key: cord-0854112-lz4ied17 authors: Gao, Chenlu; Scullin, Michael K. title: Sleep Health Early in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in the United States: Integrating Longitudinal, Cross-Sectional, and Retrospective Recall Data date: 2020-06-27 journal: Sleep Med DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.06.032 sha: 4090951cffc7f0bb972a9b0c007455dd59ff2a26 doc_id: 854112 cord_uid: lz4ied17 The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused substantial changes in lifestyle, responsibilities, and stressors. Such dramatic societal changes might cause overall sleep health to decrease (stress view), to remain unchanged (resilience view), or even to improve (reduced work/schedule burden view). We addressed this question using longitudinal, cross-sectional, and retrospective recall methodologies in 699 American adult participants in late March 2020, two weeks following the enactment of social distancing and shelter-in-place policies in the United States. Relative to baseline data from mid February 2020, cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses demonstrated that average sleep quality was unchanged, or even improved, early in the pandemic. However, there were clear individual differences: approximately 25% of participants reported that their sleep quality had worsened, which was explained by stress vulnerability, caregiving, adverse life impact, shift work, and presence of COVID-19 symptoms. Therefore, the COVID-19 pandemic has detrimentally impacted some individuals’ sleep health while paradoxically benefited other individuals’ sleep health by reducing rigid work/school schedules such as early morning commitments. In December 2019, an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 was reported in Wuhan, China [1] . By March 11, 2020 , the outbreak had spread to over 100 countries and was classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization [2] . The United States (U.S.) was the most severely impacted country, with more than 2 million confirmed cases and over 110,000 deaths in the first three months [3] . Because the coronavirus can be transmitted from person to person even when the carrier is asymptomatic, physical/social distancing is required to limit the spread of the disease [4] . To encourage social distancing, the U.S. White House declared a national emergency on March 13, prompting widespread closings of schools and businesses [5] . By March 24, shelter-in-place (or stay-at-home) policies were ordered for 175 million Americans (Figure 1 ; [6] ). These policies dramatically changed residents' lifestyles, work commitments, social opportunities, and caregiver responsibilities. For many individuals, the pandemic led to financial stress, food insecurity, and fear of becoming ill or transmitting the virus to others [7] . The present work investigated how COVID-19 impacted the sleep health of Americans during the first couple weeks of the pandemic declaration ( Figure 1 ). This question has translational health implications: Poorer sleep quality is associated with increased susceptibility to viral infections [8] , reduced efficacy of vaccinations [9] , and worsened mental health [10] . When people are sleep deprived, they show greater anxiety/stress reactivity [11] , greater tendencies to blame and punish others for mistakes [12] , poorer job performance [13] , and lower cognitive functioning [14] . In addition to translational implications, the COVID-19 social isolation policies provide an opportunity to test how one's environment influences sleep patterns. If poor sleep health is primarily driven by stress, then the COVID-19 pandemic should be linked to poorer sleep quality due to increased financial, food, and health stressors that cause pre-bed cognitive arousal [15] . Alternatively, if poor sleep health is primarily driven by demanding work/school obligations, then the COVID-19 pandemic should be linked to better sleep quality due to reduced early morning requirements, lessened time-sensitive work/school demands, and simplified to-do lists [16, 17] . It is also possible, of course, that people will show resilience in their overall sleep quality to the COVID-19 pandemic [18] . Participants (N = 699, M age = 38.04, SD age = 11.65, 44.78% female) consisted of two samples of adults who were living in the United States (Table 1 ). Both groups of participants completed all assessments online via the Amazon Mechanical Turk website. The first group included 199 adults who completed a sleep survey in mid-February, 1 that is, prior to the implementation of quarantine policies in the U.S. (Figure 1 ). We hereafter refer to this group as baseline data. We invited these baseline participants to complete the survey again in late-March, after approximately two weeks of quarantine/social distancing due to COVID-19 being declared a national emergency (longitudinal data). Two participants indicated at baseline that they did not want to complete a follow-up study, 111 individuals did not respond, and 86 Among the 86 participants who completed the longitudinal assessments, employment status did not change from baseline to follow-up (McNemar test: p = .500). The second group of 500 participants only completed the sleep survey during the quarantine period ( Table 1 ). The sample size of this second group was determined by an a priori power analysis which indicated that n = 500 provided .90 power for two-tailed tests with alpha = 0.05 to detect small-medium sized cross-sectional effects (d = 0.30) and small-medium sized (r = .15) correlations between sleep patterns and COVID-19-related factors (e.g., stress, adverse life impact, geographical location). Inclusion criteria were being 18 years or older and living in the United States. This study was approved by Baylor University Institutional Review Board and all participants provided written informed consent prior to participation. This study was registered on Open Science Framework prior to data collection (https://osf.io/exkcq). Study materials and de-identified data are also publicly available (https://osf.io/ey3fz). The procedure timeline relative to the COVID-19 pandemic spread is illustrated in Figure 1 . Baseline-phase data collection occurred on February 17, 2020. At baseline, there had been 0 deaths and only 15 confirmed cases in the U.S. [19] . There were no business or school closings and the national leading experts (e.g., Anthony Fauci) had not advised lifestyle changes in response to COVID-19 [20] . In addition, at the time of baseline assessment, no formal concerns were expressed by the U.S. White House or local governments [20] . The baseline survey assessed demographic information, global sleep quality, vulnerability to stress-related sleep disturbance, sleepiness, intraindividual variability in sleep, 2 chronotype, overall health, and music listening habits 1 (music data are reported elsewhere [21] ). Quarantine-phase data collection occurred from March 25 through March 27, 2020, which was approximately two weeks after the U.S. declared a national emergency and social distancing/quarantine policies began. At least one week before the March 25 assessment, fortyone states had mandated state-wide school closures, and many schools in the remaining 9 states had closed voluntarily (a similar pattern existed for non-essential businesses, e.g., there was local school closures before statewide school closures in Texas [22] ). We launched the survey at approximately 2:30pm CDT, which was the same time of day as the baseline survey. Data collection concluded at 4:40pm CDT on March 27, 2020. The questions included in the survey were the same as at baseline, but we replaced the questions on music listening surveys with questions regarding COVID-19-related stressors/experiences as well as retrospective recall questions on sleep patterns prior to (versus during) the COVID-19 quarantine. The primary sleep measure was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI [23] ). The PSQI is a 9-item questionnaire assessing sleep habits and sleep difficulties over the past month. The questionnaire yields a widely-used global sleep quality index in which higher scores indicate worse sleep quality (primary dependent variable). To better capture the COVID-19 quarantine time interval, we modified the PSQI to refer to sleep over the past two weeks. Vulnerability to stress-related sleep disturbance was measured by the Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test (FIRST [24] ). The FIRST has participants rate the likelihood of experiencing difficulty sleeping in 9 stressful situations on a 4-point scale from "Not likely" to "Very likely" (e.g., "How likely are you to have difficulty sleeping after a stressful experience during the day?"). Total FIRST scores range from 9 to 36 and higher scores indicate greater vulnerability to sleep disturbances in stressful situations. Daytime sleepiness was measured by the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS [25] ). Participants rated how sleepy they felt at the moment from 1 ("Feeling active, vital, alert, or wide awake") to 7 ("No longer fighting sleep, sleep onset soon; having dream-like thoughts"). Participants additionally reported their coffee consumption (number of cups that day), chronotype (from "definitely morning" to "definitely evening"), and their overall health (5-point scale ranging from "Poor" to "Excellent"). In addition to the aforementioned questionnaires, during the quarantine phase, we additionally had participants attempt to retrospectively recall how they slept before the COVID-19 pandemic relative to how they were sleeping currently. Participants were asked to estimate their bedtime, risetime, sleep duration, sleep onset latency, and the number of nighttime awakenings for before and during the quarantine. To examine moderators of sleep health during the quarantine phase, we asked questions that focused on COVID-19 experiences. Participants indicated whether their local government had issued shelter-in-place orders (or stay-at-home orders), whether they or people around them had shown symptoms of COVID-19 or been tested positive for COVID-19, and whether their caregiver or work responsibilities had changed during the COVID-19 quarantine. Moreover, participants rated the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with ten statements related to COVID-19 and reported whether they experienced changes in how well-rested they have felt during the quarantine on a 7-point Likert scale. These statements can be seen in Table S1 . We analyzed participants' responses on these statements by conducting factor analysis with Varimax rotation to reduce the number of dimensions. Factor analysis revealed that the ten statements loaded onto three factors that we labeled "adverse life impact," "worry/stress," and "proactions." We summed the scores on the items in each dimension to constitute a dimensional score. Last, participants completed a free response question in which they were invited to comment on how the quarantine/social distancing had affected them (responses are available at https://osf.io/ey3fz). At both baseline and quarantine phases, participants reported standard demographic (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity) and work information (employed, shiftwork). At the quarantine phase, we also had participants report their geographical location. By doing so, we were able to match participants' location to the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in their state of residence as of midnight March 24, 2020. The geographical distributions of participants and COVID-19 cases at the time of data collection are displayed in Figure S1 (Johns Hopkins University [26] ). Note that the number of confirmed cases may be inconsistent with daily data reported by the WHO, because the Johns Hopkins database extracted state-level data from multiple publicly available sources and updated the results in real time [27] . Participants who met any of the following criteria did not pass data quality control: (1) reported impossible values (e.g., sleeping for 25 hours/day); (2) responded to free response questions in an identical manner as other participants (suggesting a bot); (3) demographic information at follow-up did not match demographic information at baseline. Of 791 survey responses, 699 passed data quality control and were included in analyses ( Figure 2 ). Study hypotheses, study design, power analyses, and dependent variables were preregistered to Open Science Framework. We used SPSS (version 26) to conduct all statistical analyses. All tests were two-tailed and results were considered significant if p ≤ .05. Effect sizes were estimated using Cohen's d (for t-tests), φ (for chi-square tests), and correlation coefficients (for Pearson's correlation analyses). For the cross-sectional analyses, we used independent-samples t-tests to compare the sleep measures across participants who completed the study in mid February (baseline) and participants who only completed the study in late March (quarantine phase). We then supplemented the t-tests with independent samples Bayesian analyses. For the longitudinal analyses, we used paired-sample t-tests to assess changes in sleep measures in participants who completed the survey both in mid-February and late-March, supplementing these t-tests with related-samples Bayesian analyses. We first examined whether there were demographic differences between participants at the baseline assessment (n = 199) and participants who only completed the quarantine assessment (n = 500; Table 1 r(577) = .004, p = .914, it will not be discussed further (see Figure S2 ). The only other demographic difference across the two groups was that the quarantine phase included fewer shift workers than the baseline phase [χ(1) = 7.67, p = .006, φ = .11]. One possible explanation for this change was that shift workers were more likely than non-shift workers to be classified as essential workers during the pandemic, meaning they were likely less available for study participation. Shift work is known to influence sleep quality, and was associated with worse PSQI sleep quality in the current study ( Figure 3a) ; therefore, we will address the influence of shift work below using sensitivity analyses. In addition, 7.68% of participants reported having symptoms or testing positive for COVID-19, which was associated with considerably worse sleep quality (Figure 3b ). We accounted for this potential confound to the cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons via sensitivity analyses (see also, study on frontline healthcare workers [28, 29] ). Table 2 shows the cross-sectional comparison between participants who only completed the survey during the quarantine (n = 500) and participants who completed the baseline survey (n = 199). The two groups slept very similarly, as measured by the primary dependent measure (Table 2 ). This was an interesting initial finding, running counter to the notion that stress-induced heightened arousal globally worsened sleep quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. We next repeated the sleep measure analyses using participants who completed both the baseline and quarantine phase assessments. The data are presented in Table 3 The cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence has thus far indicated that, for many U.S. adults, sleep quality was not changed early in the COVID-19 pandemic; interestingly, when excluding shiftworkers and symptomatic individuals, longitudinal analyses indicated that sleep quality improved early in the pandemic in U.S. adults. At the end of the survey, we asked participants to retrospectively recall how they thought they slept before the pandemic (in comparison to their current sleep). Those reports are provided in Table 4 . When asked to retrospectively recall their sleep, participants estimated that they had slept much better prior to One interpretation of the retrospective recall data is that they indicate rosy retrospection (i.e., remembering the past as being more positive than it actually was) and/or an expectancy effect such that when COVID-19-related changes are queried participants are biased toward negative responses [32, 33] . Such psychological reporting tendencies have previously been noted when sleep was measured during wartime [34] . This explanation was supported in the longitudinal sample (shiftworkers, symptomatic individuals excluded); they showed "rosier" remembering of their pre-quarantine sleep when using their actual values at baseline for comparison. For example, at baseline these participants estimated that they slept 6.70 hours/night (SD = 1.15), but during the follow-up they retrospectively recalled their pre-quarantine sleep duration to be better than that (M = 6. (Table S3) , we further analyzed whether worse sleep disturbance scores during the quarantine phase (after controlling for baseline PSQI sleep disturbance) were associated with COVID-19 psychological factors. Figure 6 shows that greater COVID-19 adverse life impact (r p (46) = 0.30, p = .040) and greater COVID-19 worry/stress (r p (47) = 0.43, p = .002) were significantly associated with a longitudinal worsening of sleep disturbances (other factors: rs ≤ 0.24, ps > .10). Thus, there is a group of stress-vulnerable and life-impacted individuals who are particularly susceptible to sleep loss in the current pandemic. Next, we tested whether participants' retrospective recall estimates of their sleep changes were moderated by the same factors (see Table S3 Despite the myriad of COVID-19-related changes to stressors, work, and lifestyles, crosssectional analyses indicated that U.S. participants, in general, showed resilience in their overall sleep health. Though sleep quality undoubtedly worsened in some individuals during the pandemic, the longitudinal analyses indicated that, on average, sleep health actually improved in non-shiftworkers. We will discuss each of these findings in turn. The current study coincidentally had an optimal control (baseline) group for this online study as we had surveyed sleep health using an online sample one month prior to the U.S. outbreak of COVID-19 infections and associated policies. 1 The sleep data in the baseline group closely matched the sleep data we observed in another online sample taken years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (mean PSQI = 6.60 in [35] ). If we had not included this baseline group, but instead relied solely on retrospective recall data, then we would have (erroneously) concluded that most Americans' sleep during the pandemic was far worse than it was prior to the pandemic. In times of stress, recall biases can emerge [33] , particularly when people are expecting negative outcomes [32, 34] . The increased fear during the COVID-19 pandemic [36] may bias people toward recalling only poor nights of sleep, or viewing one's pre-pandemic health as more positive than it actually was [37] . We observed some evidence of rosy retrospection in our data ( Figure S3 ). Though the collective data do not point to an overall worsening of sleep quality, the longitudinal analyses did indicate that approximately ¼ of participants' PSQI scores worsened. Sleep quality was more likely to worsen if an individual had pre-existing vulnerability to stressors, if their caregiving responsibilities had increased, and if their life had been adversely impacted by COVID-19 (including becoming infected). Special attention should be paid to improving the sleep health of these at-risk individuals because sleep quality underlies cognitive, mental, and physical health, including the likelihood of resisting viral infections [8, 9] . The mental health and sleep health of frontline responders has been severely affected by COVID-19 [28, 29] . However, the current study indicates that the general public has remained resilient to the chronic threat of viral infection and upheaval of their daily lifestyles. Though surprising, this is not the first study to document that sleep can adapt well in dangerous environments. During World War II, sleep health was generally preserved in London residents during the 8-month "London Blitz" bombing campaign [18] . Furthermore, during the Gulf War, individuals living in areas under missile attacks did not show objective sleep quality declines, despite phone survey respondents issuing subjective sleep complaints [34] . While imminent threat and constant vigilance undoubtedly worsen sleep [28, 29, 38] , in general, the current findings of resilience to the pandemic are consistent with the theory that sleep is homeostatically regulated ( [39] ; see also [40] , for conceptual application to insomnia). Unlike the Gulf War environment, the COVID-19 pandemic required social distancing, school closures, and working from homes. Under these conditions, approximately 50% of U.S. adult participants showed improvements to their global sleep quality in longitudinal analyses (25% were unchanged). The improvements were strikingly evident when the analyses excluded shiftworkers and people who had tested positive or showed symptoms of COVID-19 (both of which were independently associated with worse sleep quality, Figure 3 ). These findings highlight the negative impact that morning commitments, urgency of work/school demands, and extensive to-do lists can have on society's sleep health [41] . Limitations of the current study include a non-random sample of Americans, attrition, and reliance on surveys rather than actigraphy. Nevertheless, the current work demonstrates that individuals who are not sick, are not working night shifts, and are not frontline responders may actually experience improvements to their sleep quality as a result of quarantine and social distancing policies. The lesson, therefore, is that when the nation returns "to normal" (postpandemic), maintaining flexibility in school/work schedules will be critical to preserving or enhancing the sleep health of the public. 1 The baseline data collection in February was conducted with the intention of studying sleep health in relation to music habits (Scullin & Gao, 2020) , but because assessing sleep patterns in mid-February served as an ideal pre-quarantine baseline, we recruited these participants to repeat the sleep survey during the quarantine period so that the study would include both cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome World Health Organization. WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. World Health Organization World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. World Health Organization How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Proclamation on declaring a national emergency concerning the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. 2020. The White House See which states and cities have told residents to stay at home Feeding low-income children during the COVID-19 pandemic Behaviorally assessed sleep and susceptibility to the common cold Why sleep is important for health: a psychoneuroimmunology perspective The effects of improving sleep on mental health (OASIS): a randomised controlled trial with mediation analysis Overanxious and underslept Endorsements of surgeon punishment and patient compensation in rested and sleep-restricted individuals Sleep disorders and work performance: findings from the 2008 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America poll Sleep, cognition, and normal aging: integrating a half century of multidisciplinary research Effect of cognitive arousal on sleep latency, somatic and cortical arousal following partial sleep deprivation Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time The effects of bedtime writing on difficulty falling asleep: A polysomnographic study comparing to-do lists and completed activity lists Sleep disturbances in the wake of traumatic events Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report -28. World Health Organization Fauci on coronavirus fears: No need to change lifestyle yet 2020. Available on Bedtime music, involuntary musical imagery, and sleep quality The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research Vulnerability to stress-related sleep disturbance and hyperarousal The development and use of the Stanford sleepiness scale (SSS) Coronavirus COVID-19 global cases by the center for systems science and engineering An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 The evaluation of sleep disturbances for Chinese frontline medical workers under the outbreak of COVID-19 Shift work and disturbed sleep/wakefulness Influenza viral infections enhance sleep in mice Expectancy bias in anxious samples Memory bias in clinical anxiety Sleeping under the threat of the Scud: war-related environmental insomnia The cognitive attentional syndrome is associated with sleep difficulties in a community sample The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: development and initial validation Postevent rumination and recall bias for a social performance event in high and low socially anxious individuals Night watch in one brain hemisphere during sleep associated with the first-night effect in humans A two process model of sleep regulation Cognitive therapy for dysfunctional beliefs about sleep and insomnia Early morning work--prevalence and relation to sleep/wake problems: a national representative survey We thank Taylor Luster and Therese Riesberg for their feedback on the online survey. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (1920730 and CAREER award 1943323). The authors do not have any conflict of interest to report.