key: cord-1015128-v033d0ea
authors: Kang, Seung-Ji; Kim, Sooyeon; Park, Kyung-Hwa; Jung, Sook In; Shin, Min-Ho; Kweon, Sun-Seog; Park, Hyang; Choi, Seong-Woo; Lee, Eungyu; Ryu, So Yeon
title: Successful control of COVID-19 outbreak through tracing, testing, and isolation: Lessons learned from the outbreak control efforts made in a metropolitan city of South Korea
date: 2021-07-13
journal: J Infect Public Health
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.003
sha: ee9f7f3501bc911e06b0a37664271f78fe557a36
doc_id: 1015128
cord_uid: v033d0ea

The first surge of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases began on June 27, 2020 in Gwangju metropolitan city, located in the southwestern part of South Korea, with a population of 1,501,000. Local governments and the Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention immediately started an epidemiologic investigation and traced the contacts of patients using a wide variety of data sources, including location data from mobile devices, credit card transaction, and closed-circuit television footage. Until July 16, 2020, 138 community transmission cases and 10 infection clusters were identified across the city. Through contact tracing, epidemiologic relatedness was found in 136 (98.6%) of 138 cases. Our investigation showed how the extensive and meticulous contact tracing suppressed COVID-19 outbreak in a populated city.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread very rapidly around the world since it was first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019 because of its high infectivity, short serial interval, relatively mild symptoms, and infectivity of asymptomatic carriers [1, 2] . South Korea has experienced several surges of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases since the first imported COVID-19 case was identified in February 2020 [3] . However, due to continuous contact tracing, extensive testing, and isolation strategies, the incidence of COVID-19 in South Korea remained relatively small compared to other countries, even without lockdown. In addition, meticulous contact tracing provided the valuable information about high-transmission events or locations. A sophisticated strategy to prevent the spread of infection has been established based on this information, and it helped avoid the complete business shut down in South Korea. Here, we reported how the extensive contact tracing and testing uncovered the epidemiological link between COVID-19 cases, and contained a COVID-19 outbreak in a metropolitan city of South Korea.

COVID-19 infection was confirmed through SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. Close contacts were defined based on the guidelines developed by the World Health Organization and Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) [4, 5] . Contacts J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f who did not fulfil the criteria for close contacts were classified as other contacts [6, 7] . For contact tracing, in-depth interviews were conducted with all confirmed patients. Location data from mobile devices, credit card payment history, and closed-circuit television footage were used for tracing all possible contacts if necessary. When all contacts could not be traced through these measures, emergency alert messages containing patient's movement route were sent to all community residents through a cell broadcast system; this allowed people who were present in the same place at the same time as the confirmed patient to voluntarily visit screening centers.

From February 3, 2020 to June 26, 2020, only 33 COVID-19 patients were reported in Gwangju metropolitan city. Most of them were imported cases or cases that moved to Gwangju after being infected in other regions; thus, true community spread had not been reported until June 26, 2020. The surge of COVID-19 cases began on June 27, 2020. Local governments and the KCDC formed a joint response team immediately, launched an epidemiologic investigation, traced the contacts of patients, isolated patients with confirmed COVID-19, quarantined close contacts, and performed large-scale testing all over Gwangju and the surrounding area to identify potential cases. Subjects for tests included contacts identified through investigation, all residents who reported themselves having overlapped movement route with confirmed patients, all citizens with any suspicious symptoms, and high risk groups such as all residents and workers in nursing homes, long term care hospitals, the disabled residential facilities, mental health facilities, and closed wards of mental hospital. From June 27, 2020

to July 16, 2020, 63,175 tests were performed, and a total of 3,630 close contacts were identified and asked to self-quarantine for 2 weeks. During quarantine period of close contacts, subjects were monitored for symptom development and compliance with self-quarantine rules by assigned local government case officers twice a day via phone. "Self-quarantine safety protection" smart phone app developed by Ministry of the Interior and Safety were also utilized for monitoring. In addition, 9, 554 other contacts were monitored actively for symptoms twice a day by local health authorities without quarantine. Due to these multifaceted containment efforts, the number of COVID-19 patients declined 

This outbreak investigation showed that 98.6% of COVID-19 patients who were detected during a J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f period of 20 days in a populated city were linked by one epidemiologic link. Moreover, this epidemiologic relatedness was detected through immediate and meticulous contact tracing. The infection clusters identified in our investigation included door-to-door sales organization, religious facilities, nursing homes, sauna, private education institutes and hobby sports group meetings, which represented the hot spots for COVID-19 transmission in South Korea [8] . After South Korea had experienced a large-scale COVID-19 outbreak starting with cases related to a religious group called Shincheonji from February 2020 to March 2020, strong social distancing was enforced. Furthermore, even after restrictions had eased off, people were very careful about mass gathering. However, smallscale gathering then became the key factor in COVID-19 spreading [9, 10] . In addition, during the investigation, we found that most of patients were not able to follow key principles for preventing infection, such as keeping distance and wearing a facial mask at all times, because they had been working together for long period of time in confined spaces and ate together often. Knowing the transmission pattern of infectious diseases is important to establish more effective and sophisticated preventive strategies against epidemics.

Until the population develops sufficient immunity through mass vaccination, it is essential to contain the number of patients to a level that the healthcare system can afford to manage. Our investigation showed that the continuous implementation of contact tracing is crucial to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 in communities.

pp.88-94. Korea between June 27, 2020 and July 16, 2020. During a period of 20 days, 138 community transmission cases and 5 imported cases were identified. Through contact tracing, epidemiologic relatedness was found in 136 (98.6%) of 138 community transmission cases. Initially, people related to door-to-door sales organization contracted the infection, which then spread to 10 clusters across the city.

Depending on the presence or absence of symptoms at the time of diagnosis, cases were categorized as symptomatic, asymptomatic, and pre-symptomatic cases. Patients who had no symptoms from the time of diagnosis to the end of the isolation period were defined as asymptomatic patients. Patients who had no symptom at the time of diagnosis but developed symptoms during the isolation period were defined as presymptomatic patients.

Serial interval of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections

Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

The First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Imported into Korea from Wuhan

Contact tracing in the context of COVID-19

Coronavirus Infectious Disease-19 Response Guidelines for local governments (2020)

Investigation of a COVID-19 outbreak in Germany resulting from a single travel-associated primary case: a case series

Risk factors associated with COVID-19 infection: a retrospective cohort study based on contacts tracing

Emerging COVID-19 success story: South Korea learned the lessons of MERS. Our World in Data

Clustering and superspreading potential of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Hong Kong

Clusters of COVID-19 associated with Purim celebration in the Jewish community in Marseille