key: cord-0930312-xpg4ifxm
authors: Starling, Lindsay T.; McKay, Carly; Cross, Matt; Kemp, Simon; West, Stephen; Stokes, Keith A.
title: Prolonged restricted training, fixture congestion and player rotation: what the COVID-19 pandemic taught us about injury risk in professional collision sport
date: 2022-03-24
journal: J Sci Med Sport
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.03.012
sha: 3f18dc0ea9ff606ccc3ab921fe86db3d376987ac
doc_id: 930312
cord_uid: xpg4ifxm

OBJECTIVES: The COVID19-induced suspension of the 2019–20 professional England rugby union season resulted in players being exposed to an extended time of restricted training, coupled with a congested match schedule once competition resumed. We assessed the impact of these changes on match and training injuries in the final 20-weeks of the season following the resumption of competition. DESIGN: The 2019–20 season was compared to the previous three seasons (2016–19). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean incidence, severity and burden of training and match injuries in 2019–20 compared to the 2016–19 period mean. The 2019–20 post-suspension mean match injury rate [77/1000 h (95%CIs: 67–89)] was comparable to the 2019–20 pre-suspension [93/1000 h (95%CIs:85–101)] and significantly lower than the 2016–19 seasons equivalent post-suspension period [97/1000 h (95%CIs: 90–104) IRR 0.8 p = 0.002]. In the 2019–20 season, there was a significantly higher rate of training injury post-suspension in comparison to pre-suspension [3.8/1000 h (95%CIs:3.3–4.4) vs 2.7/1000 h (95%CIs:2.5–3.1) IRR 1.4 p = 0.005]. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence, severity or burden of injuries sustained in fixtures with shorter (<6d) turnarounds but there was a significantly higher burden of soft tissue injuries. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the effect of a period of restricted training on injury risk in collision sports. Players were at an increased risk of training injury when returning from the suspension of competition, but 10-weeks of preparatory training meant that the incidence of match injury was not higher when competition resumed.

The outbreak of the Coronavirus pandemic (COVID19) resulted in the suspension of many professional sports leagues. The 2019-20 English Premiership Rugby Union (rugby) season was threequarters of the way through when it was suspended for 22 weeks. Given the physical nature and high collision demands of rugby match play, the development and maintenance of key physical qualities, skills and decision-making ability are generally developed through structured periodized training programs. Players are accustomed to high intensities of training 1 to ensure optimal performance and mitigate the risks of injury associated with the game 2,3 . It is not known what effect of a period of disrupted or restricted training might have on injury risk in collision sports.

In 2011, a 20-week shutdown of the National Football League (NFL) was followed by a fourfold increase in the number of Achilles tendon ruptures upon resumption of competition and higher numbers of soft tissue injuries than in any previous or subsequent season 4, 5 . In professional rugby union, the 5-week off-season is typically the longest period players have away from the game. Even when players have access to training facilities during this time, a greater frequency and burden of training injuries is observed in the first six weeks, in comparison to the last six weeks, of the preseason period 2 . As such, an extended period of restricted training may result in players being unable to maintain both the physical and psychological qualities necessary to protect against injury.

Alternatively, it is possible that restricted training would allow players the opportunity for mental and physical rest and recovery, and the ability to focus on full recovery and rehabilitation of previous injury 2 . Coupled with appropriate reconditioning on return to training, some players may return to competition in an improved psychological and physiological state, better able to tolerate the demands of the game.

When professional leagues restarted, to facilitate a timely completion of the season, matches were scheduled with shorter than normal intervals between matches. Limited time between games in football have been associated with a greater incidence of injury in weeks where more than one match J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof was played in comparison to weeks where only one match was scheduled [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] . The demanding physical nature of rugby match play means that players often require an extended period of time to fully recover from the match-induced fatigue and muscle damage 11 . Therefore, it is possible that reduced recovery between matches could increase the risk of injury and this could be particularly relevant following a period of limited training and match play.

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of an extended period of restricted training followed by a congested fixture schedule on the incidence, severity and nature of match and training injuries in the remaining 20-weeks of the season played following the resumption of competition.

Each season, time-loss match and training injury data were collected as part of the Professional Rugby Injury Surveillance Project from England's 12 Premiership rugby clubs 12 . Injury data were captured using an online injury surveillance platform, "Rugby Squad" (the Sports Office UK Ltd), according to the Consensus Statement for injury recording in rugby union 13 . A time-loss injury was defined according to the consensus statement as any "injury that results in a player being unable to take a full part in future rugby training or match play for more than 24 hours from midnight at the end of the day the injury was sustained" 13 . Injury severity was defined as the number of days lost from match play or training 13 . Training exposure data were collected as: Rugby skills contact (full-contact: contact without the use of external padding and semi-contact: contact with the use of pads/ bags), rugby skills non-contact (without contact between players), conditioning non-weights (e.g., running endurance, speed/agility, power) and conditioning weights. The number of players and number of minutes spent performing each training type each week was captured using an online platform. Match exposure was calculated as the number of matches multiplied by the number of exposed players (15) 

Injury incidence was calculated as the count of injuries per 1000 player hours and ninety-five % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Poisson distribution. Incidence was compared using incidence rate ratios (IRR) and p values, with Holm-Bonferroni adjustments applied to p values to offset the increased risk of a type 1 error when conducting multiple comparisons. Significance was set at p≤0.05. Mean severity was calculated as the total sum of days absent divided by the total count of injuries. Median severity was calculated as the midpoint of the range of injury severities within the dataset with interquartile range (IQR). Injury burden was calculated as the product of mean severity and incidence (days absent per 1000 player-match hours). Where a significant difference in mean burden was observed, as determined by non-overlapping 95%CIs, burden was also calculated using the median severity value to account for the positive-skewed distribution of severity data. Mean burden is presented throughout, with significance indicated only if 95%CIs did not overlap when burden was calculated with both mean and median severity. The authors acknowledge that assessing statistical difference via overlapping confidence intervals is conservative and carriers a risk for type 1 errors 14 . Stata V16.0 was used for all statistical analysis 15 . Table 1 ). The mean severity of contact-related match injuries sustained in the 2019-20 post-suspension period were significantly lower than pre-suspension; however, there was no significant difference in the burden (Table 1 ). There were no significant differences in the rate of injury by body location pre-suspension versus post-suspension (Table S1 ).

In the post-suspension period of the 2019-20 season, 57 fixtures (1140 exposure hours) had ≥6 days between sequential fixtures (normal) and 65 fixtures (1300 exposure hours) had <6 days between J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof sequential fixtures (shorter). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence, severity or burden of injuries sustained in fixtures with shorter vs normal turnaround (Table S2) . Soft tissue injuries sustained in shorter turnaround fixtures had a significantly higher burden than those sustained in normal turnaround fixtures [2388 days absence/1000 hours (95%CIs:1838-3101) vs 1239 days absence/1000 hours (95%CIs:907-1692) (Table S2) ].

In the pre-suspension period of the 2019-20 season, the mean number of players who played ≥ 20 minutes in sequential matches was 12 (tertile cut-offs:11 and 14), compared with 9 in the postsuspension period (tertiles:7 and 13). In the 2019-20 post-suspension period the mean number of players who played ≥ 20 minutes in shorter turnaround fixtures was 7 (tertiles:5 and 8), while in normal turnaround fixtures it was 12 (tertiles:11 and 15). Mean incidence of injury was not different between fixtures that had low, medium, or high player rotation, with or without adjustment for time between fixtures (i.e., normal vs shorter) (Table S3) . (Table S4 ).

Journal Pre-proof

The suspension of professional leagues due to the COVID-19 pandemic created a unique opportunity to study the influence of an extended period of restricted training and the influence of a congested match schedule on injury risk. In professional rugby in England there was an increased rate of injury when players first returned to training, but 10-weeks of preparatory training, likely alongside well-structured player management and greater player rotation, meant that the incidence of match injury when competition resumed was not higher than pre-suspension match injury rates. Scheduling of midweek matches did not result in significant differences in the overall incidence, severity or burden of injuries sustained in matches that had a shorter than normal turnaround, however there was a significantly higher burden of soft tissue injuries in fixtures with <6 days turnaround.

In the 2019-20 season there was a significantly higher overall mean training injury rate post-suspension in comparison to pre-suspension, with the 10-week training period post-suspension being the primary contributor to this. As such, it appears that players were at an increased risk of injury when they first returned following the period of restricted training. Physical parameters such as strength, power, aerobic and anaerobic running capabilities, are relatively easier to maintain when training individually in comparison to the rugby-specific physical and mental demands of the game 2 . Contact events, changing direction while running at speed and under-pressure decision making require interaction with other players to be executed to their full capacity. It is thus likely that players returned in a deconditioned state in specific aspects of rugbyrelated fitness resulting in an increased risk of injury.

Despite the greater injury rate in the immediate return to training, the 10-week post-suspension training period appeared to mitigate an increased risk of injury once competition resumed, with similar post-and presuspension in-season training injury rates. In a typical season, the preseason period is 6-12 weeks in length, therefore, the 10-week period was similar to a full preseason. Strength and conditioning and sports science The 2019-20 post-suspension match injury rate is comparable to the 2019-20 pre-suspension match injury rate and significantly lower than the 2016-19 post-suspension match injury rate. Unlike the findings of previous studies in which a higher match injury rate was observed after a prolonged break 9,10 , the suspension of matches and regular team training in our study did not result in higher match injury rates in the first three months following the resumption of competition. While factors such as a age, injury history and current injury status will have influenced each player's response to the lockdown period, it is possible that the extended period of non-contact training may have served as a positive period for physical and psychosocial rest and recovery for some players 2 . This may have been an opportunity to focus on full recovery from previous injury or target the development of specific physical weaknesses, without the stressors of having to prepare for weekly matches. Coupled with appropriate and progressive reconditioning on return to training, this may have resulted in an improvement in physical condition and performance and reduced mental fatigue and as such players were better able to tolerate the demands of the game. It is also possible that staff were more diligent in the prescription of prehabilitation and conditioning exercises as they were aware of the potential increased risk of injury following the suspension of competition.

It is important to note that a large points deduction for one team meant it was certain from early in the season they would be relegated to the second-tier competition. Knowing which team would be relegated may have resulted in teams experiencing different pressures and thus adopting different player rotation strategies, impacting individual match load. Teams may also have allowed players experiencing injury complaints greater time to recover. It is possible that clubs altered their squad size or used a wider pool of players within their squad during this period, although this was not specifically examined in the current study. turnarounds were not different. In football, increased injury rates have been reported during periods of fixture congestion in comparison to normal scheduling 6-10 , attributed to the increased physical and mental load on players 9,10,16 . In the present study, players appeared able to cope with the intensive, congested match schedule when played under the unique conditions of this period. Players were aware that this period of congestion would likely be a once-off, 10-week period, and it is possible that they were able to tolerate the increased load for a short period of time. There was also greater player rotation in shorter turnaround fixtures, reflecting careful management of players during this period.

In professional football, significantly higher rates of muscle and ligament injuries have been reported in matches with <4 days recovery compared to those with >6 days 9,10 . In the present study, there was a significantly higher burden of soft tissue injury in fixtures with <6 days compared with ≥6 days turnaround.

Furthermore, the injury rate of conditioning non-weights training in the 2019-20 season was significantly higher post-suspension in comparison to pre-suspension, with 94% of the injuries in this category being soft tissue injuries. Soft tissue injuries are often considered to be partly explained by fatigue leading to biomechanical and structural changes to the muscles making them more prone to injury [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] . Our findings suggest that players may have been beginning to show signs of fatigue accumulation and/or incomplete physical recovery during the post-suspension period of the season, where mid-week matches were played, and subsequent seasons' data will be needed to determine any medium-term impact. It should be noted that that match and training exposure data was incorporated on the team level, rather than individual level, meaning it was not possible to identify if training exposure differed between match selected and non-match selected players each week. It is worth noting that it is possible that COVID-19 induced absence from training, due to infection or close contact isolation, could influence injury incidence alongside other individual risk factors, but as this was not a research question in this study, we did not capture the data required to perform the analysis.

This is the first study to assess the influence of an extended period away from match play and the influence of congested match fixtures on injury risk in collision sports. The findings support previous work showing that a period of time away from matches and regular training is associated with an increased risk of injury when first returning to training 1, 22 . However, we found that an extended period away, coupled with an appropriate and progressive return to training resulted in a lower match injury rate than the injury rate following a regular off-season once competition resumed. In the global sports context, the potential for positive mental and physical effects of an extended period away from sport should be considered by practitioners and policy developers. While it appears that players may have been starting to show signs of fatigue accumulation towards the end of the season, when mid-week matches were played, greater player rotation strategies assisted in alleviating an increased injury rate in the short-term and suggests squad size should be a consideration by team sport practitioners when managing periods of fixture congestion. 

Patterns of training volume and injury risk in elite rugby union: An analysis of 1.5 million hours of training exposure over eleven seasons

Returning to play after prolonged training restrictions in professional collision sports

The development, retention and decay rates of strength and power in elite rugby union, rugby league and american football: A systematic review

Did the NFL lockout expose the achilles heel of competitive sports

NFL Injuries Before and After the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)

Injury Incidence and Workloads during congested Schedules in Football

Effect of 2 soccer matches more than 130 000 match observations

Effect of different between-match recovery times on the activity profiles and injury rates of national rugby league players

Trends in match injury risk in professional male rugby union: A 16-season review of 10 851 match injuries in the English Premiership (2002-2019): The professional rugby injury surveillance project

Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures for studies of injuries in rugby union

On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals

Stata statistical software: release 16

A congested football calendar and the wellbeing of players: Correlation between match exposure of European footballers before the World Cup 2002 and their injuries and performers during that World Cup

The role of fatigue in susceptibility to acute muscle strain injury

Muscle fatigue induced by a soccer match-play simulation in amateur Black South African players

The effects of multidirectional soccer-specific fatigue

Burden/1000 hours (95%CI) Low

The authors would like to thank the medical and sport science staff at each of the Premiership clubs who took part in the study. 

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f