key: cord-0006411-ts9u7vez authors: Belkhouja, Khairallah; Ben Romdhane, Kaïs; Ghariani, Asma; Hammami, Afef; M’hiri, Emna; Slim-Saidi, Leila; Ben Khelil, Jalila; Besbes, Mohamed title: Severe pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia admitted to medical Tunisian ICU date: 2011-11-02 journal: J Infect Chemother DOI: 10.1007/s10156-011-0337-8 sha: 4d4573649c420e5c1c797b51d6b371bd14792715 doc_id: 6411 cord_uid: ts9u7vez Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). There are no available data about this disease in Tunisian intensive care patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical and microbiological features of pneumococcal CAP and determine the prognostic factors. This is a retrospective cohort study of all pneumococcal CAP cases hospitalized in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of Hospital A. Mami of Ariana (Tunisia) between January 1999 and August 2008. Included were 132 patients (mean age, 49.5 years; 82.6% males); 30 patients had received antimicrobial treatment before hospital admission. The mean of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 32.9. All patients had an acute respiratory failure; 34 patients (25.8%) had pneumococcal bacteremic CAP. Among the isolated strains, 125 antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed. The use of the new Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints for susceptibility when testing penicillin against S. pneumoniae showed that all isolated strains were susceptible to penicillin. The mortality rate was 25%. The need of mechanical ventilation at admission [odds ratio (OR), 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.67–6.94; P = 0.001), Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at admission ≥4 (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.56–6.13; P = 0.001), and serum creatinine at admission ≥102 μmol/l (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.02–3.17; P = 0.043) were independent factors related to ICU mortality. In conclusion, pneumococcal CAP requiring hospitalization in the ICU is associated with high mortality. All isolated stains were susceptible to penicillin. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries [1] . Approximately 10-20% of hospitalized patients with CAP required admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), with increased morbidity, mortality, and costs [2] [3] [4] . The mortality rates reported in these patients ranged from 20% to 50% [2, 5] . The identification of the causal CAP microorganism varies from 40% to 60% for patients admitted in a general ward [6, 7] and can reached 78% for those admitted in an ICU [8] . The leading cause of CAP is Streptococcus pneumoniae, whatever the age and comorbidities of patients and the site of care (outpatient, medical ward, or ICU) [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] . During the past 35 years, the global emergence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (DRSP) has been reported [12, 13] . This resistance is particularly documented to b-lactams, and the prevalence of penicillinnonsusceptible S. pneumoniae (PNSSP) has been reported in several regions of the world [14] [15] [16] [17] . In Tunisia, there are no available data about the epidemiological characteristics and prognostic of pneumococcal CAP admitted in ICUs. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and microbiological features of pneumococcal CAP and to determine its prognostic factors. Design and study population A retrospective cohort study was carried out in the Hospital Abderrahmen Mami of Ariana, Tunisia. Approval was obtained from the hospital ethics committee. Included were all consecutive cases of CAP admitted to the ICU (22-bed medical adult ICU) between January 1, 1999 and August 31, 2008, in patients more than 15 years old in whom S. pneumoniae was isolated. All patients with severe immunosuppression [solid organ transplant, current chemotherapy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnosis] were excluded. Pneumonia was defined as the presentation of acute onset of symptoms suggestive of lower respiratory tract infection at hospital admission (cough, sputum production, pleural chest pain, fever [38.3°C or hypothermia, pulmonary consolidation at examination, abnormal leukocyte counts) and radiographic evidence of a new pulmonary infiltrate. The definitive diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia was considered if there was clinical and radiologic pneumonia with one of the following conditions: (1) blood cultures positive for S. pneumoniae; (2) pleural fluid cultures yielding S. pneumoniae; (3) validated sputum at direct examination (C25 leucocytes per field and \10 epithelial cells per field) and cultures with C10 7 colony-forming units (cfu)/ml S. pneumoniae; (4) endotracheal aspirate (ETA) cultures with C10 6 cfu/ml S. pneumoniae; (5) bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures with C10 4 cfu/ml S. pneumoniae; (6) plugged telescoping catheter (PTC) cultures with C10 3 cfu/ml S. pneumoniae; and (7) positive pneumococcal urinary antigen test result (Binax NOW-test; Binax, Portland, ME, USA). Diagnosis of atypical microorganisms was performed by means of paired serology at admission and at the third week thereafter: these microorganisms included Chlamydia pneumoniae (diagnosis in the case of fourfold increase in IgG titers and/or initial single IgM titer C1:32), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (diagnosis in the case of fourfold increase in IgG titers and/or any initial positive IgM titer), as well as Legionella pneumophila serotypes 1-6 and Coxiella burnetii (diagnosis in the case of fourfold increase in IgG titer). The diagnosis of L. pneumophila serotype 1 was also performed by positive urinary antigen. Pneumonia was considered as CAP if it was diagnosed within the first 48 h of hospitalization and the patient had been discharged from an acute care facility within 14 days of hospital admission. The following data were collected at the time of ICU admission: age, gender, current smoking, comorbid illness, antimicrobial treatment instituted within 1 month before hospital admission, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) [18] , sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score [19] , the pneumonia severity index (PSI) and the CURB-65 score [20, 21] , Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and signs of severity at admission as defined below: mechanical ventilation (MV) requirement, septic shock, acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS), coma, acute renal failure (ARF), multiple organ failure (MOF), chest radiograph pattern (alveolar, interstitial, or mixed infiltrate, multilobar involvement, bilateral involvement, presence of cavity, pleural effusion), blood analysis (leukocyte count, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, lactate, serum glucose, PCO 2 , PO 2 , and arterial pH), bacteriological identification procedure, and empiric antimicrobial treatment. During hospital admission, the following information was recorded: antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. pneumoniae isolates and any associated organism, any complication of stay (need for MV, shock, ARDS/ALI, ARF, nosocomial infections, MOF, arrhythmia, etc.), ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality. Susceptibility testing of S. pneumoniae isolates was performed using the disk-agar diffusion method. The following antibiotics were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility: penicillin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime, erythromycin, lincomycine, pristinamycine, tetracycline, levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, rifampicin, and vancomycin. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was not tested for all antimicrobials against S. pneumoniae isolates. The susceptibility of S. pneumoniae to b-lactams was determined with an oxacillin disk charged to 5 lg. For all strains including oxacillin of diameter smaller than 26 mm, the determination of the MIC for penicillin, amoxicillin, and cefotaxime was performed by the E test method. The MIC 90 and MIC 50 were not performed in this study. Before 2008, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) susceptibility breakpoints for penicillin for treatment of S. pneumoniae infection were defined as susceptible, B0.06 lg/ml; intermediate, 0.12-1 lg/ml; and resistant, C2 lg/ml. In January 2008, the CLSI published revised breakpoints for susceptibility when testing penicillin against S. pneumoniae [22] . The revised breakpoints for nonmeningeal infections treated with parenteral penicillin were defined as susceptible, B2 lg/ml; intermediate, 4 lg/ml; and resistant, C8 lg/ml. The term nonsusceptible refers to both resistant and intermediate stains. We compared the rate of PNSSP between pre-2008 and the new 2008 revised breakpoints for nonmeningitis intravenous administration. Acute respiratory failure at ICU admission was defined as PaO 2 \60 mmHg and/or PaCO 2 [45 mmHg while the patient was breathing room air, or the need for an increase in inspired oxygen concentration or MV. ALI and ARDS were defined in concordance with the American-European consensus conference [23] . Shock was defined as systolic blood pressure \90 mmHg not corrected after fluid administration or if patients needed vasopressor drug support for [4 h. Coma was defined as GCS B8. ARF was defined as a rapidly rising serum creatinine C120 lM/l or oliguria (urine output as measured, \20 ml/h or \80 ml/ 4 h). MOF was defined as the dysfunction of two or more of the six evaluated organ systems accorded to the definition by Fagon et al. [24] . Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as median (extreme) when the variables were not normally distributed. Discrete variables are expressed as counts (percentage). Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test correction, when chi-square was not appropriate. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test when the variables were not normally distributed. All the statistically significant variables in the univariate analysis were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis model with a stepwise forward selection. A twotailed P value.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. During the study period, 273 patients were hospitalized for CAP. The microorganism was identified in 187 patients (68.5%), of whom 132 had S. pneumoniae (48.3%). The mean age was 49.5 ± 21.6 years; 109 patients (82.6%) were men. Thirty-nine (29.5%) patients had received some antibiotic treatment before ICU admission. The mean SAPS II was 32.9 ± 18.6 and the median SOFA score and CURB-65 were 3 and 2, respectively; 72 patients (54.5%) had PSI class IV or V. All patients had an acute respiratory failure. Oxygen tension in arterial blood (PaO 2 )/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO 2 ) index was \300 mmHg in 97 patients (73.5%). At admission, 84 patients had one or more signs of severity, and MV was needed in 62 patients (47%). Pneumonia was bilateral and multilobar in 39.4% and 48.5% of patients, respectively (Table 1) . S. pneumoniae was associated with another organism in 37 patients (28%), mainly Haemophilus influenzae in 25 cases, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (5 cases), Escherichia coli (2 cases), Enterobacter cloacae (2 cases), and Klebsiella pneumoniae, L. pneumophila, and M. pneumoniae (1 case each). Of the 132 strains, 125 susceptibility tests were performed. Thirty-one of isolated strains had an oxacillin diameter smaller than 26 mm; the median MIC was 0.75 lg/ml, ranging between 0.125 and 2 lg/ml. When applying the old CLSI penicillin breakpoints, the rate of PNSSP was 24.8%. When applying the new CLSI penicillin breakpoints, however, all isolated stains were susceptible to penicillin. Forty-five (36%) isolated strains were fully resistant to erythromycin ( Table 2) . The median time for first antibiotic dose administration was 5.5 h (range, 1-168 h). Initial empiric antibiotic therapy was monotherapy in 71 patients (53.8%), as follows: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in 53 (40.1%), cefotaxime in 9 (6.8%), and levofloxacin in 9 (6.8%). Different combinations of b-lactams (cefotaxime or amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid) and erythromycin or quinolones (ofloxacin or levofloxacin) were used in the remaining 61 patients (46.2%).This antibiotic has been secondarily simplified, after the results of susceptibility testing, to amoxicillin alone in 103 patients (78%). During their stay, 49 patients (37.1%) had at least one complication, mainly dominated by septic shock (25 cases) and MOF (18 cases). The median length of stay in the ICU was 9.5 days (range, 1-68 days). The overall ICU mortality rate was 25% (33 patients) ( Table 3 ). The univariate analysis recorded variables related to death are listed in Table 4 for continuous variables and in Table 5 for categorical variables. Neither the empiric monotherapy [odds ratio (OR), 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-1.11; P = 0.08] nor bacteremia (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.57-3.25; P = 0.491) were predictors of mortality in univariate analysis. The logistic regression demonstrated that need of MV at admission, SOFA score C4, and serum creatinine C102 lmol/l were the only independent factors related to death (Table 6 ). The incidence of pneumococcal CAP in our study was 48.3%. In the literature, the incidence varies between 15.2% and 42% [4, 8, 11] , which is explained mainly by the variation of diagnostic procedures in these studies. Indeed, in the study by Restrepo et al. [4] , where invasive diagnostic procedures were not used, this incidence was low. In the studies by Paganin et al. [8] and Rello et al. [11] , as in our study, fiberoptic technique was used for lower respiratory tract secretions sampling in nonintubated patients. The orientation of a patient with CAP to a site of care (outcome, hospital ward, or ICU) was a major concern of the authors. Fine et al. [20] developed the PSI score. Initially designed for a prognosis evaluation, this score has become a tool for deciding CAP hospitalization. However, several limitations are noteworthy. First, hypoxemia, whose ''weight'' is only 10, remains an important factor of severity, while a 71-year-old man passes immediately to IPS class III only by the ''weight'' of his age. Second, its use in other populations or in countries with different health system needs validation. Finally, socioeconomic condition and psychological and digestive disorders are not taken into account. In our study, the decision for ICU hospitalization was based mainly on the clinical judgment of the physician, taking into account the socioeconomic condition of the patient. Another prognostic score is the CURB-65, widely used and adopted by the British Thoracic Society [21, 25] . This score is much easier to use and Data are presented as number (%) or mean ± SD or median (extreme) more practical than that of the IPS score. For the ICU admission criteria of patients with CAP, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommends admission to intensive care if the patient has two minor signs or one major sign [26] . The ATS criteria seem more practical and easy to use. Indeed, the majority of our patients had at least one criterion of the ATS (acute respiratory failure in 94% of cases, MV in 47% of cases, bilateral radiologic involvement in 39.4%, multilobar involvement in 48.5% of patients, and septic shock in 26.5% of cases). The incidence of mixed CAP varies from 13% to 38% [6, 27] , and S. pneumoniae is the pathogen most often associated with another infectious agent, particularly Haemophilus influenzae [6] , as in our series, but also with atypical bacterial pathogens and viruses [28] . This large variation is the result of the variation of microbiological tests carried out in various studies. In our work, the search for atypical pathogens is very inadequate, and no respiratory viruses have been searched. Serological analyses for atypical microorganisms were performed in 49.2% of patients and urine antigen detection in 25.7% of patients, mainly because of lack of available resources. For more than two decades, the global emergence of in vitro antibiotic resistance among S. pneumoniae has been reported. This resistance is of special interest for the b-lactams, with a variable frequency from one country to another, ranging from 18% to 53% [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] . After 2008, when CLSI revised the breakpoints, the rate of PNSSP was decreased significantly. Recently, Mera et al. have compared the rates of susceptibility of S. pneumoniae to penicillin before and after the 2008 revised CLSI breakpoint. In this study, the penicillin susceptibility level was 92.2% in 2008 (11,185 strains) , if the new breakpoints for intravenous antibiotic use and nonmeningitis syndromes such as bacteremia or pneumonia are applied, whereas using the old definition, the proportion was 58.8% [29] . In our study, the PNSSP rate was 24.8% if the old breakpoints are applied, whereas all stains were susceptible to penicillin if we referred to the present CLSI breakpoints. The resistance of S. pneumoniae to macrolides is markedly increasing worldwide, exceeding 50% in some studies [12, 13] . For treatment of severe CAP, all international scientific societies recommended the use of combination therapy [25, 26, 30, 31] , which will include an anti-pneumococcal b-lactam agent and additional coverage for ''atypical'' pathogens with a respiratory fluoroquinolone or a macrolide. This association has some drawbacks and criticisms. Length of stay (days) 9.5 (1-68) ICU mortality 33 (25) Data are presented as number (%) or median (extreme) MOF multiple organ failure, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, ICU intensive care unit The first is the significant risk of emergence of resistant strains. The second is the absence of clear epidemiological data and obvious impact of atypical pathogens in the CAP. The third and most important is that the impact of monotherapy on mortality is not clearly proven. Finally, the combination results in increased cost of care. In our study, more than half of the patients received empiric monotherapy, explained, first, by the fact that the choice of initial antibiotic therapy has not been guided throughout the study period by any rigorous protocol and, second, that combination therapy has been conducted mainly in the presence of shock and/or the need for VM. The mortality rate in our report was 25%. In a recent meta-analysis including 10 studies conducted between 1984 and 2001 and including 3,430 patients hospitalized with pneumococcal CAP, the short-term mortality ranged from 10.9% to 36.4% [31] . This study raises the problem of the important heterogeneity between studies and the extensive period of these works (17 years) . Concerning the empirical treatment of pneumococcal CAP, some studies have evaluated the efficacy of monotherapy versus combination therapy and its mortality impact [32, 33] . The report of the most recent study showed that in a group of nonsevere patients, there is no difference in mortality between monotherapy versus combination therapy. In contrast, in a group of patients with septic shock, there is a significant reduction in Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (range) SAPS Simplified Acute Physiology Score, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, PaO 2 partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood, FiO 2 fraction of inspired oxygen OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, PSI pneumonia severity index, ALI acute lung injury, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, MOF multiple organ failure, MV mechanical ventilation mortality in favor of the combination therapy (23.4% vs. 55%; P = 0.001) [33] . In our results, we did not observe any significant difference in mortality between patients treated with monotherapy and those treated by combination therapy. Because the initial treatment included at least one antibiotic effective against S. pneumoniae (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or cefotaxime and/or levofloxacin), the impact of this factor on the prognosis cannot be analyzed. Our study revealed that pneumococcal bacteremic CAP did not significantly increase mortality compared to nonbacteremic pneumococcal CAP. The impact of pneumococcal bacteremia on mortality remains controversial [34] [35] [36] . Bordon et al. have reported a larger sample size, including 1,847 cases of nonbacteremic CAP and 125 pneumococcal bacteremic CAP. Among these, 284 patients were cared for in intensive care (39 patients with pneumococcal bacteremia). The authors showed no significant differences between the two groups in either overall mortality or mortality attributable to CAP [36] . There are some limitations to our study. First, this is a retrospective cohort study, and there are inherent problems related to this design, including selection bias. However, several similar studies, including epidemiological studies, have provided relevant data to the medical scientific community. Second, the study period is very wide (January 1999-August 2008). However, during this period the epidemiology of bacterial CAP and the acquisition of antibiotic resistance have evolved and changed over time. Our diagnostic and therapeutic strategy may also have changed in this long period. Third, the antimicrobial susceptibility testing used the E test method and not the broth microdilution test, which is now considered the gold standard method. The MIC was not performed for all antimicrobial against S. pneumoniae isolates. Also, the MIC 50 and MIC 90 were not performed for any antimicrobial. Investigation to detect atypical pathogens was insufficient. All these limits are mainly the result of the lack of resources in a developing country such as ours. Finally, this is a single-center study. Indeed, the epidemiology and management of CAP, particularly those cases requiring hospitalization in intensive care, vary from one country to another and within a country could vary from one region to another. So, the results of this study cannot be extrapolated to other regions of Tunisia and other countries nearby. In conclusion, this first Tunisian study, with a relatively large size, of pneumococcal CAP hospitalizations in an adult medical ICU, can provide interesting prognostic and epidemiological data. A prospective, multicenter study seems necessary to better know our national epidemiology of severe CAP in general and, more specifically, that of pneumococcal CAP. Causes of death for patients with communityacquired pneumonia: results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis Associations between empirical antimicrobial therapy at the hospital and mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia A comparative study of community-acquired pneumonia patients admitted to the ward and the ICU Severe community-acquired pneumonia: use of intensive care services and evaluation of American and British Thoracic Society Diagnostic criteria Mixed community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalised patients Value of intensive diagnostic microbiological investigation in low-and high-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia Severe community-acquired pneumonia: assessment of microbial aetiology as mortality factor Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia: impact of age, comorbidity, and severity Community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: Spanish multicenter study Microbiological testing and outcome of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia Global antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae Alexander Project Group. The Alexander Project 1998-2000: susceptibility of pathogens isolated from community-acquired respiratory tract infection to commonly used antimicrobial agents Pneumococcal resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics: a global geographic overview Antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada during Clinical outcomes of pneumococcal pneumonia caused by antibiotic-resistant stains in Asian countries: a study by the Asian network for surveillance of resistant pathogens Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Latin America: result from five years of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North America multicenter study Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community acquired pneumonia Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 18th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S18. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS: definition, mechanism, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination Characterization of intensive care unit patients using a model based on the presence or absence of organ dysfunctions and/or infection: the ODIN model British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults Infectious Diseases Society of America/ American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults Multiple pathogens in adult patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia: a one-year prospective study of 346 consecutive patients Community-acquired pneumonia of mixed etiology: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome Impact of new Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute Streptococcus pneumoniae penicillin susceptibility testing breakpoints on reported resistance changes over time Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections SPLIFF. 15th consensus conference about management of lower respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent adults Addition of a macrolide to a b-lactam based empirical regimen is associated with lower in-hospital mortality for patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia Combination antibiotic therapy lowers mortality among severely ill patients with pneumococcal bacteremia Bacteremic and nonbacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia: a prospective study Canadian Community-Acquired Pneumonia Investigators. A comparison of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia with nonbacteremic communityacquired pneumonia of any etiology: results from a Canadian multicenter study The presence of pneumococcal bacteremia does not influence clinical outcomes in patients with community acquired pneumonia: results from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization (CAPO) International Cohort study Acknowledgments We are indebted to the doctors and nurses with the Intensive Care Medicine Service who provided care for the patients included in the study and to all the personnel in the microbiology laboratory. We also thank Dr. Nozha Brahmi for his help.