College and Research Libraries 498 College & Research Libraries status of serials treatment. Statements are frequently based on the present state of the economy, standards, database cover- age or technology, and would be some- what invalidated with a significant change in any of those conditions. However, such instances are well qualified with the criti- cal, environmental definitions so that fu- ture readers will be able to examine them for validity. The annotated bibliography contains over six hundred citations, and is ar- ranged with subcategories that generally parallel chapter headings; that is, major serials treatment categories. The book was originally conceived as a text to facilitate the teaching of serials management in li- brary schools. The annotated bibliogra- phy will provide students with a most ef- fective guide to further study. -Shere Connan, Stanford University Libraries. Wilson, Pauline. Stereotype and Status: Li- brarians in the United States. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1982. 225p. $27.50. LC 82-6119. ISBN 0-313-23516-3. The purposes of this book are "to help librarians in deciding upon and imple- menting actions necessary to help over- come the unfavorable stereotype that has plagued the library profession throughout this century . . . to provide fuller under- standing of the stereotype-its pervasive- ness in the library profession, the multi- tude of ways in which it is manifested, ahd the many ways in which it affects librari- ans and their behavior.'' (Stereotyping is defined as "the general inclination to place a person in categories according to some easily and quickly identifiable char- acteristic, such as sex, ethnic membership ... or occupation, and then to attribute to him qualities believed to be typical of members of that category.'') Among the more important components of stereo- types are alleged personality and intellec- tual traits. The hypothesis used by the author is: "Librarians handle their identity, as be- stowed on them by the stereotype, in the manner of a minority group; their re- sponse is similar to that made by members of minority groups in response to minority status." (A minority grOup is "any group November 1983 of people who because of their physical or cultural characteristics, are singled out from others in the society ... for differen- tial and unequal treatment, and who therefore regard themselves as objects of collective discrimination.'') The methodology used was adapted from a study of minority groups and con- sisted of a quantitative content analysis of journal articles, chapters in books, and news reports written about the stereotype of librarians by members of the library profession during the period 1921-April 1978. Sentences in the documents that were judged to be like a typical minority group response were counted and classi- fied. Five categories of responses were an- alyzed: (1) acceptance of the stereotype- confirmation of negative view of librarians; (2) concern with in-group purification-stereotype is the result of only a few members of the group who should conform to majority behavior; (3) denial of differences-librarians are just like other people; (4) denial of group membership-dissociation of oneself from others in the profession; (5) for group action-to combat the unfavorable stereo- type. Of the 499 documents examined, 77 fit the study's specifications for inclusion. A coding of sentences based upon the classi- fication of responses noted above reveal that: 24 percent were category 1 type re- sponses, i.e., acceptance of stereotype; category 2-38 percent; category 3-24 percent; category 4-8 percent; category 5-6 percent. The author concludes from this that the evidence supports the hy- pothesis and that being a librarian "is a burden and is perceived as being a bur- den. Librarians do regard themselves as receiving differential treatment, and they do see themselves as being objects of col- lective discrimination." This reviewer has major problems with the research design and conclusions of this study. No attempt was made to bal- ance the negative findings in the study by identifying the favorable components of the librarian stereotype, or analyzing posi- tive statements in the literature that con- tradict these responses. And so, of course, the evidence examined supports the hy- A Unique leference Synem The annual subscription price for the The topic could be Latin America or complete collection (microfiche and Africa, National Security or the Kennedy abstracts and indexes) is only $718'.00 Assassination. Whatever the information, To order, or for more information on The Declassified Document Reference Sys- either the Declassified Document Reference tern is the only comprehensive compilation System or Retrospective Collection, write or of its kind. Documents are microfllmed by call: Research Publications as they are released · under provisions of the Freedom of Infor- mation Act Amendments in 1974. Issued in quarterly installments, each annual subscription contains on microfiche exactly 3,000 of the actual government doc- uments which helped mold U.S. history over the last 35 years. . Printed quarterly abstracts and indexes, and an annual cumulative index, are included with each subscription. The abstracts and indexes may also be pur- chased separately. Also Available • A Retrospective Collection containing 8000 documents in two hardbound vol- ~a~ch Publications 11 Lunar Drive/DriWer AI Woodbridge, C'l 06888 (103) 397-8600 !lr.l:710-468-6348 PAX: 103-397-3893 Outside 11onh and South America: P.O. Box48 leading, IG 1 8 BP lngland !IL: 0734-883147 !ILU: 848338 irADL G 500 College & Research Libraries pothesis; since only minority type re· sponses were analyzed, how could the conclusions be anything else? In addition, even with this stacking of the deck, the quantity of documentation is low. If only 77 relevant publications have appeared in the last 57 years (an average of 1.35 articles per year), this would not ap- pear to constitute a major preoccupation of the profession with a negative stereo- type. However, by the end of chapter 2 the au- thor has set up this straw man, which she then attacks, primarily through a detailed analysis of librarians' scores on three stan- dard personality tests, all of which show that, in general, librarians are normal, well adjusted, and happy. Other topics touched upon in the book include factors involved in occupational choice, reasons for entering the profes- sion, recruitment, and library education. These are all important topics for the pro- fession, and one can find in this book a fas- cinating mixture of: (a) interesting com- ments regarding the differences in roles and working environments of different types of librarians, e.g., academic and school librarians have an ''especially diffi- cult time acquiring the status they desire . . . [because] the mission of the parent in- stitution of these libraries is in the hands of another and dominant profession''; (b) fuzzy statements that are not explained, but that underlie important positions taken by the author ("Although the li- brary profession is made up of different segments-library educators, public li- brarians, special librarians, (etc.) ... -they make up a dynamic whole, a group, that shares a common fate because they are interdependent"); (c) statements that dismiss important research that could, shed light on an issue ("It is doubtful that one can establish a relationship between tasks of a given occupation and specific personality traits required for members of that occupation''); (d) a very good bibliog- raphy which draws heavily on the litera- ture of sociology and psychology; (e) ex- cellent discussion of examples from the literature of how a negative mind-set re- garding the profession seriously biases one's interpretation of research results; November 1983 and finally, (f) good, practical observa- tions and advice-librarians are their own worst enemies. We should stop writing and speaking in self-destructive ways about our image and status, "acquire a better perspective on the stereotype and learn to take it in stride . . . improve it by not adding to it and by not disseminating it, and most important . . . control [our] response to it." If the cost of the book were reduced by two-thirds, and in spite of its basis on a very poor research design, I would recom- mend the book for all librarians, since the subject has a perverse fascination for most of us, the credibility of the profession is important to all of us, and the author has shown courage and thoughtfulness in confronting controversial issues ( espe- cially library school accreditation), which the profession has not dealt with in a straightforward, intelligent, and construc- tive manner. However, given the critical deficiencies in the research design, the weaknesses in the analysis, along with the very high price of the book, this reviewer recommends: caveat emptor.-Suzanne 0. Frankie, Oakland UniversitY. Libraries. Roberts, Matt and Etherington, Don. Bookbinding and the Conservation of Books: A Dictionary of Descriptive Terminology. Washington, D.C.: Library of Con- gress, 1982. 296p. LC 81-607974. The compilers of this dictionary claim that it is not an encyclopedia; it is II a guide to the vocabulary-of a field, not a compen- dium on a specific subject.'' Nevertheless, this volume is loaded with encyclopedic information, and it fails as a dictionary be- cause it does not provide lexical informa- tion about the vocabulary it contains. Like so many reference tools defying exact clas- sification, it is a vade mecum falling some- where between the two, i.e., an encyclo- pedic dictionary. It contains more than three thousand words and names, from formal usage, technical vocabularies, his- torical figures and methods, and informal trade jargon, all arranged alphabetically word by word (rather than by letter). It is a mine of information, surpassing old stan- dards like John Carter's ABC for Book Col-