RELIGIO STOICI.  Acts 1. 11. 
— Ye men of Gallile, why stand ye gazing up into heaven?  
EDINBURGH. Printed for R. Broun, 1663.   

THE STOIC To his CENSURERS.  
I Am, by Religion, a Protestant, and such confide little in merit; and by Humour, a Stoic, and such are most inconcerned in censures: Wherefore, as I intent to rival none of these who court fame, I hope none of these will asperse me; and if I obtain truce from them, I know none else will attaque me.  
The multitude (which albeit it be said to have many heads, yet, was ever known to have few brains) will doubtless condemn me for enveighing against vanity, whilst I myself am so vain as to write Books; and will pronounce me as ridiculous in this, as these Philosophers were of old, who denied motion whilst their tongues moved in their cheek; to whom my return shall be, that finding many (even of such as I know will censure me) be-myred in the puddle of error, I have, in this Essay, proffered them my assistance, with an intention, not to show my strength, but my compassion. I am no such fool, as to show these Philistines the Sampsons-lock wherein my strength lies, which doubtless their cruelty would never spare.  
Others, who, by their gravity, (or serious dulness) have sublimated themselves above the rabble, will possibly accuse my Studies of adultery, for hugging contemplations so eccentric to my employment. But, these may know, that their Papers are but the pairings of my other Studies, and because they were such, I have flung them out into the streets. Neither can I understand, how it proves a Lawyer to be remiss in his employment, that he takes leisure to reach a little helebor which lies by him, to such poor persons, as because of their fanatic melancholy stand much in need thereof. This discourse is intended to be a medicine, and such never relish well nor receive commendation from their pleasantesse, but from their profit, and are not to be censured by their taste, but by their operation.  
There are many things in this small Piece, which may seem heterodoxe to such as defy custom, and worship the Dagon of authorized tradition: Yet, who knows but my Watch goes right, albeit it differ from the public Clock of the City; especially where the sun of Righteousness hath not, by pointing clearly the dyal of Faith, declared which of the two is in the right. I acknowledge the Church to be my Mother; neither will I offer to scratch out my Mother's eyes when they perceive my errors: yet, I believe that a child may differ from his mother's judgement, in things wherein her honour is not concerned: But, I will wed no opinion without her consent who is my Parent; or, if I have wedded any, it is in the power of the Church and its Officials, to grant me a divorce. I submit myself and this Tractat to her and their censures, and desires none to believe me or it, but in these things only wherein I believe her and them. As for others, since I have taken the liberty to write, I were unmannerly if I refused them the liberty to censure and really it pleases my humour, 〈…〉 see cur's bark and snarl at wha 〈…〉 hold out to them.  
G. Mk.   

THE STOICS Friendly ADDRESS To the fanatics Of all SECTS and SORTS.  
THe madcap Zealots of this bigot Age, intending to mount heaven, Elias-like, in Zeals fiery Chariot, do, like foolish Phaeton, not only fall themselves from their flaming seat, but by their furious overdriving, invelop the ●●rld in unquenchable combustions; 〈◊〉 when they have thus set the whole Globe on a blaze, this they term a new light. It is remarkable in Scripture, that Jehu, who drove furiously, and called up the Prophet to see what zeal he had for the house of God, was even at that instant, doing it more wrong than ever was done to it by unconcerned Gallio, who flantingly cared for none of those things. And that none of all the apostolic Conclave desired ever fire might rain from above upon misbelievers; except the Sons of Zebedee, who immediately thereafter, arrived at that pitch of vanity, as to desire to sit in heaven upon Christ's right and left hand. And that Peter, who was the first who did draw a sword in his Master's quarrel, was likeways the first who denied him. Fiery Zeal blows soon up, such combustible mater as the Sons of Zebedee; and that flash being spent and evaporat, a fall follows, as befell Peter. As that body is hardly curable, which entertains such ill-suited neighbours as a cold Stomach and a hot Liver; So, the body of the visible Church may be now concluded to be in a very distempered conditon, when it's Charity waxeth cold, and its Zeal hot, beyond what is due to either; and these feverish fits of unnatural Zeal, wherewith the Church is troubled in its old and cold age, betokens too much that it draws near its last period.  
The inconsiderableness likeways of our differences, and inconsideratness wherewith they are pursued, induces me to believe, that the Zeal now a-la-mode, is not that holy Fire which is kindled by a coal from the Altar, but is that ign's fatuus, or wildfire, which is but a Meteor pieced up of malignant Vapours, and is observed to frequent Churchyards ofter than other places.  
I am none of those who acknowledge no temples, besides these of their own heads. And I am of opinion, that such as think that they have a Church within their own breasts, should likeways believe, that their heads are steeples, and so should provide them with bells. I believe that there is a Church-militant, which, like the Ark, must lodge in its bowels all such as are to be saved from the flood of condemnation: but, to chalk out its bordering lines, is beyond the geography of my Religion. He was infallible who compared God's Spirit to the wind which bloweth where it listeth, we hear the sound of it, but knows not whence it comes, or whether it goeth. And the name graven upon the whit-stone, none knows but he who hath it. Eli concluded Hannah to be drunk, when she was pouring out her soul before her Maker: and Elias believed, that the Church, in his days, was stinted to his own person; and yet God told him, that there were seven thousand in Israel who had not bowed their knees to Baal: why then should any private Christian determine, magigisterially, that, wherein the greatest of Prophets erred?  
The reed wherewith the Temple was to be measured, Rev. 11. 2. was only entrusted to an Angel; and yet he had not in commission, to measure the Court that was without, because it was given to the Gentiles. And albeit, Rev. 7. the number of the jews who were saved is determined; yet, the number of Gentiles is left indefinite, and said to be numberless.  
There is nothing more ordinar, then for each Nation to confine the Church within themselves. And in that Nation again, one corner will have themselves the Sanctum Sanctorum of that only Temple; albeit our Saviour in His Gospel assures us, that men shall come from all corners of the world, and sit down with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. And John in his Revelation tells us, that multitudes of all Nations, Kindred's and Families, were seen following the Lamb. Upon this same block do these likewayes stumble, who put the bolt of their uncharitableness upon the gates of heaven, to debar whole Professions, such as Lawyers and Physicians, from entering in thereat; notwithstanding that the abovecited place tells us, that there were only twelve thousand of the tribe of Levi the Priest chosen, and the like number was pricked; in the tribe of Judah, the Lawgiver: Aaron the Priest did mould the golden calf, and not Moses the judge; and Korah and Dathan were Levits, and yet mutined against their Magistrates.  
I say not this to disparage that holy Function: For, none shall wish Aaron's rod to flourish more than myself; and ordinarily, these who love not to touch the Lords anointed, will likeways be sure, to do His Prophets no harm: but, I say it to take off an aspersion which hath stained too long, and too injustly, these of my own profession. Is not the Church our common Mother? albeit, I confess, she is likeways their Nurse, in a more particular way; and since there is heavenly Mannah enough to aliment us all, why should Christians de ny to admit their brethren to an equal partage?  
It grieves me sore to see my mother the Church tortured like Rebecca, by carrying struggling twaines in her pained bowels. And seeing all Christians are but pilgrims here, I admire that these pilgrims should leave off to journey, and stand skirmishing and fight with all such as will not travel their road. And albeit we acknowledge, that the Spirit of God takes pains, and is sufficient for leading all men in the way wherein they should walk; yet, we must compel them, as if either He needed our help, or we resolved to share with Him the glory of their conversion. Thus God (who loves us all infinitely better than one any of us doth another) leaves us, upon our own hazard, a freedom in our choice, albeit we poor miscreants compel one another, denying to our fellow-creatures that freedom which he allows all the Creation. I wish we would consider how each man eats, drinks, cares for his family and performs all common duties, rational enough without any compulsion; and yet, in the affairs of Religion, wherein doubtless man is led by a far more infallible assistance, there are many slips committed, daily and grossly, notwithstanding of all the pains taken, and force used by one man towards another. Thus it fairs with us as with Patients, whom when the Physicians stints to a narrow diet, than they loathe even that food, which their unreined appetite would never have rejected. And this makes me apt to believe, that if Laws and Lawgivers did not make Heretics vain, by taking too much notice of their extravagancies, the world should be no more troubled with these, than they are with the Chimaeras of Alchemists and Philosophers. And it fairs with them as with Tops, which, how long they are scourged, keep foot and run pleasantly, but fall how soon they are neglected and left to themselves.  
In order to which, it was wittily observed by our great King James the Sixth, that the Puritans of his age strove with him, and yet ceded at first, in a difference between them and the Shoemakers of Edinburgh: For, not only pleases it their humour to contend where they may gain honour and can loss none, but likeways, by contesting with Monarches, they magnify to the people their pious courage, assuring the world, that such attempts require a particular assistance from heaven; and when their jangling hath extorted some concessions from the Magistrate, (as ordinarily it doth) than they press that success as an infallible mark of the Jure-divinoship of their quarrel. Albeit, I confess, that when these, not only recede from the canonised Creed of the Church, but likeways encroach upon the Laws of the State, then, as of all others, they are the most dangerous; So, of all others, they should be most severely punished.  
Opinion, kept within its proper bounds, is an pure act of the mind: and so it would appear, that to punish the body for that which is a guilt of the soul, is as unjust as to punish one relation for another. And this bloodthirsty zeal, which hath reigned in our age, supposes our most merciful God to be of the same temper with these pagan Deities, who desired to have their Altars gored with blood; and being devils themselves, delighted in the destruction of men: whereas the Almighty, who delights not in the death of a sinner, but rather that he should repent and live, hath left no war and upon holy Record, for persecuting such as descent from us; but even then when He commands that the Prophets, who tempts others to idolatry, should be slain, yet, speaks He nothing of punishing these who were seduced by them. And why should we show so much violence in these things whereof we can show no certain evidence? as ordinarily we cannot in circumfundamental debates. Are we not ready to condemn to day, as Fanatic, what yesterday was judged Jure-divino? And do not even those who persecuted others for their opinions, admire why they should be, upon that score, persecuted themselves? So that (victory depending upon event) we legitimat the persecutions, to be used by others, against ourselves, by the persecutions used by ourselves, against others. Our Saviour forbids us to pluck up the tears, lest the wheat be pulled up with it; and how can the most pious persecutors know, that the Saints are not destroyed with the sinners?  
It is remarkable, that our Saviour disarmed zealous Peter, even when he was serving Him in person, in His greatest straits, and against the most profligat of His enemies, the jews: and that to prevent the irregular zeal even of the first and best of Christians, the blessed Apostles, their divine Master thought it fit to arm them not with swords, but with scrips, and to root out of their hearts all thoughts of violence, did oft inculcat in them, that His Kingdom was not of this world; convinceing them by an excellent argument, that He had no need of arms or armies; for else He could have commanded thousands of Angels. Did ever God command the jews to war against any neighbouring nation because they were Pagans (a quarrel which would have lasted till all the world had been conquered) Or, did our Saviour leave in legacy to his servants, that they should force others to turn prosylits, which doubtless he had done, if he had resolved to allow such a rude mean of conversion? All which makes me admire, why in our late troubles, men really pious, and naturally sober, could have been so transported, as to destroy whom they could not convince, and to persuade these who were convinced, that Religion obliged them to destroy others.  
My heart bleeds when I consider how scaffolds were died with Christian blood, and the fields covered with the carcases of murdered Christians; and its probable, that there were more damned by unprepared deaths, in the fields, than were saved by peeping Sermons in incendiary Churches; and in this, I admire the clemency of our Royal Master, who, albeit His cause was more just than theirs, albeit He might have convinced them by obtruding to them their own practices: yet, hath rather chosen to command with His Sceptre then His Sword. But, if the glory of God were the mark at which these do level, Why bestow they not their zeal, rather in converting such as scarce know or acknowledge that there is a God? And why are they more enraged against these who agree with them in most things, than these who descent from them in all? Take not Christians more pains to refute one another, then to convince Gentiles? And stand not Episcopists and Presbyterians at greater distance, then either do with Turks and Pagans? And to evidence, that rather humour then piety occasions our differences, we may easily perceive, that the meaner the subject is, the heat is always the greater.  
If I had ever known so much as one whose faith had been the trophy of a debate, I should allow of debates in matters of Religion: but seeing men cannot be convinced by miracles, it were ridiculous to press conversion by arguments. All the Divines in Europe could not press the best founded of their controverted and polemic truths, with so much scripture, or so many miracles as our blessed Saviour did His own divinity (which is the foundation of all truths) And yet the jews and all the world besides, slighted this infallible doctrine; And to evidence that there is a season of grace, independent from arguments, did not many thousands turn prosylits at Peter's sermon? whom all our Saviour's homilies and miracles could not persuade. If one should say, that the testimony of a few fishermen should not be believed in a mater of so great consequence, as is the salvation of the whole world, especially when they did depone as witnesses, in a matter wherein both their honour and livelihood was concerned, might not this stagger some mean Christian? And yet I believe these truths so much the more, because such as these were its first asserters; for, certainly it is one of the greatest of miracles, that so few, and so illiterate persons were able to convince the whole world. Thus we see, that one may account that a miracle which another looks upon as a folly; and yet, none but God's Spirit can decide the controversy. Matters of Religion and Faith, resembling some curious Pictures and optic Prismes, which seems to change shapes and colours, according to the several stances from which the asp●cient views them.  
The balance of our judgements hath ●atched such a bruise by Adam's fall, that scarce can we by them know the weight of any argument. But, which is worse, there is as great a defect in our partial weighing, as in the scales themselves: For, when we take either the pro or con. of any controversy into our Patronage, we throw always in arguments into that scale, wherein our own opinion lies, without ever taking leisure to consider what may be alleged for the antipode proposition: and then, when we receive an answer, our invention is busied, not in pondering how much conviction it hath in it, but by what slight it may be answered; and thus either passion, interest or frequent meditation, are still the weights which cast the balance.  
This fiery zeal hath likeways made an other pimple flash out in the face of the fanatic Church, and that is, a conceit that the Saints have the only right to all God's creatures, the wicked being only usurpers and not masters of them: But, I have heard this opinion (so beastly is it) confuted by Balaam's ass, who could tell its Master, Am not I thine own ass? When Aaron and the people did covenant without Moses, than every man did bring his earrings to make up the golden calf. And we have lived in an age, wherein we have seen our Countrymen, like the Chaldeans, take the furniture both of the Temple and of the King's House, and carry them away to their Babylon of confusions; and in an age wherein sober men were forced to lend moneys, to buy for their own arms the heavy shekels of slavery,  Tantum Religio potuit suadere malorum. 
Religion doubtless aims at two great designs, one is like the first Table, to persuade us to adore God Almighty. Another is to persuade us, like to the second Table, to love our neighbour, and to be a mean to settle all these jealousies, and compesce all these animosities which interest might occasion; and this appears by the Doxology jubilyed by the Angels at our Saviour's birth, Glory to God, and peace and goodwill towards men. And therefore, as every private Christian should be tolerated by his fellow subjects, to worship God inwardly according to his conscience; So all should conspire in that exterior uniformity of worship, which the Laws of his Country injoins. The first remark which God made of us after the Creation, was, that it was not fit for man to be alone; there was only one Ark amongst the jews by Gods own appointment. And seeing the Gospel terms the Church Christ's Spouse, it were absurd to think, that He will divorce from her upon every error or escape; especially, seeing His blessed mouth hath told us, that under the Gospel it is not lawful to divorce upon all occasions; and if He will not for these, deny her to be His Spouse, much less should we deny her to be our mother. May not one, who is convinced in his judgement, that Monarchy is the best of Governments, live happily in Venice or Holland? And that traveller were absurd, who would rather squabble with these amongst whom he sojourns, then observe these rites and solemnities which are required by the Laws of the places where he lives? What is once statuted by a Law, we all consent to, in choosing Commissioners to represent us in these Parliaments where the Laws are made; and so if they ordain us to be decimated, or to leave the Nation if we conform not, we cannot say, when that Law is put to execution, that we are oppressed; no more than we could complain, if one did remove us legally from these Lands which he purchased from our Trustee, whom we had impowered to sell it.  
As David said to Saul, 1 Sam. 26. 20. why went the King out to catch a flea? So may I say to our great Divines, why contravert they about shadows? Is it fit that Christians, who find it too great a task to govern their private souls, should be so much concerned how the Church is governed by others? Wherefore, seeing many have been saved who were most inexpert in these questions, and that foolish zeal, passion, and too much curiosity therein, hath damned many, I may conclude, that to pry in these, is neither necessary, because of the first, nor expedient, because of the last.  
Since discretion opened my eyes, I have always judged it necessary for a Christian, to look oftener to his Practice of Piety, then to his Confession of Faith, and to fear more the crookedness of his will, than the blindness of his judgement, delighting more to walk on from grace to grace, working out the work of his own salvation with fear and trembling, then to stand still with the Galileans curiously gazing up to heaven. True Religion and undefiled is to visit the widow and the fatherless; and the dittay drawn up against the damned spirits shall be, That when our Saviour's poor ones were hungry, they did not feed them; when they were naked, they did not clothe them, without mentioning any thing of their unbelief in matters of Controversy or Government. And therefore I hope, that these to whom I address myself in this Discourse, will rather believe me to be their friend, because of their piety, than their enemy, because of their errors.   

THE VIRTUOSO, OR STOIC.  
ALbeit man be but 
Atheism.  a statue of dust kneaded with tears, moved by the hid engines of his restless passions, a clod of earth, which the shortest fever can burn to ashes, and the least shower of rheums wash away to nothing; Yet makes he as much noise in the world, as if both the Globes (these glorious Twaines) had been unwombed from that formless Chaos, by the midwifery of his wit; he speaks thunder, looks lightning, breathes storms, and by the eloquence of his own vanity, persuades himself that his commands are able to unhinge the Poles. From which boundless pride, I confidently conclude, that if a natural Instinct, or as the Stoics term it, 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, had not irresistably bowed his faith to assent to a Deity, he had never, neither upon design nor in compliance to custom (as Atheists allege) suffered to creep into his Creed, that there was one greater than himself, who could rein his affections, and bound their effects, according to the dictates of his irresistible will.  
And albeit Regiments of Arguments, levied both from the stately fabric of heavens arched Pend, and from the inimitable embroidery of earth's flowery Boul, be requisite for conquering the infidelity of others, and for rendering them tributaries to that all-forming Essence: Yet, doth my faith render up the arms of its depraved reason, and turn Prosolyte to this divine truth, upon the sole sight of one of these dying Atheists; who, upon any surprisal, do with amazement throw up their eyes to heaven, as if they sent their looks in ambassade to beg assistance from thence; and cry, God save me, as if these beastly souls, when attaqued unexpectedly, knew whence their health were to be expected: Like to other sick brutes, who when assaulted by sickness, are, by the hand of that same storge and instinct, led to some herb or flower, which is an Apothecary shop appointed by nature for them.  
Neither think I these arguments which are twisted together of three propositions so strong as these Instincts are; where truth, like the Sun, seems to dart home its light in one unperceiveable act, whereas in these, purblind nature may be mistaken, not only in judging of the truth of either of the three parts, but likewise of their connexion and alliance. I know that that miscreant, who began his hell upon earth, by being burnt at Tholouse for theoric Atheism, did upon his first approach to the Fire, cry, O God: Whereupon, being taxed by the assisting Jesuit, answered, that these and such like expressions were the offspring of custom: But poor soul, he might have considered, that seeing he had crept from his cradle into that error, and had run his glass to its last sand, in propagating that hellish conceit: That therefore this expression was rather a confession then an escape, rather the product of a rational soul then of depraved custom; for as it was in itself a divine truth, so it was in him contrary to a settled habit.  
There is another Cabal of Atheists, who think that this Belief was at first; but the acquaint Leger-de-main of some strongly-pated Statesman; who to over-awe the capriciousness of a giddy multitude, did forge this opinion of a rewarder of all humane actions: And to enforce this, do instance Numa Pompiluis, and Mahomet, whose palpable cheats grew up in their successors into religions; and whose inventions were received with as much bigotrie, by the wisest of men, as is that Deity which is now the object of our adorations. Wherefore (say they) seeing the rational soul hath failed so oft, and so absurdly in its discoveries, how, or why, should we submit ourselves slavishly to its determinations? For that which doth at some times err, can never at any time be concluded infallible.  
To these I answer, that albeit, as to the particular way of worship, the world is oft times deluded. And albeit, even as to their apprehensions of this incomprehensible Essence, multitudes be some times misled; Yet, these staggering Fancies fix this great Truth, that there is a Supreme who must be adored: For if this innate Instinct did not coopere with these impostures, in gaining an assent no their fictitious Religions and Hierarchies, it were impossible for any humane Authority to establish Principles so remote from reason, and to subjugate by these even the mildest tempers. But I take the root from which these errors do spring, to be, that the twilight of darkened reason glimpsing to man, that impressa of the divine Image, which though much decayed, yet rests still upon his soul; and not being able, because of the faintness of his light, and the decay of that divine Impressa, to discern exactly what that Deity is, with whose image it is signeted; believes implicitly with a profound respect, any who hath the confidence to obtrude any knowledge of it upon them. Concluding in the conclave of their own thoughts, that none durst contemn so far, that omnipotent Thunder-darter, as to vend their own Fancies for sacred Oracles. And albeit these hood-winked Nations did erect a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in their own hearts, wherein all these Vice-gods were worshipped; Yet were all these but representations of the true God; for His Omnipotency and Power was adored in their Mars; His Omniscience in their Apollo, etc. And it is very probable that the Heathens admired so each attribute of God Almighty, that they thought each deserved distinct Altars; so that their errors had their rise from rather too much then too little respect; and that as the same Ocean receives several names from the several shores it washes, so, according to the several operations of the most High, did these deluded Pagans establish several Deities. But that all these did ultimately terminat in one, is clear from the Inscription of that Athenian Altar, To the unknown God; from the designation of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, from their common feasts or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉; from the adjunct of Delphicus given to Apollo, which in Greek signifies unus; as Macrobius observes, from their Altars erected, Disque Deabusque omnibus, and from the general invocation of all the Deities jointly subjoined to all their particular sacrifices. So that the great and all comprehending Idea, wherein he is represented, as in one big mirror to us, was by them broke in pieces, and in each of these pieces taken alone did they see a Deity, though much abridged; Whereas all these pieces, when set together, did represent but one, and each piece did then show but a part. But to evidence that our belief of a Deity is not a state and traditional imposture, I would willingly know if ever the skilfullest of Satan's emissaries was able to induce the world to believe that there was no God; which (doubtless) might have at some occasions contributed much to some men's politic designs, and which that rebel would have attempted, if either God had not restrained him, or himself had not known it imprestable. And it is most remarkable, that the first promoters of that divine Doctrine were persons, who, both by precept and practice, decried Ambition and declined State employments; and so it were absurd to think that they invented these in subordination to State Projects.  
There is also much force in that Argument, wherein from the nature of prophesying, is concluded the being of a God: for, to foresee, is doubtless a way of seeing, far above the reach of humane nature; man not being able to conclude but that, What is possible upon both parts, may come to pass upon either of its parts. And hence it was, that the Heathens themselves termed this prediction divination, as if it could not be but divine. As also, if there were not a God, but that this were a fiction, it would follow, that error and delusion (such as this ex hypothesi) were able, and actually did, of all other things, frame a man's soul most to virtue: and that the best of men (such as are the adorers of a Deity) were both the greatest cheats and blockheads. All which, are absurdities to be hissed at by all who are masters of the meanest portion of humane reason.  
There lurketh much curious contemplation in pondering, how that albeit the parents of all heathenish Religions, have been incomparably the chiefest wits in their times; for else they could not have impressed the spirits of their disciples with such abstract principles; Yet, all their Models, seem repugnant to common reason: and they have choised to teach principles which seem ridiculous.  
Thus the Fictions related by the Poets of their gods, the Rites used by the Romans, and the Fopperies of the Alcoran, are absurdities unworthy of a rational belief, if man were not acted by an innate principle, to place the mysteries of Religion above his reason.  
By which we see, that the imputation cast upon the Scriptures of their contrariety to reason, chocks likeways the principles of all Nations: and certainly, if there were nothing revealed to us in Religion, but what the short line of our reason might fathom, the omnipotency of God, and the weakness of our own reason, should remain still unknown: and seeing our reason is only suitable to our nature, certainly if that infinite essence and its mysteries might be comprehended by that same reason, which measureth things finite, we might conclude God to be finite likeways; and is it not impudence in us who know not the ebbing and flowing of the sea, nor the reason why the Adamant draweth the iron, to repine because we cannot comprehend the essence of God Almighty? and then vainly to conclude, that because we cannot grasp within the short arms of our understanding, the vast bulk of the Deity, that there is no Deity? A conclusion as absurd, as if one should say, that when the nimble wings of an arrow transport it above our sight, it did leave off to be, when it left off to be perceived. And I am of opinion, that mysteriousness suits rarely well with divine Truths, the finest things using always to be best wrapped up: thus if we listen to our hid inclinations, we will find a pleasing veneration in reserved silence; and our curiosity will swiftly follow, what by its retiredness fleeth from us: silent groves whose bush-top trees lay their heads together, as in a conspiracy to resist the Sun's entry, and powder its light with Sables, creat's a veneration in us. And as the Heathens did choice groves, So did the primitive Christians light their Devotions with torches and candles, intimating thereby that umbraged silence was an excellent Shryn for sincere devotions; and in this sense, it may be, the Word of God is said to be a Lantern to our steps, and the seven Churches are compared to seven Candlsticks. Did not our Saviour teach His disciples in parables? and was not the Ark vailed from the eyes of the people? the Pagans dispensed their divinity in Hieroglyphics; and amongst humane Writers, the most mysterious carry still the Laurels: And why should we vainly wish to comprehend the nature of the Deity, seeing Moses, God's intimate, and minion, could not have that allowance? And God himself, when for our necessary instruction He would discover something of Himself to us, is forced per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, (as Divines speak) to discover Himself in a stile borrowed from humane frailty, and to express His infinite affections by our disordered passions.  
I believe, that Socrates, nature's greatest disciple, and the Deity's protomartyr, was a prosolyt of the same faith, which we profess, and had his large soul illuminated by that Sun of righteousness, whose refulgent rays are now the bright torches of the christian Church. Neither is my belief in this staggered by the silence of his co-temporary Writers, as to this particular: seeing these, not being of the same persuasion with him, but being convinced of his moral worth, did descrive his opinions suitably to their own apprehension. Thus did these pagan Historians admire the great Saviour of mankind, only for His moral accomplishments, without reaching these divine principles, by which He was acted. The Stoics likeways were in all probability, a tribe of john Baptist's, and God having resolved to purge the Universe of its original unrighteousness by that blessed Manna which came down from heaven to give life to the world, did by their doctrine of abstemiousness, as by a spare diet, prepare its body for receiving that divine Dose. And certainly, if men had disbanded that execrable troup of lusts, against which these preached, and had listened (as the Stoics Book of Discipline enjoined) to their own private consciences, and had by retiredness abstracted themselves from the reach of temptations, it had facilitated much their conversion: for if the young Lawyer, who came to consult Christ how to draw up his Securities of heaven, and of his portion there, had believed their Oracle, which decried riches as the unnecessary baggage of man's life, and the mud which clogged the wings of the souls contemplation, and kept it from soaring its natural pitch, he had never refuised our Saviour's yoke, because he was commanded to sell all and to give it to the poor. Thus likeways if the rich glutton had dieted himself according to the scant prescript of their allowance, his scoarched tongue had not stood in need of a drop of water to allay its thirst. Neither had Nicodemus needed to have mantled himself in the darkness of the night, when he came to our Saviour, out of fear, lest he should have been discovered; seeing their doctrine might have taught him, that fear was a passion, unworthy to be lodged in the soul of man: And that there is nothing here, which a man either should, or needeth to fear.  
But albeit neither instinct nor faith, were able to convince us infallibly of this truth; Yet is it both more satisfying, and more safe to embrace this opinion, than its contrary. More satisfying, because man's summum bonum here, being lodged in the tranquillity of his spirit; That which can best plain and smooth the rugged and uneven face of his frequent and inevitable misfortunes, must be doubtless the most carressable of opinions: wherefore, seeing nothing can strengthen so much man's frailty, nothing check so soon his despair, nothing feed so much his hope, nor animate so much his courage, as to believe that there is a God, who beareth the heaviest end of all our crosses upon the shoulders of His love; who is able to turn, or arrest the giddy wheel of fortune by the strong hand of His Omnipotency; and who twisteth Laurels of inimaginable joys for the heads of these who fight under his banners. If a man leaned not his weary soul upon this divine Rest, he were not only an enemy to nature, but even to his own happiness. What rocks of danger could men escape, if blind-fortune did sit at the helm, and if virtuous persons complain, as affairs are presently stated? that their merits are not weighed with indifferency enough in the Scales of justice, What might be expected, if hazard got the balance to manage? And these who leave their native countries, when they perceive that the Law beginneth to render its Oracles in an unconstant Style, and with a trembling voice, behoved to leave the world, if this Anarchy were by Atheism established? For as a wise Stoic well observed, 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉. It were impossible to live in a world, void of God and void of providence.  
It is likeways most safe; for if there be a Deity, doubtless these obdured Atheists, whose obstinacy hath conjured their consciences to a constrained silence, and bribed these infallible Witnesses, to depone what suited best with their wild resolutions, or rather neglected resolutly their sincere depositions: then certainly, the just flames of that God's indignation, whom they have disclaimed, will heat for them a furnace in hell, beyond what the other damned spirits shall meet with in their torture. Whereas albeit there be no tribunal, from which such a thunderbolt sentence may be darted, nor no supreme Judge by whom our actions shall be canvased, Then these who have paid their adorations at His altars, shall be in no danger. Wherefore, seeing it should be the task of a Virtuoso, to turn out all such thoughts as may raise a mutiny in his breast; it were a foolish toy in him to entertain Atheism, which is a Nursery of disquietness: for whose breast could enjoy a calm whilst a concernment of so much weight, as his external portion, did hang from the weak thread of a mere may be, and of such a may be, as marches so near with a will not be?  
But if ye would know, what disquieting vapours Atheism sends up to the brain, when it is once drunk in: go to the horror creating beds of a dying Atheist, whose roaring voice, might awake the most lethargic conscience that ever the devil Iulled a sleep. There ye shall know by the Urinal of his eyes, and the water standing therein, what convulsion-fits his soul suffers; and shall learn from his own mouth, how grievously his diseased soul is stretched upon the rack of despair: than it is, that the voluminous Registers of his conscience, which did lie formerly clasped in some unsearched corner of his memory, are laid open before him, and the devil who hitherto gave him the lessening end of the Prospect, to survey his sins in, turns now its magnifying end to his fearful eye. It should be then the grand design of a Philosopher, to order his own breast aright, before he go abroad to view the Works of the Creation; lest if he leave its door unbolted, the devil steal from him his richest Jewel, whilst he sweats to enrich his contemplation with what is of far less consequence.  
It is no wild fancy to think, that 
Superstition.  Atheism hath been the product of Superstition: for certainly, many who were by humour Gallio's, finding that Religion exacted from men such inhuman homage to its recognizance, as was the sacrificing children amongst the Heathens, wearying Pilgrimages, and hectic Lents amongst Christians, did resolve rather to deny than to adore such Deities. Thus Lucretius revolted upon Agamemnon's sacrificing his daughter Iphigenia for the graecian safety, crying out,  Tantum Religio potuit suadere malorum. 
And thus Petronius▪ Arbiter a monk of the same Cell, says that,  
Primus in orbe deos timor fecit, fulmina coelo  
Cum caderent—  
And to prevent this, our Saviour doth oft inculcat, that His yoke is easy and His burden is light. And doubtless, as the straightest line is always the shortest; So the most rational designs are always easilyest effectuated; and as Seneca hath excellently observed, Licet Deus non esset, tamen non peccarem ob peccati vilitatem. There is something of meanness in the gallantest, and most alluring sin. And this is most energetically expressed in Scripture, whilst it is said that the wicked weary themseles by their sins. A principle, which not only the magisterial Authority of God's Spirit, but our experience likeways places above the reach of all scruples: for are not the inquietuds, the cheats, and palliated parricids, and sacrileges brooded by ambition, the churlishness and close-handedness parented by avarice, effects unworthy to be fathered upon any rational soul; And at which we should scarlet our cheeks with blushes, as well as inpale them through fear, and should stand as much in awe of our consciences, as most do of a Deity? Yet, it may be we are in a mistake, whilst we place Superstition in the excess of such adorations, as are either commanded or indifferent: for seeing the object of our adorations, God Almighty, is in Himself infinite, we can never exceed either in our respects to Him, or in the expression of them. Excess being only admissible, where the object is finite, and where we attribute mor than is due, which can never be here. Thus if Kneeling be lawful at any occasion, I hardly see why it is not lawful to kneel at all occasions. And if these exterior rites and ceremonies (some whereof are allowed in all Churches) be judged requisite, for expressing our vassalage and subordination to God our maker, either they are altogether unwarrantable, or else we should proportion them (as far as in us lies) to that infinite object. And seeing the Angels are said to cover their faces with their wings before Him, the Patriarches to fall upon their face and worship; and our adorable Saviour, in that conflict wherein He represented sinful man, is by Matthew remarked to have fallen upon His face, by Mark to have fallen upon the ground, and by Luke to have kneeled. What is crawling man, that he should account such gestures fond Superstition? It would appear then, that Superstition consists in man's worshipping God by means unlawful, such as are children-sacrifices, and such like, whereby His divine attributes are misrepresented, and tainted with cruelty, or tyranny, and not in an excess, in such expressions of our respect as are in themselves lawful. And if there be any strength in that argument, wherein we enforce the being of God, from the harmonious consent and assent of all Nations: certainly, by that same argument, we may establish the decency, if not the necessity, of Ceremonies. For, what Nation bows to Altars, without profound and external submissions? And, who lodges upon the surface of our Globe, who pays not as the reddendo of their Charter to these gods whom they worship, ceremonial Adorations, wrapped up in most submissive Rites?  
That God made all things for 
Why the world was created.  His glory, is an expression, which (I think) looks not well at the test of reason, and hath no warrant but unwary custom: for beyond all question, His glory was so brimful formerly, that it neither needed, nor could receive any considerable accession from this small drop. And besides this, the innate apprehension we have of doing any thing for one's glory, dies this expression with some guilt; Yet, I confess, we may warrantably say, that when perverse man calls His power in question, or controverts His being only wise; that then, God for our instruction, and the vindication of His own glorious Attributes, doth many things for His own glory. And in this sense, the Scripture saith, that God will punish the wicked, and deliver His people, for His own glory. And wherever it is said, that God doth, or createh any thing, for His own glory, it is doubtless in this sense; in which man (who is made after His image) may act for his own glory without any vanity; albeit to act for his own glory in the first sense, were in him criminal. It is then more probable, that God being infinitely good, and all good being sui communicativum, that His design in creating the world, was to communicate and display His goodness: and upon this base probably hath Aristotle reared up his error, of the world's existency from all eternity: for, seeing God was ab aeterno infinitely good, and that good is still communicative: he did (it may be) conclude, that ab aeterno, God did communicate His goodness: which could only be to creatures. And therefore it was necessary that there should have been a world: and some Philosophers have averred, that the world flowed from God per emanationem, ab aeterno, as beams are lanced out from the body of the Sun. Albeit I be none of Aristotle's Partisans, nor holds my philosophy of him as my Superior; Yet I cannot but think, that God hath communicated His goodness to world's prior to ours, which is but of 5662 years standing. But I am not so arrogant as to determine the time of the first world's birth, nor how many Cadets it hath had, resolving to leave its Date, blank, to be filled up by some arrogant Pretender. Neither should I accuse mine own thoughts of Heresy, for concluding, that probably there are presently thousands of world's co-existing with ours, whereof some, it may be, are governed by Maxims. If not contrair, yet at least differnt from these which are our Canons. All which worlds, albeit they were actually subsisting, would lie in the bosom of the large imaginary Spaces, but like so many small balls in the corner of a large Tennis-court. I shall not for confirming this opinion, cite, with an ignorant french Curate, the parable of the Lepers, where it is said, Nun sunt decem mundi? because I know that it was wittily answered, Sed ubi sunt reliqui novem?  
That Eternity is all present, and 
Eternity.  that in it, there is neither preterite, nor future, is but a conceit, and a needless mystery imposed upon our belief, which is really more mysterious than the Trinity; who knows but it is founded upon an expression in Cicero, wherein Eternity is called aeternum instans? For how then can it be said, that God was before the world? for was is preterite, and before the world there was, as themselves allege, no time; and so there was a was in eternity. Is not God called by Himself Alpha and Omega, first and last, the one whereof is preterite and the other future? And it is said, Rev. 16. 5. O glorious God, who art, and waste, and shalt be. And if it be answered, That this is only fitted to our capacities; certainly, that is all is craved: for, doubtless there is no such real thing, as these three measures of time, even in things finite and created; for they owe their being only to our conceit, as well in the one as in the other. And when God descriv'd Himself by His name JAH I am, it was not meant, that no measure of time could be attributed to Him, but the present; but rather, that what He was, was to man incomprehensible. And that all we could know of Him, was that He existed; and by that expression, that all things to Him are present, was meant, that by His Knowledge intuitive, (as Divines term it) He comprehends all things which were to be, as if they were really present; and this is spoke, not of his being, but of his knowledge. Neither can it be concluded that if was or shall be, may be attributed to God, than He must be mutable, and that was, denotats mutation; for as I said formerly, these are but terms, not really existing, and so cannot import any real mutation.  
How God employs His uncontrollable 
Providence.  Sceptre, after what fashion He governs this lower world, and in what characters He writs His eternal Decrees, hath been the arrogant study of some madcap Pedants, who talk as magisterially of His Decrees, as if they were of His cabinet Council. And albeit to deter such bold intruders, He destroyed thousands of His ancient people, because they looked into His Ark; Yet, such is the petulancy of some latter Wits, that they must needs look in to His unsearchable bosom, and there marishall all His Decrees, and conceit they understand His way of working; and thus in disputing of objects, infinitely removed by their obstruseness from their sense, they show themselves more ridiculous, than these who would dispute concerning the qualities of an object, before it come so near, as that they may know of what species it is: for seeing it is a maxim, that there is nothing in our understanding, which hath not past to it thorough our senses, and that the things of God are immaterial, and so fall not under the cognizance of our senses; It must be folly to think, that any humane scrutiny can find out mysteries that are so unsearchable, except they be imparted to them by immediate revelation; a kind of correspondence which I concieve few now a days holds with heaven. Yet, I confess, it is as hard to confute their fictions, as it is impossible for them to come by the knowledge of them. But as this study is unattainable, so it is unprofitable for seeing God's art of governing the world, and His Decrees of saveing or damning its Citizens is a trade we shall never be able to practise, Why should we have such an itch to understand it? It should be enough to us, to be saved, albeit we know not how, or by what manner of Decrees; except we be of the same metal with that foolish patient, who would not be cured, because the Physician would not show him how the cure was to be composed, and what were its ingredients. And is it not the Zenith and top-branch of madness for us to pry into Gods unsearchable Decrees, who know not how our neighbour's calf is form in its Dame's belly?  
It was a narrow Omnipotency, which some mean spirited Heathens allowed their jupiter, when they conceited that he wanted leisure to dispose of trifles.  Non licet exiguis rebus adesse Jovi. 
For if the twinkling of an eye, were not time sufficient for God to dispose upon all the affairs of this world, than there might be a greater power than His; and the power to dispose so suddenly, were wanting to his Omnipotency, and so He were not infinite, and consequently no God.  
Neither was the Rodomontade of Alphonsus, King of Portugal, more pious than this; when he alleged that if God had made use of His advice in framing the world, He had helped many things in it, which he now could justly tax of error.  
These two extremes, are the two Poles, whereon the globe of Atheism turns itself; some, out of an impious humility, complementing God out of His Authority, by denying that He disposes of the meaner size of business, and others detracting from His providence, in attributing His operations to chance and fate, or branding them with injustice or imprudence.  
There are among Schoolmen two opinions which dispute victory with (almost) equal forces. The one whereof, will have God the sole agent, and to make use of secundary causes, only, as of cyphers, these say that it is not fire which burns, but that God burns ad praesentiam ignis; nor water which cools, but that God cools ad praesentiam aquae: which is, in my opinion, the same thing as to say, that God juggled with man; and as Charmers do, presented ingredients, but wrought by hid means.  
In too near an affinity with this, is the Doctrine of Predestination as some teach it, wherein they will have man to play the mere spectator in his own Salvation: and albeit there be a free and full tender of mercy made to lost man, yet will not allow him any power to embrace or reject it; judging this one of the necessary appanages of God's Omnipotency, that He doth save or condemn ex mero beneplacito, never considering, that the question is not, what God can do, but what He doth: And that it derogats nothing from His Omnipotency, that He will not damn poor sinners, who according to their Doctrine cannot be blamed for their obstinacy; because it was never free to them to do otherwise: and how (I pray you) could the sluggard in the parable, have been punished, for not improving his talon, and laying it up in a napkin, i● God had by His Decree cast an insolvable knot upon that napkin, wherein it was laid up?  
The other opinion, will have secundary causes the sole agents; and teaches, that God in the first moulding of each creature, did dote it with innate qualities, sufficient to act every thing requisite for its subsistence; but in sign of its subjection to its Maker, reserved to Himself, as His prerogative royal, a power to bend and bow these inclinations upon extraordinary occasions, for the good of the Universe, or when His infallible Omni-prudence should think expedient. Thus, when that Alleyeing eye of the world, the Sun, was first turned off the frame, it had in Commission to sow its influences over the world without any retardment; Yet was its motion arrested, and turned back by an extraordinar warrant in the days of joshua and Zedekiah. Thus they make the creatures resemble a Watch, which after it is once completed, goes by its own Springs and Wheels, without the Artist's continual assistance. Yet, when either its motion becomes irregular, or when the owner finds it fit, it is unpeeced, or hath its Index put forward or backward at his pleasure. And this last, seems to suit best with the principles, both of Christianity and Stoicism. With Christianity, because it gives a check to presumption, and suffers not man to think himself the sole arbiter of his own condition; because God can easily quash these babylon-like fancies, which his topless ambition is still a building; and to his despair, because a lift from the strong arm of Providence, may heave him up above all his difficulties.  
This corresponds best likeways with Stoicism, because it pulls the hands of a sluggard from his bosom and sets them a-work to prepare for himself, and not to repose his unreasonable hopes upon divine Providence; which only keeps these from sinking, who endeavour to swim. This likeways takes from man, all excuse of sinning, not suffering him to lay over his viciousness upon Providence, a shift too ordinar amongst such, as misunderstand the tashless Doctrine of the reformed Churches.  
This opinion makes us likeways understand, what the Heathens meant by fortune, which they termed giddy; what the Stoics meant by fate, which they confessed to be irresistible; and in what sense Philosophers concluded, that each man could hammer out his own fortune. As to the Pagan's fortune, it cannot be thought, that seeing it was by themselves confessed to be blind, that they could trust it with the reins of the admirably managed world. And seeing they confessed, that it was always stagering and unconstant, it cannot be thought that they could ascrive to it, all these curious and just events, which they themselves admired hourly. Wherefore it is probable, that the Philosophers, having through the prospect of nature, and by an uninterrupted experience, observed, that man (who acted from a freedom of spirit unrestrained, either by providence or starr-influences as to his ordinar operations) was of a volatile and capricious humour; therefore they concluded, that the state of humane affairs, which was framed and unframed at his ill-fixt pleasure, behoved necessarily to be most subject to changes. And that seeing the victories of Cesar, depended upon the inclinations of his soldiers, who by abandoning him, would fetch his prosperity away with them: they had reason therefore to term his fortune Frail and exposed to hazard.  
Thus the advancement of the restless Courtier is uncertain, because it hangs from the humour of his Prince, whose spirit hath some allay of unconstancy, as well as hath that of the fearful subject, who trembles under his Sceptre. And thus the oyl-consuming Student, can promise himself no applause, because the paralytic hand of the multitudes fancies, holds the scales wherein his abilities are weighed.  
In fine, fortune was nothing to these Ancients, but the unbodyed freedom of man's will, considered abstractly from all particular persons and the innate qualities of all other creatures, (which, because they are mortal, must therefore be changeable) than which nothing is more inconstant, nothing more blind.  
The other branch of divine Providence, which consists in the supreme Authority, whereby God makes all humane inclinations run sometime against the bias of their specific nature, was by them termed fate. And this in their mythology they fabled to be an Adamant chain, which they fastened to the foot of Jupiter's chair, meaning by its adamantine nature, that it was hard to be broke like the Adamant; and by fastening it to Jupiter's chair, that it was the product of the Almighty's power. Thus fortune and fate, were to them but the right and left hands of christian providence.  
These embodied angels, the Stoics, finding that fortune's megrim could not be cured, nor fates decrees rescinded, and yet resolving, in spite of all external accidents, to secure to themselves a calmness of spirit; did place their happiness in the contempt of all these follies, whose blossoms fortune could not blast, and sought for happiness in an acquiescence to all which providence did unalterably decree; So that neither fortune nor fate could stand in the way of their happiness, because they slighted the one, and submitted to the other.  
And in this sense, each man in their schools, was admitted to be Master-of-work to his own fortune: and that without disparaging the omnipotent power of the great Fortune-maker, in submission to whom their happiness was placed.  
Albeit the knowledge and acknowledgement of a God, be the basis of true Stoicism, and a firmer one than any the Heathens could pretend to; Yet, that knowledge of Him, which by the curiosity of Schoolmen and the bigotrie of Tub-preachers, as now form in a Body of Divinity, is of all others the least necessary and the most dangerous. And whereas we did see God but in a Glass formerly, that Glass is now so misted and soiled by each Pedant's phlegmatic breath, that it is hard to see Him at all, but impossible to see Him there. And to extend a little that mysterious analogy; we are said to behold God here, as in a Glass, and as objects are best percieved in the smoothest mirrors; So the plainest descriptions of Him, are still the truest: for when He is seen by Atheists in the globe-glass of their infidelity, He appears less than really He is, when beheld by the Pagans in the multiplying Glass of Paganism, He appears many; and when He is looked upon in the magnifying Glass of Superstition, though He appear but one, Yet He is misrepresented, because He is represented, as more terrible than He desires to appear: and ordinarily the better cut Glasses are, and the more artificial, the worse the face is by them represented.  
That first Curse which did sow 
Theology.  all the world with briers and thorns, did, of all other things, fall most heavily upon the soul of man. Which because it was chief in the transgression, aught in reason to have been most tortured in the punishment. And now his disquieted spirit, is daily pierced with the prickles of thorny disputes and debates: which, as like briers, they produce no fruit fit for alimenting that noble half of man, which is his rational soul; So do they, like thorns, pierce his tender conscience, and to screw his torments to their highest pin; the thoughts of God, and of settlment in Him, which like balm should cure these sores, is become that hemlock, which occasions his distractions, and poisons his meditations. For, albeit the Heroes of the primitive Church, did give milk in abundance to Infant-christians; Yet, many of their successors, have mixed it so with the tart vinegar of contention, that that milk begins now to crudle, and so is become loathsome to the appetite of tender believers. For, most of Churchmen, being idle, and concieving, that if they taught only the holy Scriptures, their vocation might by Laics be undervalved as easy; and that they would be denied that applause, which was due to quaintness of wit, especially in a settled Church, wherein Churchmen could not draw reverence from the people, by Oracles, as did the heathen Priests; nor by prophecies and miracles, as did the Servants of the most High, under the old and new Testaments. Did therefore, according to their private inclinations, frame each to himself a new kind of Divinity. The more pragmatic sort, and these whose humour was edged with choler, invented polemic or controverted divinity. And so by an intestine and civil war of opinions▪ raised within the bowels of Religion; did waste and pillage that holy Canaan, which formerly slowed with the milk of sincere Doctrine, and the honey of divine Consolations. And then, that precious blood, which formerly purpled only pagan-scaffolds, died now the swords of fellow-believers: who, to propagate their private judgement, buried Churches under their rubbish, fed the birds of heaven with the carcases of pious and reverend Churchmen; and by the mad hands of bigott opiniastrity, broke to pieces all the sacred bonds of natural and civil duties: and thus they raised the devil of contention, whom they could not lay again; and made this Itch of disputing, turn the Scab of the Church.  
Others again, in whose brains sullen melancholy, formed phantomes and ideas, invented scolastick Theology; and these, in abstract cells, erected a Mint-house for coining the dross of their own contemplations, into wonderful bombast notions: and to make them go current, in the suffering Church, gave them the impressa of Theology.  
A third sort, not able to soar their pitch in the sky of Invention, resolved to set up a correspondence with heaven: and this they called enthusiastic, or inspired, Theology. And their Cabins were Post-houses, where one might know what was resolved lately in the conclave of heaven, whether the King or Parliament was to wear the Laurels, and what should be the issue of our pious rebellions. These could likewise cast the horoscope of your salvation; and invented a species of Physiognomy, whereby they could tell if the marks of Grace dwelled upon a face, and if one had the traicts of an elect child of God. After this fashion did they prophesy their own fancies, and call that Providence only which made for them.  
There wants not some likeways, who, out of a well meaning desire, to make the lamp of truth dart its rays with the clearer splendour, snuff it so nearly, that they extinguish it quit: and leavs us nothing but the stink of its snuff; like some curious Physicians, who purge so frequently, that they destroy the body entrusted to their cure. We in this Island have met with some of these Charletans, who, I am confident, purged oftener both Church and State, than Luke, the beloved physician, would have prescrived, if we had had the good fortune to have been his Patients.  
The talest wit is not able to reach heaven, albeit (I know) many disjoint their wits in stretching them too high in the inquiry of its mysteries. Neither impute I our short-coming in the knowledge of these mysteries, solly to their obstrusness; but, I believe, our meditations are more clouded in relation to these, then really they need to be, because of their innate frailty: for we see, that some who are masters of much reason in things humane, betray much folly in their devotions: wherefore▪ I am induced to believe, that it fares with the soul in this, as usually it doth with the body, whose pulls are proportionally the weaker, as the thing grasp'd-after is placed above its true reach. And so these arrogant Pretenders pull but faintly, because they raise their meditations too high on their tiptoes: whereby they are disabled from employing all their natural vigour, in pulling at these weighty and sublime Truths, which they catch, not by that corner which is nearest, as meanner wits do, (and so are more successful) but endeavour a fetch at what in Divinity is highest, by which effort, their endeavours are fainter, than these whose spirit is of a lesser size. And these colossus wits, become the greatest Heretics, as these ordinarily are most burnt, whose fingers oftest stir up fires, and as Chirurgeons have more cuts and wounds, than any other Mechanics, who handle not so oft these wounding tools. It is not fit that mortal man should wrestle too much with these mysteries, lest his reason, like jacob, be forced to come off, halting.  
Nothing hath more busied my thoughts, then to find a reason why the Heathens, who were as assiduous and zealous too in the worship of their gods, as we Christians, did never frequent Sermons, nor knew no such part of divine Service; whereof (probably) the reason was because their Governors (whose commands amongst them were the sole jure-divinoship of all Ecclesiastic Rites) feared, that Churchmen, if they had been licenc'd to harangue to the people, would have influenced too much that gross body: which was the reason likeways, why in the primitive Church (as one of their Historians observes) ex formula populo praedicabant, tantum antiquitas timebat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉. They preached only approved Sermons, so much did antiquity fear these leaders of the people, a practice, as is reported, lately renewed by the Duke of Russia: and this seemeth also to have been the reason, why all Liturgies have pricked texts for their Preachers, lest if they had been left a freedom in their choice, they had chose such as might, in the letter, have suited best with such seditious Libels as are now obtruded upon the people, in lieu of pious homilies, at remarkable or festival occasions. Yet, I think, that our late Doctors, who can find all Doctrine in any text, would easily have eluded that canonic design. If we should parallel the homilies, which these renowned Fathers have left, as Legacies, to posterity, with these which our age runs after, we would find, that the first were pointed lessons of mortification; which, like Moses rod, could draw gushes of tears from the rocky hearts of the most obdured sinners; whereas many of these last are but State-gazets, wherein the people are informed, what are the resolves of the civil Magistrate: And whereas their first institution made them Ambassadors of glad-tydings betwixt God and His people, they have made themselves Heralds, to denounce wars betwixt God's Vicegerent and His subjects. Thus, Peter's successors will oft times, like himself, rather draw the sword then watch for their Master. And since our Saviour hath disarmed them, as He did Peter, and filled their hands with the keys, these who offend them are sure to get over the head with these. I confess, God hath not left His Church without some skilful Pilots, to lead in His servants, with security, to the harbour of Salvation: to whom this Discourse and its Author shall pay all respects.  
Most of all Churches do, like coy 
The strictness of Churches.  maids, lace their bodies so straight, that they bring on them a consumption; and will have the gates of heaven to have been only made for themselves: and as this nigardliness hath possessed Churches, so from that root hath stemmed the churlishness of some private Christians, who will allow God but a most inconsiderable number of these whom He hath admitted to make up His visible Church. Thus, some Pastors will only admit two or three to be guests at the Lord's Table, allowing no wedding garment, but what is of their own spinning: and others, with their uncharitable hands, blut the names of all their acquaintances out of the Books of Life, as if they were keepers of His Registers and Rolls; and will only have seats kept in the Church, triumphant, for three or four Sisters, who are so srugal of their devotions, as to spare them at home, to the end, they may be liberal in public. But both these should consider, that the new jerusalem is said to have more gates than one; that john in his Revelation tells us, that numberless numbers were seen following the Lamb; and that it is not probable, that the wise Framer of the world made such a spacious dwelling as heaven, to be inhabited by so inconsiderable a number: whereas hell (in the geography of believed tradition) is only the small kernel of this small shell the earth. I know, that many are called and few chosen; and that the way is straight, and few enter in at it: But we should consider, that these chosen, are said to be few, in respect only of these many who are called. Which is most certain; for ten Parts of eleven are Pagans or Mahumetans, (and all are called) of that eleunth part, many are malicious Heretics; and amongst the residue many are flagitious and public sinners; So that albeit the greatest part of the regular members of the visible Church were saved, Yet the number would be small in comparison of these others: The body of the visible Church, must (like all other bodies) be compounded of contrary elements. And albeit I am not of opinion, that this body should be suffered to swell with humours, yet I would not wish, that it should be macerated with purgations. It's nails (though but excrementitious parts) should not be so nearly paired, as that the body may bleed; yet, they should be so pared, as that christians may not scratch one another. They should feed, not upon blood, but milk: and they are unmannerly guests, who will not suffer others to sit at their Master's table with them.  
It pleases my humour to contemplate, how, that albeit all Religion's war against one another; yet, are all of them governed by the same principles, and even by these principles, in effect, which they seem to abominat. Thus, albeit the cessation of miracles be cried down by many, yet, do the most bigot relate, what miracles have been wrought by the founders of their Hierarchies, and what prophesies they have oraculously pronounced. And seeing all confess, that God, in our days, breaks the prosperous upon the same Wheel, on whose top they did but lately triumph; making fortune adopt the oppressed in their vice; why should we talk so much of the ceasing of miracles? For, doubtless, these effects are in policy, as contrair to nature, as are the swimming of iron, or sweetening of rivers; or rather more: Seing in the first, man's will is forced (without which, such revolutions could not be effectuated) whereas in the last, dull and sensual qualities are only wrested: which, as they are not so excellent, so, doubtless, are not able to make such resistance as the Soul of man: Yea, I should rather think, that the world being become old, must, doubtless, be more dim-sighted (as all old things are) then formerly; and therefore, God doth now present greater objects of admiration to our eyes then He did formerly: For, man is become so atheistical, that if God did not press His meditations with such infallible testimonies of the being of an irresistible power, he would, doubtless, shake of all resolutions of submitting. Thus, we see that in all the tract of John's Revelations, miracles grow still more frequent, the nearer the world draweth to its grave; and, like all other bodies, the weaker it becomes, the more subject it is to all alterations, and the less is nature able to resist. And it would appear, that if miracles were requisite at first, for the establishment of Religion, even when no older Religion was to cede to it, and to make an exit at its entry; much more, should miracles be necessary, for fixing any Religion against the received constitutions of a previously settled Church. But to prosecute my first design, it is remarkable, that albeit infallibility be not by all, conceded to any militant Church; yet, it is assumed by all: Neither is there any Church under the Sun, which would not fix the name of heretic, and account him (almost) reprobat, who would refuse to acknowledge the least rational of their Principles: and thus these Churchmen pull up the ladders from the reach of others, after they have by them scaled the walls of preferment themselves. That Churchmen should immerse themselves in things civil, is thought eccentric to their sphere, even in ordine ad spiritualia: And yet, even the Capuchins, who are the greatest pretenders to abstract Christianity and Mortification, do, of all others, dipth most in things civil. The fanatics inveigh against Presbyterian Gowns. The Presbyterian tears the Episcopal lawn Sleeves, and thinks them the whore of Babel's shirt. The Episcopist slouts at the popish Robes, as the livery of the beast. The Antinomian emancipats his disciples from all obedience to the Law. The Protestant enjoin good works, and such are commanded, but place no merit in them. The Roman-catholic thinks he merits in his obedience. The Fanatic belieus the Lords Supper but a ceremony, though taken with very little outward respect. The Presbyterian allows it, but will not kneel. The Episcopist knelt, but will not adore it. The Catholic mixeth adoration with his kneeling. And thus, most of all Religions are made up of the same elements, albeit their asymbolick qualities predomine in some more than in others. And if that maxim hold, that majus & minus non variant speciem, we may pronounce all of them to be one Religion.  
The Church, like the river Nilus, can hardly condescend where its head lies; and as all condescend that the Church is a multitude of christians, so join all their opinions, and you shall find that they will have it to have, like the multitude, many heads. But in this (as in all Articles, not absolutely necessary for being saved) I make the Laws of my country to be my Creed: and that a clear decision herein is not absolutely necessary for Salvation, is clear from this, that many poor Clowns shall be saved, whose conscience is not able to teach their judgements how to decide this controversy, wherein so many heads have been confounded, so many have been lost, and so many have been shrewdly knocked against one another; from which flinty collisions, much fire, but little light, hath ever burst forth.  
God, by His Omniscience, foreseeing, that it was too dazleing a sight for the purblind eyes of man's soul, to behold Him environed with the rays of divine Majesty, did bestow upon us, three mirrors, wherein we might contemplate Him (as we use to look upon the Sun in a tub of water, not daring eye His native splendour) the one was the mirror of the Law, the second is the works of the Creation, and the third is the Soul of man, which He Himself hath told us is framed after His own glorious Image.  
As for the first mirror, the Law; God knowing that instinct, or as we term it, a natural conscience, were complete digests of all that man was to observe▪ He did make that mirror very little, a volume of only two pages; but that mirror is, of late, so mullered about, by marginal Notes and Commentars', that the mirror itself is almost overspread by them; and it is very observable, that in the holy Registers, the Law is still abridged, but we never see it enlarged: For, albeit the fundamental Laws of both Tables were packed up in narrow bounds, yet our Saviour sums them in these two, fear the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and, love thy neighbour as thyself. And the Apostle Paul, in his divine Epistles, professes, that he desires to know only Christ, and Him crucified: So, that I am confident, that if our Saviour were to preach in person, once more to the world, He would inveigh against our Casuists, as much as He did against the Jewish Talmudists; for, the one as well as the other, are equally guilty of burdening the shoulders of weak christians, with the unnecessary trash of humane inventions. For, I remember to have seen a late Casuist, dispute contentiously amongst his other cases, whither Tobacco, taken in the morning, did break a commanded fast or not? To which, after a feverish conflict, his wisdom, forsooth, returns this oraculous answer; That if Tobacco be taken at the nose, it breaks not the fast, but if it be taken at the mouth, than it breaks the fast. Which, because I made a Collasterion betwixt the Casuists and the Talmudists, I shall only mention out of the Talmude (which was the jews comment upon the Law) a case, exactly parallel to this: wherein is decided, that if a man carry a burden on the Sabbath day, upon both his shoulders, than he is guilty of breach of Sabbath, but that he is not guilty if he carry it upon one shoulder. As to my own private judgement, (which I submit to my spiritual tutors) I think, that seeing the conscience of man, is the same faculty with the judgement when conversant about spiritual employments (as the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which imports a knowledge reflexive upon a man's own self, doth abundantly evidence) that therefore, as there are judgements of different tempers; So there are likewise consciences of different frames: and which vary as much amongst themselves, as natural constitutions do. And therefore, as the same Dose would prove noxious to one constitution, wherein another would find his health; So in one and the same act, that resolution may be saving to one conscience, which may condemn another: for, seeing God hath kindled a torch in each man's breast, by whose flame he may see what path he should beat. In which sense it is said, Prov. 20. 27. That the understanding of man is the candle of the Lord; and can that light misled? And seeing man must be answerable according to what it prescrives to him, doubtless it is fitter that he should hearken to the reiterated dictates of his conscience, than to the resolution of any School-casuist: and that for the same reason, that it is more rational to obey the Law itself, than the wisest Lawyer, who may either be deceived himself, or have a design to deceive others. For if God hath endued man with every thing necessary for working out the work of his own Salvation, with fear and trembling, He hath doubtless bestowed upon him an internal touchstone, by whose test he may discern betwixt good and evil; seeing to command man to walk uprightly, and not to bestow on him eyes to see the road, were to command a blind man to walk, and to punish him if he went astray. And as the composure of man's body, would be imperfect and manck, if he wanted a palate to discern betwixt the taste of what is wholesome, or what is putrid; So if the soul of man were not able to know its own duty, and by the palate of a natural conscience, to difference betwixt lawful and unlawful: certainly the soul might be thought to be but ill appointed. Thus, beasts are by an intrinsic principle taught their duty, and do accordingly shun or follow what is convenient for them, without consulting any thing from without. And shall man be less perspicacious, or more defective than these? As also seeing man is oftimes by thousands of occasions, removed far from the assistance of Chair or Pulpit-informers; and in that his retiredness, hath most of these cases to be resolved: it were absurd to think that he than wants sufficiency of help for their resolution. And it is most observable in Scripture, that men are oft checked for quenching the Spirit, but never for not consulting Casuists. I know it may be thought, that when the soul of man rages at sometime in a fever of lust, revenge, or some such sin, that then the conscience may rave; Yet I dare say, that albeit the soul, out of an inordinate desire to enjoy its own pleasures, may set its invention a work, to palliate the sinfulness of what it desires; yet by some secret knell, the conscience sounds still its reproof. And I dare say, that never man erred without a check from his conscience; nor that ever any sinned, after an approbation obtained from his conscience of what he was about: and when we assent to these Doctors, is it not because our consciences, or our judgements (which are the same) assent, to what they inform? which evidences, that our consciences are more to be believed, than they, by that rule, Propter quod unumquodque est tale, etc. but to convince us of the folly of our addresses to these Doctors. It may, and often doth fall out, that that may be a sin in me, which a Casuist pronounces to be none, as if my breast did suggest to me, that it were a sin to buy Church-lands; if thereafter I did buy them, it were doubtless a sin, albeit my Doctors, following the Canons of their particular Church, assured me, that the sale of Church-lands were no sin in itself. I am confident then, that this Casuist divinity, hath taken its rise from the desire Churchmen had to know the mystery of each man's breast, and to the end, nothing of import, might be undertaken without consulting their Cell; persuading men, that in ordine ad spiritualia, their consciences, and consequently their Salvation, may be interested in every civil affair. And to confirm this, it is most observable, that this trade is most used by jesuits and Innovators, who desire to know all intrigues and subvert all States, whereas the primitive Church knew no such Divinity, neither hath its Doctors left any such Volumes.  
It may be urged, that seeing the conscience is but a reflex act of the judgement, that as the judgement is an unsure guide, the conscience cannot pretend to be infallible; and that the one, as well as the other, is tutored by the fallacious principles of sense and custom: And I myself have seen my Landslady, in France, as much troubled in conscience for giving us flesh to eat in Lent, as if she had cast out the flesh of a christian to be devoured by dogs; and so Atheism may attribute to custom, these inclinations whereby we are acted-on to believe a Deity; and may tell us, that the mahometans find themselves as much pricked in conscience, for transgressing their Prophet's canons, as we for offending against the moral Law. And thus the adoring of a Deity might have at first been brooded in the councilchamber of a Statesman's head, and yet might have been, at that time by the vulgar, and thereafter by the wisest pates, worshipped with profound respects: Yet, if we pry narrowly into this conceit, we shall find in it something of instinct previous to all forgeries possible. For, what was it (I pray you) which encouraged, or suggested to these Politicians, that such a thing as the Deity might be dissembled to their people for their imposing that cheat, presupposed some pre-existing notion of it? Or, how entered that fancy first in their wild heads? Or, how could so many contemporary, and yet far distant, Legislators, fall upon the same thoughts, especially, it being so remote from sense; and for framing of which idea, their experience could never furnish a pattern? Conscience then must be something else than the fumes of melancholy, or, capriccios' of fancy; for else, roaring Gallants, who are little troubled, or can easily conquer all other fancies, would not be so haunted by these pricking pangs; which if they were not infallibly divine, behoved to be merely ridiculous, and to want all support from reason or experience.  
There is another file of cases of conscience, which is a Cadet of that same family; and these are such cases as were the brood of these late times, which, like Infects and unclean creatures, may be said generari ex putri materiâ: an instance whereof, was that famous Sister, who asked if she was obliged to execute her cat for killing a mouse upon the Sabbath. This was a Theology, taught by old dotting Wives, and studied by State-expectants, who, to gain applause, and in hope to mount Preferment's Saddle, made use of this gilded stirrup. I shall not inveigh against this foppery, seeing it hath not possessed men's conceit so long, as to have prescrived the tittle of Divinity; but, like a meteor, which, because it is fixed to no Orb, and is but a mass of inflamed vapours, doth therefore disappear immediately, how soon its substance flashes out; and its ashes are now entombed in the same clay with its brother twain, that pious Nonsense, wherein God Almighty was treated with in familiar and not in superior.  
As God did light the candle of a 
The Scrip tures.  private conscience, in each private breast; So hath He hung up the lamp of the Scriptures, in the body of His Church; and these we may call the conscience of the Church, whilst triumphant. Which some, by the breath of their vanity, and storms of their passion, endeavour to blow out, whilst others, make no other use of its Light, then to show them where to find a jest. And within the arms of this division, lie folded, all the profane race of mankind. As to these first (who should be first, because they are Satan's firstborn, and so deserve a double portion of this reproof) they contend, that the Scriptures are written in a mean and low stile; are in some places too mysterious, in others too obscure; contain many things ineredible, many repetitions, and many contradictions. But these miscreants should consider, that much of the Scriptures native splendour is impaired by its Translators, who, fearing to fall within the verge of the curse pronounced against such as should pair from, or add to, any thing contained in that divine Book, were, and are willing, that their Translation should want rather the lustre, then meaning of the Original. As also of all Tongues, I believe the Hebrew admits lest of a Translation; especially into northern Languages: for as these Nations differ least in their expressions, who, because of their commerce or contiguity, have the most frequent converse. So doubtless▪ the jews and we, by this Rule, should in language hold the least correspondence. And because there is no pure fountain of this Tongue left, besides the Bible, it must be hard to understand its expressions, wherein the Translators can find little or no help from the variety and collation of Authors. And seeing this Book was penned indifferently, for all Ages, Nations and Sexes, it was sit that its stile should have been condescending: for these who are tall, can pull the fruit which hangs low, whereas these who are low, cannot pull what pearches high. And it is very observable, that where the fruit is greatest and ripest, there the branch whereon it hangs, bows lowest. When God appeared to Elijah, Kings 19 there came first a terrible wind, thereafter a great earthquake, and then fire; and yet God was in none of these, but spoke in the shrill small voice. His divine Providence hath so ordered it, that our conviction cannot be ascribed to the fared of Eloquence nor slight of Logic, but merely to the truth of what is therein represented: our Saviour, will with clay and spittle, illuminate our eyes, as He did these of the other blind man in the Gospel. And such is the strength of His divine Arm, that He can vanquish Satan, misbelief and ignorance with any weapon. And as we think the Sun's circumference but little, because it is situated so far above us; So we conclude these truths and excellencies but mean, because they are placed above our frail reach, and will blame the Scriptures, when the fault lurks in ourselves, that great Physician will cure us, like an artist, with simples, specific for our disease, and not like a Charletan, with perfumed and gilded nothings. It is not always the best metal, which carries the pleasing impressa; nor doth the painted candle cast the clearest light. There are many things in Scripture, which because of our frailty, appear (like a staff in the waters) to be crooked, albeit they be straight. Why Abraham should have killed his son Isaac; or the Israelites have borrowed and not restored the egyptian Earrings, staggers not my belief: for these belonged to God, and neither to Abraham, nor the Egyptians: and so God might have given order to any He pleased to receive them: and these who obeyed, were no more guilty, than such are, who by order from the Master, receive what he did formerly lend to others. And as to its repetitions▪ they differ, no doubt, from one another; albeit we (who think all things removed, though by a little distance from us, of one shape) judge ill, in judging otherways. And as an excellent person hath well observed, God hath appointed these reiterated expressions, to be as so many witnesses, to convince Heretics and others, who should call the meaning of any one place in question, or wrest it by what precedes or follows it.  
As to these others, in whom the wine of God's consolations, (by being wound in the cracked vessels of their heads) turns into the tart vinegar of profane Satyrs, I condole their condition: for, that stomach must be very corrupt, wherein the best of aliment putrifies most; and probably, that indigested milk, being converted in excrementitious bile and humours, may cast them in a fever which shall never cool to all eternity. I pity likeways these, who, out of an in-advertent (and as they think, sinless) humour, jest with these divine truths; like foolish children, who love rather to sport with their meat then eat it. These, albeit they intent not to profane Scripture, yet, they vilify it: And we may say of the Bible as of taking of God's name in our mouths, which must not only, not be done upon design, to blaspheme and diffame Him; but must not be taken but upon necessity, and, like the Shewbread, must be used only when we are in straits. I have been too guilty of this last sin myself; and therefore, lest I should make no atonement, I have rather resolved to appear before the world, in the dust and sackcloth of this silly Discourse, a Penance, really, to me very great.  
When I consider how various and innumerable are the actions of men, and that in all these, they need particular instructions from above the Poles, I admire why there are so many passages in Scripture, from which our necessity may expect no assistance. And therefore, lest I should think, that in Scripture there is any waste of words, I am induced to believe, that there run 〈…〉 allegory in that holy Book from Genesis to John's Revelation, and that it's mystical sense is that which deserves the name of God's Word. Might we not have admired why the Story of Hagar and her bastard is there voluminously descrived, and what the Church or private Devotion was concerned therein, if Paul, Gal. 4. 24. had not discovered the mystery to us? By which things, another thing is meant: For, these two mothers are the two Testaments, the one which is Agar, of mount Sinai, which gendereth into bondage, etc. I might here relate many excellent allusions to prove this, but I shall satisfy myself with one which I did read in one Doctor Ever●t; who, preaching upon joshua, 15. 16. Then Caleb said, he who smiteth Kirjath-sepher and taketh it, even to him will I give Achsah my daughter to wife. And Othniel took it, etc. saith, that Caleb signifies a good heart, Kirjath-sepher the city of the Letter, Achsah the Vision, Othniel God's opportunity. And so the mystical sense runs, a good heart saith, that whoever will take in (and smite, as Moses did the rock) the Letter of the word, shall have the vision which lurks under it discovered and given to him. And God's own time is the only mean for accomplishing this: As also, it is most remarkable, that that City which was called Cirjath-sepher before it was taken in, or, the city of the Letter, was, after it was conquered, called Debi●, which signifies an oracle; so that the Word or Letter is no oracle, till it be once, as it were, taken in and overcome. Since the reading of which Sermon, I believe that one may profit more by an hebrew Lexicon, then by a thousand English Lectures.  
These who detract from Scripture, by attributing the production of miracles, to natural causes, do not much disparage the power of God, but (though against their depraved intention) cry rather up his omnipotency: For certainly, if these miracles were produced by secondary causes, then doubtless, that productive faculty was bestowed upon them by the Almighty; and if he can make the creatures produce such strange effects, much more is he able to effectuate them himself; as it is more difficult, for a great Master, to form curious and admirable Characters when he leads a scholars hand, then when he writes them with his own; for, such help may be called resisting assistance. I cannot likewise but blame many of our Preachers, who rather break then open holy Texts; and rather make new meanings, suiting with their private designs, then tell the meaning of the Spirit. Who would not have laughed to hear a Presbyterian observe, from the first chapter of Genesis, first verse, that whilst Moses relates what God made, he speaks nothing of Bishops; by which it was evident (said Don Quixot's Chaplain) that Bishops were not of divine Institution: a conceit as ridiculous as that of a Priest, who hearing Maria spoken of for to signify Seas, did brag that he had found the Virgin Mary named in the old Testament. Albeit I think preaching no part of divine Worship, hearing being no adoration; yet, love I to go to Church, were it but to see a multitude met together, to confess that there is a God: But, when I go to hear I care not whom, knowing that Christ elected Fishermen to preach down infidelity, when it was in the ●uff of its pride: and that Paul (the most signal Trophy of our christian Faith) was sent for confirmation, not to Peter or james at jerusalem, but to Ananias, one of the meanest amongst the Disciples. And seeing our Salvation, by preaching, is a miracle; it is still so much the greater by how much weaker the instruments are. When the Pulpit was a mount Sinai, from which the Law was thundered, or a mount of O lives, whereon our Saviour's glorious transformation was to be seen, then were Sermons to be honoured; but, since it is become a mount Calvar, whereon our blessed Saviour suffers daily, by scandalous rail, Sermons are now become unfavoury for the most part. I hate to see that divine place made either a Bar, whereat secular quarrels are, with passion, pleaded; or a Stage, whereon revenge is, by Satyrs, satisfied; or, a School-chair, from which un-intelligible questions are mysteriously debated; but amongst all these innovations, introduced by our infant Divines. I hate none more than that of giving reasons for proving the Doctrine, which being Scripture itself, can be proven by nothing that is more certain. As for instance, when the Doctrine is, that God loved us freely, how can this be proven more convincingly then thus, my Text says it: and that is idem p●r idem, a most unlogical kind of probation. When I then go to Church, I should love to spend my time in praises and prayers; which as they are the only parts of adoration, so are they the natural employments of the Church, either Militant or Triumphant: Yet, it displeases me to hear our young Pulpitires skrich and cry, like Baal's Priests, as if God were no nearer them than the visible Heavens.  
It honours much our employment, 
The moral Law.  that God Almighty was the first and great Lawgiver; and that our blessed Saviour styles himself our Advocate. And it is an amazing wonder that we are tied only by ten Laws; whereof seven were enacted doubtless for our advantage and respect, more immediately the security of the creature than the honour of the Creator, and are such restraints as men behoved to have laid upon one another, and which nature lays upon us all. And albeit I laugh at the jewish Cabala, which says, that the moral Law was written, two thousand years before Moses, in black letters, at the back of a clear burning fire: Yet, can I not approve Tertullian's wit, who endeavours to find all these ten in the prohibition made to Adam. There are indeed some sins which scarce a consequence can bring within the verge of these Commandments. As for instance, Drunkenness: Yet, these are such as are so destructive to our nature, that there needs no Law be made against them. So that the Priest hit wittily, to whom that sin being confessed, enjoined as an Penance, their being drunk a second time; which makes me conclude, that if Drunkenness were to be ranged under any of these Laws, it would fall most naturally under that, Thou shalt not kill. Albeit the fourth Commandment seems to respect only the honour of God, and that the creature seems to be no ways bettered by it: Yet, our more serious observation will discover, that all belabouring creatures, as it were, expect an ease the seventh day more than any other. Whether it be, that nature is by custom framed to that expectation, I cannot tell: But, we see that God choiced that number to be the year of jubilee amongst his own people, and that it is the period of all the several consistencies in our life, infancy, puberty, etc. And for this reason Physicians observe, that the child born in the seventh month is stronger than that which is born in the eight; because in the seventh it is come to a knot, by passing whereof, in the eight it is in a state of imperfection: But, what the mystery of this holy Climaterick is, I refer till we come to that Sabbath of rest, whereat we ordinarily arrive, after seven times nine years hath snowed upon us.  
We may think, that if God had intended, that one and the same day of the week should have been appropriated to have been a Sabbath, He had designed each day by a special term, and had commanded, that a day of such a designation, should have been sequestrated for a Sabbath; and that by designing only the seventh day He did leave a liberty to employ any day of the seven for that use. Yet, it is remarkable, that Mosos nor the jewish Church durst not attempt the change of their new-years day; but that the Almighty was pleased to bestow a peculiar sanction upon that alteration: For, Exod. 12. 2. He commands, that the month wherein the Israelites came from Egypt, should be, by them, reputed the first month of their year. Wherefore, seeing each Nation chalks out a divers Sabbath, it would appear that there is something of humour in it as well as of Religion. The Venereous Mahometan chooseth Friday, or, dies Veneris; The dull jew dull Saturn's day; The warlike Parthians Tuesday, or, Mars-day; The cheery Europeans Sunday. And albeit the Christians are influenced only by inspiration; yet, I am confident, that the heathens did follow that for Religion, which suited best with their natural temper. But this is a meditation which should travel no where beyond a man's private breast, lest it meet with enmity and beget scandal.  
It would puzzle a heathen much to hear, that he who breaks one of these Laws, is guilty of the breach of all: But, it troubles not me, seeing all these Laws are made to show our obedience, and the breach of any one of them shows our contempt of Him who is the author of all. And it may be this was typified in Moses' breaking both Tables with one passionate fling, after he came down from the Mount: For, if this breaking of them had not been pre-designed for some hid end▪ doubtless he had been reproved for his negligence. However, we may from this learn the desperate nature of passion, which made Moses, who was the meekest man upon earth, break all the Laws of God in one act. It might be also argued, that seeing all the Laws of the second Table were enacted for, and respect ultimately, the advantage of man, that where man is not wronged, there the Law cannot be broke. And thus, if a married man should have liberty from his wife to take another woman, this could be no more reputed adultery, than it could be reputed theft to take what belongs to our neighbour, himself consenting; and that for this cause, Iacob's begetting children with his wife's maids, is not in Scripture reproved as adultery, because they were given to him by herself for that effect: but, seeing the practice of all the world condemns this conclusion, far be it from me to press it further.  
Albeit the judicial Law (which 
The judicial Law.  may be justly called the judicious Law) is commonly reputed to be but the municipal Law of the Jews; yet, seeing it was thundered from mount Sinai with so much pomp, and is engrossed in the Books of holy Truth, and seems nearlier related to reason then any other Law, I admire why it should not be religiously observed by all Nations: especially seeing, as it is, the exactest picture of Justice that ever was drawn, so it hath this of a picture in it, that it seems to look directly upon all who behold it, albeit they be placed (amongst themselves) in directly opposite, situations and stances. Thus this Law suits even with contrary tempers, and the unequal complexions of all Nations. I know that the ceremonial Law is likeways insert amongst the other holy Canons, and yet binds not us who live under the jurisdiction of the Gospel: But, the reason of this seems to be, because these did immediately concern the jewish Church, and were conversant about these holy things. And so, seeing the old Testament is a description of their Hierarchy, and of God's way of working in these times, I wonder not to see these ceremonies amidst other sacred truths, and yet not observed, seeing they are expressly abrogat. But, if the judicial Law, which respected not the Hierarchy of that Church, was obligatour only whilst the jewish State was in being, I admire why the Spirit of God took so much pains, first to pen it, and then to deliver it so Canon-like to posterity. And since it is a principle in Law and reason, that Laws must still stand in vigour till they be expressly abrogat, and must not be derogated from by consequences or presumptions, I admire why this Law, which God hath enervat by no express Text, should be now looked upon as Statutes nowise a-la-mode. It is true, that our Saviour, when the woman, convicted of adultery, was brought to Him, did not, according to that Law, pronounce the sentence of death against her; whence some think, that Churchmen, following their Master's example, should not give their suffrage in criminal cases, and have only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, a bloodless Jurisdiction; for, they are appointed to be Nurses, not Chirurgeons. But, it is as true, that our Saviour professed in all the tract of His life, that He came not to be a Judge in things temporal, and His design in that place was only to convince them of their own sins, and not to absolve her, not to abrogat the Law: and therefore He desired him who was freest from sin, to cast the first stone at her. And whereas it is conjectured, that these words which our Saviour stooped down to write in the clay, immediately thereafter was an abrogation of that Law; this is a Geomancy more wild than any lesson which is alleged to have been read in the mysterious face of Heaven, and should never be taught but in a Rabbis cabalastick Gown. And whereas it is alleged, that there are many precepts in that corpus juris, which respects only the humour of the Jews, I admire why that can be urged; for certainly, theft, murder, and these other crimes punished there, are the same crimes which reigns amongst us; and so why not punishable after that same manner? Neither are the humours of these Jews more different from ours, than was the genius of the Romans; and yet, few or no Nations refuse to cast their modern Laws in that antique mould. And it is very probable, that as God did, in the moral Law, teach man how to be just in his own actions, so He would likeways instruct him by a judicial Law, how to administrate Justice to others.  
What can perpetuate a Law more than that the Authority whereby it is enacted should be obligatory in all ages, and the reason whereon it is founded should be eternal? and in what Laws do these two qualities appear more, or so much, as in the judicial Laws of the Jews, where the eternal Lawgiver was Legislator, and the occasion, productive of them seemed rational (and necessary) to His infallible omniscience? and if in any of these statutes, our purblind judgements cannot see a present conveniency, we should rather impute that to our own simplicity, then charge it as a guilt upon His divine Statutes; and are there not many municipal Laws in each Country, which have no hedge about them to keep them untrampled upon by wanton and too curious wits? But, that excellent Maxim, Omnium quae fererunt Majores nostri, non est reddenda ratio, ne que certa sunt, incerta redderentur; a reason must not be rendered for all that our Ancestors have enacted, lest what is now certain, become then uncertain. Albeit a Law enacted only by humane Authority, seem unreasonable or inconvenient; yet, it retains its vigour till it be abrogat by the same, or a higher Authority, then that whereby it was first statuted; and the Law says, that nihil est tam naturale quam unumquodque eodem modo dissolvi quo colligatum est. And, seeing the moral and judicial Laws are twisted so together, and are oft incorporated in one statute, as Levit. 20. 10. Deut. 22. 22. where adultery is forbidden, and the adulterer is to die the death: how can we think the one half of this Law obligatory for ever, and yet neglect it's other half, wherein the punishment is specified, and which appears to have been the scope of the divine Lawgiver? For, the world needed not so much to have been acquainted, that adultery was a sin, as that that sin deserved death; and if we allow our capricious humour the liberty to reject what we think inconvenient, we may at last arrive at that pitch of licentiousness, as to abrogat, by our practice, whatever chokes our present humour.  
There are many things much mistaken in that Law, which makes the dissonancy betwixt it and our Law, appear so much the greater. As for instance, it is concluded, that by that Law, no theft was punishable by death; whereof this is given as a reason, because there is no proportion betwixt goods and life; and that all that a man hath he will give for his life, whereas this argument would prove, that no guilt but murder should be punished with death; and so this dart rather flees over then hits the mark at which it is levelled. And if this argument concluded, why should adultery have been punished with death by that Law, seeing there seems no proportion betwixt that guilt and death? For, if vita & fama be in Law equiparat, by that same Law, pecunia est alter sanguis. But, if there be no proportion betwixt goods and life, and if the punishment of theft; when it is aggraged to it's greatest height, cannot, in their opinion, reach so far as to be capital. Why was it, that by that Law nocturnal thiefs might have been killed by those who found them? Exod. 22. 2. For, it appears against reason, that more should be permitted to a private and passionate party, then to a disinterested Judge. And it is clear by 2 Sam. 12. 5▪ that theft was in some cases capital: For, there David vows, that he who took his neighbours one sheep, and spared his own many, should surely die; which being spoke by a just King to an excellent Prophet, and not reproved, must not be thought a flash of passion, but a well-founded sentence. Were not likeways two thiefs crucified by the Jews at the same time with our ever glorious Saviour? which must not be thought a romish execution, seeing the Law of the Romans allowed no such punishment for theft: I judge therefore, the reason why murder and adultery were punished with death, rather than all thefts, to have been, because theft may be repaired by restitution, but murder and adultery cannot. And albeit the judicial Law commands restitution only in the theft of an ox or sheep, (things of small moment, and which may be stolen to satisfy rather hunger than lust) yet, I see no limits set to Judges, commanding them not to inflict a capital punishment in extraordinary cases: For certainly, he who steals, may, for aught he himself knows, be about the committing of murder, seeing to steal what should aliment any poor one, is, in effect, the same thing as to murder him. It is much controverted, if this Law prohibits self-murder, and I think it doth: For, we are commanded to love our neighbour as ourselves; and so, since we are commanded not to kill our neighbour, that same Law must likeways forbid our kill of ourselves. But the reason probably, why no express Text did forbid that sin, was, because the Spirit of God knew that the natural aversion we have against death, would, in this, do more than supply a Law; and that these who would be so desperate as to neglect the one, would never be so pious as to obey the other. Or else, God hath been unwilling, by making such a Law, to intimate to the world, that such a sin might be committed. Yet, it seems strange, that many are in Scripture related, as Saul and others, to have killed themselves, against whom no check stands registrated in holy Records. But, I stop here, intending to bestow a whole Tractat upon the judicial Law, a task hitherto too much neglected.  
The second mirror, wherein God Almighty is to be seen, is that of His creatures; and in that a Virtuoso may contemplate His infinite power, as in the other he may see His admirable justice. It is very observable, that when God, or His Prophets, would prove His greatness, the Sun, Orion and the Leviathan, are made use of as arguments. And when the Spirit of God descrives the inimitable knowledge of Solomb●, bestowed upon him by God, as an extraordinar mark of His favour, he says not, that he understood the quirks of Philosophy, or notions of Divinity; but, it is said, that he knew all from the Cedar of Lebanon to the Hyssop that grows upon the wall. And in earnest, it is strange, that when man comes into the gallery of this World, he should take such pleasure in gazing upon these ill-drawn fictions, which have only past the pencil of humane wit, and should not fix his admiration upon these glorious creatures, which are the works of that great Master; in framing whereof, God is content to be said to have spent six days, to the end, that man might admire the effects of so much pains; whereas His omnipotency might, with one fiat, have summoned them all to appear, apparelled in these gorgeous dresses which now adorns them. And it is as strange, that man, having that huge volumn of the Creation to revolve, wherein is such an infinite number of curious tale-duces, to feast his eyes with curiosity, and to futnish his soul with solid knowledge; he should notwithstanding spend so much oil and sweat, in spinning out ens rationis, materia prima, potentia obedientialis, and such like untelligible trash, which, like cobwebs, are but envenomed dust curiously wrought. And because the Gross of mankind was so gross, as not to understand God's greatness by the abstract ideas which instinct presented to him: Therefore, to teach that sensual crowd, by the trunchmanrie of sense He hath bestowed upon them this mirror, wherein they may see how infinite He is in power, who made Nothing so fruitful, as to bud forth in this glorious crop of creatures, which now inhabits the surface of heaven and earth.  
I admire that such Philosophers 
Monsters.  as have had their faces washed at the font, can allow of Monsters, and define them to be the preter-intentional works of nature, wherein nature missed of her design, and was not able to effectuate what she intended: For, if nature and providence signify the same thing in the Dictionary of christianity, it were blasphemy to think, that providence could not be able to effectuate what it once designed. All the creatures are indeed but as clay in the hand of this great Potter; but, it were impious to think, that His art can be mistaken in framing any Vessel: wherefore, I am apt to believe, that all these creatures which the Schools term Monsters, are rather the intentions, than errors of nature; and that as nature doth nothing without design, so it doth nothing without success. And thus I rather admire nature in these, for her cunning variety, then upbraid her with insufficiency and weakness. Neither term I an Hermaphrodite, man or woman, according to the prevalency of that Sex which predomines in it, no more than I think that the Painter, when he hath delineated curiously an exact Mermaid, resolved to draw either a woman or fish, and not one distinct creature, pieced up of both. And doubtless this error did at first proceed from man's vanity; who concluded, that every frame which answered not that idea, which resides in him, was the effect of chance, and not of nature; as if nature had been obliged to leave in the bibliothick of his head, the Original of all such Pieces as was to pass its press.  
Seing God, in His survey of the Creation, called all that He had made good, because they were useful. I conclude, that these are the best which are the most useful. And albeit I condemn prodigality of ignorance, in preferring a diamond to a capon or sheep; yet, do I not condemn such of vanity, as shine with these sparkling creatures: For, since God made nothing, which He did not destinat for some use, and seeing most of these serve for no use else, doubtless, the wearing of them is most allowable. Yet, can I not allow of these gaudy compounds, which men create to themselves; as if something had been still wanting after the Creation was finished; wherein man could supply God, and art, nature. The bestowing a hundred pounds upon a Tulip, or a thousand on a Picture, are not to me the mere rants of luxury; but are courses preordained by the Almighty, for returning to poor Artisans, that money, which oppression did at first most injustly screw from their weary hands. It is our ignorance of nature's mysteries which persuades us, that some, if not most of the creatures, serve rather for beautifying the universe, then for supplying necessity, an error which experience daily confutes: So, these herbs which of old clothed only the uninhabited mountains, do now deserve their own place in Apothecaries shops. And it is most observable, that the Scurvy grows no where but where the disease rages, which is cured by it: Seing God loved variety in the Creation, He cannot hate curiosity in man, these two being correspondents; and the one without the other would be but as flowers to the blind, or music to the deaf. I laugh at the fruitless pilgrimages of such as travel to joppa or China, to satisfy their curiosity; there being a Tredaskins closet in each Tulip, and a Solomon's Court in each Lily of the field. And seeing men's tempers are so various, it was no wonder that the creatures (which▪ were made for his use) should have been made proportional to his humour: But, seeing art hath in many things copied nature to the life, I think not the Symmetry nor variety to be seen amongst the creatures such an infallible argument for proving the being of a God. As is instinct, which all the art of men and Angels cannot counterfeit; and herein is it, that that grand Magician must acknowledge the finger of his Maker, seeing here his own art fails.  
These who expect equal excellency in all the parts of this curious Fabric, do not understand wherein its Symmetry consists. All the strings of an Instrument sound not equally high, and yet they make up the harmony: the face of the earth looks in some places deformed and parched; and yet it is there the mother of rich mines (as if God intended to bestow a great portion where He bestows an ill face) and what we think deformities, were placed there as patches, and are no more blemishes, than the spots are to the Leopards.  
I confess, that at first it puzzled much my enquiry, for what end these mountains were made so near neighbours to the divided clouds: and I once imagined, that these were rather the effects of the flood, than creatures at first intended; and were but the rubbish and mud which these impetuous waters had heaped up in a mass: But, I was thereafter dissuaded from this conjecture, by the 8. Chap. Prov. where wisdom, proving its antiquity, says, that it was with God before the heavens were prepared, and the mountains settled; by the scope of which Text, it is clear, that the heavens, hills, and the rest of the Creation, are said to bear one date. It is then more probable, that God foreseeing that the lust of conquest would, like the needle of the Compass, look oft north; as is evident by comparing all the Monarchies (first the Assyrian, than Grecian, than Roman, now German) did therefore bound ambition, as it were, with high hills, (albeit since, ambition hath found a way to climb over them) as if He told them, that they should march no further. Thus, it is very observable, that the northern parts of one Kingdom are always more barren than the southern limits of the Country which lies to the north of it. The north of England more mountainous and barren than the south of Scotland, albeit it lie nearer the Sun; the south of England more pleasant and fertile than the north of France; and the south of France then the north of Italy, etc.  
We must like ways consider, that nature bruised its face so when it fell in Adam, that it did then contract many of these blemishes which now deform it; and that as it waxes old, it's native beauty is the more deformed by furrowed wrinkles. We cannot judge what it was in health, by its present distempered condition, wherein it groans and traveleth in pain, as the Apostle tells us. And the differences betwixt these two states may be known from this, that God, when He completed the Creation, saw that all was good; whereas Solomon, having reviewed it in his time, saw all to be vanity and vexation of spirit.  
The third mirror, wherein God 
Man & his creation.  is to be admired, is man. This is that noble creature which God was pleased to mould last of all others, not willing to bring him home, till, by the preceding Creations, He had plenished his house abundantly for him. And albeit in the creation of all other creatures, it is only said, that God spoke, and it was: Yet, when man was to be framed, the cabinet Council of heaven was called▪ and it is said (let us) as if more art had been to be showed here, then in all the remanent Fabric of the terraqueous Glob, and glorious Circles of heaven. It is likewise very observable, that albeit all the fishes of the sea were form by one word, all the beasts of the field by one act, etc. Yet, God was pleased to bestow two upon the creation of man; by the first, his body was created out of the dust, and thereafter, was breathed in, his soul. And albeit transient mention is only made of all other Creations; yet, the history of man's Creation is twice repeated, once, Gen, 1. 27. and again, 2. 7. And, lest that foreseen deformity, wherewith he was to be besmeared after his fall, should make it be questioned, that at his first creation he had received the impressa of God's Image, this is oft repeated: For, in the 26. ver. Gen. 1. it is said, Let us make man in our image; and then again▪ and after our likeness. And in the 27. verse, So God created man in his own image; and again immediately thereafter, in the image of God created he him. Yet, I am confident, that this image is so bedabled in the mire of sin, and so chattred by its first fall, and this divine impressa, and print, so worn out, by our old and vicious habits, that, if this genealogy had not been so oft inculcat, we could not but have called it in question, albeit our vanity be ready enough to believe a descent so royal and sublime. Wherefore I must again admire the folly of Atheists, who, by denying a Deity, cloud their own noble birthright.  
But, albeit man be made after God's image, yet, that can be no argument to conclude, that therefore God may be made after man's image, or represented under his figure, as the Anthropomorphits foolishly contend, no more, then if we should conclude, that because a Copy may be taken off an Original, therefore an Original may be taken off a Copy. Neither is this representation salved from being idolatry, by alleging, that the image is not worshipped, but God, who is represented by it: For, it hath been well observed by an ancient Father, that idolatry in Scripture is called adultery▪ And it is no good excuse for an adulteress, that she did lie with another because he represented her husband to her, and resembled him as a Copy doth its Original: Yet, seeing nothing is roomed in our judgement and apprehension, but what first entered by the wicket of sense, it is almost impossible for man to conceive the idea of any thing but vested with some shape, as each man's private reflections will abundantly convince him,  
As the boundless Ocean keeps and shows it's well drawn images, whilst it stands quiet, with a face polished like a crystal cake, but losses them immediately, how soon it's proud waves begin to swell and in rage, to spit its frothy foam in the face of the angry heavens; so, whilst a stoical indolency and christian repose smooths our restless spirits, it is only then, that the soul of man can be said to retain that glorious image of God Almighty, with which it was impressed at its created nativity. But, when the waves of choler begin to roar, or the winds of vanity to blow, than that glorious image is no more to be discerned in him, than the shadows and representations of in-looking objects are to be seen and discerned in the disquieted bosom of the troubled waters.  
The stings of a natural conscience, 
The immortality of the soul.  which, according to each man's actings, creates to him either agues of fear, or paradises of joy, do by these ominating presages, convince us of the immortality of the soul: and seeing we see its predictions, both in dreams, in damps of melancholy, and such like enthusiastic fits, followed by suitable events; why may we not like ways believe its predictions, as to its own immortality, it being the prudence of a Virtuoso to lay hold of every mean, which may allay the rage of his hereditary misfortunes? And to what end would the soul of man receive such impressions of fear and hope, if, by its mortality, it were not to be stated in a condition, wherein its fears and hopes were to have suitable rewards or punishments? Moreover, seeing God is just, He will punish and reward: and therefore, seeing He punishes and rewards not men according to their merits, or demerits here, there must be doubtless a future state wherein that is to be expected. But, that which convinces my private judgement most of this truth, is, that the noblest Souls, and the sharpest sighted, do, of all others, most desire the state of separation, and have the weakest attaches to this life; which must doubtless proceed from an assurance of immortality, and that it hath, from the Pisgah of its contemplation, got a view of the spiritual Canoan: For, seeing the brutishest of creatures abhors annihilation, as the most aversable ill in nature, doubtless the soul of man, which is the most divine of all creatures, would never appete this separation, if by it it were to be extinct, and to be no more. And how absurd were it to believe, that man's soul should be made after God's image, and yet conclude it mortal, a quality repugnant to any thing that is divine? As also, how can the soul be thought to perish with the body, seeing these accidents which destroy the body cannot reach it? how can the heat of a fever burn, or rheums drown, that which is not corporeal and cannot be touched? And, seeing man's least peccadilio against God Almighty, is against one who is infinite, were it not absurd to think, that it could be proportionally punished in the swift glass of man's short life? then which, nothing is more finite, or sooner finished.  
As the soul is God's Image, So its products are the images of His admirable operations. Do not Mathematicians create eagles, doves, and such like automatas? And spring not flowers from the Chemists glasses? And thus art, which is man's offspring, doth ape nature, which is the workmanship of the Almighty: and therefore, seeing the soul can with one thought grasp both the Poles, can dart out its conceits as far as the furthest borders of the imaginary spaces, create worlds, and order, and disorder, all that is in this which is already created; it's strange to think it to be either corporeal or mortal: For, if it were corporeal and a mass of blood, its actings would be lent and dull, neither could its motions be so nimble and winged, as are these of our agile spirits. It were impossible for our narrow heads, to inn all these innumerable ideas (which are now in them) if these were all corporeal, and if these be not corporeal, that which produces them most be doubtless incorporeal, seeing simile generatur à simili; and dull flesh and blood could never produce such spiritual emanations.  
As the soul is God's Image, so in this it resembles Him very much, that we can know nothing of its nature without its own assistance: like a dark lanthron, or a spy, it discovers every thing to us, except itself. And because it refuses us the light of its candle, whilst we are in the quest of its mysteries; therefore it is, that our researches of its nature are gropeings in the dark: and so ofttimes vain, if not ridiculous. Avicenna, Averro, and the remanent of that Arabian tribe, admiring its prodigious effects, did attribute our spiritual motions to assisting Angels; as if such admirable notions could not be fathered upon less sublime causes; which Cardan likeways thinks, do offer their assistance and light to sensitive creatures, but that the churlishness of their mater will not suffer them to entertain such pure irradiations. This disparages so much humanity, making man only a statue, that it were against the soul's interest to admit of any such ideas: For, as it tends more to the Artists praise to cause his products move from hid and internal springs, then from extrinsic causes; as we see in Watches and such like. So it is more for the honour of that great Artist, and more suitable to the being and nature of His creatures, that all its operations flow from itself, then from assisting but exterior co-adjutors▪ which makes me averse from Aristotle's opinion of the motion of the spheres by intelligences. And it were absurd to think, that men should be blamed or praised for those effects which their assessour Angels could only be charged with. The Platonics alleged, that all souls existed before their incarceration in bodies▪ iin which state of pre-existence, they were doted with all these spiritual endowments, which shall attend them in the state of separation: and that at their first alliance with bodies, their native knowledge, was clouded, 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, with the putting off knowledge for a time, till, by a reminiscentia, their intellectuals revived, as by a resurrection. And Origen added, that these souls were, according to their escapes, committed in the state of their primitive separation, yoked with better or worse bodies; a shift taken, in all probability, by him, to evite the apprehension of God's being injust, for nfusing innocent souls, in bodies which would infect them; and by drawing them in inevitable snares, at last condemn them, or at least their infusion was the imprisoning these who were not guilty; a difficulty which straits much, such as maintain that the soul is not ex traduce. What the hazard of this opinion may be, my twilight is not able to discover.  
It may be, that the Stoics mistake in making the souls of men to be but parcels, decerpt from that universal anima mundi (by which they doubtless meant God Himself) was occasioned by a mistake of that Text, that God breathed into man's nostrils, the breath of life: concluding, that as the breath is a part of the body which breathed it, So the soul behoved to be a part of that divine essence, from which, by a second consequence, they concluded, that the soul, being a part of that divine being, could not suffer, nor undergo any torments; as is asserted by Seneca, epist. 29. Cicero, tusc. 5. and defended by their successors, these primitive heretics, the Gnostics, Manichees and Priscillianists. But this bastard is not worth the fostering, being an opinion that God hath parts, and man real divinity, and is doubtless a false and flattering testimony given by the soul to itself: For, seeing the soul is, by divine Oracles, told us to be made after God's Image, it can be no more called a part of God, than the picture should be repute a part of the Painter.  
Aristotle (like the devil (who because he knows not what to answer, answers ever in engines) tells us, that anima is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, a term fitted to exercise the empty brains of curious Pedants, and apt to beget, then explicat difficulties. Neither believe I, that his three souls, which he lodges in man, to wit, the rational, sensitive and vegetative, do differ more amongst themselves, than the will, understanding and fancy differ from the two last; So that his arithmetic might have bestowed five souls upon man, as well as three: But, seeing he, and many of his disciples, believe these to be three and yet these three to be but one; I admire why they should be so nice, as not to believe that pious mystery of the holy Trinity: whereof in my opinion, his trinity of the soul is as apposite an emblem, as was the conceit of a simple Clown, who being asked, how he could apprehend the three glorious persons to be but one? did fold his garment in three plates, and thereafter drew out all the three in one▪  
As the heraldry of our reason cannot blazen the souls impressa; So can it not help us to line out its descent: and such would appear to be the excellency of that noble creature, that heaven and earth seem to contend, the which shall be the place of its nativity. Divines (who are obliged to contend for heaven, because they are it's more immediate Pensioners) will have it to be created and infused: whereas Philosophers (ambitious to have so noble a compatriot, and willing to gratify nature, which aliments their sublime meditations) contend, that it is ex traduce, and is in generation, the bodies other twin. And albeit it would appear from Scripture, that God accomplished the Creation the first seven days, and that nature did then pass childbearing: Yet, that, in my judgement, must be meant of the Creation of whole species, and not of individuals, and to press the souls not traduction; I shall lend only one argument, not because it is the best, but because it is my own. We see, that there where the soul is confessed to be ex traduce, as in bruits and vegetative creatures, that nature, as it were, with a pencil, copies the young from off the old. The young Lions are still as rapacious and roaring as were their Syers, from whose loins they descended: and the Rose being poused up by the salt nitre which makes it vegetative, spreads the same leaves, and appears with the same blushes or paleness that beautified its eye-pleasing predecessors. The reason of which continual assimulation, precedes from the seeds, having in its bosom, all these qualities and shapes, which appear thereafter in its larger products, whereof they were but a map or index. Whereas man resembles never, at least not oft, these who are called his parents; the vicious and tall father, having oft low, but virtuous children; which shows, that the soul of man is not derived by generation, and that the soul bestowed upon the son's body, is most different and assymbolick to that which lodged in the father. And this may be further confirmed by that excellent passage, Prov. 20. 27, where it is said, that the understanding of man is the candle of the Lord. Our soul is God's Image, and none can draw that Image but Himself; we are the stamp of His divine nature, and so can only be form by Himself, who is the glorious Seal.  
From this divine principle, that man's soul is made after God's Image, I am almost induced to believe, that prophecy is no miraculous gift bestowed upon the soul at extraordinary occasions only, but is a natural (though the highest) perfection of our humane nature: For, if it be natural for the stamp, to have impressed upon it all the traits that dwell upon the face of the Seal, than it must be natural to the soul, which is God's impressa, to have a faculty of foreseeing, since that is one of God's excellencies. Albeit I confess, that that Stamp is here infinitely be-dimmed and worn off; as also, we know by experience, that men upon death bed, when the soul begins (being detached by sickness from the body's slavery) to act like itself, do foresee and foretell many remote and improbable events: and for the same reason do I think predictions, by dreams, not to be extraordinary revelations, but rather the products natural of a rational soul. And if sagacious men can be so sharp-sighted in this state of glimmering, as to foresee many events which fall out, why may we not say, that man, if he were rehabilitat in the former state of pure nature, might, without any extraordinary assistance, foresee and prophesy? For, there is not such a distance betwixt that foresight and prophecy, as is betwixt the two states of innocency and corruption, according to the received notion, which men have settled to themselves of that primitive state of innocency.  
From the same principle, may it likeways be deduced, that natural reason cannot but be an excellent mean, for knowing, as far as is possiible, the glorious nature of God Almighty: He hath doubtless lighted this candle, that we might, by it, see Himself; and how can we better know the Seal, then by looking upon its impression. And if Religion and its mysteries, cannot be comprehended by reason▪ I confess it is a pretty jest, to hear such frequent reasonings amongst Churchmen, in matters of Religion. And albeit faith and reason be looked upon as jacob and Esau, whereof the younger only hath the blessings, and are, by Divines, placed at the two opposite points of the Diameter; yet, upon an unbiased inquiry, it will appear, that faith is but sublimated reason, calcined by that divine chemical fire of Baptism; and that the soul of man hath lurking in it, all these virtues and faculties which we call Theological; such as faith, hope and repentance: for else David would not have prayed, Enlighten, Lord, my eyes, that I may see the wonders of thy Law; but rather, Lord bestow new eyes upon me. Neither could the opening of Lidea's heart, have been sufficient for her conversion, if these pre-existing qualities had not been treasured up there formerly: So that it would appear, that these holy flames lurk under the ashes of corruption, until God, by the breath of His Spirit (and that wind which bloweth where it listeth) sweep them off: And that God, having once made man perfect in the first Creation, doth not in His regeneration superadd any new faculty (for else the soul had not at first been perfect) but only removes all obstructing impediments.  
I am always ashamed, when I 
Faith and reason  hear reason called the stepmother of faith, and proclaimed rebel against God Almighty, and such declared traitors, as dare harbour it, or appear in its defence. These are such fools as they who break their Prospects, because they bring not home to their sight the remotest objects; and are as injust as jacob had been, if he had divorced from Leah, because she was tender-eyed: whereas, we should not put out the eyes of our understanding, but should beg from God the eyesalve of His Spirit for their illumination. Nor should we dash the Prospect of our reason, against the rocky walls of despair; but should rather wash its glasses with the tears of unfeigned repentance.  
Ever since faith and reason have been, by Divines, set by the ears, the brutish multitude conclude, these who are most reasonable to be least religious; and the greatest spirits to be least spiritual: a conceit most inconsistent with that divine parable, wherein these who received the many talents improved them to the best advantage, whilst he who had but one laid it up in a napkin. And it is most improbable, that God would choose low shrubs, and not tall Cedars, for the building of His glorious Temple. And it is remarkable, that God, in the old Law, refused to accept the first born of an ass in sacrifice, but not of any other creature. And some, who were content to be called Atheists, providing they were thought Wits, did take advantage in this of the Rabbles ignorance, and authorized by their devilish invention, what was at first but a mistake: and this unridles to us that mystery, why the greatest Wits are most frequently the greatest Atheists.  
When I consider, how the Angels, who have no bodies, sinned before man; and that brutes, who are all body, sin not at all, but follow the pure dictates of nature. I am induced to believe, that the body is rather injustly bamed for being, then that really it is, the occasion of sin; and probably, the witty soul hath in this, cunningly laid over upon its fellow, that where with itself is only to be charged. What influence can flesh or blood have upon that which is immaterial, no more sure than the case hath upon the Watch, or the heavens upon its burgessing Angels? And see we not, that when the soul hath bid the body adieu, it remains a carcase, fit nor able for nothing. I believe, that the body being a clog to it, m●y slow its pursuit after spiritual objects, and that it may occasion, indirectly, some sins of omission: For, we see palpably, that eating and drinking dulls our devotions; but, I can never understand, how such dumb Orators, as flesh and blood, can persuade the soul to commit the least sin. And thus, albeit our Saviour says, that flesh and blood did not teach Peter to give him his true Epithets; neither indeed could it: Yet, our Saviour imputes not any actual sin to these pithless causes. And seeing our first sin hath occasioned all our after sinning, certainly, that which occasioned our first sin was the main source of sinning, and this was doubtless the soul; for, our first sin being an immoderate desire of knowledge, was the effect and product of our spirit, because it was a spiritual sin; whereas if it had been gluttony, lust or such like, which seems corporeal, the body had been more to have been blamed for it. And in this contest, I am of opinion, that the soul wins the cause, because it is the best Orator.  
What was the occasion of the 
The fall of Angels.  first ill, is much debated (and most deservedly) amongst Moralists; for, that which was good could not produce that which was evil, seeing that which works mischief cannot be called good. Nor can we ascribe the efficiency of the first evil to evil▪ for then the question recurres, what was the cause of that evil? And by this, the supposition is likewise destroyed, whereby the evil enquired after, is supposed to be the first evil: but, if we inquire, what could produce in the Angels that first sin, whereby they forfeited their glory? we will find this disquisition most mysterious. And it is commonly believed, but by what revelation I know not, that their pride caused their fall; and that they carcht their bruise in climbing, in desiring to be equal to their Creator, they are become inferior to all their fellow creatures. Yet, this seems to me most strange, that these excellent spirits whose very substance was light, and who surpassed far, man, in capacity and understanding, should have so erred as to imagine, that equality faisable, a fancy which the fondest of men could not have entertained. And it were improbable to say, that their error could have sprouted at first from their understandnging; and to think it to have been so gross, as that fallen man doth now admire it: but, why may we not rather think, that their first error was rather a crookedness in their will, than a blindness in their judgement▪ and that they fretted to see man, whom they knew to be inferior to themselves by many stages, made Lord of all that pleasant Creation, which they gazed on with a stareing maze. And that this opinion is more probable, appears, because this Sin was the far more bating, seeing it appeared with all the charms, wherewith either pride, vanity or avarice could busk it; and explicats better to us the occasion of all that enmity with which that Serpent hath always since pursued silly man: But, whither God will save just as many believers as there fell of the Angels, none can determine; neither can it be rationally deduced from that Scripture, Statuit terminos gentium, juxta nu●erum Angelorum Dei. But, if it please God so to order it, it will doubtless aggrage their punishment, by rackling their disdain.  
And seeing the Angels have never obtained a remission for this crime, it is probable, that the correspondent of their sin is, in us, the sin against the holy Ghost.  
For, if their lapse had been 
The sin of the Angels was the sin against the holy Ghost  pardonable, some one or other of them had in all probability escaped; but, if this was not that unpardonable sin, I scarce see where it shall be found. For, to say that it is a hating of God, as God, is to make it unpracticable rather then unpardonable: For, all creatures appete naturally what is good, and God, as God, is good; So that it is impossible that He can be hated under that reduplication.  
It may be likewise conjectured, that voluntar and deliberate sacrilege is the sin against the holy Ghost; because Ananias and Saphira, in withholding from the Church, a part of the price for which they sold their lands, are, by Peter, said to have lied, not to man, but to the holy Ghost; and his wife is there said to have tempted the Spirit: but, seeing both of them resolved to continue in the Church (a resolution inconsistent with the sin against the holy Ghost) And seeing many sins are more heinous, I cannot interpret this lying to the holy Ghost to be any thing else, but a sin against light, in which most penitents have been involved; albeit, I confess, this was a gross escape, seeing it robbed God of His omnisciency, and supposed that He was not privy to such humane actings as have not the Sun for a witness. I do then conclude, that the sin against the holy Ghost may rather be a resolute undervaluing of God, and a scorning to receive a pardon from Him: and this is that which makes the Angels fall irrecoverable, and like the flaming sword, defends them from their reentry into that Paradise from which they exile. And albeit to say, that the Angel's rebellion flows from God's denying them repentance, may suit abundantly well with His unstainable justice; yet, it is hard to reconcile it with his mercy. And this makes my private judgement place the unpardonableness of this sin, not in God's Decree, but in their obduration and rebellious impenitency: And the reason why these who commit this sin are never pardoned, is, because a pardon is never sought. That place of Scripture, wherein Esau is said to have sought the blessing with tears and not to have found it, astonishes me: Yet, I believe, that if his tears had streamed from a sense of his guilt more than of his punishment, doubtless he had not wept in vain; and in that he teared, he was no more to be pitied, far less pardoned, than a Malefactor, who, upon the scaffold, grants some few tears to the importunity of his tortutes, but scorns to acknowledge the guilt of his crime: for, pain, by contracting our bodies, strains out that liquid mater, which thereafter globs itself in tears: there could ●ome no holy water from the pagan font of Esaw's eyes; and if his remorse could have pierced his own heart, it had easily pierced heaven. Whilst others admire, I bless God, that He hath closed up the knowledge of that unpardonable sin under his own privy Seal: for, seeing Satan tempts me to sin with the hopes of an after-pardon, this bait is pulled off his hook, by the fear I stand under, that the sin to which I am tempted, is that sin which can expect no pardon. And albeit it be customary amongst men, to beacon and set a mark upon such shelves and rocks as destroy passengers; yet, that is only done where commerce is allowed and sailing necessary: But, seeing all sin is forbidden, God was not obliged to guard us with the knowledge of that sin, no further then by prohibiting us not to sin, but to stand in awe.  
That first sin whereby our first 
Man's fall.  Parents forfeited their primitive excellencies, was so pitiful a frailty, that I think we should rather lament, then inquire after it. To think that an apple had in it the seeds of all knowledge, or that it could assimilate him to his Creator, and could, in an instant, sublimate his nature, was a frailty to be admired in one of his piety and knowledge. Yet, I admire not that the breach of so mean a Precept was punished with such appearing rigour, because, the easier the command was, the contempt was proportionally the greater; and the first crimes are by Legislators punished, not only for guilt, but for example: But, I rather admire what could persuade the facile world to believe, that Adam was created, not only innocent, but even stored with all humane knowledge: For, besides that, we have no warrant from Scripture for this alleadgiance, this his easy escape speaketh far otherways.  
And albeit the Scripture tells us, that man was created perfect; yet, that infers not that man was furnished with all humane knowledge: For, his perfection consisted in his adoring of, and depending upon, God, wherein we see these are exactest, whose judgements are least pestered with terrestrial knowledge, and least diverted with unnecessar speculations. And thus it appears, that these Sciences, after which his posterity pants, were not intended as noble appanages of the rational soul, but are rather toyish babies busked up by fallen man, whereby he diverts himself from reflecting too narrowly upon his native frailty. And thus Scripture tells us, that God made man perfect, but that He sought out to Himself many inventions, where perfection and invention seem to be stated as enemies; and it is palpable, that these Sciences, which are by us lawreled and rewarded, are such, as were inconsistent with that state of innocency, such as Law, Theology and Physic. And as for the rest, it is absurd to think, that Adam's happiness did consist in the knowledge of these things which we ourselves account either impertinent or superfluous. But, that which convinces me most of this, is, that we forfeited nothing by Adam's fall which Christ's death restores not to us; wherefore, seeing Christ by his own, or his Apostles promises, hath not assured us of any sub-lunary or school knowledge; nor hath our experience taught us, that Sciences are entailed upon the Saints, I almost believe, that Adam neither possessed these before, nor yet lost them by his fall. Neither think I St. Paul the more imperfect, that he desired to know nothing but Christ and Him crucified: So that the difference betwixt Adam and his successors, stood more in the straightness of his affections, then in the depth of his knowledge. For, albeit it be believed, that the names whereby he baptised the creature, were full histories of their natures written in short hand; yet, this is but a conjecture authorized by no holy Text. It is a more civil error in the jewish Talmudists, to think that all the creatures were brought to Adam, to let him see that there were none amongst them fit to be his companion, nor none so beautiful as Eve, than it is in their Cabalists to observe, that the hebrew word, signifying man, doth, by a transposition of letters, signify likeways, benediction, and the word signifying woman, makes up malediction. If we should take a character of Adam's knowledge from the Scriptures, we shall find more imprudence charged upon him then upon any of his successors: For, albeit the silly woman was not deceived without the help of subtlety; yet, Adam sinned upon a bare suggestion, and thereafter was so simple, as to hide himself when God called him to an account, as if a thicket of trees could have sconced him from his allseeing Maker; and when he was accused, was so simple, as to think his wives commands sufficient to exoner him, and so absurd, as to make God Himself sharer with him in his guilt, the woman whom thou gavest me, etc.  
There is more charm in acquireing new knowledge, then in reflecting upon what we have already gained, (as if the species of known objects did corrupt, by being treasured up in our brains) And this induces me to believe, that our scantness of native knowledge, is rather a happiness then a punishment; the Citizens of London or Paris are not so tickled by the sight of these stately Cities, as strangers who were not born within their walls, and I may say to such, as by spelling the Stars desire to read the fortunes of others, as our Saviour said to Peter, when he was desirous to know the horoscope of the beloved Apostle, What is that to thee? What can it advantage us to know the correspondence kept amongst the Planets, and to understand the whole anatomy of nature's skeleton; in gazing upon whose parts, we are oft times as ridiculous as children, who love to leaf over taliduce Pictures; for in both variety is all the usury that can be expected, as the return of our time and pains; and if we pry inly into this small ma●s of our present knowledge, we shall find, that our knowledge is one of the fertilest fountains of our misery: For, do not such as know that they are sick, groan more heavily than a country Clown, who apprehends nothing till extremity create in him some sense? And doubtless the reason why children and idiots endure more, and drunken men escape more dangers than others, is, because albeit they cannot provide such apt remedies, yet, they are less acquainted with what they feel than we are. Are not these who understand that they are affronted, more vexed than such as are ignorant of these misfortunes? and these who foresee the changes and revolutions, which are to befall either their friends or their countries, are thereby more sadly diseased, than he who sees no further than his nose? Our Saviour wept when He did foresee, that one stone of jerusalem should not be left upon another; and when Hazael asked Elisha why he wept, he told him, it was because he did foresee what mischief Hazael was to do in Israel. Let us not then complain of the loss of Adam's knowledge, but of his innocency; we know enough to save us, and what is more than that, is superfluous.  
Adam cannot be thought to have been the first sinner, for Eve sinned before him; So that albeit it seem a paradox, yet it is most probable, that albeit Adam had for ever abstained from eating the forbidden fruit, his posterity had been still as miserable as now they are; seeing the guilt of either of the Parents had been sufficient to tash the innocency of the children. For, as the Scripture tells us, who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? And David, in that Text, which of all others speaks most expressly of original sin, lays the guilt upon her and confesseth only, that his mother had conceived him in sin.  
As Adam was not the first sinner, So the eating of the apple may be justly thought not to be the first sin; Eve having, before his eating the apple, repeated most falsely the Command: For, whereas God did assure them, that in that day they did eat the fruit, they should surely die, Eve relates it thus, Ye shall not eat the fruit, lest ye die, representing only that as contingent which was most certain: and whereas God had only said, ye shall not eat of the fruit of the tree, Eve says, God said, ye shall not touch it; which it may be furnished the serpent this argument to cheat her, ye see God hath deceived you, for the fruit may be touched without danger, why may it not then be eaten without hazard? and it is probable, that he hath failed in the one as well as in the other. But to abstract from this, it cannot be said, that the eating of the forbidden fruit was the first sin; for, before Adam did eat thereof, he behoved both to believe the Serpent and mis-believe his Maker, and thus mis-belief was the first sin: For, after he had credited the Serpent's report, he was no longer innocent, and so he did not eat the apple till after his fall. What wiser are these Divines, who debate, whither Adam's falling-sickness and sin had become heriditarie, if our predecessors had come out of his loins before he sinned, than these who combated for the largest share of the King of Spain's gold, if it had been to be divided?  
In the Almighty's procedure against poor Adam for this crime, His infinite mercy appears to admiration; and God foreseeing, that man might sharpen the axe of justice too much upon the whetstone of private revenge, seems to have, in this process, form to him, an exact model of inquisition. For, He arraigns and citys Adam, Adam, where art thou? He shows him his dittay, Hast thou eat of the fruit whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldst not eat? He allows him exculpation, Who told thee? and in order thereto, did examine the woman, upon whom Adam did transfer the guilt. And albeit nothing could escape His omnisciency, and that He did see Adam eat the apple, yet, to teach Judges that they should walk according to what is proven, and not according to what they are themselves conscious to, He did not condemn him till first he should have a confession from his own mouth. And thus, Gen. 18. 21. the Lord says▪ Because the cry of Sodom is great— I will go down and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, etc. And in the last place, albeit the fatal decree did bear, in that day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die, yet, were his days prolonged a hundred and thirty years after the sin was committed.  
It is too curious a disquisition to inquire how God can be said to be merciful, mercy being the mitigation of justice, of which His pure nature cannot be capable, seeing whatever He wills is just: And so He cannot be thought in any thing which He wills to recede from justice, and so can no more properly be said to be merciful, than one Act can be both the Law and the mitigation of the Law. But I will press no point of this nature, knowing that humble modesty is the best Theology.  
The vatican of paganism cannot, 
The stile of Genesis.  for the male-ness of its stile, match that matchless Book of Genesis, whereof each sentence seems a quarry of rich meditations, and each word a spell, sufficient to conjure the devil of Delphos. Might not that excellent expression, Let us make man after our image, convince any of the being of a Trinity, who deny plurality of Gods. It is wonderful, that the Saturn-humoured Jew can, in this Passage, mistake his own Saviour; and it is strange that he should not, from the triangular architecture of his own heart, conclude the Trinity of the Godhead, whose temple it was appointed to be. Albeit I be an admirer of this nurse of Cabalism; yet, I approve not the conceit of these doting Rabbis, who teach, that God from His own mouth, dited both the words and mater of the Pentateuch; whereas, He furnished only to the other Prophets the mater and subject unphrased: for, not only did God promise, that He should put His words in their mouths, but likeways, they preface thus their own prophecies, In the days of such a King, the Word of the Lord came to such a Prophet, saying, etc. Neither is this conceit consistent with that high esteem, which they, (even in this) intent for their patron, Moses; seeing it allows him less trust from his divine Master, than the other Penmen of Scripture had reposed in them.  
That brain hath too little pia mater, 
Why man fell.  that is too curious to know why God, who evidences so great a desire to save poor man, and is so powerful, as that his salvation needed never have run the hazard, if His infinite wisdom had so decreed, did yet suffer him to fall: For, if we enter once the lists of that debate, our reason is too weak to bear the burden of so great a difficulty. And albeit it may be answered, that God might have restrained man, but that restraint did not stand with the freedom of man's will which God had bestowed upon him; yet, this answer stops not the mouth of the difficulty. For certainly, if one should detain a mad man from running over a precipice, he could not be thereby said to have wronged his liberty: and seeing man is by many Divines allowed a freedom of will, albeit he must of necessity do what is evil, and that his freedom is salved by a liberty to choose only one of more evils, it would appear strange why his liberty might not have consisted well enough with a moral impossibility of sinning, and might not have been abundantly conserved in his freedom to choose one of more goods: yet, these reasonings are the calling God to an account, and so impious. For, if God had first created man, surrounded with our present infirmities, could we have complained? Why then should we now complain, seeing we are but fallen to a better estate than we deserved; seeing we stumbled not for want of light▪ but because we extinguished our own light, and seeing our Saviour's dying for us may yet reinstate us in a happier estate then that from which we are now fallen.  
Albeit the glass of my years hath not yet turned five and twenty, yet the curiosity I have to know the different limboes of departed souls and to view the card of the region of death, would give me abundance of courage to encounter this king of terrors, though I were a pagan: But, when I consider what joys are prepared for them who fear the Almighty, and what craziness attends such as sleep in Methuselams cradle, I pity them who make long-life one of the oftest repeated petitions of their Pater noster; and yet these sure are the more advanced in folly, who desire to have their names enshrined after death in the airy monument of fame: Whereas it is one of the promises made to the Elect, that they shall rest from their labours, and their works shall follow them. Most men's mouths are so foul, that it is a punishment to be much in them: for my own part, I desire the same good offices from my good name that I do from my clothes, which is to screen me from the violence of exterior accidents.  
As these Criminals might be judged distracted, who being condemned to die, would spend their short reprival in disputing about the situation and fabric of their gibbets; So may I justly think these literati mad, who spend the short time allotted them for repentance, in debating about the seat of hell, and the torments of tortured spirits. To satisfy my curiosity, I was once resolved, with the Platonic, to take the promise of some dying friend, that he should return and satisfy me in all my private doubts concerning hell and heaven; yet I was justly afraid, that he might have returned me the same answer which Abraham returned to Dives, have they not Moses and the Prophets? if they hear not them, wherefore will they be persuaded though one should rise from the dead?  
The Millenar's ephemerises, which 
The Millenaries refuted.  assures us, that Christ shall reign a thousand years with the Saints on earth, is as sensual an opinion as that of the Turks, who make heaven a bordello, wherein we shall satisfy our venereous appetites; for the one shows the vain glory and vindictive humour of the Saints, as palpably as the other shows the lust of the mahometans. If Christ's reigning some any years be for convincing the world that he is the real Messiah, their heresy should have antedated his coming; and his reign should rather have begun long since, when many ages were to be converted, or at least it should not have been thrust out upon the selvage and border of time, when very few shall remain to be convinced: and if in this they intent a displaying of Christ's glory, certainly they are mistaken; for what honour can it be for a King, to have his footstool made his Throne? So that I think, these poor fanatics have taken the patronage of this error rather by necessity then choice, all other opinions and conceits being formerly preingaged to other Authors.  
As I am not able, by the jacobsladder 
The Author's censure of this Essay, and an account of his design  of my merits, to scale heaven, So am I less able, by the jacobs-staff of my private ability, to take up the true altitude of its mysteries. I have travelled no further in Theology then a sabbath-days journey; and therefore, it were arrogance in me to offer a map of it to the credulous world: But, if I were worthy to be consulted in these spiritual securities, I should advise every private Christian, rather to stay still in the barge of the Church with the other Disciples, then by an ill bridled zeal, to hazard drowning alone with Peter, by offering to walk upon the unstable surface of his own fleeting and water-weak fancies, though with a pious resolution to meet our Saviour. For, albeit one may be a real Christian, and yet differ from the Church, which says, that the wise men who come to bow before our Saviour's cradle-throne, were three Kings, and in such other opinions as these, wherein the fundamentals of faith and quiet of the Church are no ways concerned; yet certainly, he were no wise man himself, nor yet sound Christian, who would not even in these bow the flag of his private opinion to the commands of the Church. The Church is our mother, and therefore we should wed no opinion without her consent who is our parent; or if we have rashly wedded any, it is in the power of the Church and her Officials to grant us a divorce. As for myself, my vanity never prompted me to be standard-bearer to any, either new Sect, or old Heresy; and I pity such as love to live like Pewkeepers in the house of God, busied in seating others, without ever providing a room for themselves. If there be any thing in this Discourse which may offend such as are really pious, it shall much grieve me, who above all men honours them most. What I have spoken against cases of Conscience and the like, strikes not against their Christian fellowship and correspondence, but against the apish fopperies of prentending counterfeits. It shall always be my endeavour for the future, rather to drop tears for my own sins and the sins of others, then yrk for their conversion: our prayers help such as never heard them, whereas these only who read our discourses are bettered by them. Abraham's prayers prevailed more with God (even for Sodom) than Lot's reiterated Sermons; and no wonder that the success be unequal, seeing in the one we have to do with a merciful God, whereas in the other we must persuade a hardhearted people.  
I intent not to purchase from posterity the title of Reformer, seeing most of these have fallen under the same guilt; and have had the same fate, with that curious Painter, who having drawn an excellent face, as happily as could have been expected from the smoothest mirror, did thereafter dash it afresh upon the suggestion of each intrant, till at last he reform it from being any way like to the Original.  
Divinity differs in this from all other Sciences, that these being invented by mortals, receive growth from time and experience; whereas, it being penned by the omniscient Spirit of God, can receive no addition without receiving prejudice. It is most remarkable, that our Saviour's Prayers, His Sermons and the Creed, delivered to us by His Apostles, were roomed up in far narrower bounds than these of our times, which an hidropsie of ill concocted opinions hath swelled beyond their true dimensions: many whereof have either been brooded by vanity or interest; or else ignorant and violent defendants being brought to a bay, by such as impugned their resolv'd-upon principles, have been forced to assert these byblow and preter-intentional tenets; and having once floored them, have thereafter judged themselves concerned to defend them, in point of Scholastic honour. Some well-meaning Christians likeways, do sometimes, for maintenance of what is lawful and pious, think, that they may lawfully advance opinions, which otherways they would never have allowed of; and as in nature we see, that the collision of two hard bodies makes them rebound so much the further from one another, So opposition makes both parties fly into extremities. Thus I believe, that the debates betwixt roman-catholics and Protestants, concerning the Virgin Mary, have occasioned, in some amongst both, expressions, if not heretical, yet aleast undecent. Thus a great many Confessions of Faith become, like Noah's Ark, a receptacle of clean and unclean: and which is also deplorable, they do, like ordinar dials, serve only for use in that one meridian for which they are calculated, and by riding twenty miles ye make them heterodox. I speak not this to the disparagement of our own Church, (which I reverence in all its Precepts and Practices▪) but to beget a blushing conviction in such as have diverted from it; and whose conventicles, compared with our jerusalem, resemble only the removed huts of these who live a part, because they are sick of the plague.  
I am not at a maze, to see men so tenacious of contrary principles in Religion; for, man's thoughts being vast and various, he snatches at every offered suggestion, and if by accident he entertain any of these many, as a divine immission, he thereafter thinks it were blasphemy to bring that thought to the test of reason, because he hears that faith is above reason, or to relinquish it, because the common suffrage of his Country runs it counter, seeing he is taught even by them, that the principles of belief must not be chosen by the Pole.  
And seeing faith is above reason, (albeit, as I said formerly, it would seem otherwise) I wonder not to see even the best tempered Christians, think that which is not their own religion to be therefore ridiculous.  
My design all alongst this Discourse, butts at this one principle, that Speculations in Religion are not so necessary, and are more dangerous than sincere Practice. It is in Religion as in Heraldry, the simpler the bearing be, it is so much the purer and the ancienter. I will not say that our School-distinctions are the impressions of the devils cloven foot; but I may say, that our piety and principles scarce ever grow after they begin to fork in such dichotomies; which, like jacob and Esau, divide and jar as soon as they are born: and betwixt whom, the poor proposition, out of which both did spring, is like a malefactor, most lamentably dragged to pieces. I have endeavoured to demonstrat, that dogmaticalness and paralytic scepticism, are but the Apocrypha of true Religion; and I believe the one begets the other, as a toad begets a cockatrice: For the Sceptic perceiving, that the magisterial dogmatist errs (as these must err somewhere who assert too much) even in these things whereof he affirms, he is as sure, as of any principle in Religion, (which is their ordinary stile) he finding out their error in one of their principles, is thereby emboldened to contravert all. This being the scope of this Essay. I wish that these who read it would expound it as Divines do parables, Quae non sunt argumentativa ultra suum scopum.  
I doubt not but some will think me 
His Apology.  no less absurd in writing against vanity, whilst I am so vain myself as to write Books, than the Philosophers were judged of old, for denying motion whilst their tongues moved in their cheek; but, to these my answer shall be, that finding many grovelling in their errors, I have, in this Essay, proffered them my assistance, not to show my strength but my compassion. The multitude (which albeit it hath ever been allowed many heads, yet was never allowed any brains) will doubtless accuse my Studies of adultery, for hugging contemplations so eccentric to my employment; to these my return is, that these papers are but the pairings of my other Studies, and because they were but pairings, I have flung them out into the streets. I wrote them in my retirements when I wanted both books and employment, and I resolve that this shall be the last inroad I shall ever make into foreign contemplations. There are some thoughts in this Piece which may seem to rebel against the empire of the Schools; yet, who knows but my Watch goes right, albeit it agree not with the public Clock of the City, especially where the sun of Righteousness hath not, by pointing clearly the dyal of Faith, showed which of the two are in the error. There are some expressions in it, which censure may force to speak otherways then they have in commission; yet none of them got room in this Discourse, until they first gave an account of their design to a most pious and learned Divine: and so, it may be the lines are of themselves straight, albeit they lie not parallel with each censurers crooked rule. As this Discourse intends, for the Divines of our Church, all respect; So all that is in it, is most freely submitted to their censure.  
The Author intended this Discourse only as an introduction to the Stoics morals, but probably, he will, for many years, stop here.   

ERRATA.  
Blurs in the Copy and the Author's absence occasioned these erratas, which must be helped before reading, seeing they destroy both the sense and soundness of the Discourse.  
IN the Preface, p. 2. l. 4. for Prophet, read jehovadab: p. 9 f. Taps r. Tops. p. 15. l. 7. add some before Episcopists and Presbyterians. p. 16. l. 4. f. all r. almost all.  
In the Book, p. 24. l. 16. f. hath no, r. seems to have no. p. 2●. l. 18. f. is but a conceit, r. seems but a conceit. p. 35. l. 13. f. continual r. extraordinar. p. 58. l. 19 f. triumphant, r. militant. p. 63. l. 22. f. ever any, r. few have. p. 73. l. 10. f. excrementilius, r. excrementitius. p. 74. l. 17. f. an allegory, etc. r. that there run many hid allegories from Genesis to John's Revelations, wherein the mystical sense deserves likeways the name of God's Word. p. 85. l. 8. add, yet this is but a sophism; for, seeing our bodies are the temples of the holy Ghost, we can no more bestow them upon such uses, than a Churchwarden can give the use of the Church to Taverners, p. 85. l. 13. f. thundered from mount Sinai, r. delivered in almost one context with that Law which was thundered from mount Sinai. p. 121. l. 22. f. an unbiased enquiry it will appear, r. upon an superficial enquiry it would appear. By the Laws of his Country, p. 57 and elsewhere, 
☞  the Author means, that Religion which is settled by Law.  
In other expressions, the Author recommends himself to the gloss of the reader's charity.  
FINIS