key: cord-1006680-ennlizcb
authors: Switzer, Benjamin; Haanen, John; Lorigan, Paul C; Puzanov, Igor; Turajlic, Samra
title: Clinical and immunologic implications of COVID-19 in patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors
date: 2021-07-16
journal: J Immunother Cancer
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002835
sha: 407db7044d3361895980df805b8241fc0046376e
doc_id: 1006680
cord_uid: ennlizcb

The clinical and immunologic implications of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for patients with cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy have introduced a multitude of clinical challenges and academic controversies. This review summarizes the current evidence, discussion points, and recommendations regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with a focus on patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). More specifically, we summarize the theoretical concepts and available objective data regarding the relationships between ICIs and the antiviral immune response, along with recommended clinical approaches to the management of melanoma and RCC patient cohorts receiving ICIs throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional insights regarding the use of ICIs in the setting of current and upcoming COVID-19 vaccines and broader implications toward future pandemics are also discussed.

The clinical and immunologic implications of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for patients with cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy have introduced a multitude of clinical challenges and academic controversies. This review summarizes the current evidence, discussion points, and recommendations regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with a focus on patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). More specifically, we summarize the theoretical concepts and available objective data regarding the relationships between ICIs and the antiviral immune response, along with recommended clinical approaches to the management of melanoma and RCC patient cohorts receiving ICIs throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional insights regarding the use of ICIs in the setting of current and upcoming COVID-19 vaccines and broader implications toward future pandemics are also discussed.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and its associated COVID- 19 have left a catastrophic impact on a myriad of socioeconomic and public health systems. Severe cases of this novel viral infection provide an elevated mortality risk that appears to manifest through a life-threatening constellation of cytokine storm, 1 2 prothrombotic hypercoagulability, 3 4 and lymphopenia. 5 Although a direct correlation between the severity of lymphopenia and COVID-19 mortality has been observed clinically, 5 6 with CD8+ T-cell depletion serving as a particularly poor prognostic marker, 7 the exact pathophysiological mechanisms of how these changes worsen mortality in patients infected with COVID-19 remain unclear. Studies have observed (1) highly heterogenous innate and adaptive immune response profiles in infected patients, 8 (2) acutely hyperactive CD8+ T cells containing abnormally high concentrations of cytotoxic granules in severe cases, 9 (3) increased markers of T-cell exhaustion in severe and chronically symptomatic cases, 6 as well as (4) prolonged immune dysregulation following an acute infection regardless of clinical severity. 8 10 These findings suggest that an initially overaggressive CD8+ T-cell response may negatively impact the clinical course of this novel viral infection through an initially hyperactive cytotoxic profile followed by a pro-apoptotic state with resultant lymphopenia in tandem with excessive levels of T-cell exhaustion and eventual impairment in memory T-cell production. 6 11 Those with a cancer diagnosis during these unprecedented times constitute a large cohort of high-risk individuals who are facing a growing degree of complexity in the navigation of obtaining safe and adequate cancer care, especially through the stages of a COVID-19 infection. [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Although patients with hematologic 17 cancers have exhibited the highest mortality risk of all cancer types to date, those with lung, 18 breast, 19 or any metastatic cancer 12 as well as patients with active comorbidities 20 also appear to exhibit a more severe clinical course. The complex and multifactorial pathophysiology between metastatic disease and severity of infection remains poorly understood, with early studies showing advanced age, 12 poor performance status, 21 and smoking history 13 as factors correlating with more severe outcomes.

The immunologic implications of advanced cancer and COVID-19 remains a topic of active study, as those with metastatic disease have been observed to express a baseline proinflammatory state and dysregulated immune profile that appears to worsen the severity and mortality of COVID-19 infections within this cohort. 13 22 Further, those receiving systemic anticancer therapy possess an additional level of complexity, as conflicting Open access data have been observed regarding COVID-19 severity and mortality for those receiving chemotherapy 12 13 and immunotherapy. [23] [24] [25] For example, some studies have suggested that exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies may serve as an independent risk factor for the development of a more severe clinical course of COVID-19 infection potentially due to increased T-cell cytokine production as well as ICI-induced immunerelated pulmonary toxicities. 23 26-28 In contrast, multiple recent studies have not observed a significant risk in the contraction or mortality of a COVID-19 infection while receiving antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) ICIs in a variety of cancer types. 25 29 30 The immune-mediated killing of various cancer cell types by ICIs, achieved through the interruption of several coinhibitory signaling pathways with antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4; ipilimumab), PD-1 (cemiplimab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab), and programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1; atezolizumab, avelumab), has provided a tremendous impact on response and survival rates for a variety of solid and hematologic malignancies over the past decade, 31 and further investigation is warranted regarding the safety and immunologic implications of ICI therapy as it relates to COVID-19. Here, we provide a review of current literature and share additional immunologic and clinical insights into the implications of COVID-19 infection and vaccination as they relate to patients with cancer receiving immunotherapy through PD-1 blockade, with a specific focus on patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and melanoma given their high prevalence of ICI utilization as a widely accepted standard of care. 31 32 COMMON THEMES OF THE ANTIVIRAL IMMUNE RESPONSE The typical cellular response and immunologic profile associated with an acute viral infection begins with the activation of innate immune receptors, including several toll-like receptors (TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9), 33 that trigger the secretion of proinflammatory type 1 interferons for localized cytotoxic control of viral spread 34 with simultaneous (1) activation of natural killer (NK) cells to destroy infected host cells, 35 (2) recruitment and activation of monocytes and macrophages to provide additional proinflammatory and free radical production, 36 and (3) ultimately facilitate the adaptive immune response, including the expansion and activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. 37 38 This response, although critical to viral clearance and eventual establishment of antiviral immunity, is facilitated through highly cytotoxic pathways that often result in local tissue damage to organs harboring infected cells 39 40 as well as systemic tissue damage through a variety of complement 38 and antibodymediated 41 42 inflammatory reactions.

Several immunologic countermeasures exist to control these inflammatory pathways and limit tissue destruction. 38 Key components of these tissue-protective mechanisms include the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 10 (IL-10) and TGFβ by activated dendritic cells, macrophages, activated regulatory T cells (Treg), B cells and NK cells, [43] [44] [45] [46] as well as the upregulation of inhibitory receptors by effector T cells including PD-1, CTLA-4, lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3), and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3). [47] [48] [49] Focusing specifically on the SARS-CoV-2 virus, initial infectivity appears to occur within nasopharyngeal mucosa and lung alveolar epithelial cells after interfacing with locally expressed angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors to gain entry followed by S protein priming via the serine protease TMPRSS2. [50] [51] [52] Pathways involving the virulence and severity of this infection remain an active topic of study, with the initial innate response potentially triggered by a unique hyperactivation pattern by pulmonary bronchial mucosal-associated invariant T and γδ T cells, 53 with subsequent acute lung injury and systemic organ failure appearing to be associated with a proinflammatory storm of cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, bFGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF 53 along with a hyperactive and lymphopenic immune profile of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets for which elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios appear to serve as an independent prognostic biomarker of COVID-19 severity. 54 Further, the pulmonary tissue damage observed in more severe infections 55 appears to exhibit overactive cytotoxic CD8+ and Th17 T cells 9 as well as a unique prothrombotic immunologic milieu resembling macrophage activation syndrome 56 57 and a distinct endothelialinjury pattern that is topologically discordant to detectable virus within these tissues. 58 These findings, in addition to potential cross-reactive autoimmunity between viral spike surface proteins and host epitopes, 59 introduce a potentially viral-independent aberrant immune response causing the proinflammatory and prothrombotic sequalae observed in more severe cases of COVID-19. 57 60 61 IMPLICATIONS OF IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS AND THE SARS-COV-2 ANTIVIRAL IMMUNE RESPONSE Thorough reviews have outlined the immunologic patterns and clinical implications of chronic viral infections in patients receiving ICIs. 25 62 63 For example, the use of ICIs in patients with cancer with known RNA viral infections including HIV and hepatitis C have exhibited similar toxicity and efficacy rates as the general population 64 65 without a significant increase in viral reactivation risk. 66 Further, ICI therapy appears to improve effector memory viral-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with chronic HIV, 67 hepatitis B, 68 and hepatitis C 69 infections, reinvigorating antiviral immune responses. Some patients with cancer have also exhibited reduced hepatitis C viremia when treated with ICI therapy. 70 71 Additional efforts to define the implications of ICI in the setting of acute infection are ongoing. For example, Pauken et al observed that acute influenza infections in PD-1 deficient mice led to increased proliferation and enhancement of effector CD8+ T-cell function, resulting in more rapid viral clearance than in PD-1 wild-type mice. 72 Open access However, this study further exposed that PD-1 blockade also appears to trigger higher rates of CD8+ T-cell apoptosis, impaired CD8+ T-cell memory, and compromised immunologic recall on viral rechallenge. Therefore, the timing of PD-1 blockade may pose a modulatory role in host immune responses that warrants further exploration within the clinical setting. [72] [73] [74] Lastly, evidence remains limited when attempting to define and understand the immunologic aberrancies associated with ICI treatment throughout a COVID-19 infection. 24 75-78 Several hypotheses regarding the clinically detrimental effects of ICIs in patients infected with COVID-19 are currently under investigation. For example, ICIs are responsible for a multitude of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with very rare associations to clinically significant inflammatory disorders such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), 79 immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, 80 and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. 81 These conditions exhibit clinical and serologic similarities to the aforementioned proinflammatory state of severe COVID-19 infections, and early studies have suggested that ICIs may worsen the severity of the infection in a variety of cancer types. 12 24 82 Further, the irAE of pneumonitis is a rare but serious complication of ICI, with an observed incidence of 2.7% for all grade events and 0.8% grade 3 or higher for those on PD-1 blockade that results in a 40% mortality rate. 83 COVID-19-related lung injury has been observed to present with a clinical, radiographic, and serologic constellation of pulmonary damage that mimics ICI-induced pneumonitis and therefore provides a diagnostic dilemma to clinicians that may delay the proper diagnosis and life-saving interventions needed to control these irAEs. 84 Further, the management of such irAEs includes aggressive immunosuppressive regimens with high-dose corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade, and occasionally IL-6 receptor inhibition, which may place patients at higher risk of contracting other serious infections. 25 In addition, the aforementioned potential to develop cross-reactive autoimmunity between COVID-19 viral spike surface proteins and host epitopes adds an additional degree of complexity in the safety and management of symptomatic patients on ICI with suspected or known COVID-19. 59 78 Conversely, the use of ICIs has also been considered beneficial and even therapeutic, in multiple infectious scenarios including SARS-CoV-2. 62 63 67 In a recent review regarding the implications of various viral infections as they relate to the use of ICI, Gambichler et al emphasized the well-known concept of T-lymphocyte exhaustion as a distinguishing feature of several chronic viral infections, characterized by a functional loss of IL-2, impaired T-cell proliferation, and blunted cytotoxicity that simultaneously coincides with enhanced immunosuppressive cytokines including IL-10 and TGF-ß and overexpressed checkpoint receptors such as PD-1, CTLA-4, and Tim-3. 25 Similar immune profiles of T-cell exhaustion are well documented in various malignancies and are therefore known targets of ICI. 85 An additional potential benefit of ICI is to reduce the accumulation and upregulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells which are associated with a proinflammatory state that subsequently impairs innate and adaptive immune responses in patients with cancer 86 87 as well as bacterial, 88 parasitic, 89 and viral 90 infections. The concept of utilizing ICI to enhance the antiviral immune response has been observed in a variety of settings 62 

The above hypotheses regarding ICIs as a potential risk factor impacting the susceptibility, severity, and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 has become highly disputed in a variety of clinical settings. 25 29 77 78 93 94 A recent meta-analysis of 16 studies containing 275 patients with cancer on ICIs with a COVID-19 diagnosis found no significant difference in the risk of severe disease and mortality between immunotherapy and control groups. 95 Additional cohort studies in various subsets of patients with cancer have provided similar findings regarding the safety of ICI use throughout a COVID-19 infection, 18 with an emphasis that patients with advanced cancers, active comorbidities, older age, and a history of smoking are to be considered potentially higher-risk categories that warrant close clinical monitoring. 14 29 96 Further, the utilization of highdose systemic corticosteroids in the initial management of ICI-induced pneumonitis has also been increasingly observed to provide a mortality benefit in patients with severe COVID-19 infections. 97 98 Hence, there remains no clear evidence that the risk of a SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis be considered a contraindication to patients receiving or initiating ICIs at this time.

The scientific community has provided numerous resources regarding the negative effects and clinical constraints that SARS-CoV-2 poses on the diagnosis, 99 prognosis, 100 and outcomes 101 of patients with known or suspected melanoma. Suboptimal healthcare access due to administrative restrictions, psychological stressors,

and infectious/symptomatic scenarios have led to significant delays in the diagnosis 100 and treatment of melanoma. 15 102 For example, a recent US-based single-center study observed that patients diagnosed with melanoma during the COVID-19 pandemic exhibited significantly higher tumor depth, mitotic rates, satellitosis, and pT3/ T4 tumors compared with those diagnosed in the pre COVID-19 setting. 103 In addition, a multicenter Italian study of 169 patients with advanced (stages III and IV) melanoma on ICI found 49 (29%) of these patients to experience a delay in their ICI treatment for a median of 4 weeks due to clinician's concerns of frailty and increased risk of contracting COVID-19, while actual COVID-19 diagnoses of this entire cohort were ultimately found to be lower than the general population. 93 With no clear evidence suggesting that ICIs worsen the risk or course of a COVID-19 infection, many sources have concurred that patients with melanoma, particularly those of an advanced stage, be treated without hesitation via standard of care regimens including ICIs and targeted therapy pending individual serine-threonine protein kinase B-RAF (BRAF) mutational status. 30 95 104 We therefore agree with recently published consensus guidelines from the UK, 105 106 including continued use of front-line ICI therapies and to consider the approved alternative dosing regimens of either pembrolizumab 400 mg every 6 weeks as opposed to initial 3-week standard of care dosing per KEYNOTE-555 Cohort B data as well as nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks compared with every 2-week standard of care for those on nivolumab maintenance regimens. 107 

Compared with the melanoma patient population, a less robust body of evidence is currently available regarding RCC patients and SARS-CoV-2. However, the available retrospective studies have once again observed no increase in the severity or mortality of a COVID-19 infection within patients with RCC, 12 including those receiving ICI. 108 109 In regard to systemic therapeutic approaches, no available evidence suggests that the use of ICI worsens the risk or severity of a COVID-19 infection and therefore standard guideline-based approaches to treatment remain recommended. 110 However, it is worth re-emphasizing current standards of care including the use of pembrolizumab plus axitinib based on KEYNOTE-426 111 and nivolumab plus ipilimumab based on CheckMate 214 112 led to 27% and 29% of patients, respectively, requiring ≥40 mg/ day oral prednisone doses equivalents due to irAEs that included pneumonitis. Although alternatives to combination ICIs for patients with advanced RCC exist, such as antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with anti-PD1/PD-L1 agents, 111 113 114 these also possess a clinically meaningful side effect profile with up to 82.4% of patients developing grade 3 or higher adverse events. 115 It is therefore imperative to closely monitor patients on these regimens for such events and promptly rule out a COVID-19 infection at the time of symptom onset in order to appropriately and expeditiously treat a potentially life-threatening irAE.

In addition, should a patient with RCC on ICI therapy develop any life-threatening irAE or be considered at high risk of such events beyond 2 years of treatment, it is not unreasonable to consider indefinite discontinuation of ICI therapy in certain clinical scenarios, as members of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer have recommended stopping ICI in the setting of complete radiological response (94% recommended) or non-progressive disease (56% recommended) in patients with RCC following 2 years of treatment. 116 SHARED CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR MELANOMA AND RCC As outlined above, there remain no reliable data to suggest that the use of ICI poses any additional risk to the susceptibility or severity of a SARS-CoV-2 infection in either RCC or melanoma patient cohorts. 25 93 95 105 Besides the development of an acute COVID-19 infection, standard approaches to ICI therapy are advised throughout the course of the pandemic. One reasonable clinical consideration for these patients includes the utilization of approved dosing of pembrolizumab and nivolumab at longer intervals of every 6 and 4 weeks, respectively, in attempts to enhance practices of social distancing and limit healthcare-related exposures. 105 107 Further, the risk or history of a COVID-19 infection should not serve as a sole determinant of pursuing a non-ICI regimen such as targeted therapies. A summary of our above recommendations is provided in table 1. The J&J vaccine has received publicized criticism for an initial reported efficacy of 66.1% in preventing moderateto-severe COVID-19 28 days post vaccination as compared with the striking 94.1% 118 and 95% 119 efficacy reported in the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine trials, respectively. However, it is worth noting that the defined severity endpoints differed among these trials, and when comparing these three vaccines from a public health standpoint, the J&J vaccine is the only current option approved as a single dose with proven efficacy against the recently defined B.1.351 coronavirus variant. 120 Due to patients with cancer on active systemic therapy being excluded from initial vaccine registration trials, the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations in patients Open access with cancer have become major topics of interest within the medical and scientific community. However, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, American Association for Cancer Research, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network have unequivocally recommended that all patients with cancer seek expeditious vaccination based on the observed safety profiles of currently approved vaccines, the historical tolerance to vaccines against other viruses, and the high rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality within this cohort. [121] [122] [123] The ideal vaccine choice in patients with cancer, as well as the general population, has yet to be elucidated. A small amount of evidence has suggested that current mRNA vaccines may provide relatively favorable efficacy following a single dose, especially in those previously infected with COVID-19, 124 which could challenge support of the J&J vaccine. However, such an approach should be avoided until the generalizable efficacy of incomplete vaccine series is supported by peer-reviewed objective evidence, as the production and duration of neutralizing antibodies appear to decline prior to the second booster doses across all studied age groups 125 132 †If two-dose vaccine provided, strongly recommend adherence to receiving second dose within timeframe of pivotal trials in attempts to optimize immunologic seroconversion. 117 118 Deferral of vaccinations is ill advised and consideration to do so should be based on individual clinical context along with regional infectivity rates. ‡Clinical caution and shared decision-making are advised as provided recommendations are synthesized from available trial data that lack cancer and ICI-treated patients. §Consider utilization of approved dosing of pembrolizumab and nivolumab at longer intervals of every 6 and 4 weeks, respectively, in attempts to enhance practices of social distancing and limit healthcare-related exposures. 105 107 ¶Vaccination is recommended regardless of use of immunosuppression. However, if immunosuppressive agent is temporary in patients with low risk of severe COVID-19 and adequately low regional infectivity rates, they may consider delaying vaccination until completion of immunosuppression in attempts to optimize immunologic seroconversion. 133 **Vaccination appears safe in previously infected patients. Delay in vaccination is recommended in order to avoid both symptomatic transmission within healthcare facilities as well as misrepresentation of viral symptoms as adverse events to vaccine and advisable based on favorable immune profile of previously infected non-cancer patients. 134 AID, autoimmune disease; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; SOC, standard of care.

and may ultimately lead to an increased susceptibility of contracting vaccine resistant variants. 126 In addition, increasing age 124 and early data from patients with cancer, especially those with hematologic malignancies, 127 are cohorts who appear to exhibit suboptimal immune responses to mRNA vaccines following a single dose, further supporting strict adherence to the vaccination schedules as studied in their initial clinical trials. 125 Therefore, a current approach to vaccine prioritization should simply focus on whichever approved option becomes available for these patients until additional efficacy data are observed. 128 129 Although the ideal timing of these vaccines in relation to ICI administration has yet to be elucidated, eligible patients on ICI are encouraged to receive this vaccine as it becomes available to them in efforts to provide much-needed mitigation of the short-term and long-term complications of a COVID-19 infection and its associated delays in cancer treatment. 15 102 A minor caveat to consider should eventual prospective data for ICI-treated patients parallel the general population is to potentially consider avoidance of vaccine administration within 24-48 hours prior to scheduled ICI, especially in investigational regimens, as the transient fever and occasionally severe side effect profiles more frequently observed following the second dose of currently accepted Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines may lead to misattribution of treatment-related adverse events and potentially interfere with a patient's ability to attend and receive their scheduled ICI treatments. 130 Patients with nonhematologic cancers actively participating in clinical trials should also be prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination, with additional efforts to provide at least the first vaccine dose during the screening process for those being considered for enrollment. 131 Although more detailed considerations regarding the approach to vaccine timing and clinical trials for various solid and hematologic malignancies are beyond the scope of this article and well-articulated elsewhere, 131 a noteworthy example by Yap et al recommends that patients enrolling in experimental phase I clinical trials involving investigational medicinal products (IMPs), for which human toxicity profiles remain unknown, should consider waiting 2-4 weeks following completion of all COVID-19 vaccination(s) prior to the initiation of an IMP, especially should these drugs confer any known or theoretical risk of CRS as well as if administered in combination with ICI. 132 Lastly, patients on ICI who have previously been infected with COVID-19 are to follow guidelines outlined for the general population until prospective data within this cohort becomes available, 128 129 including a delay in vaccination for (1) at least 90 days if COVID-19 infection was treated with monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma, (2) approximately 14 days from diagnosis in asymptomatic patients, and (3) either 28 days from diagnosis or on symptom resolution in symptomatic patients (whichever occurs first). 133 134 These recommendations are summarized in table 1.

Additional risk assessment regarding the impact of ICI therapy on the efficacy and safety of these vaccines are under active investigation. Previous encouraging safety and immunologic efficacy profiles have been observed with influenza vaccines for those on ICIs 121 135 and only a single report is currently available at the time of this review regarding a case of CRS following the Pfizer/BioN-Tech vaccine in a patient on long-standing ICI therapy. 136 In addition, although the presence of PD-1 is known to enhance CD8+ T-cell exhaustion during chronic infection and cancer, 137 the exact timing of PD-1 blockade during CD8+ T-cell differentiation in the setting of an acute viral infection, as outlined in section III, may pose a modulatory role in host immune responses. [72] [73] [74] Such observations, although compelling given the theoretic implications of suboptimal long-term T-cell memory or variable immune responses on vaccination in ICI-treated patients, require further study within the clinical setting.

Patients with cancer, although comprised of a large and heterogenous cohort, are to be considered a highrisk population amidst a global pandemic. Although additional studies are needed to conclusively define the implications of ICI and the SARS-CoV-2 virus, we are in agreement with the most up-to-date consensus guidelines stating that the current pandemic should not be considered a contraindication to ICI initiation or continuation, 105 that ICI should be held on diagnosis of a COVID-19 infection until clinical stability is ensured, and that patients on ICI be expeditiously vaccinated. 122 Although our understanding of these topics is rapidly evolving, patients should be made aware that many of our current clinical approaches are based on consensus rather than controlled empirical evidence and that our vaccination guidelines are currently based on non-ICI treated and non-cancer patients.

Several knowledge gaps remain regarding the clinical and immunologic relationships between the SARS-CoV-2 virus and anti-PD-1 therapies. Currently available literature appears to suggest that the use of ICI does not pose a significantly increased risk in the susceptibility or severity of a SARS-CoV-2 infection when adjusted for comorbidities and other potential confounding factors, 25 93-95 105 although many of these studies remain underpowered and will require expanded sample sizes and longer observational periods in order to achieve adequate significance and generalizability. Further, the majority of available evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of ICI in the setting of a known viral infection are based on a chronic rather than acute viral infection status, [67] [68] [69] [70] requiring clinicians to remain vigilant to their ICI-treated patients throughout the course of a COVID-19 infection. Lastly, the impact of the innate and adaptive immune response in ICI-treated patients following COVID-19 infection and/or vaccination is largely unknown.

Given the sparsity and mostly underpowered literature currently available regarding cancer patients and COVID-19, larger and controlled prospective studies are needed to further investigate the potential risks and benefits of anti-PD-1 therapeutic pathways on the short-term and long-term clinical course and immunologic profiles associated with both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and various COVID-19 vaccines. One such dedicated project includes the COVID-19 Antiviral Response in a Pan-tumor Immune Monitoring (CAPTURE) Study (NCT03226886), evaluating longitudinal clinical outcomes and immune profiles in cancer patients and healthcare workers in attempts to cultivate an enhanced understanding and evidencebased clinical framework to minimize viral transmission and optimize cancer treatment approaches. 129 CAPTURE study is actively evaluating B-cell and T-cell response to vaccination in patients with cancer, especially those with renal cell cancer and melanoma who are receiving immune checkpoint blockade. In addition, the 'Vaccination Against COVID in Cancer' Project (NCT04715438) is an exciting prospective, national, multicenter, longitudinal, multicohort study observing the short-term and long-term immunologic profiles of patients with solid tumor cancers on multiple treatment modalities including ICI with a primary endpoint of a sufficiently mounted immune response 28 days following the completion of an mRNA vaccine series. 128 This project will also further define the T-cell immunity observed against these vaccines, which will provide valuable insights into the potential differences of ICI-treated cohorts. Lastly, several aforementioned clinical trials utilizing various anti-PD-1 therapies in attempts to reinvigorate the exhausted T cells observed in patients infected with COVID-19 and thereby promote viral clearance and immunity are ongoing. 10 25 62 We eagerly await long-term clinical and immunologic analyses of how the SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine may impact the antitumor and antiviral responses for those receiving anti-PD-1 therapy. These topics will most assuredly remain the source of many active and fruitful scientific projects in the near future, providing practicechanging insights toward the navigation of current and future pandemics within both the oncologic and general population.

Collaborators Annika Fendler and Lewis Au.

Contributors All authors contributed significantly to this research article. BS assisted in formulating the main objectives of the article, collected pertinent supportive research, and wrote multiple sections of the manuscript. JH and PCL contributed intellectual content and critical revisions to the manuscript. IP and ST served as equally contributing senior authors and provided project oversight, formulated the main objectives, and contributed to multiple sections of the manuscript.

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. no 686061) , received speaking fees from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, and Ipsen, and has the following patents filed: Indel mutations as a therapeutic target and predictive biomarker PCTGB2018/051892 and PCTGB2018/051893 and Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers P113326GB.

Patient consent for publication Not required.

Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Open access This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http:// creativecommons. org/ licenses/ by-nc/ 4. 0/.

Benjamin Switzer http:// orcid. org/ 0000-0001-8150-1963

Cytokine storm

How COVID-19 induces cytokine storm with high mortality

Coagulopathy in COVID-19: focus on vascular thrombotic events

COVID-19 and coagulation: bleeding and thrombotic manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Lymphopenia in severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): systematic review and meta-analysis

T cell responses in patients with COVID-19

Selective CD8 cell reduction by SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a worse prognosis and systemic inflammation in COVID-19 patients

Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals patient heterogeneity and distinct immunotypes with implications for therapeutic interventions

Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Sustained cellular immune dysregulation in individuals recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection

Elevated exhaustion levels and reduced functional diversity of T cells in peripheral blood may predict severe progression in COVID-19 patients

Determinants of COVID-19 disease severity in patients with cancer

Patients with cancer appear more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: a multicenter study during the COVID-19 outbreak

COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anticancer treatments: a prospective cohort study

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care: a global collaborative study

Impact of COVID-19 on anxiety levels among patients with cancer actively treated with systemic therapy

Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID-19 severity in patients with haematological malignancies in Italy: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study

COVID-19 in patients with thoracic malignancies (TERAVOLT): first results of an international, registry-based, cohort study

SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Italian Veneto region: adverse outcomes in patients with cancer

Prevalence of underlying medical conditions associated with severe COVID-19 illness in adult cancer survivors in the United States

Determinants of the outcomes of patients with cancer infected with SARS-CoV-2: results from the Gustave Roussy cohort

Immunological alternation in COVID-19 patients with cancer and its implications on mortality

The immuno-oncological challenge of COVID-19

Clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in cancer patients with prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors

On the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with viral infections including COVID-19

The many faces of the anti-COVID immune response

Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibition

SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse events in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational prospective study

Impact of PD-1 blockade on severity of COVID-19 in patients with lung cancers

Melanoma and COVID-19: a narrative review focused on treatment

Review of indications of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors per NCCN guidelines with the level of evidence

Immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy

Innate recognition of viruses

Cytokine-Mediated control of viral infections

Role of early cytokines, including alpha and beta interferons (IFN-alpha/beta), in innate and adaptive immune responses to viral infections

Natural killer cells in antiviral defense: function and regulation by innate cytokines

Expression profile of immune response genes in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome

Immunity and immunopathology to viruses: what decides the outcome?

Differential chemokine expression following respiratory virus infection reflects Th1-or Th2-biased immunopathology

Th1 and Th17 hypercytokinemia as early host response signature in severe pandemic influenza

In vivo veritas: the surprising roles of Fc receptors in immunity

Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis associated with hepatitis C virus infection

Il-10: the master regulator of immunity to infection

Effector T cells control lung inflammation during acute influenza virus infection by producing IL-10

Contextual regulation of inflammation: a duet by transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10

Regulatory T cells: key controllers of immunologic self-tolerance

The Tim-3 ligand galectin-9 negatively regulates T helper type 1 immunity

Il-10 and PD-L1 operate through distinct pathways to suppress T-cell activity during persistent viral infection

Programmed death-1-induced interleukin-10 production by monocytes impairs CD4+ T cell activation during HIV infection

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19

SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor

SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes

The cytokine storm in COVID-19: an overview of the involvement of the chemokine/ chemokine-receptor system

Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte ratio as an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

A review of the main histopathological findings in coronavirus disease 2019

Proposal of a new nomenclature for the underlying pathogenetic mechanism of severe Coronavirus Disease-19: "Inflammatory Thrombosis with Immune Endotheliitis-ITIE

Tissue-Specific immunopathology in fatal COVID-19

Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity

Pulmonary vascular Endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid-19

Pulmonary endothelial dysfunction and thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors from cancer to COVID-19: a promising Avenue for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 (review)

Checkpoint inhibition and infectious diseases: a good thing?

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients with HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C viral infection

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with HBV/HCV infection and advanced-stage cancer: a systematic review

Reconsidering the management of patients with cancer with viral hepatitis in the era of immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint blockade in infectious diseases

Checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutic vaccines for the treatment of chronic HBV infection

Coexpression of PD-1, 2B4, CD160 and KLRG1 on exhausted HCV-specific CD8+ T cells is linked to antigen recognition and T cell differentiation

Antitumor and anti-hepatitis C viral response after administration of the Anti-Programmed death 1 antibody pembrolizumab

Immunotherapy use outside clinical trial populations: never say never?

The PD-1 Pathway Regulates Development and Function of Memory CD8 + T Cells following Respiratory Viral Infection

PD-1 blockade exacerbates Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in rhesus macaques

Role of PD-1 during effector CD8 T cell differentiation

Do checkpoint inhibitors compromise the cancer patients' immunity and increase the vulnerability to COVID-19 infection?

CoViD-19 immunopathology and immunotherapy

Controversies about COVID-19 and anticancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Cancer and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in the era of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Immune checkpoint Inhibitor-Related cytokine release syndrome: analysis of who global pharmacovigilance database

Autoimmune phenomena and disease in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with immunotherapy: brief review and case report

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Immune-Engaging cancer treatment

Incidence of programmed cell death 1 Inhibitor-Related pneumonitis in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pneumonitis from immune checkpoint inhibitors and COVID-19: current concern in cancer treatment

Overcoming T cell exhaustion in infection and cancer

Myeloid-Derived suppressor cells: linking inflammation and cancer

Increased production of immature myeloid cells in cancer patients: a mechanism of immunosuppression in cancer

MyD88-dependent expansion of an immature GR-1(+)CD11b(+) population induces T cell suppression and Th2 polarization in sepsis

Reactive oxygen species and 12/15-lipoxygenase contribute to the antiproliferative capacity of alternatively activated myeloid cells elicited during helminth infection

Myeloid-Derived suppressor cells: the dark knight or the joker in viral infections?

Enhancing therapeutic vaccination by blocking PD-1-mediated inhibitory signals during chronic infection

Cd200 checkpoint reversal: a novel approach to immunotherapy

Data of Italian cancer centers from two regions with high incidence of SARS CoV-2 infection provide evidence for the successful management of patients with locally advanced and metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy in the era of COVID-19

Treatment decisions for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic

A systematic review and metaanalysis: the effect of active cancer treatment on severity of COVID-19

Challenges of cancer immunotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic

Effect of hydrocortisone on mortality and organ support in patients with severe COVID-19: the REMAP-CAP COVID-19 corticosteroid domain randomized clinical trial

Dexamethasone in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: addressing uncertainties

The danger of neglecting melanoma during the COVID-19 pandemic

Estimated effect of COVID-19 lockdown on melanoma thickness and prognosis: a rate of growth model

Management of patients with melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers in the coronavirus disease 2019 era

Oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges, dilemmas and the psychosocial impact on cancer patients

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation status of newly diagnosed melanoma: a single institution experience

Pandemic medicine: the management of advanced melanoma during COVID-19

Consensus guidelines for the management of melanoma during the COVID-19 pandemic: surgery, systemic anti-cancer therapy, radiotherapy and follow-up

Managing cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO multidisciplinary expert consensus

Extended-Interval dosing strategy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: will it Outlast the COVID-19 pandemic?

COVID-19 in patients with renal cell carcinoma in the Russian Federation

Clinical characteristics and outcome for four SARS-CoV-2-infected cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Advanced renal cell carcinoma and COVID-19 -a personal perspective

Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma

Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma

Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma

The Society for immunotherapy of cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

An interactive website tracking COVID-19 vaccine development

Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine

Covid-19: where are we on vaccines and variants?

COVID-19 vaccines for patients with cancer: benefits likely outweigh risks

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Updated Interim Recommendation for Allocation of COVID-19 Vaccine -United States

Acute immune signatures and their legacies in severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 infected cancer patients

Effect of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection on humoral and T-cell responses to single-dose BNT162b2 vaccine

Delayed second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine: innovation or misguided conjecture?

Assessing the human immune response to SARS-CoV-2 variants

Interim results of the safety and immune-efficacy of 1 versus 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for cancer patients in the context of the UK vaccine priority guidelines. medRxiv 2021. 128 van der Veldt AAM, Oosting SF, Dingemans A-MC, et al. COVID-19 vaccination: the voice for patients with cancer

COVID-19, and antiviral immunity: the capture study

Public needs to PreP for vaccine side effects

COVID-19 vaccine guidance for patients with cancer participating in oncology clinical trials

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and phase 1 cancer clinical trials

Interim clinical considerations for use of COVID-19 vaccines currently authorized in the United States

COVID-19: the green book, chapter 14A

Cell-Mediated immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Cytokine release syndrome in a patient with colorectal cancer after vaccination with BNT162b2

Genetic absence of PD-1 promotes accumulation of terminally differentiated exhausted CD8+ T cells