THE CASE OF Edward Bushel, John Hammond, Charles Milson and John Baily, Citizens and Freemen of London, stated, and humbly presented to the Honourable HOUSE of COMMONS Assembled in PARLIAMENT.  
THat they with Eight others, being Empanelled and Sworn of a Jury, for trial of divers Persons indicted for several Criminal and Capital Offences, at the Sessions of the Peace for the Goal-Delivery, held at the Old-Baily for the said City, in August, 1670. before Sr. Samuel Starling, than Lord Mayor of London, and Sr. John Howel Sergeant at Law, Recorder, and other Justices there, were (amongst other Prisoners) charged with William Penn, and William Mead.  
And the said Jury having heard and considered the Evidence against the said Pen and Mead, could not find them Guilty of the Indictment; thereupon they were threatened and menaced by the said Mayor and Recorder to be Carted, and Marks to be set upon them, to have their Throats and Noses cut, and be shut up close Prisoners, and starved to Death, unless they would comply: The Recorder adding thereunto, that he highly applauded the prudence & policy of Spain in erecting the Inquisition, and that it would never be well in England, till some such course were taken here.  
Pursuant to which Threats, the Jury by their Order were presently shut up, with express Command they should neither have Meat, Drink, Fire nor Candles, which was observed to that Extremity, that they continued in this Imprisonment, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday, the said Mayor and Recorder adjurning the Court from day to day, supposing, that the Jury in time, rather than endure such heavy pressures, would force their Consciences and comply with them.  
But all this Illegal and Barbarous Usage proving in effectual; after the said Jury had with unanimous Consent brought in their Verdict, finding the said Prisoners not Guilty, which Verdict notwithstanding the said Court did accept and Record, yet the said Lord Mayor and Recorder fined every of the Jury Men forty Marks a piece, and committed them Prisoners to Newgate till Payment (of whom eight paid their fines and were soon discharged.)  
And the said four Jurors being Merchants and Tradesmen of London, after they had been kept close Prisoners about three Months, to their very great Damage, rather than to betray the Liberties of the Country, were enforced to their extraordinary Charge to sue out their Habeas Corpus in the Court of Common-Pleas, which Court upon Return of the Causes of Commitment, and after several Arguments as well there, as before all the Judges of England, consulted in this Matter, occasioned by the great Opposition of the said Lord Mayor and Recorder, did resolve and declare according to the unanimous Opinion of all the said Judges, that they, the said four Jurors, were illegally Imprisoned and unjustly fined; and thereupon discharged them from their Imprisonments and Fines.  
All which unjustifiable Proceedings by the said Lord Mayor and Recorder were done after, and in Contempt of that memorable Vote of this honourable House of Commons, made in the Case of the late Lord chief Justice Keeling, the 13th December, 1667. declaring, that the Precedents and and Practice of Fining or Imprisoning Jurors for Verdicts was Illegal.  
And for that they, the said four Jurors do humbly apprehend it may be of dangerous Consequence for any inferior Judicature, who are only to declare the Law made, to assume to themselves an arbitrary Power of innovating and altering the same, especially, when it doth tend to the Violation and Overthrow of the ancient and fundamental Laws of the Land, consisting in nothing more than in the Liberty the Subjects have in the Freedom of Trials by their Peers. And forasmuch as the said Jurors have not only been great Sufferers in their Persons and Estates by the said arbitrary and illegal Imprisonment; but they do also humbly conceive it hath been and still is of very evil Consequence to the Lives, Liberties and Estates of his Majesty's Subjects; for such Persons (who have acted thus arbitrarily, directly contrary to and in Defiance of, not only the Laws of the Land; but also of the foresaid Votes of the House of Commons) to be still continued in Places of so great Trust and Authority, as Recorder, Justices of Peace and Aldermen of the City of London, to the great Terror and Discouragement of all Jurors in the Performance of their Duty. And forasmuch, as they the said Jurors are discouraged by their Counsel to seek Remedy or Satisfaction in the Courts of Westminster-Hall for these so great Oppressions, the Reason alleged, for that all the said Acts were done by the said Mayor and Recorder in a Court of Judicature, against which no Action can be brought: So that they are like to be left remidilesses, unless relieved by this Honourable House, unto whose Protection they do most humbly fly, and beseech their Justice for their Relief.