THE DEGREES OF Consanguinity AND AFFINITY. Described, and Delineated. BY ROBERT DIXON, D. D. LONDON, Printed by T. R. and N. T. for Benjamin Took at the Ship in St. Pauls Church Yard, 1674. Chart of genealogical relationships Right Line. Ascending Great Grandfater. Great Uncles, Grandfather, Great Aunts, unequal. Uncles. Father. Aunts. Brother. Equal Brothers Son. Nephews. nieces. □ Son. Grandson. Great Grandson. Sister. Equal Sisters Son. nieces. Nephews. Right Line. Descending. OF Consanguinity, OR, Of Kindred by Blood. LEVIT. XVIII. VI. None of you shall approach to any that is near of Kin to him, &c. THE Septuagint render it, 〈◇〉, &c. Or, 〈◇〉. The latin. Vir, Vir non accedit ad Propinquitatem carnis suae. 1. To her that is so near of kin, as that they dwell in the same House; as Parents, Children, Brothers and Sisters; or the Parents Brothers and Sisters, or Uncles and Aunts. Nearness of flesh above me, is my Mother; below me, is my Daughter; on my side, is my Sister. These may not be approached, for their own sakes, being Immediate Relations, and all else that are forbidden, Lev. 22.2. are forbidden for the sakes of these. And that this is properly nearness of kin, or flesh, may appear by the Prohibition to the High-Priest, that he may not be defiled for the Dead among his people, but for his Kin, that is near unto him he may; For his Mother and Father, for his Son and Daughter, for his Brother and[ Virgin] Sister. So that Nearness of Flesh, is 1. She out of whose Flesh I am born. Mother. 2. She that is Born out of my Flesh. Daughter 3. She that is immediately Born of the same Flesh that I am Born of. Sister. Now to keep men from this Nearness, God hath set this Bar or 〈◇〉, of Uncles and Aunts, whose Marriages are therefore forbidden to keep men farther off, from Father and Mother, Son and Daughter, and because they are Quasi Parentes, & Loco Parentum. So have some men, not God, made a Bar of cousin Germans, to keep men off from Brother and Sister. So the Jews were forbidden to make an Image, as a Bar to keep them from Idolatry. In the Levitical Law therefore are forbidden these Nearnesses. 1. In the Ascending Line, Fathers and their Children, and their Allies. 2. In the Equal Side-Line, Brothers and Sisters, and their Allies. 3. In the Unequal Side-Line, Uncles and Aunts, and their Allies. No cousin Germans at all. By the Civil Law the same Nearnesses are forbidden, and no farther; excepting as Ulpian in his Rules observes, thus: In Quarto[ Gradu] permittitur[ Connubium] extra eos Personas quae Parentum Leberorumque locum habent. Therefore says he, The Great Aunt by the Fathers and by the Mothers side, and the Sisters niece may not mary, Quamvis quarto gradu sint, because the Prohibition is not always for the Nearness, or for the Degree, but for the proper Reason aforesaid, of being Vivi Parentes, or Quasi Parentes. Ther fore supposing a Woman to Live to see Six Degrees of her Line, yet it is unlawful for her to mary that Sixth Degree of her Nephews. In Cosins in the Equal Side-Lines, the farther off the less reason they should be forbidden, but in Uncles and Aunts in the Descending unequal Side-Lines, the farther off the greater reason they should be forbidden. Therefore there is no comparison between the Cognation of Uncles and Aunts, and their Nephews or nieces, in the unequal Descending Side-Lines, and the Cognation of Cosins in the Equal Side Lines. It is true, In pari Cognationis gradu, paridemque jus Statuatur: That is when the Cognation is the same, the Law is the same too, meaning if it be measured in the same kind of Cognation, Ascending compared to Ascending; Equal Collateral, to Equal Collateral; Unequal to Unequal; for when the Comparison is of things in the same order, then not only the Degree, but the reason for the most part is the same too. 1. Levitical Law. Of cousin Germans. The Case of cousin Germans is no ways reached at as to a Prohibition in the Levitical Law, because there is no Degree equally near unto it that is forbidden, except( as before) of such Persons as are as it were Parents, or in the place of Parents. There are Instances of the Marriage of cousin Germans in Scripture, Instances. as Jacob Married his cousin German Rachel, the Daughter of his Uncle Laban. Zelophehads Daughters Married their Fathers Brothers Sons. Num. 3.6. The Virgin Mary was Married to her cousin German Joseph, who was the Legal Son of Heli, Luk. 3 23. Math. 1. but the Natural Son of Jacob. Now Heli and Jacob were Brethren the Sons of Matthan, who was Grand-Father to Joseph and Mary. 2. The Christian Law. The Christian Law or the Gospel, no where forbids these Marriages. Christ saith, A man shall leave his Father and Mother, and cleav to his Wife, and they two shall be one flesh. By Father and Mother, are forbidden the Marriage of Parents and Children. By cleaving to his Wife, are forbidden Adultery, with another mans Wife, and Extrauuptial Pollutions, and Concubitus Masculorum. By they Two shall be one Flesh, is forbidden Polygamy, and the mixture of several Species of Flesh, as Bestiality, &c. 3. public Honesty and good Report. As for public Honesty and Good Report which is required in all things, especially in Marriages there is nothing contrary to these in the Marriage of cousin Germans; I do not mean false Love, or weak Fancies and Estimations of Vulgar People, concerning public famed or Honesty. But I hold that the Laws of God and of Men, and the universal Judgments of the most Civil part of Mankind, are the measures of public Honesty. In the Oration of Sp. Ligustinus in Livy, Instances, Liv. Au. l. 11. he saith, Pater mihi uxorem dedit fratris sui filiam. Cicero pro Cluentio says, That his Sister Married Melinus, her cousin German: Augustus Caesar gave his Daughter Julia, to Marcellus the Son of his Sister Octavia. The brave Brutus was married to Portia the Daughter of his wise uncle Cato. Marcus Antonius the Philosopher was married to his Cousin German Annia Faustina Constantius the Emperor, gave his Sister to her Cousin Julianus v. l. 1. §. Duorum Just. de Nuptiis. & L. 3. l. Non solum § 1. F. 1. de Ritu Nuptiarum F. L. si Nepot. 3. de Ritu Nuptiarum. L. Conditioni 2. C. de Justit. & Sulst. Theodosius( being over-ruled by S. Ambrose) was the first that forbade these Marriages. Tantum pudori trbuens continentiae, ut consobrinarum nuptias vetuerit tanquam Sororum. Aur. ●ictor. This was abrogated by Arcadius & Honorius his Son. v. Justin. l. Celebrandis C. de Nuptiis. Revocata prisci Juris Authoritate, restinctisque calumniarum fomentis Matrimonium inter Consobrinos habeatur. In the Theodosian Code, the Law seems to say otherwise, in the Titles. Si Nuptiae ex Rescripto petantur, & T. de Incestis Nuptiis. Alaric King of the Goths, commanded Arrianus to make a Breviary of the Code, and corrupted this Law, fitting it to the customs of his own country: So did he in the Epitome of Caius his Institutions. So did Theophilus, till Curtius his latin Interpreter needed him. 4. The Canon Law. As for the Canon Law, that doth now forbid it, of old it was not so. In the Canons of the Apostles are these Instances, He that Marries two Sisters, or his Brothers Widow or Daughter, may not be received into Holy Orders, and no more: But about St. Austins time: Nondum prohibuerat Lex humana, Divina nunquam. In the Synod of Paris, almost Six Hundred Years after Christ, these are called unlawful Marriages, Quae contra Praeceptum Domini contrahuntur, none else. In the old Canons all the prohibited Instances are in this Table. Nata, Soror, Neptis, Matertera Fratris & Uxor. Et Patris Conjux, matter, Privigna, C. Extr. de Rest. Spons. Noverca. Uxorisque Soror, Privigni Nata, Nurusque Atque Soror Patris conjungi Lege vetantur. But about this time were sad Assemblies of Bishops; because the Nations were corrupted with the Goths and Vandals, and they were willing to comply with the Conquerors, they thought fit to prevent Incestuous Marriages of Brother and Sister, to make this bar a 〈◇〉 of forbidding Cousin Germans to mary. These Prohibitions of Popes began with the first Degree of Cousins called Germans, then to the Second, Third and Fourth Degrees of Cousins so often removed, then to Seven, then to Six and Four again, as in the Synod at Caballian. Sometimes usque dum generatio agnoscitur, aut memoria retinetur. Their Reasons are bald enough; For 4 Degrees. because but 4 Humours in the Body, but 4 Elements of the World, but 4 Fingers and a Thumb on a Mans Hand, The Thumb is the Stirps or Common Pajent, and the Life of Man is but a Span long, but 4 Quarters of the World. For 7 Degrees. Because there are but 3 Faculties of the Soul; which being joined to the 4 Humours of the Body make 7: And therefore we must abstain to the Seventh Generations, 1. to Cousins Seven times removed. These were their mighty Reasons against all Mankind to prohibit these Marriages. One more let us not forget, as the most doughty of all: Because, by the Civil Law, Inheritances descend but to the 7th. Degree: A false Ground; because Inheritances descend unto the 10th. Degree. But if not, they reckon their Degrees otherwise than the Civil Law doth, and consequently forbid Marriages of Cousins to the 5th. Degree Exclusively; because Cousin Germans by them are reckoned but in the 2d. Degree: Whereas by the Civil Law Law they are in the 4th. Degree: For by that Law there are so many degrees as there are Persons beside the Common Stock; but by the Canon Law, so far as either of the Persons is distant from the Common Parent, so far he is distant from the other in the Equal Line. Sometimes that which is lawful hath been prohibited, lest men should run into that which is unlawful: This is a matter of Prudence only, not of what is lawful or not. Such Laws are Drains for Money. Gold will purchase Leaden Dispensations. And so it was when the Civil Law was Tuned to the Key of the Canon Law, and both to the air of the goths and Vandals. Second Cousins are forbidden to mary, Ergo, first Cousins much more, though they be not expressly name. None ever forbade second Cousins to mary, but they that forbade first Cousins to mary. It is a Groundless Fancy, and Vulgar Error; Isaac Married his second Cousin. and that is more than can be said against it. And this is Answer enough for such a trifling Objection. OF Consanguinity. OR, KINDRED by BLOOD. THe Degrees of Consanguinity, and their different Computation between the Civilians and Canonists, are better understood by the Inspection of a Pedigree, than by Writing or Speaking; yet Justinian gives good Directions, Just. l. 1. Tit. de Nuptiis, and lib. 3. Tit. 6. de Gradibus Cognatorum. The first Degree of Consanguinity is in the Right Line Ascending and Descending, where all Degrees of that Line are forbidden. So that upwards a Man may not mary his Mother, Grandmother, or Great Grandmother, &c. And downward, he may not mary his Daughter, Granddaughter, no Great Grand-daughter, &c. The Reason is, Because in all these Cases one of the Parties is a Parent, or a Child by Blood: That is, The Woman is either a Mother, or a Daughter to the Man. This was Lots Incest, Instances. and Reubens Incest, v. Gen. 19, 33. Gen. 25.22. Gen. 38.10. Lev. 18.7. &c. Lev. 20.11, 12, &c. Ez. 22.13. Am. 2.6. The second Degree of Consanguinity is in the Side Line equal, in which all Propinquity, or nearness by Blood is forbidden to the Second or Third Degree only. The Reason is, Because Propinquity, or Nearness consisteth but in Two or Three Degrees, as he is my near Neighbour that dwelleth but two or three Houses from me. And the Levitical Law Reckons Propinquity or Nearness no further than the third Degree. The rest she accounts Remote. So that in the second Degree of the Side-equal, or Collateral Line,( the Civilians compute in that Line no first Degree at all) a Man may not mary his Sister, nor his Sisters Daughter, &c. for she is his near Kinswoman, either by the whole Blood, or by the half Blood. The Reason is, Because in all these Cases the Parties are always Brother and Sister; that is, the Woman is always Sister to the Man, and the Man Brother to the Woman by Blood. This was Amons Incest with Tamar, his Sister by the half Blood; Instances. for they were both Children to David by several Venters. The third Degree is in the Sideunequal Line or lineage upwards or downward: In which upwards a Man may not mary his Aunt nor Great Aunt, &c. And downward a Man may not mary his niece, or his nieces Daughter, &c, As when upwards I lye with my Aunt, whether she be my Fathers Sister or Mothers Sister by Blood: Or downward I lye with my niece whether she be my Brothers Daughter or my Sisters Daughter. The Reason is, Because in all these Cases the Woman is still either Aunt or niece to the Man. The Computation of Degrees in the Right Line. The first Degree in the Right Line is from me to my Father or Grandfather, and all my Parents upward, or from me to my Daughter or Grand-daughter, and all my Children downward. The second Degree in the Side-Line Equal is, from me upward to my Father one Degree, and from my Father downward to his Daughter, which is my Sister, two Degrees. Now the Reason why in the Side-Line the Computation proceedeth not directly from me to my Sister; but fetcheth a compass about upwards and downward, and passeth through our Parents is, Because the Consanguinity between me and my Sister is not Immediate, Proximous and Prime in the first Degree, but Mediate, Propinquous and secondary, through and by the means of two common Parents: For no Blood is derived or passed from me to my Sister, nor from her to me; but Blood is derived or passed from our Parents to each of us, and in us their Blood is partend. My Mother therefore, who derives her Blood to me immediately, must needs be more Consanguineous, or nearer of Kin to me than my Sister, who derives no Blood at all to me, but only takes part of the same Blood with me. And my Daughter, who derives her Blood immediately from me, must needs be more Consanguineous or nearer of Kin to me than my Sister, who derives no Blood at all from me. My Mother therefore upwards, and my Daughter downward are the Females of nearest Consanguinity or Kindred to me: And therefore they make the first Degree; for that which in order is the nearest or next to me, must needs be the first from me: And Consequently my Sister being not so near to me in Consanguinity, Kindred or Blood, as is my Mother and Daughter, cannot be computed in the first Degree; and therefore must either be in the second Degree, or in a Degree more remote, or else in no Degree at all. Hence it is, that in many Accurate Pedigrees the Lines are drawn and visibly expressed in the right Line or lineage only, and they are drawn downward only according to the Descent from the Parents to the Children. Because the course of the Blood which makes Consanguinity, passeth only by Descent downward. But sideward in the Side-Line or lineage, no Lines at all are visibly drawn and expressed; because the Blood hath no passage at all that way; for there was none at all, neither from the Brother to the Sister, nor from her to him. So that they partake not of one anothers Blood, but both partake of their Parents Blood, which descends in Common to them both, and in them is partend and divided into several Channels, making several descents; yet for Computation sake there are Lines conveyed sideward in the Side-Line or lineage, not Lines real and visible, but only imaginative and putative; such as Astronomers conceive in Heaven, and Geographers on Earth, calling them Meridians or Parallels, which are no Realities visible or sensible, but only Imaginations or Fictions in Astronomy or Geography. The third Degree sideward in the Side-Line Unequal is thus, for my Uncle or Aunt. From me to my Father or Mother upwards is one Degree, then from my Father and Mother to their Father and Mother, or my Grandfather and Grandmother is two Degrees, then downward to the Son or Daughter of my Grandfather or Grandmother, which is sideward to my Father and Mother, which are their Brother and Sister, which are my Uncle and Aunt is Three Degrees. And the Brother and Sister of my Father or Mother is my Uncle and Aunt. And for my Nephew and niece the Computation is thus; from me to my Father or Mother upwards is one Degree, from my Father and Mother, then downward to their Son and Daughter,( which is sideward to me) which are my Brother and Sister, is two Degrees, and from my Brother and Sister downward again to their Son and Daughter is Three Degrees. And the Son or Daughter of my Brother or Sister is my Nephew or niece. Sideward in the Side-Line or lineage no more Degrees are forbidden for Marriage beyond the Third Degree, either by the Law of Moses, or by the Civil Law, or by the Law of our Church. Because in these Lanes the Degrees only of Propinquity or Nearness are forbidden; and Propinquity or Nearness consisteth but in Three Degrees, determining in the Third. And therefore Persons in the Fourth Degree sideward, and much more in the Fifth or Sixth Degree, &c. may lawfully mary: Because such Persons are in no Degree of Propinquity, seeing Propinquity comprehendeth only but Three Degrees; and consequently first Cousins, or Cousin Germans, or Brothers and Sisters Children may lawfully mary, and many times do so: And therefore a Man may mary his Uncles Daughter, or his Aunts Daughter; for my Uncles or my Aunts Daughter is is my Cousin German. The Fourth Degree sideward between Brothers and Sisters Children, or Cousin Germans is thus: from me upward to my Father or Mother is one Degree, from my Father or Mother to their Father or Mother, or my Grandfather or Grandmother is Two Degrees: Then from my Grandfather or Grandmother, which are the common Stock downward to their Son or Daughter, which sideward are my Father and Mother, Brother and Sister, and my Uncle and Aunt, is Three Degrees; & from my Uncle and Aunt downward to their Son or Daughter, which are my Cousin Germans, is Four Degrees. This Computation of Degrees is according to the Civil Law, whose Rule is this, Tot sunt Gradus Cognationis, quot sunt Generationes, 1. So many Generations so many Degrees. The Computation of the Canon Law is, Quoto Gradu unusquisque eorum distat a communi stipite, eodem Gradu distant inter se, 1. In what Degrees the Parties are distant from the Common Stock, in the same Degree they are distant between themselves. So that Brothers and Sisters Children, that by the Computation of the Civil Law differ Four Degrees from each other, by the Canon Law they differ but Two Degrees from each other. So that the Civil Law considereth Degrees, especially for Successions of Inheritances from Person to Person, numbering the Degrees according to single Persons, only by one Degree at once, ascending to the next or nearest Common Stock or Parent, and thence descending to the Person whose Degree is required. But the Cannon Law considereth rather the Degrees of Marriage made by the consent of Two Persons, and for that reason joineth Two Persons together in the numbering of Degrees. As to Cousin Germans therefore,( to conclude) though some Divines and some Lawyers here in England do scruple at the slothfulness of their Marriage; yet they scruple it without alleging any sound Reason, but relying only upon Tradition, and the long practise of the Canonists, who have forbidden those Marriages for mere Lucre, to Gain Money for the licensing of them, by Dispensations, which are denied to none, but are granted of course, for Money, to all that desire them. But from the beginning it was not so, neither ought it to be so; because the Rule holds good, Quod ab initio non valuit, illud tractu Temporis convalescere non potest: That which was invalid from the beginning, cannot be made valid by length of Time. OF Affinity. OR, Alliance by Marriage. AFfinity is grounded upon Law and Marriage, as Consanguinity is grounded upon Blood and Birth: And therefore there is a near resemblance between them. And though in Affinity there be properly no Degrees, yet Degrees are Assigned to it, and are computed according to the Degrees of Consanguinity. The first Degree of Affinity is in the Right Line Ascending and Descending, where all Degrees are forbidden. So that upwards I may not mary my Fathers second Wife, and downward I may not mary my Sons Wife. The Reason is, Because in all these Cases the Party Married, is a Parent by Marriage to the Party marrying: That is, the Woman is either a Mother in Law, or a Daughter in Law to the Man. As in Consanguinity, the Woman was either a Mother in Nature, or a Daughter in Nature to the Man. This was Judas his Incest with Tamar his Sons Wife, Instances. Gen. 38.18. 1 Cor. 5.1. and this was the Corinthians Incest with his Fathers Wife. The second Degree of Affinity is in the Side or Collateral Line Equal. So that in the second Degree sideward I may not mary my Brothers Wife, or my Sister in Law, nor my Wives Sister, or my Sister in Law. The Reason is, Because in all these Cases the Woman is still Sister in Law to the Man, or the Parties Married are Brothers and Sisters in Law, as in Consanguinity the Parties are Brothers and Sisters by Nature. This was Jacobs Incest in Marrying with Rachel his Sister in Law; Instances. for she was own Sister to Leah his first Wife. This was Herods Incest, who married with Herodias his Brother Philips Wife. And this was Henry the 8th. his Case, who married Katharine his Brother Arthurs Wife. v. Gen. 29.30. Lev. 18.9, 11, 16. Lev. 20.17, 21. 2 Sam. 13.10, 11. Math. 14.3, 4. The Third Degree of Affinity is in the Side-Line Unequal. So that in the Third Degree upward I may not mary my Uncles Wife, or my Aunt in Law, nor downward my Nephews Wife, or my niece in Law. The Reason is, Because in all these Cases the Woman is still either Aunt or niece in Law to the Man by Marriage, 〈◇〉 and so 'vice ve sa, or the Parties Married are Uncle or Aunt, or Nephew and niece in Law, as in Consanguinity they are Uncles, Aunts, Nephews and nieces in Nature. Now Affinity ariseth to me Two ways; first by my own Kindred, 1. Kinsmen or Kinswomen when they are married, or by my Wifes Kinsmen or Kinswomen when I myself am married. By my own Kindred, as 1. By the Wives of my Male Kindred: Therefore the Wives of my Kinsmen by Consanguinity, are my Affines or Allies in the same Degree of Affinity, wherein my several Kinsmen and I stood by Consaguinity or Kindred. So upwards my Fathers Second Wife, or my Stepmother, or Mother in Law, are my Affines or Ally in the first Degree of Affinity or Alliance, because my Father and I are in the first Degree of Consanguinity or Kindred, and downward my Sons Wife, or my Daughter in Law is my Affines or Ally in the first Degree of Affinity or Hlliance, because my Son and I are in the first Degree of Consanguinity or Kindred: And sideward my Brothers Wife, or Sister in Law, is my Affines or Ally in the Second Degree; because my Brother and I are in the Second Degree of Consanguinity or Kindred: And so farther sideward in the Third Degree, my Uncles Wife, or my Aunt in Law is my Affine● or Ally in the Third Degree of Affinity; because my Uncle, and my Nephew, their Husbands, are my Kinsmen in the Third Degree of Consanguinity 2. In like manner 'vice versa, the Husbands of my Kinswomen, i.e. e. of my Female Kindred by Consanguinity, are my Affines or Allies in the same Degree of Affinity wherein my several Kinswomen and I stood by Consanguinity or Kindred. So upwards my Mothers Second Husband, or my Father in Law is my Affines or Ally in the first Degree of Affinity or Alliance, because my Mother is my Kinswoman in the first Degree of Consanguinity or Kindred: And downward my Daughters Husband, or my Son in Law is my Affines or Ally in the first Degree of Affinity, because my Daughter is my Kinswoman in the first Degree of Consanguinity: And sideward my Sisters Husband, or my Brother in Law, is my Affines or Ally in the second Degree of Affinity, because my Sister is my Kinswoman in the second Degree of Consanguinity; so likewise farther sideward in the Third Degree, my Aunts Husband, or my Uncle by Marriage is my Affines or Ally in the Third Degree of Affinity; and my nieces Husband, or my Nephew in Law, is my Affines or Ally in the Third Degree of Affinity, because correspondently my Aunt & my niece are Kinswomen in the Third Degree of Consanguinity or Kindred. 2. By my Wives Kindred. Besides the Affinity arising unto to me by my own Kindred, 1. My Kinsmen and my Kinswomen, there accrues unto me if I be Married a great Stock of Affinity by my Wife. Yet a Man and his Wife are properly of no Kin at all, neither by Consanguinity, or Affinity in any Degree of Propinquity neither before Marriage nor after. Not before Marriage, because their Consanguinity or Affinity in any Degree of Propinquity would be so just an Impediment against their Marriage, that thereupon they might not mary at all, or if they did mary, their Marriage would be accounted unlawful and Incestuous. Nor after Marriage, because Consanguinity and Affinity lieth necessary between two distinct Persons, who make the distinct terms of those Relations. But a Man and his Wife though naturally and sensibly they are Two distinct Persons, yet Jurally and Legally in the Estimation of Law, they are no more two but one Person, or as the Scripture phraseth it. They Two are no more Two, but one Flesh. Mat. 19.6. Again, after Marriage a man is nearer to his Wife than to his Father and Mother; for he must leave his Father and Mother and cleave to his Wife: But a Mans Consanguinity with his Father and Mother is in the first Degree, and therefore there can be no Degree of Consanguinity with his Wife, because there can be no Degree before the first. The Marriage therefore of Man and Wife effecteth neither Consanguinity nor Affinity, but an Unity, which is a Conjunction more Entire, more Perfect, more Eminent, or more transcendent than any Consanguinity or Affinity can possibly be. And though this Union by Marriage be neither Consanguinity nor Affinity, yet without Marriage there is no lawful Consanguinity nor Affinity, but Bastardy. For Marriage is the Ground and Cause of both those Relations, it is the Seed and Root from whence they arise, and it is the term or Point from whence their Degrees are measured. And Consequently a Man and his Wife are neither Affines nor Consanguinei, but Conjuges. That is, neither of Alliance or Blood, but conjoined in one Person in Law, and Yoke-Fellows in one Sacred Band of Wedlock. And though in some passages of the Civil Law they be called Affines, yet that Appellation must be construed for a Metaphor and an Impropriety. Now the Affinity that ariseth unto me by my Wife, is easily computed thus. My Wives Consanguinei or Cousins are Affines or Allies to me, and are in the same Degree of Affinity to me, as they stand in Degree of Consanguinity to her. And therefore my Wives own Father and Mother are my Father in Law and Mother in Law, which to me is Affinity in the first Degree of Consanguinity. So my Wives own Brothers and Sisters are my Brothers in Law and Sisters in Law, which is Affinity in the Second Degree. So my Wives own Uncles and Aunts are my Uncles in Law and Aunts in Law, which is Affinity in the Third Degree. And 'vice versa my Consanguinei or Cousins, are Affines or Allies to my Wife in the same Degrees of Affinity as they are to me of Consanguinity. And therefore my own Father and Mother are my Wives Father in Law and Mother in Law, which is Affinity in the first Degree. So my own Brothers and Sisters, are Brothers in Law and Sisters in Law to my Wife, which is Affinity in the Second Degree. And so my own Uncles and Aunts are Uncles in Law and Aunts in Law to my Wife, which is Affinity in the Third Degree. In Affinity therefore as to the Point of Marriage; so many Degrees are forbidden, as there are restrained in Consanguinity by Blood. As therefore in Consanguinity, I may not mary any of my Kindred or Cousins in the First, Second or Third Degree, so in Affinity I may not mary any of my Affines or Allies in the First, Second, or Third Degree. Whether that Affinity arise to me from my own Kindred, or from my Wives Kindred. But it must be observed, That though Consanguinity by the means of Marriage breed Affinity, yet Affinity so bread, begets no farther Affinity. And therefore though my Wives Kindred are Cousins or Allies to me, yet they are not Allies to my Kindred or Cousins. So that though my Wives Father & Mother are Allies to me, yet they are not Allies to my own Father & Mother, nor to my own Brothers & Sisters, nor to my own Sons and Daughters if I had any by my former Wife. So likewise my Wives own Brothers and Sisters, though they be Allied to me, yet they are not Allied to my own Father and Mother, nor to my own Brothers and Sisters, nor to my own Sons and Daughters, if I had any by my former Wife. So again my Wives own Children, if she had any by a former Husband, though they be Allies to me, yet they are not Allies to my own Father or Mother, nor to my own Brothers and Sisters, nor to my own Sons and Daughters, if I had any by a former Wife. Hereupon as to the Point of Marriage it will follow, That respectively to me and my Wife Three sorts of Marriages may be lawful. First upward, That my own Father and my Wives Mother, their respective Conjuges being dead, may mary. Because though my own Father be Allied to my Wife, yet he is no way allied to her own Mother: And her own Mother though she be Allied to me, yet she is no way Allied to my own Father. Secondly it will follow sideward, That my own Brother, and my Wives own Sister may mary. Because though my Wives own Sister be Allied to me, yet she is no way Allied to my own Brother. So likewise my own Sister and my Wives own Brother may mary for the same Reason. Thirdly it will follow downward, That my own Son by a former Wife, and my Wives own Daughter by a former Husband may mary. Because my Wives own Daughter by another Husband, though she be Allied to me, yet she is is not Allied to my own Son by another Wife. And for the same Reason my Daughter by a former Wife may mary my Wives own Son by a former Husband. In several Instances the practise of these Three kinds of marriages hath been, and is known in the World. First upward between the Parents of a man and his Wife. Secondly sideward, between the Brothers and Sisters of a man and his Wife. Thirdly downward between the Children of a man and his Wife, which they had by their former Conjuges. The Church of England in Case of marriage forbids no more Degrees of Consanguinity or Affinity than are forbidden in the Civil Law. Yet she numbers and computes the Degrees somewhat otherwise, following therein the account of the Canon Law. For she accounts Brothers and Sisters to be in the first Degree of the side Line; whereas the Civil Law accounts them in the second Degree of the side Line, and makes no first Degree in that Line at all. But the matter comes all to one pass, as some Players at Gleek, reckon their Games differently, and yet accord well enough in the sum of the account. For if we consider the side Line alone by its self, as there are several Persons in it, then some of those Persons must needs make the first Degree of the side Line in respect of the Persons following therein. But if we look upon the Standard of the Pedigree, or the Person whose Consanguinity is required, and from whom the Degrees thereof are measured and numbered upward, downward, and sideward, Then the Persons of the first Degree in the side Line, must needs make the second Degree of Consanguinity in respect of the Standard, or Person supposed whose Consanguinity is required, and from whom the Degrees are to be measured, according to the course whereby the Blood is derived, which doth constitute Consanguinity, as before hath been intimated. The Levitical Laws for Marriage, do now bind Us of the Church of England; Yet this Truth is to be understood with some Caution. For albeit these Laws do bind us, yet they bind us not by Divine Authority, because their Obligation by Divine Authority ceased, expired, and dyed at the death of Christ. And thereupon all Christian Churches were left to their several Liberties to follow such Rules, Orders, Measures, and Degrees, as by right Reason, and Christian Prudence should be established. For the determination whereof the Church of England conceived it the most prudent course to make the Levitical Laws her President and Pattern; and at last assumed them, and adopted them into her own Canons and Statutes; reviving unto them an Obligation, not of Divine Authority, as once they had from God, but of human Authority, by the Secular and Ecclesiastical Power of our Princes and Bishops after the Reformation. Thus these very Levitical Laws for Marriage, whose Obligation by Divine Authority was long since expired, were afterwards revived unto a new Obligation upon us by human Authority. In like manner divers of the Civil Laws do now oblige us here in England, yet not by their original Constitution, nor by the Imperial Authority, either of Justinian, or any other Emperor, but by the Authority of our own State, which hath assumed and confirmed them into Laws as Obligatory here in England as they were in the Roman Empire. The END.