key: cord-0063862-1ihzw8wg authors: Ghantasala, Saicharan; Pai, Medha Gayathri J.; Biswas, Deeptarup; Gahoi, Nikita; Mukherjee, Shuvolina; KP, Manubhai; Nissa, Mehar Un; Srivastava, Alisha; Epari, Sridhar; Shetty, Prakash; Moiyadi, Aliasgar; Srivastava, Sanjeeva title: Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Targeted Assays for the Validation of Protein Biomarkers in Brain Tumors date: 2021-05-14 journal: Front Oncol DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.548243 sha: de3e9df1e39f0a6c2028264c5190c330e0021c6d doc_id: 63862 cord_uid: 1ihzw8wg The emergence of omics technologies over the last decade has helped in advancement of research and our understanding of complex diseases like brain cancers. However, barring genomics, no other omics technology has been able to find utility in clinical settings. The recent advancements in mass spectrometry instrumentation have resulted in proteomics technologies becoming more sensitive and reliable. Targeted proteomics, a relatively new branch of mass spectrometry-based proteomics has shown immense potential in addressing the shortcomings of the standard molecular biology-based techniques like Western blotting and Immunohistochemistry. In this study we demonstrate the utility of Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), a targeted proteomics approach, in quantifying peptides from proteins like Apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1), Apolipoprotein E (APOE), Prostaglandin H2 D-Isomerase (PTGDS), Vitronectin (VTN) and Complement C3 (C3) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected from Glioma and Meningioma patients. Additionally, we also report transitions for peptides from proteins – Vimentin (VIM), Cystatin-C (CST3) and Clusterin (CLU) in surgically resected Meningioma tissues; Annexin A1 (ANXA1), Superoxide dismutase (SOD2) and VIM in surgically resected Glioma tissues; and Microtubule associated protein-2 (MAP-2), Splicing factor 3B subunit 2 (SF3B2) and VIM in surgically resected Medulloblastoma tissues. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the use of MRM to validate proteins from three types of brain malignancies and two different bio-specimens. Future studies involving a large cohort of samples aimed at accurately detecting and quantifying peptides of proteins with roles in brain malignancies could potentially result in a panel of proteins showing ability to classify and grade tumors. Successful application of these techniques could ultimately offer alternative strategies with increased accuracy, sensitivity and lower turnaround time making them translatable to the clinics. Advances in Mass spectrometry have provided a major impetus to the field of proteomics over the last decade. These developments have resulted in proteomics playing a role in advancing our understanding of disease biology and opened new avenues such as biomarker development, augmentation of therapeutic modalities and drug discovery. Global consortia like CPTAC (Clinical Proteomics Tumor Analysis Consortium), TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) and HUPO (Human Proteome Organization) have played a major role in utilising the power of omics technologies towards understanding the underlying mechanisms of various cancers (1) (2) (3) . The development of new softwares, global repositories and reproducible workflows has also played a key role in increasing the utility of proteomics methodologies for research in the last decade. However, despite these advancements in technology and our understanding of cancer, early detection and treatment of malignancies related to the brain continue to pose a serious challenge even today (4) . Primary brain tumors are a heterogeneous group of malignant and benign tumors arising from brain parenchyma or the cell types existing in the cranial vault including cranial nerves, meninges, neuroepithelial tissues, germ cells, pituitary gland, and even residual embryonic tissues. These tumors are characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates due to their localization, invasive growth and heterogeneous nature (5) . Among all CNS tumors, glioma accounts for approximately 28% of tumors, of which 80% are malignant (6) . Glioblastomas are the most prevalent and malignant sub-type of gliomas (3.20 per 100,000 population) followed by diffuse astrocytomas (0.48 per 100,000 population) (7) . Meningiomas are slow-growing extra-axial lesions, originating from cells of arachnoid villi or meningothelial cells present in the meninges. These are most prevalent primary brain tumors and their incidences seem to rise with an increase in age. Medulloblastomas are embryonal tumors commonly seen in children. All medulloblastomas are classified pathologically as Grade IV due to their aggressive nature. Transcriptomic studies have identified four subtypes of medulloblastoma, which include SHH, WNT, G4 and G3, each with a distinct clinical and therapeutic presentation (8) . The 2016 classification of WHO for brain cancers included molecular markers along with histological parameters for better clinical identification (9) . Recent advances in molecular biology and genomics have immensely benefitted the classification and prognosis of brain cancers. The omics research has also contributed in the brain tumour investigation which has unravelled different underlying biological mechanism, accelerated biomarker discovery (10) (11) (12) . However, there still exits a gap between direct implementation of these studies in the clinics, as brain tumors are among the deadliest cancers. Successful translation of candidate biomarkers is also limited due to the unavailability of antibodies required for the validation experiments on large cohorts. The recognition of the potential of targeted proteomics approaches such as selected reaction monitoring, accelerated its use in hypothesis driven proteomics research (13) . These proteomics approaches offer advantages such as high sensitivity and accuracy over the conventional validation approaches which rely on the use of antibodies, are labour intensive and time consuming. These approaches are slowly but surely finding use in biomedical research (14) . Faria et al. has extensively reviewed the revolutionary role of targeted proteomics in cancer biomarker discovery and its shift from shotgun proteomics (15) . Targeted proteomics has also showed its immense potential in the field of infectious disease, understanding metabolic disorders and in accelerating our understanding of the SARS CoV2 virus and its mode of infection during the ongoing pandemic (16) (17) (18) . The integration of proteogenomics and targeted proteomic validation could be a promising tool owing to increased robustness, sensitivity and selectivity in cancer research (19) . The Verification Working Group (VWG) of the CPTAC consortium carried out multiple experiment with an aim to assess the reproducibility, robustness, and transferability of MRM based assays. The findings from the study highlight the utility and practicality of highly reproducible MS-based assays and their potential role in clinics (20) . In the current study, we have employed MRM as a proof of concept to validate a few proteins previously identified in our discovery studies on the three major brain malignancies -Gliomas, Meningiomas and Medulloblastomas. To our knowledge, this is the first study to validate potential biomarkers in brain tumors from CSF and tissue proteins using mass spectrometry-based MRM approach. Glioma and Meningioma CSF Protein extraction from 17 CSF samples (MG I (n=3), MG II (n=4), GBM (n=5) and LGG or low-grade gliomas (n=5)) from Glioma and Meningioma patients was performed using the urea lysis protocol optimized in our lab. Please refer to Supplementary Table 1 for clinical information about the samples used. 500µL of CSF from Meningioma and Glioma patients was concentrated to 200µL each and processed. The CSF samples were sonicated at an amplitude of 20% with 5 sec pulse for a total of 8 cycles. Following this, the samples were vacuum dried, and the pellet was reconstituted in 6M Urea buffer. Protein amount in the sample was then quantified using 2D quant kit (GE-Healthcare, Sweden). From this, 50µg of protein sample was reduced with 0.5M TCEP at a final concentration of 20mM for one hour at 37°C followed by alkylation using 37.5mM IAA for 30 minutes at RT. The samples were diluted with 25mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0) to reduce the urea concentration to less than 1M. Protein digestion was carried out by adding Trypsin (Pierce) to the tubes in the ratio of 1:30 followed by incubation overnight at 37°C. After digestion, the contents of the tube were dried in a vacuum concentrator, reconstituted in 0.1% FA, and desalted using C18 stage tips. Finally, the desalted peptides were stored at -80°C for further use. Surgically resected tissue samples from meningioma, glioma and medulloblastoma patients were obtained from Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai. Representative MRI images for Meningioma, Glioma and Medulloblastoma can be found in Figures 2A and 4A , respectively. All the relevant clinical information can be found in Supplementary Table 1 . In brief, the tissue samples were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. The protein extraction was done using Urea buffer (8M Urea, Tris-HCl buffer) with addition of Phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich ® ) (21) . Furthermore, the reduced and alkylated proteins were digested by addition of Trypsin (Pierce, Thermofisher Scientific) followed by overnight incubation at 37°C. The digested peptides were then vacuum dried and desalted using in-house C18 stage tips. The tissue sample set had Meningioma (n=6), Glioma (n=6) and Medulloblastoma (n=6) in addition to 3 control tissues for each tumor, arachnoid tissue (n=3) for Meningioma, peritumoral tissue (n=3) for Glioma and cerebellum tissue (n=3) for Medulloblastoma. All the MRM experiments were carried out on TSQ Altis mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) coupled to a Vanquish uHPLC (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) platform. 1µg of peptides was loaded on to a Hypersil Gold C18 column 1.9mm 100 X 2.1mm (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) and chromatographic separation of peptides was carried out at a flow rate of 0.40ml/min for CSF samples and 0.45ml/min for tissue samples. The total time of gradient for CSF samples was 20 minutes, while that for tissue samples was 10 minutes. The buffer system was binary with Buffer A (0.1% Formic acid in water) and Buffer B (80% Acetonitrile in 0.1% Formic acid water). The gradients used have been shown in Supplementary Table 2 . With an ESI source to the MS, the data was acquired for 20 minutes in case of CSF samples and 10 minutes in case of tissue samples. All the other MS relevant parameters (which were kept similar for both kinds of samples) are tabulated in Supplementary Figure 1. To monitor the instrument behaviour and consistency in response, peptides from Bovine serum albumin (BSA) and MCF-7 cell line pellets were prepared with the urea extraction method as explained above for tissue samples. The transition lists were optimised and a final method containing 7 peptides DLGEEHFK, LVNELTEFAK, DDSPDLPK, AEFVEVTK, HLVDEPQNLIK, LGEYGFQNALIVR and QTALVELLK was prepared. Similarly, the refined list of MCF-7 had 2 proteins namely Fructose Bisphosphate Aldolase or ALDOA ( G I L A A D E S T G S I A K a n d A D D G R P F P Q V I K ) a n d Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase or GAPDH (LVINGNPITIFQER, GALQNIIPASTGAAK, VIPELNGK and LISWYDNEFGYSNR). To ensure the quantitative linearity of the instrument, we also injected 200ng, 400ng, 600ng, 800ng and 1µg of BSA. The results were imported in Skyline and peak areas acquired were plotted to check for linearity in the quantitative values. Proteins and their peptides for MRM experiments were selected based on data from shotgun experiments and information available in SRM Atlas (22) . The peptide sequences were imported into Skyline and transition list created with peptides having 8-20 amino acids (23) . All the selected peptides were unique with 0 missed cleavage. The transition list included y-ions from "ion 3" to "last ion -3". Method files were created for the unrefined transition list for the selected proteins and initial optimization was carried out to select the best peptides and their transitions for each protein using the sample pool. After screening the transitions from the first round of experiments, a final transition file with refined transitions was prepared. Finally, the transitions of each tumour type were monitored for each sample using cycle time of 2 second and resolution of 0.7 m/z for both Q1 and Q3. The data obtained was further analysed using Skyline daily version 20.2.1.384. The fold changes were calculated using the MSstats tool in Skyline keeping a confidence interval of 95% (24) . The schematic workflow of the experiment has been shown in Figure 1A . We performed quality checks at the following levels: 1) BSA: A single injection of 300ng of BSA was done every day when the samples were run on the instrument. The refined transition list containing 7 peptides for BSA gave uniform response. A representation of this can be seen in Figures 1B, C. The peak areas for BSA were found to be similar on all the five consecutive days the sample was injected. 2) The instrument response was found to be linear when increasing concentrations of BSA were injected ( Figure 1D ). 3) The CV values calculated using peak area values for 500ng of MCF-7 injected on five consecutive days were observed to be less than 15% ( Figure 1E ). These quality check steps helped us decipher the repeatability, reproducibility and efficiency of the instrument. Grade II (Supplementary Figure 2) . For Glioma, 3 peptides each of the above mentioned 5 proteins were chosen to look for differential expression between the grades. The same three peptides of APOE and APOA1 gave a cumulative fold change of 1.59 and 2.69 respectively in GBM when compared to low grade glioma (Figures 3B, C) . While cumulative fold change of three peptides of VTN, PTGDS and C3 in GBM were found to be upregulated in GBM as compared to low grade glioma (Supplementary Figure 2) . A final list of these proteins and peptides has been provided in Supplementary Table 3 . Differential Protein expression for a few candidate biomarkers was observed for by comparing their expression in brain tumor tissues to that in their respective control tissues. For the meningioma tissue samples, we observed overexpression of VIM, CST3 and CLU. The three selected peptides of CLU (EILSVDCSTNNPSQAK, ELDESLQVAER and LFDSDPITVTVPVEVSR) gave a cumulative fold change of 1.41 ( Figure 2D ). While the three peptides of CST3, namely LVGGPMDASVEEEGVR, QIVAGVNYFLDVELGR and TQPNLDNCPFHDQPHLK gave a cumulative fold change of 1.53. Four peptides of VIM (SLYASSPGGVYATR, ILLAELEQLK, LGDLYEEEMR and FADLSEAANR) showed a cumulative fold change of 2.25 as compared to the arachnoid controls with a confidence interval of 95% (Supplementary Figure 3) . For Glioma tissue samples we screened several known biomarker proteins including ANXA1, SOD2 and VIM. Three peptides of SOD2 (GDVTAQIALQPALK, GELLEAIK and AIWNVINWENVTER) showed a cumulative positive fold change of 2.48 in Glioma samples as compared to the peritumoral controls ( Figure 3D ). ANXA1 was found to be upregulated in Glioma tissues (peptides GLGTDEDTLIEILASR, GVDEATIIDILTK and GTDVNV FNTILTTR). Apart from the above-mentioned peptides of VIM, we observed QVQSLTCEVDALK and ETNLDSLPLVDTHSK of VIM also gave good response for glioma samples. These 6 peptides showed overexpression in tumor tissue vs peritumoral tissue (Supplementary Figure 3) . It is to be noted that one of the controls in this samples set, did not give good response and hence was excluded from the fold change calculations. The acquired data for this outlier has been provided in our data. Peritumoral tissues are rare to come by hence the analysis included only two controls. For the Medulloblastoma tissue sample set, the data clearly shows overexpression of MAP2 in tumor tissue with a fold change of 1.34. Peptides TPGTPGTPSYPR, VGSLDNAHHVPGGGNVK and VDHGAEIITQSPGR were monitored for MAP2 in the individual samples ( Figure 4B ). Three peptides of SF3B2 (VGEPVALSEEER, KPGDLSDELR and YGPPPSYPNLK) showed a cumulative fold change of 2.89 whereas the four peptides of VIM (SLYASSPGGVYATR, ILLAELEQLK, LGDLYEEEMR and FADLSEAANR) gave cumulative fold change of 2.39 ( Figures 4C, D) . The final list of all the selected proteins and their peptides for Glioma, Meningioma and Medulloblastoma has been provided in Supplementary Table 4 . Mass Spectrometry based targeted proteomics approaches like MRM require considerable optimization and investment of time. These methods are increasingly replacing the conventional molecular biology methods owing to their superior accuracy and reproducibility over techniques like western blotting and immunohistochemistry which rely heavily on the use of antibodies. In the current study we have reported the use of MRM to accurately detect and quantify proteins and their peptides from biospecimens CSF and tumor tissue in three brain malignancies. These proteins have been reported to play important roles in development of these brain tumors and accurate detection and quantification of such proteins can greatly advance our understanding of tumor pathobiology. The expression levels of proteins such as VTN, APOA1 and PTGDS were found to be highly up regulated in GBM as compared to low grade gliomas. Extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling is one of mechanisms involved in tumor maturation and migration. The ECM of adult brain is characterized by absence of most of the adhesive glycoproteins that aid in cell attachment and invasion (25) . However, to promote cell attachment and migration, malignant astrocytomas remodel the ECM through synthesis of VTN (26) . Our MRM data from CSF of gliomas also suggests a significant up-regulation of VTN in GBMs as compared to LGGs, one of the interactors of Integrins. In CSF of Meningiomas, the levels of VTN were found to be higher in Grade I as compared to Grade II. Integrins are the cell-surface heterodimeric receptors that integrate ECM with intracellular cytoskeleton to mediate cell adhesion, migration and invasion. Malignant astrocytomas are known to express integrins avb3 and avb5, which bind to VTN and RGD domain of osteopontin, thereby promoting integrinmediated cell attachment and migration (26, 27) . The protein PTGDS has been reported as a potential biomarker of meningioma in multiple studies (28, 29) . Kim et.al., reported that expression of PTGDS using Western blot was found to be decreased in Meningioma CSF when compared to non-tumor controls (29) . The same protein has also been reported in glioblastoma using deep learning (30) . Our study validated the higher expression of PTGDS in Grade I meningioma as compared to Grade II, however the expression of this protein was found to be upregulated in GBM in comparison to LGG. Another protein, Complement C3 (C3) has been reported to be key protein in tumorigenesis of Meningiomas (31) . In our study, the protein was found to be down regulated in Meningioma Grade II when compared to Grade I. The levels of this protein in gliomas were observed to be opposite to that seen in Meningiomas with the high grade GBMs showing an up-regulation over the low grade gliomas. Our discovery dataset and literature also pointed at upregulation of several apolipoproteins in gliomas and meningiomas (12, 31, 32) . APOE plays a vital role in redistribution of intracellular lipid and tissue reconstruction in CNS through a receptor dependent pathway. Astrocytes are one of the main sites of APOE synthesis (33) . Nicoll et al., showed APOE immunoreactivity in the tumor cells, macrophages and nearby astrocytes, supporting the role of APOE in delivery of lipids to tumor cells and its recycling by macrophages in necrotic areas. Increased levels of lipids in serum of GBM patients and over expression of APOE in meningioma CSF sample in comparison to non-tumor CSF have also been reported (34) and (29) . In the current study, we have observed an upregulation (37) . In the current study, we have reported four peptides for VIM, not reported elsewhere further strengthening the claim for its use as a biomarker for meningiomas as reported by Mukherjee et al. In Meningiomas, the protein CLU was found to be upregulated when compared to controls. It has been reported as a meningioma associated marker in the literature and known to inhibit apoptosis (31, 38) . We have also observed an up regulation of CST3 in meningioma tumour samples when compared to control tissues. CST3 is an inhibitor of cysteine proteases and has been reported to have a positive alteration in high-grade meningiomas (39) . Many studies have reported the role of ANXA1 and SOD2 in gliomas, by virtue of their increased expression levels in the tumor tissues (40) . ANXA1 is known to alter regular cell proliferation, differentiation and works as a substrate of EGFR. We observed that the levels of peptides for ANXA1 and SOD2 were upregulated in glioma tissues in comparison to peritumoral control tissues. MAP2 is a well-known neural marker for medulloblastoma as reported in a few studies (41) (42) (43) . It is a frequently considered marker during IHC of MB samples. It has been observed in MB tumors irrespective of the age of the patient (44) . Our data shows the overexpression of this protein in MB tumors as compared to controls. Cancerous mutations in splicing factor SF3B2 have been reported to affect the ubiquitinylation pathways and hence associated with cancer. SF3B2 has been reported as a potential gene marker in many diseases including medulloblastoma in DisGeNET and has appeared as one of the significantly dysregulated proteins in our discovery dataset (45) . One of our recent studies on medulloblastoma has also highlighted the significance of splicing events in medulloblastoma disease biology (10) . In our data, VIM was observed to be overexpressed in medulloblastoma as compared to controls in accordance with literature (12, 46, 47) . In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of targeted proteomics in detection and validation of proteins with roles in pathobiology of brain tumors. From our MRM experiments using CSF we report that APOE could be a potential tumor progression marker in Meningioma and Glioma. The trends for APOA1 were found to be opposite in Gliomas and Meningiomas, with higher expression in GBMs and Grade I meningiomas as compared to the LGGs and Grade II meningiomas, respectively. We also observed upregulation of VTN, PTGDS and APOA1 in CSF of GBM patients in comparison to CSF of LGG patients. The protein Vimentin was observed to be overexpressed in all the three brain tumor tissue samples. We have also validated tumor markers such as CLU and CST3 for Meningioma, ANXA1 and SOD2 in Glioma and MAP2 for Medulloblastoma. With the advancements in gene sequencing techniques, routine diagnosis for complex cancers has become easier, faster and efficient. However, there remains a greater reliance on the age-old molecular biology methods of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). In addition to the non-specific binding towards proteins, these antibody-based methods also have notoriously high chances of inter-observer variability leading to differences in grading the tumors (48) . The MRM technique owing to its quantitative accuracy and sensitivity, can offer a suitable alternative to the more labour-intensive molecular biology techniques currently used. The development of an analytical method and assay based on MRM involves a multitude of aspects such as generating a calibration curve, determination of analytical specificity (selectivity or interference), analytical sensitivity, carryover, precision, recovery of assay, matrix effect, recovery of immunoprecipitation, dilution integrity, stability, reproducibility, and quality control (QC) of samples (49) . Successful validation of proteins on a large cohort with easily obtainable biospecimens from patients can pave way to designing panels of protein markers with ability to distinguish between the grades of these tumors, thus providing a faster and more accurate alternative to the existing modalities. The targeted proteomic datasets are deposited in the Panorama Public and can be accessed through this link: https:// panoramaweb.org/Brain_Tumor_marker_MRM.url The studies involving Glioma patients was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Tata Memorial Hospital (TMC-ACTREC Project No.15). The study on meningioma patients was approved as part of an institutional review board at TMH (TMC-ACTREC project no.149). For use of samples from patients with Medulloblastomas the approval was obtained from TMH IRB (TMC-ACTREC project no.197). The patients/ participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Connecting Genomic Alterations to Cancer Biology With Proteomics: the NCI Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an Immeasurable Source of Knowledge Advances of the HUPO Human Proteome Project With Broad Applications for Life Sciences Research Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches for Proteomics and Biologics: Great Contribution for Developing Therapeutic Antibodies CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2010-2014 Molecular Subgroups of Medulloblastoma: the Current Consensus Meningiomas of the Orbit: Contemporary Considerations The Proteomic Analysis Shows Enrichment of RNA Surveillance Pathways in Adult SHH and Extensive Metabolic Reprogramming in Group 3 Medulloblastomas Multi-Pronged Proteomic Analysis to Study the Glioma Pathobiology Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Meningiomas for the Identification of Surrogate Protein Markers Advances in Targeted Proteomics and Applications to Biomedical Research A Timely Shift From Shotgun to Targeted Proteomics and How it can be Groundbreaking for Cancer Research Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics Provides Mechanistic Cues for Malaria Severity and Complexity Targeted Proteomics Reveals Promising Biomarkers of Disease Activity and Organ Involvement in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis Establishing a Mass Spectrometry-Based System for Rapid Detection of SARS-Cov-2 in Large Clinical Sample Cohorts Targeted Proteomic Assays for Quantitation of Proteins Identified by Proteogenomic Analysis of Ovarian Cancer From Skepticism to Embrace: the Role of Targeted Mass Spectrometry in Validating Proteomics Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Human Srmatlas: a Resource of Targeted Assays to Quantify the Complete Human Proteome Skyline: an Open Source Document Editor for Creating and Analyzing Targeted Proteomics Experiments Msstats: an R Package for Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Experiments Glioblastoma Expression of Vitronectin and the avb3 Integrin: Adhesion Mechanism for Transformed Glial Cells Cerebral Microenvironment Influences Expression of the Vitronectin Gene in Astrocytic Tumors Osteopontin Expression and Function: Role in Bone Remodeling Gene Expression Profiling of Meningiomas: Current Status After a Decade of Microarray-Based Transcriptomic Studies Proteome Analysis of Human Cerebrospinal Fluid as a Diagnostic Biomarker in Patients With Meningioma Prognostic Gene Discovery in Glioblastoma Patients Using Deep Learning Meningiomas and Proteomics: Focus on New Potential Biomarkers and Molecular Pathways The Investigation of Changes in Proteins Expression (Apolipoprotein A1 and Albumin) in Malignant Astrocytoma Brain Tumor The Apolipoprotein E E2 Allele and the Pathological Features in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Related Hemorrhage Investigation of Serum Proteome Alterations in Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Immunohistochemical Demonstration of Vimentin in Human Cerebral Tumors The Human Protein Atlas -a Tool for Pathology Comprehending Meningioma Signaling Cascades Using Multipronged Proteomics Approaches & Targeted Validation of Potential Markers Clusterin Inhibits Apoptosis by Interacting With Activated Bax Integration and Comparison of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Data for Meningioma Tissue Proteome Analysis of Different Grades of Human Gliomas Provides Major Cues for Glioma Pathogenesis. Omi A Update on the Integrated Histopathological and Genetic Classification of Medulloblastoma -a Practical Diagnostic Guideline Indian Society of Neuro-Oncology Consensus Guidelines for the Contemporary Management of Medulloblastoma The Therapeutic and Diagnostic Potential of Regulatory Noncoding Rnas in Medulloblastoma Is Medulloblastoma the Same Tumor in Children and Adults? Vimentin and Survivin Expression Rates as Prognostic Factors in Medulloblastoma Medulloblastoma -an Immunohistological Study of 50 Cases Analytic Variability in Immunohistochemistry Biomarker Studies Clinical Assay for AFP-L3 by Using Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma We would like to thank MHRD for funding the project and MASSFIITB (Mass Spectrometry Facility, IIT Bombay) for the technical support. We would also like to thank Dr. Kishore Gollapalli and Ms. Susmita Ghosh for their help in this project. The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.Copyright © 2021 Ghantasala, Pai, Biswas, Gahoi, Mukherjee, KP, Nissa, Srivastava, Epari, Shetty, Moiyadi and Srivastava. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.