key: cord-0957747-lw25m6x2
authors: Jiang, Chunying; Mu, Xihui; Liu, Shuai; Liu, Zhiwei; Du, Bin; Wang, Jiang; Xu, Jianjie
title: A Study of the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 ORF1ab Gene by the Use of Electrochemiluminescent Biosensor Based on Dual-Probe Hybridization
date: 2022-03-21
journal: Sensors (Basel)
DOI: 10.3390/s22062402
sha: 0efd2aa38ff01164f692fac65a1cc0fb447396f3
doc_id: 957747
cord_uid: lw25m6x2

To satisfy the need to develop highly sensitive methods for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and further enhance detection efficiency and capability, a new method was created for detecting SARS-CoV-2 of the open reading frames 1ab (ORF1ab) target gene by a electrochemiluminescence (ECL) biosensor based on dual-probe hybridization through the use of a detection model of “magnetic capture probes—targeted nucleic acids—Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) labeled signal probes”. The detection model used magnetic particles coupled with a biotin-labeled complementary nucleic acid sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 ORF1ab target gene as the magnetic capture probes and Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) labeled amino modified another complementary nucleic acid sequence as the signal probes, which combined the advantages of the highly specific dual-probe hybridization and highly sensitive ECL biosensor technology. In the range of 0.1 fM~10 µM, the method made possible rapid and sensitive detection of the ORF1ab gene of the SARS-CoV-2 within 30 min, and the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.1 fM. The method can also meet the analytical requirements for simulated samples such as saliva and urine with the definite advantages of a simple operation without nucleic acid amplification, high sensitivity, reasonable reproducibility, and anti-interference solid abilities, expounding a new way for efficient and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2.

The new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 has become a global public health threat with its rapid transmission and high mortality rate, causing great concern worldwide. It belongs to the same family as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus that surfaced in 2003, and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) virus that emerged in 2012 in the Middle East, posing a significant threat to human health [1] [2] [3] [4] . Since early diagnosis and cutting off the transmission route are paramount to preventing and controlling the epidemic, the rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 has become a key area of focus [5] [6] [7] .

Nucleic acid detection is currently the gold standard for detecting SARS-CoV-2, and the primary detection tool with the advantages of early diagnosis, high sensitivity, and specificity [8, 9] . Current nucleic acid-based assays include complete genome sequence [10, 11] , real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [12, 13] , isothermal nucleic acid amplification [14, 15] , CRISPR [16, 17] , enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [18] , infrared absorption spectroscopy [19] , and biosensor detection [20] [21] [22] . As the probability of genetic mutation and complexity of SARS-CoV-2 strains increase during the spreading process [23] despite rapid detection through existing methods, there is increased threat to human life and health. It is imperative to obtain high-affinity specific identification probes for conserved sequences, which enable efficient capture and specific identification of target genes, and develop multiple highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2 detection methods and rapid screening tools to further enhance detection efficiency and capability.

The ECL biosensor shows broad application prospects in nucleic acid detection of SARS-CoV-2 with advantages of simple operation, high sensitivity, and specificity. There are not many studies on detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids through the use of ECL biosensor based on screen-printed gold electrodes. How to design specific dual probes for conserved sequences needs to be investigated deeply to improve detection sensitivity. Based on the need to develop a highly sensitive ECL biosensor method for detecting SARS-CoV-2, this study has combined the high specificity of dual-probe hybridization with the advantages of the efficient sensitivity ECL biosensor technology. In our study, specific probes for particular sequences of ORF1ab genes are designed and prepared, and the detection model of magnetic capture probes-targeted nucleic acids-Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled signal probes is used to establish a new method using an ECL biosensor based on dual-probe hybridization to detect SARS-CoV-2 as shown in Figure 1 , which provides a reference for the effective diagnosis of early SARS-CoV-2 infection, timely treatment, and control of disease spread. human life and health. It is imperative to obtain high-affinity specific identification probes for conserved sequences, which enable efficient capture and specific identification of target genes, and develop multiple highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2 detection methods and rapid screening tools to further enhance detection efficiency and capability. The ECL biosensor shows broad application prospects in nucleic acid detection of SARS-CoV-2 with advantages of simple operation, high sensitivity, and specificity. There are not many studies on detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids through the use of ECL biosensor based on screen-printed gold electrodes. How to design specific dual probes for conserved sequences needs to be investigated deeply to improve detection sensitivity. Based on the need to develop a highly sensitive ECL biosensor method for detecting SARS-CoV-2, this study has combined the high specificity of dual-probe hybridization with the advantages of the efficient sensitivity ECL biosensor technology. In our study, specific probes for particular sequences of ORF1ab genes are designed and prepared, and the detection model of magnetic capture probes-targeted nucleic acids-Ru(bpy)3 2+ labeled signal probes is used to establish a new method using an ECL biosensor based on dual-probe hybridization to detect SARS-CoV-2 as shown in Figure 1 , which provides a reference for the effective diagnosis of early SARS-CoV-2 infection, timely treatment, and control of disease spread. , and the magnetic separation frames were purchased from Promega (Beijing) Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The ECL biosensor was designed by our team, and processed by the Xi'an Remex Analysis Instrument Co. Ltd. (Xi'an, China). The screen-printed gold electrode comprised a working electrode, a reference electrode, and a counter electrode. The working electrode and counter electrode material were gold, and the reference electrode was a mixture of silver chloride silver. The electrode size is 50 mm long and 12.6 mm wide, purchased from Zensor Technology Co., Ltd. (Taiwan, China).

The website of BLAST was used to compare the sequences of SARS-CoV-2 genes. According to the results, the conserved region fragment of the ORF1ab gene was selected as the target region. The sequences of biotin probes and amino probes that can be hybridized with target ORF1ab genes were designed by the use of the Primer Express 5.0 software. The target ORF1ab gene and probes were synthesized by Beijing Xingfangyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), and the sequences are provided in Table 1 . 

The magnetic beads (200 µL, 10 mg/mL) were washed with binding buffer by rotating them for 5 min in a vertical mixer. Magnetic beads were separated, and the supernatant was discarded. The washing process was repeated three times. The volume of magnetic beads was made 1 mL with binding buffer. Then the magnetic beads were mixed with a certain amount of biotin probes, incubated, shaken for 10 min, and washed three times with binding buffer. Next, PBS (0.01 M, pH = 7.4), including 1% BSA and 1% glycine, were added to close the uncombined site of the magnetic beads for 30 min. Finally, the magnetic capture probes were washed and dispersed in 200 µL of binding buffer for the following reaction.

Amino probes (176 µL, 100µM) dissolved by PBS (0.01 M, pH = 8.5) were mixed with 20 µL of DMF solution containing 10 mg/mL Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -NHS ester and reacted in an oscillator with an oscillation rate of 600 rpm/min for 12 h. After that, the above solution was taken out, and the volume made 1 mL with PBS (0.01 M, pH = 7.4) and centrifuged at 8000 g /min for 30 min. This was repeated three times to prepare Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled signal probes for the subsequent reaction in a fixed volume of 140 µL. , and the volume made 1 mL with PBS. Then the above substances were mixed with 2.5 µL of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled signal probes, incubated for 10 min, washed with PBS. After that, the hybridization complexes of magnetic capture probes-targeted nucleic acids-Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled signal probes were prepared. Finally, 200 µL of TPA was added to the hybridization complexes. ECL tests use the optical method to detect the variation real time response curve of chemiluminescence and intensities produced by Ru(bpy) 3 2+ . As for the test, 10 µL of the hybridization complexes were added to the ECL chip each time, and the ECL intensity was measured by cyclic voltammetry scanning at 0.2-1.35 V, and the rate is 0.1 V/S. A standard curve was established with the logarithm of the concentration of the ORF1ab gene (X = LgC, µM) as the abscissa and its ECL intensity as the ordinate (Y, a.u.). The linear range and LOD were determined according to a standard curve for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 ORF1ab target gene through the use of an ECL biosensor based on dual-probe hybridization.

In the linear range of detection, the method of reproducibility through the use of an ECL biosensor based on dual-probe hybridization was examined by detecting different concentrations of ORF1ab target genes (10 pM, 10 nM, 10 µM). Furthermore, the method of specificity was examined by detecting 10 pM concentrations of influenza A virus subtype H1N1, H5N1, and H7N9 pseudovirus, SARS, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus.

SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (180 µL) was added to saliva and urine (20 µL) to prepare simulation samples. After nucleic acid extraction, the concentration of extracts (10 fM) was obtained. Then the above dual-probe hybridization reaction was performed, and the ECL intensity was measured. The recovery rate and relative standard deviation (RSD) were calculated according to the standard curve.

Since the streptavidin-modified magnetic particles can be specifically bound with biotin probes, the magnetic capture probes were prepared by immobilizing the biotin probes onto the surface of the magnetic particles. The magnetic capture probes were prepared by adding different concentrations of the biotin-probe solution to 200 µg of streptavidin-modified magnetic particles. The optional amount of biotin probes immobilized on 200 µg magnetic particles was calculated by measuring the absorbance value of the biotin-probe solution at A260 nm before and after binding, according to the formula binding rate = (A260 nm pre − A260 nm post)/(A260 nm pre) × 100%, respectively. The results from Table 2 and Figure 2 show that the amount of biotin probes immobilized on the surface of magnetic particles gradually increased, and saturated with the increase in amount of biotin probes added. It was confirmed that the optimal added amount of biotin probes per 200 µg magnetic particles was determined as 150 pmoL, and the amount of immobilized biotin probes per 200 µg magnetic particles was 71.32 pmoL.

Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled signal probes are prepared by reacting Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -NHS ester with amino probes and analyzed UV-vis spectrum. Figure 3 shows the UV-vis spectrum of the solution before and after Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -NHS ester labeled the amino probes. Curve a is the spectrum of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -NHS ester, and the peak at the wavelength of 247 nm, 287 nm, and 458 nm are the three characteristic absorption peaks of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -NHS ester. Curve b is the spectrum of amino probes, and the peak at the wavelength of 260 nm is the characteristic absorption peak of amino probes. Curve c is the spectrum of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled signal probes, and the peak at the wavelength of 260 nm, 287 nm, and 458 nm are the characteristic absorption peaks of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled signal probes, thus indicating that Ru(bpy) 3 2+ has been successfully labeled on amino probes. 

Ru(bpy)3 2+ labeled signal probes are prepared by reacting Ru(bpy)3 2+ -NHS ester with amino probes and analyzed UV-vis spectrum. Figure 3 shows the UV-vis spectrum of the solution before and after Ru(bpy)3 2+ -NHS ester labeled the amino probes. Curve a is the spectrum of Ru(bpy)3 2+ -NHS ester, and the peak at the wavelength of 247 nm, 287 nm, and 458 nm are the three characteristic absorption peaks of Ru(bpy)3 2+ -NHS ester. Curve b is the spectrum of amino probes, and the peak at the wavelength of 260 nm is the characteristic absorption peak of amino probes. Curve c is the spectrum of Ru(bpy)3 2+ labeled signal probes, and the peak at the wavelength of 260 nm, 287 nm, and 458 nm are the characteristic absorption peaks of Ru(bpy)3 2+ labeled signal probes, thus indicating that Ru(bpy)3 2+ has been successfully labeled on amino probes. 

Hybridization complexes bound with different concentrations of ORF1ab target gene (0.1 fM, 1 fM, 100 fM, 10 pM, 1 nM, 100 nM, 1 µM, 10 µM, 100 µM) were detected by using an ECL biosensor. The ECL intensity was obtained, the detection process repeated five times, and the average value of the ECL intensity taken for data analysis. When the ORF1ab target gene concentrations were in the range of 0.1 fM-10 µM, a significant linear relationship was found between the logarithm of the concentration of the ORF1ab target gene (X = LgC, µM) as the abscissa and its ECL intensity as the ordinate (Y, a.u.). The regression equation was Y = 737.79X + 8516.12 (R = 0.997, N = 8). The measured ECL intensity of 0.1 fM was 1241.2 ± 48.35, and the ECL intensity of the blank was 405.2 ± 11.77. The LOD was determined as 0.1 fM by taking S/N ≥ 3 as the LOD determination standard, as shown in Figure 4a ,b. Curve a is the spectrum of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -NHS ester. Curve b is the spectrum of amino probes. Curve c is the spectrum of Ru(bpy)32+ labeled signal probes.

Hybridization complexes bound with different concentrations of ORF1ab target gene (0.1 fM, 1 fM, 100 fM, 10 pM, 1 nM, 100 nM, 1 µM, 10 µM, 100 µM) were detected by using an ECL biosensor. The ECL intensity was obtained, the detection process repeated five times, and the average value of the ECL intensity taken for data analysis. When the ORF1ab target gene concentrations were in the range of 0.1 fM-10 µM, a significant linear relationship was found between the logarithm of the concentration of the ORF1ab target gene (X = LgC, µM) as the abscissa and its ECL intensity as the ordinate (Y, a.u.). The regression equation was Y = 737.79X + 8516.12 (R = 0.997, N = 8). The measured ECL intensity of 0.1 fM was 1241.2 ± 48.35, and the ECL intensity of the blank was 405.2 ± 11.77. The LOD was determined as 0.1 fM by taking S/N ≥ 3 as the LOD determination standard, as shown in Figure 4a,b. an ECL biosensor. The ECL intensity was obtained, the detection process repeated five times, and the average value of the ECL intensity taken for data analysis. When the ORF1ab target gene concentrations were in the range of 0.1 fM-10 µM, a significant linear relationship was found between the logarithm of the concentration of the ORF1ab target gene (X = LgC, µM) as the abscissa and its ECL intensity as the ordinate (Y, a.u.). The regression equation was Y = 737.79X + 8516.12 (R = 0.997, N = 8). The measured ECL intensity of 0.1 fM was 1241.2 ± 48.35, and the ECL intensity of the blank was 405.2 ± 11.77. The LOD was determined as 0.1 fM by taking S/N ≥ 3 as the LOD determination standard, as shown in Figure 4a 

In the linear range of the detection, the concentrations of the ORF1ab target gene at concentrations of 10 pM, 10 nM, and 10 µM were selected for the above dual-probe hybridization reactions. The ECL intensity was measured five times for each one, and the 

In the linear range of the detection, the concentrations of the ORF1ab target gene at concentrations of 10 pM, 10 nM, and 10 µM were selected for the above dual-probe hybridization reactions. The ECL intensity was measured five times for each one, and the averaged ECL intensity was obtained as 4523.4 ± 87.32, 6432.6 ± 273.21, and 9710.6 ± 151.85, respectively. The RSDs were 1.93%, 4.25%, and 1.56%, respectively, which indicated that the method has reasonable reproducibility. Influenza A virus subtype H1N1, H5N1, H7N9 pseudovirus, SARS, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus were selected for specificity assay. The concentration of extracts (10 pM) was obtained after extraction of nucleic acids, and the above dual-probe hybridization reaction was performed. ECL detection was performed five times, and the ECL signals were 416.6 ± 38.02, 441.4 ± 16.95, 432.6 ± 31.64, 443 ± 19.42, and 441.7 ± 26.10, 4569.4 ± 119.85 with RSDs of 9.13%, 3.84%, 7.31%, 4.38%, and 5.91%, respectively, and response signals as shown in Figure 5 . This method can overcome the interference of frequent influenza viruses in the autumn and winter seasons to detect SARS-CoV-2, and can accurately distinguish influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses from SARS-CoV-2, indic0000ating that it has reasonable specificity. Figure 5 . This method can overcome the interference of frequent influenza viruses in the autumn and winter seasons to detect SARS-CoV-2, and can accurately distinguish influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses from SARS-CoV-2, indic0000ating that it has reasonable specificity. 

Upon testing the simulated samples, 10 fM of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus in saliva and urine was detected, as shown in Table 3 . After five times of measurements and data calculations, the recovery ratios were 94.83% and 93.65%, and RSDs were 3.22% and 3.67%, respectively. It can meet the requirements of testing simulated samples in saliva and urine. 

Upon testing the simulated samples, 10 fM of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus in saliva and urine was detected, as shown in Table 3 . After five times of measurements and data calculations, the recovery ratios were 94.83% and 93.65%, and RSDs were 3.22% and 3.67%, respectively. It can meet the requirements of testing simulated samples in saliva and urine. 

This study combined the advantages of dual-probe hybridization's high specificity with a highly sensitive ECL biosensor. This research has established a new method of using the ECL biosensor, based on dual-probe hybridization, to detect SARS-CoV-2, achieving highly sensitive detection of the ORF1ab gene of SARS-CoV-2, with a linear range of 0.1 fM-10 µM, regression equation of Y = 737.79X + 8516.12 (R = 0.997, N = 8), and LOD of 0.1 fM. The method can meet the requirements for analyzing simulated samples such as saliva and urine, with the advantages of high sensitivity, stable reproducibility, and anti-interference solid abilities. Compared with the existing reported detection method for the SARS-CoV-2 gene by ECL biosensor based on the amplification technique [24, 25] and other biosensors [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] , the ECL biosensor based on dual-probe hybridization detection of SARS-CoV-2 has improved sensitivity, as shown in Table 4 . It also has the advantages of simplifying the operation steps without amplifying and shortening the detection time, achieving rapid and highly sensitive detection within 30 min. This method provides a promising new way for the highly sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2. Entropy-driven amplification RdRp gene 2.67 fM [25] AuNMs and CDs ORF1ab gene 0.514 fM [32] Dual-probes hybridization Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.

Systems biological assessment of immunity to mild versus severe COVID-19 infection in humans

Confronting the threat of SARS-CoV-2: Realities, challenges and therapeutic strategies

MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2: A Diagnostic Challenge

An Analysis Review of Detection Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Based on Biosensor Application

Current methods for diagnosis of human coronaviruses: Pros and cons

Current advances in the detection of COVID-19 and evaluation of the humoral response

A Review of the State of the Art in Non-Contact Sensing for COVID-19

Current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for COVID-19

COVID-19 Diagnostic Strategies. Part I: Nucleic Acid-Based Technologies

A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China

Complete Genome Sequence of a 2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)

Real-Time RT-PCR Panel for Detection 2019-Novel Coronavirus

Dual-target one-step nested PCR for sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids

Direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 using non-commercial RT-LAMP reagents on heat-inactivated samples

All-in-one in situ colorimetric RT-LAMP assay for point-of-care testing of SARS-CoV-2

A CRISPR-Cas12a-derived biosensor enabling portable personal glucose meter readout for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2

A one-step, one-pot CRISPR nucleic acid detection platform (CRISPR-top): Application for the diagnosis of COVID-19

Catalytic hairpin DNA assembly-based chemiluminescent assay for the detection of short SARS-CoV-2 target cDNA

Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral nucleic acids based on surface enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy

Emerging biosensing technologies for improved diagnostics of COVID-19 and future pandemics

Biosensors as a future diagnostic approach for COVID-19

Biosensors as Nano-Analytical Tools for COVID-19 Detection

Co-mutation modules capture the evolution and transmission patterns of SARS-CoV-2. Brief

2+ Nanocomposite Biosensor for Detection of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp Gene

Entropy-driven amplified electrochemiluminescence biosensor for RdRp gene of SARS-CoV-2 detection with self-assembled DNA tetrahedron scaffolds

Multiplexed Magnetofluorescent Bioplatform for the Sensitive Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA without Nucleic Acid Amplification

Multiplexed and High-Throughput Label-Free Detection of RNA/Spike Protein/IgG/IgM Biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Utilizing Nanoplasmonic Biosensors

Rapid and unamplified identification of COVID-19 with morpholino-modified graphene field-effect transistor nanosensor

Selective and electronic detection of COVID-19 (Coronavirus) using carbon nanotube field effect transistor-based biosensor: A proof-of-concept study

An electrochemical biosensor for sensitive analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA

Electrochemical Biosensor with Enhanced Antifouling Capability for COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Detection in Complex Biological Media

Electrochemiluminescent nanostructured DNA biosensor for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.