key: cord-0743821-hbykkik5
authors: Cataldo, Ilaria; Casonato, Eleonora; Levari, Ermelinda; Negri, Attilio; Simonato, Pierluigi; Tomasi, Giulia; Branz, Giovanna; Coppola, Aurora; Gianfranceschi, Pietro; Leoni, Eva; Mistretta, Pietro; Stefani, Martina; Vanzetta, Miriam; Franceschini, Anna; Esposito, Gianluca; Corazza, Ornella
title: Gambling at the time of COVID-19: Results from interviews in an Italian sample of gamblers
date: 2022-02-01
journal: Emerg Trends Drugs Addict Health
DOI: 10.1016/j.etdah.2022.100032
sha: e1dd017bf80cafce3a6a8de3ddf3773c057dd568
doc_id: 743821
cord_uid: hbykkik5

The coronavirus pandemic affected the life of those suffering from addictive behaviors often confined to prolonged periods of self-isolation. To explore the variation of symptoms related to gambling, 46 outpatients of the mental health services in the Trento Province were invited to take part in a phone interview at the start of the national lockdown. Although only 2.17% increased gambling activity during this period, half of the sample (50.00%) experienced irritability, mood fluctuation (43.48%) and anxiety (39.13%). Follow-up studies should assess modifications in their behaviors that occurred after the reopening of gambling venues.

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the lives of people all over the world. The first country to face such an emergency in Europe was Italy [1] , where restrictive measures, such as social and physical distancing, were adopted to contain the spread of the virus starting from late March until May 2020. This sudden and prolong period of in-home self-isolation [2, 3, 4] had severe repercussions in people's lives sometimes leading to the risks for aggravation of psychological health symptoms, especially among those diagnosed with a mental disorder. A corresponding shift was also plausible in patients with behavioral addictions since the accessibility to substances, or mechanisms, was drastically reduced or modified. Specifically, gambling has been affected not only by the closure of land-based venues (i.e., casinos, betting shops), but also by the suspension of sports events and other related social activities, in combination with the necessity to use the internet more often to communicate and work [5, 6] . Hence, the only available place to gamble was on online with the temptation to do so being just a "click away". Risky online gambling behaviors could have also been further facilitated by financial concerns [7] , perceived isolation [8] , feelings of boredom and loneliness [9, 10] , and reduced social support [11] affecting the overall psychological well-being and potentially aggravating pre-existing symptoms in pathological gamblers, such as mood and anxiety disorders [12, 13] . Initial data shows that most of the reported increase in gambling during the pandemic was referred to online gambling platforms [14] . However, findings present some discrepancies: a recent investigation on US residents found that online gambling decreased during the first COVID-19 outbreak. Within those who were not involved with online gambling before the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, only a minority reported a migration from land-based gambling to the online equivalent [15] . Other results highlighted that the total online gambling activity during the first phases of COVID-19 did not increase, requiring further research to investigate this subject more in detail [16] . While further assessment is required, consideration also needs to be given to psychological distress which can be associated with gambling activities [17] , and mental health worsening in more vulnerable individuals [13] , including gamblers. Comorbidities between gambling and other psychiatric disorders, in particular depression, anxiety, mood and personality disorders, have been proved to be common [18, 19, 20] , and in some cases, land-based gambling has been substituted with other forms of behavioral addiction, such as increased rates of alcohol consumption, tobacco, and other substances intake [15] . Regarding the possible impact of these disorders on gambling behaviors, some studies have found a correlation between depression and gambling symptoms [21, 13] , which might be explained through the shared genetic contribution [22] . Stress was also considered a possible reason to gamble as a coping strategy and as a result of the social, familiar, and financial difficulties that a gambler usually has to face [23] . All these factors are even more prominent with the all-rounded pressure of COVID-19. Due to the complex nature of the problem, the conditions of gamblers in the Province of Trento, Italy, were explored during the first phase of national lockdown which occurred from March to late May 2020. Specifically, the investigation focused on both behavioral variations (i.e., increased gambling activity) and related mental health symptoms (i.e., depression, anxiety). The aim of the present study is to investigate possible behavioral variations (i.e., increased gambling activity) and related mental health symptoms (i.e., depression, anxiety) during the Italian national lockdown.

The Ethics Committee of the local Public Health Unit services approved authorized the present study on April 28, 2020.The authors recruited all the outpatients diagnosed with pathological gambling according to the DSM-5 criteria [24] and in treatment at the Addiction Treatment Unit (SERD) of the local public health services in the Province of Trento, or attending mutual-help groups based in the same province (Associazione Auto Mutuo Aiuto, AMA), for a total of 77 potential participants. Inclusion criteria were: (i) minimum 18 years of age; (ii) being in charge as outpatient at the SERD or attending a therapeutic group at the AMA during the period of data collection. Exclusion criteria adopted were the patient's refusal to take part in the interview and the unavailability of the phone number in the patients' record. Informed consent was asked and obtained before the interview. Due to the restrictions imposed on face-to-face interactions, responses were provided remotely through a telephone call immediately after the first lockdown, between May and July 2020. The study involved 77 outpatients to meet the inclusion criteria, 47 of whom answered the phone call, but with 1 refusing the interview. Phone calls were made by professionals (3 physicians, 3 psychologists, 1 social assistant, and 1 mental health practitioner) who were familiar with the outpatients and with whom they had established a significant therapeutic relationship. All data were collected anonymously during a single telephonic session.

The investigation included targeted questions about the variations in behavioral symptoms related to gambling (i.e., craving, abstinence), the presence of other addictions, mental health issues (i.e., sleep disturbances, appetite, irritability), prescription of medicines and changes in drugs intake, and the perception of the gambling-related problem. To this purpose, two types of questions were adopted: dichotomous questions (yes/no), and categorical questions to investigate variations in gambling behaviors and related symptoms. The dichotomous questions covered several topics, such as the presence of a psychiatric diagnosis, a prescription of medicines, consumption of alcohol/other substances, and mental health issues; furthermore, questions inquiring about online gambling and gaming, job circumstances (i.e., smart working), variations in behavioral symptoms (i.e., craving and abstinence of other substances) and self-evaluation (i.e., awareness of their own gambling-related problem, feeling the need to seek help) were included in this category. The categorical questions investigated about socio-demographic information, changes in gambling activities and in drugs, alcohol and other substances intake, the typology of the psychiatric diagnosis, and of the pharmacological therapy if present, and typology of online gambling if indulged in), with the possible answers being "increased", "unvaried", and "decreased". Lastly, to indicate the gambling severity participant could choose between "mild", "moderate" and "severe". All unreported answers were labeled as "unknown". The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D, [25] ) was used to assess depression further. HAM-D is widely utilized for clinical and research purposes, and it consists of 17 items scored between 0 and 4 on a Likert scale. Scores between 0 and 7 suggest the absence of depression. The range 8-16 indicates the presence of mild depression, points from 17 to 23 imply moderate depression, and scores over 24 hint severe depression, with the maximum score being 52.

RStudio Desktop 2021.09.0+351 was used to explore the database and compute analyses. One person refused to answer the interview. The final sample consisted of 46 outpatients of the Addiction Treatment Unit diagnosed with pathological gambling. Table 1 

Most of the respondents (N= 34, 73.91%) reported that no variation occurred during the first lockdown in terms of gambling frequency, followed by increased gambling (N= 10, 21.74%) and a decreasing trend (N= 2, 4.35%). Only one person reported increased online gambling (2.17%) (see Figure 3 ). Although most participants did not express symptoms related to addictive gambling behaviors, 39.13% of the sample (N= 18) revealed increased craving, and 19.57% (N= 9) indicated symptoms associated with abstinence. Only three respondents (6.52%) perceived the variations occurred as a problem and decided to speak with somebody, or to reach out for help (N= 5, 10.87%), blocking the app (100%) or referring to specific interlocutors (N_therapist= 2, 40.00%; N_close person= 3, 60.00%; N_other= 2, 40.00%). Results are displayed in detail in Table 2 .

Responses from inquiries on comorbidity and other psychopathological symptoms are shown in Table 3 . 45.65% of the sample indicated to have been diagnosed with a mental disorder, predominantly a mood disorder (N= 20), followed by addiction (N= 5, 23.81%), personality disorder (N= 3, 14.29%), psychotic disorder (N= 2, 9.52%), and eating disorder (N= 1, 4.76%). 26.09% declared to use alcohol and 8.70% to use other substances (see Figure 4) . Half of the sample was undergoing pharmacological therapy, mainly taking anxiolytics (65.22%) and antidepressants (47.83%). With regards to the variations in mental health symptoms that might have occurred during the period of self-isolation, 52.17% of respondents declared increased irritability, followed by mood fluctuation (N= 20, 43.48%), anxiety and sleep disorders (N= 18, 39.13%, eating disorders (N= 12, 26.09%), and alterations of thought (N= 8, 17.39%). 19 .56% reported modifications in alcohol use (N_increased= 6, 13.04%; N_decreased= 3, 6.52%), 4.35% indicated increased substance intake, and 2.17% a decreased substance consumption. Only 1 participant declared symptoms associated with substance craving.

With regards to depressive symptoms, the sample scored an average of 9.28. Participants mostly had no symptoms related to depression (N= Table 4 . T-tests revealed differences between the different levels of depression, with regards to reported gambling severity (t_45= 6.57, p<0.001) and modifications occurred during the social-distancing period (t(45)= 7.86, p<0.001). Further investigations revealed a statistically significant levels of depression between those reporting mild (M_mild= 3.5; SD= 3.5) and moderate gambling severity (M_moderate= 10.31; SD= 3.86) (t(13)= 2.34, p= 0.036). Another significant difference was found on level of depression between respondents who had no variations in gambling activity (M_no variations= 8.24; SD= 6.19) and those reporting an increasing practice (M_increased= 14.20; SD= 7.66) (t(41)= 2.52, p= 0.015).

To explore the existence of a predicting factor for gambling severity, a multiple regression analysis was adopted. All the dichotomous variables (Yes/No) into dummy variables prior analysis. Among the factors assessed in the telephonic interview, only the model related to the type of gambling nearly reached the level of significance (see Table 5 ). Within this model, VLT resulted as the factor that was more likely to predict the gambling severity. Taking a further look into this result, the respondents that indicated VLTs as a preferred gambling type (N= 35) also reported moderated levels of gambling severity (N= 14; 40%) or severe gambling activity and (N= 21; 60%). 

The current study sought to investigate the possibility of a behavioral change within a cohort of gambling patients at the Addiction Treatment Unit of Trento, alongside whether or not they experienced any worsen ing symptoms associated with mental health (e.g., anxiety, depression, insomnia) as a result of prolong periods of self-isolation during the first onset of the coronavirus pandemic. Concerning the possibility that online gambling would increase during this period, we registered a very marginal increase (2.17%) in online gambling activities. Such a lack of online gambling during the lockdown is corroborated by some recent findings [15] , but in contrast with others [6, 14] , where those with an increased online activity were more likely to be problematic gamblers. Regarding the gambling situation during the lockdown on a larger national level, Lugo et al. found a decrease in gambling activity, including online gambling and explained it as it was due to national regulations banning various types of land-based games [26] .

However, the answer to such a complex and unprecedented phenomenon is heterogeneous and the impact of the pandemic on online gambling is still up to debate, therefore more studies on the changes in gambling activity and their relation to other behavioral addictions are required. In terms of our investigations, result could be reinforced by the older age of the group of most of the patients, as they could have been less familiar with technological devices and use of the internet. Although no increase in online gambling was recorded during the lockdown, more than half of the interviewed (52.17%) felt more irritable during the lockdown. In addition, high rates of respondents reported mood fluctuation (43.48%) or anxiety (39.13%), confirming the existence of comorbidity coherently with the literature [27, 18, 19, 20, 21, 13] . Moreover, gambling severity resulted significantly associated with levels of depression. Similarly, the mean score of depression was statistically significant between respondents who declared no variations in gambling and those reporting increased activity. These results suggest that the awareness of moderate or increased gambling could exert greater preoccupation and mood aggravation, especially in times of uncertainties and potential financial insecurities. Concerning the factors that might predict gambling severity, we found that preferring VLT as gambling activity corresponds to moderate and severe levels of intensity. This finding is in line with previous studies indicating that VLT players are at greater risk to develop problematic gambling [28] , especially when depression co-occurs [29] . The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic could be pointed to as an additional reason for the increase of psychiatric symptoms among gamblers: the fear and anxiety related to the risk of being infected were generally really high among the population [30] , so it is not so far-fetched to think that individuals with an already fragile mental health could be affected in a significant way. This study provides an insightful exploration into the importance of implementing therapies focused on treating psychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety, stress, and irritability, extensively confirmed as comorbidities of the Gambling Disorder. While providing an overview of the Italian gamblers' community, this study is not without limitations. Firstly, the sample was composed mainly of men (84.78%), leaving the problem under-explored in the female population. Secondly, the group's average age is higher than other studies on gambling, where the sample is usually younger. Thirdly, if, on the one hand, the focus on a local reality concedes the possibility to implement results in the clinical work more promptly, it precludes the exploration of the problem in the broader population, limiting the number of participants to a small targeted sample. The sample size, in fact, might have affected the statistical significance of the results, although a total of 46 participants can be enough for exploratory studies [31] . In addition, phone call interviews were adopted instead of face-to-face interviews. This procedure allowed the researchers to conduct the study following a safe procedure and keeping a personal touch, which is fundamental in health care services. At the same time, the phone interview as a methodological approach requires short and precise questions to facilitate comprehension. As well, replies need to be concise to reduce the possibility of collecting inaccurate information and might be limit the exploration of the targeted construct to essential elements. [32] . Furthermore, it is also essential to consider different regulations concerning gambling activity in each country since the restrictions imposed by one government could be more or less strict compared to another one [13] . Therefore, it is mandatory to consider national policies when comparing studies conducted in different countries. The cross-sectional nature of the present investigation did not permit to assess exhaustively the possible causal association between the variables considered. A follow-up study would allow to study more in detail the causation among phenomena and register further variations in gambling habits (i.e., type, frequency, preferences) in the period post lockdown, after the physical venues have been reopened. 

The study was supported by the Addiction Treatment Unit (SERD) of the local public health services of the Province of Trento, Italy.

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Covid-19 in europe: the italian lesson

Correlates of symptoms of anxiety and depression and mental wellbeing associated with covid-19: a cross-sectional study of uk-based respondents

The psychological impact of covid-19 pandemic on the general population of saudi arabia

Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (covid-19) epidemic among the general population in china

Gambling during the covid-19 crisis-a cause for concern

The influence of lockdown on the gambling pattern of swiss casinos players

Low income and vulnerability for gambling problems

The convergence of gambling and digital media: Implications for gambling in young people

Is boredom associated with problem gambling behaviour? it depends on what you mean by 'boredom

Boredom proneness in pathological gambling

A grounded theory of the influence of significant life events, psychological co-morbidities and related social factors on gambling involvement

Prevalence of psychiatric co-morbidity in treatment-seeking problem gamblers: A systematic review and metaanalysis

Gambling in covid-19 lockdown in the uk: Depression, stress, and anxiety

Changes in gambling behavior during the covid-19 pandemic-a web survey study in sweden

Substitution behaviors among people who gamble during covid-19 precipitated casino closures

Transitioning between online gambling modalities and decrease in total gambling activity, but no indication of increase in problematic online gambling intensity during the first phase of the covid-19 outbreak in sweden: A time series forecast study

Isolating the impact of specific gambling activities and modes on problem gambling and psychological distress in internet gamblers

Clinical features and psychiatric comorbidity of subjects with pathological gambling behavior

Comorbidity of dsm-iv pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions

Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys

Severity of gambling is associated with severity of depressive symptoms in pathological gamblers

Shared genetic contributions to pathological gambling and major depression in men

Stress and gambling

American Psychiatric Association and others, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®)

The impact of covid-19 lockdown on gambling habit: A cross-sectional study from italy

Big five personality traits and alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, and gambling disorder comorbidity

Gambling, gambling activities, and problem gambling

Psychological vulnerability and problem gambling: The mediational role of cognitive distortions

The psychological impact of covid-19 on the mental health in the general population

Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices

The group interview in social research

The authors would like to acknowledge all the respondents that took part in the study.

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: AMA Auto Mutuo Aiuto APSS Aziwnda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari HAM-D Hamilton Depressions Rating Scale SERD Servizio Dipendenze VLT Video Lottery Terminal

The Ethics Committee of the local public health services approved the present study. It complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and with the European General Data Protection Regulation. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.