key: cord-0806645-05pevgw1 authors: Masamoto, Yosuke; Shimura, Arika; Kurokawa, Mineo title: Reduced bendamustine for elderly patients with follicular lymphoma date: 2021-06-21 journal: Ann Hematol DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04576-y sha: 4eef85bab74775ab8f93f4626aa3a3a250af6ab1 doc_id: 806645 cord_uid: 05pevgw1 nan As the outcome of follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, has been improved since the introduction of immunochemotherapy, non-lymphoma-related causes of death, including infections, have become increasingly important [1, 2] . Bendamustine is widely used as one of the key drugs of the standard therapy, and characterized by long-term lymphocytopenia as a frequent adverse event, rendering the patients especially vulnerable to various infections [2, 3] . During a pandemic of COVID-19, the use of bendamustine is not generally recommended due to its highly immunosuppressive property [4, 5] . However, it would be a serious matter that we cannot use one of the most potent therapeutic agents, while the mild epidemic is expected to continue for a long time. To mitigate the immunosuppression, we have reduced the dose of bendamustine to 2/3 for patients > 69 years old when we use obinutuzumab-bendamustine, one of the most potent therapy against both untreated and relapsed FL [2, 6] . In this study, we aimed to clarify the short-term outcome and toxicities of the reduced bendamustine. We retrospectively analyzed the elecronic records of 18 untreated and 17 relapsed FL patients consecutively started on obinutuzumab-bendamustine at the Department of Hematology & Oncology, the University of Tokyo Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020, with initial lymphocyte counts of more than 500/μL. The baseline characteristics, frequency of adverse effects, and responses are summarized in Table 1 . Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between full-and reduced-dose groups except for age. Most patients underwent bendamustine treatment without dose reduction from the original plan. The frequency of grade ≥ 3 non-hematological and grade 4 hematological adverse effects except lymphocytopenia did not differ (Table 1 ). The reduced-dose group experienced milder lymphocytopenia, as to lowest lymphocyte count (130 ± 70 vs 230 ± 90/μL, p < 0.001), while the difference in duration of grade ≥ 3 lymphocytopenia was marginal (median 5.9 vs 2.0 months, p = 0.183, Gray's test) (Table 1) . Objective response rate and progression-free survival were not different (Table 1) . There was no death in both groups (data not shown). Compared to conventional cytotoxic therapy, little clinical data support the association of dose intensity of bendamustine with the patient outcome as well as toxicities [7] [8] [9] . Considering the lack of evidence, treatment decisions whether to use bendamustine and at what dose are difficult since bendamustine is associated with higher mortality in the case of COVID-19, despite its high efficacy [4] . Elderly patients in our cohort showed promising outcomes with a similar rate of toxicities except for lymphocytopenia. Our study had some limitations, in addition to the retrospective nature. A relatively small number of patients with shortterm observation periods were included. Our cohorts contain heterogeneous populations including newly diagnosed and relapsed patients, while the profile of response and adverse events was not different (data not shown). However, considering a dearth of evidence regarding optimal dose intensity for different populations, reduced bendamustine can be an attractive option for vulnerable patients, especially under a special condition where immunosuppression should be avoided to the maximum. Ethical approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were following the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Obinutuzumab for the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma Bendamustine plus rituximab versus CHOP plus rituximab as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority trial Determinants of outcome in Covid-19 hospitalized patients with lymphoma: a retrospective multicentric cohort study Considerations for managing patients with hematologic malignancy during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Seattle strategy Obinutuzumab plus bendamustine versus bendamustine monotherapy in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (GADOLIN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial Bendamustine and rituximab combination is safe and effective as salvage regimen in Waldenström macroglobulinemia Retrospective analysis of bendamustine and rituximab use in indolent and mantle cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on initial starting dose Clinical impact of bendamustine exposure on lymphocytopenia risk after bendamustine and rituximab combination therapy for follicular lymphoma: a single-institute retrospective study