The ready and easy way to establish a free Commonwealth; and the excellence thereof come pared with the inconveniencies and dangers of readmitting Kingship in this Nation.  
The second edition revised and augmented.  
The author J. M.  
——— et nos  
consilium dedimus Syl'ae, demus populo nunc.  
LONDON, Printed for the Author, 1660.   

The ready and easy way to establish a free Commonwealth.  
ALthough since the writing of this treatise, the face of things hath had some change, writs for new elections have been recalled, and the members at first chosen, readmitted from exclusion, yet not a little rejoicing to hear declared the resolution of those who are in power, tending to the establishment of a free Commonwealth, and to remove, if it be possible, this noxious humour of returning to bondage, instilld of late by some deceivers, and nourished from bad principles and false apprehensions among too many of the people, I thought best not to suppress what I had written, hoping that it may now be of much more use and concernment to be freely published, in the midst of our Elections to a free parliament, or their sitting to consider freely of the Government; whom it behooves to have all things represented to them that may direct their judgement therein; and I never read of any State, scarce of any tyrant grown so incurable as to refuse counsel from any in a time of public deliberation; much less to be offended. If their absolute determination be to enthrall us, before so long a Lent of Servitude, they may permit us a little Shroving-time first, wherein to speak freely, and take our leaves of liberty. And because in the former edition through haste, many faults escaped, and many books were suddenly dispersed, ere the note to mend them could be sent, I took the opportunity from this occasion to revise and somewhat to enlarge the whole discourse, especially that part which argues for a perpetual Senat. The treatise thus revised and enlarged, is as follows.  
The Parliament of England, assisted by a great number of the people who appeerd and stuck to them faithfullest in defence of religion and their civil liberties, judging kingship by long experience a government unnecessary, burdensome and dangerous, justly and magnanimously abolished it; turning regal bondage into a free Commonwealth, to the admiration and terror of our emulous neighbours. They took themselves not bound by the light of nature or religion, to any former covenant, from which the King himself by many forfeitures of a latter date or discovery, and our own longer consideration thereon had more & more unbound us, both to himself and his posterity; as hath been ever the justice and the prudence of all wise nations that have ejected tyranny. They covenanted to preserve the King's person and authority in the preservation of the true religion and our liberties; not in his endeavouring to bring in upon our consciences a Popish religion, upon our liberties thraldom, upon our lives destruction, by his occasioning, if not complotting, as was after discovered, the Irish massacre, his fomenting and arming the rebellion, his covert leaguing with the rebels against us, his refusing more than seven times, propositions most just and necessary to the true religion and our liberties, tendered him by the parliament both of England and Scotland. They made not their covenant concerning him with no difference between a king and a god, or promised him as Job did to the almighty, to trust in him, though he slay us: they understood that the solemn engagement, wherein we all forswore kingship, was no more a breach of the covant, than the covenant was of the protestation before, but a faithful and prudent going on both in the words, well weighed, and in the true sense of the covenant, without respect of persons, when we could not serve two contrary Masters, God and the king, or the king and that more supreme law, sworn in the first place to maintain, our safety and our liberty. They knew the people of England to be a free people, themselves the representers of that freedom; & although many were excluded, & as many fled (so they pretended) from tumults to Oxford, yet they were left a sufficient number to act in parliament; therefore not bound by any statute of preceding parliaments; but by the law of nature only, which is the only law of laws truly and properly to all mankind fundamental; the beginning and the end of all Government; to which no parliament or people that will throughly reform, but may and must have recourse; as they had and must yet have in church reformation (if they throughly intend it) to evangelic rules; not to ecclesiastical canons, though never so ancient, so ratified and established in the land by Statutes, which for the most part are mere positive laws, neither natural nor moral, & so by any parliament for just and serious considerations, without scruple to be at any time repealed. If others of their number, in these things were under force, they were not, but under free conscience; if others were excluded by a power which they could not resist, they were not therefore to leave the helm of government in no hands, to discontinue their care of the public peace and safety, to desert the people in anarchy and confusion; no more than when so many of their members left them, as made up in outward formality a more legal parliament of three estates against them. The best affected also and best principled of the people, stood not numbering or computing on which side were most voices in parliament, but on which side appeerd to them most reason, most safety, when the house divided upon main matters: what was well motiond and advised, they examined not whether fear or persuasion carried it in the vote; neither did they measure votes and counsels by the intentions of them that voted; knowing that intentions either are but guessd at, or not soon enough known; and although good, can neither make the deed such, nor prevent the consequence from being bad: suppose bad intentions in things otherwise welldon; what was welldon, was by them who so thought, not the less obeyed or followed in the state; since in the church, who had not rather follow Iscariot or Simon the magician, though to covetous ends, preaching, than Saul, though in the uprightness of his heart persecuting the gospel? Safer they therefore judged what they thought the better counsels, though carried on by some perhaps to bad ends, than the worse, by others, though endevord with best intentions: and yet they were not to learn that a greater number might be corrupt within the walls of a parliament as well as of a city; whereof in matters of nearest concernment all men will be judges; nor easily permit, that the odds of voices in their greatest council, shall more endanger them by corrupt or credulous votes, than the odds of enemies by open assaults; judging that most voices ought not always to prevail where main matters are in question; if others hence will pretend to disturb all counsels, what is that to them who pretend not, but are in real danger; not they only so judging, but a great though not the greatest, number of their chosen Patriots, who might be more in weight, than the others in number; there being in number little virtue, but by weight and measure wisdom working all things: and the dangers on either side they seriously thus waighd: from the treaty, short fruits of long labours and seven years' war; security for twenty years, if we can hold it; reformation in the church for three years: then put to shift again with our vanquished Master. His justice, his honour, his conscience declared quite contrary to ours; which would have furnished him with many such evasions, as in a book entitled an inquisition for blood, soon after were not concealed: bishops not totally removed, but left as it were in ambush, a reserve, with ordination in their sole power; their lands already sold, not to be alienated, but rented, and the sale of them called sacrilege; delinquents few of many brought to condign punishment; accessories punished; the chief author, above pardon, though after utmost resistance, vanquished; not to give, but to receive laws; yet besought, treated with, and to be thanked for his gracious concessions, to be honoured, worshipped, glorified. If this we swore to do, with what righteousness in the sight of God, with what assurance that we bring not by such an oath the whole sea of bloodguiltiness upon our own heads? If on the other side we prefer a free government, though for the present not obtained, yet all those suggested fears and difficulties, as the event will prove, easily overcome, we remain finally secure from the exasperated regal power, and out of snares; shall retain the best part of our liberty, which is our religion, and the civil part will be from these who defer us, much more easily recovered, being neither so subtle nor so awful as a King reinthroned. Nor were their actions less both at home and abroad then might become the hopes of a glorious rising Commonwealth: nor were the expressions both of army and people, whether in their public declarations or several writings other than such as testified a spirit in this nation no less noble and well fitted to the liberty of a Commonwealth, then in the ancient Greeks or Romans. Nor was the heroic cause unsuccessfully defended to all Christendom against the tongue of a famous and thought invincible adversary; nor the constancy and fortitude that so nobly vindicated our liberty, our victory at once against two the most prevailing usurpers over mankind, superstition and tyranny unpraisd or uncelebrated in a written monument, likely to outlive detraction, as it hath hitherto covinced or silenced not a few of our detractors, especially in parts abroad. After our liberty and religion thus prosperously fought for, gained and many years possessed, except in those unhappy interruptions, which God hath removed, now that nothing remains, but in all reason the certain hopes of a speedy and immediate settlement for ever in a firm and free commonwealth, for this extolled and magnified nation, regardless both of honour won or deliverances voutsafed from heaven, to fall back or rather to creep back so poorly as it seems the multitude would to their once abjured and detested thraldom of Kingship, to be ourselves the slanderers of our own just and religious deeds, though done by some to covetous and ambitious ends, yet not therefore to be stained with their infamy, or they to asperse the integrity of others, and yet these now by revolting from the conscience of deeds welldon both in church and state, to throw away and forsake, or rather to betray a just and noble cause for the mixture of bad men who have ill managed and abused it (which had our father's don heretofore, and on the same pretence deserted true religion, what had long ere this become of our gospel and all protestant reformation so much intermixed with the avarice and ambition of some reformers?) and by thus relapsing, to verify all the bitter predictions of our triumphing enemies, who will now think they wisely discerned and justly censured both us and all our actions as rash, rebellious, hypocritical and impious, not only argues a strange degenerate contagion suddenly spread among us fitted and prepared for new slavery, but will render us a scorn and derision to all our neighbours. And what will they at best say of us and of the whole English name, but scoffingly as of that foolish builder, mentioned by our Saviour, who began to build a tower, and was not able to finish it. Where is this goodly tower of a Commonwealth, which the English boasted they would build to overshaddow kings, and be another Rome in the west? The foundation indeed they laid gallantly; but fell into a worse confusion, not of tongues, but of factions, than those at the tower of Babel; and have left no memorial of their work behind them remaining, but in the common laughter of Europe. Which must needs redound the more to our shame, if we but look on our neighbours the United Provinces, to us inferior in all outward advantages; who notwithstanding, in the midst of greater difficulties, courageously, wisely, constantly went through with the same work, and are settled in all the happy enjoiments of a potent and flourishing Republic to this day.  
Besides this, if we return to Kingship, and soon repent, as undoubtedly we shall, when we begin to find the old encroachments coming on by little and little upon our consciences, which must necessarily proceed from king and bishop united inseparably in one interest, we may be forced perhaps to fight over again all that we have fought, and spend over again all that we have spent, but are never like to attain thus far as we are now advanced to the recovery of our freedom, never to have it in possession as we now have it, never to be voutsafed hereafter the like mercies and signal assistances from heaven in our cause, if by our ingrateful backsliding we make these fruitless; flying now to regal concessions from his divine condescensions and gracious answers to our once importuning prayers against the tyranny which we then groaned under: making vain and viler than dirt the blood of so many thousand faithful and valiant English men, who left us in this liberty, bought with their lives; losing by a strange after game of folly, all the battles we have won, together with all Scotland as to our conquest, hereby lost, which never any of our kings could conquer, all the treasure we have spent, not that corruptible treasure only, but that far more precious of all our late miraculous deliverances; treading back again with lost labour all our happy steps in the progress of reformation; and most pitifully depriving ourselves the instant fruition of that free government which we have so dearly purchased, a free commonwealth, not only held by wisest men in all ages the noblest, the manliest, the equalest, the justest government, the most agreeable to all due liberty and proportioned equality, both human, civil, and Christian, most cherishing to virtue and true religion, but also (I may say it with greatest probability) plainly commended, or rather enjoind by our Saviour himself, to all Christians, not without remarkable disallowance, and the brand of gentilism upon kingship. God in much displeasure gave a king to the Israelites, and imputed it a sin to them that they sought one: but Christ apparently forbids his disciples to admit of any such heathenish government: the kings of the gentiles, saith he, exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them, are called benefactors: but ye shall not be so; but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that serveth. The occasion of these his words was the ambitious desire of Zebede's two sons, to be exalted above their brethren in his kingdom, which they thought was to be ere long upon earth. That he speaks of civil government, is manifest by the former part of the comparison, which infers the other part to be always in the same kind. And what government comes nearer to this precept of Christ, than a free commonwealth; wherein they who are greatest, are perpetual servants and drudges to the public at their own cost and charges, neglect their own affairs; yet are not elevated above their brethren; live soberly in their families, walk the streets as other men, may be spoken to freely, familiarly, friendly, without adoration. Whereas a king must be adored like a demi-god, with a dissolute and haughty court about him, of vast expense and luxury, masks and revels, to the debaushing of our prime gentry both male and female; not in their passetimes only, but in earnest, by the loose employments of court service, which will be then thought honourable. There will be a queen also of no less charge; in most likelihood outlandish and a Papist; besides a queen mother such already; together with both their courts and numerous train: then a royal issue, and ere long severally their sumptuous courts; to the multiplying of a servile crew, not of servants only, but of nobility and gentry, bred up then to the hopes not of public, but of court offices; to be stewards, chamberlains, ushers, grooms, even of the close-stool; and the lower their minds debased with court opinions, contrary to all virtue and reformation, the haughtier will be their pride and profuseness: we may well remember this not long since at home; or need but look at present into the French court, where enticements and preferments daily draw away and pervert the Protestant nobility. As to the burden of expense, to our cost we shall soon know it; for any good to us, deserving to be termed no better than the vast and lavish price of our subjection and their debauchery; which we are now so greedily cheapening, and would so fain be paying most inconsiderately to a single person; who for any thing wherein the public really needs him, will have little else to do, but to bestow the eating and drinking of excessive dainties, to set a pompous face upon the superficial actings of State, to pageant himself up and down in progress among the perpetual bowings and cringings of an abject people, on either side deifying and adoring him for nothing done that can deserve it. For what can he more than another man? who even in the expression of a late courtpoet, sits only like a great cipher set to no purpose before a long row of other significant figures. Nay it is well and happy for the people if their King be but a cipher, being oft times a mischief, a pest, a scourge of the nation, and which is worse, not to be removed, not to be controlled, much less accused or brought to punishment, without the danger of a common ruin, without the shaking and almost subversion of the whole land. Whereas in a free Commonwealth, any governor or chief counsellor offending, may be removed and punished without the least commotion. Certainly then that people must needs be mad or strangely infatuated, that build the chief hope of their common happiness or safety on a single person: who if he happen to be good, can do no more than another man, if to be bad, hath in his hands to do more evil without check, than millions of other men. The happiness of a nation must nee●s be firmest and certainest in a full and free council of their own electing, where no single person, but reason only swa●es. And what madness is it, for them who might manage nobly their own affairs themselves, sluggishly and weakly to devolve all on a single person; and more like boys under age than men, to commit all to his patronage and disposal, who neither can perform what he undertakes, and yet for undertaking it, though royally paid, will not be their servant, but their lord? how unmanly must it needs be, to count such a one the breath of our nostrils, to hang all our felicity on him, all our safety, our well-being, for which it we were aught else but sluggards or babies, we need depend on none but God and our own counsels, our own active virtue and industry; Go to the Ant, thou sluggard, saith Solomon; consider her ways, and be wise; which having no prince, ruler, or lord, provides her meat in the summer, and gathers her food in the harvest. which evidenly shows us, that they who think the nation undone without a king, though they look grave or haughty, have not so much true spirit and understanding in them as a pismire: neither are these diligent creatures hence concluded to live in lawless anarchy, or that commended, but are set the examples to imprudent and ungovernd men, of a frugal and selfgoverning democraty or Commonwealth; safer and more thriving in the joint providence and counsel of many industrious equals, than under the single domination of one imperious Lord. It may be well wondered that any Nation styling themselves free, can suffer any man to pretend hereditary right over them as their lord; when as by acknowledging that right, they conclude themselves his servants and his vassals, and so renounce their own freedom. Which how a people and their leaders especially can do, who have fought so gloriously for liberty, how they can change their noble words and actions, heretofore so becoming the majesty of a free people, into the base necessity of court flatteries and prostrations, is not only strange and admirable, but lamentable to think on. That a nation should be so valorous and courageous to win their liberty in the field, and when they have won it, should be so heartless and unwise in their counsels, as not to know how to use it, value it, what to do withit or with themselves; but after ten or twelve years prosperous war and contestation with tyranny, basely and besottedly to run their necks again into the yoke which they have broken, and prostrate all the fruits of their victory for nought at the feet of the vanquished, besides our loss of glory, and such an example as kings or tyrants never yet had the like to boast of, will be an ignomine if it befall us, that never yet befell any nation possessed of their liberty; worthy indeed themselves, whatsoever they be, to be for ever slaves: but that part of the nation which consents not with them, as I persuade me of a great number, far worthier than by their means to be brought into the same bondage. Considering these things so plane, so rational, I cannot but yet further admire on the other side, how any man who hath the true principles of justice and religion in him, can presume or take upon him to be a king and lord over his brethren, whom he cannot but know whether as men or Christians, to be for the most part every way equal or superior to himself: how he can display with such vanity and ostentation his regal splendour so supereminently above other mortal men; or being a Christian, can assume such extraordinary honour and worship to himself, while the kingdom of Christ our common King and Lord, is hid to this world, and such gentilish imitation forbid in express words by himself to all his disciples. All Protestants hold that Christ in his church hath left no vicegerent of his power, but himself without deputy, is the only head thereof, governing it from heaven: how then can any Christian-man derive his kingship from Christ, but with worse usurpation than the Pope his headship over the church, since Christ not only hath not left the least shadow of a command for any such vicegerence from him in the State, as the Pope pretends for his in the Church, but hath expressly declared, that such regal dominion is from the gentiles, not from him, and hath strictly charged us, not to imitate them therein.  
I doubt not but all ingenuous and knowing men will easily agree with me, that a free Commonwealth without single person or house of lords, is by far the best government, if it can be had; but we have all this while say they been expecting it, and cannot yet attain it. 'tis true indeed, when monarchy was dissolved, the form of a Commonwealth should have forthwith been framed; and the practice thereof immediately begun; that the people might have soon been satisfied and delighted with the decent order, ease and benefit thereof: we had been then by this time firmly rooted, past fear of commotions or mutations, & now flourishing: this care of timely settling a new government instead of the old, too much neglected, hath been our mischief. Yet the cause thereof may be ascribed with most reason to the frequent disturbances, interruptions and dissolutions which the parliament hath had partly from the impatient or disaffected people, partly from some ambitious leaders in the army; much contrary, I believe, to the mind and approbation of the army itself and their other Commanders, once undeceiud, or in their own power. Now is the opportunity, now the very season wherein we may obtain a free Commonwealth and establish it for ever in the land, without difficulty or much delay. Writs are sent out for elections, and which is worth observing in the name, not of any king, but of the keepers of our liberty, to summon a free parliament: which then only will indeed be free, and deserve the true honour of that supreme title, if they preserve us a free people. Which never parliament was more free to do; being now called, not as heretofore, by the summons of a king, but by the voice of liberty: and if the people, laying afide prejudice and impatience, will seriously and calmly now consider their own good both religious and civil, their own liberty and the only means thereof, as shall be here laid before them, and will elect their Knights and Burgesses able men, and according to the just and necessary qualifications (which for aught I hear, remain yet in force unrepeald, as they were formerly decreed in parliament) men not addicted to a single person or house of lords, the work is done; at least the foundation firmly laid of a free commonwealth, and good part also erected of the main structure. For the ground and basis of every just and free government (since men have smarted so oft for commiting all to one person) is a general council of ablest men, chosen by the people to consult of public affairs from time to time for the common good. In this Grand council must the sovereignty, not transferrd, but delegated only, and as it were deposited, reside; with this caution they must have the forces by sea and land committed to them for preservation of the common peace and liberty; must raise and manage the public revenue, at least with some inspectors deputed for satisfaction of the people, how it is employed; must make or propose, as more expressly shall be said anon, civil laws; treat of commerce, peace, or war with foreign nations, and for the carrying on some particular affairs with more secrecy and expedition, must elect, as they have already out of their own number and others, a council of State.  
And although it may seem strange at first hearing, by reason that men's minds are prepossed with the notion of successive parliaments, I affirm that the Grand or General council being well chosen, should be perpetual: for so their business is or may be, and oft times urgent; the opportunity of affairs gained or lost in a moment. The day of counsel cannot be set as the day of a festival; but must be ready always to prevent or answer all occasions. By this continuance they will become every way skilfullest, best provided of intelligence from abroad, best acquainted with the people at home, and the people with them. The ship of the Commonwealth is always under sail; they sit at the stern; and if they steer well, what need is there to change them; it being rather dangerous? And to this, that the Grand council is both foundation and main pillar of the whole State; and to move pillars and foundations, not faulty, cannot be safe for the building. I see not therefore, how we can be advantaged by successive and transitory parliaments; but that they are much likelier continually to unsettle rather than to settle a free government; to breed commotions, changes, novelties and uncertainties; to bring neglect upon present affairs and opportunities, while all minds are suspense with expectation of a new assembly, and the assembly for a good space taken up with the new settling of itself. After which, if they find no great work to do, they will make it, by altering or repealing former acts, or making and multiplying new; that they may seem to see what their predecessors saw not, and not to have assembled for nothing: till all law be lost in the multitude of clashing statutes. But if the ambition of such as think themselves injured that they also partake not of the government, and are impatient till they be chosen, cannot brook the perpetuity of others chosen before them, or if it be feared that long continuance of power may corrupt sincerest men, the known expedient is, and by some lately propounded, that annually (or if the space be longer, so much perhaps the better) the third part of Senators may go out according to the precedence of their election, and the like number be chosen in their places, to prevent the settling of too absolute a power, if it should be perpetual: and this they call partial rotation. But I could wish that this wheel or partial wheel in State, if it be possible, might be avoided; as having too much affinity with the wheel of fortune. For it appears not how this can be done, without danger and mischance of putting out a great number of the best and ablest: in whose stead new elections may bring in as many raw, unexperienced and otherwise affected, to the weakening and much altering for the worse of public transactions▪ Neither do I think a perpetual senate, especially chosen and entrusted by the people, much in this land to be feared, where the well-affected either in a standing army, or in a settled militia have their arms in their own hands. Safest therefore to me it seems and of least hazard or interruption to affairs, that none of the Grand council be moved, unless by death or just conviction of some crime: for what can be expected firm or steadfast from a floating foundation? however, I forejudge not any probable expedient, any temperament that can be found in things of this nature so disputable on either side. Yet lest this which I affirm, be thought my single opinion, I shall add sufficient testimony. Kingship itself is therefore counted the more safe and durable, because the king and, for the most part, his council, is not changed during life: but a Commonwealth is held immortal; and therein firmest, safest and most above fortune: for the death of a king, causeth ofttimes many dangerous alterations; but the death now and then of a Senator is not felt; the main body of them still continuing permanent in greatest and noblest Commonwealths, and as it were eternal. therefore among the Jews, the supreme council of seventy, called the Sanhedrim, founded by Moses, in Athens, that of Ariopaguses, in Sparta, that of the Ancients, in Rome, the senate, consisted of members chosen for term of life; and by that means remained as it were still the same to generations. In Venice they change indeed ofter than every year some particular counsels of State, as that of six, or such other; but the true senate, which upholds and sustains the government, is the whole aristocracy immovable. So in the United Provinces, the state's General, which are indeed but a council of state deputed by the whole union, are not usually the same persons for above three or six years; but the States of every city, in whom the sovereignty hath been placed time out of mind, are a standing senate, without succession, and accounted chiefly in that regard the main prop of their liberty. And why they should be so in every well ordered commonwealth, they who write of policy, give these reasons;" That to make the senate successive, not only impairs the dignity and lustre of the senate, but weakens the whole Commonwealth, and brings it into manifest danger; while by this means the secrets of State are frequently divulged, and matters of greatest consequence committed to inexpert and novice counsellors, utterly to seek in the full and intimate knowledge of affairs past." I know not therefore what should be peculiar in England to make successive parliaments thought safest, or convenient here more than in other nations, unless it be the fickl'ness which is attributed to us as we are islanders: but good education and acquisit wisdom ought to correct the fluxible fault, if any such be, of our watery situation. It will be objected, that in those places where they had perpetual senates, they had also popular remedies against their growing too imperious: as in Athens, besides Ariopaguses, another senate of four or five hundred; in Sparta, the Ephors; in Rome, the Tribunes of the people. But the event tells us, that these remedies either little availd the people, or brought them to such a licentious and unbridled democraty, as in fine ruined themselves with their own excessive power. So that the main reason urged why popular assemblies are to be trusted with the people's liberty, rather than a senate of principal men, because great men will be still endeavouring to enlarge their power, but the common sort will be contented to maintain their own liberty, is by experience found false; none being more immoderate and ambitious to amplify their power, than such popularities; which was seen in the people of Rome; who at first contented to have their Tribunes, at length contended with the senate that one Consul, then both; soon after, that the Censors and Praetors also should be created Plebeian, and the whole empire put into their hands; adoring lastly those, who most were advers to the senate, till Marius by fulfilling their inordinat desires, quite lost them all the power for which they had so long been striving, and left them under the tyranny of Sylla: the balance therefore must be exactly so set, as to preserve and keep up due authority on either side, as well in the senate as in the people. And this annual rotation of a senate to consist of three hundred, as is lately propounded, requires also another popular assembly upward of a thousand, with an answerable rotation. Which besides that it will be liable to all those inconveniencies found in the foresaid remedies, cannot but be troublesome and chargeable, both in their motion and their session, to the whole land; unwieldy with their own bulk, unable in so great a number to mature their consultations as they ought, if any be allotted them, and that they meet not from so many parts remote to sit a whole year lieger in one place, only now and then to hold up a forest of fingers, or to convey each man his bean or ballot into the box, without reason shown or common deliberation; incontinent of secrets, if any be imparted to them, emulous and always jarring with the other Senat. The much better way doubtless will be in this wavering condition of our affairs, to defer the changing or circumscribing of our senate, more than may be done with ease, till the Commonwealth be throughly settled in peace and safety, and they themselves give us the occasion. Military men hold it dangerous to change the form of battle in view of an enemy: neither did the people of Rome bandy with their senate while any of the Tarquins lived, the enemies of their liberty, nor sought by creating Tribunes to defend themselves against the fear of their Patricians, till sixteen years after the expulsion of their kings, and in full security of their state, they had or thought they had just cause given them by the Senat. Another way will be, to welqualifie and refine elections: not committing all to the noise and shouting of a rude multitude, but permitting only those of them who are rightly qualified, to nominate as many as they will; and out of that number others of a better breeding, to choose a less number more judiciously, till after a third or fourth sifting and refining of exactest choice, they only be left chosen who are the due number, and seem by most voices the worthiest. To make the people fittest to choose, and the chosen fittest to govern, will be to mend our corrupt and faulty education, to teach the people faith not without virtue, temperance, modesty, sobriety, parsimony, justice; not to admire wealth or honour; to hate turbulence and ambition; to place every one his private welfare and happiness in the public peace, liberty and safety. They shall not then need to be much mistrustful of their chosen Patriots in the Grand council; who will be then rightly called the true keepers of our liberty, though the most of their business will be in foreign affairs. But to prevent all mistrust, the people than will have their several ordinary assemblies (which will henceforth quite annihilate the odious power and name of committees) in the chief towns of every county, without the trouble, charge, or time lost of summoning and assembling from far in so great a number, and so long residing from their own houses, or removing of their families, to do as much at home in their several shires, entire or subdivided, toward the securing of their liberty, as a numerous assembly of them all formed and convened on purpose with the wariest rotation. Where of I shall speak more ere the end of this discourse: for it may be referrd to time, so we be still going on by degrees to perfection. The people well weighing and performing these things, I suppose would have no cause to fear, though the parliament, abolishing that name, as originally signifying but the parley of our Lords and Commons with their Norman king when he pleased to call them, should, with certain limitations of their power, sit perpetual, if their ends be faithful and for a free Commonwealth, under the name of a Grand or General council. Till this be done, I am in doubt whether our State will be ever certainly and throughly settled; never likely till then to see an end of our troubles and continual changes or at least never the true settlement and assurance of our liberty. The Grand council being thus firmly constituted to perpetuity, and still, upon the death or default of any member, supplied and kept in full number, there can be no cause alleged why peace, justice, plentiful trade and all prosperity should not thereupon ensue throughout the whole land; with as much assurance as can be of human things, that they shall so continue (if God favour us, and our wilful sins provoke him not) even to the coming of our true and rightful and only to be expected King, only worthy as he is our only Saviour, the Messiah, the Christ, the only heir of his eternal father, the only by him anointed and ordained since the work of our redemption finished, universal Lord of all mankind. The way propounded is plane, easy and open before us; without intricacies, without the introducement of new or obsolete forms, or terms, or exotic models; ideas that would effect nothing, but with a number of new injunctions to manacle the native liberty of mankind; turning all virtue into prescription, servitude, and necessity, to the great impairing and frustrating of Christian liberty: I say again, this way lies free and smooth before us; is not tangled with inconveniencies; invents no new encumbrances; requires no perilous, no injurious alteration or circumscription of men's lands and proprieties; secure, that in this Commonwealth, temporal and spiritual lords removed, no man or number of men can attain to such wealth or vast possession, as will need the hedge of an Agrarian law (never successful, but the cause rather of sedition, save only where it began seasonably with first possession) to confine them from endangering our public liberty; to conclude, it can have no considerable objection made against it, that it is not practicable: lest it be said hereafter, that we gave up our liberty for want of a ready way or distinct form proposed of a free Commonwealth. And this facility we shall have above our next neighbouring Commonwealth (if we can keep us from the fond conceit of something like a duke of Venice, put lately into many men's heads, by some one or other sutly driving on under that notion his own ambitious ends to lurch a crown) that our liberty shall not be hampered or hoverd over by any engagement to such a potent family as the house of Nassaw of whom to stand in perpetual doubt and suspicion, but we shall live the clearest and absolutest free nation in the world.  
On the contrary, if there be a king, which the inconsiderate multitude are now so mad upon, mark how far short we are like to come of all those happinesses, which in a free state we shall immediately be possessed of. First, the Grand council, which, as I showed before, should sit perpetually (unless their leisure give them now and then some intermissions or vacations, easily manageable by the council of State left sitting) shall be called, by the King's good will and utmost endeavour, as seldom as may be. For it is only the king's right, he will say, to call a parliament; and this he will do most commonly about his own affairs rather than the kingdom's, as will appear plainly so soon as they are called. For what will their business then be and the chief expense of their time, but an endless tugging between petition of right and and royal prerogative, especially about the negative voice, militia, or subsidies, demanded and oft times extorted without reasonable cause appearing to the Commons, who are the only true representatives of the people, and their liberty, but will be then mingled with a court-faction; besides which within their own walls, the sincere part of them who stand faithful to the people, will again have to deal with two troublesome counter-working adversaries from without, mere creatures of the king, spiritual, and the greater part, as is likeliest, of temporal lords, nothing concerned with the people's liberty. If these prevail not in what they please, though never so much against the people's interest, the parliament shall be soon dissolved, or sit and do nothing; not suffered to remedy the least grievance, or enact aught advantageous to the people. Next, the council of State shall not be chosen by the parliament, but by the king, still his own creatures, courtiers and favourites; who will be sure in all their counsels to set their Master's grandeur and absolute power, in what they are able, far above the people's liberty. I deny not but that there may be such a king, who may regard the common good before his own, may have no vicious favourite, may harken only to the wisest and incorruptest of his parliament: but this rarely happens in a monarchy not elective; and it behooves not a wise nation to commit the sum of their well-being, the whole state of their safety to fortune. What need they; and how absurd would it be, when as they themselves to whom his chief virtue will be but to harken, may with much better management and dispatch, with much more commendation of their own worth and magnanimity govern without a Master. Can the folly be paralleled, to adore and be the slaves of a single person for doing that which it is ten thousand to one whether he can or will do, and we without him might do more easily, more effectually, more laudably ourselves? Shall we never grow old enough to be wise to make seasonable use of gravest autorities, experiences, examples? Is it such an unspeakable joy to serve, such felicity to wear a yoke? to clink our shackles, locked on by pretended law of subjection more intolerable and hopeless to be ever shaken off, than those which are knocked on by illegal injury and violence? Aristotle, our chief instructor in the Universities, lest this doctrine be thought Sectarian, as the royalist would have it thought, tells us in the third of his Politics, that certain men at first, for the matchless excellence of their virtue above others, or some great public benefit, were created kings by the people; in small cities and territories, and in the scarcity of others to be found like them: but when they abused their power and governments grew larger, and the number of prudent men increased, that then the people soon deposing their tyrants, betook them, in all civilest places, to the form of a free Commonwealth. And why should we thus disparage and prejudicate our own nation, as to fear a scarcity of able and worthy men united in counsel to govern us, if we will but use diligence and impartiality to find them out and choose them, rather yoking ourselves to a single person, the natural adversary and oppressor of liberty, though good, yet far easier corruptible by the excess of his singular power and exaltation, or at best, not comparably sufficient to bear the weight of government, nor equally disposed to make us happy in the enjoyment of our liberty under him.  
But admit, that monarchy of itself may be convenient to some nations; yet to us who have thrown it out, received back again, it cannot but prove pernicious. For kings to come, never forgetting their former ejection, will be sure to fortify and arm themselves sufficiently for the future against all such attempts hereafter from the people: who shall be then so narrowly watched and keep so low, that though they would never so fain and at the same rate of their blood and treasure, they never shall be able to regain what they now have purchased and may enjoy, or to free themselves from any yoke imposed upon them: nor will they dare to go about it; utterly disheartened for the future, if these their highest attempts prove unsuccesful; which will be the triumph of all tyrants hereafter over any people that shall resist oppression; and their song will then be, to others, how sped the rebellious English? to our posterity, how sped the rebels your fathers? This is not my conjecture, but drawn from God's known denouncement against the gentilizing Israelites; who though they were governed in a Commouwealth of God's own ordaining, he only their king, they his peculiar people, yet affecting rather to resemble heathen, but pretending the misgovernment of Samuel's sons, no more a reason to dislike their commonwealth, than the violence of Eli's sons was imputable to that priesthood or religion, clamourd for a king. They had their longing; but with this testimony of God's wrath; ye shall cry out in that day because of your king whom ye shall have chosen, and the Lord will not hear you in that day. Us if he shall hear now, how much less will he hear when we cry hereafter, who once delivered by him from a king, and not without wondrous acts of his providence, insensible and unworthy of those high m●…ies, are returning precipitantly, if he withhold us not, back to the captivity from whence he freed us. Yet neither shall we obtain or buy at an easy rate this new guilded yoke which thus transports us: a new royal-revenue must be found, a new episcopal; for those are individual: both which being wholly dissipated or bought by private persons or assigned for service don, and especially to the army, cannot be recovered without a general detriment and confusion to men's estates, or a heavy imposition on all men's purses; benefit to none, but to the worst and ignoblest sort of men, whose hope is to be either the ministers of court riot and excess, or the gainers by it: But not to speak more of losses and extraordinary levies on our estates, what will then be the revenges and offences remembered and returned, not only by the chief person, but by all his adherents; accounts and reparations that will be required, suits, incitements, inquities, discoveries, complaints, informations, who knows against whom or how many, though perhaps neuters, if not to utmost infliction, yet to imprisonment, fines, banishment, or molestation; if not these, yet disfavor, discountnance, disregard and contempt on all but the known royalist or whom he favors, will be plenteous: nor let the new royalised presbyterians persuade themselves that their old doings, though now recanted, will be forgotten; what ever conditions be contrived or trusted on. Will they not believe this; nor remember the pacification, how it was kept to the Scots; how other solemn promises many a time to us? Let them but now read the diabolical fore-running libels, the faces, the gestures that now appear foremost and briskest in all public places; as the harbingers of those that are in expectation to reign over us; let them but hear the insolences, the menaces, the insultings of our newly animated common enemies crept lately out of their holes, their hell, I might say, by the language of their infernal pamphlets, the spew of every drunkard, every ribald; nameless, yet not for want of licence, but for very shame of their own vile persons, not daring to name themselves, while they traduce others by name; and give us to foresee that they intend to second their wicked words, if ever they have power, with more wicked deeds. Let our zealous backsliders forethink now with themselves, show their necks yoked with these tigers of Bacchus, these new fanatics of not the preaching but the sweating-tub, inspired with nothing holier than the Venereal pox, can draw one way under monarchy to the establishing of church discipline with these new-disgorged atheisms: yet shall they not have the honour to yoke with these, but shall be yoked under them; these shall plow on their backs. And do they among them who are so forward to bring in the single person, think to be by him trusted or long regarded? So trusted they shall be and so regarded, as by kings are wont reconciled enemies; neglected and soon after discarded, if not prosecuted for old traitors; the first inciters, beginners, and more than to the third part actors of all that followed; it will be found also, that there must be then as necessarily as now (for the contrary part will be still feared) a standing army; which for certain shall not be this, but of the fiercest Cavaliers, of no less expense, and perhaps again under Rupert: but let this army be sure they shall be soon disbanded, and likeliest without a●rear or pay; and being disbanded, not be sure but they may as soon be questioned for being in arms against their king: the same let them fear, who have contributed money; which will amount to no small number that must then take their turn to be made delinquents and compounders. They who past reason and recovery are devoted to kingship, perhaps will answer, that a greater part by far of the Nation will have it so; the rest therefore must yield. Not so much to convince these, which I little hope, as to confirm them who yield not, I reply; that this greatest part have both in reason and the trial of just battle, lost the right of their election what the government shall be: of them who have not lost that right, whether they for kingship be the greater number, who can certainly determine? Suppose they be; yet of freedom they partake all alike, one main end of government: which if the greater part value, not, but will degeneratly forgo, is it just or reasonable, that most voices against the the main end of government should enslave the less number that would be free? More just it is doubtless, if it come to force, that a less number compel a greater to retain, which can be no wrong to them, their liberty, then that a greater number for the pleasure of their baseness, compel a less most injuriously to be their fellow slaves. They who seek nothing but their own just liberty, have always right to win it and to keep it, when ever they have power, be the voices never so numerous that oppose it. And how much we above others are concerned to defend it from kingship, and from them who in pursuance thereof so perniciously would betray us and themselves to most certain misery and thraldom, will be needless to repeat.  
Having thus far shown with what ease we may now obtain a free Commonwealth, and by it with as much ease all the freedom, peace, justice, plenty that we can desire, on the other side the difficulties, troubles, uncertainties, nay rather impossibilities to enjoy these things constantly under a monarch, I will now proceed to show more particularly wherein our freedom and flourishing condition will be more ample and secure to us under a free Commonwealth then under kingship.  
The whole freedom of man consists either in spiritual or civil liberty. As for spiritual, who can be at rest, who can enjoy any thing in this world with contentment, who hath not liberty to serve God and to save his own soul, according to the best light which God hath planted in him to that purpose, by the reading of his revealed will and the guidance of his holy spirit? That this is best pleasing to God, and that the whole Protestant Church allows no supreme judge or rule in matters of religion, but the scriptures, and these to be interpreted by the the scriptures themselves, which necessarily infers liberty of conscience, I have heretofore proved at large in another treatise, and might, yet further by the public declarations, confessions and admonitions of whole churches and states, obvious in all history since the Reformation.  
This liberty of conscience which above all other things ought to be to all men dearest and most precious, no government more inclinable not to favour only but to protect, than a free commonwealth; as being most magnanimous, most fearless and confident of its own fair proceedings. Whereas kingship, though looking big, yet indeed most pusillanimous, full of fears, full of jealousies, startled at every ombrage, as it hath been observed of old to have ever suspected most and mistrusted them who were in most esteem for virtue and generosity of mind, so it is now known to have most in doubt and suspicion them who are most reputed to be religious. Queen Elizabeth though herself accounted so good a Protestant, so moderate, so confident of her Subjects love would never give way so much as to Presbyterian rereformation in this land, though once and again besought, as Camden relates, but imprisoned and persecuted the very proposers thereof; alleging it as her mind & maxim unalterable, that such reformation would diminish regal authority. What liberty of conscience can we then expect of others, far worse principled from the cradle, trained up and governed by Popish and Spanish counsels, and on such depending hitherto for subsistence? Especially what can this last parliament expect, who having revived lately and published the covenant, have reingaged themselves, never to readmitt episcopacy: which no son of Charles returning, but will most certainly bring back with him, if he regard the last and strictest charge of his father, to persevere in not the doctrine only, but government of the church of England; not to neglect the speedy and effectual suppressing of errors and schisms; among which he accounted presbytery one of the chief: or if notwithstanding that charge of his father, he submit to the covenant, how will he keep faith to us with disobedience to him; or regard that faith given, which must be founded on the breach of that last and solemnest paternal charge, and the reluctance, I may say the antipathy which is in all kings against Presbyterian and Independent discipline? for they hear the gospel speaking much of liberty; a word which monarchy and her bishops both fear and hate, but a free Commonwealth both favours and promotes; and not the word only, but the thing itself. But let our governors beware in time▪ least their hard measure to liberty of conscience be found the rock whereon they ship wrack themselves as others have now done before them in the course wherein God was directing their stearage to a free Commonwealth, and the abandoning of all those whom they call sectaries, for the detected falsehood and ambition of some, be a wilful rejection of their own chief strength and interest in the freedom of all Protestant religion, under what abusive name soever calumniated.  
The other part of our freedom consists in the civil rights and advancements of every person according to his merit: the enjoyment of those never more certain, and the access to these never more open, then in a free Commonwealth. Both which in my opinion may be best and soonest obtained, if every county in the land were made a kind of subordinate commonalty or commonwealth, and one chief town or more, according as the shire is in circuit, made cities, if they be not so called already; where the nobility and chief gentry from a proportionable compass of territory annexd to each city, may build, houses or palaces, befitting their quality, may bear part in the government, make their own judicial laws, or use these that are, and execute them by their own elected judicatures and judges without appeal, in all things of civil government between man and man. so they shall have justice in their own hands, law executed fully and finally in their own counties and precincts, long wished, and spoken of, but never yet obtained; they shall have none then to blame but themselves, if it be not well administered; and fewer laws to expect or fear from the supreme authority; or to those that shall be made, of any great concernment to public liberty, they may without much trouble in these commonalties or in more general assemblies called to their cities from the whole territory on such occasion, declare and publish their assent or dissent by deputies within a time limited sent to the Grand council: yet so as this their judgement declared shall submit to the greater number of other counties or commonalties, and not avail them to any exemption of themselves, or refusal of agreement with the rest, as it may in any of the United Provinces, being sovereign within itself, oft times to the great disadvantage of that union. In these employments they may much better than they do now, exercise and fit themselves, till their lot fall to be chosen into the Grand council, according as their worth and merit shall be taken notice of by the people. As for controversies that shall happen between men of several counties, they may repair, as they do now, to the capital city, or any other more commodious, indifferent place and equal judges. And this I find to have been practised in the old Athenian Commonwealth, reputed the first and ancientest place of civility in all Greece; that they had in their several cities, a peculiar; in Athens, a common government; and their right, as it befell them, to the administration of both. They should have here also schools and academies at their own choice, wherein their children may be bred up in their own sight to all learning and noble education not in grammar only, but in all liberal arts and exercises. This would soon spread much more knowledge and civility, yea religion through all parts of the land, by communicating the natural heat of government and culture more distributively to all extreme parts, which now lie numb and neglected, would soon make the whole nation more industrious, more ingenuous at home, more potent, more honourable abroad. To this a free Commonwealth will easily assent; (nay the parliament hath had already some such thing in design) for of all governments 〈◊〉 Commonwealth aims most to make the people flourishing, virtuous, noble and high spirited. Monarch's will never permit: whose aim is to make the people, wealthy indeed perhaps and well fleeced, for their own she●ing and the supply of regal prodigality; but otherwise softest, basest, vitiousest, servilest, easiest to be kept under; and not only in fleece, ●ut in mind also sheepishest; and will have all the benches of judicature annexd to the throne, as a gift of royal grace that we have justice done us; when as nothing can be more essential to the freedom of a people, then to have the administration of justice and all public ornaments in their own election and within their own bounds, without long travelling or depending on remote places to obtain their right or any civil accomplishment; so it be not supreme, but subordinate to the general power and union of the whole Republic. In which happy firmness as in the particular above mentioned, we shall also far exce●… the United Provinces, by having, not as they (to the retarding and distracting oft times of their counsels or urgentest occasions) many sovereignties united in one Commonwealth, but many Commonwealths under one united and entrusted sovereignty. And when we have our forces by sea and land, either of a faithful army or a settled Militia, in our own hands to the firm establishing of a free Commonwealth, public accounts under our own inspection, general laws and taxes with their causes in our own domestic suffrages, judicial laws, offices and ornaments at home in our own ordering and administration, all distinction of lords and commoners, that may any way divide or sever the public interest, removed, what can a perpetual senate have then wherein to grow corrupt, wherein to encroach upon us or usurp; or if they do, wherein to be formidable? Yet if all this avail not to remove the fear or envy of a perpetual sitting, it may be easily provided, to change a third part of them yearly or every two or three years, as was above mentioned; or that it be at those times in the people's choice, whether they will change them, or renew their power, as they shall find cause.  
I have no more to say at present: few words will save us, well considered; few and easy things, now seasonably done. But if the people be so affected, as to prostitute religion and liberty to the vain and groundless apprehension, that nothing but kingship can restore trade, not remembering the frequent plagues and pestilences that then wasted this city, such as through God's mercy we never have felt since, and that trade flourishes nowhere more than in the free Commonwealths of Italy, Germany, and the Low-Countries before their eyes at this day, yet if trade be grown so craving and importunate through the profuse living of tradesmen, that nothing can support it, but the luxurious expenses of a nation upon trifles or superfluities, so as if the people generally should betake themselves to frugality, it might prove a dangerous matter, least tradesmen should mutiny for want of trading, and that therefore we must forgo & set to sale religion, liberty, honour, safety, all concernments Divine or human to keep up trading, if lastly, after all this light among us, the same reason shall pass for current to put our necks again under kingship, as was made use of by the Jews to return back to Egypt and to the worship of their idol queen, because they falsely imagined that they then lived in more plenty and prosperity, our condition is not sound but rotten, both in religion and all civil prudence; and will bring us soon, the way we are marching, to those calamities which attend always and unavoidably on luxury, all national judgements under foreign or domestic slavery: so far we shall be from mending our condition by monarchizing our government, whatever new conceit now possesses us. However with all hazard I have ventured what I thought my duty to speak in season, and to forewarn my country in time: wherein I doubt not but there be many wise men in all places and degrees, but am sorry the effects of wisdom are so little seen among us. Many circumstances and particulars I could have added in those things whereof I have spoken; but a few main matters now put speedily in execution, will suffice to recover us, and set all right: and there will want at no time who are good at circumstances; but men who set their minds on main matters and sufficiently urge them, in these most difficult times I find not many. What I have spoken, is the language of that which is not called amiss the good Old Cause: if it seem strange to any, it will not seem more strange, I hope, than convincing to backsliders. Thus much I should perhaps have said though I were sure I should have spoken only to trees and stones; and had none to cry to, but with the Prophet, O earth, earth, earth! to tell the very soil itself, what her perverse inhabitants are deaf to. Nay though what I have spoke, should happen (which Thou suffer not, who didst create mankind free; nor Thou next, who didst redeem us from being servants of men!) to be the last words of our expiring liberty. But I trust I shall have spoken persuasion to abundance of sensible and ingenuous men: to some perhaps whom God may raise of these stones to become children of reviving liberty; and may reclaim, though they seem now choosing them a captain back for Egypt, to bethink themselves a little and consider whether they are rushing; to exhort this torrent also of the people, not to be so impetuos, but to keep their due channel; and at length recovering and uniting their better resolutions, now that they see already how open and unbounded the insolence and rage is of our common enemies, to stay these ruinous proceedings; justly and timely fearing to what a precipice of destruction the deluge of this epidemic madness would hurry us through the general defection of a misguided and abused multitude.  
The end.