Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship | Spring 2003 | |||
DOI:10.5062/F4SN06XC |
URLs in this document have been updated. Links enclosed in {curly brackets} have been changed. If a replacement link was located, the new URL was added and the link is active; if a new site could not be identified, the broken link was removed. |
Jim Martin
Science Librarian
martinj@u.library.arizona.edu
The University of Arizona Library
Tucson, AZ 85721
Collaboration between academia and industry is resulting in new programs in applied science and engineering across many campuses. The information needs of students in these programs present a unique opportunity for science librarians and business librarians to collaborate in the development of information literacy course components. This paper describes one such collaborative effort at the University of Arizona Library to provide library instruction for the course Materials Engineering and Design. Students in this engineering class are required not only to design and engineer a new product but also to address fundamental business considerations such as cost analyses and market research.
Another driving force toward stronger relationships between university science and industry is the demand by industry for broadly qualified graduates. Rodrigues (2001) describes the need for engineers who are familiar with basic market concepts and able to conduct business research in "Industry Expectations of the New Engineer." According to Rodrigues the best time for engineers to learn these skills is during their university years, before they are in the workplace.
University science and engineering departments are working to meet these needs by creating programs that are designed to provide students with the best combination of skills for today's job market. In many cases this involves training in business fundamentals as well as traditional science and engineering subjects (Smallwood 2001).
There are also several examples of universities combining engineering and business instruction. At the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference in 1998, engineering and business professors from the Pennsylvania State University highlighted a new graduate program in Quality and Manufacturing Management (QMM). The program was created to address "an emerging need for a new breed of professional: women and men who can think broadly as business people, engineers, and technologists, and who have the skills needed to bring new products to the marketplace in the most cost-efficient way possible" (Ruud & Hottenstein 1998).
All of these trends have created an interesting opportunity for librarians. As more applied science and engineering classes are added to class schedules across the country, librarians with specialties in business and science can work together in order to address the unique information literacy needs of these students. It is also an opportunity for librarians to explore what information literacy means when two very different, yet increasingly connected, disciplines come together.
The College of Science at the UA offers a professional master's degree program with degrees in applied and industrial physics, applied biosciences, and mathematical sciences. The program emphasizes business and science fundamentals, together with opportunities to gain practical experience and to interact with industry leaders.
Alaina Levine, Director of Special Projects for the College of Science, maintains that "the Professional Master's Degree program was developed in response to industry leaders' interest in hiring highly educated students who understand the connection between science and business" (Manson 2002).
This emphasis is also reflected in the promotional brochure for the Professional Master's Degree program "@ the Intersection of Science & Industry":
In today's global economic climate, science graduates need skills and credentials that place them above and beyond the crowd. In fact, more than ever, corporations, government laboratories and agencies, non-profits, and other industrial sectors are demanding that their science-educated employees also command various business related skills (The University of Arizona College of Science n.d.).
In addition, the Eller College of Business and Public Administration began offering a course in 2000 to "make engineering students more business-minded" (Dirner 2000). Tom Peterson, Dean of the College of Engineering and Mines, believes the course Management and Policy 478, Building a High Performance Company, "would benefit engineering students by allowing them to be more familiar with industry" (Dirner 2000).
The University of Arizona College of Engineering and Mines now offers a new bachelor's degree in Engineering Management. Besides courses in traditional mathematics and science, students in the program will also take courses from the Business College, including courses in accounting, business administration, and three units of business or management electives (University of Arizona n.d.).
Other courses that are not specifically part of these programs are also emphasizing the connection between science and business. Here we describe our experience with one of these courses, Materials Engineering Design, whose students were given the task of engineering a new product and determining what would be needed to successfully bring it to market. We provided a one-hour instruction session on business and science resources and created a customized web-based information pathfinder for the students. When the projects were turned in, we consulted with the instructor to assess the effectiveness of our presentation and online subject guide. We believe that our experience with this class can provide some insight into the information literacy needs of students enrolled in courses related to the applied sciences.
But there has been little written about librarians teaching information literacy skills to students outside the librarians' discipline or area of expertise. There are many examples in the literature of librarians collaborating with faculty, but little in the way of cross-discipline collaboration between librarians. With the move in science and engineering curricula to include business courses and/or business research skills, there are increasing opportunities for business librarians and science-engineering librarians to share the knowledge in their specialties and collaborate with each other in providing information literacy instruction, allowing for better understanding on the part of business librarians of science-engineering needs and vice versa. Leckie and Fullerton (1999) believe that the science and engineering faculty may not use library instruction because they are not aware of this service. There is the potential to make connections between faculty and students in different departments. For example, Audet and Pegna (2001) describe the collaboration of Commerce students with Mechanical Engineering students to develop a new product and a business plan for that product.
In the Fall 1999 semester, the author who is a business librarian assumed responsibility for teaching the library session for this course in conjunction with the former materials science and engineering librarian. When the course was taught again the following year, the author who has the science and engineering expertise began collaborating with the author who has the business expertise. Through working with the professor over several years, we were able to develop a partnership in which the library instruction session was continually refined and improved to address the learning objectives established by the professor. For example, after the second time we taught the class, the professor asked us to exclude the discussion of writing a business plan because he had eliminated it from the course requirements. We kept the business plan information on the research guide for informational purposes, but did not cover that material in the library instruction session.
Prior to the beginning of each course, the authors met with the professor to discuss changes made in the curriculum, specific design ideas that students would pursue that semester, and what should be modified from the previous library instruction session. The professor's objectives for his students included learning how to find information on:
Because the professor wanted a large amount of information to be presented to the students in a one-hour session, and because these engineering students had little or no experience with doing business research, it was important to develop instructional materials they could use later to guide themselves in their research. Science and engineering faculty often want their students to develop self-sufficiency in finding information (Leckie & Fullerton 1999). Beginning in Fall 1999, the librarians shared in the development of a web-based research guide for the class. Prior to that, bibliographic instruction for the course consisted primarily of lecture and handouts. The web-based research guide presented resources to find information in support of designing, producing and bringing a new product to the market. It was divided into clearly defined sections to lead the students through this research process:
To help make these concepts more concrete to the students, we used a case study approach with our own new product idea, a solar-powered cooling bike helmet. This type of product, the combination of an existing product with a new or modified use, is typical of the innovation in design employed by the engineering students in this class. Using the web site as a base, we led them through the research process using this example product, pointing out particular resources, and demonstrating some of the electronic sources. Also included in each section of the guide were questions, which we discussed with the students, to prompt them to think about what information they would need, for example: Who is your target market? What are their demographics and lifestyles?
As co-instructors, we alternated presentation of the resources according to our areas of expertise. Due to time constraints, the timing of transitions was a challenge, but we had prepared in our lesson plan approximately how much time to allot for each of our sections. During the hour-long session, we spent about ten minutes on each major section of the guide. For example, the students' first step after identifying a design idea is to determine what materials with specific properties would be needed to create the product. Then they need to identify if there are any existing patents on their idea or a similar idea. The science librarian demonstrated how to search the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Database, using "photovoltaic and helmet" in his search, and displayed entries like a Ventilated Welder's Helmet, which was similar to the example product idea. At the end of this section, students were given a few minutes to practice searching for patents on their own product ideas.
In the next section of the guide, Locating and Pricing Materials/Parts/Production Equipment, the science librarian presented some questions to consider in their research, including who manufactures and/or sells parts and chemicals and how much would it cost to produce their products.
Since the business information was completely new to the engineering students, the business librarian included explanations of key business concepts like the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes in the Industry Analysis section of the web site. The business librarian explained the coding systems to the students and demonstrated how to determine industry codes for an innovative product that may fit into more than one industry. For example, someone researching the solar-powered cooling bike helmet might need to look at the Photovoltaic Cells manufacturing industry (SIC 3674), the Sporting and Athletic Goods industry (SIC 3949), and the Sporting Goods and Bicycle Shops retail industry (SIC 5941). Section by section, we followed the research guide. Due to time constraints, we could not cover every resource listed, but touched on key concepts, such as why you would want to identify your competitors, how to find analysis of your industry, and what "market share" tells you about a your industry.
The next business section involved Market Research where concepts such as target market were explained. The business librarian demonstrated how to find demographic and lifestyle information for a geographic area or an age group and how that data would relate to the students' products. For example, about 48% of households who participate in bicycling frequently have a 25- to 44-year-old as head of household (SRDS 2002). That information, coupled with demographic data about Tucson from the U.S. Census Bureau, which shows that about 30% of Tucson's population in 2000 was aged 25 to 44 (U.S. Census Bureau), may indicate good potential for marketing the bike helmet in Tucson.
The last section of the research guide covered Industrial Processes and Business Operations. Here, students might investigate research questions such as, are you going to lease factory space or build a factory? How much will it cost to build a factory? The science librarian explained the need to determine if there are standards, regulations or codes that may affect the manufacture of the students' products, and demonstrated some resources they may use to gather this information, such as the Tech Data Express (TDX) database.
Finally, the research guide contains links to Tucson organizations that provide assistance to new and small businesses and links to information about requirements for starting and operating a business in Tucson, where the University of Arizona is located.
The library class was concluded with a brief exercise for the students to complete, giving them some hands-on experience using the resources:
By the end of the session the students were able to effectively use research tools that we presented in the session to find the answers to these questions.
The authors also received feedback from the professor in e-mails he sent us after each class. The professor said that the library session is an indispensable part of the course, that his students are very pleased with the instruction and the web site, and that students in his other courses have also found useful information through the site. Further research is needed in assessing the effectiveness of cross-discipline library instruction and assessing students' learning outcomes. A useful assessment would include evaluating the students' reports and bibliographies to examine what resources they used and possibly identify areas of their research and the library instruction that need improvement or augmentation. The authors plan to incorporate this type of assessment in future offerings of this course.
Cawsey, S.M. & Staninger, S.W. 1996. Achieving scientific competency: a strategy for business librarians. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 2(2):3-15.
Demain, A.L. 2001. The relationship between universities and industry: the American university perspective. Food Technology and Biotechnology 39(3):157-160.
Dirner, J. 2000. Course gives engineers business training. Arizona Daily Wildcat February 25, 2000. [Online]. Available: {http://wc.arizona.edu/papers/93/106/09_1_m.html} [December 3, 2002].
Frank, D.G. & Kollen, C. 1989. Humanities and social sciences librarians in the science-engineering library: utilization and implications for effective collection development and reference services. Science & Technology Libraries 9(3):63-71.
Hawley, G.G. & Lewis, R.J. 2002. Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary. New York: Wiley.
Leckie, G.J. & Fullerton, A. 1999. Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College & Research Libraries 60(1):9-29.
Manson, B. 2002. Degree unites science, business. Arizona Daily Wildcat October 17, 2002. [Online]. Available: {http://wc.arizona.edu/papers/96/38/01_3.html} [December 3, 2002].
National Science Board. 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. [Online]. Available: {https://wayback.archive-it.org/5902/20160210154954/http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02/} [December 5, 2002].
Rodrigues, R.J. 2001. Industry expectations of the new engineer. Science & Technology Libraries 19(3/4):179-188.
Ruud, C.O. & Hottenstein, M.P. 1998. Graduate curriculum focused upon manufacturing & integrating engineering & business. In: ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. [Online]. Available: {https://peer.asee.org/a-graduate-curriculum-focused-upon-manufacturing-integrating-engineering-business.pdf} [December 2, 2002].
Smallwood, S. 2001. Graduate studies in science expand beyond the Ph.D. The Chronicle of Higher Education 47(30): A14-A15.
SRDS. 2002. The Lifestyle Market Analyst. Des Plaines, IL: SRDS. The University of Arizona Science and Technology Park. [Online]. Available: {http://www.uatechpark.org/default1.asp} [December 3, 2002].
The University of Arizona. n.d. College of Science. @ the Intersection of Science & Industry. (Brochure for the programs of Applied and Industrial Physics, Applied Biosciences, and Mathematical Sciences). The University of Arizona. College of Engineering and Mines. [Online]. Available: {http://psm.arizona.edu/brochure-final.pdf} [January 16, 2003].
The University of Arizona. College of Engineering and Mines. n.d. Engineering Management Degree. [Online]. Available: {http://www.engr.arizona.edu/emg/} [January 16, 2003].
U.S. Census Bureau. DP-1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000. [Online]. Available: http://factfinder.census.gov/ [February 17, 2003].
Weiner, S.T. 1996. Librarians as teaching team members in a mechanical engineering design course. Science & Technology Libraries 16(1):3-10.