key: cord-0909273-6zswrkua
authors: Alshami, Alanoud; Al Attas, Rabab; Azzam, Ahmad; Mohammed, Amani; Al-Quhaidan, Norah
title: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pediatric kidney transplant patients
date: 2021-04-07
journal: BMC Nephrol
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02325-x
sha: 54be349b5b94f4c96f2bc842c105c31da19fb32f
doc_id: 909273
cord_uid: 6zswrkua

BACKGROUND: The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been studied in immunocompetent children. However, data in the pediatric kidney transplant population (PKT) are lacking. METHODS: Using two commercial immunoassays that measured IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and IgG against the nucleocapsid (N) protein, we screened 72 PKT recipients who attended the outpatient clinic for routine blood work. The majority of patients with positive serology underwent an additional serology test at least once during subsequent clinical follow-up. Patients were confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 infection if they had two positive tests. RESULTS: Eight patients out of the 72 screened (11.1%) had positive results for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in both serological tests. Of those who tested positive, 4 had positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR results before screening. All patients were asymptomatic or had a history of mild symptoms. All tested patients had persistently positive antibodies at a median follow-up time of 75 days (IQR, 44.5, 86.5 days). One patient had a positive PCR test at 75 days and a positive serology test at 120 days post infection. CONCLUSION: The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was relatively high (11.1%) in our population. Although all patients were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, they mounted a strong humoral immune response that persisted for a few months despite being on triple immunosuppressants. These findings have positive implications regarding vaccination efficacy in this group.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is considered a public health emergency. Despite all efforts and policies to contain it, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) infection continued to spread rapidly. As of October 8, 2020, COVID-19 has led to over 1 million deaths and 3.5 million cases worldwide [1] Approximately 85% of cases will be mild, while 10% will have moderate disease requiring hospitalization, and 5% will have severe disease requiring ICU admission [2] As pediatric solid organ transplant recipients are considered a high-risk group and are prone to more severe viral, bacterial, and fungal infections, this pandemic has raised concerns among the transplant community about managing this vulnerable group. In the early days of the pandemic, COVID-19 was thought to be more severe among immunocompromised patients. The fear of more severe disease has limited kidney transplant surgeries to those that are urgent and has led to the closure of many living transplant programs [3] , including ours. This perceived risk in transplant patients is an extrapolation of data from other viruses. Unlike influenza and adenovirus [4] , SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to preferentially affect immunocompromised patients. There is emerging evidence that immunosuppressed children exhibit mild disease [5] [6] [7] . This mild disease course could be explained by the role of immunosuppressants in damping of the dysfunctional or hyperimmune response that occurs in the later stages of the infection, leading to lung tissue injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [8] . Although we are one year into the pandemic, little is known about the effect of COVID-19 on the pediatric kidney transplant (PKT) population.

To better understand the SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence, clinical presentation and the rate of seroconversion in the PKT population, we aimed to perform universal SARS-CoV-2 serological testing in all our pediatric kidney transplant patients attending outpatient clinics.

This study was approved by the institutional review board of King Fahad Specialist Hospital -Dammam/ Saudi Arabia (IRB Number: PED0134). Verbal consent was obtained from all parents, and additional assent was obtained from those who were more than seven years old.

This study was a single-center cross-sectional study aiming to study the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in a pediatric cohort of kidney transplant recipients. All PKT recipients ≤17 years of age who attended an outpatient clinic visit or came to the hospital laboratory at King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam for routine posttransplant blood work between August 15th and October 12th, 2020 were enrolled. Data on demographics, immunosuppressant use, primary disease, time since transplant and SARS-COV-2 PCR results were collected from electronic records. Two extra milliliters of blood for serology testing was drawn from all patients during routine blood work.

All children enrolled were retrospectively screened for COVID-19 symptoms in the last 3 months before enrollment through the clinic triage system or phone call surveys.

The symptom checklist included fever> 38°C, cough, fatigue, shortness of breath, sore throat, runny nose, headache, abdominal pain, diarrhea, anosmia, and ageusia.

Serology tests were prospectively repeated for followup titers if the patient had initial positive serology, and a follow-up clinic visit or follow-up laboratory work were conducted for those with positive PCR who did not show evidence of seroconversion in the initial sample. Parents and/or patients were informed about the positive SARS-CoV-2 serology results and were asked again about any history of COVID-19 symptoms in the past 3 months or history of close contact with confirmed COVID-19 cases. They were also asked to perform PCR tests for their children if one of the serology tests was positive.

As the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in the pediatric transplant population is not well determined and expected to be low, the positive predictive value of a single serological assay might not be accurate. To improve the diagnostic accuracy of the serological test, we used two different FDA-approved commercially available serological assays that test different SARS-CoV-2 protein components. Assays with dual target antigens have been shown to have better predictive abilities [9] . Only patients with positive results for both tests were deemed to have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Serological essay for SARS-COV-2 antibodies Diasorine Liasion® SARS-COV-2 S1/S2 IgG assay This assay is a quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) against SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins S1 and S2 with a reported sensitivity of 97.6% at > 15 days, a specificity of 99.3% and a positive predicted value (PPV) of 87.5% [10] . The test was performed as per the manufacturer's instructions. Readings > 15 AU/ml were considered positive, and readings < 12 AU/ml were considered negative; the upper detectable limit was 400 Au/ml as per the manufacturer's manual.

This assay is a qualitative chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) intended to measure IgG antibodies against SARS-COV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein.

As per the last EUA-authorized serology test performance, the Abbot test has 100% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, and 93.4% PPV [10] . All assays were performed according to the manufacturer's protocols. Samples were interpreted as positive or negative according to the manufacturer's instructions [11] .

The demographics and clinical characteristics of the entire cohort are shown in (Table 1) . Of the 72 PKT patients screened by serological testing for SARS-CoV-2, 12.5% (9 of 72) were found to have positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG in at least one test. A total of 88.9% (8 of 9) patients had positive results on both tests. Notably, 4 patients out of the tested patients had a history of a positive PCR before serological testing. Two out of the four (50%) patients who had positive PCR were completely asymptomatic, and a test was performed for elective admissions, one for kidney biopsy for new onset de novo donor-specific antibodies (case 1) ( Table 2 ) and the other for investigations for rising creatinine.

The third patient presented to the ER with a history of fever (38.5°C), cough, shortness of breath, myalgia and headache. PCR taken at that time was positive for COVID-19 (case 2). The fourth patient (case 3) had symptoms and had positive PCR results that were not disclosed before serology testing.

The median age of patients with detectable COVID-19 antibodies was 9 years (IQR, 6-13 years). A total of 77.8% (7 out 9) were male ( Table 2 ). Seven patients were on triple maintenance immune suppressants consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone every other day. One patient was on azathioprine instead of MMF, and one patient was not on prednisone. The median time from transplant to testing positive was 3.8 years (IQR, 1.5-3.8). All but one patient had a household contact with confirmed COVID-19. Upon asking the eight asymptomatic children or their parents at the time of serology testing about history of COVID-19 symptoms in the last 3 months, 75% (6 of 8) of them reported mild symptoms. A total of 62.5% (5 of 8) reported history of fever, 50% (4 of 8) had history of cough, 2 had history of diarrhea (25%), and headache and loss of taste and smell were reported in one patient (12.5%) ( Table 2) .

A total of 85 serological tests using both Diasorin Lia-sion® and Abbott were performed on 72 PKT recipients. We reported agreement between Abbott and Diasorin in 8 patients (88.9%). All patients with a positive PCR test except one had serological evidence of seroconversion (3/4). The patient who did not exhibit seroconversion received rituximab 4 months before her positive PCR result. She was first tested 70 days after her first positive PCR test and again at 90 days, at which point she was serologically negative. Notably, this patient received 4 doses of rituximab 4 months before her positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR, and her CD19 cell count at that time was 0 cell/μL. In one patient (case 9), the Abbott test was negative, but the Diasorin assay was positive. To ensure that this was not a false positive result, we repeated both tests after 1 week, and the results were the same. This patient's PCR was negative, the patient was completely asymptomatic, and the parents denied any history of close contact with a COVID-19 patient.

From previous reports, we learned that most COVID-19 patients are IgG antibody positive by three weeks [12] and that antibodies start to decline after two to three months [13] . However, this is not the case with our young patients. Surprisingly, we had two patients whose IgG titers were above the test upper limit of detection (400 AU/ml). One patient had his test repeated 70 days after his mild symptoms (case 6), and the other had his test repeated 88 days after his symptoms (case 8). Overall, all patients had increasing titers over time ( Table 3 ). The lowest titer detected was 32 AU/ml (Case 9). All patients with positive serological tests had their test repeat at least once except for two patients (cases 5 and 7). There was a clear increase in the serology titer over time, and all of them had positive antibodies until the end of the study. The median time from onset of symptoms or from PCR in asymptomatic patients to the first serological test was 31 days (IQR 19.5-49.5 days), and the median time to the last serological test was 75 days (IQR, 44.5-86.5 days). We compared the antibody titer of our patients to the antibody titer of their immunocompetent parents or adult household contacts who requested to have their antibody titers checked using the same quantitative assay (Table 3) . Interestingly, their results were much lower than those of their children except in case 1.

Most SARS-CoV-2 infections in children with intact immune responses are mild. However, severe infection can rarely occur [14] . The difference in disease severity between adult and pediatric populations might be related to a more robust innate immune response and higher levels of interleukin-17 and interferon gamma in children [15] ,, which play an important role in early disease containment. This difference in disease severity could also be explained by the fact that children are more prone to recurrent viral infection that can cause epigenetic changes in their trained immune system, making it more efficient at fighting the virus [16] . Immunocompromised patients are always at a higher risk of contracting severe viral and bacterial infections. Understanding the host immune response of the kidney transplant population to SARS-CoV-2 infection is evolving but remains unclear.

Herein, we reported our experience in using serological testing as a screening tool for COVID-19 PKT recipients. Of the 72 PKT recipients who underwent serological testing, the prevalence of COVID-19 based on two positive serological tests for SARS-COV-2 IgG was 11.1% (8 of 72). The patient with positive PCR and negative seroconversion was found to have profound B cell lymphopenia a few months before her infection, which could explain the lack of antibody production in this case. Few case reports from multiple sclerosis patients who were on B lymphocyte-depleting agents showed either negative SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion or an attenuated antibody response [17, 18] . However, no one knows how these patients would respond to vaccination. Another explanation for the negative seroconversion in this patient could be that she lost her antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 by the time she was tested.

It is well known that the early adaptive humoral immune response involving the development of neutralizing antiviral antibodies is an important mechanism in eliminating viral replication and providing protection [22] . Furthermore, a large multicenter seroprevalence study including 992 children of health care workers living in the UK found that 68 (6.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 50% of them were asymptomatic, and the rest had only mild symptoms [23] . In another study that enrolled 13 patients with inflammatory bowel disease on immune suppressants who were diagnosed with COVID-19 based on a positive PCR, seroconversion occurred in 4 out of the 6 tested patients (66.7%), one patient had an equivocal serological test, and one did not exhibit seroconversion. Notably, 46.2% of the patients were completely asymptomatic despite no alteration in their baseline immunosuppressants; 53.8% were mildly symptomatic, and fever was the most common symptom [24] .

After reviewing the limited available literature about SARS-COV-2 infection in the pediatric transplant population, we found that transplantation and an immunocompromised state do not increase the risk of ICU admission or mortality in the pediatric population. However, data in the adult transplant population showed contradictory results. In the pediatric transplant population, there is some evidence from multiple case series showing that immunosuppressant medications might have a beneficial effect. Bush et al. reported a case of a pediatric kidney transplant recipient who had a mild course of the disease despite being on immunosuppressant medications. In a series of 200 pediatric liver transplant patients in a large transplant center in Italy, 3 cases of COVID-19 were reported, and none of these patients had severe pneumonia or a severe course [25] .

This observation led the author to conclude that immunosuppressant medications might have a protective role.

In a systematic review of 16 articles including children and adults with cancer and kidney, heart, liver and immunodeficiency patients, immunocompromised patients had similar and sometimes more favorable outcomes than the general population. However, this favorable outcome was not observed in cancer patients [26] .

In our study, serological testing identified five patients with COVID-19 who otherwise would have been missed because of mild or asymptomatic disease. Although none of those five patients had severe symptoms or complications that required hospital attention, identifying them helped us better understand the full clinical spectrum of the disease in this vulnerable group. We learned that asymptomatic COVID-19 is not uncommon in the PKT population.

Out of the four patients with documented positive PCR, 75% seroconverted with relatively high antibody titers. Two patients had readings above the detectable upper limits of the test (> 400 AU/ml). Although these levels are very high, no one truly knew how these levels translate into protection from the virus. These findings were unexpected, as we already know that compared to the regular population, transplant patients who developed infection have a blunted immune response and a low rate of seroconversion [27] .. The fact that our transplant patients mounted a strong humoral immune response to natural infection makes us believe that they will elicit the same, if not stronger, immune response with future vaccination when it becomes available for this age group. More interestingly, all patients who mounted rigorous immune responses to COVID-19 were still positive at a median time of 75 days (IQR, 69-83 days). One patient (case 2) was still positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG at 120 days. The fact that all our positive serology patients had a history of contact with SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive household members validates the positive serology results in our cohort. It also supports the hypothesis of possible household transmission among children that was addressed by Buonsenos et al [28] . The one patient (case 9) who had only one positive test was consider as negative. Of note, the parents' antibody titers from approximately the same time as those assessed their children were significantly lower than those in their children except in one patient. These findings are in contrast to what has been reported by Pierce et al., who showed that serum neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were higher in adults than in children [15] .

Importantly, no major modifications were made to the immunosuppressant medication in any PCR-positive patients except for one patient (case 3) in whom the MMF dose was reduced by half for one week. All patients but one developed a humoral immune response to COVID-19. This high rate of seroconversion in the PKT population has been replicated in adults and a few pediatric studies. In a recently published work by Prendecki et al., they found a relatively high seroprevalence rate of 10.4% in a cohort of adult kidney transplant recipients [29] In another small cohort of the PKT population that included 31 patients, seroconversion was reported in only one patient who was completely asymptomatic, and 3 patients had intermediate positive results [30] . Two adult kidney transplant patients reported seroconversion between days 19 and 23 after the reduction of immunosuppressants [31] .. There was also documented seroconversion in another two adult kidney transplant patients who developed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at 30 days post infection [32] . Moreover, a study performed by Hartzell et al. reported 100% seroconversion in 16 SARS-CoV-2positive adult kidney transplant patients [33] . Furthermore, Choi et al. also reported a 100% seroconversion rate in 5 adult KTR patients [34] . Some of the current adult transplant guidelines including the guidelines from the Canadian society of transplantation pediatric group [35] suggest reduction or complete withdrawal of immunosuppressants. However, this suggestion was challenged by multiple studies that showed the ability of CNI to inhibit in vitro viral replication of SARS-CoV-2 infection independent of its immunosuppressant effects [36] . Furthermore, cyclosporine was successfully used to treat cases of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistocytosis (HLH) that overlaps with the cytokine release storm, which seems to be the leading cause of mortality in COVID-19 patients [37] .

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to report a relatively high seroprevalence of COVID-19 in the PKT population. This is the first study to test the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection using a quantitative serological assay that correlates with neutralizing antibodies in this population. However, similar to all pediatric kidney transplant studies, we were limited by a small sample size, especially in this highly protected group. Moreover, the results cannot be generalized to all PKT patients, as the majority of the patients enrolled were more than one year post transplantation and were on lowdose maintenance immunosuppressants. The immune assays used were IgG based, so acute infection could have been missed. Importantly, all samples obtained were from Saudi children who might have different immunological backgrounds that can affect the immunoassay performance characteristics. For all these mentioned reasons, further larger studies with wider geographical samples and longer durations of antibody titer follow-up are needed.

The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in our study is the highest reported among the PKT population so far. Screening PKT patients using serological testing was effective in identifying the whole spectrum of the disease, including asymptomatic patients. On the other hand, symptom-based screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection might not be an effective tool in identifying who should be tested, as asymptomatic infection is not uncommon and can lead to disease spread in hospital settings and in public. Most importantly, the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection was rigorous and persistent in the PKT population, which will have positive implications for future vaccination. Immunosuppressants seem to not exert an additional risk for a more severe course in this population, and a reduction in immunosuppressants might not be necessary. 

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Global Epidemiological Situation

Articles Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan , China : a retrospective cohort study

Garonzik-Wang JM Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric kidney transplant in the United States

The Natural History of Influenza Infection in the Severely Immunocompromised vs Nonimmunocompromised Hosts

Flash survey on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infections in paediatric patients on anticancer treatment

The severity of COVID-19 in children on immunosuppressive medication

00:e14063. | 1 of 8 Costa Reis 13 | Ana Teixeira 14 | Maria Francelina Lopes 15 | Piotr Kaliciński 16 | Sophie Branchereau 17 | Olivia Boyer 18 | Dominque Debray 19 | Marco Sciveres

Immunosuppressive Drugs and COVID-19: A Review

Brief clinical evaluation of six high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assays

SARS-CoV-2 IgG

Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19

The dynamics of humoral immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection and the potential for reinfection

Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children: experts' consensus statement

Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized pediatric and adult patients

Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease

Negative SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing following COVID-19 infection in two MS patients treated with ocrelizumab

Attenuation of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in a patient on ocrelizumab with hypogammaglobulinemia

Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV

Longitudinal analysis of serology and neutralizing antibody levels in COVID19 convalescents

COVID-19 in children treated with immunosuppressive medication for kidney diseases

Task Force of the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology Impact of COVID-19 pandemic in children with CKD or immunosuppression

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in children: A prospective multicentre cohort study

SARS-COV-2 infection and SEROCONVERSION in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease patients

The Facts During the Third Epidemic

How is immunosuppressive status affecting children and adults in SARS-CoV-2 infection? A systematic review

Impact of immunosuppression on recall immune responses to influenza vaccination in stable renal transplant recipients

adults with COVID-19 : preliminary findings

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in kidney transplant recipients

Assessment of Seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Influence of immunosuppression on seroconversion against SARS-CoV-2 in two kidney transplant recipients

Serologies, and clinical course in a case series of transplant recipients

Evidence of potent humoral immune activity in COVID-19-infected kidney transplant recipients

Low Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies during Systematic Antibody Screening and Serum Responses in Patients after COVID-19 in a

Management of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance from the Canadian Society of Transplantation Pediatric Group

COVID-19 and Calcineurin inhibitors: should they get left out in the storm?

Efficacy of cyclosporine a in the treatment of macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile arthritis: report of five cases

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

We would like to thank our patients and their parents for participating in our research. We would also like to thank our transplant clinical coordinator (Ms. Fatima AlDokhi) for coordinating this work.

Authors' contributions A.A. Generated the research idea, collected data, drafted the manuscript, and supervised the research. R.A. Performed the serological test and manuscript editing. A.AZ. Collect data and reviewed the manuscript. A.M. Performed the serological tests and reviewed the manuscript. N.A. Performed the serological tests and reviewed the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Availability of data and materials The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the institutional review board of King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Saudi Arabia (IRB Number: PED0134). Verbal consent was obtained from all parents along with additional assent from children more than 7 years of age. The participation of patients and their families was voluntary, and their anonymity was preserved by deidentifying the data. This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Patient consent for publication was not required, as all data were anonymized.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.