key: cord-0036722-zry21spv authors: Gutierrez, Jose Luis Sandoval; Lezama, Miguel Angel Salazar; Sevilla-Reyes, Edgar title: Pandemic Influenza Management and Control Policies: Hospital Coordination During an Influenza Pandemic date: 2013-05-29 journal: Noninvasive Ventilation in High-Risk Infections and Mass Casualty Events DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1496-4_39 sha: e13d8730c49e7e86603494663a721a8705d04ba2 doc_id: 36722 cord_uid: zry21spv Since its initial outbreak in April 2009, the pandemic H1N1 virus has posed a challenge to health systems around the world, compelling them to make available the benefits of scientific and medical progress to the entire population. Some of the most significant demands were access to early diagnostics, vaccines, and antiviral treatments as well as the responsiveness of hospital care, particularly in seriously ill patients who required attention in intensive care units (ICUs). The increased demand of medical care during an influenza pandemic is a heavy burden for any health system as it is added to the regular demand for heath care, which should not become paralyzed [1]. During the pandemic of infl uenza A(H1N1), as happened during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks, ICU availability was necessary to save lives. The ICU should have the following staff and equipment available [ 2 ] . Standardized protocols for managing the critically ill patient alone are not enough to provide quality care. It is the combination of all the aforementioned factors that would provide an environment for quality care. The Institutional Infl uenza Committee (IIC) should coordinate efforts from all hospital departments involved in the clinical care of infl uenza patients. The IIC is composed of representatives from all of the departments involved: medical, nursing, administration, clinical laboratories, support services, teaching, physical security, and social communication. The IIC can take the steps necessary to ensure quality of care in the ICU and other wards and departments using the most up-to-date practices. It evaluates the local experiences but also reaches out to other institutions at national and international levels. The fl ow of information during the twenty-fi rst century is a tool that the IIC should understand and avail. The IIC should also strengthen the implementation of standard precautions for prevention of nosocomial infections. Under the standard practices model, everyone in the hospital setting should be considered both potentially infectious and susceptible to infection. For example, during procedures that form aerosols (endotracheal intubation, fi brobronchoscopy, aspiration, noninvasive mechanical ventilation) HCWs should have suffi cient protocols, training, and materials to protect themselves and protect patients and others while providing quality care. The IIC should be directly involved in creating such an environment and should develop the tools to evaluate compliance to protocols and performance of these operations. The IIC should also consider psychological counseling for health personnel involved in the operation along with regular communications with all the institutional personnel in the form of posters, memoranda, and short briefi ngs. The Communication Department can help with this task. During committee meetings, the IIC must analyze the current information and arrive at clear resolutions while avoiding cathartic discussions. The latter, if deemed necessary, should take place only under strict psychological supervision. To protect patients, personnel, and visitors, it is necessary to strengthen surveillance and restrict access and patient fl ow in the hospital. At the entrance of consultation services, monitoring stations consisting of medical or paramedical personnel with gel sanitizer and respiratory masks must be in place to question arriving patients or visitors about the presence of fever and/or respiratory symptoms. In the emergency room, it is necessary to have a separate access point and waiting room for patients with respiratory symptoms. There should also be a dedicated triage area for fi lling out a questionnaire, assessing vital signs, and pulse oximetry. Infl uenza patient should be hospitalized in an area separated from the rest of the patient population. Health personnel should not rotate to other services because this practice provides better care to the patients and reduces the risk of other workers being exposed to the virus. When the demand for care and hospitalization increases, rational use of hospital resources must be ensured. As half of the patients are young with little serious coexisting disease, elective surgery and nonurgent procedures should be postponed. Also, supplies of key items for treating infl uenza patients (e.g., drugs, medical devices, supplies for prevention, clinical laboratory tests, radioimaging) should take priority. Avoid overcrowding and reduce contact between staff members. It is not advisable for health personnel to concentrate in poorly ventilated areas or in crowds. Information sessions can be conducted in classrooms or large rooms for necessary briefi ngs. Overall, the workload for the average employee serving hospital patients increases during an epidemic. There are increased numbers of patients on mechanical ventilation and seriously ill patients who require more care and generate more tension as they offer contagion risk. At the same time, there is a rise in emergency room patients along with a lower number of workers due to illness or disability or to decreased attendance associated with an individual's decision to avoid exposure. A key part of a hospital's response is the provision of information to all staff on all shifts. Such information should be given with common sense and making the HCWs feel that they are important to the institution and are part of the responsibility and commitment of the authorities. It is also important to ensure break shifts where the worker can leave the hospital, with no liability related to the management of the epidemic. Such measures can help avoid the "burn-out" syndrome [ 3 ] . Patients are discharged after improvement, transfer, or death. For each of these situations, it is indispensable to prepare all of medical and paramedical logistics to facilitate the situation. For example, many patients require supplemental oxygen, which should be provided and connected to the patient before discharge. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs also should be scheduled before discharge. A critical care ambulance with trained staff is required for most patient transfers. The institution should verify that the ambulance has all the human and material resources. In case of death, the Pathology Department staff must be notifi ed so they can take appropriate actions regarding safe management of the body and use personal protective equipment themselves. At the start of an epidemic, standardized care protocols for handling cases should be published by the Ministry of Health (in countries that have one) and hospital authorities. Other organizations, such as professional associations, may also publish their own recommendations. It is important to reach a consensus practice as it is desirable that health personnel in charge adhere as much as possible to what their health system agreed were the optimum conditions for their system. During a pandemic, recommendations may change, and doses, procedures, and therapeutic indications may be constantly revised. One example was the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during a human pandemic, which initially was contraindicated because of the risk of contagion, aerosolization, and the risk to health care personnel [ 4 ] . In retrospect, NIV benefi ted patients who were subjected to it in the form of noninvasive mechanical ventilation or intubation not authorized by the patient [ 5 ] . A similar experience was reported in the SARS epidemic [ 6 ] . • A triage system is mandatory in pandemic infl uenza. • Non invasive ventilation is a major resource in the pandemic. • Psychological counseling. • Infl uenza committee in necessary. • Supplies. Infl uenza por el nuevo virus AH1N1. Un panorama integral. Graphimedic La Epidemia de Infl uenza A H1N1 en México. Panamericana Factors predicting nurses' consideration of leaving their job during the SARS outbreak Non-invasive ventilation for critically ill patients with pandemic H1N1 2009 infl uenza A virus infection H1N1 infection and acute respiratory failure: can we give noninvasive ventilation a chance? Non-invasive versus invasive mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure in severe acute respiratory syndrome