College and Research Libraries By C. U . F A Y E Landmarks in the Development of the Western Book Mr. Faye is a language specialist in the Catalog Department of the University of Illinois Library. In this article he out- lines the landmarks in the development of the Western book stressing the importance of the Latin alphabet. TH E O B J E C T of this sketch is to deal briefly with the elements that make up the Western book. T h e following will be touched u p o n : the codex form of the book, the material of the book (paper, etc.), printing with movable type, and the development of the Latin alphabet, which is the alphabet of W e s t e r n books as dis- tinguished from Oriental books. T h i s al- phabet appears today in our printed books (in capitals and lower-case letters), in three main styles: Roman, Gothic, and Italic. The Latin Alphabet Experience has shown that the Latin alphabet, with its less than thirty letters, is more practical for putting thoughts on paper than an ideogrammatic system, such as the Chinese, with its several hundred ideograms. It is generally accepted that our alpha- bet originated with the Semites, was adopted by the Greeks,1 who added 1 G. E. M y l o n a s h a s fixed the date f o r t h e intro- duction of the historic Greek alphabet into Greece between the t w e l f t h a n d eighth c e n t u r i e s B.C. See his article " T h e Date of the I n t r o d u c t i o n of the Greek A l p h a b e t " in The Classical Bulletin DECEMBER, 1940 vowels, and was transmitted to the Romans through the Greek colonies in South Italy. Let us turn from the origins of our alphabet to the chief materials (papyrus, etc.) that have been used in making the Western book, and to the two main forms (roll and codex) that it has assumed. Papyrus, Parchment, Roll, Codex, Paper A passage in a Greek inscription2 of the year 305 A.D. is evidence that, at that time, papyrus and parchment were the chief materials of which books were made.3 A t first both papyrus and parchment books were rolls; later both appeared in 12:54-56, 1936. Published by St. Louis U n i v e r s i t y . T h e Greek alphabet is an i m p o r t a n t element in the history of Christendom and of E u r o p e a n civilization. I t is the alphabet of native Greek l i t e r a t u r e and of Hellenistic l i t e r a t u r e , which, it is scarcely necessary to point out, includes both the Septuagint and the Greek New T e s t a m e n t . I t is also the link between th e original Semitic alphabet and the alphabets of the Christian world, being the ancestor of the L a t i n alphabet used in the W e s t e r n Church, and of various alphabets (Cyrillic, Coptic, etc.) used in the E a s t e r n Church. I n this sketch but one of the d e s c e n d a n t s of the Greek alphabet, namely the L a t i n alphabet, will be dealt with. 2 T h i s inscription is published in the Corpus inscrip- tionum atticarum, 3:48. T h e passage in question is discussed in T h . B i r t ' s Kritik und Hermeneutik nebst Abriss des antiken Buchwesens. Miinchen, 1913. p. 264. T h e passage r e a d s : " . . . T h e marginal notes . . preserved in books ( i v f i i f i y i o i s ) either p a r c h m e n t s ( d ^ e p a i t ) or papyri ( x&o-rais) or in any kind of tablets ( iv . . .ypannaTtlois )." T h e inscription, then, considers both p a r c h m e n t s and papyri as being books, while other materials that received w r i t i n g a r e gathered together u n d e r and covered by the t e r m ypafitiareia ( ypantiartlov, that on which one writes) . 3 P a p y r u s continued to be used f o r a long time in the papal chancellery. T h e latest known papal bull on p a p y r u s is one that was issued d u r i n g the reign of Pope Boniface V I I I (1012-24).—Catholic Encyclopedia, 3:54. 33 codex form. Papyrus, being brittle, was not so well adapted to the codex form as parchment. D u r i n g the fourth century A.D. the parchment codex became supreme. Once established, it held its own through- out the M i d d l e Ages. As regards form, modern books are codices. T h e reappearance of the roll, in the photographic film book, has indeed de- stroyed the monopoly, but has hardly chal- lenged the pre-eminence of the codex. O u r modern books differ, as to material, from the medieval books in one important respect: paper has taken the place of parchment. Paper was invented by the Chinese as early, at least, as the first cen- tury of the Christian E r a . I t was brought into the Near East by the Arabs about the eighth century. T h e earliest example in Europe appears to be a document in the Escorial dated 1009.4 Since the inven- tion of printing, paper, which already ear- lier had been encroaching upon the monopoly of parchment, after a while definitely took possession of the field. U p to the Renaissance, medieval books were chiefly parchment codices, written in Roman capitals, to which, in the course of time, were added minuscules (by print- ers called "lower-case" letters) and letters in the Gothic script. Let us proceed to a consideration of these. Roman Majuscules (Capitals) and Mi- nuscules (Small Letters) T h e Roman capitals of our books today are, essentially, the same as the monu- mental "square" capitals of the Roman in- scriptions. T h e y were also commonly used as a book hand up to and including the fifth century A.D. Characteristic of Roman genius are these letters that have 4 Esdaile, A r u n d e l l . A Student's Manual of Bibliog- raphy. L o n d o n , 1932, p. 36. marched in stately array down the ages. A n examination of the script of the Al- cuin Bible,5 written at St. M a r t i n ' s Monastery, T o u r s , while Alcuin (hence its name) was Abbot there (796-804) re- veals remarkable similarity between its minuscules and our present Roman lower- case letters. H o w did these letters come into being? O n e must not think of the various styles of writing that have ap- peared as being related to each other in a vertical genealogical line and descending, the later script from the earlier, in dis- tinct chronological layers. T h e Caro- lingian minuscules are not direct descend- ants of the Roman capitals, they "emerged"—to use a term that has become established—from scripts then in exist- ence.6 Important scripts that have not had so evident an influence upon modern letter forms as, for instance, the Carolingian minuscule, must be passed over in silence. W e proceed to a mention of the Gothic script. The Gothic Script As the Roman square capitals reflect the genius of Rome, so the Gothic script is a flower of the spirit that produced the Gothic cathedrals. As the curve of the Roman arch was broken in the Gothic arch, so the smooth outlines of the Roman 5 A facsimile of the first page of Genesis in this Bible is given in F r a n z S t e f f e n s ' Lateinische Palaog- raphie, 2 v e r m , aufl., 1929, plate 47. T h i s facsimile a f f o r d s a n i l l u s t r a t i o n of t h e " h i e r - a r c h y of s c r i p t s . " T h e scribes used d i f f e r e n t styles of w r i t i n g f o r d i f f e r e n t p u r p o s e s . A s t h e C h u r c h h a d its h i e r a r c h y : pope, a r c h b i s h o p , bishop, priest, so w r i t i n g also h a d its h i e r a r c h y . T h e R o m a n s q u a r e capitals, being, as it w e r e , popes, w e r e used f o r t h e i m p o r t a n t book h e a d i n g s ; the minuscules, c o r r e s p o n d - ing to c o m m o n clerics, w e r e used f o r the text i t s e l f ; while for m a t e r i a l of i n t e r m e d i a t e i m p o r t a n c e o t h e r styles of script w e r e used. 8 H e l l m u t L e h m a n n - H a u p t h a s p r e s e n t e d a conveni- e n t o u t l i n e of what took place in his " T h e H e r i t a g e of t h e M a n u s c r i p t " in A History of the Printed Book, Being the Third Number of The Dolphin, ed. by L . C. W r o t h , N e w Y o r k , 1938, pp. 3-23. F o r details, w o r k s on p a l a e o g r a p h y should be c o n s u l t e d . 34 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES letters became broken and angular in G o t h i c w r i t i n g ; e.g., the almost circular Carolingian o becomes jQf,—the circle is broken,—hence the terms used to denote this s c r i p t : fractura, by medieval scholars ; Fraktur in G e r m a n ; and brise in French. W i t h the material under the next head- ing we conclude our consideration of the chief varieties of script that have survived in our present-day printed books. Italian Humanistic and Cursive (i.e., Italic) Hand O u r lower-case R o m a n letters are de- rived f r o m the humanistic book hand of the fifteenth century, a product of the Renaissance in Italy, being the f r u i t of study and imitation of earlier models of Carolingian w r i t i n g . T h e r e developed also in Italy, d u r i n g the fifteenth century, a cursive hand, Italic—a modification of the humanistic book hand, w i t h some borrowings f r o m the G o t h i c cursive then c u r r e n t in Italy. T h i s hand survives both in Italic type and in our present-day cursive w r i t i n g . The Stage Now Set for the Invention of Printing All the elements of the printed book, except movable type, were now at h a n d : the handy codex form of t h e b o o k ; paper, cheaper t h a n all varieties of parchment, and less bulky and more pliable than ordi- nary p a r c h m e n t ; the Latin alphabet, avail- able in the R o m a n square capitals, in Gothic, in the Renaissance modification of the Carolingian minuscules, and in italics. Books were, indeed, made, but at great expense; expert technicians and much time were needed. O n e of the results of the Renaissance was an insistent demand, which scribes and professional calligra- phists could not meet, for more books at a reasonable price. P r i n t i n g was the solu- tion. Compared w i t h the o u t p u t of the scribes, that of printing was mass produc- tion. T h e essence of the new invention was t h a t the letters of the alphabet and the c u r r e n t abbreviations and ligatures were each cast into a separate and indi- vidual movable type. T h e tendency has been to lessen the number of the abbrevia- tions ( a survival is X for Christ-, as in Xmas) and of the ligatures ( a survival is for et) that early printing carried on as a legacy f r o m the manuscripts. Precursors of Typography; a Rival of Typography: Xylography I n earlier examples of printing (namely that done by wood-blocks for the making of playing cards, figures of saints, stamped textiles) t h a t which was printed formed a unified design; letters t h a t perchance ap- peared in the pattern were not set sepa- rately—the design was as much a unit as the poster is today. T h e s e remarks apply also to xylography. In this variety of printing the whole page, consisting usually of illustration with text, was cut on a block of wood and the page printed as a unit. T h e artist had to make as many designs as there were pages in the book. Xylography flourished most dur- ing the years f r o m 1460 to 1480. Its in- herent disadvantages made it impossible for xylography to continue competing with typography, which is the kind of printing that uses movable type, the letters being cast in separate, individual types. The Date of the Invention of Typography T h e oldest datable specimen of typog- raphy is an astronomical calendar, which, it is concluded, must have been printed in 1447, because it is for the year 1448. A m o n g the documents f r o m a lawsuit DECEMBER, 1940 35 of 1439 in which Gutenberg took part is the deposition of one H a n s D u n n e "that about three years before (i.e., 1436) he had made a profit of about one hundred guilders on material 'pertaining to print- i n g ' (das zu dem Trucken gehoret) sold to Gutenberg." T h e incunabulist Haebler uses the documents of this lawsuit to dis- pose of Coster's claims to priority and to establish Gutenberg as the inventor of printing. His implied interpretation of Trucken, in the phrase quoted, appears to be that it is equivalent to the modern DruckenJ O n the basis of this lawsuit it is reason- able to assume that, in the 1430's, Guten- berg either invented printing or was conducting experiments that led to its invention. Johann Gutenberg the Father of Printing It may never be proved who was the first actual printer in Europe. Claims have been made for Laurens Janszoon Coster. T h e r e may be others with claims of priority over Gutenberg. If so, then, after having spent time, ingenuity, indus- try, and money in inventing movable type, they have failed to leave for posterity products from their print shops or other testimony sufficiently convincing to sub- stantiate their claims. Gutenberg, on the other hand, stands pre-eminent among the earliest printers. N o other printer seems to have had so significant an influence upon early print- ing. I t is a fact that, from his activities in M a i n z , printing spread through Eu- rope. Whoever may have been the first actual printer, J o h a n n Gutenberg, besides having strong claims to that title, may with good reason be considered the first 7 H a e b l e r , K o n r a d , Handbuch der Inkunabelkunde. Leipzig, 1925, pp. 30-31. among effectual printers, and, therefore, may justly be honored as the father of printing. What Has Been Achieved by the Printed Book Next to the alphabet, printing is the most important achievement of mankind. By means of the alphabet, it is possible to record the ipsissima verba which clothe our thoughts. T h e imposing structure of comparative philology is made possible and depends upon documents in alphabetic script. Preserved for us are the very sounds of the words in the Sacred Scrip- tures and in the masterpieces of litera- ture—what would poetry be, if the sounds of its words were lacking? T h e letters of the Latin alphabet, cast in movable types, are the essential element of printing. Later developments in the mass production of printed material (stereotype, linotype, offset, etc.) and in the conservation of the space taken up by printed material ( f i l m ) — a l l these depend upon, as their final irreducible units, the single movable types, the individual letters of the Latin alphabet. T h r o u g h the medium of printing can be communicated, practically without limit, recorded thought. Anyone able to read may have access to whatever he may desire of what has been set down of human ex- perience, endeavor and aspiration—all this because of less than thirty letters cast in movable type. Selected References General Handbooks of Library Science Dahl, Svend, ed. Haandbog i Biblioteksund- skab. 3. for0gede udg. 1. bd. Hagerup, K0benhavn, 1924. Milkau, Fritz, ed. Handbuch der Biblio- 36 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES thekswissenschaft. i. bd. Harrassowitz, Leipzig, 1931. Writing (Ideogrammatic and Alphabetic Systems): General Works on Philology and Treatises on Special Subjects Bloomfield, Leonard. Language. Holt, New York [01933]. Conference on phonetic transcription and transliteration, Copenhagen, 1925. "Pho- netic transcription and transliteration; proposals of the Copenhagen conference, April 1925." Oxford, 1926. International institute of intellectual co- operation. "L'adoption universelle des caracteres latins." Societe des nations, Institut international de cooperation in- tellectuelle, Paris, 1934. Jensen, Hans. Die Schrift in Vergangen- heit und Gegenwart. J . J . Augustin, Gliickstadt und Hamburg, [1935]. Twaddell, W . F. On Defining the Phoneme. Waverly press, Baltimore [1935]. (Lan- guage monographs, pub. by The Linguis- tic society of America, no. 16.) The Western Book Wroth, L. C., ed. A History of the Printed Book, Being the Third Number of The Dolphin. . . . The limited editions club, New York, 1938. The Book of Classical Antiquity Birt, Theodor. Kritik und Hermeneutik nebst Abriss des antiken Buchwesens. Beck'sche verlagsbh., Miinchen, 1913. Gardthausen, V. E. Das Buchwesen im Altertum und im Byzantischen Mittel- alter. 2. aufl. Veit, Leipzig, 1911. (Griechische Palaeographie. 1. bd.) The Latin Script Steffens, Franz. Lateinische Palaographie. . . . 2. verm. aufl. W . de Gruyter, Ber- lin und Leipzig, 1929. The Influence of the Manuscript Ullman, B. L. Ancient Writing and Its Influence. Longmans, New York, 1932. The Discovery of Printing and Incu- nabula Haebler, Konrad. Handbuch der Inkun- abelkunde. Hiersemann, Leipzig, 1925. Scholderer, Victor. Gutenberg: the Man and His Invention. (Issued by The Lon- don Times, Jan. 5, 1 9 4 0 - ) Uhlendorf, B. A. The Invention of Print- ing and Its Spread till 1470. (In The Library Quarterly, 2:179-231, July, 1 9 3 2 . ) T h e Subject Specialist (Continued from page 21) make it increasingly useful to those patrons of the library who are engaged in serious research. These considerations, however, will not prevent the assignment, from time to time, of some lesser field of research to a person whose main work may be general and miscellaneous in character. W i t h a view, then, to smoothing the path for those investigators who use our libraries, decreasing administrative costs, giving sympathetic service, and expanding the opportunity for satisfying and con- structive work to the more ambitious and capable members of the staff, the principle of division of work by subject as against division by process should receive the care- f u l attention of the administrators of our large university and reference libraries. DECEMBER, 1940 37