key: cord-0786550-38rycyvb authors: Forti, Lucas R.; JapyassĂș, Hilton F.; Bosch, Jaime; Szabo, Judit K. title: Ecological inheritance for a post COVID-19 world date: 2020-08-13 journal: Biodivers Conserv DOI: 10.1007/s10531-020-02036-z sha: 6c0246d1ca9d3cc4f9fb17439d774ce533145ce8 doc_id: 786550 cord_uid: 38rycyvb nan While the exact origin of is not yet known, the fact that bats and other animals can serve as a reservoir (Shereen et al. 2020) can further alienate people from wildlife. This can have negative consequences, particularly for pangolins (Neupane 2020) and bats (Fenton et al. 2020) . Shutting down the live trade of wild animals as food sources or pets may be a relief for global biodiversity, since these activities impose strong threats on certain already threatened species (Nijman 2010) . International pressure to ban or better monitor such activities might increase after this pandemic. Restrictive policies can strongly reduce, albeit temporarily, the magnitude of anthropogenic impacts, despite the minimal attention environmentalism currently receives from governments and the ever-so-decreasing financial support for research in conservation biology. While some effects of the COVID-19 outbreak are undoubtedly negative for biodiversity (e.g. postponing invasive species eradication on remote islands (Cooper 2020) and the relaxation of environmental laws in the USA and other countries), we are also experiencing a reduction in the rate and scale of local and global travel, as well as fossil fuel consumption. We have always been told that it was impossible to slow down the global machine of economic growth, but if a single virus could break down these false premises in a couple of months, it becomes clear that other options are on the table. Now we have a golden opportunity to show human society the strong link between public policies and environmental outcomes and that cultural inheritance can be changed in a way that favors biodiversity conservation. Isolation is not a novel solution in a post COVID-19 world and we think that this difficult time could drive people to adopt new habits that reduce their ecological footprint and thereby help to safeguard biodiversity (Bavel et al. 2020 ). If we are successful in communicating the benefits of these new habits, a greener economy (Agon et al. 2020 ) will eventually become a reality in an improved world. Virtual Fig. 1 The common midwife toad (Alytes obstetricans), the European amphibian most susceptible to emerging pathogens connectivity and social organization based on home office are rapidly emerging and technologies may help to recover the economy and decrease our carbon footprint. In local perspectives, while the rich countries are expecting swift economic recovery along with environmental progress and reduced impacts (Hepburn et al. 2020) , the pandemic is clearly aggravating the vulnerabilities of traditional and small populations in developing nations (ACAPS 2020), including indigenous people living in or around conservation units (Ferrante and Fearnside 2020; Hockings et al. 2020) . While some positive actions have arisen, such as food sharing and collaborative communities (Bennett et al. 2020) , in some places the lack of tourist dollars has driven local people to hunt wild animals (Conservational International 2020). While the impacts of regulated tourism are reduced in these areas, illegal hunting activities and opportunistic extractive industries potentially increase (Buckley 2020) . Therefore, the economic disparities that exacerbate environmental problems deserve more attention and policy-makers should consider the guidelines prepared by conservation scientists (Evans et al. 2020) , creating effectively and equitably managed systems (Hockings et al. 2020) . While now we should focus on saving human lives and adapt to a ''new normality'', support for environmental sciences and funding for nature conservation including habitat restoration can result in a healthier relationship between nature and society in the post COVID-19 world. This can also better prepare us humans for the inevitable reemergence of an existing zoonosis or a new, unknown disease. ACAPS report (2020) COVID-19: Impact on Yemen: Risk report Greenrecovery: Reboot & Reboost our economies for a sustainable future COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a ''Global Human Confinement Experiment'' to investigate biodiversity conservation Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response The COVID-19 Pandemic. Coastal Management, Small-Scale Fisheries and Coastal Fishing Communities Conservation implications of COVID19: Effects via tourism and extractive industries Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction Conservation International (2020) Conservation International reports increase in poaching and tropical deforestation due to Covid-19 restrictions Gough Island mouse eradication project postponed due to COVID-19 Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation Conservation in the maelstrom of Covid-19 -a call to action to solve the challenges, exploit opportunities and prepare for the next pandemic COVID-19 and threats to bats Protect Indigenous peoples from COVID-19 Zenghelis D (2020) Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress onclimate change? Covid-19 and protected and conserved areas Global view on virus infection in non-human primates and implication for public health and wildlife conservation Neupane D (2020) How conservation will be impacted in the COVID-19 pandemic An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia Avian influenza H5N1 in viverrids: implications for wildlife health and conservation COVID-19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the effects of human activity on wildlife. Nature Ecology and Evolution Scheele BC et al (2019) Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses Acknowledgements We thank the anonymous reviewers and JosĂ© de Anchieta Nunes for their comments on an early version of the manuscript. LRF is grateful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for his current post-doctoral fellowship.Author contributions LRF and JKS conceived the idea and text, all authors debated the content, HFJ and JB reviewed the text. Conflict of interest The letter represents original ideas of the authors and we have no conflict of interest to declare.Ethical statement The content of this paper was not produced by experiments with humans nor animals and all current laws were respected. The letter represents original ideas of the authors and all parties that assisted with the content have been fully acknowledged and all persons entitled to authorship have been so named.