key: cord-0985402-nahygu6a authors: Rahman, Md. H Asibur; Uddin, Mohammad Shahab; Dey, Anamika title: Investigating the mediating role of online learning motivation in the COVID‐19 pandemic situation in Bangladesh date: 2021-03-02 journal: J Comput Assist Learn DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12535 sha: 5129a7205559be9f9914a347c28fd8d027944263 doc_id: 985402 cord_uid: nahygu6a The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mediating role of online learning motivation (OLM) in the COVID‐19 pandemic situation in Bangladesh by observing and comparing direct lectures (DL), instructor–learner interaction (ILI), learner–learner interaction (LLI), and internet self‐efficacy (ISE) as predictors of OLM and online learning satisfaction (OLS). Data were collected from 442 undergraduate and graduate students from more than 35 universities in Bangladesh. To test the hypotheses, the PLS‐SEM approach was applied using SmartPLS 3.0. The study shows a significant mediating role of OLM between the independent variables and learning satisfaction. In addition, DL, ILI, and ISE are shown to be significant predictors of student satisfaction. The findings have a number of valuable implications for education policy makers, universities, instructors, and students. Moreover, the study suggests some new research perspectives to overcome the limitations of this research and to gain precise knowledge on students' learning motivation and satisfaction regarding other online classes for different categories of students (e.g., high school and college, professional, and PhD). In December 2019, Wuhan, in Hubei province, China, was the origin of an epidemic known as COVID-19, or the corona virus disease (C. Wang, Horby, Hayden, & Gao, 2020) . The Chinese health authorities took immediate action to control the disease and started isolation of people, close monitoring of contacts, epidemiological and clinical data collection from patients, and diagnostic and expansion of treatment procedures (C. Wang et al., 2020) . Considering the intensity and seriousness of the epidemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic on 12 March 2020 (World Health Organization, 2020) . Nine months after the start of the pandemic, the world is still struggling to control the spread of the virus, and WHO has warned that the second wave of the virus could be more devastating than the first. Lockdown is continuing in different parts of the world and has changed almost all aspects of people's lives. The world is now facing a new reality, including changes to our education, health, politics, business, and economy. One of the most devastating effects of COVID-19 has been on the educational sector. All over the world, educational institutions have been forced to stop their operations to contain the spread of the virus, and schools, colleges, and universities have now been closed for a long time. Educational institutions are introducing online education so that the students can continue their studies at home. All over the world, the demand for online classes has been increasing. Allen and Seaman (2010) found that in the United States around 66% of institutions reported that the demand for new online courses and programmes was increasing. In another study, it was found that around 73% of educational institutions reported that the demand for existing online courses and programmes was also increasing (Harris & Martin, 2012) . Although these studies were carried out 10 years back, it is still very much relevant in pandemic situations. One of the reasons for the increase in demand for online learning is the fast increase in internet use in education (Bates, 2019; Wei & Chou, 2020) . However, the COVID-19 situation has intensified the drive towards online education, and like other developing countries, Bangladesh is attempting to adapt to such education both in public and private educational institutions. According to the study by Bao (2020) , the five most important areas of online education during COVID-19 that higher educational institutions must address are highly integrated online instructional design and student learning, efficient and effective delivery of online classes, sufficient support from faculties and administration, participation and group discussion among students, and back-up plans for technological interruptions. On the other hand, COVID-19 poses various challenges to online learning, such as poor online teaching facilities, lack of experienced teaching staff, information gaps, and adverse home environments . With regard to student satisfaction, T. Chen et al. (2020) suggest that personal factors have no direct impact during the COVID-19 situation; however, the availability of technology and platforms are the most important factors that influence student satisfaction. There are more facets of online education that could be considered in the pandemic situation, but we are interested in examining the most important factors of online education, such as the mediating role of online learning motivation (OLM), instruction, interaction, and perceived self-efficacy, which are the antecedents of student satisfaction with online education. Before the COVID-19 era, 90% of students in Bangladesh took part in face-to-face or traditional classes. As online classes are a reality now, in order to implement an online learning environment, it is important to know the satisfaction level of students. According to Harris and Martin (2012) , students' motivation for choosing online programmes is easy access to online classes, convenience, and flexibility. They further state that it is important to retain students in online education by meeting their needs using online platforms (Harris & Martin, 2012) . According to Heyman (2010) , there are three areas that are important for retaining students in online classes: student support and student connection with the institution; quality of interaction between faculty and students (interactions); and student self-discipline. On the other hand, regarding online learning, Street (2010) identified "significant external factors such as course structure and support (instructions), person factors such as selfefficacy and autonomy, and academic factors such as time and study management". From these studies, it can be seen that there are several variables that are outside the control of institutions employing face-to-face learning systems (Harris & Martin, 2012) ; for example, self-efficacy and course structure can have a positive impact on online learning. Information and communication technology (ICT) helps and facilitates online learning, and its use is increasing day by day. There are many advantages that ICT brings, such as the use of synchronous technology including real-time communication between learners and instructors or among learners; instant replies from instructors to students' questions; reduced travel time; and experience of a real classroom environment (Kuo et al., 2014) . Different studies have found that ICT improves students' interaction with their peers and instructors, which ultimately helps to increase their satisfaction (Kuo et al., 2014; Q. Wang, 2008) . Student satisfaction leads to higher motivation to take online classes. Wei and Chou (2020) found that students' computer/internet self-efficacy and motivation for learning demonstrated a direct, positive effect on their online conversation/ discussion scores and satisfaction with courses. In addition, they also found that internet self-efficacy (ISE) for online learning inclination had a mediating effect on online learning perceptions and satisfaction. As COVID-19 is imposing a new reality on education, we firmly believe that this study will help policy makers to take immediate actions to implement online education. We also strongly believe that the study will contribute in five significant areas. First, we have examined the mediation effect of OLM, which in turn has motivated us to develop a new model of student's satisfaction with regard to the pandemic situation; to date, to the best of our knowledge, no study has been conducted in the context of Bangladesh that relates directly to interactions/lecture and student satisfaction. Therefore, we believe that this is an important research direction during the crisis period of COVID-19, especially in the context of Bangladesh. Second, the study discusses one of the most important antecedents of online learning, namely instructor-learner interaction (ILI), which has a profound effect on the choice of online learning. Third, the study fills the knowledge gap by explaining the importance of learner-learner interaction (LLI) and its effect on student satisfaction. Fourth, the study assesses the importance of ISE, which has an impact on online education as well as on student satisfaction. No other studies have considered this issue (ISE) in the context of COVID-19 with regard to Bangladesh. We believe that our study provides new insights into ISE, which will also contribute to the literature on online education. Finally, the findings of this study will help future researchers and policy makers to integrate and formulate course design, improve ILI, implement appropriate platforms for online learning, including the issue of student motivation, and provide policy implications to tackle the post-COVID-19 educational challenges, especially for developing countries such as Bangladesh. To achieve the above objectives, we developed the theoretical background of online learning through literature review, explained all the keywords, and then developed our model and hypotheses. To test our hypotheses, we developed a questionnaire and collected data, and then tested the model. We discuss the results, and finally suggest policy implications and future research directions. Student satisfaction plays a significant role in achieving the vision and mission of universities (Muhsin et al., 2019) . Student satisfaction has been defined as the feeling or outlook of students towards their instructional or educational activities (Gee, 2018) . The attitude of learners towards their learning experience is reflected by their satisfaction (Alqurashi, 2016 ; J. C. Moore, 2005) . Student satisfaction is considered to be one of the central components for identifying the attributes of online learning (Bekele, 2010; Soffer & Nachmias, 2018) . Various factors, such as attitudes, knowledge, process and facilities, motivation, learning environment, and learning outcomes, have been found to have an impact on learning satisfaction (Listyaningrum et al., 2016; Muhsin et al., 2019) . In addition, the performance of the teacher, course appraisal, and ILI have an important influence on student satisfaction (Ali & Ahmad, 2011; Gee, 2018) . Promoting the whole comprehensive education of learners, as well as providing insight, is the purpose of education. To achieve this purpose, universities need to continually gather information about student satisfaction (Betz et al., 1971; Gee, 2018) , which is not only a significant determinant of programme and learner-related outcomes but also a positive demonstrator of learners' perceived learning skills (Kuo et al., 2013; Liao & Hsieh, 2011) . It is important to consider student satisfaction because of its contribution to academic performance (Biner et al., 1997) . The conventional face-to-face education system is no longer considered to be the only mode of distributing knowledge (Tan et al., 2016) . Studies have shown that, because of its originality and convenience, the trend towards online classes is flourishing (Allen & Seaman, 2010; Eom et al., 2006) . Various terms such as "online education", "e-learning", "distance learning", "distance education", and "online learning" are used to explain ICT-based modes of learning. Among these, online education is the most broadly used term (Lee, 2010) . In this study, the terms online learning, online education, online courses, and online classes are used interchangeably. Online learning represents education in which the whole syllabus is offered through an online course delivery system. Learners can take part irrespective of location, time, or place (Harris & Martin, 2012) . It is a method of learning in which students and teachers are physically segregated by distance, by time, or by both (Liaw, 2008; Liaw et al., 2007) . In online education, the subject matter of the course is offered to learners through computers using internet technology (Lee, 2010) . Online learning offers more independence to pupils or students to take part in the learning process or to communicate with their peers (Kuo et al., 2013) . By means of synchronous and asynchronous communication technologies, it fosters quality and quantity of communication between learners, teachers, and classmates (Wei & Chou, 2020) . According to researchers, the quality as well as quantity of online communication with instructors has a much greater influence on the advancement of learning and satisfaction than with conventional face-to-face communication in classes (Lee, 2010) . Assessing learners' satisfaction with online courses is important. Such satisfaction is based on multiple factors, such as course composition, instructional functions, and syllabus, as well as the instructors' learning and assistance, appearance and feedback, and teaching style (Eichelberger & Ngo, 2018; Wei & Chou, 2020) . Among these, perhaps the role of instructors' feedback is most crucial in the recognition of online learning and students' satisfaction with online classes (Lee, 2010) . Four factors have been indicated to be connected to the satisfaction of students with online classes: ILI and communication, length of time spent on activities, effective and devoted learning, and collaboration among peers (Gray & DiLoreto, 2016) . In addition, studies indicate that learners who are enrolled on online classes become more contented and motivated when explanations of the purpose of the course and course requisites offered by instructors are explicit, when the learning atmosphere is cooperative, when there is a high level of communication between learners and teachers, and when significant feedback is given to the participants (Soffer & Nachmias, 2018; Toven-Lindsey et al., 2015) . Garrison et al. (2000) define direct lecture (DL) as "any teaching provided directly or indirectly by the instructors in the form of lectures, video or audio lessons, synchronous and asynchronous sessions, constructive and explanatory feedback provided, and the selection and inclusion of course references and resources (textbook, readings, supplemental materials, videos, etc.)". An instructor not only performs the task of designing and organizing a course but also plays a role as a facilitator, social supporter, technology facilitator, and assessment designer (Goh et al., 2017) . However, the establishment of their own presence and personality in the course content, discussions, and activities is considered to be the most important role of instructors in online learning environments (Gray & DiLoreto, 2016) . In order to maintain students' motivation towards learning, instructors provide support and perform multiple tasks in the teaching process, including developing the course structure and providing feedback regarding students' performance (Goh et al., 2017) , can discuss personal narratives relevant to the course content in live sessions, and also make quick replies to students' queries (Gray & DiLoreto, 2016; Shea & Bidjerano, 2010) . Attainment of excellent academic achievement by satisfied students is the outcome of quality instructors. By teaching efficiently, high-quality instructors can produce high-quality students (Gee, 2018) . In addition, Osman and Saputra (2019) found that the teaching style of instructors has an important effect on student satisfaction and can be considered as a determinant of programme quality. Qualified instructors are capable of creating a pleasurable experience as well as generating meaningful learning for students who are engaged spontaneously. Students' level of understanding and other skills will continue to improve through achievement of significant engagement with the learning method (Muhsin et al., 2019) . Finally, another factor influencing student satisfaction is teaching staff who have higher levels of commitment to the student learning experience (Muhsin et al., 2019; Poon & Brownlow, 2015) . ILI has been defined as two-way communication that takes place between course instructors and learners (Kuo et al., 2014) . Guiding, supporting, evaluating, and encouraging learners are some of the different types of ILIs (Kuo et al., 2014; M. G. Moore, 1989) . ILI takes place when the instructor is involved in delivering knowledge and information, as well as encouraging learners, providing them with timely feedback, and facilitating clear collaboration (Goh et al., 2017) . As direct communication between the two parties is absent in online learning, instructors' reactions and feedback are vital. Learners also place emphasis on such feedback, as it demonstrates whether they are heading in the right direction (Alqurashi, 2016) . By providing formative feedback, instructors can create cooperation with learners, which affirms how they are accomplishing their tasks, and clarify the ways to make progress (Gray & DiLoreto, 2016) . To enhance interaction with learners, instructors are motivated to post messages on discussion boards on a regular basis and make quick responses to student queries (Herrington et al., 2006; Kuo et al., 2014) . ILI is a fundamental element of the online course experience and has a powerful influence on learner outcomes and learner satisfaction (Burnett et al., 2007; Kuo et al., 2014) . Ali and Ahmad (2011) found ILI to be the strongest variable that makes a significant contribution to learner satisfaction. High-quality and frequent interaction between students and their instructors also results in high student satisfaction and perceived learning rates. Kuo et al. (2014) found ILI to be the second most powerful predictor that contributes to learner satisfaction (Gray & DiLoreto, 2016) . Such interaction has also been found to have a greater effect on satisfaction and perceived learning than learnerlearner interaction (LLI) (Yang et al., 2016) . Researchers have highlighted the significance of interaction (Alqurashi, 2018; Kuo et al., 2013 Kuo et al., , 2014 , and LLI is one of the strongest predictors of student satisfaction and success in online courses (J. Moore, 2014) . Such interaction encompasses mutual communication among learners, whether or not their instructors are present (Kuo et al., 2014) . Moreover, LLI ensures the exchange of ideas and feedback between students (Elizondo-Garcia & Gallardo, 2020). It is especially significant for online learning environments when course curricula are formative and learner-centred (Tawfik et al., 2017) Self-efficacy is a significant factor not only for learning but also for determining the learning satisfaction of students (Alqurashi, 2018) . In his self-efficacy theory, Bandura (1977) defines it as individuals' personal judgement regarding their capability to accomplish challenging tasks at a high level or to achieve success in an action in a specific domain (Tseng et al., 2020; Vayre & Vonthron, 2019) . The theory has important implications for online learning (Puzziferro, 2008) . Thus, students with self-efficacy can confidently understand essential academic tasks, set standards for the accomplishment of significant tasks, and be more responsible for ensuring progress towards the attainment of the academic objectives (Alghamdi et al., 2020) . Previous research on online learning environments in tertiary education settings has frequently focused on the technological segment of self-efficacy, such as internet self-efficacy (ISE) (Alqurashi, 2019; Kuo et al., 2014) . ISE denotes individuals' confidence in their capability to organize and perform activities to complete a required task using the Internet (Kuo & Belland, 2019) . ISE directs individuals to use the Internet to solve problems and achieve expected objectives (P. C. Hsu et al., 2020) . Moreover, students who have low ISE may have less engagement with online systems or content due to a lack of confidence (Kuo et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2011) . Students' belief in the ease of use of the Internet has a significant influence on online course satisfaction (Wei & Chou, 2020) . Liang and Tsai (2008) found that in an online learning environment, learners with high ISE were more satisfied, as they could explore more resources and expand their knowledge. In addition, in online courses, students' ISE was a significant predictor of their satisfaction (Alqurashi, 2018; Kuo et al., 2014) . Similarly, students' ISE had a direct impact on course satisfaction (Prifti, 2020; Wei & Chou, 2020) . Furthermore, Alqurashi (2020) identified that online self-efficacy was a powerful predictor, as well as a vital contributor, to perceive satisfaction in online learning. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, adopting e-learning has become the only way of transmitting knowledge worldwide, as social distancing is the only way to reduce the spread of the disease (Biswas & Debnath, 2020) . However, learners' motivation plays an important role in such adoption (Zhou, 2016; Zhu et al., 2020) . Generally, motivation refers to the incentive that leads someone to act spontaneously (Keskin & Yurdugül, 2020) . A number of studies have pointed out that learners' motivation is a noticeable factor affecting learning outcomes (Brooker et al., 2018 ; H. C. K. Hsu et al., 2019) . Moreover, researchers have demonstrated a strong connection between the motivation to learn online and participants' success and engagement in online learning settings (Keskin & Yurdugül, 2020 (Ryan & Deci, 2020) . Similarly, to explain the relevance of SDT to online learning, Zhu et al. (2020) argue that learners' ability to control their own thoughts, motivation, and learning behaviour may provide necessary insights into how self-motivated learners can influence their online learning efforts. There are many empirical evidences which indicate that DL, ILI, LLI, and ISE are important predictors of student satisfaction in online learning (Alqurashi, 2018; Kuo et al., 2014 Kuo et al., , 2010 Muhsin et al., 2019; Prifti, 2020; Tawfik et al., 2017; Wei & Chou, 2020) . Moreover, onlinebased DL can impact students' OLM (Thai et al., 2017) . ILIs influence both intrinsic and extrinsic student motivation in the learning process (Goh et al., 2017) , and LLIs enhance students' OLM (Kuo et al., 2014) . Furthermore, self-efficacy has an impact on student learning motivation and learning outcomes (Kuo et al., 2014; Liang & Tsai, 2008) . Previous studies have found that ISE has an influence on learner motivation (Kuo et al., 2014; Liang & Wu, 2010) . Additionally, learning motivation directly influences learning satisfaction (Chang & Chang, 2012) . As these studies fulfil the requirement of investigating the mediating role of learning motivation between the independent variables and student satisfaction, this study is designed to examine the possible mediating role of students' learning motivation in the relationship between DL, ILI, LLI, and ISE and student learning satisfaction. Based on the above discussion of the related theories and studies, the following hypotheses have been developed. In addition, based on these hypotheses, the research framework has been developed (see Figure 1 ). The first part of the questionnaire asked respondents questions regarding their demographic profile. Particulars included data on their gender, current educational level, nature of their university, the faculty in which they were conducting their studies, current residential area (urban or rural), age group, the devices they used to participate in online classes, the internet facilities they were using, and, finally, who was bearing the cost of their internet data/connections. The second part of the questionnaire called for responses to items regarding both the proposed independent and dependent variables. To investigate the research objectives, multi-item scales were adopted to ensure the correct measurement of each variable. To measure DL, ILI, and LLI, three, six, and eight items, respectively, were adopted from Kuo et al. (2014) . To measure ISE, three items were adopted from Liaw (2008) . A number of recent studies have investigated students' learning satisfaction in online settings. However, there is no theoretical basis or related scale that could be used in this research setting. Wei and Chou (2020) developed a seven-item scale to measure students' satisfaction with online courses, which was adopted for this study. Moreover, to measure student motivation, 13 items were used, 7 of which were adapted from Harris and Martin (2012) and the remaining 6 were added to the scale based on expert opinions and recently published articles on COVID-19 and online higher education. All the measurement items are shown in Appendix. To avoid ambiguity and to make the questionnaire more credible for the respondents, some wording changes were made to rephrase the items. The participants were asked to respond to all the items on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 was used to perform the descriptive statistical analysis. In addition, SmartPLS3 was also employed for the partial least squares (PLS) path modelling to evaluate both the measurement and structural model. The demographic profile of the respondents (N = 442) was as follows: 64.70% of the respondents (N = 286) were male students, and 35.30% Bangladesh, such data is costlier than broadband/cable connections. Finally, the most significant finding was that, in terms of managing costs related to data connection and devices, 98.6% (N = 436) of students paid themselves to participate in online classes. This finding is significant because the current economic condition of most families in the country is not strong enough (Ahamed, 2020) to cover the high cost of participating in online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic (Jasim & Sajid, 2020) . Convergent validity was inspected by considering the item loading of the variables and the average variance extracted (AVE). As shown in Table 1 , loadings for all the items were above the 0.50 level recommended by Hair et al. (2010) . However, to obtain the final loadings and AVE, one item (OLM10) from the OLM construct was deleted because of too low and insignificant loadings. (Hair et al., 2010; Henseler et al., 2014; Igbaria et al., 1995) . Moreover, the values of composite reliability (CR) ranged from 0.873 to 0.961, which was higher than the recommended cut-off value of 0.70 (Hair et al., 2017) . Cronbach's alpha (CA) measures the internal reliability of items. In this case, the CA values for all the constructs were above 0.825, which indicates a good level of reliability, as the threshold level is 0.70. Furthermore, the Dijkstra-Henseler indicator (rho_A) was over the 0.7 cut-off value. Consequently, the reliability criteria were met both at item and construct levels (Hair et al., 2019) . We then inspected discriminant validity, that is, the degree to which a construct is distinct from others (Hair et al., 2010) . To assess this, the intercorrelations between the measures of hypothetically overlapping constructs were inspected ( Table 2 ). The correlational values among the constructs (diagonal elements denoting the square root of AVE) were much greater than with the other constructs (off-diagonal elements). Therefore, this indicates good discriminant validity (Fornell & Larcker, 1981) . In the case of the discriminant validity of the measures, item cross-loading was also assessed and found to be acceptable, and hence all the constructs were found to have satisfactory discriminant validity except the discriminant validity between DL and ILI. Henseler et al. (2014) proposed the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT) as a relatively new approach to assess discriminant validity in SEM. To assess this using HTMT, a threshold value of 0.85 has been proposed Kline (2015)), while other researchers recommend a value of 0.90 (Gold et al., 2001; Hair et al., 2019) . Therefore, in this paper the constructs meet the threshold, as the value of HTMT is <0.90 as suggested by Gold et al. (2001) and Hair et al. (2019) , and as shown in Table 3 . In summary, all the constructs demonstrate very strong reliability and validity. shows that collinearity issues between the constructs were absent. The structural model inspects the underlying relationships between the constructs (Memon et al., 2017) . In our study, the bootstrapping technique (resampling = 5,000, minimum) was applied to assess the statistical significance of the path coefficients (Hair et al., 2017) . The relationships between endogenous and exogenous variables were examined at a significance level of 0.05 (p < 0.05). From Table 4 Table 5 ). Hair et al. (2017) and Memon et al. (2017) recommend reporting the coefficient of determination R 2 and the effect size f 2 by describing the significance of the relationships. Here, R 2 refers to the predictive power of the independent variable(s) to predict the dependent variable in a model (Memon et al., 2017) ; in our case, student satisfaction with online classes in relation to the independent variable OLS. In general, R 2 values of 0.75, 0.50, and 0.25 can be interpreted as being substantial, moderate, and weak (Hair et al., 2011; Hair et al., 2019; Henseler et al., 2009 ). This study found R 2 of OLM as -0.713 and OLS as -0.788, which signifies that the independent variables DL, ILI, LLI, and ISE can explain 71.3% of the variability in students' OLM and 78.8% of the variability in their OLS during the COVID-19 outbreak (see Figure 2 ). Further, f 2 specifies effect size, that is, the extent to which an independent variable contributes to the R 2 of the dependent variable. Cohen ( of the variance, which was lower than the cut-off value 50%; therefore, CMV was not a concern in this study (Podsakoff et al., 2003) . From the findings, it can be seen that DL has a significant effect on OLM. Students feel that DL is a strong motivator and they prefer to participate in it as they are used to the approach in all their courses. This is the case in the context of developing countries such as Bangladesh, because in doing so they have the opportunity to interact with the instructors directly. Previous studies also support the preference for direct instruction or learning ( e.g., Garrison et al., 2000; Goh et al., 2017) . We also found that DL has a positive and significant influence on OLS, which is also in line with other studies (Muhsin et al., 2019; Poon & Brownlow, 2015) . However, we found a weak mediating relationship between ILI and OLM. Baker (2010) found a positive and significant relationship between instructors' presence and immediacy. Moreover, Baker also found that there was a positive relationship between instructors and learner interaction, and also a linear incorporation of instructor's social presence, which ultimately influences students' learning and motivation. Contrary to the findings of Yukselturk and Yildirim (2008) , ours show that there is a significant relationship between ILI and OLS. According to Yukselturk and Yildirim (2008) , student satisfaction is one of the most important variables for the success or failure of distance learners; however, student satisfaction fell considerably at the final semester of the programme. On the other hand, in the case of online learning, student satisfaction depends on the course structure, instructor's feedback, self-motivation, learning style, interaction, and instructor's learning facilitation (Eom et al., 2006) . We found no significant relationship between LLI and students' overall satisfaction. This was because, in the case of online learning, students are interested in interacting with each other, but this interaction does not affect their overall satisfaction. However, we did find a positive and significant relationship between OLM and OLS. Most research indicates that motivation should be given a higher priority in online learning (K. C. Chen & Jang, 2010 findings also support our model. In another study, Lee (2002) revealed that the two constructs self-efficacy (Bandura, 1982) and task value were significant in predicting students' performance and satisfaction (K. C. Chen & Jang, 2010). Lee's (2002) findings, which are also in line with our results, suggest that online learning can improve student satisfaction and performance. Biner et al. (1997) found that student satisfaction is an important indicator of the quality of academic programmes, as well as their outcomes (Kuo et al., 2014) . probably because of other situational contexts. These include unreliable networks for accessing the Internet, the need for students to bear the excessive cost of internet connections in order to participate in classes, and the generally poor economic conditions. Therefore, the authorities should address these issues. Faculties could be provided with necessary training on how to conduct online classes and ensure sufficient interaction, because students learn in a very different way online. Moreover, they should be provided with necessary system infrastructure that is appropriate for interaction with and between students. Although we found that LLI is a not significant predictor of OLS, the responsible bodies should develop and design curriculums and course content that allow sufficient interaction and collaboration with co-learners, as the necessity of such interaction among students cannot be ignored. With the purpose of determining the effect of interaction and ISE on students' OLM and OLS during the COVID-19 outbreak utilizing the PLS-SEM approach, this study found a significant positive impact of DL, ILI, and ISE on OLS, and a significant positive impact of DL, LLI, and ISE on OLM. The study also found a significant mediating role of OLM between DL, LLI, IS, and OLS. The findings have significant implications for the government, UGC as educational policy makers, universities, instructors, and students. It is recommended that online class systems be improved and that online-education-friendly curriculums be developed and the skills of instructors improved to ensure the highest level of interaction during lectures and to continue online education as a culture. The study has some drawbacks, which should be addressed in future research initiatives. First, since it is only focused on regular students on bachelor's and master's programmes, the findings of this investigation cannot be generalized to other online learning perspectives, such as MOOCs, regular courses in high schools and colleges, professional courses, and even PhD courses. Second, the implementation of the concept of online education is a very new aspect, adopted to overcome the recent COVID-19 crisis in Bangladesh. Therefore, the researchers had no option but to demonstrate a relative picture of normal pre-COVID-19 conditions that may best articulate the changes taking place. Third, the researchers could only reach a smaller number of postgraduate or master's students, meaning the study may not be representative of the findings from their perspective. Fourth, the research focused on fully online course offerings by universities, although the UGC recently requested university authorities not to hold semester final exams during COVID-19; therefore, the outcomes of the study may only be appropriate to fully online learning environments. Moreover, there have been many webinars and talk shows on the negative sides of online education, which may influence students' evaluations of their satisfaction. Finally, the study used data which to some extent were cross-sectional in nature, and thus may not represent the actual context. Therefore, to avoid these limitations and to generalize the context, other research initiatives could be taken in the future, which consider MOOCs, regular courses in high schools and colleges, and professional and PhD courses. In addition, a further longitudinal study could be conducted in the post-COVID context to identify the changes in the level of student satisfaction with online education if the approach continues. Furthermore, a separate study could be designed for both undergraduate and graduate students. Finally, the inclusion of personal characteristics, demographic profiles, previous online learning experience, university characteristics, nature of course curriculums, and learning support as moderators could influence the relationships between these constructs. Coronavirus: Economy down, poverty up in Bangladesh. Welle (DW) Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU) Islamabad, Pakistan Learning on demand online education in the United States Self-efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. The Journal of Educators Online Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change COVID -19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency Teaching in a digital age Motivation and satisfaction in internet-supported learning environments: A review A dimensional analysis of college student satisfaction The impact of remote-site group size on student satisfaction and relative performance in interactive telecourses Worldwide scenario of unplanned transition to e-learning in the time of covid-19 and students' perception: A review Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs Frequency, intensity and topicality in online learning: An exploration of the interaction dimensions that contribute to student satisfaction in online learning The effect of student learning motivation on learning satisfaction Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the COVID-19 pandemic Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences College students' perception of an online course in special education Peer feedback in learner-learner interaction practices. Mixed methods study on an xMOOC The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors The effects of technology-mediated instructional strategies on motivation Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education The impact of lecturers' competencies on students' satisfaction Students' experiences, learning outcomes and satisfaction in e-learning Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM Student motivations for choosing online classes A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing Authentic tasks online: A synergy among learner, task, and technology. Distance Education Overcoming student retention issues in higher education online programs Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies Early childhood educators' attitudes to internet self-efficacy and internet-related instructional applications: The mediating effects of internet enjoyment and professional support An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information and Management Costly data, poor connection key challenges for online classes in public universities. The Business Standard Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status Factors affecting students' preferences for online and blended learning: Motivational vs. cognitive Principles and practice of structural equation modeling Exploring the relationship between African American adult learners' computer, Internet, and academic selfefficacy, and attitude variables in technology-supported environments Interaction and other variables as predictors of student satisfaction in online learning environments A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers and Education Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction The impact of self-efficacy and task value on satisfaction and performance in a Web-based course Internet self-efficacy and preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments: A study of pre-school teachers in Taiwan Nurses' motivations for web-based learning and the role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International What influences internet-based learning? Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners' factors toward e-learning systems Pengaruh Kinerja Mengajar Dosen Terhadap Kepuasan Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan Fakultas Teknik UNJ The relationship between training satisfaction, organisational citizenship behaviour, and turnover intention: A PLS-SEM approach Effects of online interaction and instructor presence on students' satisfaction and success with online undergraduate public relations courses The Sloan consortium quality framework and the five pillars Editorial: Three types of interaction The relationship of good university governance and student satisfaction A pragmatic model of student satisfaction: A viewpoint of private higher education Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies Real estate student satisfaction in Australia: What matters most? Property Management Self-efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions Learning presence: Towards a theory of selfefficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments Internet self-efficacy, the need for cognition, and sensation seeking as predictors of problematic use of the internet Effectiveness of learning in online academic courses compared with face-to-face courses in higher education Factors influencing a learner's decision to drop-out or persist in higher education distance learning Factors affecting university students' satisfaction on online learning system The nature and level of learner-learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC) The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best "blend" of lectures and guiding questions with feedback Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses Exploring first-time online undergraduate and graduate students' growth mindsets and flexible thinking and their relations to online learning engagement Relational and psychological factors affecting exam participation and student achievement in online college courses. Internet and Higher Education A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning Online learning performance and satisfaction: Do perceptions and readiness matter? Distance Education WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 -11 Effects of online presence on learning performance in a blog-based online course. Internet and Higher Education Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students' satisfaction in an online certificate program Suspending classes without stopping learning: China's education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 Outbreak Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective University students' online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective Investigating the mediating role of online learning motivation in the COVID-19 pandemic situation in Bangladesh We like to acknowledge the faculty members from the different universities who cooperated with us to conduct the survey through sharing the research questionnaire to their students. The authors received no fund/grant from any organization to conduct this study. The authors report no conflict of interest. The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons. com/publon/10.1111/jcal.12535. The data that support the findings of this research are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. My instructor provides useful illustrations that help to make the course content more understandable to me. My instructor presents helpful examples that allows me to better understand the content of the course. My instructor provides clarifying explanations or other feedback that allows me to better understand the content of the course. My instructor regularly posts some questions for us to discuss on the discussion board. My instructor always replies my questions in a timely fashion. I always reply to messages from my instructors. Learner-learner interactions 1.I get required interactions and support for my class projects from my classmates. I receive lots of feedback from my classmates. I always answer questions asked by my classmates through different electronic means, such as email, discussion board, instant messaging tools, etc. I always share my thoughts or ideas about the lectures and its application with other students during online classes. During online classes, I always comment on the other students' thoughts and ideas. I get real time interaction during online classes and can participate in class group activities. Overall, I get numerous interactions related to the course content with fellow students.Perceived self-efficacy (Internet self-efficacy)1. I feel confident using the e-learning system.2. I feel confident in operating e-learning functions. I feel confident using online learning contents.Online learning motivation 1.The overall costs motivate me to take online classes during the Covid-19. I feel online classes are as convenient as traditional class room.3 I feel the overall environment is favorable and motivate me to take online classes during the Covid-19. I feel at home (comfortable) in participating in online classes. I feel the flexible time/class schedule is an important for me to take online classes. I feel secure participating in online classes as I can avoid campus violence among different students' wings/political wings. The interesting course design also motivate to participate online classes. I feel secure to participate in online classes as I don't have to worry regarding my online privacy/data privacy/hacking. I get the necessary support from my family members to ensure the learning environment in participating in online classes.10 I feel my family don't misunderstand me considering I am wasting time going online (visiting unwanted sites). The real time online resources are also important and motivate me to take online classes. Uninterrupted power supply and internet availability motivate me to take online classes. I really enjoy online classes during Covid-19.Student's online learning satisfaction 1. I am satisfied with the online instructional styles of the instructors during Covid-19. I am satisfied with the learning contents and course structure designed for online classes during Covid-19. I am satisfied with the instructors and teaching assistants (if any). I am satisfied with the use of online discussion forum during Covid-19. I am satisfied with the group projects for the course assignment and the criteria for group projects during Covid-19. I am satisfied with the exams conducted online during Covid-19. Overall, I am satisfied with online classes during Covid-19.