ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries June 1 9 9 1 / 363 E x p e rim e n tin g with re fe r e n c e r e f e r r a l in a m ultitype en viron m en t By Kathleen Dunn H ead, R eferen ce D epartm ent C alifornia State P olytechnic University, P om ona and Myra White Acting Assistant D irector H ead, C ollection D evelopm ent California State Polytechnic University, Pom ona Five libraries that do not belong to a multitype network create an informal one o f their own. C ovina Public Library, Pomona Public Li­brary, Genesha High School Library, Mt. San Antonio College Library, and the Univ Library at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), are located close to The large amount o f published material, continuing price increases, and inadequate budgets make it impossible f o r the libraries to be truly self-sufficient. each other in southern California. They differ dra­ matically from each other in the size o f their collec­ tions, their staffs, and their constituencies. Their resources have been deployed to meet the needs of their primary clienteles. Yet, in reality, none o f the libraries can meet all the information needs of their users from their own collections. The large amount of published material, continuing price increases, and inadequate budgets make it impossible for the libraries to be truly self-sufficient. In the past, information service in the local area was fragmented among different types of libraries e whose staffs were not informed enough about local library resources to make appropriate referrals. rsity Reference personnel were well aware that patrons were migrating between the libraries on their own, but they wondered how productive these forays were. W ere these patrons fully aware o f the serv­ ices and resources provided by their “own” librar­ ies? What about other library resources in the area that they might need to use, but were unaware of? W e were certain that better informed librarians would provide better service by making appropri­ ate referrals, either back to the patron’s home library or forward to other libraries. We wanted to find a way to help reference staff in each library become more aware o f the collections and services of the surrounding libraries. Recognizing our shared geography, shared clientele, and interre­ lated needs, representatives from these libraries came together to develop a project to test the idea that a core group o f staff could leam enough about local resources to make meaningful referrals. We put together a grant proposal for a “Pomona-Cov- ina Multitype Network.” Participating libraries agreed to reciprocal orientations, training, work exchanges, and the development o f a referral form. The project was approved by the California State Library and funded through the Library Services and Construction Act, Title III, for 1988-1989. 364 / C&RL News The grant provided us with funds to experiment with a number o f activities. Although the activities themselves— orientation, training, internships— were not new concepts for librarians, the effort to include all three in the grant project was ambitious, given the heavy service demands and modest staffs o f the participating libraries. Even though we knew that we had set for ourselves a demanding agenda, we hoped to reap substantial benefits from it. This, in fact, turned out to be the case. Orientations Each participating library prepared an orienta­ tion to its clientele, curriculum (if an educational institution), collections, and services. All reference personnel— professional and support staff—par­ ticipated in the orientations. Since each library is different in size, the orientations varied in length. They also differed in format. Some orientations were conducted as tours with on-the-spot discus­ sion of each area. Others started with formal pres­ entations on clientele, strengths and weaknesses of the collection, services, etc., and ended with a tour. Some libraries included technical services in their orientations, others did not. In all cases, time was permitted for questions. Each library had to pres­ ent two orientations in order to keep the groups to a reasonable size. Participants were very positive in their evalu­ ation of the orientations. They appreciated the opportunity to leam about holdings and services in other libraries and to meet colleagues in different types of libraries. Some recommendations they made were to distribute information packets in advance and include library hours and names and telephone numbers o f reference personnel, to limit tours to areas that were directly relevant to refer­ ence, and to discuss plans for future services. Internships and training In order to ensure a thorough knowledge of the services and collections of participating libraries, we planned to train a representative group o f nine librarians to work reciprocally in the reference areas of the five libraries. Training would focus on learning the reference collection in depth. After­ wards, the librarians were to work a prescribed number o f hours per week at the reference desks of participating libraries. During the internship phase o f the project, the participants would learn first­ hand the types of questions asked in each library, the types o f patron, etc. We expected this small group o f librarians to establish reciprocal, long­ term interactions with each other. However, unex­ pected staff shortages and difficulty in locating temporary librarians to replace permanent staff who would be interning made this level of activity impossible to implement. Based on enthusiastic response to the orientations and the desire o f most reference staff to continue their involvement in the project, we decided on an alternative plan that would allow wider participation and a less intensive commitment. The alternative plan focused on continued orientation to reference collections and clientele through both formal and informal activi­ ties. Since Cal Poly Pomona and Pomona Public have the largest staffs and collections, they organized in- depth orientations to their reference collections for all grant participants. Emphasis was on the scope of the collection, computerized services such as CD- ROM, unique sources, and specialized collections such as business reference. Staffing problems pre­ vented other libraries from offering structured sessions on their reference collections. In the final phase of the grant project, partici­ pants spent between two and four hours in the reference departments o f each library. Some felt confident enough to assist patrons at libraries other than their own; others just observed or took the opportunity to become more familiar with the col­ lection. Participants reported many benefits from this phase. They observed that reference service is approached differently in an academic library than it is in a public library: academic reference librari­ ans really do spend more time teaching the use of resources than providing the information needed. In public libraries the emphasis is reversed, and this holds true even when college students use their local public library. Staff discovered reference gems in each library and sometimes added them to their own reference collections. They also found specialized holdings to which patrons could be referred: for example, card files of short stories, plays, songs, and origins of family names; collec­ tions of business licenses; expensive business refer­ ence sources; and substantial collections o f busi­ ness statistics and national telephone books. Par­ ticipants saw a wide range of clients using the libraries, which reinforced the impression that all o f us serve users other than our primary clientele. Finally, participants appreciated the opportunity to interact on the job with colleagues. The referral form The grant proposal stated that “An appropriate referral form will be developed, tested, and used.” Our intention was to provide as much help and information as possible at the first library in order to minimize the effort required at the second one. This form was to be an important outcome of the grant because it would provide referral continuity for both patrons and librarians, and would continue to be used after the grant ended. Developing and June 1991 / 365 using a referral form seemed straightforward enough. Indeed, it was not difficult to reach agree­ ment on the content. All members of the steering committee concurred on the importance of includ­ ing the name of the patron, the referring library, the library referred to, the information needed, the level and amount of material needed, and the sources already checked. The completed form was well designed and easy to use. Reference staff were to fill it out when referring people to another library, and patrons were to present it at the desti­ nation library. Completed referral forms would serve us well as an objective, quantifiable result of our success with multitype reference referral. Nevertheless, the form was infrequently used. We made numerous referrals as a result of our increased knowledge of local collections, but filled out only 28 referral forms. Why were these forms not used? When questioned about it, reference staff gave a number of reasons for their reluctance to use the referral form— e.g., “It is hard to get a patron to wait while the information is collected” and “Filling out a form interrupts the reference process.” The chief reason was that staff felt too busy to fill out the forms. They were often hard pressed to record the number of reference transac­ tions, let alone fill out a one-page form for every local referral. Another significant factor was that a number of referrals were made over the telephone. Despite the general pattern, however, Genesha High School Library had a good experience with the referral form. We discovered that high school students were much more comfortable about going to another library when they had an “official” form in hand. We conclude from this experience that written referrals require more planning than we were able to provide. A workshop on how to integrate referral forms into normal reference activities might have helped. On the other hand, it may be that while the concept of a referral form is logical, it is not practi­ cal. Another grant project might experiment more thoroughly with the content and format of refer­ ence referral forms to determine whether or not they can be easily integrated into reference service. Outcomes Many positive benefits emerged from the Po- mona-Covina Area Network Grant that will en­ hance reference referral. Each library shared its periodical holding list. The library at Mt. San Anto­ nio College successfully established dial access to Cal Poly Pomona’s online circulation system. Genesha High School Library now has dial access to Pomona Public Libraiy’s online catalog. All of us are much more aware of the strengths in surround­ ing collections and of the expertise of local librari­ ans. These benefits add up to an increased collec­ tive ability to help our users find the information that they need. In order to maintain these positive outcomes, we decided to continue sharing periodi­ cal lists and to repeat our visits to other libraries in the future. ■ ■ RBMS Thesauri on sale Now you can get five o f ACRL’s Rare Books and Manuscripts Section’s Thesauri f o r Use in Rare B ooks & Special Collections Cataloging for the specially discounted price of $30. Bind­ ing Terms, P aper Terms, Printing an d Publish­ ing Evidence, Provenance Evidence, and Type Evidence are included in this special offer (a $42 value if purchased separately). Developed for use in MARC field 755, these thesauri “make the MARC format workable for rare books and manuscript collections” (LRTS). Make sure your RBMS thesauri collection is complete. To order, request ACRL thesauri pre-pack, ISBN # 0-8389-7513-5, from ALA’s Order Services Department, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611; or call toll free (800) 545- 2433. New edition of Genre Terms available A new edition of Genre Terms: A Thesaurus f o r Use in R are B ook and Special Collections Cataloguing has just been published by ACRL. The update to the 1983 edition includes 109 new terms for a total of 441. Developed by members of the ACRL Rare Books & Manu­ scripts Section’s Bibliographic Standards Com­ mittee, the terms are intended for use in MARC field 655, to designate intellectual genres of textual materials. For example, adding thesau­ rus terms such as dictionary, cookbooks, or ephemera to the 655 field enables an individual to easily retrieve all materials of these genre. Authorized terms in the new edition are in boldface to facilitate use, and numerous scope notes and cross references have been added and edited. The 90-page paperback printed on acid-free paper is available for $19.95 ($16.95 for ACRL members). Order G enre Terms (ISBN: 0-8389-7516-x) from ALA Publishing Services, Order Department, 50 E. Huron Street, Chicago, IL 60611; (800) 545-2433.