. impregnated with sulphate of lime, &c. it will decompose many of the secondary salts, and thus diminish their efficacy. Acetate of lead, for in¬ stance, is always decomposed by hard water, and a tur¬ bid liquor is thus formed, which by standing deposits a sediment. It would therefore be better in all cases to prescribe distilled water, or where this is not likely to be found, as in small country towns, soft water. III. We have thus considered at some length the previous knowledge required by a practitioner before he can pretend to prescribe for his patient in a scientific manner. We shall now endeavour to apply the obser¬ vations that have been made, and from the application deduce some general rules for extemporaneous prescrip- VV hen a practitioner is called to a patient, he will Practical first examine into the symptoms and causes of the ma- hints, lady under which the patient labours, and attend to the age, sex, and peculiar habit of the patient. He will then consider whether or not a cure is probable, or whether it may be in his power only to relieve the di¬ stressing symptoms. If a cure appears to be practicable, he will proceed to form his indications, and in conformi¬ ty with these he will prescribe the remedies that seem best adapted to the case. It is this method of procedure that distinguishes the scientific practitioner from the ignoiant empiric. Ihe latter, from a superficial view of the most obvious symptoms, hastily determines the nature of the complaint, which he probably contrives shall be some one of which he has witnessed many cases, or for the cure of which he is in possession of some fa¬ vourite remedy. Having resolved what the disease shall be, he has nothing to do but apply his remedy, and this he does without considering whether existing cir¬ cumstances may not render the administration of it im¬ proper. Io return from this digression, we shall endeavour to give an example as simple as will answer our purpose, to illustrate the above method of procedure. We shall suppose that a practitioner is sent for to a middle-aged man, in moderate circumstances, who has been for some days labouring under a tertian intermittent fever, with which he had never before been affected, but had com¬ monly been strong and healthy. The practitioner sees nothing in the circumstances of the case which can lead to an unfavourable prognosis, and he therefore has little hesitation in pronouncing, that the fever will probably soon be removed. Considering the indications usually laid down in practical writers on intermittents, he pro¬ ceeds to prescribe the remedies which appear best suited to the case in point. Ihus the indications given by Dr Cullen are, 1. In the time of intermission to prevent the recur¬ rence of paroxysms. 2. In the time of paroxysms to conduct these so as to obtain a final solution of the disease. 3. lo take off certain circumstances which might prevent the fulfilling of the two first indications*. * Culleri* In considering the first indication, the practitioner First hints, reflects on the effect of the usual exciting cause of anin-§ termittent, 20 Jlules for Prcscrip- ti«ns. PHESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPOR ANEOUS. . , . . !• i !, to lip a debi- in the prescription, this being considered as the guide by plU|es tenaittent,...W, .chhc^.o^ is (o ^llisoperationS. SuP- ram« i,y to,°ic‘ ,'Ujof those he b»rk of the Mom, pose tve tvere to prescribe a medicine contain,ng castor Urn by tonics, ana intermit- oil, distilled water, mucilage of gum arable, syrup of officinalis is justly celeb ate d " ^ ,jut r£ubarl, ami tincture of senna. In the preparation of tents. 1 his then ic J'ou X 1 ’ this medicine the apothecary will first rub together the after oil and he ,ill then add the and per 38 Example ot prescrip¬ tion. a paroxi/sm. We shall suppose, however, that the last paroxysm took place the day before he saw the patient, and consequently may be expected to return the next day. He finds also lliat the patient is costive, a circum¬ stance which must be removed according to. the third indication. Now, attending to the second indication, he knows that this is generally best fulfilled by the ex¬ hibition of an emetic at the commencement of the cold fit, and of an opiate at the commencement of the hot fit’-, but the costiveness of the patient contraindicating the use of opium, he must endeavour to find tor it a substitute which has not a tendency to excite or increase constipation. He will perhaps prescribe as follows: 39 Arrange¬ ment of formulae. 40 Arrange¬ ment of in ;gredients. Ijb. Vini ipecacuanha;, unc. 1. ^ , Tartritis antimonii (Edin.) unc. -§-• ha^ haustus. Signetur. T//e emetic to be taken just as the next cold ft is coming on. 13c. Pul veris Rhei Palmati, gr. 2$. Submuriatis Hydrargyri, gr. 3. Succi Spissati Hyoscyami, gr. 4. Syrupi q. s. Fiat bolus. Signetur. To be taken just as the next hot ft is coming on. Pul veris Cinchona; officinalis, scr. 2. Croti Elutheriae, gr. 10. M. f. pulvis. Signetur. One to be taken in a little wine and wa¬ ter as soon as the hot fit is gone off, and repeated every two hours till the expected return of the next cold fit. The analysis of this prescription will afford us some useful practical observations. 1. It will be observed that the formula are arranged in the order in which the medicines are to be exhibited, a circumstance to which it is always proper to attend, when the prescription is to contain more than one for¬ mula or circumstance to be directed by the practition¬ er. Thus when any thing is required immediately, as bleeding, the application of leeches, or of a blister, this should form the first clause in the prescription, in the following manner. Mittatur sanguis e brachio statim ad unc. 12.) or, Appliccntur quamprimum temporibus Jtirudines sex; or, Applicetur statim emplastrum vesicatorium capite raso. 2. The ingredients directed in each formula should be arranged in the order in which they are to be mixed by the compounder. This may be thought a matter of slight importance, but it is more deserving of notice than is generally supposed, l or the most part, indeed, in whatever order the practitioner may arrange the in¬ gredients in his formula, a skilful apothecary will com¬ bine them in that order which experience has shewn him to be the most convenient ; but it is surely much dealer that the order of preparation should be preserved haps the tincture, and lastly the water. In this order then it would he best to express the formula. See Kirby’s Tables, formula 54. In this manner the neat¬ ness of the medicine is insured, and the preparation of it rendered more easy and expeditious. It is very usual for pivseribers to begin with the article that is to be most abundant in the medicine, as the water, and so gradually descend to that of least quantity; and parti¬ cular care is generally taken to place in succession those ingredients that are employed in equal quantities, with the sign {fid singulorum, of each) after the last. This seems rather a puerile method, and is commonly incon¬ sistent with the practice of composition. There are other reasons for arranging the ingredients in the order of composition. In some cases a very vola¬ tile substance forms a part of the medicine, as aether, or ammonia j and it is proper that this should be the last ingredient in the composition of the medicine, that as little as possible of it may be dissipated. It is proper, therefore, that it should stand last in the formula (see Kirby’s Tables, formulae 126,129, and 130.). There is a formula given in the Pharmacopoeia Chirurgica for an embrocation, to be composed of 2 drams of tincture of camphor {camphorated spirit}, 1 dr. water of aceta- ted litharge {Goulard'1 s extract) and a pound of distilled 'water. We are told that the mixture of these ingre¬ dients is to take place in the order in which they are set down, otherwise the camphor will be separated *. * Ptaj We have already mentioned (N° 3) the names ofc^ the several parts of which a compound medicine may be J formed, as the basis, the adjuvant, the corrector, and constituent; and have explained the reasons for the ad¬ dition of the three latter. There are some rules re¬ specting these, which it will he proper to consider in this place. , _ 41 3. The basis should always be single, unless some qulcs manifest advantage is expected to arise from the em-tict bat ployment of two or more remedies of the same kind. The reason of this rule is sufficiently obvious, as the ef¬ fect of a single remedy is much more easily determined and proportioned than that of two or more employed to¬ gether. The advantages of simplicity in prescription will be considered presently. 4. If more than one basis be employed, they should be of the same nature, or such as produce the same ef¬ fects. This needs no illustration. 4; 5. With respect to the adjuvant, we shall remark on-for the ly that one use generally assigned to it, viz. that of fa-juvanl cilitating the solution of the basis in the stomach, ap¬ pears equivocal. It is not uncommon to order resinous drugs to he made up into pills with soap, which is con¬ sidered by many as acting in the way of promoting so¬ lution. Soap is often a good constituent, but we do not think it can produce the effect above alluded to. 4; 6. The use of the corrector requires a little more dis-fortht cussion. One of the first intentions of the corrector isrector to diminish the too violent action of the principal reme¬ dy, or l@ prevent its exerting an action in an improper part of the body. Thus, mucilage may he added to colocynth, PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. colocynth, {bitter apple), or given after it, to blunt or lessen the acrimony which this substance is commonly 321 found to possess. So again, mercury is often combined with opium, when it is required to introduce a consider¬ able quantity of the former into the system, or to speak more properly, to acquire the full benefit of its accu¬ mulated stimulus. This can scarcely be effected if it be allowed to run oft' by the bowels. Camphor is’often given after the application of a blister, to obviate the strangury which frequently attends the external appli¬ cation of cantharides. In some cases the cinchona bark produces sickness or purging, and here the addition of a few drops of tincture of opium to each dose is pro¬ per. 7. Another use of the corrector is to obviate or dis¬ guise the unpleasant taste or odour of the principal re¬ medy. ft bus, the emetic in our prescription is ordered to be prepared of the wine of ipecacuanha instead of the powder, as the wine that forms the solvent of that re¬ medy disguises its unpleasant taste, ftftie articles usually employed as correctors of flavour, are syrups and tinc¬ tures of various kinds, essential aromatic oils, &c. and the use of these has been often much abused. 'The ad¬ dition of a large quantity of sugar, in some cases, espe¬ cially in dyspepsia or indigestion, seldom fails of increas¬ ing the symptoms of the disease, as in a debilitated state of the stomach it quickly passes into a state of fermen¬ tation, and produces flatulence, pain, and anorexia or loss of appetite, the very symptoms which we are to re¬ move. It is a common practice to add syrup to several of the neutral salts, as sulphate of soda, sulphate of iron, &c. with a view to improve their flavour ; but we ap¬ prehend tnat whoever has tasted the nauseous mixture will scarcely agree with the prescriber that he has Gain¬ ed his point. 8. I he abuse of alcohol in the form of tinctures has been sometimes carried to a great, and, we think, a cul¬ pable excess. 1 his has arisen sometimes from the de¬ sire of ilie patient to have his medicines made strong and good, and not unfrequently, perhaps, fiom mercenary views in the practitioner, to induce the patient to swal¬ low a greater quantity of medicine, because it is ren¬ dered agreeable to his palate. We have no doubt that many well-meaning practitioners order a considerable dose of tincture from a mistaken complaisance to their patients, without apprehending any ill consequences from it ; but in fact, the intemperate use of these tinc¬ tures is injurious to the stomach, and has, we believe, not unfrequently drawn some of the most sober persons into a habit of dram-drinking, ft’he propensity to the use of cordials, which is now become so prevalent, has probably arisen from this source. The quantity of al¬ cohol ordered by some prescribers is truly astonishing. A book lately came into our hands, which is called a translation of elegant medical prescriptions for various disorders by the late Dr Hugh Smith. For the accu- jacy of the translation we cannot vouch, not having seen the original ; but if it be accurate, the spirituous cinna¬ mon water {spirit of cinnamon), seems to have been a very favourite article in Dr Smith’s catalogue of medi¬ cines, as it is no unusual thing to see an ounce, or if ounce of it ordered in a single draught, or four ounces in an eight-ounce mixture. Did not this occur so fre¬ quently in the prescriptions of Dr Smith, we should sup¬ pose it to be some blunder of the translator or transcriber. VOL. XVII. Part I. 1 tions. 45 45 in mistaking the character denoting dram for the sym- Ruies fo bofical character signifying ounce. Urescrip . ?• A third use of the corrector is to render the me¬ dicine more agreeable to the stomach, ft’hus, sulphate of soda is to many persons very nauseous, and is not un¬ frequently rejeeted by vomiting ; but the addition of a small quantity of lemon juice, or of supertartrate of pot- ash, is found to correct this unpleasant quality. 'The bark of cinchona does not agree with some stomachs, without the addition of an aromatic j the cascarilla or¬ dered in the above powders, affords a useful addition, with the view of rendering it more agreeable to the' stomach. ft’he unpleasant odour of a medicine is more difficult to correct than its flavour. In internal medicines this is usually best effected by regulating the form in which they are exhibited j as, in prescribing the sulphurate of potash, it is better to order it in the form of a powder to be sweetened with sugar, to be swallowed dry fsee JVirby’s Tables, formula 68), than by way of draught or mixture. The odour of external medicines is best cor¬ rected by the essential oils and perfumes. Thus, in using sulphur for cutaneous diseases, it is usual to add a quantity of essence of bergamot or oil of lavender, which, though they do not entirely destroy the odour of the sulphur, have a considerable effect in disguising 10. In ordering a corrector, the practitioner should QuanUr be aware that it is not the quantity of the basis, but itsof a remedy quality that he is to correct. If a dose of digitalis orto 1,6 regw- of squill makes the patient sick, we should not think oflaletL giving opium or effervescing draughts to prevent this effect, but we should lessen the quantity of the medicine at its next exhibition. We have been rather minute on the subject of the corrector, as we conceive that much will depend on the adroit management of this part of a formula, in showing the neatness and address of the prescriber. By a proper use of correctors he can often regulate the action of a medicine, and considerably re¬ lieve the feelings of his patient. 4g 11. 1 he constituent employed in a formula will of^ernarl{|i; course vary with the form of the medicine. In the0,1 the con* 1 ■ - - stituent. more solid compositions, as boluses, pills, and electua-' ries, it is generally syrup, conserve, confection or ex¬ tract. In liquid medicines, it is either simple water, or some watery liquid, as decoctions, infusions, or water distilled from some aromatic plant. It is proper to re¬ mark, that tne prescriber should consider whether a constituent ordered as such, be necessary, for it often happens, that the extracts or pilular masses kept in the shops, are already of a proper consistence for making in¬ to pills. It is obvious that the constituent, if it be not simple water, should have similar qualities with the other parts of the medicine, unless when it contains in it the corrector. 12. In the prescription which we have given as an^ani^^ r- example, the names of the articles are written at length, ingredients \> e do not, however, approve of this being generallyneed not be done in practice. To an apothecary’s apprentice it can written at answer no other end than to exercise his latinitv, and'6*1^1’ display the erudition of the prescriber. In fact, it may even tend to mislead him •, for as the names of the ar¬ ticles kept in his master’s shop, are always painted on the labels, or drawers, in an abbreviated form, the words at full length are not better understood by the S 3 compounder, 322 Rules for compounder, and indeed they are often more intel'1S1^® Prescrip- in the concise form in which he is accustomed to see tions. tiiem. Add to this, that the writing ot the Woitls at full length may occasionally betray the practitioner in¬ to an unguarded mistake, which may call in q^stio his grammatical accuracy. In Fox’s Formula Selectee, calomelas perpetually occurs as the gemt^e instea of calomelanos; and in a work on midwifery, Pub ^ “ ed bv Dr Pugh of Chelmsford, grammatical errors both in the names and in the directions are to be detected passim. The only advantage that writing at length seems to possess, is that it teaches a beginner o read a prescription, which by the way is often at first no easy ro matter. But practice soon renders this familiar. Symbolical ‘13. The quantities of the ingredients in the ab^e characters prescription are not expressed in the usua ^ , m.'f f- ,ve have employed the contracted forms of the words ™ded- rd thce S:: PHESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. which we may proportion the doses of the same substance . J In rpcrnlatmiT Inf* Ku1es fo Prescripi Irons. uncia ana aracnmui ts- \ ^ rr ui.se as recommended in the preface to l)r Kirby s laW«. The directions also are tvntten m English. 1 he rea- sons assigned in the work above referred to, are as fol¬ low. “ The characters' 3 and 3 are so similar, that they may easily be written for each other, and that they have sometimes been so written cannot be denied. J he con¬ sequence is obvious 5 a stroke of the pen too much may kill the patient, and a stroke too little may produce a medicine of little or no efficacy. Strange . that p hy¬ sicians should have been so misled by an affectation i mystery or concealment, (for to what else ean be attri¬ buted the use of these hieroglyphics) ? as to place the safety of their patients at the mercy of a laPsus Penn*' f7»c. and dr. can never be written for each other and we see no good reason why these abbreviations should not be employed for uncia and drachma, as well as and git. for granum and gutta. Dr Spens, in his de¬ cant edition of the Pharmacopona Nosoconnt Ldinbu?- gensis, has employed these contracted words, but has re¬ tained the Roman numerals. , , . , “ The use of the Arabian figures appears calculated to insure both perspicuity and dispatch. They are more easily written, occupy less room in a prescription, and (by their familiarity) remove all possibility of mis¬ ts As to the directions, they should always be writ¬ ten in the vernacular language. In a prescription, per¬ spicuity is always our first object j it is not icie ia avc are called upon to display our learning and classical elegance; and whoever considers that these are proper¬ ties not always to be met with in the shop of an apothe¬ cary or a druggist, will readily wave them, in order to insure the perfect understanding of Ins prescriptions. It does not indeed require any great knowledge of Batin to translate the directions which usually occur in pre¬ scriptions ; hut as there are cases in which a long and rather complex direction is employed, we should leave nothing to the contingency of the learning or ignorance of the compounder, but by writing the directions our¬ selves in the received language ot the country, put it out of his power to injure our reputation, or endanger ci the safety of the patient.’ _ Rules for The doses of medicines must, in a great measure, be the doses of determined by experience j but after having thus ascer- medicines. the medlum dose proper for an adult under ordi¬ nary circumstances, and of an ordinary constitution, there are certain general considerations, according to 2 to various constitutions and ages. In regulating the doses of medicine, we are to attend chiefly to the fol¬ lowing considerations. , , a. The circumstances of the disease and the vital powers of the patient. _ b. The powers, mode of exhibition, and particular intention of the medicine employed. c. The age, sex, constitution, and habits ot the pa- tiei 4 The circumstances of the disease to be attended to Doses are its nature, seat, period, and degree of violence.^ There are several diseases that require Herculean reme- the - stimulates the rectum and neighbouring parts, and acts ' m particular cases as an emmenagogue. We need scarcely remark, that when two or more articles of a similar nature are prescribed in the same formula, the dose of each must be proportionally lessen- 16. We must regulate our doses according to the age, Age^&c. sex, constitution, and habits of the patient. of the pa- It is evident that various ages must require various lienU proportions ; but experience shews that the required doses are not directly proportional to the ages, as might a priori be expected, and as the mathematical physicians in the. beginning of the 18th century believed (b). -fc.xperience has enabled us to construct a table, in which may be shewn the doses proportioned to various ages, adjusted from a certain medium dose for an adult: such a table is the following. Age. Weeks, Months, 7 28 Years, 3t 5 7 J4 21 63 77 100 Proportional dose T’S- 1 * 1 T 1 x TV S V Absolute dose, dr. 1. grs. 4 grs. grs. grs. 5 10 12 grs. scr. dr. scr. dr. gr* gr. scr. 1 2 1 55 50 2 55 Table. The ?? At ?e- time W,ien Newton liad by bis discoveries rendered the study of mathematics as fashl™ m useful, medicine partook of the general bias, and several physicians of ingenuity and erudition atten So “ its theory and practice under the dominion of their favourite science. Among these Gr Strothe^ re“ d d, fy? ed a course of ectures on the rationale of medicines, which he entitles Prefectiones pL^o ZathiZtu J- practicee. In his 21st lecture he treats of the doses of medicine, and after discussing in fverv nbil^ f- ner the general mode of regulating these according to the size and shape of the particles of medicineT ^d ’X™' momentum as determined by their celerity multiplied by their quantity of matte^ he proceeds to noin^ we are to proportion the doses to various ages. He has the following question ; If a person of JZ S™ totes 60 grams of any medicine, how much must a child of c years of age take 9 Tliisnn.Cm,, I, r ° ^ by the rule of proportion in the following manner. J / ° 11118 I1*8*™ be °f course resolver 30:5,6of°° = ) 10 forfte0 atVe°rmberol‘^aT''y aPPliC‘>ble t0 ^ CaSe’ ^ CallS iD 'he aid ofalSebra’ and '"brtltuting rrrthe greater age given c=the less age given *=rthe dose given £=the dose required. 32 4 prescriptions, extemporaneous. 57 Climate. 5s Idiosju- eracy. The above table may serve as a general guide to the young practitioner. The second column shows the ali¬ quot "parts of the medium dose for an adult, that ate adapted to different ages from seven weeks to I GO years, supposing this medium dose to be i and the third co¬ lumn gives the absolute quantities in grains, &c. taking the medium dose at I dr. This table, however, will by no means apply in all cases. Thus, the dose of opium adjusted from this table, for a child of five years old, is c £rr. and that of submuriate of mercury or calomel, i gr. *, but in cases of p/irenitis hydrocephahca (water in the head), we may administer half a grain of the for¬ mer, and three or four of the latter. Females m general require less doses than males ; and persons of a robust and vigorous constitution, such as country labourers, the more active mechanics, servants, and those of the me¬ lancholic and phlegmatic temperaments, will, all other things being equal, require larger doses than persons ot an opposite description. . The climate also seems to have some influence in this respect. In America and the West Indies we are in¬ formed that much larger doses of submuriate of mercury are given than are usually prescribed m Britain. In cases where we would give three or four grains, they would order 10 or 15. We are told, too, that in some parts of India, in order to excite vomiting in a native, it is sometimes necessary to give 20 scruples of ipecacu¬ anha. The Germans, and especially, according to Gau- bius, the inhabitants of Saxony and Westphalia, require much larger doses than the inhabitants of any other country in Europe. ,, . ... Peculiarities of constitution, commonly called idiosijn- crasies, require attention on the part of the prescriber. It is therefore proper to inquire whether any circum¬ stance of this kind occurs in any individual, especially when called for the first time. The habits of the patient must also be regarded, as in general medicines lose some of their effect by being often repeated, and therefore require to have their dose increased. Thus, persons who are accustomed to the use of opium, will derive no benefit from the ordinary doses of that medicine, but when labouring under a com¬ plaint that requires the exhibition of opium, they must take a quantity somewhat larger than that to which they are habituated. It is well known what quantities of Rulesf opium are consumed by some of the eastern nations •, treseri and the writer of this article has seen a travelling gypsy who never went to rest without taking more than half a dram of solid opium (c). ... 50 17 Perspicuity is essentially necessary in writing aperSpictK prescription, and every thing which can in any degree a prind* diminish it ought to be carefully avoided. Many ot theconsuta observations already made have been directed to this point •, and we have yet one or two remarks to complete this part of our subject. A prescriber should be very careful not to introduce into his prescription articles which are obsolete, or which are no longer contained in our pharmacopoeias, unless he is certain that the apothe¬ cary Avho is to prepare the medicine keeps such articles beside him ; and even then, as it is most likely that they have been long prepared, and have lost much of their efficacy, he cannot depend on their answering the end he proposes. Thus, few would now think of prescribing the confcctio paulina, the theriaca Andromachi, or the aqua alexiteria simplex, or many other compounds, which have given place to more simple and convenient forms. 53 18^ The same cautions will apply, though perhaps Obsolen with some limitations, to those medicines which are~ rarely met with, or have been newly introduced intocinest# our Pharmacopoeias. Before we vent ure to prescribe anorderc(i article of this description, we should ascertain whether with ca or not it is to be procured in or near the place wheretioa. the patient resides, or, where possible, we should give timely notice to the apothecary to provide himself with some of it. Many unpleasant circumstances may arise from not attending to this caution, especially where the patient is apprised that he is about to take a nerv re¬ medy which has been found very beneficial in cases similar to his own. For instance, the Rus Toxico¬ dendron has lately been much extolled in the cure of palsy. Suppose a physician in a provincial town, at a great distance from the capital, were to prescribe this medicine. The apothecary has none of it, nay, perhaps, has never heard of the medicine, and it must be procur¬ ed from the capital. This occasions a delay for several days, and in the mean time the paralytic person is im¬ patient to try the effect of the new remedy, and probably refuses to take any other. When the medicine arrives, the , x „ r ,. . • „ .. 0 011v1;prf nf the Doses of Medicine, we must notice an improvement lately proposed, (c) Before dismis ig J t j ^ .c t on(ton College in the intended new edition of their P/rormt/cqpoew, parts, lletweert Jater^U spirit. This will certain!, bean tea-spoon now contains a dram. lies for L'serip- ious. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. the patient lias perhaps, as not infrequently happens, lost his enthusiasm, and begins to take it with reluc¬ tance or disgust, feelings which not a little influence the success of a remedy, and thus disappoint the hopes both of the patient and physician. Under this head of avoiding uncommon medicines, it may be proper to remark, that though a physician in this empire is allowed to prescribe articles from anv of the national dispensatories, he should in general confine himself to that which is most used in the part of the em¬ pire where he resides, and if he mentions an article from either of the others, he should subjoin to the name of that article the initials P/j. Ed. Ph.Lond. or Ph. Dub. to prevent mistakes, thus, 325 recipes of old practitioners handed down from father to Rules for son, or from master to apprentice, which seem to owe Prescrip- their celebrity chiefly to the multitude of their ingredi-, ents. 1 he Lisbon diet drinks have long been famous in the cure of diseases of the skin. The following is one of these, as taken from the Pharmacopoeia Chirurgica. lions. 63 .Errors ia point of simplicity. R. Tincturae Scillae (P/r. Londd) dr. 2. R. Tincturae Angusturae (P/r. Dub.) unc. 1. R. Solutionis muriatis (Jalcis (P/£. Ed.) dr. I. tfi £ ipounds, 19. With the same view of ensuring perspicuity, we offici- should never prescribe a compound medicine which is n to be not officinal, merely by its usual title, without specifying *1 the component parts, or at least the proportions of these. 11 e ' Thus, if we propose to order an infusion of quassia, or a decoction of oak bark, it would not be sufficient to write in the formula infusi quassice, or decocti quercus, but it would be proper either to prescribe the mode of pre¬ paring them at length, thus, R. Rasurae ligni quassiae excelsae, dr. x. Aquas distillatae ferventis, Ibj Infunde per horam, et cola ; or, R. Quercus contusi, unc. 1. Aquae distillatae Ibij. Coque ad dimidium, et cola ; And then to prescribe the proper quantity, as, R. Infusi hujuce, unc. 7, &c. or, R. Decocti supra praescripti, unc. 8, &c. Or, it would at least be proper to mention within a parenthesis, the proportions to be employed in the com¬ position, in the following manner : R. Decoctum Lusitanicum, No. 2. Sarsaparillae concisae, Ligni santali rubri, Ligni santali citrini, sing. unc. iss. j Radicis glycyrrhizae, Radicis mezerei, sing, drach. ij. Ligni rhodii, Ligni guaiaci officinalis, Ligni sassafras, sing. unc. ss. ; Antimonii unc. j. Aquae distillatae lt> v. Ihese ingredients are to be macerated for 24 hours, and afterwards boiled till the fluid is reduced to half its original quantity. From one to two pints are given daily *. * Pharnt. Some practitioners adhere to this form j but others, less bigotted to old customs, have recourse to a contractedP form of it, retaining only the guaiacum, sassafras, and li¬ quorice, and adding raisins, similar tothe decoctum guai¬ aci compositum of the Pharmacopoeias. The following is given in Fox’s Formulae as a remedy for dropsy. R. Succ. limon. rec. unciam, Sal absynth. scrupulos duos, ■ coi n. cerv. scrnpulum, Tinct. cinnam. et Aceti scillit. sing, drachmas duas, Tinct. cort. Peruv. semunciam, Aq. menth. vulg. simp, et • purae sing, unciam, Vini antim. Huxbami guttas quadraginta, Tinct. Theb. guttas viginti. Fiat mistura, pro dosihus duabus. »• blj •«! tk R. Infusi quassiae excelsae (cum dr. 1. ad aquae Ibj. &c.) ; or, R. Decocti quercus (cum corticis uncia I ad aquae ibj.) &c. tQ I die i icity tu- jjj Ik tk |l!j Again, it would be absurd in private practice to pre¬ scribe the citrate of potash or of ammonia by the names of mistura salina, or julepum neutrale ; but it would be necessary to introduce into the formula the proper quan¬ tities of lemon juice and of carbonate of potash, or car¬ bonate of ammonia, to prepare these secondary salts. See Kirby’s formula 13. 2o. That we may the better avoid mistakes in compo¬ sition, it is advisable to study simplicity as much as pos¬ sible: the physician is considered as the assistant of na¬ ture, and ought to follow her example in producing ef¬ fects by the most simple means. Nothing looks so un¬ scientific as a crowded formula 5 it bears the marks of empiricism in its very face, and always reminds us of those monuments of pharmaceutical folly, the theriaca and the mithridate to be hereafter noticed. It seems as if the prescriher said to himself, “ I will put plenty of ingredients into this medicine, and the deuce is in it if some of them do’nt answer.” There are many favourite On examining this prescription, we shall find the re¬ sulting medicine to be composed of citrate of potash, acetate of ammonia, a solution of tartrate of antimony and potash, and tincture of opium, all which are dia¬ phoretics ; of squill, which is diuretic; and of cinna¬ mon, Peruvian bark, alcohol, and mint water, which are tonic and stimulant. Now, a diaphoretic, a diuretic, and a stimulant, may not form a bad compound in drop¬ sy, but as they may be given in a much more simple form, the present medicine is absurdly complex and un¬ scientific. It might be reduced as follows: R. Aquae acetitis ammoniac, unc. 1. Tincturae scillae, dr. 1. • ■ ■■ lauri cinnamomi, unc. -f. Vini tartritis antimonii, dr. 1. Tincturae opii, gt. 40. Aquae distillatae, unc. vi. M. We shall quote one other example of a medical far¬ rago, taken from De Cortex’s Formulae. It is for a pow¬ der formed of vegetables ; and we may remark it is in the vegetable kingdom that prescribers have most exu¬ berantly displayed their talent at composition. R. Rad, prescriptions, R. Rad. Imperator Aristolochii utriusque ■ zeodar. Siler, montan. aa dr. I. Zinzib. scr. 2. I'lor. Centaur, min. dr. I. Rorismar. scr. I. Gratiol. German, dr. 4* Bacca Lauri junip. aa dr. iss. Thymi, Serpylli, Absinthiae, Tanaceti, __ Summxtat. Santon. aa. dr. I. M. r. pulv* Half j | Prescr 64 Disadvan¬ tages of complex lornuiUe. Such a powder as this may vie in composition with the theriaca and mithridate of redoubted fame. As this medicine is composed of so many ingredients, possessedot various powers, it must of course be endowed with many virtues, or must be a pulvis Accordingly, its author acquaints us, in the margin, that it is resolvent, sudorific, stimulant, roborant, calefacient, aromatic, sto¬ machic, discutientj diaphoretic, diuretic, and aperient j that it is of service in dropsy, chlorosis, paralysis, apo¬ plexy, fever, delirium, and fifty other diseases and morbid affections, for a full detail of which we must refer our readers to the work itself. One would think that the absurdity of these complex formulae would be abundantly evident to every man of common sense j but the empirical prescriber will pro¬ bably say, such is the medicine which I have frequently seen given with success, and how am I sure that, by omitting one of the materials, I may not destroy the efficacy of the medicine ! _ _ . The more compounded a medicine is, the more diffi¬ cult it will be to ascertain and proportion the effects produced by its several parts on the human system. When several articles are employed at the same time, we cannot be certain to which of them we are to attri¬ bute the benefit which appears to result, or the noxious qualities which the compound may possess* This rage for composition has been one great obstacle to the im¬ provement of medicine. The effects of various substan¬ ces on the body have been but little attended to j and indeed the investigation is difficult, and requires a long series of careful and nice experiments, and these made, not on the inferior animals, but on man himself. The administration of medicines to the lower classes of ani¬ mals, can throw but little light on their action upon the human body. Several substances which are highly inju¬ rious to man, are taken by some other animals with im¬ punity. The old story of the origin of the name of an¬ timony is probably well known to many of our readers. See Antimony. On the contrary, some substances are poisons to many of the lower animals, but are much less injurious to man. A small quantity of nux voviica will destroy a garden mouse, hut a man may take five or ten grains with safety, and even advantage. The doses of medicines, too, bear no proportion in the various ani¬ mals. A few grains of aloes are sufficient to purge a man, but a horse requires from half an ounce to a whole ounce. It is therefore necessary that man himself should be the subject of experiment j and where great nicety is required, the enquirer should make the experiment on EXTEMPORANEOUS. his own person. Innumerable are the dogs, birds, anti frogs, that have been sacrificed on the altar of science. Few experimentalists have, like Pelletier and Davy, ventured to operate on themselves 5 and even where this has been done, the effects of prejudice and previous hy¬ pothesis have considerably diminished the value of their researches. It is advisable that every practitioner should, from the number of his patients, select a few cases to which he may particularly attend, carefully observing and com- paring the effects of the medicines prescribed.^ In this way he will in time collect a body of information, from which he may be able to draw some valuable conclusions. It is more peculiarly requisite to make observations on the effects of compound medicines, and compare them with those produced by the component simples, when, given separately. It would be unfair to dismiss this part of our subject, AU cot Without admitting that there are some compound medi-Pkxmt cines, the good effects of which must be acknowledged, ^ though we cannot in the present state of medical science, jeI1! explain their action. There are two medicines of this kind, which the writer of this article has often seen pre¬ scribed by physicians of whose abilitiesandexperience he has a high opinion, with evident good eflect, and which yet have much of the complex empirical air that we have been condemning. One of these is a remedy for the advanced stage of dysentery, and is prescribed neat¬ ly in the following manner. R. Infusi quassia: (cum dr. I. ad. aquae Ibj) unc. 6. Magnesise ustse dr. 2. Tincturae sennae unc* 2. — opii dr. 2. I. Electuarii aromatici dr. ' Syrupi Rhei dr. 3. M. Signetur. Three or jour table spoonsful to be taken every six hours, shaking the phial, and one spoonful after every loose stool. Here are a bitter, an absorbent, a stimulant, a laxa¬ tive, and a narcotic, combined in the same medicine. To which of these are we to attribute the good effects which have appeared to us to result from the exhibition of the whole ? Probably the slight laxative and the ab¬ sorbent are here of little use, and the chief benefit is to be ascribed to the bitter and the stimuli, considering the opium in this light. The other medicine to which we allude is considered as an antiseptic, and is frequently ordered in putrid dis¬ eases, especially in cynanche maligna or scarlatina an- ginosa. It is as follows. R. Muriatis sodse dr. Succini limonis. dr. l-£. Sacchari purificati, unc. Spiritus myristic. moschati, dr. 3. iEtheris sulphurici cum alcohole, dr. 2. Aquae menthae piperitae, unc. 6. M. Signetur. Three table spoonsful to be taken every four houi's (and in cynanche some of it to be frequently used by way of gargle). What an apparent confusion of salt and sour, of sweet and strong ! It is true that there is here no decomposi¬ tion, and yet the medicine is certainly unscientific and empirical. 21. i es for 21. d prescriher should adapt his prescription as far icrip- as may be to the worldly circumstances of his patient, di- jns recting for the poorer class those forms which are least fv ' expensive, such as powders, pills, electuaries, and ingre- >£> dients for teas and decoctions, with properdirections how to prepare them. To his more wealthy patients he may prescribe those forms which, by uniting neatness with convenience, will both please his patient, and allow an adequate remuneration to the apothecary, who in most places derives from his practice little profit, except what arises from the sale of his medicines. The forms best adapted to such patients are those of draughts, boluses, -7 powders, and julep, &c. aess to 22. Neatness in prescrip tion should always be regarded; be sjr- for as;the effects of medicines often depend much on the ,l£'' feelings of the patient, we should take care that his taste, sight, and smell, be offended as little as possible, that dis¬ gust may not either prevent his taking the medicine at all, or at least prevent him from taking it with confi¬ dence. In liquid medicines, we ought as much as pos¬ sible to avoid powders, and every thing which can ren¬ der the liquid unpleasant to the eye j and if we prescribe a formula containing oil, we ought to take care that this be intimately mixed with the other ingredients. Thus, suppose, when about to employ opium by friction, we were to order equal parts of tincture of opium and oil of olives. Though when well shaken together, these in¬ gredients would incorporate sufficiently to answer the purpose of opiate friction, yet when allowed to stand, they would speedily separate, and give the embrocation an unpleasant appearance. It would he better, there¬ fore, to insure their combination by adding a little so¬ lution of ammonia. 23. In this respect much will depend on the form of the medicine ; and a physician should be perfectly aware what form is best adapted to the articles he is to em¬ ploy, as well as what is most agreeable to the patient. This subject of forms was sufficiently explained in the article Materia Medica, Part 111. chap. 2. We have now finished all that appeared most import¬ ant on the general rules for extemporaneous prescrip¬ tions 5 but it may be proper to bring under one general view the principles which have been laid down. The great object of a practitioner is to cure his patient safe¬ ly, agreeably, and expeditiously. That he may cure him safely, he is to study perspicuity and simplicity. To in¬ sure perspicuity, he should arrange his formulae in the order of exhibition j write the words so that they may be most intelligible ; arrange the articles of each formu¬ la in the mode of composition j use abbreviated words for quantities instead of symbols j employ the common numerals ; write the directions in English ; avoid obso¬ lete or uncommon remedies, and order no article, not of¬ ficinal, merely by its name. To insure simplicity, he PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. .327 Rec la'.io prescription with a few practical cautions, for which we Rules for are chiefly indebted to Dr Percival. Prescrip- 1. A practitioner should attend to the feelings and liolls- prejudices of his patient. Dr Percival ordered bleeding to a patient labouring under peripneumony, who had a great dread of the operation, and appears to have died in consequence of its having been attempted. 2. A physician, after having ascertained the nature of a disease, in considering the treatmentwhich he means to adopt, should first reflect whether any evacuation be necessary, as bleeding, the application of leeches or of blisters, cupping, vomiting, purging, &c. 3. He should next enquire whether any particular symptom, such as hemorrhage, great pain, excessive vomiting or purging, be so violent or so distressing as to require immediate attention. 4. He is to consider whether the disease under notice is one for the cure of which any specific remedy has been discovered, such as mercury in syphilis, cinchona in intermittents, &c. 5. In chronic diseases, where the usual remedies fail of success, it is often of consequence to endeavour to rouse the system into a new action by mercury, electri¬ city, opium, &c. This practice appears rather empiri¬ cal, but the experience of many able physicians has evinced its propriety. 6. In commencing the treatment of any case, it is pro¬ per to begin with the simplest and safest method j and if this does not succeed, to try others of a more com¬ plex and bolder description. 7. A physician should not change his plan or his re¬ medies too soon or too often. 8. The cases of new born infants require peculiar caution, as a moderate dose of a powerful medicine may prove fatal. Four drops of tincture of opium have been given to a child a few weeks old for gripes. The in¬ fant was seized with stupor and convulsions, and died. A practitioner of midwifery gave an infant two tea¬ spoonfuls of castor oil by way of purgative j severe vomiting and convulsions came on, and the child sunk under them. IV. Modern pharmacy may be said to commence Origin of about the middle of the 15th century, at which time it modern appears to have been in a most deplorable state of em-pbarn,acy- pirical barbarity. Though it is probable that, among the earlier practitioners of medicine, remedies were employ¬ ed in their most simple forms, the art of compounding a number of simples together into one medicine had, by the time of which we are now speaking, arrived at a pitch of extravagance which has never been exceed¬ ed. What carried this ostentation of composition to the highest excess, was the object of framing antidotes, which being previously administered, might defend a- must employ no more ingredients than are necessary. gainst any poison whatever, that should afterwards he That he may cure his patient agreeably, he must ob- taken into the body. To this scheme is owing the enor serve neatness in his prescriptions ; adapt his forms to the nature of the remedies employed, and not prescribe offensive remedies where those that are agreeable or pa¬ latable will answer the same purpose. That he may cure his patients expeditiously, he should employ the most efficacious remedies in the proper doses, and take care they are administered in such a man¬ ner as to be most likely to produce the desired effect. We shall now conclude these general observations on mous length of the celebrated mithridate and theriaca ; for such medicines must of course recommend themselves. by the number and variety of their ingredients, as they were to contain a proper antidote for every possible spe¬ cies of poison, and more especially as these compositions were to be farther wrought up into little less than uni¬ versal remedies for all diseases to which the human body is subject. The first of these antidotes was said to be composed fio n 328 PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. Historical Sketches c u r • j o^T^m-atplv with all bole, green vitriol calcined, of each half an ounce 7 toot nm from the result of experiments made sepalately wiui au a URfi, « , ■ , r- • I . • . . , .1 uinrr whose of creemng birth wort, or in its stead ot the long hirth-s ke :oric? 70 Account of the mithri- date. Account the the- riaca. kinds of simple antidotes by the famous king whose name it bears; but as no records are left us ot any ot those particular experiments, we may reasonably consi¬ der this tale as fabulous. As it is not likely that this medicine and the theriacawill ever again appear in 0111 Pharmacopoeias, we shall, tor the amusement of our readers, describe the composition of each, as given in the London Pharmacopoeia published in 174^* ^ie mi‘ thridate is thus composed. “ Take of cinnamon 14 drams, of myrrh 11 drams j agaric, spikenard, ginger, satlron, seeds ot treacle mu¬ stard, or of mithridate mustard, frankincense, chio tur¬ pentine, of each 1.0 drams camel’s hay, costus, or in its stead zedoary, Indian leat, or in its stead mace, French lavender, long pepper, seeds of hartwort, juice ef the rape of cistus, strained storax, opopanax, strained galbanum, balsam of Gilead, or in its stead expressed oil of nutmegs, Russian castor, of each an ounce poley- mountain, water-germander, the fruit of the balsam tree, or in its stead cubebs, white pepper, seeds of the carrot of Crete, bdellium strained, of each seven drams*, Celtic nard, gentian root, leaves of dittany ot Crete, red roses, seeds of Macedonian parsley, the lesser car¬ damom seeds freed from their husks, sweet fennel seeds, gum Arabic, opium strained, of each live drams *, root of the sweet flag, root of wild valerian, anise-seed, saga- penum strained, of each three drams ; spignel, St John’s wort, juice of acacia, or in its stead Japan earth, the bellies of scinks, of each two drams and a half 7 clarifi¬ ed honey, thrice the weight of all the rest. Dissolve the opium first in a little wine, and then mix it with the honey made hot *, in the mean time melt together m another vessel the galbanum, storax, turpentine, and the balsam of Gilead, or the expressed oil of nutmeg, continually stirring them round, that they may not burn *, and as soon as these are melted, add to them the hot honey, first by spoonfuls, and afterwards more free¬ ly : lastly, when this mixture is nearly cold, add by de¬ grees the rest of the species reduced to powder. The preparation of the Theriaca andromachi, or A e- nice treacle, is thus directed. “ Take of the troches of squills, half a pound *, long pepper, opium strained, dried vipers, of each three ounces ; cinnamon, balm of Gilead, or in its stead ex¬ pressed oil of nutmeg, of each two ounces j agaric, the root of Florentine orris, water-germander, red roses, seeds of navew, extract of liquorice, of each an ounce and a half*, spikenard, saffron, ammomum, myrrh, co¬ stus, or in its stead zedoary, camel’s hay, of each an ounce ; the root of cinquefoil, rhubarb, ginger, Indian leaf, or in its stead mace, leaves of dittany of Crete, of horehound, and of calamint, French lavender, black pep¬ per, seeds of Macedonian parsley, olibanum, Chio tur¬ pentine, root of wild valerian, of each six drams ; gentian root, Celtic nard, spignel, leaves of poleymountain, of St John’s wort, of ground pine, tops of creeping germander, with the seed, the fruit of the balsam tree, or in its stead cubebs, aniseseed, sw'eet fennel seed, the lesser cardamom seeds freed from their husks, seed of bishop’s-weed, of hartwort, of treacle mustard or mithridate mustard, juice of the rape of cistus, acacia, or in its stead Japan earth, gum Arabic, storax strained, sagapenum strained, Lemnian earth, or in its stead bole Armenic or French 3 of of creeping birth wort, or in its stead of the long birth-S ketcho wort, tops of the lesser centaury, seeds of the carrot of Crete, opopanax, galbanum strained.Russia castor, Jews pitch, or in its stead white amber prepared, root of the sweet flag, of each two drams ■, of clarified honey thrice the weight of all the rest. The ingredients are to bo mixed in the same manner as in the mithridate. The theriaca may be considered as a modification of the mithridate by Andromachus, though we are not in¬ formed what were his reasons for the variations, except that by the addition of the viper’s flesh the medicine was rendered more useful against the bite of that ani¬ mal *. The theriaca was in so great repute before the * Co^ decline of the Roman empire, that even the wise Mar- Aniidol.i cus Aurelius was induced to make a daily use ot it, tobklcsm the great prejudice of his health *, for we are told by Galen, that his head was so much affected, that he dosed in the midst of business *, and when on this account he omitted the opium in the composition, he could not sleep at all. 72 It is not a little amusing to observe the reasons that Origin 0. induced the ancient compounders of medicines to crowd d^sev i their receipts with such a multitude of ingredients. Me- dicines were then distributed into four qualities, of heat¬ ing, cooling, drying, and moistening, by the combination of which, and the structure of the substance in which they adhered, whether consisting of gross or subtle parts, ■was deduced another head of qualities from consequen¬ tial effects they were supposed by this means to have on the body, of inciding, attenuating, incrassalwg, re¬ laxing, astringing, and the like *, by a farther prosecu¬ tion of this speculation was derived from the same source a third arrangement of cephalics, hepatics, stomachics, diuretics, and others 5 these orders being closed by a fourth head, to comprehend such, whose effects sur¬ mounted even the acuteness of this system to explicate j these were said to operate tola substantia. The first of these qualities, as well as those which depended on them, were farther divided into four degrees, and each of these into three subdivisions, whereby medicines might be adapted to each case with the nicest subtilty by the rules of arithmetic. Again, when the composi¬ tion was thus happily adjusted, it was farther to be en¬ quired, whether the medicine after all might not be sus¬ pected of some noxious quality, requiring correction *, and this, whether real or imaginary, was by the farther addition of some proper accompaniment to be provided for. It was also to be considered, that a medicine might be serviceable to a remote part, but exposed to be destroyed by the powers of digestion before it arrived therethen it was to be assisted by some material, by which it should be defended and conducted safely, so as neither to be acted upon, nor act, till it reached the de¬ signed part, and then be left to operate without impe¬ diment, its guide and protector being itself there oppor¬ tune! r consumed : some medicines were pretended to run too swiftly through the body, others to move on too sluggishly, the first of these required a curb, the others a spur: often a director was necessary, that the medicine might not stray from its destined course*, every medicine was supposed to have its peculiar station, in which, left to itself, its operation would be exerted j if it were requi¬ red to perform its office sooner, it was to be committed * to jjijtirical ✓r p li¬ ft by ha¬ ll PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. ,torical if custody of some other, which might fix it to the ,— • j - , „ . 329 % S'! iul ’3 In ave- rnn1! m mi etches, region desired j if it were designed to proceed farther it must have an assistant to open it a passage. How much ingenious men have been perplexed to account for these irregularities and superfluities of the earliest pharmaceutical writers, may in some measure he conceived from Bauderon’s comment on the Aierea Alexandrina, the first composition in the collection of Nicholaus, whom we shall presently notice. Opium, it seems, is the base whose powers are heightened by other ingredients, which require also others to correct then ill qualities. Besides these, one list of ingredients is to direct the operation to the head, another set to the breast, others to the heart, stomach, spleen, liver, kid¬ neys, and other parts ; insomuch, says the author, that this one medicine, in regard to the diseases he enume¬ rates, may very justly be considered as a whole apothe¬ cary’s shop, contained in a gallypot. Rondelet, in his remarks on the Syrupus Hyssopi Mesuce, seems less dis¬ posed to admire what he did not understand, when he tells us, he long doubted with himself, under what head, whether of attenuants or incrassants, it ought to be ranged, it containing so many species of each kind j and at last has recourse to this frank reason for retain¬ ing it at all, ent nobis usui, cum nondum erimus cert?\ incrassarcne, an attenuare oporteat. When the alchemists had extended the hounds of ■ ; d bv^e’r .art from mere drudgery of manufacturing gold th ' che- ant^ s^ver» th** nnore noble and philosophic employ¬ ment of composing an universal elixir that should secure its possessor from disease, and prolong his life to an in¬ definite period, pharmacy derived from their labours considerable and solid advantages. T he experiments instituted by these visionaries with the metals, led to the accidental discovery of some of the most efficacious remedies which we at present employ, especially the preparations of antimony and mercury, and most of what are called the neutral or secondary salts. By calling in the aid of fire, they enabled us to produce in bodies, changes which, without the assistance of this powerful agent, we should have been unable to effect. Now, every thing was submitted to digestion, calcination, fer¬ mentation, distillation, and sublimation; hut, as general¬ ly happens in cases of innovation or reform, these new methods of obtaining active remedies were carried to an absurd and ridiculous extent. Finding that the healing Powers of many substances were eliminated or increased by the application of heat, they seemed to imagine that the simple medicine could in no case possess any medi¬ cal virtue till it had been placed upon the fire, or kept for some hours in a furnace. Hence the immense num¬ ber of distilled waters and spirits, essential and empy- leumatic oils, with which the old pharmacopoeias are crowded, and which seem in many cases to possess no other powers than what they derive from the water or the spirit that forms the hulk of the preparation. Not only plant and minerals, but animals and animal mat¬ ters of all kinds, were distilled, digested, or calcined. Thus, we find a water of snails, a spirit of millipedes, an oil of earth worms, &c. &c. The absurd and pompous names by which the preparations were distin- gui ’hed, are truly ridiculous. Magisterial balsam, hiera- ptcra, Ethiops mineral, ens veneris, fores mart is, ca- omelfts, aqutla alba, are a few which long retained their seat, both in public and private dispensatories. As these Vol. XVII. Parti. f preparations were, from their contrivers, denominated Historical chemical; the more ancient medicines, which were Sketches. drawn almost entirely from the animal and vegetable v— ^ kingdoms, were denominated Galenical, because &chiefly employed by the followers of Galen. Hence the divi¬ sion of medicines into Galenical and chemical, a divi¬ sion which obtained for some hundred years, and which only a few years ago was preserved in the sale cata¬ logues of the London druggists. However amusing to a scientific modern chemist it 74 may he to wander through the labyrinths of the earlier pharmaceutical writers, it js necessary for us to be brief upon the subject. These absurdities are now fast dis¬ appearing j and pharmacy, guided by the increasing brightness of her younger but more enlightened sister, has begun to assume a more scientific and a more de¬ cided character. I he principles and improvements of modern chemistry have been introduced into our phar¬ macopoeias, and the civilized nations of Europe are now vying with each other in the amelioration ot these guides to the medical practitioner. In our own country, the Edinburgh college led the way to this reform. They have been followed by the Dublin physicians ; and we may soon expect the completion of the revolution in our national pharmacy, by the publishing ot a new edition of the London Pharmacopoeia, which is, we understand, now under review. 1 ne progress ot our present officinal pharmacy, from Progress ot the time of its first introduction by the Arabians, so farn,°der* as we can trace it through the obscurities attending its l'banna(7* origin, has been as follows. Saladinus of Ascoli, an author who wrote about the middle of the 15th century, while as yet there were no pharmaco|joe'as established by any public authority, informs us, that the books with which the apothecaries were generally furnished, were these : a book of Avicenna and another of Serapion, which treat on simples; Simon Jannensis r/ iblic i’hirmaco j.ueias. imply tliat he resided in that school. 01 his work, Sa- ladin gives the following account: that there were two Antidotaria under the name of this Nicholaus, the one distinguished by the title of Nicholaus Magnus, and the other by that of NicRolans Parvus ; that the latter was in most frequent use, and was only an epitome of the former, coritaining but a part of the compositions, and those reduced to less quantities. Among the collections of pieces often published together as a supplement to Mesue, one is entitled Antidotarium Nicholai, and in this are contained the compositions which were deliver¬ ed by dispensatory writers, under the name of Nicho¬ laus. This is the lesser antidotarium, and there is also a copy of the greater, published under the name of Nicholaus Alexandrinus, as translated fiom the Greek by Nicholaus of Reggio, the first translator of Galen. In this translation, as in the former antidotarium, the compositions are arranged in the order of the Latin al¬ phabet : whereas, in the origin al, the Greek alphabeti¬ cal order seems to have been followed. Here, beside a much greater number of articles than in the other Nicholaus, those which they have in common are in greater quantities. The first Pharmacopoeia which was set forth by pub¬ lic authority, was that of Valerius Cordus, published in ’ 1 (542, under the sanction of the senate of Nuremberg. This consists almost entirely of collections trom the two authors above mentioned, with short notes in relation to such names of plants or drugs in the compositions as were of doubtful signification. Subsequent pharmaco¬ poeias, however they might be rendered more copious by additions from other authors, also paid the like re¬ gard to Nicholaus and Mesue. This Pharmacopoeia of Cordus has been made more celebrated from the com¬ ments made on it by Hoffman. In 1561, Clusius pub¬ lished at Antwerp a Latin translation of the Florentine Antidotarium. In 1381 was published at Bergamo, in Italy, the Pharmacopoeia Bergamensis, which was fol¬ lowed by the Pharmacopoeia Augustana, at Augsburg in 1601 ; republished at Rotterdam, with notes by Z,welter in 1654, and again in 1666. The pharmaco¬ poeia of the faculty at Palis first appeared in 1637 ; and about the same time there was published at Paris a col¬ lection of Arabian formulae, called the Persian Phar¬ macopoeia. In the latter end of the 17th century, the incorporated physicians of Sweden published their Dis¬ pensatory under the title of Phamacopccia Holmiensis, which was republished in 1775 au<^ I7^4 ^,e of Pharmacopoeia Suecica. The Prussian Dispensatory, Pharmacopoeia Borussica, was first published in 1799. The Pharmacopoeia of Vienna was first published in 1729, and republished in 1765* Besides these, wre have seen or heard of the follow- ing *. The Dispensatory of Wirtemburg, of which the first edition is that of 1771. Pharmacopoeia Genevensis, published in 1780, re¬ published in Italian in 1800. Dispensatorium Lippiacum in 1792. Pharmacopoeia Bremensis in 1792. Pharmacopoeia Austriaco-provincialis, 1 794. Pharmacopoeia Austnaco-castrensis, 1795* Pharmacopoeia Bossica, published at St Petersburg!! first in 1798, and again in 1803. Of the British Pharmacopoeias, the earliest is that of the London college, which W’as first published in 1618. Historic It was again published either at the close of the 17th, Sketch; or beginning of the 18th century, in i8mo; again in'“““V' 1746 m 4to, and last in 1791. The college is now Briu^ 1 preparing a new edition, and has circulated among itsijc- members a specimen of the proposed alterations. Ivecopcias, have been favoured with a perusal of this specimen, and we have no doubt, that with respect to accuracy of pre¬ paration, and judicious selection of remedies, the new work will not be inferior to the late editions of the Edinburgh and Dublin Pharmacopoeias. In point of nomenclature, however, we cannot help thinking, that the committee have in a great measure failed in their desire to avoid error and confusion. Should the no¬ menclature of the specimen be adopted in the published edition, we fear that the novelty of the terms w ill be the smallest objection to their use; but that being so perfectly different, both from the language of modern chemistry and of the late pharmacy of the London druggists and apothecaries, will occasion serious incon¬ venience both to prescribers and compounders. It would be indecorous for us to particularize instances, but we chiefly allude to the names of the secondary salts, which we consider as very objectionable. The new edition will be evidently much improved, many new articles are admitted, and not a few of such as were less efficacious, or which may be prepared extemporaneously, are omit- ted. The college of Edinburgh first published their Phar¬ macopoeia in 1722-, and improved editions have succes¬ sively appeared in 1736, 1747, 1756, 1775, 1783, 1792, 1803, and 1805, this last being little more than a new impression of the preceding. The Dublin col¬ lege first published, or rather printed, a Pharmacopoeia in 1794', and they have lately, viz. in 1807, republish¬ ed it with considerable improvements. In this edition they have chiefly followed the plan of the Edinburgh Pharmacopoeia, but they retain the usual pharmaceuti¬ cal names of the simples, though they have in general adopted the reformed chemical nomenclature. The most material improvements will be noticed in the o/i- pendiv to this article. go 1 Besides the Pharmacopoeias printed under the autho-j’orejg11 rity of public colleges, a great many have been pub-private; lished by individuals both on the continent and in Bri-pensato tain. We shall notice the principal ot these in chrono¬ logical order. The earliest of these that we find on record, after those of Nicholaus, is the Antidotarium Speciale of Wecker, which was printed in 1561. Four years alter appeared the Antidotarium of Montagna, published at Venice j and at the same place in 1600, appeared a work by Fioraventi, entitled Secreti Rationale Lntorno Alla Medicina. In 1608, Renodaeus published at Pa¬ ris his Ofjicina Pharmaceutica seu Antidotarium. Myn- sicht’s Armamentarium Medico-chymicum appeared in 1631 ; and in 1656, Schroeder published at Leyden his Pharmacopoeia Medico-Chemica. In 1676 Oharas published his Pharmacopee Galenique et Chemique at Pa¬ ris, and in 1684 the same work was republished in La¬ tin at Genoa. In 1698 appeared the celebrated Phar¬ macopee Universelle of Lemery •, and in the same year the Pharmacopoeia Spagyrica of Poterius. Of those that have appeared in the 18th century, beside those men¬ tioned in the introduction to Materia Medica, we may loi'ioal itches. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. fnay notice as being of superior merit; Triller’s Dis- petisatorium Pharmaceuticum Universale, published at Frankfort in I4 : Snielman’s Phni-mnrr\nrvA, 3.3 r ish pri Dis- j natories 82 C'xtions •Iurmulse. 'Frankfort in 1764; Spielman’s Pharmacopoeia Gene¬ rali's at Strasburg in 1783, and Reuss’s Dispcnsato- riwn Universale at the same place. - In our own country, several useful works of this kind have been produced. One of the earliest (d), and ‘among the most remarkable of these, is the Pharmaco¬ poeia O fficinalis et Extemporanea, or Complete English Dispensatory of Dr Quincy, which was first published m 1718, again in 1722, and in 1739 had reached the eleventh edition, now before us. Considering the time at which it was written, this is an excellent perfor¬ mance, and is the more interesting, as it formed the foundation on which were composed those more accu¬ rate and scientific works the New Dispensatory of Lewis, and the Edinburgh New Dispensatory. Quin¬ cy’s Dispensatory was followed by similar works, as by James’s Dispensatory in 1747, Lewis’s in 1753, and the Edinburgh New Dispensatory by Webster in 1786. At length, in 1803, Dr Andrew Duncan, Junior, pub¬ lished his Edinburgh New Dispensatory, which, from the important additions and improvements progressively introduced in four editions, must be considered as a new work, and has entirely superseded every similar publi¬ cation. Of collections of formulae, both by continental and English writers, there is no want; but it will be diffi¬ cult for an unexperienced prescriber to make a judicious selection from among them. The best we have seen in this country are, the Thesaurus Medicaminum, now ad¬ mitted to be the production of Dr R. Pearson ; the PbarmacopoeiaChirurgica; and perhaps we may add those published in Dr Kirby’s Tables of the Materia Medica. The first of these was published in 1794, and a third edi¬ tion of it materially improved appeared in 1804. The Pharmacopoeia Chirurgica is a valuable selection of for¬ mulas, chiefly intended for surgeons, and drawn up prin¬ cipally from the practical Pharmacopoeia of the differ¬ ent London hospitals. The first edition appeared, we believe, in 1794; and in 1802 there was published a fifth edition, with the addition of a synoptical table of the formulae contained in the volume, arranged accord¬ ing to the order of their principal incredients. The formulae annexed to each of the classes in Dr Kirby’s Tables are intended principally to serve as examples of the method of prescribing the principal articles enume¬ rated in the class to which they are attached. They are selected partly from the best writers on extempora¬ neous prescription and the practice of medicine, and are partly derived from the private experience of the author or his medical friends. Of the older collections of formulge, we may notice the Pharmacopoeia Extemporanea of Fuller, which con¬ tains 1000 select formulae, arranged in alphabetical or¬ der, and accompanied by practical and pharmaceutical remarks. This work went through many editions, both in England and on the Continent. The best which we have seen is that published at Paris in 1768, under the , care of Theodore Baron. ? He know of very few works that have been written, ' ^ containing practical rules for the writing of prescrip- s3 tions. In our own country, almost the only work 01, v-'0lk* the subject with which we are acquainted, is pre*’ Lectures on Pharmacy ; a work now very little known, scriptioii. though the principal parts of it were introduced under their proper heads, in the later editions of the complete English Dispensatory. Quincy’s rules, though now a little antiquated, are for the most part very good ; and allowing for the imperfect state of chemical science in the beginning of the 18th century, may still be perused with advantage. Similar rules, which were indeed lit¬ tle more than modifications of those given by Quincy, were laid down by Dr Lewis in his New Dispensatory. „ One of the most celebrated foreign elementary works Gauimw. on this subject, and that which we believe is best known in this country, is Libellus de Methodo Concinnandi For¬ mulas Medicamentorum, by Gaubius, a second edition of which was published at Leyden in 1752. After laying down some general rules to be observed before prescrilT- ing, Gaubius gives an account of the nature and con¬ struction of formulae in general, and then treats parti¬ cularly of the several forms of medicines usually employ¬ ed. These he divides into internal and external, reckon¬ ing among the former powders, boluses, electuaries, eclcg-' mata or lynctuses, pills, lozenges, &c. which he distin¬ guishes into tab cl lev and rotuh, infusions, decoctions, ex¬ pressed juices, emulsions, juleps, mixtures, and draughts or contracted mixtures. External forms he divides into injections, adsperginet. ( powder sprinkled on the surface), fomentations, dry epithems, cataplasms or poultices, baths, fumigations, plasters, cerates, ointments, odorifer¬ ous balsams, liniments, epispastics or blistering plasters, frictions, collyria or eye-waters, errhines or snuffs, denti¬ frices or tooth-powders, apophlegmatisms, gargles, cly¬ sters, suppositories, and pessaries. He givres ample rules for the preparation of each of these forms, with ex¬ amples. . This work, however, from the antiquated style and prolixity with which it is written, and the obsolete names that every where occur throughout the examples, is of little use except as a book of reference. ^ In 1754, Joannes Petrus Eberhard, professor of me- Ebcrhlr! dicine in the university of Halle, in the duchy of Magde- burg, published his Methodus Conscribendi Formulas Medicos, a small pamphlet in i8mo, containing rules arranged in a tabular form. In this little work the au¬ thor first treats of the nature of a medical formula, and explains the characters usually employed in preserrption. He then lays down his plan of division, and lastly treats of the preparation of each particular form, vvith”practi¬ cal hints respecting the ingredients proper for each form» with their proportional doses, and the cases to which they are more particularly adapted. This work was first intended for the professor’s pupils, but he published it under the conviction that it would be found of advan¬ tage by practitioners in general. On the whole, it is a T t 2 useful (d) The only Pharmacopceias worth notice in this country that preceded the Dispensatory of Quincy, weie, we believe, the Pharmacopoeia Batcana, edited by Dr Thomas Fuller, and the Pharmacopoeia Extcmparmu drawn up by the same author, (to he presently noticed), both published early in the 18th century. 332 Historical Sketches. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. . *7 Alibert. useful publication, but is as much too briet as that of Gaubius is too prolix. The rules are not illustrated by examples. The best work that we have seen on the elements of extemporaneous prescription, is entitled, ha et Ratio Formulas Medicosconscribendi, by Griiner, professor of medicine in the university of Jena. As we have seen only one copy of this work, belonging to the college library Edinburgh, and when this article went to press, could not procure a second perusal of it, we can¬ not present our readers with any analysis of its contents j but from the favourable impression we received on exa¬ mining it several years ago, we consider it as a valuable The last writer on this subject whom we shall notice is M. Alibert, who, at the end of the second volume of bis Nouveaux Elemens de Therapeutique el de Matiere Medicate, has given what he calls a New Essay on the Art of Prescribing ; in the first part of which he treats of the general rules of the art, and in the second explains the particular formulae which act on the vital properties of the different organic systems of the human body. M. Alibert’s arrangement is peculiar, and we shall therefore give a sketch of it. He arranges his formulae under six sections, and divides each section into several articles. In the first section he treats of the formulae or com¬ pound medicines which the medical art principally di¬ rects towards the vital properties of the system ol the digestive organs. In the first article of this section he describes the compound medicines which are particular¬ ly directed to the muscular contractility of the stomach, in common language, emetics ; in the second article, those which are particularly directed to the muscular contractility of the intestinal canal, viz. cathaiticsj in the third article he treats of those which are particu¬ larly adapted to the changes of the vital properties that result from the presence of worms in the stomach and intestines, namely, anthelmintics j in the fourth article, Sket of those which are particularly directed against the ef-v- fects of poisons introduced into the stomach or intea* tines j and in the filth, of those compound medicines which are particularly directed to the vital properties of the larger intestines. •2) In the second section he treats of these medicine* which the art particularly adapts to the vital properties of the urinary passages $ diuretics. In third section he describes those that particularly refer to the vital properties of the respiratory organs, viz. expectorants and refrigerants. In the fourth section he treats of those compound me¬ dicines which are particularly directed to the vital pro¬ perties of the dermoid system, or the skin ; namely, dia¬ phoretics, emollients, and epispastics. In the fifth section he notices those medicines which are particularly directed to the vital properties of the nervous system ; viz. antispasmodics, narcotics, sternu¬ tatories and sialagogues. In the sixth and last section he treats of the compound medicines that the art particularly directs toward the vital properties of the system of generation. Some other late French writers on Pharmacy have given a number of examples of medical formulae, espe¬ cially M. Bouillon La Grange, in his Manueldu Phar- tnacien. In all these formulae is employed the new French standard of weights and measures, commonly ac¬ companied by the synonymous troy weights and mea¬ sures, as used by the French apothecaries under the old government j hut as neither of these are familiar to English readers, we shall here add two tables of the French weights and measures of capacity, reduced to English wine measures and troy and apothecary weights. Table I. A Comparison of French Grammes tvith Troy, French, and Nuremberg, Apothecary Grains, Grammes. 2= 3= 6= 9= 10= [Toy grains. 15-444= 30.888= 46.332= 61.776= 77.220= 92.664= 108.108= I23-552= 138.006= 154.440= Old French Grains 18.883 = 37.766 = 56.649= 75-532= 94-4I5= 113.298= 132.181 = 151.064= 169.947= 188.830= Nuremberg Grains. 16.128 32-256 48.384 64.512 80.640 96.768 I I 2.896 I29.O24 MS-M2 161.280 Table II. French Measures of Capacity, reduced to cubic inches, and English Wine Measure. French Measures. Millilitre = Centilitre = Decilitre = Litre = Decalitre = Hecatolitre = Chiliolitre = Myriolitre = F.njdish cubic inches .06102 .61028 = 6.10280= 61.02800= 610.28000= 6102.80000= 61028.00000= 610280.00000= Tuns. O o o o o a 1 10 Hhds. Gallons O O O O 2. 26.419 I 2.19 58-9 Pints. .00 2 .0211 .21 13 2-I,33 J-’Si2 ■appendix. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. APPENDIX. Preparation b. Decoctum Cornu Cervini Decoction ol hartshorn. 333 Dub. Appendix. iS The new edition of the Dublin P/iarmacopoRici hav¬ ing appeared since the printing of our article Materia Medica, it becomes us to notice the principal improve¬ ments introduced by the Dublin college 5 and as parti¬ cular circumstances prevented our doing so under Phar¬ macy, we have reserved them for an appendix to the present article. We shall also take this opportunity of supplying some omissions in the article Materia Me- DICA, rendered unavoidable by the circumstance of that article coming on at the conclusion of a volume, beyond which we could not with propriety extend it, especially by the addition of a complete table of the sy¬ nonymous Latin names of all the officinal compounds. We shall notice the additions and improvements of the Dublin college in tlie same order which we have observed in Materia Medica, Part IV. Chap. I. Animal Substances. 2. Murias Ammonia (e). Cai iate Preparation c. Carbonas Ammonia;. See Mate- ofsno- ria Medica, N° 238. In the preparation of this salt, the Dublin college now employ carbonate of soda for decomposing the mu¬ riate of ammonia, instead of chalk. The only advan¬ tage of this seems to he that the decomposition is ef¬ fected at a lower temperature. Sola a of Preparation d. Aqua Carbonatis Ammonia; . carb ite MATERIA MeDICA, N° 250. of ai 0- 7 nk Here too carbonate of soda is employed in the pro¬ portion of 28 oz. to the pound of muriate of ammonia. Ibis is made by boiling two ounces of burnt harts- Deca'ction horn reduced to powder, and 3 drs. of gum arabic, jnofharts- 3 pints of water to 2 pints, continually stirring, and h°m' then straining the liquor. In this way a considerable quantity of the phosphate ot lime is, by means of the gum arabic, suspended in the water ; but we do not think this so good a method or administering the remedy as giving the powder it¬ self, mixed with syrup or mucilage. Chap. II. Pegetable Substances. 24. Alcohol. Materia Medica, N° 294. Preparation a. Alcohol. Alcohol, The new process of the Dublin college for preparing alcohol is as follows : A gallon of rectified spirit of wine is first mixed with an ounce of caustic potash in powder ; then a pound of pearl ashes dried at the heat of 500 of I ahrenheit, and reduced to powder, is ad- , while still warm, and the mixture digested for three days in a close vessel with frequent agitation. 1 he spirit is then poured off, mixed with half a pound of dried muriate of lime (which is usually obtained from the residuum after the preparation of pure ammo¬ nia), and distilled with a moderate heat till what re¬ mains in the retort begins to grow thick. 26. Acidum Acetosum impurum. 1 reparation b. Acidum acetosum forte, E. Ma- teria Medica, N° 307. Acidum aceticum, Dub. Preparation f. Hydrosulphuretum Ammonia;. Materia Medica, N° 241. This is now introduced into the Dublin Pharmaco¬ poeia, and is directed to be prepared much in the same manner as in the pharmacopoeia of Edinburgh. Arom amint cd al c Preparation h. Alcohol Ammoniatum Aroma- tol.ticum. Materia Medica, N° 243. The only change made in the preparation is, in sub¬ stituting 4 oz. of nutmegs for 2 drs. of the essential oil, and distilling off the ammoniated alcohol, thus rend- r- mg the solution of the aromatic principles more com¬ plete. Phosp e ll!B( 5. Cervus Elaphus. Preparation a. Phosphas CALCIS. dica, N° 254. Materia Me- The Dublin college order this under the name of 'll vis cornu cervmi usti, to be prepared in the usual manner as directed by the Edinburgh Pharmacopoeia. ns is prepared by putting into a tubulated retort, Acetic 3 ounces by weight of sulphuric acid, and adding to itaci^ gradually in small portions, 6 ounces of acetate of pot¬ ash, Avaiting after each addition till the mixture be cold ; and after the whole is mixed, distilling to dry¬ ness. What comes over is the acetic acid. Preparation d. Acidum acetosum CAMPHORATUM, E. Materia Medica, N° 309. Acidum aceticum camphoratum, Dub. Prepared much in the same manner with the Edin- CamphoriK burgh acid, only with half the quantity of acid. ted aceti* J acid. 29. Cera. Materia Medica, N° 319. Preparation a. Cera FLAVA PURIFICATA, Dub. Purified yellow wax. Wax is purified by melting it with a moderate heat Purified («5 in a water bath), scumming it, and pouring off the wax. clear fluid from the dregs. 32. Angustura, Materia Medica, N° 331. Preparation situation 1 n^tbe”11°W'0^ enumei;at'ons the numbers prefixed to the simple articles correspond to those in the same refer to tl.P arran/?ement ot IV. ,n Materia Medica ; while those which follow some of the articles «tei to the paragraphs of that article as numbered in the marginal notes. 334 Appendix. r 9 Tincture of anguslura. ICO Ointment ol bluck pepper. toi Infusion of valerian. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. Preparation a. Til CIURA Angusturai, Dub. line, tore of Angustura. Tins is prepared by digesting two ounces of eoaisely powdered angustura bark in two pints of proof spirit or seven days, and straining. t i t» i This preparation, now first made officinal by tae Du >- lin college, is a good form for exhibiting the angustuia in small doses. Ordinary dose about 2 drs. generaliy in composition. Class II. Order 3. Dianbiua "irigynia. 45. Piper Nigrum. This is made by adding to the purging clyster to be Apfcndt described presently, 2 drs. of tincture of asatoetida. Class VI. Order 2. Hexandria Trigynia. 112 *. Rumex Aciuaticus, Dub. Great water dock. Grelt WJ The root. ler dock, One of the new additions to the Dublin Materia Me¬ dina. It ranks among astringents, and has been celebrated as a remedy in scurvy, diseases of the skin, and venereal complaints. It is generally given by way of infusion. f } t i t ll V ll 11 ai Preparation a. UnguENTUM Piperis NIGRI, Dub. Ointment of black pepper. A stimulating ointment, made by mixing 4 oz. of finely powdered black peppei, with a pound of prepared hogs lard. Class III. Order 1. Triandria Monogynia. 48. Valeriana Officinalis, Materia Medica, N° 354- Preparation d. Infusum Valerianae, Dub. Infu¬ sion of valerian. This is made by digesting 2 drs. of valerian root, coarsely powdered, in 7 oz. by measure of boiling water, for an hour, and draining oft the liquor when cold. This is a good antispasmodic, especially in hysteric cases, and the stomach is said to hear it better than the powder. Dose, a glassful twice or thrice a-day. In our Materia Medica, in the names of the pre¬ parations of valerian, the genitive case of valeriana is inadvertently printed vdlenanu Class VII. Order 1. Heptandria Monogynia. 11 3. AESCULUS IIlPPOCASTANUM. toy Now adopted by the Dublin college. 127. Cassia Senna. Preparation h. Syrupus Sennas, Dub. Syrup ofSynJp°3of I Senna. See SYRUPUS MaNNAE, Materia MeDICA, senna. N° 795- Class X. Order 1. DecanCria Monogynia. I30. SWIETENIA FeBRIFUGA. ioj Now also first adopted in the Dublin pharmacopoeia. 134. Quassia Excelsa. no Preparation a. TlNCTURA Quassias, Dub. Tine-Tincture ture of quassia. quassia. li It ev ti( sy i"i tin Bi a? tki tie aln aru tk opi Class V. Order 1. Pentandria Monogynia. 69. Hyoscyamus Niger. Tincture of Preparation b. TlNCTURA HyoscYAMI NlGRI, Ma- henbane. TERIA MEDICA, N° 392. Now added by the Dublin college, and made rather stronger than the Edinburgh tincture, the proportions being ounces of the dried leaves in coarse powder, to an English pint of proof spirit. 72. Cinchona Officinalis. Infusion of Preparation a. INFUSUM CINCHONAS OFFICINALIS, cinchona. E. Materia Medica, N° 402. Infusum CinchonjE sine galore, Dub. Prepared by macerating an ounce of cinchona bark in coarse powder in 12 ounces of cold water for 24 hours ; then pouring off" the liquor. This is prepared by digesting an ounce of quassia shavings in 2 pints of proof spirit for 7 days, and filter- ing. This forms a strong solution of the bitter principle of quassia. 137. Styrax Officinale. Preparation b. Pilule E styrace, Dub. Storax pills. Prepared by beating well together 3 drs. of purified storax, 1 dr. of soft purified opium, and the same quan¬ tity of saffron. This may properly he considered as a preparation of opium, of which it contains a fifth part. Class XI. Order 2. Dodecandria Digynia. , in f 142*. Agrimonia Eupatoria, Dub. The herb.Agdmoi All sti: pri son id sns lei! not tla 8GC stiii Af: las tie aici Order 2. DlGYNIA. 84. Ulmus campestris. Decoction Preparation a. DecOCTUM UlMI. of dm bark. The Dublin college order this decoction to be pre¬ pared much in the same manner as that ot the London pharmacopoeia. no. Ferula Asafoetida. IO5 ^ Tetid dy- Preparation/. Enema foetidum, Dub, Fetid clyster. A slight astringent now added by the Dublin college. Class XII. Order 5. Icosandria Polyginia. 113 158. Geum urbanum, Dub. Avens. The root. Arens. This has now obtained a place in the pharmacopoeia of Dublin, and as a useful indigenous tomc^ merits par¬ ticular notice. Dose of the powder from half a dram to a dram. „ Class pw !: tie sic seil tie fall ten, 4 Class XIII. Order i. i6cl Pap aver Somniferum. Opium. ief- PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. . v:- Polyandiua Momogynia. e.l aDd the spirits are exhilarated. Pain is alleviated, and all care for the time forgotten. The effects of this substance on those who swallow it as a substitute for wine, as is u sual in the east, are familiar to most of our readers, and sufficiently prove its stimulating effect, oimilar proofs appear to have been exhibited during the present war, among Europeans. We are told that the French soldiers are plied indifferently with opium or biandy, in order to increase their courage and ferocity and we have been credibly informed, that some of the most celebrated performers on the London stage, parti¬ cularly m tragic parts, which require peculiar self com¬ mand, or energy of expression, are accustomed to take doses of opium proportioned to the circumstances of the character which they are to perform. The excretion of urine is sometimes increased j but as an increase of absortion is a usual consequence of opium other excretions, except, as we have said, the perspi¬ ration, appear to he diminished. Opium also acts as a powerful stimulus to the genital organs, and excites the venereal appeht0: It is said that on examining the bo¬ dies of Turks slain in battle, the penis has been often found in a state of erection, even in old men *. * Murray After these eflects have continued for a time, appear- dpparat. ances of a different nature present themselves At first Medicam' a languor and lassitude not unpleasing come on, and are T* h P‘ soon followed by yawning and a strong propensity to sleep. If the quantity taken has been considerable (above two gr.), the previous symptoms of excitement are more remarkable, but they generally continue for a snorter time, and are followed by a proportional depres¬ sion. Considerable nausea supervenes, and sometimes a severe vomiting is excited, by which great part of the opium is expelled from the stomach. But if this should fail to take place, and often when it has to a partial degree appeared, a heavy stupor comes on, attended with giddiness and headach ; the breathing becomes difficult and laborious j the person falls into a profound sleep, from which he is roused with great difficulty, and into which, if left to himself, he speedily relapses ; the face becomes pale, the lips livid, the extremities cold, universal torpor seizes the limbs, and is followed by convulsions and fatal apoplexy. On examining the bodies of those animals which have AnnJarln fallen victims to opium, the stomach is found distended, ces on dis¬ and containing frothy mucus, its internal coat in a state secti°n-- of inflammation, ami sometimes the pyloris contracted. 1 he vessels of the brain are exceedingly turgid, and commonly an effusion of blood is found to have taken place. ^ ben a person awakes after having taken opium, be usually finds himself heavy and giddy, and not unfre- quently complains of headach and dimness of sight ; his bowels are costive, and bis appetite defective. Some people, so far from being soothed and lulled to sleep by opium, are rendered exceedingly irritable and restless 5 others, if they are made to sleep by the influeHce of this medicine, are harassed with frightful dreams, and’ awake unrefreshed. Effects similar to what we have described arise from opium when injected into the rectum ; hut they require a larger dose. When this substance is applied to the eye, the urethra, or other sensible parts, it excites pain and redness *, which, however, do not long continue. * CHimpe's When merely applied to the surface of the bodv, while £(•*'• the. 2'5' ' As the account of this important remedy given in the article Botany may not be deemed sufficiently satisfac¬ tory by our medical readers, and as in tbe Materia Me¬ dina we were so much confined that we could only refer to the best writers that have treated on opium, -we shall here supply that deficiency, by giving a comprehensive view of the effects of opium 5 of the discoveries that have been made by late chemical analyses respecting the nature of its narcotic principle j shall point out the ge¬ neral means by which the ill effects which sometimes attend the exhibition of this medicine may be obviated and enumerate those articles of the Materia Medica which may be most conveniently employed as substitutes for a drug now become so scarce and expensive. Perhaps no article of tbe Materia Medica ranks higher in point either of antiquity or efficacy than opium. Its peculiar properties and mode of operation have, how¬ ever, been long a subject of debate, both among theore¬ tical and practical writers. Tbe place assigned to it in systematic arrangement has been continually fluctuat¬ ing; Cullen and his followers considering it as one of the most powerful sedatives which w'e possess, while Brown, Darwin, and the advocates for their doctrines, as strenuously contend thatit ought tube ranked amongst the most active and diffusible stimuli. In fact, the par¬ ties engaged in this controversy appear chiefly to differ about words, and probably they are both partly right and partly wrong. Ihey agree that the effects of opium are similar to those ol wine and alcohol, liquors which are generally, though indeed not universally, accounted stimulants. J f opium produces similar effects with these, we see no good reason why it should not be arranged in the same class. All these substances may indeed be considered as both stimulant and sedative, according as we advert to their primary or secondary effects. If by a stimulant be meant something which increases the force and frequency of action in the muscular fibres, and possesses the power of sustaining or increasing the vital powers, which is, we believe, the generally received definition, we can surely not refuse this character to alcohol, and its modifications. MTo that has ever felt the cheering influence of wine, that has experience.d the exhilaration, the flow of spirits, and the energy of action, which are the usual effects of the bottle, can refuse to acknowledge the effects of the stimulating powers of this too fascinating beverage. Again, if by a sedative we are to understand something which diminishes the force and vigour of muscular ac¬ tion, and depresses all the vital energies, every one who has felt the effects consequent to a too free filiation at Hie shrine of Bacchus, will readily admit that wine and alcohol are, in an eminent degree, possessed of sedative powers. Now, that opium resembles alcohol in both these circumstances, is generally admitted. When a moderate quantity of opium (vve mean not more than two grains), is received into the stomach, it excites there a gentle warmth, which is gradually diffu¬ sed over the whole body, attended with an itching of the skin, and usually followed by an increase of perspi¬ ration. The pulsation of the heart and arteries is at first rendered fuller and more frequent, and there is commonly heat and flushing of the face; the eyes appear enliven- 336 PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. general debility felt alter having taken opium, are best , 117 Til effects of opium. Appendix, the cuticle is entire, it produces no change J but when v > the tincture of opium, or opium in line powder, nnxe with an oily substance, is rubbed on the skin, pain is al¬ leviated, sleep induced, delirium assuaged, and other se¬ dative effects brought on j but the stimulating effects of the medicine are, in this way, said to be less ap- ^ The ill effects which sometimes attend the exhibition of op.um, may arise, either directly from its stimulating power, or from consequent exhaustion. I The ill effects which appear to be the immediate consequence of the stimulus are, excitement, increased absorption, and determination ol the blood to the bead. Tin s, effects render it an improper remedy in t.ie early stages of inflammatory diseases, particularly in phremtis, pneumonia, catarrh, and dysentery By increasing ex¬ citement and determining to the head, opium is impro¬ per in phrenitis •, and it is hurtful in the other diseases by increasing absorption, and hence lessening expectoration, and producing costiveness. In some cases ol inflamma¬ tion, however, where increased perspiration is desirable, as in rheumatism, if the medicine he so managed as to produce full sweating in a short time alter exhibition, it may be employed with advantage. II. The ill effects which arise from the secondary circumstances following the administration of opium, are chiefly headach, general debility, tremors, spasms, pa¬ ralysis, and hypochondriasis. Of course, m cases where these symptoms and diseases are to be apprehended, it must be employed with considerable caution.. Opium has been analysed by several chemists, espe¬ cially hy Gren, Bucholtz, Josse, Proust, Dr Duncan ju¬ nior, and very lately by Derosne. “ By evaporating a watery solution of opium to the consistence of a syrup, Derosne obtained a precipitate, which was increased by diluting it with water. He dissolved this in hot alcohol, from which it again separated on cooling. W hen puri¬ fied by repeated solutions, it crystallized in rectangu¬ lar prisms with rhomboidal bases, had no taste or smell, was insoluble in cold water, and soluble in 400 parts of boiling water, did not affect vegetable blues, was soluble in 24 parts boiling alcohol and no cold*, so¬ luble in bot ether and volatile oils, and separated from them as they cooled j very soluble in all acids, and -* Dwncan’s highly narcotic *. Dispensat. ^ considerable proportion of the substance of opium 4th edit. .g insoiuh|e both in water and alcohol; and it is re¬ markable that the insoluble part is very different in Turkey opium from what it is in that which comes from the East Indies; being in the former a ductile, plastic, coherent mass, in the latter an incoherent, powdery matter, diffusible in water. According to Dr Duncan, the active constituent of opium appears to be of a volatile nature; and as this must be carried off by boiling or distillation, the usual processes for purifying opiuni tend to diminish its medical effects. The ill efleets of opium are to be obviated or coun¬ teract! d by regulating the dose according to the effect relieved by wine and exercise. When a person has swallowed such a quantity of opiuni as there is reason to fear will prove latal, it its effects are not prevented or counteracted, it is proper to exhibit an emetic as soon as convenient, in order to eva¬ cuate from the stomach as much of the opium as possi. hie. With this view, a scruple or hall a dram of sul¬ phate of ziuc dissolved in a little water, is to be given, and the action of vomiting promoted several times by proper diluting liquors. We should then administer: le¬ mon juice in considerable quantities ; and 1 the stupor be very great, all methods are to be employed for rou¬ sing the'patient, and obliging him to exert himselt in moving about. If the more alarming symptoms are made to yield, we should give wine, ether, or other sti¬ mulants, in moderate doses, still taking care to keep a- live the attention of the patient. Strong coifee has been highly recommended in these cases. As opium is now become a very expensive article, itSu|)Stl is of consequence to consider what other remedies thattbrop: are likely to produce the same good effects may be sub¬ stituted for it. Several of the narcotic vegetables have been employed for this purpose, especially lactuca virosa, conium maculatum or hemlock, datura stramonium or thorn apple, atropa belladonna or deadly nightshade, humulus lupulus or hop, and hyoscyamus niger or hen¬ bane. Of these the two last seem to be best adapted to this purpose. tiS Analysis of Extractum opii aquosum, Dub. Preparation d. The Dublin College have made some alteration in Water their mode of preparing this extract, though they pre-tract* serve the same proportions. They direct the opium to0f1™’ be triturated with hot water for ten minutes, when the water is to be poured off, a fresh quantity added, and the trituration continued lor the same period. Ibis tritura¬ tion to be repeated a third time. I hen all the liquors are to be mixed together, suffered to stand in an open vessel for two days, strained through linen, and then in¬ spissated to the consistence of an extract. Class XIV. MIA. Order i. Didynamia Gymnosper- 168. Mentha Viridis. V- 3*9- Com- 119 Means of obviating the il ef Preparation p. I NEW SUM COMPOSITUM, Dub. pound infusion of mint. ^ This is prepared by first digesting, for half an liour,Comp in a close vessel, two drams of dried mint in as muebinfaio boiling water as, when strained, may produce six oun-mmt. ces, and then mixing with the strained liquor, two drams of fine white sugar", and three drops of essential oil of mint, previously dissolved in hall an ounce ol compound tincture of cardamom. the 11 el leia^icu ~ , c j ■ • t feetb.ofopi-intended to be produced; by the mode of admimstra- . it • . 1 I 1 I i- . ^ I \«r f \ 1 _ This forms a very grateful stomachic. inn. tion, whether internally, or by friction, or by combi¬ ning with it some correcting substance which has the effect of counteracting its unpleasant properties, such as lemon-juice, ammonia, tartrate' of antimony and potash, sphmuriate of mercury, or aromatics. The languor and 174. Teucrium Chama:drys, Dub. mander. The herb. WTall ger-Wttngf niandti An indigenous tonic, employed in domestic medicine in cases of chlorosis, gout, and intermittent fever PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. O 1T T * « 124 cture of talis. Order. 2 Angiospermia. 180. Digitalis purpurea. Preparation b. Tinctura Digitalis purpureas. This medicine is now introduced into the Dublin Phaimacoposia, and is prepared in the same manner as nirpp.f^n liv Hip ^,^11 Class XXIV. Order 2. Cryptogamia. Fuel. # 1 ’ directed by the Edinburg! Class XIX. Order 2. superflua. 216. Anthemis Nobilis li college. Syngenesia Polygamia 337 Appendit. 2J5 » Focus VESJCULOSOS, QUEECDS MARINA,' —' Dub. Yellow bladder wrack. , , Eladdev A common indigenous sea-weed, the charcoal from™^ which is employed in the following preparation. (-pound reparation a *. Decoctum Chamemaeli COMPOSI d :ctionofTUM, Dub. Compound decoction of chamomile, e momile. Made by boiling for a little half an ounce of chamo¬ mile flowers and two drams of sweet fennel seeds in a pint or water, and straining. Used chiefly for clysters. Class XXI. Order 8. Monoecia Polyandria. a. Pulvis quercus marina:, Dub. Powder of sea- Powder of Wr^C • . sea-wrack, ’j'8 1S Prepared by drying and cleaning any quantity of yellow bladder wrack, gathered while in fruit; then exposing it to the fire in an iron pot or crucible, covered Avith a perforated lid, till the volatile matters have eva- porated, and the mass becomes of a dull red colour. Hus is to be reduced to a very line powder, and kept in close vessels. r 1 he medical virtues of this preparation, if it have any, are similar to those of burnt sponge, and it may be given in the same dose. ^ 226. Quercus Cerris. Galls. T'ture Of, **reParatlon a- Tinctura Gallarum, Dub. Tine- ture of galls. . PrePared by digesting four ounces of powdered galls in two pints ot proof spirit for seven days, and strain¬ ing. A strong solution of the astringent principle of galls. Order 10. Monadelphia. Order 3. Alga:. 256. Lichen Islandicus, N° 799. Preparation a. Decoctum Lichenis Islandici n IJu Dub. Decoction of Iceland liverwort. ofTceS I Ins is prepared by digesting half an ounce of Iceland livervvoi t‘ liverwort in a pint of hot water for two hours, in a close eosel, then boiling for 15 minutes, and straining off the liquor while hot. b 22 8. Pinus Abies. Burgundy pitch. ‘cicnt Preparation b. Emplastrum caleFacieNS, Dub. Laleiacient plaster. Chap. III. Mineral Substances. Sect. 2. Inflammable Substances. 260. Sulphur sublimatum. Con and Pills c°- Dub. loc) , dutn it. A warm.stimulating plaster, made by meltimr toge¬ ther with a moderate heat, seven parts of Burgundy fitch and one part of ointment of cant har ides. Preparation g. Aqua Sulphureti Kali, Dub. WatV/of » ater of sulphuret of potash. sulplmret of potash. Order 12. Syngenesia. 236. Cucumis Colocynthis. Preparation A. Pilula:Colocynthidiscomposita:, Uu. ivOmnniinrl rvillo i? Compound pills of eoloevnth. These are prepared by beating together half an ounce he pith o, colocynth, half an ounce of hepatic aloes, and he same quantity of scammony, all in powder, with Uvo drams of Spanish soap, a dram of cloves, and a suf- icient quantity of simple syrup, to form a mass for pills, i his is a strong cathartic, and may be given in a dose Of 10 or 15 grains. 244. Juniperus Sabina. . Preparation d. Unguentum ointment. Sabina:, Dub. Savine This is prepared by boiling together half an ounce of sublimed sulphur with nine ounces by measure of caustic ey tor 10 minutes, and straining through paper. The liquor is to be kept in vessels well closed. i? sPecihc gravity of this liquid is assigned by the Dublin college to he to that of distilled water, as 11 20 to 1000. SULPHt'RF-TI AmmoKM, Dub. Wftte/of ater of sulphuret of ammonia. sulphuret of This is prepared by shaking four ounces of fresh-"™™* buiat lime in an earthen vessel, which is to be kept co¬ vered ti l the 1,me has fallen into powder, and become cool ; when there are to be added four ounces of pow¬ dered muriate of ammonia, and two ounces of sublimed sulpluir mixed together, avoiding the vapours. The whole is now to be put into a retort, and distilled with a sudden and pretty strong heat, and the liquor that comes over is to be kept in a phial well closed with a glass stopper. Prepared by boiling half a pound of fresh savine aves, bruised, in two pounds of prepared hog’s lard till in(7;nbe-?T?fCriSP’ tl!en PreSsinS out the lard and melt¬ ing m it half a pound of bees wax. whb.h^1^1"? °in;ment’ USe(1 in dressing issues, for ment * ^ S U t0 ^ Pre^era^e to cantharides oint- VOL. XVII. Part I. ^ Sect. 4. Alkalies and Alkaline Salts. 265. Nitras Potassa:. Preparation g. /Ether Nitrosus, Dub. ether. 135 Nitrous Nitrous ether. I repared by pouring gradually, and in different por¬ tions upon a pound and a half of nitre, dried and coarsely powdered, in a tubulated retort, placed in a bath of cold ^u water, 33? PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. Appendix. 136. Oxymuri- :.tip a'ka- Une w.ite:'. I37. Oxymuri- -atic water. 138 "Water of _4nuriate of li:ne. 139 Precipitat «d chalk. tvater, a pound of sulphuric acid previously mixed with 19 ounces by measure of rectified spirit of wine, the mixture having been allowed to cool. ^ ith a very slight degree of heat, such as that of tepid water, an etherial liquor will pass over from the retort, and the heat which soon spontaneously arises in the retort must he moderated by cooling with cold water. I he receiv¬ er should also be cooled with ice or snow, and furnished with a proper apparatus, to carry oft and condense the superabundant vapours. The etherial liquor that spon¬ taneously comes over, is to be put into a phial with a. ground glass stopper, and as much dry subcarbonate of potash added as may be sufficient to saturate the super¬ abundant acid, which is commonly done after the addi¬ tion of about a dram of the salt. The ether which now floats on the upper part of the phial, is to be separated by means of a funnel, and kept for use. Nitrous ether is a powerful stimulus, but is seldom employed in medicine. 266. Murias Sod;e. Preparation d. Aqua Alkalina Oxymuriatica, Dub. Oxymuriatic alkaline water. This is prepared by putting into a matrass two pounds of dried muriate of soda, and a pound of powdered man- ganese mixed, then pouring on two pounds of water, and gradually adding at different times two pounds of sulphuric acid, adapting a proper apparatus of tubes and recipients, that the gas which comes over may pass through a solution of four ounces of carbonate of potash, in 29 ounces by measure of water. This preparation is a solution of oxymuriate of potash, a salt which was lately in great esteem as a remedy in several diseases, especially typhus, scurvy, and siphilis, from an idea that it imparted to the system the oxygen defective in these diseases. The remedy is already out of fashion in this country. Preparation e. Aqua Oxymuriatica, Dub. Oxy¬ muriatic water. Made by passing the gas extricated from the mixture of muriate of soda, manganese, and sulphuric acid, in the preceding preparation, through a pound of distilled water, by which this is impregnated with oxymuriatic acid gas. Forms a good bleaching liquor, but is scarcely em¬ ployed in medicine. Sect. 6. Earths and Earthy Salts. 272. Carbonas Calcis. Preparation f. Solutio Muriatica Calcis, E. Materia Medica, N° 876. AQUA MURIATIS CALCIS, Dub. Water of muriate of lime. The Dublin college direct this to be prepared by dis¬ solving an ounce of chalk in coarse powder in two ounces of diluted muriatic acid, and straining. Preparation g. Creta pr^ECIFITATA, Dub. Preci¬ pitated chalk. Prepared by precipitating the chalk from the above solution, by adding carbonate of soda, filtering and wash¬ ing the precipitate. The carbonate of lime is thus procured very pure and in a very fine powder. 273. Sulphas Magnesia. Appendix: Preparation d. Enema CaTHARTICUM, Dub. Pur-' ging clyster. Furging .... r • clyster. Made by dissolving an ounce of manna in 10 ounces by measure of compound decoction of chamomile, (see N° I 25.), and adding an ounce of olive oil, and half an ounce of sulphate of magnesia. Sect. 7. Metals, and Metallic Preparations. 275. Acidum Arseniosum. Preparation a. Arsenias Kali, Dub. *41 Arsemate Arseniati of potash of potash. The Dublin college direct this salt to be prepared by mixing together an ounce of white oxide of arsenic, and the same quantity of nitrate of potash, separately re¬ duced to powder, putting them into a glass retort placed in a sand bath, and applying a gradual heat, till the bot¬ tom of the retort assumes an obscure red ; then dissolv¬ ing the residuum in four pounds of boiled distilled water, evaporating, and setting it aside to crystallize. The use of arsenic, in the cure of many diseases of debility, has of late been much extended. It is now employed, not only in intermittents, but in protracted rheumatism, and many other cases where the vital powers are much diminished. 276. SULFHURETUM AnTIMONII. Preparation h. Oxidum Antimonii nitro-muria- ticum, olim CALX STIBII PR^ECIPIT.ATA 1 riatic oxic Dub. (See N° 879.). Nitro-muriatic oxide of anti-of anti- v uiony. mony. ' This precipitate is now directed to be prepared by mixing together 11 ounces by measure of muriatic acid, and 1 ounce by measure of nitrous acid, taking care to avoid the fumes, and gradually adding to the mixture 2 ounces of prepared sulphuret of antimony} then di¬ gesting with a gradually increased heat, till the effer¬ vescence ceases, and boiling for an hour; filtering the liquor when cold, so that it may drop into a gallon of water. The powder which falls to the bottom is to be repeatedly washed till the water poured from it is per¬ fectly free from acid, and is then to be dried on blot¬ ting paper. ^ Preparation k. Tartras Antimonii et PoTASSiE. Antim^ TART ARUM ANTIMONIATUM, sive EME-ate TICUM. Dub. Antimoniated or emetic tartar. In the Dublin pharmacopoeia we are directed to pre¬ pare this medicine by boiling 18 ounces by measure of distilled water in a glass vessel, and gradually throwing into it 2 ounces of nitro-muriatic oxide of antimony, and 2-§- ounces of powdered crystals of tartar, previous¬ ly mixed, continuing the boiling for half an hour, then filtering the liquor, and cooling it gradually, that ciys- tals may be formed. 277. Hydrargyrum. i44 Preparation a. Hydrargyrum cum Magnesia, Dub. Mercury with magnesia. neg;a. This is a new preparation, formed by first rubbing together an ounce of quicksilver with the same quantity ofmanna, adding now and then a few drops of water, so ppendix prescriptions, extemporaneous so as to reduce the mixture to the consistence of svr.m fill f 1f* f I-» /-v J * • » 1 ^ I4S. t, nouiat < iiibmu- i e of «rcuiy. 14^ 1 tureof aiaate of cili ... . i i-uusisience 01 syrup till the whole ot the mercury disappears 5 then still con- tinning the trituration, adding first a dram of magnesia and when all are well mixed, a pint of hot water and shaking the mixture. When the sediment has ’com¬ pletely subsided, the liquor is to be poured off, and the washing twice repeated, so as to dissolve the whole of the manna. To the sediment, still moist, are to be added three drams more of magnesia, and the compound is to be dried on blotting paper. This preparation is similar in its medical effects to the hydrargyrus cum creta, described in Materia Medica, N° 914. • Preparation /Z. SuBmuriaS Hydrargyri ammo- NIATUM. Dub. Ammoniated submuriate of mercury. Prepared by adding to the liquor from which preci¬ pitated submuriate of mercury has been obtained, a quantity of caustic water of ammonia, washing the pre¬ cipitate with cold distilled water, and drying on blot¬ ting paper. The same with the calx hydrargyri alba, London. 278. Zincum. Preparation g. Tinctura Acetatis Zinci. Dub. Tincture of acetate of zinc. . Made by rubbing together an ounce of sulphate of zinc, and the same quantity of acetate of potash, then adding a pint of rectified spirit of wine, macerating for a week with frequent agitation, and filtering the tinc¬ ture. Chiefly used as an external astringent. 280 *. Oxidum Manganesii nigrum. Manga- nesium, Dub. Black, oxide of manganese. 359 Employed chiefly in preparing the oxymuriatic alka- w,,,],- line water. ' 287. Sulphas Ferri nativus. Preparation e *. Ac etas Ferri. Dub. of iron. . r47 Acetate Acetate of' iron. . ^ade by digesting half an ounce of carbonate of iron in 3 ounces by measure of acetic acid, and fil¬ tering. Preparation/ Tinctura Muriatis ferri cum Tmltlc- ^ oxido rubro, Dub. Tincture of muriate of iron with muriate of red oxide. iron with Prepared by digesting an ounce of red oxide of iron with four ounces by measure of muriatic acid for 24 hours, then boiling for half an hour, evaporating the filtered liquor to the consistence of syrup, and when cold, adding rectified spirit of wine, with frequent ao-i- tation, till the tincture acquires the specific gravity of A modification of the tincture of muriated iron de¬ scribed under Materia Medica, N° 965, and is em¬ ployed in similar cases. J he above appear to be the most material changes made m the new edition of the Dublin Pharmacopoeia. A tew articles ot less consequence are omitted, and the new names of others will be seen in the following -fable. In this Table we have followed the alphabetil cal order of the last Edinburgh Pharmacopoeia, and in the third column we have caused the London names to be printed in Italics, leaving a space above each for t e insertion of such new names as may occur in the new edition of their Pharmacopoeia which the London College is expected soon to publish. Edinburgh Names. Acetis hydrargyri. Hydrargyrus ace talus. Acetis plumbi. Saccharum saturni. Acetis potassae. Lixiva acctata. Acidum acetosum destillatum. Acetum vini distillatum. Acidum acetosum forte. Acidum acetosum camphoratum. Acidum benzoicum. Flores bewzoim. Acidum sulphuricum. Acidum vitriolicum. Aither sulphuricus. Hither vitriolicus. Alcohol. Spiritus vinosus rectificatus. Alcohol ammoniatum. Spiritus ammonite. Alcob°l ammoniatum aromaticum. Spiritus ammonice aromaticus. Alcohol ammoniatum foetidum. Table of Synonymous Names of the Officinal Compounds. London Names in 1791. Hydrargyrus acetatus. Dublin Names. Acetas hydrargyri. Hydrargyrum acetatum. Acetas plumbi. Cerussa acetata. Acetas kali. Alkali vegetabile acetatum. Acetum distillatum. Acidum aceticum. Acidum aceticum camphoratum. Acidum benzoicum. Sal ben’zoini. Acidum sulphuricum. Acidum vitriolicum. ^Either sulphuricus. Hither vitriolicus. Alcohol. Cerussa acetata. Kali acetatum. Acetum distillatum. Acidum acetosum. Flores benxdes. Acidum vitriolicum. Hither vitriolicus. Alcohol. Spiritus ammonice. Spiritus ammonias. Spiritus alkali volatilis. Spiritus ammoniae aromaticus. Spiritus alkali volatilis aromaticus. Spiritus ammonice compositus opintus ammoniae feetidus. Spiritus ammonice fcctidus. ^ u 21 Ammoniaretuni, 340 Appen ix. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS Edinburgh Names. Ammoniaretum eupri. Cuprum ammoniacum. Aqua acetitis ammonise. Aqua ammonice acetatce. Aqua ammoniac. Aqua ammonice causticce. Aqua cavbonatis ammoniac. Aqua ammonice. Aqua potass*. Aqua Hxivce causticce. Carbon as ammoniac. Sal ammoniacus volatihs. Carbonas calcis praeparatus. Creta alba. Carbonas ferri praeparatus. Hubigo ferri. Carbonas ferri praecipitatus. Carbonas magnesiae, Magnesia alba. Carbonas potassae. Lixiva purijicata. Carbonas sodae. Soda. Decoctum anthemiilis nobilis. Decoctum commune. Decoctum guaiaci compositum. Decoctum lignorum. Decoctum cinchonas officinal!. Electuarium aromaticum. Confectio cardiaca. Electuarium cassiae sennae. Electuarium lenitivum. Electuarium mimosae catechu. Confectio Japonica. Electuarium opiatum. dectuarium thebaicum. Emplastrum gummosum. Dublin Names. Cuprum ammoniatum. Aqua acetatis ammoniac. Liquor alkali acetatis volatihs. Aqua ammoniac caustic*. Aqua alkali volatihs caustici. Aqua carbonatis ammoniac. Liquor alkali volatihs mitts. Aqua cupri ammoniati. Liquor cupri ammoniati. Aqua kali caustici. Lixivium causticum. Aqua subcarbonatis kali. Lixivium mite. Carbonas ammoniac. Alkali volatile mite. Creta preparata. Carbonas ferri. Magnesia. Carbonas potassae. Alkali vegetabile mite. Carbonas sodae. Alkalifossile mite. Decoctum chamaemeli. Decoctum sarsaparillae compositum. Decoctum corticis cinchonae. Decoctum corticis peruviam. Electuarium aromaticum. Electuarium sennae. Electuarium catechu compositum. Emplastrum galbani. London Names in 1791. Append* Aqua ammonice acetatce. Aqua ammonice puree. Aqua ammonice. Aqua cupri ammoniati. Aqua kali pur i. Aqua kaliprceparati. Ammonia preeparata. Creta preeparata. Rubigo ferri. Magnesia alba. Kali preepara turn. Nati'on preeparaium. Decoctum pro enemate. Decoctum sarsaparillce compositum. Decoctum corticisperuviani. Confectio aromatica. Electuarium e senna. Confectio opiata. Emplastrum lithargyri compositum. Emplastrum meloes vesicatorii. Emplastrum vesicatonum. Emplastrum oxidi plumb! semivitrei. Emplastrum commune. Emplastrum oxidi ferri rubri. Emplastrum roborans. Emplastrum resinosum. Emplastrum adheesivvm. Emplastrum saponaceum. Emulsio amygdali communis. Emulsio communis. Emulsio mimosae niloticae. Emulsio Arabica. Emulsio camphorata. Extractum anthemidis nobilis. Extractum cinchonae officinalis. Extractum corticis peruviani. Emplastrum aromaticum. Emplastrum cantharidis. Emplastrum lithargyri. Emplastrum thuris. Emplastrum lithargyri cum resina. Emplastrum saponis. Emplastrum saponaceum} Emulsio Arabica. Mistura camphorata. Extractum florum chamaemeli. Extractum cinchonae rubr* resin. Extractum corticis peruviani. Emplastrum ladani compositum. Emplastrum cantharidis. Emplastrum lithargyri. Emplastrum thuris. Emplastrum lithargyri cum resina. Emplastrum saponis. Lac amygdalce. Mistura camphorata. Extractum chamcemeli. Extractum corticis peruviani turn resino,. Extractmn PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. ,ildjXi Edinburgh Names. v—' Extractum convolvuli jalapie. Extractinti julapce. Extractum glycyrrhizae glabrae. Extract, haematoxyli campechiani. Extractum ligni campechensis, Extractum rutae graveolentis. Extractum foliorum mice. Dublin Names. Extractum jalapae. Extractum glycyrrliizae. Extractum scobis haematoxyli. Extractum foliorum rutae. London Names in 1791. Extractum jalapit, Extractum glycyrrhi%ce. Extractum ligni campechensis. Extractum rutce. Infusum cinchonae officinalis. Infusum rosae gallicae. Infusum rosarum. Infusum tamarindi cum senna. Magnesia. Magnesia usta. Mucilago astragali tragacantba. Mucilago gummi tragacanthce. Mucilago mimosae niloticae. Mucilago gummi Arabici. Murias ammoniae et ferri. Flores martiales. Murias hydrargyri. Mercurius sublimatus corrosivum. Murias antimonii. Butyrum antimonii. Nitras argenti. Causticum lunare. Oleum ammoniatum. Linimentum volatile. Hydrargyrum cum creta. Infusum cinchonae sine calore. Infusum rosae. Infusum sennae cum tamarindis. Magnesia usta. Mucilago gummi tragacanthae. Mucilago gummi Arabici. Murias ammoniae et ferri. Murias hydrargyri corrosivum. Hydrargyrummuriat. corrosivum, Nitras argenti. Argentum nitratum. Linimentum ammoniae. Hydrargyrus cum creta. Infusum rosce. Magnesia usta. Mucilago tragacanthce. Mucilago Arabici gummi. Ferrum ammoniacale. Hydrargyrus muriatus. Antimonium muriatum. Argentum nitratum. Linimentum ammonice. Oleum volatile juniperi communis. Oleum volatile lauri sassafras. Oleum lavandulae spicae. Oleum juniperi sabinae. Oleum volatile menthae piperitae. Oleum volatile myrti pimentae. Oleum volatile pimpinellae anisi. Oleum cornu cervi rectificatum. Oleum baccarum juniperi. Oleum corticis etligui sassafras. Oleum animale. Oleum essentials baccce juniperi. Radicis sassafras. Oleum lavandulce. Oleum florum lavandulae. Oleum foliorum sabinae. Oleum herbae florescentis mentbae Oleum menthce piperitidis. piperitidis. Oleum baccarum pimento. Oleum seminum anisi. Oleum essentials anisi. Oleum volatile pini. Oleum terebinthinae rectificatum. Oleum terebinthince rectifcatum.. Oleum volatile roris marini officinal is. Oleum sulphuratum. Balsamum sulphuris. Oxidum antimonii cum phosphate calcis. Antimonium calcareo-phosphorat. Oxidum antimonii cum sulph. per nitrat. potassse. Crocus antimonii. Oxidum antimonii cum sulphure vi- trificatum. Vitrum antimonii. Oxidum ferri nigrum. Ferri squamce. Oxidum rubrum. Ferrum vitriolatum ustum. Oxid.hydrargyri peracidumnitricum Mercurius prcecipitatus ruber. Oleum roris marini. Fulvis antimonialis. Oxydum ferri nigrum. Oxydum ferri rubrum. Oxydum hydrargyri. Oxydum hydrargyri nitricum. Hydrargyrum subnitratum. Oleum roris marini. Oleum sulphuratum. Fulvis antimonialis. Crocus antimonii. Antimonium vitrificatum, Hydrargyrus calcinatus. Hydrargyrus nitratus ruber. Oxidum 342 Appendix. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. Edinburgh Names. Oxitlum hydrargyri cxnereum. Pulvis mercurii cinereus. Oxidum zinci. Calx “zinci. Phosphas sodae. Soda phosphorate. Pilulse aloeticae. Pilulae aloes cum colocyntliide. Pilulcc ex colocynthide cum aloe. Pilulte assefoetidae compositae. Pilulce gummosce. Pilulae scilliticae. Potassa. Causticum commune accrrhnum. Potassa cum calce. Causticum commune mihus. Potlo carbonatis calcis. Potio cretacea. Pul vis carbonatis calcis compositus. Pulvis crctaceus. Pulvis ipecacuanhae et opii. Pulvis doveri. Solutio sulphatis cupri composita. Aqua styptica. Spiritus aetheris nitrosi. Spiritus nitri dulcis. Spiritus ammonise aromaticus. Spiritus volatilis aromaticus. Spiritus lauri cinnamomi. Aqua cinnamomi spirituosa. Spiritus myristicae moschatae. Subacetis cupri praeparatus. JErugo ceris. Submurias hydrargyri. Hydrargyrus muriatus mitis. Submurias hydrargyri praecipitatus. Subsulphas hydrargyri flavus. Mercuriusflavus, vel turpeth.min. Succus spissatus conii maculati. Extractum seminum cicutce. Succus spissatus momordicae elaterii. Elaterium. Sulphas aluminae exsiccatus. Alumen ustum. Sulphas ferri. Sal mantis. Sulphas potassae. Lixiva vitriolata. Sulphas potassae cum sulphure. Sal polychrestus. Sulphas sodae. Soda vitriolata. Sulphas zinci. Vitriolum album. Sulphuretum antimonii praecipitatum Sulphur antimoniiprcecipiiatum. Dublin Names. Oxydum hydrargyri cinereum. Oxydum zinci. Ziincum ustum. Phosphas sodae. Pilulae aloes cum zingibere. Pilulce aheticce. Pilulae colocynthidis compositae. Pilulae myrrhae compositae. Pilulae scillae cum zingibere. Pilulce scilliticce. Kali causticum. Alkali vegetabile causticum. Kali cum calce. Causticum mitius. Mistura cretae. Mistura cretacea. Pulvis ipecacuanhae compositus. Spiritus aethereus nitrosus. Liquor cethereus nitrosus. Spiritus ammoniac aromaticus. Spiritus alkali volatilis aromaticus. Spiritus cinnamomi. Spiritus nucis moschatae. iErugo praeparata. Submurias hydrargyri sublimatum. Hydrargyrum muriatum mite sub¬ limatum. Submurias hydrargyri praecipitatum. Hydrargyrum muriatum mite preecipitatum. Submurias hydrargyri ammoniatum. Oxydum hydrargyri sulphuricum. Succus spissatus cicutae. Elaterium. Alumen ustum. Sulphas ferri. Ferr urn vitriolatum. Sulphas kali. Alkali vegetabile vitriolatum. Sulphas sodae. Alkalifossile vitriolatum. Sulphas zinci. Zincum vitriolatum. Sulphur antimonii fuscum. London Names in 1791. Zincum calcinatum. Pilulce aloes compositcc. Pilulce c gummi. Pihdce scillce. Kali purum. Calx efum kali pur0. Mistura cretacea. Pulvis cretce compositus. Pulvis ipecacuanha compositus. Spiritus cetheris nitrosi. Spiritus ammonice compositus. Spiritus cinnamomi. Spiritus myristicce. JErugo preeparata. Calomelas. Hydrargyrus muriatus mitis. Calx hydrargyri alba. Hydrargyrus vitriolatus. Succus cicutce spissatus, Elaterium. Alumen ustum. Ferrum vitriolatum. Kali vitriolatum. Matron vitriolatum. Zincum vitriolatum. Sulphuretuns ,,ndix. Edinburgh Names. y ' Suljlhnretum hydrargyri nigrum. JEthiops mineral!$. SuJphuretum liydrargyri rubrum. Gin na bar is fac (in'a. Sulphuretum potasstc. He par sulphur is. Syrupus citri aurantii. Syrupus e cortice aurantiorum. Syrupus citri medici. Syrupus e succo malorum limon. Syrupus dianthi caryopliylli. Syrupus caryophyllorum. Sympus toluiferi balsami. Syrupus balsamicus. Tartris antxmonii. 1'artarus antimonialis sive cmet. Tartris potassae. Tartarum solubile. Tartris potassac et sodae. Sal rupdlensis. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. London Names in 1791. Dublin Names. Sulphuretum hydrargyri nigrum. Hydrargyrum su Ip hurat.nigrum. Sulphuretum hydrargyri rubrum. Hydrargyrum sulphur at.rubrum. Sulphuretum kali. Alkali vegetabile sulphuratum. Syrupus aurantii. Syrupus limonis. Syrupus caryophylli rubri. Tartarum antimoniatum. Tartarum stibiatum. Tartaras kali. Alkali vegetabile tartarisatum. Tartaras sodae et kali. Sal rupellensis. Hydrargyrus cum sulphure. Hydrargyrus sulphuratus ruber. Kali sulphuratum. Syrupus corticis aurantii. Syrupus limonis. Syrupus caryophylli rubri. Syrupus tolutanus. Antimonium tartarisatum.. Kali tartarisatum. Natron tartarisatum. Tinctura aloes et myrrhae. Tinctura aristolochioe serpentariae. Tinctura benzoin composita. Bulsamum traumaticum. Tinctura camphorae. Spintus vmosus camphoratus. Tinctura convolvuli jalapae. Tinctura ferulae asaefoetidae. Tinctura lauri cinnamomi. Tinctura meloes vesicatorii. Tinctura cantharidum. . Tinctura mimosae catechu. Tinctura japonica. Tinctura muriatis ferri. Tinctura opii ammoniata. Elixir paregoricum. Tinctura rhei palmati. Tinctura saponis. Linimentum saponaceum. Tinctura saponis et opii. Linimentum anodynum. Tinctura toluiferi balsami. Tinctura tolutana. Unguentum acetitis plumbi. Unguentum saturninum. Unguentuni album. Unguentuin nitratis hydrargyri. Unguentum citrinum. Unguentum oxidi plumbi albi. I Unguentum e cerussa. Unguentum meloes vesicatorii. Unguentumepispast. epulv. canth. Unguentum resinosum. Unguentum basilicum. Unguentum subacetitis cupri. Vinurn tartritis antimonii. I inum e tartaro antimoniali. Tinctura aloes composita. Tinctura serpentariae. Spiritus camphoratus. Tinctura jalapae. Tinctura assaeftetidae. Tinctura cinnamomi. Tinctura cantharidis. Tinctura catechu. Tinctura muriatis ferri. Tinctura opii camphorata. Tinctura rhei. Linimentum saponis.. Tinctura balsami tolutani. Unguentum acetatis plumbi. Unguentum cerae. Unguentum supernitratis hydrargyri Unguentum hydrargyri nitrati. Unguentum cerussae. Unguentum cantharidis. Unguentum resini albi. Unguentum aeruginis. Tinctura aloes composita. Tinctura serpentarice. Tinctura ben%oes composita.. Spiritus camphoratus. Tinctura jalapce. Tinctura asscefact idee. Tinctura cinnamomi. Tinctura cantharidis. Tinctura catechu. Tinctura ferri muriati. Tinctura opii camphorata. Tinctura rhabarbari. Linimentum saponis compositunu. Unguentum cerussce acetatce. Unguentum ccree. Unguentum hydrargyri nitrati. Unguentum cantharidis. Unguentum resini jlavi.. Vinum antimonii tartarisati. INDEX 343 Appendix. [ 344 1 A. Acetate of potash, composition of, P- 3*3 substances de¬ composing, 317 lead, composition of, 313 substances decom¬ posing, 317 mercury, substances decom¬ posing, ib* iron, substances decomposing, ib. Dublin preparation of, N°I47 Acetic acid, preparation of, 96 camphorated, 97 Adjuvant of a formula, what, 4 rule for, 42 Agrimony, 112 Alchemists, improvements in pharmacy, introduced by, 73 Alcohol, Dublin preparation of, 95 AliberVs new essay on the art of pre¬ scribing noticed, 87 arrangement of compound medicines, ib. Antidotaria, account of, 77 Antidotes, frequency of, in the middle ages, _ < 69 Arrangement of formulae in a prescrip¬ tion, _ 39 ingredients in aformula, 40 Arseniate of potash, 141 Aurelius, Marcus, stupified himself by the habitual use of theriaca, 71 Avens, 113 B. Basis of a formula, what, 4 rules for, 41 C. Cat'bonate of barytes, composition of, p. 312 substances decom¬ posing, 316 lime, composition of, 312 substances decompo- _ sing, _ 316 magnesia, composition bf, 313 substances de¬ composing, 316 potash, composition of, 313 substances decom¬ posing, 316 soda, composition of, 313 substances decompo- _ sing, . 316 ammonia, composition of, 313 Dublin prepa¬ ration of, N° 89 substances de¬ composing, p. 316 3 INDEX. Carbonate of iron, composition of, P-313 substances decompo¬ sing, 31? zinc, composition of, 313 substances decompo¬ sing, 3j7 Chalk, precipitated, N° 139 Chemical, affinity, attention to, in pre¬ scription necessary, 24 common errors from ignorance of, 25 Chemistry, knowledge of, necessary to a prescriber, 22 et seq. Clyster, foetid, 105 purging, _ J3° Composition of medicines, advantages of, 7 Compound medicines, when not officinal, to be specifically described, 61 Consistence of medicines, errors respect¬ ing, 34 Constituent in a formula, what, 4 rules for, 34, 35, 48 Corrector in a formula, what, 4 rules for, 43 D. Decoction of hartshorn, 94 of elm bark, 104 compound, of chamomile, 125 Iceland liverwort, 132 Diseases, knowledge of, necessary, 16 Dispensatories, private foreign, enumer¬ ated, 80 British, enumerated, 81 Dock, great water, 106 Doses of medicines examined, 32 regulated by circumstances, 52 by the nature and inten¬ tion of the medicines, 53 by the age, &c. ol the patient, 54 by climate, 57 by idiosyncracy and ha¬ bit, 58 table of, for different ages, 55 explained, 56 algebraical formula for,p. 223.note(B) ZXover^s powder examined, N° 32 Dropping of liquid medicines inaccurate, p. 324. note (c) Dropsy, complex remedy for, how sim¬ plified, N° 63 Dublin Pharmacopoeia, account of, 79 new improvements in. See Appendix. E. Ebei'hard'ls work on extemporaneous prescription, account of, 88 Edinburgh Pharmacopoeia, editions of, 79 Ether, nitrous, 13 5 !>• Expectorants, table of, Extract, watery, of opium, F. Formula, how differing from prescriptio parts of, division of, arrangement of, in a prescrip tion, complex, disadvantages of, not always to be cor demned, parts of, origin of the, collection of, noticed Fucus vesiculosus, G. Gaubius's work on extemporaneous pre¬ scription, account of, Germander, wall, Geum urbauum, Griffith's myrrh mixture examined, simplified, Gjuner's work on extemporaneous pre scription noticed, H. Hints to a young practitioner, Infusion of valerian, cinchona, compound of mint, L. Lisbon, diet-drink, complex formula for London Pharmacopoeia, editions of, M. Materia Medico, knowledge of, necessa ry to a prescriber, tables of, utility of, 18, exemplitied, p explained, N° Mesue, a pharmaceutical writer in the middle ages, Mithridate, account of, Muriate of barytes, composition of, p. substances decom- 37( L#1 E#11 Lofn |in,acci gen wye rm r«o posing, lime, composition of, substances decom¬ posing, soda, composition of, substances decomposing, ammonia, composition of, ; substances decom- »p( frofi fr ofs posing, mercury, mild, composition of, corrosive, compo¬ sition of, substances decom- Jlsj posing, 1 antimony, composition of, ■ ; W,N.: N. PRESCRIPTIONS, EXTEMPORANEOUS. wes of ingredients in a formula need not be written at length, N° 49 aseous medicines, how corrected, 45 mess to be observed in writing pre¬ scriptions, 67 holaus, a pharmaceutical writer of the middle ages, 77 -ate of potash, composition of, p. 312 substances decompo- sln£>. 3r5 silver, composition of, 312 substances decompo- «ng, 315 (kolete medicines to be avoided, N° 60 1 (,ur of medicines, when unpleasant, how corrected, 46 ( tment of black pepper, 100 of savine, 129 ( um, account of, 114 'f, 11 general elfects of, 11 j appearances on dissecting ani¬ mals killed by, 116 ill effects of, how obviated, analysis of, substitutes for, Q)\ie of antimony, nitro-muriatic, P. ■ mniary circumstances of the patient y; I to be regarded in prescription, 66 ,p fWpicuity, a principal consideration in prescription, ^9 ti'rmacopceias, public foreign, enume niiiiH rated, sol■>! British, enumerated, Y\-macy^ modern, origin of, “Bj, . progress of, ukmfyphate of lime, composition of, p soda, composition of, substances decompo¬ sing, 316 1 storax, N° in compound of colocynth, 128 ! calefacient, 127 der of many virtues, formula for, from De Gorter, p. 326 of sea wrack, N° 131 ^riptions, medical, nature of, 1 examples of, 2 parts of, ' .3 necessity of ac¬ quiring a habit of writing, 18 “7 118 n9 120 142 P; 78 75 69 75 313 ib. Prescriptions, medical, previous requisites for, N° 15 art of writing, im¬ portance of, 8 general courses of medicine insufficient for, 9 necessity of, 10 illustrated, u, 38 not to be learned by attending a shop, 11 nor in an hospital, 13 the finishing part of a physician’s education, 14 works on, noticed, 83 Q. Quantity of a remedy to be regulated rather than its quality cor¬ rected, 4^ Quicksilver with magnesia, 144 R. Recapitulation of the principal rules to be observed in prescrip¬ tion, , 68 Rumex aquaticus, 106 S. Salts, secondary, tables of, p. 312, 313 explained, N°29,30 uses of, 31 Simplicity to be studied in prescription, 62 errors in point of, 63 Sponge, burnt, examined, 33 Subborate of soda, composition of, p. 313 substances decompo- sing, 317 Subcarbonate of potash, composition of, 313 Submuriate of mercury, ammoniated, N° 145 Subsulphate of mercury,composition of, p.312 Sulphate of magnesia, composition of, ib. substances decom- sing, 314 potash, composition of, 312 substances decompo- . sing, 314 soda, composition of, 312 substances decomposing^ 14 copper, composition of, 312 substances decompo- s.ing> 314 green, of iron, composition of, 312 substances decompo- sing, 314 zmc, composition of, 312 c 7 z 345 Sulphate of zinc, substances decompo- s‘ng> p. 314 Supersulphate of alumina and potash, composition of, 312 substances decompo- Sl*nK> 314 Supertartrate of potash, composition of, 313 substances de- . composing, 317 Symbolical characters to he avoided in prescriptions, N° eo Syrup of senna, I08 T. Table of expectorants, ,, p. secondary salts, ^i2 doses, ^23 French weights and measures, 332 synonymous, of officinal com¬ pounds, ’330 Tartar, antimoniated, 143 Tartrate of potash, composition of, p, 313 substances decompo¬ sing* 317 and soda, composition of,'313 substances de¬ composing, 318 antimony and potash, compo¬ sition of, 313 substances de- . composing, 318 zd’amw/i chamaedrys, N0 123 Therapeutics, knowledge of, necessary to a prescriber, Theriaca, account of, Tincture of angustura, henbane, Dublin, quassia, galls, acetate of zinc, muriate of iron with red oxide, Tinctures, abuses of, deprecated, . U- Uncommon remedies to be prescribed with caution, W. TUater, cautions respecting the prescrip¬ tion of, of sulphuret of potash, ammonia oxymuriatic, alkaline, of muriate of lime, JTax, purified, fFrack, bladder, 21 71 99 102 no 126 146 148 44 60 35 133 134 137 136 138 98 130 Pff iiee, Pi ::nt P R E PRESENCE, a term of relation, used in opposition to absence, and signifying the existence of a person in a certain place. Present Tense, in Grammar, the first tense of a veib, expressing the present time, or that something is Vol. XVII. Part I. b + E See P R now performing j as scribo, I write, or am writing. Grammar. PRESENTATION, in ecclesiastical law. See Pa¬ tronage. Presentation of the Virgin, is a feast of the Rom- X x ish Present Tense, Presenta¬ tion P R E [ 34-6 ] P R E t'rc irrita¬ tion II ish church, celebrated on the 21st of November, m me¬ mory of the Holy Virgin’s being presented by her pa¬ rents in the temple, to be there educated. Emanuel Preserve- ^omncnu?> who began to reign in H43> makes mention tion Island, n,. • r .. Snmp imaaine it to have of this feast in his Constitutions. Some imagine it to have been established among the Greeks in the 1 ith century •, and think they see evident proofs of it in some homilies of George of Nicomedia, who lived in the time of Vho- tius. Its institution in the West is ascribed to Gregory XI. in 1372. Some think it was instituted in memory of the ceremony practised among the Jews for their new¬ born females •, corresponding to the circumcision on the eighth day for males. # Presentation of our Lady also gives the title to three orders of nuns. The first, projected in 1618, by a maid named Joan of Cambray. The habit of the nuns, according to the vision she pretended to have, was to be a gray gown of natural wool, &c j but this project was never accomplished. The second was established in France, about the year 1627, by Nicholas Sanguin, bi¬ shop of Senlis •, it was approved by Urban v II I. 1 bis order never made any great progress. The third was established in 1664, when Frederic Borromeo, being apostolical visitor in the Valteline, was intreated by some devout maids at Morbegno to allow them to h\e in community in a retired place •, which he granted, and erected them into a congregation, under the title of con¬ gregation of our Lady. They live under the rule of St Augustine. PRESENTMENT, in Law. See Prosecution. A presentment, generally taken, is a very comprehen¬ sive term *, including not only presentments properly so called, but also inquisitions of office, and indictments by a grand jury. A presentment, properly speaking, is the notice taken by a grand jury of any offence from their own knowledge or observation, without any bill of in¬ dictment laid before them at the suit of tne king. As the presentment of a nuisance, a libel, and the like; upon which the officer of the court must afterwards frame an indictment, before the party presented can be put to an¬ swer it. An inquisition of office is the act of a jury, summoned by the proper officer to inquire of matters re¬ lating to the crown, upon evidence laid before them. Some of these are in themselves convictions, and cannot afterwards be traversed or denied ; and therefore the in¬ quest, or jury, ought to hear all that can be alleged on both sides. Of this nature are all inquisitions oifelo de se ; of flight in persons accused of felony ; of deodands, and the like ; and presentments of petty offences in the sheriff’s tourn or court-leel, whereupon the presiding of¬ ficer may set a fine. Other inquisitions may be after- Avards traversed and examined ; as particularly the co¬ roner’s inquisition of the death of a man, tvhen it finds any one guilty of homicide 3 for in such cases the offend¬ er so presented must be arraigned upon this inquisition, and may dispute the truth of it; which brings it to a kind of indictment, the most usual and effectual means ,of prosecution. See Indictment. PRESERVATION island, a small island on the southern coast of New Holland, and one of the groupe called Furneaux islands, derives its name from the circumstance of the crew of a ship which was wreck¬ ed on the coast, having saved their lives, and resid¬ ed for some time upon it. This island is in most • places extremely barren, and is remarkable for large Length aloft . keel Breadth amidships Depth a moveable wash strake of 40 37 10 3 o 6 exclusive of 8 The form the same as the yawns of that coast; the stern post nearly upright. External gunwales hollow, forming an oblique sec¬ tion of a parabola with the side of the boat, and pro¬ jecting nine inches from it on each side : these gunwales are reduced a little in their projection towards their ends, and are first formed by brackets and thin boards cover¬ ed at top and bottom with one thickness of good sound cork, and the extremity or apex of the projection having two thicknesses of cork, the hotter to defend it from any violent blows it may meet with in bard service. Hie depth of these gunwales from top to bottom was 15 inches, and the whole covered with very strong canvas, laid on with strong cement to resist the water, and that will not stick to any thing laid upon it. A false keel of wrought iron three inches deep, marie of three bars rivetted together, and bolted under the common keel, which it greatly strengthens, and makes a very essential part of her ballast; being hxed so much below the floor, it has neaily double the power the same weight would have if laid on the floor, and therefore _j ^ 1 blocks of granite scattered on its surface in many pmm,f places. But one of the most singular phenomena in tien hlJ the history of this island lias, the discovery of a petri- JWvi fied wood in the midst of a patch of naked sand ; and at 'rm> least 100 feet above the level of the sea. Some of the stumps of the trees rose a foot and a half above the surface ; some were furnished with branches, and even it is said a green leaf Avas seen on one of them Avben they Avere first discovered. The petrifactions were found to be of a calcareous nature. V>e think it probable that the trees here said to be petrified may be of the nature of corals, may7 ha\’e been formed as usual at the bottom of the sea, and elevated to their present situation by some convulsion. In some parts of the island a little vegetation avhs observed, with some brush wood and stunted tiees. Small kangaroos were found m abundance, witii diflerent kinds of birds and some noxious snakes. Collins''s Account of New South JFales, II. PRESER VING Lives of Shipwrecked Persons. In our account of life-boats, we laid before our leaders every thing that seemed useful on so important a subject Avhich Avas then knoAvn to us. Since that time we have met with the following description of a similar inven¬ tion by a Mr Lukin of London, suggested during kk casual residence at Lowestofl in Sufloik. A boat constructed on this principle cannot be over¬ set or sunk by any power of Avind and Avater ; in pioof of which the following particulars and description of the construction are made public, Avith the hope of ren¬ dering more generally known the easy means of saving many valuable lives ; which might certainly be done, if one or two of these boats Avere built at each of our ports, and every ship furnished with one (at least) in proportion to her size. Description and Dimensions of the Lowe staff Life-Boat, Feet. Inches. , . „ P R E C 347 3 tsernng much preferable to any other ballast that can be used for sailing boats. esidial^ Thwarts and gang-board as usual; three masts and '“'v ~ lug sails, and 12 short oars. In this state, this boat is much safer than any common boat of the same dimensions, will carry more sail, and bear more weather j but to make it completely unim- mergible, empty casks of about 22 inches diameter were ranged along withinside the gunwales, lashed firmly to the boat, lying even with the tops of the gunwales, and resting upon brackets fastened to the timbers for that purpose : also two such casks in the head, and two in the stern, and all removable in a short time, if desired ; there were also some empty casks placed under the gang- board j these would be an addition to the buoyancy if empty, and an increase to her ballast if full. Thus equipped, this boat was launched on the 19th of November, in a very squally day, About 20 men were launched in her, most of them pilots or seamen. They ran her immediately from the beach across the Corton sand, in the rnid.^t ol the breakers, which would have been almost certain destruction to any common sail¬ ing boat, as that would have been filled and sunk imme¬ diately. They then turned to the southward along the top ot the sand to its end : when they tacked and stood to tne northward, pulled up the plugs in her bottom, ■and let in as much water as would come that way j the water rose very little above the thwarts. With all this water in it, the boat sailed better than without it. The plugs were now put 111 again, and water poured in by buckets, until it ran over both gunwales j and in this state it was the opinion of those on board that she would have carried 60 men without sinking, and to upset it is not possible. But it is Mr liukin’s opinion that more than 50 men should not lie taken in when the boat is lull of water, and all her casks empty. It is particularly advisable that all life-boats should be built of the torm most approved by the pilots or sea¬ men on the coast where they are to be used ; as no one form will -mit all shores; and these principles of safety are applicable to every form. To this description we have only to add, that Mr Lukin is said to he the inventor of the first life-boat •fever built in England, and to have obtained a patent for it in the year 1785* It would appear, too, that he published a pamphlet on the subject, but this pamphlet tVe have had no opportunity of seeing. PRESIDENT, Pit/ESES, is an officer, created or elected to preside over a company or assembly; so call¬ ed in contradistinction to the other members, who are termed residents. Levd President of the Council, is a great officer of the crown, who has precedence next after the lord chan¬ cellor and lord treasurer ; as ancient as the time of King John, when he was styled consiliurius capitalis.—His office is to attend on the king, to propose business at the council-table, and to report to the king the several trans¬ actions there. See Privy-Council. PR ES ID IAL, was a tribunal, or bench of judges, established (belore the Revolution) in the several consi¬ derable cities ol France, to judge ultimately, or in the last resort, ot the several causes brought before them by ■way of appeal from the subaltern judges. The presidials made one company with the officers of the bailliages and seneschaussees, where they were established. P R E PRESS (Prelum), in the mechanic arts, a machine Press. made of non or wood, serving to squeeze or compress 1 -~n. any body very close. The ordinary presses consist of six members, or pieces; viz. two fiat smooth planks; between which the things to be pressed are laid; two screws, or worms, fastened to the lower plank, and parsing thiouo-li two holes in the upper; and two nuts, in form of an S, serving to drive the upper plank which is move- able against the lower, which is stable, and without motion. _ -F*desses used for expressing Liquors, are of various kinds; some, in most respects, the same with the com¬ mon presses, excepting that the under plank is per¬ forated with a great number of boles to let the juice expressed run through into a tub, or receiver, under¬ neath. A very useful machine for a press, in the process of cyder making, has been constructed by Mr Anstjce, who, with his well-known zeal for the improvement of mechanics, permits us to lay before our readers the following description of it. AA fig. 1. two pieces of timber, 21 feet long, I 2 by pIate 6 inches, laid side by side at the distance of 12 inches, ccccxxxitS and secuied in that situation by blocks placed between and bolts passing through them ; this frame forms the bed of the machine. BB, two uprights, 12 feet long, 6 by 8 inches, morticed upon them, and secured in their position by pins and iron squares. CC, two uprights, five feet long, six hy ten inches, morticed near the end of the under frame, and secured as before. D, a lever, 17 feet long, 12 by 13 inches, turning on a large holt which passes through the short uprights, al.-,o through iron straps, which secure them to the bed inside, and a stirrup of iron which passes over the end of the lever, and which makes the turning point in the line of its lower side, and not through its middle. E, a lever 20 feet long, six by eight inches at its largest part and ta¬ pering towards the other end : this lever turns on a bolt in the uprights BB. F, I, 2, 3, 4. four pieces of oak (which he calls needles, 10 feet long), four by two and a half inches, morticed loosely into the upper lever, and hung thereto hy bolts, so as to swing perpendicularly and play in a long mortice or channel cut through the large lever to receive them. These needles have inch- holes pretty closely bored through them (in a direc¬ tion crossing the machine), from the lower ends as far upwards as the great lever will reach, when it is as high as it can go. G, a bed to receive what is to be press¬ ed. H, a frame to support a winch worked by a handle at I. At the end of the small lever two blocks or pulleys are fixed, one above, and the other below it; a rope of about half an inch diameter is then fastened to the cieling (or continuation of the uprights of the winch frame if necessary) at K; then passed through the upper block on the lever, from thence passed through a block at L, and then goes with four turns round the winch, from whence it is carried through the block un¬ der the lever, and fastens to the machine at M ; by this means, if the winch be turned one way, it raises the end of the small lever if the other depresses it. To work the machine. If we suppose the great lever hearing on the matter te be pressed, an iron pin must be put into one of the holes in the needles abov# the great lever ; and when the small lever is worked as X x 2 for P R E [ 348 ] P R E far as it will go, either up or down, another holt is to be put into the hole, which comes nearest above the .Treat lever on the other side of the uprights BB, and the winch then turned the contrary way, by which means the pressing goes on whether the small lever uses or falls. Before the resistance is very great, the needles farthest from the fulcrum of the small lever are used ; after that the nearest are employed, which doubles the power of the machine. In raising the great lever, or lowering it to its bearing, the needles most distant from the fulcrum of the small lever, are used under in¬ stead of oi;cr it. As the rope is liable to stretch and get slack, he passes it, after taking two turns on the winch, through a pulley, to which is suspended a weight of half a hundred, and then takes two turns more be¬ fore it is carried through the other block, by which means tire slack is constantly gathered in, and the weight holds on without increasing the friction, as by hanging under the winch it counteracts the pressure up¬ wards on its axis. . The power of this machine is very great, being as one to 1136 nearly, and capable by a trilling addition of any other proportion. It is applicable to many pur¬ poses beside cyder pressing, and is more simple, and less liable to injury, than any other which has fallen under our observation. Perhaps, however, it would be an improvement to use, instead of the ropes and pulleys, by which the lever E is moved, a small wheel or pinion of 10 or 12 teeth, on the axis of the winch W(hg. 2.), and a stiff beam Liberty of the Press. See Liberty oj the Press. PRESSING, in the manufactures, is the violently squeezing a cloth, stuff, &c. to render it smooth and glossy. . . 11 j There are two methods of pressing, viz. co.d ana As to the former, or cold pressing: After the stuff has been scoured, fulled, and shorn, it is folded square in equal plaits, and a skin of vellum or pasteboard put between each plait. Over the whole is laid a square wooden plank, and so put into the press, which is screw¬ ed down tight by means of a lever. After it has lain a sufficient time in the press, they take it out, removing the pasteboards, and lay it up to keep. Some only lay the stuff on a firm table after plaiting and pasteboaiding, cover Potash Plate cwrxxxix. Kiln ioi' prep a ring-. Press cvder. n p' I i, I at ■ si I ;a c, I te % V \ •essmg ! esteign P R E C 349 ] PR cover the whole with a wooden plank, and load it with there are two fairs in the year- a proper weight. ■ ’" The method of pressing hot is this : E When the stuff has received the above preparations, it is sprinkled a little with water, sometimes gum-water; then plaited equally, and between each two plaits are put leaves of pasteboard ; and between every sixth and seventh plait, as well as over the whole, an iron or brass plate well heated in a kind of furnace. This done, it is laid upon the press, and forcibly screwed down. Under this press are laid five, six, &c. pieces at the same time, all fur¬ nished with their pasteboards and iron plates. When the plates are well cooled, the stuffs are taken out and stitched a little together to keep them in the plaits. This manner of pressing was only invented to cover the defects of the stuffs ; and, accordingly, it has been fre¬ quently prohibited. Pressing, or Impressing. See Impressing. PRESSION, or Pressure, in the Cartesian philo¬ sophy, is a supposed impulsive kind of motion, or rather an endeavour to move, impressed on a fluid medium, and propagated through it See Pneumatics. See Hydrodynamics and PRESSURE of air. Pressure of Fluids. Pneumatics. PREST, is used for a duty in money, to be paid by the sheriff on his account, in the exchequer, or for money left or remaining in his hands : 2 & 3 Edw. VI. c. 4. PREST-Money, is so called from the French word prest, that is, promptus, expeditus; for that it binds those who receive it, to be ready at all times appoint¬ ed, being commonly meant of soldiers. PRESTATION-money, is a sum of money paid yearly by archdeacons and other dignitaries to their bishop, pro extcriori jurisdictione. Prestation (prastatici), ivas anciently used for other payments : Ft quietismt de prcestatione muragii. Chart. Hen. VIE Sometimes also for pourveyance. PRESTEIGN is a town in Radnorshire, distant 149 miles west-north-west from London, in the direct road to Aberystwith, and throughout South Wales, in N. Lat. 5 20 12', bounded to the north and north-east by Herefordshire. It is a neat well built town, with clean and regular streets, and is the residence of many genteel families. The neighbourhood abounds with all the comforts and conveniencies of life. It is seated on a gravelly soil on the baeks of the river Lug, and at the head of a very fertile vale : the mountains to the west and north-west of the town forming, as it were, an amphitheatre round it. The name of it in Welsh, is Slan-Andi'as, which is supposed to be derived from the church, which is dedicated to Saint Andrew. The town is divided into four wards, which have each a se¬ parate jurisdiction, separate officers, levies, &c. The curfew-bell of William the Conqueror still remains in this place, and is rung every night. It is a borough by prescription, and is governed by a bailiff annually elec¬ ted, and sworn in by a steward appointed by the crown. The living is a rectory and vicarage united, and report¬ ed to be worth from 500I. to 600I. per annum 5 the parish lying in two counties. Here is an excellent free school well endowed. The county hall, the county gaol, the county bridewell, and house of correction, are kept in this place. The markets are held on Saturdays j and About a century and presteign a half ago Presteign was considerably larger-, had a jj good woollen manufactory, of which the very large Prestos, buildings now standing (formerly belonging to clothi-' ers) bear ample testimony 5 but a fire, succeeded by the plague, in the town, about the year 1636, reduced the same, and with it its consequence as a manufacturing town. The parish embraces a circle of at least 19 miles; and is reckoned very healthy. PRESTER John, or Jean, an appellation former¬ ly given to an emperor of the Tartars, who was over¬ come and killed by Jenghiz Khan. Since that time it has been given to the emperor of Abyssinia or Ethio¬ pia 5 however, in Ethiopia itself this name is utterly unknown, the emperor being there called the grand ne¬ gus. Prester, a meteor, consisting of an exhalation thrown from the clouds downwards with such violence, as that by the collision it is set on fire. The word is Greek, the name of a kind of serpent, called also dipsas, to which this meteor is supposed to bear a resemblance. The prester difiers from the thunderbolt in the manner of its inflammation j and in its burning and breaking every thing it touches with greater vio¬ lence. Prester, a word used by some to express the ex¬ ternal part of the neck, which is usually inflated in an¬ ger. PRESTIMONY, in Canon Law, is derived a prce¬ statione quotidiana; and is, by some, defined to be a kind of benefice, served by a single priest. Others say, it is the incumbency of a chapel, without any title or collation ; such as are most of those in castles, where prayers or mass are said ; and which are mere unen¬ dowed oratories. Whence the term is also applied, in the Romish church, to certain perpetual offices bestow^- ed on canons, religious, or others, for the saying of masses, by way of augmentation of their livings. Others think it is a lease, or concession of any ecclesi¬ astical fund or revenue, belonging to a monastery, to be enjoyed during life. Hu Moulin calls it a profane be¬ nefice, which, however, has a perpetual title, and an ec¬ clesiastical office, with certain revenues attached to it $ which the incumbent is allowed to sell, and which may be possessed without tonsure ; such as the lay church¬ wardens of Notre-dame. He adds, that, in propriety, the canonries of chapels are benefices of this nature. The most probable opinion seems to be, that prestimony is a fund, or revenue, appropriated by the founder for the subsistence of a priest, without being erected into any title of benefice, chapel, prebend, or priory ; and which is not subject either to the pope or to the ordi¬ nary, but whereof tire patron, and those who have a right from him, are the collators, and nominate and confer plena jure. PRESTO, in the Italian music, intimates to perform quick as prestissimo does extremely quick. PRESTON, a town of Lancashire in England, seat¬ ed on the river Ribble, over which there is a handsome stone bridge. Here is held a court of chancery, and other offices of justice for the county palatine of Lanca¬ ster. It is noted for the defeat of the rebels here in 1715, when they were all made prisoners, and sent up to London. It contained 17,085 inhabitants in 1811. W. Long. 2. 26. N. Lat. 53. 45. PRESTRE, s PEE [ 350 ] Prtstrc PHESTIIE. Sec Vauban. 11 PRETENSED or Pretended right, In Law, Is Prevarica- where one is in possession ot lauds and tenements, , tlul1 which another, who is out, claims and sues for. litre the pretensed right is in him who so claims or sues. PRETERITE, in Grammar, a tense which expres¬ ses the time past, or an action completely finished , as, scripsi, “ I have written.” See Perfect and Gram¬ mar PRETERIT LON, or Pretermission, In Rhetoric, a figure whereby, in pretending to pass over a thing un¬ touched, we make a summary mention thereof. I will not my he is valiant, he is learned, he is just, &x. The iiio>t artful praises are those given by way ot pre¬ tention. Set Oratory. PRETEXT, a colour or motive, whether real or feigned, for doing something. Toga PRETEXT A, among the ancient Romans, a long white gown, with a border ol purple round the. edges, and worn by c hildren ot quality till the age ot puberty, viz. by the boys till 17, when they chan¬ ged it for the toga virilis ; and by the girls till mar¬ riage. PRETIUM SEPULCHRI, in old law books, &c. those good"' accruing to the church wherein a corpse is buri¬ ed. In the Irish canons, lib. xix. cap. 6. it is ordered, that along with every body that is buried, there go his cow, horse, apparel, and the furniture ot his bed •, none of which may he disposed ot otherwise than for the pay¬ ment of debts, &x. as being familiars and domestics of the deceased. PRETOR, a magistrate among the ancient Romans, not unlike our lord chief justices, or lord chancellor, or both in one *, as being vested wtth the power of distri¬ buting justice among the citizens. At first there was only one pretorj hut afterwards, another being created, the first or chief one had the title of pro:tor urbanus, or the “ citv pretorthe other was called peregrinus, as being judge in all matters relating to foieigners. But, besides these, there were afterwards created many provincial pretors } who were not only judges, hut also assisted the consuls in the government of the provinces, and even were invested with the government of pro¬ vinces themselves. PRETORI AN GUARDS, in Roman antiquity, were the emperor’s guards, who at length were increased to 10,000 : they had this denomination, according to some, from their being stationed at a place called Prcetorium : their commander was styled prafectus preetorn. PRET0R1UM, or Prattorium, among the Ro¬ mans, denoted the hall or court wherein the pretor lived, and wherein he administered justice. It likewise denoted the tent of the Roman general, wherein councils of war, &c. were held : also a place in Rome where the Pretorian guards were lodged. PREVARICATION, in the civil law, is where the informer colludes with the defendants, and so makes only a sham prosecution. Prevarication, in our laws, is when a man falsely seems to undertake a thing, with intention that he may destroy it *, where a lawyer pleads booty, or acts by col¬ lusion, &c. It signifies also the false and contradictory testimony of a witness*, and denotes sometimes the se¬ cret abu-e committed in the exercise ot a public office, or of a commission given by a private person. 1 PRIAM, king of Troy, was the son of Laonifedon. p,.;ail He was carried into Greece after the taking of that city (] by Hercules*, but was afterwaids ransomed, on which, Pr‘ce he obtained the name of Priam, a Greek word signify- ing “ ransomed.” At his return he rebuilt Ilium, and extended the bounds of the kingdom of Troy, which became very flourishing under his reign. He married Hecuba, the daughter of Cisseus king of Thrace, by whom he had 19 children*, and among the rest Paris, who carried off Helen, and occasioned the ruin of Troy, which is supposed to have been sacked by the Greeks about 1184 B. C. when Priam was killed by Pyr¬ rhus the son of Achilles at the foot of an altar where he had taken refuge, after a reign of 52 years. See Troy. PRIAPISMUS, or Priapism, is an erection of the penis without any concomitant pain, or the con¬ sent of other parts. It is thus called, because the per¬ son in this state resembles the lewd god Priapus. Cce- lius Aurelianus says it is a palsy of the seminal vessels, and other nerves distributed to the parts about the pe¬ nis, by the distension of which this disorder is pro¬ duced. It is of the same nature as the satyriasis. See Medicine, N° 372, PRIAPUS, in Pagan worship, the son of Bacchus and Venus, who presided over gardens and the most in¬ decent actions. He was particularly adored at Lampsa- cus, a city at the mouth of the Hellespont, said to be the place of his birth ; and his image was placed in gardens to defend them from thieves and birds destruc¬ tive to fruit. He was usually represented naked, with a stern countenance, matted hair, and holding either a wooden sword or sickle in his hand, and with a mon¬ strous privity ; from whence downward his body ended in a shapeless trunk. The sacrifice offered to this ob¬ scene deity was the ass } either on account of the natu¬ ral uncomeliness of this animal, and its propensity to venery, or from the disappointment which Priapus met with on his attempting the chastity of ^ esta, while that goddess was asleep, when she escaped the injury design¬ ed her by her being awaked by the braying ot old Sile- nus’s ass. PRICE, Rev. Richard, D. D. L. L. D. fellow of the Royal Society of London, and of the Academy of Sciences, New England, was born at Tynton in Gla¬ morganshire, I ebruary 22. 1723* H;s father was a dissenting minister at Bridgend in that county, and died in 1739. At eight years old he was placed under a Mr Simmons of Neath *, and in four years removed to Pentwyn in Caermarthenshire under the Rev. Samuel Jones, whom he represented as a man ot a very enlar¬ ged mind, and who first inspired him with liberal senti¬ ments of religion. Having lived as long with him as with Mr Simmons, he was sent to Mr Griffith’s acade¬ my at Talgarth in Breconshire. In 1740 he lost his mother*, and on this he quitted the academy and came to London. Here he was settled at that academy, of which Mr Eames was the principal tutor, under the patronage of his uncle the Rev. S. Price, v\ho was co¬ pastor with Dr Watts upwards of 40 years. At the end of four years he left this academy, and resided with Mr Strealfield of Stoke Newington in the quality of domestic chaplain, while at the same time he regularly assisted Dr Chandler at the Old Jewry, and occasionally assisted others. Having lived with Mr Streatfield near p II I ice. * A itrss at fun H Svc , C 35 13 years, on ins death and his uncles’s he was induced to change his situation, and in 1757 married Miss S. Blundell of Leicestershire. He then settled at Hack¬ ney, but being shortly after chosen minister at Newing¬ ton Green, he lived there until the death of his wife which was in 1786, when he returned to Hackney! He was next chosen afternoon preacher at the meeting¬ house in Poor Jewry-street, but this he resigned on be¬ ing elected pastor of the Gravel-pit meeting Hackney, and afternoon-preacher at Newington Green. These he resigned with a farewel-sermon in February 1791. Shortly after he was attacked with a nervous fever which disappearing, was succeeded by a disorder in his* bladder, which reduced him to such a degree that worn out with agony and disease, he died without a groan on the 19th April 1791. He left his property to a sister and two nephews. l)r Kippis, speaking of his learning and pursuits, observes *, that “ his chief aim was to lay a foundation for solid knowledge, by an application to sciences of the noblest kind. It was on the great and fundamental principles and obligations of morality, on the higher species of mathematics, on the snblimer parts of natu¬ ral philosophy, on the true basis of government, and on the questions which relate to the essential welfare and dignity of man, that his studies were employed ; and in the prosecution of these studies he not only enriched his own mind, but was enabled to become of eminent service to his country and to the world. In his moral writings he has laboured with distinguished ability to build the science of ethics on an immutable basis ; and what he has advanced will always stand high in estima¬ tion as one of the strongest efforts of human reason in favour of the system he has adopted. For myself (adds Dr Kippis), I scruple not to say, that I regard the treatise referred to as a rich treasure of valuable infor¬ mation, and as deserving to he ranked among the first productions of its kind. With re-pect to his other ethical works, everyone must admire the zeal, earnest¬ ness, and strength, with which he endeavours to lead men into pious views of God, of providence and prayer ; and to promote the exercise of devout and amiable dispositions. In consequence of his profound know¬ ledge in mathematical calculations, he was qualified at a particular crisis for beung of singular utility to his fellow-citizens. A number of schemes for insurance lor lives and the benefit of survivorship, promising mighty advantages, were rising up in the metropolis. These ruinous schemes would have been carried to great excess, had not Dr Pi ice stepped forward and dispelled the delusion. Gratitude will not allow us to forget the ability and spirit with which he awakened the attention of Ins countrymen to the reduction of the national debt. "ith him it was that the scheme of the present minister for that purpose is understood to have originated. Y\ hat crowned the whole of his character was, its being an assemblage of the most amiable and excellent private vir¬ tues. His piety was sincere, humble, and fervent; his sou! pure and elevated •, in his views disinterested and noble ; and in his manners mild and gentle: the ap¬ plause ot his talents and virtues will be transmitted to future ages, and he will be united in the catalogue with the most eminent benefactors of mankind.” This is the panegyric of a friend j hut with few abate¬ ments it will be admitted y every candid reader. In ] p rt 1 morals Dr Price’s principles were those ofCudworth and Clarke ; and by many who have themselves adopted a very different theory, he is allowed to have defended those principles with greater ability than any other writer 111 the English language) see Moral Philosophy, IN 14.). In metaphysics he was perhaps too great an admirer of Plato, from whom he has borrowed a doc¬ trine concerning ideas which we confess ourselves un¬ able to comprehend. He was a firm believer in the imma¬ teriality of the soul 5 but, with Dr Law, the late learn¬ ed bishop ot Carlisle, he thought, that from death to the resurrection of the body it remains in a dormant or quiescent state. He contended for its indivisibility, but maintained at the same time its extension : which fur¬ nished Dr Priestley with some advantages in their ce¬ lebrated controversy, which his own acuteness would never have obtained. In propagating his political prin¬ ciples, which were republican, he sometimes expressed himself with undue vehemence; and he was a zealous enemy to all religious establishments, which, in his opi¬ nion, encroach upon that liberty wherewith Christ has made us free. His faith respecting the Son of God was what has been called sometimes low Arianism and sometimes Semi-arianisnt. From a very early age he claimed the privilege of thinking for himself on every subject. His father was a rigid Calvinist, and spared no pains to instil lus own theological dogmas into the tender mind of his son ; but young ilichard would often start his doubts and difficulties, and sometimes incur the old man’s displeasure by arguing against his favourite system with an ingenuity that perplexed, and a solidity that could not be easily overturned. He had once the misfortune to be caught reading a volume of Clarke’s sermons, which his father in great wrath snatch¬ ed from him and threw into the fire. Perhaps he could not have taken a more effectual method to make the book a favourite, or to excite the young man’s curiosity alter the other works of the same author ; and it is by no means improbable that this orthodox bigotry contri¬ buted more than any other circumstance to lay the foun¬ dation ol his son’s Arianism. Put whatever may be thought of Dr Price’s specu¬ lative opinions, whether political or religious, his vir¬ tues in private life have never been called in question. Of his practical religion it is impossible to speak in terms too high. There was a fervour even in his public prayers which indicated the strongest sensibility as well as sincerity in himself, and communicated its warmth (0 those who joined with him. But in his family devotions he gave still fuller scope to the pious emotions of his soul, and proved to those friends who were occasionally present at them how deeply he felt religious impressions, and how happily be blended in this as well as in other things the cool decisions of the understanding with the amiable and exalted sensibilities of the heart. But it is not in devotion only that these sensibilities were displayed. He was as exemplary in affection to his relatives as in love to his Maker. Of this he gave a striking though private instance before he first quit¬ ted his native place to try his fortune in London. His father had left to an elder brother by a former marriage a very considerable fortune ; to Bichard he left a mere trifle ; and to each of two sisters still less. Our author divided his share between his sisters, reser¬ ving P R I [ 35 vine; to himself only a few pounds to defray the expen- ces of his journey, and trusting for his future support to the blessing of God upon his talents and his indus¬ try. As in early life he was an affectionate and gene¬ rous brother, in old age he was a loving and attentive husband. His wife, who for a considerable time be¬ fore her death was almost wholly helpless, found du¬ ring the last years of her life hardly any enjoyment ex¬ cept in a game at whist; and though our Doctor dis¬ liked cards as a waste of time, and never touched them on any other occasion, to amuse her he would sit down every evening to the card-table, and play till it was late, with a cheerfulness and good humour winch charm¬ ed every person who had the happiness ol viewing him in that endearing situation. . Yet, though thus attentive to the obligations ot do- mestic’life, he did not suffer his private affections to en¬ croach upon his social duties. His talents and his la¬ bours were ever ready at the call of friendship j nay so much did his nature abound with the milk ol human kindness, that he could not resist without extreme re¬ luctance even troublesome and unreasonable solicita¬ tions. His hours of study and retirement were fre¬ quently broken in upon by applications for assistance and advice, especially in matters relating to annuities and life-insurances ; and in this way he sacrificed much of his personal convenience to individuals of whom he knew but little, and from whom he would accept of no pecuniary recompense. His good nature in this re¬ spect amounted almost to a foible j and subjected him to importunities and loss of time, of which he would sometimes complain as interfering materially rvith moie important and more generally useful studies. Whilst he thus obliged the rich by his mental talents, he succoured the poor with his earthly substanee. A fifth part of his annual income was regularly devoted to charitable purposes 5 and he was laudably anxious to distribute it in such a way as might produce the greatest good. In the practice of this, and indeed ot all bis virtues, he was utterly devoid of ostentation. Simplicity and humility were among the strong features of his character. No man was ever less sensible of liis own excellence, or less elated by his own celebrity •, and in no man was the dignity of artless manners and unaffected modesty more happily displayed. His face was the true index of his mind. It beam¬ ed with philanthropy 5 and when lighted up in conver¬ sation with his friends, assumed an aspect peculiarly pleasing. His person was slender, and rather below the common size, but possessed of great musculai strength and remarkable activity. A habit of deep thought had given a stoop to his figure, and he gene¬ rally’walked a brisk pace with his eyes on the ground, his coat buttoned, one hand in his pocket, and the other swinging by his side. . It Js natural to suppose that sueh a man as J3r i nee, some of whose writings were translated into foieign languages, would be very generally respected in the re¬ public of letters, and have many correspondents. The supposition is well founded. In 1763 or 17^4 'vas chosen a fellow of the Royal Society, and contributed largely to the transactions of that learned body j . in 1769 he received from Aberdeen a diploma creating him DD.; and in 1783 the degree of LL.D. was con¬ ferred upon him by the college of Yale in Connecticut. 2 ] P R I As in 1770 he had refused an American degree which PrJ had been conveyed to him by Dr Franklin, his accep-l——yv tance of one 13 years afterwards can be attributed only to his extravagant attachment to a republican form of government} which was the greatest defect in his cha¬ racter, and shows what prejudices the most vigorous mind will imbibe by thinking always on the same sub¬ jects, and in the same track. Among his correspon¬ dents, the most eminent in his own country were the late Lord Chatham, Lord Stanhope, Lord Lansdowne, the late bishops of Carlisle and St Asaph, and the pre¬ sent bishop of Landaff "7 Mr Hume, Mr Harris of Sa¬ lisbury, Dr Gregory of Edinburgh, and the celebrated Mr Howard, who lived with him on terms of the great¬ est intimacy } in America he corresponded with Dr Franklin, Dr Chauncey, Mr Adams, and others ; and in France with the celebrated Turgot, the Duke de Rochefoucault, and several of the first national assembly. One of his female correspondents sketched his character with great justness many years ago under the fictitious but well applied name of Simplicius; and with this cha¬ racter we shall close these short memoirs. “ While the vain man is painfully striving to out¬ shine the company, and to attract their admiration by false wit, forced compliments, and studied graces, he must surely be mortified to observe how constantly Sim¬ plicius engages their attention, respect, and complacen¬ cy, without having once thought of himself as a person of any consequence among them. Simplicius imparts his superior knowledge, when called upon, as easily and naturally as he would tell you what it is o’clock j and with the same readiness and good will informs the most ignorant or confers with the most learned. He is as willing to receive information as to give it, and to join the company, as far as he is able, in the most trifling conversation into which they may happen to fall, as in the most serious and sublime. If he disputes, it is with as much candour on the most important and interesting as on the most insignificant subjects; and he is not lesspa- tient in hearing than in answering his antagonist. If you talk to him of himself or his works, he accepts praise or acknowledges defects with equal meekness, and it is im¬ possible to suspect him of.affectation in either. Me are more obliged by the plain unexaggerated expressions of his regard, than by the compliments and attentions of the most accomplished pattern of high breeding 5 be¬ cause his benevolence and sincerity are so strongly mark¬ ed in every look, word, and action, that we are comin¬ ced his civilities are offered for our sakes, not for his own, and are the natural effects of real kindness, not the studied ornaments of behaviour. Every one is de¬ sirous to show him kindness in return, which we know will be accepted just as it is meant. All are ready to pay him that deference which he does not desire, and to' give him credit for more than he assumes, or even more than he possesses. With a person ungraceful, and with manners unpolished by the world, his behaviour is always proper, easy, and respectable j as free from con¬ straint and servility in the highest company, as from haughtiness and insolence in the lowest. His dignity arises from his humility j and the sweetness, gentleness, and frankness of his manners, from the real goodness and rectitude of his heart, which lies open to inspection in all the fearlessness of truth, without any need of dis¬ guise or ornament.” Qnrll t'rice. riJe- ' n ? R 1 t 353 Such was Dr Price.—Of Ins public principles men will think differently ; of his private worth there can "J be but one opinion. He will live in the memory of his friends till memory has lost her power. To posterity his works will be his monument. They are : A Re¬ view of the principal Questions and Difficulties in Mo¬ rals, 8vo, 17585 Dissertations on Providence. &c. 8vo. 1767 ; Observations on Reversionary Payments, &c. 8vo. 1771 5 Appeal on the National" Debt, &c’ 8vo. 1773 ; Observations on the Nature of Civil Liberty, 1776: on Materialism and Necessity, in a correspon¬ dence between Dr Price and Dr Priestley, 1779; on Annuities, Assurances, Population, &c. 8vo. 1779 ; on the Population of England, 1780 ; on the Public Debts, Finances, Loans, &c. 8 vo. 1783 5 on Reversionary Pay¬ ments, 2 vols. 1783 j on tbe importance of the Ame¬ rican Revolution, 1784 : besides Sermons, and a variety of papers in the Philosophical Transactions on astrono¬ mical and other philosophical subjects. PRIDE, inordinate and unreasonable self-esteem, at¬ tended with insolence and rude treatment of others It is frequently confounded with vanity, and sometimes with dignity; but to the former passion it has no re¬ semblance, and in many circumstance it differs from the latter. ^ anity is the parent of loquacious boasting 5 and the person subject to it, if his pretences be admit¬ ted, has no inclination to insult the company. The proud man, on the other hand, is naturally silent, and, wrapt up in his own importance, he seldom speaks but to make bis audience feel their inferiority. It is this ] P R I circumstance wliicli distinguishes pride from dignity the forward petuiance of'the'il'h'■tlltl0n’-un‘ rePr.'!s> and constitutes its sinfulness. Every man „(tL„ ' 1“.," 1°/f1'6 S-'-g and constitutes its sinfulness. Every man possessed of great powers of mind is conscious of them, and feels that he holds a higher rank in the scale of existence than he whose powers are less. If he recollect, at the same time, that he has nothing which he did not receive, and that his superiority is owing to the good pleasure of Him who forms his creatures differently, as the patter- forms his clay; he will be so far from insulting his in¬ feriors, that when necessarily in company with them he will bear with their foibles, and, as far as is proper, make them lose sight of the distance which the laws of God and man have for ever placed between them and him. This condescension, however, if be be a man of dignity, will never lead him to join with them in any mean or dirty action. He will even excuse in them many things which he would condemn in himself, and give them bis good wishes, after they have forfeited bis esteem. Such a character is amiable and respectable, and what every man should labour to obtain. From tbe weakness of human nature, however, it is too apt to de¬ generate into pride. To a man of great intellectual powers and various erudition, tbe conversation of ordinary persons affords neither instruction nor amusement 5 and such conversa ence, as to insult ns inferiors, and sometimes bis equals, p.-tf without forming the resolution to insult either the one Pride or the other. Such a character is -hateful to every company, ani| is so far from indicating true dignity of mind in him to whom it belongs, that it is obviously associated with meanness, and indicates a consciousness of some radical defect. He who possesses real and con¬ spicuous merit has no occasion to depress others for the purpose of raising himself 5 his superiority will be cheer¬ fully acknowledged 5 but when a man of undoubted eminence an one respect, is so swollen with pride as to nuke him wish to appear great in all respects, he has no other means of enforcing his ill-founded claim, than displaying his acknowledged superiority, with such in¬ solence as, may drive at a distance from him every per¬ son by whom he is conscious that in many instances he nug it ie more than rivalled. Whoever is proud of knowledge, would do well to consider how much know¬ ledge he wants. The same observations which we have made on pride o parts will apply to every other species of pride, such as pride oi birth, office, or riches, &c. The peace and °r-Vur a0ftrS0Ciet>j require difference of‘ accompanied with different degrees of authority 5 and he who inhe- ntsa title or office from his ancestors, may without pride be conscious of his superiority, provided he forget not that such superiority is conferred on families and individuals, not for their own sakes, but for the good ot the community. The peer who keeps this circum¬ stance in mind, may maintain ^is station, and repress offence to any thinking man 5 but if he dwell upon his rank with too much complacency, he will in process of time be apt to consider himself and his family as supe- nor by nature to those upon whom no title has been conferred, and then his pride will become intolerable, if we could trace our descents, says Seneca, we should find all slaves to come from princes, and all princes from s aves. To be proud of knowledge, is to be blind in the light 5 to be proud of virtue,' is to poison ourselves with the antidote 5 to be proud of authority, is to make our rise our downfal. The best way to humble a proud man is to neglect him. PRIDEAUX, Humphry, a learned clergyman of tbe church of England, was born at Padstow in Corn¬ wall in 1648. He studied three years at Westminster under Dr Busby; and then was removed to Christ¬ church, Oxford. Here he published, in 1676, bis Marmora Oxoniensia ex Arundelianis, Seldeniams, alm- que conjlata, cumperpetuo Commentario. This introdu¬ ced him to tbe lord chancellor Finch, afterward earl of Nottingham, who in 1679 presented him to the rec¬ tory of St Clements near Oxford, and in 1681 bestowed on him a prebend of Norwich. Some years after he was engagecl in a controversy with the Papists at Norwich, tmn x , 7 fT --—.-.on, *-uuiiuversy wim me papists at iMorwich, tbiL u * I-epeated’, ™ast’ fr°ni the nature of concerning the validity of the orders of the church of uungs, become tedious and irksome. But it rennirpo F.no-lnml n/IvVI. 1 •„ 1 1. .1.. , • tilings, become tedious and irksome. But it requires great command of temper and of manners to prevent uneasiness long felt from sometimes betraying itself by external symptoms, such as peevish expressions, a for¬ bidding look, or absence of mind ; and these are the in¬ fallible indications of contempt for the company, tbe very worst ingredient in the passion of pride. If this contempt be often excited, it will be formed into a ha¬ bit; and the proud man will be so much under its influ- Vol. XVII. Part I. England, which produced his book upon that subject. In 1688 be was installed in the archdeaconry of Suf¬ folk ; to which he was collated by Dr Lloyd, then bi¬ shop of Norwich. In 1691, upon the death of Dr Edward Pococke, the Hebrew professorship at Oxford being vacant, was offered to Dr Prideaux, but he re¬ fused it. In 16975 be published bis Life of Mahomet, and in 1702 was installed dean of Norwich. In 1710 be was cut for the stone, which intenupted his studies t Y y ^ for R I I* 354 1 P R I Some time after his return to priests of different orders, called schiek, and mufti; and Pne, oome — the Indians and Chinese have their bramins and kon%es. ^Pnestk It has been much disputed, whether, in the Chri- Chandler's Travels in Asia Mi¬ nor. for more than a year. Condon, he proceeded with his Connection ot t ie i story of the Old and New Testament j which he had begun when he laid aside the design ol writing the Hi¬ story of Appropriations. He died in PRIENE, an ancient town of Asia Minor. It is now called Samsun, and Samsun-katesi, which do not however appear to be very recent. It was taken in laoi by Bajazet, who subdued Ionia. It had former¬ ly without including the citadel, three gateways j one of which was towards Kelibesh, an adjoining village j and without it are vaults of sepulchres. I he entrance was not wide. A part of the arch, consisting of a sin ode row of massive stones, still remains : but those on which it rests are so corroded by age, broken, or di¬ storted, as to seem every moment ready to yield and let down their load. A rugged way leads to a second opening in the wall opposite to this, and about a mile from it- beyond which are likewise vaults of sepulchres. Between these was a gate facing to the plain 5 and on the left hand going out of it is a hole, resembling the mouth of an oven, in the side of a square tower j and over it an inscription in small characters, exceeding y difficult to be read. It signifies, that a certain Cyprian stian church, there be any such officer as a priest, in the proper sense ot the word. I he church ot Itome, which holds the propitiatory sacrifice of the mass, has of course her proper priesthood. In the church of England, the word priest is retained to denote the second order in her hierarchy, but we believe with very difl'erent significa¬ tions, according to the different opinions entertained of the Lord’s supper. Some few of her divines, of. great learning, and of undoubted Protestantism, maintain that the Lord’s supper is a commemorative and eucharistical sacrifice. Those consider all who are authorised to ad¬ minister that sacrament as in the strictest sense priests. Others hold the Lord’s supper to be a feast upon the one sacrifice, once offered on the cross j and these too must consider themselves as clothed with some kind.of priesthood. Great numbers, however, of the English clergy, perhaps the majority, agree with the church of Scotland, in maintaining that the Lord’s supper is a rite of no other moral import, than the mere comme¬ moration of the death of Christ. These cannot consi¬ der themselves as priests in the rigid sense of the word, difficult to be read. It a,gutties mat a certatu .... th. word priest is a •, 0j i/te Torn. - PRIESTLEY, Joseph, LL.D. F. R. S. and mem¬ ber of many foreign literary societies, was born on the 24th of March 1733, at Field-head, in the parish of Bristall, in the west riding of Yorkshire. His father was a cloth-manufacturer, and both his parents were worship of a hero, the guardian of the city, and pointed out the place where, in obedience to them, lie had erect¬ ed the god. This was probably some local hero, whose little image was set in the wall, and w'hose name and memory have perished. PRIEST, a person set apart for the performance ot sacrifice, and other offices and ceremonies of religion. Before the promulgation of the law of Moses, the first¬ born of every family, the fathers, the princes, and the kings, were priests. I bus Cain and Abel, Noah., A- b rah am, Melchizedtc, Job, Isaac, and Jacob, offered themselves their own sacrifices. Among the Israelites, after their exod from Egypt, the priesthood was con¬ fined to one tribe, and it consisted of three orders, the /ije//-priest, priests, and Levites. The priesthood was made hereditary in the family of Aaron, and the first¬ born of the oldest branch of that family, if he had no legal blemish, was always the high-priest. This divine appointment .was observed with considerable accuracy till the Jews fell under the dominion of the Romans, and had their faith corrupted by a false philosophy.— Then, indeed, the high-priesthood was sometimes set up to sale, and instead of continuing for life, as it ought to have done, it seems from some passages in the New Testament, to have been nothing more than an annual office. There is sufficient reason, however, to believe, that it was never disposed ot but to some descendant of Aaron, capable of filling it, had the older branches been extinct. (For the consecration and offices of the Jewish priesthood, we refer our readers to the books of Moses). In the time of David, the inferior priests were divided into 24 companies, who were to serve in rotation, each company by itself, for a week. 'I he order in which the several courses were to serve was de¬ termined by lot-, and each course was in all succeeding ages called by the name of its original chief.—All na¬ tions have had their priests. The pagans had priests of Jupiter,Mars, Bacchus, Hercules, Osiiis, and Isis,&.c.j and some deities had priestesses. The Mahometans have respectable among Calvinistic dissenters. A strong de¬ sire for reading was one of the first passions which this philosopher exhibited, and which probably induced his parents and friends to change their mind respecting his destination, and instead of a tradesman, to fit him for some learned profession. He acquired a knowledge of Hebrew, Greek, and Latin, in the school of an eminent teacher at Bartley, and at the age of 19 became a theological student in the academy of Daventry. W hen about the age of 22 he was made choice of to be assistant minister to the Independent congregation of Needham market, in Suffolk. Having staid at Need¬ ham for about three years, he received an invitation to be pastor of a small flock at Namptwitch, in Cheshire, of which he accepted. Here he opened a day school, in the management of which he displayed that turn for research, and that spirit of improvement, which were afterwards destined to be such prominent features of his character. His reputation as a man of extraordinary talents and diligent enquiry soon spread among his pro¬ fessional brethren, and when Dr Aikin was chosen to succeed the reverend Dr Taylor as tutor in divinity at Warrington, the vacant department of belles lettres was assigned to Mr Priestley. His literary career may probably be said to have com¬ menced at Warrington ; and the extent, as well as the originality of his pursuits, were soon announced to the world by a variety of valuable publications. Much ot his attention about this period was taken up with gene¬ ral politics, on which he delivered a number of lectures. Although it was reasonable to think that Ins time would be sufficiently occupied by his academical and literary employments, yet his unwearied activity and indj^JT inestley. ^ ^ * t 355 ] found means to accomplish tl,e first great work in phi- felt for him in losophy which laid a solid foundation for his future fame. Having long amused himself with anelectrical ma¬ chine, and felt himself interested in the progress of dis¬ covery in that branch of physics, he undertook a history of electricity, with an account of its present state. This work made its first appearance at Warrington in the year 1767, which was so well received by the learned world, that it went through a fifth edition in 4to in the year 1794. It is justly deemed a valuable performance, and its original experiments are allowed to be very in¬ genious. About the year 1768, he was chosen pastor of a large and respectable congregation of Protestant dissent¬ ers at Leeds, which made him turn a very large share of his attention to theological subjects. His mind is said to have been strongly impressed with sentiments of piety and devotion from a child*, and though he changed most of those religious sentiments in which he had been instructed, for such as he regarded to be more rational and consistent with truth, his piety and devotion aever deserted him. He was at the head of the modern Unitarians, ■whose leading tenet is the proper humanity of Christ, confining every species of religious worship and adoration to the one supreme. Some, we believe, have charged him with a design to subvert the Christian religion ; but such an insinuation argues a total want of candour, as xeal for Christianity, as a divine dispensation, and the most valuable of all gifts bestowed upon the human race, was his ruling passion. His History and present state of Discoveries relating to Vision, Light, and Colours, appeared in 1772, in two vols. 4to. 1 his is allowed to be a performance of great merit, having a lucid arrangement; but it did not bring him such a large share of popularity as his History of Electricity, as it is probable that he was scarcely qualified to explain the abstruser parts of the science. In the year 1770, he quitted Leeds for a situ¬ ation entirely different. His philosophical writings, and the recommendation of Dr Price had made him so favourably known to the earl of Shelburne, that this nobleman made him such advantageous proposals for residing with him, that a regard for his family would not permit them to be rejected. The domestic tuition of Lord Shelburne’s sons having been previously com¬ mitted to a man of merit, they received no instructions from Dr Priestley farther than some courses of experi¬ mental philosophy. He also attended his lordship in a visit to Paris, where he had an opportunity of seeing some of the most celebrated men of science in that country, whom he astonished by asserting a firm belief in revealed religion, which had been presented to their minds in such colours, that they thought no man of sense could hesitate in rejecting it as an idle fable. I775> h® published his examination of Dr Reid «n the Human Mind ; Dr Beattie on the Nature and Immutability of Truth; and Dr Oswald’s Appeal to Common Sense. The design of this volume was to refute the new doctrine of common sense, employed as the test of truth by the metaphysicians of Scotland. He never intentionally misrepresented either the argu¬ ments or purposes of an opponent; but he measured the aspect with which he treated him by that which he P R I ,, ... his own mind. In the year 1777, he published Ins disquisitions relating to Matter and Spirit in which he gave'a history of the philosophical doctrine respecting the soul, and openly supported the material system, which makes it homogeneous with the body. I his subjected him to more odium than any of his other opinions. As he materialized spirit, so he in some mea¬ sure spiritualized matter, by assigning to it penetrability and some other subtle qualities. About the same pe¬ riod he became the champion of philosophical necessity ■ a doctrine not less obnoxious to many, on account of its supposed effects on morality, than the former. 80 asto¬ nishing was the versatility of his mind, that he at the same time carried on that course of discovery concern¬ ing aeriform bodies which has rendered Ids name s« illustrious among philosophical chemists. A second volume was published in 1775, and a third in 1777. Some of his most memorable discoveries were those of nitrous and depblogisticated or pure air; of the restora¬ tion of vitiated air by vegetation ; of the influence of fight on vegetables, and of the effects of respiration oa the blood. 1 he name of Priestley was by these means spread through the countries of Europe, and honours were heaped upon him from scientific bodies in various parts. The term of his engagement with Lord Shelburne having expired, Dr Priestley was at liberty to choose a new situation for himself, retiring with a pension for life of 150I. a-year. He chose the vicinity of the po¬ pulous town of Birmingham, as it was the residence of several men of science, such as Watt, Withering, Bol¬ ton, and Keir, whose names are well known to the pub¬ lic. Here he was invited to become pastor of a dissent¬ ing congregation, of which he accepted about the latter end of the year 1780. Soon after this appeared hi» Letters to Bishop Newcome, on the Duration of Christ’s Ministry, and his History of the Corruptions of Christi¬ anity, which were afterwards followed by his History of Early Opinions. He displayed his attachment to freedom by his Essay on the First Principles of Government; and by an an¬ onymous pamphlet on the State of Public Liberty in this country ; and had shown a warm interest in the cause of America at the time of its unfortunate quarrel with the mother country. The celebration of the anniversary of the destruction of the Bastile, by a public dinner, on July 14th 1791, at which Dr Priestley was not present, gave the signal of those riots which have thrown lasting infamv on the town of Birmingham, and in some degree on the na¬ tional character. Amidst burning houses of worship and private dwellings, Dr Priestley was the great object of popular rage; his house, library, manuscripts, and ap¬ paratus, were made a prey to the flames ; he was hunted like a criminal, and experienced not only the furious outrages of a mob, but the most unhandsome treatment from some who ought to have sustained the parts of gen¬ tlemen, and the friends of good order. He now lay under a load of public odium and suspicion, and he was constantly harassed by the petty malignity of bigotry. It was of consequence not to be wondered at, that he looked for an asylum in a country to which he had always shewn a friendly attachment, and which he sup¬ posed was in possession of all the blessings of civil and religious liberty. In the year 1794, he took leave of y 2 his Priestley. P R I [ 356 ] PHI Ins native country, and embarked for North America. He took up his residence in Northumberland, a town in the interior of the state of Pennsylvania, w hich he se¬ lected on account of the purchase ot landed property in its neighbourhood 5 otherwise its remoteness from the sea-ports, its want of many ol the comforts of life, and of all the helps to scientific pursuit, rendered it a pecu¬ liarly undesirable abode lor one of I3r Priestley’s habits and employments. The loss of his amiable wife, and of a most promising son, as well as repeated attacks of dis¬ ease, severely tried the fortitude and resignation of this great and good man. In America he was received with general respect, and the angry contests oi party were not able wholly to deprive him of the esteem due to his character. was heard as a preacher by some of the most distinguish¬ ed members of congress •, and he was offered, but de¬ clined, the place of chemical professor of Philadelphia. It became his great object to enable himself in his re¬ tirement at Northumberland to renew that course of philosophical experiment, and especially that train of theological writing, which had occupied so many of the best years of his life. By numerous experiments on the constitution of airs, he became more and more fixed in his belief of the phlogistic theory, and in his opposition to the new French chemical system, of which he lived to be the only opponent of any celebrity. By the libe¬ ral contributions of his friends in England, he was en¬ abled to commence the printing of two extensive works, on which he was zealously bent, a Church History, and an Exposition of the Scriptures; and through the pro¬ gress of his final decline he unremittingly urged their completion. An article in the Philadelphia Gazette speaks of him in the following honourable terms : “ Since his illness at Philadelphia, in the year i8or, he never regained his former good state of health. His complaint was constant indigestion, and a difficulty of swallowing food of any kind. But during this period of general debility, he was busily employed in printing his Church History, and in the first volume of his notes on the Scriptures, and in making new and original ex¬ periments. During this period, likewise, he wrote his pamphlet of Jesus and Socrates compared, and reprinted his Essay on Phlogiston. “ From about the beginning of November, 1803, to the middle of January, 1804, his complaint grew more serious •, yet, by judicious medical treatment, and strict attention to diet, he, after some time, seemed, if not gain¬ ing strength, at least not getting worse ; and his friends fondly hoped that his health would continue to improve as the season advanced. He, however considered his life as very precarious. Even at this time, besides his mis¬ cellaneous reading, which was at all times very exten¬ sive, he read through all the works quoted in his Com¬ parison of the different Systems of Grecian'Philosophers with Christianity *, composed that work, and transcribed the whole of it in less than three months j so that he has left it ready for the press. “ In the last fortnight of January, his fils of indiges¬ tion became more alarming, his legs swelled, and his weakness increased. Within two days of his death he became so weak, that he could walk but a little way, and that with great difficulty. He was fully sensible that he had not long to live, yet he talked with cheer- L • 4 Prim® Seari: ness to all who called on him. He dwelt upon the pe- prje(;t culiarly happy situation in which it had pleased the di- « vine Being to place him in life, and the great advantage he had enjoyed in the acquaintance, and friendship of some of the best and wisest men of the age in which he lived, and the satisfaction he derived from haying led an useful as well as happy life. On the 9th of February 1804, he breathed his last, so easily, that those who'were sitting close to him did not immediately perceive it. He had put his hand to his face, which prevented them from observing it.” In the constitution of Dr Priestley’s mind ardour and vivacity of intellect were united with a mild and placid temper. With a zeal for the propagation of truth which nothing could subdue, he joined a calm patience, an un¬ ruffled serenity, which rendered him proof against dis¬ appointments. The rights of private judgment were rendered sacred to him by every principle of hisunder- standmg, and his heart would not have suffered him to injure his bitterest enemy. He wms naturally disposed to be cheerful, and when his mind was not occupied with serious thoughts, could unbend with playful ease and negligence, in the private circle ot friends. He commonly spoke little in large and mixed companies, and in the domestic relations of life vvas uniformly kind and affectionate. His parental feelings were those of the tenderest and best of fathers. Not even malice itself could ever fix a stain on his private conduct, or impeach his integrity. PRIMiE vijE, among physicians, denote the whole alimentary duct*, including the oesophagus, stomach, and intestines, with their appendages. PRIMAGE, in Commerce, a small duty at the wa- ters-side, usually about 12d. per ton, or 6d. per bale, due to the master and mariners of a ship. PRIMARY, first in dignity, chief, or principal. Primary Qualities oj Bodies. See Metaphysics, N° 152. PRIMATE, in church-polity, an archbishop, who is invested with a jurisdiction over other bishops. PRIME, Primus, an appellation given to whatever is first in order, degree, or dignity, among several things of the same or like kind 5 thus we say, the prime mi¬ nister, prime cost, &.c. Prime is sometimes used to denote the same with de¬ cimal, or the tenth part of an unit. Prime-Figure, in Geometry, one which cannot be divided into any other figures more simple than itself, as a triangle among planes, and the pyramid among so- lids. For prime numbers, in arithmetic, see the article Number. Prime of the Moon, is the new moon when she first appears, which is about three days after the change. Prime Vertical, is that vertical circle which passes through the poles of the meridian, or the east and west points of the horizon ; whence dials projected on the plane of this circle are cixWeA prime vertical, or north- and-south dials. Prime, in the Romish church, is the first of the ca¬ nonical hours succeeding to lauds. Prime, in Fencing, is the first of the chief guards. See Guard. PRIMER SEASIN, in Feodal Law, was a feodal bur^ den, only incident to the king’s tentants in capite, and ’ J not imer asin ogenx jre. P K I ‘ f not to those who held of inferior or mesne lords. It was a right which the king had, when any of his ten¬ ants in capite died seized of a knight’s fee, to receive of the heir (provided he were of full age) one whole year’s -—i profits of the lands if they were in immediate possession, and half a year s profits if the lands were in reversion expectant on an estate for life. This seems to be little more than an additional relief (see Relief) ; but grounded upon this feodal reason, That by the ancient law of foods, immediately upon the death of a vassal the superiorwas entitled to enter and takeseisinor possession of the land, by way of protection against intruders, till the heir appeared to claim it, and receive investiture ; and for the time the lord so held it, he was entitled to take the profits ; and unless the heir claimed within a year and day, it was by the strict law a forfeiture. This practice, however, seems not to have long obtained in England, if ever, with regard to tenures under inferior lords; but, as to the king’s tenures in capite, this prima seisitia was expressly declared, under Henry Ilf. and Ed¬ ward II. to belong to the king by prerogative, in con¬ tradistinction to other lords. And the king was en¬ titled to enter and receive the whole profits of the land, till livery was sued 5 which suit being commonly within a year and day next after the death of the tenant, there¬ fore the king used to take at an average the first-fruits, that is to say, one year’s profits of the land. And this afterwards gave a handle to the popes, who claimed to be feodal lords of the church, to claim in like manner from every clergyman in England the first year’s pro¬ fits of his benefice, by way ofprimitice, or first-fruits. AH the charges arising by primer seisin rvere taken a- way by 12 Car. II. c. 24. PRIMING, in Gunnery, the train of powder that is laid, from the opening of the vent, along the gutter or channel on the upper part of the breech of the gun : which, when fired, conveys the flame to the vent, by which it is further communicated to the charge, in order to fire the piece. This operation is only used on ship¬ board at the proof, and sometimes in garrison j for, on all other occasions, tubes are used for that purpose. Priming-Uire, in Gunnery, a sort of iron needle employed to penetrate the vent or touch-hole of a piece of ordnance, when it is loaded : in order to discover whether the powder contained therein is thoroughly dry and fit for immediate service ; as likewise to search the vent and penetrate the cartridge, when the guns are not loaded with the loose powder. Priming, among painters, signifies the layintr on of the first colour. PRlMIPILUS,in antiquity, the centurion of the first cohort of a legion, who had the charge of the Roman eagle. PRIMIlIiE, the first-fruits gathered oil the earth, whereof the ancients made presents to the gods. PRIMITIVE, in Grammar, is a root or original I'ord in a language, in contradistinction to derivative ; thus, God is a primitive ; godly, a derivative j and god¬ like, a compound. PRIMOGENI1URE, the right of the first-born, has among most nations been very considerable. The fiist-born son in the patriarchal ages had a superiority over his brethren, and, in the absence of his father, was priest to the family. Among the Jews, he ivas conse- P K I 357 ] crated to the Lord had a double portion of the inheri- Priino„eni tance, and succeeded in the government of the family ture or kingdom. It is, however, remarkable, and unq’ues- II tionably shows the connection between this institution and ^the birth and office of our Saviour, that if a W0- ' v man’s first child were a girl, neither she, nor the chil- dien that came after her, were consecrated. In every nation of Europe, the right of primogeni¬ ture prevails in some degree at present, but it did not prevail always. The laiv which calls the elder-born to the crown, preferably to the others, was not introduced into 1 ranee till very late j it was unknown to the first race of kings, and even to the second. The four sons of Clovis shared the kingdom equally among themselves ; and Louis leDebonnaire did the same : it was not till the race of Hugh Capet, that the prerogative of succesr sion to the crown was appropriated to the first-born. . - ^ie ancient custom of Gavel-kind, still preserved in some parts of our island, primogeniture is of no ac¬ count j the paternal estate being equally shared by all the sons. And it has been a matter'of violent and learned dispute, whether at the death of Alexander III. Lahol or Eruce Avas, by the Iuav as it then stood, heir to the crown of Scotland. The former had undoubtedly the right of primogeniture, but the latter stood in one degree of nearer relation to the deceased sovereign ; and the Scottish barons, not being able to determine whose claim Avas best founded, referred the question to Ed¬ ward I. of England, and thereby involved their coun- tiy in a long and ruinous war. See Scotland. PRIMORIE, is a name given by the Slavi to that tract of sea-coast which lies between the tA\To rivers Cetr tma and Narenta, the first of which is the Nestus and liluras, and the second the Nanis, of the ancients j comprising what was properly called Dalmatia two ages before our era, and Avhich was knotvn to the Greeks of the Ioav times under the name of Paratalassia. Appian informs us that the Ardei or Vardei possessed many ci¬ ties there, part of which they seized before the invasion of the Romans, and part they built themselves. We learn also from the Tabula Peutingeriana, that after the conquest many of those cities remained, and Avere inha¬ bited by the conquerors, avIio also founded new settle¬ ments. And indeed Avere these proofs wanting, the nu¬ merous inscriptions found near the sea, and sometimes among the hills, Avould render it at least probable. The coast is extremely pleasant, the soil fertile, and the si¬ tuation most convenient for commerce Avith the inland provinces. By bad management, hoAvever, much ground has been lost near the sea, by its being covered Avith gravel 5 and by imprudent cultivation of the hills, the impetuous fury of the mountain torrents has rendered a part of it uninhabitable. Macarska is now the only town in the territory, and it appears to have risen out of the ruins of the ancient Rataneum of Pliny. It formed a part of the Narentan state for several ages, and afterwards, together Avith the rest of Primorie, passed under the obedience of various Christian princes. It af- tenvards became subject to the Ottoman Porte, and at last voluntarily subjected itself to the Venetian republic. See Dalmatia and Macarska. See also Fortis’s Travels into Dalmatia, p» 265 —^18. PRIMULA, the Primrose ; a genus of plants be¬ longing to the pentandria class : and in the natural me* > thod P H I Primula .11 Prince F.din. Phil- Trans.r. iii. p. 13, &c. thod ranking under the 21st order, I*recta. TANY Index. This genus includes the primrose, the cowslip, the polyanthus, and the auricula some 0 t ic earliest and most beautiful ornaments of the flower-gar¬ den. For the mode of culture, see Gardening. PRIMUM MOBILE, in the Ptolemaic astronomy, the ninth or highest sphere of the heavens, whose centre is that of the world, and in comparison ot which the earth is but a point. This is supposed to contain within it all other spheres, and to give them motion, turning them quite round, as well as revolving itself, in 24 hours. PRINCE, Princeps, in polity, a person invested with the supreme command ot a state, independent ot any superior. , . . Prince also denotes a person who is a sovereign 1 his own territories, yet holds of some other as Ins supe¬ rior ; such are the princes of Germany, who, though absolute in their respective principalities, are bound to the emperor in certain services. . Privce also denotes the issue of princes, or those ot the royal family. In France, before the revolution, they were called princes of the blood, and during the short continuance of the constitution of 1791, French princes. In England the king’s children are called sons and daughters of England 5 the eldest son is created prince of Wales ; the cadets are created dukes or earls as the king pleases; and the title of all the children is royal highness: all subjects are to kneel when admitted to kiss their hand, and at table out of the king’s presence they are served on the knee. See Royal Famdy. Prtxce of the Senate, in old Rome, the person who was called over first in the roll of senators, whenever it was renewed by the censors : he was always of consular and censorian dignity. See the article Senate. Fringe's Metal, or Pinchbeck, an alloy of copper and zinc, which has a resemblance to gold. See Che¬ mistry, N° 2014. Princetown. See Hew Jersey. Prince of Wales's Island, or Pulo Penang, is situat¬ ed in the entrance of the straits of Malacca, in 100 of east longitude, and in 50 of north latitude. It is about seven leagues in length and three in breadth, and is supposed to contain about 160 square miles. Its northern extremity runs nearly parallel with the main land at a distance of about two miles, by which a hue channel is formed, where the greatest fleets might ride in perfect safety, the height of the surrounding moun¬ tains acting as a barrier against the force ot the pre¬ vailing winds. c n 1 The purchase of this island from the king ot Qued- dah, on the opposite Malay coast, was made on behalf of the East India Company by Mr Light, who took [ 358 ] P R I See Bo- ment, were destroyed. A new treaty rvas entered into, Pnn, by which it was stipulated, that the Malay king should < r receive an annual payment of 6000 dollars. In 1800, a tract of land on the opposite shore, cf 18 miles in length and three in breadth, was ceded to the company by the king of Queddab, on condition of receiving an¬ nually an additional sum of 400^ dollars. Ibe num¬ ber of inhabitants in 1797 was computed at about 12,000 persons of all descriptions. The climate, considering its vicinity to the equator, is remarkably mild. The thermometer on the high grounds never rises above 7^°» seldom more than 74 > and falls as low as 66° j while on the plain it ranges from 76° to 90°. Its healthfulness is certainly not sur¬ passed by that of any European settlement on the coast. Out of a garrison of 300 troops (natives of Hindostan), not one died for the space of 14 months' $ a singular fact to be experienced by a new settlement in an uncleared country. This great salubrity is perhaps the effect of a constant ventilation, supported by almost continued but gentle breezes, added to the dryness of the soil, the uni¬ form but gradual elevation from the sea to the foot of •the hills preventing those stagnations ot vvater, which, in tro pical latitudes, are so highly prejudicial to the health of man. A ridge of beautiful mountains, deeply indented with valleys, and covered with evergreens, divides the island longitudinally. Flagstaff hill, nearly the highest on the island, is estimated at 2500 feet above the level of the sea. Innumerable rivulets receive their origin from these mountains, and are remarkable for the transparency and coolness of their waters. The soil, which is light and sandy near the sea, gradually changes toTt rich clay as it approaches to the high lands. There the sugar-cane grows with the utmost luxuriance, and the most plenti¬ ful crops of rice are everywhere produced. The gar¬ dens have already furnished the inhabitants with cabba¬ ges and potatoes ; and when industry shall have reached the tops of the mountains, it will be no surprise to see in tbe plantations most of the productions ot Europe in their utmost perfection. Here are also produced pep¬ per, cocoa-nuts, coffee, cotton, ginger, yams, sweet po¬ tatoes, a great variety of vegetables, and many different sorts of fruits. Among the exotics are the clove, nut¬ meg, cinnamon, pimento, hyapootee, colalava, and a number of other plants from the Moluccas and Eastern isles, introduced only a fewT years ago. In decorating the landscapes of this little island, nature has been pecu¬ liarly lavish. An assemblage of flowering trees and shrubs in perpetual blossom, and endless in the variety of their species, form the first shade. These are over¬ topped by forest trees of an immense height, winch of the East India Lompany by ivir^igur, - - - t^i^ branches on every side, and are cover possess,on of ,t on be of Augns 786. 1 be set sp ^ foHage. Here strangers fee „,.l tlement continued to enjoy peace and security till the year 179G when a jealousy on the Payt ot the king ot Queddah, probably arising from a collision of interests, threatened it with the calamities of war. Mr Light, however, anticipated the attack of the enemy, and car¬ ried the scene of action to his own shores. A fort con¬ structed by the Malays at the town of Prya on the op¬ posite shore, and only two miles distant iiom George Town in Prince of Wales’s island, was taken by assault; and almost the whole of the prows collected in the river for the conveyance of troops to attack the British settle- ed with the richest foliage. Here strangers feel with rapture the effect of the breezes, which, from whatso¬ ever quarter they blow, are strongly impregnated with the fragrance of the groves. . The original animal productions of this island are very limited. Of quadrupeds, the wild hog, deer, and squirrel, nearly comprehend the whole-, but the absence of the tiger and leopard, whose numbers and ferocity al¬ most render the opposite shores uninhabitable, amp y compensates for this deficiency. The flying fox and squirrel are natives of this island} the former a non- 1 descript, PR! descript, anil a great natural curiosity. Of birds there are also but few, and only one which is remarkable for the melody of its notes. The crow and sparrow, the never-failing attendants on population, have but lately made their appearance. They are now, however ra¬ pidly increasing and multiplying. AH the domestic’ani¬ mals arrive here at great perfection. The sea which surrounds the island, affords a vast variety of fish of the most delicious flavour, and its shores abundance of the finest turtle and oysters. In no situa¬ tion indeed are the conveniencies and luxuries of life enjoyed in greater profusion. The advantages of the island in a political and commercial view are very con¬ siderable. There were nothing but wooden bridges on this island in the year 1800,"which were perpetually liable to be injured,and which the rapid swellof the rivers frequently carried away; but four substantial bridges of brick and mortar were soon after that period completed their foundations being of stone. The markets are well supplied with different kinds of fish, poultry of all sorts, pork, grain, and great variety of the finest fruits and vegetables. The quality of the beel and veal xs none of the best, and they import sheep from Bengal. Milk, butter, and bread', bear a high price, the two former of which are not very abund¬ ant. Prince of M ales Island produces a great variety of timber, lit for every purpose of ship-building, and can furnish masts of any dimensions. Ships of 74 guns were provided with loiver masts of one piece in the course of the late war. There are few, if any places, more abundantly sup¬ plied with water, than this island, numerous streams of water flowing from the hills in every direction. Three or four of these streams unite, and form the Penang ri¬ ver, after traversing a considerable space ; and it "dis¬ charges itself into the sea, about a mile to the southward of the town. This island contains mines of tin; but it is said they have never been worked. r 359 i P R I and Danish, and 36 Asiatic, arrived in this island. The total number of arrivals, in 1800, amounted to 103: and in 1802, to 241, equal nearly to 57,000 tons. Prince William's Sound, situated on the north-west coast of America, and so named by Captain Cock in 1778. The men, women, and children of this sound are all clothed in the same manner. Their ordinary dress is a sort of close frock, or rather robe, which sometimes reaches only to the knees, but generally down to the ancles. Ihese frocks are composed of the skins of various animals, and are commonly worn with the hairy side outwards. The men often paint their faces of a black colour, and of a bright red, and some¬ times of a bluish or leaden hue; but not in any regular figure. The women puncture or stain the chin with black, that comes to a point in each of their cheeks. Iheir canoes are of two sorts; the one large and open, the other small and covered. The framing consists of slender pieces of wood, and the outside is composed of the skins of seals, or other sea animals, stretched over the wood. Their weapons, and implements for hunting and fishing, are the same as those used by the Green¬ landers and Esquimaux. Many of their spears are head¬ ed with iron, and their arrows are generally pointed with bone. The food they were seen to eat was the flesh of some animal, either roasted or broiled, and dried fish. Some of the former that was purchased had the appearance of bear’s flesh. They also eat a larger sort of fern-root, either baked or dressed in some other method. Their drink, in all probability, is water ; for, in their canoes, they brought snow in wooden vessels, which they swallowed by mouthfuls. Our knowledge of the . animals of this part of the American con¬ tinent is entirely derived from the skins that were brought by the natives for sale. These were principal¬ ly of bears, common and pine martens, sea otters, seals, racoons, small ermines, foxes, and the whitish cat or lynx. The birds found heie were the halycon, or great king’s-fisher, which had fine bright colours; the white- Persons rnnviWJ 1 • v • pit,. JleatIed eagle, and the humming-bird. The fish that tkb e C°r;V • , f ^,onieTs’&c- in an7 of Bri- wcre principally brought to market for sale were torsk T- . in p ™E.aSt fndle? are frequently ba- and holibut. The rocks were almost destitute of shell¬ fish ; and the only other animal of this tribe that was observed was a reddish crab, covered with very large spines. lew vegetables of any kind were observed ; and the trees that chiefly grew about this sound were the Canadian spruce pine, some of which were of a con¬ siderable size. E. Long. 115. 21. N. Lat. 59. 33. PRINCIPAL, the chief and most necessary part of a thing. '1 he principal of a college or hall is the mas¬ ter thereof. In commerce, principal is the capital of a sum due or lent; so called in opposition to interest. See Inte¬ rest. It also denotes the first fund put by partners into a common stock, by which it is distinguished from the calls or accessions afterwards required. Principal, in Music. See Fundamental, in Mu¬ sic, and Generator, in Music. Principal, in Law, is either the actor or absolute perpetrator of the crime, who is called a principal, in the first degree; or he who is present, aiding and abet¬ ting the fact to be done, who is denominated a principal in the second degree. The presence of a principal need not nished to Prince of Wales Island, so that it may be considered as the Botany Bay of the East. The following table exhibits the revenue and dis¬ bursements of the island, at several different periods, from 1789 to 1804. 1789 1790 1791 J795 1796 1800 1802 1803 Revenue. Dollars. 2500 4100 I1’235 19,612 28,000 J3A55 74,280 75,000 estimated. Disbursements. Dollars. 78,884 96,274 108,290 IJ5i379 192,598 184,469 176,000 180,000 estimated. The imports of this island consist of the various natu- ra productions of the east, as well as ol a great variety 0 the manufactures of the industrious inhabitants of those regions. In 1799, 95 English ships, 37 American, Portuguese, Piinee, Piincipal. Principal II Principle. Blackst. Comment. b. iv. c. 3. pur [ 360 not always be an actual immediate standing by, within sight or hearing of the fact j but there may be also a constructive presence, as when one commits a robbery or murder, and another keeps watch or guard at some convenient distance. And this rule has also other ex¬ ceptions *, for, in case of murder by poisoning, a man may be a principal felon by preparing and laying the poison, or giving it to another (who is ignorant ot its poisonous quality) for that purpose ; and yet not admi¬ nister it himself, nor be present when the very deed ot poisoning is committed. And the same reasoning will hold, with regard to other murders committed in the absence of the murderer, by means which he had pre¬ pared before-hand, and which probably could not tail ot their mischievous effect. As by laying a trap or pit-iall for another, whereby he is killed-, letting out a wild beast, with an intent to do mischief; or exciting a mad¬ man to commit murder, so that death thereupon ensues . in every one of these cases the party offending is guilty of murder as a principal, in the first degree. F01 he cannot be called an accessory, that necessarily presuppo¬ sing a principal j and the poison, the pit fall, the beast, or the madman, cannot be held principals, being on y the instruments of death. As therefore he must be cer¬ tainly guilty, either as principal or accessory, and can¬ not be so as accessory, it follows that he must be guilty as principal j and if principal, then in the first degree } for there is no other criminal, much less a superior in the guilt, whom he could aid, abet, or assist. Principal Point, in Perspective, is a point in the perspective plane, upon which a line drawn from the eye perpendicular to the plane falls. This point is in the intersection of the horizontal and vertical plane j and is also called the pofw* of sight, and point of the eye. See Perspective. Principal Ray, in Perspective, is that which passes perpendicularly from the spectator’s eye to the perspec¬ tive plane, or picture. Whence the point where this ray falls on the plane, is by some also called the principal point, which other writers call the centre of the picture, and the pomt of concurrence. . . PRINC1PATO, the name of a province ot Italy, in the kingdom of Naples, which is divided into two parts, called by the Italians the Principato Ultra, and the Principato Citra, the Hither and Farther Principato. The Hither Principato is bounded on the north by the Farther Principato and part of the Terra-di-Lavoro, on the west and south by the Tuscan sea, and on the east by the Basilicata. It is about 60 miles in length, and 30 in breadth ; the soil is fertile in wine, corn, oil, and saffron 5 and they have a great deal ot silk, besides se¬ veral mineral springs. The capital town is Salerno. The Farther Principato is bounded on the north by the county of Molese and the Terra-di-Lavoro, on the west by the Tuscan sea, on the south by the Hither Princi¬ pato, and on the east by the Capitanata. ^ It is about 37 miles in length, and 30 in breadth. The Apenmne mountains render the air cold j and the soil is not veiy fertile either in corn or wine, but it produces chesnuts, and pastures in great plenty. Benevento is the capital town. The population of both in 1817 was 764,000. PRINCIPLE, Principium, in general, is used tor the cause, source, or origin of any thing. Principle, in human nature. See Disposition. Princip- Pringlu ] P R I PRINCIPLE, in science, is a truth, admitted without proof, from which other truths are inferred by a chain ot reasoning. Principles are of two kinds,p/wiory and ge- neral; and to the last the name oiaxioms is usually given on account of their importance and dignity. An axiom or general principle, when the terms in which it is ex¬ pressed are understood, must be a self-evident truth -, but from its very nature it cannot be a first truth. Our first truths are all particular. A child knows that two par¬ ticular lines, each an inch long, are equal to one an¬ other, before he has formed any general notions of length and equality. “ Things equal to one and the same thing are equal to one another,” is the first of Euclid’s axioms} and an axiom it undoubtedly is, but to no man has it been a first truth. It is, if we may use the expression, a genus or class ol truths, comprehend¬ ing under it numberless individuals. W ere a full-grown man introduced into the world, without a single idea inr his mind, as we, may suppose Adam to have been, he would instantly perceive, upon laying together three pieces of wood each a foot long, that they were all equal in length -, and if he were to cut another to the same length with any one of them, he would find upon trial that it was of the same length with them all. After a few simple experiments of this kind, he would, by a law of human thought, infer, that all things equal in length or in any other dimension, to any one thing, aie in that dimension equal to one another. It was not therefore with such weakness as some have imagined, that Hobbes affirmed those propositions commonly called axioms, not to be primary but secon¬ dary principles. A primary principle deserves not the name of an axiom, as it is only a particular truth in¬ cluding in it no other truth. There is not one of Eu¬ clid’s axioms which has not been the result of induction, though we remember not the time at which the induc¬ tion ivas made. That the whole is greater than any of its parts is a general truth which no man of com¬ mon sense can controvert -, but every one discovered that truth by observing that his body was larger than his head, his foot, or his hand ; that a mountain is larger than a mole-hill in the middle of it j and that a piece of timber measuring what is called a yard is longer than any one of the divisions marked upon it, and termed inches. The particular observations are made through the senses and treasured up in the memory; and the intellect, by its constitution, compares them together, marks in what they agree and disagree, and thence draws its axioms or general principles. He, therefore, who should admit the truth of an axiom, and deny the evidence of sense and perception, would act as absurdly as he who accepts payment in a bank-bill, and refuses it in the individual pieces of gold or silver which that bill represents. General axioms are of infinite use in the pursuits of science ; but it is not because they create new truths -, they only shorten the process in the discovery of such as might be found, with labour, through the medium of particular propositions. See CampheWs Philosophy of Rhetoric and Tathain's Chart and Scale of Truth. , Principles, in Physics, are often confounded with elements, or the first and simplest parts whereof natural bodies are compounded, and into which they are again resolvable by the force of fire. _ . PRINGLE, Sir John, an eminent physician ami philosopher, V B I r 1e. philosopher, was a younger son of Sir John Pringle of —' Stitchel, ia the shire of Roxburgh, Baronet 5 tool the degree of M. D. at Leyden, j 730 ; and published there D/'ssertatw Inauguralis de Marcore Senili, gto. After having been some years professor of moral philosophy at Edinburgh, he wa* in June j 745 appointed physi¬ cian to the duke of Cumberland, and physician-general to the hospital of the forces in Flanders, where the earl of Stair appears to have been his patron. In Fe¬ bruary 1746, Dr Pringle, Dr Armstrong, and Dr Bar¬ ker, were nominated physicians to the hospital of lame, maimed, and sick soldiers, behind Buckingham- house •, and in April 1749, Dr Pringle was appointed physician inordinary to the king. In 1750 he pub¬ lished “ Observations on the Nature and Cure of Hos¬ pital and Gaol Fevers, in a letter to Dr Mead,” 8vo (reprinted in 1755) ; and in 1752 he favoured the public with the result of his long experience, in an ad¬ mirable treatise under the title of “ Observations on the Disorders of the Army in Camp and Garrison,” 8vo. On the 14th of April 1752, he married Charlotte, second daughter of Dr Oliver, an eminent physician at Bath. In 1756 he was appointed jointly with Dr Wintringham (now Sir Clifton Wintringham, Bart.) physician to the hospital for the service of the forces of Great Britain. After the accession of his present ma¬ jesty, Dr Pringle was appointed physician to the queen’s household, 1761 j physician in ordinary to the queen in 1763, in which year he was admitted of the College of physicians in London ; and on the 5th of June 1766, he was advanced to the dignity of a baronet of Great Britain. In 1772 he was elected president of the Royal Society, where his speeches for five successive years, on delivering the prize-medal of Sir Godfrey Copley, gave the greatest satisfaction. Sir John Pringle in 1777 was appointed physician extraordinary to the king. He was also a fellow of the College of Phy¬ sicians at Edinburgh, and of the Royal Medical Society at Paris j member of the Royal Academies at Paris, Stockholm, Gottingen, and of the Philosophical So¬ cieties at Edinburgh and Haerlem j and continued pre¬ sident of the Royal Society till November 1778 5 after which period he gradually withdrew from the world, and in 1781 quitted his elegant house in Pall Mali (where he had long distinguished himself as the warm friend and patron of literary" men of every nation and profession), and made an excursion to his native coun¬ try. He returned to London in the latter end of the year j died greatly beloved and respected, January 18. 1782; and having no children, was succeeded in estate, and also (agreeably to the limitation of the patent) m title, by his nephew, Sir James Pringle, Bart. A- mong the worthy physician’s communications to the Royal Society, the following are the principal : 1. Some Experiments on Substances resisting Putre¬ faction,” Phil. Trans. N° 495. p. 580 ; and N° 496, F 525> 55° 5 reprinted, with additions, in Martin’s Abridgement, vol. xi. p. 1365. 2. “ Account of some ersons seized with the Gaol lever by working in tNewgate, and of the manner by which the Infection Was communicated to one entire Family,” vol. xlviii. P- 42. At the request of Dr Hales, a copy of this useful paper was inserted in the Gentleman’s Magazine, 3753i P- 7L before its appearance in the Transactions. 3- A remarkable Case of Fragility, Flexibility, and Vol. XVII. Part I. b f 61 ] P B I Dissolution of (lie Bones, ib. p. 297. ^“Account of the Earthquake felt at Brussels,” vol. xlix. p. ?46. jj'& 5. ‘‘ Account of the sinking of a river near Pontypoo] Printing. ni Monmouthshire,” ib. p. 547. 6. “Account of an ' Earthquake felt Feb. 18. 1756, along the coast of England, between Margate and Dover,” ib. p. 579, 7- Account of the Earthquake felt at Glasgow and Dumbarton ; also of a shower of Dust falling on a Ship between Shetland and Iceland,” ib. p. 509. g. Several Accounts of the fiery Meteor which appeared on Sunday, November 26. 1758, between eight and nine at night, vol. 1. p. 218. 9. “ Account of \he Virtues of Soap in dissolving the Stone, in the Case of the Reverend Mr Matthew Simson,” ib. p. 221. 10.“ Ac¬ count of the effects of Electricity in Paralytic Cases,” ib. 481. And see a letter to him on that subject from Professor Winthorp. “ Some Account of the Success of the Vitrum Ccratum Antimonii," was printed in the Edinburgh Medical Essays, vol. v. PRINOS, in Bota?nj, a genus of the monogynia or¬ der, belonging to the hexandria class of plants 5 and in the natural method ranking under the 43d order, L)u- inosce. I he calyx is sexfid 5 the corolla monopctalous, and rotaceous $ the belly hexaspermous. PR INI ER, a person who composes and takes im¬ pressions from moveable characters ranged in order, by means of ink and a press. 1 HINTING, the art of taking impressions from coaracters or figures, moveable and immoveable, on pa¬ per, linen, silk, &c. There are three kinds of print¬ ing: the one from moveable letters, for books} ano¬ ther from copper-plates, for pictures} and the last from blocks, in which the representation of birds, fhnvers, &c. are cut, for printing calicoes, linen, &c. The first is called common or letter-press printing} the second, rolling-press printing } and the last, calico, &c. printing. The principal difl'erence between the three consists in this, that the first is cast in relievo, in distinct pieces } the second engraven in creux} and the third cut in re¬ lievo, and generally stamped, by placing the block up¬ on the materials to be printed, and stinking upon the back of it. Of the above branches, Letter-Press PRINT-i.etter- ING is the most curious, and deserves the most par-press print- ticular notice: for to it are owing chiefly our deliver-’H»• ance from ignorance and error, the progress of leam- ing, the revival of the sciences, and numberless improve¬ ments in arts, which, without this noble invention, would have been either lost to mankind, or confined to the knowledge of a few. “ To the art of printing, Utility of (says an elegant essayist *), it is acknowledged we owe tins art. the reformation. It has been justly remarked, that if*DrKnexp the books of Luther had been multiplied only by the slow process of the hand-writing, they must have been few, and would have been easily suppressed by the combination of wealth and power} but, poured forth in abundance from the press, they spread over the land with the rapidity of an inundation, which acquixes ad¬ ditional force from the efforts used to obstruct its pro. gress. He who undertook to prevent the dispersion of the books once issued from the press, attempted a task no less arduous than the destruction of the hydra. Resistance Avas vain, and religion was reformed : and we who are chiefly interested in this happy revolution must remember, amidst the praises bestowed on Luther, Z z that Printing. Good and evil result¬ ing from it 4 Its good effects overba¬ lance the bad. PEI [ 362 ] that his endeavours had been ineffectual, unassisted by the invention of Faustus. “ How greatly the cause of religion has been promo¬ ted by the art, must appear, when it is considered, that it has placed those sacred books in the hand oi every individual, which, besides that they were once locked up in a dead language, could not be procured without great difficulty. The numerous comments on them ot every kind, which tend to promote piety, and to form the Christian philosopher, would probably never have been composed, and certainly would not have extend¬ ed their beneficial influence, if typography had still been unknown. By that art, the light, which is to illumi¬ nate a dark world, has been placed in a situation more advantageous to the emission of its rays but it it has been the means of illustrating the doctrines, and en¬ forcing the practice ot religion, it has also, particulai- ly in the present age, struck at the root of piety and mo¬ ral virtue, by propagating opinions favourable to the sceptic and the voluptuary. It has enabled modern authors wantonly to gratify their avarice, their vanity, and their misanthropy, in disseminating novel systems subversive of the dignity and happiness of human na¬ ture : but though the perversion ol the art is lamenta¬ bly remarkable in those volumes which issue, with of¬ fensive profusion, from the vain, the wicked, and tue hungry j yet this good results from the evil, that as truth is great and will prevail, she must derive fresh lustre, by displaying the superiority of her strength in the conflict with sophistry. . . “ Thus the art of printing, in whatever light it is viewed, has deserved respect and attention. I rom the ingenuity of the contrivance, it has ever excited me¬ chanical curiosity ; from its intimate connection with learning, it has justly claimed historical notice ; and from its extensive influence on morality, politics, and religion, it is now become a subject of very important speculation. . , . “ But however we may felicitate mankind on tlie in¬ vention, there are perhaps those who wish, that, toge¬ ther with its compatriot art of manufacturing gunpow¬ der, it had not yet been brought to light. lts eflects on literature, they assert, that it has increased the num¬ ber of books, till they distract rather than improve the mind ; and of its malignant influence on morals, they complain, that it has often introduced a false refinement, incompatible with the simplicity of primitive piety and genuine virtue. With respect to its literary ill conse¬ quences, it may be said, that though it produces to the world an infinite number of worthless publications, yet true wit and fine composition will still retain their value, and it will be an easy task for critical discernment to se¬ lect these from the surrounding mass of absurdity : and thouo-h, with respect to its moral effects, a regard to truth extorts’ the confession, that it has diffused immorality and irreligion, divulged with cruel impertinence the se- P R I crets of private life, and spread the tale of scandal Pi-huing, through an empire ; yet these are evils which will either '—-y-* shrink away unobserved in the triumphs of time and truth over falsehood, or which may, at any time, be suppressed by the legislative interposition.” 5 Some writers have ascribed the origin of this art to History of the East, and affixed a very early period to its inven-jj1^™ tion •, particularly P. Jovius, (Hut. lib. xiv. p. 226. ed. Florent. 1350), from whom Osorius and many others have embraced the same opinion. But these have evi¬ dently confounded the European mode of printing with the engraved tablets which to this day are used in Chi¬ na. The invention of these tablets has been ascribed by many writers even to an earlier period than the com¬ mencement of the Christian era 5 but is with more pro¬ bability assigned, by the very accurate Phil. Couplet, to the year ^he Historza Sinensis of iVbdalla, writ¬ ten in Persic in speaks of it as an art in very common use. Meerman, vol. i. p. 16. 218, 219, vol. ii. p. 186. N. Trigault asserts that the Chinese prac¬ tised the art of printing five centuries before. Count Ferre Itezzonico found at Lyons plates with words and names engraven by a Nuremberger 1380. The honour of having given rise to the European method has been claimed by the cities of Haerlem, Mentis and Strasburg. And to each of these it may be ascribed in a qualified sense, as they made improve¬ ments upon one another. _ 6 I. The first testimony of the inventor is that recorded Claim of hy Hadrian Junius, in his Batavia, p. 253, ed. Lugd.Haerlem. Bat. 15885 which, though it hath been rejected by ma- nv, is of undoubted authority. Junius had the relation from two reputable menj NicholausOalius (a), who was the schoolmaster ; and Quirinius Talesius, his intimate and correspondent. He ascribes it to Laurentius, the son of John (iEdituus, or Gustos, of the cathedral of HAERLEM, at that time a respectable office), upon the testimony of Cornelius, some time a servant to Lauren- tius, and afterwards bookbinder to the cathedral, an office which had before been performed by Franciscan friars. His narrative was thus : “ That, walking in a wood near the city (as the citizens of opulence use. to do), he began at first to cut some letters upon the rind of a beech tree 5 which, for fancy’s sake being impressed on paper, he printed one or two lines, as a specimen for his grand-children (the sons of his daughter) to follow. This having happily succeeded, he meditated greater things (as he was a man of ingenuity and judgment) 5 and first of all, with his son-in-law Thomas Peter (who, by the way, left three sons, who all attained the consu¬ lar dignity), invented a more glutinous writing-ink, be¬ cause he found the common ink sunk and spread 5 and then formed whole pages of wood, with letters cut upon them 5 of which sort! have seen some essays,in an anony¬ mous work, printed only on one side, entitled Speculum nostra; saluiis : in which it is remarkable, that in the in¬ fancy (A) Callus see™ to be the sane who Is called Claes ^,nsM 5-^“ ?t:!tvq3d s in ^ -IdlersrMuy" 3-° J«3- There are some letters of Hadriao Junius to this Talesius, in the Epistolce Junuina, p. 198.. Printim P R I [ 263 . fancy of printing (as nothing is complete at its first in- vention) the back sides of the pages were pasted ton-e¬ ther, that they might not by their nakedness betray their deformity. These beechen letters he afterwards changed for leaden ones, and these again for a mixture of tin and lead [stannece] as a less flexible and more solid and dur¬ able substance. Of the remains of which types, when they were turned to waste metal, those old wine-pots were cast, that are still preserved in the family-house which looks into the market-place, inhabited afterwards by his great-grandson Gerard Thomas, a gentleman of reputation ; whom I mention for the honour of the family, and who died old a few years since. A new invention never fails to engage curiosity. And when a commodity never before seen excited purchasers, to the advantage of the inventor, the admiration of the art in¬ creased, dependents were enlarged, and workmen mul¬ tiplied ; the first calamitous incident! Among these was ] P R I tells us (Lcl. v. 13.) of its being usual to cut words on the Sar/c of a beech ; and thence he was easily led to make a wrong application of it here. 2. 1 he letters were at first wooden, and are said to be afterwards exchanged for metal types j from which the wine-pots were formed, remaining in the time of Junius. According to tradition, printing was carried on in the same house long after the time of Laurentius: these pots might therefore be formed from the waste metal of the printing-house, after the use offusile types became universal.—-But Laurentius seems to have carried the art no farther than separate wooden types. What is a remarkable confirmation of this, Henry Spiechel, who wrote, m the 16th century, a Dutch poem entitled Hertspiegel, expresses himself thus : “ Thou first Lau¬ rentius, to supply the defect of wooden tablets, adaptedst wooden types, and afterwards didst connect them with a t uead, to imitate writing. A treacherous servant sur- :;:“;'£5rw;Btr.=r t 3335»4*s=; ^ 1 of Pr‘ ng. name of laustus (b), unfaithful and unlucky to mo master, or whether it was really a person of that name, I shall not much inquire j being unwilling to molest the silent shades, who suffer from a consciousness of their past actions in this life. This man, bound by oath to keep the secret of printing, when he thought he had learned the art of joining the letters, the method of casting the types, and other things of that nature, taking the most convenient time that was possible, on Christmas eve, when every one was customarily employ¬ ed in lustral sacrifices, seizes the collection of types, and all the implements his master had got together, and, with one accomplice, marches off to Amsterdam, thence’ to Cologne, and at last settled at Mentz, as at an asylum of security, where he might go to work with the tools he had stolen. It is certain, that in a year’s time, viz. m 1442, the Doctrinale of Alexander Galius, which was a grammar much used at that time, together with the Tracts of Peter of Spain, came forth there, from the same types as Laurentius had made use of at Haerlem.” Thus far the narrative of Junius, which he had fre¬ quently heard from Nicolaus Galius; to whom it was related by Cornelius himself, who lived to a great age and used to burst into tears upon reflecting on the loss’ his master had sustained, not only in his substance, but in his honour, by the roguery of his servant, his former associate and bedfellow. Cornelius, as appears by the registers of Haerlem cathedral, died either in 1515, or the beginning of the following year j so that he might very well give this information to Nicolaus Galius, who was^schoolmaster to Hadrian Junius. Though this circumstance is probable as to the main tact, yet we must set aside the evidence of it in some particulars. 1. The first obvious difficulty is noticed by bcnverius 5 “ that the types are said to be made of the rind of beach, which could not be strong enough to hear the impression of the press though this is re- nioved, if, instead of the bark, we substitute a bough of the beech. The idea of the bark, when Junius wrote this, was perhaps strong in his mind, from what Virgil truth itself, though destitute of common and wide-spread fame 5 truth, I say, still remains.” No mention in the poem of metal types; a circumstance which, had he been lobbed of such, as well as of wooffe?! ones, would scarcely ha\e been passed over in silence. When Laurentius first devised his rough specimen of the art, can only be guessed at. He died in 1440, af¬ ter having published the Speculum Belgicum, and two e *tions of Donatus, all with different wooden types; which it is probable (considering the difficulties he had to encounter, and the many artists whom he must neces¬ sarily have had occasion to consult) cost him some years to execute ; so that the first essay might be about 1450, winch nearly agrees with Petrus Scriverius, who says, the invention was about 10 or 12 years before 1440. bee Laurentius. ^ 3. AY hat was the specimen he first diverted himself with in cutting, at the distance of three centuries, one would think impossible to be discovered. And yet Job. Enschedius, a printer, thinks he was so happy as to find it, being an old parchment Horarium, printed on both sides, in eight pages, containing the Letters of the Alphabet, the Lord’s Prayer, the Apostles Creed and three short prayers. And Mr Meerman having shown this to proper artists who were judges of these matters, they gave it as their opinion that it aoreed exactly with the description of Junius. It is conforma¬ ble to the firsteditions of the Dutch Speculum Salvationis, and the fragments of both Bonatus's of Holland, both which are the works of the same Laurentius, and were pieceded by this. In these types, which are certainly moveable, cut, and uneven, there is a rudeness which Mr Meerman has not observed in any other instances. I here are no numbers to the pages, no signatures, no direction-words, no divisions at the end of the lines ; on the contrary,_ a syllable divided in the middle is seen, thus, Spi ntu, in p. 8. 1. 2, 3- There are neither dis¬ tinctions nor points, which are seen in the other works of Laurentius j and the letter t is not marked with an accent, but with a dot at the top. The lines through- Z Z 2 out se/m? ^in Faust, or Fust, is by many supposed to have derived his name fromfaustus, “ happy j” and Dr Faustus John Hr, /lryian air ° £rande“fin the appellation : but very erroneously. John Faust, or Fust, is no more than •wm nana, whence our name Fist. u tiling-. P R I [ 364' ] P R I out are uneven. The shape of the pages not always the same ; not (as they should be) rectangular, but some¬ times rhomb-like, sometimes an isosccle trapezium : and the performance seems to be left as a specimen both of his piety, and of his ingenuity in this essay of a new in¬ vented art. Mr Meerman has given an exact engrav¬ ing of this singular curiosity. But, whatever else may appear doubtful in the nar¬ rative of Junius, it is very clear, that the first essays of the art are to be attributed to Laurentius, who used only separate tuooden types. See the article Lauren¬ tius. II. Some of Laurentius’s types were stolen from him by one of his servants (c) John Geixsfleicii senior;' who fled therewith to MENTZ. Having introduced 7 the art from Haerlem into this his native city, he set with all diligence to carry it on j and published, in 1442, z‘ Alexjndhi Galli Doctrinale, and Petri Hjspani Tractatus ; two works, which, being small, best suited his circumstances •, and lor which, being much used in the schools, he might reasonably expect a profitable sale. They were executed with wooden types, cut after the model of those he had stolen. In 1443 he hired the house Sum Jlungeil; and was assisted (c) Authors differ as to the person who committed this robbery. It is clear from all accounts that his name was John ; but what his surname was is the disputed point. Junius, alter some hesitation, ascribes it to John I ust $ but with injustice : for he was a wealthy man, who assisted the first printers at Mentz. with money j and though he afterwards w^as proprietor of a printing-office, yet he never, as far as appears, performed any part ot the business with his own hands, and consequently he could never have been a servant to Laurentius. Nor is the conjecture of Scriverius better founded, which fixes it upon John Gutenberg, who (as appears by authentic testimonies) resided at Strasburg from 1436 to 1444, and during all that period employed much fruitless labour and expence in endea¬ vouring to attain this art. Mr Mterman once thought, “it might be either John Meidenbachius, (who, we are told by Seb. Munster and the author of Chronographia Moguntinensis, was an assistant to the first Mentz printers) ; or John Petersheimius (who was some time a servant to Fust and Schoefler, and set up a printing-house at Irancfort in 14^9): or, lastly, some other person, who, being unable through poverty to carry on the business, discovered it to Geinsfleich at Mentz.” But more authentic intelligence afterwards convinced him there were two persons of this name *, and that John Geinsfleich senior* was the dishonest servant, who was born at Mentz, and who in the papers published by Kohlerus, we find there in the year 1441, and not before : for though he was ot a good lamily, yet he was poor, and seems to have been obliged, as well as his brother, to seek his livelihood in a foreign coun¬ try } and perhaps was content to be under Laurentius, that, when he had learned the art, he might lollow it in his own. But, to leave conjecture, rve may produce some certain testimonies. 1. It is what Junius himself says, that the person who stole the types did it with a view to set up elsewhere j nor is it likely that he w'ould either make no use of an art he had seen so profitable to Laurentius, or that he would teach it to another and submit to be again a servant. The Lambeth Record (which is printed below, from Mr Atkyns) tells us, that “ Mentz gained the art by the brother of one of the workmen of Haerlem, who learned it at home of his brother, who after set up for himself at Mentz.”—By the strictest examination of the best authorities, it is plain, that by these two hrdthers the two Geinsfleiches must be meant. But as the younger (Gutenberg') was never a servant to Laurentius, it must be the senior who carried off the types, and instructed his brother in the art", who first applied himself to the business at Strasburg, and afterwards joined his elder brother, who had in the mean time settled at Mentz. What is still stronger, two chronologers of Strasburg, the one named Dan Spekhnus, the other anonymous (in Meerman’s Documenta, N° lxxxv. LXXXVI.), tell us expressly, that John Geinsfleich (viz. the senior, whom they distinguished from Gutenberg), having learned the art by being servant to itsJirst inventor, carried it by theft; into Mentz his native country. They are right in the fact, though mistaken in the application of it; for they make Strasburg the place of the invention, and Mentelius the inventor, from whom the types were stolen. But this is plainly an error: for Geinsfleich lived at Mentz in 1441, as appears from undoubted testimonies-, and could not be a servant to Mentelius, to whom the before-mentioned writers ascribe the invention in I44°> though more ancient ones do not attempt to prove that he began to print before 1444 °r I44^- Nor will the narrative agree better with Gutenberg, who was an earlier printer than Mentelius ; since, among the evidences produced by him in his law-suit, 1439, no Geinsfleich senior appears, nor any other servant but Laurentius Beildek. The narra¬ tion therefore of the theft of Geinsfleich, being spread by various reports through the world, and subsisting in the time of these chronologers, was applied by them (to serve the cause they wrote for) to Strasburg j but serves to confirm the truth, since no writer derives the printing spoils from any other country than Holland or Alsatia. The chronologers have likewise, instead of Fust, called Gutenberg the wealthy manj who, from all circumstances, appears to have been poor, They also call Schoetier the son-in-law of Mentelius j when it is clear that he married the daughter of Fust. * He was called Geimjleich xar the other was distinguished by the name of Gutenberg. They were both poor; though of a family distinguished by knighthood They were both married men ; and were most probably brothers, as it was rot uncommon in that age for two brotheis to have the same Christian name. These both appear ia a disreputable light. The eldest robbed his master, with many aggravating urcumslancvs. The youngest was remarkably contentious; and, after entering into a contract of marriage with Anna, a noble girl of The Iren Cate, refused to marry hei till compelled by a judicial decree; and afterwards cared not what became of the lady, but le ft her boi n Conrad Humery took possession of all his printing materials; and engaged to the archbishop Adolphus that he never would sell them to any one hut a citizen of Mentz. They were how¬ ever, soon disposed of to Nicholas Bechtermuntze of Altavilla, who, in 1469, published Vocabularium Latim-Teu- lomcum which was printed with the same types which had been used in the Catholicon. This very curious and scarce Vocabulary was shown to Mr Meerman, by Mr Bryant, in the duke of Marlborough’s valuable library at leniieim. It is in quarto, 35 lines long, contains many extracts from the Catholieon, and is called Ex quo, from ine preface beginning with those words. Meerman, vol. ii. p. 96. (f) Gutenberg never used any other than either wooden or cut metal types till the year 1462. In 146 c he was • ail(mtteA inter Auhcos by the elector Adolphus, with an annual pension ; and died in February 1468. His elder rother Gemsfleich died in 1462. Their epitaphs are printed by Mr Meerman, vol. ii. p. 154, 295. (G) In German, Schoeffer; in Latin, Opilio ; in English, Shepherd. He is supposed by Mr Meerman to nave been the first engraver on copperplates. 1 Anna/es Ihrsaugienses, tom. ii. ad ann. 1450.—As this book was finished in 1514, and Trithemius tells us ad the narrative from Schoeffer himself about 30 years before ; this will bring us back to 1484, when Schoeffer must have been advanced in years, and Trithemius about 22 years old, who died in 1 ci6. Sea Voss. Hist. Lat. 1. 1. c. io. Fabr. Med. & Infim. Mt. 1. 9. P R I [ 366 ] P R I Printing, rlage j a promise which he soon after performed. But t.i.—v.... ' there \vere as many difficulties at first with these letters, as there had been before with wooden ones j the metal being too soft to support the force ot the impression: but this defect was soon remedied, by mixing the metal with a substance which sufficiently hardened it (i).” Fust and Schoeffer concealed this new improvement, by administering an oath of secrecy to all whom they intrusted, till the year 1462 } when, by the dispersion of their servants into different countries, at the sacking oi Mentz by the archbishop Adolphus, the invention was publicly divulged. The first book printed with these improved types was Durandi Rationale, in 1459 ; at which time, however, they seem to have had only one size of cast letters, all the larger characters which occur being cut types, as appears plainly by an inspection of the book. From this time to 1466, Fust and Schoelfer contimied to print a consider¬ able number of books $ particularly two famous editions of Tally's Offices. In their earliest books, they printed more copies on vellum than on paper, which was the case both of their Bibles and Tally's Offices. This, however, was soon inverted j and paper introduced for the greatest part of their impressions j a few only being printed on vellum for curiosities, and for the purpose of being illu¬ minated. How long Fust lived, is uncertain *, but in 1471 we find Schoeffer was in partnership with Conrad Henlif and a kinsman of his master Fust. Fie published many books after the death of his father-in-law j the last of which that can be discovered is a third edition of the Psalter in 1490, in which the old cut types ol the first edition were used. Claim of IV. With regard to the olaim of STRASBURG : Strasburg. It has been already mentioned, that Gutenberg was en¬ gaged in that city in different employments j and, among others, in endeavouring to attain the art of printing. That these endeavours were unsuccessful, is plain from an authentic judicial decree of the senate of Strasburg in 1439, after the death of Andrew Drizehen (k). But there are many other proofs that Gutenberg and his partners were never able to bring the art to perfec¬ tion. I. Wimphelingius *, the oldest writer in favour of Strasburg, tells us, that Gutenberg was the inventor of “ a new art of writing,” ars impressoria, which might also be called a divine benefit, and which he happily completed at Mentz} hut does not mention one book Meerman, of his printing : though he adds, that Mentelius print- vol> '• ed many volumes correctly and beautifully, and acquired p. Z02. vol- ii. P- I35' * Epitome Rerum Germani- cnrum ed. Argent. great wealth •, whence we may conclude that lie per- fected what Gutenberg had in vain essayed. “vvi 2. Wimphelingius, in another book f, tells us, the f Cofa/ art of printing was found out by Gutenberg incomplete . which implies, not that he practised the art in an im-&em-i perfect manner (as Laurentius had done at Haerlem), but rather that he had not been able to accomplish what he aimed at. 3. Gutenberg, when he left Strasburg in 1444 or the following year, and entered into partnership with Geinsfleich senior and others, had occasion tor his bro¬ ther’s assistance to enable him to complete the art; which shows that his former attempts at Strasburg had j been unsuccessful J. ^ 4. These particulars are remarkably confirmed by ^ Trithemius, who tells us, in two different places §, thatHirfag Gutenberg spent all his substance in quest of this art ;utsupr, and met with such insuperable difficulties, that, in de-chron- spair, he had nearly given up all hopes of attaining it,^??*] till he was assisted by the liberality of Fust, and by his^^ j brother’s skill, in the city of Mentz. ii p. id 5. Ulric Zell says || the art was completed at Mentz; I*7. but that some books had been published in Holland ear- j Her than in that city. Is it likely that Zell, who was a ^| German, would have omitted to mention Strasburg, if it had preceded Mentz in printing P There is little doubt, therefore, that all Gutenberg’s labours at Strasburg amounted to no more than a fruit¬ less attempt, which he was at last under the necessity of relinquishing: and there is no certain proof of a single book having been printed in that city till after the dis¬ persion of the printers in 1462, when Mentelius and Eg- gestenius successfully pursued the business. In fine, the pretensions of Sti'asburg fall evidently to be set aside. And as to the other twro cities, Huerlem and Mentz, the disputes between them seem easily clear¬ ed up, from the twofold invention of printing above mentioned : the first with separate wooden types at Haerlem, by Laurentius, about 1430, and after conti¬ nued by his family j the other with metal types, first cut, and afterwards cast, which were invented at Mentz, but not used in Holland till brought thither by Theodo- ric Martens at Alost about 1472. From this period printing made a rapid progress in most of the principal towns of Europe. In 1490, it reached Constantinople 5 and, according to Mr Palmer, p. 281, &c. it was extended, by the middle of the next century, to Africa and America. It was introduced into Russia about 1560: but, from motives either of policy (1) See Meerman, vol. i. p. 183. who copied this testimony from AVolfius, Monument. Typography vol. i. p. 468. ' seff* ' . (k) Their first attempts were made about 1436 with wooden types. Mr Meerman is of opinion that Geinsfleich junior (who was of an enterprising genius, and had already engaged in a variety of projects) gained some little in¬ sight into the business by visiting his brother who was employed by Laurentius at Haerlem, but not sufficient to enable him to practise it. It is certain that, at the time of the law-suit in 1439* mucfi money had been expended, without any profit having arisen ; and the unfortunate Drizehen, in 1438, on his death-bed, lamented to his con¬ fessor, that he had been at great expence, without having been reimbursed a single obolus. Nor did Gutenberg (who persisted in his fruitless endeavours) reap any advantage from them ", for, when he quitted Strasburg, he was overwhelmed in debt, and under a necessity of selling every thing he was in possession of. [Meerman, vol. 1. p. 198—202.]. All the depositions in the law-suit abovementioned (with the judicial decree) are printed by Mr Meerman, vol. ii. p. 38.—88. N. P .in?- P R I policy or superstition, it was speedily suppressed by the ruling powers; and, even under the present enlightened empress, has scarcely emerged from its obscurity.—That it was early practised in the inhospitable regions of Ice¬ land, we have the respectable authority of Mr Bryant: “ Arngrim Jonas was born amidst the snows of Ice¬ land ; yet as much prejudiced in favour of his country as those who are natives of a happier climate. This isible in his Crymogcea, but more particularly in his i-fnrrt/3 rtlt'T Iri rtirt'nrt I • .*• t 367 3 P R I IS V Intnio- Anatome Blefkiniana. I have in my possession this cu¬ rious little treatise, written in Latin by him in his own country, and printed Typis Holensibus in Islandia Borea- h anno 1612. Hola is placed m some maps within the Arctic circle, and is certainly not far removed from it. I believe it is the farthest north of any place where arts and sciences have ever resided.” Observations and In¬ quiries relating to variouspartsof Ancient History, 1767, p. 277. It was a constant opinion, delivered down by our his- tion.the torians, as hath been observed by Dr Middleton, that *1 2 tiie Art of Printing was introduced and first practised in England by Tt illiam Caxton, a mercer and citizen of I London ; who, by his travels abroad, and a residence of many years in Holland, Flanders, and Germany, in the affairs of trade, had an opportunity of informing himself of the whole method and process of the art; and by the encouragement of the great, and particularly of the ab¬ bot of Westminster, first set up a press in that abbey, and began to print books soon after the year 1471. This was the tradition of our writers; till a book, which had scarce been observed before the Bestoration, was then taken notice of by the curious, with a date of its impression from Oxford, anno 1468, and was consi¬ dered immediately as a clear proof and monument of the exercise of printing in that university several years before Caxton began to deal in it. This book, which is in the public library at Cam¬ bridge, is a small volume of 41 leaves in 4to, with this title. Bxpositio Sancti Jcronum in Simbolum Apostolqrum ad Papam Laurentium: and at the end, Explicit expositio, Sfc. Impressa Oxonie et finita Anno Domini m.cccc.lxviii. xvn. die Decembris. The appearance of this book has robbed Caxton of a glory that he had long possessed, of being the author inEni> dP°fp^ntinS in 1,1'3 kingdoin 5 and Oxford has ever since wa« at carried the honour of the first press. The only difficulty ford. was, to account for the silence of history in an event so memorable, ar.d the want of any memorial in the univer¬ sity itself concerning the establishment of a new art amongst them of such use and benefit to learning. But this likewise has been cleared up by the discovery of a record, which had lain obscure and unknown at Lam- beth-palace, in the Kegister of the See of Canterbury, and gives a narrative of the whole transaction, drawn up at the very time. An account of this record was first published in a thin quarto volume, in English ; with this title : “ The Original and Growth of Printing, collected out of History, and the Records of this Kingdome : wherein is also demonstrated, that Printing appertaineth to the Prerogative Royal, and is a Flower of the Crown of England. By Richard Atkyns, esq.—Whitehall, April the 25. 1664. By order and appointment of the right honourable Mr Secretary Morrice, let this be printed. The lit printii press s Tho. Ryeaut, London : Printed by John Streater, for the Author, 1664.” 4to. , It sets forth in short, “ That as soon as the art of printing made some noise in Europe, Thomas Bour- chier, archbishop of Canterbury, moved the then king. (Henry VI.) to use all possible means for procuring a printing mould (for so it was then called) to be brought into tins kingdom. The king (a good man, and much given to works of this nature) readily hearkened to the motion ; and taking private advice how to effect his design, concluded it could not be brought about with¬ out great secrecy, and a considerable sum of money o-i- xen to such person or persons as would draw off some ot the workmen of Haerlem in Holland, where John Vmtenberg had newly invented it, and was himself per¬ sonally at work. It was resolved, that less than 1000 merks would not produce the desired effect; towards which sum the said archbishop presented the king aoo merks. Ihe money being now prepared, the manao-e- ment ot the design was committed to Mr Robert Tur- nour, who then was master of the robes to the king, and a person most in favour with him of any of his condition. Mr I urnour took to his assistance Mr Caxton, a citizen ot good abilities, who traded much into Holland ; which was a creditable pretence, as well for his going, as stay in the Low Countries. Mr Tumour was in disguise (Ins beard and hair shaven quite off) ; but Mr Caxton appeared known and public. They, having received t ie said sum of 1000 merks, went first to Amsterdam then to Leyden, not daring to enter Haerlem itself; for the town was very jealous, having imprisoned and ap¬ prehended divers persons who came from other parts for the same purpose. They staid till they had spent the whole thousand merks in gifts and expences : so as the king was fain to send 500 merks more, Mr Tumour having written to the king that he had almost done his work ; a bargain, as he said, being struck betwixt him and two Hollanders, for bringing off one of the under- workmen, whose name was Frederick Corsells (or rather Corsellis), who late one night stole from his fellows in disguise into a vessel prepared before for that purpose ; and so, the wind favouring the design, brought him safe to London. It was not thought so prudent to set him on work at London : but, by the archbishop’s means (who had been vice-chancellor and afterwards chancellor of the university of Oxon), Corsellis was carried with a guard to Oxon ; which guard constantly watched, to prevent Corsellis from any possible escape, till he had made good his promise in teaching them how to print. So that at Oxford, printing was first set up in England which was before there was any printing-press or print¬ er in France, Spain, Italy, or Germany (except the city of Mentz), which claims seniority, as to printing, even of Haerlem itself, calling her city, Urbem Mogun- tinam artis typographical inventricem primam ; though it is known to be otherwise, that city gaining the art by the brother of one of the workmen of Haerlem, who had learnt it at home of his brother, and after set up for himself at Mentz. This press at Oxon was at least ten years before, there was any printing in Europe, except at Haerlem and Mentz, where it was but new-born. This press at Oxford was afterwards found inconvenient to be the sole printing-place of England ; as being too far from London and the sea. Wherefore the king set up a press Printing. p 11 I [368] p ft 1 Prinvmr. ptdss at St Alban’s,ami another in the city of Westnnn- •.— ' ster, where they printed several books of divttnt?/ and phy¬ sic : for the king (for reasons best known tohimsell and council) permitted then no law-books to be printed; noi did any printer exercise that art, hut only such as wei c the king’s sworn servants •, the king Imnselj having the price and emoluments for printing books.—By this means the art grew so famous, that anno primo Richard 111* * c. 9. when an act of parliament was made for restraint of aliens for using any handicrafts here (except as ser¬ vants to natives), a special proviso was inserted, that strangers might bring in printed or written books to sell at their pleasure, and exercise the art ol printing here, notwithstanding that act: so that in the space of 40 or co vears, by the indulgence of Edward TV* Edward V . Richard III. Henry VII. and Henry VIII. the Eng¬ lish proved so good proficients in printing, and grew so numerous, as to furnish the kingdom with books •, and so skilful, as to print them as well as any beyond the seas-, as appears by the act 25 Hen. VIII. c. 15. which abrogates the said proviso lor that reason. And it was further enacted in the said statute, that if any per¬ son bought foreign books bound, he should pay 6s. 8d. per book. And it was further provided and enacted, that in case the said printers or sellers of hooks were unreasonable in their prices, they should be moderated by the lord chancellor, lord treasurer, the two lords chief justices, or any two of them, who also had power to fine them 3s. 4d. for every book whose price should be enhanced —But when they were by charter corpofa- ted with bookbinders, booksellers, and founders of letters, 3 and 4 Philip and Mary, and called The Company of Stationers, they kick’d against the power that gave them lifej gcc.—Queen Elizabeth, the first year of her reign, grants by patent the privilege of sole printing all books that touch or concern the common laws of England, to Tot tel a servant to her majesty, who kept it entire to his death ; after him, to one Vest Weirt, another ser¬ vant to her majesty 5 after him, to Weight and Norton j and after them, King James grants the same privilege to More, one of the signet ; which grant continues to t2 this day, &c.” Whether From the authority of this record, all otir later wri- Caxton or ters declare Corsellis to be the first printer in England; CorseHis Anthony Wood, the learned Mr Maittaire, Palmer, Ta! ^ • and one John Bagford, an industrious man, who had * published proposals for An History of Printing, (Phil. Trans, for April 1707). But Dr Middleton has called in question the authenticity of this account, and has ur¬ ged several objections to it, with the view of supporting Caxton’s title to the precedency with respect to the introduction of the art into this country ; of which we shall quote one or two, with the answers that have been made to them. Objection 1 “ The silence of Caxton concerning a fact in which he is said to be a principal actor, is a suf¬ ficient confutation of it: for it was a constant custom with him, in the prefaces or conclusions of his works, to give an historical account of all his labours and trans¬ actions, as far as they concerned the publishing and printing of books. And, what is still stronger, in the continuation of the Polychronicon, compiled by himself, and carried down to the end of Henry the Sixth’s reign, he makes no mention of the expedition in quest ot a printer : which he could not have omitted had it been J true ; whilst in the same book he takes notice ot the invention and beginning of printing in the city of*—yv Mentz.” Answer.—As Caxton makes no mention in his Poly¬ chronicon of his expedition in quest of a printer', so nei¬ ther does he of his bringing the art into England, vfhidx it is as much a wonder he should omit as the other. And as to his saying that the invention of printing was at Meat*, he means, of printing onfusile separate types. In this he copies, as many others have, from the Eas- cicidus Temporum ; a work written in 1470, by Wer- nerus Rolevinch de Laer, a Carthusian monk, a MS. copy of which was in the library of Gerard Jo. Vossius (see lib. iii. de Histor. Latin, c. 6.) ; and afterwards continued to the year 1474, when it was first printed at Cologne typis Arnoldi ter Huernen. It was republished in 1481 by Heinricus Wirczburgh de Yach, a Cluniac monk, without mentioning the name either of the prin¬ ter or of the place of publication. It is plain that Cax¬ ton had one at least, or more probably both, of these editions before him, when he wrote his continuation of Polychronicon, as he mentions this work in his preface, and adopts the sentiments of its editor. (See Meer- MAN, vol. ii. p. 37. and his Documenta, NG vii. xxiv. and xxv.). Obj. 2.—“ There is a farther circumstance in Cax¬ ton’s history, that seems inconsistent with the record; for we find him still beyond sea, about 12 years after the supposed transactions, “ learning with great charge and trouble the art of printing” {Recule of the Histories of Troye, in the end of the 2d and 3d books) ; which he might have done with ease at home, if he had got Corsellis into his hands, as the record imports, so many years before : but he probably learnt it at Cologne, where he resided in 1471, {Recule, &c. ibid.), and whence hooks had been first printed with date the year before.” Ans.—Caxton tells us, in the preface to The History of Troye, that he began that translation March 1.1468, at Bruges; that he proceeded on rvith it at Ghent; that he finished it at Cologne in 1471 ; and printed it, probably, in that city with his own types. He was 30 years abroad, chiefly in Holland; and lived in the court of Margaret duchess of Burgundy, sister of Edward t IV. It was therefore much easier to print his book at Cologne, than to cross the sea to learn the art at Oxford. But further, there was a special occasion for his print¬ ing it abroad. Corsellis had brought over so far the art of printing as he had learned it at Haerlem, which was the method of printing on wooden separate types, having the face of the letter cut upon them. But the art of casting metal types being divulged in 1462 by the workmen of Mentz, Caxton thought proper to learn that advantageous branch before he returned to Eng¬ land. This method of casting the types was such an im¬ provement, that they looked on it as the original of printing; and Caxton, as most others do, ascribes that to Mentz.—Caxton was an assistant with Tumour in getting off Corsellis; hut it is nowhere supposed that he came with him into England. (See MeermaN, vol. n. p. 34. B.). , Obj. 3.—“ As the Eambeth record rvas never heard of before the publication (f At ky ids book, so it has never since been seen or produced by any man ; though the registers of Canterbury have on many occasions been di- PR! [ 369 ] P R I . lignutly and particularly searched for it. They were prorogued. See/o»r™/s of ,he Home of Lords, vol. P, examined, wit lout doubt, very carefully by Archbishop xi. p. 700—It is probable, then, that after Mr At- Parker, for the compiling h.s „/ the British kyns had published I,is book in April 1664, the par- Chure/r, where, in the hfe of Thomas IJourehier, though liameut thought proper, the next year, to ituire futo he congratulates that age on the noble and useful in- t/x right of the king's prerogative ; and that Sir Job,, vent,on oi printing, yet hew silent as to the introduc- Birkenhead took cate to inspect the original, then in the custody of Archbishop Sheldon : and, finding it not sufficient to prove what Mr Atkyns had cited it for, made no report ol the MS. to the house; but only mo¬ ved that the former law should be renewed. The MS. was probably never returned to the proper keeper of it} but was afterwards burnt in the fire of London, Sept. 13. 1666.—(4.) J uat printing was practised at Ox¬ ford, was a prevailing opinion long before Atkyns. Bry¬ an Iwyne, in his Apologia pro Antiquitate Acadanice Oxoniensis, published 1608, tells us, it is so delivered down in ancient writings: having heard, probably, of this Lambeth MS. And Kang Charles I. in his letters patent to the University of Oxford, March 5. in the ele¬ venth of his reign, 1635, mentions.printing as brought to Oxford from abroad. As to what is objected, “ that it is not likely that the press should undergo a ten or eleven years sleep, viz. from 1468 to 1479,” ll »s Pr°- bably urged without foundation. Corselhs might print several books without date or name of the place, as Ul- ric Zell did at Cologne, from 1467 to 1473, and from that time to 1494. Corsellis’s name, it may be said, tion of it into England by the endeavours of that arch¬ bishop : nay, his giving the honour of the invention to Strasburg clearly shews that he knew nothing of the story of Corsellis conveyed from Haerlem, and that the record was not in being in his time. Palmer himself owns, “ That it is not to be found there now j for that the late earl of Pembroke assured him, that he had em¬ ployed a person for some time to search for it, but in vain (Hist, of Printing, p. 314.). On these grounds wc may pronounce the record to be a forgery ; though all the writers above mentioned take pains to support its credit, and call it an authentic piece. Atkyns, who by his manner of writing seems to have been a bold and vain man, might possibly be the inven¬ tor; for he had an interest in imposing it upon the world, in order to confirm the argument of his book, that printing was of the prerogative royal; in opposition to to the company of stationers, with whom he was engaged in an expensive suit of law, in defence of the tents, under which he claimed some exclusive powers of printing. For he tells us, p. 3. ‘ That, upon consider¬ ing the thing, he could not but think that a public person, more eminent than amercer, and a public purse, must needs be concerned in so public a good : and the more he considered, the more inquisitive he was to find out the truth. So that he had formed his hypothesis be¬ fore he had found his record ; which he published, he says, as a friend to truth ; not to suffer one man to be intitled to the worthy achievements of another 5 and as a friend to himself, not to lose one of his best arguments of mtitling the king to this art.’ But, if Atkyns was not himself the contriver, he was imposed upon at least by some more crafty man; who imagined that his in¬ terest in the cause, and the warmth that he shewed in prosecuting it, would induce him to swallow for genuine whatever was offered of the kind. Ans.—On the other hand, is it likely that Mr At¬ kyns would dare to forge a record, to be laid before the king and council, and which his adversaries, with whom he was at law, could disprove ?—(2.) He says he recei¬ ved this history from a person of honour, who was some time keeper of the Lambeth library. It was easy to have confuted this evidence, if it was false, when he pu¬ blished it, April 23. 1664.—(3O John Bagford (who was born in England in 1651, and might know Mr At¬ kyns, who died in 1677), in his History of Printing at Oxford, blames those who doubted of the authenticity of the Lambeth MS.; and tells us that he knew Sir John Birkenhead had an authentic copy of it, when in 1665 [which Bagford by some mistake calls 1664, and is fol¬ lowed in it by Meerman] he was appointed by the house of commons to draw up a bill relating to the exercise of that art. this is confirmed by the Journals of that house, f riday Oct. 27* 1665, vol. viii. p. 622, where it is ordered, that this Sir John Birkenhead should carry the bill on that head to the house of lords for their con¬ sent.— 1 he act was agreed to in the upper house on Tuesday Oct. 31. and received the royal assent on the same day ; immediately after which the parliament was Vol. XVII. Part I. f appears not in any of his publications; but neither does that of Joannes Petersheimius. [See MEERMAN, vol. i. p. 34. ; vol. ii. p. 21 — 27, &c.] I urther, the famous Shakespeare, who was born in *5^4’ ariti died 1616, in the Second Part of Henry VI. act iv. sc. 7. introduces the rebel John Cade, thus up¬ braiding Lord T reasurer Say : “ Thou has most traito¬ rously corrupted the youth of the realm, in creating a grammar-school : and whereas, before, our forefathers had no other book but the score and the tally, thou hast caused Pi'inting to be used ; and, contrary to the king, his crown, and dignity, thou hast built a paper-mill.”— Whence now had Shakespeare this accusation against Lord Say ? We are told in the Poetical llegister, vol. ii. p. 231. ed. Lond. 1724, that it was from Fabian, Pol. ^ ergel, Hall, Hollingshed, Grafton, Stow, Speed, &c. But not one of these ascribes printing to the reign of Henry \ I. On the contrary, Stow, in his Annals, printed at London, 1560, p. 686, gives it expressly to William Caxton, 1471. “ The noble science of print¬ ing was about this time found out in Germany at Ma- gunce, by one John Guthumburgus a knight. One Conradus an Almaine brought it into Rome : William Caxton of London, mercer, brought it into England about the year I471? and first practised the same in the abbie of St Peter at Westminster ; after which time it was likewise practised in the abbies of St Augustine at Canterburie, Saint Albons, and other monasteries of England.” What then shall we say, that the above is an anachronism arbitrarily put into the mouth of an ig¬ norant fellow out of Shakespeare’s head ? We might be¬ lieve so, but that we have the record of Mr Atkyns con¬ firming the same in King Charles II.’s time. Shall we say, that Mr Atkyns borrowed the story from Shake¬ speare, and published it with some improvements of money laid out by Henry VI. from whence it might be received by Charles II. as a prerogative of the crown ? But this is improbable, since Shakespeare makes Lord 3 A Treasurer P R I [ 370 ] Printing. Treasurer Say tbe intrument of Importing it, of whom Mr Atkyns mentions not a word. Another difteience there will still be between Shakespeare and the Lambeth MS.; the poet placing it before 1449, 10 wlnch yeaJ Lord Say was beheaded; the MS. between 1454 and 141:0, when Bourchier was archbishop. We must say, then, that Lord Say first laid the scheme, and sent some one to Haerlem, though without success; but alter some years it was attempted happily by Bourchier. Am we must conclude, that as the generality of writers have overlooked the invention of printing at Haer em with wooden types, and have ascribed it to Mentz where we- tal types were first made use of; so in England they have passed by Corsellis (or the first Oxford Printer, whoever he was, who printed with wooden types at Ox¬ ford), and only mention Caxton as the original artist who printed with metal types at Westminster, [bee Meerman, vol. ii. 7, 8.]. It is strange, that the learned commentators on our great dramatic poet, who are so minutely particular upon less important occasions, should every one of them, Dr Johnson excepted, pa=s by this curious passage, leaving it entirely unnoticed. And how has Dr Johnson trifled, by slightly reniark- ing “ that Shakespeare is a little too early with this accusation !”—The great critic had undertaken to de¬ cipher obsolete words, and investigate unintelligible phrases; but never, perhaps, bestowed a thought on Caxton or Corsellis, on Mr Atkyns or the authenticity of the Lambeth Record. tl , , But, independent of the record altogether, the book •stands firm as a monument of the exercise of printing in Oxford six years older than any book ot Caxton s with a date. In order to get clear of this strong tact, Dr Middleton, . , , r , , 1. Supposes the date in question to have been falsified originally by the printer, either by design or mistake ; and an X to have been adopted or omitted m the age of its impression. Examples of this kind, he saysj are common in the history of printing. And, whilst I am now writing, an unexpected instance is fallen into my hands, to the support of my opinion; zn Inaugura¬ tion Speech of the Woodwardian Professor, Mr Mason, iust fresh from the press, with its date given 10 years earlier than it should have been, by the omission ot an * viz. MDCCXXIV ; and the very blunder exemplified in in the last piece printed at Cambridge, which I suppose to have happened in the first from Oxford. —To this it has been very properly answered 1 hat we should not pretend to set aside the authority ^ a plain date, with¬ out very strong and cogent reasons ; and what the Doc¬ tor has in this case advanced will not appear, on exami¬ nation to carry that weight with it that he seems to imagine. There may be, and have been, mistakes and P R I forgeries in the date both of books and of records too; pr;m!n?i but this is never allowed as a reason for suspecting such e— as bear no mark ol either. Me cannot from a blunder in the last book printed at Cambridge, infer a like blun¬ der in the first book printed at Oxford. Besides, the type used in this our Oxford edition seems to be no small proof of its antiquity. It is the German letter, and very nearly the same with that used by Fust [who has been supposed to be) the first printer ; whereas Caxton and Rood use a quite different letter, something between his German and our old English letter, which was soon after introduced by De W orde and I ynson. 2. “ For the probability of his opinion (he says), the book itself affords sufficient proof: for, not to insist on what is less material, the neatness of the letter, and regularity of the page, &c. above those of Caxton, it has one mark, that seems to have carried the matter be¬ yond probable, and to make it even certain, viz. the use of signatures, or letters of the alphabet placed at the bottom of the page, to show the sequel of the pages and leaves of each book; an improvement contrived for the direction of the bookbinders ; which yet was not prac¬ tised or invented at the time when this book is supposed to be printed; for we find no signatures in the books of Faust or Schoeffer at Mentz, nor in the improved or beautiful impressions of John de Spira and Jenson at Venice till several years later. We have a book in our library, that seems to fix the very time of their inven¬ tion, at least in Venice; the place where the art itself received the greatest improvements: Baldi lectura super Codic. Sfc. printed by John de Colonia and Jo. Manthem de Gherret'Zem, anno mcccclxxiiii. It is a large and fair volume in folio, without signatures, till about the middle of the book, in which they are first introduced, and so continued forward : which makes it probable, that the first thought of them was suggested during the impression; for we have likewise Lectura Barthoh super Codic. Sec. in twro noble and beautiful volumes in folio, printed the year before at the same place, by \ indehn de Spira, without them : yet from this time forward they are generally found in all the works of the Vene¬ tian printers, and from them propagated to the other printers of Europe. They were used at (l) Cologne, in 1475 5 at Paris, 1476; by Caxton, not before 1480 . but if the discovery had been brought into England, and practised at Oxford 12 years before, it is not probable that he would have printed so long at Westminster with¬ out them Mr Palmer indeed tells us, p, 54, 180, that Anthonv Zarot was esteemed the inventor of signatures; and that they are found in a Terence printed by him at Milan in the year 1470, in which he first printed. I have not seen that Terence; and can only say that J have observed the want of them in some later works ot this * Sce Maittaire. c«*« („bL< et ant it ypiece Novi Test amen ti, and in some edi ions w JP Annaj> V()j> j 2-) . an(j in Mamme- lished at Paris, without a date, but printed A. D. 147°» ( ’ j :n*X)e Tondch visione, at Antwerp, trectus, printed bv Delias de Llouffen, at Bun in Switzerland 147° , amt in use(I J/. V Ven.ce therefore, was not the place whe^ were "" “not think, of dus it seems, when the book was halt finished. 1 lie piintei ot inui down S... q ’ T cnn the use of them before. See Meerman, vol. ii. p. 18 ; and Ihil. Irans. vol. xxin. N 2 . p. 5 9- P R I [ yji this as well as ©f other excellent printers of the same place. But, allowing them to be in the Terence, and Zarot the inventor, it confutes the date of our Oxford book as effectually as if they were of later origin at Ve- nicej as I had reason to imagine, from the testimony of all the books that I have hitherto met with.” As to these proofs, first, the neatness ®f the letter, and the regularity of the page, prove, if any thing, the very re¬ verse of what the Doctor asserts. The art of printing was almost in its infancy brought to perfection ; but af¬ terwards debased by later printers, who consulted rather the cheapness than the neatness of their work. Our learned dissertator cannot be unacquainted with the la¬ bours of Fust and Jenson. He must know, that though other printers may have printed more correctly, yet scarce any excel them, either in the neatness of the letter, or the regularity of the page. The same may be observed in our English printers. Caxton and Rood were indifferently good printers j De Worde and Pyn- son were worse j and those that follow them most abo¬ minable. This our anonymous Oxford printer excels them all} and for this very reason we should judge him to be the most ancient of all. Our dissertator lays great stress on the use of signatures. But no certain conclu¬ sion can be drawn either from the use or non-use of these lesser improvements of printing. They have in different places come in use at different times, and have not been continued regularly even at the same places. If Anthony Zarot used them at Milan in 1470, it is certain later printers there did not follow his example j and the like might happen also in England. But, what is more full to our purpose, we have in the Bodleian li¬ brary an iEsop’s Fables printed by Caxton. This is, it is believed, the first book which has the leaves number¬ ed. But yet this improvement, though more useful than that of the signatures, wras disused both by Caxton him¬ self and other later printers in England. It is therefore not at all surprising (if true) that the signatures, though invented by our Oxford printer, might not immediately come into general use. And consequently, this particu¬ lar carries with it no such certain or effectual confuta¬ tion as our dissertator boasts of. 3. What the Doctor thinks farther confirms his opi¬ nion is, “ That, from the time of the pretended date of this book, anno 1468, we have no other fruit or produc¬ tion from the press at Oxford for 11 years next follow¬ ing*, and it cannot be imagined that a press, established with so much pains and expence, could be suffered to be so long idle and useless.”—To this it may be answered, in the words of Oxonides, 1st, That his books may have been lost. Our first printers, in those days of ig¬ norance, met with but small encouragement j they print¬ ed but few books, and but few copies of those books. In after-times, when the same books were reprinted more correctly, those first editions, which were not as yet become curiosities, were put to common uses. This is the reason that we have so few remains of our first printers. We have only four books of Theodoric Rood, who seems by his own verses to have been a very cele¬ brated printer. Of John Lettou-William de Machlinia, and the schoolmaster of St Albans, we have scarce any remains. If this be considered, it will not appear im- posbible, that our printer should have followed his business from 1468 to 1479, and yet time have destroyed his intermediate works. But, 2dly, We may account still ] P R 1 another way for this distance of time, without altering the date. Hie Civil Wars broke out in 1469 : this might probably oblige our Oxford printer to shut up his press; and both himself and his readers be otherwise en¬ gaged. It this were the case, he might not return to his work again till 1479; and the next year, not meet¬ ing with that encouragement he deserved, he might remove to some other country with his types. Dr Middleton concludes with apologizing for his Printin»r. “ spending so much pains on an argument so inconsider¬ able, to which he was led by his zeal to do a piece of justice to the memory of our worthy countryman Wil¬ liam Caxton ; nor suffer him to be robbed of the glory, so clearly due to him, of having frst imported into this kingdom an art of great use and benefit to mankind : a kind ot merit, that, in the sense of all nations, gives the best title to true piaise, and the best claim to be com¬ memorated with honour to posterity.” r. The fact, however, against which he contends, but Tlie real which it seems impossible to overturn, does by no means c^a,ms derogate from the honour of Caxton, who, as has been ^sdlisre* shown, was the first person in England that practised the spectively? art of printing with fusile types, and consequently the first who brought it to perfection ; whereas Corsellis printed with separate cut types in wood, being the only method which he had learned at Haerlem. Into this detail, therefore, we have been led, not so much by the importance ol the question, as on account of several anecdotes connected with it, which seemed equally cal¬ culated to satisfy curiosity and afford entertainment. Caxton had been bred very reputably in the way of trade, and served an apprenticeship to one Robert Large a mercer; who, after having been sheriff and lord mayor ot London, died in the year 1441, and left by will, as may be seen in the prerogative office, xxini merks to his apprentice William Caxton : a considerable legacy in those days, and an early testimonial of his good cha¬ racter and integrity. From the time of his master’s death, he spent the following thirty years beyond sea in the business of mer¬ chandise : where, in the year 1464, we find him em¬ ployed by Edward IV. in a public and honourable ne- gociation, jointly with one Richard Whitehill, Esq. to transact and conclude a treaty of commerce between the king and his brother-in-law the duke of Burgundy, to whom Flanders belonged. The commission styles them, ambassiatores, procuratores, nuncios, et deputaios speci- ales; and gives to both or either of them full powers to treat, &c. Whoever turns over his printed works, must contract a respect for him, and be convinced that he preserved the same character through life, of an honest, modest, man ; greatly industrious to do good to his country, to the best of his abilities, by spreading among the people such books as he thought useful to religion and good manners, which were chiefly translated from the French. The novelty and usefulness of his art recommended him to the special notice and favour of the great; under whose protection, and at whose expence, the greatest part of his works were published. Some of them are addressed to King Edward IV. his brother the duke of Clarence, and their sister the duchess of Burgundy ; in whose service and pay he lived many years before he began to print, as he often acknowledges with great gratitude. He printed likewise for the use, and by 3 A 2 the p n i is: Printing, tlie express order, of Henry VII. liis son Prince Ar- v~*~“ thnr, and many of the principal nobility and gentry ot that age. _ ' ' It has been generally asserted and believed, that all his books were printed in the abbey ol Westminster j yet we have no assurance of it from himself, nor any mention of the place before the year 1477 : so that he had been printing several years without telling us where. There is no clear account left of Caxton’s age : but be was certainly very old, and probably above fourscore, at the time of his death. In the year 1471 ^.e com' plained of the infirmities of age creeping upon him, and feebling his body : yet he lived 23 years alter, and pur¬ sued his business, with extraordinary diligence, in the abbey of Westminster, till the year 1494, in which be '' l'1"' ,AS !t 7 ““possible but that there must be some mis¬ takes in the work, either through the oversight of the compositor, or by the casual transposition of letters in the cases 3 a sheet is printed off, which is called a proof and given to the corrector; who reading it over and rectifying it by the copy, making the alterations in the margin, it is delivered back to the compositor to he cor¬ rected. The compositor then unlocking the form upon the correcting-stone, by loosening the quoins or wedges vh.ch bound the letters together, rectifies the mistakes /-v P, ng out the fauIty oi- wrong letters with a slen¬ der sharp pointed steel-bodkin, and putting others into their places. After this another proof is made, sent to the author and corrected as before ; and lastly, there :s anothf proof called a revise, which is made in order to see whether all the mistakes marked in the last proof are corrected. 1 The pressman’s business is to work off the forms thus prepared and corrected by the compositor 3 in doing which there are four things required, paper, ink, balls, and a press J o prepare the paper for use, it is to be hist wetted by dipping several sheets together in water: u se are afterwards laid in a heap over each other ; and to make them take the water equally, they are all pres¬ sed clos'e down with a weight at the top. The ink is made of oil and lamp-black ; for the manner of prepa¬ ring which see Printing-Ink. The balls, by which the ink is applied on the forms, are a kind of wooden fun¬ nels with handles, the cavities of which are filled with wool or hair, as is also a piece of alum leather or pelt nailed over the cavity, and made extremely soft by soak¬ ing in urine, and by being well rubbed. One of these the pressman takes in each hand ; and applying one of them to the ink-block, daubs and works them together to distribute the ink equally; and then blackens the orm which is placed on the press, by beating with the balls upon the face of the letter. . rile printing-press, represented fig. 2. is a very cu-FlV „ nous though complex machine. The body consists of S wo strong cheeks a, a, placed perpendicularly, and join¬ ed together by four cross-pieces, the cap b 3 the head C\ 'vh,chI 18 “oveable, being partly sustained by two iron pins or long bolts, that pass the cap 3 the till or shelf (: hy 'vbieh the spindle and its apparatus are kept in their proper position 3 and the winter e, which bears the carnage, and sustains the effort of the press beneath. I lie spind.le/is an uPright piece of iron pointed with steel, having a male screw which goes into the female one in the head about four inches. Through the eye g- ot this spindle is fastened the bar A:, by which the press¬ man makes the impression. The spindle passes through a hole in the middle of the till ; and its point works in¬ to a brass pan or nut, supplied with oil, which is fixed to an iron plate let into the top of the platten. The body of the spindle is sustained in the centre of an open frame of polished iron, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, fixed to it in such a manner as, without obstructing its free play, to keep it in a steady direction 3 and at the same time to serve for Suspending the platten. This frame consists of two parts 3 the upper called the garter, 1,1; the under, called the crane, 2, 2. These are connected to¬ gether P R I [ 376 ] P R I ofllul by two sliort logs or bolts, 3, 3-i "oiob being fixed below in tbe two ends of the crane, pass upward, through two holes in the till, and arc received at top into two eyes at the ends of the garter, where they are secured by screws. The carriage 11 is Placed a foot below the platten, having its fore-part supported by a wop called the fore-stay, while the other rests on t ie winter. On this carriage, which sustains the plank, are nailed two long iron bars or ribs •, and on the plank are nailed short pieces of iron or steel called cramp irons, equally tempered with the ribs and which shde upon them when the plank is turned in or out. Under the carriage is fixed a long piece ot iron called the spit, with a double wheel in the middle, round which leather-girts are fastened, nailed to each end of the plunk . and o the outside of the spit is Hxed a rounce m, or handle to turn round the wheel. Upon the plank is a square frame or coffin, in which is inclosed a polished stone on which the form « is laid* at the end of the coffin are three frames vi%. the two tympans and fnsket: the tyn,pans 0 ‘are square, and made of three slips of very thin wood, and at the top a piece of iron still thinner *, that cafie the outer tympan is fastened with hinges to the coffin: they are both covered with parchment; and between the tw0yare placed blankets, which are necessary to take off the impression of the letters upon the paper. T i e frisked p is a square frame of thin iron fastened with hinges L the tvmpan : it is covered with paper cut in thenecessary places, that the sheet, which is put be¬ tween the frisket and the great or outward tympan, mav receive the ink, and that nothing may hurt the 'ins To regulate the margins, a sheet of paper is Sued upon this tympan, which is called the tympan ;XrrandPon each side is fixed an iron point, which makes two holes in the sheet, which is to be placed .on the same points when the impression is to be made on the other side. In preparing the press for working, he parchment which covers the outer tympan is we.ted m l is very soft, in order to render the impression more equable > tbe blankets are then put in, and secured from slipping by the inner tympan : then while one pressman Is beating tbe letter with the balls q, covered lith ink taken from the ink-block the other person places a sheet of white paper on the tympan-sheet, turns down the frisket upon it, to keep the paper clean and prevent its slipping j then bringing the tampans upon the form, and turning the rounce he brings the form w’th the stone, &c. weighing about 300 lb,, weight, under the platteu j pu Is with the bar, y which means the platten presses the blankets and pape close upon the letter, whereby halt the form is printed, then easing the bar, he draws the form still forward , gives a second pull; and letting go the bar, turns back the form, takes up tbe tympans and frisket, takes the printed sheet, and lays on a fresh one ; and this is repeated till he lias taken off the impression upon the foil number of sheets the edition is to consist of. One side of the sheet being thus printed the form for the other is laid upon the press, and worked oil in the same manner. „ , . . To the above description of the printing press, we shall add that of one invented by Mr Nicholson, and for which a patent was granted in 1790. This machine is recommended by the inventor as being superior to other printing presses in cheapness, accuracy, and neatness, and is adapted with some slight variations in its construction Wnti for printing on paper, linen, cotton, anc woo en. iree particulars are to be attended to in the invention. 1st, The manner of preparing and placing the types, engravings, or carvings, from which the impression is to be made ; 2dly, In applying the ink or colouring matter to types or engravings j and, 3^, In taking oft the im¬ pression. „ . „ 1st. The moulds, punches, and matrices, for casting- letters, are made in the same manner, and with the same materials, as other letter-founders do, excepting that, in¬ stead of leaving a space in the mould lor the stem of one letter only, be leaves spaces for two, three, or more let¬ ters, to be cast at one pouring of the metal j and at the lower extremity of each of those spaces (winch commu¬ nicate by a common groove at top) he places a matrix, or piece of copper, with the letter punched upon its face in the usual way. And moreover, he brings the stem of Ins letters to a due form and finish, not only by upon a stone, and scraping it when arranged in the tinish- ing-stick, but likewise by scraping it, on one or more sides, in a finishing-stick whose hollowed part is less deep at the inner than the outer side. ITe ca s *ia 81 ® 0 the groove which is nearest the face of the disposed let¬ ter, the outer side j and the purpose accomplished by this method of scraping is, that ot rendering the tail ot the letter gradually smaller the more remotest is, or farther from the face. Such letters may be firmly im¬ posed upon a cylindrical surface, in the same manner as common letters are imposed upon a flat stone. 2d/i/, The ink or colouring matter is applied to the types; forms, or plates, by causing tbe surface ot a cy¬ linder, smeared or wetted with the colouring matter, to roll over the surfaces of the said forms or plates, or by causing the forms or plates apply themselves successively to the surface of the cylinder. The surface of this co¬ louring cylinder is covered with leather, or with wool¬ len, linen, or cotton cloth. When the colour to be used is thin, as in calico-printing, and m almost every case, the covering is supported by a firm elastic stuffing, consisting of hair, or wool, or woollen cloth wrapped one or more folds round the cylinder. en e vering consists of woollen cloth, the stuffing must be de¬ fended by leather or oilskin, to prevent its imbibing too much colour, and by that means losing its elasticity. It is absolutely necessary that the colouring matter e evenly distributed over the surface of the cylinder ; an for this purpose, when the colour is thick and stilt, as in letter-press printing, he applies two, three, rao^e small cylinders,called distributing-rollers,longitudinally against the colouring cylinders, so that they may e urn- ed bv the motion of the latter ; and the efiect of this ap¬ plication is, that every lump or mass of colour wine 1 may be redundant, or irregularly placed upon the face ot t e colouring cylinder, will be pressed, spread, an pa y taken up, and carried by the small rollers to the other parts of the colouring cylinder; so that this aS very speedily acquire and preserve au even lace ot lour. But if the colouring matter be thinner, he > not apply more than one or two of these d.stnbi rollers ; and, if it be very thin, he apphes a blunt edge of metal, or wood, or a straight brush, both of these last, against the colouring cylinoer i the purpose of rendering its colour uniform. '\n n applies colour to an engraved plate, or ,, P R I i nting r Fig. through the interstices of a perforated pattern, as in the* manufacturing of some kinds of paper hangings, he uses a cylinder entirely covered with hair or bristles in the manner of a brush. idly, The impressions, even in letter-press printing, are performed by the action of a cylinder or cylindrical surface. The following is the construction of this ma¬ chine. Fig. 3. represents a printing-press, more espe¬ cially applicable to the printing of books. A and E are two cylinders, running or turning in a strong frame of wood, or metal, or both. The cylinder A is faced with woollen cloth, and is capable of being pressed with more or less force upon Hi, by means of the lever M. HI is a long table, which is capable ol moving endwise, back¬ wards and forwards, upon the rollers E and K. The lollei A acts upon this table by means of a cog-wheel, or by straps, so as to draw it backwards and forwards’ by the motion of its handle L. The table is kept in the same line by grooves on its sides, which contain the cylinder A. I) is a chess, containing letter set up and imposed. B is a box, containing a colouring-roller, with its distributing-rollers CC 5 it is supported by the arm N. O is a cylinder laced with leather, and lying across an ink-block ; this cylinder is fixed by the middle to a bended lever moveable on the joint Q. The action. hen X), or the letter, is drawn beneath the cyhndei B, it receives ink, and when it has passed into the position R, a workman places or turns down a tympan with paper upon it (this tympan differs in no respect from the usual one, except that its hinge opens sidewise) ; it then proceeds to pass under the cylinder A, which presses it successively through its whole sur- lace. On the other side, at S, the workman takes off the paper and leaves the tympan up. This motion causes the cylinder B to revolve continually, and conse¬ quently renders its inked surface very uniform, by the action ol its distributing-rollers CC ; and, when the table has passed to its extreme distance in the direction now spoken of, the arm G touches the lever P, and raises the cylinder O off the ink-block, by which means it dabs against one of the distributing-rollers, and gives it a small quantity ol ink. The returning motion of the table carries the letter again under the roller B, which again inks it, and the process of printing another sheet goes on as before. Fig. 4. is another printing-press. In this, B is the inking roller j A is a cylinder, having the letter impo¬ sed upon its surface 5 and E is a cylinder, having its uniform surface covered with woollen cloth : these three c\finders are connected, either by cogs or straps at the edges of each. I he machine is uniformly turned in one direction by the handle L. The workman applies a sheet of paper to the surface of E, where it is retained, either by points in the usual manner, or by the appara¬ tus to be described in treating of fig. 4. The paper pas¬ ses between E and A, and receives an impression ; after winch the workman takes it oil; and applies another sheet j and in the mean time the letter on the surface of A passes round against the surface of B, and receives ink during the rotation of B. The distributing-rollers CC 0 their office as in the machine fig. 1. ; and once in eveiy revolution the tail F, affixed to B, raises the ink- ing-piece G, so as to cause it to touch one of the distri- utnig-rollers, and supply it with ink. In this way there- i°re the repeated printing of sheet after sheet goes on. ^OL. XVII. Parti. f C 377 3 P R I Fig. 5. IS a printing-press, more particularly adapted Printlv to print cottons, silks, paper-hangings, or other articles which run of a considerable length. A is a cylinder Fig. 5. covered with woollen cloth, or other soft substance. The web or piece ol cotton, or other goods, is passed round this cylinder, from the carrying-roller F to the receiving- rollers GH ; which are connected by a piece of linen woollen, or hair-cloth, in the manner of a jack-towel! sewed round them ; the rotation of this towel carries away the printed stuff or goods, and deposits them at I. KL is a moveable box, containing three rollers, which move against each other in rotation. The lowest roller C revolves in a mass of colour, contained in a trough or vessel in the bottom part of the box KL j the surface of this colour is represented by the line MN. The next roller B is stuffed and covered as described in section 2. 1 he pressure of B against C prevents the cylinder B from receiving too much colour. 1) is a cut or carved cylin¬ der, which receives colour, during the rotation, from the roller B, and impresses it upon the web as it passes round the cylinder A j in this way the constant and effectual action of the machine is sufficiently obvious. It must be observed, that the cylinders ABB and G are connected together by cog-wheels, straps, or other well-known equi¬ valent contrivances5 so that the handle P drives the whole, without their necessarily depending on any adhe¬ sion or friction at their surfaces. The pressure of B a- gainst D is governed by an adjustment of the axis of D, whose sockets are capable of a small motion j and the pressure ol 1) against A is governed by the position of the whole box KL. V hen it is required to print more than one colour upon the same piece, it must pass two or more times through the machine; or, in those cases where the materials are liable to change their dimensions, it is necessary to apply, at one and the same time, two or more such boxes as KL, with their respective cylinders, so that the pattern cylinder of each may make its im¬ pression upon the web or material to be printed on. I ig. 6. is a printing-press, chiefly of use for books and fig. c, papers. 1, 2, 3, 4, represent a long table, with ledges on each side j so that the two cylinders A and B can run backwards and forwards without any side shake. In one of these ledges is placed a strip or plate of metal cut into teeth, which lock into correspondent teeth in each cylin¬ der 5 by which means the two cylinders roll along, with¬ out the possibility of changing the relative positions of their surfaces at any determinate part of the table. This may also be effected by straps, and may indeed be accom¬ plished with tolerable accuracy, by the mere rolling of the cylinders on the smooth or Hat ledges without any provision. A is the printing-cylinder, covered with wTool- len cloth, and B is the inking-cylinder, with its distri¬ buting-rollers. The table may be divided into four com¬ partments marked with a thicker bounding line than the rest and numbered 1, 2, 3, 4. At 1 is placed a sheet ol paper j at 2 is the form or chess, containing letter set and imposed ; at 3 is an apparatus for receiving the printed sheet; and 4 is employed in no other use than as a place of standing for the carriage E, after it has pas¬ sed through one operation, and when it takes ink at F. Its action is as follows : the carriage is thrust forward by the workman, and as the roller A passes over the space numbered 1, it takes up the sheet of paper pre¬ viously laid there, while the roller B runs over the form and inks the letter. The sheet of paper being wrapped 3 B round P R I [ 378 3 P R I Printing. round the cylinder A, is pressed against the form as that restore its original position at B, the F1’ fj1'1 Mni, cylinder proceeds, and consequently it receives an impres- back to G. Now the figures 7 and 8 exlntnt an appa- • tXTI A 1 »l.„ nnmliprpfl o. it lets Fig. it, 12 Fig. 13- "Fig- 7* 8> 9 sion. When A arrives at the space numbered 3, it lets go the sheet of paper, while the prominent part of the carriage G strikes the lever P, and raises the inking- piece, which applies itselt against one ol the distributing- rollers. In this manner therefore the cylinder A re¬ turns empty, and the cylinder B inked, and in the mean time the workman places another sheet of paper ready in the space numbered I. Thus it is that the operation proceeds in the printing of one sheet after another. . , The preceding description is not encumbered with an account of the apparatus by which the paper is taken up and laid down. This may be done in several ways : Pig. n. and 12. represent one of the methods. DE is a lever, moving on the centre pin C, and having its end D pressed upwards by the action ot tlm spring G. The shoulder which contains the pin C is .fixed in another piece F, which is inserted in a groove in the surface of the cylinder A (fig. 6.), so that it is capable of moving in and out, in a direction parallel to the axis of that cylinder. As that cylinder proceeds, it meets a pin in the table-, which (letter P, fig. n.) act¬ ion- on the inclined plane at the other end ot the lever, throws the whole inwards, in the position represented in fig. 12. in which case the extremity D shoots inwards, and applies itself against the side of the cylinder. In fig. 13. is a representation of part of the table } the dotted square represents a sheet of paper, and the four small shaded squares denote holes in the board, with pins standing beside them. When the lever HE (fig- !2.) shoots forward, it is situated in one of these holes, and advances under the edge of the paper, which con¬ sequently it presses and retains against the cylinder with its extremity D. Nothing more remains to be said respecting the taking up, but that the cylinder is provided with two pair of these clasps or levers, which are so fixed as to correspond with four holes represented in fig. 13. It will be easy to understand how the paper is deposited in the compartment JS1 3, (ficr. 6.). A pin P (fig. 12.) rising out of the plat¬ form or table, acts against a pin E, projecting sidewise out of the lever, and must of course draw the slider and its lever to the original position; the paper con¬ sequently will be let go, and its disengagement is rendered certain by an apparatus fixed in the compart¬ ment numbered 3 (fig. 6.) of exactly the same.kind as that upon the cylinder, and which, by the action of a pin duly placed in the surface of the cylinder A, takes the paper from the cylinder in precisely the same man¬ ner as that cylinder originally took it up in the com¬ partment numbered 1 (fig. 6.). Fig. 7, 8, and 9, represent a simpler apparatus for ac¬ complishing the same purpose. If A a B 6 (fig. .9.) be supposed to represent a thick plate ot metal of a circular form, with two pins, A and B, proceeding sidewise or perpendicularly out of its plane, and diametrically oppo¬ site to each other, and G another pin proceeding in the direction of that plane, then it is obvious that any force applied to the pin A, so as to press it into the position a (bv turning the plate on its axis or centre X), w.ill at the same time cause the pin Gto acquire the position g; and, on the other hand, when B is at 6, or the dotted re¬ presentation of the side-pin, if any pressure be applied to ratus of this kind, applied to the cylinder A 5 and that cylinder, by rolling over the pins P and2?, properly fixed in the table to re-act upon the apparatus, will cause its prominent part G either to apply to the cylinder and clasp the paper, or to rise up and let it go. Hie compartment numbered 3 (fig. 6.) must of course ha.ve an apparatus of the same kind to be acted upon by pins from A, in order that it may take the paper from that cylinder. There is one other circumstance belonging to this machine which remains to be explained. When the carriage E (fig* ^ ) goes out in the direction of the numbers I, 2, 3» 4> both rollers, A and B, press the form of letter in their passage j but in then return back again the roller A, having no paper upon it, would itself become soiled, by taking a faint impression from the letter, if it were not prevented from touching it: the manner of effecting this may be understood from fig. 14. The apparatus there represented is fixed upon Fig- R the outside of the carriage E, near the lower corner, in the vicinity of the roller A; the whole of this projects sidewise beyond the ledge of the table, except the small truck or wheel B. The irregularly-triangular piece, which is shaded by the stroke of the pen, carries this wheel, and also a catch moveable on the axis or pin E. The whole piece is moveable on the pin A, which con¬ nects it to the carriage. CD, or the part which is shaded by dotting, is a detent, which serves to hold the piece down in a certain position. It may be observed, that both the detent and the triangular piece are fur¬ nished each with a claw, which holds in one direction, but trips or yields in the other, like the jacks of a harp¬ sichord, or resembling certain pieces used in clock and watch making, as is clearly represented in the figure. These claws overhang the side of the table, and their effect is as follows : There is a pin C (fig. 6.) between the compartments of the table numbered 2 and 3, but which is marked F in fig. 14. where GH represents the table. In the outward run of the carriage these claws strike that pin, but with no other effect than that they yield for an instant, and as instantly resume their original position by the action of their respective slender back springs. When the carnage returns, the claw of the detent indeed strikes the pin, but with as little effect as before, because its derangement is instantly removed by the action of the back spring of the detent itself; but, when the claw of the triangular piece takes, the pin, the whole piece is made to revolve on its axis or pin A, the wheel B is forced down, so as to lift that end of the carriage, and the detent, catching on the piece at C, prevents the former position from being re¬ covered. The consequence of this is, that the carriage runs upon the truck B (and its corresponding truck on the opposite side) instead of the cylinder A, which is too much raised to take the letter, and soil itself j bet as soon as the end of the carriage has passed clear ot the letter, another pin R (fig. 6.) takes the claw of the detent, and draws it off the triangular piece ; at which instant the cylinder A subsides to its usual place, ami performs its functions as before. This last pin R does not affect the claw of the triangular piece, because it is placed too low and the claw of the detent is made the longest, on purpose that it may strike this pin. Fig. 10. represents an instrument for printing floor- ' cloths, paper-hangings, and thelike, with a stiff paint and a brush. D is a copper or metallic cylinder fixed in a frame A, like a garden-roller; its carved part is thin and is cut through in various places, according to the desired pattern. A strong axis passes through the cy¬ linder, and its extremities are firmly attached to the frame A. To this axis is fixed a vessel or box of the same kind, and answering the same purpose as the box KL in fig. 5. It carries a cylinder P, which revolves m the colour; another cylinder E, which revolves in contact with Pj and a third cylinder B, whose exterior surface is covered with hair, after the manner of a brush, and revolves in contact with E. This cylinder B is adjusted by its axis, in such a manner that its brush-part sweeps in the perforated parts of the metallic cylinder D. The circle C represents a cog-wheel fixed concentric to the cylinder D, and revolving with it 5 this wheel takes another wheel concentric to, and fixe’d to B 5 hence the action is as follows : When the metallic cylinder is wheeled or rolled along any surface, its cog¬ wheel C drives the brush B in the contrary direction°- and this brush cylinder, being connected by coo-s or otherwise with E and P, causes these also to revolve and supply it with colour. As the successive openings of the cylinder D, therefore, come in contact with the°ground, the several parts ol the brush will traverse the uncovered part of that ground, and paint the pattern upon it. The wheel G, being kept lightly on the ground, serves to determine the line of contact, that it shall be the part opposite to B, and no other. Chinese Printing, is performed from wooden planks or blocks, cut like those used in printing of callico pa¬ per, cards, &c. , 1 Rolling-press Printing, is employed in taking off prints 01 impressions from copperplates engraven,etched or scraped, as in mezzotintos. See Engraving. * I his art is said to have been as ancient as the year 1540, and to owe its origin to Finiguerra, a Florentine goldsmith, who, pouring some melted brimstone on an engraven plate, found the exact impression of the engra¬ ving left in the cold brimstone, marked with black&ta- ken out of the strokes by the liquid sulphur: upon this he attempted to do the same on silver plates with wet paper, by rolling it smoothly with a roller ; and tin’s succeeded : but this art w'as not used in England till the reign of King James I. when it was brought from Ant- weip by Speed. I he form of the rolling-press, the composition of the ink used therein, and the mannerof applying both in taking off prints, are as follows : The rolling-press AL, fig. 15. maybe divided into two parts, the body and carriage : the body consists of two wooden cheeks PP, placed perpendicularly on a stand or foot LM, which sustains the whole press, from the foot likewise are four other perpendicular pieces, c, c, c, c, joined by other cross or horizontal enes, d, d, d, which serve to sustain a smooth even plank 01 table HIK, about four feet and a half long, two feet and a half broad, and an inch and a half thick. Into the cheeks go two wooden cylinders or rollers, DE, EG, about six inches in diameter, borne up at each end by the dheeks, whose ends, which are lessened to about two inches diameter, and called trunnions, turn in the cheeks about two pieces of wood in form of half- moons, lined with polished iron to facilitate the mo¬ tion. Lastly, To one of the trunnions of the upper rol- fnntm r ler is fastened a cross, consisting of two levers AB, or pieces of wood, traversing each other, the arms of v—^ which cross serve instead of the bar or handle of the fetter-press, by turning the upper roller, and when the plank is between the two rollers, giving the same mo- and\lkwarL^^ ^ * of“ USe? f°r copperplates, is a composition made and iv^v SU°f PnaRheS aiK jPnCOtS> the bones of sl>eep and ivory all well burnt, and called Frankfort Hack mixed with nut-oil that has been well boiled, and ground Kt^r„rbfe’ater,hesMera™“s^ , TheT|eth0A0f prInt‘ng from copperplates is as fol- ws . They take a small quantity of this ink on a rub- ber made of linen-rags, strongly bound about each other, and therewith smear the whole face of the plate as it lies on a grate over a charcoal fire. The plate be¬ foul SU IC1<;ntIy 11?Ijed’ they flrst wipe it over with a foul rag, then with the palm of their left hand and . en With thnt of the right; and to dry the hand an O i ard the wiping, they rub it from time to time in w him', i 11 II'1""? tl,e I,la,e perfectly clean, yet without taking he ink out of the engraving, the ad- dress °f the workman consists. The plate thus prepa- L lfidS f °“ 10 « a'’k °n ‘ll whence it licks out thei impr,esTsjon taken from a copperplate, bee the last article, and Engraving. 1 . thf facility of being multiplied, prints have de- Strutt', rived an advantage over paintings by no means inconsi--0^ «/ tierabJe. Ihey are found to he more durable : which EnSravers- may, however, m some degree be attributed to the dif¬ ferent methods m which they are preserved. Many of , , jest Pa'ntjngs of the early masters have generally had the misfortune to be either painted on walls, or de¬ posited in Jarge and unfrequented, and consequently damp and destructive buildings j whilst a print, passing, at distant intervals, from theportefeuille ono collector to that of another, is preserved without any great exer¬ tion of its owner: And hence it happens, that whilst the pictures of Raphael have mouldered from their walls or deserted the canvas, the prints of his friend and co¬ temporary A.ark Antonio Raimondi continue in full perfection to this day, and give us a lively idea of the beauties of these paintings, which, without their assist¬ ance had been lost to us for ever; or at least, could have been only known to us, like those of Zeuxis and Apelles, by the descriptions which former writers on these subjects have left us. Independent of the advantages which prints affords us when considered as accurate representations of paint¬ ings, and imitations of superior productions, they are no less valuable for their positive merit, as immediate representations of nature. For it must be recollected, that the art of engraving has not always been confined to the copying of other productions, but has frequent- 3 B 2 jy P R I [ 33° 1 P R I iv itself aspired to originality, and lias, in this light, produced more instances of its excellence than in the o'her. Albert Durer, Goltzius, and Rembrandt, amongst the Dutch and Germans-, Parmigiano and Della Bella amongst the Italians, and Callot amongst the French, have published many prints, the subjects ot which, there is great reason to suppose, were never painted. These prints may therefore be considered as original pictures of those masters, deficient only in those particulars in which a print must necessarily be interior to a painting. , . The preceding distinction may perhaps throw some light on the proper method of arranging and classing a collection of prints, which has been a matter of no small difficulty. As an art imitating another, the princi¬ pal should take the lead, and the design, composition, and drawing, in a print, being previous requisites, to the manner of execution and finishing *, prints engraved al¬ ter paintings should be arranged under the name ot the painter ; and every person who looks upon engraving only as auxilary to painting, will consequently adopt this mode of arrangement. But when engraving is considered as an original art, as imitating nature with¬ out the intervention of other methods, then it will cer¬ tainly be proper to regulate the arrangement according to the names of the engravers. Prints, method of cleaning. Ihe following method of cleaning prints, is recommended as safe and eltica- cious. „ , “ Provide a certain quantity of the common muria¬ tic acid, for example three ounces, in a glass bottle, with a ground stopper, of such a capacity that it may be only half full. Half an ounce of minium must then be added; immediately after which the stopper is to be put in, and the bottle set in a cold and dark place. The heat, which soon becomes perceptible, shews the beginning of the new combination. The minium aban¬ dons the greatest part of its oxygen with which the fluid remains impregnated, at the same time that it ac¬ quires a fine golden yellow, and emits the detestable smell of oxygenated muriatic acid. It contains a small portion of muriate of lead > but this is not at all noxious in the subsequent process. It is also necessary to be ob¬ served, that the bottle must be strong, and the stopper not too firmlv fixed, otherwise the active elastic vapour might burst it. The method of using this prepared acid is as follows: , „ . “ Provide a sufficiently large plate of glass, upon which one or more prints may be separately spread out. Near the edges let there be raised a border of solt white wax half an inch high, adhering well to the glass and flat at top. In this kind of trough the print is to be placed in a bath of fresh urine, or water containing a small quantity of ox-gall, and kept in this situation lor three or four hours. The fluid is then to be decanted off and pure warm water poured on, which must be changed every three or four hours until it passes limpid and clear. The impurities are sometimes of a resinous nature, and resist the action of pure water. When this is the case, the washed print must be left to dry, and alcohol is then to be poured on and left for a time. After the print is thus cleaned, and all the moisture • drained off, the muriatic acid prepared with minium is to be poured on in sufficient quantity to cover the print 3 immediately after which another plate of glass is to be laid in contact with the rim of wax, in order to Prin^ prevent the inconvenient exhalation of the oxygenated •J In this situation the yellowest print will be seen^ ^ •, • • 1 ! 4. \ o xror'xr cnAvt 11 m acid. xu mio cu.-j ; JT . to recover its original whiteness in a very shoit time. One or two hours are sufficient to produce the desired effect j but the print will receive no injury if it be left in the acid for a whole night. Nothing more is neces¬ sary to complete the work, than to decant off the re¬ maining acid, and wash away every trace of acidity, by repeated effusions of pure water. The print being then left to dry (in the sun if possible) will be found white, clear, firm, and in no respect damaged, either in the texture of the paper, or the tone and appearance of the impression.” It is farther recommended to those who shall adopt the whole process for clearing prints, to make the first trial with a print of little value, and in this way he will discover what portion of water should be employed in diluting the acid to prevent the corrosive action of the latter on the paper. Nichol. Joui'n. ii. 265* 4*°- PRIOR, in general, something before or nearer the beginning than another, to which it is compared. Prior, more particularly denotes the superior of a convent of monks, or the next under the abbot. See Abbot. Priors are either claustral or conventual. Conventual are the same as abbots. Claustral prior, is he who go¬ verns the religious of an abbey or priory in cornmendam, having his jurisdiction wholly from the abbot. Grand Prior, is the superior of a large abbey, where several superiors are required. Prior, Matthew, an eminent Knglish poet, was born at London in 1664. His father dying while lie was very young, an uncle, a vintner, having given him some education at Westminster school, took him home in order to breed him up to his trade. However, at his leisure hours he prosecuted his study of the clas¬ sics and particularly of his favourite Horace. This in¬ troduced him to some polite company who frequented his uncle’s house j among whom the earl of Dorset took particular notice of him, and procured him to be sent to St John’s college in Cambridge, where, m 1686, fie took the degree of A. B. and afterwards became fel¬ low of that college. Upon the revolution, Mr Prior was brought to court by the earl of Dorset-, and in 1690 he was made secretary to the earl of Berkeley, plenipo¬ tentiary at the Hague -, as he was afterward to the am¬ bassador and plenipotentiaries at the treaty of Ryswick in 1697 -, and the year following to the earl of Portland, ambassador to the court of France. He was in 1697 made secretary of state for Ireland : and in 1700 was appointed one of the lords commissioners of trade and plantations. In 1710, he was supposed to have had a share in writing The Examiner. In 1711, he was made one of the commissioners of the customs j and was sent minister plenipotentiary to France, for the negotiating a peace with that kingdom. Soon after the accession of George I. to the throne in 1714, he presented a memo¬ rial to the court of France, requiring the demolishing of the canal and new works at Mardyke. The year to - lowing be was recalled -, and upon his arrival was taken up bya warrant from the house of commons, and strictly examined by a committee of the privy-council. Robert Walpole, Esq. moved the house ot commons tor an impeachment against him j and Mr Prior was ordered P R I >fiorj into close custody. In 1717, he was excepted out of ioriek the act of grace 5 however, at the close of that year, he was set at liberty. The remainder of his days he spent in tranquillity and retirement, and died in 1721. His poems are well known, and justly admired. He is said to have written the following epitaph for him¬ self: “ Nobles and heralds, by your leave, Here lie the bones of Matthew Prior, The son of Adam and of Eve : Let Bourbon or Nassau go higher.” PRIORIES, Alien, were cells of the religious houses in England which belonged to foreign monasteries : for when manors or tithes were given to foreign convents, the monks, either to increase their own rule, or rather to have faithful stewards of their revenues, built a small convent here for the reception of such a number as they thought proper, and constituted priors over them.— Within these cells there was the same distinction as in those priories which were cells subordinate to some great abbey 5 some of these were conventual, and, ha¬ ving priors of their own choosing, thereby became entire societies within themselves, and received the revenues belonging to their several houses for their mvn use and benefit, paying only the ancient apport (a), acknow¬ ledgement, or obvention, at first the surplusage, to the foreign house ; but others depended entirely on the fo¬ reign houses, who appointed and removed their priors at pleasure. ’I hese transmitted all their revenues to the foreign head houses ; for which reason their estates were generally seized to carry on the wars between England and France, and restored to them again on re¬ turn of peace. These alien priories were most of them founded by such as had foreign abbeys founded by them¬ selves or by some of their family. The whole number is not exactly ascertained j the Monasticon hath given a list of 100 : Weever, p. 338. says no. Some of these cells were made indigenous or deni- zoa, or endenized. The alien priories were first seized by Edward I. 1285, on the breaking out of the war between France and England ; and it appears from a roll, that Edward II. also seized them, though this is not mentioned by our historians j and to these the act of restitution, 1 Edw. III. seems to refer. In 1237, Edward III. confiscated their estates, and let out the priories themselves with all their lands and tenements, at his pleasure, for 23 years ; at the end of which term, peace being concluded between the two nations, he restored their estates 1361, as appears by his latters patent to that of Montacute, county of So¬ merset, printed at large in Rymer, vol. vi. p. 311. and translated in Weever’s Funeral Monuments, p. 339. At other times he granted their lands, or lay pensions out of them, to divers noblemen. They were also seque¬ stered during Richard H.’s reign, and the head mona¬ steries abroad had the king’s licence to sell their lands to other religious houses here, or to any particular per¬ sons who wanted to endow others. P R I Henry I\ . began his reign with showing some fa- Priorks vour to the alien priories, restoring all the conventual II ones, only reserving to himself in time of war what they Flison- paid in time of peace to the foreign abbeys. * They were all dissolved by act of parliament 2 Henry V. and all their estates vested in the crown, except some lands granted to the college of Fother- inghay. The act of dissolution is not printed in the statute book, but it is to be found entire in Rymer’s Fccdera, ix. 283. and in the Parliament Rolls, vol. iv. p. 22. In general, these lands were appropriated to religious uses. Henry VI. endowed his foundations at Eton and Cambridge with the lands of the alien priories in pursuance of his father’s design to appro¬ priate them all to a noble college at Oxford. Other's were granted in fee to the prelates, nobility, or private persons. Such as remained in the crown were granted by Henry VI. 1440, to Archbishop Chichley, &c. and they became part of his and the royal foundations. See Some Account of A lie n -Priories, &c. in two vo¬ lumes octavo. PRIORITY, the relation of something considered as prior to another. Priority, in Law, denotes an antiquity of tenure, in comparison of another less ancient. PRXSCIANUS, an eminent grammarian, born at Ctesarea, taught at Constantinople with great reputa¬ tion about the year 525. Laurentius Valla calls Pris- cian, Donatus, and Servius, triumviri in re grammatica; and thinks none of the ancients who wrote after them fit to be mentioned with them. He composed a wrork De arte grammaiica, which was first printed by Aldus at ^ enice in 1476 ; and another, De naturalibus ques- tionibus, which he dedicated to Chosroes king of Per¬ sia : beside which, he translated Dionysius’s descrip¬ tion of the ivorld into Latin verse. A person who writes false Latin, is proverbially said “ to break Pris- cian’s head.” PRISCILLIANISTS, in church history, Christian heretics, so called from their leader Priscillian, a Spa¬ niard by birth, and bishop of Avila. He is said to have practised magic, and to have maintained the principal errors of the Manichees j but his peculiar tenet was, That it is lawful to make false oaths in order to support one’s cause and interests. PRISM, in Geometry, is a solid body, whose two ends are any plane figures which are parallel, equal, and similar 5 and its sides, connecting those ends, are parallelograms. PRISMOID, is a solid body, somewhat resembling a prism, but its ends are any dissimilar parallel plane figures of the same number of sides, the upright sides being trapezoids. If the ends of the prismoid be bound¬ ed by dissimilar curves, it is sometimes called a cylin- droicl. PRISON, a gaol, or place of confinement. Lord Coke observes, that a prison is only a place of safe custody, salva custodia, not a place of punishment. If this be the case, prisons ought not to be, what they have been in most, and still are in some places of Eu¬ rope, [ 381 ] (a) Apportas or apportagium ^from portare'), an acknowledgement, oblation, or obvention, to the mother house 01' church. Du Cange. p r i r 382 ] phi Prison, rope, loathsome dungeons. Any place where a person —y—..I.* is confined may be said to be a prison } and when a pro¬ cess is issued against one, he must, when arrested there¬ on, either be committed to prison, or be bound in a re¬ cognizance with sureties, or else give bail, according to the nature of the case, to appear at a certain day in court, there to make answer to what is alleged against him. Where a person is taken and sent to prison, in a civil case, he may be released by the plaiutift in the suit; but if it be for treason or felony, he may not re¬ gularly be discharged, until he is indicted ol the fact and acquitted. See Indictment. But a prison is not only to be considered as a place of safe custody, according to its original design, but also as a place of temporary punishment for certain crimes, and perhaps this punishment might be substituted more frequently than it is, for transportation and death. Probably this is done in no country to better purpose than in Pennsylvania 5 and no where has imprisonment been more abused than in Venice under the old govern- ment. ... . . By the laws of Pennsylvania, imprisonment is im¬ posed, not merely as an expiation for past olfences, hut also for the reformation of the criminal’s morals. The regulations of the gaol are calculated to produce this effect in the speediest manner possible, so that such a building may rather be denominated a penitentiary house than a gaol. When a criminal is committed to prison, he is made to wash ; his hair is shorn, and he is furnish¬ ed with clean apparel, if he has no decent clothes of his own. He is then put into a solitary cell, where he is excluded from the sight of every living being except the gaoler, whose duty is to attend to his mere necessi¬ ties, but not to converse with him upon any account. If committed for an atrocious crime, he is even debar¬ red from the light of heaven. The treatment of each prisoner vanes in proportion to the nature ot his crime, and his symptoms of repentance. The longest period ol confinement is for a rape, which is wot to be less than ten years, nor to exceed 21 ; and for high treason it is not to be under 6, nor above 12. The prisoners must bathe twice in the week, having proper conveniences within the prison, and they are re- -gularly supplied with a change of linen. Prisoners in solitary confinement subsist upon bread and water j and such as labour are allowed broth, puddings, &c. 'I hey are allowed meat in small quantities twice a week, and 110 beverage except water is brought into the prison. One room is set apart for shoe-makers, another lor tay- lors, and so of every other trade. There are stone-cut¬ ters, smiths, nailers, &c. in the yards. Such a prison has all the advantages of the rasping house of Amster¬ dam, without any of its enormous defects. The following account of the common prison at Ve¬ nice, is given by Dr Mosely. who visited this horrible place in September 1787. “ I was conducted (says he) through the prison by one of its inferior dependants. We had a torch with us. We crept along narrow passages as dark as pitch. In some of them two people could scarcely pass each other. The cells are made of massy marble } the architecture of the celebrated Sansovini. “ The cells are not only dark, and black as ink, but being surrounded and confined with huge walls, the smallest breath of air can scarcely find circulation in 2 them. They are about nine feet square on the floor, pr;w. arched at the top, and between six and seven feet highyv in the highest part. There is to each cell a round hole of eight inches diameter, through which the pri¬ soner’s daily allowance of twelve ounces of bread and a pot of water is delivered. There is a small iron door to the cell. The furniture of the cell is a little straw and a small tub ; nothing else. The straw is renewed and the tub emptied through the iron door occasion¬ ally. “ The diet is ingeniously contrived for the perdura. tion of punishment. Animal food, or a cordial nutri tious regimen, in such a situation, would bring on dis¬ ease, and defeat the end of this Venetian justice. Nei¬ ther can the soul, if so inclined, steal away, wrapt up in slumbering delusion, or sink to rest; from the ad¬ monition of her sad existence, by the gaoler’s daily re¬ turn. “ I saw one man who had been in a cell thirty years j two who had been twelve years j and several who had been eight and nine years in their respective cells. « By my taper’s light I could discover the prisoners horrid countenances. They were all naked. The man who had been there thirty years, in face and body was covered with long hair. He had lost the arrangement of words and order of language. W hen I spoke to him, he made an unintelligible noise, and expressed fear and surprise } and, like some wild animals in deserts, which have suffered by the treachery of the human race, or have an instinctive abhorrence of it, he would have fled like lightning from me if he could. “ One whose faculties were not so obliterated •, who still recollected the difference between day and night; whose eyes and ears, though long closed with a silent blank, still languished to perform their natural func- tiions—implored, in the most piercing manner, that I would prevail on the gaoler to murder him, or to give him some instrument to destroy himself. I told him I had no power to serve him in this request. He then entreated I would use my endeavours with the inquisi¬ tors to get him hanged, or drowned in the Canal’ Or- fano. But even in this I could not serve him : death was a favour I had not interest enough to procure for him. “ This kindness of death, however, was, during my stay in Venice, granted to one man, who had been ‘ from the cheerful ways of man cut off’ thirteen years. “ Before he left his dungeon I had some conversa¬ tion with him ; this was six days previous to his execu¬ tion. His transport at the prospect of death was sur¬ prising. He longed for the happy moment. No saint ever exhibited more fervour in anticipating the joys of a future state, than this man did at the thoughts ot be¬ ing released from life, during the four days mockery 01 his trial. “ It is the Canal’ Orfano where vessels from lurkey and the Levant perform quarantine. This place is the w'atery grave of many who have committed political or personal offences against the state or senate, and of ma¬ ny who have committed no offences at all. They are carried out of the city in the middle of the night, tied up in a sack with a large stone fastened to it, and thrown into the water. Fishermen are prohibited, on forfeiture son P R I teers Janb Law of their lives, against fishing in this district. The pre¬ tence is the plague. This is the secret history of people being lost in Venice. ^ “ The government, with age, grew feeble ; was a- fraid of the discussion of legal process and of public executions; and navigated this rotten Bucentaur of the Adriatic by spies, prisons, assassination, and the Canal’ Orfano.” ’ PRISONER, a person restrained or kept in prison upon an action civil or criminal, or upon commend- nient: and one may be a prisoner on matter of record or matter of fact. A prisoner upon matter of record is he who, being present in court, is by the court com¬ mitted to prison , and the other is one carried to prison upon an arrest, whether it be by the sheriff; constable, or other officer. PRISTIS, the Sawfish, is generally considered as a species of the squalusor shark genus, comprehendino- under it several varieties. See Squalus, Ichthyo¬ logy Index. But Mr Latham is of opinion that it ought to be considered as a distinct genus, and that the characteristics of the several varieties are sufficient to constitute distinct species. PRIVATEERS, are a kind of private men of war the persons concerned wherein administer at their own costs a part of a war, by fitting out these ships of force, and providing them with all military stores; and they have, instead of pay, leave to keep what they take from the enemy, allowing the admiral his share, &e. Piivateers may not attempt any thing against the laws ol nations ; as to assault an enemy in a port or haven, under the protection of any prince or republic, whether he be friend, ally, or neuter; for the peace of such places must be inviolably kept; therefore, by a treaty made by King William and the States of Hol¬ land, before a commission shall be granted to any pri¬ vateer, the commander is to give security, if the ship be not above 150 tons, in 1500k and if'the ship ex¬ ceeds that burden, in 3000I. that they will make sa¬ tisfaction for all damages which they shall commit in their courses at sea, contrary to the treaties with that state, on pain of forfeiting their commissions; and the ship is made liable. Besides these private commissions, there are special commissions for privateers, granted to commanders of ships, &c. who take pay ; who are under a marine C 383 ] P it 1 Privy- CounciL which being adjudged prize, and the tenth part paid to Privateers the admiral, &c. wholly belong to the owners of the * privateers and the captors, in proportions agreed on be¬ tween themselves. PRIVA1ION, in a general sense, denotes the ab¬ sence or want of something; in which sense darkness is only the privation of light. PRIVATIVE, in Grammar) a particle, which, pre¬ fixed to a word, changes it into a contrary sense. Thus among the Greeks, the « is used as a privative; as in atheist, acephalus, &c The Latins have their privative in ; as, incorrigibilis, indeclinabi/is, &c I he English, French, &c. on occasion borrow both the Latin and Greek privatives. v TRIVERNUM, (Livy, Virgil) ; a town of the V olsci, m Latium, to the east of Setia. P river nates, the people. Whose ambassadors being asked, What pumshment they deserved for their revolt ? answered, y\ hat those deserve who deem themselves worthy of 1 )ei ty. And again, being asked by the Roman con¬ sul, should the punishment be remitted, What peace was to be expected with them P If you granted a good peace, you may hope to have it sincere and lasting; but it a bad one, you may well expect it of short continu¬ ance. At which answer, the Romans were so far from being displeased, that by a vote of the people they had the freedom of the city granted them. Privernas, -atis, the epithet. The town is now called Piperno Vecchio, situated in the Campania of Rome. E. Lona- 10 0 N. Lat. 41. 30. 6 ' * PRIVET. See Ligustrum, Botany Index. PRIVILEGE, in Law, some peculiar benefit grant¬ ed to certain persons or places, contrary to the usual course of the law. Privileges are said to be personal or real. Personal privileges are such as are extended to peers, ambassadors, members of parliament, and of the convo¬ cation, &c. See Lords, Ambassador, Parlia¬ ment, Arrest, &c. A real privilege is that granted to some particular place as the king’s palace, the courts at Westminster, the universities, &c. Privileges of the Clergy. See Clergy. PRIVY, in Law, is a partaker, or person having an interest, in any action or thing. In this sense they say, privies in blood : every heir in tail is privy to re¬ cover the land entailed. In old law-books, merchants 1- . r 1 , 1 ' '-uvci me itiuu emaiieu. xn oiu law-books, men isctphne ; and if they do not obey their orders, may privy are opposed to merchants strangers. Coke tie punished with death: am tho . lie punished with death : and the' wars in later ages have given occasion to princes to issue these commis¬ sions, to annoy the enemies in their commerce, and under such supplies as might strengthen them or engthen out the war j and likewise to prevent the se- paration of ships of greater force from their fleets or squadrons. Ships taken by privateers were to be divided into five P^rts ; four parts whereof to go to the persons interest- ed in the privateer, and the fifth to his majesty : and as a farther encouragement, privateers, &c. destroying any French man of war or privateer, shall receive, for every piece of ordnance in the ship so taken, 10I. re¬ ward, &c. By a particular statute lately made, the lord admiral, or commissioners of the admiralty, may grant commis¬ sions to commanders of privateers, for taking ships, 8tc, tions four kinds of privies. Privies^in blood, as tire heir to his father ; privies in representation, as execu¬ tors and administrators to the deceased ; privies in estate, as he in reversion and he in remainder, donor and donee, lessor and lessee: lastly, privy in tenure, as the lord by escheat; i. e. when land escheats to the lord for w'ant of heirs. PRIVY-Council. See Council. The king’s will is the sole constituent of a privy-counsellor ; and it also regulates their number, which in ancient times was about twelve. Afterwards it increased to so large a number, that it was found inconvenient for secrecy and dispatch ; and therefore Charles II. in 1679, li¬ mited it to 30 ; whereof 15 were principal officers of state, and to be counsellors ex officio ; and the other 15 were composed of 10 lords and five commoners of the king’s choosing. Since that time, however, the number has ■ vp«i-pfl in this tribunal; which usually exercises its judi has been much augmented, and now continues i - th it in a committee of the whole privy-council a 4. flip ancient ottice Oi loru J .. . , c_ tu„ „ t 384 ] PRO Pi ivy- Council. ttugiucuicu, a,.... ^ ri 1 nite. At the same time also the ancient ottice ot lord president of the council was revived, in the person of Anthony earl of Shaftesbury. Privy-counsellors are made by the king’s nomination, without either paten or grant j and, on taking the necessary oaths they be¬ come immediately privy-counsellors during t le 1 ^ 0 the king that chooses them, but subject to removal at his discretion. „ ^ . . 11 „<.* Any natural horn subject of England is capable ot being a member of the privy-council j taking the pio- per oaths for security of the government, and the test for security of the church. By the act of settlemen , 12 and I3 W. III. cap. 2. it is enacted, that no person horn out of the dominions of the crown of England, unless born of English parents, even though natura¬ lized by parliament, shall he capable of being of the privy-council. The duty of a privy-counsellor appears from the oath of office, which consists of seven articles. I. To advise the king according to the best of his cun¬ ning and discretion. 2. To advise lor the king s honour and good of the public, without partiality, through aflection, love, meed, doubt, or dread. 3. To keep the king’s counsel secret. 4. To avoid cor¬ ruption. C. To help and strengthen the execution ot what shall he there resolved. 6. To withstand all per¬ sons who would attempt the contrary. And lastly, in general, 7. To observe, keep, and do all that a good and true counsellor ought, to do to his sovereign The privy-council is the primum mobile of the state, and that which gives the motion and direction to all the inferior parts. It is likewise a court of justice ot great antiquity, the primitive and ordinary way of go¬ vernment in England being by the king and privy- council. It has been frequently used by all om kings for determining controversies of great importance : the ordinary judges have sometimes declined giving judgment till they had consulted the king and privy- council ; and the parliament have frequently referred matters of high moment to the same, as being by long experience better able to judge of, and, by their se¬ crecy and expedition, to transact some state affairs, than the lords and commons. At present, the privy-coun¬ cil takes cognizance of few or no matters except such as cannot well he determined by the known laws and ordinary courts *, such as matters of complaint and sud¬ den emergencies : their constant business being to con¬ sult for the public good in affairs of state. 11ns power of the privy-council is to inquire into all offences against the government, and to commit the ofienders to sate custody, in order to take their trial in some of the courts of law. But their jurisdiction herein is only to inquire, and not to punish; and the persons committed by them are intitled to their habeas corpus by statute 16 Car. I. cap. 10. as much as if committed by an ordinary justice of the peace. . In plantation or admiralty causes, which arise out ot the jurisdiction of this kingdom, and in matters ot lu¬ nacy and idiocy, the privy-council has cognizance, even in questions of extensive property, being the court of appeal in such causes j or, rather, the appeal lies to the king’s majesty himself in council. From all the domi¬ nions of the crown, excepting Great Britain and Ire¬ land, an appellate jurisdiction (in the last resort) is 3 vesica in uji& iiiuuuaij .........— j ^ cial authc'iity in a committee of the whole privy-council, who hear the allegations and proofs, and make their re¬ port to his majesty in council, by whom the judgment is finally given. . Anciently, to strike in the house of a privy-counsel¬ lor, or elsewhere in his presence, was grievously punish¬ ed : by 3 Hen. VII. cap. 14.^ any of the king’s ser¬ vants of his household conspire or imagine to take away the life of a privy-counsellor, it is felony, though nothing shall be done upon it *, and by 9 Ann. cap. 16. it is enacted, that any persons who shall unlawfuby at¬ tempt to kill, or shall unlawfully assault, and strike, or wound, any privy counsellor in the execution of his of¬ fice, shall'he felons, and suffer death as such. With advice of this council, the king issues proclamations that bind the subject, provided they be not contrary to law. In debates, the lowest delivers his opinion first, the king last; and thereby determines the matter. A council is never held without the presence of a secretary The dissolution of the privy-council depends upon the king’s pleasure ; and he may, whenever he thinks proper, discharge any particular member, or the whole of it, and appoint another. By the common law also it was dissolved ipso facto by the king’s demise, as deri¬ ving all its authority from him. But now, to prevent the inconveniencies of having no council in being at the accession of a new prince, it is enacted, by 6 Ann. cap 7. that the privy-council shall continue for six months after the demise of the crown, unless sooner de¬ termined by the successor. Blackst.Com. bock 1. p. 229, ^The officers of the privy-council are four clerks of the council in ordinary, three clerks extraordinary, a keeper of the records, and two keepers of the council- chamber. See President. . PRIvy Seal, a seal which the king uses previously to such grants, &c. as are afterwards to pass the great The privy seal is also sometimes used in matters of less consequence, which do not require the great sea . Lord Privy Seal. See Keeper of the Privy Seal. Clerics of the Privy Seal. See Clerk. Privy'Chamber. See Chamber. PRIZE, or Prise, in maritime affairs, a vessel taken at sea from’the enemies of a state, or from pirates; and that either by a man of war, a privateer, &.c. having a commission lor that purpose. Vessels are looked on as prize, if they fight under any other standard than that of the state from rvluch they have their commission ; if they have no cnar^r' party, invoice, or hill of lading abroad ; if loaded with effects belonging to the king’s enemies, or with con¬ traband goods. .. ., 1 In ships of war, the prizes are to be divided among the officers, seamen, &c. as his majesty shall appoin^ by proclamation ; but among privateers, the division 13 according to the agreement between the owners. By stat. 13 Geo. II. c. 4. judges and officers fading of their duty in respect to the condemnation of F’zes, forfeit 500I. with full costs of suit; one moiety to the king, and the other to the informer. _ PROA, Flying, in navigation, is a name give a vessel used in the South seas, because Wj* a br^ Privv Cotinci Proa, Pift 1*1*7’ PRO Proa, , . . . C "385 trade-wind it sails near 20 miles an hour. In the con- ability. struction of the proa, the head and stern are exactly -v ' alike, but the sides are very different ; the side intend¬ ed to be always the lee-side being flat; and the wind¬ ward side made rounding, in the manner of other vessels • and to prevent her over-setting, which, from her small breadth, and the straight run of her leeward side would, without this precaution, infallibly happen, there is a frame laid out from her to windward, to the end of which is fastened a log, fashioned into the shape of a small boat, and made hollow. The weight of the frame is intended to balance the proa, and the small boat is by its buoyancy (as it is always in the water) to prevent her oversetting to windward; and this frame is usually called an outrigger. The body of the ves¬ sel is made of two pieces joined endwise, and sewed to¬ gether with bark, for there is no iron used about her • she is about two inches thick at the bottom, which, at the gunwale, is reduced to less than one. The ’sail is made of matting, and the mast, yard, boom, and out- liggeis, are all made of bamboo. See Anson's Voyage quarto, p. 341. J e ’ PROBABILITY, is a word of nearly the same impo.t with likelihood. It denotes the appearance of truth, or that evidence arising from the preponderation of argument which produces opinion. (See Opinion). Locke classes all arguments under the heads of demon’ strahve and probable: Hume with greater accuracv di¬ vides them into demonstrations^ proofs, and probabili¬ ties. Demonstration produces science; proof, belief; and probability, opinion. Haidly any thing is susceptible of strict demonstration besides the mathematical sciences, and a few propositions m metaphysical theology. Physics rest upon principles, capable, some of them, of complete proof by experience, and others of nothing more than probability by analogical reasoning. \\ hat has uniformly happened, we expect with the fullest confidence to happen again in similar circumstances ; what has frequently happened, we like¬ wise expect to happen again ; but our expectation is not confident. Uniform experience is proof; frequent expe¬ rience is probability. The strongest man has always been able to lift the greatest weight; and, therefore, knowing that one man is stronger than another, we expect, with confidence, that the former will lift more than the lat- ter. The best disciplined army has generally proved victorious, when all other circumstances wereequal. We therefore expect that an army of veterans will, upon fair ground, defeat an equal number of new levied troops : but as sudden panics have sometimes seized the oldest soldiers, this expectation is accompanied with doubt, and the utmost that we can say of the expected event is, that it is probable; whereas in the competition between the two men, we look upon it as morally certain. (See Metaphysics, Part I. chap. vii. sec. 3.). When two or three persons of known veracity attest the same thing as consistent with their knowledge, their testimony amounts to proof, if not contradicted by the testimony of others ; if contradicted, it can, at the utmost, amount only to probability. In common language we talk of circumstantial proofs and presumptive proofs ; but the expressions are improper, for such evidence amounts to nothing more than probability. Of probability there are indeed various degrees, from the confines of certain- own to the confines of impossibility ; and a variety Vol. XVII. Part I. / ] P R O of circumstances tending to il.e same point, though they P,oHbilil. amount not to what, in strictness oflanguage,should bo " ? called prmf, afford to the mind a very high degree of evidence, upon which, with the addition of one direct' Probity. testimony, the laws of many countries take away the Jite ot a man. ] Probability of an Event, in the Doctrine of Chan¬ ces, is greater or less according to the number of chances by which it may happen or fail. (See Expectation), a he probability of life liable to rules of computation. ln the Encyclopedic Methodique, we find a table of the probabilities of the duration of life, constructed from that which is to be found in the seventh volume of the oupplemens a PHzstoire de M. de Buffon; of which the following is an abridgement. Of 23994 children born at the same time there will probably die f 7 In one ' | 3 Remaining | or 15996 In eight years -■ 7998 Remaining 4 or 11997 7- 7 In thirty-eight years J Remaining | or 7998 17 In fifty years 1 j Remaining or 5998 II997 IS996 1994 1 7 1° sixty -one years Remaining -J or 3999 l9995 ~ > In seventy years Try J Remaining Tr3 or 2399 11^ 7 In eighty years V ReTmai"ing ^ °r 599 lief l In ninety years xlrr j Remaining or 80 In a hundred years Remaining Toivo or 2. LITY. 21595 22395 239r4 23992 See Bills of Morta- PROBATE of a will or testament, in Law, is the exhibiting and proving of last wills and testaments be¬ fore the ecclesiastical judge delegated by the bishop, who is ordinary of the place where the party died. PROBATION, in the universities, is the examina¬ tion and trial of a student who is about to take his de¬ grees. Probation, in a monastic sense, signifies the year of a novitiate, which a religions must pass in a convent, to prove his virtue and vocation, and whether he can bear the severities of the rule. Probation, in Scots Law. See Law Index. PROBATIONER, in the church of Scotland, a student in divinity, who bringing a certificate from a professor in an university of his good morals, and his having performed his exercises to approbation, is ad¬ mitted to undergo several trials ; and, upon his ac¬ quitting himself properly in these, receives a licence to preach. PROBA1UM est fit is provedf, a term frequent¬ ly subjoined to a receipt for the cure of some disease. PROBE, a surgeon’s instrument for examining the circumstances of wounds, ulcers, and other cavities searching for stones in the bladder, &c. I ROBIIY means honesty, sincerity, or veracity ; and consists in the habit ot actions useful to society, and in the constant observance ot the laws which justice 3 C and Probity II Process. PRO [386 and conscience impose on us. The man who obeys all 1 PRO the laws of society with an exact punctuality is not therefore a man of probity } laws can only respect the external and definite parts of human conduct, but pro¬ bity respects our more private actions, and such as it is impossible in all cases todefine*, and it appears to be in morals what charity is in religion. Probity teaches us to perform in society those actions which no external power can oblige us to perform, and is that quality in the human mind from which we claim the performance of the rights commonly called imperfect. See Moral Philosophy. PROBLEM, in Logic, is a proposition that neither appears absolutely true nor false ; and, consequently, may he asserted either in the affirmative or negative. Problem, in Geometry, is a proposition, wherein some operation or construction is required; as to divide a line or angle, erect or let fall perpendiculars, &c. See Geometry. PROBOSCIS, in Natural History, is the trunk or snout of an elephant, and some other animals and in¬ sects. . Flies, gnats, &c. are furnished with a proboscis or trunk ; by means of which they suck the blood of ani¬ mals, the juice of vegetables, &c. for their food. PROBUS, Marcus Aurelius, was the son of a hardener, and became, by his great valour as a soldier, and his eminent virtues, emperor of Rome, to which dignity he was raised by the army. Haying subdued the barbarous nations who made incursions into different parts of the empire, where they committed horrid cruel¬ ties, he managed the affairs of government with great wisdom and clemency. He was massacred in the year 282, and the 7th of his reign, by some soldiers who were weary of the public works at which he made them labour. PROCATARCTIC CAUSE, in Medicine, the pre¬ existing, or predisposing cause or occasion oi a disease. PROCELEUSMATICUS, in the ancient poetry, n foot consisting of four short syllables, or two pyrrhy- chinses; as hominihus. PROCELL ARIA, a genus of birds, belonging to the order of anseres. See Ornithology Index. Clu- sins makes the procellaria pelagica or stormy petrel the Camilla ol the sea. Vel marc per medium fluctu suspensa tumenti Ferret iter, celeres nec tingeret aquore plantas. A IRG. She swept the seas ; and, as she skimm’d along Her Hying feet unbath’d on billows hung. HryDF.N. These birds are the cypselli of Pliny, which lie places among the apodes of Aristotle ; cot because they want¬ ed feet, hut were x.ux.67roliot, or had bad or useless ones ; an attribute he gives to these species, on a supposition that they were almost always on the wing. PROCESS, in Law, denotes the proceedings in any cause, real or personal, civil or criminal, from the origi¬ nal writ to the end thereof. In a more limited sense, process denotes that by which a man is called first into any temporal court. It is the next step for carrying on the suit, after suing out the original writ. See Suit and Writ. It is the method taken by the law to compel a com¬ pliance with the original writ, of which the primary step is by giving the party notice to obey it. This no- pro,fSj tice is given upon all real praecipes ; and also upon all personal writs for injuries not against the peace, by summons; which is a warning to appear in court at the return of the original writ, given to the defendant byElacht, two of the sheriff’s messengers ca\\e& summoners, either Comrowj in person, or left at his house or land : in like manner as in the civil law’ the first process is by personal cita¬ tion, in jus vocando. This warning on the land is given, in real actions, by erecting a white stick or wand on the defendant’s grounds (which stick or wand among the northern nations is called the haculus nunciatorius), and by statute 31 Eliz. c. 3. the notice must also be pro¬ claimed on some Sunday before the door of the parish- church. If the defendant disobeys this verbal monition, the next process is by writ of attachment, or pone; so called from the words of the writ, pone per vadium et salvos plegios, “ put by gage and safe pledges A. B. the de¬ fendant,” Stc. This is a writ not issuing out of chan¬ cery, but out of the court of common-pleas, being grounded on the non-appearance of the defendant at the return of the original writ; and thereby the sheriff is commanded to attach him, by taking gage, that is, certain of his goods, which he shall forleit 11 he doth not appear; or by making him find safe pledges or sureties, which shall be amerced in case of his non-ap¬ pearance. This is also the first and immediate process, without any previous summons, upon actions of trespass vi et armis, or for other injuries, which though not for¬ cible, are yet trespasses against the peace, as deceit and conspiracy ; where the violence of the wrong requires a more speedy remedy, and therefore the original writ commands the defendant to be at once attached, with¬ out anv precedent warning. If, after attachment, the defendant neglects to appear, he not only forfeits this security, but is moreover to be farther compelled by writ oi'distringas, or distress in¬ finite : which is a subsequent process issuing from the court of common-pleas, commanding the sheriff to di¬ strain the defendant from time to time, and continually afterwards, by taking his goods and the profits of his lands, which are called issues, and which he lorfeits to the king if he doth not appear. But the issues may be sold, if the court shall so direct, in order to defray the reasonable costs of the plaintiff. In like manner, by the civil law, if the defendant absconds, so that the citation is of no effect, mittitur adversarius in possessionem bo- norum ejus. And here, by the common as well as the civil law, the process ended in case of injuries without force : the defendant if he had any substance, being gradually strip¬ ped of it all by repeated distresses, till he rendered obe¬ dience to the king’s writ; and, if he had no substance, the law held him incapable of making satisfaction, and therefore looked upon all farther process as nugatory. And besides, upon feodal principles, the person ol a feudatory was not liable to be attached for injuiies merely civil, lest thereby bis lord should he deprived ot bis personal services. But, in cases of injury accompa¬ nied with force, the law, to punish the breach oi the peace and prevent its disturbance for the future, provided also a process against the defendant’s person, incase he neglected to appear upon the former process oi attach¬ ment, or had no substance wherebv to be attached; sub¬ jecting PRO ,eess, jecting his body to imprisonment by the writ of cajjias Uy——' ad respondendum. But this immunity of the defendant’s person, in case of peaceable though fraudulent injuries, producing great contempt of the law in indigent wrong¬ doers, a capias was also allowed, to arrest the person in actions of account, though no breach of the peace he suggested, by the statutes of Marlbridge, ^2 Hen. III. c. 23. and Westm. 2. 13. Edw. I. c. 11. jn actions of debt and detinue, by statute 25 Edw. III. c. 17. and in all actions on the case, by statute 19 Hen. VII. c. 9. Before which last statute a practice had been introduced of commencing the suit by bringing an original writ of trespassywere clausum fregit, by breaking the plaintiff’s close, vi et artnis 3 which by the old common law sub¬ jected the defendant’s person to be arrested by writ of capias:' and then afterwards, by connivance of the court, the plaintiff might proceed to prosecute for any other less forcible injury. This practice (through custom ra¬ ther than necessity, and for saving some trouble and ex¬ pence, in suing out a special original adapted to the par¬ ticular injury) still continues in almost all cases, except inactions of debt} though now, by virtue of the sta¬ tutes above cited and others, a capias might be had upon almost every species of complaint. If therefore the defendant, being summoned or at¬ tached, makes default, and neglects to appear} or if the sheriff returns a nihil, or that the defendant hath nothing whereby he may be summoned, attached, or distrained, the capias now usually issues : being a writ commanding the sheriff to take the body of the defen¬ dant, if he may be found in his bailiwick or county, and him safely to keep, so that he may have him in court on the day of the return, to answer to the plaintiff of a plea of debt, or trespass, &c. as the case may be. I his writ, and all others subsequent to the original writ, not issuing out of chancery, but from the court into which the original was returnable, and being ground¬ ed on what has passed in that court in consequence of the sheriff’s return, arecaWcAjudicial, natoriginal, writs; they issue under the privy seal of that court, and not under the great seal of England } and are tested, not in the king’s name, but in that of the chief justice only. And these several writs being grounded on the sheriff’s return, must respectively bear date the same day on which the writ immediately preceding wras returnable. Ihis. is the regular and orderly method of process. But it is now usual in practice to sue out the capias in j the first instance, upon a supposed return of the sheriff } especially it it be suspected that the defendant, upon notice of the action, will abscond} and afterwards a fic¬ titious original is drawn up, with a proper return there¬ upon, in-order to give the proceedings a colour of re¬ gularity. When this capias is delivered to the sheriff, he by his under-sheriff grants a warrant to his inferior officers or bailiffs to execute it on the defendant. And, it the sheriff of Oxfordshire (in which county the injury is supposed to be committed and the action is laid) can¬ not find the defendant in his jurisdiction, he returns that he is not found, non est inventus, in his bailiwick: whereupon another writ issues, called a testatum capias, uirected to the sherifi of the county where the defendant is supposed to reside, as of Berkshire, reciting the form- fn- writ, and that it is testified, testatum est, that the de- endant lurks or wanders in his bailiwick, where he is commanded to take him, as in the former capias. But f 387 ] p 11 o here also, when the action is brought in one count v p!0ceiS. and tne defendant Jives in another, it is usual, for sa- vmg trouble, time, and expence, to make out a testa¬ tum capias at the first ; supposing not only an original, but also a former capias, to have been granted ; which in fact never was. And this fiction, being beneficial to all parties, is readily acquiesced in, and is now be¬ come the settled practice } being one among many in¬ stances to illustrate that maxim of law, that in fictionc juris consist it cec/uitas. But where a defendant absconds, and the plaintiff would proceed to an outlawry against him, an original writ must then be sued out regularly, and after that a capias. And if the sheriff cannot find the defendant upon the first writ of capias, and returns a non est inven* tus, there issues out an alias writ, and after that a plu^ ries, to the same effect as the former: only after these words “ we command you,” this clause is inserted, “ as we have formerly,” or, “ as we have often commanded you } . sicut alias,” or, i,i sicut piuries prcecipimus.’1 And if a non cst inventus is returned upon all of them, then a writ of exigent or exigi facias may he sued out, which requires the sheriff to" cause the defendant to be proclaimed, required or exacted, in five county-courts successively, to render himself} and if he does, then to take him, as in a capias: but if he does not appear, and is returned ivuinto cxactus, he shall then be outlawed by the coroners of the county. Also by statute 6 Hen. VIII. c. 4. and 31 Eliz. c. 3. whether the defendant dwells within the same or another county than that wherein the exigent is sued out, a writ of proclamation shall issue out at the same time with the exigent, commanding the sheriff of the county, wherein the defendant dwells, to make three proclamations thereof in places the most notorious, and most likely to come to his knowledge, a month before the outlawry shall take place. Such out¬ lawry is putting a man out of the protection of the law, so that he is incapable to bring an action for redress of injuries} and it is also attended with a forfeiture of all one’s goods and chattels to the king. And therefore, till some time after the conquest, no man could he out¬ lawed but for felony : hut in Bracton’s time, and some¬ what earlier, process of outlawry was ordained to lie in all actions for trespasses vi ct armis. And since, by a variety of statutes (the same which allow the writ of capias before mentioned) process of outlawry doth lie in divers actions that are merely civil; providing they be. commenced by original and not by bill. If after out¬ lawry the defendant appears publicly, he may be arrest¬ ed by a writ of capias utlagatimi, and committed till the outlawry be reversed. Which reversal may be had by the defendants appearing personally in court (and in the king’s bench without any personal appearance, so that he appears by attorney, according to statute 4 & $ W. & M. c. 18.) } and any plausible cause, however slight, will in general he sufficient to reverse it, it being considered only as a process to compel an appearance. But then the defendant must pay full costs, and put the plaintiff in the same condition as if he had appeared be¬ fore the writ of exigi facias was awarded. Such is the first process in the court of common pleas. In the king’s bench they may also (and frequently do) proceed in certain causes, particularly in actions of eject¬ ment and trespass, by original writ, with attachment and capias thereon 5 returnable, not at Westminster, where 3C2 tii'ard’ ail(1 H^'d it out to the aik 3600 5 if it were then taken to the distance of the moon, it would pull it out only to the mark 1. And we make this assertion on the authority of our having from II t rl a ^ tHe distance °r the mo°n fall! from hat distance part 0f 16 feet in a second. e do not, therefore, compare the forces, which are wThCeP tk • T;-We COmpare {he ^derations, which are their indications, effects, and measures. I ins has made philosophers so anxious to determine Two modes vi h precision, the fall of heavy bodies, in order to have °™eter- exact value of the accelerating power of terrestrial niininS the gravity. Now we must here observe, that this measure throubh ‘rTei" !tW° WayS: We maytake tbe space ^ through which the heavy body falls in a second; or we may take the velocity which it acquires in consequence of gravity having acted on it during a second. The fast is the proper measure ; for the last is the immediate effect on the body. The action of gravity has changed the state of the body—in what way P By giving it a de¬ termination to motion downwards, this both points out le klll(I and the degree or intensity of the force of gravity. Ihe space described in a second by falling is not an invariable measure; for, in the successive se¬ conds, the body falls through 16, 48, 80, 112, &c. feet, but the changes of the body’s state in each second is the same. At the beginning it had no determination to move with any appreciable velocity; at the end of ie first second it had a determination by which it would have gone on for ever (had no subsequent force acted on it) at the rate of 32 feet per second. At the end of the second second, it had a determination by which it would have moved for ever, at the rate of 64 feet per second. At the end of the third second, it had a determination by which it would have moved for ever, at the rate of 96 feet per second, &c. &c. Ihe difference of these determinations is a determination to the rate of 32 feet per second. This is therefore constant, and the indication and proper measure of the constant or invariable force of gravity. The space fal¬ len through in the first second is of use only as it is one half of the measure of this determination ; and as halves have the proportion of their whole?, different ac¬ celerating forces may be safely affirmed to be in the pro- portion of t lift ST151.P.ftS tlimufirti TirKi*-.]-* * I* 1 • 393 h ,vi may ug actieiy aiiiimeu to be in the pro- portion of the spaces through which they uniformly im- 8 pel bodies in the same time. But we should always re- Mistakes of collect, that this is but one half of the true measure 0f math«i»a- the accelerating force. Mathematicians of the first rank Subject ' 3-0 have 394 P R O J E C have committed great mistakes by not attending to this j and it is necessary to notice it just now, because cases will occur in the prosecution of this subject, where we shall be very apt to confound our reasonings by a confusion in the use of those measures. Those mathematicians who are accustomed to the geometrical consideration ol cmvi i- neal motions, are generally disposed to take the flection from the tangent as the measure of the detiectmg force ; while those who treat the same subject algebrai¬ cally by the assistance of fluxions, take the change of velocity, which is measured by twice Wk deflection. _ I he Plate reason is this : when a body passes through the point b CCCCXLI. of a curve ABC, fig. I. il the deflecting orcc w fig- i. cease at that instant, the body would describe th i t - o-ent BD in the same time in which it describes the are.11 BC of the curve, and DC is the deflection, and is therefore taken for the measure of the deflecting force. But the algebraist is accustomed to consider the curve by means of an equation between the abscissae H a, H l> He, and their respective ordinates Aa, B 0, b c ; and’he measures the deflections by the changes made on the increments of the ordinates. Thus the increment of the ordinate A o, while the body describes the arch A of the curve, is BG. If the deflecting force were to cease when the body is at B, the next increment would have been equal to BG, that is, it would have been BI 5 but in consequence of the deflection, it is only C r : there¬ fore he takes EC for the measure of the deflection, and of the deflecting force. Now EC is ultimately twice DC ; and thus the measure of the algebraist (derived solely from the nature of the differential method, and without any regard to physical considerations) happens to coin¬ cide with the true physical measure. 1 here is therefore great danger of mixing these measures. Of this we^can- Particular- not give a more remarkable instance than Leibnitz’s at- ly of Leib- tenipt to demonstrate the elliptical motion of the planets nitz- in the Leipsic Acts, 1689. He first considers the sub¬ ject mechanically, and takes the deflection or DC for the measure of the deflecting force. He then intro¬ duces his differential calculus, where he takes the dif¬ ference of the increments for the measure j and thus brings himself into a confusion, which luckily compen¬ sates for the false reasoning in the preceding part of his paper, and gives his result the appearance of a demonstration of Newton’s great discovery, while, in fact, it is a confused jumble of assumptions, self-con¬ tradictory, and inconsistent with the very laws of me¬ chanics which are used by him in the investigation. Seventeen years after this, in having been cri¬ ticised for his bad reasoning, or rather accused of an envious and unsuccessful attempt to appropriate New¬ ton’s invention to himself, he gives a correction of his paralogism, which he calls a correction of language. But he either had not observed where the paralogism lay, or would not let himself down by acknowledging a mistake in what he wished the world to think his own calculus (fluxions) *, he applied the correction where no fault had been committed, for he had measured both the centrifugal force and the solicitation of gravity in the same way, but had applied the fluxionary expression to the last and not to the first, and, by so doing, he com¬ pletely destroyed all coincidence between his result and the planetary motions. We mention this instance, not only as a caution to our mathematical readers, but also as a very curious literary anecdote. This dissertation of tiles. Leibnitz is one of the most obscure of his obscure writ¬ ings but deserves the attention of an intelligent and curious reader, and cannot fail of making an indelible impression on his mind, with relation to the modesty, candour, and probity of the author. It is preceded by a dissertation on the subject which we are now en¬ tering upon, the motion of projectiles in a resisting me¬ dium. Newton’s Principia had been published a few years’before, and had been reviewed in a manner shame¬ fully slight, in the Leipsic Acts. _ Both these subjects make the capital articles of that immortal work. Mr Leibnitz published these dissertations, without (says he) having seen Newton’s book, in order to show the world that he had, some years before, discovered the same theorems. Mr Nicholas Eatio carried a copy of the Principia from the author to Hanover in 1686, where he expected to find Mr Leibnitz j he was then absent, but Eatio saw him often before his return to France in 1687, and does not say that the book was not given him. Bead along with these dissertations Dr Keill’s letter U) John Bernoulli and others, published in the JournalLite- raire de la Hayee 1714, and to John Bernoulli in 1719. I0 Newton has been accused of a similar oversight by Newtom John Bernoulli, (who indeed calls it a mistake in prin-cased of ciple) m his Proposition x. book 2. on the very sob- ject we are now considering. But Dr Keill has shown it to be only an oversight, in drawing the tangent on the wrong side of the ordinate. For in this very pro¬ position Newton exhibits, in the strictest and most beau¬ tiful manner, the difference between the geometrical and algebraical manner of considering the subject-, and expressly warns the reader, that his algebraical symbol expresses the deflection only, and not the variation of „ the increment of the ordinate. It is therefore in the But fob last degree improbable that he would make this mis¬ take. He most expressly does not j and as to the real mistake, which he corrected in the second edition, the water of this article has in bis possession a manuscript copy of notes and illustrations on the whole Principia, written in 1693 by Dr David Gregory, Savilian professor of astronomy at Oxford, at the desire of Mr Newton, as preparatory for a new edition, where he has rectified this and several other mistakes in that work, and says that Mr Newton had seen and approved of the amend- „ ments. We mention these particulars, because MrHuincei Bernoulli published an elegant dissertation on this sub- of Bern ject in the Leipsic Acts in 1713 j in which he charges^ Newton (though with many protestations of admiration NewtQS and respect) with this mistake in principleand says, that he communicated his correction to Mr Newton, by his nephew Nicholas Bernoulli, that it might be cor¬ rected in the new edition, which he heard was in the press. And he afterwards adds, that it appears by some sheets being cancelled, and new ones substituted in this part of the work, that the mistake would have continued, had he not corrected it. We would desire our readers to consult this dissertation, which is ex¬ tremely elegant, and will be of service to us in this arti¬ cle -, and let them compare the civil things which is here said of the vir incomparabilis, the omni laude major, the summus Ncwtonus, with what the same author, in the same year, in the Leipsic Acts, but under a or rowed name, says of him. Our readers will have no hesitation in ascribing this letter to this author. For, after praising John Bernoulli as summus gcometra, ’ r 0 natus projectile I.I . urate i .sure of t accele- ve pow- f gravi- ^ 14 I rral fi ulie de- bo,. Hattis ad summorum geometarum paralogismos corrigen- dos, summi candoris ut et modestice, he betrays himself by an unguarded warmth, when defending J. B.’s de¬ monstration of the inverse problem of centripetal forces by calling it ME AM demonstrationem. Let our readers now consider the scope and inten¬ tion of this dissertation on projectiles, and judge whether the author’s aim was to instruct the world, or to acquire fame, by correcting Newton. The dissertation does not contain one theorem, one corollary, nor one step of argument, which is not to be found in Newton’s first edition ; nor has he gone farther than Newton’s single proposition the xth. To us it appears an exact com¬ panion to Ins proposition on centripetal forces, which he boasts of having first demonstrated, although it is in every step a transcript of the 42d of the first Book of Newton’s Principia, the geometrical language of New¬ ton being changed into algebraic, as he has‘in the pre¬ sent case changed Newton’s algebraic analysis into a very elegant geometrical one. We hope to be forgiven for this long digression. It is a very curious piece of literary history, and shows the combination which envy and want of honourable principle had formed against the reputation of our illu¬ strious countryman ; and we think it our duty to em¬ brace any opportunity of doing it justice.—To return to our subject: The accurate measure of the accelerative power of gravity, is the fall 16feet, if we measure it by the space, or the velocity of 32 J feet per second, if we take the velocity. It will greatly facilitate calculation, and will be sufficiently exact for all our purposes, if we take 16 and 32, supposing that a body falls 16 feet in a se¬ cond, and acquires the velocity of 32 feet per second. Then, because the heights are as the squares of the times, and as the squares of the acquired velocities, a body will fall one foot in one fourth of a second, and will acquire the velocity of eight feet per second. Now let h express the height in feet, and call it the pro¬ ducing height j v the velocity in feet per second, and call it the produced velocity, the velocity due j and t the time in seconds.-—We shall have the follow¬ ing formulae, which are of easy recollection, and will serve, without tables, to answer all questions relative to projectiles. I. v=8A///,= 8x4/,-32; yA s. or the height through which a hod, must fall to acquire .s this velocity. y In bo(Iie„ projected ^=56 . ~=7, = ^/h . 7’=/?, =49 feet. uPwards. 395 or 561=3i36 . ^^=49 feet. II. —3. 32 HI. v^=4=r4* IV. — 16P. Espies ‘ir use ing 64’ To give some examples of their use, let it be requi¬ red, ^ I* T0 the time of falling through 256 feet. Here /i=r256, y'256=16, and —=4. Answer 4". 2. To find the velocity acquired by falling four se- conds. ?~4.32X4=i28 feet per second. 3* 10 find the velocity acquired by falling 625 feet. • \lh=25 • 8y^h=20o feet per second. 4* 1o find the height to which a body will rise wien projected with the velocity of 56 feet per second, J. Suppose a body projected directly downwards with ,.„,i I? . the velocity of to feet per second ; what will be its ve-“do™. ocity after four seconds P In four seconds it will have wards, acquired, by the action of gravity, the velocity of 4 X 32 01 128 feet, and therefore its whole velocity will be 128 feet per second. ^ 6. To find how far it will have moved, compound its motion of projection, which will be 40 feet in four se¬ conds, with the motion which gravity alone would have given it in that time, which is 256 feet 5 and the whole motion will be 296 feet. 7. Suppose the body projected as already mentioned, and that it is required to determine the tim’e it will take to go 296 feet downwards, and the velocity it will have acquired. Find the height x, through which it must fall to ae- qmre the velocity of projection, 10 feet, and the time tj of falling from this height. Then find the time a of falling through the height 296+*, and the velocity v acquired by this fall. The time of describing the 296 feet will be ss y, and v is the velocity required. I rom such examples, it is easy to see the way of an¬ swering every question of the kind. Writers on the higher parts of mechanics always,, 18 compute the actions of other accelerating and retarding ial°rfomn-~ fences by comparing them with the acceleration of gra-ke. vity, and in order to render their expressions more gene¬ ral, use a symbol, such as g for gravity, leaving the rea¬ der to convert it into numbers. Agreeably to this view, the general formulae will stand thus : IIII. h=~. =! I. v= V2g h, i^e. y/2 \Zgg the Parabo,a touches the parabola APS in P ; for drawing P parallel to AB, cutting the directrix O * of the parabola APS in x, and the di¬ rectrix AL of the parabola BVM in then PBrzPx • but BF—BA, —AO, —x2: therefore PJ—PF, and the point P is in the parabola BVM. Also the tan¬ gents to both parabolas in P coincide, for they bisect the angle x PB ; therefore the two parabolas having a common tangent, touching each other in P. Cor. All the parabolas which can be described by a body projected from B, with the velocity acquired by fa Img through AB, will touch the concavity of the pa- labola APS, and lie wholly within it. 6. P is the most distant point of the line BP which can be hit by a body projected from B with the veloci¬ ty acquired by falling through AB. For if the direction is more elevated than BC, the focus of the parabola de¬ scribed by the body will lie between F and A, and the parabola will touch APS in some point between P and j and being wholly within the jiarabola APS, it must cut the line BP in some point within P. The same thing may be shown when the direction is less ele¬ vated than BC. 7* Ihe parabola APS is the focus of the greatest C T I L E S. ranges on any planes BP, BS, &c. and no point without this parabola can be struck. J ° 8. The greatest range on any plane BP is produced when the line of direction BC bisects the angle OBP formed by that plane with the vertical: for the para¬ bola described by the body in this case touches APS in P, and its focus is in the line BP, and therefore the tangent BC bisects the angle OBP. Cor. I he greatest range on a horizontal plane is made with an elevation of 450. 9. A point M in any plane BS, lying between B and o, may be struck with two directions, BC and B c • and these directions are equidistant from the direction t which gives the greatest range on that plane : for “ abou.t the centre M, with the distance ML from the directly AL, ,ve describe a circle LF/J it will cut the circle AHK m two points F and /; which are evident¬ ly the foci of two parabolas BVM, Bi,M, havino the directrix AL and diameter ABK. The intersection Of the circle ODB, with the verticals FC,/'c deter¬ mine the directions BC, B c of the tangents. Draw PAuoel a"d j°in Cc Ff: then OB t — v CiiSb, and B t is the direction which gives the greatest range on the plane BS : but because Ff is the chord of the circles described round the centres B and M, bf is perpendicular to BM, and C c to A t, and tlie arches C t, c t are equal; and therefore the angles t-'.n (, c B t are equal. Thus we have given a general view of the subject, which shows the connection and dependence of every circumstance which can influence the result j for it is evi¬ dent that to every velocity of projection there belongs a set of parabolas, with their directions and ranges- and every change of velocity has a line AB correspond! ing to it, to which all the others are proportional. As the height necessary for acquiring any velocity increa¬ ses or diminishes in the duplicate proportion of that velocity, it is evident that all the ranges with given ele¬ vations will vary in the same proportion, a double ve¬ locity giving a quadruple range, a triple velocity giving a noncuple range, &c. And, on the other hand, when the ranges are determined beforehand (which is the usual case), the velocities are in the subduplicate pro¬ portion of the ranges. A quadruple range will require a double velocity, &c. 397 On the principles now established is founded the or- r. ■ 2 • dinary theory of gunnery, furnishing rules which are to priacTpafly6 direct the art of throwing shot and shells, so as to hit directs the the mark with a determined velocity. practical But we must observe, that this theory is of little ser-8Unner‘ vice for directing us in the practice of cannonading. Here it is necessary to come as near as we can to the object aimed at, and the hurry of service allows no time foi geometrical methods of pointing the piece after each discharge. The gunner either points the cannon di¬ rectly to the object, when within 200 or 300 yards of it, in which case he is said to shoot point blank (pointer au blunc, i. e. at the white mark in the middle of the gunners target) ; or, if at a greater distance, he esti¬ mates to the best of his judgment the deflection corres¬ ponding to his distance, and points the cannon accord¬ ingly. In this he is aided by the greater thickness at the breech of a piece of ordnance. Or lastly, when the intention is not to batter, but to rake along a line occupied 398 P ft O occupied by the enemy, the cannon is elevated at a con¬ siderable angle, and the shot discharged with a small force, so that it drops into the enemy’s post, and bounds along the line. In all these services the gunner is di¬ rected entirely by trial, and we cannot say that this pa¬ rabolic theory can do him any service. . The principal use of it is to direct the bombardier in throwing shells. With these it is proposed o break down or set fire to buildings, to break through the vault¬ ed roofs of magazines, or to intimidate and kill tioops by bursting among them. These objects are always un¬ der cover of the enemy’s works, and cannot be touche by a direct shot. The bombs and carcasses are there¬ fore thrown upwards, so as to get over the defences and produce their effect. . , . These shells are of very great weight, frequently ex¬ ceeding 200 lbs. The mortars from which they are discharged must therefore be very strong, that they may resist the explosion of gunpowder which is necessary lor throwing such a mass of matter to a distance •, they are consequently unwieldy, and it is found most convenient to make them almost a solid and immoveable lump. Very little change can be made in their elevation, anc therefore their ranges are regulated by the velocities given to the shell. These again are produced by the quantities of powder in the chargeand experience (con¬ firming the best theoretical notions that we can iorm ot the subject) has taught us, that the ranges are near y proportional to the quantities of powder employed, only not increasing quite so fast. This method is much ea¬ sier than by differences of elevation •, for we can select the elevation which gives the greatest range on the given plane, and then we are certain that we are employing the smallest quantity of powder with which the service can be performed : and we have another advantage, that the deviations which unavoidable causes produce in the real directions of the bomb will then produce the small¬ est possible deviation from the intended range. This is the case in most mathematical maxima. In military projectiles the velocity is produced by the explosion of a quantity of gunpowder j but in our theory it is conceived as produced by a fall from a certain height, by the proportions of which we can accurately determine in practice, its quantity. Thus a velocity of 1600 feet per second is produced by a fall from the height ot 4000 leet, or 1433 yards. The height CA (fig. 4.) for producing the velocity of projection is called, in the language of gunneiy, the IMPETUS. We shall express it by the symbol h. The distance AB to which the shell goes on any plane AB is called the amplitude of the range, r. JECTILES. The angle DBA, made by the vertical line and the plane AB^ may be called the angle of position of that plane, p. The angle DAB, made by the axis or direction of the piece, and the direction of the object, may be called the angle of elevation of the piece above the plane AB, e. The angle ZAD, made by the vertical line, and the direction of the piece, may be called the zenith dis¬ tance, ss. . The relations between all the circumstances of velo¬ city, distance, position, elevation, and time, may be in¬ cluded in the following propositions. _ , I. Let a shell be projected from A, with the velocity Reiatl acquired by falling through CA, with the intention ofbetwes hitting the mark B situated in the given line AB. jhcT': Make ZAzzqAC, and draw BD perpendicular to the^1Kf* horizon. Describe on ZA an arch ot a cucle ZDA, containing an angle equal to DBA, and draw AD to the intersection of this circle with DB j then will a body projected from A, in the direction AD, with the velocity acquired by falling through CA, hit the mark B. For, produce CA downwards, and draw Er parallel to AD, and draw ZD. It is evident from the con¬ struction that AB touches the circle in B, and that the angles ADZ, DBA, are equal, as also the angles A ZD, DAB ; therefore the triangles ZAD, ADB are simi¬ lar. Therefore BD : DA—DA : AZ, And DA*=BD x AZ j Therefore BF,=:A1 X AZ,=rAF X 4AC. 24 The mov¬ ing force in theory different from that Fig. 4. Therefore a parabola, of which AF is a diameter, and AZ its parameter, will pass through B, and this para¬ bola will be the path of the shell projected as already mentioned. Remark. When BD cuts this circle, it cuts it in two points D, d; and there are two directions which wifi solve the problem. If B,D/ only touches the circle in D', there is but one direction, and AB' is the greatest possible range with this velocity. If the vertical line through B does not meet the circle, the problem is im¬ possible, the velocity being too small. M hen B'D' touches the circle, the two directions AD' and A ,* ,/i . S, e X * Or 4/* : r=S\p : S, e X S, K, and 4 A X S, e X S> *=r X SV S,6' S,e S,2) Hence we obtain the relations wanted. m, 7 r X S*,/> 4/z X X Thus A = -5 4—, and r= -- zlS.e X S.25 rXSV, And S, z— r7X,V~ > an(l e 4/; X S,e’ * ’ 4^ X The only other circumstance in which we are interest¬ ed is the time of the flight. A knowledge of this isToc '• necessary for the bombardier, that he may cut the flises^ of his shells to such lengths as that they may burst at very instant of their hitting the mark. Now AB : DB-Sin, ADB : Sin, DAB, =S, z : S, e, and DB=^^. But the time of the flight is ’ ’ b, Z ’ the ^ ti< 1 PROJECTILES. the same with the time of falling through DB, and 16 feet : DB=i" : t"\ Hence and we have i6S,« the following easy rule. From the sum of the logarithms of the range, and of the sine of elevation, subtract the sum of the logarithms of 16, and of the sine of the zenith distance, half the remainder is the logarithm of the time in seconds. This becomes still easier in practice ; for the mortar should be so elevated that the range is a maximum : in which case ABrrDB, and then half the difference of the logarithms of AB and of 16 is the logarithm of the time in seconds. ’ll theory Such are the deductions from the general propositions cj uinery which constitute the ordinary theory of gunnery. It "'"1 remains to compare them with experiment. In such experiments as can be performed with great accuracy in a chamber, the coincidence is as great as can be wished. A jet of water, or mercury, gives us tlie finest example, because we have the whole parabola exhibited to us in the simultaneous places of the suc¬ ceeding particles. ^ et even in these experiments a de¬ viation can be observed. When the jet is made on a horizontal plane, and the curve carefully traced on Si perpendicular plane held close by it, it is found that the distance between the highest point of the curve and the mark is less than the distance between it and the spout, and that the descending branch of the curve is more perpendicular than the ascending branch. And this difference is more remarkable as the jet is made with greater velocity, and reaches to a greater distance. This is evidently produced by the resistance of the air, which diminishes the velocity, without affecting the gravity of the projectile. It is still more sensible in the motion of bombs. These can be traced through the air by the light of their fuzes j and we see that their highest point is always much nearer to the mark than to the mortar • on a horizontal plane. The greatest horizontal range on this plane should be when the elevation is 450. It is always found to be much lower. 1 he ranges on this plane should be as the sines of twice the elevation. A ball discharged at the elev. 190.5' ranged 448 yards at 9.45 330 It should have ranged by theory 241 . The range at an elevation of 430 should be twice the impetus. Mr Robins found that a musket-ball, dischar¬ ged with the usual allotment of powder, had the velo¬ city of 1700 feet in a second. This requires a fall of 45Ij6 feet, and the range should be 90312, or ijf miles; whereas it does not much exceed half a mile. A 24 pound ball discharged with 16 pounds of powder should range about 16 miles ; whereas it is generally short of 3 miles. Such facts show incontrovertibly how deficient the parabolic theory is, and how unfit for directing the prac- deiic 7 ark^er,sk A very simple consideration is t' iftli ^ efficient for rendering this obvious to the most unin- ‘L strutted. T he resistance of the air to a very light body may greatly exceed its weight. Any one will feel this m trying to move a fan very rapidly through the air ; therefore this resistance would occasion a greater devia¬ tion from uniform motion than gravity would in that 0(^- Its path, therefore, through the air may differ this IT she ™ he more from a parabola than the parabola itself deviates from the straight line. It is for such cogent reasons that we presume to say, that the voluminous treatises which have been published on this subject are nothing but ingenious amusements for young mathematicians. Few persons who have been much engaged in the study of mechanical philosophy have missed this opportunity in the beginning of their studies. I he subject is easy. Some property of the pai abola occurs, by which they can give a neat and systematic solution of all the questions; and at this time of study it seems a considerable essay of skill. They are tempted to write a book on the subject; and it finds readers among other young mechanicians, and employs all the mathematical knowledge that most of the young gentlemen of the military profession are possessed of. But these performances deserve little attention from the practical artillerist. All that seems possible to do for his education is, to multiply judicious experiments on real pieces of ordnance, with the charges that are used in actual service, and to furnish him with tables calcu¬ lated from such experiments. . These observations will serve to justify us for having given so concise an account of this doctrine of the pa¬ rabolic flight of bodies. ^ But it is the business of a philosopher to inquire intocau^ of the causes of such a prodigious deviation from a well-this defici- lounded theory, and having discovered them, to ascer-ettcy" tain precisely the deviations they occasion. Thus we shall obtain another theory, either in the form of the parabolic theory corrected, or as a subjuct of indepen¬ dent discussion. This we shall now attempt. I he motion of projectiles is performed in the atmo- Effect of sphere, fhe air is displaced, or put in motion. What-^he atino. ever motion it requires must be taken from the bullet.SP1“:K'’ The motion communicated to the air must be in the pro- , portion of the quantity of air put in motion, and of the velocity communicated to it. If, therefore, the displaced air be always similarly displaced, whatever be the velo¬ city of the bullet, the motion communicated to it, and lost by the bullet, must be proportional to the square of the velocity of the bullet and to the density of the air jointly. Therefore the diminution of its motion must be greater when the motion itself is greater, and in the very great velocity of shot and shells it must be prodi- digious. It appears from Mr Robins’s experiments that a globe of 44 inches in diameter, moving with the velo¬ city of 25 feet in a second, sustained a resistance of 315 grains, nearly ^ of an ounce. Suppose this ball to move 800 feet in a second, that is 32 times faster, its resist¬ ance would be 32x32 times | of an ounce, or 768 ounces 01-48 pounds. This is four times the weight of a ball of cast iron of this diameter; and if the initial velocity had been 1600 feet per second, the resistance would be at least 16 times the weight of the balk It is indeed much greater than this. This resistance, operating constantly and uniformly oompai^d on the ball, must take away four times as much from ^* its velocity as its gravity would do in the same time.°f ssav^r’ We know that in one second gravity would reduce the velocity 800 to 768 if the ball were projected straight upwards. This resistance of the air would therefore re¬ duce it in one second to 672, if it operated uniformly; but as the velocity diminishes continually by the resist¬ ance, and the resistance diminishes along with the velo¬ city, 399 4oo P R O J E C city, the real diminution will be somewhat less than 128 feet. We shall, however, see afterwards that in one second its velocity -will be reduced fram 8o<3 to 6 7. From this simple instance, we see that the resistance ot the air must occasion great deviation from parabolic mo- and consi- In order to judge accurately of its effect, we must dered as a cong^er it as a retarding force, in the same way as we retarding consl(ler „rjivity. The weight W of a body is the ag- f°rCe' Predate of the action of the force of gravity g on each particle of the body. Suppose the number of equa par- ticks, or the quantity of matter, of a body to be M, then W is equivalent to g M. In like manner, the re¬ sistance R, which we observe in any experiment, is the aggregate of the action of a retarding force ly on each particle, and is equivalent to R'M : and as g is equal to —- so 11/ is equal to -rr. We shall keep this distinc- ]VI’ ivi tion in view, by adding the differential mark' to the letter R or r, which expresses the aggregate resistance. The resist- If we, in this manner, consider resistance as a retard- ance of the ing force, we can compare it with any other such force air not uni- w means of the retardation which it produces in similar form- circumstances. We would compare it with gravity by comparing the diminution of velocity which its uniform action produces in a given time with the diminution produced in the same time by gravity. But we have no opportunity of doing this directly, for when the re¬ sistance of the air diminishes the velocity of a body, it diminishes it gradually, which occasions a gradual dimi¬ nution of its own intensity. This is not the case with gravity, which has the same action on a body in motion or at rest. We cannot, therefore, observe the uniform action of the air’s resistance as a retarding force. We must fall on some other way of making the comparison. We can state them both as dead pressures. A ball may be fitted to the rod of a spring stillyard, and exposed to impulse of the wind. This will compress the stillyard to the mark 3, for instance. Perhaps the weight ol the ball will compress it to the mark 6. We know that half this weight would compress it to 3. We account this equal to the pressure of the air, because they ba¬ lance the same elasticity of the spring. And in this way we can estimate the resistance by weights, whose pres¬ sures are equal to its pressure, and we can thus compare it with other resistances, weights, or any other pressures. In fact, we are measuring them all by the elasticity of the spring. This elasticity in its different positions is supposed°to have the proportions of the weights which keep it in these positions. Thus we reason from the na¬ ture of gravity, no longer considered as a dead pressuie, but as a retarding force ; and we apply our conclusions to resistances which exhibit the same pressures, but which we cannot make to act uniformly. This sense of the words must be carefully remembered whenever we speak of resistances in pounds and ounces. Gravity The most ‘lire01 aml convenient way of stating the and resist- comparison between the resistance of the air and the Ance com- accelerating force of gravity, is to take a case in which pared whenwe know tiiat tiiey arg equal. Since the resistance is tIlcy,are here assumed as proportional to the square of Uie velo- C<1Ua ’ city, it is evident that the velocity may be so increased that the resistance shall equal or exceed the weight of the body. If a body be already moving downw’ards with this velocity, it cannot accelerate 5 because the accele¬ rating force of gravity is balanced by an equal retarding . 4 TILES. force of resistance. It follows from this remark, that this velocity is the greatest that a body can acquire by the force of gravity only. Nay, we shall afterwards see that it never can completely attain it $ because as it ap¬ proaches to this velocity, the remaining accelerating force decreases faster than the velocity increases. It may therefore be called the limiting or terminal velo¬ city by gravity. Let a be the height through which a heavy body must fall, in vacuo, to acquire its terminal velocity in air. If projected directly upwards with this velocity, it will rise again to this height, and the height is half the space which it would describe uniformly, with this velocity, in the time of its ascent. Therefore the re¬ sistance to this velocity being equal to the weight of the body, it would extinguish this velocity, by its uni- form action, in the same time, and after the same dis¬ tance, that gravity would. Now let g be the velocity which gravity generates or extinguishes during an unit of time, and let u be the terminal velocity of any particular body. The tbeo- rems for perpendicular ascents give us u ancl a being both numbers representing units of space j there¬ fore, in the present case, we have r'——' I'or the whole resistance r, or r'M, is supposed equal to the weight, or to g M; and therefore r' is equal ta g, 2 az= —. There is a consideration which ought to have place g. here. A body descends in air, not by the whole of its weight, but by the excess of its weight above that of the air which it displaces. It descends by its specific gravity only as a stone does in water. Suppose a bo¬ dy 32 times heavier than air, it will be buoyed up by a force equal to — of its weight j and instead of ac- 32 quiring the velocity of 32 feet in a second, it will only acquire a velocity of 31, even though it sustained no resistance from the inertia of the air. Let p be the weight of the body and tt that of an equal bulk of air: the accelerative force of relative gravity on each particle will be 1—~ i an(l relative accelerating force P might be distinguished by another symbol y. But in all cases in which we have any interest, and particulai- ly in military projectiles, — is so small a quantity that it would be pedantic affectation to attend to it. It is much more than compensated when we make g—^2 feet instead of 32,V which it should be. Let e be the time of this ascent in opposition to gra¬ vity. The same theorems give us 2 a; and since the resistance competent to this terminal velocity is equal to gravity, e will also be the time in which it would be extinguished by the uniform action of the re¬ sistance j for which reason we may call it the extinguish¬ ing time for this velocity. Let R and E mark the re¬ sistance and extinguishing time for the same body mov¬ ing with the velocity 1. Since the resistances are as the squares of the veloci¬ ties, and the resistance to the volcity u is —, R will ’ 20 be be =r 2a PROJECTILES. Moreover, the times in which the same ve- 40 t locity will be extinguished by different forces, acting uniformly, are inversely as the forces, and gravity would 1 extinguish the velocity I in tile time-I — rin these mea ' u“ tlle Sl?1,llar clrcumstances fur any other magnitude; t..n tnese mea- and, to avoid unnecessary complications, we shall always v I 2a _ suunose the bodies tn be anbe^o • i.-' by the same number. It is a number of units, of time, or of length. ’ Having ascertained these leading circumstances forThc com- an unit of velocity, weight, and bulk, we proceed to de-parison duce the similar circumstances for any other magnitude - mad? anrl- to nvmrl i* * • 1 „ , ? ncrai. ^ ' —we bnaii always sures) to ± “ Therefore we have the following LTrld felly.t0 ^ SphereS’ diferi"8 111 di“- First, then, let the velocity be increased in the ratio or i to v. 2a proportion L (=E) : anJ 2a equal to E, the time in which the velocity i will be ex¬ tinguished by the uniform action of the resistance com¬ petent to this velocity. The velocity i would in this case be extinguished af¬ ter a motion uniformly retarded, in which the space de¬ scribed is one-half of what would be uniformly describ¬ ed during the same time with the constant velocity i. Therefore the space thus described by a motion which begins with the velocity r, and is uniformly retarded by the resistance competent to this velocity, is equal to die height through which this body must fall in vacuo in order to acquire its terminal velocity in air. All these circumstances may be conceived in a man¬ ner which, to some readers, will be more familiar and palpable. The terminal velocity is that where the re¬ sistance ot the air balances and is equal to the weight of the body. The resistance of the ak to any particular ''1UU ^ * 10 meretore the retarding power of body is as the square of the velocity 5 therefore let R be the resistance changes in the proportion of 1 to When the whole resistance to the body moving with the velo- , . d citv I. and r the reslsfanr*. iia .v,^:— j.i._ ^ 1 the diameter %vas I, the resistance to a velocity 1 was The resistance will now be ~ — r 2a’ The extinguishing time will be — — c — — and v v ’ ev—2a ; so that the rule is general, that the space along which any velocity will be extinguished by the uniform action of the corresponding resistance, is equal to the height necessary for communicating the terminal velocity to that body by gravity. For e> v is twice the space through which the body moves while the velocity v is extinguished by tbe uniform resistance. In the 2d place, let the diameter increase in tbe pro¬ portion of 1 to d. Tbe aggregate of the resistance changes in the proportion of tbe surface similarly resist¬ ed, that is, in tbe proportion of 1 to d\ But the quan¬ tity ot matter, or number of particles among which this resistance is to be distributed, changes in the propor¬ tion of i to c/3. Therefore the retarding power of . ^ njwiug wixij ujc veio- city I, and v the resistance to its motion with the termi¬ nal velocity a; we must have rnrHxa’, and this must be =W the weight. Therefore, to obtain the terminal velocity, divide the weight by the resistance to the ve¬ locity 1, and the quotient is the square of the terminal W velocity, or =ra2: And this is a very expeditious me¬ thod of determining it, if R be previously known. Then the common theorems give a, the full necessary for producing this velocity in vacuo zz—. and the time 2g The time in which this 1 It must now be —. 2a 2ad diminished resistance will extinguish the velocity 1 must increase in the proportion of the diminution of force, and must now be E d, or 2 a d, and the space uniformly described during this time with the initial ve¬ locity 1 must he 2a d; and this must still be twice tbe height necessary for communicating the terminal veloci¬ ty w to this body. We must still have g— - ^ ; and 2 a d* nf ifo foilj , therefore w* = 2gad, and tc— ^/2 2: ad— 2 V a^Hi of tbe tall _ —e, and ea—2c, =r the space uniformly t?.,* /~T— rpi f ^ * V v • , < ^ But a—2g a. Iberefore the terminal velocity to described with the velocity a during the time of the fall, for this body is rra'^/d; and the height necessary for or its equal, the time of the extinction by the uniform communicating it is a d. Therefore the terminal velo- action ot the resistance r ; and, since r extinguishes it in city varies in the subduplicate ratio of the diameter of the time e, R, which is a* times smaller, will extinguish the ball, and the fall necessary for producingit varies in it in the time aV, and R will extinguish the velocity 1, the simple ratio of the diameter. The extinguishing- which is a times less than a, in the time u e, that is, in E d b the time 2a; and the body, moving uniformly during tie time 2a, ~E, with the velocity i, will describe the space 2a,- and, it the body begin to move with the velocity i, and be uniformly opposed by the resistance R, it will be brought to rest when it has described the snnpA n • on si • • _ i j i • . i time lor the velocity v must now be If, in the 3d place, the density of the ball be increased in the proportion of 1 to m, the number of particles among which the resistance is to be distributed is in¬ creased in the same proportion, and therefore the retard- lllCT fnrpp m flip 1C Aniiollv ,wl 1 snacfl • nnrl il • , creasetlinUiesanieProP01't1on,andthereforetheretard- velocitv’T will I" ,wCh t1he.reSl1Sta.nCe the forc« ofthe resistance is equally diminished; and if action 1? ha\ vel°city by its uniform the density of the air is increased in the proportion of 1 f’.n .etlua 0. *ie ^ight through which that body to n, tbe retarding force of the resistance increases in the same proportion : hence we easily deduce these general action, is equal to the height through which that body must fall m vacuo in order to acquire its terminal velo- city in air. And thus every thing is regulated by the time E in which the velocity 1 is extinguished by the umtoi-m action of the corresponding resistance, or by 2a, w ich isthe space uniformly described during this time, wit the velocity I. And E and 2 a must be expressed Vol. XVII. Part II. f expressions. The terminal velocity — a d™—~ tj^g a d™ n n The producing fall in vacuo -=zad n 3 E The 402 P R 0 J E C The retarding power of resistance to any velocity = 2 a d ™' Y.dm 36 Units ne- ceisary by which tha quantities may be measured- 37 Sir Isaac Newton’s endeavours in this way The extinguishing time for any velocity And thus we see that the duel circumstances ate ie gulated by the terminal velocity, or are conveniently 1C To render1 the deductions from these premises perspi¬ cuous, and for communicating distinct notions or ideas it will be proper to assume some convenient units, y which all these quantities may be measured j and as this subject is chiefly interesting in the case of nnlitaiy projectiles, we shall adapt our units to this purpose. Therefore, let a second he the unit ol time, a loot the unit of space and velocity, an inch the unit of diameter of a ball or shell, and a pound avoirdupois the unit ot pressure, whether of weight or of resistance j therefore g is 32 feet. , , , The great difficulty is to procure an absolute measure of r, or «, or o; any one of these will determine the ^SiTlsaac Newton has attempted to determine r by theory, and employs a great part of the second book of the Principia in demonstrating, that the resistance to a sphere moving with any velocity, is to the force which would generate or destroy its whole motion m the time that it would uniformly move over T of its diameter with this velocity, as the density of the air is to the den¬ sity of the sphere. This is equivalent to demonstrating that the resistance of the air to a sphere moving through it with any velocity, is equal to half the weight of a co¬ lumn of air having a great circle of the sphere for its base, and for its altitude the height from which a body must fall in vacuo to acquire tins velocity. 1 his appears from Newton’s demonstration •, for, let the speci.ic gia- vity of the air be to that of the ball as I to then, because the times in which the same velocity will he ex- tinguished by the uniform action of diflerent forces are inversely as the forces, the resistance to this velocity would extinguish it in the time of describing T m d, d being the diameter of the ball. Now t is to m as the weight of the displaced air to the weight or the ball, or as | of the diameter of the ball to the length of a co¬ lumn of air of equal weight. Call this length a; n is therefore equal to \ m d. Suppose the bail, to fall from the height a in the time £, and acquire the velo¬ city u. If it moved uniformly with this velocity during this time, it would describe a space = 20, or 4 ^ Now its weight would extinguish this velocity, or de¬ stroy this motion, io the same time, that is, in the time of describing 4 m d; hut the resistance of the air would do this in the time of describing 4 m d; that is, in twice the time. The resistance therefore is equal to half the . weight of the ball, or to half the weight of the column of air whose height is the height producing the velocity. But the resistances to different velocities are as the squares of the velocities, and therefore, as their produ¬ cing heights j and, in general, the resistance of the air to a sphere moving with any velocity, is equal to the half weight of a column of air of equal section, and whose altitude is the height producing the velocity. The result of this investigation has been acquiesced iu by all Sir Isaac Newton’s commentators. Many faults TILES. have indeed been found with his reasoning, and even ,8 with his principles j and it must be acknowledged that His mult although this investigation is by far the most ingenious of any’in the Principia, and sets his acuteness and ad-^J™ dress in the most conspicuous light, his reasoning is liable 0U8> to serious objections, which his most ingenious commen¬ tators have not completely removed. However, th« conclusion has been acquiesced m, us we have alieady stated, but as if derived from other principles, or by more logical reasoning. We cannot, however, say that the reasonings or assumptions of these mathematicians are much better than Newton’s: and we must add, that all the causes of deviation from the duplicate ratio of the velocities, and the causes of increased resistance, which the latter authors have valued themselves for discovering and introducing into their investigations, were pointed out by Sir Isaac Newton, but purposely omitted by him, in order to facilitate the discussionfn re difficillima. (See Schd. prop. 37. book ii.). .. f ' It is known that the weight of a cubic toot ot water is 62^ pounds, and that the medium density of the air is *1. of water ; therefore, let a be the height produ¬ cing the velocity (in feet), and d the diameter of the ball (in inches), and *• the periphery of a circle whose diameter is 1 j the resistance of the air will be =g^ 9T I a 11 V-X X. — Xd X4 144 2 ad' - pounds, very nearly, rr v —a 49284x64 3i54i7 4928-2- pounds We may take an example. A hall of cast iron weigh¬ ing 12 pounds, is 44" inches in diameter. Suppose this ball to move at the rate of 25x0" f£et *n a second (the reason of this choice will appear afterwards). The height which will produce this velocity in a falling body is 94 feet. The area of its great circle is 0.11044 feet, or ro'SoVe 0He foot* Suppose water to be 840 times heavier than air, the weight of the air incumbent on this great circle, and 9^ feet high, is 0.081151 pounds : half of this is 0.0405755 or t4‘§4’5‘'!4o'» or neai‘ly yr a pound. This should be the resistance of the air to this motion of the ball. ... 39 In all matters of physical discussion, it is prudent tojjccessii confront every theoretical conclusion with experiment, of expo This is particularly necessary in the present instance, be-Be¬ cause the theory on which this proposition is founded is extremely uncertain. Newton speaks of it with the most cautious diffidence, and secures the justness of the conclusions by the conditions which he assumes in his investigation. He describes with the greatest precision the state of the fluid in which the body must move, so as that the demonstrations may be strict, and leaves it to others to pronounce, whether this is the real constitu¬ tion of our atmosphere. It must be granted that it is not; and that many other suppositions have been intro¬ duced by his commentators and followers, in order to suit his investigation (tor we must assert that little 01^ nothing has been added to it) to the circumstances of the case. ■ Newton himself, therefore, attempted to compare fosNewto8 propositions with experiment. Some were made hy^u dropping halls from the dome oi St 1 aul s cathedral; and all these showed as great a coincidence with bis theory as they did with each other: but the irregulari- J 1 ties P R O J E tie? were too great to allow him to say with precision what was the resistance. It appeared to follow the pro¬ portion of the squares of the velocities with suflicient ex¬ actness j and though he could not say that the resistance was equal to the weight of the column of air having the height necessary fer communicating the velocity, kwas always equal to a determinate part of it; and might be stated —n a, n being a number to be fixed by nume¬ rous experiments. One great source of uncertainty in his experiments seems to have escaped his observation : the air in that dome is almost always in a state of motion. In the sum¬ mer season there is a very sensible current of air down¬ wards, and frequently in winter it is upwards : and this current bears a very great proportion to the velocity of the descents. Sir Isaac takes no notice of this. He made another set of experiments with pendulums ; and has pointed out some very curious and unexpected circumstances of their motions in a resisting medium. There is hardly any part of his noble work in which his address, his patience, and his astonishing penetration, appear in greater lustre. It requires the utmost intense¬ ness of thought to follow him in these disquisitions ; and we cannot enter on the subject at present; some notice will be taken of these experiments in the article Resist¬ ance, of fluids. Their results were much more uni¬ form, and confirmed his general theory ; and as we have said above, it has been acquiesced in by the first 41 mathematicians of Europe. atility of But the deductions from this theory were so inconsist- pracdce,ent W‘t‘1 ^ 0j)ferve<^ motions of military projectiles, when the velocities are prodigious, that no application could be made which could be of any service for deter- 42 mining the path and motion of cannon shot and bombs ; eat- and although Mr John Bernoulli gave, in 1718, a most t°f elegant determination of the trajectory and motion of a [ themati- Projected in a fluid which resists in the duplicate I ns, &c. ratio of the velocities (a problem which even Newton did not attempt), it has remained a dead letter. Mi- Benjamin Robins, equally eminent for physical science and mathematical genius, was the first who suspected the true cause of the imperfection of the usually received theories; and in 1737 he published a small tract, in which he showed clearly, that even the Newtonian theo¬ ry of resistance must cause a cannon ball, discharged with a full allotment of powder, to deviate farther from the parabola, in which it would move in vacuo, than the parabola deviates from astraight line. But he farther asserted, on the authority of good reasoning, that in such great velocities the resistance must be much greater than this theory assigns; because, besides the resistance arising from the inertia of the air which is put in motion by the ball, there must be a resistance arising from a condensa¬ tion of the air on the anterior surface of the ball, and a rarefaction behind it: and there must be a third resist¬ ance, arising from the statical pressure of the air on its anterior part, when the motion is so swift that there is a vacuum behind. Even these causesof disagreement with the theory had been foreseen and mentioned by Newton (see tbe Scholium to prop. 37. hook ii. Pi'incip.') ; but the subject seems to have been little attended to. The eminent mathematicians had few opportunities of making experiments ; and the professional men, who were in the service of princes, and had their countenance and aid in C T I L E S. 40^ this matter, were generally too deficient in mathemati¬ cal knowledge to make a proper use of their opportuni¬ ties. The numerous and splendid volumes which these gentlemen have been enabled to publish by the patro¬ nage of sovereigns are little more than prolix extensions of the same theory of Galileo. Some of them, how¬ ever, such as St Remy, Antonini, and Le Blond, have given most valuable collections of experiments, ready for the use of the profound mathematician. ^ I wo or three years alter this first publication, MrObserva- Itobins hit upon that ingenious method of measuring t>®ns of Mr the great velocities of military projectiles, which has Robil?s 0,1 handed down his name to posterity with great honour. t And having ascertained these velocities, lie discovered ance?^ " the prodigious resistance of the air, by observing the diminution of velocity which it occasioned. This made him anxious to examine what was the real resistance to any velocity whatever, in order to ascertain what was the law of its variation ; and he was equally fortunate in this attempt. His method of measuring the resist¬ ance has been fully described in the article Gunnery N° 9, &c. It appears (Robins’s Math. WorJcs, vol. i. page 203.) that a sphere of 4I-inches in diameter, moving at the rate of 257- feet in a second, sustained a resistance of 0-°49I4 pounds, or °f a pound. This is a greater resistance than that of the Newtonian theory, which gave in the proportion of 1000 to 1211, or very nearly in the proportion of five to six in small numbers. And we may adopt as a rule in all mo¬ derate velocities, that the resistance to a sphere is equal to tVo °f the weight of a column of air having the great circle of the sphere for its base, and for its" alti¬ tude the height through which a heavy body must fall in vacuo to acquire the velocity of projection. This experiment is peculiarly valuable, because the ball is precisely the size of a 12 pound shot of cast iron ; and its accuracy may be depended on. There is hut one source of error. The whirling motion must have occasioned some whirl in the air, which would continue till the ball again passed through the same point of its revolution. The resistance observed is therefore pro¬ bably somewhat less than the true resistance to the velo¬ city of 25^- feet, because it was exerted in a relative ve¬ locity which was less than this, and is, in fact, the re¬ sistance competent to this relative and smaller velocity. 44 —Accordingly, Mr Smeaton, a most sagacious natu-and of MV ralist, places great confidence in the observations of a^ou^e Mr Rouse of Leicestershire, who measured the resistance by the effect of the wind on a plane properly exposed to it. He does not tell us in what way the velocity of the wind was ascertained ; but our deference for his great penetration and experience disposes us to believe 44 that this point was well determined. The resistance oh-They differ served by Mr Rouse exceeds that resulting from Mr^^y*n Robins’s experiments nearly in the proportion of 7 to Jo* ciusi0ngn' Chevalier de Borda made experiments similar to those of Mr Robins, and his results exceed those of Ro¬ bins in the proportion of 5 to 6. These differences are so considerable, that we are at a loss what measure to abide by. It is much to be regretted, that in a sub¬ ject so interesting both to the philosopher and tbe man of the world, experiments have not been multipli¬ ed. Nothing would tend so much to perfect the science 3 E 2 of 404 P R 0 J E of cunnery; and indeed till this be done, all the labours of mathematicians are of no avail. Their investigations must remain an unintelligible cipher, ti t ns ey supplied. It is to be hoped that Dr1C.h^lesT?H".tt°,“ of Woolwich, who has so ably extended Mr Robins s Examination of the Initial Velocities of Mihtary Pio- iectiles, will be encouraged to proceed to this part ot this subject. We should wish to see, m the hrst place, a numerous set of experiments for ascertaining the re¬ sistances in moderate velocities j and, in order to ayoi all error from the resistance and inertia of the machine, which is necessarily blended with the resistance ot the ball, in Mr Robins’s form of the experiment, and is se¬ parated with great uncertainty and risk of error, we would recommend a form of experiment somewhat dit- ferent. Let the axis and arm which carries the ball be con- 46 ^ vu. — *f“greeted with wheelwork, by which it can be i" ">°- ment re. tion, and gradually accelerated. Let the ball be ao commend- connected with a bent spring, that this shall gradually ed* compress it as the resistance increases, and leave a mark of the degree of compression ; and let all this part ot the apparatus be screened from the air except the ball, ihe velocity will be determined precisely by the revolutions of the arm, and the resistance by the compression ot the spring. The best method would be to let this part ot the apparatus be made to slide along the revolving arm, so that the ball can be made to describe larger and lar¬ ger circles. An intelligent mechanician will easily con¬ trive an apparatus of this kind, held at any distance from the axis by a cord, which passes over a pulley in the axis itself, and is then brought along a perforation in the axis, and comes out at its extremity, where it is fitted with a swivel, to prevent it from snapping by be- in twisted. Now let the machine be put in motion. The centrifugal force of the ball and apparatus will cause it to fly out as far as it is allowed by the chord*, and if the whole is put in motion by connecting it with some mill, the velocity may be most accurately ascer¬ tained. It may also be fitted with a bell and hammer like Gravesande’s machine for measuring centrifugal forces. Now by gradually veering off more cord, the distance from the centre, and consequently the velocity and resistance increase, till the hammer is disengaged and strikes the bell. Another great advantage of this form of the experi¬ ment is, that the resistance to very great velocities may be thus examined, which was impossible in Mr Robins’s way. This is the great desideratum, that we may leaxn in what proportion of the velocities the resistances in¬ crease. . . In the same manner, an apparatus, consisting ot Ur Lynd’s Anemometer, described in the article Pneuma¬ tics, N° 311, &c. might be whirled round with pro¬ digious rapidity, and the fluid on it might be made clammy, winch would leave a mark at its greatest ele¬ vation, and thus discover the resistance of the air to ra¬ pid motions. Nay, we are of opinion that the resistance to very rapid motions may be measured directly in the conduit pipe of some of the great cylinder bellows employed in blast furnaces : the velocity of the air in this pipe is ascertained by the capacity of the cylinder and the strokes of tbe’piston. We think it our duty to point out, 2 C T I L E S. to such as have the opportunitiesof trying them, methods which promise accurate results for ascertaining this most desirable point. We are the more puzzled what measure to abide by, Tbe ^ because Mr Robins himself, in his practical proposi-0f Robin £ tions, does not make use of the result of his own expe-oxpeii- riments, but takes a much lower measure. We must™, a, content ourselves, however, with this experimental mea-^^^ sure, because it is as yet the only one of which any ac-pe^ 0, count can be given, or well-founded opinion iormed. Therefore, in order to apply our formulae, we must Applied d reduce this experiment, which was made on a ball of the font # 4-^ inches diameter, moving with the velocity of 253- *• feet per second, to what would be the resistance to a ball of one inch, having the velocity 1 foot. This will evidently give us R= beinS diminished in 4,5aX25-2 the duplicate ratio of the diameter and velocity. This 3.81973 gives us R=o,00000381973 pounds, or ^ of 1000000 a pound. The logarithm is 4.58204. The resistance here determined is the same whatever substance the ball be of*, but the retardation occasioned by it will depend on the proportion of the resistance to the vis insita of the. ball *, that is, to its quantity of motion. _ This in similar velocities and diameters is as the density of the ball. The balls used in military service are of cast iron or of lead, whose specific gravities are 7,207 and 11,37 nearly, water being I. There is considerable variety in cast iron, and this density is about the medium. These data will give us W, or weight of a ball 1 inch in For Iron. diameter Log. of W E" Log. of E «, or terminal velocity Log. u - ~ a, or producing height lbs. 0.13648 9-l3509 1116".6 3.04790 189.03 2.27653 558.3 For Lead 0.21533 9-33310 i76iw.6 3'2459I 237-43 2-31553 880.8 These numbers are of frequent use in all questions on this subject. Mr Robins gives an expeditious rule for readily find¬ ing a, which he calls F (see the article Gunnery), by which it is made 900 feet for a cast iron ball of an inch diameter. But no theory of resistance which he pro¬ fesses to use will make this height necessary for produ¬ cing the terminal velocity. His F therefore is an em¬ pirical quantity, analogous indeed to the producing height, but accommodated to his theory of the trajec¬ tory of cannon-shot, which he promised to publish, but did not live to execute. We need not be very anxious about this j for all our quantities change in the same proportion with R, and need only a correction by a multiplier or divisor, when R shall be accurately esta¬ blished. We may illustrate the use of these formula? by an ex¬ ample or two. . -,7 1. Then, to find the resistance to a 24 pound ball Ex-amp moving with the velocity of 1670 feet in a second, of dew * which is nearly the velocity communicated by idlbs. of powder. The diameter is 5,603 inches. Log. 405 Log. R Log. d1 Log. 1670* projectile s. +4.58204 +1.49674 +6.44548 Log. 334.4 lbs.—r - . 2.52426 But it is found, by unequivocal experiments on tbe retardation of such a motion, that it is 504 lbs. This is owing to the causes often mentioned, the additional resistance to great velocities, arising from the condensa¬ tion of the air, and from its pressure into the vacuum left by the ball. 2. Required the terminal velocity of this ball P Log. R Log. d* +4.58204 + 1.49674 5° 6.07878=a 1.38021=6 5-30I43 2.65071 Log. resist, to veloc. 1 - _ Log. W. - - . Diff. of a and 6, =log. Log. 447.4 As the terminal velocity u, and its producing height enter into all computations of military projectiles -- have inserted the following Table for the usual sizes sTewton of canno+slK,t, computed both by the Newtonian theo- RobiHs.1? of resistance, and by the resistances observed in Ro¬ bin’s experiments. * jle of t ninal ’ jcity 1 arding i sTewion a, we M 111 • ■— » ouujtui, gives a much smaller measure of resistance, and consequently a J’wl greater terminal velocity: but his theory is a mistake from beo-innincr to eml Mo Newton. bj 1 2 3 4 6 9 12 18 24 32 Term Vel. 289.9 324-9 348.2 365-3 39°.8 418.1 438.6 469.3 492.4 512.6 540-5 2626.4 3298-5 3788.2 4I7°-3 4472.7 54^3-5 6010.6 6883.3 75/6.3 8024.8 9129.9 Robins. Term. Vel. 263.4 295.2 316.4 331-9 355-i 379-9 398.5 426.5 447-4 465.8 49r-5 2168.6 2723-5 3127.9 3442.6 394°-7 4511-2 4962.9 5683.5 62^5.7 6780.4 7538.3 Diam. Inch. I.94 2-45 2.80 3.08 3- 52 4.04. 4- 45 5- 09 5.61 6.21 6- 75 bled to compare the results with many experiments, and the agreement is very flattering. But we shall soon see that little dependence can be had on such comparisons. VVe notice these things here, because Mr Muller being- head of the artillery school in Britain, his publications have become a sort of text-books. We are miserably deficient in works on this subject, and must have re- course to the foreign writers. We now proceed to consider these motions through The mo- icn "bole course 5 and we shall first consider them ast,ons con- anected by the resistance only 5 then we shall considersidered the perpendicular ascents and descents of heavy bodies \hr-"ghI , through the air; and, lastly, their motion in a cnrrili-^r« neal trajectory, when projected obliquely. This must be done by the help of the abstruser parts of fluxionary mathematics. To make it more conspicuous, we shalf by way of introduction, consider the simply resisted rec¬ tilineal motions geometrically, in the manner of Sir Isaac Newton. As we advance, we shall quit this track, and prosecute it algebraically, having by this time ac- quired distinct ideas of the algebraic quantities. ^ e must keep in mind the fundamental theorems of Preliminary varied motions. observa- 1. The momentary variation of the velocity is pro-tioIis‘ poitional to the force and the moment of time jointly, and may therefore be represented by z±:v—f ’t, where v is the momentary increment or decrement of’the velo- Clty *4/+6 accelerating or retarding force, and t the moment or increment of the time t. 2. The momentary variation of the square of the ve¬ locity is as the force, and as the increment or decrement of the space jointly 5 and may be represented byrtz;^ =:/s. The first proposition is familiarly known. The second is the 39th of Newton’s Principia B I It is 54 demonstrated i„ the article Optics, and is the most ex-tTons tensively useful proposition in mechanics. fected bv These things being premised, let the straight lineresIstailefe ^ ffisr. c') renresent. thp initi'al \t i 1 . only. Mr Muller, in his writings on this subject, gives a .— ......... . uu(. 1U3 uieury is a mistake from beginning to end (See his Supplement to his Treatise of Artillery, art. 150, &c.). In art. 148. he assumes an algebraic expression for a principle of mecha¬ nical argument 5 and from its consequence draws erro¬ neous conclusions. He makes the resistance of a cylin¬ der one third less than Newton it; and his rea¬ son is false. Newton’s measure is demonstrated by his commentators Le Seur and Jaquier to be even a little too small, upon his own principles, (Not. 277. Prop. 36. B. II.). Mr Muller then, without any seeming reason, introduces a new principle, which he makes the chief support of his theory, in opposition to the theories of other mathematicians. The principle is false, and even absurd, as we shall have occasion to show by and by. In consequence, however, of this principle, he is ena- (fig' 5) represent the initial velocity V,”and Jet - CO, perpendicular to AC, be the time in which this Fig' 5 velocity would be extinguished by the uniform action of the resistance. Draw through tbe point A an equi¬ lateral hyperbola AeB, having OF, OCD for its as- symptotes ; then let the time of the resisted motion be represented by tbe line CB, C being the first instant of the motion. If there be drawn perpendicular ordinates HRj &c- to the hyperbola, they will be pro¬ portional to the velocities of the body at the instants *>+ D, &c. and the hyperbolic areas AC* e> ACg-f ACDB, &c. will be proportional to the spaces describ¬ ed during the times C *, C g, CB, &c. For, suppose the time divided into an indefinite num¬ ber of small and equal moments, C c, D d, &c. draw the ordinates ac, b d, and tbe perpendiculars bp, a ec. Then, by tbe nature of the hyperbola, AC : ac—O c : OC ; and AC—a c : ac=0 c—OC : OC, that is, A a : a c=C c : OC, and A « : C c~a c : OC = AC • a c : AC-OC ; in like manner, B/3 : D c/=C c, because the moments of time were taken equal, and the rectangles AC-CO, BD-HO are equal, by the nature of the hyperbola; therefore A a . B p— AC ' a c \ BO ' b d \ but as the points c, d continually approach, and ultimately coincide with C, D, the ultimate ratio of AC • a c to B.D 'b d\s that 0/ AB* to BD2; therefore the momentary decrements of AC , 406 P B O AC and BB are as AC* and BD*. Now, because the resistance is measured by the momentary diminution ot velocity, these diminutions are as the squares oj the ve¬ locities 5 therefore the ordinates of the hyperbola and the velocities diminish by the same law ”, and the initial velocity was represented by AC : therefore the veloci¬ ties at all the other instants *,£, D, are properly repre¬ sented by the corresponding ordinates. Hence, 1. Since the abscissae of the hyperbola are as the times, and the ordinates are as the velocities, the areas ■will be as the spaces described, and AC x e is to gj as the space described in the time C * to the space described in the time C £ (1st Theorem on varied mo- t,0T The rectangle ACOF is to the area ACDB as the space formerly expressed by 2 a, or E to the space described in the resisting medium during the time CU : for AC being the velocity V, and OC the extinguishing time , w, E-, &c. and the abscissa in xj, s, h, &c. the ordinates t p, h, n, 5 K, &c. may be pro¬ portional to the hyperbolic areas e A C x, f A C g, ^ A q j then we have K the sum of all the rectangles AC , q ft, as CO to IN *> bu* PROJECTILES!. but the sum of the rectangles BD . is the space S5 , l whole n ced to a aple a; meti- ci ompu- U. a. ACDB ; and, because AC is given, the sum of the rect¬ angles AC . q n is the rectangle of AC and the sum of all the lines qn •, that is, the rectangle of AC and KL : therefore the space ACDB : AC . RL=CO : IN and ACDB x IN=AC . CO . RL ; and therefore IN • RL -AC . CO : ACDB. Hence it follows thatQL expresses the areaBVA, and in general, that the part of the line parallel to OM, which lies between the tangent KN and the curve L/oIv" expresses the corresponding area of the hyperbola which lies without the rectangle BDOG. And now, by the help of this curve, we have an easy way of convincing and computing the motion of n body through the air. For the subtangent of our curve now represents twice the height through which the ball must fall in vacuo, in order to acquire the terminal velocity j and therefore serves for a scale on which to measure all the other representatives of the motion. But it remains to make another observation on the curve L p K, which will save us all the trouble of graphical operations, and reduce the whole to a very simple arithmetical computation. It is of such a na¬ ture, that when MI is considered as the abscissa, and is divided into a number of equal parts, and ordinates are drawn from the points of division, the ordinates are a series of lines in geometrical progression, or are conti¬ nual proportionals. Whatever is the ratio between the first and second ordinate, there is the same between the second and third, between the third and fourth, and so on; therefore the number of parts into which the ab¬ scissa is divided is the number of these equal ratios which is contained in the ratio of the first ordinate to the last : For this reason, this curve has got the name ot the logistic or logarithmic curve; and it is of immense use in the modern mathematics, giving us the solution of many problems in the most simple and expeditious manner, on which the genius of the ancient mathema¬ ticians had been exercised in vain. Few of our readers are ignorant, that the numbers called logarithms.ave of equal utility in arithmetical operations, enablino- us not only to solve common arithmetical problems with astonishing dispatch, but also to solve others which are quite inaccessible in any other way. Logarithms are no¬ thing more than the numerical measures of the abscissa of this curve, corresponding to ordinates, which are measured on the same or any other scale by the natural numbers ; that is, if ML ^ be divided into equal parts, and from the points of division lines be drawn parallel to MI, cutting the curve L K, and from the points of intersection ordinates be drawn to MI, these will divide Ml into portions, which are in the same proportion to the ordinates that the logarithms bear to their natural numbers. In constructing this curve we were limited to ho par¬ ticular length of the line LR, which represented the 8pace ACDB ; and all that we had to take care of was, that when OC, O*, O g were taken in geometrical pro¬ gression, M s, M t should be in arithmetical progression. Ihe abscissae having ordinates equal lops, n t, &c. might have been twice as long, as is shown in the dotted curve which is drawn through L. All the lines which serve to hieasure the hyperbolic spaces would then have been oubled. But N1 would also have been doubled, and our proportions would have still held good ; because this subtangent is the scale of measurement of our figure as L or 2 a is the scale of measurement for the motions’ bince then we have tables of logarithms calculated for every number, we may make use of them instead ot this geometrical figure, which still requires consi¬ derable trouble to suit it?to every case. There are two sets ot logarithmic tables in common use. One is call¬ ed a. table of hyperbolic or natural logarithms. It is suited to such a curve as is drawn in the figure, where the subtangent is equal to that ordinate r t, which cor¬ responds to the side 3- O of the square w 0 a O inserted be¬ tween the hyperbola and its assymptotes. This square is the unit ot surface, by which the hyperbolic areas are expressed ; its side is the unit of length, by which thejines belonging to the hyperbola are expressed ; r « is_i, or the unit of numbers to which the logarithms are suited, and then IN is also 1. Now the square being unity, the area BACD will he some number ; being also unity, OD is some number : Call it .r. I hen, by the nature of the hyperbola, OB : O 55- == 7T 0 : DB 1 — 1 -, so that DB is —, X X That is, x Now calling Dr/*, the area BD d by which is the fluxion (ultimately) of the hyperbolic area, is —. Now in the curve Jj p K, MI has the same ratio to NI that BACD has to 0aO7t: Therefore, if there be a scale of which NI is the unit, the number on this scale cor¬ responding to MI lias the same ratio to 1 which the number measuring BACD has to 1 ; and I /, which corresponds to BD d b, is the fluxion (ultimately) of MI : Therefore, if MI be called the logarithm of .r, x . - is properly represented by the fluxion of MI. In short the line MI is divided precisely as the line of numbers on a Gunter’s scale, which is therefore a line of logarithms ; and the numbers called logarithms are just the lengths ot the different parts of this line measured on a scale of equal parts. Therefore, when we meet with such an expression as — viz. the fluxion iC of a quantity divided by the quantity itself, we consider it as the fluxion of the logarithm of that quantity, be¬ cause it is really so when the quantity is a number ; and it is therefore strictly true that the fluent of — is the hy- x J perholic logarithm of x. Certain reasons of convenience have given rise to ano¬ ther set of logarithms ; these are suited to a logistic curve whose subtangent is only tVoV/o of the ordinate t v, which is equal to the side of the hyperbolic square, and which is assumed for the unit of number. We shall suit our applications of the preceding investigation to both these, and shall first use the common logarithms whose subtangent is 0,43429. The whole subject will be best illustrated by takingIllustn an example of the different questions which maybe pro- by exa posed. u% Recollect that the rectangle ACOF is —2 a, or —, or S L* 407 40 8 PROJECTILES. E, for a ball of cast-iron one inch diameter, and it it u'd has the diameter d, it is , or 2 « d, or E d. I. It may be required to determine what will be the space described in a given time £ by a ball setting on with a given velocity V, and what will be its velocity v at the end of that time. T1,, ,, . Here we have NI : Ml^ACOF : BDCA J now NI is the subtangent of the logistic curve j MI is he difference between the logarithms of OD and OL , that thp difference betweeen the logarithms ot e+t and c. . u a , ACOF is 2 ad, or —, or E a. g Therefore by common logarithms 0,43429 e-^—log. ez=2ad : S, = space described, or 0,43429 : log. = 2a diS, log. and S. =r 2a d X log. 6 4* ^ e 0,43429 by hyperbolic logarithms S—iad X l°g Let the ball be a 12 pounder, and the velocity be 1600 feet, and the time 20 seconds. We must brst . 2ad find e, which is spaces, showing the motion during each successive se¬ cond ; the fourth column is the velocity at the end of the time t; and the last column is the differences of ve¬ locity, showing its diminution in each successive second. We see that at the distance of 1000 yards the velocity is reduced to one half, and at the distance of less than a mile it is reduced to one-third. II. It may be required to determine the distance at which the initial velocity V is reduced to any other quantity v. This question is solved in the very same manner, by substituting the logarithms of V and v for those of e-\-t and e; for AC : BDrzOD : OC, and AC , OD . V therefore log. ^zrlog.^r, or log. —_ log. ^ • Thus it is required to determine the distance in which the velocity 1780 of a 24 pound ball (which is the me¬ dium velocity of such a ball discharged with 16 pounds of powder) will be reduced to 1500. Here d is 5.68, and therefore the loga¬ rithm of 2c(/is - - +3*7^7r J^og. 0.07433, of which the log. is 4-8.87116 Log. 0.43429 —9.63778 Therefore, log. 2 o log. d (4,5) log. V. (1600) 4-3.03236 4-0.65321 —3‘204i5 Log. of 3",035=5 - And . . S*. We shall conclude these examples by applying this Applica last rule to Mr Robins’s experiment on a musket bullet of 4 of an inch in diameter-, which had its velocity re-^ Ro( ‘ Log. S. 9833 feet - < ■ For the final velocity, < OD : OC=AC : BD, or e+t : antl 52 gives 138 for the 1670 ' r' 0.3774 proportion of the resistance to the weight, and makes the resistance 12.07 pounds, fully double of the other. It is to be observed that with this velocity, which greatly exceeds that with which the air can rush into a void, there must be a statical pressure of the atmo¬ sphere equal to 6^ pounds. This will make up the dif¬ ference, and allows us to conclude that the resistance arising solely from the motion communicated to the air follows very nearly the duplicate proportion of the ve¬ locity. .Tlie next experiment, with a velocity of 1690 feet, gives a resistance equal to 157 times the weight of the bullet, and this bears a much greater proportion to the former than I69o* does to 1670*, which shows, that although these experiments clearly demonstrate a pro¬ digious augmentation of resistance, yet they are by no means susceptible of the precision which is necessary tor discovering the law of this augmentation, or for a good foundation of practical rules 3 and it is still great¬ ly to be wished that a more accurate mode of investi¬ gation could be discovered. . Thus we have explained, in great detail, the princi¬ ples and the process of calculation for the simple case of tiie motion of projectiles through the air. The learn¬ ed reader will think that we have been unreasonably prolix, and that the whole might have been comprised m less room by taking the algebraic method. We ac¬ knowledge that it might have been done even in a few lines. But we have observed, and our observation has been confirmed by persons well versed in such subjects, ^ cases where the fluxionary process introduces the fluxion of a logarithm, there is a great want of di¬ stinct ideas to accompany the hand and eye. The so- ntion comes out by a sort ol magic or legerdemain, we cannot tell either or why. We therefore thought 1 onr duty to furnish the reader with distinct conceptions ot the things and quantities treated of. For this reason, a er jWmg, in Sir Isaac Newton’s manner, how the spaces described in the retarded motion of a projectile VOL. XVII. Part II. f followed the proportion of the hyperbolic areas we shewed the nature of another curve, where lines could nath°of?|W nCh m tlle very same manner as the path of the projectile increases j so that a point describ¬ ing the abscissa MI of this curve moves precisely as ie projectile does. Then, discovering that this line is the same with the line of logarithms on a Gunter’s scale, we shewed how the logarithm of a number really represents the path or space described by the projectile. Having thus, we hope, enabled the reader to con- ceive distinctly the quantities employed, we shall leave geometrical method, and prosecute the rest of the subject in a more compendious manner. culareaare\in thj TXt plaCe’ t0 consitler fl’e perpendi-Ofthepcr- cular ascents and descents of heavy projectiles, where Pedicular tlie resistance of the air is combined with the action 0f fscents ot‘ gravity: and we shall begin with the descents heavypro- Let a, as before, be the terminal velocity, and g the* ' w;th ThatUlgiP°-Ver °f Plvity : When the body moves w the velocity u, the resistance is equal to g; and in every other velocity v, we must have : v* — • g V9 o’ —T, =r, for the resistance to that velocity. In the descent the body js urged by gravity g, and opposed by the resistance^!; therefore the remaining acce¬ lerating force, which we shall call /, is g — g u*—g v> gru*—v*\ ’0r-H—>=/ g v or u* Now the fundamental theorem for varied motions is fs—a v, and s~ r: U- v J g j r—, and s rr *—-7T g + C* N°w the fluent of —^— '{ .* —v* „ = —hyperb. log. ofy'aW. For the fluxion of -» and this divided by the sTu'— ■V* is y/ u*—1 quantity Vu>—v\ of which it is the fluxion, gives precisely — , which is therefore the fluxion of Its hyperbolic logarithm. Therefore S- u v g ^ Where L means the hyperbolic lo¬ garithm of the quantity annexed to it, and A may be used to express its common logarithm. (See article Fluxions). Hie constant quantity C for completing the fluent is determined from this consideration, that the space described is 0, when the velocity is 0: therefore C — XL vV= 0, and C = —XL , and the * & ~ complete fluent S = x ^ ^ — v%t g u* ^ f ux =—x L V-1—— = - O' 'If* 7 7* X A g . ' f~v' ‘ 0’43429<§' , u-~v or (putting M for 0.43429, the modulus or subtangent of the common logistic curve) =~r-—x 3 F ^ u*~v* This 4io , and P r 0 J E C This equation establishes the relation between the space fallen through, and the veloc.ty acqmred_by the . £■ S T / U% - fall. We obtain by it r-_.lW u%—y* ’ S_T or, which is still more conveni- ux if—v*’ M x 2^ s _ JU?_— that is. eaual to ent for us, ^ u'—v" ’ 4 the logarithm of a certain number: therefore having found the natural number corresponding to the fractio consider it as a logarithm, and take out the number corresponding to it: call this n. Then, since n is equal to we have nu'—nv1 — «*, and nv*—v?—nv', or n v' — u' X n — v, and v if X”—1 To expedite all the computations on this subject, it will be convenient to have multipliers ready computed for M X 2£, and its half, . viz. 27,794, whose log. is - - and 13,897 " " " r,•’ But v may be found much more expeditiously by observing that J is lhe seca''t of an arc'' 0f a circle whose radius is «, and whose sine is v, or whose radius is unity and sine = ^: therefore, consi¬ dering the above fraction as a logarithmic secant, look for it in the tables, and then take the sine ol the arc ot which this is the secant, and multiply it by u; the pro¬ duct is the velocity required. . We shall take an example of a ball whose terminal velocity is 6894 feet, and ascertain its velocity after a fall of 1848 feet. Here, 7/2=47C200 and its log. u =689} £ =32 - - - S =1848 Then log. 27,794 ' - - log. S log. if - = 5.67688 2.83844 3.26670 + 1-44396 -j- 5.26670 — 5.67688 Log. of 0,10809 = log. n 9-°3378 XjOg. ui U, luuwy .Wg. ~ V_ 0,10809 is the logarithm of 1,2826— ft, and n 1 0,2826, and —— = 323>6% := rl, an^ v 323>6- In like manner, 0,054045 (which is half of 0,10809) will be found to be the logarithmic secant of 28 , whose sine 0,46947 multiplied by 689^ gives 324 for the ve¬ locity. The process of this solution suggests a very perspicu¬ ous manner of conceiving the law of descent j and it may be thus expressed : M is to the logarithm of the secant of an arch whose sine is—, and radius 1, as 2a is to the height through u which the body must fall in order to acquire the velo¬ city v. Thus, to take the same example. tiles. 1. Let the height h be sought which will produce the velocity 323,62 the terminal velocity of the ball being u* . 323,62 689,44. Here 2 a, or y is 14850, antl 689,34“" o 46947, which is the sine of 28°. The logarithmic secant of this arch is 0,05407. Now M or 0,43429 : 0,05407=14850: 1848, thelielShtwante“' , , , 2. Required the velocity acquired by the body by falling 1848 feet. Say 14850 : 1848 = 0,43429 : o o C407. Look for this number among the logarith¬ mic secants. It will be found at 28°, of which the lo¬ garithmic sine is - - ■ ^'q^q 1 Add to this the log. of w - - 2.83844 The sum - - . - . 2:-5xoo5 is the logarithm of 323,62, the veloc.ty required. We mav observe, from these solutions, that the ac¬ quired velocity continually approaches to, but never equals, the terminal velocity. For it is always expres¬ sed by the sine of an arch of which the terminal veloci- tv is the radius. We cannot help taking notice here Errow of a very strange assertion of Mr Muller late professor^ jt of mathematics and director of the royal academy at Woolwich. He maintains, in his 1 realise on Lunnery, his Treatise of Fluxions, and in many of his numerous works, that a body cannot possibly move through the air with a greater velocity than this-, and he makes this a fundamental principle, on which he establishes a theo¬ ry of motion in a resisting medium, which he asserts with great confidence to be the only just theory; say¬ ing, that all the investigations ot Bernoulli, Euler, Ro¬ bins, Simpson, and others, are erroneous. ^ e use this strong expression, because, in his criticisms on the works of those celebrated mathematicians, be lays aside good manners, and taxes them not only with ignorance, bu with dishonesty -, saying, for instance, that it required no small dexterity in Robins to confirm by his experi¬ ments a theory founded on false principles 3 a«d jhat Thomas Simpson, in attempting to conceal his obliga¬ tions to him for some valuable propositions, by chan¬ ging their form, had ignorantly fal en into gross errors. ^ Nothing can be more palpably absurd than this asse - tion of Mr Muller. A blown bladder will have but a small terminal velocity *, and when ^ing with tW velocity, or one very near it, there can be no doubt that it will be made to move much swifter by a smart stroke. Well the assertion true, it would be impossible for a nortion of air to be put into motion through the re > for to terminal velocity is nothing Yet tins author makes this assertion a principle of argument, saying, that it is impossible that a ball can issue from the mouth of a cannon with a greater velocity than this ; and tta Robins and others are grossly mistaken, when t y g them velocities three or four times greater, and resist ances which are 10 or 20 times greater than is possib ; mid by thus compensating his small velocities by stilt II5; resistance's, be confirms his theory by many periments adduced in support ol the others, son whatever can be given lor the assertion. -a r 4- U ^ l- tut h n n r, the first who observed that there was a limil to the velocity which gravity “U communicate to a body ; and this limit was « his commentators to be a term to which i ' , f * convenient to refer all its other motions. It there^ 6i ] don of ody pro ed became an object of attention j and Mr Muller, through inadvertency, or want of discernment, has fallen into this mistake, and with that arrogance and self-conceit which mark all his writings, has made this mistake a fundamental principle, because it led him to establish a novel set of doctrines on this subject. He was fretted at the superior knowledge and talents of Mr Simpson, his inferior in the academy, and was guilty of several mean attempts to hurt his reputation. But they were unsuccessful. We might proceed to consider the motion of a body • projected downwards. While the velocity of projection is less than the terminal velocity, the motion is deter¬ mined by what we have already said : for we must com¬ pute the height necessary for acquiring this velocity in the air, and suppose the motion to have begun there. But if the velocity of projection be greater, this method fails. We pass it over (though not in the least more difficult than what has gone before), because it is of mere curiosity, and never occurs in any interesting case. We may just observe, that since the motion is swifter than the terminal velocity, the resistance must be great¬ er than the weight, and the motion will be retarded. The very same process will give us for the space describ- V being the velocity of pro- PKOJECTILES. If 3 Bkion bi teen tliime ci scent aupace —-jrf—X • This fluent g u — V u—V needs no constant quantity to complete it, or rather C=:o,' for tmust be rro when urro. This will evi¬ dently be the case: for then L J is T */—, — u—v L*, =o. . J U -j- V A L+V . and LV or ^^ , is always an abstract number, multiplying this time. We may illustrate this rule by the same example. In what time will the body acquire the velocity 323,62? Here u + v — 1012,96, u—v — 365,72 j ’ therefore u 22122, an(i ~ (in feet and seconds) is Now, for greater perspicuity, convert the 41 F vT-X Aa/—^-sig signify But how does this quantity n— ’ J M^* • ' u—v time ? Observe, that in whatever numbers, or by what¬ ever units of space and time, u and g are expressed, “ expresses the number of units of time in which the ve¬ locity u is communicated or extinguished by gravity j /«+ v V -—=0. . u lu '=wr x a v - + ^ . into a proportion : thus 21",542 equation . u—v M i /u-\-v u ^ and we have °»43429 : 0,22122 “ 21 542 • 10",973 the time required. This is by far the most distinct way of conceiving the subject 5 and we should always keep in mind that the numbers or symbols which we call logarithms are really parts ot the line MI in the figure of the logistic curve, and that the motion of a point in this line is pre¬ cisely similar to that of the body. The Marquis Po- leni, in a dissertation published at Padua in 1725, has with great ingenuity constructed logarithmics suited to all the cases which can occur. Herman, in his Pharo- nomia, has borrowed much of Poleni’s methods, but has obscured them by an affectation of language geometri¬ cally precise, but involving the very obscure notion of abstract ratios. It is easy to see that is the cotangent of the ^ complement of an arch, whose radius is 1, and whose sine is —: For let IvG (fig. 6.) be “?/, and Fig, BE—d; then KD=:a-f7;, and DA=r«—v. Join KB and BA, and draw CG parallel to KB. Now GA is the tangent of 4 BA, =4 complement of HB. Then, by similarity of triangles, GA : AC—All— : BK— V^AD rvODKrzV^z/—v : Vu4-v and (== cotan. GA v yBA)— j therefore look for-— among the na- u—v u 0 • V tural sines, or for log. - among the logarithmic sines, and take the logarithmic cotangent of the half comple¬ ment of the corresponding arch. This, considered as a common number, will be the second term of our pro¬ portion. This is a shorter process than the former. By reversing this proportion we get the velocity cor¬ responding to a given time. To compare this descent of 1848 feet in the air Fall of a with the fall of the body in vacuo during the same *J°dy >u aw time, say 21",542* :848 : 1926,6, which,3’^ makes a difference of 79 feet. of onet« • vacuo, Coi\ 1. The time iu which the body acquires the velocity u by falling through the air, is to the time of acquiring the same velocity by falling in vacuo, as u. L ~ to i> j for it would acquire this velocity in 3 F 2 vacuo 412 projectiles. vacuo during the time —, and it acquires it in the air in & wT fu+v the time -L/v • g u—v 2. The velocity which the body acquires hy falling through the air in the time lS to ^ie ve^°‘ city which it would acquire in vacuo during the same time, as ^ to « L *J v : ■^or t^ie ve^oc^y a which it would acquire in vacuo during the time - Here — will be found the tangent of 30.48!, the lo- a garithmic secant of which is 0,06606. Ihis, multi¬ plied by^-, gives 2259 feet for the height. It would have risen 2640 feet in a void. 66 Suppose this body to lall down again. We can Velocity compare the velocity of projection with the velocity projectic with which it again reaches the ground. The ascent compare ya3 _j_ V2 . with wlii —— , which it reach u . the grou multiplies the constant factor in the ascent, is equal to *Ju-\-v must be a L */ u— Ju-\-v (because in any time ~ the velocity w is acquired). Time of In the next place, let a body, whose terminal velo- the ascent city is a, be projected perpendicularly upwards, with of a body any velocity V. It is required to determine the height projected to which it ascends, so as to have any remaining velo- cularly.1" city alltl the time itS a8Cent \ as alf° tlle and time in which its whole motion will be extin¬ guished. c , • c v We have now ^! lor the expression ot J; u* for both gravity and resistance act now in the same di¬ rection, and retard the motion of the ascending body: • • • a* vv therefore ——^ and s——g X > and ,=-^x/-^+C, =-!xW“'+'-'‘+ g if+v* g C (see art. Fluxions). This must be =0 at the be¬ ginning of the motion, that is, when ■wzzV, that is —— X Lv/,7>+V7" +C=o, or C=—X S i U r / : and the complete fluent will be — X IJV a* + ‘l; — g /a2 + V2 a* /a2 + V* V^O-yXW M^X^V a2_j_^a- Let h be the greatest height to which the body will rise. Then s z= h /a2 4-^ * /“a + L J — mT X A a/ — J , the multiplier in the descent. The first is ^ u'—v*' * the secant of an arch whose tangent is "V7 5 the other is the secant of an arch whose sine is v. These secants are equal, or the arches are the same} therefore the ve¬ locity of projection is to the final returning velocity as the tangent to the sine, or as the radius to the cosine of the arch. Thus suppose the body projected with the terminal velocity, or V—a; then V— If ^ = 689, ^=487. . We must in the last place ascertain the relation ot the space and the time. Here ——T—- t=—v, and t= X —j, — and t —a r = -T*f» a*4-^2 -}- C. Now when v ■= 0; and = — X g mV We ha,e , therefore X = ^ a* + ■y* a2 ? \ u*-\-v*J a2 Therefore let n be the number whose common logarithm . 2M^r 1 n u a2-J-^ 3 j , a2-[-W is we shall have n— — and v — a1 u*-\-vx n —a2 } and thus we obtain the relation of r and if, as in the case of descents : but we obtain it still easier by ob¬ serving that u7, V2 is the secant of an arch whose radius is a, and whose tangent is V, and that ^s/aa-|-‘a* is the secant of another arch of the same circle, whose tangent is v. Let the same ball be projected upwards with the ve¬ locity 411,05 feet per second. Required the whole height to which it will rise ? u* u u v ~~g X + fart. Fluxions) / f % is an arch whose tangent v ^ a2-]-^2 erj # W ^ \ — - and radius 1; therefore —~ Xarc* tan* r u 7 g u u This must be = 0 when by which a body moving in a resisting medium might describe any proposed curve, reducing the whole to the simplest geometry. This is perhaps the most elegant specimen which he has given of his great talents Dr Keill proposed to him the particular problem of he trajectory and motion of a body moving through t Sto-of the most difficult Bernoull, very soon solved the problem in a way much more genera had been proposed, viz. without any limitation either the law of resistance, the law of the centripetal force, or the law of density, provided only that they ^re^ ^ and capable of being expressed algebraically. Dr Brook Taylor, the celebrated author of the Method of lucre melts, solved it at the same time, in the limited form Tn which it was proposed. Other authors since that time have given other solutions. But they ar® a11 ^ indeed they must be) the same in substance with B - noulli’s. Indeed they are all (Bernoulli’s not excepted) the same with Newton’s first approximations, modified by the steps introduced into the investigation of the spiral motions mentioned above-, and we still think it most strange that Sir Isaac did not perceive that the ‘variation of curvature, which he introduced m that vestigation, made the whole difference between his ap¬ proximations and the complete solution. This we shafi Lint out as we go along. And we now proceed to the Bernoulli’s ^ oblem itself, of which we shall give Bernoulli s solu- S0lnt,0n- tion, restricted to the case of uniform density and a re¬ sistance proportional to the square of the velocity. This solution is more simple and perspicuous than any that has since appeared. would cause the body to describe uniformly in the time /with the velocity which it generates in that time. Let this be resolved into «N,by which it deflects the body into a curvilineal path, and m n, by which it retards the ascent and accelerates the descent of the body along the tangent. The resistance of the air acts solely in retard¬ ing the motion, both in ascending and descending, and has no deflective tendency. The whole action of gra¬ vity then is to its accelerating or retarding tendency as /» N to w n, or (by similarity of triangles) as m M to mo. Or i : y =,§• : a™1 the whoie retar(latIon ln the ascent will be r+^. The same fluxionary symbol cy. will express the retardation during the descent, because in the descent the ordinates decrease, and y is a nega¬ tive quantity. The diminution of velocity is — v. This is propor¬ tional to the retarding force and to the time of its action jointly, and therefore — > ^llt ^ie time / is as the space z divided by the velocity v \ therefore _i=r+Sx2, = -^. and—= - * v 25 r'% fy—fLJL gy. Because w N is the deflection Fig. 7* Problem. To determine the trajectory, and all the circumstances of the motion of a body projected through the air from A (fig. 7-).in the direction AB, and resisted in the duplicate ratio of the velocity. M l* by gravity, it is as the force g and the square of the time /jointly (the momentary action being held as uniform), We have therefore w N, or — y=g A (Observe that N is in fact only the half of—y J but g being twice the fall of a heavy body in a second, we have —y strict- z* ' - " g ly equal to g /*). But tz— } therefore — y , Let the arch AM be put=«, the time of describing it t, the’ abscissa AP=.r, the ordinate PM_y. Let the velocity in the point M=t>, and let MN=*, be described in the moment *; let r be the resistance of the air, £ the force of gravity, measured by the ve¬ locity which it will generate in a second ; ami let a be the height through which a heavy body must fall in va¬ cuo to acquire the velocity which would render the resistance of the air equal to its gravity : so that we have r-lL. because, for any velocity u, and producing 2a and and — v* y = g The fluxion of —!/ this equation [s—v* y — 2v‘i, v = 2g z but, be¬ cause %-.y = mU:mo, = m^ : mn, = y: z, wehave z z ~ y y. Therefore 2gy y — 2g zz,z= v y 2vyv, and — 2vvy—vxy — 11 g V ih and g y. But we have already — v v =■ • v y v v zz. —4- 2y U height h, we have Let M m touch the curve in M -, draw the ordinate v N m, and draw M o, N n perpendicular to^ N^ and Mw. Then we have MN =i, and Mo=a;, also m o is ultimately =ry and M m is ultimately=MN or as. 74 Lastly, let us suppose x to be a constant quantity, the Action oi ejernentary ordinates being supposed equidistant. a^ven The action of gravity during the time / may be measured by m N, which is half the space which it 3 time. tJL-g j; therefore , ond £-»»y 4 = 2« # y a y is 7 or o y = * y» for the fluxionary equation of the U .. L'j CUIVf we put this into the form of a proportion, ... . the lei have a : ’z — y • y- Now this evidently establishes a re-oft|1(J lation between the length of the curve and its yanation ufVe of curvature 5 and between the curve itself and ts ev M^^ luta, which are the very circumstances introd^ on cU'vatl P R O J E C Newton into his investigation of the spiral motions. And L. is evidently an equation connected 4^5 the equation is y y with the logarithmic curve and the logarithmic spiral. But we must endeavour to reduce it to a lower order of fluxions, before we can establish a relation between x, and y. Let p express the ratio of y to .v, that is, let p be = t—, or p x—y. It is evident that this expresses the x inclination of the tangent at M to the horizon, and that p is the tangent of this inclination, radius being unity. Or it may be considered merely as a number, multiply¬ ing x, so as to make it z=.y. We now have y1 — pr #*, and since iz*— -j- ^*, we have z* = .v2 -j- p1 — 1 +i>* X at*, and %—x ,^/1 -\-p*. Moreover, because we have supposed the abscissa x to increase uniformly, and therefore x to be constant, we have y—a? p, and y=.xp. Now let q express the ratio of p to a?, that is, make -^-r — q, ov q x zz p. x This gives us x q~p, and ** q—x p, —y. , By these substitutions our former equation a y~% y changes to a x* q xx x 1 -j- p*| x py or a y — p s! 1 + P2> and, taking the fluent on both sides, we have a y—f'p nA +i3* +C, C being the constant quantity required for completing the fluent according to the li¬ miting conditions of the case. Now x =—, and— £> q ‘ q J Tt 1 ai 1 • Therefore a?— z=-J\- Also, since y—pxy — —, we have 7/— a pp Ps/i+p'\+C Alsoizri \/T+jF\ —- aP '/l+P'\ Pv/i+^l+C The values of xy yy %f give us /• . > —‘y ”=f- a p p PP ^ —— U M ——————— «■ ^ j Pv/i+^l-j-C j'p \/i+p'\+C 1 +PZ\P _.j' P y/i +P% jfi P 1+Pt\+C J) P J1 ^-P^V The process therefore of describing the trajectory is, \sty to find q in terms of p by the area of the curve whose abscissa is p and the ordinate is i-j-y*. tiles. ldy W e get x by the area of another curve whose abscissa isy, and the ordinate is —. q 3d, We gety by the area of a third curve whose ab¬ scissa is py and the ordinate is —. q T he problem of the trajectory is therefore complete¬ ly solved, because we have determined the ordinate, ab¬ scissa, and arch of the curve for any given position of 76 its tangent. It now only remains to compute the mag-To com- nitudes of these ordinates and abscissae, or to draw them pute t.he, by a geometrical construction. Butin this consists theoTth^ordi- difhculty. Ihe areas of these curves, which express thenateand lengths of x and y, can neither be computed nor*exhi-al)Scissa- bited geometrically, by any accurate method yet disco¬ vered, and we must content ourselves with approxima¬ tions. These render the description of the trajectory exceedingly difficult and tedious, so that little advantage has as yet been derived from the knowledge we have got of its properties. It will however greatly assist our con¬ ception of the subject to proceed some length in this construction y for it must be acknowledged that very few distinct notions accompany a mere algebraic opera¬ tion, especially if in any degree complicated, which we confess is the case in the present question. Let B m NR (fig. 8.) be an equilateral hyperbola, of Plate which B is the vertex, BA the semitransverse axis, CCCCXLII* which we shall assume for the unity of length. Let AV fig- 8. be the semiconjugate axis = BA, = unity, and AS the assymptote, bisecting the right angle BAY. Let PN, fi n be two ordinates to the conjugate axis, exceedingly near to each other. Join BP, AN, and draw B 5, N » perpendicular to the assymptote, and BC parallel to AP. It is well known that BP is equal to NP. Therefore PN* =:BAa -j- AP*. Now since BA—1, if we make AP—yi of our formulae, PN is ^ i-±p*y and Pyis= p, and the area BAPNB p V1 -j-y*|: That is to say, the number^j p +y?* (for it is a number) has the same proportion to unity of number that the area BAPNB has to BCVA, the unit of surface. This area consists of two parts, the triangle APN, and the hyperbolic sector ABN. APN zr -J- AP X PN, — \ p x/l +p2, and the hyperbolic sector ABNzrBN y /3, which is equivalent to the hyperbolic logarithm of the number represented by A y when A /3 is unity. There¬ fore it is equal to 4 the logarithm of yi -j- ^y/7 -f-p*. Hence wre see by the bye thaty p 1 y>*— 4P +y>* + £ hyperbolic logarithm ju + 1 + P*- Now let AMD be another curve, such that its ordi¬ nates V my PD, &c. may be proportional to the areas AB m V, ABNP and may have the same proportion to AB, the unity of length, which these areas have to ABCV, the unity of surface. Then VM : VCzr V m BA : VCBA, and PD : P ^zzPNBA : VCBA, &c. These ordinates will now represent^^ p \ -j-p* with reference to a linear unit, as the areas to the hyperbola represented it in reference to a superficial unit. Again, 416 P B O J E Again, in every ordinate make PD : P 3—P ^ 1 and thus we obtain a reciprocal to PD, or to C T I L E S. will describe similar trajectories if the velocities are in the subduplicate ratio ol the diameters. Ibis we shall^^75 tne SUDUUpiicaie ui ~ . To deter find to be of considerable practical importance. But let ^ (]^ i , ! 4-1-*/-v in tnp fliflPr- . y* /—;—r • 1 nl. —-p. This us now proceed to determine the velocity in the differ- velocity 5 ’ ^ Vi +P » or equivale J ’ p Ji +p* ent polllts of the trajectory, and the time of describing different its several portions. # points. Recollect, therefore, that v2= and that V will evidently he 4-, and POo^will be and the area contained between the lines AF, AW^ and the curve GEOH, and cut off by the ordinate PO, will represent = «*i +p* and y = * p. This gives t>*= —g-xi+p* ° Lastly, make PO : PQ=:AV : AP, =1 : p ! and then PQ qp will represent and the area ALEQP But p — qx. Therefore v' — , _ —g X l+P% _ —agi+p' if will represent But we must here observe, that the fluents expressed by these different areas require what is called the cor- rection to accommodate them to the circumstances ot the case. It is not indifferent from what ordinate we begin to reckon the areas. This depends on the initial direction of the projectile, and that point of the abscis- aa AP must be taken for the commencement oi an the areas which gives a value of p suited to the initial di¬ rection. Thus, if the projection has been made from Fig. 7. A (fig. 7.) at an elevation of 450, the ratio of the fluxions * and y is that of equality, and therefore the Fig- S. point E of fig. 8. where the two curves intersect and have a common ordinate, evidently corresponds to this condition. The ordinate EV passes through V, so that AV 01* ;i=AB, =1, = tangent 450, as the case re¬ quires. The values of * and of y corresponding to any other point of the trajectory, such as that which has AI for the tangent of the angle which it makes with the horizon, are now to be had by computing the areas VEOP, VEQP. Another curve might have been added, ot which the ordinates would exhibit the fluxions of the arch of the apsJ'+P trajectory xs ^ V1+P,[ + C V a sj—gs/1 +F ■, and v - xf—s1+P\ - ^ f P 1 +^*I + C .. : +7* _ Also t was found ——, — — , — P V/l w If we now substitute for v its value q v . . f> , ^p just found, we obtain t ——- —and t — / . J s/—gq " ^/—hq sj~ -S(l p Va a f- J—g j'p v/i+p*i+c’ sj—g x ^j'p V^l+c -, and of which the area V/l+/l + C •would exhibit the arch itself. And this would have . . p J1+P1 been very easy, for it is *p ^7+7] + C ’ which is evidently the fluxion of the hyperbolic loga¬ rithm of/; P Ji+p'V But it is needless, since » r= x y/i+p', and we have already got x. It is only in- 7? creasing PO in the ratio ofBA to BP. _ Consequen- And thus we have brought the investigation of this eesof problem to considerable length, having ascertained the knowing form of the trajectory. This is surely done when the tfip. form J . 1 1 _i onrl flip nnsitinn The greatest difficulty still remains, viz. the accom- modating these formulae, which appear abundantly sim-^-jccon pie, to the particular cases. It would seem at first modatinj sight, that all trajectories are similar 5 since the ratio 0^!ie^0™ the fluxions of the ordinate and abscissa corresponding any particular angle of inclination to the horizon seems cages the same in them all : but a due attention to what has been hitherto said on the subject will show us that vye have as yet only been able to ascertain the velocity in the point of the trajectory, which has a certain inclina¬ tion to the horizon, indicated by the quantity p, and the time (reckoned from some assigned beginning) when the projectile is in that point. To obtain absolute measures of these quantities, the term of commencement must be fixed upon. This will be expressed by the constant quantity C, which is assumed for completing the fluent of p 1 +/, which is the basis of the whole construction. We there found q -» the form of the arch) al)SCiss, and ordinate, and the position hjetory^' of its tangent, is determined in every point. But it is still very far from a solution, and much remains to be done before we can make any practical application of it. The only general consequence that we can deduce from the premises is, that in every case where the resistance in any point bears the same proportion to the force of gravity, the trajectory will be similar. Therefore, two balls, of the same density, projected in the same direction, 9 p s/1 -WA This fluent is in general q = a !, and the constant quantity C is to Kb be accommodated to some circumstances of the case. Different authors have selected different circumstances. Euler, B luS PEOJECTILES. S3 Euler, in Ills Commentary on Robins, and in a disserta- 'd the”6* ti°n *n t^e ^emo,rs °f Academy of Berlin publish- ’plest ili 1753> takfs the vertex of the curve for the begin¬ ning of his abscissa and ordinate. This is the simplest method of any, for C must then be so chosen that the whole fluent may vanish when p=o, which is the case in the vertex of the curve, where the tangent is paral¬ lel to the horizon. We shall adopt this method. Therefore, let AP (fig. 9.) —.r, PM AM = 2;. Put the quantity C which is introduced into the fluent 417 equal to It is plain that n must be a number j for it must be homologous with p^/1 -f. p\ which is a number. For brevity’s sake let us express the fluent of p s/1 +p* by the single letter P j and thus we shall P .. -P PP > ‘* = a X have x=z a x T~ «/ 1 J'pj'^+P end®- the accelerating force of gravity by the statical effect of the air’s gravity. But, as we have already observed, this is too trifling to be attended to in military projectiles. y_ 'v was made equal to p. Therefore the ra¬ dius of curvature, determined by the ordinary me- ;Q -v C1 +/?*) (\/i+/>a) P thods, is *+r , and, because —p is * Simpson> P Fluxions, 6S, Sec. for the descending branch of the curve, the radius of curvature at M 1 \/1 + /;* in the ascending branch at N, it is *4/ therefore P, or / p \/ 1 + which is = -^- must be , . a taken negatively. Therefore, in the ascending branch, we have AQ or x (increasing as we recede from A)— ° or y=a x/V— ; ’ AN or * = Vol. XVII. Part II. f n+P *> and* It :„ax I+PiX\/T+p* ?7Hp '• On both sides, therefore, when the velocity is infinitely great, and P by this means supposed to equal or exceed n, the radius of curvature is also infinitely great. We also see that the two branches are unlike each other, and that when p is the same in both, that is, when the tan¬ gent is equally inclined to the horizon, the radius of curvature, the ordinate, the absciss, and the arch, are all greater in the ascending branch. This is pretty ob- 3 G vious* 418 P R O J E C vious. For as the resistance acts entirely in diminishing the velocity, and does not affect the deflection occasionec bv gravity, it must allow gravity to incuryate the pat s« dfich the more (with the same inclination of its hne of action) as the velocity is more diminished. 1 he curvature, therefore, in those points which have the same inclination of the tangent, is greatest in the de¬ scending branch, and the motion is swiftest m the ascending branch. It is otherwise in a void, where both sides are alike. Here u becomes infinite, or there is no terminal velocity •, and n also becomes infinite, being a ~~ 2h' n . . — It is therefore in the quantity P, or ^ ^ V 1 » that the difference between the trajectory in a void and in a resisting medium consists j it is this quantity w 11c 1 expresses the accumulated change of the ratio of the increments of the ordinate and absciss. In vacuo the second increment of the ordinate is constant when the first increment of the abscissa is so, and the whole increment of the ordinate is as 1+^. And this ditte- rence is so much the greater as P is greater in respect of n. P is nothing at the vertex, and increases along with the angle M'TP j and when this is a right angle, P is infinite. The trajectory in a resisting medium will come therefore to deviate infinitely from a para¬ bola, and may even deviate farther from it than the parabola deviates from a straight line. '1 hat is, the di¬ stance of the body in a given moment from that point of its parabolic path where it would have been in a void, is greater than the distance between that point 0 the parabola from the point of the straight line where it would have been, independent of the action of gra¬ vity. This must happen whenever the resistance is great¬ er than the weight of the body, which is generally the case in the beginning of the trajectory in military pro¬ jectiles •, and this (were it now necessary) is enough to show the inutility of the parabolic theory. Although we have no method of describing this 8? trajectory” which would be received by the ancient Several geometers, we may ascertain several properties of it, ofTasoer- which will assist us in the solution of the problem. In tained. particular, we can assign the absolute length of any part of it by means of the logistic curve. For because P -p zy/i -{-?*> vfe flave P \/1 "^P* ~ ^>’ ant^ ^iere* «-f-P and Am tiles. q its position at m; then AM = a X log- _ a x ]0„. and therefore M w is = a X log. ° n Thus we can find the values of a great num- =/* fore 25, which was -f — ? may be expressed by logarithms ; or 2; — a J n -\-V M -}-P x fiyp- l°g- °f since at the vertex A, where ss must be 0, P is also — 0. Being able, in this way, to ascertain the length AM of the curve (counted from the vertex), corresponding to any inclination p of the tangent at its extremity M, we can ascertain the length of any portion of it, such as M/«, by first finding the length of the part A m, and then of the part AM. This we do more expeditiously thus. Let p express the position of the tangent in M,and «+P‘ her of small portions and the inclination of the tan¬ gents at their extremities. Then to each of these por¬ tions we can assign its proportion of the abscissa and ordinate, without having recourse to the values of x and y. For the portion of absciss corresponding to the arch Mw, whose middle point is inclined to the horizon m the angle b, will be M m X cosine b, and the corresponding portion of the ordinate will be X sin. b. Ihen we obtain the velocity in each part of the curve by the equation h=\ay. 1+/*; or, more directly the velocity „ at M will be = Wly. tlle length of the little arch by this, and the quotient will be the time of describing Mm very nearly. Add all these together, and we obtain the whole time of describing the arch AM, but a little too great, because the mo¬ tion in the small arch is not perfectly uniform. I he error, however, may be as small as we please, because we may make the arch as small as we please J and ior greater accuracy, it will be proper to take the p by which we compute the velocity, a medium bet'v^« the p for the beginning and that for the end of H1 This is the method followed by Euler, who was one^ of the most expert analysts, if not the very first m Lu- thod pn rope. It is not the most elegant, and the methods offerred. some other authors, who approximate directly tothe areas of the curves which determine the values of x and y, have a more scientific appearance j but they are not ultimate¬ ly very different: For, in some methods, these areas are taken piecemeal, as Euler takes the arch j and by the methods of others, who give the value of the areas by Newton’s method of describing a curve of the parabolic kind through any number of given points, the ordinates of these curves, which express x and y, must be taken singly, which amounts to the same thing, with the great disadvantage of a much more complicated calcu¬ lus, as any one may see by comparing the expressions of x and y with the expressions of 25. As to those me- -f C,or = aX thods which approximate directly to the areas or va¬ lues of * and y by an infinite series, they all, witho exception, involve us in most complicated expres»io , with coefficients of sines and tangents, and am ig signs, and engage us in a calculation almost endle». And we know of no series which converges fast enoug to give us tolerable accuracy, without such a num e terms as is sufficient to deter any person from the at¬ tempt. The calculation of the arches is very moi - rate, so that a person tolerably versant in arithmetical operations may compute an arch with its velocity and time in about five minutes. M e have therefo sitation in preferring this method of Euler s to all that we have seen, and therefore proceed to deteimin • • other circumstances which render its application general. jf ; app'ica in made ire gone 1 diole is ar- f * flu- P K 0 j £ If there were no resistance, the smallest velocity would he at the vertex of the curve, and it would immediately increase by the action of gravity conspiring (in however ' small degree) with the motion of the body. But in a Resisting medium, the velocity at the vertex is diminish¬ ed by a quantity to which the acceleration of gravity in that point bears no assignable proportion. It is there- fofe diminished, upon the whole, and the point of smal¬ lest velocity is a little way beyond the vertex. For the same reasons, the greatest curvature is a little way be¬ yond the vertex. It is not very material for our pre¬ sent purpose to ascertain the exact positions of those points. The velocity in the descending branch augments con¬ tinually : but it cannot exceed a certain limit, if the ve¬ locity at the vertex has been less than the terminal velo¬ city, for when the curve is infinite,^ is also infinite, and h— ”p-> because a in this case is nothing in respect of P, which is infinite; and becausep is infinite, the num¬ ber hyp. log. p x ^i +p\ though infinite, vanishes in comparison with/7 x Vi +p'; so that in this case P— £-/7l, and h—a, and v— the terminal velocity. If, on the other hand, the velocity at the vertex has been greater than the terminal velocity, it will diminish continually, and when the curve has become infinite v will be equal to the terminal velocity. In either case we see that the curve on this side will have a perpendicular assymptote. It would require a long and pretty intricate analysis to determine the place of this assymptote, and it is not material for our present purpose. . The place and position of the other assymp¬ tote LO is of the greatest moment. It evidently di¬ stinguishes the kind of trajectory from any other. Its position depends on this circumstance, that if/7 marks the position of the tangent, rc—P, which is the deno¬ minator of the fraction expressing the square of the ve¬ locity, must be equal to nothing, because the velocity 13 Infinite : tberefbre, jn this place, P — «, 0r n - +7 ^1 +P1- order, therefore, to find the point L, where the assymptote LO cuts the horizontal line AL, put P=r«, then will AL—at—■ y \J n—¥ pJ n—P / . ^ ev*dent that the logarithms used in these expres¬ sions are the natural or hyperbolic. But the operations may be performed by the common tables, by making the value of the arch M m of the curve — v W , r, M s * ^ “f“ Q q f ^ ^TjTp, °cc* wbere M means the subtangent of the com¬ mon logarithms, or 0,43429; also the time of descri¬ bing this arch will be expeditiously had by taking a medium p, between the values of C T I L E S. process we have only learned how to compute the mo¬ tion from the vertex in the descending branch till the ball has acquired a particular direction, and the motion to the vertex from a point of the ascending branch where the ball has another direction, and all this de¬ pending on the greatest velocity which the body can acquire by falling, and the velocity which it has in the vertex of the curve. But the usual question is, “ What Will be the motion of the ball projected in a certain direction with a certain velocity ?” The mode of application is this: Suppose a traiecto- ry computed for a particular terminal velocity, produced by the fall a, and for a particular velocity at the vertex which will be characterized by n, and that the velocity at that point of the ascending branch where the incli¬ nation of the tangent is 30° is 900 feet per second. J hen, we are certain, that if a ball, whose terminal ve¬ locity is that produced by the fall a, be projected with tfmveJocity of 900 feet per second, and an elevation of 3p , it will describe this very trajectory, and the velo¬ city and time corresponding to every point will be such as is here determined. Now this trajectory will, in respect to form, answer an infinity of cases: for its characteristic is the propor- tion of the velocity in the vertex to the terminal velo- city. When this proportion is the same, the number n will be the same. If, therefore, we compute the tra- jectories for a sufficient variety of these proportions, we shall hnd a trajectory that will nearly correspond to any case that can be proposed : and an approximation suftf- ciently exact will be had by taking a proportional me¬ dium between the two trajectories which come nearest to the case proposed. Accordingly a set of tables or trajectories have been computed by the Engl.sh translator of Euler’s Com- tabu. “ mentary on Itobins’s Gunnery. They are in number 18, trajecto- distinguished by the position of the assymptote of the rks- ascending branch. This is given for 50, io°, 150, &c. to 85°, and the whole trajectory is computed as far as it can ever be supposed to extend in practice. The follow¬ ing table gives the value of the number « corresponding to each position of the assymptote. 419 OLB 10 J5 20 25 30 35 40 OLB 0,00000 0,08760 0,17724 0,27712 d»37i85 0,48269 0,60799 °»75382 0,92914 45 5° 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 1,14779 M3236 1,82207 2j39°33 3,29040 4,88425 8,22357 17,54793 67,12291 and making the time = ^a ^1 -\~P , ^1 +(r —, and — Vn-j-P */ iz-j-Q X log. '4-Q Motiof ,.-*88 I* dee. M«y/y ~ "js-^+p- such then is the process by which the form and mag- 1 u e of the trajectory, and the motion in it, may be e ermined. But it does not yet appear how this is to fie applied to any question in practical artillery. In this Since the path of a projectile is much less incurvated, and more rapid in the ascending than in the descending branch, and the difference is so much the more remark¬ able in great velocities; it must follow, that the range on a horizontal or inclined plane depends most on the ascending branch : therefore the greatest range will not be made with that elevation which bisects the angle of position, but with a lower elevation; and the deviation from the bisecting elevation will be greater as the initial 3^2 velocities 420 projectiles. velocities are greater. It Is very difficult to frame an exact rule for determining the elevation which give .n eatest range. We have subjoined a little table which gives the proper elevation (nearly) correspond.ng to the different initial velocities. 2 diirereni nnuai _ . . It was computed by the following approximation, which will be found the same with the series used iy Newton in his Approximation. , . Let * be the angle of elevation, a the height producing the terminal velocity, /i the heigi pro cing the initial velocity, and c the number whose hy¬ perbolic logarithm is i (i. e. the number 2,71S). Then, ’ x * / * \ y = ,x (.a»-+iX^)-a(C“C0S'‘_1^ &C. Make y = v, and take the maximum by vary¬ ing we obtain Sin. * = hyperbol. log. 2h (i jLm 2/l—), which gives us the angle e. \ ” a sine e I , . • a sine e i The numbers in the first column, multiplied by the terminal velocity of the projectile, give us the initial velocity ; and the numbers in the last column, being multiplied by the height producing the terminal veloci¬ ty, and by 2,3026, give us the greatest ranges > Ihe middle column contains the elevation. 1 he table is not computed with scrupulous exactness, the question not re¬ quiring it. It may, however, be depended on within one part of 2000. .... , To make use of this table, divide the initial velocity hy the terminal velocity u, and look for the quotient in the first column. Opposite to this will be found the ele¬ vation giving the greatest range ; and the number in the last column being multiplied by 2,3026 X« (the height producing the terminal velocity) will give the range. Table of Elevations giving the grea test Range. Initial vel. 8.3 antage >t de d from 0,6909 0,7820 0,8645 i,38i7 1,J641 1,7291 2,0726 2,346! 2,5936 2,7635 3,1281 34544 34581 3,9101 4>I452 44227 4,6921 4,8631 Elevation. Range. 2,3026 a 43°-40 43 -20 42 .50 41 .40 40 .20 40 .10 39 -5° 37 -20 35 -5° 35 •— 34 -4° 34 -20 34 33 33 33 31 31 .20 •5° •32 •3° •5° •5° °,I75I 0,2169 0,2548 0,4999 °,5789 0,655! o,7877 0,8967 o,9752 1,0319 i,i411 1,2298 1,2277 I»337I i,3901 1,4274 1,5050 1,534! But let us see what advantage we are likely to derive from it. ,. In the first place it is very limited in its applica¬ tion. There are few circumstances of general coinci¬ dence, and almost every case requires an appropriated calculus. Perhaps the only general rules are the two following: . ' . . 1. Balls of equal density, projected with the same elevation, and with velocities which are as the square roots of their diameters, will describe similar curves.— This is evident, because, in this case, the resistance will he in the ratio of their quantities of motion. Iherelore all the homologous lines of the motion will be in the proportion of the diameters. _ 2. If the initial velocities of balls projected with the same elevation are in the inverse subdupheate ratio of the whole resistances, the ranges, and all the homo¬ logous lines of their track, will be inversely as those re- sistances. These theorems are of considerable use: for by means of a proper series of experiments on one ball projected with different elevations and velocities, tables may be constructed which will ascertain the motions of an infi¬ nity of others. . . f 1 , s9 But when we take a retrospective view of what we shown fr have done, ami consider the conditions tvhich »s- = sumed in the solution of the problem, we shall find that ^ much yet remains before it can be rendered of great^ practical use, or even satisfy the curiosity of the man of science The resistance is all along supposed to be in the duplicate ratio of the velocity j but even theory points out many causes of deviation from this law, such as the pressure and condensation of the air, in the case of very swift motions j and Mr Robins’s experiments are sufficient to show us that the deviations must be ex¬ ceedingly great in such cases. Mr Euler and all sub¬ sequent writers have allowed that it may be three times greater, even in cases which frequently occur j and Lu- fer irives a rule for ascertaining with tolerable accuracy what this increase and the whole resistance may amount to. Let H be the height of a column of air whose weight is equivalent to the resistance taken m the du¬ plicate ratio of the velocity. The whole resistance will Such is the solution which the present state of our Llution mathematical knowledge enables us to give of this cele- icprob-brated problem. It is exact in its principle, am t re ap plication of it is by no means difficult, or even operose. be expressed by H+ This number 28845is the height in feet of a column of air whose weight balances its elasticity. We shall not at present call in ques ion his reasons for assigning this precise addition, l ney are rather reasons of arithmetical conven.ency than of physical import. It is enough to observe, that it tin measure of the resistance is introduced into the proce of investigation, it is totally changed j ana it is not 00 much to say, that with this complication it requires tl knowledge and address of a Euler to make even a p tial and very limited approximation to a soffition. Any law of the resistance, therefore, which is more complicated than what Bernoulli has assumed, namefy, that of a simple power of the velocity is abandoned by all the mathematicians, as exceeding their abilities, they have attempted to avoid the error arising from be assumption of the duplicate ratio of the velocity, either by supposing the resistance throughout the who jectory to be greater than what it is !" gener^r 'they have divided the trajectory into diflere p tions, and assigned different resistances to each, "bicn P R O J E vary, through the whole of that portion, in the dupli¬ cate ratio of the velocities. By this kind of patch- work they make up a trajectory and motion which cor¬ responds, in some tolerable degree, with what ? With an accmate tiieory ? !No , but with a series of experiments, lor, in the first piace, every theoretical computation that we make, proceeds on a supposed initial velocity ; and this cannot be ascertained with any thing approach¬ ing to precision, by any theory of the action of gun¬ powder that we are yet possessed of. In the next place our theories of the resisting power of the air are en¬ tirely established on the experiments on the flights of shot and shells, and are corrected and amended till they tally with the most approved experiments w'e can find. We do not learn the ranges of a gun by theory, but the theory by the range of the gun. Now the variety and irregularity of all the experiments which are appealed to are so gieat, and the acknowledged diflerence between the resistance to slow and swift motions is also so great, that there is hardly any supposition which can be'made concerning the resistance, that will not agree in its re¬ sults with many of those experiments. It appears from the experiments of Dr Hutton of Woolwich, in 1784, 1785, and 1786, that the shots frequently deviated to the right or left of their intended track 200, 300, and sometimes 400 yards. This deviation was quite acci¬ dental and anomalous, and there can be no doubt but that the shot deviated from its intended and supposed elevation as much as it deviated from the intended ver¬ tical plane, and this without any opportunity of mea¬ suring or discovering the deviation. Now, when we have the whole range from one to three to choose among for our measure of resistance, it is evident that the com firmations which have been drawn from the ranges of shot are but feeble arguments for the truth of any opi¬ nion. Mr Robins finds his measures fully confirmed by the experiments at Metz and at Minorca. Mr Muller finds the same. Yet Mr Robins’s measure both of the initial velocity and of the resistance are at least treble of Mr Aluller’s j but by compensation they give the same results. The Chevalier Borda, a very expert mathematician, has adduced the very same experiments in support of his theory, in which he abides by the New¬ tonian measure of the resistance, which is about 4 of 90 Air Robins’s, and about \ of Aluller’s. C eofiu What are we to conclude from all this? Simply this, lr jhty* that we have hardly any knowledge of the air’s resist¬ ance, and that even the solution given of this problem has not as yet greatly increased it. Our knowledge con¬ sists only in those experiments, and mathematicians are attempting to patch up some notion of the motion of a body in a resisting medium, which shall tally with them. There is another essential defect in the conditions as¬ sumed in the solution. The density of the air is sup¬ posed uniform ; whereas we are certain that it is less by one-fifth or one-sixth towards the vertex of the curve, in many cases which frequently occur, than it is at the beginning and end of the flight. This is an¬ other latitude given to authors in their assumptions of the air’s resistance. The Chevalier de Borda has, with considerable ingenuity, accommodated his investigation to this circumstance, by dividing the trajectory into portions, and, without much trouble, has made one equation answer them all. AA'e are disposed to think that his solution ol the problem (in the Alemoirs of the c T I L E S. 42 Academy of Pans for 1769) corresponds better with the physical circumstances of the case than any other. But this process is there delivered in too concise a man- ner to be mtelhgible to a person not perfectly familiar with all the resources of modern analysis. AVe there¬ fore preferred John Bernoulli’s, because it is elementary and rigorous. J Aftei all, the practical artillerist must rely chiefly on v 9l- the records of experiments contained in the books ofofauend7 practice at the academies, or those made in a more pub-inj- to ex- lic manner, l.ven a perfect theory of the air’s resis-Pe“mem*' tance can do him little service, unless the force of gun¬ powder were uniform. This is far from being the case even in the same powder. A few hours of a damp day will make a greater diflerence than occurs in any theory 1 and, in service it is only by trial that every thing is per- ormed. If the first shell fall very much short of the mark, a little more powder is added ; and, in cannonad- mg, the correction is made by varying the elevation. e hope to be forgiven by the eminent mathemati¬ cians tor these observations on their theories. They by no means proceed from any disrespect for their labours., e aie not ignorant of the almost insuperable difficul¬ ty of the task, and we admire the ingenuity with which some of them have contrived to introduce into their ana¬ lysis reasonable substitutions for those terms which would itncei the equations intractable. But we must still say, upon their own authority, that these are but inge¬ nious guesses, and that experiment is the touchstone by which they mould these substitutions ; and when they have found a coincidence, they have no motive to make any alteration. Now, when we have such a latitude for our measure of the air’s resistance, that we may take it ol any value, from one to three, it is no wonder that compensations of errors should produce a coincidence j but where is the coincidence ? The theorist supposes the ball to set out with a certain velocity, and his theory gives a certain range; and this range agrees with obser¬ vation—but how ? Who knows the velocity of the ball in the experiment ? This is concluded from a theory in¬ comparably more uncertain than that of the motion in a resisting medium. The experiments of Air Robins and Dr Hutton show, in the most incontrovertible manner, that the resistance to a motion exceeding 1100 feet in a second, is almost three times greater than in the duplicate ratio to the re¬ sistance to moderate velocities. Euler’s translator, in his comparison of the author’s trajectories with experi¬ ment, supposes it to be no greater! Yet the coincidence is very great. The same may be said of the Chevalier de Borda’s. Nay, the same may be said of Air Ro¬ bins’s own practical rules : for he makes his F, which corresponds to our a, almost double of what these au¬ thors do, and yet his rules are confirmed by practice. Our observations are therefore well founded. But it must not be inferred from all this, that the The theory physical theory is of no use to the practical artillerist. is still of It plainly shows him the impropriety of giving the pro-some use in jectile an enormous velocity. This velocity is of no ef.Practlce' feet altei 200 or ^00 yards at farthest, because it is so rapidly reduced by the prodigious resistance of the air. Air Robins has deduced several practical maxims of the greatest importance from what we already know of this subject, and which could hardly have been even conjec¬ tured without this knowledge. See Gunnery. Audi 422 93 and may be brought to greater per¬ fection. 94 , Tables cal culated on the prece¬ ding prin¬ ciples. p R O J E C And it mdst still he acknowledged, that tins branch of physical science is highly interesting to the philoso¬ pher; nor should we despair of carrying it to a greater perfection. The defects arise almost entirely from our ignorance of the law of variation of the air’s resistance. Experiments may he contrived much more conducive to our information here than those commonly resorted to. The oblique flights of projectiles are as we have seen, of very complicated investigation* and ill ntted tor instructing us j but numerous and well contrived expe¬ riments on the perpendicular ascents are ot great sim¬ plicity, being affected by nothing but the air s resist¬ ance.' To make them instructive, we think that the following plan might be pursued. Let a set ot expe¬ riments be premised for ascertaining the initia veloci¬ ties. Then let shells be discharged perpendicularly with great varieties of density and velocity, and let no¬ thin* be attended to but the height and the time j even a considerable deviation from the perpendicular not affect either of these circumstances, and the effect ot this circumstance can easily be computed. I he height can be ascertained with sufficient precision for very va¬ luable information by their light or smoke. It is evi¬ dent that these experiments will give direct imottna- tion of the air’s retarding force *, and every experiment gives us two measures, vii. the ascent and descent: and the comparison of the times of ascent and descent, com¬ bined with the observed height in one experiment made with a great initial velocity, will give us more informa¬ tion concerning the air’s resistance than 50 ranges. It we should suppose the resistance as the square ot the ve¬ locity, this comparison will give in each experiment an exact determination of the initial and final velocities, which no other method can give us. These, with ex¬ periments on the time of horizontal flights, with known initial velocities, will give us more instruction on this head than any thing that has yet been done *, and till something of this kind is carefully done, we presume to say that the motion ol bodies in a resisting medium will remain in the hands ^of the mathematicians as a matter of curious speculation. In the mean time, the rules which Mr Robins has delivered in his Gunnery are very simple and easy in their use, and seem to come as near the trdth as any we have met with. He has not informed us upon what principles they are founded, and we are disposed to think that they are rather em¬ pirical than scientific. But we profess great deference for his abilities and penetration, and doubt not but that he had framed them by means ot as scientific a discus¬ sion as his knowledge of this new and difficult subject enabled him to give it. . # We shall conclude this article, by giving two or three tables, computed from the principles established above, and which serve to bring into one point of view the chief circumstances of the motion in a resisting medium. Although the result of much calculation, as any person who considers the subject will readily see, they must not be considered as offering any very accurate results j or that, in comparison with one or two experiments, the differences shall not be considerable. Let any person peruse the published registers of experiments which have been made with every attention, and he will see such enormous irregularities, that all expectations of perfect -agreement with them must cease. In the experiments at Woolwich iu 1735? which were continued for seve- TILES. ral days, not only do the experiments of one day diffci* among themselves, but the mean of all the experiments of one day differs from the mean of all the experiment* of another no less than one-fourth of the whole. The experiments in which the greatest regularity may be expected, are those made writh great elevations. When the elevation is small, the range is more affected by a change of velocity, and still more by any deviation from the supposed or intended direction of the shot. The first table shows the distance in yards to which a ball projected With the velocity 1600 will go, while its velocity is reduced one-tenth, and the distance at which it drops 16 feet from the line of its direction. This table is calculated by the resistance observed in Mr Robins’s experiments. rI he first column is the weight of the ball in pounds. The second column remains the •same whatever be the initial velocity 5 but the thud co¬ lumn depends on the velocity. It is here given for the velocity which is very usual in military service, and its use is to assist us in directing the gun to the maxk.— If the mark at which a ball of 24 pounds is directed i* 474 yards distant, the axis of the piece nuist he pointed .16 feet higher than the mark. I hese deflections from the line of direction are nearly as the squares of the di¬ stances. 2 4 9 18 32 II. 92 121 I59 200 272 III. i.,.—i 420 428 456 470 479 The next table contains the ranges in yards of a 2 pound shot, projected at an elevation of 450, with the diflerent velocities in feet per second, expressed in the first column. The second column contains the distances to which the ball would go in vacuo in a horizontal plane j and the third contains the tlistances to which it will go through the air. The fourth column is added, to show the height to which it rises in the air j and the fifth shows the ranges corrected for the diminution of the air’s density as the bullet ascends, and may therelorebe called the corrected range. I. 206 400 600 800 IOOO 1200 I4OO 1600 1800 2000 2200 24OO 2600 2800 3000 3200 II. 416 1664 374° 6649 10300 14961 20364 26597 33663 4I559 50286 59846 III. IV. 349 1121 18x2 2373 2845 3259 3640 3950 4235 4494 4720 49x7 5106 5293 5455 106 338 606 866 xxsS 1378 1606 1814 X992 2168 2348 2460 2630 2760 2862 V. 360 11 CO 1859 2435 29x9 3343 3734 4°50 4345 4610 4842 5°44 5238 543° 5596 5732 The PROJECTILES WrH K PIATE CCCCJLJJ. jfu/. JO. 4 f, i J I P R O J E s The initial velocities can never be pushed as far as L of the we have calculated for in this table j but we mean it I table, for a table of more extensive use than appears at first sight. Recollect, that while the proportion of the ve¬ locity at the veitex to the terminal velocity remains the same, the curves will he similar: therefore, if the initial velocities are as the. square-roots of the diameters of the balls, they will describe similar curves, and the ranges will be as the diameters of the balls. Therefore, to have the range of a 12 pound shot, if projected at an elevation of 45, with the velocity 1500 *, suppose the diameter of the 12-pounder to be d, and that of the 24-pounder andjet the velocities’be v and V: Then say, d: 13 = 1500, to a fourth proportional V. If the 24-pounder he projected with the velocity V, it will describe a curve similar to that described by the 12-pounder, having the initial velocity 1500. Therefore find (by interpolation) the range of the 24-pounder, having the initial velocity V. Call this R.. Then D : c/=R : r, the range of the 12-pounder which was wanted, and which is nearly 3380 yards. A^e see by this table the immense difiei*ence between the motions through the air and in a void. We see that the ranges through the air, instead of increasing in the duplicate ratio of the initial velocities, really in¬ crease slower than those velocities in all cases of mili¬ tary service j and in the most usual cases, viz. from Soo to 1600, they increase nearly as the square-roots of the velocities. A set of similar tables, made for different elevations, would almost complete what can he done by theory, and would be much more expeditious in their use than Mr Euler’s Trajectories, computed with great labour by his English translator. The same table may also serve for computing the ranges of bomb-shells. We have only to find what must be the initial velocity of the 24 pound shot which cor¬ responds to the proposed velocity of the shell. This must be deduced from the diameter and weight of the shell, by making the velocity of the 24-pounder such, that the ratio of its weight to the resistance may be the same as in the shell. C T I L E S. 423 That the reader may see with one glance the rela¬ tion of those diflerent quantities, we have given this table, expressed in a figure (fig. 10.). The abscissa, Fig 10. or axis DA, is the scale of the initial velocities in feet 9° per second, measured in a scale of 400 equal parts jn Reloti°n an inch. The ordinates to the curve ACG express the yards of the range on a scale containing 800 yards in tities in it. an inch. 1 he ordinates to the curve A * y express (by the same scale) the height to which the ball rises in the air. The ordinate BC (drawn through the point of the abscissa which corresponds to the initial velocity 2000) is divided on the points 4, 9, 12, 18, 24, 32, 42, in the ratio of the diameters of cannon-shot of diflerent weights: and the same ordinate is produced on the other side of the axis, till BO be equal to BA; and then BO is divided in the subdnplicate ratio of the same diameters. Dines are drawn from the point A, and from any point D of the abscissa, to these divisions. . ,^e see distinctly by this figure how the effect of the initial velocity gradually diminishes, and that in very great velocities the range is very little increased by its augmentation. The dotted curve APQR, shows what the ranges in vacuo would be. By this figure may the problems he solved. Thus, to find the range of the 12-pounder, with the initial velocity 1500. Set off 1500 from B to F ; draw FH parallel to the axis, meeting the line 12 A in H ; draw the ordinate HK , draw HL parallel to the axis, meet- ing 24 B in L ; draw the ordinate LM, cutting 12 B in N. MN is the range required. If curves, such as ACG, were laid down in the same manner for other elevations, all the problems might lie solved with great dispatch, and with much more accu¬ racy than the theory by which the curves are drawn can pretend to. Note, that Jig. 10. as given on Plate CCCCXLII, is one-half less than the scale according to which it is described ; but the practical mathematician will find no difficulty m drawing the figure on the enlarged scale to correspond to the description. PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. Ste pl Pi R 11 of tbei her,.. T^E PROJECTION of the SPHERE is a perspective representation of the circles on the surface of the sphere ; and is variously denominated according to the different positions of the eye and plane of projection. There are three principal kinds of projection ; the stereographic, the orthographic, and gnomic. In the tereographic projection the eye is supposed to be placed on the surface of the sphere ; in the orthographic it is supposed to be at an infinite distance ; and in the gno¬ mic projection the eye is placed at the centre of the sphere. Other kinds of projection are, the globular, Mercator's, scenographic, &c. for which see the articles Geography, Navigation, Perspective, &c. Definitions. I. The plane upon which the circles of the sphere are described, is called the plane of projection, or the primitive circle. The pole of this circle is the pole Stereogra- of projection, and the place of the eye is the projecting Phic Pr°- point. jection of 2. The line of measures of any circle of the sphere is ^iie that diameter of the primitive, produced indefinitely, which passes through the centre of the projected circle. Axiom. The projection, or representation of any point, is where the straight line drawn from it to the pro¬ jecting point intersects the plane of projection. SECTION I. Of the Stereographic Projection of the Sphere. In the stereographic projection of the sphere, the eye 424 ' projection of Stereogra- eye is placed on the surface of the sphere in the pole of phic Pro- the great circle upon which the sphere is to be project- jection of ^ " The projection of the hemisphere opposite to the the Sphere. fallg wlthin the primitive, to which the projection ' v is generally limited j it, however, may be extended to the other hemisphere, or that wherein the eye is placed, the projection of which falls without the primitive. As all circles in this projection are projected either into circles or straight lines, which are easily described, it is therefore more generally understood, and by many preferred to the other projections, Proposition I. Theorem I. Every great circle which passes through the projecting point is projected into a straight line passing through the centre of the primitive; and every arch of it, reckoned from the other pole of the primitive, is pro¬ jected into its semitangent. Plate Let ABCD (fig. I.) be a great circle passing through ccccxliii. A, C, the poles of the primitive, and intersecting it in fi£- I* the line of common section BED, E being the centre of the sphere. From A, the projecting point, let there be drawn straight lines AP, AM, AN, AQ, to any number of points P, M, N, Q, in the circle ABCD : these lines will intersect BED, which is in the same plane with them. Let them meet it in the points p, m, n, a; thenp, m, n, q, are the projections oi P, M, N, Q: hence the whole circle A BCD is projected into the straight line BED, passing through the centre of the primitive. . . . „ . Again, because the pole C is projected into C, anti the point M into m ; therefore the arch CM is project¬ ed into the straight line E m, which is the semitan¬ gent of the arch CM to the radius AE. In like man¬ ner, the arch CP is projected into its semitangent, E p, &c. Corollaries. 1. Each of the quadrants contiguous to the project¬ ing point is projected into an indefinite straight line, and each of those that are remote into a radius of the primitive. 2. Every small circle which passes through the pro¬ jecting point is projected into that straight line which is its common section with the primitive. 3. Every straight line in the plane of the primitive, and produced indefinitely, is the projection of some circle on the sphere passing through the projecting point. 4. The projection of any point in the surface of the sphere, is distant from the centre of the primitive, by the semitangent of the distance of that point from the pole opposite to the projecting point. Proposition II. Theorem II. Every circle on the sphere which does not pass through the projecting point is projected into a circle. If the given circle be parallel to the primitive, then a straight line drawn from the projecting point to any point in the circumference, and made to revolve about the circle, will describe the surface of a cone ; which being cut by the plane of projection parallel to the base, the section will be a circle. See CoNic-Sections. THE SPHERE. Sect. But if the circle MN (fig. 2.) be not parallel to the Stereog; primitive circle BD, let the great circle ABCD, pas- phic pi5 sing through the projecting point, cut it at right angles j^tion in the diameter MN, and the primitive in the diameter BD. Through M, in the plane of the great circle, letp^T MF be drawn parallel to BD ; let AM, AN be joined, and meet BD in m, ft. Then, because AB, AD are quadrants, and BD, MF parallel, the arch AM is equal to AF, and the angle AMF or Amn is equal to ANM. Hence the conic surface described by the revolution of AM about the circle MN is cut by the primitive in a subcontrary position ; therefore the section is in this case likewise a circle. Corollaries. 1. The centres and poles of all circles parallel to the primitive have their projection in its centre.. 2. The centre and poles of every circle inclined to the primitive have their projections in the line ol mea¬ sures. ... 3. All projected great circles cut the primitive in two points diametrically opposite ; and every circle in the plane of projection, which passes thiough the extre¬ mities of a diameter of the primitive, or through the projections of two points that are diametrically oppo¬ site on the sphere, is the projection of some great circle* 4. A tangent to any circle of the sphere, which does not pass through the projecting point, is projected into a tangent to that circle’s projection ; also, the circular projections of tangent circles touch one another. jj. The extremities oi the diameter, on the line of measures of any projected circle, are distant from the centre of the primitive by the semitangents of the least and greatest distances of the circle on the sphere, from the pole opposite to the projecting point. 6. The extremities of the diameter, on the line of measures of any projected great circle, are distant fiom the centre of the primitive by the tangent and cotan¬ gent of half the great circle’s inclination to the primi¬ tive. 7. The radius of any projected circle is equal to half the sum, or half the difference of the semitangents of the least and greatest distances of the circle from the pole opposite to the projecting point, according as that pole is ivithin or without the given circle. Proposition III. Theorem III. An angle formed by twro tangents at the same point in the surface of the sphere, is equal to the angle formed by their projections. Let FGI and GH (fig. 3.) be the two tangents,Fig. >| and A the projecting point ; let the plane AGI cut the sphere in the circle AGL, and the primitive in the line BML. Also, let MN be the line of common sec¬ tion of the plane AGH with the primitive : then the angle FGHrrLMN. If the plane FGH be parallel to the primitive BLD, the proposition is manifest. If not, through any point K. in AG produced, let the plane FKH, parallel to the primitive, be extended to meet FGH in the line FH. Then, because the plane AGF meets the two parallel planes BLD, FKH, the lines of common section LM, FK are parallel; there- foie ;ct I. ereo^ra- iic fro- ition of Sphere. . , , iMT EJECTION OF THE SPHERE. for tic angle AML=AkF. But since A is the pole ttijD, the chords, and consequently the arches AB AL, are equal, and the arch ABG is the sum of the arches AL BGj hence the angle AML is equal to an angle at the circumference standing upon AG and therefore equal to ACI or FGK; consequently the angle FGK—FKG, and the side FG=FK. In like manner HGzzHK : hence the triangles GHF, KHF are equal, and the angle FGHzrFKH = LMN. — 2NIIG—NCG : hence ENC=:INE 4-INC—Nrr o ^ ^ Jnt to tT “ rig‘vang'e k""'1 tlltrefore^,C « a tan- ph"^ gent to the primitive at N ; but the arch ND is the Jection of distance of the less circle from its nearest pole T) . the Sphere, hence is the tangent, and EC the secant of theV,“ v distance of the less circle from its pole to the radius of the primitive. ~ 1 * * * * Proposition VI. Theorem VI. f 4. Corollaries. 1. An angle contained by any two circles of the sphere is equal to the angle formed by their projec¬ tions. For the tangents to these circles on the sphere are projected into straight lines, which either coincide with, or are tangents to, their projections on the primi¬ tive. 2. An angle contained by any two circles of the sphere is equal to the angle formed by the radii of their projections at the point of intersection. Proposition IV. Theorem IV. The centre of a projected great circle is distant from the centre of the primitive ; the tangent of the incli¬ nation of the great circle to the primitive, and its ra¬ dius, is the secant of its inclination. . ^et MNG (fig. 4.) be the projection of a great circle, meeting the primitive in the extremities of the dmmeter MN, and let the diameter BD, perpendicular to MN, meet the prbjection in F, G. Bisect FG in JH, and join NH. I hen, because any angle contained by two circles of the sphere is equal to the angle formed by the radii of their projections at the point of intersec¬ tion 4 therefore the angle contained by the proposed great circle and the primitive is equal to the angle LI\H, of which EH is the tangent, and NH the se¬ cant, to the radius of the primitive. Corollaries. the centre of the primitive, gent, of half its inclination. T "A M "VT , V . Let MN (fig. 6.) be a great circle perpendicular tor.V A he primitive ABCD, and A the projecting point; then & aie tlie P^es of MN, and of ail its parallels m n, i-*. meet 1,16 diameter BI) in F f which will therefore be the projected poles of MN and its parallels. The angle BEM is the inclination of the circle MEN, and its parallels, to the primitive : and because BC and MF are quadrants, and MC common to both ; therefore PC=BM : and hence PEC is also the inclination of MN and its parallels. Now EF is the tangent of EAF, or of half the angle PEC the in- clination ; and E/is the tangent of the angle EA f; but EA / is the complement of EAF, and E f is the cotangent of half the inclination. Corollaries. V Projection of that pole which is nearest to the projecting point is without the primitive, and the pro¬ jection of the other within. 2. The projected centre of any circle is always be¬ tween the projection of its nearest pole and the centre of the primitive ; and the projected centres of all circles are contained between the projected poles. Proposition VII. Theorem VII. 1. All circles which pass through the points M, N, are the projections of great circles, and have their cen¬ tres in the line BG; and all circles which passthrough the points F, G, are the projections of great circles, and have their centres in the line HI, perpendicular to 2-If NF, NH be continued to meet the primitive in BL is the measure of the great circle’s in¬ clination to the primitive ; and MT=2BL. I ! t Proposition V. Theorem V. I he centre of projection of a less circle perpendicular to the primitive, is distant from the centre of the primi¬ tive, the secant of the distance of the less circle from i I Jts barest pole; and the radius of projection is the tangent of that distance. fl'- T I [ , e* (fig. 5.) be the given less circle perpendi- cu ar to the primitive, and A the projecting point, raw AM, AN to meet the diameter BD produced an<^ ? ’ ^ien 18 ^ie projected diameter of e ess circle : bisect GH in C, and C will be its centie; join NE, NC. Then because AE, NI are parallel, the angle INK-NEA ; but NEA=2NMA Vol. XVII. Part II. 4. Equal arches of any two great circles of the sphere will be intercepted between two other circles drawn on the sphere through the remote poles of those great circles. Let AGB, CFD (fig. 7.) be two great circles of the Fis- 7 sphere, whose remote poles are E, P; through which draw the great circle PBEC, and less circle PGE, in¬ tersecting the great circles AGB, CFD in the po’ints B, G, and D, F; then the arch BG is equal to the arch DF. Because E is the pole of the circle AGB, and P the pole of CFD, therefore the arches EB, PD are equal; and since BD is common to both, hence the arch ED is equal to the arch PB. For the same reason, the arches EF, PG are equal; but the angle DEF is equal to the angle BPG : hence these triangles are equal, and therefore the arch DF is equal to the arch BG. Proposition VIII. Theorem VIII. If from either pole of aprojected greatcircle, two straight lines be drawn to meet the primitive and the pro¬ jection, they will intercept similar arches of these circles. 3 H Gn 426 Stereo 'ra- 0n the plane of projection AGB (fig. 7.) let tn® phic lJro- great circle CFD be projected into cfd, and its pole I jection of into p ; through p draw the straight lines 7? f/,/>/, then ^lierc; are the arches GB,/d similar. 1 ' Since pd lies both in the plane AGB and ArBU,, it is in their common section, and the point t> is also in their common section ; therefore p d passes through the point B. In like manner it may be shown that the line p f passes through G. Now the points I), I are projected into d,f: hence the arches FU,./rt are similar 5 but GB is equal to FD, therefore the inter¬ cepted arch of the primitive GB is similar to the pro¬ jected arch fd. PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. Sect ! straight line EGH, meeting the diameter AB produ-Stereo; ced if necessary in FI } then Irom the centre H, with phic 1 the radius HE, describe the oblique circle DIE, audit jeetioir will he the projection of the great circle required. jhe Or, make Div equal to 1 A j join EE, which inter¬ sects the diameter AB in I ; then through the three points, D, I, E, describe the oblique circle DIE. -» Proposition XI. Problem III. To find the poles of a great circle. Corollary. Hence, if from the angular point of a projected sphe¬ rical angle two straight lines be drawn through the projected poles of the containing sides, the intercepted arch of the primitive will be the measure of the spheri¬ cal angle. Proposition IX. Problem I. Fig. 8. Fig. 9. Fig. to. To describe the projection of a great circle through two given points in the plane ol the pi imitive. Let P and B be given points, and C the centre of the primitive. ... c .1 if When one point P (fig. 8.) is the centre of the primitive, a diameter drawn through the given points will be the great circle required. - . 2. When one point P (fig. 9.) is m the circumfe¬ rence of the primitive. Through P draw the diameter PD * and an oblique circle described through the three points P, B, D, will be the projection of the required great circle. . , 2 When the given points are neither in the centre nor circumference of the primitive. Through either of the given points P (fig. 10.) draw the diameter ED, and at right angles thereto draw the diameter IG. From F through P draw the straight line FPH, meet¬ ing the circumference in H : draw the diameter HI, and draw the straight line FIK, meeting ED produced in K ; then an arch, terminated by the circumference, being described through the three points, P, B, K, will be the great circle. 1. When the given great circle is the primitive, its centre is the pole. 2. To find the pole of the right circle ACB (fig. 11.). Draw the diameter PE perpendicular to the given cncle AB ; and its extremities P, E are the poles of the circle ACB. 3. To find the pole of the oblique circle DEF (fig. Fig. i 13'.). Join DF, and perpendicular thereto draw the diameter AB, cutting the given oblique circle DEF in E. Draw the straight line FEG, meeting the cir¬ cumference in G. Make GI, GU, each equal to AD j then FI being joined, cuts the diameter AB in P, the lower pole j through F and H draw the stiaight line FH», meeting the diameter AB produced in p, which will be the opposite or exterior pole. Proposition XII. Problem IV. To describe a less circle about any given point as a pole, and at any given distance from that pole. Proposition X. Problem II. To describe the representation of a great circle about any given point as a pole. Fig. 11. Let P be the given pole, and C the centre of the pri¬ mitive. ' , ... 1. When P (fig. 8.) is in the centre ol the primitive, then the primitive will be the great circle required. 2. When the pole P (fig. II.) is in the circumfe¬ rence of the primitive. Through P draw the diameter PE, and the diameter AB drawn at right angles to PE will be the projected great circle required. 2. When the given pole is neither in the centre nor circumference of the primitive. Through the pole I (fig* 12.) draw the diameter AB, and draw the diame- ccccxuv. ter J)E perpendicular to AB ; through E and P draw the straight line EPF, meeting the circumference in F. Make FG equal to FD } through E and G draw the 4 ,. When the pole of the less circle is in the centre of the primitive-, then from the centre of the primitive, with the semitangent of the distance of the given circle from its pole, describe a circle, and it will be the pro¬ jection of the less circle required. 2. If the piven pole is in the circumference of the primitive, from C (fig. 14.) the centre of the primitive, Fig. 1 set ofFCE the secant of t^ie distance of the less circle from its pole P then from the centre E, with the tan¬ gent of the given distance, describe a circle, and it will be the less circle required. Or, make PG, PF each equal to the chord of the distance of the less circle from its pole. Through B, G draw the straight line BGD meeting CP produced in D : bisect GD in H,^ and draw HE perpendicular to GD, and meeting PD in E • then E is the centre of the less circle. 3. When the given pole is neither in the centre nor circumference of the primitive. Through P (fig. i5-)>Fig. the given pole, and C the centre of the primitive, draw the diameter AB, and draw the diameter DE perpen¬ dicular to AB ; join EP, and produce it to meet the primitive inp-, make pY, pG, each equal to the chord of the distance of the less circle from its pole join El which intersects the diameter AB in H j from E throng 1 G draw the straight line EGI, meeting the diameter AB produced in I bisect HI inK : Then a circle de¬ scribed from the centre K, at the distance KH or El, will be the projection of the less circle. Plate Proposition XIII. Problem V. To find the poles of a given less circle. The poles of a less circle are also those of its parallel ct I reogra- iic Pro- tian of Sphere. if- PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. • great circle. If therefore the parallel great circle he given, then its poles being found by Prob. III. will be those of the less circle. But if the parallel great circle be not given, let HMIN (fig. 15.) be the given less circle. Through its centre, and C the centre of the pri¬ mitive, draw the line of measures IAHB ; and draw the diameter DE perpendicular to it, also draw the straight line EHF meeting the primitive in F 5 make F/> equal to the chord of the distance of the less circle from its pole: join E^, and its intersection P with the diame¬ ter AB is the interior pole. Draw the diameter p CL through E and L, draw EL^ meeting the diameter AB produced in q; then q is the external pole. Or thus : Join El intersecting the primitive in G; join also EH, and produce it to meet the primitive in F •, bisect the arch GH in p; from E to p draw the straight line EPp, and P is the pole of the givep less circle. 427 line of chords will give the measure of the arch DE of stereo,, the give,, less circle. pLieX. jection of 1 KOFOSITION XVI. Problem VIII. the Sphere. To measure any spherical angle. 1. If the angle is at the centre of the primitive, it is measured as a plane angle. 2. W hen the angular point is in the circumference of the primitive j let A (fig. 19.) be the angular point, Fi T and ABE an oblique circle inclined to the primitive. & 9’ Through P, the pole of ABE, draw the line A.V p meet¬ ing the circumference in p: then the arch E p is the measure of the angle BAD, and the arch AYp is the measure of its supplement BAF : also p F is the mea¬ sure of the angle BAC, and p ED that of its supple- , ment. Proposition XIV. Problem. VI. To measure any arph of a great circle. 1. Arches of the primitive are measured on the line of chords. 2. Bight circles are measured on the line of semi¬ tangents, beginning at the centre of the primitive. Thus, jj, the measure of the portion AC (fig. 16.) of the right circle DE, is found by applying it to the line of semi¬ tangents. The measure of the arch DB is found by subtracting that of BC from 90°: the measure of the arch AF, lying partly on each side of the centre, is ob¬ tained by adding the measures of AC and CF. Lastly, To measure the part AB, which is neither terminated at the centre or circumference of the primitive, apply CA to the line of semitangents j then CB, and the difi'erence between the measures of these arches, will be that of AB. Or thus : Draw the diameter GH perpendicular to DE; then from either extremity, as 1), of this diame¬ ter, draw lines through the extremities of the arch in¬ tended to be measured j and the intercepted portion of the primitive applied to the line of chords will give the measure of the required arch. Thus IK applied to the line of chords will give the measure of AB. 3. To measure an arch of an oblique circle : draw lines from its pole through the extremities of the arch to meet the primitive, then the intercepted portion of the primitive applied to the line of chords will give the measure of the arch of the oblique circle. Thus, let AB (fig. 17.), be an arch of an oblique circle to be measured, and P its pole 5 from P draw the lines PAD, PBE meeting the primitive in B and E ; then the arch DE applied to the line of chords will give the measure of the arch of the oblique circle AB. 3. If the angular point is neither at the centre nor circumference of the primitive. Let A (fig. 20.) bepio. 0 the angular point, and DAH, or GAF, the angle to~1S' ^ be measured, P the pole of the oblique circle DAF, and p the pole of GAH : then from A, through the points Pp, draw the straight lines APM, A p N, and the arch MN will be the measure of the angle DAH j and the supplement of MN will be the measure of the angle HAF or DxlG. Proposition XVII. Problem IX. Io draw a great circle perpendicular to a projected great circle, and through a point given in it. Find the pole of the given circle, then a great circle described through that pole and the given point will be perpendicular to the given circle. Hence if the given circle be the primitive, then a diameter drawn through the given point will be the required perpendicular. If the given circle is a right one, draw a diameter at right angles to it; then through the extremities of this dia¬ meter and the given point describe an oblique circle, and it will be perpendicular to that given. If the given circle is inclined to the primitive, let it be represented by BAD (fig. 21.), whose pole is P, and let A be the FjV point through which the perpendicular is to be drawn : °' then, by Prob. I. describe a great circle through the points P and A, and it will be perpendicular to the ob¬ lique circle BAD. Proposition XVIII. Problem X. Through a point in a projected great circle, to describe another great circle to make a given angle with the former, provided the measure of the given angle is not less than the distance between the given point and circle. Proposition XV. Problem VII. To measure any arch of a less circle. Let DEG (fig. 18.) be the given less circle, and DE the.arch to be measured : find its internal pole P $ and describe the circle AFI parallel to the primitive, and whose distance from the projecting point may be equal to the distance of the given less circle from its pole P: then join PD, PE, which produce to meet the parallel circle in A and F. Now AF applied to a Let the given circle lie the primitive, and let A (fig. 19.) be the angular point. Draw the diameter AE, DF perpendicular to each other; and make the angle CAG equal to that given, or make CG equal to the tangent of the given angle; then from the centre G, with the distance GC, describe the oblique circle ABE, and it will make with the primitive an angle equal to that given. If the given circle be a right one, let it be APB (fig. Fio-. 22, 22.) and let P be the given point. Draw the diameter 3 H 2 GH 428 PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. Sect. s GH perpendicular to AB j join GP, and produce it. to Pro- a ; make H b equal to twice A a: and G b being joined jeetion ot intersects A13 in C. Draw CD perpendicular to A13, the Sphere ant| eqiuil to the cotangent of the given angle to the ' v radius PC \ or make the angle CPI) equal to the com¬ plement of that given : then from the centre D, with the radius DP, describe the great circle I PE, and the angle APF, or BPE, will be equal to that given. Fig. 23. If APB (fig- 23O is an oblique circle. From the angular point P, draw the lines PG, PC through the centres of the primitive and given oblique circle. Through C, the centre of APB, draw GCD at right annles toPGj make the angle GPD equal to that given ; and from the centre I), with the radius DP, describe the oblique circle I1 PE, and the angle All, or BPE, will be equal to that proposed. Proposition XIX. Problem XI. about « as a pole, describe the great circle EDF, cut* Stereos- ting the primitive and given circle in L and D, and it phic M will be the great circle required. jection & the Sphi Scholium. It will hence be an easy matter to construct all the various spherical triangles. The reader is, however, referred to the article Spherical Tgigonometry, for the method of constructing them agreeably to this pro¬ jection ; and also for the application to the resolution of problems of the sphere. For the method of projecting, the sphere upon the plane of the meridian, and of the horizon, according to the stereographic projection, see the article Geography. SECTION II. Any great circle cutting the primitive being given, to describe another great circle which shall cut the given one in a proposed angle, and have a given arch intercepted between the primitive and given circles. If the given circle be a l ight one, let it be represent- CCGCXLVed by APC (fig. 24.) •, and at right angles thereto draw fig. 24. the diameter BPM ; make the angle BPF equal to the complement of the given angle, and PF equal to the tangent of the given arch ; and from the centre of the primitive with the secant of the same arch describe the arch G g". Through I draw FG parallel to AC, meet* jnp- Gg in G y then from the centre G, with the tangent PF, describe an arch n 0, cutting APC in I, and join GT. Through G, and the centre P, draw the diameter HK *, draw PL perpendicular to HK, and XL perpendicular to GI, meeting PL in L j then L will be the centre of the circle HIK, which is that re- quired. But if the given great circle be inclined to the pri- Fig. 25. mitive, let it be ADB (fig. 25.), and E its centre : make the angle BDF equal to the complement of that given, and DF equal to the tangent of the given arch, as before. From P, the centre of the primitive, with the secant of the same arch, describe the arch G#, and from E, the centre of the oblique circle, with the ex¬ tent EF, describe an arch intersecting Gg-in G. Now G being determined, the remaining part of the opera¬ tion is performed as before. "When the given arch exceeds 90°, the tangent and secant of its supplement are to be applied on the line DF the contrary way, or towards the right 5 the former construction being reckoned to the left. Proposition XX. Problem XII. Any great circle in the plane of projection being given, to describe another great circle, which shall make gi¬ ven angles with the primitive and given circles. Fig. 26. Let ADC (fig. 26.) be the given circle, and Q its pole. About P the pole of the primitive, describe an arch m n, at the distance of as many degrees as are in the angle which the required circle is to make with the pri¬ mitive. About Q the pole of the circle ADC, and at a distance equal to the measure of the angle which the required circle is to make with the given circle ADC, describe an arch 0 v, cutting m n in n. Then Of the Orthographic Projection of the Sphere. The orthographic projection of the sphere, is that in which the eye is placed in the axis of the plane of pro¬ jection, at an infinite distance with respect to the dia¬ meter of the sphere ; so that at the sphere all the visual rays are assumed parallel, and therefore perpendicular to the plane of projection. Hence the orthographic projection of any point is where a perpendicular from that point meets the plane of projection ; and the orthographic representation of any object is the figure formed by perpendiculars drawn from every point of the object to the plane of pro¬ jection. This method of projection is used in the geometrical delineation of eclipses, occultations, and transits. It is also particularly useful in various other projections, such as the analemma. See Geography, Sec. • Proposition I. Theorem I. Every straight line is projected into a straight line. . If the given line be parallel to the plane of projection, it is projected into an equal straight line ; but if it is inclined to the primitive, then the given straight line will be to its projection in the ratio of the radius to the cosine of inclination. Let AB (fig. 27.) be the plane of projection, and Fig. 2^ let CD be a straight line parallel thereto : from the ex¬ tremities C, D of the straight line CD, draw the lines CE, DF perpendicular to AB j then by 3. of xi. of Eucl. the intersection EF, of the plane CEFD, with the plane of projection, is a straight line : and because the straight lines CD, EF are parallel, and also CE, DF \ therefore by 34* i* Eucl. the opposite sides are equal •, hence the straight line CD, and its projec¬ tion EF, are equal. Again, let GH be the proposed straight line, inclined to the primitive; then the lines GE, HF being drawn perpendicular to AB, the inter- * cepted portion EF will be the projection of GH. Through G draw GI parallel to AB, and the angle IGH will be equal to the inclination of the given line to the plane of projection. Now GH being the radius, GI, or its equal EF, will be the cosine of IGH; hence the given line GH is to its projection EF as radius to the cosine or inclination. Corollaries. ict. II. rthagra- COROLLARIES. i|iic pro- ctionof i. A straight line perpendicular to the plane ofpro- Sphere. jectJ011 {s projected into a point. 2. Every straight line in a plane parallel to the pri¬ mitive is projected into an equal and parallel straight line. & 3. A plane angle parallel to the primitive is projected into an equal angle. 4. Any plane rectilineal figure parallel to the primi¬ tive is projected into an equal and similar figure. 5. The area of any rectilineal figure is to the area of its projection as radius to the cosine of its inclina¬ tion. Proposition II. Theorem II. Every great circle, perpendicular to the primitive, is projected into a diameter of the primitive j and every arch of it, reckoned from the pole of the primitive, is projected into its sine. PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. 429 tance of the parallel circle from the primitive, or the Orthopia- sine of its distance from the pole of the primitive. Proposition IV. Theorem IV. phic pro¬ jection of the Sphere. An inclined circle is projected into an ellipse, whose transverse axis is the diameter of the circle. 1. Let ELI (fig. 30.) he a great circle inclined to Fig. 30, the primitive EBF, and EF their line of common sec¬ tion. From the centre C, and any other point K, in EF, let the perpendicular CB, KI be drawn in the plane of the primitive, and CL, KN, in the plane of the great circle, meeting the circumference in L, N. Let LG, ND be perpendicular to CB, KI; then G, D are the projections of L, N. And because the tri¬ angles LCG, NKD are equiangular, CL*: CG*:: NK*: DK* ; or EC* : CG* :: EKF : DK* : therefore the points G, D are in the curve of an ellipse, of which EF is the transverse axis, and CG the semiconjugate axis. ■ 58. Let BFD (fig. 28.) be the primitive, and ABCD a great circle perpendicular to it, passing through its poles A, C ; then the diameter BED, which is their line of common section, will be the projection of the circle ABCD. For if from any point, as G, in the circle ABC, a perpendicular GH fall upon BD, it will also be perpendicular to the plane of the primitive: therefore H is the projection of G. Hence the whole circle is projected into BD, and any arch AG into EH equal to GI its sine. Corollaries. 1. Every arch of a great circle, reckoned from its in¬ tersection with the primitive, is projected into its versed sine. 2. Every less circle perpendicular to the primitive is projected into its line of common section with the pri¬ mitive, which is also its own diameter: and every arch of the semicircle above the primitive, reckoned from the middle point, is projected into its sine. 3. Every diameter of the primitive is the projection of a great circle; and every chord the projection of a less circle. 4. A spherical angle at the pole of the primitive is projected into an equal angle. Proposition III. Theorem HI. A circle parallel to the primitive is projected into a circle equal to itself, and concentric with the primi¬ tive. '■9' Let the less circle FIG (fig. 29.) be parallel to the plane of the primitive BND. The straight line HE, which joins their centres, is perpendicular to the primi¬ tive; therefore E is the projection of H. Let any radii HI and IN perpendicular to the primitive be drawn. Then IN, HE being parallel, are in the same plane ; therefore IH, NE, the lines of common section of the plane IE, with two parallel planes, are parallel ; and the figure I HEN is a parallelogram. Hence NErz IH, and consequently FIG is projected into an equal circle KNL, whose centre is E. Corollary. The radius of the projection is the cosine of the dis- COROLLARIES, 1. In a projected great circle, the semiconjugate axis is the cosine of the inclination of the great circle to the primitive. 2. Perpendiculars to the transverse axis intercept corresponding arches of the projection and the primi¬ tive. 3. The eccentricity of the projection is the sine of the inclination of the great circle to the primitive. Case 2. Let AQB (fig. 31.) be a less circle, incli-Fjg. 31. ned to the primitive, and let the great circle LBM, per¬ pendicular to both, intersect them in the lines AB, LM. From the centre O, and any other point N in the dia¬ meter AB, let the perpendiculars TOP, NQ, be drawn in the plane of the less circle, to meet its circumference in T, P, Q. Also from the points A, N, O, B, let AG, NI, OC, BH, be drawn perpendicular to LM; and from P, Q, T, draw PE, QD, TF, perpendicular to the primitive; then G, I, C, H, E, D, F, are the projections of these points. Because OP is perpendicu¬ lar to LMB, and OC, PE, being perpendicular to the primitive, are in the same plane, the plane COPE is perpendicular to LBM. But the primitive is perpen¬ dicular to LBM ; therefore the common section EC is perpendicular to LBM, and to LM. Hence CP is a parallelogram, and EC=OP. In like manner, FC, HI, are proved perpendicular to LM, and equal to OT, NQ. Thus ECF is a straight line, and equal to the diameter PT. Let QR, DK be parallel to AB, LM; then RO=NQ=DI=rKC, and PRxRT=EK XKF. But AO : CG :: NO : Cl ; therefore AO* : CG* : : QR* : DK*; and EC* ; CG2 ; : EKF : DK*. Corollaries. 1. The transverse axis is to the conjugate as radius to the cosine of the circle’s inclination to the primitive. 2. Half the transverse axis is the cosine of half the sum of the greatest and least distances of the less circle from the primitive. 3. The extremities of the conjugate axis are in the line of measures, distant from the centre of the primi¬ tive by the cosines of the greatest and least distances of the less circle from the primitive. 4. If 43° Oitliogra- j>hic Pro¬ jection of tlie Splicre. Tig. 33. fig. 34. PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. Sect. II 4. If from the extremities of the conjugate axis of any elliptical projection perpendiculars be drawn (in the same direction if the circle do not intersect the primi¬ tive, but if otherwise in opposite directions), they wrl intersect an arch of the primitive, whose chord is equal to the diameter of the circle. Proposition V. Theorem V. The projected poles of an inclined circle are in its line of measures distant from the centre of the primitive the sine of the inclination of the circle to the pri¬ mitive. Let ABCD (fig. 32.) be a great circle, perpendicu¬ lar both to the primitive and the inclined circle, and intersecting them 111 the diameters AC , ISIN. T hen ABCD passes through the poles of the inclined circle: let these be P, Q ; and let P^, Q be perpendicular to AC } p., q are the pro]ected poles 5 and it is evident that pO = sine of BP, or MA, the inclination Corollaries. 1. The centre of the primitive, the centre of the pro¬ jection, the projected poles, and the extremities of the conjugate axis, are all in one and the same straight line. . . 2. The distance of the centre of projection from the centre of the primitive, is to the cosine of the distance of the circle from its own pole, as the sine of the cir¬ cle’s inclination to the primitive is to the radius. GV of the primitive equal to QP, and draw \ A at Orthogn right angles to GC ; and in G g towards the opposite phicl'n parts of C, take CB equal to AC j then, with the greater axis BS, and less axis AB, describe an ellipse, i | ^ and it will be the projection of the oblique circle re¬ quired. 3. When the distance of the given point from the primitive is equal to the cosine of the given inclination. Every thing remaining as in the preceding case} let A be the given point, and AC the cosine of an arch GV, equal to the given arch QP } then drawing the diameter RCS at right angles to ACB, the ellipse de¬ scribed with the given axis RS, AB will be the projec¬ tion of the inclined circle. 4. When the distance of the given point from the centre of the primitive is less than the semidiameti 1 of primitive, but greater than the cosine of the given in¬ clination. Let D be the given point, through which draw the diameter IC 2; and at the point D draw DL peipen- dicular to DC meeting the primitive in L } also draw LK, making with LD the angle DLK equal to the complement of the given inclination. Let Llv meet DC in K } then will DK be less than DC. On DC as Walker a diameter describe a circle, and make DH equal to ^ r DK} through H draw a diameter of the primitive1' RCS, and describe an ellipse through the points R, D, S, and it will be the projection of the inclined circle. Proposition VIII. Problem III. Proposition VI. Problem I. Through two given points in the plane of the pnnn- tive to describe the projection of a great circle. To describe the projection of a circle perpendicular to the primitive, and whose distance from its pole is equal to a given quantity. Let PA p B (fig. 33.) be the primitive circle, and P, p the poles of the right circle to be projected. Then if the circle to be projected is a great circle, draw the diameter AB at right angles to the axis P p, and it will be that required. But if the required pro¬ jection is that of a less circle, make PE, PF each equal to the chord of the distance of the less circle from its pole} join EE, and it will be the projection of the less circle required. Proposition VII. Problem II. Through a given point in the plane of the primitive to describe the projection of a great circle, having a given inclination to the primitive. 1. When the given inclination is equal to a right anode, a straight line drawn throngh the centre of the primitive, and the given point, will be the projection required. 2. When the given inclination is less than a right angle, and the given point in the circumference of the primitive. Let R (fig. 34). he a point given in the circumference of the primitive, through which it is re¬ quired to draw the projection of a great circle, inclined to the primitive in an angle measured by the arch QP of the primitive. Through the given point R draw the diameter RCS, and draw GCg at right angles to it. Make the arch 1. If the two given points and the centre of the pri¬ mitive be in the same straight line, then a diameter of the primitive being drawn through these points will be the projection of the great circle required. 2. When the two given points are not in the same straight line with the centre of the primitive} and one of them is in the circumference of the primitive. - Let DR (fig. 34.) be the two given points, of which R is in the circumference of the primitive. Draw the diameters RCS, and GC g, FDH perpendicular to it, meeting the primitive in Gg F. Divide GC, £ C, in A, B, in the same proportion as FH is divided in D } and describe the ellipse whose axes are RS, AB, and centre C; and it will be the projection required. 3. When the given points are within the primitive, and not in the same straight line with its centre. Let D, E (fig. 35.) be the two given points; lg' through C the centre of the primitive draw the straight lines ID, KE i; draw DL perpendicular to I /, and EO perpendicular to K k, meeting the primitive in L, O. Through E, and towards the same parts of C, draw EP parallel to DC, and in magnitude a fourth proportional to LD, DC, OE. Draw the diameter CP meeting the primitive in R, S, and describe an el¬ lipse through the points D and R, or S, and it will also pass through E. This ellipse will be the projection of the proposed inclined circle. Proposition IX. Problem IV. To describe the projection of a less circle parallel to the primitive, its distance from the pole of the primitive being given. riom [lii# ect. n. Irthogra- From the pole of the primitive, with the sine of the l)lic Pi0- given distance of the circle from its pole, describe a ;eeCSp0he?e.C^]g’ and lt wiU be projection of the given less Proposition X. Problem V. About a given point as a projected pole to describe the projection of an inclined circle, whose distance from its pole is given. Let P (fig. 36.) be the given projected pole, through which draw the diameter G g, and draw the diameter H b perpendicular thereto. From P draw PL per¬ pendicular to GP meeting the circumference in L ; through which draw the diameter L /. Make LT, LIv each equal to the chord of the distance of the less ciicle from its pole, and join i K, which intersects L /, Q- JI0m tl,e Points T, Q, K, draw the lines FA, QS, KB, perpendicular to Gg; and make OK, OS, each equal to QT, or QK. Then an ellipse described through the points A, S, B, K will be the projection of the proposed less circle. 37* 38.. Proposition XI. Problem VI. To find the poles of a given projected circle. 1. If the projected circle be parallel to the primitive, the centre of the primitive will be its pole. 2. It the circle be perpendicular to the primitive, then the extremities of a diameter of the primitive drawn at right angles to the straight line representing the pro¬ jected circle, will be the poles of that circle. 3. When the projected circle is inclined to the pri¬ mitive. Let ARBS (fig. 36, 37.) be the elliptical projection ot any oblique circle ; through the centre of which, and C the centre of the primitive, draw the line of mea¬ sures CBA, meeting the ellipse in B, A, and the pri¬ mitive in G, g. Draw CH, BK, AT perpendicular to G g, meeting the primitive in H, K, T. Bisect the arch KT in L, and draw LP perpendicular to G g-; a tmdci wil! be th? Pr.°.iected pole of the circle, of which AKBS is the projection. Proposition XII. Problem VII. To measure any portion of a projected circle, and con¬ versely. projection of the sphere. t intercepted portion BF of the primitive will be the OrtlZ^ measure of the given arch DE of the less circle DEH. phic Pro 3- D the given less circle, of which an arch is to be jection of measured, is perpendicular to the primitive. the sPhere. Let ADEB (fig. 40.) be the less circle, of which ^ the measure of the arch DE is required. Through C ^ 4°‘ the centre of the primitive, draw the line of measures M m, and from the intersection O of the given right circle, and the line of measures, with the radius OA°or OB describe the semicircle AFGB; through the points D, L, draw the lines DF, EG parallel to the line of measures, and the arch EG will be the measure of DE to the radius AO. In order to find a similar arch in the circumlerence of the primitive, join OF, OG, and at the centre C of the primitive, make the angle m CH equal to FOG, and the arch m H to the radius C m will be the measure of the arch DE. 4. When the great projection is of a less circle incli¬ ned to the primitive. . ^et (%• 41-) be the projection of a less circle Fig 41 inclined to the primitive, and DE a portion of that cir- cle to be measured. Through O the centre of the pro¬ jected circle, and C the centre of the primitive, draw the line of measures M m ; and from the centre O, with the radius OK, or OS, describe the semicircle KGFS : through the points D, E, draw the lines DF, EG parallel to the line of measures, and EG will be the measure of the arch DE to the radius OR, or OS .loin OI OG, and make the angle m CH equal to 1 UG, and the arch m H of the primitive will he the measure of the arch DE ol the inclined circle RDS. 1 he converse of this proposition, namely, to cut off an arch from a given projected circle equal to a given arch ol the primitive, is obvious. The above operation would be greatly shortened by using the line of signs in the sector. . 11 seems unnecessary to insist farther on this projec¬ tion, especially as the reader will see the application of it to the projection of the sphere on the planes of the Meridian, Eavator, and Horizon, in the article Geo¬ graphy ; and to the delineation of Eclipses in the arti¬ cle Astronomy. The Ana lemma, Plate CCXXXV. in the article Geography, is also according to this pro¬ jection ; and the method of applying it to the solution ol astronomical problems is there exemplified. SECTION III. 1. cle. When the given projection is that of a great cir- Gnomonic Projection of the Sphere. Let ADBE (fig. 38.) be the given great circle, either perpendicular or inclined to the primitive, of which the portion DE is to be measured, and let M m be the line of measures of the given circle. Through the points D, E, draw the lines EG, DF parallel to m , and the arch IG of the primitive will be the measure of the arch DE of the great circle, and con¬ versely. 1 When the projection is that of a less circle paral¬ lel to the primitive. c DE (fig. 39.) be the portion to be measured, 1 U'1, ?i ^le ess cjr(de DELI parallel to the primitive. From ie centre C draw the lines CD, CE, and produce them to meet the primitive in the points. B, F. Then the te In this projection the eye is in the centre of the sphere, and the plane of projection touches the sphere in a given point parallel to a given circle. It is named gnomonic, on account of its being the foundation of di¬ alling : the plane of projection may also represent the plane of a dial, whose centre being the projected pole, the semiaxis of the sphere will be the stile or gnomon of the dial. As the projection of great circles is represented by straight lines, and less circles parallel to the plane of projection are projected into concentric circles : there¬ fore many problems of the sphere are very easily resol¬ ved. Other problems, however, become more intricate on account of some of the circles being projected into ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas. Proposition 432 Gnomonic I’rojection of the Sphere. Fig. 42. PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. Proposition I. Theorem I. Every great circle is projected into a straiglit line per¬ pendicular to the line of measures 5 and whose distance from the circle is equal to the cotangent of its inc 1- nation, or to the tangent of its nearest distance Irom the pole of the projection. Let BAD (fig. 42-) be tbe g'iven cIre1*’ an(1] kt the circle CBED be perpendicular to BAD, and to the plane of projection j whose intersection Cl’ with this last plane will be the line of measures. Now since the circle CBED is perpendicular both to the given circle BAD and to the plane of projection, the com¬ mon section of the two last planes produced will there¬ fore be perpendicular to the plane ol the circle CBL1 produced, and consequently to the line ot measures: hence the given circle will be projected into that sec¬ tion ; that is, into a straight line passing through it, perpendicular to C d. Now C d is the cotangent of the angle C A, the inclination of the given circle, or the tangent of the arch CD to the radius AC. Corollaries. 1. A great circle perpendicular to the plane of pro¬ jection is projected into a straight line passing through the centre of projection : and any arch is projected into its correspondent tangent. 2. Any point, as D, or the pole of any circle, is pro¬ jected into a point d, whose distance from the pole of projection is equal to the tangent ol that distance. 3. If two great circles be perpendicular to each other, and one of them passes through the pole of pro¬ jection, they will be projected into two straight lines perpendicular to each other. 4. Hence if a great circle be perpendicular to several other great circles, and its representation pass through the centre of projection $ then all these circles rvill be represented by lines parallel to one another, and per¬ pendicular to the line of measures, for representation of that first circle. Proposition II. Theorem II. If two great circles intersect in the pole of projection, their representations will make an angle at the centie of the plane of projection, equal to the angle made by these circles on the sphere. For since both these circles are perpendicular to the plane of projection, the angle made by their intersec¬ tions with this plane is the same as the angle made by these circles. Proposition III. Theorem III. Any less circle parallel to the plane ol projection is pro¬ jected into a circle whose centre is the pole of projec¬ tion, and its radius is equal to the tangent ot the dis¬ tance of the circle from the pole ol projection. Sect. Ill Gnomor Corollary. ErojectL . of the If a circle be parallel to the plane of projection, and Sphere, 45 degrees from the pole, it is projected into a circle equal to a great circle of the sphere ; and therefore may be considered as the primitive circle, and its ladius the radius of projection. Proposition IV. Theorem IV. A less circle not parallel to the plane of projection is projected into a conic section, whose transverse axis is in the line of measures ; and the distance ol its nearest vertex from the centre of the plane ot pro¬ jection is equal to the tangent of its nearest distance from the pole of projection j and the distance ol the other vertex is equal to the tangent of the greatest distance. Any less circle is the base of a cone whose vertex ^ is at A (fig. 43.) ; and this cone being produced, its in- £‘4j tersection with the plane of projection will he a conic section. Thus the cone DAF, having the circle DF for its base, being pioduced, will be cut by the plane of projection in an ellipse whose transverse diameter is df; and C d is the tangent of the angle CAD, and c f the tangent of CAF. In like manner, the cone AFE, having the side AE parallel to the line of mea¬ sures d f; being cut by the plane of projection, the section will be a parabola, ol whichJ^is the nearest ver¬ tex, and the point into which E is projected is at an infinite distance. Also the cone AFG, whose base is the circle FG, being cut by the plane of projection, the section will be a hyperbola ", of which/is the near¬ est vertex j and GA being produced gives d the other vertex. Corollaries. 1. A less circle will be projected into an ellipse, a parabola or hyperbola, according as the distance of its most remote point is less, equal to, or greater than, 90 degrees. 2. If H be the centre, and K &, / the focus of the ttt^ A d—A/ ellipse, hyperbola, or parabola j then HK. — ^ for the ellipse *, H for the hyperbola j and / n being drawn perpendicular to hJL f n for the parabola. 2 Proposition V. Theorem V. Let the plane TW (fig. 44.) be perpendicular^ to the Fig. 44. plane of projection TV, and BCD a great circle of the sphere in the plane TW. Let the great circle BED be projected into the straight line b ek. Draw CQS perpendicular to b k, and C m parallel to it and equal to CA, and make QS equal to Q m ; then any angle QS t is the measure of the arch Q £ ol the pro¬ jected circle. Let the circle PI (fig. 42.) be parallel to the plane GF, then the equal arches PC, C.L are projected into the equal tangents GC, CH", and therefore C the point of contact and pole of the circle PI and ot the projec¬ tion, is the centre of the representation G, H. 1 Join AQ : then because C m is equal to C A, the angle QC m equal to QCA, each being a right angle, and the side QC common to both triangles j therefore Q m, or its equal QS, is equal QA. Again, since the plane ACQ is perpendicular to the plane TV, and b Q ect. IIL nomoHic to the intersection CQ j theiefore b Q is perpendicular rojection both to AQ and QS : hence, since AQ and QS PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. are :■ 44- equal, all the angles at S cut the line b Q in the same points as the equal angles at A. But by the angles at A the circle BED is projected into the line b Q. Therefore the angles at S are the measures of the parts of the projected circle b Q ; and S is the dividing centre thereof. * Corollaries. I- Any great circle Q £ is projected into a line of tangents to the radius SQ. 2. If the circle b C pass through the centre of pro¬ jection, then the projecting point A is the dividing cen¬ tre thereof, and G ^ is the tangent of its correspondent arch CB to CA the radius of projection. Proposition VI. Theorem VI. Let the parallel circle GLH (fig. 44.) be as far from the pole of projection C as the circle FNI is from its pole; and let the distance of the poles C, P be bisect- , eJ by the radius AO : and draw b AD perpendicular to AO ; then any straight line b Q t drawn through b will cut ob tne arches h /, l n equal to each other in the representations of these equal circles in the plane of projection. Corollary. Hence, if from the projected pole of any circle a perpendicular be erected to the line of measures, it will cut Oil a quadrant from the representation of that circle. 433 Gnomon k; Projection of die Sphere. Proposition VIII. Theorem VIII. Let F n & (fig. 45.) be the projection of any circle FI, and p the projection of its pole P. If C g be the cotangent of CAP, and g B perpendicular to the line ot measures g C, let CAP be bisected by A 0, and the line 0 B drawn to any point B, and also p B cutting Y n kin d; then the'angle p- 0 B is the mea¬ sure of the arch F d. 45* I he arch PG is a quadrant, and the anpje p- 0 A=: P A-f-o A P=g A C-foA p—g a C-f C A o=g A 0; therefore g- Az=g 0; consequently 0 is the dividing cen- tix 0 g 13, the representation of GA 5 and hence, by i rop. v. the angle ^ o B is the measure of g B. But since pg represents a quadrant, therefore/? is the pole of g B ; and hence the great circle p dB passing through the pole of the circles g B and F n will cut off equal arches m both, that is F d=g B=angle g o B. Corollary. ^ Let the projections of the less circles be described* Then, because BD is perpendicular to AO, the arches BO, DO are equal ; but since the less circles are equally distant each from its respective pole, therefore the arches FO, OH are equal; and hence the arch BF ia equal to the arch DH. For the same reason the arches BN, DL are equal; and the angle FBN is equal to the angle LDH; therefore, on" the sphere, the arches I N, HL are equal. And since the great circle BNLD is projected into the straight line b Q n f, &c. therefore n is the projection of N, and l that of L ; hence/ra, h /, the projections of FN, TIL respectively, are equal. Proposition VII. Theorem VII. HS- HYnk, h lg, (fig. 45.) be the projections of two equal circles, whereof one is as far from its pole P as the other from its pole C, which is the centre of projec¬ tion ; and if the distance of the projected poles C,/? be divided in o, so that the degrees in (b o, o p he equal, and the perpendicular o S be erected to the line of measures g h. Then the line p n> C l drawn from the poles C, /?, through any point Q in the line 0 S, ivill cut oft the arches F n, h l equal to each other, and to the angle Q C/?. Phe great circle A o perpendicular to the plane of the primitive is projected into the straight line o S perpendi¬ cular to g-/?, by Prop. i. cor. 3. Let Q be the projec¬ tion of and since/? Q, CQ are straight lines, they are therefore the representations of the arches P <7, C q of great circles. Now since P y C is an isosceles spherical triangle, the angles PCQ, CPQ are therefore equal ; and hence the arches P C <7 produced will cut off equal arches from the given circles FI, GH, whose re¬ presentations 1 «, h l are therefore equal: and since the angle QC/? is the measure of the arch h /, it is also the measure of its equal F n. Vol. XVII. Part II. The angle g 0 B is the measure of the angle g pB. 1 or the triangle g p B represents a triangle on the sphere, wherein the arch which g B represents is equal to the angle which the angle p represents ; because gp is a quadrant; therefore g- 0 B is the measure of both. Proposition IX. Theorem I. To draw a great circle through a given point, and whose distance from the pole of projection is equal to a given quantity. Let ADB (fig. 46.) be the projection, C its pole or FiV. 46. centre, and P the point through which a great circle is ° ^ to be drawn : through the points P, C draw the straight line PC A, and draw CE perpendicular to it: make the angle CAE equal to the given distance of the circle from the pole of projection C ; and from the centre C, with tne 1 ad ms Ck, describe the circle El* G : through P draw the straight line PIK, touching the circle EFG in I, and it will be the projection of the great circle re¬ quired. Proposition X. Problem II. To draw a great circle perpendicular to a great circle which passes through the pole of projection, and at a given distance from that pole. Let ADB (fig. 46.) be the primitive, and Cl the given circle : draw CL perpendicular to Cl, and make the angle CLI equal to the given distance: then the straight line KP, drawn through I parallel to CL, will be the required projection. Proposition XI. Problem III. At a given point in a projected great circle, to draw another great circle to make a given angle with the former; and, conversely, to measure the angle con¬ tained between two great circles. Let P (fig. 47.) be the given point in the given great 47. I 3 I circle PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. of the Sphere. Clonic circle PB, and C the centre of the primitive : Projection the points P, C draw the straight line 1 CG , and d ^ the radius of the primitive CA perpendicular theie , join PA; to which draw AG perpendicular: through G draw BGD at right angles to GP, meeting PB in B ; bisect the angle CAP by the straight line AO , join BO, and make the angle BOD equal ^ that g*ven ’ then DP being joined, the angle BPD will he that re- 4 If the measure of the angle BPD be required, from the points B, D draw the lines BO, DO, and the ang e BOD is the measure of BPD. Proposition XII. Problem 1^ • To describe the projection of a less circle parallel to the plane of projection, and at a given distance from its pole. Fi,r 46. Let ADB (fig. 46-) he the primitive, and C its cen- ” tre : set the distance of the circle from its pole, from to H, and from H to D ; and dravy the straight line AED, intersecting CE perpendicular to BC, in the point E : with the radius CR describe the circle El G, and it is the projection required. Proposition XIII. Problem V. To draw a less circle perpendicular to the plane of pro¬ jection. Plate Let C (fig. 48.) be the centre of projection, and TI CCCCXLVII. a great circle parallel to the proposed less cnee, at %. 45- make the angles 1CN, TCO each equal to the distance Sect. I! one half of H Q : then with the vertex j\ and focus Gnomon: describe the parabola f m, for the projection of the gi- i'rojcctn • 1 TT' P Of the: ven circle IE. Sphere,: Proposition XV. Problem ^ II. '—N— To find the pole of a given projected circle. Let DME (fig. 50.) be the given projected circle Fig. 5c. whose line of measures is DI, and C the centre of pio- jection ; from C draw the radius of projection CA, per¬ pendicular to the line of measures, and A will be the projecting point : join AD, AT1, and bisect the angle DAE by the straight line AP ; hence P is the pole. If the given projection be an hyperbola, the angle /AG (fig. 49.), bisected, will give its pole in the line of measures ; and in a parabola, the angle/AE bisect¬ ed will give its pole. Proposition XVI. Problem VIII. To measure any portion of a projected great circle, or to lay off any number of degrees thereon. Let EP (fig. 51.) be tbe great circle, and IP a por-Fig.51. tionthereofto be measured: draw ICD perpendicular to IP ; let C be the centre, and CB the radius of projec¬ tion, with which describe the circle LBD ; make IA equal to IB; then A is the dividing centre of EP; hence AP being joined, the angle IAP is the measure of the arch IP. . Or, if IAP be made equal to any given angle, then IP is*the correspondent arch of the projection. Proposition XVII. Problem IX. Fig. 49- make tue angles ^ . . rpr iDf of the less circle from its parallel great circle II; t CL be the radius of projection, and from the extremity L draw LM perpendicular thereto ; make C\ equal to LM; or GF equal to CM: then with the vertex V and * See Conic assymptotes CN, CO describe the hyperbola M \ K ; Sections. or/wjth the focus F and CV describe the hyperbola, and it will be the perpendicular circle described. Proposition XIV. Problem ^ I. To describe the projection of a less circle inclined to the plane of projection. Draw the line of measures dp (fig. 49O i and at C, the centre of projection, draw CA perpendicular to dp, and equal to the radius of projection: with the centre A, and radius AC, describe the circle DCFG ; and draw LAE parallel io dp: then take the greatest and least distances of the circle from the pole of projection, and set them from C to D and F respectively, for the circle DI ; and from A, the projecting point, draw the straight lines AI/, and ADd; then df will be the transverse axis of the ellipse ; but if D fall beyond the line HE, as at G, then from G draw the line GAD/ and // is the transverse axis of an hyperbola : and it the point D tall in the line HE, as at E, then the line AE will not meet the line of measures, and the circle will be projected into a parabola whose vertex is/: bisect d f in H, the centre, and tor the ellipse take half the difference of the lines A/ A/ which laid from H will give K the focus : for the hy¬ perbola, half the sum of A/ A/ being laid trom 11, will give k its focus: then with the transve’rse axis dj, and focus K, or k, describe the ellipse d M/ or hyper¬ bola/ m, which will be the projection ot the inclined circle: for the parabola, make EQ equal to I'/ and draw/ n perpendicular to AQ, and make/A: equal to To measure any arch of a projected less circle, or to lay off any number of degrees on a given projected less circle. Let F 11 (fig. 52.) be the given less circle, and P its Fig. 52, pole : from the centre of projection C draw CA perpen¬ dicular to the line of measures GH, and equal to the ra¬ dius of projection ; join AP, and bisect the angle CAP by the straight line AO, to which draw AD perpendi¬ cular : describe the circle G l II, as far distant from the pole of projection C as the given circle is from its pole P; and through any given point n, in the projected cir¬ cle F n, draw D n l, then H l is the measure of the arch F 7Z* Or let the measure be laid from H to l, and the line D / joined will cut off F rc equal thereto. Proposition XVIII. Problem X. To describe the gnomonic projection of a spherical triangle, when three sides are given ; and to find the measures of either of its angles. 1 Let ABC (fig. 53.) be a spherical triangle whose pjg. J three sides are given : draw the radius CD (fig. 54-) Fig. 54 perpendicular to the diameter of the primitive El ; and at the point D make the angles CDA, CDG, ADI, equal respectively to the sides AC, BC, AB» of spherical triangle ABC (fig. 53.), the lines DA, DG intersecting the diameter EE, produced if necessary m the points A and G : make DI equal to DG ; then from the centre C, with the radius CG, describe an arch ; and from A, with the distance AI, describe ano¬ ther arch, intersecting tlie former in B ; join AB, CtS, and ACB will he the projection of the spherical tri¬ angle (fig. <;3-) 5 an(I Bie rectilineal angle ACii is tlie measure of the spherical angle ACB (fig- 53-) • Proposition. Sect. Ill* PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. Proposition XIX. Problem XL J5nomonic Projection of the The three angles of a spherical triangle being given, to project it, and to find the measures of the sides. Sphere. ■ iff- 55- Let ABC (fig. 55.) be the spherical triangle of which the angles are given : construct another spherical triangle EFG, whose sides are the supplements of the given angles of the triangle ABC ; and with the sides of this supplemental triangle describe the gnomonic pro¬ jection, &c. as before. It may be observed, that the supplemental triangle EFG has also a supplemental part EFg-; and when the sides GE, GF, which are substituted in place of the angles A, B, are obtuse, their supplements g-E, g F are to be used in the gnomonic projection of the tri¬ angle. Proposition XX. Problem XII. of the triangle > and to find the measure of the re¬ maining parts. Let the sides AC, CB, and the angle BAC of the spherical triangle ABC (fig. 53.) be given : make the angles CDA, CDG (fig. 56.) equal respectively to the measures of the given sides AC, BC : draw L>K perpendicular to AD, make KH equal to DK, and the angle KHI equal to the given spherical angle BAC;- draw the perpendicular KI, meeting HI m I ; join AI j and from the centre C, with the distance LG, describe the arch GB, meeting AI in B ; join , > and wiU he the rectilineal projection of the spherical triangle ABC (fig. 53.) and the measures ot the unknown parts of the triangle may be found as before. 435 Gnomonic Projection of tile Sphere. Proposition XXIII. Problem XV. 'Si 5C Given two sides, and the included angle of a spheri¬ cal triangle, to describe the gnomonic projection of that triangle, and to find the measures of the other parts. Let the sides AC, CB, and the angle ACB (fig. 53.), be given ; make the angles CDA, CDG (fig. 56.) equal respectively to the sides AC, CB (fig. 53.) j also make the angle ACB (fig. 56.) equal to the spherical angle ACB (fig. 53.), anil CB equal to CG, and ABC will be the projection of the spherical tri¬ angle. To find the measure of the side AB : from C draw CL perpendicular to AB, and CM parallel thereto, meeting the circumference of the primitive in Mj make LX equal to LM } join AN, BN, and the angle ANB will be the measure of the side AB. To find the measure of either of the spherical angles, as BAC : from D draw DK perpendicular to AD, and make KH equal to KD : from K draw KI per¬ pendicular to CK, and let AB produced meet KI in I, and join HI: then the rectilineal angle Kill is the measure of the spherical angle BAC. By proceeding in a similar manner, the measure of the other angle will be found. Given two angles, and a side opposite to one of them, to describe the gnomonic projection of the triangle, and to find the measures of the other parts. Let the angles A, B, and the side BC of the tri¬ angle ABC (fig. 55.) be given: let the supplemental triangle FEE be formed, in which the angles E, F G are the supplements of the sides BC, CA° AB, respec¬ tively, and the sides EF, FG, GE, the supplements of the angles C, A, B. Now at the centre C (fig. r6.) make the angles CDA, CDK equal to the measures of the sides GE, GF respectively, being the supple¬ ments of the angles B and A 5 and let the lines DA, DK intersect the diameter of the primitive EF in the points A and K : draw DG perpendicular to AD, make GH equal to DG, and at the point H make the angle GHI equal to the angle E, or to its supplement ; and let El, perpendicular to CH, meet HI in I, and join AI : then from the centre C, with the distance CG, describe an arch intersecting AI in B 5 join CB, and ABC will be the gnomonic projection of the gi¬ ven triangle ABC (fig. 55.) : the supplement of the angle ACB (fig. 56.) is the measure of the side AB, (fig- 55-) 5 the measures of the other parts are found5 as before. Proposition XXL Problem XIII. Two angles and the intermediate side given, to describe the gnomonic projection of the triangle ; and to find the measures of the remaining parts. Let the angles CAB, ACB, and the side AC of the spherical triangle ABC (fig. 53.), be given: make the angle CDA (fig. 56.) equal to the measure of the given side AC (fig. 53.) ; and the angle ACB (fig. 36.) equal to the angle ACB (fig. 53.) ; produce AC to H, draw DK perpendicular to A3), and make KH equal to KD; draw KI perpendicular to CK, and make the angle Kill equal to the spherical angle CAB : from I, the intersection of KT, HI, to A draw IA, and let it in¬ tersect CB in B, and ACB will be tbe gnomonic pro¬ jection of the spherical triangle ACB (fig. 93.). The unknown parts of this triangle may be measured by last problem. Proposition XXII. Problem XIV. Two sides of a spherical triangle, and an angle oppo¬ site to one of them given, to describe the projection It has already been observed, that this method of pro¬ jection has, for the most part, been applied to dialling only. However, from the preceding propositions, it ap¬ pears that all the common problems of the sphere may be more easily resolved by this than by either of the pre¬ ceding methods of projection ; and tbe facility with which these problems are resolved by this method has given it the preference in dialling. It may not per¬ haps be amiss in this place, to give a brief illustration of it in this particular branch of science. In an horizontal dial, the centre of projection Z (fig- 57-) represents tbe zenith of the place for which Fig. ^7. the dial is to be constructed ; ZA the perpendicular height of the style : the angle ZPA, equal to the given latitude, determines the distance ZP of the zenith from the pole ; and AP the edge of the style, which by its shadow gives the hour : the angle ZAP, equal also to the latitude, gives the distance of the equator EQ from the zenith : let E a be equal to EA, and a will be the dividing point of the equator. Hence if the angles E a I, E a II, &c. E a XI, E a X, &c» be made equal 1° 15°» 30°> ^•c* lfie equator will he divided into hours; 3 I 2 and 436 Gnomomc 1’rojection oi' the Sphere. PROJECTION OF THE SPHERE. and lines drawn from P to tliese points of division will be hour lines. . > i • If the dial is either vertical, or inclined to the hori¬ zon, then the point Z will he the zenith of that place whose horizon is parallel to the plane ol the dial. Z.L will be that latitude of the place and the hours on the former dial will now be changed into others, by a quan¬ tity equal to the difference of longitude between the given place and that for which the dial is to be con¬ structed. Thus, if it is noon when the shadow oi the style falls on the line PX, then the difference oi meri¬ dians is the angle E a X, or 3c0. Hence, when a dial is to be constructed upon a given plane, either perpen¬ dicular or inclined to the horizon, the decimation and inclination of that place must be previously found. In an erect direct south dial, its zenith z. is the south point of the horizon, ZP is the distance oi this point from the pole, and ZE its distance Irom the equa¬ tor. If the dial is directed to the north, Z represents the north point of the horizon ', PZ the distance ol Z from the pole under the horizon ; and ZE the elevation of the equator above the horizon. _ If the dial is an erect east or west dial, the zenith Z is the east or west points of the horizon, accordingly, and the pole P is at an infinite distance, for the angle ZAP is a right angle, and therefore the line At will Sect. I[ not meet the meridian PZ. The line ZA produced is Gm>mo: the equator, and is divided into hours by lines perpen- Projecti! dicular to it. If the plane of the dial is parallel to the equator, its zenith Z coincides with one ol the poles of the equa¬ tor P", and hence the hour lines ol this dial are formed by drawing lines from the point Z, containing angles equal to 150. In the preceding methods of projection of the sphere, equal portions of a great circle on the sphere are re¬ presented by unequal portions in the plane of projec¬ tion, and this inequality increases with the distance from the centre of projection. Hence, in projections of the earth, those places towards the circumference of the projection are very much distorted. In order to a/oid this inconveniencv, M. de la Hire ^ proposed, that the * Hist eye should he placed in the axis produced at the di-^OT; stance of the sine ol 450 beyond the pole: In this case A arches of the sphere and their projections are veiy near- gee ^ 1 ]y proportional to each other. Hence in a map of theticle C-.i earth agreeable to this construction, the axis, instead of being divided into a line of semitangents, is divided equally^ in like manner as the circumference. The map of the world is constructed agreeable to this method of projection. Projection 11 Prolate. PRO PROJECTION, in Perspective, denotes the appear¬ ance, or representation of an object on the perspective plane. . . . , , , • , The projection of a point is a point through which an ontic ray passes from the objective point through the plane to the eye •, or it is the point wherein the plane cuts the optic ray. And hence may he easily conceived what is meant by the projection of a line, a plane, or a solid. ' Projection, in Alchemy, the casting of a certain imaginary powder, called powder of projection, into a crucible, or other vessel, full of some prepared metal, or other matter ; which is to be hereby presently trans¬ muted into gold. Powder oj' Projection, or of the philosophers stone, is a powder supposed to have the virtue of changing any quantity of an imperfect metal, as copper or lead, into a more perfect one, as silver or gold, by the admixture of a little quantity thereof. The mark to which alchemists directed all their en¬ deavours, was to discover this powder of projection. See Philosophers Stone, and Chemistry, History of. PROJECTURE, in Architecture, the outjetting and prominency, or embossing, which the mouldings and other members have beyond the naked wall, column, &c. PROLAPSUS, in Surgery, a prolapsion or falling out of any part of the body from its natural situation : thus we say, prolapsus intestini, “ a prolapsion qf the in¬ testine,'” &c. See Surgery. PROLATE, in Geometry, an epithet applied to a spheroid produced by the revolution of a semi-ellipsis about its larger diameter. See Spheroid. PRO PROLEGOMENA, in Philology, certain prepara- torv observations or discourses prefixed to a book, &c. containing something necessary for the reader to be ap¬ prised of” to enable" him the better to understand the L book, or to enter deeper into the science, &c. PROLEPSIS, a figure in Rhetoric, by which we anticipate or prevent what might be objected by the ad¬ versary. See Oratory, N" 80. PROLE PTIC, an epithet applied to a periodical dis¬ ease which anticipates, or whose paroxysm returns sooner and sooner every time 5 as is frequently the case in agues. PROLIFER FLOS, {proles, “ an offspring and fero, “ to bear) j” a prolific flower, or a flower which ‘from its own substance produces another-, a singular de¬ gree of luxuriance, to which full flowers are chiefly in¬ cident. See Botany. PROLIFIC, something that has the qualities neces¬ sary for generating. The prolific powers of some individuals among man¬ kind are very extraordinary—Instances have been found where children, to the number ot six, seven, eight, nine, and sometimes sixteen, have been brought iorth alter one pregnancy. The wife ol Emmanuel Gago, a la¬ bourer near Valladolid, was delivered, the 14th of June 1779, of five girls, the two first of whom were bap¬ tized : the other three were born in an hour after 5 two of them were baptized ; but the last, when it came into the world, had every appearance ot death. Jhe cele¬ brated Tarsin was brought to bed in the seventh month of her pregnancy, at Argenteuil near Paris, 17th July 1779, of three boys, each 14 inches and a hall long, and of a girl 13 inches: they were all four baptized, but did not live 24 hours. I he Prole; men; 11. Proli T&. A PROJE-CTIOXofthe SPHERE. PL1TE CCCCWff. , £- FW-9- jFw.JO. " A PROJECTI ON of the SI’HUUE. /‘LIZ/; CCCCJLVZ J^iq. 39. Fuj. 40. FY a Muscovite peasant, named James and Ins wife, were presented to the empress of Russia. This peasant Ijad been twice married, and was then 70 years of age. His first wife was brought to bed 21 times ; namely, four times of four children each time ; seven times of three, and ten times of two ; making in all 57 children, who were then alive. His second wife, who accompanied him, had already been delivered seven times, once of three children, and six times of twins, which made 15 children for her share. Thus the Muscovite patriarch had already had 72 chil¬ dren by two marriages. We are assured that the sul¬ tan Mustapha III. had issue by his concubines 580 male children. What number of female children he had, and whether there were twins of both sexes, we are not informed. Ihese facts suppose great fecundity ; and whatever credit is given them, we must consider as entirely fabulous what is reported concerning a countess of Holland, who was delivered of 365 children, of a very small size. PROLIXITY in discourse, the fault of entering in¬ to too minute a detail, or being too long, precise, and circumstantial, even to a degree of tediousness. PROLOCUTOR of the convocation, the speaker or chairman of that assembly. See Convocation. PROLOGUE, in dramatic poetry, a discourse ad¬ dressed to the audience before the drama or play begins. The original intention was to advertise the audience of the subject of the piece, and to prepare them to enter more.easily into the action, and sometimes to make an apology for the poet. PROMETHEUS, the son of Japetus, supposed to have been the first discoverer of the art of striking fire by flint and steel; which gave rise to the fable of his f 437 ] PRO ronnse. stealing fire from heaven : A renowned warrior ; but wnose history is involved in fable. He flourished about 1687 B. C. The poetical account is, that he formed a man of clay of such exquisite workmanship, that Pallas, charmed with his ingenuity, offered him whatever in heaven could contribute to finish his design ; and for this purpose took him up -with her to the celestial mansions, where he stole some fire from the chariot of the sun, which he used to animate his image. At this theft Jupiter was so enraged, that he ordered Vulcan to chain him down on Mount Caucasus, and sent an eagle or vul¬ ture to prey on his liver; which every night was re¬ newed in proportion to the quantity eaten up in the day¬ time, until at last he was delivered by Hercules, who killed the vulture. Prometheus, in Ancient Astronomy, was the name °f a constellation of the northern hemisphere, now cal¬ led Hercules Eugonasiji. See Astronomy. PROMISE, in ordinary cases, is a declaration of some intention to be put in execution ; but in morals is a solemn asseveration by which one pledges his veracity that he shall perform, or cause to be performed, the thing which he mentions. As such a declaration excites expectations in the minds of those to whom it is made; and ae to frustrate these expectations might rouse indignation, and be fol- Prc lowed by consequences injurious to the person, the cha- ' v racter, or interest, of him who made it—it becomes a * matter of prudence in the promiser to keep his word How il And farther, as a certain degree of confidence is found necessary to the very existence of civil society, and as £’ others may have acted on the GIH, nf I,;c • others may have acted on the faith of his promise, it is now not a matter of prudence only to keep his word— A is a duty which he owes to all who have spent their time, their money, or their labour, in consequence of those expectations which he has warranted them to en¬ tertain. It, then, being consonant to sound reason, necessary to the existence of civil society, and in general the in¬ terest of both the promiser and promisee, that the words of the promise should he fulfilled, it has become a maxim m morals that a man is obliged to perform his promise. In many instances, the great difficulty concerning alnterjrn*. pionnse is, how to explain it; for although the grounds1*011 ol a of its obligation be those expectations which it hasprorai?c raised, a question will occur, Is the promiser bound to difficult10* answer fully all the expectations to which the different constructions ol his words may have given birth ? Should I, lor instance, desire a man to run with a letter to such a place, and engage to satisfy him upon his return ; and if on his return I gave him double of the usual hire in like cases ; but it he be not satisfied with less than the triple of such a sum, am I obliged to grant his demands ? I bis will lead us to consider Rie rules by which a pro¬ mise should be -interpreted. . If a promise were always to be deemed obligatory Whether m the sense in which the promisee receives it, a rnaii ^ 1Rean- would not know what he had promised ; the promisee, ot t^le from a difference of views, associations, and interests’1>r°miSei- might conceive a sense of which the promiser had ne-oug-lit to ver dreamed ; might suppose engagements which were he taken, never intended, which could not be foreseen, and, al¬ though foreseen, could not be performed. For these reasons it is natural to think that the sense of the pro¬ miser should rather direct the interpretation. He knows precisely what it is he has undertaken, and is unques¬ tionably the best judge of what meaning he affixed to his words. His explanation should therefore be admit¬ ted, if information alone could give him a title to de¬ cide in the affair. But something more than mere information, or a knowledge of the cause, is expected from a judge, as integrity is equally essential to his character. Doubts may arise when the words will admit of various mean¬ ings, whether the promiser will be so candid as impar¬ tially to own the precise meaning which he had actually annexed to his expressions : At any rate, if he wishes to deceive, he might purposely use an ambiguous phraseo- logy, and perform the promise in a sense of his own, without satisfying the reasonable hopes of the promisee. W hen the daughter of Tarpeius bargained with Ta- tius to betray the citadel for what he and his Sabines wore on their left hands, meaning their rings and their golden bracelets, Tatius ^probably performed his pro¬ mise in the way which he intended, when he caused her to be buried under their shields, which they carried al¬ so on their left hands. But who will say that here were not treachery and a dishonourable abuse of that confidence which had been reposed in him ? It Promise. It must therefore be obvious, that the import of a i y ' promise, where its meaning is disputed, is not to be de- 5 tei mined by the sense of the promiser nor by the expee- la doubtful tat;ons of t[ie promisee j and if it was said that the obb- interoreta- gation of a promise arose from those expectations which tion of nei- had been raised by it, the assertion now must be limited ther is to to those expectations which were intentionally raised by be trusted. tjie promiser, or those which to his knowledge the pro¬ misee was induced to entertain in consequence of that declaration which had been made to him. Should there still be a doubt about what expectations were intention¬ ally raised, and what should have been reasonably enter¬ tained, recourse must be had to the judgment or those who are allowed to be persons of candour, and who are acquainted with the characters of the men, and with those circumstances in which the promise was made. „ 6 . The following are. some of the cases in which a pro- a mUe is not binding. As the obligation to perform Me is not bind-promise arises from those expectations which are listen¬ ing. tionally raised by the promiser j it is plain that no pro¬ mise can be binding before acceptance, before the pro¬ mise has been communicated to the promisee, and be¬ fore he has entertained hopes of its performance. Ihe case is similar where a promise is released, that is, where- the performance is dispensed with by the promisee, and where he entertains no expectations on account of anv \vu,l it Is thing than the promiser has said to him. Should a third released by person entertain hopes on account of the promise, he is the promi- to cherish these hopes at his own hazard, having no en- see- couragement from the promiser to do so : yet if this per¬ son has been warranted to hope by the promisee, the promisee has renounced his privilege of releasing the promise, and along with the promiser becomes bound for its performance. 8 . A promise is not binding where the performance is Where its un]awfu] an^ tlie performance is unlawful where it is aace^Tun- contrary to former promises, or to any moral and reli¬ gious precept, which from the beginning to the end of time is of perpetual and unalterable obligation. I bus no man is bound by bis promise to give to me what he has already promised to another •, and no man is bound bv his promise to blaspheme God, to commit murder, or to criminate the innocent. Such promises are un¬ lawfully made, and cannot be otherwise than unlawful¬ ly performed. Some have even carried their scruples so tar as to doubt, whether any promise unlawfully made, can be doubS have Awfully performed. Should a man, during the lifetime arisen. of his wife, happen to promise marriage to another, such a man (they say) by the Christian religion has already committed adultery in his heart: and should he after¬ wards become a widower, he is not bound, and he even ought not, to fulfil his engagements, as this would be putting his criminal intention into execution. Tins spe¬ cies of reasoning, we must confess, is to us unintelligi¬ ble. As the wife is dead, what now should prevent the man from marrying the object of his affections ? Why, say the casuists, he already is under a promise to marry her, and his promise was made at a time when it should not have been made. It is true, the performance, con¬ sidered by itself, is opposed by no law human or divine j but then it originated in what was wrong j and however much the Supreme Being and the bulk of the creation may he out of the secret, we have discovered by the in¬ genious logic of casuistry, that evil can never spring 3 lawful A case where out of good, nor good out of evil j but that the means pron:i( and the end, the motive and the action, are always of' ^ the same complexion in morals. . Tcc; When a promise is made, the particular circumstan- Erron^s ces in which it is to he deemed obligatory are some- pronik times mentioned. “ I promise (for instance) to lend my friend 200 pounds within three days, provided a certain creditor which I name do not make a demand on me before that time. In other cases no circumstance is foreseen by the promiser to prevent the fulfilling of his engagement j and hence we have erroneous promi¬ ses, which proceed on the supposition that things are true, possible, and lawful, which are not so. An eno- ncous promise, which proceeds on the false represenui- tion of the promisee, is not binding. A London gentleman lately purchased an. estate in the south of England at a public sale, believing the description which he saw in the newspapers, and which likewise was given by the auctioneer, to be true j but finding afterwards that the estate nowise corresponded to the^description, the law freed him from his engage- ment, because the seller had evidently been guilty of a breach of promise in not satisfying those expectations which he had intentionally and even studiously excited in the buyers. . . 1JJ An erroneous promise, whose performance is impos-Apro je sible, is not binding. Before the conclusion of the nothing late war, a planter of Tobago, promised to send to his ^' friend in England 12 hogsheads ol sugar from the nextance 1Q. year’s produce of his estate-, but before that time To-possit bago fell into the hands of the French, and the West Indian found it impossible to answer the expectations of his friend in England. An erroneous promise, whose performance is unlaw-nor lq ful, or, to speak more precisely, whose performance isj.^smr contrary to a prior promise, or to any moral or reli¬ gious obligation, is not binding. A father, beheung the accounts from abroad of his son’s death, soon al¬ ter bequeathes his fortune to his nephew. but the son, the report ot whose death had been false, returns home, and the father is released from the premise to his nephew, because it was contrary to a prior promise, which he had tacitly come under to his son. This prior promise was implied in the whole of the lather s con¬ duct, and was expressed in signs as emphatic and as unequivocal as those of language.. It had all the ef¬ fect too of the most solemn promise on the son, who, to his father’s knowledge, was induced in consequence of this promise to entertain the most sanguine hopes of succeeding to his father, if he survived. The world likewise could hear testimony that these expectations were not rashly cherished. He was brought into exist¬ ence by means of his father, who was thereby under¬ stood to love him affectionately he was ushered in¬ to society as the representative of his family, and was therefore supposed to be the heir of its wealth. Religion itself supported his pretensions, pronouncing the father worse than an infidel who neglects to show that atten¬ tion to his children which the world naturally expects from a parent.—That the father’s promise was not re¬ leased from the mere circumstance that the mistake was known to his nephew the promisee, will appear plain from the following circumstance. Suppose the father a landed proprietor, that the lease of one of his farms has expired, and that he has long been expecting PRO ■'roniise ] PRO sinn, interest, or opinion. For those reasons it annear- snrpnsmg hot. an, person should ever imagine tbit the obligation to perform a promise should depend entirely mTty!‘e ‘JeaS W ' tlle 1,r0n’iser Winded of its The best refutation of such an opinion are the sing,,. Jar conclusions to winch it leads. ° Promise. 13 ility no Itilii: ill- I. ;14. I pnn- 1 would g uanc- t ta vice » :alse- 1 , [ 43O to let it at 200I.; suppose that this sum is refused 'and that he agrees with the present tenant to mant a new lease at i5ol.-the obligation here to perform his promise is not dissolved by an after offer of 200I though the tenant knew that 200I. had been expect¬ ed, am, that only from despairing of that sum his landlord had granted the new lease at 1 jol. : the pro¬ mise is binding, because the performance is every wav A 1 no , T lawful, contrary to no prior engagement, and opposed have embraced?! Tetsfnto? JUSt-Ce’ 'V!l° api,earS toThec»n*e- to no principle in morals. The law of the land were In - , to, reasoning not very common, quences the proprietor reluctant, would enfore the oblivion 0 trade ° ^ Sy8tr.he 1?oks 0!1 ™«rals as?n article}^?- and exact obedience in the tone of authorilv • k? ’ , * V.lrtUC and v,ce» in l)is Chapter of Promises S'°Tt n- bread,es of faith, were they pe mitted in Lcl^ cares and wrong^rlredTo” m0'' an'' '?SS 5 !"’ the assistance of others, which caprice may refuse or justice withhold. He and all others will he taught to acqmre such ment-and to engage in such pursuits, as shall oblige any honest man to come to their succour if they should stand m need of assistance. This breach of promise, with a view to the general utility, will so tar from being criminal, form a part of that resolute execution of justice which would in a thousand ways increase the independence, the energies, and the virtue of mankind *.” * n j , q . . * CrOdwin s ouch are the views which determined this author to^nfiu^ consider “ the validity of promises” as “ inconsistent with justice,” and as “ foreign to general good.” From one, however, who relies with so much confidence on book id. the promiser, it would certainly be desirable to know cliaP- 3- whether the person, who violates his faith for the pul/ lie utility, is always to be candid. Where breach of£E“ faith promotes his own interest, ought he alone to de-has no right cide on the validity of his promise P or where promises10 *ntrutfe of social union : Men live and prosper but in mutual trust; A confidence of one another’s truth. Oroonoko. r . difficulty which many have to encounter erehy lo ^ wh™ err™neous promises ought or ought »e of n.0t.t0 pe kept» arises ft'Gni their proceeding on a prin- validityCiP e 0 wf]0se consequences they do not seem to be al- jiomises, ways aware. There is seldom, they perceive, a virtu¬ ous action that is not attended with some happy effects : and it will, perhaps, be generally allowed, that the com¬ parative merit of similar virtues may safely be estimated by their utility: But to make utility, as some do, the criterion of virtue, and pronounce an action vicious or virtuous merely on account of those consequences which they see may flow from it, is a dangerous maxim. Evil has often sprung out of good, and good out of evil j and That root of evil Avarice, 1 hat damn’d ill-natur’d baneful vice, Was slave to Prodigality, That noble suij whilst Luxury Employ’d a million of the poor, And odious Pride a million more. Envy itself and Vanity Were ministers of Industry : That darling folly, Fickleness, Li diet, furniture, and dress, I hat strange ridiculous vice, was made The very wheel that turn’d the trade. • <^escnPt*on bere is not altogether false ; and these indeed may be some'of the consequences that flow from avarice, luxury, pride, vanity, and envy: but these are,not a 11. —— To see at once all the consequences that spnng from an action, the good and the bad, the par¬ ticular and general, the immediate and remote, would require sometimes the foresight of Omniscience, and at all tunes a knowledge superior to what is human. In the I able of the Bees, the author’s object was to show that private vices are public benefits 5 and he therefore was naturally led by his argument to consider only such consequences of vice as favoured his hypothesis. Pie wanted candour. And that artifice which runs through Jus P able happens to remind us, that while the remote an tie general effects of an action may not be seen, ae paiticular and immediate, which fall within our no- aie apt to be viewed through the medium of pas- are broken for the general good, is he to be guided byhis s?1.ieraes his own visionary schemes of utility? Is he ^to act as ^hv0n trustee for the public without any delegated power ? PU IC' and shall the community submit to his decisions without so much as putting the question, Who hath made thee a ruler over us ? When a writer thus deviates so far from the path of reason, it is natural to ask, what was the ignisJatuus that misled him ? In the present case it is pretty obvious. Being something of opinion with the celebrated Turgot f, that romances are the only f Sec Note books in which moral principles are treated in an im- book iii. partial, manner, this gentleman, in his Chapter ofchaP' 6* Promises, seems to have borrowed a part of his morality from Promise. PRO from tlie doggerels of Butler 5 f though from different motives, the political principles of Sir Hudibras’s squire, that obedience to civil go¬ vernment is not due because it is promised, he has come to exactly the same conclusion with respect to the obli¬ gation of keeping one’s word. But Ralph has reasone with more ingenuity 5 and has shewn not only that the public good, but the glory of the Lord, may be some¬ times promoted by a breach of taith. * The saints are Godwin’s rational and intelli¬ gent be¬ ings. The saints*, whom oaths and vows oblige, Know little of their privilege } Further, I mean, than carrying on Some self-advantage of their own : For if the dev’l, to serve his turn, Can tell truth, why the saints should scorn, When it serves theirs, to swear and he, I think there’s little reason why: Else h’ has a greater pow’r than they, Which ’twere impiety to say : W’ are not commanded to forbear, Indefinitely, at all to swear; But to swear idly, and in vain, Without self-interest and gain •, For breaking of an oath and lying Is hut a kind of self-denying, A saint-like virtue ; and from hence Some have broke oaths by Providence : Some, to the glory of the Lord, _ Perjur’d themselves and broke their word :—— For saints may do the same thing by The spirit, in sincerity. Which other men are tempted to, And at the devil’s instance do. „ TT Hudibras, Lanto 11, x7 . yiews of utility an unsafe guide in morals. Here are new views of utility j which, were they to he considered as of any weight, would increase the dif¬ ficulty of determining when an erroneous promise ought to he kept. , . But should views of utility be laid aside, and should it be made an invariable rule that truth is on no account to be violated, that deceit is never to be practised, and that moral obligations are not to be dissolved for the prospect of anv physical advantage } those doubts which arise concerning the validity of erroneous promises will soon disappear. Disagreeable perhaps and ridiculous [ 440 ] PRO 1 1 nflouted always be the consequence of judging of the vice Proraiss and having a P _ > ^ ^irtue 0f an action by its utility, and of estimating' v- its utility by our limited views and erroneous concep¬ tions. ... . , As for extorted promises, it is curious to observe how this question should always be started, whether or not they ought to be kept? and another question should seldom he thought of, whether or not they ought lS to be made ? Fortitude was one of the cardinal virtues,Extom among the ancients j and is deemed of such importance in the Christian system, that the fearful are classed with the unbelievers, and are thought unworthy of the fa¬ vour of the Deity, as being incapable of supporting those trials to which heaven exposes the faithful as the truest l9 test of Christian virtue.—If a person should want theWhetl,, necessary fortitude to be virtuous, it will be a poor exAmdmg cuse for his baseness, that he has added deceit to his cowardice : and surely it is not the business of morality, when it has'found him guilty of one crime to giant him a dispensation for committing two. The laws of iurisprudence, it will readily be allowed, cannot favour the claims of the promisee j because they ought never to lend their support to oppression and violence. But their acquital, should he violate his faith, will means vindicate the character of the promise. Iheir acquitting a woman from the charge of adultery, goes a short way in restoring the fair reputation oi her inno- cence Let jurisprudence decide as it will, the man of honour and the generous patriot can never he brought to re¬ spect the person who, struck with a panic, could betray either himself or his friends. The magnanimous spirits who could die for the truth will view with contempt his pitiful deceit. Those unfortunate men who may suffer from that very distrust which the breach of Ins faith has begotten, will always detest him as a traitor and enemy 5 and heaven itself cannot be supposed to re¬ ward that soldierwho deserts her cause, and relinquishes the post which she has assigned him, at the sight of dan¬ ger If we once begin to accommodate morality to the dispositions and humours of mankind, it is hard to say where this species of complaisance will end 1 he de¬ grees of timidity are so various, and some tempers by nature so yielding, that repeated importunity or an ear¬ nest request will extort a promise. : A young lady w*. frequently preyed by her d,,ngTh«l. ! soon disappear. Disagreeable perhaps and nd.culous ^ ' oJJ that she would niff-' consequences may sonietimes arise marry after ids death. For some time she was able to" from an honest and conscientious adherence to theii promise •, but will any assert that the general good, that burden of the song, will ever be endangered by too much veracity. . • i -i r ti So numerous inconveniences arise daily from tlie re- o-ular operation of those great physical laws, which are under the immediate direction of Providence, that those philosophers who have adopted the principle of utility, and are much surprised to see the universe so awkwardly planned for the ease and comfort of them and their spe¬ cies, have been under the necessity of imputing many events in nature to the malignity of some evil indepen¬ dent being \ or of allowing that things have, degenera¬ ted since they first came from the hands of the Crea¬ tor, and that they must now be exceedingly altered from what they had been when He chose to pronounce them all very good. Thus, absurdity or impiety must 4 marry aiiei mo — be aec, resist with becoming spirit his absurd request ; bu- uponnl0(3at » his declaring oftener than once that he could not other-the r- wise die in peace, she complied and promised. T00jntel.e youno-, however, for this eflort of continence, she alter- inanhi wards listened to the addresses of a second lover, and found her heart insensibly engaged before she adverted to the impropriety of a new attachment. . But propo¬ sals of marriage could scarcely fail to remind her ot her promise and awaken her scruples. These she soon com¬ municated to her lover, with her firm resolution to re¬ main a widow, if the contrary measure, which, she greatly preferred, and on which her earthly happiness depended, were not removed by some spiritual counsel- 10 Upon this declaration it was agreed to take the advice of their own minister, who was an eminent dissenting clergyman P B O promise PRO [ 441 1 clergyman in the diocese of Oxford - hut this J . ,....... ;s 21 [oral laws perior to lysical in ' lint of oh' ration. number of arguments on each side of the question, and committed them to a letter, which a learned gentleman of our acquaintance had some time ago an opportunity of seeing in manuscript. J If the sentiments to which the bishop was inclined could have been interred from his statement of argu¬ ments, he seemed to think that the promise was binding. In our opinion, he ought to have a given positive deci¬ sion. It was no matter whether the promise was ex¬ torted or not : the promise was made 5 and the question was now, whether or not was the performance lawful ? That it was lawful appears evident. The lady was un¬ der a moral obligation to remain a widow ; and no moral obligation, so far as we know, required her to marry. To be fruitful and multiply, indeed, is declared in Scripture, and is found, to the woful experience of many to be one of the general laws of our nature. But of all those laws intended by nature to regulate the con- ductof inferiarintelligences, the moral, which were meant to be checks and correctors of those abuses to which the physical are apt to be carried, are certainly the most sacred and obligatory. To procreate his species, a man is not then to be guilty of adultery, or of fornication, or to listen to the lewd calls of incontinency. St Paul’s observation, that it is better to marry than burn, can¬ not be allowed in this instance to have much weight, lie has not defined what degree of amorous inflamma¬ tion constitutes burning, nor in what cases this burning would be a sufficient warrant for marrying. In the present instance he does not even consider marriage as a duty ; he compares it with burning, and thinks it on- Jy the least of the two evils. Not that marriage is evil 01 itself; for he that marrieth doth well : but there are circumstances in which it would be inconvenient to mar¬ ry, and in which he that marrieth not is said to do bet¬ ter. But if those inconveniences be reasons sufficient to deter from marrying, is that person to be held excusable who, m order to gratify an animal passion, somewhat refined, should violate an oath, and trample on a sacred moral obligation ? -The young lady might indeed declare that her earth¬ ly happiness was at an end if she were not permitted to marry again : but what circumstance prevented her irom marrying ? It was not the opinion of her own pastor, or the bishop of Oxford : the truth is, it was certain scruples of her own, which being unable of her¬ self to overcome, she had piously solicited the assistance of others. It is certainly a misfortune that a devotion¬ al and amorous turn should always be so closely con- nected in the females. Both, however, cannot always be indulged. Who will say, that the motive is rational R nci inclines one to cherish a passion which conscience isapproves? Ihe virtue of continency might indeed nave borne bard on this ladv’a rrmatlf.if;™ 1. 1 w wuLincuuy inipul inaeeti ave borne hard on this lady’s constitution, and in her ^vay to immortal happiness might have formed a gate so rait and narrow as it might hie difficult for her to pass t irough : but after all, her case was not harder than that ° nuns, who lake the vows of perpetual chastity, and en ure suderings of a similar nature, and in some instances Vol. XVII. Part U. Lvery promise, therefore, which is not released, nor fraudulently obtained by the promisee, is to be held bind- “’Vi Performance be lawful and possible. n ihe Christian cannot, and a man of honour willA Prorrise scarcely venture to reject this maxim, that a good man 0' a ought not to change though he swear to his hurt. Yet TZT a simple promise and a promissory oath are not very dif- Jerent in point of obligation. Most people know, and where any moral duty is concerned, they ought parti- cu ai y to reflect, that this world is governed by an Al¬ mighty Being, who knows all things, who lives always ‘ and who is just to reward and to punish. The person 1 , " . v. pun ism. 1 lie person who makes a promissory oath does it avowedly under an immediate sense of these truths; the . . ~. person who makes a simple promise, though he certainly om-ht yet may not reflect on these at the' time. The former when he violates his oath, exhibits, only to outward appearance, a greater contempt of the Divine power, knowledge, and justice, than he who violates a simple promise under an impression of the same truths. To Him who knows the secrets of the heart, the breach of the promise must appear as criminal as the breach of the oath. See Assumpsit and Oath. PROMONTORY, in Geography, a high point of Jand or rock projecting into the sea ; the extremity of which towards the sea is called a cape or headland. See Geography Index. 1 ROM1 1ER, in the drama, an officer posted be¬ hind the scenes, whose business it is to watch attentively the actors speaking on the stage, in order to suggest and put them forward when at a stand, to correct them when amiss, &c. in their parts. PROMULGATED, or Promulged, somethin?- published or proclaimed, and generally applied to a law, to denote the publishing or proclaiming it to the people. PRONAOS, in ancient architecture, a porch to a church, palace, or other spacious building. See the ar¬ ticle Porch. PRONATION, among anatomists. The radius of the arm has two kinds of motion, the one called/;ro- nation, the other supination. Pronation is that where¬ by the palm of the hand is turned downwards ; and su¬ pination, the opposite motion thereto, is that whereby the back of the hand is turned downwards. The pe¬ culiar muscles wdiereby pronation is performed, are call¬ ed prottatores, as those by which supination is performed are termed supinaloi'es. See Anatomy, Table of the Muscles, and Plates. PRONG-Hoe, in husbandry, a term used to express an instrument used to hoe or break the ground near and among the roots of plants. The ordinary contrivance of the hoe is very defective, it being only made for scraping on the surface; but the great use of hoeing being to break and open the ground, beside the killing of the weeds, which the ancients, and many among us, have thought the only use of the hoe, 3 K this PRO [ 442 ] , tills dull ana blunt instrument is by no means calculated gibberish -llOC - * r»M /tnu 1CtU At Pr0nf'h<,e for the purposes it is to serve. The prong-hoe consists of Pronuncia- two hooked points oi five or seven inches ong, an tion struck into the ground will stir and remove it the same U—* depth as the plough does, and thus ansvver both the ends of cutting up the weeds and opening the land. It is use¬ ful even in the horse-hoeing husbandry, because the hoe- plough can only come within three or four inches of the rows of the corn, turnips and the like ; whereas this in¬ strument may be used afterwards, and with the !a may be raised and stirred -even to the very stalk oi the plant. See AGRICULTURE. PRONOUN, Pronomen, in Grammar, a declinable part of speech, which being put instead of a noun, points out some person or thing. See Grammar. PRONUNCIATION, in Grammar, the manner oi articulating or sounding the words of a language. Pronunciation makes the most difficult part of written grammar , in regard that a hook expressing itself to the eyes, in a manner that wholly concerns the ears, seem, next akin to that of teaching the blind to distinguish co¬ lours : hence it is that there is no part so defective m grammar as that of pronunciation, as the writer has tre- t f ^ _ * I» «-> •***-» r» ei e-i t* VI A 1 O I-* 51. Oi geld, &c Greek a PRO It is also generally hard before c, as in get, Pronuncia but soft in many words derived from the tion, nd Latin, as m geometry, genealogy, genus, &c. Two gg are always hard, as in dagger, &.c. The sound of g, when soft, is like that of> 10. In any part of a word, ph sounds like /j as in philosophy, II* -*4e sound of (in, at the end of French words, is like k, as m risque, &c. I 2. The syllables ti and ci, if followed by a vowel, sound like siav s/u; as m fiction, logician, &c. 1 o When cc occurs before i, the first is hard and the latter is soft j as mflaccid, &c. 14. The letter p is not pronounced at the beginning of syllables before .9and as in psalm, ptarmics, &c. As to other peculiarities reo-arding the pronunciation of single letters, many of them have been taken notice of at the beginning of each, in the course of this work. . But it is not enough to know the just pronunciation of single letters, but also of words : in order to which, the accenting of words ought to he well understood j since nothing is more harsh and disagreeable to the ear, than to hear a person speak or read with wrong ac¬ cents. And indeed in English the same word is often both a noun and a verb, distinguished only by the ac- io give a 1 ust iiiea ui tuc « it seems necessary to fix as nearly as possible all the seve¬ ral sounds employed in the pronunciation of that lan¬ guage. Cicero tells us, that the pronunciation under¬ went several changes among the Romans : and indeed it is more precarious in the living languages, being, as IJu Bos tells us, subservient to fashion in these. 1 he iMench language is clogged with a difficulty in pronunciation from which most others are free ; and it consists in this, that most of their words have two different pronuncia¬ tions, the one in common prose, the other in verse. As to the pronunciation of the Engli-h language, the ingenious Mr Martin, in his Spelling-Book of Arts and Sciences, lays down the following rules: 1. Hie final (v) lengthens the sound of the foregoing vowelas in can, cane; reb, robe; tun, tune, &c. 2. The final (f), in words ending in re, is sounded before the r like u; massacre, massa-cur; lucre, lu-cur, &c. 3. The Latin diphthongs *», cc, are sounded like e; asJEtna, Etna; ctconomy eco¬ nomy, ike,: but at the end of the words oc sounds like 0; as in toe, foe, &c. 4. Also the English improper diph¬ thongs, ea, eo, tit, ve, sound only the e and u; as tea or te; f office, orfieffee; due or du; true or tru, See, though sometimes eoand ea are pronounced likece, as in people, fear, near, &c. 5. Sometimes the diphthong fie) is pronounced like e in ceiling, like ee 10field, and, at the end of words, always like y, as in lie, &C. j and ei is pro¬ nounced either like e or ai, as in deceit, reign, &c. 6^ 1 he triphthong ean is pronounced like 0, in beau andjef eVeau; and ieu sounds like u in lieu, adieu, &c. The sound of c is hard before the vowels a, 0, u, as in call, cold, cup, &c.also sometimes before h, as in chart, (hoi d, ikt-} and before /and r, as in clear, creep, &c. It is other¬ wise generally soft, as in city, cell, cyder, child. &c. 8. n French words eh is sounded like sh, as in chagreen, ma¬ chine ; and sometimes like yn, as in choir. 9. Hie sound of g is hard before a, 0, v, l, r, as in gall, go, gum, glean, (rrope; also before vi, as in guilt, guild, Sic.} and beforeVz, as in ghost; sometimes before i, as in gibbous, to a ]usi expressum ui vwmo, o accent on the syllable, as in torment, &c.} but in others it should be marked double, as in ani'mal, because it is pronounced as if the letter was wrote double, viz. ozzzzz- Mr Sheridan’s Dictionary will be found extremely useful as a directory in acquiring the pronunciation of the English language; but care must be taken to avoid his provincial brogue, which has certainly misled him m several instances. Mr Walker’s Pronouncing Diction¬ ary, lately published, will likewise deserve the students attention. It is a work of great labour and merit, and is highly useful. It has indeed some faults and inaccu¬ racies, but it is notwithstanding, in all probability, the best of the kind. , , , , Pronunciation is also used for the faith ami last part of rhetoric, which consists in varying and regulat- ing the voice agreeablv to the matter and words, so as most effectually to persuade and touch the hearers. See Oratory, Part IV. PROOF, in Law and Logic, is that degree of evi¬ dence which carries conviction to the mind. ‘ It differs from demonstration, which is applicable only to those truths of which the contrary is inconceivable. It dif¬ fers likewise from probability, which produces for the most part nothing more than opinion, while proof pro¬ duces belief. See Probability. The proof of crimes was anciently effected among our ancestors divers ways ; viz by duel or combat, fne, water, &c. See Duel ard GrDEAL. . Proof of Artillery and Small Arms, is a trial whe¬ ther they stand the quantity of powder allotted for that purpose. The rule of the board of ordnance is, that all guns, under 24-pounders, be loaded with powder as much as their shot weighs ; that is, a brass 24 pounder with 21 lb. a brass 32-pounder with 26 lb. 12 oz. and a 42-pounder with 31 lb. 8 oz. j the hen 24 P0,|n er with 18 lb. the 32-pounder with 21 lb. 8 oz. and the 42-pounder with 25 lb. The brass light field-pieces are proved with powder ■'that weighs halt as much as their shot, except the 24. pounder which is loaded with 10 lb. only. 4 Government allows 11 bullets of lead in the pound for the proof of muskets and 14,5, or 29 in two pounds, Proof, Propaga¬ tion. for service j 17 ,n the pound for the proof of carabines and 20 tor service j 28 in the pound for the proof of pistols, and 34 for service. When guns of a new metal, or of lighter construc¬ tion, are proved} then, besides the common proof, they are bred 220 or 300 times, as quick as they can be, loaded with the common charge given in actual service. Our light 6-pounders were fired 300 times in 3 hours 27 minutes, loaded with 1 lb. 4 oz.. without receivino- any damage. ^ Proof of Powder, is in order to try its goodness and strength. See Gunpowder. Proof of Cannon, is made to ascertain their being well cast, their having no cavities in their metal, and, m a word, their being fit to resist the effort of their charge of powder. In making this proof, the piece is laid upon the ground, supported only by a piece of wood in the middle, of about 5 or 6 inches thick, to raise the muzzle a little ; and then the piece is fired against a solid butt of earth.. Tools used in the Proof of Cannon, are as follows : Searcher, an iron socket with branches, from 4 to 8 m number, bending outwards a little, with small points at their ends : to this socket is fixed a wooden handle, from 8 to 12 feet long, and i| inch in diameter. This searcher is introduced into the gun after each firing, and turned gently round to discover the cavities within : if any are found, they are marked on the outside with chalk } and then the Searcher with one point is introduced : about which point a mixture of wax and tallow is put, to take the impression of the holes ; and if any are found of one- fourth of an inch deep, or of any considerable length, the gun- is rejected as unserviceable to the government. Reliever, is an iron ring fixed to a handle, by means of a socket, so as to be at right angles } it serves to dis- engage the first searcher, when any of its points are re¬ tained in a hole, and cannot otherwise be got out. When guns are rejected by the proof-masters, they or¬ der them to be marked X thus, which the contractors generally alter JFP thus} and after such alteration, dis¬ pose of them to foreign powers for Woolwich proof. The most curious instrument for finding the principal defects in pieces of artillery, ivas lately invented by Lieu¬ tenant-general Desaguliers, of the royal regiment of ar¬ tillery. This instrument, grounded on the truest mecha¬ nical principles, is no sooner introduced into the hollow cylinder of the gun, than it discovers its defects, and more particularly that of the piece not being truly bor¬ ed } which is a very important one, and to which most ol the disasters happening to pieces of artillery are in a great measure to be imputed } for, when a gun is not truly bored, the most expert artillerist will not be able to make a good shot. Proof of Mortars and Howitzers, is made to ascer- tain their being well cast, and of strength to resist the effort of their charge. For this purpose the mortar or howitzer is placed upon the ground, with some part of f-heii- trunnions or breech sunk below the surface, and degrees011 ^ ^ eleVatI°n °f about 7° The mirror is generally the only instrument to dis- covei the defects m mortars and howitzers. In order /*“ to use it, the sun must shine ; the breech must be placed owards the sun, and the glass ove*-against the mouth of the piece: it illuminates the bore and chamber suffi¬ ciently to discover the flaws in it. . ^ Roof of Foreign Brass-Artillery. 1st, The Prus sians. Their battering-train and garrison artillery are proved with a quantity of powder equal to 4 the weight of the shot, and fired 75 rounds as fast as in real ser- vice} that is, 2 or 3 rounds in a minute. Their light nel cl-train, from a 12-pounder upwards, are proved with a quantity ot powder zr l-3d of the weight of the shot, and fared 150 rounds, at 3 or 4 rounds in a minute. 1 rom a 12-pounder downwards, are proved with a quantity of powder = i-5th of the shot’s weight, and fired 300 rounds, at 5 or 6 rounds each minute, proper- ly spunged and loaded. Their mortars are proved with the chambers full of powder, and the shells loaded. Ihree rounds are fired as quick as possible. 2d, The Dutch prove all their artillery by firing each piece 5 times } the two first rounds with a quan¬ tity of powder zr 2-3ds of the weight of the shot; and the three last rounds with a quantity of powder — £ the weight of the shot. 3d, The French the same as the Dutch. Proof, in brandy and other spirituous liquors, is a little white lather which appears on the top of the li¬ quor when poured into a class. This lather, as it dimi¬ nishes, forms itself into a circle called by the French the chapelet, arid by the English the bead or bubble. Proofs of Prints, were anciently a few impressions Nichols's taken off in the course of an engraver’s process. -He °f Ho proved a plate in different states, that he might ascertain gar , jj These general notions of property were then sufficient to answer all the purposes of human life; and might per-^ haps still have answered them, had it been possible forages 0: mankind to have remained in a state of primaeval sim-world, plicity: as may be collected from the manners of many American nations, when first discovered by the Europe¬ ans ; and from the ancient method of living among the first Europeans themselves, if we may credit either the memorials of them preserved in the golden age of the poets, or the uniform accounts given by historians ot those times wherein craw £ omnia communia et indivisa omnibus, veluti unum cunciis patrimOnium esset. Not that communion of goods seems ever to have been applicable, ■" even . * iiperty. ] PRO > Hi to all men, is universally allowed to give the Pl.0Dertv ia.rest and most reasonable title to an exclusive proper- " ' ■ . , p R ° [4+5 even m the earliest ages, to aught but the substance of common the thing; nor could it be extended to thewse of it. For by the law of nature and reason, he who first bJgan to ty therein rrrty’ „ Thfe artide °f ^* r** «.« 1 -ti \ was Ujing it, and no longer : therefore a more early cons deration. Such as nm otherneces- or, to rpoak w.th greater prectston the right of poSSea- contentej with the spontaneous protluct of the ea?tl a°U- s,°n continued for the same time only that the ac, of pos- nought for a more solid refreshment in the He h of beast, C'C’- r:°‘L.1, r !»r,m“> ^ •b^d by h«B&g. But the vein s f of per¬ il ent p pty in v ms tl b. no part of it was the permanent property of any man in particular; yet whoever was in the occupation of any determinate spot of it, for rest, for shade, or the like, acquired for the time a sort of ownership, from which it would have been unjust, and contrary to the law of nature, to have driven him by force ; but the instant that he quitted the use or occupation of it, another might seize it without injustice. Thus also a vine or other tree might be said to be in common, as all were equal¬ ly entitled to its produce ; and yet any private indivi¬ dual might gain the sole property of the fruit, which he had gathered for his own repast. A doctrine well illu¬ strated by Cicero, who compares the world to a great theatre, which is common to the public, and yet the place which any man has taken is tor the time his own. But when mankind increased in number, craft, and ambition, it became necessary to entertain conceptions of more permanent dominion ; and to appropriate to in¬ dividuals, not the immediate use only, but the very substance of the thing to be used ; otherwise innume¬ rable tumults must have arisen, and the good order of the world been continually broken and disturbed, while a variety of persons were striving who should get the first occupation of the same thing, or disputing which of them had actually gained it. As human life also grew more and more refined, abundance of convenien- cies were devised to render it more easy, commodious, and agreeable; as habitations for shelter and safety, and raiment for warmth and decency. But no man would be at the trouble to provide either, so long as he had only an usufructuary property in them, which was to cease the instant that he quitted possession ;—if, as soon as he walked out of his tent, or pulled off his garment, the next stranger who came by would have a right to inhabit the one and to wear the other. In case of ha¬ bitations in particular, it was natural to observe, that even the brute creation, to whom every thing else was in common, maintained a permanent property in their dwellings, especially for the protection of their young ; that the birds of the air had nests, and the beasts of the field had caverns, the invasion of which they esteemed a very flagrant injustice, and would sacrifice their lives to preserve them. Hence a property was soon established in every man’s bouse and home-stall; which seem to have been originally mere temporary huts or moveable cabins, suited to the design of Providence for more speedily peo¬ pling the earth, and suited to the wandering life of their owners, before any extensive property in the soil or ground was established. And there can be no doubt, but that moveables of every kind became sooner appro¬ priated than the permanent substantial soil : partly be¬ cause they were more susceptible of a long occupancy, which might be continued for months together without any sensible interruption, and at length by usage ripen Jnto an established right; but principally because few of them could be fit lor use, till improved and meliora* ted by the bodily labour of the occupant ; which bodily labour, bestowed upon any subject wnich before lay in appointments incident to that method of provision indu¬ ced them to gather together such animals as were of a more tame and sequacious nature; and to establish a per¬ manent property in their flocks and herds, in order to sustain themselves in a less precarious manner, partly by the milk of their dams, and partly by the flesh of the young. The support of these their cattle made the ar- 7 tide ol water also a very important point. And there- Nature of fore the book of Genesis (the most venerable monumentpalria,chaI of antiquity, considered merely with a view to history) pr0F y‘ will furnish us with frequent instances of violent conten¬ tions concerning wells ; the exclusive property of which appears to have been established in the first digger or oc¬ cupant, even insuch places where theground and herbage in common. Thus we find Abraham, who remained yet was hut a sojourner, asserting his right to a well in the country of Abimelech, and exacting an oath for his se¬ curity, “ because he had digged that well.” And Isaac, about 90 years afterwards, reclaimed this his father’s property; and, after much contention with the Phili¬ stines, was suffered to enjoy it in peace. All this while the soil and pasture of the earth re¬ mained still in common as before, and open to every oc¬ cupant: except perhaps in the neighbourhood of towns, where the necessity of a sole and exclusive property in lands (for the sake of agriculture) was earlier felt, and therefore more readily complied with. Otherwise, when the multitude of men and cattle had consumed every convenience on one spot of ground, it w as deemed a na¬ tural right to seize upon and occupy such other lands as would more easily supply their necessities. This practice is still retained among the wild and uncultivated nations that have never been formed into civil states, like the Tartars and others in the east; where the climate itself, and the boundless extent ot their territory, conspire to retain them still in the same savage state of vagrant liberty, which was universal in the earliest ages, and which Tacitus informs us continued among the Ger¬ mans till the decline of the Roman empire. We have also a striking example of the same kind in the histo¬ ry of Abraham and his nephew Lot. When their joint substance became so great, that pasture and other con- venicncies grew scarce, the natural consequence was, that a strife arose between their servants; so that it was no longer practicable to dwell together. This conten¬ tion Abraham endeavoured to compose : “Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between thee and me. Is not the whole land before thee ? Separate thyself, I pray thee, from me: if thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right; or if ih»u depart to the right hand, then I will go to the left.” This plainly implies an acknowledged right, in either, to occupy whatever ground he pleased, that was not pre occupied by other tribes. “ And Lot lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every v\ here, . even as the garden of the Lord. Then Lot chose him all the plain ol Jordan, and journeyed east; and Abra¬ ham dwelt in the had of Ciinaaa.” Upon PRO [ 44<5 ] PRO Property. Upon the same principle was founded the' right of ^r—migration, or sending colonies to find out new habita¬ tions, when the mother-country was overcharged wit 1 inhabitants *, which was practised as well by the I hoe- nicians and Greeks, as the Germans, Scythians, and other northern people. And, so long as it was confined to the stocking and cultivation ol desert uninhabited coun- S tries, it keptstrictly withinthe limits ot the la wot nature. Necessity But as the world by degrees grew more populous, it of property became more difficult to find out new spots to in- respectim*8,1abit’ without encroaching on former occupants ^ and by constantly occupying the same individual spot, the fruits of the earth were consumed, and its spontaneous produce destroyed, without any provision tor a future supply or succession, it therefore became necessary to pursue some regular method of providing a constant sub¬ sistence •, and this necessity produced, or at least pro¬ moted and encouraged, the art ot agriculture. And the art of agriculture, by a regular connection and conse¬ quence, introduced and established the idea of a more permanent property in the soil than hail hitherto been receivi d and adopte d. It was clear that the earth would not produce her fruits in sufficient quantities without the assistance of tillage j hut who would be at the pains of tilling it, if another might watch an opportunity to seize upon and enjoy the product ot his inelustry, art, and ia hour? Had not therefore a separate property in lands, as well as moveables, been vesteel in some individuals, the world must have continued a forest, and men have been mere animals of prey ; which, according to some philosophers, is the genuine state of nature. Whereas now (so graciously has Providence interwoven our duty and our happiness together) the result ot this very ne¬ cessity has been the ennobling of the human species, by giving it opportunities of improving in rational facul¬ ties, as well as of exerting its natural. Necessity begat property: and in order to insure that property, recourse wras had to civil society, which brought along with it a long train of inseparable concomitants *, states, govern¬ ment, law*, punishments, anel tne public exercise of re¬ ligious duties. Thus connected together, it was found that a part only of society was sufficient to provide, by their manual labour, for the necessary subsistence of all j and leisure was given to others to cultivate the human mind, to invent useful arts, and lay the foundation of science. Properly The only question remaining is, How this property acquired became actually vested 5 or what it is that gave a man first by oc- an exclusive right to retain in a permanent manner that cupancy. Specibc ]ami which before belonged generally to every body, but particularly to nobody ? And as we before observed, that occupancy gave the right to the temporary use of the soil j so it is agreed upon all hands, that oc¬ cupancy gave also the original right to the permanent property in the substance of the earth itself, which ex¬ cludes every one else hut the owner from the use of it. There is indeed some difference among the writers on natural law, concerningthe reason why occupancy should convey this right, anel invest one with this absolute pro¬ perty : Grotius anel Puflendorf insisting, that this right of occupancy is founded upon a tacit and implied as¬ sent of all mankind, that the first occupant shoulel be¬ come the owner •, and Barheyrac, Titius, Mr Locke, and others, holding that there is no such implied assent, neither is it necessary that there should be j lor that the very act of occupancy, alone, being a degree of bodily labour, is from a principle of natural justice, without any pr0p. consent or compact, sufficient of itseli to gain a title. A l——v «j dispute that savours too much of nice and scholastic re¬ finement. However, both sides agree in this, that oc¬ cupancy is the thing by which the title was in fact ori¬ ginally gained \ every man seizing to his own continu¬ ed use such spots of ground as he found most agreeable to his own convenience, piovided he found them unoc¬ cupied by any one else. 1 Properly, both in lands and moveables, being thus By wh originally acquired by the first taker, which taking" amounts to a eleclaration, that he intends to appropi iateor the thing to his own use, it remains in him, by the prin¬ ciple oi universal law, till such time as he does some other act which shows an intention to abandon it; for then it becomes naturally speaking, public 1 juris once more, and is liable to be again appropiiateel by liie next occupant. So if one is possessed ot a jewel, and casts it into the sea ora public highway, this is such an express dereliction, that a propeity will be vested in the first fortunate finder that shall seize it to his own use. But if he hides it privately in the earth, or other secret place, and it is discovered, the finder acquires no property therein ; for the owner had not by this act declared any intention to abandon it, but rather the contrary : and if he loses or drops it by accident, it cannot be collected from thence that he designed to quit the possession; and therefore in such cases the property still remains in the loser, who may claim it again of the finder. ^ And this, we may remember, is the eloctrine of the Lnglish law with relation to TuEASURE-Trove. _ , But this method ot one man’s abandoning his pro¬ perty, anel another seizing the vacant possession, how¬ ever well-founded in theory, could not long subsist in fact. It was calculated merely for the rudiments of civil society, and necessarily ceased among the compli¬ cated interests and artificial refinements of polite and established governments. In these it was found, that what became inconvenient or useless to one man, was highly convenient anti useful to another; who was ica- dy to give in exchange for it some equivalent that was equally desirable to the former proprietor. This mu¬ tual convenience introduced commercial trafhc, and the reciprocal transfer of property by sale, grant, or conveyance : which may be considered either as a con¬ tinuance of the original possession which the first occu¬ pant had; or as an abandoning of the thing by the present owner, and an immediate successive occupancy of the same by the new proprietor. The voluntary de¬ reliction of the owner, and delivering the possession to another individual, amount to a transter ot the pioper- ty ; the proprietor declaring his intention no longer to occupy the thing himself, but that his own right ot oc¬ cupancy shall be vested in the new acquirer. Or, taken in the other light, if I agree to part with an acre of my land to Titius, the deed of conveyance is an evidence of my intending to abandon the property ; and I itius, being the only or first man acquainted with such my intention, immediately steps in and seizes the vacant pos¬ session : thus the consent expressed by the conveyance o-ives Titius a good right against me; and possession or occupancy confirms that right against all the world be- The most universal and effectual way of abamloninff cesc property is by the death of the occupant : when, b°th dentil the actual possession and intention of keeping posses-tie ; How sion PaIlt‘ I 'V p R ° . [ 447 J ,erty. slon ceasing, die property, which is founded upon such into general law. possession and intention, ought also to cease of course. For, naturally speaking, the instant a man ceases to be* he ceases to have any dominion : else, if he had a right to dispose ofhis acquisitions one moment beyond his life he would also have a right to direct their disposal for a million of ages after him •, which would he highly ab¬ surd and inconvenient (a). All property must there¬ fore cease upon death, considering men as absolute indi¬ viduals, and unconnected with civil society: for then by the principles before established, the next immediate occupant would acquire a right in all that the deceased possessed. But as, under civilized governments, which are calculated 101 the peace ol mankind, such a consti¬ tution would be productive of endless disturbances, the universal law of almost every nation (which is a kind of secondary law of nature) has either given the dying per¬ son a power of continuing his property, by disposing of his possessions by will ; or, in case he neglects to dispose of it, or is not permitted to make any disposition at all the municipal law of the country then steps in, and de¬ clares who shall be the successor, representative, or heir of the deceased ; that is, who alone shall have a right to enter upon this vacant possession, in order to avoid that confusion which its becoming again common would oc¬ casion. And farther, in case no testament be permitted by the law, or none be made, and no heir can be found so qualified as the law requires, still, to prevent the ro¬ bust title of occupancy from again taking place, the doc- tiine of escheats is adopted in almost every country j whereby the sovereign of the state, and those who claim under his authority, are the ultimate heirs, and succeed to those inheritances to which no other title can be formed. uA1 The right of inheritance, or descent to the children and relations of the deceased, seems to have been allow¬ ed much earlier than the right of devising by testament. We are apt to conceive at the first view that it has na¬ ture on its side ; vet we often mistake for nature what we find established by long and inveterate custom. It is certainly a wise and effectual, but clearly a political, establishment ; since the permanent right of property, vested in the ancestor himself, was no natural^ hut mere¬ ly a civil, right. It is true, that the transmission of one’s possessions to posterity has an evident tendency to make a man a good citizen and a useful member of society : it sets the passions on the side of duty, and prompts a man to deserve well of the public, when he is sure that the reward of his services will not die with himself, hut be transmitted to those with wdioni he is connected by the dearest and most tender affections. Yet, reasonable as this foundation of the right of inheritance may seem, it is probable that its immediate original arose not from speculations altogether so delicate and refined, and, if not from fortuitous circumstances, at least from a plainer ami more simple principle. A man’s children or nearest relations are usually about him on Ids death-bed. and are the earliest witnesses of his decease. They became therefore generally the next immediate occupants, till at length in process of time this frequent usage ripened PRO , therefore also in the earliest Property ages, on failure of c.nldren, a man’s servants born under ns rooi were allowed to be bis heirs; being immediate- Jy on the spot when he died. For we find the old pa¬ triarch Abraham expressly declaring, that “ since God bad given him no seed, bis steward Elitzer, one born in Ins bouse, was his heir.” W hile property continued only for life, testaments Last wills- vyeie useless and unknown; and when it became inhe-or testa- ritable, tde inheritance was long indefeasible, and thements children or heirs at law were incapable of exclusion by wail. 1 ill at length it was found, that so strict a rule ol inheritance made heirs disobedient and headstrong defrauded creditors of their just debts, and prevented many provident fathers from dividing or-charging then- estates as the exigence of their families required. This introduced pretty generally the right of dkpodng of one’s property, or a part of it, by testament; that is, by written or oral instructions properly witnessed and au¬ thenticated, according to the pleasure of the deceased ; which we therefore emphatically style his will. This was established in some countries much later than in others. In England, till modern times, a man could only dispose of one-third of his moveables from bis wife and children ; and in general, no will was permitted of lands till the reign of Henry VIII. and then only of a certain portion ; for it was not till after the Restoration that the power of devising real property became so uni¬ versal as at present. W ills, therefore, and testaments, rights of inheritance, are crti- and successions, are all of them creatures of the civil or,;ures of the municipal laws, and accordingly are in all respects re-civii.°.r gidated by them ; every distinct country having differ-j™"icipal ent ceremonies and requisites to make a testament com- ll"S pletely valid; neither does anything vary more than Blackst. the right of inheritance under different national establish- Comment. ments. In England particularly, this diversity is carri¬ ed to such a length, as if it had been meant to point out the power of the laws in regulating the succession to property, and how futile every claim must be that has not its foundation in the positive rules of the state. In personal estates, the father may succeed to his children ; in landed property, he never can be their immediate heir by any the remotest possibility : in general, only the eld¬ est son, in some places only the youngest, in others all the sons together, have a right to succeed to the inheri¬ tance : In real estates, males are preferred to females, and the eldest male will usually exclude the rest; in the division of personal estates, the females of equal degree are admitted together with the males, and no right of primogeniture is allowed. This one consideration may help to remove the Scruples scruples of many well meaning persons, who set up arespecting mistaken conscience in opposition to the rules of law.llentabIc If a man disinherits his son, by a will duly executed,removed: and leaves his estate to a stranger, there are many who consider this proceeding as contrary to natural justice ; while others so scrupulously adhere to the supposed in¬ dention of'he deed, that if a will of lands be attested by only two witnesses instead of three, which the law requires, •A) Fliis right, inconvenient as it certainly is, the law of Scotland gives to every man over his real estate bv authorising him to entail it on his heirs for ever. See Law, clxxx. 9, 10, n. and Tailzie. r R W L rrop ru-. require*, they ere apt to imagine that the heir is \, —-v ijound in conscience to relinquish Ins title to the see. But both of them certainly proceed upon very er¬ roneous principles : as if, on the one hand, this son had by nature a right to succeed to his father’s lands ; or as if, on the other hand, the owner was by nature entitled to direct the succession of his property alter his own decease. Whereas the law of nature suggests, that on the death of the possessor, the estate should again become common, and be open to the next occu¬ pant, unless otherwise ordered, for the sake ot civil peace, by the positive law of society. The positive law of society, which is with us the municipal laws ot England and Scotland, directs it to vest in such person as the last proprietor shall by will, attended with ceitain requisites, appoint 5 and, in defect ol such appointment, to go to some particular person, who from the result ol certain local constitutions, appears to be the heir at law. Hence it follows, that, where the appointment is regularly made, there cannot be a shadow of right in any one but the person appointed ; and, where Unne¬ cessary requisites are omitted, the right of the heir is equally strong, and built upon as solid a foundation, as the right of the devisee would have been, supposing such requisites were observed. But, after all, there are some few things, which not¬ withstanding the general introduction and continuance t- #» j xMi !J . 1,1 — r»r»mmnn 1 16 Of things that are still in com mon. that wise and orderly maxim, of assigning to every Pf0pc thing capable of ownership a legal and determinate I’ropii owner. , . lS Tn this age of paradox and innovation, much hasjjiere been said of liberty and equality; and some few haveSoning contended for an equalization of property.^ One ofthosev the wildest declaimers on this subject, who is for abo-“nteni! lishing property altogether, has (inadvertently we sup-jj^^, pose) given a complete confutation, not only of hispr0pcrt own arguments, hut also of the arguments of all who have written, or, we think, can write, on the same side of the question. After labouring to prove that it is gross injustice in any man to retain more than is absolutely necessary to supply him with food, clothes, and shelter, this zealous reformer states an objection to his theory, arising from the well-known allurements of sloth, which, if the accumulation of property were not permitted, would banish industry from the whole world. The objection he urges fairly, and answers it thus : “ It may be observed, that the equality for which we are pleading is an equality that would succeed to a state of greaf intellectual improvement. So bold a revolu¬ tion cannot take place in human affairs, till the general mind has been highly cultivated. The present age of mankind is greatly enlightened j hut it is to be feared is not yet enlightened enough. Hasty and undigested tumults may take place, under the idea of an equahza- of nroDertv"must still unavoidably remain in common 5 tion of property *, but it is only a calm and clear con- heiPn7su ^7erein nothing bu/an usufructuary pro- viction of justice, of justice mutually to be rendered and perU is capable of being hfd : and therefore they still received, of happmess to be produced by the desertronof helolm to the first orcupant, during the time he holds our most rooted habits, that can introduce an in\aria e possession of them, and no linger. Such (among others) system of this sort. Attempts without this preparation possession 01 mem, an h ^ y'[\\ be productive only of confusion. Their effect will he momentary, and a new and more barbarous inequa¬ lity will succeed. Each man with unaltered appetite will watch his opportunity to gratify his love of power, or his love of distinction, by usurping on his inattentive neighbours.” These are just observations, and such as we have of- ine ten made to ourselves on the various proposed reforma'"ance| tions of government. The illumination which the au- are the elements of light, air, and water ; which a man may occupy by means of his windows, his gardens, his mills, and other conveniences } such also are the generality of those animals which are said to he ferec natures, or of a wild and untameable disposition *, which any man may seize upon and keep for his own use or pleasure. All these things, so long as they remain in possession, every man has a right to enjoy without dis¬ turbance 5 but if once they escape from his custody, or he voluntarily abandons the use of them, they return to the common stock, and any other man has an equal right to seize and enjoy them afterwards. Of similar Again, there are other tilings in which a permanent whidi have property may subsist not only as to the temporary use, been aj>- but also the solid substance ; and which yet would he propriated. frequently found without a proprietor, had not the wis¬ dom of the law provided a remedy to obviate tills in¬ convenience. Such are forests and other waste grounds, which were omitted to he appropriated in the general distribution of lands : such also ai,“e wrecks, estrays, and that species of wild animals, which the arbitrary con¬ stitutions of positive law have distinguished from the -rest by the well-hnown appellation of game. With re¬ gard to these and some others, as disturbances and quar¬ rels would frequently arise among individuals contend¬ ing about the acquisition of this species of property by first occupancy, the law has therefore wisely cut up the root of dissension, b^ vesting the things themselves in the sovereign of the state 5 or else in his representa¬ tives appointed and authorised by him, being usually the lords of manors. And thus our legislature has uni¬ versally promoted the grand ends of civil society, the peace and security of individuals, by steadily pursuing 5 thor requires before he would introduce his abolition of tare, property, would constitute men more than angels ; for to be under the influence of no passion or appetite, and to he guided in every action by unmixed benevolence and pure intellect, is a degree of perfection which we can attribute to no being inferior to God. But it is the object of the greater part of this writer’s book to prove that all men must arrive at such perfection be* fore his ideal republic can contribute to their happi¬ ness •, and therefore every one who is conscious of be¬ ing at any time swayed by passion, and who feels that he is more attached to his wife or children than to strangers, will look withont envy to the present inequa¬ lities of property and power, if he he an intelligent disciple of Mr Godwin. Literary Pbopehty. See CoPY-lhght,. ^ .pefi|| PBOPHECY is a word derived from and in its original import signifies the prediction ci future events. _ _ . . PM As God alone can perceive with certainty the tuture^i actions of free agents, and the remote consequences otsupd those laws of nature which he himself established, Pr0'ljM phecy, when clearly fulfilled, affords the most convincing^ evidence of an intimate and supernatural communion^ 1 between PRO C 449 ] PRO 9 word 5’crip- * !i, vL i 7. -f Cor. q siv. ’ 3- tion. Together with the power of working miracles, it is indeed the only evidence which can be given of such a communion. Hence among the professors of every re- pe pro- Hgious system, except that which is called the religion ! “‘""'J the'J! '■“ve been numberless pretenders to ,, pre- tbe, g‘ft .ol prophecy. The Pagan nations of antiquity tiltd to had their oracles, augurs, and soothsayers. Modern idolaters have their necromancers and diviners • and the Jews, Christians, and Mahometans, hare thei/seers and prophets. The ill-founded pretensions of paganism, ancient and modern, have been exposed under various articles of this work. (See Divination, Magic, Necroman¬ cy, and Mythology). And the claims of the Ara¬ bian impostor are examined under the articles Alco¬ ran and Mahometanism ; so that at present we have only to consider the use, intent, and truth, of the Jewish and Christian prophecies. Previous to our entering on this investigation, it may ^ be proper to observe, that in the Scriptures of tbe Old i s mean-an<^ Testaments, the signification ol the word pro- ii. phecy is not always confined to the foretelling of fu¬ ture events. In several instances it is of the same im¬ port with preaching, and denotes the faculty of illu¬ strating and applying to present practical purposes the doctrines of prior revelation. Thus in Nehemiah it is said, “ Ihou hast appointed prophets to preach and whoever speaketh unto men to edification, and exhorta¬ tion, and comfort, is by St Paul called a prophet J. Hence it was that there were schools of prophets in Is¬ rael, where young men were instructed in the truths of religion, and fitted to exhort and comfort the people. In this article, however, it is chiefly of importance to confine ourselves to that kind of prophecy which, in declaring truths either past, present, or future, required the immediate inspiration of God. Every one who looks into the history of the world must observe, that the minds of men have from the be- ginning been gradually opened by a train of events still improving upon, and adding light to each other; as that of each individual is, by proceeding from the first elements and seeds oi science, to more enlarged views, and a still higher growth. Mankind neither are nor ever have been capable of entering into the depths of knowledge at once ; of receiving a whole system of na¬ tural or moral truths together ; hut must he let into them by degrees, and have them communicated by little and little, as they are able to bear it. That this is the case with respect to human science, is a fact which can¬ not be questioned ; and there is as little room to que¬ stion it with respect to the progress of religious know¬ ledge among men, either taken collectively or in each individual. Why the case is thus in both, why all are not adult at once in body and mind, is a question which the religion ol nature is equally called upon with reve¬ lation to answer. The fact may not he easily accounted for, but the reality ol it is incontrovertible. Accordingly, the great object of the several revela¬ tions recorded in the Old Testament was evidently to tent keeP alive a sense of religion in the minds of men, and to train them by degrees for the reception of those simple but sublime truths by which they were to be sa¬ ved. Ihe notions which the early descendants of A- 4am entertained of the Supreme Being, and of the re- Vol. XVII. Part IL + ,5 Si'ice aneli- dtiy 1. TMive. ;of iatic the . Tesi, gross; and we see them graduali; refined by a Ses7fW- revelations or prophecies, each in succession more ex¬ plicit than that by which it was preceded, till the ad vent of him who was the way, the truth, and the life" and who brought to light life and immortality. vhen a revelation was made of any important truth d 1 = ground3 °r which ,he n.ind of mL L ^2^. ties lo comprehend, that revelation, though undouht.comp.nM eclJy a prophecy, must have been so far from confirm-by rair£U mg the truth of revealed religion in general, that itdeS* could not gam credit itself, hut by some extrinsic evi¬ dence that it came indeed from God. Hence we find Moses after it was revealed to him from the burning hush that he should deliver his countrymen from Eirvo- tian bondage, replying, “ Behold, they will not believe me, nor hearken to my voice ; for they will say, the l^ord hath not appeared unto thee.” This revelation certainly constituted him a prophet to Israel; and there cannot be x doubt but that he perfectly knew the divine sourc e from which he received it; but he very naturally ami reasonably concluded, that the children of Israel would not believe that the Lord had appeared to hinv unless he could give them some other proof of this pre¬ ternatural appearance than his own simple affirmation of its reality. This proof he was immediately enabled to give, by having conferred upon him the power of work¬ ing miracles in confirmation of bis prophecy. Apain when Gideon was called to the deliverance of Israel’ the angel of the Lord came and said unto him, “ The Lord is with thee, thou mighty man of valour : go in this thy might, and thou shall save Israel from the hand of the Midianites. Have not I sent thee ?” Here was a prophecy delivered by the angel of the Lord to en¬ courage Gideon’s undertaking: hut he, being probably afraid of some illusion of sense or imagination, demand¬ ed a sign that he was really an angel who talked with him. A sign is accordingly given him, a miraculous sign, with which he is satisfied, and undertakes the work appointed him. From these and many similar transactions recorded and o^it- in the Old lestament, it appeals that prophecy was never .self can be intended as evidence of an original revelation. It is 110 proof indeed, by its very nature, totally unfit for such a pur-of f reYe" pose ; because it is impossible, without some extrinsiclaUoD* proof of its divine origin, to know whether any prophe¬ cy be true or false, till the era arrive at which it ought to be fulfilled. When it is fulfilled, it affords complete evidence that he who uttered it spake by the spirit of God, and that the doctrines which lie taught of a reli¬ gious nature, were all either dictated by the same spirit, or at least are true, and calculated to direct mankind in the way of their duty. The prophecies vouchsafed to the patriarchs in the jt j most early periods of the world, were all intended to tended To” keep alive in their minds a sense of religion, and to di-preserve a reel their views to the future completion of that firstscnse ot re* and greatest prophecy which was made to Adam im- llf’,0‘1 a* mediately on his fall : but in order to secure credit to nion“ mca’ those prophecies themselves, they were always accom¬ panied by some miraculous sign that they were indeed given by the God of truth, and not the delusions of fanaticism or hypocrisy. Prophecy, in the proper sense of the word, commenced with the fall; and the first instance of it is implied in the sentence denounced upon 3 L the Prophecy. 10 Probable effects of the .first PRO the original deceiver of mankind , - — » between thee and the woman, and between thy seetL and her seed : It shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” . , This prophecy, though one of the most important that ever was delivered, when considered by itself, is ex- the.first ceedinMy obscure. That Adam should have under- Mst stood it, as some of his degenerate sons have pretended piTu. to do, in a literal sense, ,s absolutely .mposs.ble He knew well that it was the great God ol heaten and earth who was speaking, and that such a ^emg was incapable of trifling with the wretchedness of Ins fallen creature. The sentence denounced upon himself and his wife was awful and severe. The woman was doom¬ ed to sorrow in conception } the man to sorrow am travel all the days of his life. The ground was cur¬ sed for his sake 5 and the end of the judgment was “ Dust thou art, and to dust thou shalt return. Had our first parents been thus left, they must have looked upon themselves as rejected by their Maker, delivere u'p to trouble and sorrow in the world, and as having no hone in any other. With such impressions on their minds they could have retained no sense of religion ; for reli¬ gion, when unaccompanied by hope, is a state oi frenzy and distraction : yet it is certain that they could have no hope from any thing expressly recorded by Moses, ex¬ cept what they might draw from tins sentence passed on their deceiver. Let us then endeavour to ascertain what consolation it could afford them. At that awful juncture, they must have been sensi > e that their fall was the victory of the serpent, whom by experience they had found to be an enemy to God and to man. It could not therefore but be some comfort to them to hear this enemy first condemned, and to see that, however lie had prevailed against them, he had gained no victory over their Maker. By this condem¬ nation they were secured from thinking that there was anv malignant being equal to the Creator in power and dominion j an opinion which, through the prevalency ot evil gained ground in after times, and was destructive of all true religion. The belief of God’s supreme do¬ minion being thus preserved, it was still necessary to o-ive them such hopes as might induce them to love as well as to fear him •, and these they could not but con¬ ceive when they heard from the mouth of their Creator and Judge, that the serpent’s victory was not complete even over themselves ; that they and their posterity should be enabled to contest his empire 5 and that thou oil they were to suffer much in the struggle, they should yet finally prevail, bruise the serpent’s head, and deliver themselves from his power and dominion. This prophecy therefore was to our first parents a light shining in a dark place. All that they could certainly conclude from it was, that their case was not desperate ; that some remedy, some deliverance from the evil they were under, would in time appear-, but when or where, or by what means they were to be delivered, they could not possibly understand, unless the matter, was further revealed to them, as probably it was at the insti¬ tution of sacrifice (see Sacrifice). Obscure, how¬ ever, as this promise or prophecy was, it served alter the fall as a foundation for religion, and trust and con¬ fidence towards God in hopes of deliverance in time from the evils of disobedience : and this appears to have Piophec [ 45° ] PRO « j wiil put enmity as some well-meaning though weak advocates for Chris- i will put j >t.an.ty have imag;ned, as a prediction pointing directly to the cross of Christ. ... As this prophecy was the first, so is it the only con¬ siderable one in which we have any concern from the creation to the days of Noah. It was proportioned to the then wants and necessities of the world, and was the grand charter of God’s mercy after the fall. Nature had no certain help for sinners-, her rights were lost with her innocence. It was therefore necessary either to destroy the offenders, or to raise them to a capacity of salvation, by giving them such hopes as might ena¬ ble them to exercise a reasonable religion, bo iar the light of this prophecy extended. By what means God intended to work their salvation, he did not expressly declare : and who has a right to complain that he did not, or to prescribe to him rules in dispensing his mercy to the children of men ? . “ Upon the hopes of mercy winch this prophecy gives The cm. in very general terms, mankind rested till the b.rth <*££ Nnal,. At that period a new prophecy was delivered »«• bv Lamcch, who foretels that ins son should comiort them concerning the work and toil of the,r hands, “ because of the earth which the Lord had cursed. \\ e are to remember -that the curse pronounced upon the earth was part of the sentence passed upon our first pa¬ rents 1 and when that part was remitted, if it ever was remitted, mankind would acquire new and more lively hopes that in God’s good time they should be freed Irom the whole. But it has been shown by Bishop bherlock , * Ustm that this declaration of Lamech’s was a prediction, thatMj during the life of bis son the curse should be taken off 1 > • from the earth : and the same prelate has proved with o-reat perspicuity, and in the most satisfactory manner, that this happy 'revolution actually took place after the flood. The limits prescribed to an article ot this kind will not permit us even to abridge his arguments. ! We shall only observe, that the truth of Ins conclusion | is manifest from the very words of scripture; for when God informs Noah of his design to destroy the world, he adds, “ But with thee will I establish my covenant: and as soon as the deluge was over, he declared that lie “ would not again curse the ground any more tor man s sake • but that while the earth should remain, seed-time and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night, should not cease.” I rom this last declaration it is apparent that a curse had been on tbe earth, and that seed-time and harvest had often failed ; that the curse was now taken off j and that m conse¬ quence of this covenant, as it is called, with Noah am his seed and with every living creature, mankind should not henceforth be subjected to toil so severe and so ge¬ nerally fruitless. r, _ ^ “ It may seem surprising perhaps to some, that after so A tom great a revolution in the world as the deluge wiade tfo..; God should say nothing to the remnant of mankind 01 i the punishments and rewards of another life, hut should akd make a new covenant with them relating merely to fruit¬ ful seasons and the blessings of the earth.. But m ie scriptures we see plainly a gradual working oi provi¬ dence towards the redemption of the world from the curse of the fall -, that the temporal blessings were hist restored as an earnest and pledge of better things 0 follow; and that the covenant given to Noah ha , trom the evils of disobedience : and this appears to have to ow ^ ^ ^ ^ the hopes 0f futurk been the sole purpose for which it was given, and not, stnctl) s^e &> o ^ 4 PRO [451 ’ropheoy. ty, winch were reserved to he the matter of another —■/— covenant, in another age, and to he revealed by him" whose provmce it was to « bring life and itamortalit^ to light through the gospel.” But if Noah and his forefathers expected deliverance from the whole curse of the fall, tne actual deliverance from one part of it was .a very good pledge of a further deliverance to be ex¬ pected in time. Man himself was cursed as well as the ground j he was doomed to dust: and fruitful seasons are but a small relief compared to the greatness of his loss. But when fruitful seasons came, and one part of the curse was evidently abated, it gave great assurance that the other should not last for ever, but that l.y some means, still unknown to them, they should be freed from the whole, and finally bruise the serpent’s head, who, at the deluge, had so severely bruised man’s heel. 13 amise to rahanit nesis &c. . UPon tliis assurance mankind rested for some genera¬ tions, and practised, as we have every reason to believe a rational worship to the one God of the universe. At last, however, idolatry was by some means or other in¬ troduced (see Polytheism), and spread so universally through the world, that true religion would in all pro¬ bability have entirely failed, had "not God visibly inter¬ posed to preserve such a sense of it as was necessary for the accomplishment of his great design to restore man¬ kind. Tins he did by calling Abraham from amidst diis idolatrous kindred, and renewing to him the word of prophecy : “ Get thee out of thy country (said he), and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee. And I will make of thee a great nation, and 1 will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shall be a blessing. And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee ; and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed.” 1 hese magnificent promises are several times repeated to toe father of the faithful, with additional cir¬ cumstances of great importance, such as, “ that be should be multiplied exceedingly; that he should be a father of many nations ; that kings should come out of him and above all, that God would establish an everlasting; covenant with him and his seed, to give him and them all the land of Canaan for an everlasting possession, and to be their God.” Upon such of these promises, as relate to tempo¬ ral blessings we need not dwell. They are much of the same nature with those which had been given be¬ fore to Lamecb, Noah, Shem, and Japbeth ; and all the world knows how amply and literally they have been fulfilled. 1 here was, however, so little probability in nature of their accomplishment at the time when they were made, that we find the patriarch asking, “ Where¬ by be should know f that be should inherit such an ex¬ tent of country ?” And as the promises that lie should 1 T R O inherit it were fo^d to be a foundatioa for religio,, p, .11.I confidence m God, a miraculous sign was given him 1 v - that they came indeed from the spirit of truth This removed from h.s mind every doubt, and made him give the fullest credit, not only to them, but also to That other promise, “ that in his seed should all the nations oi the earth be blessed.” What distinct notion he had of this blessing, or in what manner he hoped it should be effected, we cannot pietend to say. “ But that he understood it to be a promise of restoring mankind, and delivering them from the remaining curse of tl.e fall, there can be no doubt, xle knew that death had entered by sin; he knew that ~od. ,mtl promised victory and redemption to the seed or toe woman. Upon the hopes of this restoration the religion of his ancestors was founded ; and when God from whom this blessing on all men was expected, did expressly promise a blessing on all men, and in this pro¬ mise founded bis everlasting covenant—what could A- braham else expect but the completion in his seed of that ancient promise and prophecy concerning the vic¬ tory to he obtained by the woman’s seed ? The curse of the ground was expiated in the Hood, and the earth re¬ stored with a blessing, which was the foundation of the temporal covenant with Noah ; a large share of which Ood expressly grants to Abraham and his posterity par¬ ticularly, together with a promise to bring, by their means, a new and further blessing upon the whole race of men. 11 we lay these tilings to heart, we cannot suppose that less could he expected from the new pro¬ mise or prophecy given to Abraham than a deliverance lorn that part ol the curse still remaining on men : JJust' thou art, and to dust thou shall return. In virtue ol this covenant Abraham and his posterity had reason to expect that the time would come when man should be called from bis dust again. For this expectation they had his assurance who gave the covenant, that he would be tneir God for ever. Well might our Saviour then.* Sher- tell the sons of Abraham, that even Moses at the bush lock’s Use snowed the resurrection of the dead, when he called \\\q and Intent Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and0-^0?7'*' the God of Jacob c2/- 1 hese promises made to Abraham were renewed to To Isaac isaac and Jacob ; to the last ol whom it was revealed, aud Jacob, not only that all . the nations of the earth should be blessed in his seed, but that the blessing should spring from his son Judah. It is, however, by no means evi¬ dent that any one of those patriarchs knew precisely by what means (a) the curse ol the fall was to he entirely removed, and ad men called from their dust again. It was enough that they were convinced of the fact in ge¬ neral terms, since such conviction was a sufficient foun¬ dation or a rational religion ; and the descendants of Abraham had no other foundation upon which to rest their (a) This they certainly could not know from the promises expressed in the very general terms in which they are recorded in the book of Genesis. It is, however, not improbable that those promises, as they immediately re- r |?n1’ wfre. conceive(l in terms more precise and particular ; and, at all events, Dr Warburton has proved o e full conviction of every man who is not a determined unbeliever, that Abraham was commanded to sacri- ce ns son Isaac, not only as a trial of bis obedience, but also that God might give him what he earnestly de- , a soemcal representation of the means by which mankind were to be redeemed from death. The learned a1" I I Lr O 1 I * * 1 . • . * 1 • .1 . __ sired w T " • . --f.—gi me jjjcaua uj wintn iiiduiviiiu were io ue reueemeu irom rieatli. i lie learned mer thinks, and bis reasoning compels us to think with him, that to this transaction our Saviour alludes when ie gays, “ Lour father Abraham rejoiced to see my day, and he saw it and was crlad.” Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day, and he saw it and was clad. 3 L 2 ceedin_ prophets 16 Were all PRO [45 Prophecy, tlieir hopes, and pay a cheerful worship to the God ot ' v——' their fathers, till the giving ot the law to Moses. en 15 indeed they were incorporated into a society wit i mum- The law of ci , jaws of t|ieir own> and placed under a theocratic thetuc government-, the temporal promises made to their fa¬ thers were amply fulfilled religion was maintained a- mong them by rewards and punishments equally distri¬ buted in this world (see Theology) : and a series ot prophets succeeding one another pointed out with greater and greater clearness, as the fulness of time approach¬ ed, the person who was to redeem mankind from the power of death j by what means he was to work that great redemption, and at what precise period he was to make his appearance in the world. By these superna¬ tural interpositions of divine providence, the principles of pure theism and the practice of true religion were preserved among the children of Israel, when al! other nations were sunk in the grossest idolatry, and wallowed in the most abominable vices j when the far-famed &- gyptians, Greeks, and Romans, fell down with adoration to stocks and stones and the vilest reptiles and when they had no well grounded hope of another life, an were in fact without God in the world. . w . n From this short deduction, we think ourselves intitled intended to to conclude, that the prwuny use and intent of prophe- keep alive under the various dispensations ot the * a it sense of ment waS notj as \s too often supposed, to establish the Tdi*'ion divine mission of Jesus Christ, but to keep alive in the minds of those to whom it was given, a sense ot reli¬ gion, and a hope of future deliverance from the curse ot the fall. It Was, in the expressive language ot bt L eter, “ a light that shone in a dark place, unto which men did well to take heed until the day dawned and the day- star arose in their hearts.” But though this was cer¬ tainly the original intent of prophecy (tor Christ, had tie never been foretold, would have proved himself to he the son of God with power by his astonishing mi¬ racles, and his resurrection from the dead), yet it can¬ not be denied, that a long series of prophecies, given in different and far distant ages, and having all their completion in the life, death, and resurrection, ot Jesus, concur very forcibly with the evidence of miracles to prove that he was the seed of the woman ordained to bruise the head of the serpent, and restore man to his forfeited inheritance. To the Jews the force of this evidence must have been equal, if not superior, to that of miracles themselves ; and therefore we find the A- postles and first preachers of the gospel, in their ad¬ dresses to them, constantly appealing to the law and the prophets, whilst they urged upon the Gentiles the evi¬ dence of miracles. In order to form a right judgment of the argument XcETte for the truth of Christianity drawn from the sure word beconsider-of prophecy, we must not consider the prophecies given cd in con- in the Old Testament as so many predictions only inde- pendent of each otherfor if we do, we shall totally lose sight of the purpose for which they were originally gi¬ ven, and shall never bf able to satisfy ourselves when confronted by the objections of unbelievers. It is easy for men of leisure and tolerable parts to find difficulties in particular predictions, and in the application ot them made by writers, who lived manv hundred years ago, and who had many ancient books and records of the Jewish church, from which they drew many passages, and perhaps some prophecies which book# and records '1 The pro- 11 ection. 2 ] ' PRO we have not to enable us to understand, and to jestify pr^J their applications. But it is not so easy a matter to y-"* show, or to persuade the world to believe, that a chain of prophecies reaching through several thousand years, delivered at different times, yet manifestly subservient to one and the same administration ot providence irom beginning to end, is the effect ol art and contrivance and religious Iraud. In examining the several piophe- cies recorded in the Old Testament, we are not to sup¬ pose that each of them expressly pointed out and clear- ly characterized Jesus Christ. Had they done so, in¬ stead of being a support to religion in general, the pur¬ pose for which they were originally intended, they would have had a very different effect* by making those to whom they were given repine at being placed under dispensations so very inferior to that ot tlie gospel. .We are therefore to inquire only whether all the notices,- which, in general and often metaphorical terms, God aave to the fathers of his intended salvation, are perfect- fy answered by the coming of Christ j and we shall find that nothing has been promised with respect to that sub¬ ject which has not been performed in the amplest man¬ ner. If we examine the prophecies in this manner, we shall find that there is not one of them, which the Apostles have applied to the Messiah, that is not appli¬ cable in a rational and important sense to something in the birth, life, preaching, death, resurrection, and as¬ cension of Jesus of Nazareth that as applied to him they are all consistent with each other and that though some few of them may be applied without absurdity to persons and events under the Jewish dispensation, Christ is the only person that ever existed in whom they all meet as in a centre. In the limits prescribed us, it is impossible that we should enter upon a particular proof of this position. It has been proved by numberless wri¬ ters, and, with respect to the most important prophecies, by none with greater success than Bishop Sherlock in his Use and Intent of Prophecy in the several ages ot the World; a work which we recommend to our read¬ ers as one of the most valuable on the subject in our own or any other language. . iS But admitting that it would have been improper, tor object! the reason already hinted at, to have given a clear alldfr°™ precise description of Christ, and the Christian {sPen*0j prop] sation, to men who were ordained to live under disjten-^ sations less pertect, how, it may be asked, comes it to pass that many of the prophecies applied by the writers of the gospel to our Saviour and his actions are still daik and obscure, and so far from belonging evidently to him and to him only, that it requires much learning and sa¬ gacity to show even now the connection between some prophecies and the events ? , , . , . ^ In answer to these questions, the learned prelate just Ansue referred to observes, “ That the obscurity of prophecy does not arise from hence, that it is a relation or descrip¬ tion of something/wtare ; for it is as easy to speak ot things future plainly, and intelligibly, as it is ot things past or present. It is not, therefore, of the nature ot prophecy to be obscure ; for it may easily be made, when he who gives it thinks fit, as plain as history. 11 the other side, a figurative and dark description ot a future event will be figurative and dark still when the event happens •, and consequently will have all the ob¬ scurity of a figurative and dark description as well attet as before the event. The prophet Isaiah describes the pkey . P. R 0 C 453 peace of Christ’s kingdom in the following manner: ‘ The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and The leopard shall lie down with the kid, and the calf and the young- lion, and the falling, together, and a little child shall lead them.’ Nobody, some modern Jews excepted, ever understood this literally j nor can it now be lite¬ rally applied to the state of the gospel. It was and is capable of different interpretations : it may mean tem¬ poral peace, or that internal and spiritual peace that tranquillity of mind, which sets a man at peace with God, himself, and the world. But whatever the true meaning is, this prophecy does no more obtrude one determinate sense upon the mind since the coming of Christ than it did before. But then we say, the state of the gospel was very properly prefigured in this de¬ scription, and is as properly prefigured in a hundred more of the like kind ; and since they all agree in a fair application to the state ot the gospel, we strongly con¬ clude, that this state was the tiling foretold under such expressions. So that the argument from prophecy for the truth of Christianity does not rest on this, that the event has necessarily limited and ascertained the parti¬ cular sense and meaning of every prophecy ; but in this, that every prophecy has in a proper sense been complet¬ ed by the coming of Christ. It is absurd, therefore, to expect clear and evident conviction from every single prophecy applied to Christ; the evidence must arise from a view and comparison of all together.” It is doubtless a great mistake to suppose that prophecy was intended solely or chiefly for their sakcs in whose time the events predicted are to happen. What great occa¬ sion is there to lay in so long beforehand the evidence of prophecy to convince men of things that are to hap¬ pen in their own times; the truth of which they may, if they please, learn from their own senses P Yet some people are apt to talk as if they thought the truth of the events predicted depended very much on the evi¬ dence of prophecy : they speak, for instance, as if they imagined the certainty and reality of our Saviour’s re¬ surrection were much concerned in the clearness of the prophecies relating to that great and wonderful event, and seem to think that they are confuting the truth of his resurrection when they are pointing out the absurdi¬ ty of the prophecies relating to it. But can any thing be more absurd ? For what ground or pretence is there to inquire whether the prophecies foretelling that the Messiah should die and rise again do truly belong to Christ, unless we are first satisfied that Christ died ^and rose again P The part which unbelievers ought to take in this question, if they would make any use of prophecy, should be, to show from the prophets that Christ was necessarily to rise from the dead ; and then to prove that in fact Jesus never did rise. Here would be a plain consequence. But if they like not this method, they ought to let the prophecies alone; for if Christ did not rise, there is no harm done though the prophets have not foretold it. And if they allow the resurrection of Christ, what do they gain by discrediting the prophets ? The event will be what it is, let the prophets be what they will. These considerations show how far the gospel is neces¬ sarily concerned in prophetical evidence, and how clear the prophecies should be. Christ claims to be the per¬ son foretold in the law and the prophets; and as truth ] PRO must ever be consistent with itself, this claim must be Pr„pW true as well as all others. This is the part theu to be iZJS tried on the evidence of prophecy : Is Christ that per¬ son described and foretold under the Old Testament or not ? Whether all the prophecies relating to him be plain or not plain, it matters little ; the single question is, Are there enough plain to show us that Christ is the person foretold under the Old Testament ? If there be, we are at an end ot our inquiry, and want no farther help from prophecy ; especially since we have seen the day dawn and enjoyed the marvellous light of the gos¬ pel of God. Lut so unreasonable are unbelievers, that whilst some OSje*dons ot them object to the obscurity of the prophecies, from the others have rejected them altogether on account of theirclran,ess °C clearness, pretending that they are histories and notSO:"epr°' predictions. The prophecies against which this objec- tion has been chiefly urged are those of Daniel, which were first called in question by the famous Porphyry. He affirmed that they were not composed by Daniel, whose name they bear, but by some author who lived in Judea about the time of Antioclius Epiphanes; because all to that time contained true history, but that all the facts beyond that were manifestly false. This method of opposing the prophecies, as a father answered, 1 oi the church rightly observes, is the strongest testimo- ny of their tnsth : for they are so exactly fulfilled, that to infidels the prophet seemed not to have foretold things future, but to have related things past. To an infidel of this age, if he has the same ability and know¬ ledge of history that Porphyry had, all the subsequent prophecies of Daniel, except those which are still ful- filhng, would appear to be history and not prophecy ; 22 for it entirely overthrows the notion of their beingfrom wliat written in the days of A/Oiochus Epiphanes, or of the^8.^^11* Maccabees, and establishes the credit of Daniel as a pro- tae'objec- phet beyond contradiction, that there are several of tion wa» those prophecies which have been fulfilled since that pe-lllstsUlrt€t,5 riod as well as before ; nay, that there are prophecies of Daniel which are fulfilling at this very time in the world. Our limits will not permit us to enter into the objec¬ tions which have been made to this prophet by the au¬ thor of the Literal Scheme of Prophecy considered ; nor is there occasion that we should enter into them. 'They have been all examined and completely answered by Bishop Chandler in his Vindication of his Defence of Christianity, by Mr Samuel Chandler in his Vindica¬ tion of the Antiquity and Authority of Daniel’s Prophe- 23 cies, and by Bishop Newton in his excellent Disserta-aru* froin tions on the Prophecies. To these authors we refer thefacts 0.1 ^ reader; and shall conclude the present article with a1 tb view of some prophecies given in very remote ages, which are in this age receiving their accomplishment. Of these the first is that of Noah concerning the ser¬ vitude ofthe posterity of Canaan. In the greater part of original manuscripts, and in our version of the holy scriptures, this prophecy is thus expressed: “ Cursed be Canaan ; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren but in the. Arabic version, and in some co¬ pies of the Septuagint, it is, “ Cursed be Ham the fa¬ ther of Canaan ; a servant of servants shall he be to his brethren.” Whether the curse was really pronounced upon Ham, which we think most probable, or only up¬ on his son Canaan, we shall find the prediction remark¬ ably P K O [ 454 1 P; R O Propliec’ alilv fulfilled, not barely ages after the book of Genesis was very generally known, but also at this very day. It is needless to inform any man who has but looked into the Old Testament, that when the ancient patri¬ archs pronounced either a curse or a blessing upon any of their sons, they meant to declare the future fortunes, not of that son individually, but of his descendants as a tribe or a nation. Let us keep this in mind, and pro¬ ceed to compare with Noah’s prophecythe fortunes of the descendants of Canaan, the fourth son of Ham, and then the fortunes of the posterity of Ham by his other sons. . With the fate of the Canaamtes every reader is ac¬ quainted. They were conquered by Joshua several cen¬ turies after the delivery of this prophecy *, and such of them as were not exterminated were by him and bolo- mon reduced to a state of the lowest servitude to the Is¬ raelites, the posterity of Shem the brother of Ham. 11m Greeks and Romans, too, who were the descendants of Japbeth, not only subdued Syria and Palestine, but also pursued and conquered such of the Canaanites as were anywhere remaining, as for instance the Tyrians and Cartha ‘inians, of whom the former were ruined by A- lexander and the Grecians, and the latter by Scipio and the Romans. Nor did the effects of the curse stop there. The miserable remainder of that devoted people have been ever since slaves to a foreign yoke •, first to the Saracens who are descended from Shem, and afterwards to the Turks who are descended from Japheth } and un¬ der the Turkish dominion they groan at this day. If we take the prophecy as it stands in the Arabic version, its accomplishment is stiil more remarkable. The whole continent of Africa was peopled principally by the posterity of Ham. And for how many ages have the better parts of that country lain under the dominion first of the Romans, then of the Saracens, and now oi the Turks ? In what wickedness, ignorance, barbarity, slavery, and misery, live most of its inhabitants ? and of the poor negroes how many thousands are every year sold and bought like beasts in the market, and conveyed from one quarter of the world to do the work of beasts in another ; to the full accomplishment indeed of the prophecy, but to the lasting disgrace of those who are from the love of gain the instruments of fulfilling it. Nothing can be more complete than the execution of the sentence as rvell upon Ham as upon Canaan } and the hardiest infidel will not dare to say that it was pio- nounced after the event. The next prophecy which we shall notice is that o. Abraham concerning the multitude of his descendants ; which every one knows is still fulfilled in the Jews even an their dispersed state, and therefore cannot have been given after the event of which it speaks. & Of the same kind are the several prophecies concern¬ ing Ishmael 5 of which some have been fulfilled, and others are at present fulfilling in the most astonishing manner. 01 this son ol A.biaham it was foretold, that “ he should be a wild man ; that his hand should be against every man, and every man’s hand against him } that he should dwell in the presence of all his brethren ; that he should be multiplied exceedingly, beget twelve prinfces, and become a great nation.” i he sacred hi¬ storian who records these prophecies adds, that “ Cod was with the lad, and he grew, and dwelt in the wilder¬ ness, and became an archer.” To show how fully and literally all these prophecies. Proph have been accomplished, would require more room than we have to bestow'; and to the reader of history the la-, hour would be superfluous. We shall therefore only re¬ quest the unbeliever to attend to the history of the Arabs, the undoubted descendants of Ishmael ; and to say how it comes to pass, that though they have been robbers by land and pirates by sea for time immemorial, though their hands have been against every man, and every man’s hand against them, they always have dwelt, and at this day dwell, in the presence of their brethren, a free and independent people. It cannot he pretended that no attempt has ever been made to conquer them j for the greatest conquerors in the world have all in their turns attempted it: but though some of tnem made great progress, not one was ever ci owned with success, it cannot be pretended that the inaccessibleness of their country has been their protection j for then country has been often penetrated, though it never was entirely subdued. When in all human probability they have been on the brink of ruin, they were signally and pro¬ videntially delivered. Alexander was preparing an ex¬ pedition against them, when he was cut off in the flower of his age. Ponipey was in the career of his conquests when urgent affairs called him elsewhere, iElius Cal¬ lus had penetrated far into their country, when a fatal disease destroyed great numbers of his men, and obliged him to return. Trajan besieged their capital city, but was defeated by thunder and lightning and whirlwinds. Severus besieged the same city twice, and was twice re¬ pelled from before it. The Turks, though they were able to wrest from them their foreign conquests, have been so little able to subdue the Arabs themselves, or even to restrain their depredations, that they are obliged to pay them a sort of annual tribute for the safe passage of the pilgrims who go to Mecca to pay their devotions. On these facts we shall not exclaim. He who is not struck upon comparing the simple history of this singular people with the prophecies so long ago delivered of them and their great ancestor, whose love of liberty is compa¬ red to that of the wild ass, would rise wholly unmoved from our exclamations. _ _ T, , A fourth prophecy of this kind, which cannot be al- ^ leged to have been uttered after the event, is the denun-theJ( elation of Moses against the children of Israel in case ofpiajni their disobedience j which is so literally fulfilled, that fore to even at this moment- it appears rather a history of the present state of the Jews, than a remote prediction of their apostasy and punishment. “ And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people from the one end of the earth even unto the other. And among these nations shalt thou find no case, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest j hut the Lord shall give thee there a tremb¬ ling heart and falling of eyes; and sorrow of mind. And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee 5 and thou shaft fear day and night, and shall have none assurance of thy life,” (Deut. xxviii. 64, 65, 66.). “ And thou shall become an astonishment, a proverb, and a bye-word, among all nations, whither the Lord shall lead you. (Deut. xxviii. 37.). Similar to this denunciation, hut attended with some circumstances still more wonderful, is the following pio- diction of the prophet Hosea : “ The children of Israel shall abide many days without a king, and without a prince, and without a sacrifice, and without an image, PRO ! he of it phecy. and without an ephod, and without teraphim. After- * wards shall the children of Israel return, and seek the* Lord their God, and David their king; and shall fear the Lord and his goodness in the latter days (b) ” In this passage we find the state of the Jews for the last 1700 years clearly and distinctly described with all its circumstances. From the time that they rejected their Messiah all things began to work towards the destruc¬ tion of their politics both civil and religious 5 and with¬ in a few years from his death, their city, temple, and government, were utterly ruined 5 and they themselves not carried into a gentle captivity, to enjoy their laws, and live under governors of their own, as they did in Babylon, but they were sold like beasts in a market and became slaves in the strictest sense; and from that day to this have had neither prince nor chief among them. Nor will any one of them ever be able, after all their pretences, to prove his descent from Aaron, or to say with certainty whether he is of the tribe of Judah or of the tribe of Levi, till he shall discover that un¬ known country where never mankind dwelt, and where the apocryphal Esdras has placed their brethren of the ten tribes. This being the case, it is impossible they can have either an altar, or a sacrifice, or a priesthood, according to the institution of Moses, but are evidently an outcast people living under laws which cannot be fulfilled. The cause of this deplorable condition is likewise as¬ signed with the same perspicuity : They are scattered over the face ol the earth, because they do not acknow¬ ledge Christ for the Messiah 5 because they do not sub¬ mit to their own king, the true David. In the prophe¬ tic writings the name of David is frequently given to the Messiah, who was to descend from that prince. Thus Ezekiel, speaking of the kingdom of Christ, savs', “I will set up one Shepheid over them, and he shall feed them, even my servant David j he shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd.55 And Jeremiah says, “ They shall serve the Lord their God, and David their king, whom F will raise up unto them.” I hat in these places, as well as in the passage under consideration, the Messiah is meant, is undeniable ; for David the son of Jesse was dead long before any of the three prophets was born ; and by none of them it is said ■‘afterwards David their king shall come again $” but “afterwards the children of Israel .shallreturn to David their king,” they shall recover from their blind infatua¬ tion, and seek him whom they have not yet known. By their not receiving Jesus for their Christ, they have forfeited all claim to the divine favour, and are, of con¬ sequence, “ without a king, and without a chief, and without a sacrifice, and without an altar, and without a priesthood.” The time, however, will come, when they shall re¬ turn and seek “ the Lord their God and David their king;” when they shall tremble before him whom their fathers crucified, and honour the son even as they ho- C 455 PRO ?our tbel fatl,er- That this part of the prophecy will m time be as completely fulfilled as the other has been may be confidently expected from the wonderful preser¬ vation of the Jews for so many ages. Scattered as they are over the whole earth, and hated as they are by all nations, it might naturally be thought, that in process ot time they would have coalesced with their conquer¬ ors, and have been ultimately absorbed and annihilated by their union, so that no trace of them should now have remained 5 yet the fact is, that, dispersed as they have ever since been over the whole face of the globe they have never, in a single instance, in any country, lost their religious or natural distinctions j and they are now generally supposed to be as numerous as they were under the reigns of David and Solomon. This is contrary to all history, and all experience, of the course of human, allairs in similar cases 5 it has been boldly and justly styled a standing miracle. Within 1000 or 1200 years back, a great variety of extraordinary and important re¬ volutions have taken place among the nations of Eu¬ rope. In the southern part of this island the Britons were conquered by the Saxons, the Saxons by the Danes and the Danes and Saxons by the Normans ; but in a few centuries these opposite and hostile nations were con¬ solidated into one indistinguishable mass. Italy, about the same time that Britain was subdued by the Saxons was conquered by the Goths and Vandals : and it is not easy to conceive a more striking contrast than that which sub¬ sisted between the polished inhabitants of that delightful country and their savage invaders ; and yet how soon did all distinction cease between them ! In France, the Roman colonies gradually assimilated with the ancient Gauls; and in Spain, though the Moors continued for several ages, and till their final expulsion, a distinct people, yet after they were once reduced to a state of subjection, their numbers very sensibly diminished ; and such ot them as were suffered to remain after their last overthrow have been long since so blended with the Spa¬ niards that they cannot noiv be distinguished. But with regard to the dews, the wonder is, that though they do not in any country where they are settled bear any pro¬ portion to the natural inhabitants, though they are uni¬ versally reduced to a state of the lowest subjection, and even exposed to hatred, contempt, and persecution; yet m no instance does there seem to be the least appearance or probability of their numbers being diminished, in no instance do they discover anydecay of attachment to their religious principles. Whence then comes it that this people alone, who, having no form of government or a republic anywhere subsisting, are without the means by which other people are kept united and distinct, should still be preserved amongst so many different nations ? How comes it, when they have been thus scattered in¬ to so many distant corners, like dust which cannot be perceived, that they should still so long survive the dis¬ solution of their own state, as well as that of so many others! To these questions the answer is obvious ; They arer Prophecy. (b) Such is our translation of this remarkable prophecy ; but the Greek version of the Seventy has it, per¬ haps more properly, thus : “ The children of Israel shall abide many days without a king, and without a chief, and without a sacrifice, and without an altar, and without a priesthood, and without prophecies. After¬ wards,” &.c. Prophecy, Prophet. 27 Of prophe¬ cies re¬ specting; the Chri¬ stian church. PRO t are preserved, tliat, as a nation, “ tliey may return ami seek the Lord their God and David their king, and tear ' the Lord and his goodness in the latter days. We might here subjoin many prophecies both irom the Old and the New Testament, and especially trom the writings of St Paul and St John, which so clearly describe the various fortunes of the Christian chine 1, her progress to that state of general corruption under which she was sunk three centuries ago, and her gia^ua restoration to her primitive purity, that they ca™ot- be supposed to proceed from the cunning craftiness ot men, orPto have been written after the events of which they sneak. To do justice to these, however, would lequne /volume, and many excellent volumes have been writ¬ ten upon them. The reader who wishes tor satisfaction on so interesting a subject will do well to consult th writings of MrSMede and Sir Isaac Newton together with Bishop Newton’s Dissertations, and the Sermons of Hurd, Halifax, and Bagot, preached at \\ arbur on s lecture. We shall only observe, that one of the ablest reasoners that Great Britain ever produced, after having paid the closest attention to the predictions ot the New Testament, hath been bold enough to pnt the truth ot revealed religion itself upon the reality of that prophetic spirit which foretold the desolation of Chnst s churci and kingdom by antichrist. It (says he), in r days of St Paul and St John, there was any foot¬ step of such a sort of power as this in the world 5 or it there had BEEN any such power in the world j or it there was THEN any appearance or probability that could make it enter into the heart of man to imagine that there EVER could be any such kind of power in the world, much less in the temple or c/mrch of hod, and if there be not now such a power actually and con¬ spicuously exercised in the world j and if any picture ot this power, DRAWN AFTER THE event, can now de¬ scribe it more plainly and exactly than it was originally described in the words of the prophecy—then may it, with some degree of plausibility, be suggested, that the prophecies are nothing more than enthusiastic imagma- Upon the whole, we conclude with Bishop Sherlock, that the various prophecies recorded in the Holy Scrip¬ tures were given, not to enable man to foresee with clearness future events, but to support the several dis¬ pensations of religion under which they were respective¬ ly promulgated. The principal prophecies recorded m the Old Testament led mankind to hope lor a complete deliverance from the curse of the fall $ and therefore tended to fill their minds with gratitude, and to enforce a cheerful obedience to that God who in the midst of judgment remembereth mercy. The prophecies, whe¬ ther in the Old or New Testament, that pourtray the present state of the Jews, and the various fortunes of the Christian church, as they are daily fulfilling in the pre¬ sence of all men, are the strongest possible proot of the divinity of our holy religion, and supply to us in the latter-days the place of miracles, by which it was at first established. PROPHET, in general, a person who loretels future events •, but is particularly applied to such inspired per¬ sons among the Jews as were commissioned by God to declare his will and purposes to that people. Among the canonical books of the Old Testament we have the writings of 16 prophets, four of whom are denominated I 456 ] PRO the greater prophets, viz. Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel j so called from the length and extent of their writings, which exceed those of the others, viz. Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habak- kuk, Haggai, Zecbariah, and Malachi, who are called the lesser prophets, from the shortness of their writings. The Jews do not place Daniel among the prophets, be¬ cause, they say, he lived the life of a courtier rather than that of a prophet. An account of the several wri¬ tings of the prophets may be seen each under its parti¬ cular head. See the article Isaiah, &c. Sons of the Prophets, in scripture history, an appel¬ lation given to young men who were educated in the schools or colleges under a proper master, who was commonly, if not always, an inspired prophet, in the knowledge of religion and in sacred music, and thus were qualified to be public preachers } which seems to have been part of the business of the prophets on the Sabbath days and festivals. It is probable that God generally chose the prophets, whom he inspired, out of these schools. See Prophecy. PROPITIATION, in Theology, a sacrifice offered to God to assuage his wrath and render him propitious. Among the Jews there were both ordinary and public sacrifices, as holocausts, &c. offered by way of thanks¬ giving ; and extraordinary ones, offered by particular persons guilty of any crime, by way of propitiation. The Romish church believe the mass to be a sacrifice of propitiation for the living and the dead. I he re¬ formed churches allow of no propitiation but that one offered by Jesus Christ on the cross. See Sacrifice. PROPITIATORY, any thing rendering God pro¬ pitious j as we say propitiatory sacrifices, in contradi¬ stinction to sacrifices which were eueharisttcal. Among the Jews the propitiatory was the cover or lid of the ark of the covenant} which was lined both within and withoutside with plates of gold, insomuch that there was no wood to be seen. This propitiatory was a type or figure of Christ, whom St Paul calls the propitiatory ordained from all ages. See Ark of the Covenant. PROPOLIS, the name of a certain substance more tenacious than wax, with which the bees stop up all the holes or cracks in the side of their hives. See Bee, N° 13. PROPONTIS, or Sea of Marmora, a part of the Mediterranean, dividing Europe from Asia 5 it has the Hellespont or canal of the Dardanelles to the south¬ west, whereby it communicates with the Archipelago, and ’the ancient Bosphorus of Thrace, or strait of Constantinople, to the north east, communicating with the Black or Euxine sea. It has two castles : that on the Asia side is on a cape, where formerly stood a tem¬ ple of Jupiter. The castle of Europe is on an oppo¬ site cape, and had anciently a temple of Serapis. It is 120 miles long, and in some places upwards ot 40 miles ^PROPORTION, the identity or similitude of two ratios. Hence quantities that have the same iatl° be' tween them are said to be proportional 5 e. |r* “ ® to B as C to D, or 8 be to 4 as 30 to 15 ; A, B, L, L>, and 8, 4, 30, and 15, are said to be in proportion, 01 are simply called proportionals. Proportion is frequent¬ ly confounded with ratio •, yet have the two in reality very different ideas, which ought by all means to distinguished. Ratio is properly the relation or ^a^ ropoi tion P H O ^ j Pro ^'Ldltermine,S tlie, quantity of vide the product by the number remaining after the P nuddle or second xs subtracted from doublf the first the quotient xs a third harmonical proportion ; thus sup- Proposi- fhe^i tr'r9> i2> i6> a fourth wiu bpy c °7 Uie quantity o one from the quantity of another, without the interven t.on of any third : thus we say the ratio of c and 10 is 2, the ratio of 12 and 24 is 2. Proportion is the same¬ ness or likeness of two such relations 5 thus the relations between 5 and 10 and 12 and 24 being the same, or equal, the four terms are said to be in proportion. Hence ratio exists between two numbers, but proper tion requires at least three. Proportion, in fine is the habitude or relation of two ratios when compared too¬ ther ; as ratio is of two quantities. See Algebra A- rithmetic, and Geometry. Arithmetical and Geometrical PRoponriofc. See Progression. Inordinate Proportion, is. where the order of the terms compared is disturbed or irregular. As, for ex¬ ample, in two ranks of numbers, three in each rank viz. in one rank, - - 2, 3, n and in the other, - - 8,* 24,' 36* which are proportional, the former’to the latter, but in a different order, viz. - 2 : 3 : : 24 : 36 and '. ‘ - 3 : 9 : : 8 : 24’ then ; casting out tne mean terms in each rank it is con¬ cluded that - - 2 : 9 : ; 8 : 36, that is, the first is to the third in the first rank as the first is to the third in the second rank. Harmonical or Musical Proportion, is a kind of numeral proportion formed thus : of three numbers if the first be to the third as the difference of the first and second to the difference of the second and third • the tinee numbers are in harmonical proportion. ^hus 2, 3, 6, are harmonical, because 2:6:: 1:3. So also four numbers are harmonical, when the first is to the fourth as the difference of the first aim second to the difference of the third and fourth. Thus 24, 16, 12, 9, are harmonical, because 24 : 9 . : 8 : 3. Ey continuing the proportional terms in the first case, there arises an harmonical progression or se¬ nes. 1. If three or four numbers in harmonical propor¬ tion be multiplied or divided by the same number the products or quotients will also be in harmonical pro¬ portion : thus, if 6, 8, 12, which are harmonical, be divided by 2, the quotients 3, 4, 6, are also harmo- mcal j and reciprocally the products by 2, viz. 6, 8, 2. To find an harmonical mean between two num¬ bers given j divide double the product of the two num¬ bers by their sum, the quotient is the mean required : thus suppose 3 and 6 the extremes, the product of these Js 18, which doubled gives 36 ; this divided by 9 (the sum of 3 and 6) gives the quotient 4. Whence 3, 4, 6, are harmonical. 3. To find a third harmonical proportion to two numbers given. Call one of them the first term, and the other the second ; multiply them together, and divide the product Jy the number remaining after the second is subtracted 10m double the first; the quotient is a third harmoni¬ ca pioportional : thus, suppose the given terms 3, 4 eii product 12 divided by 2 (the remainder after 4 is taken from 6, the double of the first), the quotient is 0, the harmonical third sought. 4- Ip find a fourth harmonical proportion to three errns given ; multiply the first into the third, and di- VOL. XVH. Part II. f. the rule to be 24. 5- H there be four numbers disposed in order, where¬ of one extreme and the two middle terms are in arith¬ metical proportion ; and the same middle terms with the other extreme are in harmonical proportion : the foui are in geometrical proportion ; as here 2 : 3 • • 4 • 6 which are geometrical 5 whereof 2, 3, 4, are arith¬ metical, and 3, 4, 6, are harmonical. : betvv,xt any two numbers you put an arithme- cal mean, and also an harmonical one, the four will be m geometrical proportion : thus betwixt 2 and 6 an arithmetical mean is 4, and an harmonical one 3 : and the four 2:31:4:6, arc geometrical. J We have this notable difference between the three 'ims 0 proportion, arithmetical, harmonical, and £eo- metncal; that from any given number we can raise a continued arithmetical series increasing inin/imtum, but not decreasing: the harmonical is decreasable in infim- tmn, but not increasable; the geometrical is both. Proportion, or Rule of Three. See Arithmetic. Reciprocal 1 roportion. See IIeciprocal. 1 ROPORTION is also used for the relation between unequal things of the same kind, whereby their several parts correspond to each other with an equal augmenta¬ tion or diminution. b Thus, in reducing a figure into little, or in enlarging it, care is taken to observe an equal diminution or en¬ largement through all its parts; so that if one line e. gr. be contracted by one-third of its length, all the’ rest shall be contracted in the same proportion. Proportion, in Architecture, denotes the just mag¬ nitude of the members of each part of a building, and the relation of the several parts of the whole ; e. nr. of the dimensions of a column, &c. with regard to the or- donnance of the whole building. One of the greatest differences among architects, M Perrault observes, is in the proportion of the heights of entablatures with respect to the thickness of the columns, to which they are always to be accommoda¬ ted. In effect, there is scarcely any work, either of the ancients or moderns, wherein this proportion is not dif¬ ferent ; some entablatures are even near twice as high as others :—yet it is certain this proportion ought of all others to be most regulated ; none being of greater importance, as there is none in which a defect is sooner seen, nor any in which it is more shocking. Compass of Proportion, a name by which the French, and after them some English, authors call the Sector. 1 ROPORTIONAL, relating to proportion. Thus we say, proportional compasses, parts, scales, spirals,&c. Proportionals, in Geometry, are ouantities. tion. •'’v r spiiaiSjOCC. 1 roportionals, in Geometry, are quantities, either linear or numeral, which bear the same ratio or relation to each other. PROPOSITION, in Logic, part of an argument, wherein some quality, either negative or positive, is at¬ tributed to a subject. Proposition, in Mathematics, is either some truth advanced and shown to be such by demonstration, or some operation proposed and its solution shown. If the 3 proposition PRO [ 45s 1 PRO Proposition Prose. proposition be deduced from several theoretical defini¬ tions compared together, it is called a theorem •, il from a praxis, or series of operations, it is called a problem. See the articles Theorem and PROBLEM. Proposition, in Oratory. See Oratory, N° 28. 124. Proposition, in Poetry, the first part 01 a poem, wherein the author proposes briefly, and in general, what he is to say in the body of his work. It should comprehend only the matter of the poem, that is, the action and persons that act. Horace prescribes mo¬ desty and simplicity in the proposition, and would not have the poet promise too much, nor raise in the read¬ er too great ideas of what he is going to relate. PRO PREFECT, among the Romans, the prefect’s lieutenant, or an officer whom the prefect ot the pre- torium commissioned to do part ol his duty in his place. . . . . PROPRETOR, a Roman magistrate, who, having discharged the office of pretor at home, was sent into a province to command there with his former pretorial authority. It was also an appellation given to those who, without having been pretors at Rome, were sent extraordinarily into the provinces to administer justice with the authority of pretors. PROPRIETOR, or Proprietary, is he who pos¬ sesses any thing as his own in the utmost degree. Such monks were called proprietary as had reserved goods and effects to themselves, notwithstanding their formal renunciation of all at the time of their profession. They are frequently mentioned in the Monast. Anglic. &c. and were to be very severely dealt with } to be ex¬ communicated, deprived of burial, &c. Monacht pro- prictarii cKcommunicentur ab abbattbus: et, si in morte proprietarius inventusfuerit, ecclesiustica careat sepultura, &c. Addit. ad Matt. 1 ar. PRO RATA, in commerce, a term sometimes used by merchants for in proportion ; as, each person must reap the profit or sustain the loss, pir) rata to his inte¬ rest, that is, in proportion to his stock. PROROGATION, the act of prolonging, ad¬ journing, or putting off, to another time, I he differ¬ ence between a prorogation and an adjournment of par¬ liament is, that by prorogation the session is ended, and such bills as passed in either house, or both houses, and had not the royal assent, must at the next assem¬ bly begin again. PROSCRIPTION, a publication made in the name of the chief or leader of a party, whereby he promises a reward to any one who shall bring him the head of one of his enemies. Sylla and Marius by turns proscribed each others adherents.—Under the triumvirate great part ot the best and bravest of the Romans fell by proscription. The term took its rise from the practice of writing down a list of the persons names, and posting it in pub¬ lic ; from pro and scribo, “ I write.” PROSE, the natural language of mankind, loose and unconfined by poetical measures, rhymes, See. In which sense it stands opposed to verse. There is, however, a species of prose which is mea¬ sured, such as that in which epitaphs and other in¬ scriptions are generally written ; and indeed every man who has formed for himself a style writes in uniform periods regularly recurring. It has been much dispu- Pronerpii 1 v-J ted whether a poem can be written in prose. VTe en- Pn ter not into that dispute, as we have said enough on the subject elsewhere. See Novel. The word prose comes from the Latin prosa, which some will have derived from the Hebrew paras, which signifies expendit: others deduce it from the Latin prorsa, of prorsus, “ going forwards by way of op¬ position to versa, or “ turning backwards, as is ne¬ cessary in writing. ... m PROSECUTION, in the criminal law. i he next step towards the punishment of offenders after Com¬ mitment, is their prosecution, or the manner ot then formal accusation. And this, in the English law, is either upon a previous finding of the fact by an inquest or grand jury $ or without such previous finding. The former way is either by Presentment or In¬ dictment. See these articles. The remaining methods of prosecution are without any previous finding by a jury, to fix the authoritative stamp of verisimilitude upon the accusation. One ot these, by the common law, was when a thief was taken ivit/i the mainour, that is, with the thing stolen upon him, in manu. For he might, when so detected, fla¬ grante delicto, he brought into court, arraigned, and tried, without indictment: as by the Danish law he might be taken and hanged upon the spot without ac¬ cusation or trial. But this proceeding was taken away bv several statutes in the reign of Edward III. though id Scotland a similar process remains to this day. So that the only species of proceeding at the suit ot the king without a previous indictment or presentment by a grand jury, now seems to be that ol Information j which see. ...... These are all the methods of prosecution at the suit of the king. There yet remains another which is merely at the suit of the subject, and is called an Ap¬ peal. See that article. , . But of all the methods of prosecution, that by in¬ dictment is the most general. See Indictment. PROSECUTOR, in Law, he that pursues a cause in another’s name. . PROSELYTE, a new convert to some icligxon or religious sect. . PROSERPINACA, a genus of plants belonging to the triandria class, and in the natural method ranking under the 19th order, Inundata. See Botany Index. PROSERPINE, in fabulous history, the daughter of Jupiter and Ceres, was carried off by Pluto as she was gathering flowers with her companions. Ceres, disconsolate for the loss of her daughter, alter having long sought her, heard where she was and mtreated Jupiter to let her return from hell. 1 his request Ju¬ piter granted, on condition she had tasted nothing in Pluto’s dominions. Ceres therefore went to fetch her; but when her daughter was preparing to return, Asca- faphus gave information that he had seen l roserp.ne eat some grains of a pomegranate she had gathered in Pluto’s garden *, on which she was sentenced to con 1- nue in Tartarus in quality of Pluto’s spouse, and the queen of those gloomy regions: but to mitigate t ie grief of Ceres for her disappointment, Jupiter granted that her daughter should only spend six months toge¬ ther in hell with her husband, and the other six 0 earth with her mother. , Some mythologists imagine that the lattei par ^ PRO i w/s 1 ory of I dc, 1 ei't. hi m ?ol. fable ailades to the corn, which must remain all the winter hid in the earth, in order to sprout forth in the spring, and produce the harvest. PROSEUCHE, in antiquity, properly signifies pray¬ er ; but it is taken for the places of prayer of the Jews, and was pretty near the same as their synagogues. But the synagogues were originally in the cities, and were covered places : whereas, for the most part, the pro- seuches were out of the cities, and on the banks of ri¬ vers ; having no covering except perhaps the shade of some trees or covered galleries. The word is Greek 7rgoiriv%y, prayer. FHOSLAMBANOMENE, the name of a musical note in the Greek system. As the two tetrachords of the Greeks were conjunc¬ tive, or, in other words, as the highest note of the first served likewise for the lowest note of the second, it is plain that a complete octave could not be formed. To remedy this deficiency, therefore, one note beneath the lowest tetrachord was added, as an octave to the high¬ est of toe last tetrachord. Thus, if we suppose the first to have begun on B, the last must have ended upon A, to which one note subjoined immediately beneath the lowest B in the diatonic order must have formed an octave. 1 his note was called proslambanomene. But it appears from authors who have scrutinized antiquity with some diligence, and perhaps with as much success as the data upon which they proceeded could produce, that the names of the notes m the Greek system, which originally signified their natural station in the scale of ascending or descending sounds, were afterwards ap¬ plied to their positions in the lyre. Higher or lower, then, according to this application, did not signify their degrees of acuteness or gravity, but their higher or lower situation upon this instrument. PROSODY, that part of grammar which treats of the quantities and accents of syllables, and the manner of making verses. The English prosody turns chiefly on two thino-s, numbers and rhyme. See Poetry,'N° 66—76. and Part III. PEOftOPIS, in Botatiy, a genus of the monogy- nia order, belonging to the dodecandria class of plants. The calyx is hemispherical and quadridentate; the stigma is simple ; the legumen inflated and monosper- mous. See Botany Index. PROSOPOPOEIA, a figure in oratory, whereby we raise qualities of things inanimate into persons. See Oratory. ( PROS FATiE, in Anatomy, a gland, generally sup¬ posed to be two separate bodies, though in reality but one, situated just before the neck of the bladder, and t 459 ] PRO See Ana- h 2% surrounding the beginning of the urethra. TOmy Index. . PROSTYLE, in Architecture, a range of columns in the front of a temple. PROIAGORAS, a famous Greek philosopher, was 01 n at Abdera. In his youth, his poverty obliged him to submit to the servile office of frequently car¬ rying logs of wood from the neighbouring fields to Abdera. It happened that as he was one day going on briskly towards the city under one of these loads, he ■Has met by Democritus, who was particularly struck with the neatness and regularity of tlie bundle. Desi¬ ring him to .stop and rest himself, Democritus ex ami * ned more closely the structure of the load, and found that prola„„„ .t waa put together wtth mathematical exactness; upon | which he asked the youth whether he himself had made p''o:evt. it up. i rot ago ran assured him that he had; and imme- v diately taking it to pieces, with great ease replaced every log in the same exact order as before. Democri¬ tus expressed much admiration of his ingenuity ; and sau to him, “ Young man, follow me, and your talents shall be employed upon greater and better things.” The youth consented, and Democritus took him home, main¬ tained him at Ins own expence, and taught him philo- sophy which qualified him for the office of legislator of the Ihunans. He was more subtle than solid in bis reasonings; however, be taught at Athens with great reputation, but was at length banished from thence for the impiety of his doctrines. He then travelled, and vi¬ sited the islands in the Mediterranean, where it is said that he was the first philosopher who taught for money. He died in a voyage to Sicily, in a very advanced age. lie commonly reasoned by dilemmas, and left the mind in suspense with respect to all the questions he proposed. His moral principles were adopted by Hobbes. (See AIoral Philosophy). Plato wrote a dialogue against him. Lie flourished 400 years B. C. PROTASIS, in the ancient drama, the first part of a comic or tragic piece, wherein the several persons are shown, their characters intimated, and the subject of the piece proposed and entered upon. It might reach as far as our two first acts; and where it ended the epitasis commenced. See the article Efi- TASIS. PROTEA, the Silver-tree, a genus of plants, be- longing to the tetrandria class; aiuHn the natural me¬ thod ranking under the 47th order, Stellatce. See Botany Index. PROTECTOR, a person who undertakes to shelter and defend the weak, helpless and distressed. Every Catholic nation, and every religious order, has a protector residing at the court of Rome, who is a car¬ dinal, and is called the cardinal protector. 1 rotector is also sometimes used for a regent of a king¬ dom, made choice of to govern it during the minority of a prince. Cromwell assumed the title and quality of lord pro¬ tector of the commonwealth of England. PEOIESILAI Iurris, the sepulchre of Protesi* laus, with a temple, at which Alexander sacrificed, (Arian) ; situated at the south extremity of the Helle’ spent, near the Chersonesus Thracia. Protesilaus was the first Greek who landed on the coast of Troy, and the first Greek slain by the Trojans, (Homer, Ovid). His wife Laodamia, to assuage her grief, begged the gods for a sight of his shade; and obtaining her request, she expired in his embraces, (Hyginus).' Protesilaus was also called I hylacides, from Phylace, a town of Thessaly. PBO I ES F, in Law, is a call of witness, or an open affirmation that a person does, either not at all, or but conditionally, yield his consent to any act, or to the proceeding of any judge in a court in which his juris¬ diction is doubtful, or to answer upon his oath farther than he is hound by law. Any of the lords in parliament have a right to pro¬ test then' dissent to any bill passed by a majority; winch protest is entered in form. Phis is said to be a very 3 ^ 2 ancient PRO [ 460 ] PRO ancient privilege. The commons have no right to pro¬ test. See Parliament. Protest, in Commerce, a summons written by a no¬ tary-public to a merchant, banker, or the like to accept or discharge a bill of exchange drawn on him, after his having refused either to accept or pay it. See Hill of Exchange. PROTESTANT, a name first given in Germany to those who adhered to the doctrine of Luther j be¬ cause in 1529 they protested against a decree of the emperor Charles V. and the diet'of Spires j declaring that they appealed to a general council. The same name has also been given to those ol the sentiments of Calvin } and is now become a common denomination for all those of the reformed churches. PROTEUS, in Heathen Mythology. See Egypt, N° 6. PROTHONOTARY, a term which properly sig¬ nifies first notary, and which was anciently the title of the principal notaries of the emperors of Constanti¬ nople. < Prothonotary, with us, is used lor an officer in the court of king’s bench and common pleas } the former of which courts has one, and the latter three. The prothonotary of the king’s bench records all civil ac¬ tions sued in that court, as the clerk of the crown-office does all criminal causes. The prothonotaries of the common pleas enter and enrol ail declarations, plead¬ ings, assizes, judgments, and actions : they also make out all judicial writs, except writs of habeas corpus, and distringas jurator, for which there is a particular office, called the habeas corpora office ; they likewise enter re¬ cognizances acknowledged, and all common recoveries j make exemplifications of records, &c. In the court of Rome there is a college of 12 pre¬ lates, called apostolical prothonotaries, empowered to receive the last wills of cardinals, to make all informa¬ tions and proceedings necessary for the canonization of saints j and all such acts as are of great consequence to the Papacy : for which purpose they have the right of admission into all consistories, whether public or half public. They also attend on the pope whenever he performs any extraordinary ceremony out of Rome. PROTO, a Greek term, frequently used in com¬ position of priority : thus proto-collum, in the ancient jurisprudence, signifies the first leaf of a book •, proto- martyr, the first martyr j proto-plast, the first man formed, &c. PROTOGENES, a celebrated ancient painter, was born at Caunas, a city of Caria, subject to the Rhodians, and flourished 300 years before the birth of our Saviour. He was first obliged to paint ships for his livelihood ; but afterwards acquired the highest repu¬ tation for history-painting j though Apelles blamed him for finishing his pieces too highly, and not knowing when to have done. The finest of his pictures w'as that of Jalisus, which is mentioned by several ancient authors, though none of them give any description of it. He worked seven years on this picture j during which time he lived entirely upon lupines and water, being of opinion that this light and simple nourish¬ ment left him greater freedom of fancy. Apelles, on seeing this picture, was struck with such admiration, that he was unable to speak, or to find words sufficient to express his idea of its beauty. It was this picture that saved the city of Rhodes when besieged by De- Protege,,^ metrius king of Macedon •, for being able to attack it [( only on that side where Protogenes worked, which he Protractcs intended to burn, he chose rather to abandon his de- sign than to destroy so fine a piece. Pliny says, that Apelles asking him what price he had for his pictures, and Protogenes naming an inconsiderable sum, Apelles concerned at the injustice done to the beauty of his productions, gave him 50 talents, about 10,000!, for one picture only, declaring publicly, that he would sell it for his own. This generosity made the Rho¬ dians sensible of the merit of Protogenes j and they were so eager to purchase the picture Apelles had bought, that they paid him a much greater price for it than he had given. PROTOTYPE, is the original or model after which a thing was formed but chiefly used for the patterns of things to be engiaved, cast, &c. PROTRACTOR, an instrument for laying down and measuring angles upon paper with accuracy and dispatch j and by which the use of the line of chords is superseded. This instrument is variously formed, as semicircular, rectangular, or circular j and constructed of different materials, as brass, ivory, &c. It is neces¬ sary in laying down those surveys or other plans where angles are concerned. The rectangular protractor is constructed in form of a right-angled parallelogram, which, when applied to a case of mathematical instruments, is substituted in place of the semicircular protractor and scale of equal ^ajeJ parts. Fig. 1. is a representation of it: the manner of using it is exactly similar to that of the Semicircular one. The circular protractor, as its name implies, is a complete circle, and is superior by far to either of the former, both in point of accuracy and dispatch, espe¬ cially when several angles are to be formed at the same point. The limb of this instrument is divided into 360 degrees, and each degree in some protractors is halved : it has a subdividing scale or vernier, by which an angle may be laid down or measured to a single mi¬ nute. In the centre of the protractor is a fine mark, which, when an angle is to be protracted or measured, is to be laid upon the angular point, and o, or zero on the limb, upon the given line forming one side of the angle. Fig. 2. represents a circular protractor whose limb is Fig. a. divided as above described, and the dividing scale on the index, which moves round the limb of the protrac¬ tor on a conical centre, gives every minute of a de¬ gree. That part of the index beyond the limb has a steel point fixed at the end, in a direct line with the centre of the protractor, and whose use is to prick oft the proposed angles. _ _ . Fig. 3. is another circular protractor, a little differ-3' ently constructed from the former. The central point is formed by the intersection of two lines crossing each other at right angles, which are ent on a piece of glass. The limb is divided into degrees and half degrees, ha¬ ving an index with a vernier graduated to count to a single minute, and is furnished with a tooth and pinion, by means of which tli^e index is moved round by turn¬ ing a small nut. It has two pointers, one at each end of°the index, furnished with springs for keeping them suspended while they are bringing to any angle 5 and being r PRO [ 46 being brought, applying a finger to the top of the || pointer, and pressing it down, pricks off the angle, •overb. There is this advantage in having two pointers, that 'Y-—' all the bearings round a circuit may be laid or pricked off, although the index traverses but one-half of the pro¬ tractor. I Another circular protractor, different from either of 14- the former, is represented at fig. 4. The centre is also formed by the intersection of two lines at right anodes to each other, which are cut on glass, that all parallax may thereby be avoided. The index is moved round by a tooth and pinion. The limb is divided into de¬ gress and half degrees, and subdivided to every minute by the vernier. The pointer may be set at any conve¬ nient distance from the centre, as the socket which carries it moves upon the bar BC, and is fixed thereto by the nut D, at right angles to the bar BC, and moveable with it. There is another bar EF : On this bar different scales of equal parts are placed 5 so that by moving a square against the inner edge thereof, angles may be transferred to any distance within the limits, from the centre containing the same number of degrees marked out by the index. It would indeed be superfluous to describe any more of these circular protractors, especially as the little al¬ terations in them depend very much upon the fancy of the artist. Suffice it however to say, that we have seen others still differently constructed, one of which we shall briefly describe. The divisions upon the limb of this instrument are similar to those already de¬ scribed •, but the index is a straight bar continued to some considerable distance each way beyond the limb of the instrument, and has a vernier to show minutes as usual-, a mark upon one of the edges of the index, al¬ ways coincides with the centre of the instrument. In¬ stead, therefore, of pricking down the angle as in the former, part of the line containing the angle may be drawn, which, although perhaps not so accurate as a point, is more conspicuous, and the line is easily com¬ pleted upon removal of the protractor. The common dimensions of the circular part of these instruments is from six to ten inches diameter} and they are made of brass. PBOIUBERANCE, in Anatomy, is any eminence, whether natural or preternatural, that projects or ad¬ vances out beyond the rest. PROVEDITOR, an officer in several parts of Italy, particularly at Venice, who has the direction of matters relating to policy. PROVENCE, a province or government of France, bounded by Dauphine on the north, by Piedmont on the east, by the Mediterranean on the south, and by the river Rhone, which separates it from Languedoc, on the west: it is about 100 miles long, and near as many broad. PRO VEND, or Provender, originally signified a kind of vessel containing the measure of corn daily gi¬ ven to a horse, or other beast of labour, for his subsist¬ ence } but is now generally used to signify the food for cattle ; whatever it is. PROVERB, according to Camden, is a concise, witty, and wise speech, grounded upon experience, and for the most part containing some useful instruc¬ tion. R00A: of Proverbs, a canonical book of the Old 1 ] pro Testament, containing a part of the proverbs of Solo- pr„„rI, n.on the son of David king of Israel. The first 24 ProriW. chapters are acknowledged to be the genuine work off 11 v1 that prince ; the next five chapters are a collection of several of his proverbs made by order of King Heze- kiah } and the two last seem to have been added, though belonging to different and unknown authors, Agur the son of Jakeh, and King Lemuel. In this excellent book are contained rules for the conduct of all conditions of life} for kings, courtiers, masters, servants, fathers, mothers, children, &c. x PROV IDEN CE, the superintendence and care Definition, ■which God exercises over creation. Ihat there exists a divine providence which attends Belief of a to the affairs of this world, and directs their course, has Prov'dence been a received opinion among the human race in every un‘veTsal- country and in every period of history. Every altar that is erected, every prayer and every sacrifice that is offered up, affords a proof of this belief. So fully have men been convinced of the sincerity of each other’s faith upon this subject, that in one form, that of an ap¬ peal to the Divine Ruler of the world, by the solemnity ol an oath, they have introduced it both into the most ordinary and the most important business of life. 3 ibis universal conviction of men of all degrees of^xlstence knowledge, from the most profound philosopher to the^fproV1' rudest barbarian, is probably to be traced to some pri- mawal tradition, never totally effaced from any nation on sebnti- under heaven. I he truth itself, however, is susceptible princi- of the most complete proof from principles of science. p*cs- If the world had a beginning, it may obviously have an end, and can be continued in existence only by the con¬ stant energy of that power by which it was at first crea¬ ted. He therefore who acknowledges a creation and denies a providence, involves himself in this palpable contradiction—“ that a system, which of itself had not an original and momentary existence, may yet of itself have a perpetual existence; or that a being which can¬ not of itself exist for a second of time, mav’yet, of it¬ self, exist for thousands of years !” Or should we be so complaisant, as for a moment to suppose, with certain theists, ancient and modern, that the matter of the uni¬ verse is self-existent and eternal, and that the power of God was exerted, not in creating substances, but in re¬ ducing the original matter from a state of chaos into that beautiful order in which we see it arranged ; the constant energy of providence must still be admitted as necessary to preserve the forms and to continue the mo¬ tions which were originally impressed upon the chaotic mass. From late experiments it appears extremely doubtful whether any two atoms of the most solid body be in actual contact; and that they are not all in contact is certain. (See Metaphysics, N° 176. and Optics, N° 45, p. 185.). A ct it requires a very considerable degree of force to carry to a greater distance from one another the parts of a stone or of a bar of iron. By what power then are those parts kept contiguous? It cannot be by their own ; because nothing can act where it is not present, and because our best philosophy has long taught us that the atoms of matter are essentially inactive. Again, it requires a very great degree of force to bring two bodies, however small, into apparent contact (see Optics, and therefore it follows that they must be kept asunder by some foreign power. Every attempt to solve these phenomena by the inter¬ vention [ Providence 4 Reasoning of the Bici- mins of llindostan. * Asiatic Researches, •vol. i. }dea of pro vidence in rude ages. PRO . ventlon of a subtle fluid is vam j for the question recurs what keeps the parts of the fluid itself contiguous, an vet separated from each other ? ^ The cohesion therefore of the parts of matter, and that which is called their repulsive power, demonstrate, through the whole system, the immediate energy o something which is not matter, and by w uc i e\eiy dy small and great is preserved in its proper lorm' has been elsewhere shown (see Metaphysics, 1 art 11. chap. 5. and Motion, N° i9, 20.), that the various motions which are regularly carried on through the uni¬ verse, by which animals and vegetables grow and decaj, and by which we have day and night, summer and win¬ ter, cannot be accounted for by any laws of mere me¬ chanism, but necessarily imply the constant agency 0 something which is itself distinct from matter, but the forms of bodies are preserved, and their natural mo¬ tions carried on, for purposes obviously planned by Wis¬ dom. The power therefore which effects these things must be combined with intelligence: but power and in¬ telligence preserving the order of the universe constitute all that is meant by a general providence *, w ncb i therefore as certainly administered as the sun daily rises and sets, or as bodies are kept solid by wuat is termed cohesion and repulsion. Abstracted and metaphysical as this reasoning may -appear, it is by no means peculiar to the philosophers 0 Europe. Its force lias been felt from time immemo¬ rial by the Bramins of Hmdostan, who, as Sir William Jones informs us *, “being unable to form a distinct idea of brute matter independent of mind, or to conceive that the work of supreme goodness was felt a momen to itself, imagine that the Deity is ever present to his work, not in substance, hut in spirit and in energy. On this rational and sublime conception they have in¬ deed built numberless absurd superstitions ; but. their holding the opinion itself, shows that they believe in the reality of providence upon philosophical principles : and what truth is there on which the mind of man has not ingrafted marks of its own weakness ? _ Few nations, however, except the ancient Greeks, have had philosophers equally subtile with the Lramuis of India ; and therefore though all mankind have in ge¬ neral agreed in the belief of a superintending Providence, they have in different ages and countries admitted that truth upon different kinds of evidence, and formed very different notions concerning the mode in winch the Ui- vine superintendence is exerted. , While societiesare still in a rude and unpolished state, while individuals possess little security and little leisure for the exertion of their rational powers, every impor¬ tant or singular appearance in nature becomes an ooject of wonder or of terror. In this state of ignorance, men see not the universe as it is, a great collection of connect¬ ed parts, all contributingto form one grand and beautiiul system. Every appearance, seems to stand alone j they know that it must have a cause, but what that cause is they are ignorant. The phenomena exhibited by nature are so complicated and so various, that it never occurs to them that it is possible for one Being to govern the whole. Hence arose the different systems of poly theism that have appeared in the world. Nature was divided into different regions, and a particular invisible power was assigned to each department: one conducted the flam inn chariot of the sun, another wielded the terrible 5 462 1 p 11 o thunderbolt, and others were employed in diffusing Pnmdej plenty, and introducing the useful arts among men. Thus, although the various systems of polytheism in general acknowledged one Supreme lluler, the father of gods and men, yet they at the same time peopled not only the regions above, the air and the heavens, but they also filled the ocean and the land, every grove, and every mountain, with active but invisible natures. Ha¬ ving arisen from the same causes, these systems of po¬ lytheism, which are so many hypotheses concerning Di¬ vine providence, are all extremely similar •, and we have a very favourable specimen of them in the elegant my¬ thology of Greece and Borne, which gave to every re¬ gion of nature a guardian genius, and taught men 111 the deep recesses of the forest, or in the windings of the ma¬ jestic flood, to expect the presence of protecting and friendly powers. See POLYTHEISM. . . 6 Notwithstanding this universal reception, in some The dc: form or other, of the doctrine of a divine providence,™^ it has in every age met with some opponents. . nienentsia most ancient of these were Democritus and Leucippus. almost _ They denied the existence of a Deity—asserted that all ry age. things were mechanically necessary, and that thought and sense were only modifications of matter. Ibis is atheism in the strictest sense, and the only form of it that has ever been consistently supported. Epicurus followed upon the same principles , but he rendered the system altogether absurd, by confessing the ireedom of the human will. To avoid the imputation of atheism, he asserted the existence of God •, hut declared that he resided above the heavens, and interfered not in human affairs. One of his maxims was, that “ the blessed and immortal Being neither hath any employment himself nor troubles himself with others.” Maximus Tynus justly observes, that this is rather a description of Sardanapalus than of a Deity. And some of the mo- jcicm ralistsf of antiquity remarked, that they knew many^ito^ men among themselves possessed of active and generously minds, whose characters they valued more highly than^^ that of Epicurus’s god. Some of the ancients also ap-lib pear to have entertained the following strange notion: They acknowledged the existence of a Supreme and of many inferior deities ; but at the same time, they sup¬ posed that there is a certain fate which ruies over all, and is superior to the gods themselves. See Necessity in Mythology. , , „ The providence exerted by the Author of nature over his works is usually divided into two branches : a o-etieral, referring to the management of the universe at Targe j and a 'particular providence, chiefly regarding particular men. ^ 7 Upon the first of these, in The Religion o/ Na/ott de- Gcneiaj lineated, the question is stated somewhat in the follow-P ing manner: The world may be said to fie gov einei , or" at least cannot be said to fluctuate fortuitously, it there are laws or rules by which natural causes act; it the several phenomena in it succeed regularly, and m general the constitution of things is preserved ; if there are rules observed in the production of herbs, trees, and the like ; if the several kinds of animals are furnished with faculties proper to determine their actions in the different stations which they hold in the general econo¬ my of the world ; and lastly, if rational beings are ta¬ ken care of in such a manner as will at last agree be* with reason. By the providence of God also manage those of less importance. Nations are composed of individuals. The progress of individuals is the progress of the nation, and the greatest events usually depend upon the history and the most trifling^ actions* *4 The Deity may easily foresee the actions of men; PRO [464 Providence, actions of private persons. The difficulty is to con- * —v" ceive how the superintendence and management ot a this can be brought about. But as the ways and t ie thoughts of the Omnipotent Spirit whose influence pei- vades, and rules, and animates nature, resemble not the limited operations of men, we can only form conjec¬ tures concerning the means by which his government is conducted. 1. In the first place, then, it is not impossible that the Deity should foresee the future actions of intelli¬ gent beings. Many of these actions depend upon the mechanism of the material world, which was formed by himself, and must be entirely known to him. Many men among ourselves possess much sagacity in discerning the future actions of others, from attending to their known characters, and the circumstances in which they are placed. If superior natures do exist, and minds more perfect than the human, they must possess this pe¬ netration in a more eminent degree in proportion to the excellence of their intellectual powers. But if this dis¬ cernment be in God proportionable to his nature, as in lower beings it is proportionable to theirs, it then be¬ comes altogether unlimited, and the future actions of free agents are at once unlocked and exposed to his view. ° Add to this, that the Author of nature is well acquainted with the creatures that he has made j he knows the mechanism of our bodies, the nature and ex¬ tent of our understandings, and all the circumstances by which we are surrounded. With all these advantages, it is making no great stretch to suppose him capable of discerning the line of conduct which we will pursue; and this even setting aside the infinity of his nature, to which a thousand years are as one day, and supposing him to reason from probabilities in the imperfect man¬ ner that we do. 2. There is no impossibility at least, that men, whose characters and actions are thus foreknown, may be in¬ troduced into the world in such times and places as that their acts and behaviour may not only coincide with the general plan of things, but may also answer many private cases. The celestial bodies are so placed that their jarring attractions make out a splendid system. Why then may there not be in the Divine mind some¬ thing like a projection of the future history of mankind, as well as of the motions of the heavenly bodies ? And why should it not be thought possible for men, as well as for them, by some secret law, or rather by the ma¬ nagement of an unseen power, to be brought into their places in such a manner as that, by the free use of their faculties, the conjunctions and oppositions of their in¬ terests and inclinations, the natural influence of theii different degrees of talents, power, and wealth, they may conspire to make out the great scheme of human affairs ? There is no absurdity in this supposition : it is not beyond the power of an almighty and perfect Be¬ ing ; and it is worthy of him. Let us take from the Jewish history, as most generally known, an example of what may be supposed to happen daily. It was the intention ot providence to place David the son of Jesse upon the throne of the Hebrews. Jbe country is in¬ vaded by a foreign enemy : the hostile armies meet, and He encamped upon opposite mountains. A man comes forth from the army of the invaders, as was extremely common in those times, and defies the Hebrew host to send forth a champion to meet him in single combat. 2 J5 and may tlience fit them for their situa¬ tions iu life. 16 The possi¬ bility of this exem¬ plified. ] PRO Terrified by the gigantic bulk and mighty force of Go-provi( ^ liah, no man would risk the unequal conflict. David, t_ ^ ^ who was too young to carry arms, had been sent to the camp with provisions for his brothers, and heard the challenge. In defence of his flock he had killed some beasts of prey in the wilderness, and he was an excellent marksman with the sling. He thought it might pro¬ bably be as easy to kill a man as a wild beast ; at all events, be knew that a stone well directed would prove no less fatal to a giant than to a dwarf: he therefore resolved to try his skill ; and be tried it with success. Here no man’s free will was interrupted, and no miracle was accomplished : Yet by this tram of circumstances thus brought together, a foundation was laid for the fu¬ ture fortunes of the son of Jesse, for the greatness of his country, and for accomplishing the purposes of Pro¬ vidence. According to Seneca, “ Hoc dico, fulmina non mitti a Jove, sed sic omnia disposita, ut ea etiam quae ab illo non fiunt, tamen sine rationenon fiunt j quae illius est.—Nam etsi Jupiter ilia nunc non facit, fecit ut fierent.”—1 my, that the lightning tomes not direct¬ ly from the hand of Jove, but things are properly dis¬ posed for the indirect execution of his will; for he acts not immediately, but by the intervention oj means. r 3. Lastly, it is not impossible that many things may Secret' be accomplished by secret influence upon the human flueicc: mind, either by the Deity himself, or by the interventionthe ™ of agents possessed of powers superior to those which from k belong to us. “ For instance, if the case should require that a particular man be delivered from some threaten¬ ing ruin, or from some misfortune, which would certain¬ ly befal him if lie should go such a way at such a time, as he intended: upon this occasion some new reasons may be presented to his mind why he should not go at all", or net then, or not by that roady or he may forget to go. Or, if he is to be delivered from some danger¬ ous enemy, either some new turn given to his thoughts may divert him from going where the enemy will be, or the enemy may be after the same manner diverted from coming where he shall be, or his resentment may be ijuulified; or some proper method of defence may be suggested to the person in danger. After the same man¬ ner advantages and successes may be conferred ou the deserving •, as, on tbe other side, men, by way of punish¬ ment for their crimes, may incur mischiefs and calami¬ ties. These things, and such as these (says Mr Wollas- ^ J ton*), may be. For since the motions and actions of0y;yflJ men, which depend upon their wills, do also depend delinel upon their judgments, as these again do upon the present sect.; appearances of things in their minds 5 if a new prospect of things can be any way produced, the lights by which they are seen altered, new forces and directions impres¬ sed upon the spirits, passions exalted or abated, the power of judging enlivened ox debilitated, or the attention taken off without any suspension or alteration of the standing laws of nature,—then, without that, new volitions, de¬ signs, measures, or a cessation ot thinking, may also be produced j and thus many things prevented that other¬ wise would be, and many brought about that would not. That there may possibly be such inspirations of new thoughts and counsels (continues our author), may perhaps appear farther from this, that we frequently find thoughts arising in our heads, into which we are led by no discourse, nothing we read, no clue ot reason¬ ing, but they surprise and come upon us from we know . , , ^ftlR ° , • t 465 ] PRO MiJcnce. not what qnarter. If they proceetled fionl the mobility even by the free exercise of their own notver- imtru p -i ' 0 S,nn xst;-aggl,ng „t,t of order, and fortuitous affections ,„cnU of God’s particular providenc^.K “0 °, _ fl * * °lf- "C1C-i |K-y '1 t ie nAture oi dreams, may we well suppose that these higher beings may be so why are they not as wdd, rneoherent, and extravagant distributed through the universe, and subieot to such an as they are ?” Is ,t not much more reasonable to ima- economy, unkn ’ • J ' gme that they come by the order and direction of an lS id may '' . . " / --wwivu Clli all-seeing and all-gracious God, who continually watches over us, and disposes every thing in and about us for the good of ourselves or others P not to speak of the agree¬ ableness of this notion to the opinions of the best and wisest men in all ages (a). “ If this, then, he the case, as it seems to be, that men’s minds are susceptible of such insinuations and impressions, as frequently, by wavs unknown, do affect them, and give them an inclination towards this or that ; how many things (asks our au¬ thor) may he brought to pass by these means without jiving and refixing the laws of nature, any more than they are unfixed when one man alters the opinion of another by throwing in his way a book proper for that purpose ?” All this may be effected either by the immediate in- hlSSr terP?sitio!1 of himself, or by that of beings invisible, lerioi-'to !n na^re superior to us, who act as the ministers or by his providence. That there are such beings’we can : Deity, hardly doubt, as it is in the highest degree improbable that such imperfect beings as men are at the top of the scale of created existence. And since we ourselves, by the use of our limited powers, do often alter the course of things within our sphere from what they would be if. left to the ordinary laws of motion and gravitation, without being said to alter those laws ; why may not su¬ perior beings do the same as instruments of divine pro¬ vidence ? i his idea of the intervention of superior na¬ tures is beautifully illustrated by Thomson in the fol¬ lowing passage : These are the haunts of meditation, these The scenes where ancient bards th’ inspiring breath, Ecstatic, felt; and from this world retir’d, Convers’d with angels and immortal forms, On gracious errands bent : to save the fall Of virtue struggling on the brink of vice ; In waking whispers, and repeated dreams, To hint pure thought, and warn the favour’d soul lor future trials fated to prepare. We agree, however, with Mr Wollaston, in thinking the power of these beings not so large as to alter or sus¬ pend the general laws of nature (see Miracle) j for the world is not like a bungling piece of clock-work, which requires to he often set backwards or forwards. We are likewise perfectly satisfied, that they cannot change their condition, to ape us or inferior beings j and consequently we are not apt hastily to credit stories oi portents, &x. such as cannot be true, unless the nature of things and their manner of existence were occasional¬ ly reversed. Yet as men may be so placed as to become, economy, unknown to us, as may render them also in¬ struments .of the same providence; and that they may, in proportion to their greater abilities, he capable, con¬ sistently with the laws of nature, of influencing human affairs in proper places. . We shall next proceed to state some of the chief ob- Objection* jections which in ancient or modern times have been to the doc- brought against the opinion, that the world is govern-t,inc.of cd by a Divine providence. ° providence x* 1 ^u'sf these is this, that the system of nature from the contains many imperfections which it ought not to do ifirapeifec- it be the work of a perfectly wise and good Being. To lions of na- avoid the force of this objection, some modern writerstuie’ have deserted the ground of supreme and absolute good¬ ness, which the ancient theists always occupied, and have asserted that the divine perfection consists in unlimited power and uncontrouled supremacy of will ; that conse¬ quently the Deity does not always that which is best, but merely what he himself pleases ; and that for no other reason but because he wills to do so. But this is no bet¬ ter than atheism itself. For it is of no importance to us whether the universe is governed by blind fare or chance, that is to say, by nothing at all ; or whether it is go¬ verned by an arbitrary sovereign will that is directed by- chance, or at least by no principle of beneficence. The true answer to this objection is, that no created answered, system can have every perfection, because it must necessa¬ rily be destitute of self-existence and independence ; and therefore if being destitute of some perfections be bet¬ ter than nothing, it was worthy of infinite power and perfect goodness to create such beings. In our present state, u'e mortals stand upon too low ground to take a commanding view of the whole frame of things. We can only reason concerning what is unknown from the little that is within our reach. In that little, we can see that wisdom and goodness reign ; that nature al¬ ways aims to produce perfection ; that many salutary efleets result even from the thunder and the storm : and we doubt not that a view of the whole structure of the universe would afford an additional triumph to the goodness and skill of its great Architect. We see a regular ascent in the scale of beings from mere lifeless matter up to man ; and the probability is, that the scale continues to ascend as far above man in perfection as created beings can possibly be raised.— The sole purpose of God in creating the world must have been to produce happiness : but this would be most effectually done by^creating, in the first place, as many of the most perfect class of beings as the system could contain ; and afterwards other classes less and less per¬ fect, till the whole universe should be completely full. We do not positively assert such a scheme of creation, Where . (A) That such was the general belief of the Greeks in the days of Homer, is plain from that poet’s constantly introducing his deities into the narrative of his poems, and telling us that Minerva, or some other god, altered the minds of his heroes. “ By this,” says Plutarch, “ the poet does not mean to make God destroy the will of man, but only move him to will : nor does he miraculously produce the appetites themselves in men, but only causes such imaginations as ale capable of exciting them.” ^OL. XVII. Part II. f 3N PRO [ Providence. was Where all must fall, or not coherent he j And all that rises, rise in due degree, actually in the divine Architect’s intention j but that it is possible, is sufficiently obvious. No man will pretend to say, that this earth could afford a comfort¬ able subsistence to a greater number of the human race, were all the inferior animals annihilated, than it could at present, swarming as every element is with life.— Suppose then, that as many men had been placed at first upon the earth as it could possibly support, and that matters had been so constituted, as that the num¬ ber should never have been either increased or diminish¬ ed ; we beg leave to ask, whether, since there would have been evidently room for inferior animals, it would have been most worthy of infinite goodness to leave the whole globe to men, or to introduce into it different orders of fess perfect beings, which, while they could not incom¬ mode this principal inhabitant, would each find plea¬ sure in its own existence ? To this question different answers cannot surely be given. Let the reader then extend his view, and consider the universe, which, how¬ ever vast, cannot be’positively infinite, as one system as much united as the several parts of this globe 5 let him suppose that there wyere at first created as many of the highest order of beings as it could have contained had Creation there stopt j let him remember that happiness in many different degrees is valuable ;—and he will not surely think it any imputation on the goodness of God that there are in the universe many beings far from per¬ fection. The most imperfect of these are by themselves better than nothing-, and they all contribute to make up a system which, considered as a whole, we have every reason to believe to be as perfect as any thing not self-existent can possibly be. 2. If the world is conducted by a benevolent provi¬ dence, how came evil to be introduced into it ? This tion°of evil question has perplexed mankind in all ages. The an¬ cient Persians resolved it, by asserting the existence ot two gods, Oromasdes the author of good, and Anma- nius the author of evil. From them the Christian he¬ retics called Manichees borrowed their doctrine of two opposite co-eternal principles. Both the Platonists and Stoics ascribed the origin of evil to the perverseness or imperfection of matter, which they thought the Deity could not alter : and Pythagoras imagined a state of pre-existence, in which the souls of men had committed offences, for which they are here suffering the punish¬ ment. But these hypotheses are, some of them impious, and all unsatisfactory. Taking the expression in its most extensive sense, the evils to which the human race are exposed may be re¬ duced to pain, uneasiness, disappointment of appetites, and death; of which not one could have been wholly pre¬ vented without occasioning greater evils, inconsistent with the perfect goodness of the Creator. As long as we have solid bodies capable of motion, supported by food, subject to the influence of the atmosphere, and divisible 21 Objection from the introduc 23 answered. they must necessarily be liable to dissolution or death : But if a man could suffer death, or have his limbs bro¬ ken, without feeling pain, the human race had been long ago extinct. A fever is a state of the body in which the fluids are in great disorder. Felt we no uneasiness from that disorder, we should have no inducement to pay the proper attention to our state, and should cer- 3 466 ] PRO tainly die unawares, without suspecting ourselves to beprovidei: in danger j whereas, under the present administration of divine providence, the pain and sickness of the disease compel us to have recourse to the remedies proper for restoring us to soundness and to health. Of the unea¬ sinesses to which we are liable, and which are not the effect of immediate pain, the greatest has been sometimes said to arise from the apprehension of death, which constantly stares us in the face, and frequently embitters all our pleasures even in the hour of perfect health.- But this dread of death is implanted in our breasts lor the very best of purposes. Had we no horror at the apprehension of death, we should be apt, whenever any misfortune befel us, to quit this world rashly, and rush unprepared into the presence of our Judge : but the horror which attends our reflections on our own disso¬ lution, arising not from any apprehensions of the pain of dying, but from our anxiety concerning our future state of existence, tends strongly to make us act, while we are here, in such a manner as to ensure our happiness here¬ after. Add to this, that the fear of death is the great¬ est support of human laws. We every day see persons breaking through all the regulations ot society and good life, notwithstanding they know death to be the certain consequence, and feel all the horrors of it that are natural to man: and therefore were death divested of these horrors, how insignificant would capital punish¬ ments be as guardians of the law, and how insecure would individuals be in civil society ? With regard to the unavoidable misfortunes and an¬ xieties of our present state, so far from being truly hurt¬ ful in themselves, they are proofs of divine beneficence. When we see men displeased with their situation, when we hear them complain of the difficulties, the miseries, and the cares of life, of the hardships which they have undergone, and the labours which still lie before them. instead of accounting them unfortunate, we ought to regard them as active beings, placed in the only situa¬ tion that is fit for the improvement of their nature. That discontent, these restless wishes to improve their condition, are so many sure indications that their facul¬ ties will not languish. They who are in the least de¬ gree accustomed to observe the human character, know well the influence which pleasure and repose have in en¬ feebling every manly principle, and how capable they are of attaching us even to a sordid and dishonourable existence. Happy indeed it is for the human race, that the number of those men is small whom providence has placed in situations in which personal activity is unne¬ cessary. By far the greater number are compelled to exert themselves, to mix and to contend with their equals, in the race of fortune and of honour. It is thus that our powers are called forth, and that our nature reaches its highest perfection. It is even perhaps a general truth, that they who have struggled with the greatest variety of hardships, as they always acquire the highest energy of character, so if they have retained their in- tegrity, and have not sunk entirely in the contest, sel¬ dom fail to spend their remaining days respectable and happy, superior to passion, and secured from folly by the possession of a wisdom dearly earned. < Physici But the benefits of physical evils have been set in aeviitW still stronger light by a great master of moral wisdom,cause c ^ who was himself subject to many of those evils. Thatmora 1 man PRO [ 467 1 P P nidence. man is a moral agent, sent into tin's world to acnn.V 1 j l ^ U ^ h*hlts of virtue and piety to fit him for a better slate n ^ ^,St °f trifles must be scattered is a truth to which no consistent theist will fa a mo tll nient refuse h,s assent. But almost all the moral good ration scarce 8 • ,er",ly- To tllis inside, which is left among us, ,s the apparent effect of physi- inn and H y IS|a"'ak''llf'1 b“t by some press, ca! «''!• P y DgJ • rt I. esf ev‘l 5 tl,e ledge all its consequences, find it easy to elude this diffi¬ culty. 1 hey very fairly deny the existence of any suck thing as moral evil ,n the abstract; and assert, that what we call a crime, is nothing more than an action which we always regard with a painful sensation : that these apparent evils endure only for a time ; and that all will at last terminate in the perfection and happiness of every intelligent being. Upon the system of'liberty, the shortest answer seems answered, to be this : that some things are absolutely impossible, not from any weakness in the Deity, but because they infer absurdity or contradiction. Thus it is impossible tin twice tvyo to be any thing else than four; and thus it is impossible for Omnipotence itself to confer self¬ approbation upon an intelligent being who has never deserved it; that is to say, it is impossible for a man of sense to be pleased with himself for having done a cer¬ tain action, while he himself is conscious that he never did that action. But self-approbation constitutes the highest, the most unmingled, and permanent felicity, of which our nature is capable. It is not in the power of Omnipotence itself, then, to bestow the highest and most permanent felicity of our nature; it must be earned and deserved before it can be obtained. In the same manner good desert, virtue or merit, cannot be confer¬ red; they must be acquired. To enable us to acquire these, we must be exposed to difficulties, and must suf¬ fer in a cei tain degree. If these difficulties had no in¬ fluence upon our conduct and feelings, if they exposed us to no real danger, no fabric of merit and of self¬ approbation could be reared upon them. All that the Supreme Being could do for us, was to confer such an oi iginal constitution and character as would enable us to do well if we should exert our utmost powers. The 3 N 2 universe Providence' ?7 . By Simpli¬ cius, * Simplic. Com, in E- pict. p. i85 1S7. ed. Salmas. PRO [ 4^3 universe is not ruled by favour, but by justice. Com¬ plete felicity must be purchased. Guilt is an abuse o our freedom, a doing ill where we could have done •well, and is entirely the work of man. Heaven cou not avoid permitting its existence, and exposing us to danger: for temptation is necessary to virtue, and vir¬ tue is the perfection ol our nature, oiu g 01 y, am oar '^The permission of moral evil has been so ably ac¬ counted for by Simplicius, a Pagan writer, _ and there¬ fore not biassed by any partiality to the Jewish or C ni- stian Scriptures, that we cannot deny ourselves the plea¬ sure of laying his reasoning before our readers, tie asks * “ Whether God may he called the author oi sin, because he permits the soul to use her liberty . ant answers the question thus . , . • “ He who says that God should not permit the, exer¬ cise of its freedom to the soul, must affirm one ol these two things •, either that the soul, though by nature ca- „ • *. nr* .i 1- _ _, * tw ft non Id vt* „ ] PRO the divine administrations. Even the best men have at Provider]; times been shaken by this consideration.—-But there are ' many reasons for rendering this world a mixed scene : it 29 would become unfit for a state ot trial and ot ecucation to virtue were it otherwise. , . . It has been shown already, that physical evil is the answerer parent of moral good 5 and therefore it would be absurd to expect that the virtuous should be entirely exempt¬ ed from that evil. For the occasional prosperity ol the wicked, many reasons have been assigned even by those who in their disquisitions, were not guided by that re¬ velation which has brought to light life and imnrovta- lity. “ God (says Plutarch) spares the wicked, that he may set to mankind an example of forbearance, and teach them not to revenge their injuries too hastily on each other. He spares some wicked men from early punishment, in order to make them instruments ot Ins fustice in punishing others. And he spares all tor a time, that they may have leisure for repentance 5 for , n > Irmlr nt nothimr two tilings j either that the soul, though by ^ men%ays the same excellent moralist) look at nothing pable. of indifferently choosing ^ or sho y { - , punishments which they inflict, than to be constantly prevented from choosing evil J or e se that u her, n \ and therefore they pur- . , , , v.L nf ,,oh . nature as to have ^ with the ut t age and eagerness j whereas God, aiming at the cure of those who are not utterly incurable^gives them ypow, “ time to be converted.” , . _ . But this objection receives the best solution from the doctrine of the immortality of the human soul. *S . Objection from the apparent confusion of human affairs, lie consuuiuy ^ ^ 1 it should have been made of such a nature as to have no power of choosing evil. . . , “ The former assertion (continues he) is irrational and absurd 5 for what kind of liberty would that be in which there should be no treedom ot choice . and what choice could there be, if the mind were constantly re¬ strained to one side of every alternative . With respec to the second assertion, it is to be observed (says he), that no evil is in itself desirable, or can be chosen cs evil. But if this power of determining itselt either way in any given case must be taken from the soul, it must either be as something not good, or as some great evil. But whoever saith so, does not consider how many things there are which, though accounted good and de¬ sirable, are yet never put in competition with this tree- dom of will : for without it we should be on a level with the brutes 1 and there is no person who would rather be a brute than a man. If God then shows his goodness in givincr to inferior beings such perfections as are tar below this, is it incongruous to the divine nature and woodness to give man a self-determining power over Ins actions, and to permit him the free exercise ot that power ? Had God, to prevent man’s sin, taken away the liberty of his will, he would likewise have destroyed the foundation of all virtue, and the very nature ot man j for there could be no virtue were there not a possibility of vice •, and man’s nature, had it continued rational, would have been divine, because impeccable. Here- fore (continues he), though we attribute to God, as its author,this self-determining power, which is so necessai y in the order of the universe •, we have no reason to at¬ tribute to him that evil which comes by the abuse ot U- bertv : For God doth not cause that aversion from good which is in the soul when it sins ; he only gave to the soul such a power as might turn itself to evil, out ot which he produces much good, which, without such a power, could not have been produced by Omnipotence itself.” So consonant to the doctrine ot our scriptures is the reasoning op this opponent of the writings ot Moses ! Fas est et ab hosts doceri. The last objection to the belief of a divine providence arises from the apparent contusion ot human affairs, that all things happen alike to all, that bad men are prospe¬ rous, and that a total want of justice appears to attend -And see ! ’Tis come, the glorious morn! the second birth Of heav’n and earth ! awakening nature hears The new creating word, and starts to life. In every height’ned form, from pain and death For ever free. The great eternal scheme, Involving all, and in * perfect whole Uniting, as the prospect wider spreads, To reason’s eye refin’d clears up apace. Ye vainly wise ! Ye blind presumptuous^, now, Confounded in the dust, adore that 1 ow r And Wisdom oft arraign’d ; see now the cause, Why unassuming worth in secret liv’d And died neglected : why the good man’s share In life was gall and bitterness of soul: Why the lone widow and her orphans pin’d In starving solitude 5 while luxury, In palaces, lay straining her low thought, To form unreal wants : why heav’n-born truth, And moderation fair, wore the red marks • Of superstition’s scourge ; why licenc’d pain, That cruel spoiler, that embosom’d foe, Imhitter’d all our bliss. Ye good distrest. Ye noble few ! who here unbending stand Beneath life’s pressure, yet bear up a while, And what your bounded view, which only saw A little part, deem’d evil, is no more : The storms of wintry time will quickly pass, And one unbounded spring encircle all. Thomson’s It inter, Provthence-Plantation, a colony of New England, which, with llhode-island, formerly constituted a charter government. Its chief town is Newport. Providence, one of the least ot the Bahama islands in the American ocean, but the best of those planted and fortified by the English. It is seated on the east 3* The inm tality ol soul the answer this obj' tiuii o [ 469 W. Long. 77. 35. N. Lat. OTOSt. p rt (idence side of the gulf of Florida II 25. o. PROVINCE, in Roman antiquity, a country of con- siderable extent, which, upon being entirely reduced under the Roman dominion, was new-modelled accord¬ ing to the pleasure of the conquerors, and subjected to the command of annual governors sent from Rome; be¬ ing commonly obliged to pay such taxes and contribu¬ tions as the senate thought fit to demand. Of these countries, that part of France next the Alps was one, and still retains the name Provence. Nicod derives the word a procul vivendo, “living afar oft'but it is better deduced from pro and vinco, “ I overcome.” Province, in Geography, a division of a kingdom or state, comprising several cities, towns, &c. all under the same government, and usually distinguished by the ex¬ tent either of the civil or ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The church distinguishes its provinces by archbishop¬ rics ; in which sense, England is divided into two pro¬ vinces, Canterbury and York. The United Provinces are seven provinces of the Ne¬ therlands, who, revolting from the Spanish dominion, made a perpetual alliance, ofiensive and defensive, at Utrecht, anno 1579. See United Provinces. PROVINCIAL, something relating to a province. It also denotes, in Romish countries, a person who has the direction of the several convents of a province. PROVISIONS, in a military sense, implies all manner of eatables, food or provender, used in an army, both for man and beast. PROVOST of a city or town, is the chief munici¬ pal magistrate in several trading cities, particularly Edinburgh, Paris, &c. being much the same with mayor in other places. He presides in city-courts, and together with the bailies, who are his deputies, deter¬ mines in all differences that arise among citizens. The provost of Edinburgh is called lord, and the same title is claimed by the provost of Glasgow. The former calls yearly conventions of the royal boroughs to Edinburgh by his missives, and is, ex ojjicio, president to the convention when met. Provost, or Prevot-Royal, a sort of inferior judge formerly established throughout France, to take cogni¬ zance of all civil, personal, real, and mixed causes, among the people only. Grand Provost of France, or of the Household, had jurisdiction in the king’s house, and over the officers therein ; looked to the policy thereof, the regulation of provisions, &c. Grand Provost of the Constable, a judge who ma¬ nages processes against the soldiers in the army who have committed any crime. He has four lieutenants distributed throughout the army, called provosts of the army, and particular pro¬ vosts in the several regiments. Provost Marshal of an Army, is an officer appoint¬ ed to seize and secure deserters, and all other crimi¬ nals. Fie is to hinder soldiers from pillaging, to in¬ dict offenders, and see the sentence passed on them ex¬ ecuted. He also regulates the weights and measures, and the price of provisions, &c. in the army. For the discharge of his office, he has a lieutenant, a clerk, and a troop of marshal-men on horseback, as also an ex¬ ecutioner. ] PR u There is also a provost-marshal in the navy, who has charge over prisoners, &c. . T!ie French also had a provost-general of the ma¬ rines, whose duty it was to prosecute the marines when guilty of any crime, and to make report thereof to the council of war; besides a marine provost in every ves¬ sel, who was a kind of gaoler, and took the prisoners into his care, and kept the vessel clean. Provosts of the Marshals, were a kind of lieute¬ nants of the marshals of France ; of these there were 180 seats in I ranee ; their chief jurisdiction regarded highwaymen, footpads, house-breakers, &e. Provost of the Mint, a particular judge instituted for the apprehending and prosecuting of false coiners. Provost, or Prevot, in the king’s stables; his office is to attend at court, and hold the king’s stirrup when he mounts his horse. There are four provosts of this kind, each of whom attends in his turn, monthly. PROW, denotes the head or fore-part of a ship, par¬ ticularly in a galley; being that which is opposite to the poop or stern. PROXIMI1 Y, denotes the relation of nearness, ei¬ ther in respect of place, blood, or alliance. PRUDENCE, in ethics, may be defined an ability of judging what is best, in the choice both of ends arid means. According to the definition of the Roman mo¬ ralist, He Offichs, lib. i. cap. 43. prudence is the know¬ ledge of what is to be desired or avoided. According¬ ly, lie makes prudentia (De Legibas, lib. i.) to be a con¬ traction of providentia, or foresight. Plato (De Legi- bi/s, lib. iii.) calls this the leading virtue ; and Juve¬ nal, Sat. x. observes, Nullum numtn abest si sit prudentia. The idea of prudence includes or due consul¬ tation ; that is, concerning such things as demand con¬ sultation in a right manner, and for a competent time, that the resolution taken up may be neither too preci¬ pitate nor too slow; and rvwtrts, or a faculty of discern¬ ing proper means when they occur: and to the perfec¬ tion of prudence, these three things are farther required, viz. or a natural sagacity ; cty^ivou, presence of mind, or a ready turn of thought; and or ex¬ perience. The extremities of prudence are craft or cunning on the one hand, which is the pursuit of an ill end by direct and proper though not honest means ; and folly on the other, which is either a mistake, both as to the end and means, or prosecuting a good end by fo¬ reign and improper means. Grove’s Moral Philosophy, vol. ii. chap. ii. PRUDENTIUS, or Aurelius Prudentius Cle¬ mens, a famous Christian poet, under the reign of Theo¬ dosius the Great, who was born in Spain in the year 348. He first followed the profession of an advocate, was afterwards a judge, then a soldier, and at length had an honourable employment at court. We have a great number of his poems, which, from the choice of his subject, may be termed Christian poems; but the style is barbarous, and very different from the purity of the Augustan age. The most esteemed editions of Pru- dentius’s works are that of Amsterdam, in 1667, with Heinsius’s Notes, and that of Paris in 1687, in nsu?n Delphini. PRUNELLA, a genus of plants belonging to the didynamia class ; and in the natural method ranking under Provost Prunella. Prunella P R U - [ under the I2th order, Hohracea. See Botany dex. Pruning. PRUNES, are plums dried in the sunshine, or in an oven. PRUNING, in Gardening and Agriculture, is the lopping off the superfluous branches of trees, in order to make them bear better fruit, grow higher, or appear more regular. Pruning, though an operation of very general use, is nevertheless rightly understood by few *, nor is it to be learned by rote, but requires a strict observation of the different manners of growth of the several sorts of fruit- trees } the proper method of doing which cannot be known without carefully observing how each kind is naturally disposed to produce its fruit: for some do this on the same year’s wood, as vines} others, for the most part, upon the former year’s wood, as peaches, necta¬ rines, &c. $ and others upon spurs which are produced upon wood of three, four, &c. to fifteen or twenty years old, as pears, plums, cherries, &c. Therefore, in order to the right management of fruit-trees, provision should always be made to have a sufficient quantity of bearing wood in every part of the trees j and at the same time there should not be a superfluity of useless branches, which would exhaust the strength of the trees, and cause them to decay in a few years. The reasons for pruning of fruit-trees, are, I. To preserve them longer in a vigorous bearing-state j 2. To render them more beautiful j and, 3. To cause the fruit to be larger and better tasted. The general instructions for pruning are as follow. The greatest care ought to be taken of fruit-trees in the spring, when they are in vigorous growth j which is the only proper season for procuring a quantity of good wood in the different parts of the tree, and for displa¬ cing all useless branches as soon as they are produced, in order that the vigour of the tree may be entirely distri¬ buted to such branches only as are designed to remain. For this reason trees ought not to be neglected in April and May, when their shoots are produced : however, those branches which are intended for bearing the suc¬ ceeding year should not be shortened during the time of their growth, because this would cause them to produce two lateral shoots from the eyes below the place where they were stopped, which would draw much of the strength from the buds of the first shoot: and if the two lateral shoots are not entirely cut away at the win¬ ter-pruning, they will prove injurious to the tree. This is to be chiefly understood of stone-fruit and grapes j but pears and apples, being much harder, sufl’er not so much, though it is a great disadvantage to those also to be thus managed. It must likewise be remarked, that peaches, nectarines, apricots, cherries, and plums, are always in the greatest vigour when they are least maim¬ ed by the knife ; for where large branches are taken off, they are subject to gum and decay. It is therefore the most prudent method to rub off all useless buds when they are first produced, and to pinch others, where new shoots are wanted to supply the vacancies of the wall •, by which management they may be so ordered as to want but little of the knife in winter-pruning. The management of pears and apples is much the same with these trees in summer j but in winter they must be very differently pruned : for as peaches and nectarines, for 470 ] P R U In- the most part, produce their fruit upon the former year’s prun^ wood, and must therefore have their branches shortened according to their strength, in order to produce new shoots for the succeeding year j so, on the contrary, pears apples, plums, and cherries, producing their fruit upon spurs, which come out of the wood office, six, and seven years old, should not be shortened, because thereby those buds which were naturally disposed to form these spurs, would produce wood branches 5 by which means the trees would be filled with wood, but would never pro¬ duce much fruit. The branches of standard-trees should never be shortened unless where they are very luxuriant, and, by growing irregularly on one side of the trees, at¬ tract the greatest part of the sap, by which means the other parts are either unfurnished with branches, or are rendered very weak j in which case the branch should be shortened down as low as is necessary, in order to ob¬ tain more branches to fill up the hollow of the tree : but this is only to be understood of pears and apples, which will produce shoots from wood of three, four, or more years old ) whereas most sorts of stone-fruit will gum and decay after such amputations : whenever this happens to stone-fruit, it should be remedied by stopping or pinching those shoots in the spring, before they have obtained too much vigour, which will cause them to push out side-branches j but this must be done with cau¬ tion. You must also cut out all dead or decaying branches, which cause their heads to look ragged, and also attract noxious particles from the air: in doing of this, you should cut them close down to the place where they were produced, otherwise that part of the branch which is left will also decay, and prove equally hurtful to the rest of the tree j for it seldom happens, when a branch begins to decay, that it does not die quite down to the place where it was produced, and if permitted to remain long uncut, often infects some of the other parts of the tree. If the branches cut oft are large, it will be very proper, after having smoothed the cut part exactly even with a knife, chissel, or hatchet, to put on a plaster of grafting clay, which will prevent the wet from soak¬ ing into the tree at the wounded part. All such branches as run across each other, and occasion a confusion in the head of the tree, should be cut off; and as there are fre¬ quently young vigorous shoots on old trees, which rise from the old branches near the trunk, and grow upright into the head, these should be carefully cut out every year, lest, by being permitted to grow, they fill the tree too full of wood. As to the pruning of forest-trees, if they be large, it is best not to prune them at all; yet, if there be an ab¬ solute necessity, avoid taking oft large boughs as much as possible. And, 1. If the bough be small, cut it smooth, close and sloping. 2. If the branch be large, and the tree old, cut it off at three or four feet from the stem. 3. If the tree grow crooked, cut it off at the crook, sloping upward, and nurse up one ot the most pro¬ mising shoots for a new stem. 4. If the tree grow top- heavy, its head must be lightened, and that by thinning the boughs that grow out of the main branches. But if you would have them spring, rub oft the buds, and shroud up the side-shoots. 5. If the side-bough still break out, and the top be able to sustain itself, give the boughs that put forth in spring a pruning after Midsum¬ mer, cutting them close. lining j usias. r K u £ 47 It lias been observed, that trees are subject to cum u decay, m consemienr.(> of . ? , , . 7 „ 111 c ouujeci to cum and decay, in consequence of pruning ; to prevent tbe J PRUSIAS, the name ol several kings of Bithynia. Prusias, a town of Bithynia, anciently called Cios, from a cognominal river, and giving name to the Sinus 1 J P R U j H Tki. i» the Prusias „l,„ harbaur- Hauu.bal alter the defeat of Autiodms.-Of Z physloTa" I"adeS’ SUr,’araei1 JWl“' f— P1SUSSIA, a modern, but deservedly celebrated s“ Map of u gdom of Europe, whose monarch, along with Prussia i'01"”'1 and P| oper, possesses also the electorate of Brandenburg, and L'T™ some other terntor.es of considerable extent. The di- Se ' • jICI ?r,°pef! y called Prussia is of great extent, and di-ccccxxxiv. vided into the Ducal and liegal Prussia, the latter be- if’the" i>‘r‘ le.re|’"bi-0 01 D°land 1:11 tl,e late I™'1111™ of the Polish territories. Both together are of great tTe s ;,lbK1”pb.<>“n,dedJ0" 1,16 nortl'H the Baltic, on west bv p y a'“ Ztbe ‘,uclly of Mazovia, on the west by Pomerania, and on the east by Lithuania and bamogitia flic name is by some thought to he deri- Etymolo ved from the Borusst a tribe of the Sarmatians, who, 87 of the ni gratnig from the foot of the Riphtean mountains -me, , , ?? I by the^beauty and fertility of the coun¬ try to settle there Others think that the name of this country is properly Porussia; P0 in the language of the natives signifying near, and Porussia signifying near Bussia To the latter etymology we find the king of Prussia Inmselfassentmg in the treatise intitled Memoirs of the House of Brandenburg. However, it must be owned, that these or any other etymologies of the word are very uncertain and we find nothing like it mention¬ ed by historians before the tenth century The ancient state of Prussia is almost entirely un-Fxtr * known. However, the people are said to have been barbarity veiy savage and barbarous 5 living upon raw flesh, and ^ the an- dnnking the blood of horses at their feasts, according c!ent inha- to btella, even to intoxication (a). Nay, so extreme*5 aUtS* ly savage were this people, that they were even unac¬ quainted with the method of constructing huts, and took up their dwelling m caves and cavities of rocks and trees where they protected themselves and children from the’ inclemencies of the weather. Among such a people it is vain to expect that any transactions would be record¬ ed, or indeed that any thing worthy of being recorded would be transacted. We shall therefore begin our hi¬ story of I russia with the time when the Teutonic knights first got footing in the country. (See Teutonic Knights). On the expulsion of the Christians from the Holvm • Land by Saladin a settlement was given to the Teu-ShiT tonic knights in Prussia by Conrade duke of Mazovia first get the competitor of Boleslaus V. for the crown of Poland! ^00l‘n£ 1,1 Their first residence in this country was Culm; to which the coun" territory they were confined by the conditions of the do- tIT‘ nation, excepting what they could conquer from their pagan neighbours, all which the emperor granted to them in perpetuity. Encouraged by this grant, the knights conquered the greatest rtJhlnJ'lf aUtl,'T JoT,0t,rr" “n>' Particular method by which they communicated an inebriating qualitv to davs w , 0SS'b'-V’ l,0WeVer’ ,"ie V,tal raay have a property of this kind, though unknown .Vonr ere such barbaious customs are disused. Drunkenness from drinking blood is freciuentlv 1 • Scripture, but whether literally or metaphorically must be decided by the learned ’ 7 “e"‘«"« 16 It was in this king’s reign that Prussia first perceived Enmity her natural enemy and rival to be the house of Austria, and not France as had been formerly supposed. Hence Austrk frequent bickerings took place between these two powers, for which the persecution of the Protestants by some of the Catholic states of the empire afforded a pretence ; and though a war never actually took place, yet it was easy to see that both were mortal enemies to each other. But when Frederic William died in i74<-)> ^fu® enmity broke out in full force. The empress queen was then left in a very disagreeable situation, as has been obsery- ed under the article Britain, N° 410, &c. Of thisFrederH Frederic III. took the advantage to do himself justice, as seizes b he said, with regard to Silesia, of which his ancestors51 had been unjustly deprived. This province he seized at that time : but it cost him dear j for the empress hav¬ ing at last overcome all difficulties, formed against him the most terrible combination that ever -was known in Europe. f The treaty was hardly concluded with the king ot Prussia, by which she reluctantly yielded up the province of Silesia, and with it aclear revenue of 800,oool. a^year, before she entered into another with the court of Peters- ,g burg, which was concluded May 22. 174^‘ fiea^’ C«nil)ir as tar as it was made public, was only of a defensive na-tionagi ture ; but six secret and separate articles were added to »“• it. By one of these it was provided, that in case his Prussian majesty should attack the empress queen, or the empress of Russia, or even the republic of Poland, it should be considered as a breach of the treaty of Dres¬ den, by which Silesia was given up. It was also sti¬ pulated, that, notwithstanding that treaty (which in¬ deed had been dictated by the king of Prussia lumseliX (V# - ■i Pnlssfa- l9 invades , .any, 20 a!;es '“oSax on ri- «, , He seci i the oro. jlic ^ 'I,and W the the ««;> L 4 the right of the empress-queen to Silesia still conti¬ nued, and for the recovery of that province the con¬ tracting powers should mutually furnish an army of 60,000 men. To this treaty, called the treaty of Pc- tersburg, the king of Poland was invited to accede • but he, being in a manner in the power of the king of Prussia, did not think proper to sign it : however he verbally acceded to it in such a manner, that the other parties were fully convinced of his design to co¬ operate with all their measures ; and in consideration ol this intention, it was agreed that he should have a share in the partition of the king of Prussia’s do¬ minions, in case of a successful event of their enter¬ prises. In consequence of these machinations, every art was U^ed to render the king of Prussia personally odious to the empress of Russia j the queen of Hungary made vast preparations in Bohemia and Moravia • and the king of Poland, under pretence of a military amusement, drew together 16,000 men, with whom he occupied a strong post at Pirna. The queen of Hungary, still further to strengthen herself, concluded a treaty with the court of France at Versailles, dated May 1. 1756. tut in the mean time, the king of Prussia having un¬ derstood by his emissaries what was going forward, re¬ solved to be beforehand with his enemies, and at least to keep the war out of his own country ; and therefore entered Saxony with a considerable army. At first he ailected only to demand a free passage for his troops, and an observance of the neutrality professed by the king of Poland ; but, having good reasons to doubt this neutrality, he demanded, as a preliminary, that these Saxon troops should immediately quit the strong post they occupied, and disperse themselves. This de¬ mand was refused ; on which his Prussian majesty blockaded the Saxon camp at Pirna, resolving to re¬ duce it by famine, since its strong situation rendered an attack very dangerous. At that time there were in Bohemia two Saxon armies, one under the command of M. Brown, and the other under M. Picolomini. To keep these in awe, the king had sent M. Schwerin with an army into Bohemia from the country of Glatz, and M. Keith had penetrated into the same kingdom on the side of Misnia. But still the king of Prussia did not entirely confide in these dispositions ; and therefore fearing lest M. Brown might afford some assistance to the Saxons, he joined his forces under Keith, and on December 1. attacked and defeated the Austrian general, so that the latter found it impossible to relieve the Saxons, who, after a vain attempt to re¬ tire from their post, were all taken prisoners. The king of Poland quitted his dominions in Germany, and the Prussians took up their winter quarters in Saxony. Plere they seized on the revenues, levied ex- 01 bitant contributions, and obliged the country to fur¬ nish them with recruits. The king of Prussia at this time made himself master of the archives of Dresden, by which means he procured the originals of those pieces above mentioned, which, when produced to the world, gave a full proof of the combination that had een formed against him, and consequently justified the measures he had taken for his own defence. No sooner had the king entered Saxony, in the man¬ ner already related, than a process was commenced against him in the emperor’s Aulic council, and before Prussia. /o J P H U the diet of the empire, where he was soon condemned for contumacy, and put to the ban of the emphe!-' ie various circles of the empire were ordered to fur¬ nish their contingents of men and money to put this tha enbedmteXr,Utl°n/ bUt tl,eSe Came in S" slowly, that, had it not been for the assistance of the French under ti]e pnnce Soubise, the army would pro- Austrians6 iiTth*1" '’“Y" “ “Y'1™ aCt- The P,o,%L in/.,!; .! ‘.me’ made Kreat preparations, prepara- •ft- ^lset* I00>000 men in Bohemia, whom they com lIons a- ^d by M B6 °?n T6 Chai'leS ofL^rain,Assist-gaiastl,im' men^und* ^ Cza.rina sent a body of 6o,oco men under M. Apraxin, to invade the Ducal Prussia : ortW t 8 fleCt Wa! e‘luiPPefl m the Baltic, in older to co-operate With that army. The king of Sweden also acceded to the confederacy, in hope? of recovering the possessions in Pomerania which his an- tnnL°7l 1111 enJ°yed 5 and Ule duke of Mecklenburg Irmv VT party’ Promising to join the Swedish amiy with 6000 men as soon as it should be ne¬ cessary. On the king of Prussia’s side appeared no¬ body excepting an army of between ^o,coc and 40,000 -Hanoverians commanded by the duke of Cumber¬ land ; and these were outnumbered and forced to yield dVtieeT11017 anny °f ri'ench commandcd by M. t h at" he'1 rn ^ ,hl° Prus^ majesty, finding He invade, that he must depend for assistance solely on his own hernia, abilities, resolved to make the best use of his time and totillly Accordingly, ,11 the spring 1757, his armies poured in-S^0 0 Bohemia from two different quarters, while the,A King himself prepared to enter it from a third. M. ochwerm entered from Silesia ; the prince of Bevern rom Lusatia, where he defeated an army of 28,000 ustnanS that opposed his passage. As the intentions ol he king Inmself were not known, the Austrians de- ; army. tached a body of 20,000 men from their main army t'o* observe his motions. motions. This was no sooner done than the king cut of} all communication between the detach¬ ment and the main body : and having joined his two generals with incredible celerity, he engaged the Au¬ strians near Prague, totally defeated them, took their camp, military chest, and cannon ; but lost the brave General Schwerin, who was killed at the age of 82 with a colonel’s standard in his hand. On the Au¬ strian side, M. Brown was wounded, and died in a short time, though it is supposed more from the cha¬ grin he suffered, than from the dangerous nature of the wound itself. About 40jp00 of the Austrian army took refuge inBesiegts 11 ague, while the rest fled different ways. The cityand'J0U1* was instantly invested by the king, and all succours were bards cut off. I he great number of troops which it contain-1>ragUe* ed rendered an attack unadvisable, but seemed to render the reduction of it by famine inevitable; however, the king, to accomplish his purpose the more speedily, pre¬ pared to bombard the town. On the 29th of May after a most dreadful storm of thunder and lightnino-’ foui battenes began to play on the city. From these were thrown, every 24 hours, 288 bombs, besides a vast number of red-hot balls, so that it was soon on fire in every quarter. The garrison made a vigorous defence, &nd one well-conducted sally; but had the misfortune to be repulsed with great loss. I he magistrates, burgh¬ ers, and clergy, seeing their city on the point of being 3 0 2 reduced *P 11 u [ 47r> ] P R U rmssia. 25 Count Dawn takes rrin the eom- uiand of the Au¬ strian ar my. 76 reduced (0 an heap of rubbish, supplicated the command¬ er in th^most earnest manner to capitulate j but he was deaf to their intreaties, and drove 1 2,oco of the most useless mouths out ot town, who were quickly driven in again by the Prussians. "Thus* the affairs of the empress queen seemed ver- to destruction, when Leopold count Daun took, upon him the command ot the remains ot M. Brown s army. This general had arrived within a few miles of Prague the day after the great battle. He immedi¬ ately collected the scattered fugitives with the greatest diligence, and retired with them to a strong post in the neighbourhood, from whence he gave the troops in Prague hopes of a speedy relief. It was now the king of Prussia’s business, either to have attempted to make himself master of the city by one desperate eliort, m- entirely to have abandoned the enterprise, and driven Count Daun from his post before his troops had recovered from the terror of their late defeat j but, by attempting to do both, he rendered himself incapable •Defeats the of doing either. Though the army of Count Daun Prussians at a]|*eac]y amounted to 60,000 men, ana though they Cdin. were strongly entrenched, and defended by a vast train of artillery, his majesty thought proper to send no more than 32,000 men. This body made the ardu¬ ous attempt on the 18th of June j but though they did all that human courage and conduct could do, and though the king himself at la^t charged at the head of ills cavalry, the Prussians were driven cut ot the held with great loss. This engagement was named t/ie but¬ tle of Colin. • . The first consequence or the battle of Colin was, that the king of Prussia was obliged to raise the siege of Prague 5 soon after which, he was obliged to quit Bohemia, and take refuge in Saxony. The Austrians harassed him as much as possible-, but, notwithstand¬ ing their great superiority, their armies were not in a condition to make any decisive attempt upon him, as the frontiers of Saxony abounded with situations easily defended. In the mean time the liussians, who had hitherto been very dilatory in their motions, began to exert themselves, and entered Ducal Prussia, under M. A P rax in and Fermor, where they committed innu¬ merable cruelties and excesses. A large body of Austrians entered Silesia, and penetrated as tar as Breslau. Then they made a turn backwards, and be¬ sieged Schweidnitz. Another body entered Lusatia, ami made themselves masters of Zittau. An army ot 22,00c Swedes entered Prussian Pomerania, took the towns of Anclam and Demmcin, and laid the whole country under contribution. Ihe trench, too, being freed from all restraint by the capitulation of the duke * See Bri-°f Dtimberland at Closter Seven made tneir way in- TA1N N° to Halberstadt and the Old March of Brandenburg, . . 1 .a (-1,^. 27 Siege of Prague raised. 441. 28 Benin laid under con- 'trikution. first exacting contributions, and then plundering the towns. The army of the empire, being reinforced by that of the prince de Soubise, after many delays, was on full march to enter Saxony, which left the Au¬ strians at liberty to exert the greatest part of their fpree in the reduction of Silesia. General Haddick penetrated through Lusatia, passed by the Prussian ar¬ mies, and suddenly appeared before the gates of Ber¬ lin, which city he laid under contribution. He re¬ tired on the approach of a body of Prussians j yet he j^ilj found means to keep such a post as interrupted the king’s communication with Silesia. The destruction press;ai of the king of Prussia therefore now seemed inevitable.' y— Fvery exertion which he had made, though brave and well-conducted, had been unsuccessful. His general Lehwald, who opposed the liussians, had orders to attack them at all events. He obeyed his orders; and with 30,000 men attacked 60,000 of the enemy 29 strongly entrenched at a place called JSIorkitten. The Lelnvald: Prussians behaved with the greatest valour j but after1'1'™ having killed live times more of the enemy than theyf themselves lost, they were obliged to retire, thoughtije Rus more formidable after their defeat than the Russianssians. after their victory. The king, in the mean time, ex¬ erted himself on every side, and his enemies fled every¬ where before him ; but whilst he pursued one body, another gained upon him in some other part, and the winter came on fast, while his strength decayed, and that of his adversaries seemed to increase on every quarter. The Prussian monarch, however, though distressed, did not abandon himself to despair, or lose that won¬ derful presence of mind which has so eminently distin¬ guished him in all his military enterprises. He indu- 50 striously delayed a decisive action till the approach of The kin; winter; but at last, after various movements, on No-gains a vember 5. 1737, he met at Rosbach with the unitedS^tjic army of his enemies commanded by the prince of Saxe Rosbac Hilburghausen and the prince de Soubise. Ihe allied army amounted to 50,000 men complete j but most of the troops of the Circles were new raised, and many of them not well affected to the cause. The Prus¬ sians did not exceed 25,000 men ; but they were su¬ perior to any troops in the world, and were inspired, by the presence of their king, with the most enthusi¬ astic valour. The Austrians were defeated with the loss of 3000 killed, eight generals, 250 officers of dif¬ ferent ranks, and 6000 private soldiers, taken prisoners, while night alone prevented the total destruction of the army. By this battle the king was set free on one side; hut this only gave him an opportunity of lenevving his labours on another. The Austrians had a great force, and now began to make a proportionable pro¬ gress in Silesia. After a siege of 16 days, they had le- 31 duced the strong fortress of Schweidnitz, and obligedScliweic the Prussian garrison of 4000 men to surrender pri-™f* I soners of war. Hearing then of the victory at Ros- Cl bach, and that the king of Prussia was in full march to relieve Silesia, they resolved to attack the prince of Bevern In his strong camp under the walls of Bres- jij lau. They attacked the prince’s army on November Bait ej 22d but their attack was sustained with the greatest resolution. The slaughter of the Austrians was pro¬ digious. A great part of the enemy had retired from the field of battle, and the rest were preparing to retire, when all at once the Prussian generals took the same resolution. Their army had suffered much in the en¬ gagement, and they became apprehensive ot a total de¬ feat in case their intrenchments should be forced in any part} for which reason they quitted their strong postr and retired behind the Oder. Two days alter, the prince of Bevern, going to reconnoitre without escort, attended only by a groom, was taken prisoner by an advanced party, of Croats* a small body of whom had crossed; the Oder, p n u nssia t pen' li ty. C : D ' de¬ le.- d by tb mg of issia at On tli is the town of Breslau imiftediately surrendered ; where, as well as at Sclnyeidnit^, the Austrians found j 33 great quantities of provisions, ammunition, and money. 'Ihu ^ All Silesia was on the point of falling into their hands, j antl t!?e Prussian affairs were going into the utmost di’ \ straction, when the king himself by a most rapid march passed through Thuringia, Misnia, and Lusatia, in spite of the utmost efforts of the generals Haddick and Marshal, who were placed there to oppose him *, and, entering Silesia on the 2d of December, joined the prince of Bevern’s corps, who repassed the Oder to meet him. The garrison of Schweidnitz, who, as we have already observed, had been made prisoners of war, also joined the king’s army unexpectedly j and their presence contributed not a little, notwithstanding the smallness of their number, to raise the spirits of the Clrison ofvv,,ole army* They had submitted to the capitulation s Lid- with the greatest reluctance j but as the Austrians rjreee- were conducting them to prison, they happened to re- ceive intelligence of the victory at Rosbach : on which they immediately rose on the escort that conducted them, and entirely dispersed it j and afterwards march¬ ed in such a direction as they thought might most readily lead them to their king, they accidentally fell in with his army. His Prussian majesty now approached Breslau j on which the Austrians, confiding in their superiority, (for they exceeded 70,000, while the Prussians scarce s!a amounted to 36,000), abandoned their strong camp, ^then.the same which the prince of Bevern had formerly oc¬ cupied, and advanced to give him battle. The king did not intend by any means to disappoint them, but advanced on his part with the greatest celerity. The two armies met on December 5th, near the village of Leuthen. Count Daun made the best dispositions pos¬ sible. The ground occupied by his army was a plain, with small eminences in some parts. These eminences they surrounded with artillery j and as the ground was also interspersed with thickets, they sought to turn these likewise to their advantage. On their right and left were hills, on which they planted batteries of can¬ non. The ground in their front was intersected by many causeways j and to make the whole more imprac¬ ticable, the Austrians had felled a great number of trees, and scattered them in the way. It was almost impossible at the beginning of the engagement for the Prussian cavalry to act, on account of these impedi¬ ments; but, by a judicious disposition made by the king himself, all difficulties were overcome. His majesty had placed four battalions behind the cavalry of his riyht wing; foreseeing that General Nadasti, who was pla¬ ced on the enemy’s left with a corps de reserve, design¬ ed to attack him in flank. It happened as he had fore¬ seen : that general’s cavalry attacked the Prussian right wing with great fury ; but he was received with such a severe fire from the four battalions, that he was obli¬ ged to retire in disorder. The king’s flank then, well covered and supported, was enabled to act with such order and vigour as repulsed the enemy. The Austrian artillery was also silenced by that of the Prussians ; however, the Austrians continued to make a gallant re¬ sistance during the whole battle. After having been once thrown into disorder, they rallied all their forces about Leuthen, which Avas defended on every side by entrenchments and redoubts. The Prussians attacked t 477 3 P it u Hien, „itl. Ifee utmost impetuosity, and at last became masters of the post; on which the enemy fled on all ' - % sides, and a total rout ensued. In this battle the Au¬ strians lost 6000 killed on the spot, 15,000 taken pri¬ soners, and upwards of 200 pieces of cannon. The consequences of this victory were very great. rr_ Breslau was immediately invested, and surrendered on taken. December 29th ; the garrison, amounting to 13,000 men, were made prisoners of war. The blockade of bchweulnitz Avas formed as closely as the season of the year Avould permit ; Avhile detached Prussian parties o\erran the whole country of Silesia, and reduced e\Tery place of less importance. The Russians, who had ra¬ vaged and destroyed the country in such a manner that they could not subsist in it, thought proper to retire out of the Prussian dominions altogether. Thus Ge-Swedes neral Deliwald was left at liberty to act against the driven out Swedes; and them he quickly drove out of Prussian i:°mera' Pomerania, the whole of which country he not onlyKla' recovered, hut also some part of Swedish Pomerania-, Ihus the duchy ot Mecklenburg being left quite ex- posed, the king took ample vengeance on it by exact- in General Wedel attacked 70,000 Russians posted in the most advantageous manner at Zulichau, and defended „ - rs by a numerous artillery. '1 bough the Prussians march- ,Wealed ated on to certain destruction and disgrace, they sustain- Zutichau. ed the attack for a long time with unparalleled resolu¬ tion. At last, however, they gave way, and were obli¬ ged to retire with the loss of 4700 killed or taken pri¬ soners, and 3000 wounded. The consequences of this victory were, that the Rus¬ sians penetrated into the king’s territories, and took 49 Prussians 5° The Ilus sians take siaus latte nimio 1 o • Crossen and possession of the towns of Crossen and l rank tort on tne t.** 1.r l. ■v*. ■ « • 1 1 •. 1 1 — ..-r 4-Vv«* f liL' 1 n rt* Frankfort on the Oder. Oder, which made it absolutely necessary for the king to come in person to oppose them. Accordingly, on the 4th of August, he joined Wedel with a considerable body of forces, having left the greatest part of his army in Saxony under Prince Henry. But as Marshal Daun had sent a body of 12,000 horse and 8000 foot under General Laudohn to the assistance of the Russians, the king still found himself unable to fight them *, as, with this and some other reinforcements, their army now amounted to upwards of 90,000. He therefore re¬ called General Finck, whom he had sent into Saxony with 9000 men 5 but with all his reinforcements, it was found impossible to augment his army to 50,000 -complete. His situation, however, was now so critical 5 that a battle was unavoidable •, and therefore, on the 12th of August, with this inferiority ot number, the king attacked his enemies strongly intrenched, and de¬ fended by a prodigious number of cannon. In this ac¬ tion, his principal effort was against the left wing of the Russian army. He began the attack, according to cu¬ stom, with a heavy cannonade ; which having produced the desired effect, he attacked that wing with several battalions disposed in columns. The Russian intrench¬ ments were forced with great slaughter, and 72 pieces of cannon were taken. But still there was a defile to he passed, and several redoubts which covered the vil¬ lage of Cunnersdorf to be mastered. These were attack¬ ed with the same resolution, and taken one after another. The enemy made another stand at the village, and en¬ deavoured to preserve their ground there by pushing forward several battalions of horse and foot: but this also proved unsuccessful j they were driven from post to post quite to the last redoubts. For upwards of six hours the Prussians were successful, and everywhere broke the enemy with prodigious slaughter *, drove them from almost all the ground they had occupied be¬ fore the battle, took more than half their artillery, and scarce any tiling seemed wanting to make the victory complete. In these circumstances, the king wrote the following billet to the queen : “ Madam, we have beat the Russians from their intrenchments. In two hours expect to hear of a glorious victory.” Of this victory, however, he deprived himself, by an excessive eagerness for conquest. Hie enemy, defeated almost in every quarter, found their left wing, shattered as it was, to be more entire than any other part of their army. Count Soltikoff, the Russian general, therefore, assembled the remains of his right wing, and, gathering as many as he could from his centre, reinforced the left, and made a stand at a redoubt which had been erected on an advantageous eminence in a placed called t/te Jews burying-grmind. All the king’s generals are said to have been of opinion that he ought to allow the Rus¬ sians the peaceable possession of this post. 1 hen army had already suffered so much, that it would have been impossible for them to have attempted any enterprise of consequence after the battle 5 but their artillery was still numerous, the post very strong, and the Prussian troops greatly fatigued. Uiese reasons lor a few mo¬ ments had some weight with the king •, but the natu¬ ral impetuosity of his temper getting the better 0 his reason, he led on his wearied troops again and again •, till at last, when their strength was in a man¬ ner totally exhausted, they were attacked and utterly routed by the Austrian and Russian cavalry, the former of which had hitherto remained quite inactive, and were therefore quite fresh, and irresistible by the en¬ feebled Prussians. The night, and the prudent use of some eminences, prevented the total destruction 0 the army; however, their loss amounted to 20,000 men killed and wounded. The king, when he foun the victory totally lost, sent another billet to the queen, expressed in the following manner : “ Remove from Berlin with the royal family ; let the archives be car¬ ried to Potsdam ; the toivn may make conditions with the enemy.” . 1f Immediately after this defeat, the king set hunseli about repairing his losses with the utmost diligence. n a few days every thing was again put in order in ns J J 0 0 camp. Pm:, K- 5 King Prussi; featecii the fif.| sians; Cunnfi | doif. tr T 48 r pn!ss[a camp. Ke replaced his artillery from Berlin : recalled -n- General Khest with 5000 men from Pomerania: de- tached 6000 from Ins own army to the defence of Saxo¬ ny ; and with the remainder put himself between the Russsians and Great Glogau, covering that city which had been the chief object of their designs ; and in short notwithstanding their victory, obliged them to return to Poland without accomplishing any thing besides the carnage at Cunnersdorff. The misfortunes of the Prussian monarch, however were not at an end. Prince Henry, indeed, by a most extraordinary and well-conducted march, entered Sax¬ ony, which was now totally overrun by the armies of the enemy. At the same time, strong detachments ha¬ ving been sent into that country under generals Finck and Wunsch, the whole was in a short fime recovered except Dresden. Towards this place Marshal Daun retired, and in all probability would soon have been obliged to leave Saxony entirely. But the kind’s im¬ patience could not be satisfied without cutting off his retreat, and forcing him to a battle; for which" purpose he sent General Finck with upwards of 12,000 men according to the Prussian account, but 20,000 accord- ing to the Austrians, to seize some passes through which 5* aun c?ul.d only take his route towards Bohemia. Ti. , ^commission was executed with great exactness: poo 1. 1 russ,’an ^neral, having probably advanced too ssians ar int0 jliese de^les5 and neglected to preserve a com- ! endcrs munication with the main army, gave bis enemy an op- iaeAu- portunity of surrounding him, and at last forcing him 4 ,KS' and his whole army to surrender prisoners of war." This disaster was soon after followed by another. General Durceke was posted at the right o'f the Elbe, opposite to Messen 5 but on the approach of a large body of Au¬ strians, they prepared to retreat over the river into a place where they hoped to be more secure. But having been obliged by an hard frost to withdraw their bridge of boats, a thaw supervened, when they attempted to lay a bridge of pontoons, so that they were again obli¬ ged to have recourse to their boats. In this situation, their rear-guard was attacked with great fury by the Austrians, and all the soldiers who composed it killed or taken. The loss of the Prussians on this occasion Prussia. ] PRO possess, and though he undoubtedly exerted them to the utmost, it seemed only to be contending against fate, and his enemies gained still greater and greater advan¬ tages. General Laudohn, with whom none but the p ^ rie^ofTt fur’1" ^ '’I''6 t0 C°1,e’ b>' a r es ot artful movements, drew into a disadvantageous Landshut situation M. bouquet, one of the Prussian generals with a strong body of forces. Perceiving it impossible lor them to escape, Laudohn then made a violent at¬ tack on their entrenchments in the dead of the ni»ht of June 23d. The Prussians made a gallant defence, jut at last were all killed or taken prisoners except about 300. Of the Prussians were killed 4000, and 7000 taken prisoners ; 58 pieces of cannon, and a great number of colours, were also lost. The victory, how¬ ever, was dear bought 5 for the Austrians lost’ above 12,000 men in killed and wounded ; whom, however, they could better spare than the Prussians, on account ot their numbers.—This action was called the battle of Lands hut. J Baron Laudohn failed not to improve this victoryGlatzta- to the utmost. He instantly turned back from Land-ken by the shut, and fell upon the city of Glatz; which he tookAustrians- in a very short time, with 'the garrison who defended it, consisting of 2000 men. In this place were found 10r pieces of brass cannon, with immense quantities ot provisions and military stores. From thence.he marched against Breslau, and immediately invested it. But, in the mean time, the king of Prussia, whose mo- lions had been all this time counteracted by M. Daun S.axony, marched with his usual rapidity towards Silesia. By this means he drew M. Daun out of Sax¬ ony; and indeed the Austrian general used such ex¬ pedition, that he gained two full days on the king.* I his was no sooner known to his Prussian tlis fn was no sooner Known to ms Prussian majesty than he returned with the same expedition that lie had advanced, and sat down before Dresden. QfDresdenbei this M. Daun soon received intelligence, and returned si-fTed' but also. _ In the mean time, however, the buildings ofsa’ccesf bv the city were terribly shattered by the king’s cannon the king of and bombs which continually played on it. His cn. Prussia, deavours, however, proved ineffectual to reduce it before the arrival of M. Daun. The siege had was computed at 3000 men # been begun on the 13th of July, and on "Uie^mh M The year 1760 showed the Prussian monarch in a more Daun appeared within a league of Dresden9 IV 5 S1*U.atlon than ,lei had ever yet experienced. Prussians then redoubled their efforts. They had that Karate tt-T 113 affa»'S now seemed to be altogether desperate, day received reinforcements of heavy cannon and mor- *4“ of\. . Were.not t0 measured by the number of tars, with which they battered the place incessantly bg°f the kihed or prisoners but by armies destroyed or ta- The cathedral church, New Square, several principal vice s.W 0r|bet‘n klied m h'S Sei" St~reetS and S°me Palaces» and noble manufactory ice since the beginning of October T75^> exclusive of those who were wounded or taken prisoners. This of itself would have been an irreparable loss, had not the very wars which destroyed these furnished others equal¬ ly capable of filling their places. But another deficien¬ cy, which could not be remedied, still remained.—The king had, by liis indefatigable industry and exertions, Supplied all the deficiencies of men in his armies, but they were not the same men as before. The hardy ve¬ terans, with whom he had originally taken the field, were now no more, and their places were supplied by Others who had neither the same experience nor disci¬ pline ; so that now he was obliged to supply this defi¬ ciency by his own genius and heroism. But whatever abilities the Prussian monarch might Vol. XVII. Part II. f of porcelain, ■were entirely destroyed. rlhe siege was continued till the 22d ; but, on the night of the 21st, M. Daun had thrown 16 battalions into the city ; which rendered it impossible for the king to continue longer before it with any prospect of success. He therefore raised the siege, and retired without molesta¬ tion, though there were three considerable armies of the enemy in the neighbourhood. Breslau was fiercely bombarded by Laudobn, but the approach of Prince Henry obliged him to desist from his enterprise on the 5th of August. But, in the mean time, the fortune of the king seem¬ ed likely to be terminated by one fatal stroke. ° Find¬ ing it impossible for him to carry on a defensive war, he marched towards Silesia with such astonishing ra- 3 P pidity, P R U [ 482 ] P R U IVunbarrass- ient of : e king. P R u [ 483 1 “ t!,at r'-e with „» ,„Jthe atlack i I lefeats di. at au. 6l great expecht.on. But so great were the embarrass- men s which now attended tliat monarch, that it seem¬ ed almost beyond human power to retrieve his affairs. I he Imperialists, on their return from Berlin havintr no army to oppose them, made themselves masters of Leipsic, Torgau, Meissen, and Wirtemberg j ;in which last city they found the grand magazine of the Prussians immensely stored with provisions, ammunition, &c. , ^tain7 6 also> Wlt,‘ a detachment from Broelio the Irench general’s army, laid the city and duchy of Halberstadt under contribution. In Eastern Pomera¬ nia, the Russians had besieged Colberg by sea and land. In the Western Pomerania, the Swedes advanced with great celerity, hoping to share in the plunder of Berlin In Silesia, the king no sooner began his march to the northward, than Laudohn advanced, and laid siege to the important fortress of Cosel ; and, to complete this distress and embarrassment, the king himself was at¬ tended at every step by Count Daun with a superior army well prepared to take every advantage. In this desperate situation the king, being joined by his generals Hulsen and Prince Eugene of Wirtemberg with the corps under their command, advanced up the Elbe, while M. Daun fell back to cover Leipsic and lorgau, but the latter finding that the Prussians direc- ted their march towards the Elbe, encamped within reach of lorgau ; one part of his army extending to the Elbe, by which he was covered on that side, whilst on the other he was covered by hills and woods, so that it was impossible to choose a more advantageous situation. Ihe Prussian army did not amount to 50,000 men, waxlst that of the Austrians exceeded 86,000: yet such were the unfortunate circumstances of the king that he was obliged to fight under all these disadvanta¬ ges ; and therefore he caused his army to be informed, that he was now to lead them to a most desperate at¬ tempt, that his affairs required it, and that he was de¬ termined to conquer or die. His soldiers unanimously declared that they would die with him. The 3d of November 1760 was the day on which tins important affair was decided. The king divided his forces into three columns. General Hulsen was to take post witli one in a wood that lay on the left of the Austrian army, and had orders not to move until he found the rest of the Prussians engaged. General Ziie- then was to charge on the right ; and the great attack in front was to lie conducted by the king in person. His forces were disposed in such a manner, that either Ids right or left must take the enemy in rear and close them in, so as to disable them from undertaking any thing against the part where he intended to effect his principal attack. O.i the other hand, M. Daun per¬ ceiving the king to be serious in his design of fighting, to prevent confusion, sent all his baggage over the Elbe, across which he threw three bridges in case a retreat should he necessary. At the same time he caused Tor¬ gau to be evacuated; and then, extending his first line to a village called Zinne on the left, he stretched it to another called Croswit'Z on the right; supporting the right of his second line upon the Elbe. In this disposi¬ tion he was found, when, about two o’clock in the after¬ noon, the king began bis attack. He was received by the fire of 200 pieces of cannon, which, were disposed along the Austrian front. The Prussians were thrice led Prussia P R U broken with commanded a fresh body of cavalry ,o advance, vulch ' t. ^.rst C0*nPehed the Austrians to retire ; but new reinforcements continually coming in, this cavalry waT m its turn obliged to fall back, and the Prussians main- tamed themselves with extreme difficulty, until Gene- in ffiereaT’Wlthlth^ 7^ Wi"g’ attack^d the enemy in the rear, repulsed them, and possessed himself of ome eminences which commanded the whole Austrian army. Encouraged by this success, the Prussian in¬ fantry once more advanced, mastered several of the enemy s in trench ments, and made way for a new attack of their cavalry, which broke in with irresistible fury on the Austrians, and threw several bodies of them into irreparable disorder. It was now about 9 o’clock and of consequence both armies were involved in thick tarkness ; yet the fire continued without intermission and the battalions with a blind rage discharged at one another without distinguishing friend from foe. • Daun received a dangerous wound in the thigh and was carrmd fr°m the field, which probably hasten! ed the defeat of h.s troops. The command then de- volyed on Gonnt Q’Donnel ; who, finding the greatest part of his troops in disorder, the night advanced, and the enemy possessed of some eminences which com¬ manded his camp, and from which it was in vain to think of driving them, ordered a retreat, which was conducted with wonderful order and exactness; none were lost in passing the bridges, and by far the greater part of their artillery was preserved. The loss of the Prussians was estimated at lo,000 killed and wounded and 3000 taken prisoners. That of the Austrians in killed and wounded is not known ; but 8000 were taken prisoners, with 216 officers, among whom were four generals. The consequence of the victory of Torgau was, that All Sor¬ tie king recovered all Saxony except Dresden ; and in ony except the mean time General Werner having marched into Dresden Pomerania, the Russians raised the siege of Colberg iecovcred- and retired into Poland, without having effected any thing further than wasting' the open country. Werner then flew to the assistance of Western Pomerania, where he defeated a body of Swedes, and at last drove them totally out of the country. General Laudohn too ab¬ ruptly raised the blockade of Cosel ; and afterwards abandoning Landshut, he retired into the Austrian Si! lesia, leaving the Prussian part entirely in quiet. M. L)aun placed one part of his army in Dresden, and the other in some strong posts which lie to the south and west of it, by which he commanded the Elbe, and pre¬ served his communication with Bohemia. The army of the empire retired into Franconia, and placed its head- quaiters at Barnberg. I hough these successes had, to appearance, retrieved the king’s affairs in some measure, yet his strength seemed now to he wholly exhausted ; and in the cam¬ paign of 1761, he made no such vigorous efforts as he had formerly done. The Russians, dividing themselves into two bodies, invaded Silesia and Pomerania. In the former country they laid siege to Breslau, and in the latter to Colberg. Tottleben also, who had command- t d the Russian armies, was now removed on a suspicion that he had corresponded with the king of Prussia, and General Romanzow put in his place ; by which it was 3 P 2 expected P It u [ 484 ] P R U Prussia. 63 Scliwcid- iiitz and Colberg re taken. expected that the Russian operations would be more brisk this year than formerly. The king continued strongly encamped near Schwem- nitz ", where he was so closely watched by generals Daun and Laudohn, that he could attempt nothing. How¬ ever, he defeated the designs of the Russians against Lre- slau, by sending General Platen to destroy their maga¬ zines 5 which he accomplished with great success, at the same time cutting off a body of 4000 of their troops. But this only brought the more sure destruction upon Colberg to wbich place that body of Russians imme¬ diately^ marched, cruelly wasting the country as they went along. The king of Prussia could do nothing but send detachments of small parties, which, though they could not oppose their enemies in the field, yet he ho¬ ped, by cutting ofi' the convoys of the enemy, might distress them to such a degree as to oblige them to abandon the siege, or at least protract it till the severity of the winter should render it impossible for them to carry on their operations. Thus he weakened his own army so much, that it was found requisite to draw 4000 men out of Schweidnitz in order to reinforce it ; and no sooner was this done, than General Laudohn suddenly attacked and took that fortress by a coup de main. Colberg made a brave defence; but the troops sent to its relief being totally unable to cope with the Russian army, consisting of 50,000 men, it was obliged to surrender on the 3d of December ; and thus the fate of the Prussian monarch seemed to be decided, and almost every part of his dominions lay open to the iu- vaders. Empress of In the midst of these gloomy appearances the em- Hussiadies.press 0f Russia, the king’s most inveterate and index¬ ible enemy, died on the 2d of January 1762. Her suc¬ cessor, Peter HI. instead of being the king’s enemy, was bis most sanguine friend. As early as the 23d of February, in a memorial delivered to the ministers of the allied couits, he declared, that, “in order to the establishment of peace, he was ready to sacrifice ad the conquests made in this war by the arms of Russia, in hopes that the allied coui ts will on their parts equally prefer the restoration of peace and tranquillity, to the advantages which they might expect from the continu¬ ance of the war, but which they cannot obtain but by a continuance of the effusion of human blood.”—This address was not so well relished by the allies : however, they were very willing to make peace, provided it was for their own interest; hut they recommended to his attention fidelity to treaties, which constitutes a no less valuable part of the royal character, than humanity and leucc uc- disinterestedness. This answer made no impression on tween Itus-^}ie czar ; a suspension of hostilities took place on the sui, Swe- 0f |VIarch, which was followed by a treaty of alli¬ ance on the 5th May. In this treaty the czar stipu¬ lated nothing in favour of his former confederates; on the contrary, he agreed to join his troops to those of the king of Prussia, in order to act against them. Swe¬ den, which had for a long time acted under the direc¬ tion of Russian counsels, now followed the example of her mistress, and concluded a peace with Prussia on the 22d of May. # 66 It is not to be supposed that the king of Prussia Sf ih*?8 would remain long inactive after such an unexpected ol‘ Rnissiaf turn in his favour. His arms were now everywhere attended with success. Prince Henry drove the Impe- 65 Peace be- den, and .i russia. rialists from some important posts in Saxony, by which Pmssk, he secured all that part which the Prussians possessed ;' /■— and though the Austrians frequently attempted to re¬ cover these posts, thcjy were constantly repulsed with great slaughter. The king was not joined by his new allies till the latter end of June ; after which he drove M. Daun before him to the extremity of Silesia, leaving the town of Schweidnitz entirely uncovered, and which the king immediately prepared to invest. In the mean time, different detachments ot Prussians, some on the side of Saxony, and others on that of Silesia, penetrated deep into Bohemia, laid many parts ot the country un¬ der contribution, and spread an universal alarm. A con¬ siderable body of Russian irregulars also made an iiiup- tion into Bohemia, where they practised on the Austri¬ ans the same cruelties which they had long been accus¬ tomed to practise on the Prussians. 67 But while the king was thus making the best use of A. new ru his time, he was all at once threatened with a fatal re- J^0'1 5 verse of fortune by a new revolution in Russia. 'Hie emperor was deposed, and his deposition was soon alter followed by his death. The empress, who succeeded him, suspected that her husband had been misled by the counsels of his Prussian majesty, against whom, there¬ fore, she entertained a mortal enmity. She could not, however, in the very beginning of her reign, undertake again a war of so much importance as that which had been just concluded. She therefore declared her inten¬ tion of observing the peace concluded by the late em¬ peror ; hut, at the same time, of recalling her armies from Silesia, Prussia, and Pomerania ; which indeed the unsettled state of the kingdom now made in some degree necessary. At the same time a dlsco^ely was made with regard to the king ot Prussia himself, which turn¬ ed the scale greatly in his favour. I he Russian senate, flaming with resentment against this monarch, and against their late unfortunate sovereign ; and the em¬ press, full of suspicion, that the conduct of the latter might have been influenced by the counsels of the ior- mer, searched eagerly amongst the papers of the late emperor for an elucidation or proofs of this point. They found indeed many letters from the Prussian mo¬ narch, but in a strain absolutely different from what they had expected. The king had, as far as. prudence would permit, kept a reserve and distance with regard to the too rash advances of this unhappy ally ; and, in particular, counselled him to undertake nothing against the empress his consort. The hearing of these letters read is said to have had such an effect upon the empress, that she burst into tears, and expressed her gratitude towards the Prussian monarch in the warmest terms. Still, however, the Russian army was ordered to separate from the Prussians ; hut all the important places which the former bad taken during the whole war were faith¬ fully restored. The king, finding that the Russians were no more to take an active part in his favour, resolved to profit by their appearance in his camp ; and, theiefine, the very day after the order for their return had arrived, he at¬ tacked the Austrian army, and drove their right wing from some eminences and villages where they were ad¬ vantageously posted ; by which means he entirely cut off their communication with Schweidnitz, so that no¬ thing could be attempted for its relief. Prince Henry kept them in continual alarms for Bohemia; and a r great russia. P R U r 4 great patt of their attention, and no small part of their forces, were engaged on that side. Marshal Daun, now finding himself rendered almost incapable of underta „ king any thing, detached General Laudohn, with a Hyde- force very much superior, to attack the prince of Be ed. vern, and drive him from the advantageous post he oc¬ cupied. But the prince defended himself with such re¬ solution, that all the efforts of Laudohn could not suc¬ ceed before the king had time to come to his assistance ihe Austrians, being then put between two fires, were routed and pursued with terrible slaughter ; after which the king met with no more disturbance in bis prepara¬ tions for the siege, and the trenches were opened on the 18th of July. Marshal Daun made no attempts to relieve the place ; but the garrison being very strong-, it he.d out for near two months from the opening of the trenches. It is said that the attack was conducted, and the defence made, by two engineers who had writ¬ ten on the subject of the attack and defence of forti¬ fied places; and they were now practically engaged to prove the superiority of their systems. At last how¬ ever, the garrison, to the number of 8000 men, surren¬ dered prisoners of war j and the whole body, except nine, were soon after drowned at the mouth of the O- der, on their passage to their intended confinement in Ivon igs berg. . Tile kinK of Prussia, now become master of Schweid- nitz, turned his attention towards Saxony, where he •- considerably reinforced his brother’s army, and made preparations for laying siege to Dresden. In this coun- try the Austrians had lately met with some success, and dnven Prince Henry as far back as Freyberg 5 but on the 291). of October, they were attacked by the Prus¬ sian army thus reinforced, and totally routed. Great numbers were slain, and near 6000 taken prisoners. Hus victory proved decisive: and the empress-queen, findmg herself deserted by all her allies, was glad to conclude a treaty, the substance of which was, that a mutual restitution and oblivion should take place, and both parties sit down at the end of the war in the same situation in which they began it. This treaty is called the peace of Hubertsburg. The war was no sooner concluded than the king of Irussia turned his attention to domestic policy, and the recovery of. his dominions from those innumerable ca¬ lamities which had befallen them during the war. He immediately distributed lands to his disbanded soldiers, and gave them the horses of his artillery to assist them in t ieir cultivation. By his wise and prudent manage¬ ment, the horrors of war were soon forgotten ; and the country was quickly in as flourishing a state as ever, otwitlistanding this pacific disposition, however, the mg never slackened bis endeavours for the defence of Ins country, by keeping a respectable army on foot 5 Which might be able to act on the least emergency. n tne year 1778, a new difference with the house of Austria took place, concerning the duchy of Bavaria, no ut though the most enormous warlike preparations cent! C 'VeiC 0n .s‘^es» an^ immense armies brought into the field, nothing of consequence was effected. What httle advantage there was, seems to have been on t ie Prussian side, since they made themselves masters 0 several towns, and kept the war in the enemy’s coun- ry- owever, the emperor acted with so much caution, and showed so much skill in a defensive war, that all 1 p n u Prussia T! otal de : of thfaistri an Fn ;rg pnpes a- 5 A jc var comm tea .85 the manoeuvres of his Prussian ™ 11 • material advantage; as, on the other hand, Vis'^adveT sa.y was too wise to venture an engagement. A peace here ore was very soon concluded, and since that time lustoi y off russia, during the remainder of the great Ficdenc s reign, affords no remarkable event which we icie' PolTkd'h611!1 f 1'° life °f lhat llCr°’ a,Kl the ai- , tide r oland. He left Ins crown to his nephew, whose 71 silver."”' "r T1' s >"'l it , ^ , ,f a kingdom, which had risen suddenly succee, that human wisdom could provide or de-,,c'litvi°ur vise ; by leaving him a full treasury, the finest army in!YtIie liev* the world, and a people enthusiastically attached to bis^8’ memory and government. The new monarch, with theoe advantages, was not wanting to himself. The Dte king s predilection for the French language and i reneh literature were not grateful to his" subjects I he present ^sovereign began his reign with declaring in council, Germans we are, and Germans I mean we sha l continue; giving directions, at the same time, that their native language should resume its natural rank and station, from which for near half a century it had been degraded by the French. This was a very‘popular measure, and it was followed by another still more so. serving that he had marked with great concern the progress of impiety and profaneness on the one hand and of enthusiasm on the other, he declared, that he* would not have his subjects corrupted either by fanatics or atheists, and strictly prohibited all publications tend¬ ing to excite a contempt or indifference for religion. •Sucb, on bis immediate accession to the throne was the pacific conduct of the monarch, which endeared him to his subjects, and commanded the approbation of all good men. An opportunity soon occurred, in He assists which he was thought to have displayed such talents in the stadt- negoeiation and in military arrangements, as proclaim-ko^er a- ed him in every respect a worthy successor of his uncle.gaimt the The states of Holland, who had long been jealous o4“|LX the power ot the stadtholder, and inclined to a republi¬ can government without any permanent chief, had ‘min¬ ed such au ascendency in the states general, that in 1786 and 1787 they in effect divested the Prince of Orange of all his prerogatives, (see Un'ted Provinces). They proceeded even to the seizure and imprisonment of the princess, sister to the king of Prussia ; and de¬ pending upon support from France, treated with inso¬ lence every power connected with them in Europe. The court of Berlin did not witness these proceedings with¬ out indignation ; and the king formed his plan for re¬ storing the power of the stadtholder with such secrecy and prudence, that perhaps nothing could surpass it but the bravery and military skill of the duke of Brunswick by whom it was carried into execution. In the short space of one month, that accomplished general led J 8,003 Prussians to Amsterdam, and restored the just prerogatives of the prince of Orange. The affairs of Prussia during the early period of the French revolution, and the active but unsuccessful part which that monarch took against it, are interwoven with the 0 P ni'-sia. P R U the historical details of that period under the articles France and Britain, to which we refer our readers. For a number of years he acted the prudent part ot standing dear of hostilities as much as possible; and when he did at last interfere, we find little in his con¬ duct which is intitled to the praise either ot consistency or honour. Indeed it may perhaps be admitted, that on many occasions he acted rather trom necessity than choice ; and finding that a contest with I ranee was both absurd and ruinous, he chose to sacrifice a less evil to a greater good. Whether by consent or compulsion is not certainly known, the king of Prussia ceded to France the duchies of Cleves and Berg, March 1806, which were to be governed by Prince Murat, the bro¬ ther-in-law of Bonaparte, under the title of Joachim, duke of Cleves and Berg. The king of Prussia likewise took possession ot the Hanoverian states 30th October 1806, at the time when Great Britain had no reason to apprehend any such mysterious conduct from that quarter. He entered into a secret treaty with France for the purpose of shutting the northern ports ; a measure which gave such offence to this country, that the British minister thought proper to take his leave of Berlin. At one period he came to a final determination to make no separate treaty with the French government, and proposed a treaty of peace and alliance between his court and that of Britain, lo give this as much effect as possible, the Prussian princes of the blood began to raise volunteer regiments in Poland and Silesia, the loyalty of the peasantry in these coun¬ tries far exceeding the most sanguine expectations. So low, however, were the king of Prussia’s finances at the time of Lord Hutchinson’s arrival at Memefi March 1807, that his lordship found it necessary to ad¬ vance 8o,oool. for the support of his family and domes¬ tic household. This being intimated to the British mi¬ nisters, his majesty recommended it to parliament to en¬ able him to implement the agreement. _ Yet not long after this period he actually entered into a treaty ot peace with the emperor of France, by virtue ot which his territories were so dreadfully mutilated, as to leave him little more of a sovereign than the name. He was required to renounce the whole of his dominions situated between the Rhine and the Elbe; the circle of Cotbus in Lower Lusatia; nearly all the provinces which former¬ ly constituted part of the kingdom of Poland ; the city of Dantzic ; and Ire was laid under the necessity of shut¬ ting all the ports and harbours of his whole dominions against the trade and navigation of Great Britain. Not above 18 months prior to this treaty, the king of Prus¬ sia might have been said to hold the fate of Europe in his hands; but by means of it he was reduced to the very lowest rank among the powers of Europe. Had he taken a decided part against France before the bat¬ tle of Austerlitz, he might have been able to secure the independence of Europe ; but, having suffered this au¬ spicious moment to pass unimproved, the consequences were exactly such as might have been predicted, with¬ out any pretensions to uncommon sagacity. The king of Prussia being thus degraded by means of his own imprudence and want ol sound policy, endea¬ voured to ease the burdens of his remaining subjects by reducing his civil and military establishments. The army was reduced to 24,000 men, and General Kno- Wesdorf was sent to Paris to procure a diminution ot the jp B ti contributions exacted from him, or to crave that pay- p,^ ments might be accepted of by instalments ; and, in the ^ mean time, the troops belonging to I ranee were not to be withdrawn from the impoverished kingdom of Prus¬ sia. Every decree issued in Holland against the com¬ merce of Great Britain, this humbled monarch was ob¬ liged to adopt, and to order the publication of them in every part of his mutilated dominions. In this state of degradation the Prussian monarchy continued till the extraordinary events of 1812. When Bonaparte made his irruption into Russia, Prussia was compelled to furnish a body of troops for the service, who formed part of the army under Macdonald. After the disastrous retreat of the French, the king made his escape from Potsdam, and retired to Silesia. He im¬ mediately called on his subjects to rise in arms for the defence of their country, without at first disclosing against whom he wras to act. Great numbers of all ages joyfully obeyed the call. On the 22d February 1813, he entered into a treaty of alliance with Russia. The , battle of Lutzen, however, on the 2d, and of Bautzen on the 20th May, threw discouragement on the rising hopes of the allies. But in August they were strength¬ ened by the junction of Austria. The battle of Dres¬ den was lost on the 26th of August ; but from this time their affairs began to improve, and the victory of Leip- sic, on the 16th October, turned the scale entirely in their favour. Prussia was now delivered entirely from French oppression ; and her armies took a part in all the events that followed, to the peace of Paris in May 1814. When the war broke out again on Bona¬ parte’s return, the Prussian armies performed essential services. The advance ol Blucher in the afternoon gave a decisive turn to the battle of Waterloo. By these successes Prussia not only recovered her for¬ mer losses, but gained large additions of territory and population. She recovered the province of Posen in Poland, all her territories between the Elbe and the Rhine ; and obtained besides, about one half of the king of Saxony’s territories, and extensive districts on the south side of the Rhine. She acquired also Swedish Pomerania ; and ceded East I riesland with some other districts to Hanover, and Anspach and Bayreuth to Ba¬ varia. After these acquisitions and cessions, Prussia contained in 1819, 106,000 square English miles, and 10,065,000 inhabitants. « The air of Prussia is wholesome, and the soil fruitful ^ s in grain ; affording, besides, plenty of pitcoal and other andp • fuel. The rivers and lakes are well stored with fish ; lation I and amber is found on its coast towards the Baltic.huSii The principal rivers are the Vistula, Bregel, Memel, the Passarge, and the Elbe ; all of which frequently do damage by their inundations. Since the year 17*9 1*' is computed that about 34>0®0 colonists have removed to Prussia from I ranee, Swit¬ zerland, and Germany ; of which number one halt were Saltzburgbers. These emigrants have built 400 small villages, 11 towns, 50 new churches, and founded 1000 village-schools. The manners of the people dif¬ fer but little from those of the Germans. I he esta¬ blished religions are those of Luther and Calvin, but chiefly the former; though almost all other sects are tolerated. • The late king of Prussia, by the assistance of an ex-Comj cellent police, brought the commerce and manufactures^ j t 486 ] 11 1 ■'c ti Si ta lo K m su po F st an co co P ce am dec sidl tlie mil d I lieu 1 for I fers irltl I Tb and JOC 1 " P1*! peri pl»; I 1 l'te 1 doi I I j I day | S/f/ j I Chi 1 f PRY , , Hfe h. : f J[' lues, Ro;t of this country to a very flourishing state, which during his life were daily improving. The manufactures of Prussia consist m glass, iron-work, paper, gunpowder copper and brass-mills, manufactures of cloth, camblet’ linen, silk, gold and silver lace, stockings, and other ar¬ ticles. The inhabitants export variety of naval stores amber, lint-seed and hemp-seed, oat-meal, fish, mead’ tallow, and caviar j and it is said that 500 ships are loaded with those commodities every year, chiefly from Koningsberg. J His Prussian majesty is absolute through all his do¬ minions ; but the late king was too wise to oppress his subjects, though he availed himself to the full of his power. The government of this kingdom is by a re¬ gency of four chancellors of state, viz. 1. The great-ma- sterj 2. The great-burgrave ; 3. The great-chancellor j and, 4. The great-marshal. There are also some other councils, and 37 bailiwicks. The states consist, 1. Of counsellors of state ; 2. Of deputies from the nobility 5 and, 3. From the commons. Besides these institutions’ tlie late king erected a board for commerce and navi! gation. His Prussian majesty, hy means of the happy situa¬ tion of his country, its inland navigation, and the ex¬ cellent regulations of his predecessor, derives an amaz¬ ing revenue from this country, which, about a century and a half ago, was the seat of boors and barbarism. It is said, that amber alone brings him in 26,000 dollars annually. His other revenues arise from his demesnes, his duties of customs and tolls, and the sub¬ sidies yearly granted by the several states. In 1815 the whole revenues of Prussia were estimated at seven millions sterling. See Europe, Supplement. The military regulations introduced by the late king bad a wonderfully quick operation in forming his troops and recruiting his armies. Every regiment has a par¬ ticular district assigned it, where the young men proper for bearing arms are registered ; and when occasion of¬ fers, they join their regiment, and being incorporated with veterans they soon become well disciplined troops. The Prussian army, in the time of peace, consists of 250,000. of the best disciplined troops in the world ; and during tlie last war, that force was augmented to 300,000 men. The royal arms of Prussia are argent, an eagle dis¬ played sable, crowned, or, for Prussia: azure, the Im¬ perial sceptre, or, for Courland : argent, an eagle dis¬ played, gules, with semicircular wreaths, for the mar- quisate of Brandenburg: to these are added the respec¬ tive arms of the several provinces subject to the Prussian crown. There are two orders of knighthood ; the first, that of the Black Eagle, instituted by Frederic I. on the day of his coronation at Koningsberg, with this motto, uuni cuique. I he sovereign is always grand master ; and the number of knights, exclusive of the royal fami¬ ly, is limited to 30.. Next to this is the order of Me¬ rit, instituted by his late majesty; the motto is, Pour le merite. PRUSSIAN blue. See Prussiate of iron, Chemistry Index. PRUSSIC acid. See Chemistry Index. PRANNE, William, an English lawyer, much < istinguished in the civil commotions under Charles I. "as born at Swainswick in Somersetshire in 1600. His [ 487 ] PSA Hi sir io77i as tix, written against stage-plays in 16a 7 rnn p taming some reflections that offended'the court was' 11 sentenced by the star-chamber to pay a fine of 5000!. Psahnan* to stand in the pillory to lose his ears, and to perpe- ■ zar' tual imprisonment. During his confinement, he wrote several more books j particularly, in 1637, one entitled hewS /}o7n Ipswich, which reflecting severely on the bishops, he was again sentenced by the star-chamber to ano her fine of 5000 . to lose the remainder of his ears he pillory to be branded on both cheeks with S. L. .or se itious libeller, and to be perpetually imprisoned m Caernarvon castle. Nothing but cutting^ his hands still d IT- prrntr1PrynnR from writing: he wrote still, and in 1640, being set at liberty by the house of commons, he entered London in a kind of triumph was elected into parliament for Newport in Cornwall and opposed the bishops with great vigour, being the’ chief manager of Archbishop Laud’s trial. In the long parliament he was zealous in the Presbyterian cause! hut when the Independents gained the ascendency, he opposed them warmly, and promoted an agreement wth the king. W hen the army garbled the house and refused him entrance, he became a hitter enemy to them and their leader Cromwell, and attacked them with his pen so severely, that he was again imprisoned: but be pleaded the liberty of the subject so successfully, that he was enlarged, to write more controversial books. emg restored to his seat after Cromwell’s death with the other secluded members, he assisted in promoting the restoration, and was appointed keeper of the Tower records j a place excellently well calculated for him and where he was very useful by the collections be pub! lished from them. He presented 40 volumes of hi* works, in folio and 410, to Lincoln’s-inn library, of which society he was a member j and, dying in 1660 was buiied under the chapel. * 9’ PRA TANES, in Grecian antiquity, were the pre¬ sidents of the senate, whose authority consisted chiefly in assembling the senate j which, for the most part, was done once every day. rI he senate consisted of 500, 50 senators being elected out of each tribe : after which, lots were cast to de¬ termine in what order the senators of each tribe should preside ; which they did by turns, and during their pre¬ sidentship were called prytanes. However, all the 50 prytanes of the tribes did not govern at once, but one at a time, viz. for seven days ; and after 35 days, ano¬ ther tribe came into play, and presided for other five weeks ; and so of the rest. PSALM, a divine song or hymn ; but chiefly appro¬ priated to the 150 Psalms of David, a canonical book of the Old Testament. Most of the psalms have a particular title, signifying either the name of the author, the person who was to set it to music or sing it, the instrument that was to be used, or the subject and occasion of it. Some have ima¬ gined that David was the sole author of the Book of Psalms j but the titles of many of them prove the con¬ trary, as psalm xix. which appears to have been written by Moses. Many of the psalms are inscribed with the names Korah, Jeduthun, &c. from the persons who were to sing them. I SALMANAZAR, George, the fictitious name of a pretended Formosan, a person of learning and in¬ genuity. He was born in France, and educated in a free PSA [ 488 ]' PSA Psalmaaa- free-school, ami and afterwards in a college of Jesuits, in zar. an arcbiepiscopal city, the name of which, as likewise ‘ those of his birth-place and of his parents, are unknown. Upon leaving the college, he was recommended as a tutor to a young gentleman *, hut soon fell into a mean rambling life which involved him in disappointments and misfortunes. His first pretence was that ol being .a sufi'erer for religion. He procured a certificate that he was of Irish extraction, that he left that country tor the sake of the Catholic faith, and was going on a pilgri¬ mage to Rome. Being unable to purchase a pilgrim s oai b, and observing one in a chapel, dedicated to a mi¬ raculous saint, which had been set up as a monument of gratitude by some wandering pilgrims, he contrived to take both the staff and cloak away *, and, being thus accoutred, begged his way in fluent Latin, accosting only clergymen or persons of figure *, whom he found so generous and credulous, that, before he had gone 20 miles, he might easily have saved money, and put him¬ self in a much better dress : but as soon as he had got what he thought was sufficient, he begged no more *, but \iewed every thing worth seeing, and then retired to some inn, where he spent his money as freely as he had obtained it. Having heard the Jesuits speak much of China and Japan, he started the wild scheme, when he was in Germany, of passing for a native of the island of Formosa ; 'and what he wanted in knowledge, he supplied by a pregnant invention. He formed a new character and language on grammatical principles, which, like other oriental languages, he wrote from right to left with great readiness ; and planned a new religion, and a division of the year into 20 months, with other novelties, to credit his pretensions. He was now a Japanese convert to Christianity, travelling foi instruction, with an appearance more wretched than even that of common beggars. He then entered as a soldier in the Dutch service: hut, still desirous of passing for a Japanese, he altered his plan to that of being an unconverted heathen } and at Sluys, Brigadier Lauder, a Scots colonel, introduced him to the chaplain, who, with the view of recommending himself to the bishop of London, resolved to carry him over to England. . At Rotterdam, some persons having put shrewd questions to him, that carried the air of doubt, he took one more whimsical step, which was to live upon raw flesh, roots, and herbs ; which strange food he thought would remove all scruples. The bishop of London pa¬ tronized him with credulous humanity j and Psalma- nazar found a large circle of friends, who extolled him as a prodigy. Yet were there some who entertained a just opinion of him, particularly the Drs Halley, Mead, and Woodward 5 but their endeavours to expose him as a cheat only made others think the better of him, espe¬ cially as those gentlemen were supposed to be unfriendly to revelation. But in this instance at least, easiness of belief was no great evidence of penetration. Fie was employed to translate the churcn-catechism into the Formosan language, which was examined, approved, and laid up as a valuable Mb.5 and the author, alter writing his well-known History oj iormosn^ was rewai d- ed and sent to Oxford to study what he liked, while his patrons and opponents were learnedly disputing at London on the merits of his work. The learned members of the university were no better agreed in 4,heir opinions than those at London ; but at length the sceptics triumphed. Some absurdities were msco-Psaiir ^ vered in his history, of such a nature as to discredit the whole narration, and saved him the trouble of an p8aJ open declaration of his imposture •, which however he wJ ^ owned at length to his private friends. For the remain¬ der of his life, his learning and ingenuity enabled him to procure a comfortable support by his pen : he was con¬ cerned in several works of credit, particularly The Uni¬ versal History. He lived irreproachably for many years, and died in 1763. PSALMIST, in the church of Rome, one of the lesser ecclesiastical orders } the same with what among us is called clerk, pi'ccentor, or singer. PSALMODY, the art or act of singing psalms. See Psalm. Psalmody was always esteemed a considerable part of devotion, and usually performed in the standing posture: and as to the manner of pronunciation, the plain song was sometimes used, beinga gentle inflexion of the voice, not much different from reading, like the chant in ca- | thedrals ; at other times more artificial compositions were used, like our anthems. As to the persons concerned in singing, sometimes a single person sung alone *, sometimes the whole assem¬ bly joined together, which was the most ancient and ge¬ neral practice. At other times the psalms were sung al¬ ternately, the congregation dividing themselves into two parts, and singing verse about, in their turns. There was also a fourth way of singing pretty common in the fourth century, which was, when a single person began the verse, and the people joined with him in the close: this was often used for variety, in the same service with alternate psalmody. The use of musical intruments in the singing of psalms, seem to be as ancient as psalmody itself; the first psalm ive read of being sung to the timbrel, viz. that of Moses and Miriam, after the deliverance of the Israelites from Egypt; and afterwards, musical instru¬ ments were in constant use in the temple of Jerusalem. See Organ. „ m i’SALTER, the same with the book of psalms. See the article Psalm. Among the religious in the Popish countries, the terra psalter is also given to a large chaplet or rosary, consisting of 150 beads, according to the number of psalms in the psalter. PSALTERY, a musical instrument, much in use among the ancient Hebrews, who called it nebel. We know little or nothing of the precise form of the ancient psaltery. That now in use is a flat instrument, in form of a trapezium or triangle truncated at top : it is strung with 13 wire-chords, set to unison or octave, and mounted on two bridges, on the two sides: it is struck with a plectrum, or little iron rod, and sometimes with a crooked stick. Its chest or body resembles that of a spinet. PSAMMETICUS, or PsammiticHUS, a renown¬ ed conqueror, who subduing 11 other petty kings of Egypt, became the founder of the kingdom of Egypt, about 670 R. C. Fie is memorable likewise for taking the city of Azot, after a siege of 29 years; and for discovering the sources of the river Nile. See Egygt, N° 10. , PSATYRIANS, a sect of Arians, who, in the council of Antioch, held in' the yeai 360, maintained that p s e r 48 i I p„l,,;...s that the Son was not like the Father as to will • that 9 Tl , , P S E || lie was taken from nothing, or marie nf ,wi • ’ . 1 16 bees» w'10 are a match for mn0f etrr Pseudo, that in God, generation was not ^ he rlleL Kand hy means °f their stings, wonlrl ^ crcat1ure8 PS^ tlL™'« they are covered with - " * ^vmous armour ~ ^ creation. MtCHAEL, a learned Christian of the >**^/ry.IIth centur{’ wa8’ by hnth, a Constantinopolitan of consular rank, and flour,shed under the emperor Con- stantine Monomachus. His genius and industry raised h,m far above the level of his cotemporaries ; and the fema e historian Anna Comnena speaks of him as one who had been more indebted for his attainments to his own excellent talent than to the instructions of his ore ceptors j adding that having made himself master of all the wisdom of the Greeks and the Chaldeans, he was justly esteemed the most learned man of the age. Thus furnished, he became the chief instructor of the Con- stantmopolitan youth. He was at the same time the companion and the preceptor of the emperor, who was so captivated by the studies and amusements in which 1 sellus engaged him, that, according to Zonaras, he ne¬ glected the concerns of the empire. The Byzantine historians complain, that the emperor, deluded by the head of the philosophers (the title with which Psellus was honoured), lost the world. Meeting, towards the close of this life, with some disappointment, Psellus re¬ tired into a monastery, and soon afterwards died : the time of his death is uncertain. His works, which have been much celebrated, are, Commentaries upon Aristo¬ tle s Logic and Physics j a Compendium of Questions and Answers ; and an Explanation of the Chaldean Ora¬ cles. ihe two latter works prove him to have been conversant, not only with Grecian, but with Oriental philosophy. r ’ PSEUDO, from -J/ivdos, a Greek term used in the composition of many words to denote false or spurious • as the pseudo-acacia, or bastard acacia; pseudo-fumaria’ or bastard-fumitory ; pseudo-ruta, or bastard-rue, &c. We also say, a pseudo-apostle or false apostle; a pseu¬ do-prophet, or false prophet, &c. PsEUDO-China. See Smilax. /• UD°- Galena, or Black-Jack. See Zinc, Ores ol, Mineralogy Index. Pseudo- Pine a ^ in Natural History, the name of a very remarkable species of insect described by M Reaumur, approaching to the nature of the tinea, or clothes moth, while in the worm-state, but not making themselves coats of the substance of leaves, cloth, &c. though they orm a sort of cases for their defence against a very ter¬ . These creatures are of the caterpillar kind, and have, in the manner of many of these insects, 16 legs. They feed on wax, and for food enter the bee-hives ; where they boldly engage the bees, and are not to be prevent¬ ed by them from feeding, though at the expence of their habitations and the cells of their reservoirs of honey : so that it is no uncommon thing for a swarm of bees to be forced to change their place of habitation, and make new combs elsewhere; leaving the old ones to this con¬ temptible victor, whom they know not how to drive out or dispossess. Virgil and Aristotle, and all the authors who have written on bees, have complained of this destructive animal. It never eats the honey, but feeds only on the wax; attacking principally those waxy cells where the female bee deposits her eggs for the future progeny. Vol. XVII. Part II. f of armour of a double matte/ T "e ^whYc , " ^ diately covers the body, is of a kind of sflk ofTl •mme“ spinning; and the ouL cov^^^r this irofT lure V, S -S ,aid considerably thick ; and the crea tuie just thrusting out its head to feed, g’oes on devour-' inhabitants S U"dlStU.rb®d’ wl,i!e a whole army of the ing to nierceYim ^ buz.Zing about b-n, and aYempt- ng to pierce him with their stings. He never forsake- h s covering, but lengthens and enlarges it as he goes witl/T'Y^- d°Wn the SldeS °f tbe cells in his march’ destimctio/h? t0 Ca-t them °ne hy one’ t,le llavock and When the t' °pnasions are scarcely to be conceived, en the time of the change of this creature approaches contracts its body within its double coveTg I there changes into the nympth state ; whence, Stei a nlYVr’ 11 C°JmeS f°rth in f°rm of a moth, with Ja. nulated horns and a crooked proboscis. stnmfLbeeS haVe Tnnin2 enough to know their de- structive enemy in this new form; and as this is a weak moths'of Tb SS Sta-e’ attaCk and destr°y aH the are so / Z'118. S^CleS tbey meet with. They seldom are so fortunate however, as to kill the whole race as oon as produced ; and if only one escapes, it is able to A H f|f fldatl°" ° revenge for the death of its brethren. the flies of the moth kind lay a vast number of eggs, and this is behind hand with none of them in that particular mous. .1 , 111 lUHl _ the young ones produced from the ego-s of one surviving female of this species are sufficient to de- shoy many honey-combs ; nay, many hives of them. he moth produced by this caterpillar flies but little; yet it is very nimble in avoiding danger, by running, winch it does with great swiftness. I here is a species of these pseudo-tineee, or wax-eat¬ ing caterpillars, which infest the subterraneous hives of wasps and other creatures which make wax : the man¬ ner of living, feeding, and defending themselves from then enemies, is the same in all the species. These last if they are at any time distressed for food, will eat their own dung; the wax having passed almost unaltered through their bodies, and being still wax, and capable of aflording them more nourishment on a second diges¬ tion. These species, though they naturally live on this soft food, yet if by any accident they meet with harder only, they know how to live upon it; and can eat a way into the covers and leaves of books, and make themselves cases and coverings of the fragments of these substances. Tihe accurate authorf of these observations describes al- f Rcau- so a kind of pseudo-tinea which feeds on wool, and ano- wwr's His- ther that eats leather ; both making themselves houses °P^n~ also of the materials they feed on. 1 here is also anotiier kind very destructive to corn : these make themselves a covering by fastening together a great number of the grains, and there living and eat¬ ing in secret. All these creatures, whatever be their food or habitation, finally become p hale nee, or moths ; and may be distinguished, even in this state, from the other species, by having granulated horns of a remark¬ able structure, and all of them a proboscis, or trunk, more or less incurvated. PSEUDONYMOUS, among critics, an author who publishes a book under a false or feigned name; as cryp- 3 Q tonymous P S Y [ 49° 1 P S Y nious Psylli. Pscudony- tonymous is given to him who publishes one under a (Us guised name, and anonymous to him wlio publishes out any name at all. . , , > i „„ , PS1D1UM, the Guava j a genus of plants belong¬ ing to the icosandria class, and in the natural metho ranking under the 19th order, Hespendece. bee Bo¬ tany Index. . , i *iU A decoction of the roots of guava is employed with success in dysenteries : a bath of the decoction of he leaves is said to cure the itch and other cutaneous erup¬ tions. Guayava, or guava, is distinguished iiom the co¬ lour of the pulp into two species, the white and the ret , and, from the figure of the fruit, into the round and he pear-fashioned or perfumed guava. L he lattei has a thicker rind and a more delicate taste than the ot . The fruit is about the bigness of a large tennis ball , rind or skin generally of a russet stained with red. 1 he pulp within the thick rind is of an agreeable flavour, and interspersed with a number of small white seeds, li e rind, when stewed, is eaten with milk, and preferred to any other stewed fruit. From the same part is made marmalade j and from the whole fruit is prepared the finest jelly in the world. The fruit is very astringent, and nearly of the same quality with the pomegranate. The seeds are so hard as to resist the eflects of the sto¬ machs of animals *, so that, when voided with the excre¬ ments, they take root, germinate, and produce thriving trees. Whole meadows in the West Indies are cover¬ ed with guavas, which have been propagated in this PSITTACUS, or Parrot, a genus of birds, belong¬ ing to the order of Piece. See^ Ornithology Index. "PSOAS, in Anatomy. See taere, fable oj the Mus- ^PSOPHIA, a genus of birds belonging to the order of Gallince. See Ornithology Index. _ PSORALEA, a genus of plants belonging to the diadelphia class, and in the natural method ranking un¬ der the 3 2d order, Papilionacece. See Botany Index. FSYCHOTRIA, a genus of plants belonging to the pentandria class, and in the natural method ranking un¬ der the 47th order, Stellatce. See Botany Index. PSYLLI, (Strabo, Ptolemy'): a people in the south of Cyrenaica, so called from King Psyllus, (Agathar- gides, quoted by Pliny) : almost all overwhelmed by sand driven by a south wind (Herodotus). Ihey had something in their bodies fatal to serpents, and then- very smell proved a charm against them, according to Pliny, Lucan, &c. . Though we may justly look upon it as tabulous, that these people had any thing in their bodies differ¬ ent from others; it is, however, certain that there are in Egypt at this day some persons who have a me¬ thod &of handling the most poisonous serpents without any hurt. Of these Mr Hasselquist gives the follow¬ ing account : . , . They take the most poisonous vipers with their bare hands, play with them, put them in their bo¬ soms, and use a great many more tricks with them, as I have often seen. I have frequently seen them handle those that were three or four feet long, and ot the most horrid sort. I inquired and examined whe¬ ther they had cut out the vipers poisonous teeth •, but I have with my own eyes seen they do not. We may therefore conclude, that there are to this day Psylli in 4 Egypt •, but what art they use Is not easily known, pSy]ii, Some people are very superstitious, and the generalityv— believe this to be done by some supernatural art winch they obtain from invisible beings. I do not know whe¬ ther their power is to be ascribed to good or evil ; but I am persuaded that those who undertake it use many supers titions. “ The art of fascinating serpents is a secret amongst the Egyptians. It is worthy the endeavours of all natu¬ ralists, and the attention of every traveller, to learn some¬ thin- decisive as to this affair. How ancient this art is among the Africans, may be concluded from the an¬ cient Marii and Psylli, who were from Africa, and daily showed proofs of it at Rome. It is very remarkable that this should be kept a secret for more than 2000 years being known only to a few, when we have seen how many other secrets have within that time been re¬ vealed The circumstances relating to the fascination of serpents in Egypt, related to me, were principally, 1. That the art is only known to certain families, who propagate it to their offspring. 2. The person who knows how to fascinate serpents, never meddles with other poisonous animals, such as scorpions, lizards, &c. There are different persons who know how to fascinate these animals •, and they again never meddle with serpents. 3. Those that fascinate serpents eat them both raw and boiled, and even make broth of them, which they eat very commonly amongst them •, but in particular, they eat such a dish when they go out to catch them. I have been told, that serpents fried or boiled are frequently eaten by the Arabians both in Egypt and Arabia, though they know not how to fascinate them, but catch them either alive or dead. 4 After they have eaten their soup, they procure a bles¬ sing from their scheik (priest or lawyer), who uses some superstitious ceremonies, and amongst others spits on them several times with certain gestures. I his man¬ ner of getting a blessing from the priest is pure super¬ stition, and certainly cannot in the least help to fasci¬ nate serpents j but they believe, or will at least per¬ suade others, that the power of fascinating serpents de¬ pends upon this circumstance.” , , ., Notwithstanding this testimony of Hasselquist, the story of the incantation of serpents, though frequently alluded to in Scripture, has been generally treated as a fable. It is, however, affirmed as a certain truti, both by Mr Bruce and M. Savary. “ There is no doubt (says the former of these travellers) of its reah- tv. The Scriptures are full of it. All that have been in Egypt have seen as many different instances as they chose Some have doubted that it was a trick ; and that the animals thus handled had been first trained, and then deprived of their power of hurting J and fond of the discovery, they have rested themselves upon it, without experiment, in the face ot all antiquity. u I will not hesitate to aver, that I have seen at Cairo (and this may be seen daily without any trouble or ex¬ pence), a man who came from the catacombs, where the pits of the mummy-birds are kept, who has taken a cerastes with his naked hand from a number of others lying at the bottom of a tub, has put it upon his bare head, covered it with the common red cap he wears, then taken it out, put it in his breast, and tied it about his neck like a necklace *, after which it has been ap¬ plied to a hen, and bit it, which died in a few minutes, P S Y |]; to complete the experiment, the man has taken it —> by tiie neck^ beginning at his tail, has ate it as one would do a carrot or stock of celery, without anv seeming repugnance. “ We know from history, that where any country has been remarkably infested with serpents, there the people have been screened by this secret. “ To •cave ancient history, I can myself vouch, that all the black people in the kingdom of Sennaar/whe¬ ther Funge or Nuba, are perfectly armed against the bite of either scorpion or viper. They take the cera¬ stes in their hands at all times, put them in their bo¬ soms, and throw them to one another as children do apples or balls, without having irritated them by this usage so much as to bite. The Arabs have not this se¬ cret naturally, but from their infancy they acquire an exemption from the mortal consequences attending the bite ol these animals, by chewing a certain root, and washing themselves (it is not anointing) with an infu¬ sion of certain plants in water.” From this account we should be apt to think, that these vipers really would Tiot bite any who were thus armed against their poison ; especially as he adds, that he constantly observed, that the viper, however live¬ ly before, upon being seized by any of these barbari¬ ans, seemed as if taken with sickness and feebleness, frequently shut his eyes, and never turned his mouth towards the arm of the person who held him.” Yet in another place, speaking of the activity of the cerastes, he says, “ 1 saw one ot them at Cairo, in the house of Julian and Rosa, crawl up the side ot a box in which there were many, and there lie still, as if hiding himself, till one ol the people who brought them to us came near him •, and though in a very disadvantageous posture, sticking as it were perpendicularly to the side of the box, he leaped near the distance of three feet, and fas¬ tened^ between the man’s fore-finger and thumb, so as to bring the blood. The fellow showed no signs of either pain or fear, and even kept him with us full four hours, without his applying any sort of remedy, or seeming inclined to do so.” It is difficult to see how these two accounts can be reconciled. It those who catch vipers are in danger of being bit by them after they are catched, certainly they must be so before, and then the whole relation becomes contradictory. Our author tells us, that these feats were performed for a season, by those who were artifi¬ cially armed against the viper’s poison, as well as those who had the exemption naturally ; but though put in possession of the drugs, he never had the courage to make the experiment. That he should have made such a dreadful experiment on himself, no person in his senses would expect; but it is indeed very surprising, that he did not attempt by means of these medicines to arm some of the brute creatures, of the lives of which he was sufficiently prodigal, against the effects of that deadly poison by which so many of them perished. As sur¬ prising it is, that he did not try what effect the root or its decoction would have upon the serpents themselves; or that, though he says he had a small quantity of this extraordinary root by him, he gave neither drawing nor dscription of it. 1 hough it is impossible to reconcile the particulars of this account to one another, the general fact of the incantation is confirmed by the testimony of M. Savary. f 491 ] PTE lli.s writer tell, us, that he saw at the feast of Sidi biahim, a troop of people, seemingly possessed, with naked arms and a fierce look, holding in their hands enormous serpents, which twined round their body, and scape. These Psylli, grasping them endeavoured to escape strongly by the neck, avoid'ed"tire"b;t'e fand not^Hh. standing their hissing, tore them with their teeth, and ate them alive, while the blood streamed from their mouth. 7 JTARMIGAN* See Tetrao, Ornithology In- 11 ELE A, Shrub-trefoil ; a genus of plants be¬ longing to the tetrandria class ; and in the natural me¬ thod ranking with those of which the order is doubtful, oee Rot any Index. f gen«s of plants belonging to the order ot hlices, and to the cryptogamia class. See Botany Ihe fructifications are in lines under the mar¬ gin. 1 here are 19 species ; the most remarkable is the aquilma, or common female fern. The root of this is viscid, nauseous, and bitterish ; and like all the rest of le fern tribe, has a salt, mucilaginous taste. It creeps under the ground in some rich soils to the depth of five or six feet, and is very difficult to be destroyed. Trequent mowing in pasture grounds, plentiful dung¬ ing m arable lands, but, above all, pouring urine up¬ on it, are the most approved methods of killing it. It has however, many good qualities to counterbalance the tew bad ones. Fern cut while green, and left to rot upon the ground, is a good improver of land; for its ashes, if burnt, will yield the double quantity of salt that most other vegetables will. Fern is also an excellent manure for potatoes ; for if buried beneath their roots, it never fails to produce a good crop Its astringency is so great, that it is used in many places abroad in dressing and preparing kid and chamois lea¬ ther. _ In several places in the north, the inhabitants mow it green, and, burning it to ashes, make those ashes up into balls, with a little water, which they dry in the sun, and make use of them to wash their linen with instead of soap. In many of the Western Isles the people gain a very considerable profit from the sale of the ashes to soap and glass makers. In Glenelg in Inverness-shire, and other places, the people thatch their houses with the stalks of this fern, and fasten them down with ropes made either of birk-bark or heath. Some¬ times they use the whole plant for the same purpose, but that does not make so durable a covering. Swine are fond of the roots, especially if boiled in their wash. In some parts of Normandy we read that the poor have been reduced to the miserable necessity of mixing them with their bread. And in Siberia, and some other north¬ ern countries, the inhabitants brew them in their ale, mixing one-third of the roots to two-thirds of malt. The ancients used the root of this fern, and the whole plant, in decoctions and diet-drinks, in chronic disor¬ ders of all kinds, arising from obstructions of the vis¬ cera and the spleen. Some of the moderns have given it a high character in the same intentions, but it is rarely used in the present practice. The country people, however, still continue to retain some of its an¬ cient uses ; for they give the powder of it to destroy worms, and look upon a bed of the green plant as a so¬ vereign cure for the rickets in children. PTEROCARPUS, a genus of plants belonging to 3 Q 3 the Pterocar- pus n Ptolemais. P T O [ 492 1 the cliailelphia class •, and In the natural method ranking Another, under the 3 2d order, Papilionacece. See Botany In¬ dex. There are four species, viz. i.P)raco ; 2, Ecasta- phyllum; 3. Lunatus ; and, 4. Santahnus. Ibis last is by some referred to the genus Santalum. It is called red sounders ; and the wood is brought from the Bast Indies, in large billets, ot a compact texture, a dull red almost blackish colour on the outside, and a deep bright¬ er red within. Bhis wood has no manliest smell, and little or no taste. It has been commended as a mild astringent, and a corroborant of the nervous system ; but these are qualities that belong only to the yellow sort. The principal use of red saunders is as a colouring drug; with which intention it is employed in some for¬ mulae, particularly in the tinctura lavendulce composita. It communicates a deep red to rectified spirit, but gives no tinge to aqueous liquors*, a small quantity ot the resin, extracted by means of spirit, tinges a large one of fresh spirit of an elegant blood-red. There is scarcely any oil, that of lavender excepted, to which it communi¬ cates its colour. Geoffrey and others take notice, that the Brazil woods are sometimes substituted for red saunders 5 and the college of Brussels are in doubt whether all that is sold among them for saunders be not really a wood of that kind. According to the account which they have given, their saunders is certainly the Brazil v/ood 5 the distinguishing character of which is, that it imparts its colour to water. PTEROCOCEUS, a species of plant belonging to the genus Calligonum. See Calligonum, Botany Index. PTERONIA, a genus of plants belonging to the monodelpbia class; and in the natural method ranking under the 37th order, Columniferce. See Botany In¬ dex. PTINUS, a genus of insects belonging to the order of coleoptera. See Entomology Index. PTISAN, is properly barley decorticated, or de¬ prived of its hulls, by beating in a mortar, as was the ancient practice 5 though the cooling potion obtained by boiling such barley in water, and afterwards sweet¬ ening the liquor with liquorice-root, is what at present goes by the name of ptisan ; and to render it laxative, some add a little sena or other ingredient of the same intention. PTOLEMAIC System of Astronomy, is that in¬ vented by Claudius Ptolemseus. See Ptolemy, Clau¬ dius. PTOLEMAIS, in Ancient Geography; the port of Arsinoe, situated on the west branch of the Nile, which concurs to form the island called Homos Heracleotes, to the south of the vertex of the Delta. Ptolemais, (Strabo) } the largest and most consi¬ derable town of the Thebais, or Higher Egypt, and in nothing short of Memphis j governed in the manner of a Greek republic j situated on the west side of the Nile, almost opposite to Coptos. This town, which was built by Ptolemy Philadelphus, is now known by the name of Ptalometa. The walls and gates are still entire, and there are a vast number of Greek inscriptions, but only a few columns of the portico remain. There is like¬ wise an Ionic temple done in the most ancient manner of executing that order, of which Mr Bruce took a drawing, which is preserved in the king’s collection. PUB of Cyrenaica, anciently called Parce. A third of the Troglodytica, surnamed Epitheras, from the chace of wild beasts, as elephants ; lying in the same parallel wdth Meroe (Strabo) 5 on the Arabian gulf (Pliny) ; 4820 stadia to the south of Berenice. A fourth, of Galilee, anciently called Aca, or Aeon; made a Roman colony under the emperor Claudius (Pliny). A fifth of Pamphylia •, situated near the river Melas, on the borders of Cilicia Aspera. PTOLEMY Soter, or Lagus, king of Egypt, a renowned warrior, and an excellent prince : he estab¬ lished an academy at Alexandria, and was himself a man of letters. Died 284 B. C. aged 92. Ptolemy Philadelphus, his second son, succeeded him to the exclusion of Ptolemy Ceraunus. He was re¬ nowned as a conqueror, but more revered for his great virtues and political abilities. He established and aug¬ mented the famous Alexandrian library, which had been begun by his father. Pie greatly increased the com¬ merce of Egypt, and granted considerable privileges to the Jews, from whom he obtained a copy of the Old Testament, which he caused to be translated into Greek, and deposited in his library. TLhis is supposed to have been the version called the Septuagint. He died 246 years B. C. aged 64. Ptolemy Ceraunus, the elder brother, fled to Se- leucus king of Macedon, who received him hospitably \ in return for which he assassinated him, and usurped his crown. He then invited Arsinoe, who was his widow and his own sister, to share the government with him j but as soon as he got her in his power, he murdered her and her children. He was at length defeated, killed, and torn limb from limb by the Gauls, 279 B. C. Ptolemy, Claudius, a celebrated mathematician and astrologer, was hern at Pelusium, and surnamed by the Greeks Most Divine and Most Wise. He flourished at Alexandria in the second century, under the reigns of Adrian and Marcus Aurelius, about the 138th year of the Christian era. There are still extant his Geo¬ graphy, and several learned wmrks on astronomy. The principal of which are, 1. The Almagest j 2. De Judi- ciis Astrologicis ; 3. Planispheerium. His system of the world was for many years adopted by the philosophers and astronomers; hut the learned have rejected it for the system of Copernicus. See Astronomy, N° 16. PTYALISM, in Medicine, a salivation, or frequent and copious discharge of saliva. The word is Greek, formed from tttvu, “ to spit.” PUBERTY, denotes the age at which the person is- capable of procreating or begetting children. See Man. Puberty, in Law, is fixed at the age of 12 in females, and 14 in males j after which they are reck¬ oned to be fit for marriage. But as to crimes and punishments, the age of puberty is fixed at 14 in both sexes. PUBES, in Anatomy, denotes the middle part of the hypogastric region in men or women, lying between the two inguina or groins. Section of the Pubes. See Midwifery and Si¬ ca ulti an Operation. Pubes, in Botany, the hair or down on the leaves of some plants. See Hair. PUBLICAN, among the Romans, one who farmed the taxes and public revenues. PUBLICATION, Ptokmain 11 Publican,: Lication II a. hndorft. , , . P U F [ 49.3 1 PUBLICATtON, the art of making a thing known of the public to the world ; the same with promulgation 1 1 . ^BLIUS Syrus, a Syrian mimic poet, who flou- nshed about 44 years before Christ. He was original¬ ly a slave sold to a Roman patrician, called Domitius, who brought him up with great attention, and o-ave him his freedom when of age. He gained the esteem of the most powerful men at Rome, and reckoned Julius Caesar among his patrons. He soon eclipsed the poet Labenus, whose burlesque compositions were in oeneral esteem. There remains of Publius a collection of mo¬ ral sentences, written in iambics, and placed in alpha¬ betical order. 1 Oak PUCERON, a name given by naturalists to a very remarkable species of animal of (he puceron kind. 1 hey bury themselves in the clefts of the oak and some other trees, and getting into the crevices, where the bark is a little separated from the wood, they there live at ease, and feed to their fill, without being exposed to their common enemies. They are larger than the other pu- cerons, the winged ones being nearly as large as a com¬ mon house fly ; and those without wings are also larger than any other species of the same genus. The win te¬ ed ones are black, and the others of a coffee colour. Iheir trunk is twice the length of their bodies, and, when walking, it is carried straight along the belly, trail¬ ing behind it with the poiiw up. When the creature has a mind to suck a part of the tree that is just before it, it draws up and shortens the trunk, till it brings it to a proper length and direction j but when it sucks in the common way, it crawls upon the inner surface of the bark, and the turned up end of the trunk, which re¬ sembles a tail, fixes itself against the wood that is be¬ hind it, or contiguous to its back, and sucks there. The extremity of this trunk holds so fast by the wood, that when it is pulled away, it frequently brings a small piece of the wood away with it. The ants are as fond of these as of the other species of pucerons, and that for the same reason, not feeding upon them, but on their dung, which is a liquid mat> ter of a sweet taste, and is the natural juice of the tree, very little altered. These creatures are the surest guides where to find this species of puceron; for if we at any ime see a number of these crawlingup an oak to a cer- am part, and there creeping into the clefts of the hark we may be assured that in that place there are quanti¬ ties of these oak pucerons. The ants are so extremely Jond of the juices of the tree, when prepared for them PUG i . ■ aw, which in Germany consists of the ;,',t rr °v ,ri? •s ol cmi,:i'e o'’*1- f* and states of which it is composed, and those of the princes and states with respect to each other But though he used his utmost efforts to distinguish himself he despised those pompous titles which are so much sought for at universities, and never would take the de<- gree of doctor. He accepted the place of governor to the son of M. Covet a Swedish nobleman, who was then ambassador from Sweden to the court of Denmark For this purpose he went to Copenhagen, but continued not ong at ease there j for the war being renewed some time after between Denmark and Sweden, be was seiz¬ ed with the whole family of the ambassador. During Ins confinement, which lasted eight months, as he had no looks, and was allowed to see no person, he amused himself by meditating on what he read in Grotius’s trea- Rt\J!ire BeJ!1 et faci's, and the political writings of , 1 T^bbes. 0ut 0* these be drew up a short system, to which he added some thoughts of his own, and pub- islied it at the Hague in 1660, under the title of Efe- mentci Jurisprudent ice Universalis. This recommended nm to the elector Palatine, who invited him to the uni¬ versity of Heidelberg, where he founded in his favour a professorship of the law of nature and nations, which was the first of that kind established in Germany. Puffen- dorf remained at Heidelberg till ,673, when Charles vVl. of Sweden gave him an invitation to be professor of the law of nature and nations at Lunden; which place the elector Palatine reluctantly allowed him to accept. He went thither the same year; and after that time his reputation greatly increased. Some years after, the king of Sweden sent for him to Stockholm, and made him lus historiographer, and one of his counsellors. In 1688 the elector of Brandenburg obtained the consent of his Swedish majesty, that he should come to Berlin, in or¬ der to write the history of the elector William the Oreat ; and in 1694 niade him a baron. But he died that same year of an inflammation in his feet, occasion¬ ed by cutting his nails ; having attained his grand cli¬ macteric. Of his works, which are numerous, the fol¬ lowing are the principal : 1. A Treatise on the law of Nature and Nations, written in German; of which there is au English translation with Barbeyrac’s Notes. 2. An Introduction to the History of the Principal States which at present subsist in Europe ; written in German ; which has been also translated into English. 3. -The History of Sweden, from Gustavus Adolphus’s by passing tl ml ti l , VT” them 3- The History of Sweden, from Gustavus Adolphus’s the puceron has -S ° t HS aniTa ’ that when exPedltl0n mto Germany to the abdication of Queen be puceron has a drop not yet evacuated, but hanging Christina. 4. The History of Charles Gustavus t, on it thfr °Ut ^ PaSSage’ an ant Wijl °ften volumes folio, &c 7 taVUS’ tW° Prmi?xTTx ^ine-frettersi or Plant-lice. See Aphis. UEADA, the parts of generation in both sexes, bee Anatomy, N° 107 and 108. ERILliY, in discourse, is defined by Longinus to be a thought which, by being too far fetched, be¬ comes flat and insipid. Puerility, he adds, is the com- mon fault of those who affect to say nothing hut what is brilliant and extraordinary. PU1FENDORF, Samueh DE, was born in 1631 ^ ci, a little village in Misnia, a province in Upper t axony; and was son of Elias Puffendorf, minister of ia pace. After having made great progress in the sciences.at Leipsic, he turned his thoughts to the study 3 volumes folio, TUP I IN. ^ See Alca, Ornithology Index. I LGE1, Pkter Paul, one of the greatest painters and sculptors I ranee ever produced, though but little noticed by their own writers, was born at Marseilles in 1623. Bi bB youth he was the disciple of Roman, an able sculptor; and then went to Italy, where he studied painting and architecture. In painting he so well imitated the manner of Peter de Cortona, that this painter desired to see him, and entered into a friend¬ ship with him. In 1657, a dangerous disorder obliged him to renounce the pencil, and devote himself to sculp¬ ture ; and his reputation causing him to he invited to Paris, he enjoyed a pension of 1200 crowns, as sculp¬ tor and director of the works relating to vessels and galleys,... PUL [ Puget I! Pulex. Barbut's1 Genera of Insects, p. 330, &c, ffalleys. He died at Marseilles in 1695, and has left a number of admirable statues behind him both in Prance , and Italy. ... P PUGIL, in Materia Medico, such a quantity ot flowers, seeds, or the like, as may be taken up between the thumb and two fore-fingers. It is reckoned the eighth part of the manipulus or handful. PULEGIUM, or PmsY-lloyal. bee Mentha, Botany Index. . PULEX, the Flea, in Zoology, a genus ot insects belonging to the order of aptera. See Entomology ^By keeping fleas in a glass tube corked up at both ends, but so as to admit fresh air, their actions and man¬ ners may be observed. They are thus seen to lay their eirgs, not all at once, but ten or twelve in a day, tor se¬ veral days successively ; which eggs will be afterwards found to'hatch successively in the same order. Ihehea maY easily be dissected in a drop of water j and by tins means the stomach and bowels, with their peristaltic motion, maybe discovered very plainly, as also their testes and penis, with the veins and arteries, though minute beyond all conception. Mr Leuwenhoek aihrms also, that he has seen innumerable animalcules, shaped Iwe serpents, in the semen masculinum of a flea. 1 ns blood¬ thirsty insect, which fattens at the expence of the human species, prefers the more delicate skin of women ; but prays neither upon epileptic persons, nor upon the dead or dying. It loves to nestle in the fur of dogs, cats, and rats, the nests of river-swallows are sometimes plenti¬ fully stored with them. _ , Fleas are apterous •, walk but little, but leap to a heioht equal to 200 times that of their ovvn body. This *amazing motion is performed by means of the ela¬ sticity of their feet, the articulations of which are so many springs. Thus it eludes, with surprising agility, the pursuit of the person on whom it riots. Among the memorabilia of fleas, one, they say, has been seen to draw a small silver piece of ordnance to which it was fastened, the firing of the gun nowise daunting its intre¬ pidity. The owner carried it about m a little box lin¬ ed with velvet, every now and then placing it 011 her arm to let it feed ; but winter put an end to the being of this martial flea. Another flea that became slave to an Englishman, had, fer its daily and easy task, to drag its golden chain and padlock, of the weight of one crain. A third flea served as a thill-horse to an Eng- fish artist, who had made an ivory coach and six, that carried a coachman and his dog between his legs, a po¬ stillion, two footmen, and four inside riders. _ At Surat fleas bugs, and other voracious vermin, are in so great veneration, that they have an hospital endowed, where every night a poor fellow, for hire, suffers himself to be preyed upon. He is fastened naked on a bed, when the feast begins at his expence. In Turkey there is a simi¬ lar foundation for decayed dogs j an institution less ri¬ diculous than the other. Mercurial ointment brim¬ stone, a fumigation with the leaves of pennyroyal, or fresh-gathered leaves of that plant sewed up in a bag, and laid in the bed, are remedies pointed out as destruc¬ tive of fleas. PULEX Arboreus, in Natural History, the name given by Mr Reaumur to a very large genus of small animals. They are a kind of half-winged creatures: they have 494. ] PUL perfect state, have complete wings. These are distin- ly guished from the others by the name of musca-pulex, or the winged pulex. See Coccus, Entomology Index., ^ Pulex Aquations auctorum (monoculus pulex of Lin¬ naeus) is a species of the genus Monoculus j which see, under Entomology Index. PuLEX-Eaters, a name given by naturalists to a sort of worms frequently found on the leaves of trees, where they devour the animals called pulices arborei. Of these there are several species, which owe their origin to the eggs of different creatures j for there are none of them in their ultimate state in this their time of feeding. According to the difl'erent animals whose eggs they are hatched from, these are of different form and structure. Some are hexapodes, or endued with six feet} these belong to the beetle-tribe, and finally change into beetles like the parent animal from whose eggs they sprung. Others have no legs, and are produced from the eggs of flies of various kinds. And, finally, others are genuine caterpillars, though smally but these are the most rare of all. The two general kinds are the hexapodes, or beetle- worms ; and the apodes, or fly-worms. The fly which gives origin to the last of these is a four-winged one 5 and takes care always to deposit her eggs in a place where there are plenty of the pulices, usually on the stalk or young branches of a tree in the midst of large families of them. The worm, as soon as hatched, finds itself in the midst of abundance of food, preying at pleasure on these animals, which are wholly defence¬ less. The stalks of the elder and woodbine are fre¬ quently found covered over with these puhees 5 and among them there may usually be found one 01 more of these destroyers feeding at will, sucking in the juices from their bodies, and then throwing away the dry skins. Besides the worms of this four-winged fly, there is one of a two-winged wasp-fly, very destructive of these animals. . PULLEY, in Mechanics, one of the five mechanical powers. See Mechanics. PULMO, the Lungs, in Anatomy. See Anatomy Index. PULMONARIA, Lungwort, a genus of plants belonging to the pentandria class, and in the natural method ranking under the 41st order, Asperifolice. See Botany Index. . . PULO, the name of several Asiatic islands, m the Indian ocean, the principal of which only, it is sale, is inhabited. It is denominated PuLO-Condore, an island about 13 mileslong and three broad, which was visited by Lord Macartney on Ins way to China. It has convenient anchoring places during either monsoon. Here his lordship’s squadron came to anchor on the 17th of May., The bay is formed by four small islands approaching so near to each other, as to exhibit the appearance of meeting together in dillerent points. They all seem to be the rude fragments ot pri¬ mitive mountains, which have been detached from t great continent in the lapse of ages. Condole lies m 8° 40' North Lat. and 105° 55' E. Long. The English at one period had a settlement here, bu being driven from it by some Malay soldiers in t leir pay, probably for some unjustifiable treatment, noJU- ropeans, it is said, have resided in it ever since. VY ^ ftey are a kind of longed chores: have granulated antennae j and some ot them, in their most a paity tliey PUL [ 495 ] PUL they were welcomed by the natives with much urbanity It nearly answered in f ,, , of manners, and conducted to the house of their chief! nuished from the „ t ajliul? i' f®?6’38 J:st!n- Polpitnm, — j j — tijuv/u ui uctui of manners, and conducted to the house of their chief. Their dress consisted chiefly of blue cotton garments hanging loosely about them; and their flat faces and no¬ ses seemed to denote that they were descended from the Chinese. A missionary being of the party, could not understand their language as they spoke it 5 but as soon as committed to writing it was perfectly intelligible to him. This led to the conclusion, that the inhabitants of Pulo-Condore were originally Cochin Chinese, who fled from their own country in consequence of their at¬ tachment to one of its sovereigns who had been dethro¬ ned by a number of his own subjects. Here the squadron was to purchase provisions, and the people promised to have the proposed quantity in readi¬ ness, if possible, at the appointed time. Next morning, a party of pleasure went from the Hindostan to a small island near Pulo-Condore ; but being apprehensive of an approaching storm, they made towards the ship with all convenient speed. The weather again becominP- fa¬ vourable, they set off for the island again, and were astonished, on their arrival, to find it wholly abandoned. In the principal cabin a letter was found, written in the Chinese language, expressing their terror at the arrival of such great ships and powerful persons ; not being able to satisfy their demands as to cattle and other provisions the poor inhabitants of Pulo-Condore having scarcely any to supply, they therefore fled to preserve their lives’- declared themselves to be few in number, and very poor, but honest 5 and concluded with requesting the great people to have pity on them, as they had left their all behind, and earnestly implored them not to burn their cabins. • The Serous English left them an intimation that they called merely for refreshment on fair and equitable terms, without harbouring against them any evil de¬ signs. They claimed a connection to a civilized nation, actuated by principles of humanity, by which they were prohibited from plundering or doing injury to others who might have the misfortune to be fewer or weaker than themselves. No doubt the poor terrified inhabi¬ tants would be agreeably surprised to find, on their re¬ turn, not only that all their tents were in perfect safety but that nothing was either disturbed or removed, and a small present left to their chief in the principal dwelling. FuLo-Lingen, another island of the cluster mention¬ ed above, is of some extent, though inferior in size to xulo-Condore. It is chiefly remarkable for a mountain in its centre, terminating in a fork like Parnassus, but denominated by mariners the ears. The people of •Lord Macartney’s squadron were constantly discoverino- new islands, many of which were clothed with verdure : some had lolly trees growing upon them $ others were not iing but naked rocks, the resort of innumerable birds, and whitened with their dung. Pm 2 PeNA]'TG- See Prime of Wales's Island. , in Pharmacy^ the fleshy and succulent parts 0 ruits extracted by infusion or boiling, and passed through a sieve. PULPIT, an elevated place in a church, whence sermons are delivered. The French give the same name to a reading desk. PULPITUM, in the Grecian and Roman theatres, as a p ace where the players performed their parts. It as °wer than the scena, and higher than the orchestra. guished from the pit and galleries. Pulphum was'aiso a moveable desk or pulpit, from which disputants pro- works^ t ieir dlSSertations’ and authors recited their • PUPSE, m the animal economy, denotes the beat- ing or throbbing of the heart and arteries. No doctrine has been involved in more difficulties rnnnf f U° P T ’■ ^'"8 * Ph Vsiological ac¬ count of them, physicians have espoused quite opposite sentiments 5 whilst some doubt whether the pulse is ow¬ ing to the systole or diastole ; as also, whether the mo- ion of the heart and arteries is one and the same, for a moment of time. ’ ’ M ith regard to motion, the pulses are reckoned only four 5 great and little, quick and slow. When quick¬ ness and greatness are joined together, it becomes vio- , ’ a"d when ,ti 18 li,;.tle slow it is called a weak puise. 1 bey are also said to be frequent and rare, equal and unequal; but these are not the essential affections ol motion. Frequency and quickness are often con¬ founded with each other. A pulse is said to be hard or sojt, with regard to the artery, according as it is tense, renitent, and hard, or flaccid, soft, and lax : for the disposition of the arteries contributes greatly to the change of the pulse ; wherefore it sometimes happens, tnat the pulse in both arms is not alike, which is very common in a hemiplexy. Add to these a convulsive pulse, which does not proceed from the blood, but from the state of the artery ; and is known by a tre¬ mulous subsultory motion, and the artery seems to be drawn upwards this, in acute fevers, is the sign of death j and is said to be the pulse in dying persons, which is likewise generally unequal and intermitting. A great pulse shows a more copious afflux of the blood to the heart, and from thence into the arteries : a little pulse the contrary. The pulses of persons differ according to the large¬ ness of the heart and vessels, the quantity and tempe- nes of the blood, the elastic force of the canals 5 as al¬ so with regard to the sex, age, season, air, motion, food, sleep, watchings, and passions of the mind. The pulse is larger and more quick in men than in women j in the bilious and sanguineo-bilious, than in the phlegma¬ tic and melancholic. Those who are lean, with tense fibres, and large vessels, have a greater and a stronger pulse, than those that are obese, with lax fibres and small vessels ; whence they are more healthy, robust, and apt for labour. In children, the pulse is quick and soft; in adults greater and more violent. In the old* it is commonly.great, hard, and slow. Labour, mo¬ tion, and exercise of the body, increase the circulation of the blood, the excretions, and particularly respira¬ tion ; rest renders the circulation slow- and weak ; in¬ tense speaking increases the circulation, and consequent¬ ly renders the pulse large and quick. In watching, the pulse is more evident; in sleep, more slow and languid. After drinking hot things, such as coffee and tea, or hot bath-waters, as well as after meals, the pulse vi¬ brates more quick. But nothing produces a greater change in the pulse than affections of the mind: in terror, it is unequal, small, and contracted : in joy, fre¬ quent and great; in anger, quick and hard ; in sadness, slow, small, deep, and weak ; and in intense study, lan¬ guid and weak. With regard to the air, when, after the predominancy Pulse. PUL [49 I’dlsc, predominancy of a west or soutli wind, it becomes north Pultcney. or east, the pulse is stronger and larger ; as also when “v the quicksilver rises in the barometer. But when the atmosphere is dense, humid, rainy, with a long south wind; as also where the life is sedentary, the sleep long, and the season autumnal, the pulse is languid and small, and the perspiration decreased. In May it is great, and sometimes violent; in the middle of summer, quick but weak; in the autumn, slow, soft, and weak ; in the winter, hard and great. A drastic purge and an emetic render the pulse hard, quick, and weak, with loss of strength ; chalybeates, and the bark, render it great and robust, and the complexion lively ; volatiles amplify and increase the pulse ; acids and nitrous re¬ medies refrigerate the body, and appease the pulse ; opiates and the like render it small and weak, and de¬ crease the elasticity of the solids ; and poisons render it small, contracted, and hard. When the quantity of the blood is too great, bleeding raises the pulse. Pulse, is also used for the stroke with which any medium is affected by the motion of light, sound, &c. through it. Sir Isaac Newton demonstrates, that the velocities of the pulses in an elastic fluid medium (whose elasticity is proportionable to its density) are in a ratio compounded of half the ratio of the elastic force directly, and half the ratio of the density inversely ; so that in a medium whose elasticity is equal to its density, all pulses will be equally swift. Pulse, in Botany, a term applied to all those grains or seeds which are gathered with the hand ; in contra¬ distinction to corn, &c. which are reaped, or mowed : or, It is the seed of the leguminous kind of plants, as beans, vetches, &c.; but is by some used for artichokes, asparagus, &c. PULTENEY, William, the famous-opposer of Sir Robert Walpole in parliament, and afterward earl of Bath, was descended from one of the most ancient fa¬ milies in the kingdom, and was born in 1682. Being well qualified in fortune, he early procured a seat in the house of commons, and distinguished himself as a warm partisan against Queen Anne’s ministry ; whose errors he had sagacity to detect, and spirited eloquence to ex¬ pose. When King George I. came to the throne, Mr Pulteney was made secretary at war, and soon after cofferer to the king’s household; but the good under¬ standing between this gentleman and Sir Robert Y al- pole, who then acted as prime minister, was interrupted in 1725, on a suspicion that Walpole was desirous of extending the limits of prerogative, and of promoting the interests of Hanover, to the prejudice of those of Britain. His opposition to Sir Robert was indeed car¬ ried to such indiscriminate lengths, that some have been of opinion he often acted against measures beneficial to the public, merely from personal motives. It would be impracticable here to trace his parliamentaiy conduct . so it must suffice to observe in general, that he became so obnoxious to the crown, that in 173* king called for the council-book, and with his own hand struck out bis name from the list of privy-counsellors ; a proceed- i ] P U M ing that only served to inflame his resentment and in- pnjtl crease his popularity. Thus he still continued to at- |j tack the minister with a severity of eloquence and sar- Pu» casm that worsted every antagonist ; so that Sir Robert 0 was heard to declare, he dreaded that man’s tongue more than another man’s sword. At length, when Walpole found the place of prime minister no longer tenable, and resigned in 1741, among other promotions Mr Pulteney resumed his place in the privy-council, and was created earl of Bath ; a title purchased at the expence of that popularity which afterward he naturally enough affected to contemn. In 1760, toward the close of the war, he published A Letter to two Great Men, recommending proper articles to be insisted on in a treaty of peace; which, though the writer was then unknown, was greatly applauded, and went through several im¬ pressions. He died in 1764 ; and as his only son died before him, the title became extinct. PULVERIZATION, the art of pulverizing, or reducing a dry body into a fine powder ; which is per¬ formed m friable bodies by pounding or beating them \ in a mortar, &c ; but to pulverize malleable ones, j other methods must be taken. 1 o pulverize lead, or tin, the method is this : Rub a round wooden box all over the inside with chalk ; pour a little of the melted metal nimbly into the box ; when shutting the lid, and shaking the box briskly, the metal will be reduced to powder. PUMEX, the Pumice-stone. See Mineralogy Index. Pumice-stone is used in some mechanical arts ; as for rubbing and smoothing the surface of metals, wood, pasteboard, and stone ; for which it is well fitted by reason of its harsh and brittle texture ; thus scouring and carrying off the little inequalities from the surfaces just mentioned. PUMICE-stone. See Mineralogy Index. PUMP, an hydraulic machine for raising water by means of the pressure ef the atmosphere. It would be an entertaining and not an uninstruc-Oftbl- tive piece of information to learn the progressive stepsveuti f>f by which the ingenuity of man has invented the variousP™!1 methods of raising water. A pump must be considered as the last step of this progress. Common as it is, and overlooked even by the curious, it is a very abstruse and refined invention. Nothing like it has been found in any of the rude nations whom the restless spirit of the Europeans has discovered, either in the new continent of America, or the islands of the Pacific ocean. Nay, it was unknown in the cultivated empire of China at the time of our arrival there by sea; and it is still a ra¬ rity everywhere in Asia, in places unfrequented by the Europeans. It does not appear to have been known to the Greeks and Romans in early times; and perhaps it came from Alexandria, where physical and mathemati¬ cal science was much cultivated by the Greek school un¬ der the protection of the Ptolemies. The performances of Ctesibius and Hero are spoken of by Pliny and Vitru¬ vius as curious novelties (a). It is perhaps not difficult to trace the steps by which those mechanicians were len (a) In the early Greek writings, it does not appear that the words cu.Xitv, &c. jraWlng of press any thing like what we call a pump. In all these passages the words eit.ui expiess gt y water, 'Plate :ccxlix, fig-1- 2 csibius’s 1 p v u r 4 ?nmP. ‘0 the invention. The Egyptian wheel was a common —/ 'machine all over Asia, and is still in use in the remotest corners, and was brought by the Saracens into Spain where it is st. livery common under its ancient name NORIA. A he Danish missionaries found in a remote village in the kingdom of Siam the immediate off-sprin-r of the noria (Lettres Edifiantc.s et Curieuses). It was a wheel turned by an ass, and carrying round, not a string of earthen pots, but a string of wisps of hay which it drew through a wooden trunk. This rude chain-pump was m frequent use for watering the rice fields. It is highly probably that it is of great antiquity, although we do not recollect its being mentioned by anv of the Greek or Roman writers. The Arabs and ^Indians were nothing less than innovators j and we may suppose with great safety, that what arts we now find amono- them they possessed in very remote periods. Now the step from this to the pump is but short, though it is nice and refined ; and the forcing pump of Ctesfbius is the easiest and most natural. Let AB (fig. i.) be the surface of the water in the well, and D the height where it is to he delivered. Let DC he a long wooden trunk, reaching as deep under water as possible. Let the rope EF be fitted with its knot of hay F. When it is drawn up through the trunk, it will bring up along with it all the water lying between C and A, which will begin to run out by the spout D as soon as the knot gets to G, as far below D as C is below A. All this is very obvious: and it re¬ quired but little reflection to be assured, that if F was let down again, or pushed down, by a rod instead of a rope, it would again perform the same office. Here is a very simple pump. And if it was ever put in prac¬ tice, it behoved to show the supporting power of the at¬ mosphere, because the water would not only he lifted by the knot, but would even follow it. The imper¬ fection of this pump behoved to appear at first sight, and to suggest its remedy. By pushing down the knot F, which we shall henceforth call the piston, all the force expended in lifting up the water between A and G is thrown away, because it is again let down. A valve G, at the bottom would pervent this. But then there must be a passage made for the water by a lateral tube KBD (fig. 2.) And if this be also furnished with a valve H, to prevent its losing the water, we have the pump of Ctesibius, as sketched in fig. 2. The valve is the great refinement: but perhaps even this had made its appearance before in the noria. For, in the more perfect kinds of these machines, the pots have a stop or valve in their bottom, which hangs open while the pot descends with its mouth downwards, and then allows it to fill readily in the cistern : whereas, without the valve, it would occasion a double load to the wheel. If we suppose that the valve had made its appearance so Pumr*. ] P U M Tly; '1 ■'V,0t ''";’r"hal,lc tllat Hie common m,m» sketched m fig 3. w.s as old a, llmt of ClesilmJ | tin, place we shall first give a short description of the % j. hief varieties of these engines, considering them in their simplest form, and we shall explain in very general terms their mode ol operation. We shall then give a concise and popular theory of their operation, furnishing nrinci- p es to direct us in their construction 5 and we shall con¬ clude with the description of a few peculiarities which may contribute to their improvement or perfection. Ihere are but two sorts of pumps which essentially ditfer; and all the varieties that we see are only modi fications of these. One of these original pumps has a solid piston; the-other has a piston with a perforation and a valve. W e usually call the first a forcing pump and the second a lifting or sucking pump. . 2- 18 a sketch of the forcing pump in its mostForciL V"1 ag ‘ a'U Sltuatl0n- consists of a hollow cylin- pump de- der AC c a, called the working barrel, open at both'cribecI- ends and having a valve G at the bottom, opening ,m-FiS- 2> wards. 1 his cylinder is filled by a solid piston EF co¬ vered externally with leather or tow, by which means it fits the box of the cylinder exactly, and allows no water to escape by its sides. There is a pipe KHD, which communicates laterally with this cylinder, and has a valve at some convenient place H, as near as possible to its junction with the cylinder. This valve also opens upwards. This pipe, usually called the rising pipe, or main, terminates at the place D, where the water must be delivered. Now suppose this apparatus set into the water, soltsmldeof that the upper end of the Cylinder may be under or even operation, with the surface of the water AB; the water will open the valve G, and after filling the barrel and lateral pipe, will also open the valve H, and at last stand at an equal height within and without. Now let the piston he put in at the top of the working barrel, and thrust down to K. It will push the water before it. This will shut the valve G, and the water will make its way through the valve H, and fill a part B 6 of the rising pipe, equal to the internal capacity of the working bar¬ rel. When this downward motion of the piston ceases, the valve H will fall down by its own weight and shut this passage. Now let the piston he drawn up again : I he valve H hinders the water in the rising pipe horn returning into the working barrel. But now the valve G is opened by the pressure of the external water, and the water enters and fills the cylinder as the piston rises. When the piston has got to the top, let it be thrust doxvn again : T he valve G will again be shut, and the water will be forced through the passage at PI, and rise along the main, pushing before it the water already there, and will now have its surface at L. Repeating this operation, the water must at last arrive at D, how- water, or, more particularly, the drawing it with a bucket or something similar. ’Atrtos, which is the primitive, is drain, sink, or receptacle for collecting scattered water, either for use, or to get rid of it; hence it came to S1£aiv.l‘ie sink or well of a ship; and uvrtei* was synonymous with our verb “ to bale the boat.” (Odyss. O. 476 1VI. 411. Eurip. Hecuba, 1025). ’ArrAioi is the vessel or bucket with which water is drawn. ’ArrXix is the prooably a bucket and rope. Vol.' XVII. Part H. 3E P U M t 498 i P U M Pump ever remote, and the next stroke would raise it to e. Hie water j this, especially in deep wells, makes it of dimcolt access tor repairs, and requires long piston rods Tins would not do in a forcing pump, because they would bend. - J We have supposed, in our account of the lifting pump, that the rise ot the piston always terminated at the sur¬ face of the water in the cistern. This we did in order that the barrel might always be filled by the pressure of the surrounding water. But let us suppose that the rise of the piston does not end here, and that it is gradually drawn up to the very top : it is plain that the pressure of the atmosphere is by this means taken off from the water in the pipe (see Pneumatics), while it remains pressing on the water of the cistern. It will therefore cause the water to follow the piston as it rises thrornrh the pipe, and it will raise it in this way 33 feet at a me- oium. If, therefore, the spout D is not more than 33 feet above the surface of the water in the cistern, the pipe will be full of water when the piston is at 1). ’ Let it be pushed down to the bottom ; the water will remain in the pipe, because the valve G will shut: and thus we may give the piston a stroke of any length not ex¬ ceeding 33 feet. It we raise it higher than this, the water will not follow 5 but it will remain in the pipe, to be lifted by the piston, after it has been pushed down through it to the bottom. But it is not necessary, and would be very inconve¬ nient, to give the piston so long a stroke. The great use of a pump is to render effectual the reciprocation of a short stroke which we can command, while such a long stroke is generally out of our power. Suppose that the piston is pushed down only to b ; it will then have a column b f incumbent on it, and it will lift this column when again drawn up. And this operation may be repeated like the former, when the piston was always under water ; for the pressure of the atmosphere will al¬ ways cause the water to follow the piston to the height Of 33 feet. Nor is it necessary that the fixed valve G be placed at the lower orifice of the pipe, nor even under water, lor, while things are in the state now described, the piston drawn up to f, and the whole pipe full of wa¬ ter ; if we suppose another valve placed at b above the surface of the cistern, this valve can do no harm. Now let the piston descend, both valves G and b will sluit. G may now be removed, and the water will remain sup¬ ported in the space £ G by the air; and now the alter¬ nate motions of the piston will produce the same effect as before. We found in the former case that the piston was car¬ rying a load equal to the weight of a pillar of water of the height AT), because the surrounding water could only support it at its own level. Let us see what change is produced by the assistance of the pressure of the at- mosphefe. Let the under surface of the piston be at b ; when the piston was at y, 33 feet above the surface of the cistern, the water was raised to that height by the pressure of the atmosphere. Supjrose a partition made at A by a thin plate, and all the water above it taken away. Now piece a hole in this plate. The pressure of the atmosphere was able to carry the whole column fa. Part of this column is now removed, and the re¬ mainder is not a balance for the air’s pressure. This will therefore cause the water to spout up through this hole and rise to f. Therefore the under surface of this [ 499 ] P U M ? le.' P1'eSscI'.llj> the contiguous water with a force p„m„ equal to the weight ot that pillar of water which it for- merly supported ; that is, with a force equal to the weight o the pillary b. Now the under snrthce of the piston, when at A, is in the same situation. It is pressed upwards by the water below it, with a force equal to the weight of the column/4: But it is pressed downwards by the whole pressure of the atmosphere, which presses on all bodies 5 that is, with the weight of the pillar fa. Un the whole, therefore, it is pressed downwards by a force equal to the difference of the weights of the pillars 1 an,, ^ 1 that 1S» a force erpnt In .v, c pipe must generally have. The third LNOM is pro¬ perly the beginning of the main, and is continued to the place ol delivery. At the joint IX there is a hanging valve or clack S; and there is a valve R on the top of the suction-pipe. . r^^ie piston IJQ L V is solid, and is fastened to a stout iron rod which goes through it, and is fixed by a key drawn through its end. The body of the piston is a sort of double cone, widening from the middle to each ond, and is covered with two bands of very strong lea- Ger, fitted to it in the manner already described. quite indifferent in this respect what is the diameter of the rising pipe ; because the pressure on the piston de¬ pends on the altitude of the water only, independent of its quantity. We shall even see that a small rising pipe will require a greater force to convey the water along it to any given height or distance. When we would employ a pump to raise water in a crooked pipe, or in any pipe of moderate dimensions, this form of pump, or something equivalent, must be* used. In bringing up great quantities of water from mines, the common sucking-pump is generally employ¬ ed. P U M [ 5°+ 3 P U M Pump. 25 - Measure et the quanti¬ ty of water delivered by any pump. 25 The opera tion of pumps not equable; 27 and the mode of making them so. r*g-13 ed, as real’y the best of them all j but it is ibe mo»t ex¬ pensive, because it requires the pipe to be perpendicu¬ lar, straight, and of great dimensions, that it may con¬ tain the piston rods. But this is impracticable when the pipe is crooked. If the forcing pump, constructed in the manner now described, be employed, we cannot use forcers with long rods. These would bend when pushed down by then further extremity. In this case, it is usual to employ only a short and stiff rod, and to hang it by a chain, and load it with a weight superior to the weight of wa¬ ter to be raised by it. The machinery therefore is em¬ ployed, not in forcing the water along the rising pipe, but in raising the weight which is to produce this effect by its subsequent descent. In this case, it would be much better to employ the lifting-pump of fig. II. For as the load on the forcers must be greater than the resistances which it must sur¬ mount, the force exerted by the machine must in like manner be greater than this load. This double excess would be avoided by using the lifting-pump. It will readily occur to the reader that the quantity of water delivered by any pump will be in the joint pro¬ portion of the surface or base of the piston and its velo¬ city : for this measures the capacity of the part of the working barrel which the piston passes over. The velo¬ city of the water in the conduit pipe, and in its passage through every valve, will be greater or less than the ve¬ locity0if the piston, in the same proportion that the area of the piston or working barrel is greater or less than the area of the conduit or valve. For whatever quantity of water passes through any section of the working band in a second, the same quantity must go through any one of these passages. This enables us to modify the velocity of the water as we please; ive can increase it to any de¬ gree at the place of delivery by diminishing the aper¬ ture through which it passes, provided we apply suffi¬ cient force to the piston. It is evident that the operation of a pump is by starts, and that the water in the main remains at rest, pressing on the valve during the time that the piston is withdrawn from the bottom of the working barrel. It is in most cases desirable to have this motion equable, and in some cases it is absolutely necessary. Thus, in the engine for extinguishing fires, the spout of water going by jerks could never be directed with a certain aim, and half of the water would be lost by the way ; because a body at rest cannot in an instant be put in rapid motion, and the first portion of every jerk of water would have but a small velocity. A very ingenious contrivance lias been fallen upon for obviating this inconvenience, and pro¬ curing a stream nearly equable. We have not been able to discover the author. At any convenient part of the rising-pipe beyond the valve S there is annexed a capa¬ cious’ vessel VZ (fig. 13. N° 1. and 2.) close a-top, and of great strength. When the water is forced along this pipe, part of it gets into this vessel, keeping the air con¬ fined above it, and it fills it to such a height V, that the elasticity of the confined air balances a column reaching to T, we shall suppose, in the rising-pipe. The next stroke of the piston sends forward more water, which would fill the rising-pipe to some height above T. But the pressure of this additional column causes some more of it to go into the air vessel, and compress its air so much more that its elasticity now balances a longer co- J lumu. Every succeeding stroke of the piston produces a like effect. The water rises higher in the main pipe, but '■ some more of it goes into the air vessel. At last the wa¬ ter appears at the place of delivery } aud the air in the air vessel is now so much compressed that its elasticity balances the pressure of the whole column. I he next stroke of the piston sends forward some more water. If the diameter of the orifice of the main be sufficient to let the water flow out with a velocity equal to that of the piston, it will so flow out, rising no higher, and pro¬ ducing no sensible addition to the compression in the air vessel. But if the orifice of the main be contract¬ ed to half its dimensions, the water sent forward by the piston cannot flow out in the time of the stroke without a greater velocity, and therefore a greater force. Part of it, therefore, goes into the air vessel, and increases the compression. When the piston has ended its stroke, and no more water comes forward, the compression ol the air in the air vessel being great¬ er than what was sufficient to balance the pressure of the water in the main pipe, now forces out some of the water which is lying below it. Ibis cannot return towards the pump, because the valve S is now shut. It therefore goes forward along the main, and produces an efflux during the time of the piston’s rising in or¬ der to make another stroke. In order that this efflux may be very equable, the air vessel must be very large. If it he small, the quantity of water that is discharged by it during the return of the piston makes so great a portion of its capacity, that the elasticity of the confined air is too much diminished by this enlargement of its hulk, and the rate of efflux must diminish accordingly. The capacity of the air vessel should be so great that the change of bulk of the compressed air during the in¬ action of the piston may be inconsiderable. It must therefore be very strong. It is pretty indifferent in what way this air vessel is connected with the rising-pipe. It may join it lateral¬ ly, as in fig. 13. N° I. and the main pipe go on with¬ out interruption ; or it may be made to surround an Tti; N* 2. It interruption of the main pipe, as in fig. 13 may also be in any part of the main pipe. If the sole effect intended by it is to produce an equable jet, as in ornamental water-works, it may be near the end of the main. This will require much less strength, because there remains but a short column of water to compress the air in it. But it is, on the whole, more advanta¬ geous to place it as near the pump as possible, that it may produce an equable motion in the whole main pipe. This is of considerable advantage : when a column of water several hundred feet long is at rest in the main pipe, and the piston at one end of it put at once into motion, even with a moderate velocity, the strain on the pipe would be very great. Indeed if it were possible to put the piston instantaneously into motion with a finite velocity, the strain on the pipe, tending to burst it, would be next to infinite. But this seems impossible in The*™' nature 5 all changes of motion which we observe are gia- tor) ,'fe ■urii dual, because all impelling bodies have some elaStlClty tije or softness by which they yield to compression. And, in the way in which pistons are commonly moved, viz. by cranks or something analogous to them, the motion is verif sensibly gradual. But still the air vessel tends to make the motion along the main pipe less desultory, and therefore diminishes those strains wliich would really take place toni P U M 1 Pump. 29 rrected. place m the main-pipe. It acts like the sprin^of a tfavellmg-carfiage, whose jolts arc incomparably less tnan those oi a cart 5 and by this means really enables a given force to propel a greater quantity of water in the same time. 1 505 ] P U M foot liigl], am! this would just balance the compression in the air-vessel, which maintains this velocity during tne non-action of the piston. It is, however, a matter ot tact, that a pump furnished with an air-vessel delivers We may here by the way observe that tb. ofi. * f, So- m°re '?ater !Lan k ‘lo without it. But of mechanicians to correct this unequal motion 3 V 6 * * ,eren?e llePen<^s on the combination of many very ’ - ' ’ ’ - • 9 al m0tlon °f the dissimilar circumstances, which it is extremely difficult Pump. 3° : on a piston-rod are misplaced, and if it could be done would greatly hurt a pump. One of the best methods of pro¬ ducing this ellect is to make the piston-rod consist of two parallel bars, having teeth in the sides which front each other. Let a toothed wheel be placed between them having only the half of its circumference furnished with teeth. It is evident, without any farther description that if tins wheel he turned uniformly round its axis the piston-rod will be moved uniformly up and down with¬ out intermission. This has often been put in practice • but the machine always went by jolts, and seldom lasted a lew days. Unskilled mechanicians attributed this to defect in the execution : but the fault is essential and lies in the principle. I he machine could not perform one stroke if the *:»prin-first mover did not slacken a little, or the different parts or the machine did not yield by bending or by compres¬ sion ; and no strength of materials could withstand the violence of the strains at every reciprocation of the mo¬ tion. This is chiefly experienced in great works which are put in motion by a water-wheel, or some other equal power exerted o'n the mass of matter of which the machine consists. The water-wheel being of great weight, moves with considerable steadiness or unifor- , mitj ; and when an additional resistance is opposed to it by the beginning of a new stroke of the piston, its great quantity of motion is but little affected by this addition, and it proceeds very little retarded ; and the machine must either yield a little by bending and com¬ pression, or go to pieces, which is the common event. Cranks are free from this inconvenience, because they accelerate the piston gradually, and bring it gradually to rest, while the water-wheel moves round with almost perfect uniformity. The only inconvenience (and it may be considerable) attending this slow motion of the piston at the beginning of its stroke is, that the valves do not shut with rapidity, so that some water gets back through them. But when they are properly formed and loaded, this is but trifling. We must not imagine, that because the stream pro Borne of these will be meu- r ■equa- dnced by the assistance of an air-barrel is almost uer- __ _ 1 i ii ' very hore mctly equable, and because as much water runs out du- jhan ring the returning of the piston as during its active stroke, it therefore doubles the quantity of water. No more water can run out than what is sent forward by the piston during its effective stroke. The continued stream is produced only by preventing the whole of tuis water from being discharged during this time, and by providing a propelling force to act during the piston’s return. Nor does it enable the moving force of the pi¬ ston to produce a double effect: for the compression which is produced in the air-vessel, more than what is necessary lor merely balancing the quiescent column of water, reacts on the piston, resisting its compression just as much as the column of water would do which pro- uces a velocity equal to that of the efflux. Thus if the Water is made to spout with the velocity of eight feet per second, this would require an additional column of one Vol. XVII. part H. to bring into calculation, tioned afterwards. lo describe, or even to enumerate, the immense va¬ riety of combinations of these three simple pumps would hll a volume. We shall select a few, which are more deserving ol notice. L The common sucking-pump may, by a small ad-The JX (i ion, be converted into a lilting pump, fitted for pro-ing-pump pe ing the water to any distance, and with any velo-convei’ted City- ' into a lift- A^Vfn1,4' is a 8uck,’nS-Pum!>’ whose working-barrel inLpump' AGDB has a lateral pipe xiEGHF connected with it FS' I4‘ close to the top. This terminates in a main or rising pipe IK, furnished or not with a valve L. The top of the barrel is shut up by a strong plate MN, havino- a hollow neck terminating in a small flanch. The pistoS rod Uii passes through this neck, and is nicely turned and polished. A number of rings of leather are put over tne rod, and strongly compressed round it by an¬ other flanch and several screwed bolts, as is represented at OP. By this contrivance the rod is closely grasped by the leathers, but may be easily drawn up and down, while all passage of air or water is effectually pre¬ vented. i he piston S is perforated, and furnished with a valve opening upwards. There is also a valve T 011 the top of the suction-pipe YX; and it will be of ad¬ vantage, though not absolutely necessary, to put a valve L at the bottom of the rising pipe. Now suppose the piston at the bottom of the working-barrel. 'When it is drawn up, it tends to compress the air above it, be¬ cause the valve in the piston remains shut by its own weight. The air therefore is driven through the valve L into the rising pipe, and escapes. In the mean time, the air which occupied the small space between the pi¬ ston and the valve T expands into the upper part of the working-barrel j and its elasticity is so much dimi¬ nished thereby, that the atmosphere presses the water of the cistern into the suction-pipe, where it will rise till an equilibrium is again produced. The next down¬ ward stroke of the piston allows the air, which had come from the suction-pipe into the barrel during the ascent of the piston, to get through its valve. Upon drawing up this piston, the air is also drawn off through the rising pipe. Repeating this process brings the wa¬ ter at last into the working-barrel, and it is then driven along the rising-pipe by the piston. This is one of the best forms of a pump. The ra-^ refaction may he very perfect, because the piston can 0fthts'coiT-8 be brought so near to the bottom of the working-version, barrel : and, for forcing water in opposition to great pressures, it appears preferable to the common forcing- pump ; because in that the piston rods are compressed and exposed to bending, which greatly hurts the pump by wearing the piston and barrel on one side. This soon renders it less tight, and much water squirts out by the sides of the piston. But in this pump the piston rod is always drawn or pulled, which keeps it straight j f 3 S and Pomp. 34 Equable stieani1? tions. P U M ' t S°6 and rods exert a much greater force in opposition to a pull than ia opposition to compression, ihe collar of leather round the piston-rods is found hy experience to need very little repairs, and is very impervious to water. The whole is very accessible for repairs and in this re¬ spect much preferable to the common pump in deep mines, where every fault of the piston obliges us to draw up some hundred leet ot piston-rods. Ly tins addition, too, any common pump tbr the service ol a house is converted into an engine for extinguishing lire, or may be made to convey the water to every part of the house > and this without hurting or obstructing its common uses. All that is necessary is to have a large cock on the upper part of the working barrel oppo¬ site to the lateral pipe in this figure. This cock serves for a spout when the pump is used for common pur¬ poses : and the merely shutting this cock converts the whole into an engine for extinguishing fire or lor sup- plyincr distant plates with water. It is scarcely neces¬ sary to add, that for these services it will be proper to connect an air-vessel with some convenient part of the rising pipe, in order that the current of the water may he continual. c We have frequently spoken of the advantages ot a proved incontiom d current in the main pipe. U all gfMt works g’-f-at works a considerable degree o» uniformity is pi o u by combina- manner of disposing the actions of the different pumps *, for it b very rarely that a machine works hut one pump. In order t» maintain some uniformity in the resistance, that it may not all he opposed at once tC) movin'* power, with intervals of total inaction, which would ^produce a very hobbling motion, it is usual to distribute the work into portions, which succeed alter¬ nately *, and thus both diminish the strain, and give greater uniformity of action, and frequently enable a natural power which we can command, to perform a piece of work, which would be impossible if the whole resistance were opposed at once. In all pump ma¬ chines, therefore, we are obviously directed to construct them so that they may give motion to at least two pumps, which work alternately. By tins means a much greater uniformity of current is produced in the main pipe It will he rendered still more uniform if four are employed, succeeding each other at the interval of one quarter of the time of a complete stroke. ingenious men have attempted the same thing »8i"g,e pun'i>’am’ for this purpose have been proposed and executed. The thing is not of much importance, or of great re¬ search. We shall content ourselves therefore with the description of one that appears to us the most perfect, both in respect of simplicity and effect. XI. It consists of a working-barrel AB (fig. 15.) close at both ends. The piston C is solid, and the rod OP passes through a collar of leathers in the plate, which closes the upper end ot the working-barrel. 1 his barrel communicates laterally with two pipr-s II, Iv ; the communications m and n being as near to the top and bottom of the barrel as possible. Adjoining to the passage m are two valves l4 and C* opening upwaids. Similar valves accompany the passage n. The two pipes H and K unite in a larger rising pipe L. 1 hey are all represented as in the same plane *, but the upp^r ends must be bent backwards, to give room for the motion of the piston-rod OP. .33 A single pump for Fij IS* ] P U M Suppose the piston close to the entry of the lateral pipe n, and that it is drawn up: it compresses the air'- above it, and drives it through the valve G, where it escapes along the rising pipe ; at the same time it rarefies the air in the space below it. Therefore the weight of the atmosphere shuts the valve E, and causes the water of the cistern to rise through the valve D, and fill the lower part of the pump. When the piston is pushed down again, this water is first driven through the valve E, because I) immediately shuts j and then most of the air which was in this part of the pump at the beginning goes up through it, some of the water coming back in its stead. In the mean time, the air which remained in the upper part of the pump after the ascent of the piston is rarefied by its descent *, because the valve G shuts as soon as the piston begins to de¬ scend, the valve F opens, the air in this suction pipe E /expands into the barrel, and tne water rises into the pipes by the pressure of the atmosphere. The next rise of the piston must bring more water into the lower part :ff the barrel, and must drive a little moie ^air through the valve G, namely, part of that which had come out of the suction-pipe E / ; and the next descent of the piston must drive more water into the rising pipe H, and along with it most if not all of the air which remained below the piston, and must larcfy still more the air remaining above the piston ; and more water will come in through the pipe T/j ami get into the barrel. It is evident, that a few repetitions will at last fill the barrel on both sides of the piston with water. When this is accomplished, there is no difficulty in per¬ ceiving how, at every rise ot the piston, tne water of the cistern will come in by the valve D, and the water- in the upper part of the barrel will he driven through the valve G and, in every descent of the piston, the water of the cistern will come into the barrel by the valve F, and the water below the piston will be driven through’the valve E: and thus there will be a continu¬ al influx into the barrel through the valves D and F, and a continual discharge along the rising pipe L through the valves E and G. r • • This machine is, to be sure, equivalent to two forerng It is eqt pumps, although it has but one barrel and one piston *,valentt but it has no sort of superiority. It is not even morejng pun economical in most cases -, because we apprehend that the additional workmanship will fully compensate ior the barrel and piston that is saved. There is indeed a saving in the rest of the machinery, because one lever produces both motions. We cannot therefore say that it is inferior to two pumps-, and we acknowledge that there is some ingenuity in the contrivance. We recommend to our readers the perusal of Bell-Author f dor’s Architecture Hydraulique, where is to be found a commei great variety of combinations and forms ot the simple6 pumps; but we must caution them with respect to Ins theories, which in this article are extremely defective. Also in Leopold’s Theat rum Machinarum Hydraulua- rum, there is a prodigious variety of all kinds ot pumps, many of them very singular and ingenious, and many which have particular advantages, which may suit local circumstances, and give them a preference. But it would he improper to swell a work ol this kind with so many peculiarities-, and a pt rson who makes himself master of the principles delivered here in sufficient de¬ tail, can be at no loss to suit a pump to his particular iews, 37 ttinirt df cor I# ItCCL iji suf .11 P u Pump. M [ 507 ] J"1166 of tl,e “£rit o! sucl1 as mi>y l>e pro- air which had come posed to him We must now take notice of some very considerable and important varieties in the form and contrivance of 3S the essential parts of a pump. Udiffe* II/* Tre f°rCing pU,mp is sornetimes of a very differ- I ntly con- e!lt fo™ from that already described. Instead of a Pump, pructed. Plate piston, which applies itself to the inside of the barrel, and slides up and down in it, there is a Iona cylinder DCCCL. POQ (fig. 16.) nicely turned and polished on the out- *• ' side, and ot a diameter somewhat less than the inside of the barrel. Ibis cylinder (called a plunger) slides through a collar of leathers on the top of the working- barrel, and is constructed as follows. The top of the barrel terminates in a flanch al>, pierced with four holes for receiving screw-bolts. There are two rings of me¬ tal, c d, e f^ ol the same diameter, and having holes cor¬ responding to those in the flanch. Four rings of soft leather, of the same size, aud similarly pierced with holes, are well soaked in a mixture of oil, tallow, and a little rosin. T^wo ot these leather rings are laid on the pump flanch, and one of the metal rings above them. The plunger is then thrust down through them, by which it turns their inner edges downwards. The other two rings are then slipped on at the top of the plun¬ ger, and the second metal ring is put over them, and then the whole are slid down to the metal ring. By this the inner edges of the last leather rings are turned upwards. The three metal rings are now forced to¬ gether by the screwed bolts j and thus the leathern rings are strongly compressed between them, and made to grasp the plunger so closely that no pressure can force the water through between. The upper metal ring just allows the plunger to pass through it, but without any play : so that the turned-up edges of the leathern rings do not come up between the plunger and the upper metal ring, but are lodged in a little conical taper, which is given to the inner edge of the upper plate, its hole being wider below than above. It is on this trifling circumstance that the great tightness of the collar depends. To prevent the leathers from shrinking by drought, there is usually a little cistern formed round the head of the pump, and kept full of water. The plunger is either forced down by a rod from a working beam, or by a set of metal weights laid on it, p as is represented in the figure, h ode of It is hardly necessary to be particular in explaining the operation ot this pump. When the plunger is at the bottom of the barrel, touching the fixed valve M with its lower extremity, it almost completely fills it. That it may do it completely, there is sometimes a small pipe R.SZ branching out from the top of the barrel, and fitted with a cock at S. Water is admitted till the barrel is completely filled, and the cock is then shut. Now when the plunger is drawn up, the valve N in the rising pipe must remain shut by the pressure of the at¬ mosphere, and a void must be made in the barrel. There¬ fore the valve M on the top of the suction-pipe must be opened by the elasticity of the air in this pipe, and the air must expand into the barrel j and being no longer a balance for the atmosphere, the water in the cistern must be forced into the suction-pipe, and rise in it to a certain height. When the plunger descends, it must drive the water through the valve N (for the valve M will immediately shut), and along with it most of the P U M . into tlle barrel. And as this air occupied the upper part of the barrel, part of it will re- v— mam when the plunger has reached the bottom ; but a stroke or two will expel it all, and then every succeed¬ ing stroke of the descending piston will drive the water along the rising pipe, and every ascent of the plunger W,H be followed by the water from the cistern. Ihe advantage proposed by this form of piston is that it may be more accurately made and polished than the inside of a working barrel, and it is of much easier repair. Yet we do not find that it is much used, al¬ though an invention of the lytli^ century (we think by Sir Samuel Morland), and much praised by the writers on these subjects. It is easy to see that the sucking-pump may be vari-Sucklng- ed in the same way. Suppose this plunger to be open PumP simi- both at top and bottom, but the bottom filled with a va~ valve opening upward. When this is pushed to the11^* bottom of the barrel, the air which it tends to com- piess lifts the valve (the lateral pipe I IK being taken away and the, passage shut up), and escapes through the plunger. When it is drawn up, it makes the same ra¬ refaction as the solid plunger, because the valve at O shuts, anti the water will come up from the cistern as in the former case. If the plunger be now thrust down again, the valve AI shuts, the valve O is forced open, aud the plunger is filled with water. This will be lifted by it during its next ascent; and when it is pushed down again, the water which filled it must now be push¬ ed out, and will flow over its sides into the cistern at the head of the barrel. Instead of making the valve at the bottom of the piston, it may be made at the top 5 but this disposition is much inferior, because it cannot rare¬ fy the air in the barrel one half. This is e%-ident ; for the capacity of the barrel and plunger together cannot be twice the capacity of the barrel. IV. It may be made after a still different form, as Another represented in fig. ty. Here the suction pipe CO'01"011*1® comes up through a cistern KMNIj deeper or longer I '.iou. than the intended stroke of the piston, and has a valve Fi^. 17. C at top. The piston, or what acts in lieu of it, is a tube AHGB, open at both ends, and of a diameter somewhat larger than that of the suction pipe. The interval between them is filled up at HG by a ring or belt of soft leather, which is fastened to the outer tube, and moves up and down with it, sliding along the smoothly polished surface of the suction-pipe with very little friction. There is a valve I on the top of this piston, opening upwards. Water is poured into the outer cistern. 42 The outer cylinder or piston being drawn up from and it» the bottom, there is a great rarefaction of the air which mo^e was between them, and the atmosphere presses the wa-opeiatlon'’ ter up through the suction-pipe to a certain height; for the valve I keeps shut by the pressure of the atmo¬ sphere and its own weight. Pushing down the piston causes the air, which had expanded from the suction- pipe into the piston, to escape through the valve I; drawing it up a second time, allows the atmosphere to press more water into the suction-pipe, to fill it, and al¬ so part of the piston. When this is pushed down again, the water which had come through the valve C is now forced out through the valve I into the cistern KMNL, and now the whole is full of water. When, therefore, the piston is drawn up, the water follows, and fills it, if 3 S 3 not P U M Pump, not 33 feet above the water in the cistern*, and when it —y 1 js pushed down again, the water which tilled the piston is all thrown out into the cistern 5 and after this it dc 1- vers its full contents of water every stroke. '1 tie water in the cistern KMNL etlectually prevents the entry ot any air between the two pipes; so that a very moderate compression of the belt of soft leather at the mouth of the piston cylinder is sufficient to make all peilectly 43 tight. _ . , The piston Jt might be made differently. 1 be ring ot leather cylinder m;0.|lt fastened round the top of the inner cylinder differently at J)E, an(l slid on the inside of the piston cylinder ; but the first form is most easily executed. Muschen- broeck has given a figure of this pump in Ins large system of natural philosophy, and speaks very highly ot its performance. But we do not see any advantage which it possesses over the common sucking-pump. He indeed says that it is without friction, and makes no mention of the ring of leather between the two cy¬ linders. Such a pump will raise water extremely well to a small height, and it seems to have been a model only which he had examined : But if the suction-pipe is long, it will by no means do without the leather ; for on drawing up the piston, the water of the upper cistern will rise between the pipes, and fill the piston, and none 44 will come up through the suction-pipe. Pumps "We may take this opportunity of observing, that the without many ingenious contrivances ot pumps without friction nofiTim- are ef little importance in great works ; because the portaut use. friction which is completely sufficient to pi event a escape of water in a well-constructed pump is but a very trifling part of the whole force. In tne great pumps which are used in mines, and are woiked by a steam-engine, it is very usual to make the pistons and valves without any leather whatever. I he working bar¬ rel is bored truly cylindrical, and the piston is made of metal of a size that will just pass along it without stick¬ ing. When this is drawn up with the velocity com¬ petent to a properly loaded machine, the quantity ot water which escapes round the piston is insignificant. The piston is made without leathers, not to aviod fric¬ tion, which is also insignificant in such works ; but to avoid the necessity of frequently drawing it up for re- 4- pairs through such a length of pipes. Example V. If a pump absolutely without friction he wanted, of a simple t]ie following seems preferable foi’ simplicity and per- pump with-formance t0 any we have seen, when made use of in tion!^ proper situations. Let NO (fig. 18.) be the surface Eig. iS. of the water in the pit, and K the place of delivery. The pit must be as deep in water as from K to NO. ABCH is a wooden trunk, round or square, open at both ends, and having a valve B at the bottom. I he top of this trunk must be on a level with K, and has a small cistern EADF. It also communicates laterally with a rising pipe GHK, furnished with a valve at H opening upwards. LiVl is a beam ot timber so fitted to the trunk as to fill it without sticking, and is of at least equal length. It hangs by a chain from a work¬ ing beam, and' is loaded on the top with weights ex¬ ceeding that of the column of water which it displaces. Now suppose this beam allowed to descend from the position in which it is drawn in the figure ; the wa¬ ter must rise all around it, in the crevice which is be¬ tween it and the trunk, and also in the rising pipe; be¬ cause the valve P shuts, and H opens; so that when the 4 P U M plunger has got to the bottom, the water will stand at pimt the level of K. When the plunger is again drawn up y_v to the top by the action of the moving power, the wa¬ ter sinks again in the trunk, but not in the rising pipe, because it is stopped by the valve H. Then allowing the plunger to descend again, the water must again rise in the trunk to the level of K, and it must now flow out at K ; and the quantity discharged will be equal to the part of the beam below the surface of the pit- water, deducting the quantity which fills the small space between the beam and the trunk. This quantity may be reduced almost to nothing ; but if the inside of the trunk and the outside of the beam be made tapering, the beam may be let down till they exactly fit; and as this may be done in square work, a good workman can make it exceedingly accurate. But in this case, the lower half of the beam and trunk must not taper : and this part of the trunk must be of sufficient width round the beam to allow free passage into the rising pipe. Or, which is better, the rising pipe must branch off from the bottom of the trunk. A discharge may be made from the cistern EA13F, so that as little water as possible may descend along the trunk when the piston is raised. _ _ 45 One great excellence of this pump is, that it is per-Itsexce fectly free from all the deficiencies which in common I ncies pumps result from want of being air-tight. Another^1 t! is, that the quantity of water raised is precisely equal to the power expended ; for any want of accuracy in the work, while it occasions a diminution of the quan¬ tity of water discharged, makes an equal diminution in the weight which is necessary for pushing down the plunger. We have seen a machine consisting of two such pumps suspended from the arms of a long beam, the upper side of which was formed into a walk with a rail on each side. A man stood on one end till it got to the bottom, and then walked soberly up to the other end, the inclination being about twenty- five decrees at first, but gradually diminished as he went along, and changed the load of the beam. By this means he made the other end go to the bottom, and so on alternately, with the easiest of all exertions, and what we are most fitted for by our structure. With tins machine, a very feeble old man, weighing 110 pounds, raised 7 cubic feet of water ixi- feet high in a minute, and continued working 8 or 10 hours everyday. A stout young man, weighing nearly 135 pounds, raised 8i to the same height, and when he carried 30 pounds, conveniently slung about him, he raised 9^ feet to this height, working 10 hours a-day without fatiguing himself. This exceeds Desagulier’s maximum of a 47 hogshead of water 10 feet high in a minute, in the pro- but u 1: t portion of 9 to 7 nearly. It is limited to very mode-uute“ rate heights ; but in such situations it is very eftectual. It was the contrivance of an untaught labouring man, possessed of uncommon mechanical genius. We shall have occasion to mention, with respect, some other con¬ trivances of the same person, in the article IFater- Wirks. _ _ 4-8i VI. The most ingenious contrivance of a pump with-Hnskm out friction is that of Mr Haskins, described by Desagu- liers, and called by him the Quicksilver Pump. Its construction and mode of operations are pretty compli¬ cated ; but the following preliminary observations will, we hope, render it abundantly plain. Let [ 5c8 ] P U M 49 node Let ilmk (fig. 19.) be a cylindrical iron pipe, about 'six feet long, open at top. Let eg hf be another cy¬ linder, connected with it at the bottom, and of smaller diameter. It may either be solid, or, if hollow, it must be close at top. Let ac db he a third iron cylinder, of an intermediate diameter, so that it may move up and down between the other two without touching either, but with as little interval as possible. Let this middle cylinder communicate, by means of the pipe AB, with the upright pipe FE, having valves C and D (both opening upwards) adjoining to the pipe of communication. Suppose the outer cylinder sus¬ pended by chains from the end of a working beam, and let mercury be poured into the interval between the three cylinders till it tills the space to 0p, about of their height. Also suppose that the lower end of the pipe FE is immersed into a cistern of water, and that the valve D is less than 33 feet above the surface of this water. Now suppose a perforation made somewhere in the pipe AB, and a communication made with an air-pump. When the air pump is worked, the air contained in CE, in AB, and in the space between the inner and middle cylinders, is rarefied, and is abstracted by the air-pump ; for the valve D immediately shuts. The pressure of the atmosphere will cause the water to rise in the pipe CE, and will cause the mercury to rise between the inner and middle cylinders, and sink between the outer and middle cylinders. Let us suppose mercury 12 times heavier than water : Then for every foot that the water rises in EC, the level between the outside and inside mercury will vary an inch ; and if we suppose DE to be 30 feet, then if we can rarefy the air so as to raise the water to D, the outside mercurv will be de¬ pressed to q, and the inside mercury will have risen to [ 509 ] P U M Pamp. s, t, sq and t r, being about 30 inches. In this state of things, the water will run over by the pipe BA, and every thing will remain nearly in this position. The columns of water and mercury balance each other, and balance the pressure of the atmosphere. While things are in this state of equilibrium, if we allow the cylinders to descend a little, the water will rise in the pipe FE, which we may now consider as a suction-pipe *, for by this motion the capacity of the whole is enlarged, and therefore the pressure of the at¬ mosphere will still keep it full, and the situation of the mercury will again be such that all shall be in equilibrio. It will be a little lower in the inside space and higher in the outside. Taking this view of things, we see clearly how the water is supported by the atmosphere at a very consi¬ derable height. The apparatus is analogous to a sy¬ phon which has one leg filled with water and the other with mercury. But it was not necessary to employ an air-pump to fill it. Suppose it again empty, and all the valves shut by their own weight. Let the cylinders descend a little. The capacity of the spaces below the valve D is enlarged, and therefore the included air is rarefied, and some of the air in the pipe CE must dif¬ fuse itself into the space quitted by the inner cylinder. Therefore the atmosphere will press some water up the pipe FE, and some mercury into the inner space be¬ tween the cylinders. When the cylinders are raised again, the air which came from the pipe CE would re¬ turn into it again, but is prevented by the valve C.— Raising the cylinders to their former height would com¬ press this air 5 it therefore lifts the valve D, and escapes. y- Another depression of the cylinders will have a similar ettect. I he water will rise higher in EC, and the mer cury m the inner space; and then, after repeated strokes the water will pass the valve C, and fill the whole ap¬ paratus, as the air-pump had caused it to do before . e position of the cylinders, when things are in this situation, is represented in fig. 20. the outer and inner Fig. 20, cylinders in their lowest position having descended about 30 inches. The mercury in the outer space stands at (^, / , a little above the middle of the cylinders, and the mercury in the inner space is near the top ts of the inner cylinder. Now let the cylinders be drawn up. 1 he water above the mercury cannot get back again through the valve C, which shuts bv its own weight. We therefore attempt to compress it j but the mercury yields, and descends in the inner space, and rises in the outer, till both are quickly on a level, about the height vv. If we continue to raise the cylinders, the compression forces out more mercury, and it now stands lower in the inner than in the outer space. But that there may be something to balance this inequality of the mercurial columns, the water goes through the valve D, and the equilibrium is restored when the height of the water in the pipe ED above the surface of the internal mercury is 12 times the difference of the mercurial columns (on the former supposition of specific gravity). If the quantity of water is such as to rise two feet in the pipe ED, the mercury in the outer space will be two inches higher than that in the inner space. Another depression of the cylinders will again enlarge the space within the apparatus, the mer¬ cury will take the position of fig. 19. and more ivater wri!l come in. Raising the cylinders will send this water four feet up tiie pipe ED, and the mercury will he four inches higher in the inner than in the outer space. Repeating this operation, the water will be raised still higher in DE ; and this will go on till the mercury in the outer space reaches the top of the cy¬ linder j and this is the limit of the performance. The dimensions with which we set out will enable the ma¬ chine to raise the water about 30 feet in the pipe ED ; which, added to the 30 feet of CF, makes the whole height above the pit-water 60 feet. By making the cylinders longer, we increase the height of FD. This machine must be worked with great attention, and hut slowly ; for at the beginning of the forcing stroke the mercury very rapidly sinks in the inner space and rises in the outer, and will dash out and be lost. To pre¬ vent this as much as possible, the outer cylinder termi¬ nates in a sort of cup or dish, and the inner cylinder should be tapered a-top. _ The machine is exceedingly ingen-ious and refined ; Ingenuity and there is no doubt hut that its performance will ex-of. lhe con- ceed that of any other pump which raises the water totrivaDGe the same height, because friction is completely avoided,&1Cat' and there can he no want of tiglitness of the piston.— But this is all its advantage ; and from what has been but the ad- observed, it is but trifling. The expence would he enor- vantage mous ; for with whatever care the cylinders are made, Ul^nS« the interval between the inner and outer cylinders must contain a very great quantity of mercury. The middle cylinder must be made of iron plate, and must be without a seam, for the mercury would dissolve every solder. For suck P U M [ Pump, such reasons, it has never come into general use. f"' v'" ' it would have been unpardonable to have omitted the description of an invention which is so original and in¬ genious 5 and there are some occasions where it may be of great use, as in nice experiments for illustrating the theory of hydraulics, it would give the finest pistons for measuring the pressures of water in pipes, &.c. It is on precisely the same principle that the cylinder bel¬ lows, described in the article Pneumatics, are con- ^ structed. Description We beg leave to conclude this part of the subject of another with the description of a pump without friction, which pump with- may he constructed in a variety of ways by anv common out fric- J . -i . _r.i n— — Pu* turn. Sfifr 31. 53 Its mode of opera¬ tion, &c. carpenter, without the assistance of the pump-maker or plumber, and will be very effective for raising a great quantity of water to small heights, as in draining marshes, marl-pits, quarries, &c. or even for the service of a house. VII. ABCD (fig. 21.) is a square trunk of carpen¬ ter’s work, open at both ends, and having a little ci¬ stern and spout at top. Near the bottom there is a partition made of board, perforated with a hole E, and covered with a clack. /fff represents a long cy¬ lindrical bag or pudding, made of leather or of double canvas, with a fold of thin leather such as sheep skin be¬ tween the canvas bags. This is firmly nailed to the board E with soft leather between. The upper end of this bag is fixed on a round board, having a hole and valve F. This board may be turned in the lathe with a groove round its edge, and the bag fastened to it by a cord bound tight round it. The fork of the piston- rod EG is fiimly fixed into this board 5 the bag is kept distended by a number of wooden hoops or rings of strong wire//,//,/f, &c. put into it at a few inches distance from each other. It will be proper to connect these hoops before putting them in, by three or four cords from top to bottom, which will keep them at their proper distances. Thus will the bag have the form of a barber’s bellows powder-puff. The distance between the hoops should be about twice the breadth of the rim of the wooden ring to which the upper valve and piston-rod are fixed. Now let this trunk be immersed in the water. It is evident that if the bag be stretched from the compres¬ sed form which its own weight will give it by drawing up the piston-rod, its capacity will be enlarged, the valve F will be shut by its own weight, the air in the bag will be rarefied, and the atmosphere will press the water into the bag. When the rod is thrust down again, this water will come out by the valve F, and fill part of the trunk. A repetition of the operation will have a similar effect j the trunk will be filled, and the water will at last be discharged by the spout. Here is a pump without friction, and perfectly tight. For the leather between the folds of canvas renders the bag impervious both to air and water. And the can¬ vas has very considerable strength. We know from experience that a bag of six inches diameter, made of sail-cloth N0 3. with a sheep skin between, will bear a column of 15 feet of water, and stand six hours work per day for a month without failure, and that the pump is considerably superior in effect to a common pump of the same dimensions. We must only observe, that the length of the bag must be three times the intended length of the stroke j so that when the piston-rod is in I 510 ] P U M But its highest position, the angles or ridges of the bag may be pretty acute. If the bag be more stretched than this, the force which must be exerted by the labourer becomes much greater than the weight of the column of water which he is raising. If the pump be laid aslope, which is very umal in these occasional and hasty drawings, it is necessary to make a guide for the piston- rod within the trunk, that the bag may jday up and down without rubbing on the sides, which would quick¬ ly wear it out. The experienced reader will see that this pump is very like that of Gosset and De la Deuille, described by Belidor, vol. ii. p. 120. and most writers on hydrau¬ lics. It would be still more like it, if the bag were on the under side of the partition E, and a valve placed farther down the trunk. But we think that our form is greatly preferable in point of strength. When in the other situation, the column of water lifted by the piston tends to burst the bag, and this with a great force, as the intelligent reader well knows. But in the form re¬ commended here, the bag is compressed, and the strain on each part may be made much less than that w'hich tends to burst a bag of six inches diameter. The nearer the rings are placed to each other, the smaller will the strain be. The same bag-piston may be employed for a forcing pump, by placing it below the partition, and inverting the valve \ and it will then be equally strong, because the resistance in this case too will act by compression. We now come naturally to the consideration of the different forms which may be given to the pistons and valves of a pump. A good deal of what we have been describing already is reducible to this head ; but, having a more general appearance, changing as it were the whole form and structure of the pump, it was not im¬ proper to keep these things together. J The great desideratum in a piston is, that it be as piston tight as possible,and have as little friction asis consistentshouldWi with this indispensable quality. We have already said,llUlef1 that the common form, when carefully executed, has110 * these properties in an eminent degree. And according¬ ly this form has kept its ground amidst all the improve¬ ment which ingenious artists have made. Mr Belidor, an author of the first reputation, has given the descrip¬ tion of a piston which he highly extols, and is undoubt¬ edly a very good one, constructed from principle, and extremely well composed. .5 It consists of a hollow cylinder of metal ^ A (fig. . pierced with a number of holes, and having at top a Beljdj flanch AB, whose diameter is nearly equal to that oftig. 2 the working-barrel of the pump. This flanch has a groove round it. There is another fl inch IK below, by which this hollow cylinder is fastened with bolts to the lower end of the piston, represented in fig. 23. This Fl§-% consists of a plate CD, with a grooved edge similar to AB, and an intermediate plate which forms the seat of the valve. The composition of this part is better under¬ stood by inspecting the figure than by any descrip¬ tion. The piston rod HL is fixed to the upper plate by bolts through its different branches at G, G. Ihis metal body is then covered with a cylindrical bag of leather fastened on it by cords bound round it, filling up the grooves in the upper and lower plates. I he operation of the piston is as follows. A little water is poured into the pump, which get* past i P U M [ SI amp. past tlie sides of the piston, ami lodges below in the iV-J fixed valve. The piston beins: pushed down r: faxed valve. Ihe piston being pushed down dips into this water, and it gets into it by the valve. Eul as the piston in descending compresses the air below it this compressed air also gets into the inside of the piston swells out the bag which surrounds it, and compresses it to the sides of the working-barrel. When the piston is drawn up again, it must remain tight, because the valve will shut and keep in the air in its most compressed state ; therefore the piston must perform well during the suction. It must act equally well when pushed down again, and acting as a forcer j for however gn at the resistance may be, it will affect the air within the piston to the same degree, and keep the leather close applied to the barrel. There can he no doubt therefore of the piston’s performing both its offices completely j but we imagine that the adhesion to the barrel will be greater than is necessary : it will extend over the whole sur¬ face of the piston, and be equally great in every part of its surface; and we suspect that the friction will there¬ fore be very great. We have very high authority for supposing that tiie adhesion of a piston of the common ,s fornb carefully made, will be such as will make it per- jifects. fectly tight; and it is evident that the adhesion of Beli- dor’s piston will be much greater, and it will be produc¬ tive of worse consequences. If the leather bag be worn through in any one place, the. air escapes, and the piston ceases to be compressed altogether ; whereas in the com¬ mon piston there will very little harm result from the leather being worn through in one place, especially if it project a good way beyond the base of the cone. We still think the common piston preferable. Belidor’s piston would do much better inverted as the piston of a sucking pump ; and in this situation it would be equal, but not superior to the common. 7 Belidor describes another forcing piston, which he !)ie had executed with success, and prefers to the common k wooden forcer. It consists o! a metal cylinder or cone, having a broad flancb uniting to it at one end, and a si¬ milar flancli which is screwed on the other end. Be¬ tween these two plates are a number of rings of leather strongly compressed by the two Ranches, and then turn¬ ed in a lathe like a block of wood, till the whole fits tight, when dry, into the barrel. It will swell, says be, and soften with the water, and withstand the greatest ons pressures. We cannot help thinking this but an indif¬ ferent piston. When it wears, there is nothing to squeeze it to the barrel. It may indeed be taken out and another ring or two of leather put in, or the flanthes may he more strongly screwed together ; but all this may be done with any kind of piston; and this has therefore no peculiar merit. ^ The following will, we presume, appear vastly pre¬ ferable. A BCD (fig 24,) is the solid wooden or metal as block of the pi-ton ; EF is a metal plate, which is turn- ;e. eel hollow or dish-like below, so as to receive within it the solid block. The piston rod goes through the wnole, and has a shoulder above the plate F.F, and a nut H below. Four screw-bolts, such as t k, hn, also go through the whole, have their heads k, m sunk into the block, and nuts above at i.l. The packing or stuf¬ fing, as it is termed by the woikmen, is represented at •NO. lljjs js nia(le as solid as possible, and generally consists of soft hempen twine well -0 iked in a mixture °f oil, tallow, and rosin. The plate EF is gently screw- toit r bv. 1 P U IVf ed down, and the whole is then put into the barrel fitting it as Ught as may be thought proper. When k wears loose it may be tightened at any Le by screw ng down the nuts */, which cause the edges c/the dTh ^;r:^^rkin§’andc—^ ^ ^ • lie, greatest difficulty in the construction of a piston to give a sufficient passage through it for the water and yet allow a firm support for the valve, and fixture or the piston rod. \Ve shall see presently that it oc¬ casions a considerable expence of the moving power to force a piston with a narrow perforation through the water lodged in the working barrel. When we are raismg water to a small height, such as 10 or 20 feet the power so expended amounts to a fourth part of the whde j the water-way in the piston is less than one- half of the section of the barrel, and the velocity of the piston two feet per second, which is very moderate. 1 here can be no doubt, therefore, that metal pistons are preferable, because their greater strength allows much wider apertures. I be following piston, described and recommended by Belidor, seems as perfect in these respects as the nature of things will allow. We shall therefore describe it in the author sown words as a model, which may be adopt¬ ed with confidence in the greatest works. “ Ihe body of the piston is a truncated metal cone (hg. 25.) having a small fillet at the greater end. * ig. 26. shows the profile, ami fig. 27. the plan of its upper base; where appears a cross bar DD, pierced vvith an oblong mortise E for receiving the tail of the piston-rod. A baud of thick and uniform leather AA (hg. 26. and 28.) is put round this cone, and secured by a brass hoop BB firmly driven on its smaller end, wheie it is previously made thinner to give room for the hoop. “ ^lus piston is covered with a leather valve fortified with metal plates GG (fig. 29.). These plates are wider than the hole of the piston, so as to rest on its There are similar plates below the leather of a Pump. Diffieulties in construc¬ ting pis¬ tons. 5r consider¬ ably remo¬ ved m one described by iieiidor. Plate CCCCLI. Kig. 25. Fig. %6. Hg. 27. fig. a*. Fig. rim smaller size, that they may go into the hollow of the piston; and the leather is firmly held between the metal plates by screws H, H, which go through all. This is represented by the dotted circle IK. Thus the pres¬ sure of the incumbent column of water is supported by the plates GG, whose circular edges rest on the brim of the water-way, and their straight edges rest on the cross bar DI) of fig. 26. and 27. This valve is laid on the top of the conical box in such a manner that its middle FF rests on the cross bar. To bind all together, the end of the piston-rod is formed like a cross, and the arms MN (fig. 30.) are made to rest on the diameter FF of tlie valve, the tail EP going through the hole E in the middle of the leather, and through the mortise E of the cross liar ot the box ; and also through another bar Qlt (fig. 28. and 29.) which is notched into the lower brim of the box. A key V is then driven into the hole T in the piston rod ; and this wedges all fast. The bar QR is made strong; and its extremities project a little, so as to support the brass hoop BB which binds the leather band to the piston-box. The adjoining scale gives the dimensions of all the parts, as they were exe¬ cuted tor a steam-engine near Conde, where the piston Fig. 30. gave complete satisfaction.” This piston has every advantage of strength, tightness, and P U M [ 51 PutiHi. ;tinl large water-way. The form of the valve (which \.,m—v — * Jias given it the name of the butterfly-valve) is extreme¬ ly favourable to the passage of the water ; and as it has but half the motion of a complete circular valve, less 62 water goes back while it is shutting. Advanta- rj;[ie following piston is also ingenious, and has a ges °f this g00d deal of merit. OPPO (fig* 31.) is the box of piSt°n' the piston, having a perforation Q, covered above with a fiat valve K, which rests in a metal plate that forms the top of the box. ABCBA is a stirrup of iron to which the box is fixed by screws a, a, a, «, whose heads are sunk in the wood. This stirrup is perforated at C, to receive the end ol the piston-rod, and a nut fl is screwed on below to keep it fast. DEFED is another stirrup, whose lower part at DD forms a hoop like the sole of,a stirrup, which embraces a small part of the top of the wooden box. The lower end of the piston-rod is screwed} and before it is put into the holes of the two stirrups (through which holes it slides freely) a broad nut G is screwed on it. It is then put,into the holes, and the nut H firmly screwed up. The packing Eli is then wound about the piston as tight as possible, till it completely fills the working barrel ot the pump. When long use has rendered it in any degree loose, it may be tightened again by screwing down the nut G. This causes the ring I)D to compress the packing be¬ tween it and the projecting shoulder of the box at PP ; and thus cause it to swell out, and apply itself closely 53 to the barrel. Another \Ye shall add only another form of a perforated.piston *, ingenious being on a principle different from all the preced- pStonde- ing> wil1 suggest many others ; cach of which will have scribed. its peculiar advantages. OO in fig. 32. represents the box of this piston, fitted to the working barrel in any of the preceding ways as may be thought best. AB is a cross bar of four arms, which is fixed to the top of the box. CF is the piston-rod going through a hole in the middle of AB, and reaching a little way beyond the bottom of the box. It has a shoulder D, which prevents its going too far through. On the lower end , there is a thick metal plate, turned conical on its upper side, so as to fit a conical seat PP in the bottom of the 64 piston-box. Another on When the piston-rod is pushed down, the friction on a difi'crent t}ie barrel prevents the box from immediately yielding, principle; r0(J therefore slips through the hole of the cross lig- kar rpijg plate therefore, detaches itself from the box. When the shoulder I) presses on the bar AB, the box must yield, and be pushed down the bar¬ rels, and the water gets up through the perforation. When the piston-rod is drawn up again, the box does not move till the plate E lodge in the seat PP, and thus shuts the water-way and then the piston lifts the water which is above it, and acts as the piston ot a 65 sucking pump. Its advan- This is a very simple and effective construction, and makes a very tight valve. It has been much recom¬ mended by engineers of the first reputation, and is frequently used ; and from its simplicity, and the great solidity of which it is capable, it seems very fit for great works. But it is evident that the water-way is limited to less than one-half of the area of the working- barrel. For if the perforation of the piston be one-half of the area, the diameter of the plate or ball EF must 2 ] P U M be greater j and therefore less than half the area will pQmj, be left for the passage of the water by its sides. -y-i t We come now to consider the forms which may he 66 j given to the valves of a hydraulic engine. | The requisites of a valve are, that it shall be tight, vaives , of sufficient strength to resist the great pressures to which it is exposed, that it afford a sufficient passage for the water, and that it do not allow much to go back while it is shutting. 67 j We have not much to add to what has been said al-Clack ready on this subject. The valves which accompanyvalves- the pump of hg. 5. are called clack valves^ and are of all the most obvious and common j and the construction described on that occasion is as perfect as any. TV e on¬ ly add, that as the leather is at last destroyed at the hinge by such incessant motion, and it is troublesome, especially in deep mines, and under water, to undo the joint of the pump in order to put in a new valve, it is frequently annexed to a box like that of a piston, made a little conical on the outside, so as to fit a conical seat made for it in the pipe, as represented in fig. 33. and it Fig. 3 . has an iron handle like that ot a basket, by which it can be laid hold of by means of a long grappling-hook let down from above. rlhus it is drawn up 5 and being very gentle tapered on the sides, it sticks very fast in its place. . . 6S The only defect of this valve is, that by opening Eefect very wide when pushed up by the stream of water, it them, allows a good deal to go back during its shutting again. In some great machines which are worked by a slow turning crank, the return of the piston is so very slow, that a sensible loss is incurred by this 5 but it is nothing like what Dr Desaguliers says, one-half of a cylinder whose height is equal to the diameter of the valve. For in such machines, the last part of the upward stroke is equally slow, and the velocity of the water through the valve exceedingly small, so that the valve k at this time almost shut. _ ^ The butterfly-valve represented in figures 29, &c. ispqiiity > free from most of these inconveniences, and seems tnethebiitr most perfect of the clack valves. Some engineers make fly™1' their great valves of a pyramidal form, consisting of four clacks, whose hinges are in the circumference of the water-way, and which meet with their points in the middle, and are supported by four ribs which rise up from the sides and unite in the middle. This is an ex¬ cellent form, affording the most spacious water-way, and shutting very readily. It seems to be the best pos¬ sible for a piston. The rod of the piston is branched out on four sides, and the branches go through the pi¬ ston-box, and are fastened below with screws. These branches form the support for the four clacks.. VVe have a seen a valve of this form in a pump of six feet diameter, which discharged 20 hogsheads of water every stroke, and made 1 2 strokes in a minute, raising the water above 2 2 feet. ^ There is another form of valve, called the button orBntton tail-valve. It consists of a plate of metal AB (fig. 34-) valves, turned conical, so as exactly to fit the conical cavity « iFig 3*3 of its box. A tail CD projects from the under side, which passes through a cross bar EF in the bottom of the box, and has a little knob at the end, to hinder the valve from rising too high. This valve, when nicely made, is unexceptionable. Pomp P U M ih newliat i perfect the wa- -way. 173 . cry sim I calve ■ribed. J 35- He t .4 A ve tit Jci hy tlidor e^t re- qufe. AlU I; val the Pnn ]c. It has great strength, and Is therefore proper for all se- i vere strains, and it may be made perfectly tiVht by grinding Accordingly it is used in all eases where this is of indispensable consequence. It is most durable, and the only kind that will do for passages where steam or hot water is to go through. Its only imperfection is a small water-way ; which, from what has been said cannot exceed, or indeed equal, one half of the area of the pipe. If we endeavour to enlarge the water-way, by "ivine tbe cone very little taper, the valve frequently Sticks so fast in the seat that no force can detach them. And this sometimes happens during the working of the machine ; and the jolts and blows given to the machine in taking it to pieces, in order to discover what has been the reason that it has discharged no water fre¬ quently detach the valve, and we find it quite loose and cannot tell what has deranged the pump. When this is guarded against, and the diminution of the water¬ way is not of very great consequence, this is the best form of a valve. Analogous to this is the simplest of all valves, repre¬ sented m fig. 35. It is nothing more than a sphere of metal A, to which is fitted a seat with a small portion BC of a spherical cavity. Nothing can be more effec¬ tual than this valve ; it always falls into its proper place, and in every position fits it exactly. Its only imperfection is the great diminution of the water-way. If the diameter of the sphere does not considerably ex¬ ceed that of the bole, the touching parts have very little taper, and it is very apt to stick fast. It opposes much less resistance to tiie passage of the water than the flat under-surface of the button-valve. N. B. It would be an improvement of that valve to give it a taper-shape below like a boy’s top. The spherical valve must not he made too light, otherwise it will lie hurried up hy the water, and much may go back while it is returning to its place. b Belidor describes writh great minuteness (vol. ii. p. 221, &c.) a valve which unites every requisite. But it is of such nice and delicate construction, audits de¬ fects are so great wdien this exactness is not attained, or is impaired hy use, that we think it hazardous to in- troduce it into a machine in a situation where an intel¬ ligent and accurate artist is not at hand. For this reason we have omitted the description, which cannot he given in few words, nor without many figures 5 and desire our curious readers to consult that author, or per¬ use Dr Desaguliers’s translation of this passage. Its principle is precisely the same with the following rude contrivance, with which we shall conclude the descrip¬ tive part of this article. Suppose A BCD (fig. 36.) to be a square wooden trunk. El is a piece of oak board, exactlv fitted to the trunk in an oblique position, and supported by an iron pin which goes through it at I, one-third of its length from its lower extremity at E. The two ends of this board are bevelled, so as to apply exactly to the sides ot the trunk. It is evident, that if a stream of water come in the direction BA, its pressure on the part II of this board will be greater than that upon EE. It will therefore force it up and msh through, making it stand almost parallel to the sides of the trunk. To prevent its rising so far, a pin must be put in its Way. When this current of water changes its direc- VOL. XVII. Part II. f t 513 ] p U M Pump tion, the pressure on the upper side of the board being again greatest on the portion IF, it is forced back airain v—v—' to its former situation 5 and its two extremities rising on the opposite sides of the trunk, the passage is com- p etely stopped. This board therefore performs the office of a valve; and this valve is the most perfect that can be, because it offers the freest passage to the water and it allows very little to get back while it is shutting • or the part IE brings up half as much water as IF al¬ lows to go down. It may be made extremely tight by fixing two thin fillets H and G to the sides of the trunk, and covering those parts of the board with lea¬ ther which applies to them; and in this state it perfect¬ ly resembles Belidor’s fine valve. And this construction of the valve suggests, by the Description way, a form of an occasional pump, which may be°^anoc- quickly set up by any common carpenter, and will fie casi°iial very effectual in small heights. Let ah c de (fig. 36.) be a square box made to slide along this wooden trunk structed' without shake, having two of its sides projecting up- Fig. 36. wards, terminating like the gable-ends of a house. A piece of wood e is mortised into these two sides, and to this the piston-rod is fixed. This box being furnished with a valve similar to the one below, will perform the office of a piston. If this pump he immersed so deep in the ivater that the piston shall also he under water, we scruple not to say that its performance will he equal to any. I he piston may he made abundantly tight by co¬ vering its outside neatly with soft leather. And as no pipe can be bored with greater accuracy than a very or¬ dinary workman can make a square trunk, we presume that this pump will not be very deficient even for a con¬ siderable suction. ^ We now proceed to the last part of the subject, toThemo- consider the motion of water in pumps, in reference totion.ofwa- the force which must be employed. What we have|er*n hitherto said with respect to the force which must heiUlmr,s’ applied to a piston, related only to the sustaining the water at a certain height: but in actual service we must not only do this, hut we must discharge it at the place of delivery in a certain quantity ; and this must require a force superadded to what is necessary for its mere support at this height. This is an extremely intricate and difficult subject, an intri- and very imperfectly understood even hy professed en-<">te sub- gineers. The principles on which this knowledge muslJect’ he {bunded are of a much more abstruse nature than the ordinary laws of hydrostatics ; and all the genius of Newton was employed in laying the foundation of this part of physical science. It has been much cultivated in the course of this century hy the first mathematicians of Europe. Daniel and John Bernoulli have written very'elaborate treatises on the subject, under (he very apposite name of Hydrodynamics ; in which, although The'theory they have added little or nothing to the fundamental denomina- propositions established in some sort by Newton, and tcd Hydro- acquiesced in hy them, yet they have greatly contribu- ted to our progress in it by the methods which they have pursued in making application of those fundamen¬ tal propositions to the most important cases. It must be acknowledged, however, that both these proposi¬ tions, and the extensions given them hy these authors, are supported hy a train of argument that is by no means unexceptionable ; and that they proceed on as¬ sumptions or postulates which are but nearly true in 3 T any Pump. P U M [ any case, and in many are inadmissible: and it re¬ mains to this hour a wonder or puzzle how these propo¬ sitions and their results correspond with the phenome¬ na which we observe. But fortunately this correspondence does obtain to a certain extent. And it seems to be this correspond¬ ence chiefly which has given these authors, with New¬ ton at their head, the confidence which they place in their respective principles and methods : for there are considerable differences among them in those respects $ and each seems convinced that the others are in a mistake. Messieurs d’Alembert and De la Grange have greatly corrected the theories of their predecessors, and have proceeded on postulates which come much nearer to the real state of the case. But their investigations involve us in such an inextricable maze of analytical investiga¬ tion, that even when we are again conducted to the light of day by the clue which they have given us, we can make no use of what we there discovered. But this theory, imperfect as it is, is of great service. It generalizes our observations and experiments, and " enables us to compose a practical doctrine from a heap of facts which otherwise must have remained solitary and unconnected, and as cumbersome in their applica- 81 tion as the characters of the Chinese writing. Fimdamen- The fundamental proposition of this practical hydro- tal pioposi-dynamics is, that water or any fluid contained in an open vessel of indefinite magnitude, and impelled by its weight only, will flow through a small orifice with the velocity which a heavy body would acquire by falling from the hoi’izontal surface of the fluid. Thus, if the orifice is 16 feet under the surface of the water, it will issue with the velocity of 32 feet in a second. Its velocity corresponding to any other depth h of •the orifice under the surface, will be had by this easy proportion : “ As the square root of 16 is to the square root oi h; so is 32 feet to the velocity required : or, 32 _ So though imperfect is very use ful. alternately, \6 : 32= \/ h : v, and vz 32 ■v/ 16 •v/ //, =: 8 Jh \ that is, multiply the square root of 4 the height in feet by eight, and the product is the re¬ quired velocity. On the other hand, it frequently occurs, that we want to discover the depth under the surface which will produce a known velocity v. Therefore, 8a Its utility. and h ~ : that is, divide the square of the velo¬ city by 64, and the quotient is the depth wanted in feet. This proposition is sufficient for all our purposes. For since water is nearly a perfect fluid, and propagates all impressions undiminished, we can, in place of any pressure of a piston or other cause, substitute a perpen¬ dicular column of water whose weight is equal to this pressure, and will therefore produce the same efflux — Thus, if the surface of a piston is half a square foot, and it be pressed down with the weight of 500 pounds, and we would wish to know with what velocity it would cause the water to flow through a small hole, we know that a column of water of this weight, and of half a foot base, would be 16 feet high. And this proposition 5,4 ] P U M e- teaches us, that a vessel of this depth will have a velo- p,, city of efflux equal to 32 feet in a second. If therefore our pressing power be of such a kind that it can continue to press forward the piston with the force of 5C0 pounds, the water will flow with this velocity, whatever be the size of the hole. All that remains is, to determine what change of actual pres¬ sure on the piston results from the motion of the piston itself, and to change the velocity of efflux in the sub¬ duplicate ratio of the change of actual pressure. But before we can apply this knowledge to the cir-Reman cumstances which take place in the motion of water in previm pumps, we must take notice of an important modifica-1®.lts.81 tion of the fundamental proposition, which is but verylucaiu obscurely pointed out by any good theory, but is esta¬ blished on the most regular and unexceptionable obser¬ vation. If the efflux is made through a hole in a thin plate, and the velocity is computed as above, we shall discover the quantity of water which issues in a second by obser¬ ving, that it is a prism or cylinder of the length indi¬ cated by the velocity, and having its transverse section equal to that of the orifice. Thus, in the example al¬ ready given, supposing the hole to be a square inch, the solid contents of this prism, or the quantity of water is¬ suing in a second, is 1X32X12 cubic inches, or 384 cubic inches. This we can easily measure by receiving it in a vessel of known dimensions. Taking this me¬ thod, we uniformly find a deficiency of nearly 38 parts in iooj that is, if we should obtain 100 gallons in any number of seconds, we shall in fact get only 62. This is a most regular fact, whether the velocities are great or small, and whatever be the size and form of the ori¬ fice. The deficiency increases indeed in a very minute degree with the velocities. If, for instance, the depth of the orifice be one foot, the discharge is i^oVoV 5 if it be 15 feet, the discharge is iVoVo* This deficiency is not owing to a diminution of velo¬ city } for the velocity may be easily and accurately mea¬ sured by the distance to which the jet will go, if direct¬ ed horizontally. This is found to correspond very near¬ ly with the proposition, making a very small allowance for friction at the border of the hole, and for the resist¬ ance of the air. Sir Isaac Newton ascribed the defici¬ ency with great justice to this, that the lateral columns of water, surrounding the column which is incumbent on the orifice, press towards the orifice, and contribute to the expence equally with that column. These lateral filaments, therefore, issue obliquely, crossing the motion of the central stream, and produce a contraction of the jet } and the whole stream does not acquire a parallel motion and its ultimate velocity till it has got to some distance from the orifice. Careful observation showed him that this was really the case. But even his genius could not enable him to ascertain the motion of the la¬ teral filaments by theory, and he was obliged to mea¬ sure every thing as he saw it. He found the diameter of the jet at the place of the greatest contraction to be precisely such as accounted for the deficiency. His ex¬ plication has been unanimously acquiesced in } and ex¬ periments have been multiplied to ascertain all those cir¬ cumstances which our theory cannot determine a prion. The most complete set of experiments are those of Mi- chelotti, made at Turin at the expence of the prince of Piedmont. mmp. P U M [ 5 Piedmont. Plere jets were made of I, 2, 3, and 4 — inches diameter ; and the water received into cisterns most accurately formed of brick, and lined with stucco. It is the result of these experiments which we have ta¬ ken for a measure of the deficiency. We may therefore consider the water as flowino- through a hole of this contracted dimension, or substi^ tote this for the real orifice in all calculations. For it is evident that il a mouth-piece (so to call it) were made whose internal shape precisely tallied with the form which the jet assumes, and if this mouth-piece be ap¬ plied to the orifice, the water will flow out without any obstruction. The vessel may therefore be considered as really having this mouth-piece. Nay, from this we derive a very important observa¬ tion, “ that if, instead of allowing the water to flow through a hole of an inch area made in a thin plate, we make it flow through a hole in a thick plank, so formed that the external orifice shall have an inch area, but be widened internally, agreeably to the shape which nature forms, both the velocity and quantity will be that which the fundamental proposition determines. Michelotti measured with great care the form of the great jets of three and four inches diameter, and found that the bounding curve was an elongated trochoid. He then made a mouth-piece of this form for his jet of one inch, and another for bis jet of two inches; and he found the discharges to be and 5 and he, with justice, ascribed the trifling deficiency which still remained, partly to friction and partly to his not having exactly suited his mouth-piece to the natural form. We imagine that this last circumstance was the sole cause : For, in the first place, the water in his experiments, before get¬ ting at his jet-holes, had to pass along a tube of eight inches diameter. Now a jet of four inches bears too great a proportion to this pipe ; and its narrowness un¬ doubtedly hindered the lateral columns from contribut¬ ing to the efflux in their due proportion, and therefore rendered the jet less convergent. And, in the next place, there can be no doubt (and the observations of Daniel Bernoulli confirm it) but that this convergency begins within the vessel, and perhaps at a very consider¬ able distance from the orifice. And we imagine, that if accurate observations could be made on the motion of the remote lateral particles within the vessel, and an in¬ ternal mouth-piece were shaped according to the curve which is described by the remotest particle that we can observe, the efflux of water would almost perfectly tally with the theory. But indeed the coincidence is already sufficiently near for giving us very valuable information. We learn that the quantity of water which flows through a hole, in consequence of its own weight, or by the ac¬ tion of any force, may be increased one half by proper¬ ly shaping the passage to this hole 5 for we see that it may be increased from 62 to near 99. But there is another modification of the efflux, which we confess our total incapacity to explain. If the water issues through a hole made in a plate whose thickness is about twice the diameter of the hole, or, to express it better, if it issues through a pipe whose length is about twice its diameter, the quantity discharged is nearly tVo- °f what results from the proposition. If the pipe be longer than this, the quantity is diminished by fric¬ tion, which increases as the length of the pipe incxeases. If the pipe be shorter, the water will not fill it, but de- l5 J P U M taches itself at the very entry of the pipe, and flows with a contracted jet. When the pipe is of this length, and the extremity is stopped with the finger, so that it begins to flow with a full mouth, no subsequent contrac tion is observed j but merely striking on the pipe with a key or the knuckle is generally sufficient to detach the water in an instant from the sides of the pipe, and re¬ duce the efflux to TA^-. This effect is most unaccountable. It certainly arises trom the mutual adhesion or attraction between the wa¬ ter and the sides of the pipe ; but how this, acting at right angles to the motion, should produce an increase trom 62 to 82, nearly |, we cannot explain. It shows, however, the prodigious force of this attraction, which in the space of two or three inches is able to communi¬ cate a great velocity to a very great body of water. In¬ deed the experiments on capillary tubes show that the mutual attraction of the parts of water is some thousands of times greater than their weight. . have only further to add, that every increase of pipe beyond two diameters is accompanied with a dimi¬ nution of the discharge ; but in what ratio this is dimi¬ nished it is very difficult to determine. We shall only observe at present that the diminution is very great. A pipe of 2 inches diameter and 30 feet long has its discharge only of what it would be if only 4 inches long. If its length be 60 feet, its discharge will be no more than tVW* A pipe of 1 inch diameter would have a discharge of and tVo? in the same situation. Hence we may conclude that the discharge of a 4 inch pipe of 30 feet long will not exceed -f of what it would be if only 8 inches long. This will suffice for our pre¬ sent purposes j and the determination of the velocities and discharges in long conduits from pump machines must be referred to the article JFUteb-Works. At pre¬ sent we shall confine our attention to the pump itself, and to what will contribute to its improvement. Before we can proceed to apply this fundamental proposition to our purpose, we must anticipate in a loose ivay a proposition of continual use in the construction of water-works. Let water be supposed stagnant in a vessel EFGH (fig- 37*)> and let it be allowed to flow out by a cylin- Fig. ^ drical pipe HIKL, divided by any number of partitions B, C, D, &c. Whatever be the areas B, C, D, of these orifices, the velocity in the intermediate parts of the pipe will be the same ; for as much passes through any one orifice in a second as passes through any other in the same time, or through any section of the inter¬ vening pipe. Let this velocity in the pipe be V, and let the area of the pipe be A. The velocity in the orifices B, C, D, must be &c. Let g be the velocity acquired in a second by a heavy body. Then, by the general proposition, the height of water VA in the vessel which will produce the velocity in Vs A* the first orifice alone, is -After this passage the velocity is again reduced to V in the middle of the space between the first and second orifices. In the se- VA cond orifice this velocity is changed to -7^-. This 3 T 2 alone Pump P U M Pump. [ Si6 ] P U M V’ A3 alone would have required a height of water 2 g ^ But the water is already moving with the velocity V, which would have resulted from a height of water in the vessel (which we shall, in the language ot the art, call , V* the HEAD OF water) equal to —. 2g Therefore there V2 A* V* or 2gC% 2g Therefore the whole height necessary is only required a head of water V* A3 — X yt, 2g C* ' for producing the efflux through both orifices, so as still to preserve tiie velocity V in the intervening pipe, v» A2 . A2 2g B »+in—1 In like manner the third orifice , r V2 A* D would alone require a head oi water ~ X — 2g V* , . . A2 Aa and all the three would require a head ~ X ^ + -^4- By this induction may easily be seen what A* D2 2’ head is necessary for producing the efflux through any number of orifices. Let the expence or quantity of water discharged in an unit of time (suppose a second) be expressed by the symbol Q. This is measured by the product of the ve¬ locity by the area of the orifice, and is therefore = VA, VA „ VA „ 0 , ,Ta Q* rp. or -J^-XB, or -jrr- X C, &c. and ^ =ji- There¬ fore we may compute the head of water (which we shall express by H) in reference to the quantity of wa¬ ter discharged, because this is generally the interesting Q2 circumstance. In this view we have II = —r X 2gA A2 A2 + + D2 2 : which shows that the head of 84 To deter¬ mine the motion of water necessary for producing the discharge increases in the proportion of the square of the quantity ot water which is discharged. These things being premised, it is an easy matter to determine the motion of water in a pump, and the quan¬ tity discharged, resulting from the action of any force water, &c. on t]ie piston, or the force which must be applied to the piston in order to produce any required motion or quantity discharged. We have only to suppose that the force employed is the pressure of a column of water of the diameter of the working barrel; and this is over and above the force which is necessary for merely sup¬ porting the water at the height of the place ot delivery. The motion of the water will be the same in both eases. Let ns, first of all, consider a sucking-pump. The motion here depends on the pressure of the air, and will be the same as if the pump were lying horizontally, and communicated with a reservoir, in which is a head of water sufficient to overcome all the obstructions to the motion, and produce a velocity of efflux such as we de¬ sire. And here it must be noted that there is a limit. No velocity of the piston can make the water rise in the auction-pipe with a greater velocity than what would be produced by the pressure of a colufnn of water 33 feet high •, that is, about 46 feet per second. Let the velocity of the piston be V, and the area of the working barrel be A. Then, if the water fills the barrel as fast as the piston is drawn up, the discharge during the rise of the piston, or the number of cubic feet of water per second, must be rr VxA. This is always supposed, and we have already ascertained the circumstances which ensure this to happen. If, there¬ fore, the water arrived with perfect freedom to the pi¬ ston, the force necessary for giving it this velocity, or for discharging the quantity V X A in a second, would be equal to the weight of the pillar of water whose height V2 is —, and base A. 2g It does not appear at first sight that the force ne¬ cessary for producing this discharge has any thing to do with the obstructions to the ascent of the water into the pump, because this is produced by the pressure of the atmosphere, and it is the action of this pressure which is measured by the head of water necessary for produ¬ cing the internal motion in the pump. But we must al¬ ways recollect that the piston, before bringing up any water, and supporting it at a certain height, was pressed on both sides by the atmosphere. While the air sup¬ ports the column below the piston, all the pressure ex¬ pended in this support is abstracted from its pressure on the under part of the piston, while its upper part still supports the whole pressure. The atmosphere continues to press on the under surface of the piston, through the intermedium of the water in the suction-pipe, with the difference of these two forces. Now, while the piston is drawn up with the velocity V, more of the atmosphe¬ ric pressure must be expended in causing the water to follow the piston ; and it is only with the remainder of its whole pressure that it continues to press on the un¬ der surface of the piston. Therefore, in order that the piston may be raised with the velocity V, a force must be applied to it, over and above the force necessary for merely supporting the column of water, equal to that part of the atmospheric pressure thus employed ; that is, equal to the weight of the head of water necessary for forcing the water up through the suction-pipe, and pro¬ ducing the velocity V in the working barrel. Therefore let B be the area of the mouth of the suction-pipe, and C the area of the fixed valve, and let the suction-pipe be of equal diameter with the working barrel. The head necessary for producing the velocity 8S In the sucking- pump, VVA2 + :-)• if V on the working barrel 2oAB2 t £ d express the density of waterthat is, if d be the number of pounds in a cubic foot of water, then d A-— will express the weight of a column whose base is A, and height —, all being reckoned in feet. Therefore ° 2£!’ the force which must be applied, when estimated in d AV2/A2 , A2 \ pounds, will be p, = 2g VB2”^ C2 — / The first general observation to be made on what has been said is, that the power which must be employed to produce the necessary motion, in opposition to all the obstacles, is in the proportion of the square of the velo- city P U M city which we would produce, or the square of the quantity of water we would discharge. We have hitherto proceeded on the supposition, that there is no contraction of the jet in passing through these two orifices. This we know would be very far from the truth. We must therefore accommodate things to these circumstances, hy diminishing 13 and C in the ratio of the contraction, and calling the diminished areas b and , . Ac? V* /A* A* \ c: then we have p ~ ( , -I j }. ’ 1 2g U* ^ c* / What this diminution may be, depends on the form of the parts. If the fixed valve, and the entry into the pump, are simply holes in thin plates, then£— B and c = /02^C. The entry is commonly widened or trumpet-shaped, which diminishes greatly the contrac¬ tion : but there are other obstacles in the way, arising from the strainer usually put round it to keep out filth. The valve may have its contraction greatly diminished also by its box being made bell-shaped internally j nay, even giving it a cylindrical box, in the manner of fig. 33. is better than no box at all, as in fig. 5.5 for such a cylindrical box will have the unaccountable effect of the short tube, and make b=. T— B, instead of ^0-B. Thus we see that circumstances seemingly very triflinv may produce great effects in the performance of a pump. We should have observed that the valve itself presents an obstacle which diminishes the motion, and requires an increase of power ; and it would seem that in this respect the clack or butterfly valve is preferable to the button valve. Example. Suppose the velocity of the piston to be 2 feet or 24 inches per second, and that the two con¬ tracted areas are each £ of the area of the pump, which is not much less than what obtains in ordinary pumps. We have +-^ 1 j = 4w (25 + 25—1) = 36,75 inches, and the force which we must add to what will merely support the column is the weight of a pillar of water incumbent on the piston, and something more than three feet high. This would be a sensible portion of the whole force in raising water to small heights. We have supposed the suction-pipe to be of the same diameter with the working barrel ; but it is usual to make it of smaller diameter, generally equal to the wa¬ ter way of the fixed valve. This makes a considerable change in the force necessary to be applied to the pi¬ ston. Let a be the area of the suction-pipe, the area of the entry being still B ; and the equivalent entry with¬ out contraction being still b, we have the velocity at AV J the entrance = an^ the producing head of water = 1 517 ] P U M fixed valve, that the water may follow the platen with A* Va 2£- a3 VVA* A^ A* \ b* c2 a2 )' **us 1S evidently less than the velocity V, is A* V* 2gb2 ' 2g C2 This AV After this the velocity is changed to -—- in A*V* 2g b2’ ' “ a _ the suction-pipe, with which the water arrives at the AV valve, where it is again changed to , and requires for A2 V 2g c2 But this change a head of water equal to the velocity retained in the suction pipe is equivalent to f rr A*V* the effect of a head of water r. Therefore the 2g a2 head necessary for producing such a current through the Pump. -Y- before, because « is less than A, and therefore ^ • , . oa is greater than unity, which was the last term of the lormer formuia. There is some advantage, therefore, derived from making the diameter of the suction-pipe less than that of the working barrel: but this is only be¬ cause the passage of the fixed valve is smaller, and the inspection of the formula plainly points out that the area of the suction-pipe should be equal to that of the fixed, valve. When it is larger, the water must be accelerated in its passage through the valve; which is an useless ex¬ pence of force, because this velocity is to be immediate¬ ly reduced to V in the working barrel. If the forego¬ ing example be computed with a equal to f of A, we shall find the head H equal to 29 inches instead of 37. But this advantage of a smaller suction-pipe is in all cases very moderate; and the pump is always inferior to one of uniform dimensions throughout, having the ori¬ fice at the fixed valve of the same area. And if these orifices are considerably diminished in any proportion, the head necessary for overcoming the obstacles, so that the required velocity V may still be produced in the working barrel, is greatly increased. If we suppose the area of A, which is frequently done in house pumps, where the diameter of the suction-pipe does seldom ex¬ ceed y of that of the working-barrel; and suppose every thing made in proportion to this, which is also usual*, because the unskilled pump-makers study a symmetry which satisfies the eye ; we shall find that the pump taken as an example will require a head of water 13 feet and upwards. Besides, it must be observed that the friction of the suction-pipe itself has not been taken into the account. This alone is greater, in most cases, than all the obstructions we have been speaking of; for if this pipe is three inches diameter, and that of the working-barrel is six, which is reckoned a liberal allowance for a suction-pipe, and if the fixed valve is 25 feet above the surface of the water-pit; the friction of this pipe will amount to one-third of the whole pro¬ pelling force. Thus we have enabled the reader to ascertain the force necessary for producing any required discharge of water from a pump of known dimensions : and the con¬ verse of this determination gives us the discharge which will be produced by any given force. For making A* A2 A* . -J-— — -^7- (which is a known quantity, resulting from the dimensions of the pump) = M, we have H zz — M, and V2 = and Vzz J. Now H 2g M M is that part of the natural power which we have at com¬ mand which exceeds what is necessary for merely sup¬ porting the column of water. Thus, if we have a pump whose piston has an area of of a square foot, its diameter being 6y inches; and we have to raise the water 32 feet, and can apply a power of 525 pounds to the piston ; we wish to know at what rate the piston will be moved, and the quantity of water discharged P Merely Pump. P U M [51 Merely to support the column of water of this height and diameter, requires 500 pounds. Therefore the re¬ maining power, which is to produce the motion, is 25 pounds. This is the weight of a column 1 foot 4 inches high, and H =1,333 feefc* ^et us suPPose ^ie ter of the suction-pipe 4 of that of the working-barrel, so that ^ = 4. We may suppose it executed in the best manner, having its lower extremity trumpet-shaped, formed by the revolution of the proper trochoid. 'Ihe contraction at the entry may therefore be considered A A2 as nothing, and-^- = 4, and —=16. We may also 8 ] P U M suppose the orifice of the fixed valve equal to the A* area of the suction-pipe, so that —rj- is also = 16, A* and there is no contraction here j and therefore ~ A* is also 16. And lastly, — is also 16. Therefore a* Aa , A* A* Aa -- or M, = cr 16 + 16 — 16, = 16. quires for its production a head of water This is the height of a column of water whose base is not A but A—a. Calling the density of water d, we have for the weight of this column, and the force p in 1 /A—a\ V* eA?2(A—<7)3 . rf x A-a+{—) X ^.=—^47— IK / 2 ^ IT We have also 2g =r 64. Now N = v —jyj—. ; =2,309 feet, and the piston will move with the velocity of 2 feet 4 inches nearly. Its velocity will be less than this, on account both of the friction of the piston and the friction of the water in the suction-pipe. These two circumstances will pro¬ bably reduce it to one foot eight inches j and it can hardly be less than this. We have taken no notice of the friction of the water in the working-barrel, or in the space above the piston •, because it is in all cases quite insignificant. The longest pipes employed in our deep mines do not require more than a few inches of head to overcome it. But there is another circumstance which must not be omitted. This is the resistance given to the piston in its descent. The pistons of an engine for drawing wa¬ ter from deep mines must descend again by their own weight in order to repeat their stroke. This must re¬ quire a preponderance on that end of the working-beam to which they are attached, and this must be overcome by the moving power during the effective stroke. It makes, therefore, part of the whole Avork to be done, and must be added to the weight of the \column of wa¬ ter which must be raised. This is \rery easily ascertained. Let the velocity of the piston in its descent be V, the area of the pump- barrel A, and the area of the piston-valve a. It is evident, that while the piston descends with the velo¬ city V, the Avater which is displaced by the piston in a second is (A—a) V. This must pass through the hole of the piston, in order to occupy the space above, Avhich is left by the piston. If there Avere no contraction, the Avater would go through Avitli the velocity ——V 5 but as there Avill ahvays be some contraction, let the dimi¬ nished area of the hole (to be discovered by experiment) be b, the velocity therefore Avill be V —7—* This re- c, AVe see again, is proportional to the square of the velo¬ city of the piston in its descent, and has no relation to the height to Avhich the Avater is raised. If the piston has a button valve, its surface is at least equal to a ; and therefore the pressure is exerted on the Avater by the whole surface of the piston. la this case «?V2 A3 avc shall have p = ^7- considerably greater than before. We cannot ascertain this value with great pre¬ cision, because it is extremely difficult, if possible, to determine the resistance in so complicated a case. But the formula is exact, if b can be given exactly ; and we knoAV within very moderate limits Avhat it may amount to. In a pump of the very best construction, with a button valve, b cannot exceed one-half of Aj A* and therefore -7- cannot be less than 8. In this V* A3 Y* case, r: Avill be -5-* In a good steam-engine pump 2 g b* o i V* . V is about three feet per second, and is about 11 o feet, Avhich is but a small matter. S(, We have hitherto been considering the sucking-pump and jntiJ alone : but the forcing pump is of more importance, forcing- and apparently more difficult of investigation.—I^ex•ePUIBP• Ave have to overcome the obstructions in long pipes, Avith many bends, contractions, and other obstructions. But the consideration of Avhat relates merely to the pump is abundantly simple. In most cases avc have only to force the water into an air-vessel, in opposition to the elasticity of the air compressed in it, and to send it thither Avith a certain velocity, regulated by the quan¬ tity of water discharged in a given time. The elasticity of the air in the air-vessel propels it along the Main. We are not now speaking of the force necessary for counterbalancing this pressure of the air in the air-vessel, which is equivalent to all the subsequent obstructions, but only of the force necessary for propelling the water out of the pump with the proper velocity. We have in a manner determined this already. The piston is solid, and the Avater which it forces has to pass through a valve in the lateral pipe, and then to move in the direction of the main. The change of di¬ rection requires an addition of force to what is neces¬ sary for merely impelling the Avater through the valve. Its quantity is not easily determined by any theory, and it varies according to the abruptness of the turn. It appears from experiment, that when a pipe is bent to a right angle, without any curvature or rounding, _ 1—nVistiif 1 This Would the velocity is diminished about 'Ihis would aug¬ ment the head of water about £. This may be added to the contraction of the valve hole. Let c be its na¬ tural area, and whatever is the contraction competent to its form, increase it xVj and call the contracted area _ V1 A* Then this Avill a require a head of water = - fj. (J. * & ■ . This P U M V , This must be added to the head —, necessary for mere- 2g J lv giving the velocity V to the water. Therefore the ... A* \ whole is — -J-i I; and the power p necessary for f/AVVA2 \ 2g this purpose is It cannot escape the observation of the reader, that in all these formulae, expressing the height of the co¬ lumn of water which would produce the velocity V in the working barrel of the pump, the quantity which d A V* multiplies the constant factor depends on the 2g contracted passages which are in different parts of the pump, and increases in the duplicate proportion of the sum of those contractions. It is therefore of the utmost consequence to avoid all such, and to make the main which leads from the forcing-pump equal to the work¬ ing barrel. If it be only of half the diameter, it has but one-fourth of the area, the velocity in the main is four times greater than that of the piston, and the force necessary for discharging the same quantity of water is 16 times greater. It is not, however, possible to avoid these contrac¬ tions altogether, without making the mam pipe wider than the barrel. For if only so wide, with an entry of the same size, the valve makes a considerable obstruc¬ tion. Unskilful engineers endeavour to obviate this by making an enlargement in that part of the main which contains the valve. This is seen in fig. 14. at the valve L. If this be not done with great judgment, it will increase the obstructions. Foril this enlargement is full of water, the water must move in the direction of its axis with a diminished velocity j and when it comes in¬ to the main, it must again be accelerated. In short, any abrupt enlargement which is to be afterwards con¬ tracted, does as much harm as a contraction, unless it 1 be so short that the water in the axis keeps its velocity fex* fill it reaches the contraction. Nothing would do more euts. servjce t0 an artJstj WJ10 J3 no(; we]i founded in the theory of hydrodynamics, than to make a few simple and cheap experiments with a vessel like that of fig. 37. Let the horizontal pipe be about three inches diameter, and made in joints which cam be added to each other. Let the joints be about six inches long, and the holes from one-fourth to a whole inch in diameter. Fill the vessel with water, and observe the time of its sinking three or four inches. Each joint should have a small hole in its upper side to let out the air ; and when the water runs out by it, let it be stopped by a peg. He will see that the larger the pipe is in proportion to the orifices made in the partitions, the efflux is more dimi¬ nished. We believe that no person would suspect this who has not considered the subject minutely. t AH angular enlargements, all boxes, into which the pipes from different working barrels, unite their water before it goes into a main, must therefore be avoided by an artist who would execute a good machine j and the different contractions which are unavoidable at the seats of valves and the perforations of pistons, &c. should be diminished by giving the parts a trumpet- shape. In the air-vessels represented in fig. 13. this is of very great consequence. The throat O, through which the f S'9 ] P U M water ‘S (breed by the expansion of the confined air, ru,„p. should always be formed in this manner. For it is this ' v^— which produces the motion during the returning part of the stroke in the pump constructed like fig. 13 N° j and during the whole stroke in N° 2. Neglecting this* seemingly trifling circumstance will diminish the per- 01 mance at least one-fifth. The construction of N° 1. is the best, for it is hardly possible to make the passage of the other so free from the effects of contraction. The motion of the water during the returning stroke is very much contorted. ] There is one circumstance that we have not taken any Accelcra- notice of, viz. the gradual acceleration of the motion ofbon of the water in pumps. When a force is applied to the piston,molion.of it does not in an instant communicate all the velocitywater m which it acquires. It acts as gravity acts on heavy bo- dies; and if the resistances remained the same, it would produce, like gravity, an uniformly accelerated motion. But we have seen that the resistances (which are always measured by the force which just overcomes them) in¬ crease as the square of the velocity increases. They therefore quiekly balance the action of the moving power, and the motion becomes uniform, in a time so short that we commit no error ol any consequence by supposing it uniform from the beginning. It would have prodigiously embarrassed our investigations to have introduced this circumstance; and it is a matter of mere speculative curiosity: for most of our moving powers are unequal in their exertions, and these exer¬ tions are regulated by other laws. ’I he pressure on a piston moved by a crank is as variable as its velocity, and in most cases is nearly in the inverse proportion of its velocity, as any mechanician will readily discover. The only case in which we could consider this matter with any degree of comprehensibility is that of a steam- engine, or of a piston which forces by means of a weight lying on it. In both, the velocity becomes uniform in a very small fraction of a second. S9 We have been very minute on this subject. For al-Deficiency though it is the only view of a pump which is of any of elemen- importance, it is hardly ever understood even by profes- or^tllis^ub sed engineers. And this is not peculiar to hydraulics, ject. but is seen in all the branches of practical mechanics. The elementary knowledge to be met with in such books as are generally perused by them, goes no farther than to state the forces which are in equilibrio by the in¬ tervention of a machine, or the proportion of the parts of a machine which will set two known forces in equili¬ brio. But wdien this equilibrium is destroyed by the su¬ periority of one of the forces, the machine must move; and the only interesting question is, what will be the motion $ Till this is answered with some precision, we have learned nothing of any importance. Few engi¬ neers are able to answer this question even in the simplest cases ; and they cannot, from any confident science, say what will be the performance of an untried machine. They guess at it with a success proportioned to the mul¬ tiplicity of their experience and their own sagacity. Yet this part of mechanics is as susceptible of accurate computation as the cases of equilibrium.—We therefore thought it our duty to point out the manner of proceed¬ ing so circumstantially, that every step should be plain and easy, and that conviction should always accompany our progress. This we think it has been in our power to do, by the very simple method of substituting a co¬ lumn PUN r 520 ] PUN pump lumn of water acting by its weight in lieu of any natu- || ral power which we may chance to employ. Puncheon.^ 'J’q gUC[j ag -vvish to prosecute the study ot this impor- v tant part of hydraulics in its most abstruse parts, We re¬ commend the perusal ot the dissertations of Mr and Mr Bossut, in the memoirs of the Academy ol Ba¬ ris j also the dissertations ot the Chevalier de la Borda, 1-766 and 1767 5 also the liydrauhcjuc of the Chevalier De Buat. We shall have occasion to consider the mo¬ tion of the water in the mains of forcing or lifting pumps which send the water to a distance, in the aiticle WATER-Works ; where the reader will see how small is the performance of all hydraulic machines, in compari¬ son of what the usual theories, founded on equilibrium only, would make him expect. PUN, or PuNN, an expression where a word has at once different meanings. The practice of punning is the miserable refuge of those who wash to pass foi wits, without having a grain of wit in their composition. James the I. of England delighted in punning; and the taste of the sovereign was studied by the courtiers, and even by the clergy. Hence the sermons of that age abound with this species of false wit. It continued to be more or less fashionable till the reign of Queen Anne, when Addison, Swift, Pope, and Arbuthnot, with the other real wits ot that classical age, united their efforts to banish punning from polite composition. It is still admitted sparingly in conversation; and no one will deny that a happy pun, when it comes unsought, contributes to excite mirth in a company. A professed punster, however, who is always pouring forth his sense¬ less quibbles, as Sancho Pan$a poured forth his pro¬ verbs, is such an intolerable nuisance in society, that ive do not wonder at Pope or Swift having written a pamphlet with the title of God's Reve?ige against Run¬ ning. PUNCH, an instrument of iron or steel, used in se¬ veral arts, for the piercing or stamping holes in plates of metals, &c. being so contrived as not only to perforate, but to cut out and take away the piece. The punch is a principal instrument of the metal-button makers, shoe¬ makers, &c. Punch is also a name for a sort of compound drink, much used here, and in many parts abroad, particu¬ larly in Jamaica, and several other parts of the West Indies. Its basis is spring-water ; which being rendered cool¬ er, brisker, and more acid, with lemon or lime juice, and sweetened again to the palate with fine sugar, makes what they call sherbet; to which a proper quantity of spirituous liquor, as brandy, rum, or arrack, being add¬ ed, the liquor becomes punch. PUNCHEON, Punchin, or Punchion, a little block or piece of steel, on one end whereof is some figure, letter, or mark, engraven either in crenx or relievo, impressions whereof are taken on metal, or some other matter, by striking it with a hammer on the end not engraved. There are various kinds of these puncheons used in the mechanical arts ; such, for instance, are those of the goldsmiths, cutlers, pewte- rers, &.c. The puncheon, in coining, is a piece of iron steeled, whereon the engraver has cut in relievo the several fi¬ gures, arms, effigy, inscription, &c. that there are to be in the matrices, wherewith the species are to be mar-Punch,, ked. Minters distinguish three kinds of puncheons, ac- Puncte cording to the three kinds of matrices to be made ; that( don of the effigy, that of the cross or arms, and that of the ^“v'' legend or inscription. The first includes the whole por¬ trait in relievo ; the second are small, such only contain¬ ing a piece of the cross or arms ; for instance, a fleur- de-lis, an harp, a coronet, &c. by the assemblage of all which the entire matrice is formed. The puncheons of the legend only contain each one letter, and serve equal¬ ly for the legend on the effigy side and the cross side, See the article Coinage. For the puncheons used in stamping the matrices wherein the types of printing characters are cast, see LETTER-Foundery. Puncheon is also used for several iron tools, of va¬ rious siz.es and figures, used by the engravers en creux on metals. Seal-engravers particularly use a great num¬ ber for the several pieces of arms, &c. to be engra¬ ven, and many stamp the whole seal from a single pun¬ cheon. Puncheon is also a common name for all those iron instruments used by stone-cutters, sculptors,blacksmiths, &c. for the cutting, inciding, or piercing their several matters. Those of sculptors and statuaries serve for the re¬ pairing of statues when taken out of the moulds. The locksmiths use the greatest variety of puncheons ; some for piercing hot, others for piercing cold ; some flat, some square, some round, others oval, each to pierce holes of its respective figure in the several parts of locks. Puncheon, in Carpentry, is a piece of timber pla¬ ced upright between two posts, whose bearing is too great ; serving, together with them, to sustain some large weights. This term is also used for a piece of timber raised up¬ right, under the ridge of a building, wherein the legs of a couple, &c. are jointed. Puncheon, is also the name of a measure for li¬ quids. Hum is brought from the colonies in pun¬ cheons, which are large casks containing about 130 gallons. PUNCTUATION, in Grammar, the art of point¬ ing, or of dividing a discourse into periods, by points expressing the pauses to be made therein. The points used are four, viz. the period, colon, semi¬ colon, and comma. See the particular use of each undei its proper article, Comma, Colon, I ericd, and Se?.ii- COLON. In general, we shall only here observe, that the comma is to distinguish nouns from nouns, verbs from verbs, and such other parts of a period as are not neces¬ sarily joined together. The semi-colon serves to suspend and sustain the period when too long : the colon, to add some new supernumerary reason, or consequence, to what is already said: and the period to close up the sense and construction, and release the voice. It has been asserted, that punctuation is a modern art, and that the ancients were entirely unacquainted with the use of our commas, colons, &c. and wrote not on y without any distinction of numbers and periods, but al¬ so without distinction of words: which custom, Bip- sius observes, continued till the hundred and fourth lympiau 5 PiiMr /’LA//'• C( YYIYL/A E.A/ilr/tr//' SA/rZ/t PUMP. PLATE CCCCL. Selkirk Sculp} P UM P. PLATE CCCCLI. Fie/. ZJ. rf.rr® g- P U N [ r2I nctua- lympmil; Junng which time the sense alone divideii the discourse. What within our own knowledge at this day puts this he,end dispute, ,s the Alexandrian manuscript, which is at present in the king’s library, at the British Mustemn Whoever examines this, will find that the whole is writ- ten continuo ductu, without distinction of words or sen¬ tences. How the ancients read their works written in tins manner, it is not easy to conceive. After the practice of joining words together ceased, notes of distinction were placed at the end of every word. In all the editions of thp • .1 . ] P U N in Hrckiuy^ty^s in "riook- ^ appears that „ was only for the purpose of an abbre viation, as m (namq;) (neq for namque c and v 4^1?“ Whid‘ 11 i8 ,10w ployed, JW,! t. iTSt’. “■-^-ry word. In all the editions of the I'asli Ctmlo/ZA'll'I. • ‘"“"“i «» wen as all the ordinary points occur. The same are to be seen on H,e Cotulna Sr n5 atUi T “ "“‘t e"lit'ed “ IulaS‘Qes Deorum,” Jios rata For want of these, we find much confusion Lrs We ^ ^ -T" f5Sl’ in Roman c^rac- :Ll'^r.OT'“"d covenant between a jnstl, coHraK^e^^r^^ and pood man Pla.'IsV A/T . , C arv. ^ 'Vise e ...... emu me covenant between the bmyrnaeans and Magnesians, which are both now at. ° r; Sa,mas!us,s edition of Dedicatio statute c j ^ IIerodls’ t,le llke confusion occurs, where we find AEYPITE and an. Of these marks of distinction, the Walcote inscrip¬ tion found near Bath may serve as a specimen ; IVLIUSv VITALISv FABRI CESISv LEGv XXVv Vv V STIPENDIORUMv &c. After every word here, except at the end of a line we see this mark v. There is an inscription in Montfau- *on, which has a capital letter laid in an horizontal po¬ sition, by way of interstitial mark, which makes one apt to think that this way of pointing was sometimes accor¬ ding to the fancy of the graver. P. FERBARIVS HERMES CAECINIAE H DIGNAE CONIVGI H KARISSIMAE NVMERIAE H &c. He we observe after the words a T laid horizontally, but not after each word, which proves this to be of a much later age than the former. As the improvement of stops appears not to have ta¬ ken place while manuscripts and monumental inscrip¬ tions were the only known methods to convey know¬ ledge, it is conjectured that it was introduced with the art of printing. The 14th century, to which we are supposed to be indebted for this invention, did not, how¬ ever bestow those appendages we call stops: whoever Wf ^ at the Pa,ns of examining the first printed books, will discover no stops of any kind ; but arbitrary marks here and there, according to the humour of the printer. AVr . I-1 century> we observe their first appearance. e find, from the books of this age, that they were not all produced at the same time 5 those we meet with there in use, being only the comma, the parenthesis, the interrogation, and the full point. To prove this, we need but look into Bale’s Acts of English Worthies, hlack letter, printed 1550. Indeed, in the dedication of this book, which is to Edward VI. we discover a co¬ on : but, as this is the only one of the kind throughout the work, it is plain this stop was not established at this ime, and so warily put in by the printer; or if it was, tat it vvas not in common use. Thirty years after this ime, m that sensible and judicious performance of Sir loams Elyot, entitled The Gove mom', imprinted o, we sec the colon as frequently introduced as any oticr stop; but the semicolon and the admiration were Vol. XVII. Part IJ. , ' - > ......w, in x leucii ny II and good man, 1 h.hp Mornay, lord of Plessis; in the with 1H maSter -0 R°/er Ascham’ Printe(l ^ 1570, with the exception of the semicolon; and in the rewnesse of the Christian Religion,” by Sir Philip Sulney, published in 1587, in which we find the aste- r sk, brackets, the interrogation, the comma and the se¬ ll ico I on, all as we now use them ; and the colon and period are square dots. In an alchemical manuscript of the date of 1 ^2 the semicolon is said to be met with, as well as the other three points which axe in common use. The colon and period are abundant in a work entitled “ Dionisius de bitu Oi bis, printed at Venice in 1498, but none of the o her stops or points. The single point ( . ) appears to be the most ancient. Since the year 1485 the colon was introduced ; the comma is first seen about the year 1521 ; and the more refined semicolon was brought into use about the year 1570. 1 he invention of the semicolon is most probably due to the English ; for from the Leyden edition of Pliny, ;r553» lt 18 evident that the Butch printers were not then in the practice of using it; and if in 1570, they were, Roger Ascham would probably have employed it; for the Butch were the principal classical printers in Ins time; but we find that some English books were marked with it at that period. The admiration was the last stop that was invented, and seems to have been added to the rest in a period not so far distant from our own time. Ihus we see that these notes of distinction came into use as learning was gradually advanced and improved ; one invention indeed, but enlarged by several additions. But notwithstanding what has been said relative to the use of stops as being a modern invention, we shall find reason to be satisfied that the ancients were not un¬ acquainted with the method of making pauses in speak¬ ing and writing, if we attend to the following elaborate investigation of Mr Warburton, which we shall lay be¬ fore our readers in the words of the author. “ Some species of pauses and divisions of sentences in speaking and writing must have been coeval with the knowledge of communicating ideas by sound or by sym¬ bols. “ Suidas* says, that the period and the colon were * Be Thru* discovered and explained by Thrasymachus, about 380 aymacho. years before the Christian tera. Cicero! says, that f Cicero I hrasymachus was the first who studied oratorical num- § 33, hers, which entirely consisted in the artificial structure of periods and colons. It appears from a passage in Ari¬ stotle I, that punctuation was known in his time. The £ Rh.eL 3U learned lb’ ul' e’ PUN [ 522 1 PUN * Beni. Or bis erud. Jjilerat tab. 30. edit. 1689. } Cic. de Oral. lib. iii $ ab. Ibid. 7. Orat. pro Muruaui, i 25. | Sen. E- p,si. 40. $ Quit id. fcb.ix.c. iv [j A. D. 340 * Hieron. Ercef.in Esiiam. Vide cUatn Prft’f. in Josvain, &c tom. iit p. 20. f Vide Monif. Palceog. Gruca. life iii c. 4. learned Dr Edward Bernard* refers the knowledge ot pointing to the time of that philosopher, and says, that it consisted in the different position of one single point. At the bottom of a letter •, thus, (A.) it was equivalent to a comma ; in the middle (A-) it was equal to a colon j at the top (A’) it denoted a period, or the conclusion ot a sentence. > . “ This mode was easily practised in Greek manu¬ scripts, while they were written in capitals. But when the small letters tvere adopted, that is, about the ninth century, this distinction could not be observed j a change was therefore made in the scheme of punctuation. Un- < idles literas hodierno vsu dicimus eas in vetustis codict- bus, quae priscam formam servant, ac solutce sunt, nec mvtub colligantur. Hi jus modi liter ee unciales observan- tur in libris omnibus ad nonum usque sezculum. Monti. Paloeog. Recens. p. xii. “ According to Cicero, the ancient Romans as well •ns the Greeks made use of points. He mentions them under the appellation of librariorum notee; and in several parts of his works he speaks of ‘ interpunctce clausula: in orationibus\ of ‘ clausula atque interpunctce verbo- rum\ of interpunctiones verbomm, Sfc. t. “ Seneca, who died A. D. 65, expressly says, that Latin writers in his time, had been used to punctuation. ‘ Nos t, cum scribimus interpungere consuevimus: Mu- retos and Lipsius imagined that these words alluded to the insertion of a point after each word ; but they cer¬ tainly were mistaken, for they must necessarily refer to marks of punctuation in the division of sentences, because in the passage in which these words occur, Seneca is speaking of one Q. Haterius, who made no pauses m his orations. xr 1 • “ According toSuetonius in his Illust. Gram. Valerius Probus procured copies of many old books, and employ¬ ed himself in correcting, pointing and illustrating them devoting his time to this and no other part ot grammar. Malta exemplaria contracta emendare, ac distinguere et adnotare euravit; soli hide, nec ulhpraterca, gramma- ikes parti deditus. . “ It appears from hence that in the time of rrobus, or about the year 68, Latin manuscripts had not been usually pointed *, and that grammarians made it their business to supply tins deficiency. “ Quintilian, who wrote his celebrated treatise on Oratory about the year 88, speaks of commas, colons, and periods •, but it must be observed that by these terms he means clauses, members, and complete sentences, and not the marks of punctuation §. “ iElius Donatus || published a treatise on Grammar in the fourth century, in which he explains the distinctio, the media distinctio, and the subdistmctio : that is, the use of a single point in the various positions already men¬ tioned. “ Jerom *, who had been the pupil of Donatus, m his Latin version of the scriptures, made use of certain distinctions or divisions, which he calls cola and com- mata. It has however been thought probable, that the e divisions were not made by the addition ol any points or stops , but were formed by writing, in one line, as many we ds as constituted a clause, equivalent to what we di¬ stinguish by a comm or a eo > n. r\ hese divisions were c died e-Ti%oi cr fouetr* , a d In '! the appearance ot short irre/ular vers-s in poetry. 'Ha re are some Greek ma- * nuscripts still extant which are written in .this manneri. “ The best treatise upon punctuation I have seen, and from which these authorities are partly taken, wa.5 pub¬ lished some years since and dedicated to Sir Clifton Wintringham, Bart, the name of the author 1 know not*.” PUNCTUM SAL1ENS, in Anatomy, the first rudi¬ ments of the heart in the formation of the toetus, where a throbbing motion is perceived. rlhis is said to be ea¬ sily observed with a microscope in a brood-egg, wherein alter conception, we see a little speck or cloud, in the middle whereof is a spot that appears to beat or leap a considerable time before the foetus is formed for batch¬ ing. See the articles Foetus and Anatomy. Punctum stans, a phrase by which the schoolmen vainly attempt to bring within the reach of human, comprehension the positive eternity of God. 'Those subtile reasoners seem to have discovered that nothing, which is made up of parts, whether continuous or dis¬ crete, can be absolutely infinite, and that therefore eter¬ nity cannot consist of a boundless series of successive moments. Yet, as if such a series had always existed, and were commensurate in duration with the supreme Being, they compared his eternity to one of the mo¬ ments which compose the flux of time arrested in its course : and to this eternal moment they gave the name of punctum stans, because it was supposed to stand still, whilst the rest followed each other in succession, all va¬ nishing as soon as they appeared. We need not waste time or room in exposing the absurdity ot this conceit, as we have elsewhere endeavoured, in the best manner we can, to ascertain the meaning of the words eternity and infinity, and to show that they cannot he predicated of time or space, of points or moments, whether flowing or standing still. See METAPHYSICS, Part II. chap. 7. 8. and Part III. chap. 6. PUNCTURE, in Surgery, any wound made by a sharp-pointed instrument. PUNDITS, or PendiTS, learned Bramins devoted to the study of the Sanscrit language, and to the ancient science, laws, and religion of Hindostan. See Philo¬ sophy, N° 4—12. PUNICA, the Pomegranate Tree, a genus of plants belonging to the icosandria class, and in the na¬ tural method ranking under the 36th order, Pomacece. See Botany Index. PUNISHMENT, in Law, the penalty which a per¬ son incurs on the commission of a crime. See the article Crime and Punishment. The ingenuity of men has been much exerted to tor¬ ment each other > but the following are the punishments that have been usually adopted in tl* different countries of the world. The capital punishments have been be¬ heading, crucifixion, burning, roasting, drowning, sea ping, hanging by the neck, the arm, or the leg, star¬ ving, sawing, exposing to wild beasts, rending asunder by horses drawing opposite ways, burying alive, shoot¬ ing, blowing from the mouth ef a cannon, compulsory deprivation of sleep, rolling in a barrel stuck with nails Pune „ lid j I! Punk mu: v—V J * Mov,, Mag. i I 186. rock, teai mg our toe uuwtis, / . hot pincers, the rack, the wheel, impaling, flaying aln , & The punishments short of death have been fine, pillo¬ ry, imprisonment, compulsory labour at the mines, ga^' PUR isf.mcnl leys> highways, or correction-house ; whipping, bastina' i) ding, mutilation by cutting away the ears, the nose , the tongue, the breasts of women, the foot, the hand •’ ''v squeezing the marrow from the bones with screws or ,wedges, castration, putting out the eyes, banishment running the gauntlet, drumming, shaving off the hair’ burning on the hand or forehead, &c. PUNNING. See Pun. / PUPIL, in the civil law, a boy or girl not yet arri¬ ved at the age of puberty j i. e. the boy under 14 years the girl under 12. ’ Pupil, is also used in universities, &c. for a youth un¬ der the education or discipline of any person. Pupil, in Anatomy, a little aperture in the middle of the uvea and iris of the eye, through which the rays of light pass to the crystalline humour, in order to be painted on the retina, and cause vision. See Anatomy Index. PURCELL, Henry, a justly celebrated master of music, began early to distinguish himself. As bis ge¬ nius was original, it wanted but little forming, and he rose to the height of his profession with more ease than others pass through their rudiments. He was made or¬ ganist to Westminster abbey in the latter end of the reign of Charles II. In that of William, he set several songs for Dryden’s Amphytrion and his King Arthur, which were received with just applause. His notes in his operas were admirably adapted to his words, and so echoed to the sense, that the sounds alone seemed ca¬ pable of exciting those passions which they never failed to do in conjunction. His music was very different from the Italian. It was entirely English, and perfect¬ ly masculine. His principal works have been published under the title of Orpheus Britannicus. He died in 1695, in the 37th year of his age, and was interred in West¬ minster abbey, where a monument is erected to his me¬ mory. PURCHAS, Samuel, an English divine, famous for compiling a valuable collection of voyages, was horn in I577> at Thacksted in Essex. After studying at Cam¬ bridge, he obtained the vicarage of Eastwood in his na¬ tive county; hut leaving that cure to his brother, he set¬ tled in London, in order to carry on the great work in which he was engaged. He published the first volume in folio, 1613, and the four last, 12 years after, under the title of Pitrc/ias his Pilgrimage, or Relations of the world, and the Religions observed in all ages and places. Meanwhile he was collated to the rectory of St Mar¬ tin’s, Ludgate, in London, and made chaplain to Dr Abbot, archbishop of Canterbury. His Pilgrimage, and the learned Hackluyt’s Voyages, led the way to all the other collections of that kind, and have been justly valued and esteemed. But unhappily, by his publishing, he in¬ volved himself in debt: he did not, however, die in pri¬ son, as some have asserted ; but at bis own house, about the year 1628. PURCHASE, in Law, the buying or acquiring of lands, &c. with money, by deed or agreement, and not by descent or right of inheritance. Purchase, in the sea-language, is the same as draw m: thus, when they say, the capstan purchases a pace, they only mean it draws in the cable a-pace. PURE, something free from any admixture of fo¬ reign or heterogeneous matters. PURELEW, a term in heraldry, expressing ermins, Pmflc Pnmatorv. 23 ] PUR peans or any of the furs, when they compose a bordure round a coat of arms: thus they say, He beareth gules, a bordure, purflew, vairy; meaning, that the bordure is vairy. > — the art of purging, scouring, or purifying a thing, by separating, or carrying off any impurities found therein. Thus, ^ In pharmacy, purgation is the cleansing of a medicine >y retrenching its supeifiuities. In chemistry, it is used for the several preparations of metals and minerals in¬ tended to clear them of their impurities, more usually called purification and refining. J In medicine, purgation is an excretory motion arising from a quick and orderly contraction of the fleshy fibre# of the stomach and intestines, whereby the chyle, cor¬ rupted humours, and excrements lodged therein, are protruded further and further, and at length quite ex¬ cluded the body by stool. See Materia Medica. Purgation, in Late, signifies the clearing a person’s self of a crime of which he is suspected and accused be¬ fore a judge.. This purgation is either canonical or vul¬ gar. Canonical purgation is prescribed by the canon- law, and the form thereof in the spiritual court is usual¬ ly thus: The person suspected takes his oath that he is innocent of the crime charged against him ; and at the same time brings some of his neighbours to make oath that they believe he swears truly. Vulgar purgation was anciently by fire or water, or else by combat, and was practised here till abolished by our canons. See Battel, in law; Ordeal, &c. PURGATIVE or Purging Medicines, medica¬ ments, which evacuate the impurities of the body by stool, called also cathartics. PURGATORY, a place in which the just, who de¬ part out of this life, are supposed to expiate certain of-, fences which do not merit eternal damnation. Brough¬ ton has endeavoured to prove, that this notion has been held by Pagans, Jews, and Mahometans, as well as by- Christians ; and that in the days of the Maccabees the Jews believed that sin might be expiated by sacrifice after the death of the sinner, cannot be questioned. Much abuse has been poured upon the church oi^aPb>t mi*- Rome for her doctrine of purgatory, and many false re- rePJfseTtte^ presentations have been made of the doctrine itself. The Icntcd1!™' following view of it is taken from a work which is con¬ sidered as a standard by the British Catholics. 1. Every sin, how slight soever, though no more than an idle word, as it is an offence to God, deserves punishment from him, and will be punLhed by him hereafter, if not cancelled by repentance here. 2. Such small sins do not deserve eternal punishment. 3. Few depart this life so pure as to be totally exempt from spots of this na¬ ture, and from every kind of debt due to God’s justice. 4. Therefore few will escape without suffering some¬ thing from his justice for such debts as (hey have carried with them out of this world ; according to that rule of divine justice, by which he treats every soul hereafter according to its works, and according to the state in which he finds it in death. From these propositions, which the Papist considers as so many self-evident truths, he infers that there must be some third place of punish¬ ment; for, since the infinite goodness of God can ad¬ mit nothing into heaven which is not clean and pure from all sin both great and small; and his infinite- justice can permit none to receive the reward of bliss, 3 U 2 wh« PUR r 524 ] P U R Fnr^atory, who as yet are not out of debt, but have something in JPurifica- iustice to suffer; there must of necessity be some place lion. or state, where souls, departing this life, pardoned as to ' ' v the eternal guilt or pain, yet obnoxious to some tempo¬ ral penalty, or with the guilt of some venial faults, are purged and purified before their admittance into hea¬ ven. And this is what he is taught concerning purga¬ tory. Which, though he knows not where it is, of w hat nature the pains are, or how long each soul is de¬ tained there ; yet he believes, that those that are in this place, being the living members of Jesus Christ, are relieved by the prayers of their fellow members here on earth, as also by alms and masses offered up to God for their souls. And as for such as have no relations or friends to pray for them, or give alms, or procure mas¬ ses for their relief; they are not neglected by the church, which makes a general commemoration of all the faithful departed in every mass, and in every one of the canonical hours of the divine office. Such is the Popish doctrine of purgatory, which is built chiefly upon 2 Macc. xii. 43, 44, 45 ; St Matth. xii. 31, 32; and 1 Cor. iii. 15. By Protestants the books of Maccabees are not acknowledged to be in¬ spired scripture ; but if they were, the texts referred to would rather prove that there is no such place as pur¬ gatory, since Judas did not expect the souls departed to reap any benefit from his sin-offering till the resurrec¬ tion. Our Saviour, in St Luke, speaks of remission in this woi'ld, and in the world to come ; hut surely neither of these is purgatory. The world to come is the state after the resurrection, and the remission spoken of is the sentrnce of absolution to be pronounced on the penitent from the seat of general judgment. In the obscure verse referred to in the epistle to the Corin¬ thians, the apostle is, by the best interpreters, thought to speak of the difficulty with which Christians should be saved from the destruction of Jerusalem. 01 the state of souls departed he cannot wTell be supposed to speak, as upon disembodied spirits fire could make no impression. We cannot help, therefore, thinking with the church of England, that “ the Romish doctrine of purgatory is a fond thing, vainly invented, and ground¬ ed on no warranty of scripture;” hut we must confess at the same time, that it appears to us to he a very harmless error, neither hostile to virtue nor dangerous to society. See Resurrection. PURIFICATION, in matters of religion, a cere¬ mony which consists in cleansing any thing from a sup¬ posed pollution or defilement. The Pagans, before they sacrificed, usually bathed or washed themselves in water; and they were particularly careful to wash their hands, because with these they were to touch the victims consecrated to the gods. It was also customary to wash the vessel with which they made their libations. The Mahometans also use puri¬ fications previous to the duty of prayer ; which are also of two kinds, either bathing, or only washing the face, hands and feet. The first is required only in extraor¬ dinary cases, as after having lain with a woman, touch¬ ed a dead body, &c. But lest so necessary a prepara¬ tion for their devotions should be omitted, either where water cannot be had, or when it may be of prejudice to a person’s health, they are allowed in such cases to make use of fine sand, or dust, instead of it; and then they perform this duty by clapping their open hands on the sand, and passing them over the parts, in the same tioiij manner as if they were dipped in water. R There were also many legal purifications among the , *>ul’Pi Hebrews. When a woman was brought to bed of a r 1 male child, she was esteemed impure for 40 days; and when of a female, for 60 : at the end of which time she carried a lamb to the door of the temple to be offered for a burnt-offering, and a young pigeon or turtle for a sin offering ; and by this ceremony she was cleansed or purified. PUR1M, or The Feast of Lots, a solemn festival of the Jews, instituted in memory of the deliverance they received, by means of Mordecai and Esther, from Haman’s wicked attempt to destioy them. PURITAN, a name formerly given in derision to the dissenters from the church of England, on account of the profession to follow the pure word of God, in opposition to all traditions and human constitutions. It was likewise given in the primitive church to the No- vatian schismatics, because they would never admit to communion anv one who from dread of death had apo¬ statized from the faith. PURITY, the freedom of any thing from foreign ad¬ mixture. Purity of Style. See Oratory, p. 4II> &c’ PURLIEU, signifies all that ground near any forest, which being made forest by King Henry II. Richard I. and King John, was afterwards by perambulations and grants of Henry HI. severed again from the same, and made purlieu ; that is to say, pure and free from the laws of the forest.—The word is derived from the French pur, “ pure,” and lieu, “ place.” PURLINS, in building, those pieces of timber that lie across the ratters on the inside, to keep them from sinking in the middle of their length. By the act of parliament for rebuilding London, it is provided, that all purlins from 15 feet 6 inches to 18 feet 6 inches long, be in their square 9 inches and 8 inches ; and all in length from 18 feet 6 inches to 21 feet 6 inches, be in their square 12 inches and9 inches. PURPLE, a colour composed of a mixture of red and blue. See Colour-Making, N° 29, and Dyeing Index. PURPURA, in Natural History. See Murex, Con- CHOLOGY Index. The Tyrian method ot dyeing purple was with a liquid extracted from this fish. It has been affirmed, however, that no such method was ever prac¬ tised. “ At Tyre (says Mr Bruce) I engaged two fish¬ ermen, at the expence of their nets, to drag in those places where they said shell-fish might be caught, in hopes to have brought out one of the famous purple-fish. I did not succeed ; but in this I was, I believe, as lucky as the old fishers had ever been. The purple-fish at Tyre seems to have been only a concealment of their knowledge of cochineal ; as, had they depended upon the fish for their dye, if the whole city of Tyre applied to nothing else but fishing, they would not have colour¬ ed 20 yards of cloth in a year.” PURPURE, in Heraldry. The colour so called, which signifies purple, is in engraving represented by diagonal lines, from the left to the right. See He- HALDRY. It PUS Lic¬ it may serve to denote an administrator of justice a lawgiver, or a governor equal to a sovereign : and ’ ' ( cording to G. Leigh, if it is compounded with r Uiches. Quietness, Politics. r 525 1 put Or, l Arg. | Gul. Az. Ver. Sab I rJ-= Fidelity. Cruelty. Sadness. PURRE, or Perkin. See Agriculture Indrr PURSER, an officer aboard a man of war, who re¬ ceives her victuals from the victualler, sees that it be well stowed, and keeps an account of what he every day de¬ livers to the steward. He also keeps a list of the ship’s company, and sets down exactly the day of each man’s admission, in order to regulate the quantity of provisions to be delivered out; and that the paymaster or treasurer of the navy may issue out the debursements, and payoff the men, according to his book. See PoRTULACA> Botany Index. PURVIEW, a term used by some lawyers for the body of an act of parliament, or that part which begins with “Be it enacted, &c.” as contradistinguished from the preamble. PURULENT, in Medicine, something mixed with, or partaking of, pus or matter. PUS, in Medicine, a white or yellowish matter design¬ ed by nature for the healing and cementing of wounds and sores. The origin and formation of pus is as much un¬ known as that of any other animal fluid. In an in¬ augural dissertation published at Edinburgh by Dr Hendy, the author supposes pus to be a secreted fluid. It has been thought by many, that pits is ei¬ ther a sediment from serum when beginning to putre¬ fy, or that it is the same fluid insipissated by the heat of the body. But both these opinions are refuted by some experiments of our author, which show, that pus is much less inclined to putrefaction than serum, and the putrefaction of both is hastened by an addition of some of the red part of the blood. Some other expe¬ riments were made, in order to try whether pus could be artificially produced. A thin piece of lamb’s flesh, applied to an ulcer discharging laudable pus, and cover¬ ed over with lead, did not assume the appearance of pus, but became fetid, and was much lessened. Serum, in its inflammatory and in its ordinary state, and lymph in different states, were applied to the same ulcer, which still discharged good pus; but none of these were converted into pus ; on the contrary, they became very putrid. In opposition to these arguments of our author, however, it may be alleged, that if pus ivas a secreted fluid, the vessels by which it was secreted would cer¬ tainly be visible; but no such thing has ever been ob¬ served : on the contrary, it is certain that pus cannot e formed unless the air is excluded from the wound. Jiiese disptres, however, are of no great consequence: but in some cases it becomes a matter of real import¬ ance to distinguish pus from mucus ; as thus we may he enabled to know whether a cough is consumptive, «r merely catarrhons. See Mucus. Mr Hume, in a issertation on the properties of pus, in which he avails umself of the experiments of Mr Hunter, as delivered in his 1 hysiolpgica! Lectures, says, “ that the characteri- Pll, s ic of pus is its being composed of globules; and he I! t links that the presence of globules seems to depend upon P«tcoH. the pus being ,n a perfect state. It differs from the' blood in the colour of the globules ; in their not being soluble m water, winch those of the blood are: and tiom the fluid in which they swim being coagulable by a solution of sal ammoniac, which serum is not.” Re¬ specting the formation of pus, our author adopts the idea suggested by Mr Hunter, that the vessels of the part as¬ sume the nature of a gland, and secrete a fluid which becomes pus. Mr Horne ascertains, by experiment, that pus, at its formation, is not globular* but a trans¬ parent fluid, of a consistence, in some sort, reseniblin«- jelly ; and that the globules are formed while lying up° on the surface of the sore; requiring, in some instances, while the influence of the external air is excluded fif¬ teen minutes for that purpose. c J ^ ^ ULE’ a or small eruption on the skin ’ suc*1 as tl,e options of the smallpox. "Ul AMINEiE, (from putamcn, “ a shell,”) the name of the 25th order of Linnaeus’s fragments of a natural method ; consisting of a few genera of plants allied in habit, whose fleshy seed-vessel or fruit is fre¬ quently covered with a hard woody shell. See Bo¬ tany. PUTEOLI, (Livy, Strabo) : a town of Campania; stow-' so called either from its wells, there being many hot and burnc's cold springs thereabouts; or from its stench, putor, Travels in caused by sulphureous exhalations, (Varro, Strabo)’^. ^ It is now called PuzKito/i, and is pleasantly and advan-™^' tageously situated for trade. In a very remote age, th« Cumeans made it their arsenal and dockyard; and to this naval establishment gave the sublime appellation of DicearcZiia or Just Power. The Romans were well aware of the utility of this port, and took great pains to improve its natural advan¬ tages. Nothing remains of their works but a line of piers, built to break the force of a rolling sea : they are vulgarly called the bridge of Caligula, because that mad¬ man is said to have marched in triumph from Puzzuoli to P>aiie on a bridge ; but his was a bridge of boats. 1 he ruins of its ancient edifices are widely spread along the adjacent hills and shores. An amphitheatre still exists entire in most of its parts, and the temple of Serapis offers many curious subjects of observation ; half of its buildings are still buried under the earth thrown upon it by volcanieal commotions, or accumu¬ lated by the crumblings of the hill; the inclosure is square, environed with buildings for priests and baths for votaries ; in the centre remains a circular platform, with four flights of steps up to it, vases for fire, a cen¬ trical altar, rings for victims, and other appendages of sacrifice, entire and not displaced ; but the columns that held its rool have been removed to the new palace of Caserta (see Caserta). Behind this round place of worship stand three pillars without capitals, part of the pronaos of a large temple , they are of cipoline marble, and at the middle of their height are full of holes eaten in them by the file-fish*. The present city contains near 10,000 inhabitants, * and occupies a small peninsula ; the cathedral was a pa- Vactyhis, gan temple, dedicated to the divinities that presided over commerce and navigation. E. Long. 14. 40. N. Lat. 41. 15. In PUT i 526 ] PUT Putcoli lii the neighbourhood of Puteoli are many relick.9 ot Futref-ic anc*en^ grandeur, of which none deserve more attention l'ti0;r than the Campanian way paved with lava, and lined on each side with venerable towers, the repositories ot the dead, which are richly adorned with stucco in the inside. This road was made in a most solid expensive manner by order of Domitian, and is frequently the subject of en¬ comium in the poems of Statius. PUT! caraja, in Botaivj, is a genus of Indian plants, of which the characters, as given by Sir William Jones in the Asiatic Researches, vol. ii. p. 351. are these. The calyx is five-cleft, the corolla has five equal petals, the pericarpium a thorny legumen and two seeds, the leaves oval and pinnated, and the stem armed. “ The seeds (says the learned president) are very bitter, and perhaps tonic ; since one of them, bruised and given in two dozes, will, as the Hindoos assert, cure an inter¬ mittent fever.” PUTORIUS. See Mustela, Mammalia Index. PUTREFACTION, is the natural process by which organized bodies are dissolved, and reduced to what may be called original elements. Putrefaction differs from chemical solution ; because in the latter, the dissolved bodies are kept in their state of solution by being combined with a certain agent from which they cannot easily be separated } but in pu¬ trefaction, the agent which dissolves the body appears not to combine with it in any manner of way, but mere¬ ly to separate the parts from each other. It differs also from the resolution of bodies by distillation with violent fire '•) because, in distillation, new and permanent com¬ pounds are formed, but by putrefaction every thing seems to be resolved into substances much more simple and in¬ destructible than those which are the result of any che¬ mical process. The bodies most liable to putrefaction are those of animals and vegetables, especially when full of juices. Stones, though by the action ot the weather they will moulder into dust, yet seem not to be subject to any thing like a real putrefaction, as they are not resolved into any other substance than sand, or small dust, winch still preserves its lapideous nature. In like manner, ve¬ getables of any kind, when deprived of their juices by drying, may be preserved for many ages without being subjected to any thing like a putrefactive process. The same holds good with respect to animals j the parts of which, by simple drying, may be preserved in a sound state for a much longer time than they could be without the previous exhalation of their juices. Putrefaction is generally allowed to be a kind of fer¬ mentation, or rather to be the last stage of that process ; which beginning with the vinous fermentation, goes on through the acetous, to the stage of putridity, w here it stops.° It is argued, however, and seemingly not without a great deal ot reason, that if putrefaction be a fermentation, it must necessarily be a kind distinct from either the vinous or acetous *, since we frequently observe that it takes place where neither the vinous nor the ace¬ tous stages have gone before \ of consequence, it must be, in some cases at least, entirely independent of and unconnected with them. In several other respects it dif¬ fers so much from these processed that it seems in some degree doubtful whether it can with propriety be called •a fermentation or not. Both the vinous and acetous fer¬ mentations are attended with a considerable degree of 5 heat $ but in the putrefaction of animal matters espeti- putrefe ally, the heat is for the most part so small, that we can- uon not be certain whether there is any degree of it or notv-. produced by the process. In cases, indeed, where the quantity of corrupting animal matter is very great, some heat may be perceived: and accordingly Dr Monro tells us, that he was sensible of heat on thrusting his hand into the flesh of a dead and corrupting whale. But the most remarkable difference between the putre¬ factive fermentation and that of the vinous and acetous kinds is, that the end of both these processes is to pro¬ duce a new and permanent compound j but that of the putrefactive process is not to produce any new form, but to destroy, and resolve one which already exists into the original principles from which all things seem to proceed. Thus the vinous fermentation produces ardent spirits } the acetous, vinegar : but putrefaction produces nothing but earth, and some effluvia, which, though most disagreeable, and even poisonous to the human bo¬ dy, yet, being imbibed by the earth and vegetable crea¬ tion, give life to a new race of beings. It is commonly supposed, indeed, that volatile alkali is a production of the putrefactive process : but this seems liable to dis¬ pute. The vapour of pure volatile alkali is not hurtful to the human frame, but that of putrefying substances is exceedingly so ; and, excepting in the case of urine, the generation of volatile alkali in putrid substances is very equivocal. This substance, which produces more alkali than any other, is much less offensive by its putrid fetor than others ; and all animal substances produce a volatile alkali on being exposed to the action of fire, of quick¬ lime, or of alkaline salts. In these cases the volatile al¬ kali is not supposed to be produced by the quicklime or fixed salt, but only to be extricated from a kind of ammoniacal salt pre-existing in the animal matters j the probability is the same in the other case, viz. that vola¬ tile alkali is not produced, but only extricated, from these substances by putrefaction. The only thing in which the putrefactive fermenta¬ tion agrees with the other kinds is, that in ail the three there is an extrication of fixed air. In the putrefactive process, it has been thought that this escape of the fix¬ ed air deprives the body of its cohesion : and Dr Mac- bride has written a treatise, in which he endeavours to prove that fixed air is the very power of cohesion itself, and that all bodies when deprived of their fixed air en¬ tirely lose their cohesion. According to this hypothesis, the cause of putrefaction is the escape ot fixed air ; but it is impossible to give a reason why fixed air, after having so long remained in a body, and preserved its cohesion, should of a sudden begin to fly off without being acted upon bv something else. To a similar objection the hypothesis of those is liable, who suppose putrefaction to be occasioned by the escape ot phlogiston ; for phlo¬ giston is now known to be a chimera : and though it were a reality, it would not fly oft without something to carry it off, any more than fixed air. Animalcules have been thought to be the cause of putrefaction : but if animal substances are covered so as to exclude the ac¬ cess of flies or other insects, no such animalcules are to be discovered though putrefaction has taken place ; and indeed it requires little proof to convince us, that ani¬ mals are produced jn corrupted bodies only because such substances prove a proper nidus for the eggs of the pa¬ rent insects. ^ PUT C 527 rcfac- To understand the true cause of putrefaction, we l ion must take notice of the circumstances in which the pro- h ' cess goes on most rapidly. These are, heat, a little moisture, and confined air. Extreme cold prevents pu¬ trefaction, as well as perfect dryness ; and a free circu¬ lation of air carries off the putrid effluvia ; a stagnation of which seems to be necessary for carrying on the pro¬ cess. It seems also to hold pretty generally, that pu¬ trefying bodies swell and become specifically lighter 5 for which reason the carcases of dead animals, after having sunk in water, rise to the top and float. ’ This last phenomenon, as has been observed under the article Blood, 2p. shows that these bodies have received a certain quantity of an elastic principle from the air, which thus swells them up to such' a size. It may he said indeed, that this increase of size in putrefying bo¬ dies is owing only to the extrication of air within them¬ selves : but this amounts to the same thing j for the air which exists internally in the body of any animal, is entirely divested of elasticity while it remains there, and only shows its elastic properties upon beintr extri¬ cated. The elastic principle which combines with the air fixed in the animal substance, therefore, must come from the external atmosphere 5 and consequently the agent in putrefaction must be the elastic principle of the atmosphere itself, probably the same with elementary fire. But, granting this to be true, it is difficult to show why putrefaction should not take place in a living body as well as in a dead one $ seeing the one is as much ex¬ posed to the action of the air as the other. This dif¬ ficulty, however, is not peculiar to the present hypothe¬ sis ; but will equally occur whatever we may suppose the cause of putrefaction to be. The difficulty seems to be a little cleared up by Dr Priestley, who shows, that, by means of respiration, the body is freed from many nox¬ ious effluvia which would undoubtedly destroy it; and by the retention of which, he thinks, a living body would putrefy as soon as a dead one. The way in which respiration prevents the putrefaction of the body, is evidently the same with that in which the wind pre¬ vents fish or flesh hung up in it from becoming putrid. The constant inspiration of the air is like a stream of that element continually blown upon the body, and that not only upon its surface, but into it; by which means putrefaction is prevented in those parts that are most liable to become putrid. On the other hand, the *Soe|/ooYVil \ V ill! YV CJ C ? goue to that of fixe, since these are the very properties * imprisoned in the black-hole at Calcutta, after passing PUT t 5: Putrefac- a night in that dismal habitation, he found himseli in tioa. a high putrid fever. When sailors in long voyages are ■—~V " ‘ obliged to feed upon putx-id aliments} when, through stormy weather, they are much exposed to wet j in the one case the putrescent eftluvia being kept from flying off, and in the other a greater quantity being thrown in¬ to the body than what it naturally contains, the scurvy, malignant fevers, &c. make their appearance (a). Nei¬ ther can these diseases be removed without removing every one of the causes just now mentioned : for as pu¬ trid diseases will be the consequence of confined air, nastiness, &c. though the provisions be ever so good', so on the other hand, if the provisions be bad, the best air, and most exact cleanliness, nay, the best medicines in the world, will be of no service j as hath been often observed in the scurvy. From this account of the nature, cause, and method of preventing putrefaction by means of a current of air, we may easily see the reason why it does not take place in some other cases also. Bodies will not pu¬ trefy in vacuo, because there the atmosphere has not access to impart its elastic principle } and though in the vacuum itself the principle we speak of does un¬ doubtedly exist, yet its action there is by far too weak to decompose the structure of an animal body. In ex¬ treme cold, the reason why putrefaction does not take place, has been already shown. If the heat is extreme- Jy great, the process of ignition or burning takes place ' instead of putrefaction. If the body is very dry, pu¬ trefaction cannot take place, because the texture is too firm to be decomposed by the weak action of the ela¬ stic principle. Putrefaction may also be prevented by the addition of certain substances ; but they are all of them such as either harden the texture of the body, and thus render it proof against the action of the ela¬ stic fluid, or, by dissolving its texture entirely, bring it into a state similar to what it would be brought by the utmost power of putrefaction, so that the process cannot then take place. Thus various kinds of salts 8 ] PUT and acids harden the texture of animal substances, and plUrc(.. thus are successfully used as antiseptics. The same tion thing may be said of ardent spirits •, while oils and gums of various kinds prove antiseptic by a total exclusion of air, which is necessary in some degree for carrying on the piocess of putrefaction. Many vegetables, by the astringent qualities they possess, harden the texture of animal substances, and thus prove powerfully antiseptic j , while, on the other hand, fixed alkaline salts, quicklime, and caustic volatile alkali, though they prevent putre¬ faction, yet they do it by dissolving the substances in such a manner that putrefaction could do no more though it had exerted its utmost force. There is only one other antiseptic substance whose effects deserve to be considered, and that is sugar. This, though neither acid nor alkaline, is yet one of the most effectual means of preventing putrefaction : and this seems to be owing to its great tendency to run into the vinous fermentation, which is totally inconsistent with that of putrefaction ; and this tendency is so great, that it can scarce be coun¬ teracted, by the tendency of animal substances to putrefy in any c ircumstances whatever. Some kinds of air are remarkably antiseptic, though this subject has not been so fully inquired into as could be wished. The most powerful of them in this respect is the nitrous air; next to it, is fixed air; but the powers of the other airs are not so well known. It is probable that the antiseptic properties of fixed and nitrous air, are owing to their quality of extinguishing fire, or at least that the principle is the same j but till the nature ot these two kinds of air are better known, little can be said writh certainty on the subject. Sir John Pringle has made experiments to determine the powers of certain substances to promote or to pre¬ vent putrefaction. From these experiments he has form¬ ed the following Table, showing the relative antiseptic powers of the saline substances mentioned. Having found that two drams of beef put in a phial with two ounces of water, and placed in a heat equal to 90° of Fahrenheit’s (A) This aeriform fluid, which is exhaled from animal bodies in a state of putrefaction, acts at certain tunes more powerfully than at others, and is indeed in one stage of the piocess infinitely more noxious than any other elastic fluid yet discovered. In the Gentleman’s Magazine for August 1788, Dr St Johri informs us, that he knew a gentleman who, by slightly touching the intestines of a human body beginning to liberate this corrosive gas, was affected with a violent inflammation, which in a very short space of time extended up almost the entire length of his arm, producing an extensive ulcer of the most foul and frightful appearance, which continued tor se¬ veral months, and reduced him to a miserable state of emaciation. The same writer mentions a celebrated profes¬ sor who was attacked with a violent inflammation of the nerves and fauces, from which he with difficulty recover¬ ed merely by stooping for an instant over a body which was beginning to give forth this deleterious fluid. lienee he infers, that the same gas modified or mixed, or united with others, may be the occasion of the plague, w nci las so often threatened to annihilate the human species. It is happy, however, for mankind that this particu ar stage of putrefaction continues but for a few hours ; and what may appear very remarkable, tins destructive gas is no very disagreeable in smell, and has nothing of that abominable and loathsome fetor produced by dead bodies 111 a less dangerous state of corruption 5 but has a certain smell totally peculiar to itself, by which it may be install y discovered by any one that ever smelled it before. This is an object very worthy the attention of p lysicians . 1 is both extremely interesting, and very little known •, but at the same time it is a study in the highest degree un¬ pleasant, from the detestable smell and nastiness which attend the putrefaction «t animal bodies 5 and a man mus be armed with uncommon philanthropy and resolution to attempt it. . • Dr St John thinks it probable that there is a rapid fixation of the basis of vital air in dead bodies at » certain state of putrefaction, on account of the luminous appearance which they sometimes make, and wine 1 exis s for a few hours : but whether this luminous appearance takes place in every body, or whether it precedes follows the exhalations of the corrosive gas above mentioned, he had not, when he wrote Ins papei, aen a e discover. 1 u T ' [ 529 1 Falirenlieit’s thermometer, became miti lfl T, 1 ^ U T andthatfiograiMofsea-saltpreservedasimilarlixtare ?LrmXurt0bea0af““‘‘’'"g Fabrcnhoit’. of beef and water more than 2n Im.,r-0 a. _ mometer, began to ferment m a u 1 f a oiuiiiar mixture of beef and water more than 30 hours, he made the an- t.septic power of the sea-salt a standard, to which he compared the powers of the other salts. The algebraic character -f- signifies, that the substance to which it is annexed had a greater antiseptic power than is expressed by the numbers : r Sea-salt, or the standard ... Sal-gem Vilriolated tartar Spiritus Mindereri Soluble tartar Sal diureticus Crude sal ammoniac Saline mixture Nitre Salt of hartshorn Salt of wormwood Borax Salt of amber Alum x + 2 2 2 2~t~ 3 3 4+ 4 + 4 + 12 20 30 thermometer, began to ferment in" a Pi continued in fermentation during it began to ferment and swell, the Dutrpftrri-’ 1 i,en gnn ; and in a few hours afterwards, the smefi was of" fenmve. Neat day the putrid smell leased and " ,c°d taste and smell succeeded. Fresh alimentary vegetables fectsas3 breadPai'TSi sc"rv='-grass- produced similar ef! fects as bread on flesh, but in a weaker degree. From several other experiments he found, that§animal sub and thSatedietei M of ^table substances, oFthe 10™.““" SUbStanCeS C°rr“t ““ Potresceney By adding saliva to a similar mixture of flesh bread and water, the fermentation was retarded moderated’ but rendered of twice the usual duration, and t acid produced at last was weaker than when no saliva was A.B. The quantities of spiritus Mindereri and of the saline mixture were such, that each of them contain¬ ed as much alkaline salt as the other neutral salts. Myrih, aloes, asafcetida, and terra Japonica were found to have an antiseptic power 30 times greater than the standard. Gum amnioniacum and sagapenum show¬ ed little antiseptic power. Of all resinous substances, camphor was found to re¬ sist putrefaction most powerfully. Sir John Pringle be¬ lieves that its antiseptic power is 300 times greater than that of sea-salt. . Chamomile flowers, Virginian snaxe-root, pepper, ginger, saffron, contrayerva root, and galls, were found to be 12 times more antiseptic than sea-salt. Infusions of large quantities of mint, angelica, ground- ,vy> green tea, red-roses, common wormwood, mustard, and horse-radish, and also decoctions of poppy-heads were more antiseptic than sea-sait. Decoctions of wheat, barley, and other farinaceous grains, checked the putrefaction by becoming sour. Chalks and other absorbent powders, accelerated the putrefaction, and resolved meat into a perfect mucus. The same powders prevented an infusion of farinaceous grains, from becoming mucilaginous and sour. One dram of sea-salt was found to preserve two drams of fresh beef in two ounces of water, above 30 hours, uncorrupted, in a heat equal to that of the human body, or above 20 hours longer than meat is preserved in wa¬ ter without salt: but half a dram of salt did not pre¬ serve it more than two hours longer than pure water. Twenty-five grains of salt had little or no antiseptic quality. Twenty grains, 15 grains, but especially 10 grains only of sea-salt, were found to accelerate and heighten the putrefaction of two drams of flesh. These small quantities of sea-salt did also soften the flesh more than pure water. The same learned and ingenious physician made ex¬ periments to discover the effects of mixing vegetable with animal matters. Two drams of raw beef, as much bread, and an ounce of water, being beat to the consistence of pap, Vol. XVII. Part II. offUb dt d r 017 8uhstance t0 the common mixture producedbretd,iand 'mter’ R stronger fermentation was produced which could not be moderated by the quan- five 1° Rhra Use1 111 the folIowin£ experiment, till some fixed alkaline salt was added j which salt was found W He1* rSda iVf’fit0/t?P SU<1(!enly Very hi§h fermentations! lie did not find that small quantities of the following salts, sal ammoniac, nitre, vitriolated tartar, sal diureti¬ cus, salt of hartshorn, salt of wormwood, were septic as small quantities of sea-salt were. P Sugar was found to resist putrefaction at first, as other salts do, and also to check the putrefaction after it had begun by its own fermentative quality, like bread and other fermentative vegetables. tion^1116'''^61 ma