key: cord-0885617-hcvsjekm authors: Joseph, Joshua J.; Nolan, Timiya S.; Williams, Amaris; McKoy, Alicia; Zhao, Songzhu; Aboagye-Mensah, Emmanuela; Kluwe, Bjorn; Odei, James B.; Brock, Guy; Lavender, Dana; Gregory, John; Gray, Darrell M. title: Improving cardiovascular health in black men through a 24-week community-based team lifestyle change intervention: The black impact pilot study date: 2022-01-13 journal: Am J Prev Cardiol DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100315 sha: e878fb5b3a096a5ede13c2ea58a6fec6f4896416 doc_id: 885617 cord_uid: hcvsjekm BACKGROUND: Higher cardiovascular health scores, using American Heart Association's (AHA) Life's Simple 7 (LS7), have been associated with lower risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and mortality among all racial/ethnic groups. Nationally, Black men have the lowest levels of LS7. Thus, a study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a community-based team lifestyle change program on LS7 among Black men. METHODS: Black adult males (n = 74) from a large Midwestern city participated in Black Impact, a 24-week community-based team lifestyle change program adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program and AHA's Check, Change, Control Blood Pressure Self-Management Program, which incorporates AHA's LS7 framework. The change in a LS7 score (range 0–14) from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks was evaluated using a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for age, education, and income. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 52 ± 10 years. The men were sociodemographically diverse, with annual income ranging from <$20,000 (7%) to ≥$75,000 (25%). Twenty-five percent were college graduates, 73% had private insurance, and 84% were employed. In fully adjusted models, LS7 score at baseline was 7.12 and increased 0.67 (95%CI: 0.14, 1.20, p = 0.013) and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.40, 1.46, p<0.001) points at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively, compared to baseline. Sensitivity analysis evaluating 5 components (excluding diet and physical activity) and 6 components (excluding diet) also showed significant increases at 12 and 24 weeks (all p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Black Impact lifestyle change single-arm pilot program showed that a community-based lifestyle intervention has the potential to improve LS7 in Black men. Further randomized studies are urgently needed to improve cardiovascular health and advance cardiovascular health equity in Black men. United States (US) Black populations account for 12% of total, but 32% of preventable cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths [ 1 , 2 ] . Higher attainment of American Heart Association's (AHA) Life's Simple 7 (LS7) scores has been associated with lower risk of CVD, type 2 diabetes (diabetes), cancer, and mortality [3] [4] [5] [6] . In the US, men compared to women and Black compared to non-Hispanic White (White) populations have lower attainment of AHA LS7 ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics (physical activity, diet, cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index are paramount. Black Impact was a CBRP intervention developed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a 24-week CBPR study focused on improving the attainment of LS7 CVH scores in Black men in a large Midwestern city [ 8 , 13 , 14 ] . This report focuses on the change in CVH scores during the study intervention. In 2016, the African American Male Wellness Agency (AAMWA) and Ohio State University researchers formed a collaborative academiccommunity partnership to expand programming focused on preventing and improving control of chronic disease among Black men [ 8 , 13 , 14 ] . Academic-community partners interacted directly with community members to formulate programming topics and strategies using the PETAL framework for CBPR, including: 1) prioritizing health equity; 2) engaging the community; 3) targeting health disparities; 4) acting on the data; and 5) learning and improving [ 10 , 13 , 15 , 16 ] . Community members voiced a desire for physical activity, nutrition, and mental health programming. A consensus was built around a team-based intervention "Black Impact " with physical activity and nutrition, delivered by community-engaged health professionals and trainees. Black Impact was grounded in the social cognitive theory at the individual level, and used a multi-level framework consistent with the socioecological model [ 17 , 18 ] . At the 2019 AAMWA walk, Black men were apprised of the upcoming study. The study team met with potential participants at community locations during Fall 2019 and reviewed the consent documents. The inclusion criteria were: 1) Black men; 2) age 18 years or older; 3) poor or average CVH ( < 4 LS7 ideal metrics); English speaking; 5) living in Metropolitan Columbus, Ohio; 6) no healthcare provider-imposed limitations on physical activity; and 7) appropriate for a group setting. In February 2020, 100 Black males were enrolled in the pilot study and divided into 6 geographic-based teams [19] . Due to COVID-19, the study was paused prior to initiation. In July 2020, the study began with 74 participants with programming through December 2020 (Supplemental Figure 1 ). Twelve and 24-week biometric health screenings occurred at study sites, and survey data was collected electronically. The study was reviewed and approved by The Ohio State University Biomedical Sciences IRB (Study ID: 2019H0302) and was registered on Clinical-Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04787978. All participants provided written informed consent. The 24-week community-based lifestyle intervention was adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program [20] and AHA Check, Change, Control program applying evidence-based strategies and stakeholder feedback [21] . Participants were not randomized, and all received the intervention [6] . Participants were grouped into 6 teams of 8-25 participants based on participant proximity to a central meeting location (e.g. recreation center). Each team had a personal trainer and health coach. The personal trainers had pre-intervention meetings with an American College of Sports Medicine Certified Personal Trainer (ACSM-CPT). They were trained in a standardized 45-minute workout with increasing intensity over the study intervention consistent with Exercise is Medicine (Supplemental Methods). An ACSM-CPT intermittently observed team workouts to ensure a homogeneous dose and intensity of physical activity across teams. The Black Impact curriculum was adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program [20] and the AHA Check, Change, Control program [22] . During the development of the curriculum, community members and stakeholders emphasized the importance of sessions/instruction which included: cooking, grocery store shopping, mental health, historical trauma, stress, financial wellness, and cancer screening. Thus, sessions focused on those topics were included in the curriculum (Supplemental Table 1 ). Health coaches (2 physicians and 1 nurse practitioner who were experienced in lifestyle change and trained on the Black Impact protocol) implemented the curriculum after the physical activity portion of the weekly team sessions for ∼30 min. Key health coach activities included delivering education and establishing, monitoring progress in wellness goals in their assigned 2 teams, and directing nursing students. Healthy food samples, cross-trainer shoes, GARMIN watches, and workout bands were provided to all participants. Individual incentives (e.g., gift cards) were provided to participants for survey completion at 0, 12 and 24 weeks. All participants received a one-year gym membership to a local recreation and park center at study completion. Assessments were performed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Data from participants included self-reported measures (sociodemographic and health history), survey data, and biometric measurement including blood pressure (mmHg), fasting cholesterol (mg/dl), fasting glucose (mg/dl), weight (lbs), and BMI (kg/m 2 ). The sociodemographic data included age, education, race, ethnicity, employment status, insurance status, and annual income. The self-reported health history included hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and smoking status, as well as medications for chronic conditions. The survey data included the Diet History Questionnaire(DHQ)-III [23] and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool [24] . The valid and reliable DHQ-III consisted of 135 food and beverage line items and 26 dietary supplement questions [25] [26] [27] . The social needs screening tool included 26 questions addressing living situation, food security, transportation, utilities, safety, financial strain, employment, family and community support, education, physical activity, substance abuse, mental health, and disabilities [24] . Physical activity minutes per week calculated using the validated moderate physical activity 2-question physical activity questionnaire with the CMS screening tool [28] . Biometric screenings were performed by trained healthcare staff, including nurses, nursing students, and physicians. Blood pressure was checked via an automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer (Omron 5 series) with two measurements performed after the participants were seated for 5 min and averaged. Weight was measured using a zeroed and calibrated Omron Body Composition Monitor and Scale (Model: HBF-514C). Height was measured via a tape measurer. BMI was calculated by multiplying weight (lbs) by 703 and then dividing by height squared (inch 2 ). Blood total cholesterol and glucose were measured in the fasting state using the Cardio Check Silver® (Polymer Technology, Inc., Heath, OH, USA) device. The main outcome measure was LS7 (CVH) score (range 0-14). The CVH score was summed based on the individual LS7 metrics (glucose, cholesterol, blood pressure, BMI, physical activity, diet and smoking) categories of poor (0 points), intermediate (1) and ideal (2) CVH at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks (Supplemental Table 2 ). The individual LS7 metrics were additionally evaluated at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Descriptive statistics were performed for all variables, including mean (standard deviation [SD]) for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Change in CVH score Table 2 ). (range 0-14) at 12 and 24 weeks was calculated using a linear mixedeffects model with random intercepts for each participant. The models were adjusted for age, education, and income. Additionally, analyses were performed using 6 components of the CVH score excluding diet (range 0-12) and 5 components excluding diet and physical activity (range 0-10). Statistical significance for all analyses was defined as twosided alpha < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9. Baseline demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1 . The mean age of participants was 52 years (SD 10) ranging from 27 to 73 years. All participants had a high school degree or equivalent. The majority of participants were employed with private insurance (84% and 73%, respectively). The income of participants was heterogeneous, ranging from < $20,000 (7%) to ≥ $75,000 (25%). Sixty-percent, 26%, and 38% of participants reported hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia, respectively. A high proportion of participants were in the poor range for blood pressure (49%), glucose (30%), BMI (55%), and diet (38%). The baseline CVH score of 7.12 increased by 0.67 (95%CI:0.14-1.20; p = 0.013) and 0.93 (95%CI:0.40-1.46; p < 0.001) at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively, in fully adjusted analyses ( Table 2 ). Similar findings were seen for CVH scores when excluding diet alone (6 components) or excluding diet and physical activity (5 components) at 12 and 24 weeks (all p < 0.01). Among the individual continuous metrics, BMI, body weight, glucose, and cholesterol all declined significantly at 12 and 24 weeks (all p < 0.05). Systolic blood pressure decreased at week 12 ( p = 0.04), but was non-significant at week 24. Black Impact, a novel pilot study evaluating a 24-week communitybased lifestyle intervention in Black men, improved AHA LS7 CVH. This is the first lifestyle change CBPR study examining LS7 CVH in Black men [10] . Additionally, Black Impact provides evidence of a significant 23 . Physical Activity was calculated using a validated moderate physical activity 2-question physical activity questionnaire collected with the surveys at baseline, week 12 and week 24 or during weekly sessions and carried forward to week 12 or 24 for participants missing physical activity at week 12 or 24. 24, 28 . positive effect of the intervention on weight, BMI, cholesterol, glucose, and diet. The nearly 1-point increase in CVH score (0-14) from baseline to 24-weeks in Black Impact is a large effect size considering a 1-point higher CVH score is associated with an 18% and 19% lower odds of stroke and myocardial infarction, respectively [29] , and an 11% and 19% lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [ 30 , 31 ] . Only 2 CBPR lifestyle interventions have evaluated all 7 components of LS7 [10] [11] [12] . "Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health [FAITH!] interventions focused on faith-based nutrition and exercise programming conducted in AA churches in Minnesota ( ∼70% female) [ 11 , 12 ] . The first study recruited 37 adult church congregants and performed a 16-week education series implementing the LS7 framework with lectures, cooking, exercise, prayer, and personal reflection [11] . The proportion of participants meeting LS7 CVH scores of 7-8 (moderate) or 9-14 (ideal) compared to 0-6 (poor) increased from 70% to 82% [11] . In the second study, 50 AAs were recruited to a 10-week digital application of the FAITH! Program [12] . The LS7 CVH score increased from 8.3 to 9.0 ( P = 0.05). The main differences between the FAITH! and Black Impact studies are the setting and study population. Black Impact was performed at recreation and park centers, was 100% male and had a larger number of participants. There are currently no other CBPR lifestyle interventions focused on Black men and all LS7 components for comparison, a group that may have less readiness for LS7 behavior change compared to Black women [32] . Strengths include: 1) a focus on an understudied population with inequities in CVH; 2) community engagement and collaborations among 12 organizations to develop and implement Black Impact; 3) use of validated surveys for physical activity and diet; and 4) use of evidence-based approaches for biometric data collection. Despite these strengths, the study should be considered in light of some limitations. First, the study was not randomized due to: 1) no previous test of intervention feasibility and acceptability; and 2) concerns raised from community members in regards to not receiving a potentially beneficial intervention (albeit, novel and not previously tested). Second, while the surveys were validated and, incentives were provided for completion, they were lengthy impacting completion rates. Even with omitting physical activity and diet in the CVH score, the study showed significant improvements in 5 CVH components at weeks 12 and 24. Finally, although the cohort was sociodemographically diverse, compared to US averages, participants had higher levels of employment (84% vs. 61%), and education (Bachelor degree or higher [41% vs. 20%]), which may limit generalizability [ 33 , 34 ] . In conclusion, Black Impact, a 24-week community-based lifestyle intervention increased CVH scores among Black men. Given the significant CVH inequities, collaborative community-based approaches with the potential to catalyze health equity such as Black Impact are urgently needed. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Preventable deaths from heart disease and stroke among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States Heart disease death rates among blacks and whites aged ≥ 35 years -United States Ideal cardiovascular health predicts lower risks of myocardial infarction, stroke, and vascular death across whites, blacks, and hispanics: the northern Manhattan study The association of ideal cardiovascular health with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Ideal cardiovascular health, glycaemic status and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study Ideal cardiovascular health is inversely associated with incident cancer: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study American Heart Association Council on epidemiology and prevention statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association The association of ideal cardiovascular health with self-reported health, diabetes, and adiposity in African American males Provisional Life Expectancy Estimates for 2020. Vital Statistics Rapid Release; no 15 Community-engaged and community-based participatory research to promote American Heart Association Life's Simple 7 among African American adults: A systematic review Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health (FAITH!): An Application of the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 TM among Midwestern African-Americans Improving cardiovascular health among African-Americans through mobile health: the FAITH! App Pilot Study Mask up: academic-community-government partnerships to advance public health during COVID-19 Association of socioeconomic status with ideal cardiovascular health in black men Diversity in clinical trials: an opportunity and imperative for community engagement Reckoning with our trustworthiness, leveraging community engagement. Popul Health Manage Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective Breadth of the socio-ecological model Intervention research: designing, conducting, analyzing, and funding Program The Diabetes Prevention . Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin Engaging an urban African American community to deliver cognitive health education to breast cancer survivors American Heart AssociationAmerican Heart Association Check. Change. Control. Implementation Guide Diet History Questionnaire III (DHQ III) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Alley D, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesStandardized screening for health-related social needs in clinical settings: the accountable health communities screening tool. NAM Perspectives Cognitive research enhances accuracy of food frequency questionnaire reports: results of an experimental validation study Comparative Validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study Initial validation of an exercise "vital sign " in electronic medical records Cardiovascular health score and the risk of cardiovascular diseases Association between ideal cardiovascular health metrics and risk of cardiovascular events or mortality: A meta-analysis of prospective studies A systematic review of the prevalence and outcomes of ideal cardiovascular health in US and non-US populations Health perceptions, stroke risk, and readiness for behavior change: gender differences in young adult African Americans ACS 1-Year Estimates Selected Population Profiles Table A-2. Employment status of the civilian population by race, sex, and age All authors contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis and interpretation of the results and to the writing of the manuscript. The authors wish to thank the staff and participants of Black Impact. The authors wish to thank all of the partners that made this project possible including Allan Sommer, ACSM-CPT, the American Cancer Society, Cardinal Health, Central Ohio American Heart Association, Cigna Foundation, City of Columbus Recreation and Parks Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100315 .