key: cord-1018783-3hbj0hg8
authors: Jemec Kokalj, Anita; Dolar, Andraž; Drobne, Damjana; Marinšek, Marjan; Dolenec, Matej; Škrlep, Luka; Strmljan, Gregor; Mušič, Branka; Škapin, Andrijana Sever
title: Environmental hazard of polypropylene microplastics from disposable medical masks: acute toxicity towards Daphnia magna and current knowledge on other polypropylene microplastics
date: 2022-01-04
journal: Microplast nanoplast
DOI: 10.1186/s43591-021-00020-0
sha: a90f4ce556280f947a39e229df589d8d892523bc
doc_id: 1018783
cord_uid: 3hbj0hg8

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the use of disposable plastics, including medical masks, which have become a necessity in our daily lives. As these are often improperly disposed of, they represent an important potential source of microplastics in the environment. We prepared microplastics from polypropylene medical masks and characterised their size, shape, organic chemical leaching, and acute toxicity to the planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna. The three layers of the masks were separately milled and characterised. Each of the inner frontal, middle filtering, and outer layers yielded different types of microplastics: fibres were obtained from the inner and outer layer, but irregular fragments from the middle layer. The shape of the obtained microplastics differed from the initial fibrous structure of the intact medical mask layers, which indicates that the material is deformed during cryo-milling. The chemical compositions of plastics-associated chemicals also varied between the different layers. Typically, the inner layer contained more chemicals related to antimicrobial function and flavouring. The other two layers also contained antioxidants and their degradation products, plasticisers, cross-linking agents, antistatic agents, lubricants, and non-ionic surfactants. An acute study with D. magna showed that these microplastics do not cause immobility but do physically interact with the daphnids. Further long-term studies with these microplastics are needed using a suite of test organisms. Indeed, studies with other polypropylene microplastics have shown numerous adverse effects on other organisms at concentrations that have already been reported in the environment. Further efforts should be made to investigate the environmental hazards of polypropylene microplastics from medical masks and how to handle this new source of environmental burden. PLEASE CHECK THE SI WORD DOCUMENT. THE AUTHORS ARE NOT LISTED THERE. I CANNOT EDIT THAT FILE. PLEASE ADD THE AUTHORS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43591-021-00020-0.

With the crisis of the global coronavirus pandemic , the consumption of single-use plastics, including personal protective equipment, has increased significantly. This has become essential to prevent the spread of infection among healthcare workers and the general public [1] [2] [3] . Among the protective equipment, disposable medical (face) masks (also called surgical masks) are most commonly used by the general public, as some governments have recommended or mandated their use indoors as well as outdoors [1] .

The use of medical masks as an infection control measure was common in East and South-East Asia at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and it then gained momentum in the rest of the world during 2020 and 2021 [4] . The production volume as well as the use of medical masks is already enormous, and is expected to continue to increase in the near future. For example, at the end of April 2020, China was producing about 450 million medical masks daily. Indeed, as the leading manufacturer, the annual production volume of medical masks in China increased from 5 billion in 2019 to 10 billion in 2020 [5] .

There is a wide variety of medical masks on the market that are made of different plastics, such as polyurethane, polyacrylonite, polyester, polyethylene terephthalate and polypropylene. The last of these, polypropylene, remains by far the most common material and has a long history of use [6] [7] [8] . This was also confirmed by searching online medical devices catalogues (search term: surgical masks; Medical Expo, 2020), where all of the medical masks that indicated the polymer composition (about 20% of those available) were polypropylene. In addition, many companies online sell polypropylene as the raw material for making medical masks. Generally, medical masks consist of three main layers: the inner frontal layer, the middle filtering layer, and the outer layer, which is usually water repellent and coloured. The filter materials are produced by a 'non-woven' approach, which refers to the layers of the fibres as bonded together by physical entanglements or contact adhesion between the individual fibres [9, 10] . This approach includes different processes, such as for melt-blown and spun-bond fabrics, each of which results in different final fibre diameters. The most commonly reported approach to produce the middle filter layer of the medical mask material is melt blowing, while the spun-bond process is used to produce the inner and outer layers of the masks [9] .

The major environmental concern associated with the increasing use of disposable medical masks by the general public is poor waste management [2, 6, 7] . Although it was suggested recently that a possible route for waste management would be thermo-chemical conversion of disposable medical masks into valueadded products [11] , improper disposal of masks in public spaces [2] and into the environment in general [6, 7] , is widespread. This contributes to global plastics pollution, which has numerous negative impacts on the environment [12] . In addition, as identified recently, disposable medical masks might represent a significant new source of microplastics [2, 6, 7, 13, 14] .

Similar to other plastic items, once medical masks are disposed of into the natural environment, they undergo weathering processes, including ultraviolet radiation, temperature fluctuations, increased humidity, biodegradation, physical abrasion and chemical oxidation. Weathering affects the physicochemical properties of plastics, and eventually leads to their fragmentation into microplastics and nanoplastics [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] . The degradation of plastics is highly dependent on the polymer type and any chemical additives [20, 21] . Polypropylene, the material most commonly used in the medical mask production, is susceptible to photodegradation [14, 20, 22] , heat [23] and atmospheric oxygen [24] . Polypropylene is excellent in terms of water resistance, but inferior in terms of weathering resistance. Moisture accelerates the oxidative degradation of polypropylene, and consequently its melting point and thermal decomposition temperature are lowered, and its mechanical properties deteriorate [25] . In the external environment, conditions can be even more severe, such as lower (acidic) pH due to acid rain, higher (alkaline) pH due to fertilization with nitrogen compounds and accelerated decomposition of plastics, and the presence of electrolytes, due to road salting or along coastal areas. A number of studies have shown that polypropylene is susceptible to outdoor weathering [19, 26] , although it is not readily biodegradable [27] . To some extent, shedding and peeling of microfibres from medical masks is also likely to occur, as has been shown for polyester textiles that release fibres into water and air during household washing and drying, and during their regular use [28] . However, the release of fibres is highly dependent on the textile structure, as there will be less release for textiles with a compact woven structure [29] . There are already some estimations on the amount of microplastics released from medical masks [13, 14] . Chen et al. [13] estimated the release of microplastics from 18 brands of medical masks into the water (shaking at 120 rpm, 24 h). In this way, from 159.80 ± 46.14 to 222.17 ± 98.79 particles/medical mask was released when the masks were new, but the numbers increased significantly when the masks were already used (1146.00 ± 307.60 to 1478.00 ± 265.80 particles/mask). Both fragments and fibres were found in water. The second study by Wang et al. [14] incubated the three layers of the medical mask separately in water with added quartz sand (shaking at 300 rpm, 24 h). The authors report that the release of microplastics depends on the UV weathering of the masks, addition of the sand as well as on the layer of the mask. They estimated that around 483,888 plastic particles could be released from one virgin disposable mask, and 1,566,560 particles from the weathered mask if the whole mask would disintegrate.

Over the past 15 years, tremendous research efforts have been made to understand the global occurrence, distribution and potential environmental hazards of microplastics and their associated chemicals [30, 31] . Research on the potential adverse effects of microplastics on organisms has been very intense over the past decade which has demonstrated physiological perturbations in organisms exposed to microplastics (e.g., alterations to behaviour, immune responses, energy allocation, life traits), and potential links to altered ecosystem function (for reviews see [32] [33] [34] ).

The aim of this paper was to thoroughly characterise the microplastics obtained from commercially available polypropylene medical masks and to evaluate their acute toxicity to the planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna. The microplastics from the inner frontal, middle filtering, and outer layers of disposable medical masks were investigated separately in terms of their size, shape, organic chemical leaching and aquatic toxicity. We discuss the properties of polypropylene microplastics from medical masks in line with the literature reports on plasticsassociated chemicals in other polypropylene products. We provide an extensive overview of currently available ecotoxicity data for microplastics from other polypropylene-based products, as currently very limited data for microplastics from medical masks exist. Finally, we identify the knowledge gaps to guide further research in the field.

We produced microplastics from exemplary medical masks (sold as polypropylene, with three layers, the outer layer was blue) which were obtained from local supplier of medical protective equipment. The three layers were milled separately according to our established protocols [35] . Briefly, the material of each layer was separately cut with scissors into small pieces (~0.5 cm 2 ), which were placed in a milling bowl. This milling bowl was put into liquid nitrogen, and left frozen for 4 min. Then the samples were milled, following a 'quasicryo-milling' procedure, whereby instead using liquid nitrogen as the coolant for the cryo-milling, the liquid nitrogen was used to maintain the material frozen before milling. This was carried out with a horizontal homogeniser (Milli Mix 20; Domel, Slovenia) with milling balls (diameter, 25 mm). The milling of the samples was performed at a horizontal frequency of 28 Hz, for 2.5 min. After milling, the samples were sieved through a 250-μm-pore sieve.

To determine the main material used in the three layers of the medical masks, attenuated total reflection-Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (diamond crystal) was carried out (FTIR Spectrum Two spectrometer; Per-kinElmer). The spectra were recorded from 400 cm − 1 to 4000 cm − 1 with an average of four scans at 4 cm − 1 resolution (Supplementary information Fig. S1 ).

The particles were characterised in terms of size, shape and chemical composition. The shape of microplastics as well as the structure of intact mask layers was characterized using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Zeiss ULTRA plus, Carl Zeiss, Germany). The samples were sputtered before observation with a 10 nm thin layer of Au/Pd coating. Microscopy was performed at 5.3 mm working distance using a secondary electron detector, 2 kV accelerating voltage and 30 μm aperture size. The particle size distribution was determined using a particle sizer Microtrac Bluewave as described in Selonen et al. [35] . The samples were measured in three sequentially performed runs, from which averages were calculated and used in the data analysis. The diameters of the fibres in intact mask layers were evaluated using imageJ software on SEM images (n data = 60 for each of the layer).

For each of the inner frontal, middle filtering and outer layers of the medical mask, 0.12 g of the milled material was weighed into glass vials with PTFE lid and 0.7 g methanol was added. A blank with methanol only was also prepared. The exact mass of the methanol was recorded. The vials were sealed, put in an autoclave and heated to 100°C for 144 h. After cooling, the vials were removed and centrifuged at 9000 rpm. A small amount of methanol solution was transferred into 0.2-mL GC-MS vials using a syringe. A drop of methanol spiked with diethyl adipate as internal standard was added to each, and the vials were sealed. The exact mass of the spiked methanol was also recorded.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis was performed on a 7890B gas chromatograph (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with a quadrupole mass detector (5977B). The GC-MS conditions were as follows: column, DB-5 MS Ultra Inert (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA); injected volume, 1 μL; inlet temperature, 250°C; carrier gas, He; and split ratio, 1:20. Temperature program: Initial temperature, 45°C; hold time, 5 min; ramp rate, 10°C/ min; final temperature, 300°C; hold time, 10 min. The components were identified based on the mass spectra in comparison with probability-based matching (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A total number of peaks with an initial area > 30,000 and initial threshold > 15.0 were counted. Quantitative analysis was performed based on the peak area of each component compared to the peak area of the internal standard. An area of the particular peak from the procedural blank was subtracted. A relative response factor of 1 was used in the calculations.

Acute toxicity tests were performed according to the ISO 6341:2012 [36] . The daphnids used were derived from Daphtoxkit F™ magna. Hatched daphnids less than 24 h old were fed with algae (Desmodesmus subspicatus) for 1.5 h (density 5 × 10 4 cells/mL) prior to the microplastics exposure. The microplastics from the milled layers of the medical mask were added to the ISO 6341: 2012 test medium (11.76 g CaCl 2 2H 2 O, 4.93 g MgSO 4 7H 2 O, 2.59 g NaHCO 3 , 0.23 g KCl, dissolved to 1 L in water) with 0.0024% (v/v) Tween40, and the suspensions were stirred with vortex prior to dilutions and pipetting. For each test concentration 4 Petri dish with 10 mL test medium were prepared, and 5 neonates were placed into each of the Petri dish. Controls that contained only the test medium and test medium with 0.0024% (v/v) Tween40 were included in all of the experiments. The daphnids were exposed for 48 h at 21 ± 1°C under a 16: 8 h light/dark regime. The exposure during the toxicity testing was static, without mixing of the test suspensions. Three concentrations were tested: 1 mg L − 1 , 10 mg L − 1 and 100 mg L − 1 . Two separate experiments were carried out, with 20 daphnids per microplastic and control each time. After 24 h and 48 h of exposure, the daphnids were inspected for mobility (according to ISO 6341:2012 [36] ), and their mortality was determined by the absence of a heartbeat.

The literature search was carried out in September 2021. Two databases: Web of Science and ScienceDirect were searched using two keyword combinations: "microplastics" AND "polypropylene"; and "microplastics" AND "polypropylene" AND "toxic*". In both knowledge bases only research articles within Environmental Sciences category were considered. Preliminary title and abstract screening were used to exclude irrelevant literature. In the second stage, the selected papers were inspected in detail for relevance to the review.

Characteristics of microplastics obtained from medical masks Polymer chemistry

The spectra from the Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy of the inner frontal, middle filtering and outer layers of the mask materials had absorption bands at the same positions and with the same relative intensities as spectra obtained for polypropylene, from the internal database of the Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute (Supplementary Information Fig. S1 ). This confirmed that the source mask indeed contained polypropylene.

Two different shapes of microplastics were obtained from the three layers: fibres resulted from milling of the inner and outer layers, while milling of middle layer resulted in irregularly-shaped fragments (FE-SEM Zeiss Ultra Plus; Fig. 1 D-F) . This is not surprising given the fact that the composition of the intact source medical mask material was different between the layers: the inner layer and outer layer were very similar in shape being composed of a mesh of fibres with very uniform diameters (21.2 ± 1.5 μm and 22.1 ± 1.6 μm for inner and outer layer, respectively), while the fibres in the middle layer were significantly thinner (4.3 ± 2.2 μm). The fibres in middle layer had various diameters and the mesh was more compact and interwoven ( Fig. 1 A-C) . This difference is in line with the fact that these layers are produced using different technological approaches (see introduction and ref. (9)). Also, Ellison et al. [10] reported that thinner fibres are formed by melt-blown process used for the middle layer than by the spun-bond processes used for the inner and outer layers.

We observed that cryo-milling deforms the shape of the original fibres in medical mask. It is unclear how relevant these particles are for ecotoxicity testing in comparison to those released in the environment. Wang et al. [14] reported that different shapes of microplastics, mostly fragments of fibres, were released from the three layers of medical masks after UV weathering. Interestingly, the middle layer was more susceptible to UV than the inner and outer layers. Extraction of fibre fragments from the water after aging could be an option to obtain relevant testing materials, but the recovery in this case is low and would not be sufficient for large scale experiments or for soil toxicity testing where large quantities are needed. Therefore cryo-milling remains the most common approach to produce microplastics for research as it enables sufficient amount of testing material to be produced. Other approaches that had been used previously to produce microplastics from larger plastic items all include some mechanical fragmentation, these are: cutting with scissors, grinding with mortar and liquid nitrogen, and cutting with cryogenic microtome (Table 1) .

The particle size distributions obtained by laser diffraction analysis (Microtrac S3500 Bluewave) were very similar for the inner and outer layers, with mean sizes (± standard deviation; expressed as the equivalent diameters of spherical particles) of the fibres of 45.1 ± 21.5 μm and 42.0 ± 17.8 μm, respectively. The fragments of the middle filtering layer were slightly larger, at 55.6 ± 28.5 μm. As can be seen from the size distributions shown in Fig. 2 , for the inner, middle and outer layers, 99.1%, 97.6% and 99.4% of the particles, respectively, were < 176 μm, which is not too surprising given that they were sieved through a 250-μm fine-mesh sieve.

Wang et al. [14] reported that the particle size distributions differed between the layers of medical mask weathered in water. The particles from the outer layer were mainly distributed in the range of 20-100 μm and 100-500 μm, particles from the inner layer were mainly distributed in 30-100 μm and 100-500 μm, and for the middle layer, the particle size of the microplastics was 50-200 μm. Most of the particles released were less than 200 μm in size for all three mask layers, with this trend being particularly pronounced for the middle layer, where this size distribution accounted for 91.2% of the total concentration. This means that the size range of particles obtained by cryo-milling in our case study is within the environmentally relevant values, although the particle sizes will largely depend on the choice of the parameters used for the milling method as well as for sieving.

We analysed extracts from the milled microplastics from the inner frontal, middle filtering and outer layers of the medical mask. GC-MS chromatograms solvent (methanol), procedural blank and of the extracts are presented in Figs. S2-S6 (Supplementary information). The data for the different compounds identified from the three layers of the medical mask are given in Table 1 . This revealed several long-chain hydrocarbons; however, many of these are not listed in Table 1 because the identification of long-chain hydrocarbons is not reliable.

Among most common groups of chemicals were: antioxidants, such as 2,4-di-(tert-butyl) phenol; 2,6-di-(tert-butyl)-4-(methoxymethyl)phenol and methyl-3,5-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-benzene-propanoate (also known as Metilox); and lubricants: e.g. methyl palmitate; methyl-3,5-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-benzene-propanoat;, eicosane; methyl stearate and (E)-9-octadecenamide (i.e., oleamide). Some oleamide was detected in the procedural blank as well ( Supplementary Fig. S3 ). Of particular interest, some of the compounds detected from the extraction of the inner layer are commonly used as food flavourings and antimicrobial agents (e.g. 2,4-dimethylanisole; 2,4-dimethylphenol; benzothiazole; heptadecane). The total amounts of the extracted compounds detected by GC-MS were similar for each of the layers of the medical masks (Table 1) , but there were indications of many more compounds in the GC-MS chromatogram from the extraction of the inner frontal layer (Supplementary Fig. S2 ). Table 1 Results of the GC-MS analysis for the three layers of the disposable medical mask, with total numbers of peaks detected, combined mass fraction of extracted compounds detected and a list of compounds with ≥90% quality and at levels of > 10 μg/g microplastics. The possible functions of chemicals were extracted from Zimmermann et al. [37] and Groh et al. [38] through the database "Chemicals associated with plastic packaging". For the chemicals which were not listed in any of these two publications, the function was summarised from the PubChem database. Where available, detection in other plastic samples was described (after Zimmermann et al. [37] )

It has been reported that a number of different compounds can leach from polypropylene products [39] . For example, a total of 107 analytes were identified in leachates from polypropylene food containers [39] . Among these, the most abundant groups were antioxidants and their degradation products (tris (2,4-di-tert-buthylphenyl)phosphite; 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-ethyl-phenol), plasticizers (e.g. bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; dibutyl phthalate), cross-linking agents (e.g. 2-mercaptobenzothiazole; benzothiazole) and other additives (e.g., antistatic agents; lubricants; non-ionic surfactants) [39] . Similarly, Zimmermann et al. [37] reported a number of chemicals in PP products, for example 18, 5 and 22 different chemicals in gummy candy packaging, handkerchief packaging, and shampoo bottle, respectively. Some of these chemicals were also detected in the medical masks characterised in this study (Table 1) . We could not find data specific to medical masks, but there are some records that medical masks might contain formaldehyde and bromo-2nitropropane-1,3-diol (bronopol), which can cause acute dermatitis in healthcare workers [40] , but these were not identified in the present samples.

We observed no effects on the mobility and survival of D. magna exposed to the three types of microplastics that were milled from the three layers of the medical mask at 1 mg L − 1 -100 mg L − 1 for 48 h. However, there was attachment of these microplastics to the body surface and ingestion of the microplastics by D. magna (Fig. 3) . This is in line with our previous work where no acute effects of polyethylene cosmetic beads and polyester textile fibres on D. magna were recorded, but these microplastics were as well found in the gut [41, 42] . Acute effects were however observed in the case of polyester textile fibres when the exposure was prolonged for additional 24 h as the daphnids could not recover from the exposure [41] . We would thus suggest the need for further studies on chronic effects of microplastics from medical masks. Of note, chronic studies have already shown numerous effects of other types of microplastics on D. magna [43, 44] . Furthermore, multigenerational studies with daphnids have shown that some effects, such as decreased reproduction, can persist over at least two generations without further exposure to the microplastics [43] . The choice of exposure scenarios and endpoint selection in future polypropylene microplastics ecotoxicity studies with D. magna should also consider the physicochemical properties that appear particular for this type of test material [45] , as well as testing for the expected chemically and physically induced interactions of microplastics with the test organisms, for example adsorption onto the body surface and interference with moult.

Although several plastics-associated chemicals were identified in methanol extracts from medical mask microplastics (Table 1) , obviously the concentrations in test medium during the acute exposure of D. magna were not high enough to cause acute lethal effects. Similarly, when leachates from 26 different plastic products were tested (analysed at 100-250 g plastics L − 1 water), none of the leachates from polypropylene were toxic to the water flea D. magna [46] . Also, in another study, leachates from polypropylene showed the lowest inhibition of the survival and settlement of the barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite when compared to highdensity and low-density polyethylene, polyvinylchloride, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, polystyrene (all analysed at 1000-5000 cm 2 L − 1 with water; equivalent to 100-500 g plastics L − 1 water) [47] .

Currently, there is only one very recent ecotoxicity study available on the polypropylene microplastics from medical masks [48] . The authors report the effect of microplastics obtained from FFP2 medical mask on springtails Folsomia candida and earthworms Eisenia andrei. The reproduction and growth of juvenile springtails and spermatogenesis of earthworm were decreased already at environmentally relevant concentration (Table 2) . No induction of oxidative stress and effects on survival were found for both species. To our knowledge, no data on the effects of medical mask microplastics for aquatic organisms currently exists.

A review of ecotoxicity data on microplastics from other polypropylene-based products Many literature reviews have indicated that polypropylene microplastics are among the least studied microplastics in laboratory ecotoxicity studies [77] [78] [79] . This is surprising given the fact that polypropylene is the second largest European and global plastic resin in terms of production volume [80, 81] and polypropylene microplastics are among the most common found in the environment [77] . For example, of the total of 157 peerreviewed ecotoxicity articles published by 2018 with 612 different microplastics on aquatic organisms, only 12.1% included polypropylene [33] . Our literature search using the keywords "polypropylene" and "microplastics" (September 2021) resulted in 688 hits within the category Environmental Sciences of the Web of Science knowledge base and 2003 hits within ScienceDirect. For the keyword combination "polypropylene" and "microplastics" and "toxic" the number of hits was 59 and 1175 for Web of Science (WoS) and ScienceDirect, respectively (Table S1 Supplementary information) . After abstract inspection, in total 27 studies were identified as ecotoxicity studies including species being relevant for this review. An additional 3 were found in the review by De Sá et al. [33] dealing with microplastics from fishing ropes which were not identified during our search in WoS or ScienceDirect. Interestingly, 44% of studies included in our review were recently published (2021) which indicates that the number of studies on polypropylene microplastics has increased significantly (Supplementary information Table S1 , Table 2 ). Three types of polypropylene microplastics have been studied in terms of their shapes and sources: fibres from the cutting of fishing rope; fragments obtained from cryo-milling of different products; and purchased fragments (pellets) from polymer producing companies. A comparative analysis of the reported adverse effects across the test species for exposure concentrations and with other microplastic polymer types is very difficult, because the various studies have used a range of test materials of different dimensions (fibres: length 20-1000 μm, width 15-200 μm; fragments: diameter~10-3000 μm), and according to different concentration metrics (particle mass/volume, particle number/volume, particle mass/mass sediment or soil, particle mass/surface area of agar plate) and toxicity endpoints. Also, it was not possible to find a difference between the effects of polypropylene fibres and fragments, although it was suggested previously that the shape of the microplastics has a predominant role in some adverse effects, with fibres showing greater toxicity [49, 50] .

Nevertheless, it can be concluded that both polypropylene fibres and fragments have the potential to induce adverse effects on organisms at concentrations that can already be found in the environment [49, 52, 53, 55] , although some studies also tested unrealistically high microplastics levels [50] ( Table 2 ). The environmental relevance of some of the test concentrations is difficult to assess, as the measurement metrics are different from those most commonly reported in monitoring studies (i.e., particles volume − 1 or km − 2 ) [82] . The potentially adverse effects induced by polypropylene microplastics are similar to those induced by other types of microplastics [33] , and include: their retention in the gut; decreased feeding and growth rates; changed metabolic rates and metabolic processes; changes in moult process; decreased reproduction; stress induction, oxidative stress and antioxidant responses; induction of immune responses; alteration of the gut microbiome; and (very rarely) mortality (Table 2) . However, as Rochman et al. [83] emphasised, microplastics represent a diverse suite of contaminants that show a range of different molecular structures, monomer compositions, chemical additives, sizes, shapes and colours, with many of these potentially involved in their toxicity potential. It is therefore imprecise to generalise toxicity data across microplastics types, even within the same polymer group. This implies the need for new experimental data for polypropylene microplastics from medical masks as currently only such study exists [48] . In particular, such studies should be directed towards the investigation of microplastics from weathered medical masks. Weathering affects not only the surface properties of the particles, but also the release of the additives and the plastic-derived intermediates, as well as the sorption of other environmental pollutants [18, 84, 85] . This can lead to alterations to the behaviour of the microplastics and to their bioavailability to organisms (i.e., the form in which they are available for organisms to ingest), and ultimately to their hazard potential [18, 86, 87] .

We have presented a case study of mechanically induced formation of polypropylene microplastics from a commercially available medical mask. Different types of microplastics were obtained from the three layers of the mask, as fibres from the inner frontal and outer layers, and irregularly shaped fragments from the middle filtering layer. The shape of the obtained microplastics differed from the initial fibrous structure of the intact medical mask layers, which indicates that the material is deformed during cryo-milling. Microplastics from the three layers differed in the organic chemical composition of their leachates. The inner frontal layer that comes into contact with the face contained more additives that function as antimicrobials and flavourings, while the middle filtering and outer layers contained more antioxidants, plasticisers and lubricants. Our preliminary acute toxicity study using the standard test organism D. magna did not show any severe effects of these microplastics at relatively high exposure concentrations, although adsorption and ingestion of the particles by the daphnids was observed. As evident from the review on the ecotoxicity of polypropylene microplastics derived from other polypropylene products these can induce various adverse effects on organisms at environmentally relevant values. Due to the increasing use of medical protective masks we thus suggest the need for a thorough investigation into the environmental hazards and impacts of medical mask microplastics on the environment. Further chronic ecotoxicity studies and multigeneration studies with a suite of ecotoxicity test organisms are needed.

With the development and widespread use of new advanced materials for air filtration [9] also other types of microplastics and nanoplastics could be released into the environment from medical masks. The most popular advanced materials are polymer nanofibre membranes, electret membranes, and porous filters based on metalorganic frameworks [88] [89] [90] . Filtration materials can also be treated or coated with numerous antimicrobial agents, such as metal nanoparticles, organic compounds, organic acids and sodium chloride [9] . Silver nanoparticles are often added to such materials, which can release silver ions into the environment, which pose an additional hazard [91] . There are many other variations of filtering materials under investigation, and each of these might also release different types of microplastics and/or nanoplastics.

At this point, it remains unknown how great the environmental burden of improper disposal of medical masks is. However, it is certain that the production volume and use of disposable medical masks will continue to expand globally.

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi. org/10.1186/s43591-021-00020-0.

Additional file 1.

COVID-19 pandemic repercussions on the use and management of plastics

Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2: masks and testing are necessary to combat asymptomatic spread in aerosols and droplets

Face mask use in the general population and optimal resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario

Covid-19 face masks: a potential source of microplastic fibres in the environment

Face masks and respirators in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of current materials, advances and future perspectives

Face masks in the new COVID-19 normal: materials, testing, and perspectives

Melt blown nanofibres: fibre diameter distributions and onset of fibre breakup

Valorization of disposable COVID-19 mask through the thermo-chemical process

The effects of plastic pollution on aquatic wildlife: current situations and future solutions

Used disposable face masks are significant sources of microplastics to environment

Disposable masks release microplastics to the aqueous environment with exacerbation by natural weathering

Weathering plastics as a planetary boundary threat: exposure, fate, and hazards

Nano/microplastics in water and wastewater treatment processes -origin, impact and potential solutions

Reducing uncertainty and confronting ignorance about the possible impacts of weathering plastic in the marine environment

Effect of weathering on environmental behavior of microplastics: properties, sorption and potential risks

Combined effects of uv exposure duration and mechanical abrasion on microplastic fragmentation by polymer type

Pathways for degradation of plastic polymers floating in the marine environment

Induced degradation of polypropylene with an organic pro-degradant additive polyolefins properties and applications view project polymer blends view project induced degradation of polypropylene with an organic prodegradant additive greek letters

Natural weathering studies of polypropylene

Polymer life-time prediction: the role of temperature in UV accelerated ageing of polypropylene and its copolymers

Different aspects of the accelerated oxidation of polypropylene at increased pressure in an autoclave with regard to temperature, pretreatment and exposure media

Degradation behavior of polypropylene during reprocessing and its biocomposites: thermal and oxidative degradation kinetics

Multivariate correlation analysis of outdoor weathering behavior of polypropylene under diverse climate scenarios

An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling

Microfibres from synthetic textiles as a major source of microplastics in the environment: a review

Microfibre release to water, via laundering, and to air, via everyday use: a comparison between polyester clothing with differing textile parameters

Microplastics research -from sink to source in freshwater systems

Distribution, abundance and risks of microplastics in the environment

Microplastics in aquatic environments: toxicity to trigger ecological consequences

Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: what do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?

Quality criteria for microplastic effect studies in the context of risk assessment: a critical review

Exploring the impacts of plastics in soil -the effects of polyester textile fibres on soil invertebrates

Water quality -determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea) -acute toxicity test. International Organization for Standardization

Benchmarking the in vitro toxicity and chemical composition of plastic consumer products

Overview of known plastic packaging-associated chemicals and their hazards

An untargeted evaluation of the volatile and semi-volatile compounds migrating into food simulants from polypropylene food containers by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-timeof-flight mass spectrometry

Surgical mask dermatitis caused by formaldehyde (releasers) during the COVID-19 pandemic

Uptake and effects of microplastic textile fibres on freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna

Plastic bag and facial cleanser derived microplastic do not affect feeding behaviour and energy reserves of terrestrial isopods

Primary and secondary plastic particles exhibit limited acute toxicity but chronic effects on Daphnia magna

Microplastics but not natural particles induce multigenerational effects in Daphnia magna

Quality of nanoplastics and microplastics ecotoxicity studies: refining quality criteria for nanomaterial studies

Comparative acute toxicity of leachates from plastic products made of polypropylene, polyethylene, PVC, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, and epoxy to Daphnia magna

Effects of toxic leachate from commercial plastics on larval survival and settlement of the barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite

Post COVID-19 pandemic: Biofragmentation and soil ecotoxicological effects of microplastics derived from face masks

Responses of Hyalella azteca to acute and chronic microplastic exposures

Size-and shape-dependent effects of microplastic particles on adult daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio)

Toxicological effects of microplastics in Litopenaeus vannamei as indicated by an integrated microbiome, proteomic and metabolomic approach

Long-term microplastic retention causes reduced body condition in the langoustine

Effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic fibres on Pacific mole crab (Emerita analoga) mortality and reproduction

Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Effects of different microplastics on nematodes in the soil environment: tracking the extractable additives using an ecotoxicological approach

Accumulation and immunotoxicity of microplastics in the estuarine worm Hediste diversicolor in environmentally relevant conditions of exposure

Realistic environmental exposure to microplastics does not induce biological effects in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas

Tissue-specific biomarkeer responses in the blue mussel Mytilus spp. exposed to a mixture of microplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations

Effects of sizes and concentrations of different types of microplastics on bioaccumulation and lethality rate in the green mussel, Perna viridis

Microplastics mixture exposure at environmentally relevant conditions induce oxidative stress and neurotoxicity in the wedge clam Donax trunculus

Evaluation of the interaction among microalgae Spirulina sp, plastics polyethylene terephthalate and polypropylene in freshwater environment

Microplastic interactions with freshwater microalgae: hetero-aggregation and changes in plastic density appear strongly dependent on polymer type

Effect of microplastics exposure on the photosynthesis system of freshwater algae

Ecotoxicological determination of microplastic toxicity on algae Chlorella sp.: response surface modeling approach

Morphometric effects of various weathered and virgin/pure microplastics on sac fry zebrafish (Danio rerio)

Metabolomic profiling reveals the intestinal toxicity of different length of microplastic fibres on zebrafish (Danio rerio)

The influence of different polymer types of microplastics on adsorption, accumulation, and toxicity of triclosan in zebrafish

Impacts to larval fathead minnows vary between preconsumer and environmental microplastics

Impact of polypropylene microplastics and chemical pollutants on European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) gut microbiota and health

The effects of highdensity polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics on the soil and earthworm Metaphire guillelmi gut microbiota

Ecotoxicological effects of different size ranges of industrial-grade polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics on earthworms Eisenia fetida

Ecotoxicological effects of microplastics and cadmium on the earthworm Eisenia foetida

Plastic pollution-a case study with Enchytraeus crypticus-from micro-to nanoplastics

Long-term effect of plastic feeding on growth and transcriptomic response of mealworms (Tenebrio molitor L.)

Physiological responses of garden cress (L. sativum) to different types of microplastics

Impact of microplastics on growth, photosynthesis and essential elements in Cucurbita pepo L

Microand nano-plastics in marine environment: source, distribution and threats-a review

Perspectives and challenges of micro/nanoplasticsinduced toxicity with special reference to phytotoxicity

Microplastics in aquatic environments: occurrence, accumulation, and biological effects

Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite

Understanding the fragmentation pattern of marine plastic debris

The adsorption behavior of metals in aqueous solution by microplastics effected by UV radiation

An exploratory ecotoxicity study of primary microplastics versus aged in natural waters and wastewaters

An environmental concentration of aged microplastics with adsorbed silver significantly affects aquatic organisms

Transparent polyurethane nanofibre air filter for high-efficiency PM2.5 capture

Preparation of a polyurethane electret nanofibre membrane and its air-filtration performance

Preparation of nanofibrous metal-organic framework filters for efficient air pollution control

Toxicity of ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

The part of the analysis the was performed using GC-MS was within the scope of contract C3330-18-952000 and Consortium Agreement 2017/1, granted by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of Republic of Slovenia, with the investment co-financed by the Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Education, Science and Sport and the European Regional Development Fund. We thank Christopher Berrie for English language revision.