key: cord-1032720-irgojlxp authors: Spartalis, Eleftherios; Plakopitis, Nikolaos; Theodori, Maria Anna; Karagiannis, Sotirios P; Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I; Spartalis, Michael; Boutzios, Georgios; Paschou, Stavroula A; Nikiteas, Nikolaos; Troupis, Theodore title: Thyroid cancer surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: perioperative management and oncological and anatomical considerations date: 2021-08-25 journal: Future oncol DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0585 sha: f6252fadd384e63b04bd625c17ae08dd848bb79a doc_id: 1032720 cord_uid: irgojlxp The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed many aspects of our everyday lives and medical practice, including oncology treatment; thyroid cancer surgery is not an exception. The reported number of fine-needle aspirations performed during the first semester of 2020 was significantly reduced. Poorly differentiated, medullary and anaplastic thyroid tumors are considered important indications for immediate surgical intervention. By contrast, most well-differentiated carcinomas present slow growth, and thus surgery can be deferred for a short period of time during which patients are under active surveillance. Thyroid surgeries have decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, prior to any intervention, negative COVID-19 status – with the use of a nasopharyngeal swab and reverse transcription PCR assay as the gold standard and chest CT scan as a complementary modality in some cases – must be confirmed to achieve a COVID-free pathway. Thorough preoperative assessment regarding both oncological and anatomical aspects should be performed to identify optimal timing for safe management. COVID-19 and are more vulnerable to complications [7, 11, 14] . Thyroid cancer patients are generally not an exception, as far as respiratory infections are concerned, demonstrating various mechanisms of cellular and humoral immunity suppression even in the case of differentiated thyroid cancer, although research suggests that these latter patients are no more susceptible to severe disease than the general population [16] [17] [18] Although some cancers require urgent operations, others do not, even though patients may understandably be afraid [4, 10, 11] . Thyroid tumors generally grow slowly [4, 14, 19] ; in fact, observation of microcarcinomas is encouraged by the American Thyroid Association [4, 20] . The aim of this study was to review thyroid cancer surgery framework shifts throughout the pandemic globally as well as the actual impact on clinical reality, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Eligible articles were identified by a search of the Medline (PubMed) electronic database and Cochrane Library up to 5 April 2021. The search strategy included the following keywords and MeSH terms: thyroidectomy or 'thyroid surgery' or 'endocrine surgery' and cancer or oncology and covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2 or pandemic. Abstracts of potentially relevant titles were assessed for eligibility, and full-length articles were selected for closer screening. The selection was limited to guidelines, recommendations and both prospective and retrospective studies describing original data written in English. Out of 38 results, 14 were considered to meet the inclusion criteria [1, 4, [7] [8] [9] 18, [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] . Before approaching the effects of COVID-19 on surgery of thyroid gland cancers, it is essential to examine whether the diagnostic approach has changed during the pandemic. Zhang et al. found that during the period between January and February 2020 (pandemic phase I), when the alert level was at its highest in Changchun, China, fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) were conducted 99.7% less often than FNAs during the period between January and February 2019, and none of the tumors under examination were found to be malignant [21] . This gap was progressively shortened from the period between February and March 2020 (pandemic phase II) to the period between March and April 2020 (pandemic phase III). During phase III, FNAs were performed 30.1% less often than FNAs during the period between March and April 2019, and approximately half of the samples were malignant. Outpatient visits also showed a progressively smaller decline (from 93.3 to 18.3%) during those months. Rana et al. compared all diagnostic cytology examinations performed from March to May 2020 -the time frame of national lockdown in India -with those performed during the same interval in 2019 and found a significant decrease in thyroid cytology samples, with no FNAs of thyroid tissue performed during this period [22] . It is clear that during the pandemic the number of FNAs significantly declined [21, 22] . Nonetheless, it is of great importance to determine whether this reduction could potentially be harmful for patients. Vrachimis et al. concluded that diagnostic procedures (FNA, ultrasound, scintigraphy) in patients with thyroid nodules can be postponed safely and established that a delay of a few months in diagnosis does not affect the outcome of thyroid cancer in a negative way [18] . However, the clinical picture should always be taken into account, and FNA should not be delayed in patients with a history or suspicion of medullary, anaplastic or metastatic thyroid carcinoma and significant symptoms of pressure to critical structures, dysphagia, dyspnea or dysphonia. The researchers also suggested teleconsultation as a way of informing patients about the reasons leading to alteration of the procedure and clarifying that every decision is made based on a thorough assessment of risks and benefits. After the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the high risk of infection in patients and surgeons, concern arose regarding the proper selection of cancer patients for surgical management. To overcome these difficulties, some medical groups have proposed parameters that contribute to prioritizing surgical cases [1, 4, 7, 8, 18, 23, 24] . Among the suggested parameters, histological and clinical characteristics are those commonly utilized. First and foremost, acute airway compression is an indication for urgent surgery, which should be carried out even in acute phases of the pandemic, when the burden on hospitals is greatest [7, 18] . With regard to histology, anaplastic, poorly differentiated and medullary thyroid cancers are those that most often require urgent surgical intervention [1, 4, 7, 8, 18, 23, 24] . In addition, patients with locally aggressive tumors with adverse features, such as invasion of surrounding vital structures (e.g., recurrent laryngeal nerve, trachea, esophagus, major vascular structures) and large, compressive or fast-growing differentiated tumors with concurrent nodal involvement, should be considered candidates for surgery. By contrast, surgical management for most well-differentiated carcinomas, which are generally slow-growing, can be safely postponed for approximately 3-6 months. During this period, patients can remain under active surveillance and be evaluated at predefined time intervals. Should surgery be impeded, alternative therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies and 131 I, mainly for the treatment of anaplastic or poorly differentiated carcinomas, can occasionally be suggested [1, 4, 7, 1823 ]. However, these therapeutic choices render thyroid cancer patients susceptible to COVID-19 infection and more severe illness [18] . Therefore, there is conflict regarding whether these modalities should be considered part of the therapeutic algorithm. Although there are those who recommend these therapies even as first-line therapy, others are opposed to using them unless offered as palliative care [23, 24] . However, as surgeries decrease -including thyroid cancer surgeries -as part of the healthcare regulations put in place after the onset of the pandemic, the aforementioned modalities can, circumstantially, benefit high-risk patients unable to undergo surgery. Thus, despite the threat of COVID-19 infection, they should be offered in selected cases after performing an individual risk-benefit analysis [18] . Another parameter examined by Jozaghi et al. are the phases of care published by the American College of Surgeons [7] . Specifically, management of surgical cases is dependent on regional prevalence and is aligned with the hospital's capacity to perform selected surgeries based on intensive care unit capacity and available supplies. Finally, other researchers have defined scheduling levels, each corresponding to an ideal surgery time and urgency level (surgical tier class) correlated with the prognosis, to select patients [1, 23] . Before proceeding with any invasive therapeutic maneuver or surgical intervention, the COVID-19 status of the patient should be evaluated for the safety of both patient and personnel [1, 4, 8, 9, 21, 24, 25] . A nasopharyngeal swab sample and subsequent reverse transcription PCR assay are the gold standard assessment modality [1, 8, 21, 24, 25] . Should the patient test negative while there is still clinical suspicion, the test is repeated within a 24-to 48h interval [1] . Because of limited diagnostic value of the reverse transcription PCR method, conduction of a complementary chest CT has been recommended by some studies [1, 21] . If the patient tests positive, the surgery is postponed until resolution of symptoms and normalization of laboratory test values [21, 24] . In addition, clinical evaluation [1, 8, 24] and blood and biochemical testing are suggested by some researchers not only for COVID-19 status screening but also for a general preoperative assessment [1, 25] . Preoperative vocal cord examination should also be performed with the appropriate personal protective equipment [1] . Some medical groups have statistically analyzed the actual effect of the pandemic on thyroid cancer surgery. Specifically, Lombardi et al. performed planned surgeries on 14 patients over a period of 4 weeks without delay, accounting for one-third of the usual surgical workload, and nonurgent cases (n = 79) were postponed [8] . Bakkar et al. reported 12 patients who successfully underwent surgery as scheduled [9] . In addition, according to de Pelsemaeker et al., oncology procedures, including those for thyroid cancer, were classified as urgent and were allowed to continue [26] . Nevertheless, a statistically significant decrease in thyroidectomies was noted in a comparable time frame. In the retrospective analysis by Zhang et al., results are presented based on the three public health emergency phases of the pandemic [21] . In the first phase, no surgeries were performed, and in Phases II and III, a significant decrease in both inpatients and malignant thyroidectomies was noted and mean surgical time was decreased in comparison with the same period in 2019 [8] . Moreover, in the cohort study by Wai et al., a reduction in thyroid procedures was reported, with an increase in operative time [27] . No perioperative COVID-19 transmissions were reported [8, 21, 27] . Wai et al. [27] and Lombardi et al. [8] came to the conclusion that there was no significant difference in the number of patients experiencing postoperative complications during the pandemic. By contrast, Zhang et al. observed that vocal cord paralysis significantly increased in Phase III [21] . Aygun et al. recommend dealing with patients at risk of postoperative hypocalcemia on an outpatient basis and treating patients with severe hypocalcemia in the hospital until it can be determined that discharge carries only a minimal readmission risk [1] . It is understood that thyroid function tests may be difficult to carry out because of the global pandemic [23] ; hence, Aygun et al. recommend treating patients with levothyroxine until further testing becomes available [1] . Zhang et al. found that the mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly reduced by 0.4 days compared with the same time frame in 2019 [21] . With regard to longer-term follow-up, Baud et al. recommend teleconsultation as a proper way to ensure continuity of care while limiting the risk of SARS coronavirus 2 transmission [23] . Additionally, the researchers advise that follow-up blood and imaging tests be performed by primary care providers. The pandemic has affected many aspects of medical practice, including diagnostic procedures, surgeries and followup protocols [1, 4, [7] [8] [9] 18, [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] . This review found that the number of surgeries and FNAs was generally decreased. However, there was a discrepancy in the degree to which these numbers declined between the different articles used for the purposes of this review. This finding is probably a reflection of the various effects of lockdown restrictions applied in different countries at different stages of the pandemic. The differences between the articles may also be attributed to recommendations that were rushed to publication early in the pandemic and based on anecdotal previous experiences with coronaviruses, pandemics and natural disasters [8, 9, 15, 21, 22, [25] [26] [27] 29] . However, guidelines were updated later on through expert consensus and became more specific and detailed regarding the terms under which surgeries could be postponed [1] . Newly occurring challenges and subsequent alterations in healthcare services can provide clinicians an opportunity to reevaluate their approach to thyroid cancer management and encourage surgeons as well as patients to follow a more in-depth and data-driven decision-making process [30, 31] . Admittedly, surgery for low-risk thyroid tumors can be safely delayed for a period of time while the patient remains under active surveillance or even offered an alternative, nonsurgical option [1, 4, 7, 18, 23, 24, 30] . However, it is important to note that a diagnosis of cancer upsets patients, let alone when asked to consider a conservative approach while their intuition is to undergo an immediate life-saving intervention [30] . Therefore, surgeons are tasked with helping patients gain a better understanding of their situation through a detailed and thorough consultation [18, 30] . This includes an individualized risk-benefit analysis during which the surgeon can reassure the patient of the low-risk nature of the diagnosis and the efficacy of the suggested measure by referring them to specific trials and available online sources of information regarding their disease. Moreover, patients should be notified beforehand to be prepared and jot down questions they need clarified [18] . If extended observation is required, follow-up with ultrasound imaging can make patients more receptive to the idea of active surveillance [1, 4] . Mild airway compression from large goiters is usually subacute or chronic and does not cause symptoms [32] . But what if a patient with a large goiter requires immediate intubation due to acute COVID-19-induced respiratory distress? Such a patient may present with significant and likely fatal airway compromise. Moreover, many patients with large goiters are extremely worried about their postponed surgeries not only for oncological reasons but for anatomical reasons as well. Most differentiated and medullary thyroid cancers are slow-growing tumors that do not cause significant morbidity over the short-term, although there is a subset of more biologically aggressive cancers that progress more rapidly. Therefore, clinical correlation with rate of progression, size, invasion of surrounding structures and proximity to critical structures is recommended [33] . This means that for those living with thyroid malignancieswhich are usually asymptomatic -the disease might continue to grow in the absence of treatment, and therefore the cancer may spread, lead to the need for more advanced operations and increase complication rates or, in some instances, lead to metastatic disease or even death [19, 34, 35] . Subsequently, the anatomical parameters play a vital role with regard to the decision for undelayed diagnosis and treatment. COVID-19 has caused unprecedented societal turmoil, triggering a rapid and still ongoing transformation of healthcare provision on a global level. In this new landscape, it is highly important to acknowledge the challenges this pandemic poses to the care of particularly vulnerable cancer patients and the subsequent psychosocial impact this has on them. Both diagnostic and therapeutic surgical procedures for thyroid cancer have declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even though active surveillance for a predefined time period can be a safe option for lower-risk patients, anaplastic, poorly differentiated, medullary and advanced differentiated thyroid cancer management must not be delayed. Prevention, timely diagnostic testing and effective treatment are key for the confinement of COVID-19 [6] . Notwithstanding the high importance of vaccinations, newly arising, more contagious and possibly more difficult to treat variants of the virus could pose an obstacle to the recovery from this pandemic, the duration of which is hard to predict [6, 11, 36] . Thus, thyroid cancer surgery guidelines need to be continuously updated based on the current phase of the pandemic while ensuring optimal safety for both patients and healthcare workers [11, 16] . Hopefully, our experience with this modern-day pandemic will prove to be a valuable lesson for future crisis management as well as for everyday medicine. Guidelines were first based on previous experience and continue to be updated. Disease-centered & patient-oriented approach • An initial conservative approach is often a safe alternative to immediate surgery. Clinicians should explain to patients that their illness is managed after an in-depth risk-benefit analysis. Anatomical concerns • Complications can occur when diagnosis and treatment are delayed in the presence of pressure symptoms and local aggression. Financial & competing interests disclosure Endocrine surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations from the Turkish Association of Endocrine Surgery Director-general's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 (2020). www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail /who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-brief ing-on-covid Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard Thyroid surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: principles and philosophies Only strict quarantine measures can curb the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Italy A rapid review of recent advances in diagnosis, treatment and vaccination for COVID-19 Endocrine surgery in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: surgical triage guidelines Endocrine surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: do we need an update of indications in Italy Impact of COVID-19 on thyroid cancer surgery and adjunct therapy COVID-19 related stress exacerbates common physical and mental pathologies and affects treatment (Review) Guidelines for triage and management of elective cancer surgery cases during the acute and recovery phases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic Joint statement: roadmap for maintaining essential surgery during COVID-19 pandemic Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of COVID-19 Oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges, dilemmas and the psychosocial impact on cancer patients COVID-19: guidance for triage of non-emergent surgical procedures Thyroid cancer in the age of COVID-19 Immune and inflammatory cells in thyroid cancer microenvironment Endocrinology in the time of COVID-19: management of thyroid nodules and cancer Neglected papillary thyroid carcinoma seven years after initial diagnosis American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Thyroid surgery during coronavirus-19 pandemic phases I, II and III: lessons learned in China, South Korea, Iran and Italy Impact of ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: an institutional experience Endocrine surgery during and after the COVID-19 epidemic: expert guidelines from AFCE Recommendations for head and neck surgical oncology practice in a setting of acute severe resource constraint during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international consensus COVID-19 screening protocols for preoperative assessment of head and neck cancer patients candidate for elective surgery in the midst of the pandemic: a narrative review with comparison between two Italian institutions The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated Belgian governmental measures on cancer screening, surgical pathology and cytopathology Head and neck surgery during the coronavirus-19 pandemic: the University of California San Francisco experience Prospective and observational study of COVID-19's impact on mental health and training of young surgeons in France Updated intercollegiate general surgery guidance on COVID-19 Delays to low-risk thyroid cancer treatment during COVID-19 -refocusing from what has been lost to what may be learned and gained Upheaval in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak Endocrine surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic Safety recommendations for evaluation and surgery of the head and neck during the COVID-19 pandemic Sternal metastasis as first presentation of a well-differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma Histone deacetylase inhibitors: a novel therapeutic weapon against medullary thyroid cancer? The basis of a more contagious 501Y.V1 variant of SARS-COV-2 The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.