College and Research Libraries B y J . W . P E R R Y , A L L E N K E N T A N D M . M . B E R R Y Mechanised Literat A Progress Report The authors are members of the staff of Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio. RE C E N T Y E A R S h a v e w i t n e s s e d a n i n -c r e a s i n g a m o u n t of time and e f f o r t b e i n g devoted to the problems of scientific and t e c h n i c a l d o c u m e n t a t i o n . U n f o r t u - n a t e l y , discussion of n e w l y developed m e t h - ods and e q u i p m e n t sometimes obscures the purposes to be served. U n r e a l i s t i c e v a l u a - tion of n e w d o c u m e n t a t i o n techniques m a y do more h a r m than g o o d . T h e m a t e r i a l basis of our c i v i l i z a t i o n is p r o v i d e d by science and t e c h n o l o g y . E f f i - cient use of scientific and t e c h n i c a l i n f o r m a - tion is essential to a v e r y w i d e r a n g e of activities, such as d e v e l o p i n g n e w p r o d u c t s and d e s i g n i n g n e w machines, p l a n n i n g and c o n d u c t i n g research, and e v a l u a t i n g the results of tests and experiments. In plan- n i n g p r o d u c t i o n , either in f a r m or f a c t o r y , in e x p l o r i n g f o r n e w m i n e r a l resources, in c o n d u c t i n g t r a d e and c o m m e r c e , the effec- tive use of scientific and technical i n f o r m a - tion m a y w e l l provide the m a r g i n b e t w e e n success and f a i l u r e . I t should not be c o n c l u d e d , h o w e v e r , t h a t scientific o r technical i n f o r m a t i o n is so high in v a l u e , that r e n d e r i n g it r e a d i l y a v a i l a b l e justifies u n l i m i t e d cost. A t best, the v a l u e of a g i v e n piece of i n f o r m a t i o n c a n n o t ex- ceed the cost of r e g e n e r a t i n g it t h r o u g h e x p e r i m e n t , test o r o t h e r w i s e . T h e philoso- p h y t h a t should u n d e r l i e the design of a d o c u m e n t a t i o n system in science and tech- n o l o g y is the same as f o r d e s i g n i n g a sol- Searching— v e n t - r e c o v e r y system. T h e v a l u e of the recovered m a t e r i a l — b e it i n f o r m a t i o n or a c e t o n e — m u s t , in no case, be less than the cost of r e c o v e r y . D i f f i c u l t i e s i n v o l v e d in e s t i m a t i n g the v a l u e of retrieved i n f o r m a - tion o f t e n render q u a n t i t a t i v e application of this philosophy difficult, b u t this in no w a y u n d e r m i n e s the l a t t e r ' s v a l i d i t y . T h e philosophy of cost j u s t i f i c a t i o n , even if applied only in a q u a l i t a t i v e w a y , pro- vides considerable v a l u a b l e g u i d a n c e . W e are r e m i n d e d , first of all, t h a t there are o n l y d i s a d v a n t a g e s in r e t a i n i n g i n f o r m a t i o n f o r w h i c h absence of f u t u r e use can cer- t a i n l y be predicted. F u r t h e r m o r e , this principle s t r o n g l y suggests t h a t time and e f f o r t invested in processing d i f f e r e n t types of i n f o r m a t i o n f o r f u t u r e r e t r i e v a l should be p r o p o r t i o n a l to the benefits to be achieved. S u c h benefits m a y be measured as the f r e q u e n c y of use times the v a l u e pro- v i d e d by each use. In e s t i m a t i n g v a l u e , t h o u g h t should be g i v e n n o t o n l y to the cost of e v e n t u a l l y r e g e n e r a t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n by e x p e r i m e n t or test, but also to the f a c t t h a t the record of an e x p e r i m e n t is f a r less i n f o r m a t i v e than the e x p e r i m e n t itself. R e - p e a t i n g an e x p e r i m e n t can be expected to provide considerably m o r e i n f o r m a t i o n t h a n l e a d i n g someone else's description of w h a t he did and s a w — o r t h o u g h t he did and s a w , as the case m a y be. A p a r t i c u l a r l y i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r in deter- m i n i n g the v a l u e of recorded i n f o r m a t i o n is the l e v e l of ability and c o m p e t e n c e of the user. A first-rate scientist m a y be stimu- lated by a report of a previous f a i l u r e to APRIL, 1955 157 t r y a s l i g h t l y d i f f e r e n t a p p r o a c h or to re- peat the p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t w i t h j u s t those p r e c a u t i o n s needed to achieve success. M e - diocre t a l e n t , u n d e r the same circumstances, m a y be discouraged f r o m any f u r t h e r re- search. S k i l l in e v a l u a t i n g and u s i n g the results of e a r l i e r w o r k is an essential f a c - t o r in d e t e r m i n i n g the v a l u e of d o c u m e n t a - tion. S u c h skill, it should be noted, is closely akin to the a b i l i t y to observe and to e v a l u a t e the results of e x p e r i m e n t s in o r d e r t o a r r i v e at sound conclusions. M e d i o c r e t a l e n t is at a d i s a d v a n t a g e w h e n c o n f r o n t e d by n e w results r e g a r d l e s s of w h e t h e r they o r i g i n a t e in l a b o r a t o r y or l i b r a r y . E n o u g h has been said, perhaps, to enable us to say t h a t the g o a l of d o c u m e n t a t i o n in science and t e c h n o l o g y is to reduce the cost of research, d e v e l o p m e n t , and related activi- ties by m a k i n g scientific and technical in- f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e as needed. T h i s defini- tion of purpose presupposes n o t h i n g con- c e r n i n g m e t h o d s to be used. T h e choice of m e t h o d s w i l l be d e t e r m i n e d , of course, by the p a r a m e t e r s of the s i t u a t i o n t o be met and the needs to be served. C o n s i d e r , as an a l m o s t t r i v i a l , t h o u g h i n s t r u c t i v e , e x a m p l e , a s m a l l c o l l e c t i o n of a d o z e n or so w o r k i n g papers of m o d e r a t e l e n g t h . C l a s s i f y i n g or i n d e x i n g such a s m a l l c o l l e c t i o n can p r o v i d e l i t t l e or no s a v i n g of t i m e or e f f o r t w h e n u s i n g them. N o o r g a n i z a t i o n is, f o r this simple s i t u a t i o n , almost sure t o be the best o r g a n i z a t i o n . T h e s i t u a t i o n c h a n g e s , of course, w i t h i n c r e a s i n g n u m b e r of papers. H e r e , it m a y be h e l p f u l t o distinguish b e t w e e n t w o cases. I n one of these, let us assume t h a t the v a r i o u s items m a y be a r r a n g e d in some one o r d e r in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h some one f e a t u r e , such as the serial n u m b e r on the patents of a g i v e n c o u n t r y or the senior a u t h o r name on reprints. S e t t i n g up a m o n o d i m e n s i o n a l a r r a y on such a basis can p r o d u c e satisfac- tion t o the user, if other aspects, especially those r e l a t i n g to s u b j e c t m a t t e r , w i l l n e v e r need to be a v a i l a b l e as leads to d o c u m e n t s of interest. E v e n w h e n s u b j e c t m a t t e r is of i m p o r t a n c e , it m a y be a d v i s a b l e to m a i n - tain an a u t h o r i n d e x or a n u m e r i c a l i n d e x f o r patents if f r e q u e n c y of use and r e s u l t i n g s a v i n g in t i m e p r o v i d e j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the expense i n v o l v e d . I n the m o r e g e n e r a l case, o f . c o u r s e , con- siderable a d v a n t a g e s are achieved by pro- v i d i n g a s u b j e c t a p p r o a c h t o the contents of scientific and technical d o c u m e n t s . B e f o r e c o n s i d e r i n g in detail some of the methods, techniques, and devices t h a t h a v e been de- v e l o p e d or proposed f o r use in this connec- tion, it is w e l l to note t h a t c e r t a i n steps are i n v o l v e d regardless of w h a t m e t h o d s , tech- niques, o r devices m a y be used. T h e s e basic steps m i g h t be s u m m a r i z e d as f o l l o w s : (1) Analysis of subject matter. D u r i n g this step, decisions must be made as to which aspects of subject matter are likely to be important in retrieving the document or correlating its information w i t h that of other documents. F a i l u r e to detect an im- portant aspect may result in the document being overlooked when its contents should be considered. O v e r - evaluation of a document may result in its being selected as pertinent when it is of so little interest as to be merely troublesome. F o r these reasons, the expense incurred in having an expert conduct this analytical step usually can be justified as a good investment. (2) Processing important aspects of subject matter. T h e goal of such processing is to establish means f o r facilitating the identification of pertinent documents to meet the users' requirements. A s is w e l l known, such processing may assume a variety of forms. W o r d s and phrases may be selected to constitute index entries which are then alphabetized to provide an array and thus facilitate a person's finding 158 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES a given entry, as a lead to a desired paper. A n alternate possibility, that has been extensively discussed during the past year, is to establish a separate card for each aspect and enter on each aspect card the numbers of the docu- ment to which the given aspects per- tain. A book devoted to this system, sometimes referred to by the name " U n i t e r m , " appeared a f e w months ago. E a r l i e r embodiments of this approach w e r e the Batten-Cordonnier and N a - tional B u r e a u of Standards (Office of Basic Instrumentation) systems, in which holes w e r e punched on aspect cards to permit easier manipulation of the reference cards. (See R . S. Casey and J. W . P e r r y , eds., Punched Cards—Their Application to Science and Industry. N e w Y o r k , Reinhold Publishing Company, 1951. Chapter by D r . Batten.) A third alternative is to relate the various aspects selected as being im- portant in an array of headings, such as the U n i v e r s a l D e c i m a l Classifica- tion System, or the M a n u a l of Classi- fication of the U . S. Patent Office. O n e or several headings of more or less generic scope may be used to d r a w together papers having certain aspects in common. A f o u r t h procedure is to use the various aspects as a basis f o r making entries on a medium to be searched by mechanical or electronic means. F o r examples, holes may be punched in cards, or magnetic spots may be re- corded on tape, or transparent spots recorded on photographic film. V a r i - ous systems, usually referred to as codes, are used f o r attributing mean- ing to such holes or spots in a w e l l - defined orderly manner. A n alternate possibility, to which w e have been and still are devoting con- siderable time and attention, is to organize the w o r d s and phrases that correspond to important aspects so that a telegraphic-style abstract is generated. Encoding its component w o r d s and phrases renders it " r e a d - able" by recently designed scanning equipment. V a r i o u s problems involved and advantages that can be achieved w i l l be discussed subsequently. (3) Utilizing processed aspects to identify pertinent documents. T h e importance of this step seems to be underestimated w i t h surprising frequency. I t is obvious, of course, that indexes, classification systems, and other forms of documentation cannot be regarded as successful unless they enable persons needing information to identify documents of pertinent in- terest at reasonable cost of time and energy. (4) Acquiring needed information. Identifying those documents most likely to contain information of value to the user must be followed by his actually contacting and absorbing the needed information. A t this stage, effective abstracts can provide valuable assistance in aiding the user either to reject papers of marginal interest or to obtain a quick bird's-eye view of papers of sufficient interest to w a r r a n t detailed study. Problems involved in supplying copies of needed documents or difficul- ties caused by language barriers w i l l not be discussed in this paper. H o w - ever, new approaches to some of the problems involved in supplying copies of needed documents are being de- veloped in France ( F i l m - O - R e x ) and in the United States ( E a s t m a n Kodak's M i n i c a r d ) , etc. I t is n o t the purpose of this paper to a t t e m p t to define w i t h precision the c i r c u m - stances u n d e r w h i c h v a r i o u s methods, tech- niques, and e q u i p m e n t w i l l p r o v e to be most a d v a n t a g e o u s . T h e d e t e r m i n i n g parame- ters, as is perhaps e v i d e n t f r o m p r e c e d i n g discussion, are as f o l l o w s : ( 1 ) Size of file, i.e., number of reports, reprints, and other papers. ( 2 ) Complexity of subject matter involved, range of aspects of importance, num- ber of aspects involved on an average per document, important relationships between aspects. ( 3 ) Frequency of use of file. APRIL, 1955 19 7 ( 4 ) T y p e of search required; in particular, range and number of aspects involved in defining an average search. ( 5 ) N e e d f o r speed in responding to search requirements. I n t e r m s of these p a r a m e t e r s , each of the m e t h o d s p r e v i o u s l y o u t l i n e d has its range of usefulness. T h e m a c h i n e s e a r c h i n g sys- t e m n o w to be discussed has been designed t o meet the m o s t severe c o n d i t i o n s w i t h respect to size of file, c o m p l e x i t y of sub- j e c t m a t t e r , f r e q u e n c y of use, c o m p l e x i t y of search, need f o r speed and, last b u t n o t least, m i n i m u m cost. T o p r o v i d e m a x i m u m flexibility, the n e w i n d e x i n g - a b s t r a c t i n g m e t h o d s h a v e been de- signed so t h a t any i m p o r t a n t aspect or fea- t u r e of the s u b j e c t m a t t e r of d o c u m e n t s or any c o m b i n a t i o n of such aspects m a y be used to define the scope of a search to be c o n d u c t e d by m a c h i n e . S e a r c h i n g m e t h o d s h a v e been devised so t h a t the m a c h i n e scans encoded abstracts of special design. A s p e c t s of s u b j e c t m a t t e r m e n t i o n e d in these ab- stracts m a y i n c l u d e s p a t i o - t e m p o r a l entities ( t h i n g s o r substances, organisms, persons, devices, a p p a r a t u s , or m a c h i n e s ) , processes and actions, c o n d i t i o n i n g c i r c u m s t a n c e s , g e o g r a p h i c a l regions, locations and dates, concepts of g e n e r i c or t h e o r e t i c a l n a t u r e , a t t r i b u t e s i n c l u d i n g those i n v o l v i n g n u m e r i - cal v a l u e s , such as m e l t i n g points. T h e abstracts are so prepared as to r e n d e r ex- plicit relationships b e t w e e n these d i f f e r e n t aspects of s u b j e c t m a t t e r . T h e analysis of s u b j e c t m a t t e r a l r e a d y p r e v i o u s l y discussed is the first step t o w a r d p r e p a r i n g these abstracts. T h i s analysis is best accomplished by a s u b j e c t - m a t t e r e x p e r t w h o decides w h a t the i m p o r t a n t aspects of s u b j e c t m a t t e r are and then designates these aspects by a p p r o p r i a t e l y selected w o r d s and phrases. U n d e r l i n i n g or s i m i l a r m a r k i n g m a y be used to direct a t t e n t i o n to the selected w o r d s and phrases or they m a y be p r o v i d e d as m a r g i n a l notations. N o restric- tions are imposed on the w o r d s o r phrases t h a t m a y be so selected. T h e n e x t step is to o r g a n i z e the w o r d s and phrases into t e l e g r a p h i c style abstracts and f i n a l l y to encode the abstracts t o render e x p l i c i t i m p o r t a n t points of m e a n i n g w h i c h then serve as r e f e r e n c e points in d e f i n i n g and c o n d u c t i n g the scope of a search. B e f o r e u n d e r t a k i n g to o u t l i n e the prin- ciples i n v o l v e d in p r e p a r i n g the abstracts and in e s t a b l i s h i n g codes f o r w o r d s and phrases, it s h o u l d be pointed o u t that the d e v e l o p m e n t of these m e t h o d s proceeded hand in hand w i t h the d e v e l o p m e n t of the n e w s c a n n i n g e q u i p m e n t f o r s e a r c h i n g en- coded abstracts and s e l e c t i n g those of per- t i n e n t interest. E a r l y in this d e v e l o p m e n t , it w a s recog- n i z e d t h a t the s c a n n i n g m a c h i n e should h a v e the a b i l i t y to p e r f o r m selections de- fined by r e q u i r i n g the s i m u l t a n e o u s presence of a l l of s e v e r a l search c r i t e r i a . S u c h a r e q u i r e m e n t w h i c h is said to i n v o l v e the l o g i c a l p r o d u c t of the c r i t e r i a m a y be rep- resented by A B C - D E ( f o r five cri- t e r i a ) . A n o t h e r possibility is a search in w h i c h a n y one of several c r i t e r i a suffices f o r a positive response. T h i s r e q u i r e m e n t , sometimes c a l l e d the l o g i c a l sum, m a y be represented by A + B + C + D + E ( a g a i n f o r five c r i t e r i a ) . W h e n it is required t h a t some c r i t e r i o n be absent, the l o g i c a l d i f f e r - ence is i n v o l v e d as s y m b o l i c a l l y expressed by A — B ( i n this case, the search r e q u i r e m e n t is f o r A to be present and B to be a b s e n t ) . I t w a s r e a l i z e d e a r l y in this d e v e l o p m e n t of n e w m e t h o d s and e q u i p m e n t t h a t the use of selected w o r d s to designate the impor- t a n t aspects of the s u b j e c t m a t t e r of docu- m e n t s has p r o v e d h i g h l y e f f e c t i v e in con- s t r u c t i n g s u b j e c t indexes to be scanned by h u m a n experts. T h e i r ability to i n t e r p r e t the m e a n i n g of t e c h n i c a l t e r m i n o l o g y , and other w o r d s , is also essential to s u c c e s s f u l 160 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES use of c o n v e n t i o n a l classification systems. T h e use of p h r a s i n g to indicate relation- ships b e t w e e n substances, processes, attri- butes, and concepts in g e n e r a l p l a y s an im- p o r t a n t role in a b s t r a c t i n g , i n d e x i n g , and c l a s s i f y i n g a l o n g t r a d i t i o n a l lines. T h e p r o b l e m is to p r o v i d e means f o r r e n d e r i n g e x p l i c i t f o r machine s e a r c h i n g those im- plied aspects of the m e a n i n g of w o r d s and phrases w h i c h can be understood easily and q u i c k l y by the h u m a n e x p e r t b u t w h i c h can- not be i n t e r p r e t e d by e l e c t r o n i c machines of p r a c t i c a l design at the present level of e l e c t r o n i c t e c h n o l o g y . T h e most c o n v e n i e n t approach to this p r o b l e m is to consider the p r o b l e m pre- sented by the m e a n i n g of w o r d s . W e ob- serve, first of a l l , t h a t certain technical terms are so derived e t y m o l o g i c a l l y t h a t their G r e e k and L a t i n roots render c e r t a i n basic aspects of m e a n i n g e x p l i c i t in the w o r d s ' s p e l l i n g . E x a m p l e s of such w o r d s are " t h e r m o m e t e r " ( h e a t , m e a s u r e ) , and " c y t o l y s i s " ( c e l l , d i s s o l u t i o n ) . If a l l the w o r d s of o u r l a n g u a g e w e r e derived in the same w a y , basic aspects of m e a n i n g , denoted by the G r e e k roots, w o u l d be rendered e x p l i c i t by c e r t a i n l e t t e r combinations in the spelling, such as " t h e r m " f o r heat, " m e t e r " or " m e t r i c " f o r measure, " l y s i s " f o r dissolution, etc. T h e limited degree to w h i c h the s p e l l i n g of technical terms e x p l i c i t l y exhibits, in a l o g i c a l w a y , the basic elements of their m e a n i n g has m a d e it advisable to g e n e r a t e codes to render such m e a n i n g explicit and thus m a k e it possible f o r machines to detect certain combinations of symbols used to designate elements of m e a n i n g . I n the code w e h a v e developed, three-letter combinations are u s u a l l y so used. T h u s , M A C is used to designate " m a c h i n e , apparatus, e q u i p m e n t , d e v i c e , " M E S " m e a s u r e , " N A L " a n a l y s i s , " R E H " h e a t , " R E L " l i g h t , " etc. T h e three- l e t t e r combinations can be set up so as to be m n e m o n i c in c h a r a c t e r and o t h e r w i s e c o n v e n i e n t in use. A typical g r o u p of w o r d s selected f r o m our code d i c t i o n a r y are p r o v i d e d f o r illus- t r a t i v e purposes. abaca T E X F I B abortion B I L D E D G E G abortifacient B I L D E D G E G D O G abrade B A R abrasion B A R abrasive B A R absorb B A S absorbent cotton B A S T E X absorber B A S M A C absorption band B A S R A L C A P absorption tower B A S M A C acaricide D E D P E S I n d e v e l o p i n g such codes f o r scientific t e r m i n o l o g y , o u r e f f o r t s have been directed, as a l r e a d y noted, to r e n d e r i n g e x p l i c i t in the codes, those aspects of the m e a n i n g of t e r m s m o s t u s e f u l as r e f e r e n c e points f o r d e f i n i n g s e a r c h i n g operations to be per- f o r m e d by a u t o m a t i c equipment. I t is perhaps obvious t h a t t w o p r o b l e m s have been e n c o u n t e r e d . O n e of these is t o a r r i v e at a set of basic aspects of m e a n i n g as exemplified by M A C f o r " m a c h i n e , apparatus, equipment, d e v i c e " or M E S f o r " m e a s u r e . " S u c h aspects of m e a n i n g — o r semantic f a c t o r s , as they are sometimes c a l l e d — p r o v i d e a f r a m e w o r k of generic r e f e r e n c e points f o r s e a r c h i n g opera- tions. T h e second, n o less i m p o r t a n t p r o b l e m , has been to a p p l y the semantic f a c t o r s in a consistent fashion w h e n s e t t i n g up the codes f o r i n d i v i d u a l terms used in science and tech- n o l o g y . A t the present time, w e are c a r r y i n g t h r o u g h a revision of the o r i g i n a l t e n t a t i v e codes f o r 7000 terms f r e q u e n t l y used in tra- ditional i n d e x i n g and c l a s s i f y i n g systems. I t is not possible, w i t h i n the limits of this paper, to set f o r t h in detail the v a r i o u s con- siderations t h a t h a v e come to our a t t e n t i o n in d e v e l o p i n g codes based on semantic APRIL, 1955 19 7 f a c t o r s . I t m a y be i l l u m i n a t i n g , h o w e v e r , to point out the n a t u r e of the l o g i c a l re- lationships t h a t exist b e t w e e n specific terms and the semantic f a c t o r s f r o m w h i c h the codes of the terms are c o n s t r u c t e d . T hese relationships are of f o u r t y p e s : ( i ) F u n c - t i o n a l ; ( 2 ) A t t r i b u t i v e ; ( 3 ) W h o l e - p a r t ; ( 4 ) C l a s s inclusion. F u n c t i o n a l a t t r i b u t e s are i l l u s t r a t e d by those semantic f a c t o r s w h i c h designate operations such as M E S f o r " m e a s u r e m e n t " or N A L f o r " a n a l y s i s . " T h e f o l l o w i n g sample codes i l l u s t r a t e the use of semantic f a c t o r s i n d i c a t i n g f u n c t i o n a l aspects, w h i c h are pointed o u t by u n d e r l i n i n g . Examples of F a c t o r s Indicating Functions Grindstone B A R ; M A C ( a b r a d e ; machine) Saber C U T ; W E P ( c u t ; w e a p o n ) Insecticide D E D ; P E S ( k i l l ; pest) N a v i g a t o r G U D ; P E P ( g u i d e ; person) Filter S E P ; M A C (sepa- r a t e ; machine) A t t r i b u t i v e semantic f a c t o r s indicate a relationship of a descriptive o r a d j e c t i v a l c h a r a c t e r . T h i s type of relationship m a y be i l l u s t r a t e d by the f o l l o w i n g examples, in w h i c h codes f o r the a t t r i b u t i v e f a c t o r s h a v e been u n d e r l i n e d . Examples of F a c t o r s Indicating A t t r i b u t i v e Relationship Forestry W O D ; P A N ; S I C H o u r ( w o o d ; p l a n t ; science) T I M ; L E M ( t i m e ; unit) M e t e o r o l o g y W E T ; S I C Forceps Bombsight ( w e a t h e r ; science) S U G ; M A C ( s u r g e r y ; machine) M I L ; P O T ; M A C ( m i l i t a r y ; optics; machine) T h e role of the w h o l e - p a r t relationship is p a r t i c u l a r l y w e l l i l l u s t r a t e d by codes f o r g e o g r a p h i c units, f o r w h i c h d e p a r t u r e f r o m the use of t h r e e - l e t t e r c o m b i n a t i o n s permits m o r e c o m p a c t codes to be established. G e o g r a p h i c a l Codes Illustrating W h o l e - P a r t Relationships United States N e w England M a s s a c h u s e t t s V e r m o n t N e w Hampshire Connecticut M a i n e Rhode Island U S U S N E U S N E M A U S N E V T U S N E N H U S N E C T U S N E M E U S N E R I In c o d i n g scientific and technical ter- m i n o l o g y the w h o l e - p a r t relationship comes into use r e l a t i v e l y i n f r e q u e n t l y . T h e rea- son f o r this is the f a c t that this type of relationship is m o r e f r e q u e n t l y an i m p o r t a n t aspect of m e a n i n g at the i n d e x i n g - a b s t r a c t - i n g level r a t h e r t h a n a semantic aspect of the m e a n i n g of i n d i v i d u a l terms. Examples of F a c t o r s Indicating W h o l e - P a r t Relationships Roof T a u - s a g h y z Fleet S U T ; C O V (struc- t u r e ; cover) P A N ; R U B ( p l a n t ; rubber) M I L ; S A S ; S I P (mili- t a r y ; o r g a n i z a t i o n ; ship) F r o m the philosophical point of v i e w any set of i n d i v i d u a l s h a v i n g one or s e v e r a l f u n c t i o n s or a t t r i b u t e s in c o m m o n con- stitute a class. S i m i l a r l y , the v a r i o u s parts of a g i v e n w h o l e also f o r m a class. H e n c e , f r o m this point of v i e w , class i n c l u s i o n — o u r f o u r t h l o g i c a l relationship b e t w e e n specific t e r m s and semantic f a c t o r s — m i g h t be r e g a r d e d as all inclusive w i t h respect to the other t h r e e . T h e s e m a n t i c f a c t o r s of the type e x e m p l i f i e d by M A C " m a c h i n e , a p p a r a t u s , e q u i p m e n t , d e v i c e " or T E X " t e x t i l e " m a y be said to be based on g e n e r i c 162 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES t e r m s d e n o t i n g classes. S u c h class designa- tion does n o t i n v o l v e direct e x p l i c i t r e f e r - ence to the a t t r i b u t e s i n v o l v e d , f o r e x a m p l e , in textiles or machines and similar devices. F r o m this point of v i e w , w e m a y find logi- cal j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r speaking of semantic f a c t o r s based on class inclusion. C e r t a i n l y , this concept proves h e l p f u l in establishing codes f o r terms. Examples of Factors Indicating C l a s s Inclusion C y t o l o g y C E L ; S I C ( c e l l ; • science) C u r i e R A X ; L E M (radia- tion; element) Beer's L a w R U L ; B A S ; R A L ( l a w ; absorption; light) Chaplain R E L ; P E P (religion; person) Gasoline P E T ; F U L (petro- l e u m ; f u e l ) In discussing the establishment of codes f o r terms, r e n d e r i n g their m e a n i n g e x p l i c i t is the p r o b l e m w i t h w h i c h w e have been c o n c e r n e d . D e s i g n a t i n g a t h e r m o m e t e r as a device f o r m e a s u r i n g t e m p e r a t u r e ( M A C ; M E S ; T E M ) does not, h o w e v e r , indi- cate in w h a t respect a t h e r m o m e t e r m a y be i n v o l v e d in a g i v e n situation reported in some d o c u m e n t . T h e r m o m e t e r s m i g h t , f o r e x a m p l e , be r e f e r r e d to as being m a n u - f a c t u r e d or the d o c u m e n t m a y be concerned w i t h research on t h e r m o m e t e r s . T h e re- lationships b e t w e e n the v a r i o u s things, proc- esses, and circumstances are also i m p o r t a n t w h e n d e v e l o p i n g a system aimed at render- i n g e x p l i c i t as m a n y i m p o r t a n t aspects of s u b j e c t m a t t e r of a d o c u m e n t as m a y be ad- v a n t a g e o u s f o r s e a r c h i n g and c o r r e l a t i n g . I n a n a l y z i n g these relationships, g u i d a n c e is p r o v i d e d by the same l o g i c a l relationships as u n d e r l i e the d e v e l o p m e n t of codes em- p l o y i n g semantic f a c t o r s . W h e n i n d e x i n g a d o c u m e n t , w e m a y note, f o r e x a m p l e , t h a t a certain c h e m i c a l c o m p o u n d is used as a c o m p o n e n t of a m i x t u r e ( w h o l e - p a r t re- l a t i o n s h i p ) or t h a t a g i v e n c o m p o u n d or m i x t u r e m a y be used to t r e a t a disease ( f u n c t i o n a l r e l a t i o n s h i p ) or t h a t a g i v e n m e d i c i n a l p r e p a r a t i o n has a c e r t a i n physical consistency ( a t t r i b u t i v e r e l a t i o n s h i p ) . T h e class inclusion relationship w i l l be based, w h e n c o n d u c t i n g i n d e x i n g , on some w h o l e - p a r t , f u n c t i o n a l or a t t r i b u t i v e relationship, w h i c h is m u c h m o r e e x p l i c i t in c h a r a c t e r t h a n is the case in the establishment of ter- m i n o l o g y . Linda Hall Library (Continued from page 14.1) R a r e B o o k R o o m is located at the south- east c o r n e r of the first floor, a d j a c e n t to the l i b r a r i a n ' s office. A small e l e v a t o r and t w o b o o k - l i f t s to a l l levels are located on the l o w e r stack levels. B o o k capacity of the n e w b u i l d i n g is estimated a t a b o u t one-half m i l l i o n v o l u m e s , and the t o t a l cost at less t h a n one and one-half m i l l i o n dollars. T h e r e is e v e r y indication to believe that the L i n d a H a l l L i b r a r y , w i t h a l a r g e and r a p i d l y g r o w i n g collection in science and t e c h n o l o g y , meets a real need in a region w h i c h has s h o w n a r e m a r k a b l e rate of ex- pansion in i n d u s t r i a l and t e c h n i c a l f a c i l i t i e s since the end of the w a r . W i t h a n e w b u i l d i n g , p r o v i d i n g space f o r at least t w e n t y years, and an e n d o w m e n t w h i c h should p r o v e adequate f o r the steady g r o w t h of the c o l l e c t i o n , L i n d a H a l l should become an i n c r e a s i n g l y v a l u a b l e research asset. APRIL, 1955 19 7