key: cord-0987947-gafs6knj
authors: Almadhi, Marwa Ali; Abdulrahman, Abdulkarim; Alawadhi, Abdulla; Rabaan, Ali A.; Atkin, Stephen; AlQahtani, Manaf
title: The effect of ABO blood group and antibody class on the risk of COVID-19 infection and severity of clinical outcomes
date: 2021-03-11
journal: Sci Rep
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84810-9
sha: 629187bf2ae827820a5952200f656d0c9619fb75
doc_id: 987947
cord_uid: gafs6knj

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected more than 100 million cases and caused immense burdens on governments and healthcare systems worldwide. Since its emergence in December 2019, research has been focused on treating the infected, identifying those at risk and preventing spread. There is currently no known biological biomarker that predicts the risk of infection. Several studies emerged suggesting an association between ABO blood group and the risk of COVID-19 infection. In this study, we used retrospective observational data in Bahrain to investigate the association between ABO blood group and risk of infection, as well as susceptibility to severe ICU-requiring infection. We found a higher risk associated with blood group B, and a lower risk with blood group AB. No association was observed between blood group and the risk of a severe ICU-requiring infection. We extended the analysis to study the association by antibodies; anti-a (blood groups B and O) and anti-b (blood groups A and O). No association between antibodies and both risk of infection or susceptibility to severe infection was found. The current study, along with the variation in blood group association results, indicates that blood group may not be an ideal biomarker to predict risk of COVID-19 infection.

www.nature.com/scientificreports/ All methods and retrospective analysis of data was approved by the National COVID-19 Research and Ethics Committee, and carried out in accordance with local and international guidelines and regulations. All data used in this study was collected as part of routine medical procedures. Informed consent was waived by the National COVID-19 Research and Ethical Committee for this study due to its retrospective and observational nature, the absence of any patient identifying information, and the urgent nature of the investigation.

In this cross-sectional observational study, we investigated the association between blood group and risk of COVID-19 infection and severity of clinical outcomes. Association was analyzed by ABO blood group and blood antibody class. To study effect of blood group on susceptibility of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, the distribution of blood types amongst a sample of confirmed COVID-19 individuals in Bahrain were compared to the distribution of blood types amongst the general population of Bahrain. To study the effect of blood type on the severity of clinical outcomes, the distribution of blood types were compared between COVID-19 individuals who were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and those of the general COVID-19 patients sample. This was replicated in the analysis by antibody class, with blood groups being grouped as anti-A (blood groups B and O), and anti-B (blood groups A and O).

A confirmed COVID-19 case was any individual who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab. Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the NP sample was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using the E gene as a target. If the E gene was detected, the sample was confirmed by a PCR test targeting RdRp. All confirmed cases tested positive for the E gene and the RdRp using real time PCR from Roche and Invitrogen kits. Cases were identified based on their symptomatic presentation to the medical services, through community screening targeting close contacts, travelers and random testing in areas with outbreaks. A random sample of 3000 COVID-19 positive individuals was chosen from the National COVID-19 Database to represent the COVID-19 infected population. Of those, 2138 individuals had blood group data documented or obtainable, and hence included in the study. As of 19 July 2020, there have been 196 COVID-19 cases with ICU admissions, all of which were included in this study. Blood group data for all the COVID-19 infected individuals were obtained from medical records. To represent the blood type distribution of the general population of Bahrain, the blood types of 4985 individuals who donated whole blood or platelets at King Hamad University Hospital Blood Bank over the past 2 years were obtained and analyzed.

Statistical analysis. Chi-squared (X 2 ) and Fischer's exact tests were used to compare the distributions of blood groups and antibodies between samples. Odds Ratio (OR) tests were used to study the odds of a blood type or antibody category testing positive, in a one-vs-all manner. ORs are reported with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical values were considered significant at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA statistical software (version 15.1).

Code: CRT-COVID2020-084).

All authors approved to publish this data.

Analysis of susceptibility to COVID-19 infection. Of 4985 individuals representing the control group, we observed a high frequency of blood group O (n = 2316, 46.46%), followed by B (n = 1225, 24.57%), A (n = 1092, 21.91%) and AB (n = 352, 7.06%) accordingly. A total of 2334 COVID-19 infected individuals represented the COV + group, showing an identical order of frequency; blood group O (n = 1060, 45.41%), followed by B (n = 644, 27.59%), A (n = 513, 21.98%) and AB (n = 117, 5.01%). The distributions of the two groups are shown in Fig. 1 . Blood group distributions were statistically different between the two groups (X 2 = 16.45, p = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that blood group AB was associated with a decreased risk of infection (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.86, p = 0.001) while blood group B was associated with an increased risk (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.31, p = 0.006). No association between blood group A and risk of COVID-19 infection was found (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.89-1.13, p = 0.943) ( Table 1) . Analysis by antibody class showed no association between type of antibodies present and risk of testing positive ( Table 1) .

To test the association between blood group and the susceptibility to a severe COVID-19 infection, blood group distributions were compared between COVID-19 infected individuals that required ICU admission and those that did not, COV + ICU + and COV + ICU-respectively. Of 196 COV + ICU + individuals, 80 (40.82%) were blood group O, 59 (30.10%) were blood group B, 46 (23.47%) were of blood group A, and 11 (5.61%) were of blood group AB. Of 2138 COV + ICU-individuals, 980 (45.84%) were blood group O, 585 (27.36%) were blood group B, 467 (21.84%) were of blood group A, and 106 (4.96%) were of blood group AB. The distributions of the two groups are shown in Fig. 2 . No difference in blood group distributions was observed (X 2 = 1.85, p = 0.603). No association to severity of COVID-19 infection was found with blood group or antibodies present ( www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Following several reports of the association between blood group distribution and risk of COVID-19 or susceptibility to severe infection, we sought to analyse these trends amongst the population in Bahrain. This study used blood-bank data of blood distributions to represent the general population in Bahrain. The distributions we obtained were similar to a previous report of blood-bank blood distributions, which also showed that these distributions were comparable to population sample distributions in Bahrain 14 . www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Regarding the association between blood group and risk of COVID-19 infection, most studies were similar in reporting that blood group A was associated with an increased frequency amongst COVID-19 individuals and risk of infection, and conversely that blood group O was associated with a decreased frequency and risk of infection [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] . Our data does not present an association between susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and blood group A, similar to observations by Latz et al. 13 . In addition, we found a significantly increased risk associated with blood group B, which is also comparable to findings by Latz et al. 13 and meta-analysis by Liu et al. 11 . Individuals with blood group AB showed a decreased risk of COVID-19 infection, synonymous with a few reports, however in all these cases including this study, this group was represented by a small sample size 6, 7 . Unlike all other reports, no association between blood group O and decreased risk of infection was observed.

To study the association of blood group and the severity of COVID-19 infection, we compared blood group distributions between the general COVID-19 sample and those that required ICU admission. As previously reported, no association was observed between blood group and susceptibility to a more severe COVID-19 infection [7] [8] [9] 13 . Although there was a decrease in odds of individuals with blood group O requiring ICU admission, similar to observations by Zhao et al., this was not statistically significant 6 . Hence, no association was observed between blood group and susceptibility to a more severe infection.

As per Gerard et al., we extended the analysis by antibody class 12 . There was no association found between antibodies present and the risk of COVID-19. We observed that individuals with anti-A antibodies were at higher odds of testing positive for COVID-19, however this finding was not statistically significant. This finding contradicts that by Gerard et al., who found that anti-A was associated with a significantly lower risk of infection. A recently published study suggests that perhaps the relationship lies in the levels of antibodies rather than the type of antibodies themselves, where COVID-19 patients were found to have significantly lower levels than asymptomatic controls 15 . There is no published analysis yet of the relationship between antibodies and severity of outcome, however in this study we found none.

Results from this study, and the limited reports in this field, reveal a variety of findings making a conclusion regarding an association between blood type and COVID-19 challenging. However, this variation in results may indicate that an unexplored underlying factor may be causing the association, not necessarily the blood group or type of antibodies present. 

WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard

Preventive and treatment strategies of COVID-19: From community to clinical trials

ABO blood groups and hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Human susceptibility and resistance to Norwalk virus infection

ABO blood group and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome

Relationship between the ABO Blood Group and the COVID-19 susceptibility

Testing the association between blood type and COVID-19 infection, intubation, and death

Association between ABO blood groups and risk of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

The effects of blood group types on the risk of COVID-19 infection and its clinical outcome. Turk

Relationship between ABO blood group distribution and clinical characteristics in patients with COVID-19

The impact of ABO blood group on COVID-19 infection risk and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

COVID-19 and ABO blood group: another viewpoint

Blood type and outcomes in patients with COVID-19

ABO blood group and Rhb phenotypes in Bahrain: results of screening school children and blood donors

Covid-19 and blood groups: ABO antibody levels may also matter

Available upon request from the corresponding author. 

M.Q. contributed to the study conception and data collection. A.K.A. contributed to the study design, data preparation and study supervision A.A.W. contributed in material preparation and data collection. design. M.A. contributed to the data analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. A.R., S.A. reviewed the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https ://doi. org/10.1038/s4159 8-021-84810 -9.Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.A.Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.