key: cord-0978281-xchrja8w authors: Maslove, David M.; Sibley, Stephanie; Boyd, J. Gordon; Goligher, Ewan C.; Munshi, Laveena; Bogoch, Isaac I.; Rochwerg, Bram title: Complications of critical COVID-19: Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations for the mechanically ventilated patient date: 2021-10-13 journal: Chest DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.011 sha: de9823937186cdfc61040181f9eb63f255b352a1 doc_id: 978281 cord_uid: xchrja8w Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with critical COVID-19 often require prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation. Difficulty weaning, lack of progress, and clinical deterioration are commonly encountered. These conditions should prompt a thorough evaluation for persistent or untreated manifestations of COVID-19, as well as complications from COVID-19 and its various treatments. Inflammation may persist and lead to fibroproliferative changes in the lungs. Infectious complications may arise including bacterial superinfection in the earlier stages of disease. Use of immunosuppressants may lead to the dissemination of latent infections, and to opportunistic infections. Venous thromboembolic disease is common, as are certain neurologic manifestations of COVID-19 including delirium and stroke. High levels of ventilatory support may lead to ventilator-induced injury to the lungs and diaphragm. We present diagnostic and therapeutic considerations for the mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patient who shows persistent or worsening signs of critical illness, and we offer an approach to managing this complex but common scenario. Rates of ICU admission due to COVID-19 have varied over time, by region, and by prevalence of variants, but have reached as high as 30 to 120 patients per million population(1). ICU mortality also varies but is consistently high. First wave reports from Europe showed ICU mortality rates of 26-35%, despite some outcomes being censored at the time of publication (2, 3) . A more recent report from the UK revealed 43% ICU mortality, with rates as high as 60% in patients with non-resolving hypoxemia (4) . In those who do survive, COVID-19 critical illness is often slow to resolve, with a median duration of mechanical ventilation of 12 to 13 days, 50% longer than in non-COVID ARDS (3) (4) (5) . Patients may also get worse before they get better, with one study showing 75% of patients remained in a similar or worse category of oxygenation during their first week in ICU (4) . Clinicians may face uncertainty around why a critically ill patient with COVID-19 further deteriorates, and current evidence does not provide actionable guidance around appropriate diagnostics or interventions under such conditions. Nonetheless, insights can be gleaned by examining the large corpus of observational and interventional studies performed in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, as well the smaller number of studies with a specific focus on the critically ill. We present an overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic considerations relevant to this common but challenging scenario. While our focus is on those conditions that are specifically associated with critical COVID-19, it is important to also consider the usual complications encountered during mechanical ventilation in general. Critical COVID-19 can be characterized by different illness phases (Figure 1 ). SARS-CoV-2 infection is initially met with an interferon-mediated immune response aimed at clearing the virus, which generates the predominant symptoms seen in early disease including fever, myalgias, and fatigue (6) . Impaired interferon signaling is associated with progression to severe or critical disease, suggesting that failure to mount an effective immunologic response to the initial infection may be a risk factor for critical illness (6, 7) . A second phase of COVID-19 is seen in the subset of patients who, following the initial viral prodrome, show worsening signs and symptoms consequent to an exaggerated inflammatory response affecting the alveolar epithelial cells. Typically classified as severe COVID-19, patients in this second phase develop dyspnea, hypoxemia, and patchy infiltrates on lung imaging, and require respiratory support in the form of supplemental oxygen. Those who go on to develop ARDS, sepsis, or the need for life-sustaining treatment are said to have critical COVID-19. Anti-inflammatory treatments including corticosteroids and IL-6 receptor antagonists (IL6-RA) have shown efficacy at this stage, with salutary effects most notable in those with critical disease (8) (9) (10) . J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 4 Among these critically ill patients, there are some whose condition does not improve despite initial ICU management. In this later phase of COVID-19, viral replication has ceased, and inflammation may be abating, but critical illness persists or even worsens. This is a common but challenging scenario in the ICU. Diagnostic possibilities relate to persistence of inflammation, the development of co-infections, venous thromboembolic disease (VTE), and neurologic manifestations of COVID-19, including delirium and less commonly, stroke (Table 1) . Given the intensity and duration of mechanical ventilation often used in COVID-19, concerns related to severe ARDS-including ventilator induced lung and diaphragm injury, as well as ICU acquired weaknessmust also be considered. Though there has been debate around whether critical COVID-19 is a hyperinflammatory syndrome, some degree of inflammation is believed to be an important component of the pathophysiology (11) . Corticosteroids are indicated for patients with moderate to severe disease, defined by the need for supplemental oxygen or more advanced forms of respiratory support. Perhaps the most compelling evidence for the use of corticosteroids in COVID-19 comes from the UK-based RECOVERY platform, which randomized more than 6,000 patients with COVID-19 to treatment arms that either did or did not include a regimen of 6 mg of dexamethasone daily, given for up to 10 days. Patients treated with dexamethasone had improved survival compared to those treated without (29.3% vs 41.4%) (8) . Despite the fact this largest study used dexamethasone, there are a variety of corticosteroid regimens that have shown benefit in COVID-19 (12) . This includes different formulations of corticosteroid (eg. hydrocortisone(9)), higher doses(13), or longer-term regimens in which treatment is given for more than 7-10 days (14) . In addition, patients may have also received an IL-6RA such as tocilizumab or sarilumab, which have also been shown to be effective in severe or critical COVID-19 (10) . Here too the optimal timing of initiation and dosing are unclear, as some patients enrolled in clinical trials received a second dose, and the extent to which real-world dosing mirrors the dosing in clinical trials is unknown (15) . Taken together, these findings suggest that by the time of admission to ICU, patients with critical COVID-19 will have likely received various anti-inflammatory treatments, with variable rates of residual inflammation persisting. Clinical deterioration should therefore prompt the consideration of additional antiinflammatory therapies, once infection is ruled out or treated. Potential measures include adding or giving a second dose of IL-6 RAs, or resuming, increasing the dose of, or extending the duration of corticosteroid treatment, however data from randomized studies evaluating either approach are currently lacking. The extent to which markers of inflammation such as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) are helpful in guiding anti-inflammatory interventions also remains unclear. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 5 In its earliest phases, COVID-associated ARDS is an inflammatory condition. However as ARDS progresses, inflammation gives way to fibrosis, which in some cases can be severe, resulting in persistent impairments in gas exchange, increased work of breathing, and prolonged mechanical ventilation (16) . Although classified as a 'late' complication, there are likely elements of fibroproliferation that start even in the earlier phases of ARDS (17) . In one study, lung biopsy evidence of fibrosis was evident in more than half of ARDS patients a median of 11 days after the initiation of mechanical ventilation (16) . The development of fibrosis or chronic pulmonary parenchymal damage is readily diagnosed on CT imaging, which may reveal interstitial fibrosis, traction bronchiectasis, cystic changes, and hydropneumothoraces (18) . Therapeutic targets for fibroproliferative ARDS likely overlap to some degree with earlier, predominantly inflammatory, ARDS. Some have suggested a role for prolonged corticosteroid administration, with a slow taper aimed at regulating the host immune response, however data supporting this approach are limited (19) . There are studies evaluating the role of anti-fibrotic agents in patients with COVID-19, however none of these has yet demonstrated efficacy when used in this setting (20) . Lacking specific management options, clinicians caring for COVID-19 patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation are most often left hoping time leads to sufficient lung function recovery to facilitate liberation. In patients who develop non-resolving pneumonia with severe permanent destruction of lung tissue, cases of lung transplantation have been reported at expert centers and in select patients, however this intervention requires further study, and access remains a significant limitation (18, 21) . The above considerations must also be balanced by the recognition that corticosteroids are not without potential adverse effects, including immunosuppression, metabolic disturbances, and neuromuscular weakness. While some evidence supports the use of a prolonged course of corticosteroids in ARDS, treatment initiated late in the course of ARDS may worsen outcomes(12). Patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 may be at an increased risk of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), with some reported rates as high as 50%, more than twice that of intubated patients without COVID-19 (22) . The onset of VAP usually occurs between 1 and 2 weeks following intubation (22, 23) and is commonly due to organisms such as S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and Klebsiella species. High rates of resistant Gram-negative species have also been reported, and likely reflect the hospital and community burden of drug-resistant organisms. (22, 23) . Clinicians caring for critically ill COVID-19 patients must have a high suspicion for VAP and be prepared to add antibacterial agents in the event of clinical deterioration. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 6 Despite the high rates of VAP seen in intubated patients with COVID-19, there is currently no evidence to support a strategy of prophylactic antibiotics. VAP prevention should focus on measures previously shown to be effective, including elevating the head of the bed, and using a closed suctioning system. VAP should be suspected in the setting of worsening respiratory status, fever, increased sputum purulence, leukocytosis, and new or evolving infiltrates on radiographic imaging, and may be identified using structured tools such as the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS). Empiric management should be tailored to local flora, but should cover Gram negatives, and possibly resistant Gram negatives, until respiratory cultures are available to guide targeted prescribing. VAP may also progress to sepsis and septic shock, which may necessitate a re-visiting of adjunctive therapies including corticosteroids and vasopressors. The potent anti-inflammatories used to treat severe COVID-19 may exert a strong immunosuppressive effect, with the potential to cause reactivation of latent or dormant infections. A recently highlighted concern is that of Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome among patients with severe COVID-19 receiving corticosteroids and/or IL-6 RAs. Strongyloides sterocoralis is a parasitic nematode estimated to infect between 30 and 100 million people worldwide, mostly in tropical and subtropical regions (24) . It is often asymptomatic in adults and can persist for decades but can become disseminated in the setting of immunocompromise, including from the administration of corticosteroids (24, 25) . Strongyloides hyperinfection and dissemination are associated with high mortality rates, frequently greater than 70% (26) . Patients at highest risk of latent Strongyloides infection include those from West Africa, South and Southeast Asia, South America, and the Caribbean, in particular migrants, refugees, and those with a history of rural travel in endemic regions. Hyperinfection manifests as fever, respiratory, and gastrointestinal symptoms, and can be associated with Gram-negative sepsis. Strongyloides infection may be suspected on the basis of peripheral eosinophilia, and can be demonstrated with positive stool testing or serology, however these methods lack sensitivity, and eosinophilia is frequently absent in Strongyloides hyperinfection or disseminated disease (27). Treatment algorithms have recently been proposed for severely ill COVID-19 patients that mostly favour empiric therapy for high-risk patients with a single dose of ivermectin (200mcg/kg), a medication that is inexpensive, widely available, and generally well tolerated (24, 25, 28) . Ivermectin has been proposed as a possible treatment for COVID-19 itself, however current data are insufficient to support its use outside of clinical trials (29) . Though published reports are currently lacking, the reactivation of latent tuberculosis poses a similar concern for patients from endemic regions who are receiving corticosteroids for severe COVID-19 (30) . While only a small minority of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU may have an underlying immunodeficiency, some element of immune dysfunction is likely universal in the later stages of the condition. COVID-19 itself causes a relative lymphopenia, and therapies like corticosteroids and IL-6 RAs further impair immune function. Invasive support devices such as endotracheal tubes and central venous catheters further predispose patients to new infections. Patients may therefore be at increased risk of opportunistic infections, especially in the weeks following initial ICU admission. Data regarding opportunistic infection in COVID-19 are sparse, but hint at the presence of clinically important immunosuppression. One French study of 108 critically ill patients with COVID-19 found that P. jirovecii was detected in 9% of respiratory tract specimens, 74% of which were bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples (31) . All but 3 patients were intubated at the time of ICU admission, and only 10% had underlying immunocompromise. Whether the presence of P. jirovecii was indicative of infection in these cases is less clear. Of the positive cases, more than two-thirds had not received corticosteroids prior to sample collection, suggesting that the incidence may in fact be higher still, now that corticosteroids and IL-6 RAs have become a mainstay of therapy for severe COVID-19. Some case reports describe patients with SARS-CoV-2 and P. jirovecii (PJP) co-infection who responded favourably to treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole(32). SARS-CoV-2, like other respiratory viruses, causes direct damage to airway epithelium, leaving patients vulnerable to invasive fungal pneumonia. COVID-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) has been characterized in a number of cohorts, with estimates of the incidence ranging from 10% -35%, and an overall mortality rate approaching 50% (33) . A consensus statements on CAPA from medical mycology groups has defined criteria for possible, probable, and proven CAPA, based on the presence of clinical signs including refractory fever and hemoptysis, infiltrates or cavitating lesions on lung imaging, and microbiology or histology suggesting the presence of fungal elements (34) . The mainstay of therapy is voriconazole. The diagnosis of both PJP and CAPA benefit from the testing of respiratory samples obtained by bronchoscopy. Since this is considered an aerosol-generating medical procedure (AGMP), many centers may exercise caution around its use in critically ill patients with active COVID-19 given concerns of potential spread, particularly to healthcare workers. Opportunistic infections tend to occur beyond the first week of ICU admission, which itself tends to occur beyond the first week of COVID-19 symptoms. The extent to which patients at this late stage of disease remain infectious is not entirely known, and likely varies between cases, and according to the presence of underlying immunosuppression. Time-based and testing-based criteria have been proposed to inform infection control decisions around discontinuing droplet isolation. 8 Rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis and pulmonary mucormycosis in the setting of COVID-19 have been described in a number of case reports (35, 36) , particularly from India. COVID-19 patients with diabetesa known risk factor for mucormycosismay be particularly vulnerable, with the risks further increased by the use of immunosuppressive treatments for COVID-19. Further observational and epidemiological studies are needed to better characterize these risks. COVID-19 is associated with disorders of coagulation, evidenced by elevated plasma D-dimer levels, as well as autopsy studies showing fibrin thrombi within small vessels and capillaries (37) . Venous thrombosis is common in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU, with reported incidence rates as high as 15% to 28% from recent systematic reviews (38) . In hospitalized COVID-19 patients with venous thromboembolic disease (VTE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) appears to be more common than pulmonary embolism (PE), while isolated subsegmental PE is uncommon (38) . Most patients with PE have some degree of hypoxia due to V/Q mismatch and intrapulmonary shunting, enoxaparin on the composite outcome of thrombosis, need for ECMO, and mortality and found no differences between groups, even with stratification by disease severity (43) . The observational STOP-COVID study found that therapeutic anticoagulation was not associated with improved survival among critically ill patients with COVID-19 (44) . In terms of interventional studies, a multiplatform trial (REMAP-CAP, ATTACC and ACTIV-4) compared routine therapeutic anticoagulation to prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. A preprint from the trial reports that routine therapeutic anticoagulation had a high probability of being inferior to usual pharmacological thromboprophylaxis when considering the outcomes of organ support-free days and hospital mortality (45) . There have been reports of heparin resistance in patients with COVID-19 which may be explained by several pro-thrombotic mechanisms induced by SARS-CoV-2. These include high factor VIII and fibrinogen levels, low antithrombin levels, and thrombotic microangiopathy due to von Willebrand factor multimers and ADAMTS13 deficiency. (46) (47) (48) The partial prothrombin time (PTT) can be affected by the increased factor VIII level, making the patient appear to be therapeutically anticoagulated while failing to achieve inhibition of activated factor X (49) . Anti-Xa monitoring improves heparin effectiveness when used in critically ill patients and should be considered in the COVID-19 population in particular (50) . The CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report recommends anticoagulation therapy for a minimum duration of three months for patients with COVID-19 diagnosed with a proximal DVT or PE, although there are no randomized studies to support this(51). Impaired consciousness may be an additional barrier to weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Delirium is an acute change in level of consciousness, characterized by an impairment in attention and fluctuating course. The rate of delirium in critically ill COVID-19 has been difficult to summarize, but by most estimates is higher than in the general ICU population. One of the largest multicentre studies assessed over 2000 critically ill COVID-19 patients from 14 countries(52) and found 55% of individuals experienced delirium, with a median duration of 3 days. Importantly, coma (defined as a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of -4/-5, or Glasgow Coma Scale < 8) was also common, with a median duration of 10 days. Higher severity of illness, benzodiazepine and opioid infusions, and older age were risk factors for impaired consciousness. Family presence (either in person or virtual) was associated with a reduced risk of delirium. While delirium is a common complication of critical COVID-19, acute ischemic stroke is a rare but serious neurological event that may underly a patients' depressed level of consciousness and inability to wean from mechanical ventilation. Rates of ischemic stroke in critically ill patients with COVID-19 range from 2.1% to 7% (53, 54) . When assessing patients in situations where a complete neurological exam is challenging due to the severity of illness, it may be reasonable to perform cerebral imaging (eg. CT scan) for patients when depressed consciousness is a barrier to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 are at risk of critical illness neuropathy and critical illness myopathy, conditions that are often combined into the single syndrome of ICU acquired weakness J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 10 (ICUAW). Risk factors for ICUAW include high dose steroids, high severity of illness, and possibly the use of neuromuscular blockers, all of which are seen in patients with critical COVID-19 (55) . Few data exist on the prevalence of ICUAW in patients with COVID-19. A recent single-centre prospective observational study performed electrodiagnostic studies on critically ill patients with and without COVID-19 (56) . Of 111 COVID-19 positive patients, 14 were referred to the neurophysiology laboratory for possible ICUAW. Eleven of those patients had electrophysiological evidence of both critical illness neuropathy and myopathy, although there seemed to be a slightly higher prevalence of critical illness neuropathy in patients with COVID-19. To assess whether ICUAW is contributing to difficulties weaning from mechanical ventilation, bedside assessments such as vital capacity, maximum inspiratory pressure, and maximum expiratory pressure may be helpful. A 20/30/40 rule of thumb (reflecting a vital capacity of >20 cc/kg, maximum inspiratory pressure of at least 30 cmH2O, and maximum expiratory pressure of >40 cmH20) has been suggested as criteria to consider intubation for a patient with respiratory failure due to neuromuscular weakness (eg. Guillian-Barre syndrome) (57) . It would be reasonable to consider values at or below these criteria as indicative of neuromuscular weakness contributing to the difficult weaning of a critically ill patient with COVID-19. Although early mobilization makes intuitive sense as a treatment for ICUAW, a beneficial effect was not seen in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis(58). Given the severity and duration of respiratory failure commonly encountered in critical COVID-19, it is not surprising that injury to the lungs is common, with an incidence of overt barotrauma in excess of 10% (59) . Many COVID patients undergoing mechanical ventilation have been shown to have relatively low lung compliance and high airway pressures, which can lead to regional lung overdistention, and a cascade of pathophysiologic factors associated with ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) (60) . While pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax may be obvious manifestations, the clinical and radiographic findings of VILI may simply mimic those of the underlying ARDS and present as worsening or nonresolving disease. Mechanical ventilation can also induce diaphragm dysfunction, which is also associated with difficulty weaning and prolonged ICU stay(61). The mainstay of preventing and treating VILI is lung protective ventilation. While there has been some discussion that ARDS due to COVID-19 is a pathophysiologically distinct entity (62, 63) , the general principles of ARDS management remain the mainstay of treatment in COVID-19 as well (64) . Tidal volumes should be kept low enough to maintain driving pressure below 15 cm H2O(65), with a target plateau pressure of < 30 cmH20. High driving pressures (VT/CRS) have been associated with an increased risk of mortality in ARDS (66) . Permissive hypercapnia may be useful in limiting airway pressures and reducing injurious forces. A recent meta-trial suggests awake prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 11 requiring high-flow nasal cannula oxygen reduced the incidence of treatment failure, defined as intubation or death within 28 days (67) . In intubated patients with severe ARDS, prone positioning has been shown to reduce mortality (68) . Optimal lung protection can be achieved through the use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), with one recent meta-analysis of 1896 patients suggesting that better outcomes were associated with younger age (69) . Because many patients with COVID-19 exhibit extraordinarily high respiratory drive (70) , it is important to monitor respiratory effort to avoid excessive lung-distending pressures, even when airway pressure is low (71) . This can be accomplished by means of minimally-invasive and non-invasive maneuvers including esophageal manometry, diaphragm ultrasound, and monitoring of airway occlusion pressures (71) (72) (73) . Diaphragm muscle atrophy is associated with poor outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients, and preliminary data suggest a possible association with COVID-19 pneumonia in particular (74) (75) (76) . Diaphragmatic weakness is readily diagnosed in mechanically ventilated patients using diaphragm ultrasound and other techniques (77) . Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) can be employed to specifically target the diaphragm and respiratory muscles for rehabilitation. IMT increases respiratory muscle strength and may accelerate liberation from mechanical ventilation, with some preliminary observations suggesting it may improve dyspnea and quality of life for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia when applied in the recovery phase(78). Patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to ICU are at high risk for prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation. This translates to a long period at risk for complications. Clinical management can be fraught with challenges and frustration, as setbacks are common, and mortality remains high. Patients with COVID-19 may be at enhanced risk of the usual complications associated with prolonged critical illness but face additional risks specific to COVID-19 itself. Many of the potential complicationsincluding VILI, VTE, and secondary or latent infection, may be difficult to disentangle from the underlying condition. Clinicians must therefore maintain a high degree of suspicion, and pursue timely investigation and treatment as indicated in patients who either fail to improve or worsen despite optimal management. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Table 1 Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations for potential complications from critical COVID-19. VILIventilator induced lung injury; ECLSextracorporeal life support; VTEvenous thromboembolic disease; IL-6 RAinterleukin-6 receptor antagonist; VAPventilator associated pneumonia; PJP -Pneumocystis jirovecii; PCRpolymerase chain reaction; VCvital capacity; MIPmaximum inspiratory pressure; MEPmaximum expiratory pressure; EMGelectromyography; NCS-nerve conduction studies; CAM-ICUconfusion assessment method for the ICU; ICDSC -Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Weekly New ICU Admissions for COVID-19 Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region U. I. the, Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study Natural history, trajectory, and management of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the United Kingdom Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries Influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2: pathogenesis and host responses in the respiratory tract Presence of Genetic Variants Among Young Men With Severe COVID-19 Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19 Is a "Cytokine Storm" Relevant to COVID-19? Corticosteroids in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis Effect of Dexamethasone on Days Alive and Ventilator-Free in Patients With Moderate or Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19: The CoDEX Randomized Clinical Trial Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Metaanalysis Interleukin-6 receptor blockade in patients with COVID-19: placing clinical trials into context. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine The fibroproliferative response in acute respiratory distress syndrome: mechanisms and clinical significance Fibroproliferation occurs early in the acute respiratory distress syndrome and impacts on outcome Early outcomes after lung transplantation for severe COVID-19: a series of the first consecutive cases from four countries Pharmacological principles guiding prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in ARDS Pulmonary fibrosis and COVID-19: the potential role for antifibrotic therapy How I Do It: Considering lung transplantation for patients with COVID-19 Bacterial coinfections in coronavirus disease 2019 Ventilator-associated pneumonia in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: How common and what is the impact? Risk of Strongyloides Hyperinfection Syndrome when prescribing dexamethasone in severe COVID-19 COVID-19 and Dexamethasone: A Potential Strategy to Avoid Steroid-Related Strongyloides Hyperinfection Disseminated strongyloidiasis: a retrospective study of clinical course and outcome Dexamethasone and COVID-19: Strategies in Low-and Middle-Income Countries to Tackle Steroid-Related Strongyloides Hyperinfection Multiple-dose versus single-dose ivermectin for Strongyloides stercoralis infection (Strong Treat 1 to 4): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled superiority trial A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19 Implications of COVID-19 in high burden countries for HIV/TB: A systematic review of evidence The presence of Pneumocystis jirovecii in critically ill patients with COVID-19 A Case of COVID-19 and Pneumocystis jirovecii Coinfection The Incidence, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of COVID-19-associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA): A Systematic Review Defining and managing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria for research and clinical guidance. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Mucormycosis with orbital compartment syndrome in a patient with COVID-19 A challenging complication following SARS-CoV-2 infection: a case of pulmonary mucormycosis Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in Covid-19 Arterial and venous thromboembolism in COVID-19: a study-level metaanalysis Enoxaparin is associated with lower rates of mortality than unfractionated Heparin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients Heparin in COVID-19 Patients Is Associated with Reduced In-Hospital Mortality: the Multicenter Italian CORIST Study Beneficial nonanticoagulant mechanisms underlying heparin treatment of COVID-19 patients American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 Effect of Intermediate-Dose vs Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation on Thrombotic Events, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Treatment, or Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: The INSPIRATION Randomized Clinical Trial Thrombosis, Bleeding, and the Observational Effect of Early Therapeutic Anticoagulation on Survival in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19 -Preliminary Report Heparin failure and COVID-19: Should we explore other anticoagulants? An observational report regarding in-vitro recovery of anticoagulant action in COVID-19 patients in intensive care Heparin resistance in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 Coagulopathy monitoring and anticoagulation management in COVID-19 patients on ECMO: Advantages of a heparin anti-Xa-based titration strategy Anti-Xa monitoring improves low-molecular-weight heparin effectiveness in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of VTE in Patients With Coronavirus Disease Prevalence and risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (COVID-D): a multicentre cohort study Delirium and encephalopathy in severe COVID-19: a cohort analysis of ICU patients Neurological Manifestations in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Study Risk factors for intensive care unit-acquired weakness: A systematic review and meta-analysis Critical illness polyneuropathy, myopathy and neuronal biomarkers in COVID-19 patients: A prospective study Acute Neuromuscular Respiratory Failure Systematic early versus late mobilization or standard early mobilization in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: systematic review and meta-analysis Pulmonary Barotrauma in COVID-19 Patients With ARDS on Invasive and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Ventilator-induced lung injury Mechanical Ventilation-induced Diaphragm Atrophy Strongly Impacts Clinical Outcomes COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Is severe COVID-19 pneumonia a typical or atypical form of ARDS? And does it matter? Severe Covid-19 Effect of Lowering Tidal Volume on Mortality in ARDS Varies with Respiratory System Elastance Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis High Respiratory Drive and Excessive Respiratory Efforts Predict Relapse of Respiratory Failure in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Lung-and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation Non-invasive method to detect high respiratory effort and transpulmonary driving pressures in COVID-19 patients during mechanical ventilation Monitoring patient-ventilator interaction by an endexpiratory occlusion maneuver Low diaphragm muscle mass predicts adverse outcome in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia: an exploratory pilot study Association of Low Baseline Diaphragm Muscle Mass With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Mortality Among Critically Ill Adults Diaphragm Pathology in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 and Postmortem Findings From 3 Medical Centers Assessing Diaphragmatic Function Inspiratory muscle training for recovered COVID-19 patients after weaning from mechanical ventilation: A pilot control clinical study Initial infection leads to viral replication, which if impaired may hasten the onset of severe and critical COVID-19. (2) Inflammation may recur after completion of anti-inflammatory treatments, or may persist despite these, possibly leading to fibroproliferative ARDS (3). (4) Decreases in immune function -whether due to COVID-19 directly or to anti-inflammatory treatments -can cause susceptibility to infection including ventilator associated pneumonia. (5) Anti-inflammatories may also precipitate dissemination of latent infections such as Strongyloides. (6) Later in the course of critical COVID-19 Neurologic sequelae of COVID-19 may also contribute to worsening, including delirium, which is common and may occur at any time during the acute infection Prolonged mechanical ventilation, high levels of ventilatory support, and high respiratory drive may contribute to ventilator-induced injury of the lungs and diaphragm. (12) It is hoped that optimal treatment and supportive care lead to an eventual resolution of derangements in inflammation, immunity, and neurologic function