key: cord-0003395-942634t2
authors: Liao, Yuqian; Liao, Yulu; Li, Jun; Li, Junyu; Fan, Ying; Xu, Binghe
title: Polymorphisms in AURKA and AURKB are associated with the survival of triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy
date: 2018-09-21
journal: Cancer Manag Res
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s174735
sha: e695e6821ad966d7e370bc12a7ec162b264eff0e
doc_id: 3395
cord_uid: 942634t2

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more than a single disease. Identifying biomarkers to further subdivide TNBC patients with distinct outcome is of great importance. It has been reported that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Aurora kinase A (AURKA) or Aurora kinase B (AURKB) are associated with the risk and survival of several cancers. But till now, there is no research about these polymorphisms in TNBC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we investigated the association between polymorphisms in AURKA or AURKB gene and prognosis of TNBC patients treated with taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 273 TNBC patients were enrolled. Haploview 4.2 software was used to identify Tag SNPs. Genotyping was conducted using the MassARRAY MALDI-TOF system. RESULTS: We found that AURKA rs6099128 GG genotype carriers had significantly worse overall survival (OS) than TT+ TG genotype carriers (P = 0.003, HR = 12.499, 95% CI = 2.357–66.298). AURKB rs11651993 TT genotype carriers had better disease-free survival (DFS) than TC + CC genotype carriers (P = 0.018, HR = 1.876, 95% CI = 1.116–3.154). AURKB rs2289590 CC genotype carriers had worse DFS than CA + AA genotype carriers (P = 0.021, HR = 0.536, 95% CI = 0.315–0.912). After subgroup analysis, rs11651993 TC + CC genotype predicted worse DFS in subgroups of age ≤ 50, post-menopausal, grade unknown (UK), tumor size >2 cm, and lymph node negative. Rs2289590 CA + AA genotype could predict favorable DFS in pre-menopausal, grade 3 and lymph node-positive patients. CONCLUSION: We first demonstrated that polymorphisms in AURKA or AURKB gene might predict the OS or DFS of TNBC patients treated with taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and is the leading cause of cancer death in women around the world. 1 It is a very heterogeneous disease and is divided into several subgroups that have different clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. 2 Triplenegative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined as lacking expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). It is characterized by aggressive behavior, onset at young age, and early relapse. 3, 4 TNBC is insensitive to endocrine and HER2-targeted therapy, and therefore, chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment. Although some clinical trials found that TNBC is more sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, 5, 6 taxane/anthracycline-based regimens are still standard and preferred regimens for TNBC patients in the adjuvant setting. 7 3802 liao et al However, not all TNBC patients respond to chemotherapy, which suggests that TNBC is more than a single disease. 8 Identifying biomarkers to further subdivide TNBC patients with distinct outcome is of great importance.

Aurora kinase A (AURKA) and Aurora kinase B (AURKB) are members of the Aurora kinase subfamily of conserved serine/threonine kinases. 9 AURKA localizes to the duplicate centrosomes from the beginning of S phase, shifts to the bipolar spindle microtubules during mitosis, and, finally, moves to perinuclear materials of the daughter cells at the end of mitosis. 10 By contrast, AURKB starts at early G2 and localizes to the chromosomes in prophase, the centromere in prometaphase and metaphase, the central spindle in anaphase, and the mid-body in cytokinesis. 11 AURKA plays a critical role in centrosome duplication and maturation. 12, 13 AURKB plays a key role during mitosis by regulating chromosomal alignment, segregation, and cytokinesis, as the catalytic protein of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC). 11 Deregulation of Aurora kinases leads to impairment of mitotic spindle checkpoints causing abnormal spindle assembly. 9 It has been reported that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in AURKA or AURKB are associated with the risk and survival of several cancers including breast cancer, 14 esophageal cancer, 15 and so on. But till now, there is no research about polymorphisms in AURKA or AURKB and prognosis of TNBC patients. In our study, we first demonstrated that polymorphisms in AURKA or AURKB gene were associated with the survival of TNBC patients.

Between January 2004 and December 2012, 273 primary TNBC patients treated with taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. Blood samples were collected from each patient. Patients were followed up until July 30, 2017, to collect data on recurrence and death. The disease-free survival (DFS) time was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis until the date of first locoregional recurrence, first distant metastasis, or death from any cause (whichever came first). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of death from any reason or last follow-up.

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue samples were obtained from the patients. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed with anti-ER and anti-PR antibodies was used to evaluate the ER and PR status. A positive ER and PR status was defined by nuclear staining of more than 1% according to the guidelines issued by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAPs) in 2010. 16 To determine the HER2 status, IHC or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed. 17 Tumors negative for ER, PR, and HER2 were defined as TNBCs.

This investigation was approved by the institutional review board of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Hospital. It was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and following the national and international guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Genotype data from AURKA and AURKB gene regions encompassing 10 kb of upstream and 3 kb of downstream flanking sequences were extracted from the HapMap Chinese Han population (Hapmap Data Rel 27, Phase II + III, http:// www.HapMap.org). Haploview 4.2 software (http://www. broadinstitute.org/mpg/haploview) was used to identify Tag SNPs. The inclusion criteria were SNPs known in ethnic Han Chinese people and with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.05. Finally, a total of 11 candidate SNPs were selected for genotyping, and information for these SNPs is listed in Table 1 . Primers and probes were designed using MassAR-RAY Typer 4.0 software.

Peripheral blood samples (5 mL) were collected from each subject on recruitment. Genomic DNA was isolated by the routine phenol-chloroform method. Each DNA sample was diluted to a working concentration of 10 ng/mL for genotyping. Genotyping was conducted using the MassAR-RAY MALDI-TOF System (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) 18, 19 at once by the method described in the Sequenom Genotyping Protocol. Twenty percent duplicate samples and negative controls (without DNA) were included for quality assurance of genotyping. Concordance for duplicate samples was 100%. The analysts who carried out the genotyping were blinded to the group information on each sample. 

Polymorphisms in AURKA and AURKB and TNBC estimated by using the Cox model. The multivariate analysis was adjusted for age (≤50 vs >50), histological grade (1-2 vs 3 vs unknown [UK]), tumor size (≤2 cm vs >2 cm), lymph node status (with vs without regional lymph node metastasis), and vascular invasion (with vs without vascular invasion). We performed subgroup analysis for polymorphisms, which were associated with OS or DFS of patients in multivariate analysis. Since there were only 10 patients with rs6099128 GG genotype, we did not perform subgroup analysis for rs6099128. All statistical tests were two sided, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

A total of 273 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age at diagnosis is 48 years (range, 22-75 years). The 5-year OS rate was 87.1%, and the 5-year DFS rate was 72.8%. Among total patients, 142 (52.0%) and 131 (48.0%) patients were at pre-and post-menopausal stages, respectively. Seventy (25.6%) patients presented with grade 1-2 and 152 (55.7%) with grade 3 tumors. Eighty-four (30.8%), 137 (50.2%), and 52 (19.0%) subjects were diagnosed at stage I, II, and III, respectively. The relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and survival of these patients is summarized in Table 2 . Patients with grade 1-2 tumors had a significantly higher 5-year OS rate than those with grade 3 tumors (96.8% vs 79.5%, P = 0.039, HR = 3.640, 95% CI = 1.071-12.373). Tumor size and lymph node status were significantly related to both DFS and OS. No significant association was observed between age or menopausal status and TNBC survival. After multivariate analysis, tumor size (P = 0.024, HR = 3.149, 95% CI = 1.166-8.509) and lymph node status (P < 0.001, 

In multivariate analysis, AURKA rs6099128 was associated with OS, but since there were only 10 patients with GG genotype, we did not explore the relationship in subgroups. As shown in Table 5 , we explored the relationship between AURKB rs11651993 or rs2289590 and survival of TNBC in 

Polymorphisms in AURKA or AURKB have been reported to be associated with prognosis of some kinds of cancers. Up to now, there is no such comprehensive research that investigated the association between polymorphisms in both AURKA and AURKB and the outcome of TNBC patients. In our study, we first demonstrated that AURKA rs6099128 GG genotype carriers had significantly worse OS than TT + TG genotype carriers, AURKB rs11651993 C allele was 

Polymorphisms in AURKA and AURKB and TNBC associated with worse DFS, and AURKB rs2289590 A allele was significantly associated with better DFS. AURKA gene is an oncogene located on chromosome 20q13. Polymorphisms in AURKA gene are associated with risk and intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. 20, 21 In the study by Ruan et al, 22 High AURKA expression was strongly associated with decreased survival of breast cancer (P = 0.0005), and it was an independent prognostic marker in the study by Nadler et al. 25 In TNBC patients with AURKA high expression, the risk of distant recurrence peaked at the first 3 years and declined rapidly thereafter, whereas patients with AURKA low expression showed a relatively constant risk of recurrence during the entire follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that overexpression of AURKA predicted poor OS (P = 0.002) and progression-free survival (P = 0.012) in TNBC. 26 AURKA had been reported to interact and phosphorylate several important proteins involved in stress response and cell cycle checkpoint after DNA damage. 27 Overexpression of AURKA led to diminished transcriptional activity and increased degradation of p53, causing checkpoint defects and genetic instability and ultimately facilitating cancer development and progression. 28 AURKB gene is located on chromosome 17p13. In German population, 29 synonymous AURKB rs2241909 (885A>G) polymorphism resulted in an increased familial breast cancer risk for carriers of the homozygous 885G genotype (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.05-2.0, P = 0.02). There have been debating data regarding the role of the AURKB expression in cancer prognosis. Zhang et al 30 found that AURKB expression was correlated with the proliferation index (P < 0.001) and p53 expression (P = 0.014) in breast cancer tissues. Higher expression of AURKB is significantly correlated with the poor survival in these cases (P = 0.038).

A multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that AURKB expression is an independent prognostic indicator of breast cancer DFS (HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.04-1.86). While in the study by Nadler et al, 25 

Polymorphisms in AURKA and AURKB and TNBC associated with the survival of breast cancer patients. None of the polymorphisms in AURKB of our study has been reported in TNBC. We first found that rs11651993 TC + CC genotype predicted worse DFS in subgroup of age ≤ 50 years, post-menopausal, grade UK, tumor size >2 cm, and lymph node negative. It also predicted shorter OS in subgroup of age > 50 years and grade 3. Rs2289590 CA + AA genotype could predict favorable DFS in pre-menopausal, grade 3, and lymph node-positive patients.

All patients in our study received taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Taxanes are microtubule targeting agents (MTAs), which are most widely used drugs in adjuvant setting for TNBC patients. The cytotoxic action of these compounds is mediated primarily through their binding of β-tubulin monomers, leading to microtubule stabilization, thus blocking their depolymerization and subsequently triggering cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase. 31 Considering the role of Aurora kinases in spindle formation and the reported extent of their deregulation in cancer, we hypothesize that polymorphisms in AURKA or AURKB might contribute to taxane resistance and then influence the survival of cancer patients. Zhang et al 30 demonstrated that in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (containing sequential taxane and anthracycline-based regimens), elevated expression of AURKB contributed to chemoresistance (P = 0.011). In taxane-resistance breast cancer cell lines, expression of AURKA was significantly higher. Knockdown of AURKA not only markedly decreased the expression of P-gp but also downregulated the P-gp function in resistant breast cancer cells. The results indicated that AURKA plays a crucial role in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer. 32 However, the underlying mechanisms of these SNPs on survival of TNBC are not yet clear and need to be further investigated. By silico analysis of prediction of binding motifs, Mesic et al 33 indicated that polymorphic sites in AURKA and AURKB could bind different transcription factors. As for AURKA rs8173, when the G allele was present, C/EBPalpha, C/EBPbeta, and NF-1 transcription factor binding motifs were recognized, whereas when the same region contained the C allele, additional E2F and RAR-β transcription factor motifs were identified. In the case of AURKB rs2289590, when the A allele was present, PEA3 and TFII-I binding motifs were recognized. In contrast, when the C allele is present, PEA3, TFII-I, and YY1 binding motifs were identified. Since YY1 expression level and/or activity is associated with unchecked cell proliferation, resistance to apoptosis, metastasis, and tumor cell resistance to chemo-therapeutics, 34 the binding of an additional YY1 protein in the presence of C allele may alter the level of AURKB expression and then influence the survival, which might be a possible explanation for our result that AURKB rs2289590 A allele was significantly associated with better DFS.

Previous studies enrolled different subtypes of breast cancer patients, and the regimens are not consistent. In our study, only TNBC patients were enrolled, which can better explain the correlation between polymorphisms in AURKA or AURKB and survival. There are some limitations of our study. First, this was a retrospective study, so selection bias might exist. Second, the sample size was relatively small, and the prospective large-scale studies are needed to confirm the conclusions. Finally, since we did not explore the mechanisms, further studies on the biological mechanisms are warranted.

For the first time in TNBC patients receiving taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy, we demonstrated that AURKA rs6099128, AURKB rs11651993, and AURKB rs2289590 were associated with the survival. Since most polymorphisms have never been reported, more research are needed to verify our results.

Cancer Statistics

Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies

Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer

Adjuvant therapy of triple negative breast cancer

Antitumor activity and safety profile of weekly carboplatin plus paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a ten-year, monocentric, retrospective study

Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIB/III Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin (CAP Regimen): A Single Arm

Role of Platinum in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

How many diseases is triple negative breast cancer: the protagonism of the immune microenvironment

Roles of Aurora kinases in mitosis and tumorigenesis

Molecular dynamics of Aurora-A kinase in living mitotic cells simultaneously visualized with histone H3 and nuclear membrane protein importinalpha

INCENP-aurora B interactions modulate kinase activity and chromosome passenger complex localization

Aurora-A -a guardian of poles

Aurora kinase A is essential for correct chromosome segregation in mouse zygote

Two nonsynonymous polymorphisms (F31I and V57I) of the STK15 gene and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 5966 cases and 7609 controls

Association of Aurora-A (STK15) kinase polymorphisms with clinical outcome of esophageal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer

Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer

Establishment and Application of a Universal Coronavirus Screening Method Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Major Drug Resistance Mutations in Reverse Transcriptase Gene for HIV-1 CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC and Subtype B in China Using Sequenom MassARRAY® System

Inconsistent association between the STK15 F31I genetic polymorphism and breast cancer risk

Polymorphisms of the AURKA (STK15/Aurora Kinase) Gene and Breast Cancer Risk (United States)

Genetic polymorphisms in AURKA and BRCA1 are associated with breast cancer susceptibility in a Chinese Han population

Genetic variation in cell cycle regulatory gene AURKA and association with intrinsic breast cancer subtype

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the 20q13 amplicon genes in relation to breast cancer risk and clinical outcome

Expression of Aurora A (but not Aurora B) is predictive of survival in breast cancer

Aurora-A identifies early recurrence and poor prognosis and promises a potential therapeutic target in triple negative breast cancer

Aurora-A kinase maintains the fidelity of early and late mitotic events in HeLa cells

p53 Family Members Regulate Phenotypic Response to Aurora Kinase A Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Aurora kinases A and B and familial breast cancer risk

Elevated Aurora B expression contributes to chemoresistance and poor prognosis in breast cancer

Function of Aurora kinase A in Taxol-resistant breast cancer and its correlation with P-gp

Paclitaxel resistance in nonsmall-cell lung cancer associated with beta-tubulin gene mutations

Single nucleotide polymorphisms rs911160 in AURKA and rs2289590 in AURKB mitotic checkpoint genes contribute to gastric cancer susceptibility

Transcription factor YY1: structure, function, and therapeutic implications in cancer biology

This study was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China (No. 20151BAB205043).

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.

Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival and quality of life for the cancer patient. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors.