key: cord-0727535-pofvx16c
authors: Aitken, K.; Good, J.; Hawkins, M.; Grose, D.; Mukherjee, S.; Harrison, M.; Radhakrishna, G.
title: Liver Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy: an Effective and Feasible Alternative to Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic
date: 2020-05-01
journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.04.012
sha: 0b90214ba1f750222308aded6b6503910e34d255
doc_id: 727535
cord_uid: pofvx16c

nan

Liver Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy: an Effective and Feasible Alternative to Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic Madam d The COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on UK cancer services. Access to radical surgery has been severely restricted and resources for systemic therapy provision are being limited as the crisis unfolds. Radiotherapy resources are rightly being focused on patients being treated with curative intent. However, it is our experience that access to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is diminishing, predominantly due to staffing shortages.

SABR offers a non-invasive, outpatient ablative approach with minimal hospital footfall and with lower immunosuppressive risks than chemotherapy. The recently published long-term outcomes of the SABR COMET study illustrate the ability of SABR to substantially impact survival across tumour types [1] . The NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation process has shown that SABR can be safely delivered in the UK [2,3].

SABR requires specialist multidisciplinary expertise. The majority of radiotherapy departments are planning to maintain their capacity for category 1e4 treatments [4] and many have therefore suspended SABR for oligometastatic disease. However, we are concerned that diminishing access to SABR, at a time when access to other curative local treatment modalities is already restricted, will result in poorer patient outcomes in the short and medium term when this need not be the case.

Patients with liver-limited colorectal cancer have a 5year survival of 40% following surgery [5] . Given the evidence supporting SABR for colorectal liver metastases [6] , we believe that this should be prioritised if patients are unable to access surgery and interventional ablative techniques. Similarly, SABR should be considered for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma while access to other services (particularly transplant) is limited. We urge radiotherapy departments to preserve access to SABR for patients in these situations, particularly as the COVID-19 pandemic wanes and staffing levels allow the re-establishment of normal services.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial

Colorectal liver metastases: a critical review of state of the art

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: a systematic review

The Royal College of Radiologists

Liver Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy: an Effective and Feasible Alternative to Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic