key: cord-0023803-05s2vm71
authors: Shakhtshneider, Elena; Ivanoshchuk, Dinara; Timoshchenko, Olga; Orlov, Pavel; Semaev, Sergey; Valeev, Emil; Goonko, Andrew; Ladygina, Nataliya; Voevoda, Mikhail
title: Analysis of Rare Variants in Genes Related to Lipid Metabolism in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Western Siberia (Russia)
date: 2021-11-19
journal: J Pers Med
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111232
sha: 1f61915eb67a41c73fd1adc79c6d22e91d3f0fd8
doc_id: 23803
cord_uid: 05s2vm71

The aim of this work was to identify genetic variants potentially involved in familial hypercholesterolemia in 43 genes associated with lipid metabolism disorders. Targeted high-throughput sequencing of lipid metabolism genes was performed (80 subjects with a familial-hypercholesterolemia phenotype). For patients without functionally significant substitutions in the above genes, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification was conducted to determine bigger mutations (deletions and/or duplications) in the LDLR promoter and exons. A clinically significant variant in some gene associated with familial hypercholesterolemia was identified in 47.5% of the subjects. Clinically significant variants in the LDLR gene were identified in 19 probands (73.1% of all variants identified in probands); in three probands (11.5%), pathogenic variants were found in the APOB gene; and in four probands (15.4%), rare, clinically significant variants were identified in genes LPL, SREBF1, APOC3, and ABCG5. In 12 (85.7%) of 14 children of the probands, clinically significant variants were detectable in genes associated with familial hypercholesterolemia. The use of clinical criteria, targeted sequencing, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification makes it possible to identify carriers of rare clinically significant variants in a wide range of lipid metabolism genes and to investigate their influence on phenotypic manifestations of familial hypercholesterolemia.

Familial hypercholesterolemia is a condition caused by a type of genetic defect leading to a decreased rate of removal of low-density lipoproteins from the bloodstream and a pronounced increase in the blood level of total cholesterol [1] . Familial hypercholesterolemia is one of the most common congenital metabolic disorders [2] . With very rare exceptions, familial hypercholesterolemia is an autosomal dominant disorder [3] . In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, there is a significantly higher total serum cholesterol level (from birth) and a significantly higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration, while triglyceride levels are normal or moderately elevated [4] . Familial hypercholesterolemia poses a substantial risk of the early onset of complications such as coronary heart disease and atherosclerotic lesions in the vessels of the brain and arteries of the lower extremities [5] . In people with a high blood level of LDL-C and a confirmed mutation associated with familial hypercholesterolemia, the incidence of cardiovascular diseases Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia were recruited in the Clinical Diagnostic Department of the Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine (IIPM)-a branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG SB RAS). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the IIPM-a branch of the ICG SB RAS (session No. 68 of 4 June 2019). Written informed consent to be examined and to participate in the study was obtained from each patient or his/her parent or legal guardian.

The study included 80 patients referred by a clinical lipidologist for molecular genetic testing after a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. This diagnosis was made using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) Criteria [Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999]. To calculate the total score in accordance with the DLCN criteria, the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Calculator software was used, which has been developed in the Department of Automation of the Faculty of Automation and Computer Engineering at Novosibirsk State Technical University (https://lipidcenter.iimed.ru/o-lipidnom-tsentre/ calc.html [accessed on 1 November 2021]). In this software, the likelihood of familial hypercholesterolemia in a patient is computed from the sum of subscores obtained in each group of criteria. For these calculations, LDL-C levels of first-degree relatives that are known to exceed the age-and sex-specific 95th percentile are analyzed by the software according to populational age-and sex-specific LDL-C data from Russia [1] . Familial hypercholesterolemia is designated as "definite," "probable," or "possible" according to the total score (hereafter: DLCN score). All three subtypes are referred to as a "phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia" below. A JavaScript v.1.5 function is employed to compute the total score. Taking into account the DLCN criteria and the results of molecular genetic testing, an electronic database was compiled for this study.

In this way, in the total of 80 participants, 34 subjects were assigned to the "definite" familial hypercholesterolemia group (DLCN score > 8), five subjects to the "probable" familial hypercholesterolemia group (DLCN score: [6] [7] [8] , and 41 subjects to the "possible" familial hypercholesterolemia group (DLCN score: [3] [4] [5] . The study included 60 probands and 20 first-degree relatives of the probands. Among these relatives, 70% (n = 14) were children of the probands.

The patients underwent a medical examination and ultrasonographic testing, and blood samples were collected for biochemical tests (the lipid profile and general biochemical indicators) and molecular genetic testing. The testing of the probands and their first-degree relatives was carried out according to the principles of cascade genetic screening [18] .

Blood samples for biochemical tests were taken once from the cubital vein in the morning on an empty stomach (12 h after a meal). The lipid parameters (levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]) and blood glucose concentration were determined by enzymatic methods on an automatic biochemical analyzer KoneLab300i (Vantaa, Finland) with Termo Fisher reagents (Vantaa, Finland). The LDL-C level was calculated using the Friedewald formula; when LDL-C concentration was >4.5 mmol/L, direct LDL-C measurement was employed. Means ± standard deviation were computed in the SPSS software for Windows for the data on biochemical testing of the subjects over 18 years of age.

To isolate DNA from blood, phenol-chloroform extraction was used [19] . The quality of the extracted DNA was assessed by means of an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer capillary electrophoresis system (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Targeted high-throughput sequencing of lipid metabolism genes was performed on the whole participants (n = 80, all had a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia to various degrees of certainty). The custom panel of genes for the testing consisted of 43 genes (LDLR,  APOB, PCSK9, LDLRAP1, CETP, LPL, HMGCR, NPC1L1, PPARA, MTTP, LMF1, SAR1B,  ABCA1, ABCG5, ABCG8, CYP7A1, STAP1, LIPA, PNPLA5, APOA1, APOA5, APOC2, APOE,  LCAT, ANGPTL3, LIPC, APOA4, APOC3, SREBF1, LMNA, PPARG, PLIN1, POLD1, LPA,  SMAD1, SMAD2, SMAD3, SMAD4, SMAD5, SMAD6 , SMAD7, SMAD9, and LIPG). Genes LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 are associated with the autosomal dominant type of familial hypercholesterolemia; genes LDLRAP1, ABCG5, ABCG8, and CYP7A1 with the autosomal recessive type of familial hypercholesterolemia; and genes STAP1, LIPA, and PNPLA5 are associated with phenotypic variations of familial hypercholesterolemia, including the development of hypertriglyceridemia. Rare variants in the genes of apolipoproteins and other genes related to lipid metabolism can cause a familial-hypercholesterolemia-like phenotype in patients [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] .

Targeted high-throughput sequencing (next-generation sequencing) was performed with NimbleGen SeqCap Target Enrichment (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) on a MySeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The coverage was 97%.

The bioinformatic processing pipeline included the following steps. After we removed adapters from sequencing data via cutadapt ( , which contains data from more than 30 pathogenicity prediction tools (e.g., MutationTaster2, SIFT, PROVEAN, and Polyphen2), and from 10 conservation prediction tools (e.g., phastCons, GERP++, and SiPhy). For pathogenicity prediction tools, we set thresholds according to respective authors' recommendations; additionally, for conservation prediction tools, we used one common threshold, 0.7; therefore, we assumed a variant to be conserved if its conservation score was greater than the scores of ≥70% other variants. Additionally, we used databases dbscSNV and regSNP-intron for variants that may have an effect on splicing. Nevertheless, all these databases were only a supplementary tool, and they contributed little to the summary measure of pathogenicity. − Gene-based phenotype databases (e.g., OMIM and some other article databases as a source of information on specific clinical cases.

We estimated pathogenicity of each novel candidate mutation according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology [25] .

All selected rare SNVs were verified by Sanger direct automatic sequencing on an ABI 3500 DNA sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) by means of the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Primer design for the selected SNVs was performed in the Primer-Blast software (available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/ [accessed on 4 October 2021]). Targeted Sanger sequencing was carried out to detect mutations in the relatives of the probands.

For patients without functionally significant point substitutions in the above genes, MLPA was conducted to find possible bigger mutations (deletions and/or duplications) in the LDLR promoter and exons. The MLPA analysis was performed using SALSA MLPA Kit P062 (MRCHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) followed by the separation of fluorescently labeled fragments by capillary electrophoresis (on an ABI3500 sequencer). The Coffalyser.Net software (MRCHolland, Amsterdam) was utilized to interpret the MLPA results.

In the subjects over 18 years of age (n = 69; all participants [n = 80] had a phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia), the total cholesterol level was 8.6 ± 3.4 mmol/L (mean ± standard deviation), with a maximum of 25 mmol/L (Table 1 ). This relatively low total cholesterol concentration is due to the fact that at the time of the initial medical examination by the clinical lipidologist in the Clinical Diagnostic Department of the IIPM (a branch of the ICG SB RAS), lipid-lowering drugs were taken by 41% of the probands. All lipid-lowering drugs were statins. One proband did not tolerate lipid-lowering medication of the statin class. According to the medical examination, in 42% of the subjects, tendon xanthomas were present. Three probands (4.9%) had comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus. A clinically significant variant in some genes associated with familial hypercholesterolemia was identified in 47.5% of the subjects. Clinically significant variants in the LDLR gene were identified in 19 probands (73.1% of all variants identified in probands); in three probands (11.5%), pathogenic variants were found in the APOB gene, and in four probands (15.4%), rare, clinically significant variants were identified in genes LPL, SREBF1, APOC3, and ABCG5. In 12 (85.7%) of 14 children of the probands, clinically significant variants were detectable in genes associated with familial hypercholesterolemia: in 10 cases, in the LDLR gene; in one case, in the APOB gene; and in one case, in the SREBPF1 gene. Among the other six first-degree relatives of the probands (mother, father, or sibling), a pathogenic variant in the LDLR gene was identified in one case.

Structural changes in the LDLR gene in patients with a phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia are presented in Table 2 . All missense variants were heterozygous. Some of the identified variants (Cys352Tyr, Cys340Phe, and Leu401His) have been described in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Russia [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] . The variant most common in our participations-rs121908038-was found in three unrelated families (six subjects total). Two unrelated probands were compound heterozygotes in terms of the LDLR gene and showed a clinical course corresponding to the homozygous type of the disease. In the first case, a 28-year-old (patient P52) got a diagnosis of "definite" familial hypercholesterolemia (DLCN score of 18, a history of myocardial infarction at the age of 24; percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at ages 25 and 26 years); rare variants chr19:11217342 and chr19:11221441 were identified in exons 5 and 7 of the LDLR gene ( Table 2) . The patient had been taking lipid-lowering medication, and the total cholesterol level was 18.6 mmol/L, and LDL-C 15.2 mmol/L.

In the second case, a 35-year-old (patient P10) got a diagnosis of "definite" familial hypercholesterolemia (DLCN score of 18, a history of myocardial infarction at the age of 24; mammary coronary artery bypass grafting at the age of 24; a second myocardial infarction at 34 years of age); rare variants were identified in exons 3 and 8 of the LDLR gene. One of these variants is located at position chr19:11213415 (NM_000527:exon3:c.G266C:p.C89S), earlier, a rare "pathogenic" variant (rs875989894) has been described at this position: a G > A substitution (available online: https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/00000921 11#00011039 [accessed on 1 October 2021]). The other variant is located at chr19:11222252; it is described for the first time: NM_000527:exon8:c.T1123G:p.Y375D (Table 2) . Before treatment with lipid-lowering medication was started, the total cholesterol level was 25.0 mmol/L, and LDL-C 11.94 mmol/L.

The clinical signs of the homozygous type of familial hypercholesterolemia, including early onset of severe complications in the cardiovascular system, are typical for patients who are compound heterozygotes in the LDLR gene, as shown in various populations [34] .

The rs879255191 variant in the regulatory region of LDLR has previously been described by us in proband P24 with familial hypercholesterolemia and in his two children (patients P25 and P26) with hyperlipidemia (7 and 8 years old) [35, 36] . Variant c.2389 + 5G > A is located in highly conserved dinucleotide AG at the splice donor site of intron 16 of LDLR. Functional significance of the detected substitution was evaluated in the SPANR software (available online: http://tools.genes.toronto.edu/ [accessed on 4 October 2021]). According to the SPANR analysis, the change in the probability of exon inclusion in mRNA in various tissues when this variant is present is −13.47 points, meaning that the probability of inclusion of exons 14-16 in gene transcripts is lower than 100%. Previously, rs879255191 has already been detected in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, including in Russia [32] . In the present study, the rs879255191 variant was also detected in a sibling (patient P81) and a nephew (P82) of the proband (P24) who has clinical signs of familial hypercholesterolemia (Figure 1) . Patient P81 had a myocardial infarction at age 44 years.

Forty-two patients, without functionally significant point substitutions in lipid metabolism genes, were subjected to MLPA analysis to find possible structural changes (deletions or duplications) in the LDLR promoter and exons. This analysis revealed deletions in DNA samples from two unrelated patients. In the first case, deletion NM_000527.4:c.(67+1_68-1)_(1586+1_1587-1)del in a heterozygous state eliminated a region spanning exons 2 to 10 ( Figure 2a) . In the second case, the patient was a carrier of a deletion of exon 15 in the LDLR gene NM_000527.4:c.(2140+1_2141-1)_(2311+1_2312-1)del in a heterozygous state (Figure 2b) . Patient P33 (31 years old) with an exon 2-10 deletion had a total cholesterol level of 10.96 mmol/L, and LDL-C 7.76 mmol/L (DLCN score: 6), with a family history of deaths from myocardial infarction before the age of 50 on the paternal side. At the time of the medical examination, she was not taking lipid-lowering medication. This deletion was first described in 2010 in the French Autosomal Dominant Hypercholesterolemia Research Network study [37] .

In patient P5 (69 years old) with an exon 15 deletion, the total cholesterol level was 6.6 mmol/L and LDL-C 3.8 mmol/L while the patient was on 10 mg of rosuvastatin. A similar deletion of LDLR exon 15 has been described by Koivisto P.V. et al. [38] . that the probability of inclusion of exons 14-16 in gene transcripts is lower than 100%. Previously, rs879255191 has already been detected in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, including in Russia [32] . In the present study, the rs879255191 variant was also detected in a sibling (patient P81) and a nephew (P82) of the proband (P24) who has clinical signs of familial hypercholesterolemia (Figure 1) . Patient P81 had a myocardial infarction at age 44 years. 

Forty-two patients, without functionally significant point substitutions in lipid metabolism genes, were subjected to MLPA analysis to find possible structural changes (deletions or duplications) in the LDLR promoter and exons. This analysis revealed deletions in DNA samples from two unrelated patients. In the first case, deletion NM_000527.4:с.(67+1_68-1)_(1586+1_1587-1)del in a heterozygous state eliminated a region spanning exons 2 to 10 ( Figure 2a) . In the second case, the patient was a carrier of a deletion of exon 15 in the LDLR gene NM_000527.4:c.(2140+1_2141-1)_(2311+1_2312-1)del in a heterozygous state (Figure 2b ). . The ratio charts of the patients with a familial hypercholesterolemia phenotype were generated by means of SALSA MLPA Kit P062. Each red dot below the red curve represents a deletion. The probes whose data do not go outside the blue and red curves represent two wild-type copies of the LDLR gene.

Patient P33 (31 years old) with an exon 2-10 deletion had a total cholesterol level of 10.96 mmol/L, and LDL-C 7.76 mmol/L (DLCN score: 6), with a family history of deaths from myocardial infarction before the age of 50 on the paternal side. At the time of the medical examination, she was not taking lipid-lowering medication. This deletion was first described in 2010 in the French Autosomal Dominant Hypercholesterolemia Research Network study [37] .

In patient P5 (69 years old) with an exon 15 deletion, the total cholesterol level was . The ratio charts of the patients with a familial hypercholesterolemia phenotype were generated by means of SALSA MLPA Kit P062. Each red dot below the red curve represents a deletion. The probes whose data do not go outside the blue and red curves represent two wild-type copies of the LDLR gene.

In the molecular genetic test, we detected some structural changes in the APOB gene in patients with a phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia (Table 2 ). In three patients from two unrelated families (a proband and a son of the proband from one family and a proband from another family), variant rs5742904 was found: NM_000384.3(APOB):c.10580G > A (p.Arg3527Gln). Minor allele frequency was T = 0.000275 according to database GnomAD.

In the first family, patient P71 (36 years old) carried the rs5742904 variant, and the total cholesterol level was 7.75 mmol/L and LDL-C 5.76 mmol/L while on 10 mg of rosuvastatin (DLCN score: 12; examination revealed xanthomas). The patient's father had a myocardial infarction at age 50 and died of a second myocardial infarction at age 62; the father's mother died of ischemic stroke at age 60. The son (13 years old, patient P11) of patient P71-had a total cholesterol level of 6.9 mmol/L and carried the rs5742904 variant.

In the second family, patient P15 (25 years old) carried the rs5742904 variant, and the total cholesterol level was 7.5 mmol/L, LDL-C 5.7 mmol/L, and the DLCN score was 11.

The clinical effect of rs5742904 has conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in the literature: likely pathogenic (three studies), pathogenic (27 studies), and uncertain significance (one study) according to database ClinVar [39].

A rare variant, rs145164937, in the ABCG5 gene in a heterozygous state was detected in one of the probands (patient P74, woman, 38 years old) with a total cholesterol level of 8.3 mmol/L, LDL-C of 5.4 mmol/L, and a DLCN score of 3 (Table 2 ). Minor allele frequency (MAF) of allele C is 0.002223 for Europeans (non-Finnish) according to the GnomAD database [40] . A known disease-associated mutation at this position is HGMD ID CM169023. When the rs145164937 (NM_022436; p.Ala98Gly; c.293C > G) variant was analyzed in PolyPhen-2, it showed a high probability of a damaging effect on the protein product (a score of 0.977). Earlier, an association of rs145164937 with non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels has been demonstrated [41] .

Analysis of the targeted-high-throughput-sequencing data from the APOC3 gene revealed variant rs138326449 (IVS2 + 1G > A) in a heterozygous state ( Table 2 ). MAF of allele C is 0.002244 for Europeans (non-Finnish) according to the GnomAD database. This substitution is located in a highly conserved dinucleotide at a splice donor site, thereby leading to alternative splicing and a dysfunctional protein [42] . A.B. Jorgensen et al. have reported an association of the IVS2 + 1G > A variant with low triglyceride levels and a low risk of coronary heart disease [42] . In our study, variant IVS2 + 1G > A of APOC3 was detected in a 65-year-old subject (patient P59) with hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol 8.2 mmol/L, LDL-C 5.45 mmol/L) and normal levels of triglycerides (0.7 mmol/L) and HDL-C (2.4 mmol/L), with a DLCN score of 5. In the ClinVar database, rs138326449 is listed as pathogenic for apolipoprotein C-III deficiency.

Analysis of the targeted-high-throughput-sequencing results from the LPL gene revealed a rare variant: rs118204077 (NM_000237; p.Arg270Cys, c.808C > T) in a heterozygous state ( Table 2) . MAF of allele C is 0.0001 for Europeans (non-Finnish) according to the Gno-mAD database. Its clinical significance is indicated as pathogenic in the ClinVar database. A known disease-associated mutation at this position is HGMD ID CM941054. When the rs118204077 variant was analyzed in PolyPhen-2, the probability of a damaging effect on the protein product turned out to be 1.000 (very high score).

The rs118204077 variant in LPL was identified in a 45-year-old (patient P9) with hypercholesterolemia (12.4 mmol/L), hypertriglyceridemia (17.4 mmol/L), and a DLCN score of 5. Previously, at this locus, variants associated with hypertriglyceridemia have been described in the literature [43, 44] .

A rare variant of the SREBF1 gene (rs115855236, chr17:17820281) was identified in proband P83 and a son of this proband (patient P84) with clinical signs of familial hypercholesterolemia ( Table 2) . MAF of allele A is 0.001210 for Europeans (non-Finnish) according to the GnomAD database. In other genes associated with familial hypercholesterolemia, pathogenic and probably pathogenic variants were not identified in these patients. SREBF1 encodes a transcription factor of the basic helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper family (bHLH-Zip); this protein binds to a sterol regulatory element (SRE1) and regulates the biosynthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol. One of the target genes for transcription factor SREBF1 is LDLR.

In this study, the prevalence of detected "pathogenic" and "probably pathogenic" mutations was 47.5% among the analyzed probands with a phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia from the Western Siberia region (Russia) and 85.7% among their tested children who also had a phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia. As in other studies, this finding confirms the effectiveness of cascade genetic screening [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] .

Among 34 subjects with a diagnosis of "definite" familial hypercholesterolemia (DLCN score > 8), pathogenic variants in LDLR (76.5%) or APOB (8.8%) were identified in 29 subjects. In five subjects (14.7%), no pathogenic variants were found in the genes included in the tested panel.

Among the five subjects with a diagnosis of "probable" familial hypercholesterolemia (DLCN scores 6-8), two subjects were found to have pathogenic variants in the LDLR gene, including deletion NM_000527.4:c.(67+1_68-1)_(1586+1_1587-1)del in a heterozygous state.

Among 41 subjects with a diagnosis of "possible" familial hypercholesterolemia (DLCN score: 3-5), rare "pathogenic" and "probably pathogenic" variants in the analyzed genes of lipid metabolism were identified in only 15% of cases. In two subjects, pathogenic variants in the LDLR gene were identified, including a deletion of the 15th exon NM_000527.4:c.(2140+1_2141-1)_(2311+1_2312-1)del; in one subject, a pathogenic variant was found in the APOB gene, and in four probands, in other lipid metabolism genes (ABCG5, LPL, APOC3, or SREBF1). A negative result of genetic screening for LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 mutations does not rule out the presence of familial hypercholesterolemia in a patient. In~40% of cases, molecular genetic testing fails to determine the cause of familial hypercholesterolemia [51] or an elevated LDL-C level that may have a polygenic type of inheritance [52, 53] . Despite the lower prevalence of detected mutations among our subjects with "possible" familial hypercholesterolemia, they should also be monitored by a doctor and receive appropriate lipid-lowering therapy because of the high risk of cardiovascular events at elevated LDL-C levels and/or with a family history of an early cardiovascular disease [54] [55] [56] .

Molecular genetic research on familial hypercholesterolemia in Russia has been conducted for more than 30 years in different regions of the country [29] . It is worth mentioning some variants of the LDLR gene that not only occur in most regions of Russia but are also the most common variants of this gene: rs121908038 and rs761954844 [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] 57] . Additionally, these variants have been found in populations of Northern and Central Europe (rs121908038) and in populations of Central and Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, and North America (rs761954844) [40] .

The most common limitation of such studies is a small sample size [29] . We should also mention low accessibility of molecular genetic testing in some regions of Russia and the high cost of these tests. The small sample sizes do not allow us to assess clinicalcourse features of the disease that are associated with various pathogenic variants in lipid metabolism genes and to evaluate the spectrum of pathogenic variants in lipid metabolism genes in the population of Russia. Targeted sequencing can be useful not only for rapid and cost-effective diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, but also for investigation of rare variants of lipid metabolism genes and their influence on the patients' phenotype [30, 57, 58] . This method may help to combine the efforts of physicians and investigators from different regions for the research on familial hypercholesterolemia.

MLPA is necessary for the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients without functionally significant point substitutions in relevant genes to which one of the sequencing methods has been applied [59] . Wider use of the MLPA method should help to identify 2-3% more probands with familial hypercholesterolemia. As revealed by research on the practice of molecular genetic diagnostics, patients who carry a confirmed pathogenic variant in a relevant gene are more likely to lead a healthy lifestyle and to regularly take lipid-lowering medication [18] .

The use of clinical criteria, targeted sequencing, and MLPA makes it possible to identify carriers of rare clinically significant variants in a wide range of lipid metabolism genes and to investigate their influence on phenotypic manifestations of familial hypercholesterolemia.

Clinical guidelines for familial hypercholesterolemia

European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: Guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: Consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society

Homozygous autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia in the Netherlands: Prevalence, genotype-phenotype relationship, and clinical outcome

Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Pathophysiological, genetic, and therapeutic insights: A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel

International Atherosclerosis Society Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Panel. Defining severe familial hypercholesterolaemia and the implications for clinical management: A consensus statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Panel

Lipid Screening, Action, and Follow-up in Children and Adolescents

European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents: Gaining decades of life by optimizing detection and treatment

Genetics of familial hypercholesterolemia

Convened by the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation. Clinical Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: JACC Scientific Expert Panel

Advances in genetics show the need for extending screening strategies for autosomal dominant hypercholesterolaemia

Molecular basis of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia: Assessment in a large cohort of hypercholesterolemic children

Familial hypercholesterolemia: A complex genetic disease with variable phenotypes

The complex molecular genetics of familial hypercholesterolaemia

Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system

Exome-wide association study of plasma lipids in >300,000 individuals

Association of low-frequency and rare coding-sequence variants with blood lipids and coronary heart disease in 56,000 whites and blacks

From lipid locus to drug target through human genomics

Diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in general practice using clinical diagnostic criteria or genetic testing as part of cascade genetic screening

Purification of nucleic acids by extraction with phenol: Chloroform

Mutations in STAP1 are associated with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia

Application of expanded genetic analysis in the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with very early-onset coronary artery disease

Lysosomal acid lipase A and the hypercholesterolaemic phenotype

Prevalence of cholesteryl ester storage disease among hypercholesterolemic subjects and functional characterization of mutations in the lysosomal acid lipase gene

ABCG5/G8 gene is associated with hypercholesterolemias without mutation in candidate genes and noncholesterol sterols

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

Familial hypercholesterolemia in St-Petersburg: The known and novel mutations found in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in Russia

Analysis of the LDLR gene variability in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Russia using targeted high throughput resequencing

Analysis of the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9 and LDLRAP1 genes variability in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in West Siberia using targeted high throughput resequencing

Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Russia: Three Decades of Genetic Studies

Identification of novel variants in the LDLR gene in Russian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia using targeted sequencing

Verification of underlying genetic cause in a cohort of Russian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia using targeted next generation sequencing

Familial hypercholesterolemia in Russia: Genetic and phenotypic characteristics

The mutation R3500Q of apolipoprotein B in caucasian population of west Siberia and in patients with highest total cholesterol level

Compound Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Caused by LDLR Variants

Cascade genetic screening in diagnostics of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Clinical case. Russ

Clinical case: The development of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in a patient with rs879255191 in LDLR gene

Molecular spectrum of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia in France

Diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. DNA analysis complements clinical examination and analysis of serum lipid levels

Genetic variability in the absorption of dietary sterols affects the risk of coronary artery disease

Loss-of-Function Mutations in APOC3 and Risk of Ischemic Vascular Disease

Mutations in LPL, APOC2, APOA5, GPIHBP1 and LMF1 in patients with severe hypertriglyceridaemia

Recurrent missense mutations at the first and second base of codon Arg243 in human lipoprotein lipase in patients of different ancestries

Results and Lessons of a Pilot Study of Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in US Primary Care Practices

Molecular diagnosis methods in familial hypercholesterolemia

A proof-of-concept study of cascade screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the US, adapted from the Dutch model

Cascade Screening and Treatment Initiation in Young Adults with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Genetics, Screening, and Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Experience Gained From the Implementation of the Vietnam Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry

Familial hypercholesterolaemia and cascade testing in general practice: Lessons from COVID-19

The Most Common Monogenic Disorder in Humans

Use of low density lipoprotein cholesterol gene score to distinguish patients with polygenic and monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia: A case-control study

Toward a new clinical classification of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: One perspective from Spain

ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk

Genetics of Dyslipidemia and Ischemic Heart Disease

Mutational analysis of a cohort with clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia: Considerations for genetic diagnosis improvement

The LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 Variants of Index Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Russia

Target sequencing in patients with clinically diagnosed hereditary lipid metabolism disorders and acute coronary syndrome

Molecular Genetic Approach and Evaluation of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Clinical Familial Hypercholesterolemia Phenotype from Romania

Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from each subject or his/her parent or legal guardian.

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy concerns.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.