key: cord-0799555-wyrbmbjn authors: Ali, Ahmed S; Ibrahim, Ibrahim M; Burzangi, Abdulhadi S; Ghoneim, Ragia H.; Aljohani, Hanin S; Alsamhan, Hamoud A; Barakat, Jehan title: Scoping Insight on Antiviral Drugs Against COVID-19 date: 2021-08-16 journal: Arabian journal of chemistry DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103385 sha: 9bcd4e8bef90e1157811d69bb7fd7a15e7df84fa doc_id: 799555 cord_uid: wyrbmbjn Background COVID-19 is an ongoing viral pandemic produced by SARS-CoV-2. In light of in vitro efficacy, several medications were repurposed for its management. During clinical use, many of these medications produced inconsistent results or had varying limitations. Objective The purpose of this literature review is to explain the variable efficacy or limitations of Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Remdesivir, Hydroxychloroquine, and Favipiravir in clinical settings. Method A study of the literature on the pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK), safety profile, and clinical trials through academic databases using relevant search terms. Results & Discussion The efficacy of an antiviral drug against COVID-19 is associated with its ability to achieve therapeutic concentration in the lung and intestinal tissues. This efficacy depends on the PK properties, particularly protein binding, volume of distribution, and half-life. The PK and PD of the model drugs need to be integrated to predict their limitations. Conclusion Current antiviral drugs have varying pharmacological constraints that may associate with limited efficacy, especially in severe COVID-19 patients, or safety concerns. Disclaimer What was mentioned in this paper is a scientific view and information relating to general principles which should not be construed as specific instructions to change or criticize any protocols. But rather an academic discussion to push further research and development of these drugs for better achievements. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic caused by a highly infectious respiratory virus, SARS-CoV-2. It resulted in significant human and economic losses. About 181 million cases had been confirmed as of June 29, 2021, and 3.92 million verified deaths [1] [2] [3] [4] . Drug repurposing is the process of providing new uses for currently approved drugs. Some repurposed FDA-approved drugs were subjected to in vitro testing and showed promising results against SARS-CoV-2 [5, 6] . However, clinical trials of most antiviral drugs demonstrated inconsistent results or limitations [7, 8] . Limited publications were concerned with integrating pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) parameters to predict their efficacy in clinical settings [9, 10] . For an antiviral drug to be effective in treating COVID-19, it must achieve sufficient concentrations that suppress viral replication in multiple sites, primarily the cells of the upper and lower respiratory tract [11] . Wang; et al. suggested antiviral drugs, which showed activity against the virus in vitro and have high lung distributions, might benefit COVID-19 patients by reducing viral load (Table 1) . The low concentration of unbound lopinavir (LPV) in the lung tissues limits its efficacy in COVID-19 patients [12] . The present review aims to provide a deeper understanding of the reasons behind variable efficacy or limitations of some antiviral drugs through the integration of their PK/PD and safety profiles. Four drugs were selected: Remdesivir (RDV), Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and Favipiravir (FPV). RDV (Veklury) is a broad-spectrum antiviral drug RNA polymerase inhibitor (Fig 1) . It was initially developed in the United States to treat hepatitis C, but it was directed toward Ebola viral infection treatment. It is currently the first FDA approved antiviral drug against COVID- 19 . Only intravenous injection formulation is available, which needs patients to be hospitalized for administration. It is a prodrug that is expected to enable better intracellular delivery of an adenosine analog (GS-441524) monophosphate, which is then biotransformed into the active triphosphate intracellular metabolite (GS-443902) (Fig 2) [14] [15] [16] . RDV is an adenosine analog prodrug; within the cells, it is transformed into its active triphosphate metabolite that competes endogenous adenosine triphosphate to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) ultimately inhibiting viral replication [17] . Studies in VeroE6 cells demonstrated selectivity and high potency against SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated by its IC 50 of 0.77 µM and an IC 90 of 1.760 µM [18] . However, a higher IC 50 value of 23.15 µM was reported [19] . In monkeys, RDV demonstrated widespread tissue distribution and transformation into the final active metabolite (GS-443902) in both peripheral blood mononuclear cells and respiratory tissues [20] . Animal PK studies revealed that renal and biliary excretion were the primary routes of elimination [21] . PK parameters of RDV and its major metabolite in humans are summarized in Tabel.2 [17, [22] [23] [24] . RDV should be given by slow IV infusion, over 60 min. At the end of the infusion, peak concentration of RDV in the blood was reached; however, disappeared after 1 hr. due to its rapid metabolism and distribution [26] . RDV has a high ability to bind to plasma proteins (88-93.6% bound). In contrast, the plasm protein binding of GS-441524 is as low as 2%. RDV is extensively metabolized in the liver and blood. The nucleoside metabolite GS-441524 is mainly excreted in the urine and most of the dose recovered in urine was as GS-441524 (48.6%) and about 10% of the RDV dose was recovered in the urine unchanged. The intracellular activation of RDV was assumed to involve several steps that end up by forming the final active nucleoside triphosphate (GS-443902) (Fig 2) . In vivo bioactivation pathway of RDV [27] In the presence of serum enzymes, the phosphate prodrugs are hydrolyzed prematurely to the nucleoside. GS-441524, which after access to the cells activated to the triphosphate. Other pathway (not shown) involves access of RDV into the cells, its metabolism to GS-441524 monophosphate, then to GS-441524 triphosphate. The following data (Fig 3) were based on RDV PK study in two severe COVID-19 patients, one of them has moderate renal dysfunction. On the first day, RDV was given as 200 mg loading dose then 100 mg daily. On days 3 through 9, blood samples were taken (after the end of IV infusion) immediately (C 0 ), 1hr. (C 1 ), and 24 hr. (C 24 ). RDV serum concentration reached a peak (C 0 ), then began to decline to almost undetectable after 1 hr. In contrast, the plasma concentrations of the metabolite GS-441524 peaked at C 1 and remained measurable until the next dose. (Left RDV, Right GS-441524. Patient 1: with renal impairment. Patient 2: normal renal function. Data are shown as mean ± SD; at 3-9 days after RDV initiation from [28] . Some early reports and meta-analyses suggested that RDV is not sufficient on its own for the management of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients [29] [30] [31] . Later several meta-analyses suggested favorable benefit-risk profiles for RDV compared with placebo effects [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] . A recent metaanalysis concluded that RDV attenuates disease progression, leading to lower odds of MV/ECMO and greater odds of hospital discharge for COVID-19 patients. However, RDV does not affect the odds of mortality [38] . On the other hand, the WHO Solidarity Trial, which included 11,330 in-patients with COVID-19 who were randomized to receive HCQ (n=954), LPV (n=1411), RDV (n=2750), interferon regimens (n=2063), or none of these drugs (n=4088), found that all these investigated drugs had little to no effect on overall mortality [39] . However, RDV becomes the 1 st FDA approved drug for the management of COVID-19 [40] . Many adverse effects were reported for RDV during COVID-19 clinical trials, severe bradycardia being of particular concern, which is consistent with RDV's PD properties, [41], changes in ECG, anaphylaxis, infusion-related reactions, nephrotoxicity, and hepatic toxicity [42] . The oral bioavailability of GS-441524 in beagle dogs was investigated, and it was discovered that plasma concentrations up to 24-fold greater than the EC 50 against SARS-CoV-2 could be maintained readily and safely. These findings support the development of GS-441524 as an oral COVID-19 treatment [43] . Furthermore, GS-441524 effectively inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection in mouse models [44] . RDV (EC 50 = 0.47-1.09 M), according to cell-based research [45] . Moreover, there is evidence of fast metabolism of RDV in the blood into the parent molecule, nucleoside analog GS-441524. Moreover, the enzymes required for RDV metabolism and activation were more expressed in liver and kidney cells than in type ll pneumocytes in the lungs. Given these emerging data, it seemed logical to speculate that the anti-COVID-19 effect of RDV in vivo is mainly mediated through its parent compound GS-441524. Yan and Muller concluded that GS-441524 is thought to be superior to RDV in the management of COVID-19. In addition, GS-441524 has a simplified synthesis method, easier to formulate as IV or inhalation [27] . Moreover, RDV solution contains 6% sulfobutylated beta-cyclodextrin, which is likely to accumulate in patients with severe renal impairment [17] . LPV is an antiretroviral protease inhibitor (Fig 4) indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infection and has been repurposed to manage COVID-19. It is available as a fixed combination with ritonavir, a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450-3A4, which allows LPV to be effective orally [46, 47] . LPV has been found to inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication by binding to viral main protease 3C-like protease (3CLpro) with an EC 50 of 16.7 µg/ml; however, other values have been reported [48] . When administered alone, LPV has a low oral bioavailability of 25%; therefore, it is only given in combination with ritonavir, which increases its bioavailability by slowing its metabolism allowing therapeutic LPV concentrations to be obtained. After oral dosing, the maximal plasma LPV is 98% bound to plasma proteins. Both alpha-1-acid glycoprotein and albumin are involved. LPV is mainly metabolized by hepatic CYP3A isozymes. Biotransformation is reduced and plasma levels of the active antiviral drug are enhanced when concomitantly taken with ritonavir, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A enzymes [49] . A meta-analysis concluded no significant advantage of LPV/r in alleviating symptoms of COVID-19 [50] . Moreover, the WHO published results from the Solidarity Trial showed that LPV was not significantly different from control in reducing mortality or hospitalization. At a dose of LPV/r 400 /100 mg twice orally, the steady-state peak (4 hr. post-dose) and trough (before next dose) LPV concentration was about 18 μg/mL. Recall that its free level (unbound) was only about 1% (protein binding > 98%). Thus, the therapeutic free drug level (active form) is not achievable (Fig 5) . Another critical limitation is that ritonavir, a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450-3A4 is given in combination with LPV; therefore, a long list of interactions with other medications must be considered in COVID-19 patients [52] . FPV (T-705) is a modified pyrazine analogue (Fig 4) . It is a broad-spectrum antiviral RdRp inhibitor. It was developed in Japan and approved by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) to treat influenza. Also, it has been included in COVID-19 treatment guidelines in many countries [54, 55] . FPV is a modified nucleoside analog that targets RdRp enzymes. It is a prodrug that undergoes intracellular activation to favipiravir-ribofuranosyl-5'-triphosphate (T-705-RTP) that binds to and inhibits RdRp, consequently inhibiting viral transcription and replication [56] . Wang, et al. reported low potency against SARS-CoV-2 (EC 50 61.88 µM) [57] . However, other in vitro studies showed different EC 50 values. The drug is administered orally with a bioavailability of about 97%. FPV has non-linear PK demonstrated as a decrease in drug concentration after chronic administration. This may be explained by the auto-induction of certain CYP450 enzymes responsible for its metabolism [58] . Moreover, there is an ethnic variation in FPV's disposition [59, 60] . FPV accelerates viral clearance by seven days and contributes to clinical improvement in about fourteen days. Particularly in patients with mild to moderate disease [61] [62] [63] . FVP treatment results in considerable clinical and radiological improvements compared to standard care, with no significant differences in viral clearance, need for oxygen, or side effect profiles. A study reported favorable outcomes when compared with umifenovir or LPV/r [64] . A randomized controlled trial in non-severe COVID-19 patients demonstrated that on day 7, FPV provided a better clinical recovery rate and was more effective than umifenovir in alleviating fever and cough. FPV is still under evaluation. Its PK/PD profile suggests potential effectiveness, at least, in mild and moderate cases of COVID-19. However, a PK study in critically ill COVID-19 patients who received the recommended dose of FPV demonstrated a low trough level (1 µg/mL) [65] . Recall low potency against SARS-CoV-2 with EC 50 61.88 µM [57] . The lung-to-tissue level of FPV was estimated to be about 50% of that in the blood. These PK data suggest moderate drug access to lung tissues [66] . The drug did not show life-threatening adverse effects in clinical trials, but it has some adverse effects including a rise in serum uric acid, liver enzymes, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and tachycardia [64] . FPV may be teratogenic and has a long list of potential drug-drug interactions [Drug67]. HCQ is a 4-aminoquinoline derivative of chloroquine (CQ) (Fig 4) [68] . It is a low-cost drug that has been used to prevent and treat malaria and manage rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and porphyria, among other conditions. [69] [70] [71] . It is usually taken orally as HCQ sulfate. The drug received extensive interest and debate due to its potential activity against COVID-19 [72] . Many African countries have already approved the use of HCQ or CQ to treat COVID-19 at the national level [73] . In vitro studies showed that HCQ is more potent than CQ against SARS-CoV-2 (EC 50 of 0.72 μM for HCQ and 5.47 μM for CQ). As a result, HCQ was one of the earliest drugs to be tested against COVID-19. Regardless of the antiviral activity, HCQ has immunomodulatory effects [74, 75] , which provided the basis of their utility to prevent cytokine release syndrome (CRS) [76] . Interestingly, HCQ has been suggested as a valuable drug for prophylaxis against lung thrombosis [77] . Absorption of HCQ after oral administration is good but extensively variable (~70%; range: 25 to 100%). HCQ is considered a lysosomotropic drug that accumulates intracellularly at concentrations up to 1000-fold higher than the extracellular concentration. The rise in endosomal pH mediated by HCQ blocks virus/cell fusion. The elevated Golgi apparatus pH impairs the terminal glycosylation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and reduces its binding affinities to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [78, 79] . This accumulation in lysosomes is likely to explain the considerable very high volume of distribution of HCQ (Vd = 70 L/kg). The lung/plasma ratio of HCQ was suggested to be high, at least 50. HCQ has a long elimination halflife of about 40 to 50 days. These PK/PD characteristics explain the potential efficacy of HCQ against the novel virus [80, 81] . HCQ is metabolized in the liver through CYP 2C3, 2D6, 2C8, 3A4, and 3A5 into active and inactive metabolites. Therefore, the genetic polymorphism of these enzymes would affect its blood level. About 20% of HCQ dose is excreted in urine as unchanged drugs; hence renal function is likely to affect its clearance [82] . HCQ has a narrow therapeutic range and moderate protein binding (about 50%), primarily with albumin [83] . According to a systemic review, HCQ was found beneficial in hospitalized COVID-19 patients when given early in the outpatient setting. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19, has not caused disease deterioration, and is well tolerated [91] In contrast, the WHO published the Solidarity Trial results showing that HCQ was not significantly different from control in reducing mortality or hospitalization [92] . This was in line with RECOVERY trial that concluded: "there is no benefit of using HCQ in COVID-19 patients" [93] . An in vitro study suggested that HCQ suppresses trained immunity, which is may be counterproductive to the antiviral innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 [94] . Lung acidosis that can be induced by severe COVID-19 is likely to reduce access of the weakly basic drug to lung tissues [95] . Hence, HCQ has marked reduction in cellular uptake in severely ill patients [96] . Consequently, Ali et al. suggested that HCQ is not likely to provide a potent antiviral effect in severe cases of COVID-19. If indicated, it should be given as early as possible to optimize its use [97] . Another limitation of HCQ is potential QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmia. Unfortunately, there has been no dose-response relationship study to accurately predict the association of HCQ drug level with cardiac toxicities [93, 98, 99] . Moreover, the drug showed extreme variability in drug levels in COVID-19 patients, as shown in figure 6 . To ensure optimal use of medications in management of a disease; the integration of their PK/PD and side effects should be extended to include other variables such as genetic, chronic diseases, drug interactions, immunological status etc. A complex disease-drug-drug interaction is expected in severe COVID-19 [101] . Pathophysiological changes induced by severe COVID-19 include, hyperinflammation, severe hypoxia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), encephalopathy, myocardial injury, heart failure, coagulation dysfunction and acute kidney injury [102] are likely to affect drug transporters, and its PK [103] . For example, COVID-19 induced hypoxia and inflammation can reduce the intracellular transport of RDV main metabolite GS-441524 and its activation to GS-441524 monophosphate [104] . COVID-19 associated complications also predispose the patients for drug induced toxicities [105] . For example, hypokalemia predisposes the patient to tachyarrhythmias, the cytokine storm is also known to prolong QT intervals [106] . This may explain the higher incidence of cardiac toxicity of antiviral drugs such as HCQ. Pharmacotherapy of COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing comorbidities, especially elderly, is highly challenging due to the use of multiple medications with great potential for drugdrug interactions [107] [108] [109] [110] . The PK properties (e.g., induction or inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes, competition in renal elimination) as well as the PD properties (e.g., QT prolongation) are largely responsible for such drug-drug interactions. In addition to these interactions, COVID-19 patients have a significant pathophysiological changes, which can alter the PK of the medications (e.g., downregulation of CYP isoenzymes, organ failure, modification of plasma protein binding) [111, 112] . Dosing of drugs used to treat COVID-19 in patients with renal or hepatic impairment requires great attention. Fortunately guidelines for dose adjustment and precautions are available in the drug monograph and some publications [113] . For example, RDV should only be used in adults and children with an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min if the possible benefit justifies the potential danger [114] . Based on the genetics of COVID-19 patients, pharmacogenetics could explain the interindividual variability in medication response. Variants in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes, transporters, or receptors have been identified, and they may provide the information needed to develop a tailored therapy that optimize the use of pharmacotherapy for COVID-19 [115] [116] [117] . Using a nebulizer with an inhaled nanoparticle formulation to deliver medications directly to the primary site of infection may allow for more targeted and accessible delivery in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients, as well as potentially decrease systemic exposure to the drug. Inhaled nanoformulations of RDV is under development [118] [119] [120] . Inhaled HCQ is also under investigation and showing promising results [121] [122] [123] [124] . To our knowledge, no other medications have been studied for inhalable formulation. Table 4 In vivo bioactivation pathway of RDV [27] In the presence of serum enzymes, the phosphate prodrugs are hydrolyzed prematurely to the nucleoside. GS-441524, which after access to the cells activated to the triphosphate. Other pathway (not shown) involves, access of RDV into the cells, its metabolism to GS-441524 monophosphate, then to GS-441524 triphosphate. After thorough revision of the manuscript, the authors modified the abstract and the conclusion, accordingly; added some new information; and added some figures for better illustration of the content. All changes are highlighted (yellow) in the revised text. Here is a point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments and concerns. Comment 1: There are a lot of punctuation mistakes in the manuscript. For example, the semicolon must be used between remdesivir and lopinavir in Keywords part. And the full stop should not use in the manuscript title. "and Methods" in Abstract part must be written as bold. These mistakes should be corrected. Response: Thanks for pointing these out. I have revised and corrected all spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewer. Response: We revised the manuscript and made the necessary changes. Fig. 4, Fig. 4 and subtitle were written different font. Response: Thanks for pointing this out. We revisited all the figures and addressed the reviewer's comments and concerns. We the undersigned declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before and isnot currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) COVID-19 Outbreak: An Overview COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention. Science of the Total Environment Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine In vitro screening of a FDA approved chemical library reveals potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication Old drugs for a new virus: repurposed approaches for combating COVID-19. ACS infectious diseases Systematic and Statistical Review of Coronavirus Disease 19 Treatment Trials. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine Clinical efficacy of antivirals against novel coronavirus (COVID-19): A review Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Antiviral Agents Used to Treat SARS-CoV-2 and Their Potential Interaction with Drugs and Other Supportive Measures: A Comprehensive Review by the PK/PD of Anti-Infectives Study Group of the European Society of Antimicrobial Agents Prioritization of anti-SARS-Cov-2 drug repurposing opportunities based on plasma and target site concentrations derived from their established human pharmacokinetics Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerging microbes & infections Lung tissue distribution of drugs as a key factor for COVID-19 treatment Tissue distributions of antiviral drugs affect their capabilities of reducing viral loads in COVID-19 treatment Remdesivir: a review of its discovery and development leading to emergency use authorization for treatment of COVID-19 Current knowledge about the antivirals remdesivir (GS-5734) and GS-441524 as therapeutic options for coronaviruses. One Health Remdesivir: review of pharmacology, pre-clinical data, and emerging clinical experience for COVID-19 Drug information Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Patients Infected with 2019-New Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): A Review and Perspective Remdesivir, lopinavir, emetine, and homoharringtonine inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro ADME and Pharmacokinetic Properties of Remdesivir: Its Drug Interaction Potential The journey of remdesivir: from Ebola to COVID-19 The antiviral compound remdesivir potently inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Remdesivir in COVID-19: A critical review of pharmacology, preclinical and clinical studies Arguments in favour of remdesivir for treating SARS-CoV-2 infections Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19 Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Drug-Interaction Profile of Remdesivir, a SARS-CoV-2 Replication Inhibitor Advantages of the parent nucleoside GS-441524 over remdesivir for Covid-19 treatment. ACS medicinal chemistry letters Pharmacokinetics of remdesivir and GS-441524 in two critically ill patients who recovered from COVID-19 Remdesivir use in patients with coronavirus COVID-19 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese Lancet trial with the NIH trial Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis Use of Remdesivir in the Management of COVID-19: A Systematic Review on Current Evidences Remdesivir in Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Benefit-Risk Assessment Remdesivir: A potential game-changer or just a myth? A systematic review and meta-analysis Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the Literature Clinical efficacy and safety of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Remdesivir and its antiviral activity against COVID-19: A systematic review Mortality Benefit of Remdesivir in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Remdesivir therapy in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Repurposed antiviral drugs for COVID-19-interim WHO SOLIDARITY trial results Serious bradycardia and remdesivir for coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19): a new safety concerns. Clinical Microbiology and Infection Remdesivir might induce changes in electrocardiogram beyond bradycardia in patients with coronavirus disease 2019-The pilot study Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered GS-441524 in Dogs. bioRxiv Remdesivir Metabolite GS-441524 Effectively Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Mouse Models Remdesivir inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in human lung cells and chimeric SARS-CoV expressing the SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase in mice FDA approved drugs with pharmacotherapeutic potential for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) therapy Favipiravir (T-705), a broad spectrum inhibitor of viral RNA polymerase Lopinavir/ritonavir for the treatment of SARS, MERS and COVID-19: a systematic review Lopinvair 2021 Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. medRxiv Prediction of lopinavir/ritonavir effectiveness in COVID-19 patients: a recall of basic pharmacology concepts Pharmacologic treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review Lopinavir pharmacokinetics in COVID-19 patients Clinical efficacy and safety of favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19 patients Experimental treatment with favipiravir for COVID-19: an open-label control study. Engineering Role of favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19 Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro Ebola virus infection: review of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs considered for testing in human efficacy trials Influenza virus polymerase inhibitors in clinical development Favipiravir pharmacokinetics in Ebola-Infected patients of the JIKI trial reveals concentrations lower than targeted Favipiravir: A new and emerging antiviral option in COVID-19 Favipiravir versus Arbidol for COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. medRxiv Favipiravir for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC infectious diseases Favipiravir Use in COVID-19: Analysis of Suspected Adverse Drug Events Reported in the WHO Database. Infection and drug resistance Safety and effectiveness of favipiravir for novel coronavirus (COVID-19): a rapid review of available evidence Pharmacokinetics of Favipiravir in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Clinical and translational science Favipiravir 2020 Hyroxychloroquine 2021 Hydroxychloroquine in prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism following hip arthroplasty Pharmacology of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine In Search for the Truth about Hydroxychloroquine Prophylaxis of Covid-19 Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19: A fiction, hope or hype? An updated review. Therapeutics and clinical risk management Off-Label Use of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 Treatment in Anti-malarial and cytokine-modulating effects of andrographolide in a murine model of malarial infection Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology Hydroxychloroquine: an update The effect of hydroxychloroquine on thrombosis prevention and antiphospholipid antibody levels in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: a pilot open label randomized prospective study Targeting endosomal acidification by chloroquine analogs as a promising strategy for the treatment of emerging viral diseases Improving the efficacy of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-2 may require Zinc additives -A better synergy for future COVID-19 clinical trials Excessive lysosomal ion-trapping of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin Immune asynchrony in COVID-19 pathogenesis and potential immunotherapies Fact sheet for health care providers emergency use authorization (EUA) of hydroxychloroquine sulfate supplied from the strategic national stockpile for treatment of Covid-19 in certain hospitalized patients Pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine during treatment of rheumatic diseases Early treatment of COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: A retrospective analysis of 1061 cases in Marseille, France. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clinical infectious diseases Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial Comparing the impact of Hydroxychloroquine based regimens and standard treatment on COVID-19 patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study Aminoquinolines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies Virological and clinical cure in COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine: A systematic review and meta-analysis Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for Covid-19 -Interim WHO Solidarity Trial Results Lopinavir-ritonavir in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. The Lancet Hydroxychloroquine Inhibits the trained innate immune response to interferons The Influence of Virus Infection on the Extracellular pH of the Host Cell Detected on Cell Membrane Kinetic modelling of the response of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine and its experimental testing in vitro: implications for mechanism of action of and resistance to the drug Optimizing the Use of Hydroxychloroquine in the Management of COVID-19 Given Its Pharmacological Profile COVID-19 and (hydroxy)chloroquine-azithromycin combination: Should we take the risk for our patients? Safety considerations with chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection Hydroxychloroquine pharmacokinetic in COVID-19 critically ill patients: an observational cohort study. Intensive care medicine Disease-drug and drug-drug interaction in COVID-19: risk and assessment A systematic review of pathological findings in COVID-19: a pathophysiological timeline and possible mechanisms of disease progression Potential effects of COVID-19 on cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism and disposition in infected patients Cellular Uptake and Intracellular Phosphorylation of GS-441524: Implications for Its Effectiveness against COVID-19. Viruses Pathophysiological mechanisms of liver injury in COVID-19 Cardiac arrhythmias in COVID-19 infection. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Potential Drug Interactions of Repurposed COVID-19 Drugs with Lung Cancer Pharmacotherapies Drug interactions: a review of the unseen danger of experimental COVID-19 therapies Potential drug-drug interactions associated with drugs currently proposed for COVID-19 treatment in patients receiving other treatments Drug-drug interactions with candidate medications used for COVID-19 treatment: An overview Impact of infectious and inflammatory disease on cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics Immune activation mediated change in alpha-1-acid glycoprotein: impact on total and free lopinavir plasma exposure. The journal of clinical pharmacology Recommendations for dosing of repurposed COVID-19 medications in patients with renal and hepatic impairment Remdesivir in patients with acute or chronic kidney disease and COVID-19 Pharmacogenomics of COVID-19 therapies Repurposing drugs for COVID-19: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine Important Pharmacogenetic Information for Drugs Prescribed During the SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19) In vivo pharmacokinetic study of remdesivir dry powder for inhalation in hamsters Remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19: combination of pulmonary and IV administration may offer aditional benefit. The AAPS journal Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Nanoparticle Formulation of Remdesivir (GS-5734) and NA-831 Inhalable Hydroxychloroquine Powders for Potential Treatment of COVID-19 Inhaled hydroxychloroquine to improve efficacy and reduce harm in the treatment of COVID-19 Hydroxychloroquine as an aerosol might markedly reduce and even prevent severe clinical symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection A Strategy to Treat COVID-19 Disease With Targeted Delivery of Inhalable Liposomal Hydroxychloroquine: A Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Study Does lopinavir really inhibit SARS-CoV-2? Pharmacological Research Favipiravir antiviral efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in a hamster model Antimalarial drugs inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2: An in vitro evaluation Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases. The Lancet infectious diseases Subheadings in the manuscript must be written bold such as "Mechanism of Action Response: Thanks for your comment. We revised the subheadings in the manuscript and made sure they are written bold In Safety Concern part, why is "anaphylaxis and infusion-related reactions" written in italics, I could not understand Response: Thanks for pointing this out. Probably it was done by mistake Comment 10: In Abstract part and in the title of the manuscript, it was written that one of the drugs to be mentioned is lopinavir. However, lopinavir/ritonavir combination was discussed in the manuscript. Similarly, it was written that hydroxychloroquine was one of the drugs to be considered. However, it was given information about hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in the manuscript so there is incompatibility, and the title of this manuscript is not consistent with the manuscript content Comment 11: I could not understand that some words were underlined (on page 11 line 45, 49, 52, 53), and some words were written as bold Probably this was done to highlight some points during revision. We revised the manuscript and corrected the formatting. Comment 12: References should be written for Fig There are no volume, issue, and page numbers in some references for example We explored the issue and added missing volume, issue, and page numbers. However, for #40, StatPearls is an online library that publishes peer-reviewed PubMed indexed articles; for #42 and #44, the articles were published in an online library as well. Comment 14: Sometimes long names of journal were written, sometimes abbreviations for journal names were used Sometimes the first letter of journal name was written as capital, sometimes it was written as lowercase Similarly, sometimes the first letter of article names was written as capital, sometimes it was written as lowercase. The correction is needed here We revised the references and made the corrections and changes as per the reviewer's comments. -Journal names are consistently in long form Comment 18: It has been found that reference 37 and 38 are the same. Response: Thanks for your comment. We checked the references and duplicates are removed. Comment 19: Reference 59 was not written clearly and suitably, and this reference contains wrong words such as Response: Thanks for pointing this out. The reference (now #67) has been revised and fixed as per the reviewer's comment We look forward to hearing from you in due time regarding our submission and to respond to any further questions and comments you may have Non of the authors has a conflict of interest Journal : Arabian J of Chemistry Manuscript : Scoping Insight On Four Antiviral Drugs Against COVID-19 Given Their Pharmacological Profile The authors acknowledge Miss Asmaa A. Ali, 6th year medical students at Ibn Sina National college for medical studies for designing the figures of this manuscript.Hydroxychloroquine [127] We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that thereare no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process. He/she is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions ofrevisions and final approval of proofs Signed by all authors as follows: Ahmed S. Ali Date 26/ 5/ 2021 Ibrahim M Ibrahim 26-5-2021