key: cord-0762541-ij3czbgm authors: Latour, Debra title: Advances in Upper Extremity Prosthetic Technology: Rehabilitation and the Interprofessional Team date: 2022-03-19 journal: Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep DOI: 10.1007/s40141-022-00342-x sha: 2bf12d8abf0c03c83dd9bf37bd2588504baa4a48 doc_id: 762541 cord_uid: ij3czbgm PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this paper is to explore current trends and advancements that lead to improved practitioner knowledge and patient care resulting in better outcomes. It is common for the physiatrist to lead the team of interprofessional practitioners in the care of individuals with upper limb absence. The focus of the care is to understand and access prosthetic options, but there are often other health factors and relevant issues to consider. RECENT FINDINGS: Some of the latest updates offer solutions to pain management, prosthetic control, access to relevant evidence, and outcomes-related data. An interesting finding was the influence of telehealth service delivery on multiple issues faced by this population. These issues include lack of information, pain management, monitoring skin breakdown and peripheral vascular disease, prosthetic training, and access to peers and specialized practitioners. SUMMARY: The diverse technology advancements in surgical techniques, materials, outcome measures, and data management, as well as telehealth, work together to assist the collaborative interprofessional team to provide contemporary and comprehensive care to this unique population. Upper limb absence (ULA) may be a result of surgery, trauma, disease, or due to a congenital manifestation. Regardless of the cause, it is common for the physiatrist to lead the team of interprofessional practitioners in the care of individuals with ULA. While the focus of the care is to understand and access prosthetic options, there are often other health factors and relevant issues to consider. The rehabilitation process itself begins by educating the individual with ULA and their caregivers and encouraging them to engage actively and collaborate with the team members to establish goals, research prosthetic options, and make decisions [1] . "Amputation" refers to the surgical removal of all or part of a limb or extremity resulting in the absence of a limb [2] . Not all limb absence is due to an acquired loss as some individuals are born with congenital absence or difference. Because of this, the population may be collectively described as individuals with limb absence (LA). There are approximately 2 million Americans living with LA (1:200 people); there are an additional 28,000,000 individuals who are at risk for amputation. Approximately 185,000 amputations occur in the USA each year. The number of individuals living with limb loss is projected to more than double by 2050, largely due to the rise of vascular disorders [3, 4, 5] . Individuals with lower limb absence (LLA) outnumber those with ULA by a ratio of 4:1 [5] . Upper extremity amputation affects approximately 41,000 persons or 3% of the LA population. Increased awareness of work safety and changes in workforce patterns may contribute to diminished rates for traumatic upper extremity amputations. Current data reveals that trauma-acquired upper limb loss occurs at a rate of 3.8 per 100,000 persons. Loss of digits, particularly a single finger, are the most common of trauma-related upper limb amputations (2.8 per 100,000) [6, 7] . Following this, acquired loss at the trans-radial (47%) and trans-humeral levels (25%) is the next most common levels of upper limb amputations, with elbow disarticulations occurring least common (2.1%) [7] . Congenital upper limb difference affects approximately 1500 (4 in 10,000) infants in the USA and may present with longitudinal and/or transverse deficiencies [8, 9] . Longitudinal deficiency involves the absence of or shortening of a bone, such as in the radial clubhand. Transverse deficiency presents as the total or partial absence of bony segments; a common example is a trans-radial congenital difference, in which the forearm, wrist, and hand are not present. Congenital absence is the primary etiology of approximately 90% among the pediatric population; acquired loss accounts for about 10% of the pediatric population. As the congenitally involved population ages, this ratio shifts so that by adulthood only 10% of upper extremity absences are congenital. Unfortunately, there is a lack of literature following these children into adulthood, particularly in relation to prosthesis use, satisfaction, and challenges toward optimal function [5, 6, 10] . This is a prime example of how physiatrists familiar with human development might implement a life course health development model to influence the plan of care. National and global health initiatives state that specific attention from health care and public health professionals is necessary to address the needs of populations and to prevent further disparities [11, 12, 13] . Specific issues faced by members of this group include the experiences of loss, pain, and isolation as well as understanding prosthetic technology and its control, and accessing technology. It is vital for the population with ULA to receive specialized care for the presenting multi-faceted challenges. Unfortunately, it is difficult for many individuals with ULA to access specialized care. The care of individuals with ULA often requires specialized training that is not easily available to most generalist clinicians. The course of intervention and outcomes of people with ULA varies and is based upon the individual needs. Regardless of the unique patient/client factors, optimal outcomes require the expertise of a specialized collaborative interprofessional team: individual practitioners from diverse disciplines who collaborate, contribute knowledge, skills, and experiences to offer optimized care. The communication and collaboration must transcend beyond the different institutions for which the practitioners work. A collaborative interprofessional team for ULA often includes surgeons, physiatrists, nurses, prosthetists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, vocational rehabilitation counselors, social workers, case managers, and, in some cases, life care planners [14, 15, 16, 17 •] . A physiatrist, specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation, is knowledgeable about the developmental, physical, and psychosocial processes and the resources needed for optimal outcomes. Sheehan and Gondo [18] reported on the effect of limb loss in the USA, stating that each well-trained member of the specialized amputee rehabilitation team has a specific and important role in the care and recovery of people with limb loss. Regardless of the level of loss, the presentation, or the etiology, absence of the upper limb may be devastating to the individual and/or the family because of the impact to social and physical function [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23] . During a recent conversation, David Crandell, MD, Medical Director for the Amputee Program at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital in Boston stated that it is vital for practitioners to remember that "limb loss does include loss. Even with all the good technology, we must build in the psychological support for someone that is experiencing loss. We need to move the momentum to help people and their families to see limb loss not as an end point but a new beginning. I tell people that an amputation shapes you but doesn't define you." [24] Pain Individuals with ULA are very likely to experience the pain of diverse etiologies. These may include overuse syndrome, phantom pain, neuromas, or heterotopic ossification. Individuals with ULA, whether congenital or acquired, are at risk to experience overuse of the sound side. The presence of pain and deteriorated musculoskeletal function of the sound arm in individuals with unilateral or bilateral ULA is well documented [25, 26, 27, 18] . Gambrell [26] documented the importance of preventing overuse syndrome and recommended a team approach, with practitioner responsibility to educate patients to the likelihood of overuse and methods that impede development. Secondary conditions affect physical and mental health; current standard medical treatments often exclude psychosocial interventions [28] . Recent advancements in different forms of technology and techniques have helped to address the challenges experienced by this population and thus improve patient/client care and outcomes. Individuals with ULA may experience a variety of pain issues including neuromas and phantom pain. Phantom pain affects 80% of persons with limb loss. It is common for an individual to experience pain in the phantom limb soon after a loss that also diminishes over time [3] . Intervention for phantom sensation and phantom pain is implemented in the acute postoperative phase [2, 7, 29] . Interventions include active participation in functional tasks, gentle massage, prosthetic wear, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS), and mirror therapy [30, 31, 32•] . Surgical techniques that may reduce pain and improve prosthetic control and function include targeted muscle reinnervation and osseointegration. These procedures can influence the future course of intervention, outcomes, and prognosis, and are typically considered to attain better functional outcomes [2, 22, 31, 33, 34, 35] . A nerve that is severed or injured attempts to regenerate and can result in a painful neuroma. Targeted muscle re-innervation (TMR) is a procedure offered at the time of or following amputation that provides nerve endings with a new host muscle to innervate in a way that will not cause a neuroma or phantom limb pain. TMR can improve a person's ability to use and control some prosthetic technology by using a concept called pattern recognition [34, 36, 39] . Osseointegration is a major advance in amputation surgery in which an artificial implant is permanently, surgically anchored, and integrated into the bone, which then grows into the implant. The procedure offers a direct skeletal connection between the natural bony anatomy and the prosthesis extension. Research shows that osseointegration improves mobility and proprioception (osseoperception), reduces nerve pain, and eliminates common problems associated with fitting the residual limb into a socket [35] . Technology has advanced the care for the person with ULA in numerous ways. New materials, such as silicone, and processes, such as additive manufacturing, have influenced options on every level for the prosthetic user. Passive functional esthetic devices are static prostheses that appear to look like a hand; functions include stabilizing, supporting, and improving cosmesis. Advancements have resulted in more lifelike appearances helping the user to more easily blend into society and often improving self-esteem and quality of life. More robust materials have enhanced the development of activity-specific devices to accommodate more rigorous activities or harsh environments. Likewise, the use of softer silicones, air bladders, and temperature management systems are yielding more comfortable sockets for different types of prostheses. The control of the body-powered prosthesis has been improved with newer materials for harnessing, and even the elimination of the harness through the application of adhesives [38, 36] . Externally powered prosthesis control has been improved by pattern recognition, a mechanism that requires a set of myoelectric signals, corresponding to possible prosthesis movement, recorded, and used to calibrate the control system [37, 39] . It has also been improved by radio-frequency identification (RFID), a wireless communication that typically involves a RFID reader and a tag. The tag has information stored in its memory, and the reader (using an antenna) can read this information [40] . Another option for prosthesis users is additive manufacturing, or 3-D printing, which is a three-dimensional device that resembles a prosthesis. It is fabricated from computer-aided manufacturing (CAM). Such devices are less costly and typically less robust requiring more frequent replacement, and not reimbursed by health insurance [41, 42, 43] . Outcome measures that accurately assess areas of concern to the key stakeholders are important to determine efficacy and to aid in access to specialized healthcare, technology, and the reimbursement for such services. Technology has also influenced patient care with the opportunity to create and collect data, using diverse outcome measures developed to interpret function, frequency of use, satisfaction, and quality of life [44, 45, 46, 47••, 48, 49, 50] . Collection of data to diverse repositories, such as search engines and even the "cloud" offers practitioners the evidence upon which to make informed decisions to guide care, and to justify it for insurance authorization and reimbursement. This technology development further gives individuals with ULA the opportunity to access more than one type of prosthesis because data regarding functional outcomes, prosthesis use, and satisfaction are more readily available. The lives of people are complex, with multiple roles and various responsibilities, and no one prosthesis can accommodate for the multiple functions of the natural hand. Different prosthetic technologies can offer opportunities to the user to live fully and to protect the remaining anatomy from overuse. Blair Lock, CEO of Coapt Engineering states that there now exist different types of data collection and computing analysis. This is important because of how the information can be crunched by the "cloud" and disseminated to practitioners for patient care. The information gives insight into "what we need to know, why we need to know it and how we can use it for better patient outcomes, incorporation to daily life, and product development. The data becomes more real, valuable, and valid." [51] 3. Telehealth Individuals with ULA often report receiving little to no information from medical professionals about preventing secondary conditions [3] . Often, these individuals are invited to peer support groups, for the purpose of education, engagement, and empowerment; however, because the groups are often predominated by people with LLA, they do not return. This leads to further isolation, and lack of information. Telehealth offers a remote pathway for practitioners to collaborate and consult with each other and offers individuals with ULA access to specialized practitioners and to peers [52] . Recently, Hewitt et al. [53 •] discussed the ways that COVID-19 has catalyzed virtual health care for persons with limb absence. The areas cited include surgical decision-making, monitoring of wounds and peripheral vascular disease, postoperative care, prosthetic training, residual limb care, pain management, and psychosocial needs. Many times, natural disasters, wars, conflicts, and even pandemics have resulted in technological advancement and utilization. It appears that the effects of COVID-19 have had similar results. Managing the health of the person with ULA is strategic and complex. In addition to being knowledgeable about the absent limb(s), the provider must also be cognizant of the impact to other anatomy, in its current state and projected for the future over the life course. The rehabilitation team should be aware and understanding about the individual's response to the limb absence, and understanding of the psychosocial aspects that may include change in self-image and body image, acceptance of the residual limb, and feeling comfortable in society as a person with limb absence. Health providers should facilitate and reinforce good communication with the client-centered health care team, allowing the individual patient to be an active stakeholder to establish the plan of care and rehabilitation goals [54••, 55, 56, 57] . Health care practitioners cannot be expected to know everything, but collaborating with an interprofessional team will help providers to be more aware of resources, advancements, and make appropriate referrals to improve patient health, function, satisfaction, and quality of life. Physiatrist perspective on upper-limb prosthetic options: using practice guidelines to promote patient education in the selection and the prescription process Taber's Medical Dictionary. Amputation Amputee Coalition of America (ACA). Resources Amputee coalition Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities Epidemiology of limb loss Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States Upper Limb Amputations. In: Essentials of physical medicine and rehabilitation: musculoskeletal disorders, pain, and rehabilitation Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects Facts about upper and lower limb reduction defects Pediatric limb differences and amputations Home of the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion -health.gov Institute of Medicine. The national prevention council: bringing federal agencies together to build health and resilience in Americans. In: Cross-sector responses to obesity: models for change Prosthetics and patient management : a comprehensive clinical approach The benefits and challenges of interdisciplinary client-centered goals setting in rehabilitation Development of a test prosthesis: an important tool in the decision making process in providing patients with an upper limb prosthesis Team approach to prosthetic prescription decision-making Impact of limb loss in the United States Sternstein-Grodin R. Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration The psychological and social impact of disfigurement to the hand in children and adolescents The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: positive coping and minimizing feeling different Congenital upper limb deficiency: a case report Medical Director for the Amputee Program: Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston; Member of the MGH ICAN Clinic, Interdisciplinary Care Amputee Network; Director, Amputee Rehabilitation Fellowship Harvard/ Walter Reed Army Medical Center Assistant Professor Save that arm Overuse syndrome and the unilateral upper limb amputee: consequences and prevention Musculoskeletal pain and overuse syndromes in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees A survey of overuse problems in patients with acquired or congenital upper limb deficiency Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies Occupational therapy for the polytrauma casualty with limb loss Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation Upper limb loss. In: In Ways of living: intervention strategies to enable participation. American Occupational Therapy Association; 2020.(The author of this chapter describes the rehabilitation process Life care planning and case management handbook Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms Can osseointegrated prosthetic attachment revolutionise the world of prosthetics: The truth and nothing but the truth Search engines for the world wide web: simplified approach to myoelectric and electrode placement for success in clinical pattern recognition A comparison of the real-time controllability of pattern recognition to conventional myoelectric control for discrete and simultaneous movements Ipsilateral scapular cutaneous anchor. International Society of Orthotics, 13th Annual Congress Ipsilateral scapular cutaneous anchor system: an alternative for the harness in body-powered upper-limb prostheses Infinite Biomedical Technologies Perspective: the synergistic potential of embracing 3D printing American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists. The provision of 3D printed orthoses and prostheses should Ohio set to implement rules for 3D-printed prostheses [Internet]. The O&P EDGE Magazine Upper limb prosthetic outcomes measures (ULPOM): a working group and their findings Development and evaluation of the activities measure for upper limb amputees Userrelevant factors that determine choices for type of prosthesis and type of prosthesis control Innovative outcome measures for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation Improving outcomes for persons with congenital limb absences Prosthetic outcome measures for use with upper limb amputees: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature Understanding the relationship between patient-reported function and actual function int he upper limb prosthesis user population: a preliminary study Personal interview Unlimbited wellness: telehealth for individuals with upper-limb difference COVID-19: a catalyst for change in virtual health care utilization for persons with limb loss Results of an internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users A survey on activities of daily living and occupations of upper extremity amputees Demographic differences in the upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation experience. MEC20 Symposium The orthotic and prosthetic profession: a workforce demand study Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations The author acknowledges Ms. Amelia Lee, OT/S and graduate assistant at Western New England University for her assistance in the preparation of this document. The author declares no competing interests. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.