College and Research Libraries Classification System for Linguistics and Languages Bibliographical Classification System for Linguistics and Languages. By George L. Trager. Washington, D.C., 1946. (Re- printed from Studies in Linguistics 3:54-108, 1945; 4:1-50, 1946.) Any work, whether intellectual or other- vise, must be judged on the basis of its vowed aim. If it fulfils this aim well, the ~ork must be adjudged excellent to the extent hat we are prepared to view the aim itself vith favor. Mr. Trager has set himself the ask of preparing a classification system for inguistics and for languages-clearly a com- pendable undertaking. As a practlcmg inguist of broad interests and wide experi- nce, he must have long felt the need for a ~ore up-to-date and linguistically more satis- ying organization of his field than the chemes provided by Dewey and the Library :>f Congress. It is, therefore, not surprising ~t all that the present work goes back to '1930, and it is, likewise, in the best tradition of scholarship that the author did not see fit to publish it until it had been thoroughly ~ested by years of use. As a classification for linguists, Trager's work is concerned with two main problems: the classification of languages and the classifi- cation of linguistic materials. The classifica- tion of languages presupposes not only the listing of all the languages known but everi more so their proper ii)terrelation and group- ing within language families and classes. It is on this point that Trager's work shows the greatest departure from the prevailing library classifications. Linguistically consid- ered, the English language with its tremen- dous literature is only one of several lan- guages in the Indo-European family, just as, for instance, Livonian with only about a score of publications is a full-fledged member of the Finno-Ugrian family. The amount of available material, the quantitative aspect, counts not at all in the grouping of lan- guages within a family, and the families them- selves within the classification follow the logical sequence of their historical develop- ment. In other words, the classification takes full account of relationship, development, and origin. A feature of the greatest interest is Trager's practice of citing authority for his OCTOBER_, 1947 • classification. The over-all grouping of linguistic families and languages follows the excellent and authoritative works of Meillet and Cohen, Les langues du monde (Paris, 1924) and Kieckers, Die Sprachstamme der Erde (Heidelberg, 1931). Nothing more comprehensive has ever appeared in print. Even more important, however, are the refer- ences to authorities to the less-well-known but equally basic studies of individual lan- guages and language families, such as End- zelin, Lettische Grammatik (Riga, 1922) and Szinnyei, Finnisch-U grische Sprachwis- senschaft (Berlin, 1922). The amount ot exact dialect information thus recorded in systematic order is a unique feature of this classification system. - The point on which Trager's system has most profited from existing library classifica- tions is the classification of linguistic ma- terials in general. We might almost say that this is very largely a workmanlike amalgamation of the most useful features of the Dewey and the Library of Congress schemes. The geographical tables, excellent and logical as they are, are not altogether satisfactory because they are too closely re- lated to political rather 'than to linguistic and cultural needs. Then, too, they are in need of considerable expansion. The notation also leaves something to be desired, especially as regards the somewhat confusing use· of the decimal point and the apostrophe. It may well be that a closer study of the form divi- sions of the Universal Decimal Classifica- tion may have suggested to the author ways and means of procedure less confusing to the uninitiated. There is no question at all as to the use- fulness of Trager's classification to the linguist. It has once and for all done away with the oversimplified "form of speech" classification (isolating, agglutinating, inflec- tive) and substituted the much less preten- tious but at the same time more scientific "genealogical" system. The librarian, how- ever, will not be in a position to derive much profit from it. For the very point which makes it excellent for the linguist-its scien- tific impartiality-will make it hard to use in a library where the bulk and preponder- ance of material is always a major factor in 469 classification. On one question, however, Trager's work is bound to exert a consider- able and beneficial influence: it will enable the classifier to place a little known or even an unknown language in its proper relation others with much more certainty and d patch than has been possible up to this time. Arthur B. Berthold. Guide to Business Materials Guides to the Harvard Libraries. No. I.' Economics and Business. By Arthur H. Cole. Cambridge, Harvard University Li- brary, 1947. x, 64p. The size and complexity of the modern university library, with its resources scat- tered in many branch libraries and special collections, often embracing overlapping sub- ject fields, has created the well-recognized problem of how to impart to the research worker knowledge essential to the location and use of his materials. The issuance by various libraries of handbooks, general de- scriptions of their collections, lists of biblio- graphical tools in subject fields, and instruc- tions in methods of research have been at- tempts to meet this problem. Arthur H. Cole, librarian of the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administra- tion, in Guides to the Harvard Libraries, No. I: Economics and Business, has combined these four approaches to produce what should prove to be a most effective and useful manual for the graduate student in business or econ- omics at Harvard. The manual has four sections: I. Library Facilities; II. Library Tools; III. Practical Applications; IV. Special Fields of Economics and Business. In Section I Cole describes briefly the Harvard library system and lists other li- braries in the Cambridge and Boston area .of interest to students of economics and business, together with pertinent information concern- ing their holdings and availability. There follows a description of the collections in Har- vard libraries which contain mate~ials in economics, business, and related fields , with particular reference to the Widener Library and the Library of the Graduate School of Business Administration. The purposes of these libraries, their fields, the special types of material they contain, and their distinc- tive characteristics are set down with enough detail to give the reader a good working knowledge of the resources of each one. The second portion of the section, on "The Effe tive Use of the Basic Libraries," takes u in order of use, what the author calls t "several depths" or "strata" which must penetrated to reach all the material that c be secured on a given subject-the card cat logs, the bibliographical collection, t stacks, the reference department, interlibra loan, microfilm, and book purchase. A not worthy feature of the descriptions of t public and union catalogs is the care wit which their limitations are pointed out, by t detailing of the types of material not include at all. Too often instruction in the use of t catalog leaves the impression that everythin is there if the student only knows how to fin it. In Section II Dr. Cole lists and character izes basic bibliographical tools. Include are guides to government documents ( th Library of Congress Monthly Checklist o State Publications is omitted), guides t theses, printed catalogs of large libraries trade bibliography and periodical indexes The works cited here, as well as all othe titles mentioned in the guide, are listed, wit full bibliographic.al information, at the en of the manual. Section III, on "Locating a Particula Work" and "Preparation of a Bibliography,' contains much sound, practical advice. On hopes, however, that the graduate studen will not be discouraged by the example o the hard-to-find item that the author take through all possible tools, in order to illus trate the use and extent of each. The re- viewer was slightly troubled by the fact that, although at the beginning "the work sought is assumed to be a printed item of substantia] size, not a pamphlet or broadside or map, and not a part of a series, a magazine article, Oli a government document," we later find the student, having exhausted all possible tools for monographic literature, exploring the possibility that the item is a magazine article, a serial, or a government document. We 470 COLLEGE A!vD RESEARCH LIBRARIES