key: cord-1048892-ewy64onp
authors: Davoudi, Alireza; Najafi, Narges; Aarabi, Mohsen; Tayebi, Atefeh; Nikaeen, Roja; Izadyar, Hamideh; Salar, Zahra; Delavarian, Leila; Vaseghi, Narges; Daftarian, Zahra; Ahangarkani, Fatemeh
title: Lack of association between vitamin D insufficiency and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection
date: 2021-05-18
journal: BMC Infect Dis
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06168-7
sha: 7c2e0dd624cbccb3c9be550408410b1a771b0f6d
doc_id: 1048892
cord_uid: ewy64onp

BACKGROUND: A protective effect of vitamin D against COVID-19 infection is under investigation. We aimed to analyze the effect of vitamin D sufficiency on the clinical outcomes of patients infected with COVID-19. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we analyzed the vitamin D levels of COVID-19 patients who were admitted to Razi Hospital (an infectious disease referral center in Mazandaran province in northern Iran) from February to March 2020. Overall, a cutoff point of 30 ng/mL was used for the definition of vitamin D sufficiency. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients were analyzed in this study who had laboratory documentation of a 25(OH) D level at the time of hospitalization. The vitamin D levels of the patients were 27.19 ± 20.17 ng/mL. In total, 62.7% (n = 96) of the patients had a 25(OH) D level of less than 30 ng/mL and 37.25% (n = 57) had a 25(OH) D level of more than 30 ng/mL. In total, 49% (n = 75) of the patients suffered from at least one underlying disease. The univariate and multivariable regression showed that vitamin D sufficiency was not associated with a statistically significant lower risk of adverse clinical outcomes of COVID-19 such as duration of hospitalization and severity of infection (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient vitamin D levels were not found to be protective against adverse clinical outcomes in patients infected with COVID-19. Chronic disorders in COVID-19 patients were found to have greater relevance than vitamin D levels in determining the adverse outcomes of the infection. Further studies are needed to determine the role of vitamin D level in predicting the outcomes of COVID-19 infection.

Coronavirus 2019 or COVID-19, a respiratory infectious disease, has led to a pandemic of pneumonia-related illness [1] [2] [3] . The clinical features of this disease vary from asymptomatic or mild (in over 80%) to severe cases leading to acute respiratory syndrome and respiratory failure, requiring hospitalization in the intensive care unit, sepsis, septic shock and death [4] [5] [6] . The rapidly increasing number of infected individuals in highly critical states requiring intensive resources is a huge public health challenge worldwide [7] . Unfortunately, no suitable antiviral treatment has been found for this disease so far, and all therapeutics used are based on hypotheses that do not have sufficient evidence to support their use. Given the high economic importance of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to find methods that reduce the risk of infection and mortality at a low cost [8] . The status of the immune system is affected by multiple factors that may contribute to the risk of morbidity and mortality related to viral infections such as COVID-19. There are several vitamins and essential elements that have been shown to be necessary for a robust immune system response [9, 10] . Recent studies have highlighted a crucial supportive role for vitamin D in immune system functions, particularly in balancing the inflammatory response to viral infection [9, 11, 12] . Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that plays a key role in modulating both innate and adaptive immune responses. Previous studies have also shown that adequate levels of vitamin D have been shown to reduce the risk of viral respiratory infections and the length of hospital stay [1, 13, 14] . On the other hand, there is no accurate information about the COVID-19 virus in this field and the role of vitamin D supplementation in reducing the risk of infection is still under evaluation [15] [16] [17] . There is a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Iranians based on several studies [18, 19] . Mazandaran province is located in the north of Iran, along the southern coast of the Caspian Sea with a moderate climate. In this study, we investigated the effect of vitamin D sufficiency on the clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection hospitalized in Razi hospital, which is a referral center of COVID-19 patients in Mazandaran province.

This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study analyzing vitamin D levels of COVID-19 patients > 18 years old who were admitted to Razi Hospital, an infectious disease referral center in Mazandaran province, located in the north of Iran, from February to March 2020. The census method was used for sampling. The exclusion criteria was vitamin D intake in the past month prior to the diagnosis of COVID-19. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Ramsar international branch (IR.MAZUMS.RI-B.REC.1399.019). Hospital medical records were analyzed from the inpatient database of Razi teaching hospital affiliated with Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences.

The definitive diagnosis of COVID-19 infection was based on the positive results of real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) using nasopharyngeal swab.

The vitamin D levels were measured by a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method at the time of admission to the hospital. Based on the Endocrine Society's Practice Guidelines on Vitamin D, overall, a cutoff point of 30 ng/mL was used for the definition of vitamin D sufficiency [20] .

Definitions of COVID-19 severity were based on the World Health Organization COVID-19 clinical management guideline: 1-Mild stage (definitive COVID-19 patients without evidence of viral pneumonia or hypoxia); 2-Moderate disease (clinical signs of pneumonia [fever, cough, dyspnea, tachypnea] but no signs of severe pneumonia, including SpO2 ≥ 90% on room air not requiring supplemental oxygen); 3-Severe stage (with clinical signs of pneumonia [fever, cough, dyspnea, tachypnea) plus one of the following: respiratory rate > 30 breaths/ min; severe respiratory distress; or SpO2 < 90% on room air; 4-Critical (Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis/septic shock, acute thrombosis) or other conditions that would normally require the provision of life sustaining therapies such as mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive) or vasopressor therapy [21] . Severe and critical categories were grouped together as "severe" in our study.

Data such as demographic information (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], and living area), medical history, comorbidities, and diagnostic data of the patients, including vitamin D levels and the outcomes were extracted from medical files. Age was categorized into three classifications (50>, 50-65, and > 65 years old) [22] . The following outcomes were measured: duration of hospitalization, lung involvement, ICU admission, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilator use, severity of disease, and in-hospital mortality.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Stata software version 14.0. Differences between groups (patients with 25(OH) D level ≥ 30 and patients with 25(OH) D level ≤ 30) were determined by the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the association between variables and severity of diseases. Univariate linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between vitamin D status, demographic characteristics and existing comorbidities with adverse outcomes of COVID-19. Variables with a P-value less than 0.2 according to a univariate analysis and vitamin D status were included in the multivariable analysis. The descriptive values below 5% (P-value< 0.05) were considered statistically significant. Tables 1 and 2 .

Based on the age group patients were distributed into three groups where 35.94% (n = 55) were less 50 years old, 34.64% (n = 53) were in the range of 50-65 years old, and 28.75% (n = 44) were over 65 years old respectively. 58.2% (n = 89) of patients were male, and 41.8% (n = 64) were female. There were no differences between the two groups (patients with 25(OH) D level ≥ 30 and patients with 25(OH) D level ≤ 30) in regards to gender and place of resident. Most of the patients had multiple underlying disorders. The most common underlying illnesses were hypertension 26.8% (n = 44), diabetes 26.8% (n = 41), cardiovascular disease 19.6% (n = 30), dyslipidemia 6.5% (n = 10), hypothyroidism 5.9% (n = 9), asthma 5.9% (n = 9), malignancy 1.96% (n = 3) and chronic liver disease 1.3% (n = 2), respectively. In total, 49% (n = 75) of patients suffered from at least one underlying disease. Significant differences between the two groups were noted to be preexisting comorbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and hypothyroidism (p < 0.05). Hypertension (17/30) and cardiovascular disease (13/30) were mostly noted among patients with 25(OH) D level ≥ 30 ng/mL, while hypothyroidism was only seen in patients with 25(OH) D level ≤ 30 ng/mL.

The average hospitalization stay of patients were 6.3 ± 4.12 days. Bilateral lung involvement was seen in 17.64% of patients. In total, 6.53% of patients were admitted to the ICU. Invasive mechanical ventilator was utilized for 1.96% of patients while 9.08% of patients were under non-invasive ventilation. Based on severity of disease, 41.7% of patients were categorized into the mild form of COVID-19 disease, while 41.2 and 11.8% experienced the moderate and severe / critical forms of COVID-19, 

Ordinal logistic regression on parameters such as vitamin D level, gender, BMI, place of residence and preexisting comorbidities showed that patients with diabetes (OR 4, 95% CI (1.403-12.073%), P = 0.010), male patients (OR 3, 95% CI (1.413-6.056), P = 0.004) and patients living in rural areas (OR 2.5, 95% CI(1.295-5.025), P = 0.007) experienced the severe form of COVID-19 infection more often than other patients. However, there was no significant association between the other evaluated parameters and COVID-19 severity.

There were few patients with some adverse outcomes of COVID-19 such as ICU admission (10/153), mortality (5/153), and invasive ventilation (3/153). Therefore, the univariate and multivariable linear regression was performed for hospitalization duration. The univariate and multivariable linear regression results showed that there was no significant association between vitamin D status and duration of hospitalization as well as the demographic variables and chronic disorders (Table 3) . 

The association between vitamin D status and seasonal respiratory infections has been proven in several studies [12, 23, 24] . Optimizing vitamin D status could improve the immune response and has been suggested as possibly protective in COVID-19 infection [10, 25, 26] . The COVID-19 outbreak began during the winter and a common feature of the inhabitants of all countries north of the 42nd parallel is a vitamin D insufficiency [27] . These facts resulted in the concept of using vitamin D for the prevention of COVID-19 infection or using vitamin D as an intervention strategy in COVID-19 patients [3, 23] . In our study, only 37. negative controls [28, 29] . Consistent with our study findings, the study by Hastie et al. did not support a potential link between vitamin D concentrations and risk of COVID-19 infection [25, 28] . Older age and comorbidities are linked to an insufficient vitamin D supply [30, 31] . It is notable that 64.05% of our patients were greater than 50 years old. [25, 33, 34] . In addition, demographic data reviewed from several studies highlighted the severity of COVID-19 was more significant in male compared to female patients [35, 36] . Moreover, delays in hospitalization and less access to health facilities can be factors involved in more severe forms of the disease among patients residing in rural areas. Several studies have reported that a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was observed in patients with worse COVID-19 outcomes [13, 14, 17, 37] . In our study, there was no evidence to suggest that assessment of vitamin D can serve as an indicator of the outcomes of COVID-19 infection. In line with our findings, Hastie et al. reported that the measurement of vitamin D would not be useful to evaluate the risk of COVID-19 in clinical practice [25] .

There are some limitations in this research due to its cross-sectional retrospective design. The first drawback is that we included only patients who had documented vitamin D levels. The other drawback of our study is its small sample size, as well as some confounding factors, such as smoking and socioeconomic status were not recorded for most patients and could have an admissible impact on the COVID-19 severity.

Despite the fact that the number of patients with an insufficient vitamin D level was greater in our study, and approximately 44% of patients fell into the moderate and severe/critical categories, some requiring invasive/non-invasive ventilation, ICU admission, longer hospitalization, and death, there was no statically significant evidence that insufficient vitamin D levels might play a role in adverse outcomes of COVID-19 infection.

Chronic disorders in COVID-19 patients likely have greater relevance than vitamin D levels in determining the adverse outcomes of the infection. Therefore, vitamin D supplementation may not be helpful in the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. As there is still no effective pharmaceutical treatment for COVID-19, general vaccination of the community, as well as adherence to health protocols, are the main tools to reduce morbidity and mortality caused by this disease. Larger prospective studies are needed however to support or refute our study findings.

Abbreviations OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; SPO2: Peripheral oxygen saturation; BMI: Body mass index; ICU: Intensive care unit; Not Applicable: NA

Evidence that Vitamin D Supplementation Could Reduce Risk of Influenza and COVID-19 Infections and Deaths

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

Vitamin D and inflammation: potential implications for severity of Covid-19

Critical care management of adults with community-acquired severe respiratory viral infection

Diagnosis and clinical management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection: an operational recommendation of Peking union medical college hospital

Editorial: low population mortality from COVID-19 in countries south of latitude 35 degrees north supports vitamin D as a factor determining severity

Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Contribution of selected vitamins and trace elements to immune function

Baseline Serum Vitamin A and D Levels Determine Benefit of Oral Vitamin A&D Supplements to Humoral Immune Responses Following Pediatric Influenza Vaccination

Vitamin D and immuno-pathology of COVID-19: many interactions but uncertain therapeutic benefits

Vitamin D and the anti-viral state

Local expression profiles of vitamin D-related genes in airways of COPD patients

Vitamin D sufficiency, a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection

Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are associated with greater disease severity

Lack of association of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with disease severity and mortality in Indian patients hospitalized for COVID-19

Acute Respiratory Tract Infection and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Are Lower in Patients with Positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2

Vitamin D deficiency, bone turnover markers and causative factors among adolescents: a cross-sectional study

High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Iranian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline

World Health O. COVID-19 clinical management: living guidance

Serology-informed estimates of SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality risk in

Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomised controlled trials

Vitamin D alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury via regulation of the reninangiotensin system

Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK biobank

Vitamin D for COVID-19: a case to answer?

Vitamin D deficiency and co-morbidities in COVID-19 patientsa fatal relationship?

Serum vitamin D concentrations in CoVID19 patients

No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo

Vitamin D status and outcomes for hospitalised older patients with COVID-19

The Role of Vitamin D in The Age of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Along with an Ecological Approach. medRxiv

Incidence, clinical characteristics and prognostic factor of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv

Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study

Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan

The role of vitamin D in the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 infection and mortality

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations