key: cord-0074283-md2cyezs
authors: Huang, Yan; Xu, Midie; Jing, Chuyu; Wu, Xiaohua; Chen, Xiaojun; Zhang, Wei
title: Extracellular vesicle-derived miR-320a targets ZC3H12B to inhibit tumorigenesis, invasion, and angiogenesis in ovarian cancer
date: 2021-11-17
journal: Discov Oncol
DOI: 10.1007/s12672-021-00437-2
sha: c278c0f1483e5a2fb55c80171cde719c2d3f34b6
doc_id: 74283
cord_uid: md2cyezs

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play crucial roles in intercellular communication. miRNAs derived from EVs emerge as promising diagnostic indicators and therapeutic targets in a variety of malignancies. Tremendous studies have revealed the function of miRNAs derived from EVs in tumorigenesis, metastasis and other aspects. The mechanism of action of EV-derived miRNAs, however, in ovarian cancer remains largely unknown. In this study, EVs were enriched from the ovarian cancer cell lines. EVs as a whole could promote cell proliferation, invasion and new vasculature formation. However, the down-regulated EV-derived miR-320a was demonstrated to potentially suppress tumorigenesis, metastasis and angiogenesis. Moreover, EV-derived miR-320a has been proved to directly regulate a previously unknown target, ZC3H12B. An unreported role of ZC3H12B in promoting ovarian cancer cell proliferation has been elucidated and miR-320a could mediate the expression of ZC3H12B, thereby inhibiting the downstream response. As for the practical clinic values, lower expression of EV-derived miR-320a correlates with shorter survival period, indicating that EV-derived miR-320a may also serve as a prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer. This research provides new insight into the molecular mechanism of EV-derived miR-320a in ovarian cancer and may provide new therapeutic and prognostic strategies for ovarian cancer treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-021-00437-2.

plasma samples from advanced-stage OC patients diagnosed were obtained from the tissue bank of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. All samples were stored at − 80 °C prior to use. Informed consent was obtained from all participants when they were asked to collect samples. The survival data were summarized based on the regular follow-ups. This study (SCCIRB-090371-2 in 2015) was approved by the Ethical Committees of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and performed in concordance to the principles of Declaration of Helsinki.

For EVs from cells, cell culture supernatant was collected and transferred to a 15 ml centrifuge tube and spined at 3000g for 10 min at 4 °C to eliminate cell debris in the sample. Subsequently, the supernatant was added to another tube and centrifuged at 100,000g at 4 °C for 6 h. The EVs were pelleted at the bottom. 200 μl of 1 × PBS was added to resuspend the exosome pellet and then transferred to a new 1.5 ml tube. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000g for 2 min at 4 °C and the supernatant containing EVs was kept at − 80 °C for further use. The protein concentration was measured using BCA assays (Thermo Fisher, USA).

As suggested by the International Society of Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV), a guideline for standardized characterization of particular EVs has been proposed [25] , leading to further reproducible information through different studies. In this study, the protein markers and morphologies of the isolated samples were evaluated. The proteins in EVs were dissolved in RIPA buffer. The solution was boiled at 95 °C for 5 min and then the mixture was spined at 10,000g for 5 min to obtain the clean protein solution. The solution was loaded onto an SDS-PAGE gel (5% stacking gel, 12% running gel, Bio-Rad). After electrophoresis and transferring, the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVEF) membrane (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) was incubated with 0.1% BSA in TBST at room temperature for 1 h. The primary antibody was added onto the membrane and incubated at 4 °C for 12 h. After washing, the secondary antibody was incubated with the membrane at room temperature for another 1 h. The membrane was rinsed for three times. Finally, the membrane was detected under the ChemiDoc XRS imaging system (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system (Thermo Scientific, OR, USA). The concentration and size were measured with nanosight (Malvern, UK) and FEI Tecnai™ T12 electron microscope (Thermo Scientific, OR, USA).

miRNAs were extracted by NanoSep 100 K (Pall Corporation, USA) and de-salted by pushing through an ultracentrifuge tube (Sartorius Stedim Biotech). miRNA ULSTM Labeling Kit (Kreatech Diagnostics, The Netherlands) was used to make the fluorescent labels. The pre-hybridized Mouse miRNA OneArray® v5 (Phalanx Biotech Group, Hsinchu, Taiwan) was used for fluorescent labels detection. The hybridization was kept for 16 h at 37 °C and the non-specific binding was removed by rinsing three times. Then the slide was dried and scanned by an Axon 4000B scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The intensity of Cy5 of every single spot was quantified by GenePix 4.1 software (Molecular Devices). R program (2.12.1) was used for data processing. Data were removed whose flag < 0 within all arrays. The normalization was performed using invariant set normalization method.

cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) based on the instructions without further modifications. The quantification process was conducted using TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) on ABI QuantStudio Dx (Applied Biosystems, USA). Before the amplification and quantification. Even amount of total RNA and cDNA was added in the experiment. The mix was heated at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 s. The internal standard, U6, was also tested as the reference. The 2 -ΔΔCt method was applied for determination of miRNA levels.

EVs were enriched from patient plasma as described above. The purified EVs were labeled with PKH26 (Thermo Scientific, OR, USA), a red membrane dye, according to the protocol without further modifications, followed by extensive rinsing to eliminate the residue dye. Cells were incubated with PKH-labeled EVs (10 μg/ml) for 30 min. Cells were then washed three times with 1 × PBS to remove EVs on the surface. Subsequently, 4% paraformaldehyde was added and kept for another 5 min. The EVs inside the cells were visualized by confocal microscopy (Carl Zeiss Inc, Thornwood, NY, USA).

An optimized calcium chloride transfection method has been performed to incorporate the miR-320a mimic or inhibitor into the EVs. In brief, 5 ml of EVs-free media was added in a 60-mm petri dish. 200 pmol miRNA mimic or inhibitor were mixed with 20 μg EVs in 1 × PBS. 0.1 M calcium chloride was added and placed on ice for 30 min. Heat shock was applied at 42 °C for 1 min, and the mixture was kept on ice again for 5 min. For any free miR, 5 μg/ml RNase was added and kept for 30 min at 37 °C.

To characterize the cell proliferation, the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) colorimetric assay (DOJINDO Molecular Technologies Inc, Kumamoto, Japan) was utilized. Both cell lines were inoculated in 96-well plates. After overnight incubation, 200 nM of the miR-320a mimic/miRNA control or miR-320a inhibitor/inhibitor control were added to the cells for transfection. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate. Cell viability was characterized at 48 h by measuring the optical intensity of each well at 450 nm by a plate reader.

Matrigel gel was diluted with serum-free culture medium. 100 μl of diluted gel was added into the upper chamber of the 24-well transwell and then kept at 37 °C for 4 h. The cell concentration was adjusted to 5 × 10 5 cells/ml and 200 μl cell suspension was added to the upper chamber. As for the lower chamber, 600 μl medium with 5 μg/ml fibronectin was added. For migration assay, the plate was placed at 37 °C for 24 h, while invasion for 48 h. After incubation, the non-invasive cells were wiped off from the upper chamber. The transwell was fixed with methanol for 5 min and dried. 500 μl of 0.1% crystal violet was added to the 24-well plate, the membrane was immersed in the culture medium for 30 min at 37 °C. After being rinsed for three times, the chamber was placed under the microscope for imaging.

The Matrigel was put in an ice box in a refrigerator at 4 °C to slowly melt the glue overnight in prior to the experiment. 10 μl Matrigel was added to ibidi angiogenesis slides and covered with the lid. The ibidi angiogenesis slide was put into the 10 cm petri dish and stood for about 30 min for gelation. The concentration of cell suspension was adjusted to 2 × 10 5 cells/ml. 50 μl of cell mixture was seeded to each well. The image of angiogenesis was regularly recorded and the length of tube, the area, the number of rings, and the intercepts were analyzed, respectively.

The wild-type and muted binding sites of ZC3H12B 3′UTR were incorporated into the firefly luciferase gene within the psiCHECK-2 vector (Promega), respectively. HEK-293T cells were added into 96-well plates. After incubation for 24 h, 10 ng firefly luciferase reporter plasmid and an equal amount of miR-320a mimic or negative control RNA were added for transfection using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, CA, USA). After another 24 h, the luciferase assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's manual without further modifications.

All data are shown as the means ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for multiple comparisons. Student's t test was performed for comparisons between two groups. p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism® (Version 7).

CD81 and TSG101 are two typical biomarkers for EVs. Western blotting result showed that the exosome samples contain both markers. No calnexin was detected in EVs samples, indicating the high quality and purity of the isolated EVs (Fig. 1A) . Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed to obtain the images of EVs. Figure 1B clearly exhibited the lipid bilayer of the EVs. Additionally, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was utilized to measure the size and the concentration of EVs, a conventional approach based on the tracking of Brownian movement [26] . The average size measured by NTA was similar to that in TEM characterization (Fig. 1C) . In sum, the EVs were successfully isolated from hosepic and ES-2 cell lines with high quality and verified by diverse methods.

In order to investigate the mechanism of action of EVs, the normal epithelial ovary cell line, hosepic, was co-incubated with EVs secreted by hosepic and OC cell line, ES-2. ES-2 EVs remarkably improved the cell viability and promoted the cell proliferation (Fig. 2I ). Both migration and invasion assays showed greater cell confluence and higher cell numbers per view ( Fig. 2A-F) . Moreover, the angiogenesis seemed to be activated and the length and area of tubes were significantly increased with more intercepts between newly formed structure (Fig. 2G, H ).

The raw EV-derived miRNA array data were normalized and discriminated between ES-2 and hosepic groups. The criterion for screening is that the fold change (FC) has to be within the range of either < 0.5 or > 2. p value must be < 0.05. In total, 486 EV-derived miRNAs were found to upregulated; while another 332 EV-derived miRNAs were downregulated (Fig. 3A) . The top ten upregulated and downregulated EV-derived miRNAs were listed in Fig. 3B . Among them, miR-466 is the most upregulated and miR-320a is the most downregulated. Since EVs as a whole could serve as an oncogenic driver, the downregulated miRNAs, such as miR-320a seemed likely to function in an opposite manner. 

The original miR-320a level was quantified in ES-2 and hosepic and their corresponding EVs. Similar to the miRNA array result, the level of miR-320a in ES-2 cells and EVs was significantly lower than that of Hosepic (Fig. 4A, B) . Since the EVs were derived from the cells, the contents secreted in the vesicles might not be in proportion to the cellular level. Figure 4C -F showed the results after the miR-320a mimic has been successfully transfected in two cell lines. The mRNA level of miR-320a was verified by RT-qPCR. As expected, the amount of miR-320a dramatically increased as compared to other groups at both cellular and EV levels. Nevertheless, the inhibitor of miR-320a did not affect the expression, which only took effect through binding to the target, blocking the subsequent signaling pathway.

The intracellular uptake of EVs has been clearly confirmed by the confocal imaging (Fig. 5 ). Exosome were labeled with a lipid membrane dye, PKH26, in red. The cytosol and nuclei were labeled in green and blue, respectively. The merged image clearly exhibited that the EVs have entered into the recipient cells.

Both Hosepic and ES-2 cell lines were treated with miR-320a mimic/inhibitor and control mimic/inhibitor loaded EVs to evaluate their effect on the cell migration, invasion as well as angiogenesis. As shown in Fig. 4G , H, miR-320a distorted the cell viability only in ES-2 group, but not in Hosepic group, implying that overexpressed miR-320 could only inhibit the proliferation in cancer cells. After adding the miR-320a inhibitor, the cell viability of both ES-2 and Hosepic group were elevated. Similarly, miR-320a mimic could crucially suppress cell migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells, but not in normal ovarian cells. In contrast, miR-320a inhibitor promotes the cell migration and invasion in both cell lines (Fig. 6, Figure S1 ). Newly generated vessels play a crucial role in supplying nutrients and oxygen into the core of the tumor tissue. miR-320a mimic could dramatically disturb the process of angiogenesis in ES-2, but not in Hosepic. The length and the area of tubes were significantly increased with more intercepts between newly formed structure after treating with miR-320a mimic ( Figure S2 ).

The 3′UTRs of mRNAs are considered as the targets of miRNAs to regulate gene transcription. RNAhybrid, miRanda and, TargetScan were used to analyze the target genes of miR-320a. Three target genes have been selected based on the overlapped prediction, namely ZC3H12B, CLCN3, and TNRC6B. RT-qPCR was performed to quantify the level of target genes in normal and cancerous ovarian cell lines. Without any interference, all three target genes were highly expressed in ES-2 at both cellular and EV levels ( Figure S3A-F) . ZC3H12B was the most expressed target gene, which was chosen for further studies. Once the external miR-320a mimic has been incorporated, the expression of 1 3 Figure S3I , J). To further explore whether ZC3H12B is a direct target of miR-320a, a dual luciferase reporter assay was performed. The intensity of luminescence was measured in different groups. The negative control did not interfere with the luciferase activity. Moreover, miR-320a mimic did not lower the luminescence because of the vector without the 3'UTR sequence of ZC3H12B. Surprisingly, cells transfected with both miR-320a mimic and the vector containing the 3ʹUTR sequence of ZC3H12B displayed remarkably lower luciferase activity among all groups. On the contrary, co-infection of miR-320a with the ZC3H12B 3ʹUTR mutant exhibited no significant change, suggesting that the binding of miR-320a to ZC3H12B is straightforward ( Figure S3K ).

For prognostic evaluation, firstly, the survival of patients was analyzed based on TCGA database. The subjects were classified into 2 groups based on the gene expression level (high vs. low). As can be seen from Figure S4A , B, elevated expression of ZC3H12B (HR = 1.55, p = 0.0089) was associated with shorter survival, reflecting a worse prognosis. Whereas this result ought to be interpreted with caution because these target genes were evaluated on a platform that only consists of several thousand cases. Subsequently, the prognostic potential of EV-derived miR-320a was investigated in OC patients. Plasma samples from 32 OC patients in the sample bank were used for quantification of miR-320a level. The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were summarized based on the results of regular follow-ups. Both RFS and OS in high miR-320a group were longer than that in low miR-320a group, indicating a late recurrence and better prognosis ( Figure S4C, D) . Therefore, EV-derived miR-320a could be a promising prognostic biomarker in OC to predict survival.

The cell communication is mediated by EVs secreted by various types of cells [27] . Apart from the advances in exosome research, the functions of EV-derived miRNAs have also been extensively investigated. miRNAs were transported by EVs to regulate various cellular bioactivities [28] [29] [30] . In this study, EVs enriched from cancer cells were proved to enhance the cell growth and invasion. On the contrary, the down regulated EV-derived miR-320a suppressed tumorigenesis, invasion, and angiogenesis of ovarian cancer by directly targeting a novel target, ZC3H12B. Besides, the data from clinical samples revealed that EV-derived miR-320a could also be a prognostic indicator associated with patient outcomes. Several studies have already studied the function of miR-320a in other types of cancer. For instance, serum miR-320a was proved to directly bind to PBX3 protein in melanoma and inhibit the malignant phenotype of cells and affects the occurrence and progression of melanoma [31] . Another research group explored the function of miR-320a The role of miR-320a in cell migration. A Migration study of mimics NC, miR-320a mimics, inhibitors NC, and miR-320a inhibitors in Hosepic cells. B Migration study of mimics NC, miR-320a mimics, inhibitors NC, and miR-320a inhibitors in ES-2 cells in retinoblastoma tissues. Inhibition of miR-320a alleviates the proliferation and induces apoptosis of retinoblastoma cells through the pathway involving TUSC3 [32] . Additionally, miR-320a could be used as a diagnostic indicator to differentiate tumor and benign tissues with high sensitivity and specificity. Further experiments proved the direct binding between miR-320a and 3ʹUTR of PD-L1 and overexpression of p53 leads to the upregulation of miR-320a, implying that defective p53-regulated miRNA response led to PD-L1 expression and induced immune evasion in malignant pleural mesothelioma [33] . Moreover, the function of EV-derived miR-320a has also been studied. For instance, loss of exosomal miR-320a contributes to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Exosomal miR-320a in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) inhibited HCC progression and could be a treatment target for further exploration [34] . Interestingly, similar results were obtained in another study. Lower level of exosomal miR-320a expression in serum reflects poorer prognosis in HCC patients. Besides, decreased exosomal miR-320a was also associated with metastasis in lymph node, vascular invasion, and more severe disease stages [35] . Another group discovered that miR-320a in extracellular vesicles (EVs) distorts endometrial cancer by disrupting the HIF1α/VEGFA signaling pathway. Exosomal miR-320a could mediate the downregulation of HIF1α, resulting in lowered expression of VEGFA. These results suggest exosomes derived from CAF containing elevated miR-320a which could be a novel therapeutic tactic for endometrial cancer [36] . Apart from studying the tumor suppressor mechanism, miR-320a in exosomes has also been proposed as a diagnostic marker. Metastatic and non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer can be differentiated with exosomal miR-320a. The combination of CEA, miR-320a, miR-622, and Cyfra21-1 had an improved efficiency for the diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC [37] . In endometriosis, exosomal miR-320a and miR-22-3p in serum were significantly increased, as compared to that in benign individuals, indicating the potential for endometriosis diagnosis [38] . Limited research has been conducted on ZC3H12B, especially in oncology. In one study, the elevated level of ZC3H12B distorts tumor progression by trapping the cell cycle in the G2 phase. The mRNA level of ZC3H12B was found to be increased in the neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y and human brain. The specific modulators remain to be furthered discovered [39] .

In conclusion, it is the first time to propose the idea that EV-derived miR-320a directly binds to ZC3H12B to exert its antitumor effect in ovarian cancer. However, the function of miR-320a remains to be complicated and may play various roles in different types of diseases, not only in cancer. Our group only performed the in vitro experiments and animal study is planned to be conducted in the near future to verify its function in vivo. Besides, a study illustrated that numerous PKH26 nanoparticles are formed during PKH26 dye staining of exosomes without clear differentiation. Next time the sucrose gradient should be applied to remove PKH26 nanoparticles for uptake studies [40] . The current study demonstrated that EV-derived miR-320a was downregulated in ovarian cancer cells. In vitro studies displayed the suppressor function of miR-320a in tumorigenesis, invasion, and angiogenesis by directly targeting ZC3H12B to attenuate the expression. Lower expression of EV-derived miR-320a and higher expression of ZC3H12B correlate with shorter survival period, indicating that EV-derived miR-320a may also serve as a prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer. This research provides new insight into the mechanism of EV-derived miR-320a in ovarian cancer and propose new directions for OC treatment.

Circ-0001068 is a novel biomarker for ovarian cancer and inducer of PD1 expression in T cells

Maintenance therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: current therapies and future perspectives-a review

The application of metabolomics in ovarian cancer management: a systematic review

Extracellular vesicles-mediated intercellular communication: roles in the tumor microenvironment and anti-cancer drug resistance

Specificities of secretion and uptake of EVs and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication

Emerging potential of EVs and noncoding microRNAs for the treatment of neurological injury/diseases

Identification of mammalian microRNA host genes and transcription units

A parsimonious model for gene regulation by miRNAs

MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions

Exosomal cargos modulate autophagy in recipient cells via different signaling pathways

Ageing and mesenchymal stem cells derived EVs: Molecular insight and challenges

Mesenchymal stem cell derived-EVs: a modern approach in translational medicine

Angiogenic and restorative abilities of human mesenchymal stem cells were reduced following treatment with serum from diabetes mellitus type 2 patients EVs

Diabetic sera disrupted the normal exosome signaling pathway in human mesenchymal stem cells in vitroEVs

Potential therapeutic application of mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Application of stem cell-derived EVs in ischemic diseases: opportunity and limitations

The role of cancer-associated fibroblasts and extracellular vesicles in tumorigenesis EVs

Synergies in EVs and autophagy pathways for cellular homeostasis and metastasis of tumor cells

Cancer-derived exosomal miR-25-3p promotes pre-metastatic niche formation by inducing vascular permeability and angiogenesis

Metformin increases exosome biogenesis and secretion in U87 MG human glioblastoma cells: a possible mechanism of therapeutic resistance

miR-320a is an independent prognostic biomarker for invasive breast cancer

MicroRNA-320a inhibits proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells by targeting RAB11A

MicroRNA-320a acts as a tumor suppressor by targeting BCR/ABL oncogene in chronic myeloid leukemia

MicroRNA-320a inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by targeting BMI-1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines

Nanoparticle tracking analysis for multiparameter characterization and counting of nanoparticle suspensions

Towards defining reference materials for measuring extracellular vesicle refractive index, epitope abundance, size and concentration

Cancer-secreted hsa-miR-940 induces an osteoblastic phenotype in the bone metastatic microenvironment via targeting ARHGAP1 and FAM134A

MicroRNAs transported by EVs in body fluids as mediators of intercellular communication in cancer

MiRNAs in astrocyte-derived EVs as possible mediators of neuronal plasticity

MiR-320a inhibits malignant phenotype of melanoma cells via targeting PBX3

Downregulation of microRNA-320a inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of retinoblastoma cells via targeting TUSC3

P53-regulated miR-320a targets PDL1 and is downregulated in malignant mesothelioma

Loss of exosomal miR-320a from cancer-associated fibroblasts contributes to HCC proliferation and metastasis

Decreased serum exosomal miR-320a expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Extracellular vesicle encapsulated microRNA-320a inhibits endometrial cancer by suppression of the HIF1α/VEGFA axis

Tumor-associated exosomal miRNA biomarkers to differentiate metastatic vs. nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Serum exosomal MicroRNAs as potential circulating biomarkers for endometriosis

ZC3H12B/MCPIP2, a new active member of the ZC3H12 family

PKH26 labeling of extracellular vesicles: characterization and cellular internalization of contaminating PKH26 nanoparticles

Acknowledgements We express sincere gratitude to Dr. Zhi Yang for his assistance.Authors' contributions YH: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing; MX: Conceptualization, methodology, resources, investigation; CJ: Resources, investigation; XW: Resources, investigation; XC: Supervision, funding acquisition. Writing; WZ: Writing, project administration, funding acquisition, investigation. All authors read and approved final manuscript.Funding This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81602270).

The original data can be shared upon reasonable request.

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.