key: cord-0988645-8df4c8y7 authors: Ha, Wilson; Zabarsky, Trina F.; Eckstein, Elizabeth C.; Alhmidi, Heba; Jencson, Annette L.; Cadnum, Jennifer L.; Donskey, Curtis J. title: Use of carbon dioxide measurements to assess ventilation in an acute care hospital date: 2021-11-27 journal: Am J Infect Control DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.017 sha: a218f1753f73ed9d5ca1a299a0678d5e3a315634 doc_id: 988645 cord_uid: 8df4c8y7 Poorly ventilated indoor spaces pose a risk for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We measured carbon dioxide levels in a multiple areas in an acute care hospital to assess the adequacy of ventilation. Carbon dioxide levels remained below 800 parts per million in most areas but exceeded this level in a small conference room with 8 occupants, an office with 3 occupants, and a bathroom with 2 occupants. Measuring carbon dioxide levels could provide a simple means for healthcare facilities to assess the adequacy of ventilation. Poorly ventilated indoor spaces pose a risk for airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory viruses. [1] [2] [3] One rapid and simple method to assess the adequacy of ventilation in occupied indoor settings is monitoring of carbon dioxide levels. [1] [2] The concentration of carbon dioxide in outdoor air is approximately 400 parts per million (ppm) versus approximately 40,000 ppm in exhaled breath. 4 Thus, carbon dioxide levels rise in occupied spaces that are inadequately ventilated. Carbon dioxide monitoring has been used to identify measures to improve ventilation in settings such as schools and dental offices. [4] [5] For example, Wargocki and Da Silva 5 used carbon dioxide sensors in classrooms to provide real-time visual feedback on air quality that was used to indicate when windows should be opened to improve ventilation. In comparison to residential and commercial buildings, the risk for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 may be relatively low in healthcare facilities due to requirements for increased ventilation in areas involving or affecting patient care. 6 In 2 recent studies on COVID-19 wards, carbon dioxide levels were consistently below 800 ppm. [7] [8] However, other investigators have reported elevated carbon dioxide levels in hospitals, particularly in settings with increased room occupancy. 9 Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 transmission in healthcare facilities often occurs in ancillary care and outpatient areas that might have suboptimal ventilation, 10 and exposures frequently occur in areas such as breakrooms. 11 Therefore, we monitored carbon dioxide levels in a wide range of settings in an acute care hospital to assess ventilation. The assessment was approved by the Cleveland VA Medical Center's Infection Control Committee as a quality improvement project. The hospital engineering department maintains ventilation requirements throughout the facility in accordance with American Institute of Architects and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) recommendations. 6 A minimum of 2 air changes of outdoor air per hour are maintained in clinical areas. Using an IAQ-MAX COW Monitor and Data Logger (CO2Meter, Inc), carbon dioxide levels were continuously monitored and recorded every minute over 12 hours from 7 AM to 5 PM in the main lobby, cafeteria, physical therapy, and emergency department. The peak number of people present in these locations during monitoring was recorded. All measurements were taken during weekdays. Based on recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), carbon dioxide readings above 800 ppm were considered an indicator of suboptimal ventilation 4 requiring intervention. 1 If available, the expected air changes per hour (ACH) based on design specifications were recorded for the areas or rooms where carbon dioxide readings were taken. The table shows the peak carbon dioxide levels, peak number of people present, and duration of monitoring for all the test sites. Peak carbon dioxide levels were below 800 ppm for all sites except a small conference room that was overcrowded during a meeting (Figure 1 In the 5 offices tested, the carbon dioxide level remained below 800 ppm when the door was open with 2 or 3 people present (Figure 1 .B shows data for 2 offices). When 3 people were present, the carbon dioxide level rose in all offices after the door was closed, but only exceeded 800 ppm in 1 of the offices. This office routinely has 3 co-workers present and the door is usually closed; the 3 co-workers maintain >1.8 meters between individuals. In 3 bathrooms, the carbon dioxide levels remained below 800 ppm when 2 people were present. However, in a fourth bathroom the carbon dioxide level rose to 908 ppm with 2 people 5 present and spaced >1.8 meters apart. In inpatient rooms and in outpatient clinic rooms with 6 to 9 ACH, carbon dioxide levels remained less than 800 ppm when 2 to 3 people were present. Our findings suggest that ventilation in most areas of our hospital may be adequate to minimize the risk for airborne transmission of respiratory viruses. 1-2 Carbon dioxide levels remained consistently below 800 ppm in most areas, including in the main lobby and cafeteria when more than 50 people were present. However, our results also highlight the fact that ventilation may be suboptimal in some areas or under certain conditions such as when a conference room or office is overcrowded or when doors are closed. Our results also suggest that ventilation may vary considerably in locations such as offices, bathrooms, and conference rooms. Carbon dioxide levels rose above 800 ppm in 1 of 5 offices, 1 of 4 bathrooms, and 1 of 2 conference rooms tested. These findings suggest that measuring carbon dioxide levels in different areas with varying levels of occupancy may provide information that can be used to improve ventilation and/or adjust the maximum recommended occupancy. As noted previously, real-time feedback on carbon dioxide levels in school classrooms has been used to indicate when windows should be opened to improve air quality. 5 The CDC has recommended that adjunctive measures such as portable air cleaners or upper room germicidal irradiation be considered in areas of buildings with suboptimal ventilation. 1 In addition to ensuring adequate ventilation, wearing face masks and maintaining physical distancing of >1.8 meters are essential measures to minimize the risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission in healthcare facilities. 1 It is notable that in the overcrowded conference room where carbon dioxide levels rose above 800 ppm, it was not possible for the meeting participants 6 to maintain appropriate physical distancing. Thus, efforts to ensure adequate spacing may have prevented the elevation of carbon dioxide above 800 ppm. However, carbon dioxide levels rose above 800 ppm in 1 office and 1 bathroom despite adequate physical distancing of >1.8 meters between occupants. Our study has some limitations. Only a small number of offices and conference rooms were tested. Carbon dioxide levels in areas such as patient rooms and breakrooms were only Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ventilation in buildings. 2021. Available at Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on a patient transport van Ventilation assessment by carbon dioxide levels in dental treatment rooms Use of visual CO 2 feedback as a retrofit solution for improving classroom air quality Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 in hospital indoor air of COVID-19 patients' ward with impinger method Hospital indoor air quality monitoring for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in inpatient and outpatient settings in a Veterans Affairs health care system What are the sources of exposure in healthcare personnel with coronavirus disease 2019 infection? Affairs to C.J.D.