key: cord-1003758-do8v5qin
authors: Wattal, Chand; Raveendran, Reena; Oberoi, Jaswinder Kaur; Goel, Neeraj; Datta, Sanghamitra; Rao, Brijendra Kumar; Gogia, Atul
title: Clinical presentation & laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2: An observational study from a tertiary care centre in New Delhi, India
date: 2021-04-23
journal: Indian J Med Microbiol
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.04.007
sha: ceb0998f7a56eebe0c02db02efcc2155ea0ca9ed
doc_id: 1003758
cord_uid: do8v5qin

nan

The pandemic of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has aggravated human suffering with the number of suspected cases and deaths increasing daily. Since March 2020, when the first case was detected in Delhi, 340,436 confirmed cases and 6,128 deaths have been reported by 22 October 2020 [1] . Data regarding the clinical characteristics and associated markers in laboratory confirmed patients of COVID-19 is sparse from India.

According to recent studies from China, where the disease was reported first, clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV2 varies from asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory infection to severe pneumonia resulting in respiratory failure [2] [3] [4] . But one challenging feature of COVID-19 in India has lately been identified as being asymptomatic in a large number of cases [5] . Given the rapid spread of COVID-19, an updated analysis of cases in New Delhi might help identifying the defining clinical characteristics and severity of this disease.

The aim of the current study is to analyze the patient demographics, clinical presentations, laboratory findings and risk factors associated with mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients in North India which is important in planning and execution of control strategies.

This is a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi. Covid-19 screening by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was started from 28 March 2020 after obtaining approval from Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). The patients tested from 28 March -3 June 2020 were enrolled in the study. All suspected cases of SARS CoV-2 infection presented to our hospital in different outpatient departments, emergency department as well as suspected admitted patients who were subjected to COVID -19 testing were included in the study. The decision to test was based on clinical and epidemiological factors assessing the likelihood of infection as per the national guidelines [6] . RT-PCR was done for symptomatic cases and for asymptomatic close contacts of laboratory confirmed cases. This criteria for testing kept on evolving with time [7, 8] . Patients were categorized as per the categories suggested by ICMR (Table 1 ) which were 5 to begin with, followed by 6, 7, 8 & 9 categories [7, 8] .

Nasopharyngeal swabs or throat swabs collected were transported to the laboratory in viral transport medium. All other specimens including sputum, endotracheal aspirate and broncho alveolar lavage, stool samples etc. were collected in sterile container and transported to the laboratory within 30 min. Specimens were stored at 2-8 C & the tested within 48 h of receiving.

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee (Letter dated 27 August 2020) and the requirement of informed consent was waived off.

RNA extraction was performed in a bio safety level-2 facility using DSP DNA Midi extraction kit in automated Qiasymphony (Qiagen, USA) extractor. Various RT-PCR platforms targeting viral genes nucleocapsid (N), envelope (E), spike (S), RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and open reading frames (ORF) were performed depending on the availability of test kits. Each nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) run included both external & internal controls and results were interpreted as per the manufacturer's guidelines. A positive result by NAAT was reported when at least 2 targets were positive of which at least 1 was specific for SARS CoV-2. An inconclusive result was tested by another NAAT assay with a different platform. The Cartridge based nucleic acid amplification (CBNAAT) platforms (GeneXpert & BioFire) were used mainly in situations where severely sick patients requiring emergency surgery or intensive care unit (ICU) care were received in the casualty.

Patient demographics were collected from the specimen referral forms (SRF). All repeat RT-PCR tests of a patient once labeled COVID-19 positive were excluded from the data. In case of admitted patients, additional investigation results were collected from hospital information system (HIS) and electronic medical records (EMR) which included clinical and laboratory data, associated co-morbidities and treatment outcomes. Other investigations such as complete blood count, coagulation profile, serum biochemical tests, plasma/serum based biomarkers including interleukin-6 (IL-6), serum ferritin, D-dimer, procalcitonin, Creactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) wherever available were included in the study. The readings of first instance of investigations after admission were taken for analysis in all the above cases. Imaging results like Chest X-ray & computed tomography (CT) scan thorax were also analyzed in admitted patients wherever available. Other bacterial or fungal cultures were done wherever required for pneumonia, blood stream infections (BSI) or urinary tract infection (UTI). The outcome analysis was the rate of in-hospital death during a follow-up period of 45 days from the date of admission.

Descriptive data is expressed as mean (SD) or median (IQR) for continuous variables and number (%) for categorical variables. We used the Mann Whitney U test, X 2 test, or Fisher's exact test to compare differences between survivors and non-survivors.

Of the total 6378 suspected cases subjected to RT-PCR for SARS CoV-2, 1456 (22.8%) were positive. The maximum number of positive cases (31%) belonged to the category 6. Since category 8 & 9 also were ILI, the total number of cases presented with ILI was 35.7% of the positive patients ( Table 1) .

The various platforms used for RT-PCR are shown in Table 2 . Patient demographics of all the samples tested including positive cases are shown in Table 3 . Most of the positive cases were from Delhi (96.8%) and the rest belonged to UP (2.5%) and Haryana (0.6%). The commonest sample collected was a nasopharyngeal swab (99.3%). Other samples included endotracheal aspirate (38 cases), throat swab (3 cases) and one stool sample.

Majority of the cases (61.1%) were between 21 and 50 yrs of age ( Table 3 ). The median duration from onset of symptoms to testing was 3 days (IQR 2-5 days) which varied between 1 and 21 days. A total of 242 (16.6%) cases were health care workers (HCWs). The percentage positivity was observed to be marginally higher in case of CBNAAT platforms, 27.5% compared to regular PCR platforms, 22.7% (p value 0.085) ( Table 2) . Fever (59.8%) followed by cough (42.7%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Other predominant symptoms were sore throat (26%) and body ache (23.6%). Nausea (2.1%) or vomiting (2.7%) and diarrhea (1.7%) were uncommon (Table 4 ). 20.5% of positive cases were asymptomatic, who were either contacts of laboratory confirmed cases or those who got admitted in hospital for major surgeries or other procedures. Among the overall positive cases 12.7% had at least one coexisting illness (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal, liver or heart disease, malignancy or other immunosuppressive conditions). Only 47% of positive patients gave history of contact with a known case of COVID-19 infection.

Out of the 1456 COVID-19 positive cases, 517 patients were admitted in hospital. Patient demographics, laboratory findings and outcomes were analyzed in those who were hospitalized (Table 5 ). Median age of 62, leucocytosis, raised levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase, serum creatinine, D-dimer, serum ferritin, IL-6, prothrombin time, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were observed to be associated with increased mortality ( Table 5) .

The typical findings of chest X-ray were bilateral patchy or diffuse pulmonary infiltrates with a tendency towards the lung periphery & lower lobe (Fig. 1 ) CT thorax images of admitted patients showed typical findings of bilateral ground glass opacity & sub segmental areas of consolidation (Fig. 2) .

There were 31 episodes of secondary infections involving 24 patients, which included 13 episodes of blood stream infection (BSI), 13 episodes of pneumonia, and 5 episodes of UTI. The commonest organism involved was Klebsiella pnuemoniae causing 76.9% of BSI & 46.2% of pneumonia cases. Other major organisms causing pneumonia included P. aeruginosa followed by A. baumanii. Out of the secondary infections, 5 were fungal isolates including one case of Aspergillus flavus from endotracheal secretions, two Candida species causing BSI (one C. albicans and one C. auris) and two Candida species causing UTI (one C. glabrata and one C. tropicalis). Among those who had secondary infections, 15 out of 24 (62.5%) patients died in hospital.

On subsequent follow up of admitted patients, 53 (10.3%) patients expired in hospital. The median age of nonsurvivors was 62 years (IQR 52 to 68). 73.6% of these patients were associated with one or more comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, kidney disease, malignancy or transplant recipients. Hypertension (37.7%) was the commonest comorbidity in our study followed by diabetes (33.9%). However, 26.4% of non survivors didn't have any known comorbid conditions.

In the current study, 20.5% of positive cases didn't have any symptoms at the time of reporting to hospital. Majority of these cases were asymptomatic family contacts of laboratory-confirmed cases or health care workers exposed without adequate PPE. This category also included few patients who had reported to hospital for some surgical procedure, dialysis or chemotherapy & antenatal women in third trimester. Asymptomatic carriers have been reported in many previous studies as well, including a recent study from Delhi (44.4%) and they remained so during the hospital stay [5, 9, 10] . Because of these asymptomatic spreaders, it is imperative that testing programs include those without symptoms as well in order to halt transmission. Studies have shown that such cases may be associated with subclinical lung abnormalities as detected by computed tomography [11] . Only 59.8% (870) of patients in our study, had fever as presenting complaint, so afebrile cases may be missed if the surveillance case definition focuses on fever alone. A study from China had similar observation which quotes fever in 43.8% of cases at admission and 88.7% of cases during hospitalization [4] . A meta-analysis from China showed fever (83.3%), cough (60.3%) and fatigue (38.0%) were the commonest symptoms [12] . Studies from CDC, USA as well South East Asian countries also report similar 3 prominent symptoms [13, 14] . Uncommon gastro intestinal (GI) symptoms as per our study was also observed by other studies [4, 13] . This makes it different from SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV where more than 30% of patients presented with GI symptoms [15, 16] . Fu L et al. observed that the prevalence of diarrhea was significantly higher in studies in which proportion of patients with any coexisting medical condition was larger [12] . A recent study published from Delhi on patients admitted in ICU reported 12.3% of patients with some degree of GI symptoms [17] .

CBNAAT helped us in providing report within 2 h after receipt of sample compared to the RT PCR platforms which was reported within 24-48 h. The higher percentage positivity observed in case of rapid platforms (27.5% vs. 22.7%) may be due to the patient selection bias and was not statistically significant. Whether there was an improved sensitivity in case of rapid PCR assays needs more studies with comparative analysis of both the platforms. A multicenter evaluation study had concluded 100% concordance between GeneXpert and in house RT-PCR assays [18] .

The mortality of 10.3% in our study was higher than the estimated case fatality rate of 1-4% in other studies [14, 19] . This may be because, the mortality was calculated only among those who were admitted in hospital with severe COVID-19 disease or were associated with co morbidities or both. 73.6% of non survivors were also observed to have associated co morbidities. Hypertension followed by diabetes was the commonest comorbidities in our non survivor group. A study by Zhou et al. also share similar findings, with hypertension (48%) and diabetes (31%) as the commonest comorbidities associated with mortality [3] . Hypertension as the commonest comorbidity associated with mortality was consistent with data from China, Italy and USA [20, 21] .

Patients' age differed significantly between survivors and non survivors (Table 5) . Previously, older age has been reported as an important independent predictor of severe illness and increased mortality in SARS-COV-2 infection [3, 20] . It may be due to defects in T-cell and B-cell function associated with advanced age which might lead to deficiency in control of viral replication leading to prolonged proinflammatory response and poor outcome [22] . Another study from China also confirms elderly and patients with co-morbidities were likely to develop critical illness [23] .

There was an overall male preponderance among all COVID-19 positives in the current study (63.9%), as well as those who were admitted in hospital (59.2%). Mortality was also observed to be higher in males (13.1%) compared to females (6.2%) similar to other studies [24] . However, there are studies which have reported no such significant difference between male and females patients in terms of case fatality rate or severity of infection [12] .

There was a significant increase in inflammatory markers CRP, procalcitonin, serum ferritin and IL-6 in the non survivor group compared to survivor group in the current study. It is already documented that viral infection triggered Inflammatory responses play a significant role in the severity of pulmonary pathology [25] . The median in IL-6 was much higher in the non survivor group compared to survivors (132 vs. 39.7), similarly the proportion of CRP 10 mg/L (100% vs. 54.8%) and procalcitonin 0.5 ng/ml (75.6% vs. 16.2%). It has been reported that, during SARS-CoV-2 infection, a small subgroup of patients experience a cytokine storm caused by excessive release of proinflammatory cytokines like IL-2, TNF-α, IL-7 & interferon-γ [26] . The proportion of patients with D-dimer, 0.5 mg/L was also higher in the non survivor group (78.3% vs. 28%; p value < 0.001).

CT scan is useful in picking up pulmonary involvement early and also tell the extent of the disease and is helpful in the patients who have a negative RT-PCR test but strong clinical suspicion of COVID-19. General hallmarks of SARS-CoV-2 infection as per literature are similar to our observation which include chest X-ray findings of bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and chest CT findings of bilateral & peripheral ground glass and consolidated opacities, with an absence of concomitant pulmonary nodules, cavitation, adenopathy & plural effusion [2, 27] .

Among hospitalized patients in our study, 4.6% developed secondary infections during their hospital stay, Klebsiella pnuemoniae was the commonest causative agent causing BSI & pneumonia. Data on secondary infections during COVID-19 is limited. 13.5% of patients were reported to have secondary infection in a single centered retrospective study from China which included mostly hospital acquired pneumoia caused by organisms like Klebsiella pneumoniae or Aspergillus species [28] . A review of 9 studies mainly from China reported 8% of secondary bacterial or fungal infections which included mostly respiratory infections & bacteremia [29] . There are also reports of presumptive invasive aspergillosis among immunocompetent patients who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during COVID-19 episode [30] .

In this study 16.6% of total positive cases in our hospital were HCWs. A study from New York also reports 5% of their patients as HCWs [20] . This reinforces the usage of fit-tested N95 masks and other personal protective equipments for HCWs. It is recommended to closely monitor HCWs for any symptoms of infection and should immediately be subjected to RT-PCR and quarantined till the results are available.

The limitation of our study is that majority of our patients were diagnosed in outpatient settings, who were not subjected to other laboratory testing or were not followed up for subsequent development of symptoms or outcome analysis. Also due to the retrospective nature of study, all tests were not done in all patients especially LDH, serum ferritin, D-dimer and procalcitonin.

This study offers an overview of the epidemiology of COVID-19 patients in the Northern region of Indian sub continent and compares with the findings in other areas of the world. Our center being one of the earliest private setup approved for COVID-19 testing in Delhi, the data is a valuable contribution in understanding the pattern of infection in the capital city. We observed that some patients with COVID-19 did not present with fever and more than 20% of infections were asymptomatic. Older age, associated co morbidities along with secondary infections had higher mortality rate. Higher levels of CRP, IL-6 and D-dimer were also associated with severe disease and fatality.

None.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

A chronicle of SARS-CoV-2: Part-I -epidemiology, diagnosis, prognosis, transmission and treatment

New Delhi: NCDC, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India

Strategy for COVID19 testing in India (Version 4)

Indian Council of Medical Research. Specimen referral form (SRF) ID information for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2)

Information for testing laboratories

Clinicodemographic profile & hospital outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted at a tertiary care centre in north India

Prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection : a narrative review

Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Coronavirus disease 2019 case surveillance -United States

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among patients under investigation in Thailand

Enteric involvement of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus infection

Hospital outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus

Epidemiological & clinical characteristics & early outcome of COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India: a preliminary analysis

Multi-center evaluation of cepheid xpert® xpress SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak -an update on the status

Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study

Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy

The immunopathogenesis of sepsis in elderly patients

COVID-19 in a designated infectious diseases hospital outside Hubei Province, China

Clinical characteristics of 2019 novel infected coronavirus pneumonia:a systemic review and meta-analysis

Immune responses in influenza A virus and human coronavirus infections: an ongoing battle between the virus and host

COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression

Radiology perspective of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome

Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a singlecentered, retrospective, observational study

Bacterial and fungal co-infection in individuals with coronavirus: a rapid review to support COVID-19 antimicrobial prescribing

COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis