key: cord-0850904-uk75bfna
authors: Garcia, Ana Cristina; Beja, André; Cupertino de Barros, Fernando Passos; Delgado, António Pedro; Ferrinho, Paulo
title: The Covid‐19 pandemic reinforces the need for sustainable health planning
date: 2021-11-25
journal: Int J Health Plann Manage
DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3389
sha: 26dfa9c4165cda47048ec2affc2c0d7965bb9bcf
doc_id: 850904
cord_uid: uk75bfna

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development highlighted the growing attention to the adequacy of health planning models to sustainable development. A re‐reading of the results of a round table debate on “sustainable planning”, which took place at the 5th National Congress of Tropical Medicine (Portugal, 2019) under a participant observation strategy, framed by the findings of a “synthesis of better evidence” literature review and cross–referenced with the reflections of different authors and experts about the momentum created by the COVID–19 pandemic, underlined the challenges to sustainable health planning that have emerged and are projected beyond the current pandemic context. Variable perceptions of the term “sustainable health development”, leading to the potential loss of their relevance in guiding the elaboration of policies and strategic plans, and the potential higher effectiveness of the participatory approaches of health planning in achieving sustainable health were highlighted in the debate and literature, in general and in public health emergency contexts. Those results gained new relevance during the current COVID–19 pandemic, bringing back to the forefront a reflection of the inadequate planning framework that has usually been used to understand and respond to global health challenges, despite the already existing experience, evidence and support instruments.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 1 reinforced the growing attention of countries and health systems to the adequacy of planning models to sustainable development. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] As a joint global action initiative, it commits countries to decide how best to integrate the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and their 169 targets in the planning processes, policies and strategies, 1 continuing the importance attached to planning by successive global action plans since 1987 as a useful process for the implementation of sustainability strategies. [7] [8] [9] [10] In general, and in the current pandemic context, recognising the central role of health in achieving sustainable development poses specific challenges to health planning, 8,11,12 which have been addressed in different ways by countries and multilateral health agencies. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] The current pandemic COVID-19 has rekindled the debates about the development of a health planning model within the framework of the SDGs, 12 providing new opportunities to revisit previous reflections and research results on the topic. In this sense, we propose a re-reading of the results of a round table debate on 'sustainable planning', which took place at the 5th National Congress of Tropical Medicine (5NCTM) (Portugal, Lisbon, April 2019) under a participant observation strategy, gathering about 80 participants from different countries, framed by the findings of a 'synthesis of better evidence' literature review 13 and cross-referenced with the reflections of different authors and experts about the momentum created by the COVID-19 pandemic.

This approach reiterated the challenges for sustainable health planning showing not only its timeliness but also its projection beyond the current pandemic context.

The variability of concepts to define 'planning for sustainable health', the need for citizen participation in these processes and the imperative of intersectoral articulation, as particularly relevant components of a sustainable health planning framework, were three of the main themes that emerged during the 5NCTM round table debate. In the literature consulted they were also highlighted.

Only a minority of participants in the debate framed the term 'planning for sustainable health' as planning that contributes to the achievement of the SDGs, highlighting allusions such as: planning 'based on the balance of the three pillars of sustainable development: environment, society and economy', or 'that responds to needs without ecological damage and without compromising future generations'. Other perceptions were suggested by expressions such as: planning 'that guarantees the continuity of the planning cycle' or 'that ensures implementation'. This variability GARCIA e t al. 644

COVID-19, health planning, health policy, pandemic, sustainable health Highlights • The path to sustainable development needs appropriate health planning models • COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragilities of the strategic planning frameworks

• Sustainable health planning approaches demand social and community mobilisation • Equity in health must integrate the planning models for sustainable development is consistent with the lack of consensus regarding the perception of the concepts of 'sustainable' and 'sustainability' described in the literature consulted, contributing, as a consequence, to the potential loss of relevance of the concept of 'sustainable health development' in guiding the elaboration of policies, strategic plans and in the implementation of coherent strategies. 14 Whenever used in fields that require its rigorous operationalisation, the clear definition of those terms is recommended. 14, 15 Participatory approaches to health planning, integrating both citizen participation and intersectoral articulation, with a particular focus on reducing health inequities and achieving universal coverage, were considered most effective in achieving health and well-being objectives in line with the principles of sustainable health development, both at the debate and in the literature consulted. [4] [5] [6] The participation of citizens in all stages of the planning process and the advantages of its precocity were underlined, considering, in the debate, that the involvement of people and communities is 'the most effective way of adjusting solutions to the intersectoral needs of society and the population'. The consulted literature reinforces that the early involvement of citizens and civil society increases the potential for all sectors to adhere to the resolution of health problems, in general and in public health emergency contexts. [16] [17] [18] The discussion about the procedural and methodological characteristics of sustainable health planning that emerged during the round table gained new relevance throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. 19 The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic context brought back to the forefront of the health planning debate significant issues related to sustainable health already identified in non-pandemic contexts and in past pandemics. 20 Past pledges of sustaining the lessons from previous outbreaks and be better prepared for future ones did not materialise. We are once again discussing and trying to cope with predictable challenges, previously identified -such as health systems fragility and lack of resilience, inadequate surge capacities, and poor communication. This is as much a moral failure 19 as well as a reflection of the inadequate planning framework used to understand and respond to global health challenges, demonstrating the lack of preparedness for globally catastrophic risks. 21 It also identifies that the lack of capacity for impactful governance and consequent planning for sustainable health development is not limited to low and middle-income countries but widespread at all levels of development. This highlights the inability of ministries of health (MoH) to extend their leadership beyond narrow sectoral boundaries, to the pluralistic and multisectoral milieus where health determinants are embedded, to correspond to the expectations created by the SDG. It also reflects the incapacity of MoH to predict and be prepared for emergent and future challenges while continuing to manage public services and institutions. 22 The pandemic is affecting communities, populations, and countries throughout the world, interacting synergistically with already existing endemic infectious and non-communicable diseases, hence deeply influencing health outcomes. Additionally, it has a synergistic effect also with socio-economic, cultural, and contextual determinants of health which seem to contribute to poorer health and accumulating social disadvantages. Hence, we argue that the SARS-CoV-2 disease is of a syndemic nature and that the failure to acknowledge this contributes to weakened policy-making processes and public health responses and ineffective health policies, plans and programs. 23 What is observed currently is an inappropriate framework for health policy development and planning, reflecting a biomedical bias, the 'curse of piecemeal perspectives' and 'siloed frameworks' adopted, [24] [25] [26] which preclude planning for sustainable health. Acknowledging the syndemic nature of the pandemic implies the recognition of the need for a more holistic approach, integrating other conceptual frameworks such as 'one health' or 'health in all policies', and assuming the SDGs agenda in the solutions adopted. 12, [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] On the other hand, there are instruments for translating the SDG into relevant issues of sustainable health planning, namely the Gap Frame Model by Katrin Muff and collaborators. [33] [34] [35] [36] A second instrument -materiality analysis -is a specific analytical technique that allows prioritising 'material' topics and themes and supports the mobilisation of different actors from diverse sectors to gather perceptions about the relative importance of environmental, social, economic and governance issues. [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] The OECD Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development (CSDP) analytical framework and its integrated checklist, 43 with contributions from the models by Nunes et al. 44 and Costanza et al. 45 represent a third instrument. Finally, the Roadmap to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, building on Health 2020, the European policy for health and well-being 46 and the E4A approach -engage, assess, align, accelerate and account 47 have also the potential to support the sustainable health planning process in the World Health Organization European Member States.

These instruments enhance the implementation of health strategies aligned with sustainable development. Others are needed to broaden the frameworks to include one health concerns in the planning process.

The good news is that several studies describe the evolution of the planning process according to the values and principles of sustainable development, albeit highlighting important differences between countries. [3] [4] [5] [6] 48 England, 49 Wales, 50 Norway and New Zealand 6 are examples of countries with health planning processes and products that are more consistent with the sustainable development paradigm, namely through the systematic integration of equity in health and intersectoral action in the respective planning cycles. 5, 6 The current pandemic highlights the timeliness of the issues discussed in the 5NCTM in 2019 but also represents an opportunity to challenge existing health planning models and adopt more relevant ones along the lines proposed in this text, to correct the lack of critical reflection addressing short-and long-term sustainable health challenges. 51,52

Planning for sustainable health is needed and feasible. The COVID-19 pandemic once again exposed the fragilities of the strategic planning frameworks. A more holistic planning approach, that privileges the intersectoriality, early social and community mobilisation, and the systematic integration of equity in health, along with the clear definition of essential concepts related to sustainable development, seem to be the most adequate for governance and action towards the achievement of sustainable health, both in non-pandemic and pandemic contexts.

Not applicable.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This material is the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published and not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. The paper reflects the authors' own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner. The paper properly credits the meaningful contributions of co-authors and co-researchers. The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research. All sources used are properly disclosed (correct citation). All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper, and will take public responsibility for its content.

Data sharing not applicable -no new data generated.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8286-1987

Paulo Ferrinho https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3722-0803

Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

The DAC guidelines: guidance for development co-operation. Strategies for Sustainable Development. OECD

Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans

Report of the capacity building workshop and expert group meeting on integrated approaches to sustainable development planning and implementation

Integrated planning and sustainable development: challenges and opportunities-synthesis report

Strategizing National Health in the 21st Century: A Handbook. World Health Organization

Report of World Commission on Environment and Development: our common future, from one earth to one world

United Nations

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Health and sustainable development: addressing the issues and challenges-WHO background paper prepared for the world summit on sustainable development

Exemplos para a CPLP

Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade

Sustainable development: our common future revisited

Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins

Civil society: the catalyst for ensuring health in the age of sustainable development. Glob Health

Engaging 'communities': anthropological insights from the West African Ebola epidemic

Optimizing pandemic preparedness and response through health information systems: lessons learned from Ebola to COVID-19

12 Lessons learned from the management of the coronavirus pandemic

Learning lessons from COVID-19 requires recognizing moral failures

Apocalypse now? Initial lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic for the governance of existential and global catastrophic risks

Governance roles and capacities of ministries of health: a multidimensional framework

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a syndemic perspective. One Health

COVID-19-an opportunity to redesign health policy thinking

COVID-19 and the curse of piecemeal perspectives

a terceira onda da Covid-19 ou o paciente invisível. Accessed

Implementing One Health as an integrated approach to health in Rwanda

The holistic way of tackling the COVID-19 pandemic: the one health approach

What role for One Health in the COVID-19 pandemic?

SDGs, health and the G20: a vision for public policy

Key learning on health in all policies implementation from around the world-information brochure

The implementation of Health in All Policies initiatives: a systems framework for government action

The gap frame-translating the SDGs into relevant national grand challenges for strategic business opportunities

Moving the world into a safe space-the GAPFRAME methodology

A safe operating space for humanity

How food connects all the SDGs

Stichting Global Reporting Initiative. G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines-reporting principles and standard disclosures

Stichting Global Reporting Initiative. G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines -implementation manual

Defining What Matters: Do companies and investors agree on what is material?

England National Health Service. Sustainable, resilient, healthy people & places-module: an integrated approach to metrics

Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: a method for making it work in practice

Aspectos relevantes para el diseño de planes de salud sostenibles orientados a los grupos de interés. Una propuesta basada en la guía ISO 26000:2010. Rev Esp Salud Pública

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Better policies for sustainable development 2016: a new framework for policy coherence

The importance of an integrating framework for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: the example of health and well-being

Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals

Roadmap to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Building on Health 2020, the European Policy for Health and Well-Being

Health and well-being for all: an approach to accelerating progress to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in countries in the WHO European Region

Health in sustainable development planning: the role of indicators

England National Health Service. Sustainable, resilient, healthy people & places: a sustainable development strategy for the NHS, Public Health and social care system

Public health wales: nationally focused, globally responsible: our international health strategy

SARS-CoV-2 pandemics: the lack of critical reflection addressing short-and long-term challenges

Emergency management, mitigation for COVID-19 and the importance of preparedness for future outbreaks

The Covid-19 pandemic reinforces the need for sustainable health planning