key: cord-0885857-wqkx5m7d
authors: Vadiati, Meysam; Beynaghi, Ali; Bhattacharya, Prosun; Bandala, Erick R.; Mozafari, Masoud
title: Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment: How deep and how long?
date: 2021-12-10
journal: Sci Total Environ
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152255
sha: a3eec3325e9116c357b17432dab897b3fc228955
doc_id: 885857
cord_uid: wqkx5m7d

Although the World Health Organization (WHO) announcement released in early March 2020 stated there is no proven evidence that the COVID-19 virus can survive in drinking water or sewage, there has been some recent evidence that coronaviruses can survive in low-temperature environments and in groundwater for more than a week. Some studies have also found SARS-CoV-2 genetic materials in raw municipal wastewater, which highlights a potential avenue for viral spread. A lack of information about the presence and spread of COVID-19 in the environment may lead to decisions based on local concerns and prevent the integration of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 into the global water cycle. Several studies have optimistically assumed that coronavirus has not yet affected water ecosystems, but this assumption may increase the possibility of subsequent global water issues. More studies are needed to provide a comprehensive picture of COVID-19 occurrence and outbreak in aquatic environments and more specifically in water resources. As scientific efforts to report reliable news, conduct rapid and precise research on COVID-19, and advocate for scientists worldwide to overcome this crisis increase, more information is required to assess the extent of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment. The goals of this study are to estimate the extent of the environmental effects of the pandemic, as well as identify related knowledge gaps and avenues for future research.

The indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment, such as an increase in waste production, could negatively affect water resources (Zambrano-Monserrate et al. 2020) .

Although there is no direct evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus-the virus that causes COVID-19-can survive in drinking water or wastewater, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in municipal sewage has been reported in different locations around the world Wu et al., 2020; Wurtzer et al., 2020; Gonzalez et al., 2020; Kumar et al. 2020a,c,b) . Wastewater surveillance has been identified as a promising tool for tracking virus circulation because it correlates the reported prevalence of COVID-19 cases with the SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in sewage .

Containing a global pandemic is difficult and ensuring that people have access to safe water is a vital step in decreasing viral spread among populations and in the aquatic environment (Habibi et al., 2020) . As documented by many scientists and organizations worldwide, the emphasis since the start of the pandemic has been to provide the public with realistic reports of COVID-19 and counteract unrealistic/unfounded information. In early March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) disclosed that there was a lack of information on the survival and potential transmission of the COVID-19 virus in drinking water and sewage (WHO, 2020b). The first paper confirming the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in municipal wastewater came shortly after that statement .

Considering the lack of available information, even if drinking water can be considered safe, the potential transmission of SARS-CoV-2 or its genetic information in wastewater remains J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof mostly unknown and is worth further study. There are significant knowledge gaps that need to be addressed, such as the strength and duration of SARS-CoV-2 spread in wastewater, as well as the difference between SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses and pathogens found in wastewater.

SARS-CoV-2 is considered "not robust" and less stable in the environment and more susceptible to inactivation. Nevertheless, according to some previous studies, enveloped viruses like coronavirus are known to persist in water bodies for several weeks (Kumar, 2020c).

The goals of this work are to provide a critical analysis of the potential of SARS-CoV-2 to spread in the aquatic environment, evaluate the risks and challenges of potential viral spread, and identify knowledge gaps and avenues for future research.

2. The potential spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the aquatic environment A technical report released by WHO (WHO, 2020b) revealed that the morphology and chemical structure of SARS-CoV-2 are similar to those reported for synonymous human coronaviruses. Because of these similarities, McLellan et al. (2020) found that the current processes at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) can prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in treated water effluents and comply with regulations during the treatment process. Based on previous experience with the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and other SARS-CoVtype viruses, the risk of coronavirus reaching drinking water is considered low (WHO, 2020b), which has been confirmed as information on COVID-19 has progressively increased.

Global efforts are needed to delineate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 spreading through water bodies and a more detailed investigation is needed to assess the J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof activity and fate of the genetic components of SARS-CoV-2 during wastewater treatment processes to determine its potential removal.

The efficacy of wastewater treatment processes in removing SARS-CoV-2 is a significant knowledge gap related to the readiness of WWTPs in dealing with novel waterborne illnesses.

For example, very little information is available on the role environmental conditions play in the purification of water bodies potentially contaminated with SARS-CoV-2. It is relatively wellknown that the persistence of enveloped viruses (e.g., influenza or herpes simplex viruses) in water may reach up to 200 days at 4 °C. The time required for the initial viral titer to decrease by 90% in wastewater ranges from 20 to 40 days for enveloped viruses, whereas the same value for human coronavirus can vary between 200 to 400 days at 4 °C. However, the effects of climate change stressors such as increases in temperature and ionic strength, as well as changes in pH on these values are unknown (Kumar et al., 2020c) .

The indirect effects of this pandemic on our lives and its adverse environmental results are also poorly understood. The drastic decrease in traffic and other global anthropogenic/economic activities during the mandatory pandemic lockdown substantially improved air and water quality (Somani et al., 2020) . Nevertheless, a remarkable peak in the generation of municipal solid waste and an increased production of biomedical waste has been observed in the past months (Bandala et al., 2021) . Because the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are yet to be determined, assessing its current effects on our daily lives is an interesting avenue of future research that is worth exploring to develop technology to alleviate long-term effects and provide decision makers with valuable information to address similar or related events in the future.

Furthermore, the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on global water bodies is another J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof critical knowledge gap that needs to be addressed. It is clear that we need a better understanding of the survival of SARS-CoV-2 in water and wastewater, as well as its source and dispersion potential in aquatic environments (Kumar et al., 2021c) . Very little information is available on these topics, which is another significant knowledge gap that needs attention considering the potential consequences for water security and reliability.

The lipid membrane envelope surrounding coronaviruses makes them more fragile than nonenveloped viruses (Walls et al., 2020) , and therefore more susceptible to disinfection processes.

The schematic in Figure 1 shows the intact (a), incapacitated (b), and degraded (c) stages of SARS-CoV-2. In several locations around the world without a wastewater treatment plant or sewer network, untreated sewage is known to drain into surface water bodies or infiltrate into groundwater (Abbaszadegan et al., 2003; Fout et al., 2003; Bhattacharya et al., 2021 ; Kuroda et., Elsaid et al., 2021) . Groundwater, which is a vital water resource, has been historically reported to have lower pathogen loads than surface water because of the natural purification that occurs during natural adsorption and inactivation processes. The physical characteristics of porous media (i.e., soil geological and hydrogeological properties) play a key role in the dynamics of the pollutants released into the environment (Hart & Casper, 2004; Bivins et al., 2020; Paleologos et al., 2021) . Some authors (Craun, 2010) have suggested that almost all waterborne disease dispersion is related to polluted groundwater and that pathogens can be transmitted from wastewater to groundwater through septic tanks, leaky sewers, and weak well nets. Many of these outbreaks may come from wells or small water systems that do not include disinfection.

Because water treatment is time and resource demanding, preventing groundwater contamination is a more logical approach than disinfection. However, many other parameters are also known to contribute to the inactivation of pathogens and/or damage to the DNA/RNA structure in surface water, such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation or the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS). UV radiation, ROS, and thermal inactivation threaten cells by inducing DNA and protein damage (Tran et al., 2021) . None of these parameters are usually present in groundwater, which has been identified as a receptacle of untreated wastewater where the COVID-19 virus has been reported to survive for long periods of time and has been found to accurately reflect changes in the number of COVID-19 cases in nearby communities (Mahlknecht et al., 2021) .

A recent study identified the high vulnerability of the Arctic to virus contamination (Benediktsdóttir et al. 2020) because the viral degradation process is slow in low-temperature environments, which suggests the virus can persist in Arctic waters for years. Therefore, the survival of SARS-CoV-2 at groundwater temperature in the Arctic (between 3 °C and 6 °C) is highly likely, which highlights the need for more studies about this claim. This topic is another interesting avenue for further research. Although some authors have reported the natural decay

Journal Pre-proof of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity after eight days of release into raw wastewater and river water based on the reduction of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA (Rimoldi et al. 2020 ), water resource monitoring should be continued until more robust results are available from studies on the survival of SARS-CoV-2 in recipient water bodies (Annalaura et al., 2020) .

Several studies have been conducted to assess the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in municipal raw wastewater in the Netherlands , the United States, (Wu et al., 2020) , Australia , France (Wurtzer et al., 2020) , India vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2. This lack of awareness is especially concerning considering higher pumping rates in private wells to ensure water security could expand the SARS-CoV-2 plume with unknown, undesirable consequences. Minor amounts of SARS-CoV-2 RNA fragments (the original active or inactive coronavirus) detected by PCR analysis have been reported in non-potable water of the Seine and the Canal de l'Ourcq (Leste-Lasserre, 2020). This undrinkable water is mainly used for street washing, watering parks, and feeding waterfalls and lakes in parks and forested areas. In these areas where highly polluted water is used, the dispersion of disintegrated genetic materials from wastewater is a greater risk. Water contaminated by viruses and virions in affected areas could be a factor that might cause significant health impacts and make these areas more susceptible to other viral diseases. Therefore, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 over an extended period of time has unveiled underlying vulnerabilities in many areas worldwide.

Unfortunately, water authorities make decisions from a local viewpoint while ignoring global water cycle integration. For example, people have extensively applied chlorine disinfectants to prevent coronavirus progression. Although there are benefits to the use of disinfectants and hand sanitizers against COVID-19, these germicidal agents penetrate porous media and pollute water resources directly and indirectly (Ghafoor et al., 2021; Bandala et al., 2021; Kumar et al., 2021b) , which poses even more severe risks to aquatic ecosystems (Sedlak & von Gunten, 2011; Ghafoor et al., 2021; Bhattacharya et al., 2021) . The continued release of these pollutants into the environment could potentially have catastrophic effects on aquatic ecosystems worldwide (Zhang et al., 2020) . However, these crises are not a pretext for dropping scientific standards (London and J. Kimmelman et al., 2020) . Providing safe, clean water for J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof human consumption is critical to fighting off this pandemic, especially in countries that already face water scarcity issues that have been exacerbated by the transboundary nature of the pandemic (Van der Voorn et al. 2020).

Although several studies have optimistically assumed that COVID-19 has not yet affected freshwater sources, the possibility of subsequent global environmental issues may exist (Barouki et al., 2021) . Very limited studies have explored coronavirus contamination in water bodies and the current COVID-19 crisis makes a case for studying the virus's effect on the environment and the appropriate response to it (La . A study of the sewage system across the United States (Pennisi, 2015) revealed that each city has its own microbial character, showing local health levels and disease types. Similarly, COVID-19 can be considered an indicator of environmental vulnerability. The COVID-19 crisis has been an excellent opportunity to show our responsibility to our planet by preventing water overuse during handwashing and avoiding added pressure on the public sewage system and water supply (Sayeed et al., 2021) . Once this crisis ends, the lessons learned should be remembered and applied to similar challenges in the future.

It is interesting that a tiny RNA particle revealed the need to find more sustainable wastewater treatments, but this lesson is far from being the ideal outcome of this pandemic. It is scientists' duty to report reliable news, conduct rapid and precise research on COVID-19, and advocate for scientists worldwide to overcome this crisis. It will be important not to forget that the price paid during the COVID-19 pandemic will help us handle future health crises. The 

Occurrence of viruses in US groundwaters

First detection of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in the vicinity of COVID-19 isolation centre through wastewater surveillance in Bangladesh. medRxiv (preprint)

First detection of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in the vicinity of COVID-19 isolation centre in Bangladesh: Variation along the sewer network

First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: A proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community

Making waves: Coronavirus detection, presence, and persistence in the water environment: State of the art and knowledge needs for public health

Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the wastewater pathway into surface water: A review

& HERA-COVID-19 working group

Virus inactivation in groundwater in postglacial lava field in arctic climate

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in communities through wastewater surveillance -A potential approach for

Wastewater-Based Epidemiology

Role of wastewater treatment in COVID-19 control

Causes of outbreaks associated with drinking water in the United States from 1971 to

Effects of COVID-19 on the environment: an overview on air, water, wastewater, and solid waste

A multiplex reverse transcription-PCR method for detection of human enteric viruses in groundwater

Excessive use of disinfectants against COVID-19 posing potential threat to living beings

COVID-19 surveillance in Southeastern Virginia using wastewater-based epidemiology

Survival of coronaviruses in water and wastewater

Do not violate the International Health Regulations during the COVID-19 outbreak

Potential groundwater pollutants from cemeteries

Coronavirus in water environments: Occurrence, persistence and concentration methods-A scoping review

Coronavirus found in Paris sewage points to early warning system

Against pandemic research exceptionalism

and vitality of SARS-CoV-2 virus in wastewaters and rivers

The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in different freshwater environments in urban settings determined by RT-qPCR: Implications for water safety

Coronavirus and the water cycle-here is what treatment professionals need to know

Presence of SARS-coronavirus-2 RNA in sewage and correlation with reported COVID-19 prevalence in the early stage of the epidemic in the Netherlands

Post Covid-19 water and wastewater management to protect public health and geoenvironment

Pollution, human health tracked with sewage microbes

Transmission of SARS-Cov-2 and other enveloped viruses to the environment through protective gear: a brief review

Handwashing with soap: A concern for overuse of water amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh

The chlorine dilemma

Indirect implications of COVID-19 towards sustainable environment: an investigation in Indian context

SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in water and wastewater: A critical review about presence and concern

Never waste a crisis: drawing first lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic to tackle the water crisis

Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein

Study on the resistance of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus

Analysis of inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by specimen transport media, nucleic acid extraction reagents, detergents, and fixatives

Water, sanitation, hygiene and waste management for COVID-19: technical brief

World Health Organization

Water, sanitation, hygiene and waste management for COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater are higher than expected from clinically confirmed cases

Evaluation of lockdown impact on SARS-CoV-2 dynamics through viral genome quantification in Paris wastewaters

Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment

Disinfection threatens aquatic ecosystems

Meysam Vadiati: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Writing -Original Draft

Writing -Original Draft; Prosun Bhattacharya: Conceptualization, Validation, Resources, Writing -Review & Editing

Bandala: Investigation, Resources, Writing -Original Draft

Authors grateful thanks Ms. Nicole Damon (DRI) for her editorial review.

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof