key: cord-0430287-s7ek8oj9 authors: Whitenack, Lisa B.; Mickley, Brady L.; Saltzman, Julia; Kajiura, Stephen M.; Macdonald, Catherine C.; Shiffman, David S. title: Sharks, Lies, and Videotape: A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries date: 2021-08-18 journal: bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.18.456878 sha: cd507ccf3cab311906c2e775f45df1fd83ff3138 doc_id: 430287 cord_uid: s7ek8oj9 Despite evidence of their importance to marine ecosystems, at least 25% of all chondrichthyan species are estimated or assessed as threatened with extinction. In addition to the logistical difficulties of effectively conserving wide-ranging marine species, shark conservation is believed to have been hindered in the past by public perceptions of sharks as dangerous to humans. Shark Week is a high-profile, international programming event that has potentially enormous influence on public perceptions of sharks, shark research, shark researchers, and shark conservation. However, Shark Week has received regular criticism for poor factual accuracy, fearmongering, bias, and inaccurate representations of science and scientists. This research analyzes the content and titles of Shark Week episodes across its entire 32 years of programming to determine if there are trends in species covered, research techniques featured, expert identity, conservation messaging, type of programming, and portrayal of sharks. We analyzed titles from 272 episodes (100%) of Shark Week programming and the content of all available (201; 73.9%) episodes. Our data demonstrate that the majority of episodes are not focused on shark bites, although such shows are common and many Shark Week programs frame sharks around fear, risk, and adrenaline. While anecdotal descriptions of disproportionate attention to particular charismatic species (e.g. great whites, bull sharks, and tiger sharks) are accurate and supported by data, 79 shark species have been featured briefly at least once. Shark Week’s depictions of research and of scientists are biased towards a small set of (typically visual and expensive) research methodologies and (mostly white, mostly male) scientists, including presentation of many white male non-scientists as experts. While sharks are more often portrayed negatively than positively, limited conservation messaging does appear in 53% of episodes analyzed. Results suggest that as a whole, while Shark Week is likely contributing to the collective perception of sharks as monsters, even relatively small alterations to programming decisions could substantially improve the presentation of sharks and shark science and conservation issues. Abstract: Despite evidence of their importance to marine ecosystems, at least 25% of all chondrichthyan 29 species are estimated or assessed as threatened with extinction. In addition to the logistical 30 difficulties of effectively conserving wide-ranging marine species, shark conservation is believed 31 to have been hindered in the past by public perceptions of sharks as dangerous to humans. Shark 32 Week is a high-profile, international programming event that has potentially enormous influence 33 on public perceptions of sharks, shark research, shark researchers, and shark conservation. have reported that their words were selectively edited to make it appear that they were 106 responding to questions they were not asked, or that they found the way they were presented in 107 Shark Week programs profoundly professionally embarrassing (28, 29) . In 2010, in response to 108 criticism, Discovery Communications agreed to reduce entertainment programming during 109 Shark Week and present more scientifically-oriented episodes, though many of these more 110 scientific programs continued to depict sharks negatively (30). 195 or "Lair of the Mega Shark". Titles that contained the word "Jaws" were treated as negative 196 since the word was deliberately chosen based on its association with the eponymous movie. Episodes from the "Air Jaws" series were not treated as negative unless other parts of the title 198 had a negative connotation, as this series already has a reputation for not being negative. The The proportion of titles that were assessed as having negative connotations ranged from 0-75% 320 in any given year (Fig 1) . During the first five years of programming (1988-1992) only two titles 321 were considered negative. In total, six non-consecutive years, (1990, 1991, 1992, 1995, 1998 , Title length ranged from one to eight words, with four word titles occurring most frequently. One 331 hundred seventy-three titles (64.6%) included the root word "shark". While 99 of the titles 14 332 (36.4%) did not include the root word "shark", many of these titles referred to a specific species, 333 such as "Great White Encounters" or, "Search for the Golden Hammerhead". Sixteen titles 334 (5.9%) were merely descriptive and used the format, "Sharks of xxx", where the xxx denotes a 335 location. The 272 program titles were composed of 1047 total words. There were 354 unique words, 337 including root words plus their derivatives. The words "shark" and "sharks" occurred the most 338 frequently (161 occurrences) and accounted for 15.4% of all title words. This was followed by 339 the prepositions "of" (6.5%) and "the" (5.6%), then "jaws" (3.2%), "great" (2.8%), "white(s)" (2.6%), and "attack(s)" (1.4%). "Attack(s)" was the most frequently occurring word that has a 341 negative connotation based on the ANEW list, and "jaws" was the most frequently occurring 342 word that has a negative connotation in context (Fig 2) . Some words that have a negative connotation in isolation can be rendered neutral in context. For example, an existing franchise entitled, "Naked and Afraid" produced episodes for Shark 360 Week in 2018 and 2020 with the title, "Naked and Afraid of Sharks". In this case the franchise 361 title already included the word "afraid" so these titles were not included in the list of negative 362 titles. However, taken in isolation, the title "Naked and Afraid of Sharks" would be considered to 363 be a negative title. Similarly, the word "monster" is recognized as negative, but a program 364 entitled "Monster Garage: Shark Boat" used the word "monster" to describe a garage, not 365 sharks. In this case the title was not classified as negative. The word, "monster" can also refer 366 to something that is very large, so programs like, "Monster Mako", can refer to a particularly 367 large mako shark. However, the word "monster" in this and similar titles was likely chosen to 368 elicit fear and titles which used words like "monster" to describe sharks themselves were 369 classified as negative despite some ambiguity around their meaning. The word "Jaws'' is unique in the context of Shark Week titles. Nearly all vertebrates possess 371 jaws, so the word is not considered negative in itself. However, the 1975 movie "Jaws" caused 372 people to associate the word with a killer shark. The word thus evokes a primal fear of being 373 attacked, bitten, or eaten. Titles that include the word "Jaws" take advantage of this association 374 by indirectly suggesting that the subject is dangerous or fear-inducing, without having to use 375 words that are explicitly negative. Therefore, titles that included the word "jaws", other than "Air 376 Jaws", were classified as negative within context. There has been a recent trend to amalgamate "shark" with root words that have a negative of these fabricated words would appear in the ANEW list so they were analyzed within context. While the root words "apocalypse", "armageddon", and "shipwreck" are not included in the 383 ANEW list, the root word "insane" is listed and does have a negative connotation (52). analyzed by year, we found no trends in programming; episodes have not become more or less 400 focused on science or shark bites over time (Fig 4) . However, we note that "research" themed the remaining hosts/experts (20.1%) were associated with female pronouns (Fig 7) . Including species that weren't the focus of an episode but were briefly introduced by name on 570 screen, at least 79 extant (living) species of shark or species groups (e.g. "hammerhead", 571 "mako", "sevengill", "sixgill", "thresher", "wobbegong") were featured in at least one Shark Week 572 episode (Fig 8, Supplement 3) . Additionally, eight extinct species and 13 species of extant non-573 shark chondrichthyans were also featured (10 batoids (rays), 3 holocephalans (chimera and 574 ratfish)). 46 extant species were featured in more than one episode, 30 appeared in more than 575 five episodes, and 16 appeared in more than ten episodes. Across all episodes, an average of 576 4.9 species appeared. 39 episodes showed just one species, and 36 of these single-species 577 episodes featured only white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias). sharks Carcharhinus leucas (9.6% of all episodes), and hammerhead sharks Sphyrnidae (8.4% 589 of all episodes) (Fig 8) . Often the specific species of hammerhead was not mentioned, so all 590 hammerheads were grouped together for analysis; when species were specified, great 591 hammerheads Sphyrna mokarran were featured most often (62.3%) with the occasional 592 scalloped (21.7%) and smooth (2.9%) hammerheads (S. lewini and S.zygaena, respectively). "The threat against humans from sharks has never been greater." "Deadly maneaters lurking in the shadows." "You can't outswim a shark, and you can't overpower it." "Great white sharks can be absolute monsters." "The New Jersey shore became a killing ground." "Sharks are the stuff of nightmares." "Sharks are mindless, monstrous killers." "Sharks are stalking and killing us from the deep." "Great whites keep returning to California to terrorize people." "A missile armed with teeth, ready to fire." 653 654 655 "The balance and health of the ocean depends on their survival." "A marine ecosystem is not healthy without top predators." "You cannot remove the top predators without affecting every link below." "Sharks are misunderstood animals." "Sharks are more valuable alive than dead." "Gentle giants" "Great white sharks are one of the most awe-inspiring animals on the planet." "Sharks are clearly intelligent, not mindless killers." "Seeing a great white breach is one of the most spectacular things in nature." "What's not to love?" 656 657 The language used to describe sharks does matter, as studies have shown that negatively 658 valenced words like "attack" can contribute to negative public sentiment towards sharks (49,74). Public acceptance of predators is related to the frequency and intensity of interactions Research or Natural History (Fig 3) . Even episodes focused on bites or attacks can offer some 776 educational value when they include scientifically accurate information, though this is often 777 undermined by conflicting messages and sensationalism, as in programs which terrorize 778 viewers and then briefly mention shark conservation as the credits roll. While conservation 779 content may not be appropriate for every episode, providing actionable steps for viewers is 780 necessary in order for them to move from positive attitudes towards behavior that supports How Shark Week screws scientists Shark Week Lied to Scientists to Get Them to Appear in "Documentaries Shark Week and the rise of infotainment in science documentaries Discovery Channel Provokes Outrage with Fake Shark Week Documentary The Real Megalodon: Prehistoric Shark Behind Doc Uproar When did Carcharocles megalodon become extinct? A new 920 analysis of the fossil record The Early 922 Pliocene extinction of the mega-toothed shark Otodus megalodon: a view from the eastern 923 North Pacific The effects of media narratives about failures and discoveries in 925 science on beliefs about and support for science Trust no one': Modernization, paranoia and conspiracy culture The relationship between exposure to 930 pseudoscientific television programmes and pseudoscientific beliefs among Taiwanese 39 931 university students Effects of exposure to 933 pseudoscientific television programs upon Taiwanese citizens' pseudoscientific beliefs The relationship between exposure to televised 936 messages about paranormal phenomena and paranormal beliefs Listening to mothers II: Report of the 939 second national U.S. survey of women's childbearing experiences for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze 941 International Media representations of pregnancy and childbirth: an analysis of 943 reality television programs in the United States London: Routledge Television's cultivation of American 946 adolescents' beliefs about alcohol and the moderating role of trait reactance Medical disinformation and the unviable nature of COVID-19 conspiracy 949 theories Confessions Of A Wildlife Filmmaker: A Memoir: The Challenges of Staying 951 953 (46) Minorities in Shark Science Restyling factual TV: Audiences and news, documentary and reality genres. : (48) Barasch A. Blue Planet II Captivated Audiences Abroad Shark Week and Public Perceptions of Sharks Nature documentaries as catalysts for change: 963 Mapping out the 'Blackfish Effect'. People and Nature Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and 967 affective ratings Channeling Violence: The Economic Market for Violent Television 969 Programming Controversy is marketing: Mining sentiments in social media The drone 973 revolution of shark science: A review The Dark Side of Being a Female Shark Researcher Trends in 978 chondrichthyan research: An analysis of three decades of conference abstracts How does television represent science? Pushy or a princess? Women experts and British broadcast news Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny Status incongruity and backlash 986 effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders Media-constructed anti-intellectualism: The portrayal of experts in popular 989 US television talk shows Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin Survey of Academic Field Experiences 993 (SAFE): Trainees report harassment and assault The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-997 stereotypic textbook images on science performance Improving girls' sense of fit 1000 in science: Increasing the impact of role models Testing the effects of a role model intervention on 1003 women's STEM outcomes Experts and the operational bias of television news: The case of the Persian 1005 Gulf War Birds of a feather Systemic Practice and (72) 2010 Census of Population and Housing. Commonwealth of the Bahamas 2012. 1011 (73) Lehohla P. Census 2011: Census in brief Science, policy, and the public discourse of shark "attack": a proposal for 1013 reclassifying human-shark interactions Factors influencing the social acceptability of large 1016 carnivore behaviours Do PSAs take a bite out of Shark Week? The effects of juxtaposing 1018 environmental messages with violent images of shark attacks Shark bites and shark conservation: An analysis of human 1021 attitudes following shark bite incidents in two locations in Australia Humans and sharks: Changing public perceptions and Overcoming 1024 fear to facilitate shark conservation Celebrities and medicine: A potent combination The effectiveness of celebrities in conservation 1028 marketing Shark Riders Pose Threat to Conservation Gains Made with Diving 1030 Understanding and 1034 avoiding misplaced efforts in conservation Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward 1036 charismatic megafauna: The case of dolphins Disgusting" animals: Primary school children's attitudes and 1039 myths of bats and spiders Cognitive structure and the affective domain: On knowing and 1042 feeling in biology The impact of 1047 nature documentaries on public environmental preferences and willingness to pay: entropy 1048 balancing and the Blue Planet II effect Fostering changes in attitude, knowledge and behavior: 1051 demographic variation in environmental education effects Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are 1054 the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Nature documentaries and saving 1057 nature: Reflections on the new Netflix series Our Planet Men in nursing on television: exposing 1059 and reinforcing stereotypes Science on the Air: Popularizers and personalities on radio and 44 1061 early television Science communication: Science fresh from the box The limits of television?: Natural history programming and the transformation 1064 of public service broadcasting Shark Week episodes by year. Blue column indicates whether the episode was included in 1068 the content analysis. Yellow columns indicate titles deemed negative using the ANEW Coding guidelines for the content analysis of Shark Week episodes Chondrichthyan species featured in Shark Week episodes and number of episodes