id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
crln-16865	Riegelman, Amy; Bakker, Caitlin	Understanding the complexities of retractions: Recommended resources	2018-01-05	5	.pdf	application/pdf	2602	142	36	_Research_Report.pdf https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/AC_Materials/SBE_Robust_and_Reliable _Research_Report.pdf https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/AC_Materials/SBE_Robust_and_Reliable _Research_Report.pdf https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken/ https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken/ C&RL News January 2018 40 environment, this 1992 article describes the activities librarians regularly per- formed in a print environment, including tagging pages of retraction articles and affixing a citation to retraction notices, displaying featured retractions, and com- municating via library newsletters fea- turing articles “on the dangers of citing works that may have been retracted.” A systematic review and meta-analysis by Danielle Fanelli studied rates of sci- entists admitting to research misconduct, as well as assessing research misconduct of colleagues.4 Fanelli found that 1.97% admitted to research misconduct in the form of fabricating, falsifying, or modifying data, while 33.7% of respondents admitted to other questionable research practices.5 Regarding practices of colleagues, 72% responded that colleagues engaged in questionable research practices.6 The resources included in this article were selected to provide context and help librarians and information specialists understand and identify retractions within Amy Riegelman and Caitlin Bakker Understanding the complexities of retractions Recommended resources internet resources	cache/crln-16865.pdf	txt/crln-16865.txt