AN ENQUIRY Into the Measures of SUBMISSION To the SUPREME AUTHORITY. And of the Grounds upon which it may be Lawful, or Necessary for SUBJECTS to Defend their RELIGION LIVES And LIBERTIES. LONDON, Printed in the Year 1688. An Enquiry into the Measures of SUBMISSION, to the Supreme Authority: And of the Grounds upon which it may be Lawful or Necessary for Subjects, to Defend their RELIGION, LIVES and LIBERTIES. THis Enquirie cannot be Regularly made, but by taking, in the first place, a true and full view of the Nature of Civil Society, and more particularly of the Nature of Supreme Power, Whether it is lodged in one or more Persons. 1. It is certain that the Law of Nature has put no difference nor subordination among Men, except it be that of Children to Parents, or of Wives to their Husbands; So that with Relation to the Law of Nature, all Men a●e born free; And this Libert● must still be supposed Entire, unless so far as it is limited by Contracts, Provisions and Laws; For a Man can ei●her bind himself to be a Servant, or sell himself to be a Slave, by which he becomes in the power of another, only so far as it was provided by the Contract: Since all ●hat Liberty which was not expressly given away, remains still entire; so that the Plea for Liberty always proves itself, unless it appears that it is given up, or limited by any special Agreement. 2. It is no less certain, that as the light of Nature has plan●ed in all Men a Natural principle of the Love of Life, and of a desire to preserve it; so the comm●n principles of all Religion agree in this, that GOD having set Us in this World, we are bound to preserve that Being, which he has given Us, by all Just and Lawful ways. Now this Duty of Self-Pr●serv●tion, is exerted in instances of two sorts; The one are in the resisting of violent Aggressors; The other are the taking of J●st Revenges of those who have invaded Us so secretly, that We could not prevent them▪ and so violently that We could nor resist them. In which cases the principle of Self preservation warrants us, both to recover what is our own, with just Damages; And also to put such unjust persons out of a capacity of doing the like injuries any more, either to ourselves or to any others. Now in these instances of Self-preservation, this difference is to be observed, that the first cannot be limited, b● any slow Forms, since a ●ressing Danger requires a vigorous Repulse, and cannot admit of delay; whereas the second, of taking Reverges or Reparations, is not of such haste, but that it may be brought under Rules and Forms. 3. The true and original Notion of Civil Society and Government is, that it is a com-promise made by such a body of Men, by which they resign up the right of demanding Reparations, either in the way of Justice, against one another, or in the way of War against their Neighbours; to suc● a single person, or to such a body of Men as they think fit to trust with this. And in the management of this Civil Society, great distinction is to be made between the power of making Laws for the regulating the conduct of it, & the power of executing these Laws: the Supreme Authority must still be supposed to be lodged with those who have the Legislative Power reserved to them; but not with tho●e who have only the Executive, which is plainly a Trust, when it is separated from the Legislative power; and all Trusts by their nature Imp●rt, that those to whom they are given, are accountable, even though that it should not be expressly specified in the words of the ●rust itself. 4. It cannot be supposed by the principles of Natural Religion, that GOD has authorised any one Form of Government, any other way than as the general Rules of Order and of Justice oblige all Men not to subvert Constitutions, nor disturb the peace of Mankind, nor invade those Rights with which the Law may have vested some Persons; For it is certain that as private Contracts lodge or translate private Rights; so the public Laws can likewise lodge such Rights, prerogatives and Revenues, in those under whose protection they put themselves; and in such a manner that they may come to have as good a title to these, as any private person can have to his property; so that it becomes an Act of high injustice and violence to invade these, which is so far a greater sin than any such Actions would be against a private person; As the public Peace and Order is preferable to all private considerations whatsoever. So that in truth, ●the principles of Natural Religion, give those that are in Authority no power at all●, but they do only secure them in the possession of that which is theirs by Law▪ And as no considerations of Religion can bind me to pay another more than I indeed owe him, but do only bind me more strictly to pay what I owe; So the considerations of Religion do indeed bring Subjects under stricter Obligations, to pay all due allegiance and Submission to their Princes; but they do not at all extend that Allegiance further than the Law carries it. And though a Man has no Divine Right to his Property, but has acquired it by Humane Means, such as Succession or Industry, yet he has a security for the enjoyment of it, from a Divine Right, so though Princes have no immediate warrants from Heaven, either for their Original Titles, or for the extent of them, yet they are secured in the possession of them by the Principles and Rules of Natural Religion. 5. It is to be considered that as a private Person, can bind himself to another Man's service by different degrees, either as an ordinary Servant for wages, or as an appropriate for a longer time as an Apprentice, or by a total giving himself up to another, as in the case of Slavery: In all which cases the General name of Master may be equally used, yet the degrees of his power are to be judged by the nature of the Contract; so likewise Bodies of Men can give themselves up in different degrees, to the conduct of others. And therefore though all tho●e may carry the same name of King, yet every ones power is to be taken from the Measures of the Authority which is lodged in him, and not from any general Speculations founded on some Equivocal terms, such as King, Sovereign or Supreme. 6. I●'s certain, that GOD, as the Creator and Governor of the World, may set up whom he will, to rule over other Men: But this Declaration of His will, must be made evident by Prophet's, or other extraordinary Men sen● of Him, who have some manifest proofs of the Divine Authority, that is committed to them, on such occasions, and upon such Persons declaring the will of GOD, in favour of any others, that Declaration is to be submitted to and obeyed. But this pretence of a Divine Delegation, can be carried no farther than to those who are thus expresl● marked out, and is unjustly claimed by those who can prove no such Declaration to have been ever made in Favour of them, or their Families. Nor does it appear Reasonable to conclude from their being in possession, that it is the will of GOD that it should be so, this justifies all Usurpers, when they ●re successful. 7. The Measures of Power, and by consequence of Obedience, must be taken from the express Laws of any S●ate, or Body of Men, from the Oaths that they swear, or from Immemorial prescription, and a long possession, which both give a Title, and in a long tract of time make a bad one become good, since prescription when it passes the memory of man, and is not disputed by any other pretender, gives by the common sense of all men, a just and good title: So upon the whole matter, the degrees of all Civil Authority, are to be taken either from express Laws, Immemorial Customs, or from particular Oaths, which the Subjects swear to their Princes: This being still to be laid down for a principle, that in all the disputes between Power and Liberty▪ Power must always be proved, but Liberty proves itself; the one being founded only upon positive Law, and the other upon the Law of Nature. 8. If from the General Principles of humane Society, and natural Religion, we carry this matter to be examined by the Scriptures, it is clear that all the passages that are in the Old Testament, are not to be made use of in this matter, of neither side. For as the land of Canaan, was given to the jews by an immediate grant from Heaven, so GOD re●erved still this to himself, and to the Declarations that he should m●ke from time to time, either by his Prophets, or by the answers that came from the Cloud of Glory that was between the Cherubims, to set up Judges or Kings over them, and to pull them down again as he thought fit, here was an express Delegation made by God, and therefore all that was ●one in that Dispensation, either for or against Princes, Is not to be made use of in any other State, that is founded on another bottom and constitution, and all the expressions in the old Testament relating to Kings, since they belong to persons that were immediately designed by God, are without any sort of reason applied to those, who can pretend to no such Designation, neither o● themselves nor for their Ancestors. 9 As for the New Testament, it is plain▪ that there are no rules given in it, neither for the Forms o● Government in general, nor for ●he degrees of any one Form in particular▪ but the general rules of Justice, order, and peace, being established in it upon higher Motives, and more binding considerations, than ever they were ●n any other Religion whatsoever, we are most strictly bound by it, to observe the constitution in which we are? And it is plain, that the rules set us in the Gospel, can be carried no further. It is indeed clear from the New Testament, that the Christian Religion as such, gives us no grounds to defend or propagat it by force. It is a Doctrine of the Cross, and of Faith, and Patience under it: And i● by the order of Divine providence, and of any constitution of Government, under which we are born, we are brought under sufferings, for our professing of it, we may indeed retire and fly out of any such Country, if we can; but if that is denied us, we must then according to this Religion, submit to those sufferings under which we may be brought, considering that God will be Glorified by us in so doing, and that he will both support us under our sufferings, and gloriously reward us for them. This was the State of the Christian Religion, during the three first Centuries, under Heathen Emperors, and a Constitution in which Paganism was established by Law; But i● by the Laws of any Government, the Christian Religion, or any form of it, is become a part of the Subjects Property, it than falls under another consideration, not as it is a Religion, but as it is become one of the Principal Rights of the Subjects, to believe and profess it: And then we must ju●ge of the Invasions made on that, as we do of any other Invasion that is made on Our Rights. 10. All the passages in the New Testament that relate to Civil Government are to be expounded as they were truly meaned, in opposition to that false notion of the jews, who believed themselves to be so immediately under the Divine Authority, that they would not become the Subjects of any other Power; particularly of one that was not of their Nation, or of their Religion: therefore they thought, they could not be under the Roman yoke, nor bound to pay Tribute to Caesar▪ but judged that they were only subject out of Fear, by reason of the Force that lay on them, but not for Conscience sake: And so in all their Dispersion, both at Rome and elsewhere, they thought they were GOD'S Freemen; and made use of this pretended Liberty as a cloak of maliciousness. In Opposition to all which, since in a cour●e of many years, they had asked the protection of the Roman yoke, and were come under their Authority, our Saviour ordered them to continue in that by his ●aying, Render to Caesar that which is Caesar's; and both St. P●ul in his Epistle to the Romans, and St. Peter in his General Epistle, have very positively condemned that pernicious Maxim, but without any formal Declarations made of the Rules or Measures of Government. And since both the People and Senate of Rome had acknowledged the power that Augustus had indeed violently usurped, it became legal when it was thus submitted to, and confirmed both by the Senate and People: And it was established in his Family by a long prescription when these Epistler were writ: So that upon the whole matter, all that is in the New Testament upon this Subject. imports no more but that all Christians are bound to acquiesce in the Government, and submit to it, according to the constitution that is settled by Law. 11 We are then at last brought to the Constitution of our English Government; So that no General Considerations from Speculations about Sovereign Power, nor from any passages either of the Old and New Testament, aught to determine us in this matter; which must be fixed from the Laws and Regulations that have been made among Us. It is then certain, that with Relation to the Executive part of the Government, the Law has lodged that singly in the King; So that the whole administration of it is in him: but the Legislative Power is Lodged between the King and the two Houses of Parliament; So that the Power of making and Repealing Laws, is not singly in the King, but only so far as the two Houses concur with him. It is also clear, that the King has such a determined extent of Prerogative, beyond which he has no Authority: As for instance, if he Levies Money of his People, without a Law impowering him to it, he goes beyond the limits of his Power, and asks that to which he has no Right▪ So that there lies no obligation on the Subject to grant it: And if any in his Name use Violence for the obtaining it, they are to be looked on as so many Robbers, that invade our Property and they being violent Aggressors, the Principle of Self preservation seems here to take place, and to warrant as violent a resistance. 12 There is nothing more evident, than that England is a free Nation, that has its Liberties and Properti●s reserved to it b● many positive and express Laws: If then we have a right to our Property, we must likewise be supposed to have a right to preserve it; for these Rights are by the Law secured against the Invasions of the Prerogative, and by consequence we must have a right to preserve them against those Invasions. It is also evidently declared by our Law, that all Orders and Warrants, that are issued out in opposition to them, are null of themselves; And by consequence, any that pretend to have commissions from the King for those ends, are to be considered as if they had none at all: Since these commissions being void of themselves, are indeed no commissions in the construction of the Law; And therefore those who act in virtue of them, are still to be considered, as private persons who come to Invade and disturb u●. It is also to be observed, that the●e are some points that are justly disputable and doubtful, and others that are so manifest, that it is plain that any Objections that can be made to them, are rather for●ed pretences, than so much as plausible colours. It is true, if the case is doubtful, the interest of the public Peace and Order ought to carry it; ●ut the case is quite different when the Invasions that are made upon Liberty and Property, are plain and visible to all that consider them. 13. The main and great difficulty here, is, that though our Government does indeed as●ert the Liberty of the Subject, yet there are many express Laws made, that lodge the Militia singly in the King, that make it plainly unlawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take Arms against the King, or any commissioned by him; And these Laws have been put in the form of an Oath, which all that have born any Employment either in Church or State ●ave sworn; And therefore ●h●se Laws, ●or the assu●eing ●ur Liberties, do indeed bind the King's conscience, and may affect his Ministers; y●t since it is a M●x●m of our Law, t●at the King can do no wrong, these cannot be carried so far as to justify our taking Arms against him, be the transgressions of Law e●er so many and so manifest: And since this has be●n the constant Doctrine of the Church of England, it will be a very heavy Imputation on us, if it appears, that though we held these opinions, as long as the Court and the Crown have favoured us, ●et as soon as the Court turns against us, we change o●r Principles. 14. Here is the true difficulty of this whole matter, and therefore it ought to be exactly considered. Fi●st, all general words, ●ow large so●ver, are still supposed to have a tacit Exception, and reserves in them, if the matter seems to require it. Children are commanded to Obe● their Parents in all things: Wives are declared be the Scripture, to be subject to their Husbands in a●l things; as the Church is unto Christ: And yet how comprehensive so●ver these words may seem to be, there is still a reserve to be understood in them; And though by our Form of Marriage the Party's swear to one another till death them do part, yet few doubt 〈◊〉 this bond is dissolved by Adultery, though it is not named; for odious things ought not to be suspected, and therefore not named upon such occasions: But when they fall out, they carry still their own force with them. 2. When there seems to be a Contradiction between two Articles in the constitution, we ought to examine which of the two is the most evident, and the most Important and so we ought to fix upon it, and then we must give such an accommodating sense to that which seems to contradict it, that so we may reconcile those together. Here then are two seeming contradictions in our constitution: The oneiss the Public Libert● of the Nation; the other is the renouncing of all resistance, in case that were Invaded. It is plain, that our Liberty is only a thing that we enjoy at the King's discretion, and during his pleasure; if the other against all Resistance is to be understood according to the outmost Extent of the words. Therefore since the chief Design of Our whole Law, and all the several Rules of our Constitution, is to secure and mantain Our Liberty, we ought to lay that down for a conclusion, that it is both the most plain and the most important of the two: And therefore the other Article against Resistance ought to be so softened▪ as that it do not destroy this. 3. Since it is by a Law that Resistance is condemned, we ought to understand it in such a sense, as that it does not destroy all other Laws: And therefore the intent of this Law must only relate to the Executive Power, which is in the King, and not to the Legislative, in which we cannot suppose that our Legislators, who made that Law, intended to give up that, which we plainly see they resolved still to preserve entire, according to the Ancient Constitution. So then the not resi●ting the King, can only be applied to the Executive Power, that so upon no pretence of ill Administrations in the Execution of the Law, it should be lawful to resist him; but this cannot with any reason be extended to an Invasion of the Legislative Power, or to a total subversion of the Government. For it being plain, that the Law did not Design to lodge that power in the King; it is also plain, that it did not intend to secure him in it, in case he should ●et about it. 4. The Law mentioning the King, or those Commissionate by him, shows plainly, that it only Designed to secure t●e King in the Executive Power: For the word Commission necessarily imports this, since if it is not according to Law, it is no Commission; And by consequence, ●●ose who Act in Virtue of it, are not commissionate by the King in the sense of the Law. The King likewise imports a Prince clothed by Law with the Regal Prerogative, but if he goes to Subvert the whole Foundation of the Government, he subverts that by which he himself has his power, and by consequence he annuls his own power; and then he ceases to be King, having endeavoured to destroy that, upon which his own Authority is founded. It is acknowledged by the greatest asserters of Monarchical power, that in some cases a King may fall from his power, and in other cases that he may fall from the exercise of it. His deserting his people, his going about to enslave or sell them to any other, or a furious going about to destroy them, are in the opinion of the most Monarchical Lawyers, such abuses, that they naturally divest those that are guilty of them, of their whole Authority. Infamy or Frenzy do also put them under the Guardian-ship of others. All the crowned heads of Europe have, at least secretly, approved of the putting the late King of Portugal under a Guardian-ship, & the keeping him still Prisoner for a few Acts of Rage, that had been fatal to a very few persons: And even our Court gave the first countenance to it, though of all ot●ers the late King had the most reason to have done it at least last of all, since it justified a Younger brother's supplanting the Elder; yet the evidence of the thing carried it even against Interest. Therefore if a King goes about to subvert the Government, and to overturn the whole Constitution, he by this must be supposed either to fall from his power, or at least from the exercise of it, so far as that he ought to be put under Guardians; and according to the case of Portugal, the next Heir falls naturally to be the Guardian. The next thing to be considered, is, to see in Fact whether the Foundations of this Government have been struck at, and whether those Errors, that have been perhaps committed, are only such Malversations, as aught to be Imputed only to humane Frailty, and to the Ignorance, Inadvertencies, or passions to which all Princes may be Subject, as well as other men, but this will best appear if we consider, what are the Fundamental points of our Government, and the chief securities that we have for our Liberties. The Authority of the Law is indeed all in one word, so that if the King pretends to a power to Dispense with Laws, there is nothing left, upon which the Subject can depend; And yet as if Dispensing power were not enough, if Laws are wholly suspended for all time coming, this is plainly a repealing of them, when likewise the Men, in whose han●s the Administration of Justice is put by Law, su●h as Judges and Sheriffs are allowed to tread all Laws un●er foot, even th●se that infer an incapacity on themselves if they violate them; this is such a breaking of the whole Constitution, that we can no more have the Administration of Justice, so that it is really a dissolution of th● Government; since all Trials, Sentences, and the Executions of them are become so many unlawful Acts, that are null and void of themselves. The next thing in our Constitution, which secures to us our Laws and Liberties, is a Free and Lawful Parliament. Now not to mention the breach of the Law of Triennial Parliaments, it being above three years since we had a Session, that enacted any Law; Methods have been taken, and are daily a taking, that render this impossible. Parliaments ought to be chosen with an in●ire Liberty, and without either Force or Pre-engagements: Whereas if all Men are required before hand to enter into Engagements, how they will Vote, if they were chosen themselves; Or how they will give their Votes in the Electing of others; This is plainly such a preparation to a Parliament, as would indeed make it no Parliament, but a Cabal, if one were chosen a●ter all that Corruption of Persons, who had pre-engaged themselves; and after the Threatening and Turning out of all Persons out of Employments who had Refused to do it; And if there are such daily Regulations made in the Towns, that it is plain those who manage them, intent at last to put such a number of Men in the Cor●orations as will certainly choose the persons who are recommended to them. But above all, if there are such a number of Sheriffs and Majors made over England, by whom the Elections must be conducted and returned, who are now under an Incapacity by Law, and so are no Legal Officers, and by consequence these Elections that pass under their Authority are null and void▪ If, I say, it is clear that things are brought to this, than the Government is dissolved, because it is impossible to have a Free and Legal, Parliament in this State of things. If then both the Authority of the Law, and the constitution of the Parliament are struck at and dissolved, here is a plain subversion of ●he whole Government. Bu● if we enter n●xt into the particular branches of the Government, we will find the like disorder among them all. The Protestant Religion, and the church of England, make a great Article of our Government, the Latter ●eing secured not only of old by Magna Charta, but by many special Laws made of late; And there are particular Laws made in K. Cha●l●s the First, and the late King's time, securing them fr●m all Commissions that the King can raise for Judging or Cen●ureing them: If then in oppofition to this, a Court so condemned is E●●cted, which proceeds to Judge and Censure the Clergy▪ and even to d●ssei●e them of their Free holds, without so much as the Form of a Trial, though this is the most indispensable Law, of all these that secures the Property of Engla●d: And if the King pretends that he can ●equire the Clerg● to publish all his Arbitrary Declarations▪ And in particular one that strikes at their whole Setlement, and has Ord●red Process to be begun against all that disobeyed this illegal Warrant, and has treated so great a number of the Bishops as criminals, only for representing to him the reasons of their not obeying him; If likewise the King is not satisfied to pro●ess his own Religion openly, though even that is contra●y to Law, but has sent Ambassadors to Rome, and received Nunioes from thence, which is plainly Treason by Law, if likewise many Popish Churches and Chapels have been publicly opened; if several Colleges of jesuits have ●e●n set up in ●ivers parts of the Nation, and One of the Order has been made a Privy Counsellor, and a Principal Minister of State; and if Papists and even those who tu●n to that Religion, though declared Traitors by Law, are brought into all the chief Employments, bo●h Military and Civil; than it is plain▪ that all the rights of the Church of England, and the whole establishment of the Protestant Religion are struck at, and designed to be overturned; since all these things, as they are notoriously illegal, so they evidently demonstrate, that the gr●at design of them all, is the rooting out this Pestilent Heresy, in their stile, I mean the Protestant Religion. In the next place, if in the whole course of Justice, it is visible, that there is a constant p●actis●ing upon the judges, that the● are turned out upon their varying from the Intentions of the Court, and if Men of no Reputation or Abilities are put in their places; If an Army is kept up in time of Peace, and Men who withdraw from that illegal service are hanged up as Criminals, without any colour of Law, which by consequence are so many Murders; And if the soldiery are connived at and encouraged in the most enormous Crimes, that so the● may be thereby prepared to commit great ones, And from singl● Rapes and Murders, proceed to a rape upon all our Liberties▪ and a Destruction of the Nation: If I say, all these things are true in Fact, than it is plain, that there is such a Dissolution of the Government made, that there is not any one part of it left Sound and Entire: And if all these things are done now, it is easy to imagine what may be expected, when Arbitrary Power that spares no Man, And Popery that spares no Heretic, are finally established: then we may look for nothing but Gabelles, Tailles, Impositions, Benevolences, and all sorts of illegal Taxes; As from the other we may expect Burnings, Massacres, and Inquisitions. In what is doing in Scotland we may gather what is to be expected in England; where, if the King has over and over again declared, That he is vested with an Absolute Power, to which all are bound to Obey without Reserve. And has upon that annulled almost all the Acts of Parliament that passed in K. james I. Minority, though they were ratified by himself when he came to be of Age; And were confirmed by all the subsequent Kings, not excepting the present. We must then conclude from thence, what is resolved on here in England, and what will be put in Execution as soon as it is thought that the times can bear it. When likeways the whole setlement of Ireland is shaken, and the Army that was raised, and is maintained by Taxes, that were given for an Army of English Protestants, to secure them from a new Massacre by the Irish Papists, is now all filled wìth Irish Papists, as well as almost all the other Employments; It is plain, that not only all the British Protestants Inhabiting that Island, are in daily danger of being butchered a second time, but that the Crown of England, is in danger of loseing that Island, it being now put wholly into the hands and power of the Native Irish, who as they formerly offered themselves up sometimes to the Crown of Spain, sometimes to the Pope, and once to the Duke of Lorraine, so are they perhaps at this present treating with another Court for the sale and surrender of the Island, and for the Massacre of the English in it. If thus all the several branches of our Constitution are dissolved, it might be at least expected, that one part should be left entire, and that is the Regal Dignity; and yet that is prostituted, when we see a Young Child put in the reversion of it, and pretended to be the Prince of Wales; concerning whose being born of the Queen, there appears to be not only no certain proofs, but there are all the presumptiones that can possibly be imagined to the contrary. No proofs were ever given either to the Princess of D●nmark, or to any other Protestant Ladies, in whom we ought to repose any confidence that the Queen was ever with Child; that whole matter being managed with so much mysteriousness, that there were violent and public suspicions of it before the Birth. But the whole contrivance of the Birth, the sending away the Princess of Denmark, the sudden shortening of the Reckoning, the Queen's sudden going to St. James', her no less sudden delivery, the hurrying the Child into another Room, without showing it to these present, and without their hearing it cr●; And the Mysterious Conduct of all since that time; No satisfaction being given to the Princess of Denmark upon her return from the Bath, nor to any other Protestant Ladies, of the Queens having been really brought to Bed; These are all such evident Indications of a base Imposture, in this matter, that as the Nation has the justest reason in the World to doubt of it, so they have all possible rea●on to be at no quiet, till they see a Legal and Free Parliament assembled, which may Impartially, and without either fear or corruption, examine that whole matter. If all these matters are true in Fact, than I suppose no Man will doubt, that the whole Foundations of this Government, and all the most sacred parts of it are overturned; And as to the truth os all these Suppositions, that is left to every English-Mans Judgement and Sense. FINIS.