key: cord-0751303-4d8capb8 authors: Eskander, Ramez N. title: Clinical Trials, Adaptability and the COVID-19 Pandemic date: 2020-12-08 journal: Gynecol Oncol Rep DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2020.100680 sha: 62ad1658ebc8cec3b94eba0153c2add99389b0d5 doc_id: 751303 cord_uid: 4d8capb8 nan Despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and public health crisis on health care delivery, the GOG-Foundation has continued to prioritize the delivery of novel and state-of-the-science treatment options to patients via clinical trials. Since the first document case of COVID-19 in the United States on January 20, 2020, there have been over 10.3 million individuals infected, with over 241, 000 deaths. Globally, over 52 million cases have been documented, with nearly 1.3 million COVID related deaths (1). Although mitigation strategies, including incorporation of symptoms screening, face masks, and social distancing have been advocated regionally and internationally, the number of infections continues to rise. Even prior to the pandemic, physicians and health care workers faced burnout, stress, anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and suicidality (2) . In context of the above, it is important to continue to focus on providing support to the workforce that tirelessly commit themselves to the care of patients suffering from gynecologic malignancies. As we continue with the academic school year, which is being predominantly conducted on virtual platforms due to case numbers, these responsibilities are confounded by needs to coordinate home and childcare activities, while balancing clinical obligations. School closings have necessitated that parents adopt novel approaches to accommodate education, including work-from-home, telehealth opportunities, as well as time off. These duties have impacted health care providers, research coordinators, support staff and regulatory specialists both personally and professionally. Compounding the above are limited child care opportunities, as the child care industry faces economic strains and concerns about transmission (3). Office staff, mandating the development of strategies, including "flex" schedules to provide clinical trial coordinators with the necessary plasticity to meet their various obligations. Understandably, solutions are likely to vary based on clinical practice structure, team size, and geographic location, although with over 970 clinical trials halted as of November 2020 due to the pandemic, the need to adapt is clearly evident (4) . Examples of accommodations include remote monitoring of clinical trial results, remote site visits for trial initiation and monitoring, and use of electronic signature for patient consent. Specific statements issues by both the National Cancer Institute, and the US Food and Drug Administration further outline guidance for clinical trial activities during the ongoing pandemic. These pressures may be more pronounced for women physicians (accounting for nearly half of the gynecologic oncology workforce) and health care employees (5, 6) . Understandably, there will be significant geographic variation in COVID-19 related disruption based on current COVID-19 burden. It is encouraged that efforts be made for continued support of clinical trial staff as they work to manage personal and professional expectations. Working collectively to ensure staff are supported in this arena is critical to the success of clinical operations enabling access to novel treatment options for our patients. Dr. Eskander reports personal fees and/or institutional support/grants for clinical research outside of the submitted work; AstraZeneca, Clovis, Merch, GSK/Tesaro, Eisai, Institutional PI for industry sponsored trials from CLOVIS Pothuri reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support outside of the submitted work; institutional PI for industry sponsored trials from Tesaro/GSK Randall reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support outside of the submitted work from BluPrint Oncology Slomovitz reports personal fees and non-financial support outside of the submitted work from: Clovis, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, GSK, Genentech/Roche, and the GOG foundation Moore reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support outside of the submitted work; advisory board participation for: Astra Zeneca Coleman reports consulting and/or research support funding from AstraZeneca Herzog reports consulting and serving on scientific advisory boards for AstraZeneca Dr. Monk reports honoraria and consulting fees from Abbvie Copeland reports no personal disclosures References Preventing a Parallel Pandemic -A National Strategy to Protect Clinicians' Well-Being COVID-19 Transmission in US Child Care Programs Women Physicians and the COVID-19 Pandemic The pandemic and the female academic All authors contributed to the development of the clinical commentary. -The COVID-19 pandemic has required adaptability in the workplace -Women health care professionals are disproportionately affected by the burdens resulting from the pandemic -Flexible work options are critical to ensure staff have the resources to provide cancer care and clinical trial options