College and Research Libraries R A Y M O N D K I L P E L A The University Library Committee Almost every large university has a library committee. It is usually composed of thirteen members, most of whom are drawn from the teaching faculty. The members are appointed by the university ad- ministration or faculty acting individually or jointly. The library di- rector is likely to be an ex officio member of the committee. The committee is largely advisory, concerning itself with the establishment of policies and with the maintenance of liaison among the faculty, administration, and library. A . Q U E S T I O N N A I R E regarding the struc- ture and functions of the library com- mittee was forwarded on September 1, 1967, to the library directors of sixty-four universities holding membership in the Association of Research Libraries. Re- plies were received from fifty-six, of which fifty-four have university library committees. C O M P O S I T I O N OF THE C O M M I T T E E The average number of members on a library committee is thirteen, of whom ten are members of the teaching faculty; one is the library director; and two are either members of the library staff, uni- versity administrative officers, or stu- dents. The smallest committee is com- posed of six members, and the largest sixty-six. Only one committee is made up of entirely teaching faculty members. The teaching faculty constitutes a ma- jority on all committees but two, and a two-thirds majority on all but eight com- mittees. As shown in Table 1, members representing the teaching faculty are ap- pointed either by the university admini- stration without faculty participation in Mr. Kilpela is Assistant Professor of Li- brary Science at the University of Southern California. the selection procedure, by the faculty directly or indirectly through one of its agencies such as a committee on commit- tees or the senate, by the university ad- ministration and the faculty acting joint- ly, or by the governing body of the uni- versity. The library director is consulted re- garding the appointments made to ap- proximately two-thirds of the committees included within this survey. As revealed in Table 2, he is more likely to be con- sulted when the university administra- tion exercises the appointment power, and less likely to be consulted when the power is left entirely in the hands of the faculty. The library director is an ex officio member of forty-three committees and the chairman of six. For the remaining five committees, one director serves as the administrative advisor to the com- mittee; one is usually appointed to the T A B L E 1 A P P O I N T M E N T OF F A C U L T Y M E M B E R S TO T H E C O M M I T T E E Members Appointed by No. of Committees University Administration . 2 0 Faculty 17 University Adm. and Faculty jointly 13 Governing Board 4 / 141 142 / College b- Research Libraries • March 1968 committee; and three, although they have no official status in relation to the committee, do attend its meetings. The library director is the only person in an official capacity representing the li- brary on forty-three committees, while on eleven committees from one to thir- teen library staff members other than the director serve as members of the com- mittee. As a rule there is but one such member, and he almost always serves on an ex officio basis; he is usually a member of the administrative staff of the library. On thirty-three of the committees the university administration is not repre- sented; on twenty-one it is. The number of members who represent the university administration ranges from one to seven with the most common number being either one or two. Two-thirds of such members serve on an ex officio basis while the other third is appointed. The university officers who most commonly serve in this capacity are the president, the academic vice-president, the gradu- ate school dean, and deans of other schools within the university. Thirty-nine committees have no student representa- tives while fifteen do. Student appoint- ees to seven committees are named by an agency of student government, to four committees they are nominated by an agency of student government and ap- pointed by the president, and to one they are named by the senate. The num- ber of student members ranges from one T A B L E 3 .. TERMS OF O F F I C E 1 year . . . . 7 committees 3 years . . . . . . . 27 4 " . . . . . . . 7 5 " . . . . . . . 2 Indefinite . . . 11 to four with the average number being two. Table 3 shows that the term of office of appointed members varies from one year to an indefinite term with the three- year term being the one most commonly used. Forty-four committees attempt to stagger the terms. Thirty-seven accom- plish this by retiring either a third, fourth, or a fifth of the members each year depending upon the length of the term. F U N C T I O N S Table 4 discloses that the committee acts largely in an advisory capacity. The committee's role in the selection of new key library staff members is almost nil. Its part in book selection can be de- scribed at best as minor. Although the committee may be involved in the allo- cation of the book budget to the various departments and schools within the uni- versity and in the approval of the pro- posed library budget prior to its sub- mission to the university fiscal officer, its role in both of these areas is limited. T A B L E 2 CONSULTATION OF THE LIBRARY DIRECTOR BEGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMITTEE Usually Sometimes Not No Method of Appointment Consulted Consulted Consulted Reply University administration 1 5 2 3 Faculty 7 9 1 University administration and faculty jointly 7 1 5 Governing board 4 Total 3 3 3 1 7 1 T A B L E 4 FUNCTION O F C O M M I T T E E S No. of Committees Primary Function: Advisory 45 Policy making 4 Advisory and liaison 3 Advisory and legislative . . . . 1 Liaison . 1 Role in Selection of New Key Library Staff Members: None 44 Consulted occasionally . . . . 6 Advisory 1 No reply 3 Role in Book Selection: None 30 Advisory 8 Establishment of general policies 7 Very minor role 5 Consulted occasionally . . . . 2 No reply 2 Role in Allocation of Book Budget: None 25 Establishment of final allocation . 10 Approval 9 Advisory 6 Examination and approval . . . 1 Beview 1 No reply 3 Approval of Proposed Budget: None 35 Advisory 7 Approval 5 Approval of book portions only . 3 Examination and approval . . . 1 No reply 1 Establishment of Policies Regarding the Library's Operations: Major activity 18 Active ' 1 0 Advisory 9 Minor role 9 Useful in establishing public service policies 6 No reply 2 Liaison Among the Library, Faculty, and University Administration: Active 22 Limited role . 1 5 Major role 11 None 2 Advisory . . . . . . . . 1 No reply 3 Selection of a New Library Director: None 18 Definite role, but not specified . . 8 Part of a larger selection committee . 6 Uncertain as to its role . . . . 6 University Library Committee / 143 Substantial role 5 Advisory 4 Possible role 2 No reply 5 Other Areas: No new ones added 15 Help with plant needs . . . . 6 Automation policies 1 Operational procedures and general growth of library 1 No reply 31 The committee is concerned largely with the establishment of policies, especially those of a public service nature, in the operation of the library and with the maintenance of liaison among the facul- ty, library, and university administration. There is an even chance that the com- mittee may be involved in the selection of a new library director. S U M M A R Y The average library committee there- fore is composed of thirteen members, most of whom are drawn from the teach- ing faculty. They are appointed by either the university administration or the faculty, acting individually or joint- ly. The library director is usually con- sulted concerning appointments td two- thirds of the committees. He is also like- ly to be an ex officio member of the the committee. Thirty-five of the fifty- four committees included in this survey appear to play a minor role in the oper- ation in the library; thirteen perform an important role in a particular area; and six appear to have a major role. Com- mittees are most concerned with the establishment of policies regarding the operation of the library and in the main- tenance of liaison among the various ele- ments making up the university com- munity. Approximately half of the com- mittees participate in varying degrees in the selection of a new library direc- tor. • •