College and Research Libraries Thurlow (see "Graduate Theses Accepted by Library Schools in the United States, 1950- 195 !-Supplement," Library Quart erly 22:36- 37, January, 1952) , and the essay by Malcolm (George Peabody) listed in the Library Quarterly 20:296, October, 1950. There may be others, as no effort was made to check all items. Material relating to college and research libraries may be estimated as abundant when one realizes that 12 pages of entries are needed for "College and university librarians" aQ~ "College and university libraries" and its vari- ous subdivisions. Many more references of special interest are included under such head- ings as Acquisitions, Bibliographical control, Bibliography, Cooperation, Photographic re- production and projection, Reference books, Research and the library, and Research mate- rials.-Mauric e F. Tauber, Columbia Uni- v ersity. M anagement Terms The Management Dictionary; Standardiza- tion of Definitions and Con cepts of the T erminology in the Field of P ersonnel Management. By A . E. Benn. New York, E.xposition Press, f952. 376p. $7 .50. It is fairly easy for a reviewer to pick out faults in a compil~tion of this sort, especially a pioneer reference book in its field. One can criticize the omission by the Management Dictionary of a definition for cost accounting (one of the 14 topics specifically mentioned as being within the scope of the book). Then there is an elaborate, inconsistent system of indirect entries, using DEPARTMENTAL RANKING, ORDER OF MERIT and ORGANIZATION, COMMUNIST- ACTION; but GUARANTEED ON- TRIAL RATE and 1oo PER CENT PREMIUM PLAN. There are numerous cross references, but one looking under COM- MUNIST-ACTION ORGANIZATION; RATE, GUARANTEED ON-TRIAL; or PREMIUM PLAN, 100 PER CENT wol,lld not find any guide. The compiler's penchants for listing abbreviations twice, with and with- out the periods (as ALA, A.L.A.) and for the expression "and so forth" are annoying. However the essential criteria in judging a dictionary are the proper choice of words and phrases to be included and the accuracy and OCTOBER, 1952 clarity of the definitions. To insure excellence in these endeavors, the compiier analyzed sta- tistically over 50,000 possible concepts; defi- nitions were compiled from 86oo current ( 1945-) sources, including some 3300 periodi- cals, 2600 newspapers, 1400 pamphlets, 1200 monographs and 100 speeches. Only those concepts defined similarly at least five times were retained. Thus the method of compiling items and defining them seems unusually valid. The definitions should be correct as far as they go, though in that for the LABOR- MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACT not too rpuch light is cast on the provisions: " Federal legislation~ enacted June 23, 1947, which amends the National labor relations act of 193 5 ; • it deals with labor and management relations affecting interstate commerce. Abbrevi- ated L.M.R.A. Syn.: Taft-Hartley law." This characteristic is neither rare nor, on the other hand, typical. . The dictionary can be improved, and a pos- s:ble future second edition should be more satisfactory. It provides definitions of words and phrases, with their synonyms and anto- nyms, and explanations of symbols and formu- las, brought together for the first time in one alphabetic list. For its accuracy and conveni- ence, it is recommended to business, industrial engineering, labor and personnel management libraries.-Robert Scott, Engin eering Library, Columbia University. Marginal Punched Cards Marginal Punched Cards. By Howard F. McGaw. Washington, D.C., The Scare- crow Press, 1952. 218p. $4.50. Many librarians shy away from articles con- taining statistics set forth with highly techni- cal explanations that only practising experts can appreciate. They are apt to treat similarly the descriptions of punched card routines that have been appearing the last few years in re- gard to the bibliographic control of the litera- ture of scientific and technical subjects. The relatively small number of articles on library applications of punched card systems has shown a conscious effort on the part of the writers to use terms familiar to any librarian with an ordinary knowledge of mathematics, but Dr. McGraw takes the extra precaution of warning readers on page 61 of his book: (Librarians who have had no experience with 401