key: cord-0975144-aq13m28k
authors: PROBST, CHARLOTTE; KILIAN, CAROLIN
title: Commentary on Peña et al.: The broader public health relevance of understanding and addressing the alcohol harm paradox
date: 2021-03-22
journal: Addiction
DOI: 10.1111/add.15466
sha: 1c4869a70f34472facc52f3d462bb643e102df84
doc_id: 975144
cord_uid: aq13m28k

Socio-economic inequalities in alcohol-attributable mortality make an important contribution to socio-economic health inequalities overall. A comprehensive approach to reducing socio-economic inequalities in alcohol-related health requires combining the implementation of evidence-based, cost-effective alcohol control policies with broader policy measures that act upon the structural, economic and social root causes of socioeconomic inequalities.

life expectancy at birth in the general population of the United States. Seminal research by Case & Deaton [3] has demonstrated that the increases in mortality that are underlying these recent trends are largely driven by an increase in so-called 'deaths of despair'; that is, deaths from causes that are closely linked to alcohol and drug use (alcohol and drug poisoning, alcoholic liver cirrhosis and suicide). Individuals with low SES are most affected by these increases in mortality. Similarly, inequalities in alcohol-attributable mortality are rising in Europe and constitute an important driver of socio-economic inequality in mortality in many parts of Europe [4] . This underlines the public health importance of understanding and acting upon socio-economic inequalities in alcohol-attributable health above and beyond understanding the alcohol harm paradox. The rise in socio-economic inequalities that can be expected as a consequence of the current COVID-19 pandemic adds urgency to understanding the alcohol harm paradox and the ways in which the high alcohol-attributable burden among those with low SES can be addressed [5] .

What options exist to tackle inequalities in alcohol-attributable harm from a public health perspective? Unfortunately, the most cost-effective alcohol control policies, such as taxation, regulation of availability and implementation of screening and brief intervention (SBI) [6] , are not well equipped per se to target low SES populations if we do not pay close attention in their implementation [7] . For example, increasing the coverage with SBI may, in fact, exacerbate socio-economic inequalities in health outcomes due to lower health-care access for individuals with low SES [8] . It is therefore important to combine such initiatives with efforts to increase and facilitate health-care access for low SES populations and to ensure that SBI is offered across a wide range of health-care services, including occupational health-care and community health centers.

Minimum unit pricing is the policy with the strongest evidence so far on addressing socioeconomic inequality in alcohol consumption and alcohol-attributable harm [9, 10] . By setting a floor price on the cheapest alcohol, which is more likely to be purchased by heavy drinkers and drinkers with low SES, minimum unit pricing has been shown to be a promising tool in lowering inequalities in alcohol-attributable harm. Currently, however, only ten countries [11] in the WHO European Region have implemented some form of minimum unit pricing [12] .

Even if effective alcohol policies are being implemented, their impact upon health inequality in alcohol-attributable harm is limited, given that the prevalence and average level of drinking are often already lower among those with low SES. Thus, alcohol policies must be accompanied by upstream policy measures that address the root causes of the socioeconomic inequalities themselves.

Such upstream policies include initiatives for social welfare, universal health-care coverage, quality and equality in education and reducing stigma and social exclusion [13] . Importantly, a 'health in all policies' approach should be applied in all policy planning, assessing potential health consequences for the most disadvantaged groups explicitly, rather than focusing upon productivity alone [14] .

In conclusion, relying exclusively upon fast-acting downstream interventions that are directed at emerging health consequences will fail to address the underlying causes that give rise to the alcohol-related inequalities in the first place [13] . A comprehensive approach to reducing inequalities in alcohol-related health has to act on several levels, addressing the social determinants of health, relevant behavioral risk factors and health consequences down the line [13] .

Jones L The alcohol harm paradox: using a national survey to explore how alcohol may disproportionately impact health in deprived individuals

Joint effects of alcohol use, smoking and body mass index as an explanation for the alcohol harm paradox: causal mediation analysis of eight cohort studies

Mortality and morbidity in the 21(st) century

Trends in health inequalities in 27 European countries

Are the 'best buys' for alcohol control still valid? An update on the comparative cost-effectiveness of alcohol control strategies at the global level

Preventing Alcohol-Related Problems: Evidence and Community-Based Initiatives

Preventing disparities in alcohol screening and brief intervention: the need to move beyond primary care

Immediate impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland: controlled interrupted time series analysis for 2015-18

Brennan A Model-Based Appraisal of the Comparative Impact of Minimum Unit Pricing and Taxation Policies in Scotland-an Adaptation of the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model version 3

Alcohol control policies in Former Soviet Union countries: A narrative review of three decades of policy changes and their apparent effects

World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe Alcohol pricing in the WHO European Region: update report on the evidence and recommended policy actions

Alcohol and Inequities-Guidance for Addressing Inequities in Alcohol-Related Harm. Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization: Copenhagen

Marmot M Global action on the social determinants of health