Notre Dame ReSource:  Garnett discusses Supreme Court decision on abortion ban | News | Notre Dame News | University of Notre Dame






	
	





  	Skip To Content
	Skip To Navigation
	Skip To Search






  
  
    University of Notre Dame

    
      
      Notre Dame News

      
      
    


    
    
      
        
        
        	
	Experts
	ND in the News
	Subscribe
	About Us
	


      
        
          
          
          
          
          
        

      


      
    


    
    
      	 Home
	 Contact
	 Search
	
          
          
            
            
          
          Menu
        
        


      
        
          
          
          
          
          
        

      

    

  

  
  

  

  
    	Home › 
	News › 
	Notre Dame ReSource:  Garnett discusses Supreme Court decision on abortion ban


    
      
        
          Notre Dame ReSource:  Garnett discusses Supreme Court decision on abortion ban

          
            
              
                
                Published: April 17, 2007
              

              
                Author: Michael O. Garvey
              

              







          

          
          
          

          
        
        
        
          

Todays Supreme Court decision upholding the 2003 Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act isa narrow, but important one,according to Richard W. Garnett, associate professor in theNotre DameLawSchool.

Writing for the majority in the 5-4 ruling Justice Anthony Kennedy said that opponents of the banhave not demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases.

Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the majority does not change the court’s basic position with respect to abortion,Garnett said,but it does make clear that the court’s precedents permit reasonable, careful regulations of abortion, in order to promote the state’s valid interest in protecting what Justice Kennedy called the government’s ‘interest in respect for life.The justices distinguished, but did not overrule, their2000 decision, Stenberg v. Carhart, which struck downNebraska’s differently worded partial-birth-abortion ban.

Unlike the earlier decision, today’s ruling respects the views of the overwhelming number of Americanspro-life and pro-choice alikewho concluded that partial-birth-abortion is a procedure that a decent and humane society need not permit,Garnett said.In this sense, the decision is consistent with the view, expressed by Chief Justice Roberts during his confirmation hearings, that federal judges should be restrained, and not take it on themselves to remove controversial debates from public discourse.

* Contact: *  _Richard W. Garnett at 773-702-9566 or rgarnett@uchicago.edu 

_

TopicID: 22230

        

        
        
          
            

          

        
      
      
    
  
  
    	Home
	Experts
	ND in the News
	Subscribe
	About Us


  

  
  
    
     
  
  

  
  
    
      	For the Media
	Contact


    
            
    
      
	Office of Public Affairs and Communications


      Notre Dame News

      
        
          
            500 Grace Hall
 
            Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
          
          
          
          
        

        
          	 Facebook
	 Twitter
	 Instagram
	 YouTube
	 Pinterest


        
      

      
© 2022 University of Notre Dame

    
    
      

        
      
      
        
          	Search
	Mobile App
	News
	Events
	Visit
	Accessibility


        
        
          	 Facebook
	 Twitter
	 Instagram
	 YouTube
	 LinkedIn