key: cord-1018301-dmy7fovg authors: Donà, Daniele; Minotti, Chiara; Costenaro, Paola; Da Dalt, Liviana; Giaquinto, Carlo title: Fecal-Oral Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 In Children: is it Time to Change Our Approach? date: 2020-04-16 journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000002704 sha: 1885d0350c4cb00a63236f61ebb1374ac869815a doc_id: 1018301 cord_uid: dmy7fovg Starting from 2 pediatric cases of COVID-19, with confirmation at nasopharyngeal and rectal swabs, we considered the lesson learnt from previous Coronavirus epidemics and reviewed evidence on the current outbreak. Surveillance with rectal swabs might be extended to infants and children, for the implications for household contacts and isolation timing. During the SARS outbreak in 2002 to 2003, there were reports of viral RNA being found in fecal samples, occasionally even after 30 days after symptoms onset, determining a risk for the stools to become a source of contamination of airdrops and several environmental surfaces. 3 In children, SARS-CoV infection was associated to gastrointestinal symptoms, but there is no evidence of rectal swabs being performed for diagnosis and further surveillance. In Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-CoV epidemic in 2012, there was proof of viral RNA detection in fecal specimens in adults, but there were no data about surveillance in children, despite reported occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms. 1 As for COVID-19 outbreak, the most relevant international evidence is reported in Table 1 . Zhang et al 4 reported that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found in stool specimens and rectal swabs, often with a higher number of positivities than oral samples in a later phase of disease. These findings might suggest that, if feasible, "non-infectivity" should not rely only on negativity of oral swabs, as the virus might still be shed in the body fluids. 4 Wang et al 5 reported detection of viral RNA in respiratory tract swabs and stools, with 44/153 positive fecal samples. Four positive fecal samples showed high copy numbers with a mean cycle threshold (Ct) value of 31 4 (<2.6 × 10 4 copies/mL). Live virus was found in feces of patients without diarrhea, suggesting a systemic infection. The spread of the virus by also non-respiratory routes might justify the rapid diffusion of infection and testing of samples from multiple sites may be useful to enhance sensitivity and decrease false-negative results. Zhang et al 6 reported an adult case that presented after initial negativization positive sputum and fecal samples, with the latter still testing weakly positive 10 days after discharge. The hospital revised criteria for discharge, requiring 2 consecutive negative samples from the respiratory tract and stool alike. Holshue et al 7 published the first adult case in the US, showing high viral loads in nasopharyngeal specimens at onset, with a tendency to decrease following disease course, with increasing Ct values. In addition, viral detection in stool samples occurred at 7 days from onset. An initial concern was the sensitivity and specificity of SARS-CoV-2 PCR tested in stools. Recently, the same level of accuracy has been demonstrated for stool samples and pharyngeal swabs, regardless of symptoms and with no correlation to disease severity. 8 Concerning the pediatric population, evidence on the use of rectal swabs or viral detection in stools is reported in Table 1 . Xu et al 2 reported ten pediatric PCR-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, all with non-specific symptoms. The children's pattern of viral shedding was monitored with subsequent nasopharyngeal and rectal swab samples: 8 patients showed persistent positivity on rectal swabs, with 2 of them remaining positive for up to 13 days after discharge, also after nasopharyngeal swabs had turned negative. Viral loads showed that shedding from the gastrointestinal tract may be higher and more long-lasting compared with the respiratory tract. As reviewed by He et al, 9 a newborn presenting vomiting and diarrhea as first symptoms was tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, showing negativization of pharyngeal swab after treatment but a persistently positive rectal swab. Park et al 10 reported a pediatric case with positive nasopharynx, throat and feces samples on admission. By day 16 from symptoms onset, throat swab samples had turned negative, while on day 17, viral RNA was still found on feces and with weak positivity on nasopharyngeal samples. Last, Tang et al 11 showed how an asymptomatic child presented a positive fecal sample for up to 17 days since the last exposure, with reported negative samples from the respiratory tract. Droplets are the main human-to-human mechanism of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, but fecal shedding with environmental contamination may play an important role in viral spread. As pointed out by Li et al, 12 there is a great number of infections not being documented, especially in paucisymptomatic or asymptomatic individuals, which may have helped the fast diffusion of the virus. 12 The clinical pattern of disease presentation among children may have facilitated viral dissemination. Moreover, there is evidence supporting viral viability in environmental settings that may predispose fecal-oral transmission, with recent evidence supporting that SARS-CoV-2 can remain viable in aerosols up to 3 hours, and for 72 hours on solid surfaces, similarly to SARS-CoV. 13 Not only the importance of correct hand hygiene should be encouraged by every mean, but severe measures must also be observed handling the feces of infected patients, and sewage from hospitals requires proper disinfection. Current evidence brings concerns on excluding SARS-CoV-2 infection by single time point nasopharyngeal swabs, with sensitivity being dependent on the test's characteristics and technique of collection of the samples, with increasing data hinting at fecal transmission as an important alternative route. Since gastrointestinal symptoms seem to be more frequently reported in children than adults, and in view of current evidence of fecal shedding, there are implications for every child being admitted or home-isolated, and for household contacts. Indeed, rectal swabs should be considered especially in children for diagnosis as well as to better define the duration of isolation, along with findings from nasopharyngeal swabs. Further evidence on gastrointestinal involvement and excretion of SARS-CoV-2 in stools is necessary to confirm fecal viral loads regardless of enteric symptoms, and to better explore viral RNA detection in the early incubation or late convalescence stages. A negativity in both nasopharyngeal and stool samples might be considered as a standard requirement for cessation of mandatory isolation, especially in those settings where there is a risk of infecting vulnerable populations (eg, retirement homes). Coronavirus Infections in Children Including COVID-19 an overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention options in children Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding Enteric involvement of coronaviruses: is faecaloral transmission of SARS-CoV-2 possible? Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens SARS-CoV-2 turned positive in a discharged patient with COVID-19 arouses concern regarding the present standard for discharge Washington State 2019-nCoV Case Investigation Team. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States Fecal specimen diagnosis 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia Public health might be endangered by possible prolonged discharge of SARS-CoV-2 in stool First pediatric case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Korea Detection of Novel Coronavirus by RT-PCR in Stool Specimen from Asymptomatic Child Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1 All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, collection, and interpretation of data for this article, drafted the manuscript, revised it critically for content, and approved the final version.