Mr. SMIRKE; OR, THE DIVINE in MODE: BEING Certain Annotations, upon the Animadversions on the Naked Truth.  
Together with a Short Historical Essay, concerning General Councils, Creeds, and Impositions, in Matters of Religion.  
Nuda, sed Magna est Veritas, & praevalebit.  
BY ANDREA'S RIVETUS, Junior, Anagr. RES NUDA VERITAS.  
Printed Anno Domini MDC LXXVI.   

To the CAPTIOUS READER.  
ALL that I have to require of thee is, That wheresoever my Style or Principles Strike out, and keep not within the same Bounds, that the most Judicious Author of the Naked Truth hath all along observed; he may not therefore be traced. He could best have writ a Defence proportionable to his own Subject; had he esteemed it necessary, or that it was decent for him to have entered the Pit with so Scurrilous an Animadverter. But I thought it a piece of due Civility from one of the Laities, to interest myself for one of the Clergy, who had so highly obliged the People of England. And I will answer for mine own faults, I ask thee no pardon. Nor therefore is either the Author, or any other particular Person, or any Party, to be accused, or misrepresented upon my Private Account. For the rest, neither let any particular Man, or Order, enlarge my meaning against themselves, further than in Conscience they find they are guilty. Nor let the body of Chaplains think themselves affronted. None more esteems them, nor loves their Conversation better than I do. They are the succeeding hope of our Church, the Youth of our Clergy; and the Clergy are the Reserve of our Christianity. Some of them, whom I know, have indeed, and do continue daily to put very Singular Obligations upon me; but I write to a Nobler end, than to revenge my Petty Concernments.  
Adieu.   

The Erratas are too many to be Corrected; But p. 7. l ult. Eighth is to be struck out.   

Mr. SMIRKE, Or the Divine in Mode.  
IT hath been the Good Nature (and Politicians will have it the Wisdom) of most Governors to entertain the people with Public Recreations; and therefore to encourage such as could best contribute to their Divertisement. And hence doubtless it is, that our Ecclesiastical Governors also (who as they yield to none for Prudence, so in good Humour they exceed all others,) have not disdained of late years to afford the Laity no inconsiderable Pastime. Yea so great hath been their condescension that, rather than fail, they have carried on the Merriment by men of their own Faculty, who might otherwise by the gravity of their Calling, have claimed an exemption from such Offices. They have Ordained from time to time several of the most Ingenious and Pregnant of their Clergy to supply the Press continually with new Books of ridiculous and facetious argument. Wherein divers of them have succeeded even to admiration: in so much that by the reading thereof, the ancient Sobriety and Seriousness of the English Nation hath been in some good measure discussed and worn out of fashion. Yet, though the Clergy have hereby manifested that nothing comes amiss to them, and particularly, that when they give their minds to it, no sort of men are more proper or capable to make sport for Spectators; it hath so happened by the rewards and Promotions bestowed upon those who have laboured in this Province, that many others in hopes of the like Preferment, although otherwise by their Parts, their Complexion and Education unitted for this Jocular Divinity, have in order to it wholly neglected the more weighty cares of their Function. And from hence it proceeds, that to the no small scandal and disreputation of our Church, a great Arcanum of their State hath been discovered and divulged: That, albeit Wit be not inconsistent and incompatible with a Clergyman, yet neither is it inseparable from them. So that it is of concernment to my Lords the Bishops henceforward to repress those of 'em who have no Wit from Writing, and to take care that even those that have, do husband it better, as not-knowing-to what exigency they may be reduced: But however that they the Bishops ●…e not too forward in Licensing and perfixing their venerable Names to such Pamphlets. For admitting, though I am not too positive in it, that our Episcopacy is of Apostolical Right, yet we do not find that among all those gifts then given to men, that which we call Wit is enumerated: nor yet among th●…se qlifications requisite to a Bishop▪ And therefore should they out o●… Comp●…cy for an Author, o●… Deli●…ht in the Argument, or 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of a ●…ll Book, their own understandings will be answerable, and irreverent people, that cannot distinguish, will be ready to think that such of them differ from men of Wit, not only in Degree, but in Or●…▪ For all are not of my mind, who could never see any one ele●…ted to that Dignity, but I presently conceived a greater opinion of his Wit then ever I had formerly. But some do not 〈◊〉 to 〈◊〉 that even they, the Bishops, come by their●… not by Inspiration, 〈◊〉 by Teaching, but even as the poo●… Laity do sometimes light upon i●…, by a good Mother? Which has ●…sioned the homely Scotch▪ Proverb that, An Ounce of Mother ●…it is worth a Pound of Clergy▪ And as they come by it as do other men, so they possess it on the same condition▪ That they cannot transmit it by breathing, touching, or any natural 〈◊〉 to other persons●… not so much as to their most Domes●… Chaplain▪ or to the closest Re●…identiary. That the King himself, who is no 〈◊〉 the Spring of That, than he is th●… Fountain of Honour, yet has never used the Dubbing or Creating of Wits as a Flower of his Prerogative: much less can the Ecclesiastical Power confe●…re it with the same case as they do the Holy Orders. That whatsoever they can do of that kind is, at uttermost, to 〈◊〉 power men by their authority and commission, no other 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the 〈◊〉 of Midwife's o●… Physicians. But that a●… to their collating of any internal talon or ability, they could never p●…tend to it▪ their grants and their prohibitions are alike invalids, and they can neither capacitate one ma●… to be Witty, nor hinder another 〈◊〉 being so, further than as the Press is at their Dev●… 〈◊〉 which if i●… be the Case, they cannot be too 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, and should be very exquisite, seeing this way 〈◊〉 w●…iting is ●…und so necessary, in making choice of ●…it 〈◊〉. The Church's credit is more interested in a●… Ecclesia●… 〈◊〉 then i●… 〈◊〉 Lay Chancellor. It is no small ●…rust 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to whom the Bishop shall commit: Omne & omnimodum suum Ingenium tam Temp●…rale quam Spirituale: And, however it goes with Excommunication, they should take good heed to what manner of person they delegate the Keys of Laughter. It is not every man that is qualified to sustain the Dignity of the Church's Jester: and, should they take as exact a scrutiny of them as of the Non-conformists thorough their Dioceses, the number would appear inconsiderable upon this Easter Visitation. Before men be admitted to so important an employment, it were fit they underwent a severe Examination; and that it might appear, first, whether they have any Sense: for without that how can any man pretend, and yet they do, to be ingenious? Then, whether they have any Modesty: for without that they can only be scurrilous and impudent. Next, whether any Truth: for true Jests are those that do the greatest execution. And Lastly, it were not amiss that they gave some account too of their Christianity: for the world has always hitherto been so uncivil as to expect something of that from the Clergy▪ in the design and style even of their lightest and most uncanonical Writings. And though I am no rigid Imposer of a Discipline of mine own devising, yet had any thing of this nature entered in to the minds of other men, it is not impossible that a late Pamphlet, published by Authority and proclaimed by the Gazette, Animadversions upon a late Pamphlet, entit●…led the Naked Truth, or, the true state of the Primitive Church, might have been spared.  
That Book so called The Naked Truth, is a Treatise, that, were it not for this its Opposer, needs no commendation: being writ with that Evidence and Demonstration of Spirit, that all sober men cannot but give their Assent and Consent to it, unasked. It is a Book of that kind, that no Christian scarce can peruse it without wishing himself had been the Author, and almost imagining that he is so: the Conceptions therein being of so Eternal an Idea, that every man finds it to be but the Copy of an Original in his own Mind, and though he never read it till now, wonders it could be so long before he remembered it. Neither, although there be a time when as they say all truths are not to be spoken, could there ever have come forth any thing more seasonable. When the sickly Nation had been so long indisposed and knew not the Remedy, but (having Taken so many things, that rather did it harm then good,) only longed for some Moderation, and as soon as it had tasted this, seemed to itself sensibly to recover. When their Representatives in Parliament had been of late so frequent in consultations of this nature, and they the Physicians of the Nation, were ready to have received any wholesome advice for the Cure of our Malady: It appears moreover plainly that the Author is Judicious, Learned, Conscientious, a sincere Protestant, and a true Son, If not a Father, of the Church of England. For the 〈◊〉▪ the Book cannot be free from the imperfections in●…ident to all humane endeavours, ●…t those so small, and guarded every where with so much Modesty, that it seems here was none left for the Animadverter, who might otherwise have blushed to reproach him. But some there were that thought Holy Church was concerned in it, and that no true born Son of our Mother of England but aught to have it in detestation. Not only the Churches but the Coffeehouses rung against it, they itinerated like Excise-●…pyes from one house to another, and some of the Morning and Evening Chaplains burned their lips with perpetual discoursing it out of reputation, and loading the Author, whoever he were, with all contempt, malice and obloquy. No●… could this suffice them, but a lasting Pillar of Infamy must be erected to eternize his Crime and his Punishment. There must be an answer to him, in Print, and that not according to the ordinary rules of civility, or in the sober way of arguing Controversy, but with the utmost extremity of J●…ere, Disdain, and Indignation: and happy the man whose lot it should be to be deputed to that performance. It was Shrove-Tuesday with them, and, not having yet forgot their Boyes-play, they had set up this Cock, and would have been contet some of them to have ventured their Coffee-Farthings, yea their Easter-pences by advance, to have a sting at him. But there was this close youth who treads always upon the heels of Ecclesiastical Preferment, but hath come nearer the heels of the Naked Truth than were for his service, that rather by favour the●… any tolerable sufficiency ●…ied away this employment, as he hath done many others from them. So that being the man pitched upon, he took up an unfortunate resolution that he would be Witty. Infortunate I say, and no less Criminal: for I dare aver that never any person was more manifestly guilty of the sin against Nature. But however to write a Book of that virulence, and at such a season was very improper: even in the Holy time of Lent when, whether upon the Sacred account, it behoved hi●…●…ther to have subjugated and mortified the swelling of his passions▪ or whether upon the Political reason, he might well have forborn his young Wit, as but newly Pigged or Calved, in order to the growth of the yearly summer provisions. Yet to work he fell, not omitting first to ●…m himself up in the whole wardrobe of his Function▪ as well because his Wit consi●…ing wholly in his Dres●…e, he would (and 'twas hi●… concernment 〈◊〉) have it all about him▪ as to the end that being hu●…'d up in all his Ecclesiastical 〈◊〉, he might appear more formidable, and in the pride of his Heart and Habit out- ●…niface an Humble M●…derator. So that there was 〈◊〉 to do in ●…quipping of Mr. Smirke then there is about 〈◊〉, and the Di●…ine is M●…de ●…ight have vied with Sir Fopling Flutter. The Vestry and the Tir●…ng-Roome were both exhausted, and 'tis hard to say whether there went more attendants toward the Composing of Himself, or of his Pamphlet. Being thus dressed up, at last forth he comes in Print. No Poet either the First or the Third day could be more concerned, and his little Party, like men hired for the purpose, had posted themselves at every corner to feign a more numerous applause: but clapped out of time, and disturbed the whole Company.  

Annotations upon his Animadversions on the Title, Dedication, etc.  
AT first bolt in his Animadversions on the Title, the Dedication, and the Epistle to the Reader, he denounces sentence before inquiry but against the Book itself, forgetting already his subject, so early his brain circulates; and saith, that, Having perused the Book thoroughly he is abundantly satisfied not only from his Style, which is something Enthusiastic (his speech bewrays him) but from his matter and Principles if he stick to any, that the Author is a borderer upon Fanaticis●…e and does not know it. Even as the Animadverter is upon Wit and Reason; for I have heard that Borderers for the most part, are at the greatest distance, and the most irreconcilable. What the Style is of a Title, and what the Principles of a Dedication and Epistle to the Reader (for these, if any, the Animadverter ought here to have stuck to) it's indeed a weighty disquisition fit for a man of his Talon. But I have read them over, and so have others of better judgement, and find every sentence therein poised with so much reverence, humility, and judicious Piety, that from an humane pen (allowing the Reader any tolerable share too of Humanity) I know not what more could have been expected. And as to the Matter, it seems to be but a Paraphrase upon the Principles of the Song of the Angels; Glory to God on high, on Earth Peace, Good Will toward men. If to speak at that rate, and upon such a subject, with so good an intention, be to have an Enthusiastic Style or Fanatical Principles, it is the first crime of which I should be glad to be guilty. What in the mean time shall we say to these men, who out of a perverse jealousy they have of the Non-conformists, ru●…, which few wise men do into the contrary extreme, affixing such odious names to every word or thing that is sober and serious, that with their good will they would render it impracticable for men even to discourse pertinently concerning Religion or Christianity? Put it upon this short issue: If the stile of the Epistle before the Naked Truth be Enthusiastic and Fanatical, the stile of the Animadverter is presumed, and so allowed of, as Spiritual, Divine, and Canonical.  
The first Evidence that he produces after so hasty a sentence against the Author, is out of the Book too, not out of the Title, Dedication, or Epistle; that he has said p. 17. In the Primitive times when the whole world of Jews and Gentiles were enemies to the Church and not one of your Ceremonies to preserve it, the simple Naked Truth without any Surplice to cover it, without any Ecclesiastical Policy to maintain it, overcame all, and so it would do now did we trust to it, and the Defender of it. And upon this he runs division. The Defender in Heaven, God; the Defender of the Faith His Majesty; and the many Defenders (among whom I suppose he reckons himself of the Principal) who may be trusted, This is all fooling, whereas the Author does manifestly intend it of God Almighty, and could not otherwise. For though His Majesty may well be trusted for his Reign with the Defence of the Naked Truth, yet most of us know that in the Primitive Times, His Majesty was too young for that employment, and that it was God alone who could then protect it, when the Defenders of the Faith were all Heathens, and most of them Persecutors of Christianity. He than descants no less upon Naked Truth; The Naked Truth of our Cause, or the Naked Truth of the Pamphlet, or, he knows not what Naked Truth. But he saith it should have been Truth Fleed (so he had the Butchery of it) Which is like Pilate and no worse man, who when our Saviour told him, he came into the world John 18. 37. That he might bear witness to the Truth, asked him, What is Truth? and than though he confessed he found no evil in this man, delivered him over, against his Conscience, to be Stripped, Scourged, Fleyed, and afterwards Crucified. Such like also is his talking, that this is Stripping the Church to skin, nay skin and all, and skin for skin: so wretchedly does he hunt over hedge and ditch for an University Quibble. The casual progress and leaping consequences of any man's memory are more rational than this method of his understanding, and the Non-Conformists Concordance is a Discourse of more coherence than such Ammadversions: I have heard a mad man having got a word by the end ramble after the same manner: in this only he is true to himself, and candid to the Author, having avowed that he had s●…nn'd the Book thorough, this hacking and vain repetition being just like it, when we were at our  
Montibus inquit erant & erant, sub montibus illis:  
Rifit Atlantiades, &, me mihi perfide prodis,  
Me mihi prodis, ait.  
For as I remember this Scanning was a liberal Art that we learned at Grammar-School; and to Scann Verses as he does the Author's Prose, before we did, or were obliged to understand them. But his tugging all this while at skin, and skin for skin, and all that he has he will give for his life, merely to hale in an ill favoured Jeer at the Author, and truly with some profaneness, for proposing the Naked Truth as necessary for the self preservation of our Church, and an expedient against Popery; is, (whatsoever the Animadverters judgement be) a retchlesness and mockery ill becoming his Character. And it savours of the Liquorishness of a Trencher-Chaplain, little concerned in the Curâ Animarum, so he may but Curare Cuticulam.  
But as to his fastidious reproach of the Authors seeking of God, his Fasts and his Prayers, the Animadverter is more excusable, having doubtless writ his Pamphlet without practising any of these Fanatical Superstitions, as neither was it requisite; But if he had, 'twas such an answer to his Prayers as never before came from Heaven. The Animadverter is proof against all such Exorcisms and although our Saviour prescribed these remedies against the most obstinate Devils, this man it seems is possessed with a superior spirit which is not to be cast out, no not by Prayer and Fasting, but sets them at defiance.  
Nor had the Animadverter, when he considered himself, less reason to blame the Author for deliberating so long before he published his Book, and for doing it, then with so much Modesty. These are Crimes of which the Animadverter will never be suspected or accused by any man at least they will do him very much wrong, but however it will be impossible ever to convict him of them. But to word it too so superciliously! This has been the Travel of his mind, since he had these thoughts, which he has been humbly conceiving these two years; time enough for an Elephant to bring forth in. Why there is, 'tis true, a winged sort of Elephant, hath a peculiar Trunk too like the other, is not so docile and good-natured; but impudent flying in every man's face, and sanguinary thirsting always after blood, and as if it were some considerable Wild-Beast, makes a terrible Buzz; but in conclusion 'tis a pitiful, giddy, blind, troublesome Insect, engendered in a night's time in every Marish, can but run a Poor thorough and give a skinne-wound, and the least touch of a man's finger will crush it. In the Naked Truth it is but a Gnat: and such is the Animadverter compared with the Author.  
But in this next Paragraph the Animadverter seems to have outshot himself, that not content with having passed his own Ecclesiastical Censure upon the Author, he forges too in his mind a sentence of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament: who, he believes and 'tis probable, would have doomed the Book to be burnt by the Hangman. In this he hath meddled beyond his last: but it is some men's property: yet neither is it so likely they would have done it, at the same time when they were about passing an Act for the easing all Protestant dissenters from Penalties, had he vouched for the Convocation, his Belief, or his probability might have been of more value.  
But what has he to do, (yet they have a singular itch to it) with Parliament business: or how can so thin a scull comprehend or divine the results of the Wisdom of the Nation? Unless he can, as in the Epilogue.  
Legion his name, a People in a Man,  
And, instead of Sir Fopling Flutter, he Mr. Smirke.  
Be Knight oth'-Shire and represent them all.  
Who knows indeed but he may, by some new and extraordinary Writ, have been summoned upon the Emergency of this Book, to Represent in his peculiar person the whole Representative? Yet by his leave, though he be so, he ought not to Undertake before he be Assembled. I know indeed he may have had some late Precedents for it, and for some years' continuance, from men too of his own Profession. And if therefore he should Undertake, and to give a good Tax for it, Yet what security can he have himself, but that there may rise such a Contest between the Lords and Commons within him, that, before they can agree about this Judicial Proceeding against the Book, it may be thought fit to Prorogue him.  
The Crimes indeed are heinous, and if the Man and Book be guilty, may when time comes, furnish special matter for an Impeachment. That he has made a breach upon their Glorious Act of Unniformity, Violated their Act, their most necessary Act (the Animadverter hath reason by this time to say so) against Printing without a Licence: and I suppose he reserves anotherfor aggravation in due time; the Act against seditious Conventicles. For these three are all of a piece, and yet are the several Pieces of the Animadverters Armour: and are indeed no less, nor no more than necessary: For considering how empty of late the Church Magazines have been of that Spiritual Armour, which the Apostle found sufficient against the assaults of whatsoever enemy, even of Satan; what could men in all humane reason do less, then to furnish such of the Clergy as wanted, with these Weapons of another Warfare? But, although these Acts were the true effects of the Prudence and Piety of that season, yet it is possible (but who can provide for all cases?) that, if there have not already, there may arise thereby in a short time some notable inconvenience. For suppose that Truth should one day or other come to be Truth and every man a Liar, (I mean of the humour of this Parliamentum Indoctum, this single Representativer, this Animadverter) you see there is no more to be said, as the Case stands at present, but Executioner do your Office. Nor therefore can it ever enter into my mind, as to that Act particularly of Printing, that the Lawgivers could thereby intend to allow any man a promiscuous Licentiousness, and Monopoly of Printing Pernicious Discourses, tending to sow and increase dissension thorough the Land (of which there is but too large a crop already;) as neither of Prohibiting Books dictated by Christian meekness and charity for the promoting of Truth and Peace among us, and reconciling our Differences; no nor even of such as are writ to take out the Blots of Printing-Inke, and wipe off the Aspersions which divers of the Licenced Clergy cast upon men's private Reputations: and yet this is the use to which the Law is sometimes applied. And this Animadverter, who could never have any rational confidence or pretence to the Press or Print, but by an unlucky English saying men have, or by the Text-Letters of his Imprimatur, arraigns' this worthy Author for Printing without Allowance, as if it were a sin against the Eleventh Commandment. Though a Samaritan perhaps may not practise Physic without a Licence, yet must a Priest and a Levite always pass by on the other side and if one of them, in an Age, pour Oil and Wine into the Wounds of our Church (instead of Tearing them Wider,) must he be Cited for it into the Spiritual Court and incur all Penalties? This high Charge made me the more curious to inquire particularly how that Book The Naked Truth was published, which the Animadverter himself pretends to have got a sight of with some difficulty. And I am credibly informed that the Author caused four hundred of them and no more to be Printed against the last Session but one of Parliament. For nothing is more usual then to Print and present to them Proposals of Revenue, Matters of Trade, or any thing of Public Convenience; and sometimes Cases and Petitions, and this, which the Animadverter calls the Author's Dedication, is his humble Petition to the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament: And understanding the Parliament inclined to a Temper in Religion, he prepared these for the Speakers of both Houses and as many of the Members as those could furnish. But that, the Parliament rising just as the Book was delivering out and before it could be presented, the Author gave speedy order to suppress it till another Session. Some covetous Printer in the mean time getting a Copy, surreptitioufly Reprinted it, and so it flew abroad without the Author's knowledge, and against his direction. So that it was not his, but the Printers fault to have put so great an obligation upon the public. Yet because the Author has in his own Copies, out of his unspeakable Tenderness and Modesty begged pardon of the Lords and Commons, in his Petition, for transgressing their Act against Printing without a Licence, this Indoctum Parliamentum mistaking the Petition as addressed to himself, will not grant it, but insults over the Author and upbraids him the rather as a desperate offender, that sins on he saith, goes on still in his wickedness, and hath done it against his own Conscience. Now truly if this were a sin, it was a sin of the first Impression. And the Author appears so constant to the Church of England, and to its Liturgy in particular, that, having confessed four hundred times with an humble, lowly, penitent, and obedient heart, I doubt not but in assisting at Divine Service he hath frequently since that received Absolution. It is something strange that to publish a good Book is a sin, and an ill one a virtue; and that while one comes out with Authority; the other may not have a Dispensation. So that we seem to have got an Expurgatory Press, though not an Index, and the most Religious Truth must be expunged and suppressed in order to the false and secular interest of some of the Clergy. So much wiser are they grown by process of time than the Obsolete Apostle that said, We can do nothing against the Truth. But this hath been of late years the practice of these single Representers of the Church of England, to render those Peccadillioes against God as few and inconsiderable as may be, but to make the sins against themselves as many as possible, and these to be all heinous and unpardonable. In so much that if we of the Laity would but study our Self-Preservation, and learn of them to be as true to our separate interest as these men are to theirs, we ought not to wish them any new Power for the future, but after very mature deliberation. Forasmuch as every such Act does but serve, as some of them use it, to make the good people of England walk in peril of their Souls, to multiply sin and abomination thorough the Land, and by engaging men's minds under spiritual Bondage, to lead them Canonically on into Temporal slavery. Whereas the Laity are commonly more temperate and merciful (I might say more discreet) in the exercising of any Authority they are entrusted with, and what Power they have, they will not wear it thread bare: so that if I were to commit a fault for my life, (as suppose by Printing this without a Licence) I would choose to sin against good Mr. Oldenburg.  
But this Animadverter is the genuine example of Ecclesiastical Clemency, who proceeding on cannot bear that the Author should use the Title of an Humble Moderator (he thinks him sure guilty herein Lasae Majestatis Ecclesiasticae, and that both these Qualities are incompatible with one of their Coat, and below the Dignity of any man of the Faculty) much less will he endure him when he comes, in the following discourse, to justify his Claim to that Title, by letting his Moderation according to the Apostles precept, be known to all men, for the Lord is at hand. But he saith that the Author Assumes, Imposes, and Turns all upside down, and witnesses an Immoderate Zeal for one (that is the Non-Conformists) Party: than which the Animadverter could never have invented a more notorious, studied, and deliberate Falsehood, to prepossess and misled the gentle Reader: Wherein does he Assume? He speaks like a Man, a Creature to which Modesty and Reason are peculiar; not like an Animadverter, that is an Animal which hath nothing Humane in it but a Malicious Grin, that may Provoke indeed, but cannot Imitate so much as Laughter. Wherein does he Impose? In nothing but by declaring his Opinion against all unreasonable Imposition? And though it appears natural to him to speak with Gravity, yet he usurps not any Authority further, then as any man who speaks of a Truth which he thoroughly understands, cannot with all his Modesty and Humility hinder others from paying a due Reverence to his Person and acquiescing in his Doctrine. But wherein does he Turn all upside down? This hath been a common Topick of Ecclesiastical Accusation. Our Saviour was accused that he would Destroy the Temple. The first Martyr Steven was stoned as a Complice. And Saint Paul (as ill luck would have it) was made odious upon the same Crimination of the Animadverters, Acts 17. v. 5, 6. For, certain Lewd-fellows of the base sort, set all the City in an uproar, crying those that have turned the world Up-side-down are come hither also. And yet notwithstanding all these Calumnies, The Naked Truth, Christianity, hath made a shift, God bethanked, to continue till this day: and there will never want those that bear testimony to it, even to the Primitive Christianity, maugre all the arts that the men of Religion can contrive to misrepresent and discountenance it. But as for the Turning all up-side-down, the Animadverter is somewhat innocent, if by the defect of his Organt, as it fares with those whose Brain turns round, (' So we vulgarly express it) he have imagined that the world is tumbling headlong with him. But as to the Prejudice, which he therefore reserved as the most effectual and taking to undo the Author by, that he is Immoderately Zealous for the Non-Conformists; it is the effect of as strong a Fancy, or as Malicious an Intention as the Former; it being scarce possible to open the Book in any place without chancing upon some passage where he makes a firm Profession, or gives a clear proof of his real submission and Addiction to the Church of England: all his fault for aught I see being, that he is more Truly and Cordially concerned for our Church then some men's Ignorance is capable of, or their corrupt interest can comply with. But therefore whoever were the adviser it is not well done to use him in this dirty manner. There is no prudence in it, nor whereas the Author, in excuse that he sets not his name, saith it is, because he is a man of great Passions, and not able to bear a Reproach (The Animadverter had done fairer to cite the whole, or Commendations: my small Ability puts me out of danger of the last, but in great fear of the former.) Therefore to resolve thus (whereas they might have undone him you see by Commendation) the rather to Reproach him, now they have learned his Feeble Holy Church, I can tell you hath suffered upon that account so of ten that it were time for her to be wiser. For by exasperating men of Parts, who out of an ingenious love of Truth have temperately Writ against some abuses, She hath added Provocation to men's Wit to look still further; insomuch that at last it hath sometimes produced (than which nothing can be more dangerous to the Church) a Reformation. Therefore, though Christ hath commanded his Followers (so it be not I suppose out of his Way) that if any man press them to go one mile, they should go two; yet it is not wisdom in the Church to pretend to, or however to exercise, that Power of Angariating men further than their occasions or understandings will permit. If a man cannot go their Length 'tis better to have his company in quiet as far as his Road lies. For my part I take the Church of England to be very happy in having a Person of his Learning and Piety so far to comply with Her; and, if my advice might be taken, She should not lose one inch more of him by handling him irreverently. For if once She should totally lose him, God knows what an Instrument he might prove, and how much good he might do in the Nation, more than he ever yet thought of. What a shame it is to hear the Animadverter abuse him (who by the very Character of his Style appears no Vulgar Person, and by how much he hath more of Truth, hath more of God's Image, and should therefore have imprinted that Awe upon him that Man hath over most Brutes:) he to trifle with so worthy a person at that rate, that one would not use the meanest Varlet, the dullest Schoolboy, the rankest Idiot, no nor the veriest Animadverter! However he saith, the Author hath done himself and him the Animadverter a great favour, by concealing his Name, in making it impossible for him to reflect upon his Person (otherwise it seems he should have had it home) which he knows no more than the Man in the Moon. But therefore I am the rather jealous he did know him: for the Animadverter having a Team of Gnaz'as always a his devotion, and being able if any one tired by the way to relieve it and draw in person, never think that he would want intelligence in that Region. Come 'twas all but an affected ignorance in the Animadverter, and he had both inquired and heard as much as any of us who was the probable Author: and all the Guard that he Lies upon is, because the Author had not given him legal notice that he Writ it. And this was even as the Animadverter would have wished it. For if a Reverend Person had openly avowed it, he could not have been saucy with so gooda Grace: But under the pretence of not knowing, Sir, that it was you, but only, Sir, as you were the Patron of so vile a Cause, many a dry bob, close gird, and privy nip has he given him. Yet he saith, the Author would have done well, and a piece of Justice to have named himself, so to have cleared others: for it hath been confidently laid to the charge of more than one Reverend Person (how slily!) who (I have great reason to believe, and am several ways assured) had no hand in it. Truly the Animadverter too would have done a piece of Justice to have named himself; for there has been more than one Witty person traduced for his Pamphlet, and I believe by this time he would take it for a great favour if any man would be such a Fool as own it for him. For he very securely reproaches the Author, and yet I have been seeking all over for the Animadverters name, and cannot find it. Not withstanding that he writes forsooth in defence of the Church of England; and against so vile a Cause, as he styles it, and under the Public Patronage. Which is most disingenuously done, as on other accounts, so in respect of my Lord Bishop of London, whom he has left in the lurch to justify another man's Follies with his Authority. But however that venerable Person, who has for Learning, Candor, and Piety, as he does for Dignity also, outstripped his Age and his Fellows, have been drawn in to Licence what certainly he cannot approve of, it was but his First Fruits, and a piece of early liberality, as is usual, upon his new Promotion, and I am given to understand that, for the Animadverters sake, it is like to be the last that he will allow of that nature. But this is not only a Trick of the Animadverters, but ordinary with many others of them, who while we write at our own peril, and perhaps set our names to it, (for I am not yet resolved whether I can bear Reproach or Commendation) they that rail for the Church of England, and under the Public Licence and Protection, yet leave men, as if it were at Hot-Cockles to guess blindfold who it is that hit them. But it is possible that some of these too may lie down in their turns. What should be the reason of it? sure theirs is not so Vile a Cause too that they dare not abide by it. Or are they the Writers conscious to themselves that they are such Things as ought not once to be Named among Christians? Or is it their own sorry performance that makes them ashamed to avow their own Books? Or is there some secret force upon them that obliges them to say things against their Conscience? Or would they reserve a Latitude to themselves to turn Non-Conformists again upon occasion? Or do they in pure honesty abstain from putting a single Name to a Book, which hath been the workmanship of the whole Diocese?  
But though he know not his Name, seeing he has vented his own Amusements to the Churches great and real prejudice he saith, (and that is this Case) he must not think to scape for the Godliness of his Style: Impious and most unmerciful! Poor David was often in this Case. Psal. 22. They gaped upon him with their Mouth. He trusted, said they, in the Lord that he would deliver him, let him deliver him seeing he delighted in him. And Psal. 71. 11. Persecute and take him, there is none to deliver him. And yet there are many places too in Scripture, where God spared men even for their outward Formalities, and their Hypocrisy served to delay his Judgements; and should he not still do so, the Church might re-receive greater prejudice. But the Church, and God are two things, and are not it seems obliged to the same Measures: insomuch that even the sincerity of one Person, which might perhaps atone for a whole Order and render them acceptable both to God and Man, yet cannot hope for his own pardon.  
Neither must be think to scope for a Man of good Intentions: yet sure he is, else would not give the Devil so much more than his due, saying he would never condemn any good action though done by the Devil, As if saith the Animadverter, be supposed the Devil might do some such. Here he thinhs he has a shrewd hit at him, and this if a man had leisure might beget a Metaphysical Controversy: but I desire him rather to comment on that Text: Dost thou Believe? thou dost well, the Devils also Believe and Tremble. Whereas he goeth on to mock at the Author's Good Intentions, and tells him pleasantly that, Hell itself is full of such as were once full of Good Intentions: 'tis a Concluding piece of Wit, and therefore, as well as for the Rarity, should be civilly treated and encouraged; so that I shall use no further 〈◊〉 there, that if this be the qualification of such as go to Hell, the Animadverter hath secured himself from coming there and so many more as were his Partners. And thus much I have said upon his Animadversions on the Title, etc. Wherein, he having misrepresented the Author and prejudicated the Reader against him by all disingenuous methods, and opened the whole Pedlers-pack of his malice, which he half-p— worths out in the following discourse to his petty Chapmen, I could not properly say less, though it exceeds perhaps the number of his Pages. For it is scarce credible how vuluminous and pithy he is in extravagance: and one of his sides in Quarto, for Falsehood, Insolence, and Absurdity contains a Book in Folio. Besides, the Reader may please to consider how much labour it costs to Bray even a Little Thing in a Mortar: and that Calumny is like London-dirt, with which though a man may be spattered in an instant, yet it requires much time, pains, and Fullers-earth to scour it out again.   

Annotations upon the Animadversions on the first Chapter, concerning Articles of Faith.  
THe Play begins. I Confess (Do so then and make no more words) when first I saw this Jewel of a Pamphlet, and had run over two or three pages of this Chapter, I suspected the Author for some Youngster that had been Dabbling amongst the Socinian Writers, and was ambitious of showing us his Talon in their way. I was quickly delivered from this Jealousy, by his Orthodox Contradictory expressions in other places. That word Jewel is commonly used in a good sense, and I know no reason why this Book of the Authors might not be properly enough called so, though the Animadverter hath debased the meaning of the word to deprave and undervalue the worth of the Treatise. For I perceive that, during his Chaplainship, he hath learned it in conversation with the Ladies, who translate it frequently to call Whore in a more civil and refined signification. But to say thus, that he suspected him at first for a Socinian, yet was quickly cured of his Jealousy, because he found the Author was Honest and Orthodox. Why should he vent his own Amusements thus to the great and real prejudice of any worthy person? It is indeed a piece of second Ingenuity for a man, that invents and suggests a Calumny of which he is sure to be convict in the instant, therefore with the same breath to disclaim it: but it manifests in the mean time how well he was inclined if he thought it would have passed upon the Author; and that could the Animadverter have secured his Reputation, he would have adventured the Falsehood. What would he not have given to have made the world believe that he was a Socinian! In this beginning you have a right Pattern of the Animadverters whole Stuffe, and may see what Measure the Author is to expect all thorough.  
But he finds, he faith, that he is one of the Men of the second Rate, (as he takes leave to style them) that scarce ever see to the second Conseqnence. At first I suspected from this expression that the Animadverter had been some Ship-Chaplain, that had been Dabbling in the Sea-Controversies, a Tarpawlin of the Faculty: but I was quickly delivered from this Jealousy by his Magisterial Contradictions, that show him to be a man of more Consequence, one of them whose Eccleastical Dignities yet cannot wean them from a certain hankering after the Wit of the Laity, and applying it as their own upon (or 'tis no great matter though it be without) occasion. Yet therefore once for all he Protests, too, that he does not charge him with any of his own most obvious Consequences as his Opinions (for who would believe the one or other that reads the Author?) for 'tis plain that he does not (nor any man that hath Eyes) discern them. This is a Candour pregnant with Contempt. But in the mean time he thinks it ingenuous to load this second Rate Frigate, (that was fitted out for the Kings and the Nations service) so deep that she can scarce swim, with a whole Cargo of Consequences which are none of the Authors, but will, upon search, be all found the Animadverters proper goods and Trade, his own Inconsequences and Inanimadversions. So men with vicious Eyes see Spiders wove from the Brim of their own Beavers.  
As for example. p. 1. He saith that this Chapter does admirably serve the turn of the rankest Sectarian. That in his two or three first pages he appeared a Socinian. p. 12. That his Pique at the new word Homoousios carries such an ugly reflection upon the Nicene Creed, that be, the Animadverter, scarce dares understand him. p. 6. The Author speaking against introducing new Articles of Faith, the Adversary tells him; he hopes he does not mean all our Thirty Nine Articles; and defends them as if they were attaqued. That he does implicitly condemn the whole Catholic Church both East and West for being so presumptuous in her Definitions. p. 9 That upon his Principles the Prime and most necessary Articles of Faith will be in danger. The old dormant Heresies, Monothelites, Nestorians, etc. May safely revive again. p. 13. That his are the very dregs of Mr. Hobbs his Divinity, and worse, p. 14. That he would have some men live like Pagans and go to no Church at all, p. 16. So for aught we know this Author is a Jesuit, and writes this Pamphlet only to embroile us Protestants. p. 25, That he is guilty of unthought, of Popery. p. 33. That our Author like her (the foolish woman) in the Proverbs, plucks down our Church with his own hands and that she had need therefore be upheld against such as he is. Of these Inferences which, not being natural, must have required some labour, he is all along very liberal to the Author; but the vile and insolent language costs him nothing, so that he lays that on prodigally and without all reason. Now whether a man that holds a true Opinion, or he that thus deduces ill Consequences from it, be the more blame-worthy, will prove to be the Case between the Animadverter and the Author. And (to show him now from whence he borrowed his Wit of the second Rate, and at the second Hand)  
— all the subject matter of debate,  
Is only who's the Knave of the First Rate.  
But he saith, because of these things, the Mischief being done, to undo the Charm again it is become a Duty to Expose him. Alas what are they going to do with the poor man? What kind of death is this Exposing? But sure, considering the Executioner, it must be some Learned sort of Cruelty. Is it the Taeda, in which they candled a Man over in Wax, and he instead of the wick, burnt out to his lives end like a Taper, to give light to the Company? Or is it the Scapha, wherein a man, being stripped Naked and Smeared with Honey, was in the scorching Sun abandoned to be stung and Nibbled by Wasps; Hornets, and all troublesome Infects till he expired? Or is it rather ad Bestias, turning him out unarmed to be bated, worryed, and devoured, by the wild Beasts in the Theatre? For in the Primitive Times there were these and an hundred laudable ways more to Expose Christians; and the Animadverter seems to have studied them. But the Crime being of Sorcery, and that there is a Charm which hath wrought great Mischief and it not to be undone but by Exposing the Malefactor (Charm he never so wisely) 'tis more probable that it may be the Punishment usual in such Cases. And indeed the Animadverter hath many times in the day such Fits tale him, wherein he is lifted up in the Air that six men cannot hold him down, tears, raves, and foams at the mouth, casts up all kind of trash, sometimes speaks Greek and Latin, that no man but would swear he is bewitched: and this never happens but when the Author appears to him. And though in his Animadversions on the Title etc. He hath so often scratched and got blood of him (the infallible Country Cure) yet he still finds no ease by it, but is rather more tormented. So that in earnest I begin to suspect him for a Witch, or however, having writ the Naked Truth, 'tis manifest he is a Soothsayer, that's as bad. Many persons besides have for trial run needless up to the Eye in several remarkable places of his Naked Truth, that look like moles or warts upon his body, and yet he, though they prick never so much, feels nothing. Nay some others of the Clergy, whereof one was a Bishop, have tied him hand and foot and thrown him into the Thames betwixt Whitehall and Lambeth, for experiment; laying so much weight too on him as would sink any ordinary man, and nevertheless he swims still and keeps above Water. So dangerous is it to have got an Ill Name once, either for speaking Truth or for Incantation, that it comes to the same thing almost to be Innocent or Guilty: for if a man swim he is Guilty, and to be Burnt; if he sink, he is Drowned, and Innocent. But therefore this Exposing must surely be to condemn the Author, as he has done his Book already, to the Fire, (for no man stands fairer fort as being first Heretic, and now Witch by Consequence) and then the Devil sure can have no more power over the Animadverter. Yet when I considered better that he does not accuse him of any harm that he has suffered by him in person, but that it is the Church which may justly Complain of him, and having done her so much mischief, therefore it is become a Duty to Expose him, I could not but imagine that it must be a severer Torment. For if our Church be bewitched, and he has done it,  
Huic mites nimium Flammas, huic lenta putassem,  
Flumina, fumiferi potasset nubila Peti.  
Though I never heard before of a Church that was Bewitched except that of the Galatians, Gal. 3. 1. Whom Saint Paul asks O foolish Galatians who hath Bewitched you? taking it for evident that they were so, because (they are his very next words) they did not obey the Truth. (And that was a Naked Truth with a Witness, the Apostle teaching, that Christ is become of none effect to them, that from their Christian Liberty returned to the Jewish Ceremonies. Gal. 5. 4.) But therefore I looked over the Canons, the Rational, the Ceremonial, the Rubric, imagining the Exposing mentioned, must be some new part of our Ecclesiastical Discipline, that I had not taken notice of before, and I should find it in one or other of the Offices. But I lost my labour, and 'twas but just I should, for being so simple, as not to understand at first that to Expose a man, is to write Animadversions upon him. For that is a crueler Torment than all the Ten Persecutors (and which none but this Clergyman, could have) invented. To be set in the Pillory first, and bedaubed with so many Addle Eggs of the Animadverters own Cakle as he pa●…ts him with! How miserable then is the man that must suffer afterwards, sub 〈◊〉 le●…to Ingenio! To be raked and harrowed thorough with so ●…usty a Saw! So dull a Torture that it contains all other in it, and which even the Christian Reader is scarce able to endure with all his Patience! Had he been a man of some accuteness, the pain would have been over in an instant: but this was the utmost inhumanity in whoever it was that advised (whereas several witty men, were proposed that would have been glad of the the employment) to choose out on purpose the veriest (Animadverter) in all the Faculty. This it is to which the Author is condemned. And now that I know it, and that it is an Office a Duty to which our Church it seems has advanced the Animadvertur; I wish him Joy of his new Preferment, and shall henceforward take notice of him as the Church of Englands' Exposer, for I can never admit him by any Analogy to be an Exposito●….  
It is no less disingenuously, then constantly done of the Exposer in this same; p. 1. To concern the Author in the Non-Conformists, that may have reflected any where, as if there were Socinian, or Pelagian Doctrines; Allowed to be preached and maintained in the City Pulpits. For the Author hath not in his whole Book the least syllable that can be wrested to any such purpose. Only it serves the Adversaries turn, as he thinks, to preingage the whole Clergy and Church of England against him, if they were so simple, and by giving him an odious Badge and jumbling them altogether, to involve him in all the prejudices which are studioufly advanced against that party. But neither have I any thing to urge of that nature further then, because he will out of season mention these matters, to observe that our Church seems too remiss in the Case of Socinus and Volkelius, who had many things to great value stolen from them by a late Plagiary, but as yet have not obtained any Justice or Restitution.  
But seeing the Exposer is thus given to transform not only the Author, but his words and his meaning; it is requisite to state this Chapter in his own Terms: as men set their Arms on their Plate, to prevent the nimbleness of such as would alter the property. The sum of what he humbly proposes is: That nothing hath caused more mischief in the Church, than the establishing New and Many Articles of Faith, and requiring men to assent 〈◊〉 them with Divine Faith. For the imposing such on Dissenters, hath caused furious Wars and lamentable Bloodshed among Christians. That it is irrational to promote the Truth of the Gospel by Imposition, which is contrary to the Laws of the Gospel, and break an evident Commandment to establish a doubtful Truth. For if such Articles be not fully expressed in Scripture w●…ds, it is Doubtful to him upon whom it is Forced, though not to the the Imposer. If it be fully expressed in Scripture Words, there needs no new Articles: but if not so, and that it be only Deduced from Scripture Expressions, than men that are as able and knowing as the Imposer, may think it is not clearly Deduced from Scripture. But there is nothing more Fully Expressed, or that can be more clearly Deduced from Scripture, nor more suitable to Natural Reason, then that no man should be Forced to Believe. Because no man can Force himself to believe, no not even to believe the Scriptures. But Faith is a work of peculiar Grace and the Gift of God. And if a man Believe what is Clearly Contained in Scripture, he needs not believe any thing else with Divine Faith. To add to, or diminish from the Scripture, is by it unlawful, and liable to the Curse in the Revelation. If the Imposer answer, he requires not to Believe it as Scripture, he doth, if he urge it to be believed with Divine Faith. If he say he requires it not to be Believed with Divine Faith, he does, if he make it necessary to Salvation. There is no Command nor Countenance given in the Gospel to use Force to cause men Believe. We have no Comprehensive Knowledge of the Matters declared in Scripture, that are the Prime and Necessary Articles of Faith, therefore it is not for any man to Declare one Tittle more to be Believed with Divine Faith, than God hath there Declared. He cannot find the least hint in the Word of God to use any Force to Compel men to the Churches established Doctrine or Discipline: and from Reason there can be no motive to be Forced beyond their Reason. To attempt any such Force, though to the True Belief, is to do Evil that Good may come of it. But the Pastor ought first by plain and sound Doctrine to stop the Mouths of Gainsayers. When the Ministers have Preached and Prayed, they have done all they can in order to men's Believing, the rest must be left to the Justice or Mercy of God. But if turbulent spirits broach New Doctrines, Contrary to Scripture, or not Clearly Contained in the Gospel, and neither by Admonitions nor Entreaties will be stopped, the Pastors may proceed to the Exeroise of the Keys. Which if it were duly performed as in the Primitive Times, and not by Lay Chancellors and their surrogates, would be of great effect. The Magistrate ought to sili●…ce and oppose such at preach what is Contrary to or not Clearly Contained in the Gospel, and if they persevere in their perversuess, he may use his power with Christian Moderation. For his power reaches to Punish Evil Doers, who Publi●… or Practise something to subvert the Fundamentals of Religion, or to Disturb the Peace of the State, or to Injure their Neighbours: but not to Punish Evil Believers. But if the Magistrate shall conceive he hath power also to punish Evil Believers, and on that pretence shall punish. True Believers, the Subject is bound to submit and b●…ar it, to the loss of Goods, Liberty or Life. The Reader will excuse this one long Quotation, for it will much shorten all that follows.  
But now for which of these is it that 'tis become a Duty to Expose him? What is there here that seems not, at first sight, very Christian, very Rational? But however, it is all delivered in so Grave and Inoffensive manner, that there was no temptation to alter the stile into Ridicule, and Satire. But like some Carl, the Animadverter, may browse upon the Leaves, or Peel the Bark, but he has not teeth for the Solid, nor can hurt the Tree but by accident. Yet a man that sees not into the second, but the Thirteenth Consequence that is one of the Disputers of this World, and aught to be admitted to these Doubtful Disputations (from which he ironically by St. Paul's rule forsooth excludes the Author) what is there that such an one, so subtle so piercing, cannot distinguish upon and Controvert? Truth itself ought to sacrifice to him that he would be propitious. For if he appear on the other side, it will go against her avoidable.  
In his 27. P. he is ravished in Contemplation how Rarachose it is, to see or hear a material Question in Theology defended in the University-Schools, where one stands a Respondent, enclosed within the Compass of his Pen, as Popilius the Roman Ambassador, made a Circle with his Wand about Antiochus, and bid him give him a determinate answer before he went out of it; a most apt and learned resemblance, and which shows the Gentleman's good reading! But it is, I confess a noble spectacle, and worthy of that Theatre which the munificence of the present Archbishop of Canterbury hath dedicated in one (may it be too in the other) of our Universities; where no Apish Scaramuccio, no Scenical Farces, no Combat of Wild-Beasts among themselves, or with men condemned, is presented to the People; but the modest Skirmish of Reason, and which is usually performed so well that it turns to their great honour, and of our whole Nation. Provided the Chair be well filled, with an Orthodox Professor, and who does not by Solaecismes in Latin, or mistake of the Argument, or Question, render the thing ridiculous to the Bystanders. That the Pew be no less fitted with a Respondent, able to sustain and answer in all points the expectation of so Learned an Auditory: That the Opponent likewise exceed not the terms of Civility, nor Cavil where he should Argue; and that the Questions debated be so discreetly chosen; as there may be no danger, by Controverting the Truth, to unsettle the minds of the Youth ever after, and innure them to a Disputable Notion about the most weighty points of our Re-Religon; by which sort of subtilizing the Church hath in former Ages much suffered, nor hath Ours in the Latter wholly escaped. Now, seeing the Exposer seem●… to delight so much (as men use in what they excel) in this Exercise, he and I, because we cannot have the conveniency of the Schools and Pew, will play as well as we can in Paper, at this new Game of Antiochus and (Popilius. I must for this time be the Roman Senator, and he the Monarch of Asia●… for by the Rules of the Play, he always that hath writ the last Book is to be Antiochus, until the other has done replying. And I hope to gird him up to close with●… in his Circle, that he shall appear very slender. For I am sensible, yet could not avoid it, how much of the Readers and mine own time I have run out in examining his Levity; but now I am glad to see my labour shorten: for, having thus plumed him of that puff of Feathers, with which he buoyed himself up in the Air, and flew over our heads, it will, almost by the first Consequence, be manifest in his Argument, how little a Soul it is, and Body, that henceforward I am to deal with.  
The Author having said that, That which we commonly call the Apostles Creed, is, and was so received by the Primitive Church, as the sum Total of Christian Faith, necessary to Salvation. Why not now? Is the state of Salvation altered? If it be Complete, what need other Articles? The Exposer p. 2. answers. There may have been needful heretofore, not only other Articles, but other Creeds for the further Explication of these Articles in the Apostles Creed: and yet in those New Creeds not one New Article. 'Tis safely and cautiously said, there May, and not there Were other Articles and other Creeds needful. But the whole Clause besides is so drawn up, as if he affected the Academical glory of justifying a Paradox: nor is it for the reputation of such Creeds, whatever they be, to be maintained by the like Methods. But seeing he disdains to explicare further, how there can be a New Creed, and yet not one New Article; I will pres●… to understand him, and then say, that in such Creeds, whatsoever Article does either explain the Apostles Creed Contrary to, or Beside the Scripture, or does not contain the same Express Scriptural Authority (which only makes this that is called the Apostles Creed to be Authentic) that is a New Article to every man that cannot conceive the necessary Deduction. But then he galls the Author. The Apostles Creed is the sum of the Christian Faith True. Yet I hope he will not think the Nicene, the Constantinopolitan, and the Athanasian) Creed Superfluous and and unnecessary. First, it is not necessary to take all those Three in the Lump, as the Exposer puts it: for perhaps a man may think but one, or but two of them to have been superfluous, and unnecessary. Next it is an hard thing for the Exposer, who ought rather to have proved that they were necessary to shift it back thus upon the Author. I have not spoke with him, nor know whether I shall as long as I live, (though I should be glad of the opportunity,) to know his mind. But suppose he should think them, One, Two, or Three Unnecessary, who can help it? But so much I think, upon the State or sum of this Controversy in his own 〈◊〉, I may adventure for him; that 〈◊〉 Confessions of Faith he does not disapprove them, (taking it granted there is nothing in any of them flatly against the Word of God) but that if any thing be therein drawn up in such or such an exact Form of Words, not Expressed in Scripture, and required to be Believed with Divine Faith, as necessary to a Mans own Salvation, and without Believing which he must Declare too that no Man else can be saved that this is Dangerous, and the imposing of it is Unwarrantable by Reason or Scripture, He adds in this same Paragraph, that the Author's Censure upon Constantine is so bold and upon some Godly Bishops, (whom he conceives more Zealous than Discreet, and so do some Godly Bishops conceive of this Author) and his Pique at the New Word Homoousios carries such as ugly reflection upon the Creed, that he scarce 〈◊〉 understand him, And I on the other side take his Fears and his Hopes to be alike inconsiderable. His words are p. 6. I am confident had the most prudent and pius Constantine, the First and Best of Christian Emperors pursued his own intention, to suppress all Disputes, and all new Questions about God the Son, both Homoousian, and Homoiousian, and commanded all to acquiesce in the very Scripture Expressions, without any addition, that the Arrian Heresy had soon expired. I note that the Exposer very disingenuously, and to make it look more ugly, take not the least notice of his Pique against 〈◊〉 too and the Arrian Heresy. But what is there here to fright the understanding Animadverter out of his Wits, or what to make some Godly Bishops (who it seems must be numberless or nameless) to conceive the Author 〈◊〉 Zealous then Discreet? But for this Censure of the Author, as well as for the Godliness of the Bishops, we must acquiesce it seems upon the Credit, or Gratitude of one Nameless Exposer.  
He than blames the Author p. 3. for saying p. 1. that he would have men improve in Faith rather Intensive, then Extensive, to confirm it, rather than enlarge it. Still and always, to make things a little more ugly and of less value, he eclipse the Author's good English. You would have men improve in Faith, so would I, but rather Intensive then Extensive. 'Tis good to know all Gospel Truths, no doubt of that, the more the better still; but the Question is not what is Good, but what is Necessary. This is a pious and undonbred Truth and confirmed by the Author out of several Places of Scripture: May I add one Mark the 9 17. Where one brought his Son, being troubled with a Dumb Spirit to our Saviour. v. 23. Jesus saith to the Father, if thou canst Believe, all things are possible to him that Believeth. The Father coys out with tears, Lord I Believe, strengthen thou my Unbelief. And this Confession of the Intensive Truth of his Faith, with his reliance upon Christ for the strengthening of it, was sufficient to cooperate with our Saviour toward a Miracle, and throwing that Dumb and Deaf Spirit out of a third Person. Whoever indeed will deny this Truth, must go against the whole current of the New Testament. But the Exposer is Deaf to that, 'tis all one to him. Yet he is not Dumb, though as good he had, for all he has to say to it is: And yet it is certain that all formal and mortal Heretics, that are not Atheists, are justly condemned for want of due extension in their Faith. What pertinence! But there goes more Faith I see to the ejecting of a Talkative then of a Dumb Spirit. There is no need of further answer to so succinct a Bob, then that it had been well those terms of Formal, and Mortal, and Heretics, and no less that of Condemned had in this place been thoroughly explained. For we know that there was a time when the Protestants themselves were the Format, and, to be sure, the Mortal Heretics, even here in England, and for that very crime too, For want of due extension in their Faith, they were Condemned, whether justly or no it is in the Exposers power to determine. For some of our Ruling Clergy, who yet would be content to be accounted good Protestants, are so loath to part with any thank they have got, at what time soever, over the poor Laity, or what other reason, that the Writ de Haeretico Comburendo, though desired to be abolished, is still kept in force to this day. So that it is of more concernment than one would at first think, how far men's Faith (lest afterwards for Believing short their Persons and Estates) be Extended, or taken in Execution.  
He proceeds page the 3. and several that follow, to quarrel the Author for quoting to this purpose Acts 8. and then saying: I pray remember the Treasurer (the Exposer will do it I warrant you, and the Chancellor too, without more entreaty) to Candace Queen of Ethiopia, whom Philip instructed with in the Faith. His time of Catechising was very short and soon proceeded to Baptism. But Philip first required a Confession of his Faith, and the Eunuch made it, and I beseech you observe it. I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and strait way he was Baptised: How, no more than this? No more. This little Grain of Faith, being sound, believed withal his heart, purchased the Kingdom of Heaven. 'Tis not the Quantity but the Quality of our Faith God requireth. Here the Exposer, pretending now to be a learned Expositor, hopes to win his Spurs, and lays out all his ability to prove that Philip (in a very short time for so much work as he finds him) had instructed the Treasurer thorough the whole Athanasian Creed; concerning the Equality, Inseparability, Coeternity of the Three Persons in the Trinity. For, saith the Ezposer, the very Form of Baptism, if thoroughly explained, is a perfect Creed by itself: In the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: For it seems the name of the Son, was by a Divine Criticism interposed between the other two Persons, whose Godhead was confessed and acknowledged by the Jewish Church, rather than that of the Word, to de●…te the second Person, etc. I should be glad to know where the Exposer learned that the Jewish Church acknowledged the Godhead of the Holy Ghost, as of a Distinct Person; which if he cannot show, he is very far out in the Matter, as he is in that Expression of Divine Criticism. Therefore he may do well to Consider. But it is simply, to say no worse, done of him, to call that Form of words as it is ordered by our Saviour himself, a Divine Criticism, as if Christ had therein affected that Critical glory, which the Exposer himself in so subtle a Remark doubtless pretends to. But the Exposer will not only have Philip to have instructed the Treasurer in this Criticism, but to have read him so long a Lecture upon Baptism, as must for certain have been out of the Assemblies, and not Noel's Catechism: acquainting him and instructing him abundantly, in those great Points of Faith, the Dying, Burying, and Rising again of Christ for our Justification from our sins, together with the Thing signified, Death unto sin, Mortification, the New Birth unto Righteousness, than the Mystery of the First and Second Covenant, Original sin, how thereby he was a Son of Wrath, had hereby Forgiveness; of sins, Adoption, being made a Child of Grace, Coheir with Christ, to live with him in the Communion of Saints, after the Resurrection, in Life Everlasting; I am glad to see that, at least when it serves to his purpose, this Exposer will own all the Doctrines, which another Exposer would have called so many Stages of Regeneration, and have thought them too many to have driven over in one day's journey, but would rather have turned out of the Road, and laid short all night somewhere by the way. Here is a whole Calvinistical Systeme of Divinity, that, if the Treasurer had been to be Baptised in the Lake of Geneva, more could not have been expected. And he has in a trice made him so perfect in it, that, as soon as the christening was over, he must have been fit to be received not only ad Communionem Laecam, but the Clericam also, if it were then come into fashion. These Exposers are notable men, they are as good as Witches, they know all things, and what was done, and what was not done equally. In earnest, he has made us as formal a sto●…y of all Ppilip said, and the Treasurer believed; as if he had sat all the while in the Coock-boot, and knows how long the discourse lasted, as well, as if he had set his Watch when they began, and looked upon it just as the Spirit caught up Philip to Azotus. But (suppose, for the Exposers sake, that the Treasurer) were in a Coach, discourse, and for all the rumbling, so distinctly and thoroughly, in so short a time too, if it had been, which is the uttermost, a day's passage Catechumeniz'ed) it came to this short Print between them: The Treasurer desires to be Baptised, Philip replies; If thou believest with all thine heart thou mayest, which can never signify otherwise then with all the Intention of our Spirit, as when we are said to love God wi●…h all our Heart: The Treasurer replies, and that's all, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. Now it is worth the Readers observation, that out of a desire of C●…villing and the luxury the Exposer takes in it, he has quite forgot the matter he brought in Controversy. For the Dispute is concerning New Creeds, Imposed beyond clear Scripture: the Author's arguments and proofs tended wholly thither, and to that purpose he urged this passage of Philip, to prove that God considers both, but rather the Quality, than Quantity of our Faith. The Exposer amuses himself and us, to tell what Philip preached to the Treasurer, but never minds that, let that have been as it will, and the Eunuch have believed all that this man can imagine, yet all the Creed demanded, and all that he professes is no more than those formal words, believed with all his heart. I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, Wherein the Author has clearly carried, and the Exposer thus far lost the Question. And indeed Antiochus, you are much too blame to have put the Romans to all this trouble, to no purpose. But any thing to stuff out the Dimensions of a Book, that no man may imagine he could have said so little, in so much (which is the new way of Compendiousness found out by the Exposer) whereas he might have known, that, not God only, but even men always do respect the Quality of any Thing, of a Book, rather than the Quantity. One Remark I must make more, before I take leave of this page, how, having thus liberally instructed both Philip and the Treasurer, he immediately chaps in p. 5.  
Now this Author may see what Use and Need  
There was of the Constantinopolitan Creed.  
That puts in one Baptism for the Remission of Sins. I read it over and over, for there was something in it very surprising, beside the elegancy of the Verses. For the Now in that place is a word of immediate Inference, as if it appeared necessarily, from what last preceded, that he had notably foiled the Author in some Arguments or other, and therefore exulted over him. To any man of common sense it can signify nei●…her more nor less than that, (whereas I upon prospect of this spoke merrily of the Athanasian Creed, Noel's and the Assemblies Catechism, etc. wherein Philip instructed the Treasurer) the Exposer means in good earnest (if men mean what they say) that Philip, having studied the Constantinopolitan Creed himself very ex●…ctly, explained every Article of it thoroughly to the Eunuch, and in especial manner that of Baptism for the Remission of Sins: Which happening to have been so many hundred years before that Council was in being, must needs be an extraordinary civility in Philip, and which he would scarce have done, but for the particular sa●…isfaction of so great a personage, that had the whole manage of the Revenue of the Queen of Ethiopia. I am sure it is more than our Church will vouchsafe in Baptism, 〈◊〉 of Infan●…s or those of Riper Years, with their Godfathers', but fobbs them of with the plain Apostles Creed: And truly the easier the better, if afttr that, and by powering water upon them, these persons be without any more ado (as the Priest according to our Rubric, shall then say) Regenerate.  
To as little purpose doth he trouble in this same 5. p. Another Scripture the first of John 4. 2. Every Spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ is come in the Flesh, is of God: Which the Author urges in confirmation of what he said before concerning the Intention of Faith. But, saith the Exposer, Will a Mahometan, or a Socinian Confession of Faith suffice? This is I trow what they call reducing a man ad Absurdum, and I doubt he has hampered the Author mischievously. No it will not suffice in the Mahumetam or Socinian interpretation: but a Confession according to the true sense of this, and the clear express words of Scripture in other places will do it, especially if St. John, as most men are of opinion, writ his own Gospel. Nay, though the Exposer contends against this place, he admits another concerning Peter, that is not much more pregnant. All the few primary Fundamentals of Christianity, saith he, were virtually contained in St. Peter's short Confession of Faith. Thou art Christ the Son of the living God: For which Confession he was blest, and upon which Faith Christ declared that he would build his Church as upon a Rock. In conclusion I see Antiochus has ex mero motu & certâ Scientiâ, and Prince— like Generosity, given us the Question: For I would not suspect that he hath hunted it so long till he lost it, or let it go of Necessity, because he could hold it no longer. For the Extension as well as Intention of Peter's Faith, was terminated in these few words. For it is no irreverence to take notice how plain the Apostles were under that dispensation. The same John the Apostle and Evangelist C. 14. V. 26. and in the following Chapters, shows how little it was, and in how narrow a compass, that they knew and believed, and yet that sufficed. Insomuch that where C. 16. V. 17. Our Saviour promises the Holy Ghost, to instruct them further, he saith only, It is Expedient for you that I go away, for if I go not away, the Comforter will not Come to you. He saith not it is Necessary. For that Measure of true Belief would have sufficed for their own Salvation, but there was a larger Knowledge requisite for the future work of their Apostleship, In how many of them, and St. Peter himself as much as any, were there such Ignorances', I humbly use the word, in matters of Faith, that our Saviour could not but take notice of it and reprove them! As for Peter, when our Saviour was so near his Death as to be already be●…ray'd, yet he, Upon whose Faith he built his Church as on a Rock, knew not the effect of his Passion, but was ready with his sword, against Christ's Command and example, to have interrupted the Redemption of Mankind. And this short confession, in which all the Fundamentals were virtually contained (as the Exposer here teacheth us, and so hath reduced himself to that little Grain of Faith, against which he contends with the Author) was upon occasion of our Saviour's question; when Peter doubtless did his best, to answer his Lord and Master, and told him all he knew. For that similitude, taken from so small a G●…aine by our Saviour, did equal the proportion of Faith then attainable and requisite. And as in a Seed, the very Plain and Upright of the Plant is indiscernably expressed, though it be not branched out to the Eye, as when it ge●…minates, spreads, blossoms, and bears fruit; so was the Christian Faith seminally straitened in that virtual sincerity, Vital Point, and Central vigour of Believing with all the heart that Jesus Christ was come in the Flesh, and was the Son of the Living God. And, would men even now Believe that one thing thoroughly, they would be better Christians, then under all their Creeds, they generally are both in Doctrine and Practice. But that gradual Revelation, which after his death and Resurrection shined forth in the Holy Ghost, must now determine us again within the Bounds of that saving Ignorance by Belief according to the Scriptures, until the last and fu●…l Manifestation. And the Intention of this Faith now also, as it hath been explained by the Inspiration of the Holy Spirit in the Sacred Writers, is sufficient for Salvation, without the Chcianrey and Conveyancing of humane Extentions. And the Controverter himself hath, if not by his own confession, yet, by his own Argument all along hitherto proved it.  
In the 6. p, he saith that, where the Author charges some with introducing Many and New Articles of Faith, He●… hopes he does not mean all our Thirty nine Articles. If he hopes so, why doth he raise the suspicion, for which indeed there is no cause imaginable, but the E●…posers own disingenuity; the Author appearing thorough his whole Book a True Subscriber to Then●…e, without that Latitude of Equivocation which some others use, or else they would not Publish those Doctrines they do, and be capable nevertheless of Ecclesiastical Places? But here, as though any man had meddled with those Articles, he explica●…es his Learning out of Bishop L●…y and of the Communio Laica, which is but his harping upon one string and his usual Scanning on his fingers. For the Author having named many and neew Articles of Faith, the Exposer revolves over in his mind Articles, Articles of— and, the word not being very pregnant, he hits at last upon the Thirty nine Articles of the Church of England: which yet the Exposer saith himself, are Articles of Peace and Consent not of Faith and Communion. Why then does he bring them by head and shoulders, when the Author he knows was only upon Articles, of Faith? He might as well have sa●… the Lords of the Articles. But this, he saith is one, as he takes it, of our Church's greatest Ecclesiastical Policies, that she admits the many in thousands and hundred thousands, without any subscription, ad Communionem Laicam. Truly she is ve●…y civil, and we are an hundred thousand times obliged to Her. But I know not whether she will take it well of him, that he, not being content with so good an Office as that of her Exposer, should pretend to be her Ecclesiastical Politician, over an other man's head that is fitter for both, and not expect the Reversion. And she cannot but be offended, that he should thus call her Fool by craft, assigning that for her greatest Ecclesiastical Policy, when to have done otherwise would have been the greatest Impertence and Folly. But who are these the many, whom she so graciously receives Communionem Laicam without subscription? Truly all of us whom she trusts not with Teaching others or with University Degrees. The whole body of the Laity. (There again is another name or us, for we can scarce speak without affronting ourselves with some contemptuous name or other that they (forsooth the Clergy) have affixed to us.  
Nos Numerus sumus the many, & fruges consumere nati.  
Even his Majesty too, God bless him, is one of the many, and she asks no su●…scription of him neither, although I believe he has taken his Degree in the University. Well we must be content to do as we may: we are the many, and you are the few, and make your best of it. But now, though I am none of you, yet, I can tell you a greater Ecclesiastical Policy, than all this you have been talking of. It is a hard Word, and though it be but one Syllable, I cannot well remember it, but by good luck it was burnt by the hand of the Hangman, about that time that the Naked Truth was Printed. And had that Policy succeeded, the many must have taken not only all the Thirty Nine Articles, but all the Ecclesiastical Errors and Encroachments that escaped notice, all in the mass at once, as if they had been Articles of Faith, infallible, unalterable; but the State of the Kingdom had been apparently changed in the very Fundamentals. For a Few of the Few, for above these forty years, have been carrying on a constant Conspiracy to turn all Upsidedown in the Government of the Nation: But God in his mercy hath always hitherto, and will; I hope, for ever frustrate all such Counsels.  
In his 7. p. it is that he saith, the Author in his 4. p. implicitly condemns the whole Catholic Church, both East and West for being so Presumptuous in her Definitions. However if he does it but Implicitly, the Exposer might have been so Ingenuous or Prudent as not to have Explicated it further, but concealed it lest it might do more harm, but at least not to have heigh●…en'd it so; the whole Catholic Church, and not only so, but, the whole Catholic Church both in the East and West too (why did he not add in the North and South too?) for being so Presumptuous, a term far beyond and contrary to the Modesty and Deference of the Author's expressions. But this is the Art and Duty of Exposing, Here it is that he brandishes the whole dint of his Disputative Faculty, and if it be not the most rational, I dare say (and yet I should have some difficulty to persuade men so) that it is the most foolish passage in the whole Pamphlet. It is impossible to clear the Dispute but by transcribing their own words. In the mean time therefore I heartily recommend myself to the Readers patience. The Author, pursuing his point how unsafe and unreasonable it is to Impose New Articles of Faith drawn by humane Inferences beyond the Clear Scripture Expressions; instanceth in several of the Prime and most Necessary Principles of the Trinity, especially that of the Holy Ghost. Are they not things, saith he, far above the Highest Reason and sharpest understanding that ever man had? Yet we Believe them because God, who cannot lie, hath Declared them. Is it not then a strange thing for any man to take upon him to Declare one title more of them then God hath Declared? seeing we understand not what is Declared, I mean we have no Comprehensive Knowledge of the Matter Declared, but only a Believing Knowledge? To which the Exposer will have it that, if the Author be here bound up to his own words, (and 'tis good reason he should) he hath said that we understand not that the matter is Declared, and moreover he saith that he is sure he has done him no wrong in fixing this meaning to the Author's words. No, it is no wrong, it seems then, to say that to understand That, and to comprehend What is the same thing, As for example, (if our Ignorance may be allowed in things so infinitely above us, to allude to things as far below us) because I understand That the Exposer here speaks Nonsense; I must therefore be able to Comprehend What is the meaning of his Nonsense, and be capable to raise a Rational Deduction from it. I am sure I do the Exposer right in this Inference, and should be glad he only would therefore wear it for my sake, for it will fit none but him 'twas made for. But let us come down to the particular, The Scripture, saith the Author, plainly tells, that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father, and That he is sent also by the Father, That he is sent also by the Son: but whether he Proceeds From the Son, or By the Son, the Scripture is silent. I grant that by Rational Deduction, and Humane way of Argument 'tis probable that the Holy Ghost Proceeds from the Son, as from the Father. But we understand not What the Procession or Mission of the Holy Ghost is, and therefore we cannot prove they are Both one. And therefore to determine it or any such Divine and high Mysteries by Humane Deductions, in Humane Words, to be Imposed and Believed with Divine Faith is Dangerous: And much more the Author adds demonstratively to the same purpose,, but the Exposer culls out, by the Duty of his Place, what may best serve for his, neither will that do the turn unless he also pervert it. Here again is the That and the What the same thing●…, Is it the same thing to say or understand That the Holy Ghost is sent by the Son (which is Declared in Scripture) and to understand and comprehend What the Nature of that Mission is, or What the Nature of Procession that a man may safely say that he Proceeds From or By the Son, as from the Father (which is not Declared in Scripture but by Humane Deduction) and exact the Divine Belief thereof under Eternal and Temporal Penalties? Yet this is the Exposers Logic. And away he goes with it, as if the world (as this inference is) were all his own, and knocks all on the head with a kill Instance which that I may still open more visibly to the Readers, I must beg pardon that I am necessitated to repeat over again their own Words sometimes upon occasion. The Exposer saith, But he means we have no Comprehensive knowledge. His meaning is good and true but his inference is stark naught, if he means therefore we understand not at all that this or that is Declared. But the Author neither says nor means any such thing, and the Exposer does him notwit●…hstanding his ave●…ment to the Contrary, the most manifest wrong imaginable: for as much as he would not only fix a false meaning upon the Author's words which I first mentioned in the beginning, but upon these other words also which, contrary to their plain signification, he produces for proof against him. They are by the Exposers own relation, If then our Reason understand not what is Declared (which is the very Equipollent of what the Author had said, that we have no Comprehensive knowledge of the matter Declared) how can we by reason make any Deduction by way of Argument from that which we understand 〈◊〉? No more. From whence it is evident from that virtual repetition and natural reflection that every Conclusion hath of and upon its Premises, that the full sense of the words must be— from that which we understand not, Comprehensive, And yet he saith that he does him no wrong, he is sure he does not in affixing this meaning unto those words. And proceeds, Is it even so? Then let us put the Case with reverence that Almighty God, who assuming I suppose, the shape of an Angel, treated with Abraham face to face, as a man doth with his Friend. Should for once have spoken in the same manner, to Arrius or Socinus, and made this one Declaration, that the Catholic Churches Doctrine of the Trinity was true, and his false: then I demand, would not this have been demonstration enough of the Faith which we call Catholic either to Socinus or Arrius? And yet all these contradictory Arguments which either of them had once fancied so insolable, supposing them not answered in particular, would remain against it, and stand as they did before, any such declaration, and yet all this without giving him any comprehensive knowledge. This instance is made in Confutation of his own false supposition that the Author's words, if then our reason understand not with comprehensive knowledge what is declared, how can we then make any deduction by way of Arguments from that which we understand not, did in their true meaning signify how can we by reason make any deduction by way of Argument, from that which we understand not to have been declared, or, that I may p●…t it the furthest I can imaginable, to the Exposers purpose or service, how can ●…e by reason understand that it is declared, which is to impose a most ridiculous and impossible sense upon the Author's plain words; for if we neither understand That nor What, there is an end of all understanding. Yet admitting, here, says the Exposer, I have stated you a Case which proves the contrary, for here Arrius or Socinus have no comprehensive knowledge of what is declared, and yet they understand that it is declared; and doubtless the Author would say so too, without ever meaning the Contrary: yea and that this revelation would have been demonstration enough of that Faith, which we call Catholic. But what would become of their former Contradictory Arguments which the Exposer saith, would stand as they did before, and remain against it. I cannot vouch for the Author, that he would be of the same opinion. For I cannot comprehend though God had not answered those Arguments of theirs, in particular as the Exposer puts it, that those Arguments would or could remain against it, and stand as they did before any such declaration, to Arrius and Sacinus after they had received a sufficient demonstration from Gods own mouth by New Revelation. They would indeed remain against it, and stand as they did before to Mr. Sherlock. But when I have thus given the humorous Exposer his own will and swing in every thing, yet this superlunary instance does not serve in the least to confirm his Argument that he makes against the Author's words, after his transforming them: For here Arrius and Socinus only bring their sense of hearing, and having heard this from God, do not by Reason make any Deduction by way of Argument, but by a believing knowledge do only assent to this, second further Revelation: Nor can they then from this second Revelation make any third step of Argument to extend it beyond its own tenor, without incurring the Author's just & wise Argument again, that seeing our reason understands not what is declared, I mean we have no comprehensive knowledge of this Doctrine of Trinity. (which the Exposer supposes to be declared) how can we by reason make any deduction by way of Argument from that which we understand not, to wit, not comprehensively? As I have abundantly cleared. But this instance was at first extinguished, when I showed in the beginning that he did impertinently tradnce the Author's words, and forge his meaning.  
In the mean time, though he saith put the Case with Reverence, when the Case so put cannot admit it, I cannot but at last reflect, upon the Exposers unpardunable indiscretion, in this more than absurd and monstruous representation of God almighty, assuming the shape of an Angel as he saith he treated with Abraham face to face as a man do●…h with his friend, to Discourse with Arrius and Socinus. These are small escapes wi●…h which he aptly introduces such an interview and conference, that he treated our 4th. Abraham face to face, as a man doth with his friend: for it is true Abraham is Styled the friend of God, and that God spoke to him; but it is never said in Scripture that God did Treat, that is a word of Court, not of Scripture: No nor that God spoke to him face to face. But it is said in Sripture only of Moses, Exod. 33. 11. The Lord spoke to him face to face as a man speaketh unto his friend. But that was a privilege peculiar to Moses. Numbers 12. 5. And the Lord came down in a Pillar of Cloud, and stood in the door of the Tabernaele of the Congregation, and called Aaron and Miriam, and they both came forth, and he said, hear now my words if there be a Prophet among you, I the Lord will make myself known to him in a Vision, and will speak unto him in a Dream: my servant Moses is not so who is faithful in all my house, with him will I speak mouth to mouth even apparently and not in dark Speeches, and the similitude of the Lord shall he behold, wherefore then were not you afraid to speak against my Servant Moses? (the Exposer is not afraid to do him manifest injury.) for Deut. 34. 10. And there arose not in Israel a Prophet like unto Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face, etc. And much more might be said of this matter, were the man capable of it: But I perceive he neither reads nor understands Scripture, and one Divine Criticism is stock enough it seems to set up an Exposer. Neither is it so notorious an error that he saith God assumed the shape of an Angel to treat with him. I would be glad to know of the Exposer, seeing he is so Cherubick▪ what is the shape of an Angel? Some humane Critics have told me that it was the similitude of a Calf. But Gods appearing in a sha' e to Abraham, when he treated with him face to face was in the shape of a man. Gen. 18 1. The Lord appeared to him in the Plane of Mamre as he sat in the Tent door, and so three men stood by him, etc. These are easy slips and he that stumbles and falls not, gains a step. Yet for one as he mocks the Author p. 2. That appears as one dropped down from Heaven, vouching himself a Son of the Church of England, teaching as one having authority like a Father, to trip in this manner, is something indecent. But to bring God in to so little a purpose, contrary to all rules, that I have seen one with a better grace brought down by a Machine to treat with Arrius and Socinus, no other Company, those who have contended against the Son of God and his Holy Spirit, whose Opinions have been the Pest of the Clergy for so many Ages, to have them now at last brought in as Privadoes to the Mysteries of Heaven, and the Trinity; what Divine in his Wits but would rather have lost an Argument! What will the Gentleman I last named say, to see such a reconciliation, to behold Arrius and Socinus in so close Communion with God, as to be admitted even to single Revelation: He cannot then avoid thinking, what he lately printed, and now with more reason: That God is all Love and Patience when he has taken his fill of Revenge, as others use to say the Devil is good when he is pleased. What a shame is it to have men like the Exposer, who are dedicated to the service of the Church, and who ought as in the place quoted by the Author in the present Argument, they of all other to hold fast the form of sound Words, thus by their rash levity administer so much occasion upon the most revered subject, that one can scarce answer them in their own dialect without seeming though never so averse to border upon their Profaneness. But those are the Divines in Mode, who being by their Dignities and Preferments plumped up beyond humane proportion, do whether for their Pride or Ignorance, neither understand to speak of God, which ought to be their study, with any tolerable Decorum; These are the great Animadverters of the times, the Church-respondents in the Pew, Men that seem to be members only of Chelsey College, nothing but broken Windows, bare Walls, and rotten Timber. They with a few Villainous words, and a s●…ared Reason, are the only Answerers of good and serious Books: But then they think a Book to be sure fully answered, when as the Exposer has by an humane Criticism, they write or scribble the same number of pages. For the Author's Book of the Naked Truth, chancing to be of sixty six pages, the Exposer has not bated him an Ace, but paid him exactly, though not in as good Billet, yet in as many Notches. This being done, than the Exposer ubiquits himself, peeping at the Keyholes, or picking the Locks of the Bedchambers of all the great Ministers, and though they be reading Papers of State▪ or at the Stool, more seasonably obtrudes his Pamphlet. Next he sends it by an express to his friends at the Universities, but especially to his own College, and can scarce refrain from recommending it to the Tutors to instruct their Pupils, reading it to them in lieu of their Lectures. But they are laid in for provision by the Manciple and Butler, and that Quarter few escape without being sconced for an Animadversion. The Country cathedrals learn it latest, and arrive by flower degrees to their understanding, by the Carrier. It grows a business of Chapter, and they admire it in body as a profound Book of Theology. Those of 'em that can confide in one another, discourse it over in private, and then 'tis odds, but, before the Laity get notice of it, they first hear it preached over by him whose turn it is next Sunday in the Minster, the rest conceal the Fraud for the reputation of the Diocese. After the Book is grown common the plagiary wonders how, but that proportionable Wits jump together, the Exposer could hit so right upon his Motions. But if the Dean foresee that 'tis a very vendible Book, he you may imagine forestalls the Market, and sends up for a whole Dicker of 'em to retail at his last advantage. All this while the little Emissaryes here in town are not idle, but hawk about from London to Westminster with their Breeches stuffed with the Copies, and will sell them to any one for Commendation. Nor do the grudge this drudgery out of the hope and vision that they themselves also may, at some happy hour or other, be received into the band of Answerers, and merit the same Applause and advancement. But if they found it so hard a task as I do this, sure they would be better advised. 'Tis a great pain to answer, even an Animadverter; they are much happier of the rwo 'tis better by far Preaching, and a Sermon is soon curried over. Yet sometimes it happens the Printing of a Sermon is toilsome afterwards and hazardous: for even one that was preached before His Ma●…esty, and by his special command to be Printed, is it seems making over again, there having been sure some error in the Fonte, and has laid several months in disobdience. But when it shall come out new vamped and refitted, it will be a question worthy the Schools, whether it be the same Sermon, and whether he has not prevaricated against his Majesty's special Command, and Sinned on, by Printing without a Licence. Yet I rather expect that after all, it will incur the same fate with that memorable Sermon preached before the House of Commons, at their receiving the Sacrament upon the first opening of the Parliament: Which for some dangerous opinions there vented, was so far from ever coming forth, that one might sooner have obtained His Majesty's special Command against over Printing it. But to return to the Exposer, who by this impertinence has forced an occasion upon me to effect on some Few who are guilty of the same, and may thank him for the favour. May not, with more reason p. 1. than he saith it of the Author, the Church justly complain of him for thrusting out such crude indigested matter, without communicating these conceptions of his to some that would have showed him the weak and blind sides of them? I profess after those passages of his that I have already taken notice of, and this egregious one the last, wherein by so few lines he hath so amply molested the Judicious Reader, I do not think I owe him the patience to consider what remains with the same exactness, every thing that he adds henceforward growing methodically slighter and worse as it hastens to, the Centre of Levity, the Conclusion of his Pamphlet. Yet something I will reply all along, with more justice than he practices toward the Author, for whereas he picks out here and there what he thinks; tenderest in him to tyre upon, and render it by his affected misrepresentation obnoxious, but shuts his eyes as not being able to endure the resplendence of those evident Truths which he delivers with great demonstration; I shall in the Exposer only observe and deal with what seems the least impertinent. Only I may not perhaps think him worth the transcribing so punctually as I have done hiterto, but for brevity more often refer to his own pages.  
Therefore be pleased to look on his p. 7. where, relating to what the Author had said p. 4. of the Procession of the Holy Ghost, wherein the Greek Creed and ours differ, he muffles it all up with saying that yet this breaks 〈◊〉 Communion between us, the difference arising only from the Inadequation of Languages. Which is a Mathematical and more Civil way, either of owning his Ignorance in so weighty a point, or confessing that he cannot answer what the Author hath said upon it. If by reason of the Inadequation of Languages a mystery so inexplicable could not be expressed why did either our Church or theirs meddle in it beyond the Scripture? There is no Inadequation between the Languages, in speaking of it, Dia and Apo a Patre Filioque, and a Patre per Filium: From the Father and Son, or From the Father By the Son: Proceeding or Sending: But no language can reach the nature of Profession or Mission, nor to represent to humane understanding how they can both be the same, or wherein they may differ. He does in this as the Arrian Bishops in their subscription of the Nicene Creed to Jovianus Socr. l. 3. c. 21. which now they said they could do with a good Conscience, understanding neque vocabulum substantiae apud sanctos Patres ad consuetudinem Graeci Sermonis capi. 'Tis an happy thing I see to find our Church in good humour, else she might have made more ado about an Article of Faith, as she does about much lesser matters. 'Tis not strange that the Exposer finds no greater difference or distinction between terms so distant, seeing in the last Paragraph above, he was so dull that he understood not What is What. But he most aptly concludes how Demosthenes once answered the Orator Aeschines, who kept much ado about an improper word. The Fortunes of Greece do not depend upon it. So trivial a thing it seems does the Exposer reckon it, to have improper words obtruded upon Christians in a Creed, without believing of which no man can be saved, and whereupon the Eastern and Western Churches divided with so much concernment. But how proper and ingenious a contrivance was it of the Author (who is the very Cannon of Concinnity) to bring in Demosthenes and Aeschines, as being doubtless both of the Greek Church, to decide the matter in Controversy of the Procession or Mission of the Holy Ghost between them and the West. Antiochus, whensoever you take the Pew again, be sure you forget not Demosthenes and Aeschines: For it will be to you as good as current Money, which answers all things. The Exposer, though here so gentle, yet, in the very page before this was as dogged, to as good men as the Greeks some of them, the Papists, Lutherans, and Calvinists. The Author, he says, may make as bold with them as he pleases, for we are none of these, I am not bound to make War in their vindication. But if he should once Kyrie Elieson, what would become of us? Good Mother Church of England maintain this humour thorough, carrey it on, but above all things make much of this thy Exposer; give him any thing, think nothing too good for him, Happy the Church that hath, and miserable that wants such a Champion!  
But I must find some more expeditious way of dealing with him, and walk faster, for really I get cold. The force of all that he ●…aith in the 8, and 9, pages, is to represent the Author ●…idiculously and odiously, as if upon his wishing that Constantine had commanded both party's Homoousian, and Homoiosian to acquiece in the very Scripture Expressions, without any addition, whereby he is contident the Arrian He esie had soon expired, he did by consequence cut, Poe-dike to let in a Flood of Heresies, upon the Fens of Christianity. But the words with which he cuts the Author down, are Why this was the design of the Arrians themselves, that which they drove at Court, that silence might be imposed on both Parties. Well, and 'twas very honestly done of them, and modestly, and like Christians, if the Controversy arose, as men think, about the Imposing of a Creed, or Article co●…ncerning a Question so fine, in Words so Gross, which yet a man must Believe that without Believing it, no man can be Saved; though no humane understanding can comprehend the subject of the Question, nor the Scripture Expressions, as they conceived, did reach it. There is field enough for Faith in the Scriptures, without laying out more to it; and to resign their Reason to be silenced in a Question, stirred up by others, that Peace might be established in the Church, was Ingenuity in them: and the contrary proceeding of the Church, was the occasion of many other Heresies that else had never been heard of. But the Exposer had said something, if he could have divined that they would have used this silencing the disputes by Constantine as the Arminians (so they were at that time called) did the same in the Reign of his late Majesty, who procuring a command from him to prohibit all writing or preaching about those points, having thereby gagged their Adversaries, did let the Press and the Pulpit lose more than ever to propagate their own Doctrines. That which the Exposer drops in the ardour of this Argument. p. 9 How many terms in the Athanasian Creed, which to seek for in the Apostles Creed, or in the whole Bible, were to as much purpose as it was for the old affected Ciceronian in Erasmus, to labour and toil his Brains to turn that Creed into Ciceronian Latin. Yet these are the terms in which the Catholic Church thought she spoke safely in these Divine matters; is totidem verbis, either to beg the Question, or make a formal resignation of it. And our Church (howsoever else he may have obliged her) has reason to resent this indiscretion. Why was she herself so indiscreet to admit such a Blab into her secrecies? How if no man else aught to have known it? It is an ill matter to put such things in men's minds, who otherwise perhaps would never have thought of it. 'Tis enough to turn a man's stomach that is not in strong health, not only against the Athanasian Creed, but against all others for its sake. He saith p. 8. Scoffingly that the Author is one of those whom St. Paul forbids to be admitted to any doubtful disputations: But let the Exposer see whether it be not himself rather that is there spoken of. And withal that he may make some more proper use of the place, which he warily citys not, I recommend it to him in order to his dispute about future Ceremonies: 'Tis the 14. Rom. v. 7. Where St. Paul calls them that contend for him the Weak Brother, Weak in the Faith; and such therefore the Apostle excludes from doubtful Disputations, so that one gone so far in Ceremony as the Exposer, had no Licence from him to Print Animadversions.  
As to what he patches in p. 10. upon the matter of School-Divinity, as if the Author poured contempt upon the Fathers, I refer it to the Animadversions on the Chapter about preaching, and should I forget, I desire him to put me in mind of it. And p. 11. and 12. where the Author having in his 2. and 3. p. said that, None can force another to believe, no more then to read where the Candle does not give good light, and more very significantly to that purpose; the Exposer flying giddily about it, burns his wings with the very similitude of a Candle. Sure if a man went out by night on Travelling, or Batfowling, or Proctoring, he might catch these Exposers by Dozen. But the force of his Argument is p. 13. Whereas the Author says, you can force no man's sight, nor his Faith. ●…he replies, If it be not in any man's truth to Discern Fundamental Truths, (of which this Chapter treats) when they are laid before his Eyes when there is a sufficient proposal, than it is none of his fault. Yet this is as weak as water: For, supposing a Fundamental Truth clearly demonstrated from Scripture, though a man cannot force himself to believe it, yet there is enough to render a man inexcusable to God. God hath not been wanting (one of the Exposers scraps) in necess●…iries: but I hope he will not compel God too, but that he may dispense his saving and efficatious influence (without which all that sufficient Proposal he speaks of will have been insufficient,) only to the minds of whom he pleases. The Animadverter in defending that a man can force himself to believe, argues against Experimental Demonstration (try it in any man, in every man) but raises only a malign ignorant and Caviling dispute, herein to reduce the Author to the dregs, forsooth, of Mr. Hobb's his Divinity, I. e. It is not in the man's fault saith he, if he cannot believe after a sufficient Proposal, He saith, he is sure, too it is not then the man's fault (so in the Dispute lately about That and What, he said, he was sure he did the Author no wrong) But I desire him first to read Romans 3. the 4, 5, 6. verses, with the Context: But especially Romans 9 from the 13. to the 22. verse, where the Apostle introduces a man objecting in the same words to the same purpose, Thou wilt say unto me why doth God yet find fault, etc. And if the Exposer will not take the Apostles Answer, but be sure of the contrary, than he too cannot, it seems force himself to believe after what he ought to have allowed for a sufficient Proposal. But where the Author supposes that any man does clearly or sufficiently demonstrate a Fundamental Truth from Scripture: yet unless a man's Brains be clear it is to him no demonstration. You suppose that all of you do clearly demonstrate, so that if they don't Believe you may justly open their Eyes with a pair of Pincers. Whereas there are some Few among the Few, such Spermologers, that unless a grain of Faith fall down, by the by, from Heaven your seed is Barren. I do not reckon much upon a Church Historical devilish belief. Unless a thing be in the Express words of Scripture, there are some of the Laity to whom a Counsel cannot demonstrate clearly, a Preacher cannot demonstrate, sneezing Powder cannot demonstrate, no Earthly can do it. Christ used Clay indeed, but it was his spital that gave the healing quality, and cured the Blind man. Alas you are so wise in your own conceit, that you cannot conceive how simple some poor men are. He saith, the Reason which helps every man to see these Fundamental Truths, at least when they are showed and pointed out to him (such Truths you must conceive as the Creed Doctrines of the Trinity) is a vulgar and popular thing (what need then so many Disputes in the Councils? and sure the Author, that he may not admit any man's hypocrisy and wilfulness to be gross and palpable, imagines there are a world of Idiots. So the exposer would now coke's the Lay-multitude, whom before he called the hundred thousands, and the many, and for their simplicity excusable from subscribing the 39 Articles, to be grown on the sudden so very wise men, that he may with justice therefore compel them by corporal punishments or penalties to believe in spite of their Teeth or their understandings. Alas if any men consider those Fundamental Truths, so subject he saith to vulgar and popular reason, it is one of the difficultest things in the world, and yet more to those who are most removed from being Idiots to believe them; and some men by their clear Demonstrations, by their sufficient Proposals, by their Creeds have rendered it still more difficult. Why have I wasted all this on the Exposer who, (whether it be his fault or no) yet cannot force himself to Believe even the Naked Truth, though so clearly demonstrated from Scripture (and the Exposer I suppose believes the Scripture▪) though so Consonant and obvious to the most vulgar and popular reason, but Believes his own Animadversions, against the most vulgar and popular Reason, to be a sufficient Proposal to the Contrary? In the 13. and 14. p. speaking of that place Gal. 5. 12. which the Author understands of the Magistrates Power, but the Exposer will have to be Excommunication; I crave leave to descent from both of them, humbly conceiving that the Word there of Cutting off is rather meant in the usual sense▪ of Scripture in a multitude of places, for Gods taking them of by his hand. But whatsoever it be, I desire the Exposer for his own sake to take good heed that, whether it be Executing, or Punishing, or Banishing, or Excommunicating, or taking them away God's hand of Justice, the Apostle speaks of such as taught for Circumcision, and alluding to the word wishes that they were rather cut off, who trouble the Galatians about the retaining of that, and who would oblige them contrary to their Christian Liberty to such Jewish Ceremonies.  
For what he ha●…es in of the great and notable effect p. 14. of conferences, wishing that there were such held publicly or privately to satisfy the Non-conformists; truly though they be no great men; yet perhaps it were fit they were first satisfied what kind of Reception they should meet with. But I doubt such Conferences in Public are but the Resemblance and Epitome of General Councils. For that of the Savoy in which he instances it might almost as well have been in Piedmont. A man disintessed either way, might make a pleasant story of the Anecdota of that Meeting, and manifest how well his Majesty's Gracious Declaration, before his return, and his Broad-Seal▪ afterwards were pursued. But it is not my present business. But for shortness sake, as to his desire That he that does not believe the notable effect of them would but read what my Lord Bishop of Winchester printed of that Conference, where the Adverse Party was driven immediately to assert that whatsoever may be the occasion of sin to any must be taken away: I shall as civilly as I can, though I defer much to his extraordinary veracity, tell the Exposer I do not believe him.  
I come now to what he p. 14, 15, 16, 17. and in other places declares to be his Judgement, as to Compulsion in matter of Faith and Religion. The Author's opinion appears in the beginning, where I stated his own words thorough this Chapter. The expose does beat the air. p. 14. concerning the Donatists, a must seditious and turbulent sect. who saith the Author (as it is objected by those that would have Force used) some of them came to St. Augustine and gave thanks, that the Civil Power was made use of to testraine them, confessing that was the means that brought them to consider more calmly their own former extravaga●… opinions, and so brought them home to the true Church. But he quarrels the Author for his four answers, against the Magistrates using that as a Precedent. The first, our Case is not in repressing seditious Practices, but enforcing a Confession of Faith. I will return strait to the Exposers Answer to this. The Author's second is; unless it can be evidenced that their hearts were changed as well as their Profession (a thing impossible to prove) all this proves nothing. Neither does it. For the dispute now betwixt the Author and his Adversary is, whether it be possible to compel a man to believe. This instance proves only that those Donatists were forced to come to Church. Therefore there cannot be a more uncharitable and disingenuous thing invented, then for the Exposer to upbraid him with such a retort, for aught he knows they were Hypoorites: (the Author does say so) so for aught we to know this Author is all this while a Jesuit, and writes this Pamphlet only to imbroile us Protestants. But he must make some sputter, rather than be held to the terms of the Question: and truly I perceive. Antiochus is very weary and shifts like a Crane (not to instance in a worse Bird) first one foot and then another to rest on, being tired to stand so long within so close a Circle. For thirdly the Author answers, Put the case their hearts were really changed, as to matter of Belief, 'tis evident their hearts were very worldly still, grovelling on earth not one step nearer Heaven: He will not be candid without Compulsion, but leaves out what follows; and sure their heart was evil, which was far m●…re moved for the quiet enjoyment of this world's good, then for the blessed enjoyment of Christ. In earnest I begin to think an Exposer is a Rational Creature. For had he not on pu●…pose left these last words out, he could not have cried, A horrible 〈◊〉 saying! We may forgive the Author any thing after this; which is all the Answer he gives: so charitable is the Exposer grown to the Donatists, for every man that will come to Church is ipso facto with him, a true Believer. But it did in truth appear to have been so, and there is not the least uncharitableness in this that the Author has said. For by those Donatists own confession, it was not any love to that which they now owned for the Truth to St. Austin, not any Convicton of Conscience, not so much as even 〈◊〉 inclination to obey the Magistrate; but mere fine force and fear of Punishment that brought them to Church, and whatsoever good came on't was by accident. Whether might not a man add that their giving thanks for that force, and so owning that Principle of Compulsion, was a further evidence that their heart was naught still, even while they were with St. Augustine? I think a man might, until I be better informed. But the Author having given a fourth answer, that, suppose they were now really brought over to the Truth of the Church of Belief, and Religion by the Magistrate's severity, (I express it thus that I may with the Exposer trifle about the Jews care) yet St. Paul hath said, God forbid we should do evil that good may come of it? This is answer enough for a man of understanding. For it is not lawful, suppose for St. Austin himself, to beguile any man even into Christianity: unless as St. Paul perhaps, 2 Cor. 12. 16. Being crafty, caught the Corinthians with guile, by preaching the Gospel without being Burdensome to the People. No man ought to cheat another though to the true belief: Not by Interlining the Scripture. Not by false Quotation of Scripture, or of a Father. Not by forging a Heathen Prophecy, or altering an Author. Not by false Syllogism: Not by telling a lie for God. And if no Petty Fraud much less can a Pia Vis be allowed, to compel them to Faith, to compel them to a Creed, seeing it were to do evil that grod may come of it: much less to a Creed not perfectly Scriptural, and, instead of being enforced, indeed weakened by compulsion, seeing it is impossible to compel a man to believe, and some Divines teach us to believe (though I suspend,) that even God himself cannot, or doth not Compel men to Believing. But now it falls in naturally to me to be as good as my word, to consider what the Exposer replies to the Author's first answer concerinig the Donatists, that our Case is of enforcing a Confession of Faith, not concerning seditious Practices, of which the Donatists were notoriously guilty, in which Case he had shown before, that the Civil Magistrate may proceed to Punishment. Wherein the Author reasons with his usual justness, and I though a very slender accession, cannot but come into him. For St. Paul, in the 13. Chapter of the Romans, laying out the Boundaries of the Duty of Christian subjects and the Magistrates Power; saith, Rulers are not (ought not to be) a terror to good works, but to evil, and so forward: but to the Christian people he saith, they must be subject not only for wrath as those Donatists were afterwards, but for Conscience sake. And the subjection he defines is in doing good, walking up●…ightly, keeping the Moral Law, Fearing, Honouring, and Paying Tribute to the Magistrate. But not one word saith the Apostle of forbearing to Preach out of that Obedience; saying in another place Necessity is laid upon one and woe is unto me if I preach not the Gospel: (and that supposes too meeting) and as little of Compelling to hear. For in those times and a great while after, there was no enforcing to Christianity. It was very long before that came in fashion: And, writing on the sudden, I do not well remember whether it did ever before the days of Picarro and Almagro, the Apostles of the Indians. yet upon recollection it was sooner. But what saith the Exposer to this of the Donatists, whom the Author allows only to have been punishable only for seditious Practices, having before declared that for such as only refuse to conform to the Churches established Doctrine and Discipline (pardon him if he say really he cannot find any warrant or so much as any hint from the Gospel to use any Force to compel them: and from Reason sure there is no motive to use force, because as he showed before, Force can't make a man believe your Doctrine, but only as an Hypocrite, Profess what be believes not. I expect that the Exposer, in this place above all other, which I guess was his greatest motive to this Employment, should ply and overly him now with Reason, but especially with Scripture, let us hear how he answers. I say only this p: 5. (for he speaks now of our Non-Conformists) the very Act against them calls them Seditious Conventicles, and openly to break so many known Laws of the Land, after so many reinforcements, is not this to be turbulent? This now you must understand to be Reason, and not Scripture: That I suppose as the strongest is reserved for the Rear. Truly, (as far as a man can comprehend by comparing that with other Acts of this Parliament,) they did only appoint that the Penalty of Sedition should lie against those that frequent such Meetings: as in the Act against Irish cattle, if it be not in itself a Nuisance no Lawgivers can make it so. Nor can any Legislators make that to be Sedition which is not Sedition in its own nature. So Prohibitions of that kind operate no more as to the intrinseque Quality, than a public. Allowance of taking away any honest men's Goods by violence and giving it another name, would extinguish the Robbery. It was the King and Parliaments prudence to make such Laws, and as long as they shall continue of that mind, it is reason the Non-Conformists should lie under the Penalty, which I humbly conceive is all that could be intended, But the Exposer rivets this with Reason again, not Gospel. And was it not ever understood so in all Religions; even in Heathen Rome? The most learned P. Aerodius tells us (Does he so? What is it I beseech you) that the Roman Senate (the Exposer quotes it at large as a story of great use and not to be huddled over; I must be glad to contract it) made an Act against the Conventicles of certain Innovators in their Religion; if any particular person judged such a sacrifice to be necessary, he must repair first to the Praetor, he to the Senate, where the Quorum must be an hundred, and they must not neither give him leave if at all to have above five persons present at the Meeting. The self same number, beside the Dissenters own Family, is so far forth endured by an Act of this present Parliament, that there must be more than Five to make it a Conventicle. This is a very subtle Remark that he has made, as if it were one of those Witty accidents of Fortune, or an extraordinary hand of Providence, that the Senate of Rome and the Parliament of England should hit so put, upon an Act of the same nature: And upon that number of Five. However they are obliged to him, and he deserves the public Thanks for furnishing them, so long after, with a Precedent. I confess I always wondered they would allow them so many as Five, for fear when, not two or three, but Five of'em were gathered together God should bear their request: and it seemed therefore to me a Formidable Number. But where has the Example been hid so long? I believe the Exposers study has laid much this way. But this was so deep an Arcanum that was fit for none but an Arch-Bishops Closer. I wish he have come honestly by it. But Murder I see and Theft will out, and so this comes to light by a blabbing Animadverter, that cannot keep counsel, but will violate the Ecclesiastical secret rather than lose the Lechery of his Tattle and the vainglory of his Pedantry. I could be glad to know what complexion this Exposer is of. I am persuaded, whatsoever he may be now, he was once extreme fair: for I remember since I was at School: that the learned P. Ovid told me, that the Crow was once a white Bird, and much in Apollo's favour till for telling of Tales,  
Sperantem non falsae praemia linguae,  
Inter aves albas vetuit consistere Corvum.  
And of another, the fairest thing that ever eyes were laid on, but for carrying of Stories, was turned into a Jackdaw, and grew as black as a Crow, Filching, and Kaw me and I'll Kaw thee, ever after.  
And that which sure must make him more black, more a Jack-daw, and like it, worthy to be expelled from the guard, and from the protection of Minerva, and who henceforward  
— Ponatur post Noctis avem,  
is, that he does with open mouth proclaim the Naked design of all the Few that are of his Party. p. 12. The Jews in Rome are constrained once a week to hear a Christian Sermon. The same p. 12. We that would oblige him to open his Eyes whether he will or no. p. 14. jean only wish for the present, that by forcing them into our Churches, they may hear our defences, p. 17. I speak nothing more against them than that they may he brought to our Churches, etc. All this as the last result and greatest condescension of his Ecclesiastical Clemency. In conclusion he declares he would have them forced: and for what manner of force, violence, punishment or penalty he leaves it all open, go as high as men will. These things still are not Scripture neither, but Reason. His first was an Heathenish Reason in one sense, and this a Jewish in another. For I confess it is a very pregnant and adequate example, and of great authority for us to imitate; that the Jews in Rome are constrained once a week to hear a Christian Sermon. What could there be more proportionable, then to resemble the proceeding with Christians among themselves here in England, not differing in any point of Faith, with the proceeding at Rome against the Jews? But that the Exposer should implicitly liken and compare our Bishops to the Pope, may perhaps not be taken well by either Party. So that I dare say, had he consulted with his usual Prudence, he would not have disoblidged both sides at once. But for the Precedent, I have nothing to oppose to this more than the first, it being doubtless of notable effect, as notable as that of the Piedmont conference. Only out of the affection I have for him, I would wish him to correct here one slip, if I be rightly informed; for some that have been abroad say his Intelligence from Rome has failed him, for that it is not once a week, but once a year that the Jews at Rome are, obliged, forced, to hear a Christian Sermon. And therefore, when the Parliamentum Indoctum sits again, I would advise him not to make his Act too severe here upon this mistake, than it is against those Judaic Non-Conformists at Rome.  
But the next Reason would be so extraordinary troublesome to the Few, that are of the Exposers party and to himself, that, if he had thoroughly considered it, I question whether he would have been so charitable to the fanatics, that he would oblige them to open their Eyes whether they will or no. For it would require two of the Church of England to every Nonconformist, unless 'twere here and there one that had lost an Eye in the Service. Less would not do the business decently, and those two also must be well in order, to open the Non-conformists Eyes both at once, lest one Eye should be of one and the other Eye of a contrary opinion. And then they should in humanity, give them some interval for winking. Else they had as good cut off their Eyelids, as the Episcopal Carthaginians used the Presbyterian Regulus, for keeping in the true sense to his Covenant. But on the other side, it would look too big for a Company of beggarly fanatics, to be waited upon in as much Majesty as Obeshankanogh the King of Virginia, that had two Squires of the Body in constant attendance, to lift up his Eyelids as oft as he conceived any man worthy to be looked upon. But let the Exposer order it as he pleases, I am not bound to be any of his Sight-supporters. Only this, it would be very improper for him to choose any one that is blind to that employment. For his several times repeated wish, that they might be forced to come to Church to give them a fair hearing, and to bear their discourses: truly I believe they know the Lion by the Claw, there is a great part of Oratory consists in the choice of the Person that is to persuade men. And a great Skill of whatsoever Orator is, to persuade the Auditory first that he himself is an honest and a fair man. And then he is like to make the more impression on them too, if he be so prudent as to choose an acceptable subject to speak on, and manage it decently, with fit arguments and good language. None but the very rabble love to hear any thing scurrilous or railing; especially if they should hear themselves railed on by him, they would be ready to give him the due applause of Petronius his Orator, with fl●…ging the stones about his ears, and then leaving him to be his own Auditory. Now, they have had so ample experiment of the Exposer as to all these points, in his Defence against the Naked Truth, that I doubt his persuasion to this coming to hear him or others, will be of little force with them, and nothing would oblige these Donatists to it, but the utmost extremity; nor then would they find themselves one step nearer heaven. His Book is as good to them as a Sermon, and no doubt he has preached as well as printed it, and took more pains in it than ordinary; did his best. Must they, will they think, be compelled to make up the pomp of his Auditory? Must they, while the good Popish Fathers suffered those of Chiapa to come to Church with their 〈◊〉 pots, to comfort their hearts, be enforced to come to Church by him, to have Snush thrust up their Noses, to clear their Brains for them 'Tis the only way to continue and increase the Sch●…sme. But in good sober earnest, 'tis happy that some or other of this Few chances ever and a non to speak their minds out, to show us plainly what they would be at. Being conscious of their own unworthiness, and hating to be reform, it appears that they would establish the Christian Religion by a 〈◊〉 way, and gather so much Force that it might be in their power, and we lie at their mercy, to change that Religion into Heathenism Judaisme, Turkism, any thing. I speak with some emotion, but not without good reason, that I question whether, which way soever the Church Revenues were applied, such of them would not betake themselves to that side as nimbly as the Needle to the Load stone. Have they not already, ipso facto renounced their Christianity, by avowing this Principle, so contrary to the Gospel? Why do not they Peter Hermit it, and stir up our Prince to an Holy War abroad, to propagate the Protestant Religion, or at least our Discipline and Ceremonies, and they take the Front of the Battle? No 'tis much better lurking in a fat Benefice here, and to domineer in their own Parishes above their Spiritual Vassals, and raise a kind of Civil War at home, but that none will oppose them. Why may they not, as well as force men to Church, eram the Holy Supper too down their Throsts (have they not done something not much unlike it) and drive them into the Rivers by thousands to be baptised or drowned? And yet this, after the King and Parliament by his, their, Gracious Indulgence have enacted a Liberty for Five beside their own Family to meet together in their Religious Worship: and could not therefore in end at the same time to force them to go to Church with the utmost or any severity. What can be the end of these things, but to multiply Force with Force, as one absurdity is the consequence of another, till they may again have debased the Reason and Spirit of the Nation, to make them fit for Ignorance and Bondage? Is it not reason, if they had care or respect to men's souls (which they only exercise it seems the cure of, perhaps not that neither, but evacuate one Residence by another) to allow that men should address themselves to such Minister as they think best for their souls health? Men are all infirm and indisposed in their spiritual condition. What sick man, but, if a Physician were enforced upon him, might in good prudence suspect it were to kill him, or that, if the next Heir and the Doctor could agree, he would certainly do it? I shall conclude this reasonable transport with remarking that although the Author did modestly challenge any man to show him a warrant or colour or hint from Scripture, to use Force to constrain men to the Established Doctrine and Worship, and offered to maintain that nothing is more clear to be deduced or is more fully expressed in Scripture, nor is more suitable to Natural Reason, than that no man be forced in such Cases; the Exposer took notice of it, yet hath not produced one place of Scripture, but only made use of Force at an Invincible Reason; so that upon supposal, which none granted ●…m, that all his Few do clearly demonstrate from Scripture, what is at best therefore but deducible from Scripture, she thinks it reasonable to oblige all men by force to come to all their Parishes. And yet he himself who does (I suppose it only for the Cases sake) believe the Scripture, although he cannot produce one place of Scripture for using this force, and though the Author has produced so many, and urges the whole Scripture that such force is not to be used, hath his brains nevertheless so confused, or so obdurate, that he cannot force himself to believe the Author: but persists in his unchristian and unreasonable desire that men may be compelled, and hereby deserves to be made an Example of his own Principle. For herein he exceeds Phara●…h, who had ten sufficient Proposals, and yet his heart was so hardened, that he would not let Israel go out of Egypt, but was proof against Miracles. But He only would imagine that the Israelites were idle, and would therefore force them to make Brick without Straw: but the Exposers heart and brains are so hardened, that he will conceive all the Nonconformists to be obstinate fools or hypocrites, and therefore will compel them all to go to all their Parish Churches, and to make therefore Faith without Reason. And hence it is not only probable but demonstrable, if they were compelled to go and hear him and the Few of his Party, how well he or they would acquit themselves too, in clearly demonstrating from Sciprture the Prime Articles of Faith, as it is extended in all the Creeds, of which it was treated in this Chapter that I have now done with, and truly almost with those remaining.  
For I had intended to have gone Chapter by Chapter, affixing a distinct Title, as he does to every one of them (that men may believe he has animadverted thoroughly without reading) except that concerning the difference between Bishops and Presbyters, which, as being the most easy to be answered, he therefore referred to a Bishop. But in good earnest, after having considered this last Chapter, so Brutal whether as to Force or Reason, I have changed my resolution. For he argues so despicably in the rest; that even I, who am none of the best Disputers of this World, have conceived an utter contempt for him. He is a mere Kitchin-plunderer, and attacks but the Baggage, where even the Sutler's would be too hard for him. P. 18. Does the Exposer allow that under Constantinus Pogonatus to have been a free General Council? In the same page, If the Exposer would have done any thing in his, Dic Ecclesiae, he should have proved that a General Council is the Church, that there can be such a General Council, or hath been; that the Church can impose new Articles of Faith beyond the Express Words of Scripture; that a General Council cannot err in matters of Faith; That the Church of his making cannot err in matters of Faith; Whereas our Church, Article 19 saith thus far, The Church of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, have erred, so also the Church of Rome hath erred, not only in their living and manner of Ceremonies, but also in matters of Faith. This is an Induction from Particulars, and remark the Title of the Article, being of the Church, Ours defines it, The Visible Church of Christ is a Congregation of faithful men, in which the pure Word of God is preached, and the Sacraments be duly ministered, according to Christ's Ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same. And then, if the Reader please to look on the 20. and 21. Articles following, one of the Authority of the Church, the other of the Authority of General Councils, unless a man will industriously misapply and misconstrue them, those three are a Compendious and irrefragable Answer, not only to wh●… he saith here upon the Appendix, but to his whole Book, from one end to the other, p. 19 I ask him when the Greek Church is excommunicate by the Roman, when the Protestants left the Roman Church, when we in England are neither Papists, Lutherans, nor Calvinists, and when in Queen Mary's time we returned to the Roman Church, what and where then was the Catholic Church, that was indefectible and against which the Gates of Hell did not prevail? Was it not in the Savoy? Moreover I ask him what hinders but a General Council may err in matters of Faith, when we in England, that are another World, that are under an Imperial Crown, that are none of them, as the Exposer words it, but have a distinct Catholic Faith within our Four Seas, did in the Reign before mentioned (and reckon how many in that Convocation those were that dissented) again make ourselves one of them? unless he has a mind to do so too, which would alter the Case exceedingly. P. 20. He quotes the Act I Eliz. cap. I. let him mind that clause in it, by the express and plain words of Canonical Scripture▪ and then tell me what service it hath done him: whether he had not better have let it alone, but that it is his fate all along to be condemned out of his own mouth, which must always succeed so, when man urges a Real Truth against a Real Truth. P. 23. I have reason to affirm and he will meet with it (and has already in the Author) that those General Councils howsoever called, were no Repraesentatio totius nominis Christiani, but nominally: yea that such a Representation could not be. P 22. He expounds Scriptures here, and thinks he does wonders in it, by assuming the Faculties of the whole Body to the Mouth, which Mouth, he saith (and in some sense 'tis very true, if a man would run over the Concordance) is the Clergy. But I know not why the Mouth of the Church should pretend to be the Brain of the Church, and understand and will for the whole Laity. Let every man have his word about, and 'tis reason. We are all at the same Ordinary, and pay our souls equally for the Reckoning. The Exposer's Mouth, which is unconscionable, would not only have all the Meat but all the Talk too, not only at Church, but at Council Table. Let him read Bishop Taylor of Liberty of Prophecy. P. 25 The Exposer, that always falsely Represents his Adversary, as an Enemy to Creeds, to Fathers, (as afterwards he does to Ceremonies, to Logic, to Mathematics, to every thing that he judiciously speaks and allows of) here. P. 25. saith the Author (who delivers but the Church of England's Doctrine herein, and would not have Divine Faith imposed upon, nor things pressed beyond Scripture) in this matter of General Councils is guilty of unthought of Popery, for the Papists (really I think he partly slanders them herein) cannot endure Councils, General and Free. They allow many a General Council more than we do. If the Pope do not, for some reason or other, delight in some that are past, or in having new ones; it does not follow that the Papists do not. I think those were Papists that ruffled the Pope too here in the West, and that at the Council of Constance burnt John Hus and Hierome of Prague, and resolved that Faith was not to be kept with Heretics. But pray Mr. Exposer, if we must give divine Faith to General Councils, let the Author ask you in his turn which are those General Councils? How shall we know them? Why, only such as accord with Scripture. Why, then we, I mean you Mr. Exposer, make ourselves, you still, Judges of the General Councils, the fault you so much condemn the Author for. But what Popery, thought or unthought of, are you, in the very next line, guilty of, that call the Pope's Supremacy the Quintessence of Popery? So that it seems the Quintessence of the Controversy betwixt ou●… Church and theirs, is only which shall be Pope: for the Articles of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 compulsion, though the Non-conformists may. I thank you, Mr. Exposer, for your News: I had often heard it before, I confess, but till now I did never, and scarce yet can, believe it; it is rather to be wished then hoped for, a thing so surprisingly seasonable. But for the good news, Mr. Exposer, I will give you four Bottles (which is all I had by me, not for mine own use, but for a friend upon occasion) of the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Essence. But the Quintessence I doubt would be too strong for your Brain, especially in the morning when you are writing Animadversions. P. 28. of Ceremonies he sport's unworthily, as if the Author spoke Pro and Con, Contradictions: while, as a Moderator, he advises our Church to Condescension on the right, and the Dissenters to submission on the left (how are men else to be brought together?) He had as good call every man, because he has two hands, an Ambidexter. He would turn every man's Stomach, worse than the Singing-mens' dirty Surplices, to hear him defend it so foolishly. P. 29, 30, 35, 36. The best of his reasons for it are the Apparitions in white, in the Evangelists. The Transfiguration. The Saints in white Linen. The Purity of a Minister, Why then does he not wear it all the Week? The Bishop Sisynnius did so, and a Churchman ask him, why not in Black? as 'twas then the mode, he gave the same reasons; and I believe Gurnay the Nonconformist, if, as they say, he went to Market in it, learned them of him. Why does not the Exposer (there is more reason in Scripture. Col. 4 6. Let your speech be always seasoned with Salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man) carry a Salt-box always in his Pocket, to be tasting of? for I doubt he is of the Salt that has lost his savour: however I am sure he is very insip●…d, and this might correct it: beside it must have been of great virtue, when he was to animadvert on the Naked Truth, that he might have known how to answer him. See Fox Vol. 3. p. 500 col. 2. what the Martyr, the Conformable Bishop Ridley saith, would not be forced to wear it, he was no Singer. See as to all these thing, his beloved Tertullian, de Cor. Mil. Si ideo dicatur Coronari licere, quia non prohibeat Scriptura, aequè retorquebitur, ideo Coronari non licere, quia Scriptura non jubeat. Bishop chrysostom Or. 1. adversus Judaeos, Ostendite eos ex Dei sententi●… jejunare Quod ni id fiat q●…vis eb●…ietate sceleratius est jejunium. Etenim contra-quod fit praeter Dei voluntatem est omnium p●…ssimum. Non enim ipsa corum quae fiunt natura, sed Dei voluntas ac Decretum essicit ut eadem vel bona sint vel mala. P. 33. 〈◊〉 jeering at the Authors Oh my Fathers, is inhuman and impious: but Changed the pity of it that twenty such Oh's will not amount to one Reason They will, Heb. 4. 12, 13. that day, which the Devils believe and tremble, when all things shall be naked and bare before the Word of Truth. P. 37. he is scarce proper to come in a Pulpit, after what he saith, that the Apostles received not the Sacrament sitting; much less after p. 41. he has said, We read that our Saviour kneeled in several places, much less after p. 59 where of preaching he saith, He knows not what the Author means by the Demonstration of the Spirit, unless to speak as he does, magisterially. He never read 1 Cor. 2. 4. of preaching in demonstration of the spirit, nor Mat. 7. 29. how Christ taught as one having authority; there is such an Art if he knew it. P. 42. he can never answer the Author upon Rom. 14. where the zeal us Observer of Ceremonies is the weak Brother. He whiffles, those were the Jewish Ceremonies. The Jews had a fairer pretence than we: for theirs were instituted by God himself, and they know not they were abrogate.  
His intolerably ridiculous Story out of Scholtus p. 15. of contriving a pair of Organs of Cats, which he had done well to have made the Pigs at Hogs Norton play on, puts me in mind of another Story to quit it, relating as his does to screwing the Non-conformists into Church; and I could not possibly miss of the rencontre, because the Gentleman's name of whom it is told, is the Monosyllable voice with which Cats do usually address themselves to us. 'Twas (you have it as I had it) the Vicechancellor of one of our Universities, but now a Bishop, Octob. 22. 1671. and 12. Febr. 1669, He came to a fanatics house, they not being then at Worship, yet one of them said, They were come to pray to the God of Heaven and Earth; he said, Then they were within the Act. He would force them to Church to Saint mary's, himself laid hands on'm. He commanded them to follow him in the King's name. His Beadle told them, He would drive them thither in the Devil's name. The Vicechancellor said he had converted hundreds so at Reading. They spoke of Queen Mary's days, he said, he could burn them too now, if the Law required it. There was old tugging, he had the victory. They were placed in Saint mary's, with Beadles to attend them. As he carried them in he quoted Luke 14 23 Compel them to come in. What pity 'tis the Exposer knew not of this Text, that he might have had one Scripture for his Doctrine of Compulsion! But it chanced the Minister there preached one time Acts 5. 41. the other time Mat. 10. 16. Afterwards he took the penalty nevertheless for not having been at Church that same Sunday that he had hurried them thither. P. 62. He speaks of Bishop Morton, whose industrious Brain made up the fatal breach between the two Houses of York and Lancaster. Much good do the Clergy with their Lay Offices He cogs p. 7. with the Bishop of Ely for his short Syllogism: he made a longer of the Holiness of Lent. He compliments (I said he would not forget him) my Lord Chancellor the Christian Cicero. 'Tis true of him, but contradictorily expressed. Ps. 35. 16. With the flatterers were busy mockers, that gnashed with their teeth. The Exposer has commenced in both Faculties. But the Printer calls: the Press is in danger. I am weary of such stuff, both mine own and his. I will rather give him this following Essay of mine own to busy him, and let him take his turn of being the Popilius.   

A short Historical Essay, touching General Councils, Creeds, and Imposition in Religion.  
THE Christian Religion, as first Instituted by our Blessed Saviour was the greatest security to Magistrates by the Obedience which it taught, and was fitted to enjoy no less security under them by a Practice conformable to that Doctrine. For our Saviour himself, not pretending to an Earthly Kingdom, took such care therefore to instruct his followers in the due Subjection to Governors; that, while they observed his Precepts, they could neither fall under any Jealousy of State as an ambitious and dangerous Party, nor as Malefactors upon any other account deserve to suffer under the Public Severity: So that in this only it could seem pernicious to Government that Christianity, if rightly exercised upon its own Principles, would render all Magistracy useless. But although he, who was Lord of all, and to whom all Power was given both in Heaven and in Earth, was nevertheless contented to come in the form of a Servant, and to let the Emperors and Princes of the World alone with the use of their Dominions; he thought it good reason to retain his Religion under his own cognizance and exempt its Authority from their jurisdiction. In this alone he was imperious, and did not only practise it himself against the Laws and Customs then received, and in the face of the Magistrate; but continually seasoned and hardened his Disciples in the same confidence and obstinacy. He tells them, They shall be brought before Kings and Governors for his name but fear them not, he will be with them, bear them out and justify it against all Opposition. Not that he allowed them hereby to violate their duty to the Public by any resistance in defiance of the Magistracy; but he instructed and animated them in their duty to God, in despite of Suffering.  
In this manner Christianity did at first set out and accordingly found reception. For although our Blessed Saviour, having fulfilled all Righteousness and the time of his Ministry being completed, did by his Death set the Seal to his Doctrine, and show the way toward Life and Immortality to such as Believing imitate his Example: yet did not the Heatken Magistrate take the Government to be concerned in the point of Religion or upon that account consent to his Execution. Pontius Pilate, than Governor of Judaea, though he were a man unjust and cruel by Nature, and served Tiberius, the most tender, jealous, and severe in point of State or Prerogative, of all the Roman Emperors; though he understood that great Multitudes followed him, and that he was grown the Head of a new Sect that was never before heard of in the Nation, yet did not be intermeddle. But they were the men of Religion, the Chief-Priests, Scribes and Elders and the Highpriest Caiapkas. And yet, although they accused him falsely, That he taught that Tribute was not to be given to Caesar that he was a Fifth Monarch and made himself a King, and (as it is usual for some of the Clergy to terrify the inferior Magistrates out of their duty to Justice under pretence of Loyalty to the Prince) threatened Pilate that if he let that man go he was not Caesar's friend; he understanding that they did it out of Envy, and that the Justice and Innocence of our Saviour was what they could not bear with, would have adventured all their Informing at Court, and first have freed him and then have exchanged him for Barrabas; saying, that he found no fault in him: but he was overborne at last by humane weakness and poorly imagined that by washing his own hands he had expiated himself and wiped off the guilt upon those alone who were the occasion. But, as for Tiberius himself, the growth of Christianity did never increase his cares of Empire at Rome, nor trouble his sleep at Capri: but he both approved of the Doctrine, and threatened the Informers with Death; nor would have stayed there, but attempted, according to the way of their Superstition, upon the intelligence he had from Pilate, to have received Christ into the number of their Deities. The Persecution of the Apostles after his Death, and the Martyrdom of Stephen happened not by the interposing of the Civil Magistrate in the matter of Religion, or any disturbance occasioned by their Doctrines: but arose from the Highpriest and his emissaries, by suborned Witnesses, stirring up the rabble in a brutish and riotous manner to execute their cruelty. How would the modern Clergy have taken and represented it, had they lived in the time of St. John Baptist and seen Jerusalem, Judaea and all the Region round about Jordan go out to be baptised by him! Yet that Herod, for any thing we read in Scripture, though he wanted not his instillers, apprehended no Commotion: and had not Calig●…la banished him and his Herodias together, might in all appearance have lived without any change of Government. 'Twas she that caused John's Imprisonment for the convenience of her Incest, Herod indeed seared him, but rather reverenced him, as a just man, and an holy, observed him and when he heard him he did many things and heard him gladly. Nor could all her subtlety have taken off his Head, but that Herod thought himself under the obligations of a Dance and an Oath, and knew not in that Case they ought both to be dispensed with. But he was exceeding sorry at his death, which few Princes are if men have lived to their jealousy or danger. The Killing of James and Imprisonment of Peter by that other Herod was because he saw he pleased the people; when the Priests had once set them on madding: a Complaisance to which the most innocent may be exposed, but which partakes more of guile than Civility or Wisdom.  
But, to find out what the disinteressed and prudentmen of those days took to be the wisest and only justisiable way for the Magistrate to proceed in upon matters of Religion, I cannot see any thing more pregnant than the concurrent Judgement of three Persons, of so different Characters, and that lived so far a sunder, that there can be no danger of their having corrupted one another's Understanding in favour to Christianity. Gamaliel, the Deputy of Achaia, and the Town clerk of Ephesus; The first a Jewish Doctor, by Sect a Pharisee, one of the Council, and of great Authority with the People, who (when the Chief-Priest had cast the Apostles in Prison, and charged them for Preaching against the Command he had before laid upon them) yet gave this advice, confirming it with several fresh precedents, Acts 5. That they should take keed to themselves what they intended to do with those men and let them alone, for if this counsel, saith he, or this work be of men, it will come to nought, but if it be of God you cannot overthrow it, lest ye be found fight with God. So that his Opinion grounded upon his best experience, was that the otherwise unblameable Sect of Christianity might safely and aught to be left to stand or fall by God's Providence under a free Toleration of the Magistrate. The Second was Gallio, Acts 18. A Roman, and Deputy of Achaia. The Jews at Corinth hurried Paul before his Tribunal, laying the usual charge against him. That he persuaded men to Worship God contrary to the Law: which Gallio looked upon as so slight and without his Cognizance, that, although most Judges are willing to increase the jurisdiction of their Courts, He drove them away, saving Paul the labour of a defence, and told them, If it were a matter of wrong or wicked lewdness▪ reason would that he should bear with them, but if it be a question of words and names and of your law, look ye to it I will be no judge of such matters: and when he had so said, Paul was released, but the Greeks that were present took Barrabas, and before the Judgement Seat beat So●…henes the Chief Ruler of the Synagogue, and Ring leader of the Accusers. His Judgement therefore was that, to punish Christians merely for their Doctrine and Practice, unless they were Malefactors otherwise, was a thing out of the Magistrates Province and altogether unreasonable. The Third case was no less remarkable. For one Demetrius, that was a Silver-smith by trade and made shrines for Diana, stirred up all the Free men of his Company against Paul, and indeed he stated the matter very fairly and honestly, assigning the true Reason of most of these Persecutions: Ye know that by this craft we have our wealth, but that by Paul's Preaching that they be no Gods which are made with hands, not only our Craft is in danger to be set at naught, but also the Temple of the great Goddess and her Magnificence, whom all Asia and the World Worship, should be despised and destroyed. And it is considerable that even the Jews, though of a contrary Religion yet, fomented, as it usually chances, this difference and egged the Ephesians on against the Apostle and his followers. But when they had brought Alexander, one of Paul's Companions into the Theatre, the Recorder of Ephesus (more temperate and wise than some would have been in that Office) would not make any Inquisition upon the matter, nor put Alexander upon his trial and defence, but, (although he himself could not have born that Office without being a great Dianist, as he declared too in his discourse) he tells the People, They had brought those men which were neither robbers of Churches nor Blasphemers of their Goddess, (for that Judge would not Condemn men by any inferences or expositions of old Statutes which long after was Julian's practice and since imitated) and therefore if Demetrius and his Craftsmen had any matter against them the Law was open, and it should be determined in a Lawful Assembly, but that the whole City was in danger to be called in question for that uproar, there being no cause whereby they might give account of that concourse. And by this he plainly enough signified, that if Paul and his Companions had stolen the Church-Plate they might well be i●…ed, but that Demetrius had no more reason in Law against them, than a Chandler might have had, if by Paul's Preaching Wax tapers, as well as Silver-Candlesticks had grown out of fashion. That it is matter of right and wrong betwixt man and man that the Justice of Government looks too: but that, while Christianity was according to its own Principle carried on quietly, it might so fall that the disturbers of it were guilty of a Riot and their great City of Ephesus deserve to be fined for't. And taking this to have been so, he dismissed the Assembly, Acts 19  
After these Testimonies which I have collected out of the History of the Acts, as of greatest Authority, I shall only add one or two more out of the same Book, wherein Paul likewise was concerned before Heathen Magistrates of greater eminence, Acts 23. Ananias the High Priest (these always were the men) having countenanced and instigated the Jews to a Conspiracy, in which Paul's Life was endangered and aimed at Lysias the chief Captain of Jerusalem interposes and sends him away to Foelix then Governor of Judaea; signifying by Letter That he had been accused only of questions of their Law, but he found nothing to be said to his Charge worthy of Death or of Bonds. Whereof Foelix also, though the Highpriest was so zealous in the Prosecution that he took the journey on purpose, and had instructed an exquisite Orator Tertullus to harangue Paul out of his Life, as a Pestilent-fellow, a mover of Sedition and Ringleader of the Sect of the Nazarenes, not omitting even to charge Lysias for rescuing him by great violence from being Murdered by them, was so well satisfied of the contrary upon full hearing, that he gave him his Libery and a Centurion for his guard, with command that none of his acquaintance should be debarred from coming and Ministering to him. But being indeed to leave his Government afterwards; left him in Prison, partly to show the Jews and their Highpriest another piece of complaisant Policy, which; 'tis possible they paid well for, seeing the other reason was, because though he had sent for Paul the oftener and communed with him, in hopes that he would have given him money to be discharged, there came nothing of it. Which was so base a thing in so great a Minister, that the meanest Justice of the Peace in England would scarce have the face to do so upon the like occasion. But his Successor F●…stus, having called Agrippa and Berenice to hear the Cause, they and three were of Opinion that 'twas all on the Jews side calumny and impertinence, but that Paul had done nothing worthy of death or of Bonds, and might have been set free but that having appealed to Caesar he must be transmitted to him in safe Custody. Such was the sense of those upon whom the Emperors then relied for the Government and security of their Provinces: and so gross were their Heathen understandings, that they could not yet comprehend how quietness was Sedition, or the innocence of the Christian Worship could be subject to forfeiture or penalty. Nay, when Paul appeared even before Nero himself and had none to stand by him but all forsock him: he was by that Emperor acquitted, and permitted a long time to follow the work of his Ministry. 'Tis true that afterwards this Nero had the honour to be the First of the Roman Emperors that Persecuted Christianity; whence it is that Tertullian in his Apologetic saith; We glory in having such an one the first beginner and Author of our punishment, for there is none that hath read of him, but must understand some great good to have been in that Doctrine, otherwise Nero would not have Condemned it.  
And thence forward Christianity for about Three hundred Years lay subject to Persecution. For the Gentile Priests could not but observe a great decay in their Parishes, a neglect of their Sacrifices and diminution of their Profits by the daily and visible increase of that Religion. And God in his wise Providence had so ordered that, as the Jews already so, the Heathens now having filled up their measure with iniquity, Sprinkling the Blood of his Saints among their Sacrifices, and the Christians having in a severe Apprenticeship of so many Ages Learned the Trade of Suffering, they should at last be their own Masters and admitted to their Freedom. Neither yet, even in those times when they lay exposed to Persecution, were they without some intervals and catching seasons of Tranquillity, wherein the Churches had leisure to reap considerable advantage, and the Clergy too might have been enured, as they had been Exemplary under Affliction so, to bear themselves like Christians when they should arrive at a full prosperity. For as oft as there came a just Heathen Emperor and a lover of Mankind, that either himself observed, or understood by the Governors of his Provinces, the innocence of their Religion and Practices, their readiness to pay Tribute, their Prayers for his Government and Person, their faithful Service in his Wars, but their Christian valour and contumacy to Death, under the most exquisite Torments, for their holy profession; he forthwith relented, he rebated the Sword of the Executioner, and could not find in his heart or in his power to excercise it against the exercise of that Religion. It being demonstrable that a Religion instituted upon Justice betwixt man and man. Love to one another, yea even their Enemies, Obedience to the Magistrate in all Humane and Moral Matters, and in Divine Worship upon a constant exercise thereof and as constant Suffering in that Cause, without any pretence or latitude for Resistance, cannot, so long as it is true o itself in these things, fall within the Magistrate's Jurisdiction.  
But as it first was planted without the Magistrates hand, and the more they plucked at it, so much the more still it flouricted, so it would be to the end of the world, and whensoever Governors have a mind to try for it, it will by the same means and method sooner or later foil them, but, if they have a mind to pull up that Mandrake it were adviseable for them not to do it themselves, but to choose out a Dog for the Employment. I confess whensoever a Christian transgresseth these bounds once, he is impoundable or like a wafe and stray whom Christ knows not, he falls to the Lord of the Manor. But otherwise he cannot suffer, he is invulnerable by the sword of Justice: only a man may swear and damn himself to kill the first honest man he meets, which hath been, and is the case of all true Christians worshipping God under the power and violence of their Persecutors.  
But the Truth is that, even in thosetimes which some men now, as oft as it is for their advantage, do consecrate under the name of Primitive, the Christians were become guilty of their own punishment, and had it not been, as is most usual, that the more Sincere Professors suffered promiscuously for the Sins and Crimes of those that were Carnal and Hypocrites, their Persecutors may be looked upon as having been the due Administrators of God's Justice. For (not to go deeper) if we consider that which is reckoned the Tenth Persecution under Dioclesian, so incorrigable were they after nine preceding, what other could be expected when Eusebius l. 3. c. 1. sadly laments having related how before that the Christians lived in great trust and reputation in Court, the Bishops of each Church were beloved, esteemed and reverenced by all mankind and by the Precedents of the Provinces, the Meetings in all the Cities were so many and numerous, that it was necessary and allowed them to erect in every one spacious and goodly Churches, all things went on prosperously with them, and to such an height that no envious man could disturb them, no Devil could hurt them, as long as walking yet worthy of those mercies they were under the Almighty's cure and protection: after that our affair by that too much Liberty, degenerated into Luxury and Laziness, and some prosecuted others with Hatred, Contumely, and almost all of us wounded ourselves with the weapons of the Tongue in ill language when Bishops set upon Bishops, and the people that belonged to one of them stirred Sedition against the people of another; then horrible Hypocrisy and Dissimulation sprung up to the utmost extremity of Malice, and the Judgement of God, while yet there was liberty to meet in the Congregations, did sensibly and by steps begin to visit us, the Persecution at first discharging itself upon our Brethren that were in the Army. But having no feeling of the hand of God, not endeavouring to make our peace with him, and living as if we believed that God did neither take notice of our Transgressions nor would visit us for them, we heaped up Iniquity upon Iniquity. And those which seemed to be our Pastors, kicking under foot the rules of Piety, were inflamed among themselves with mutual Contentions, and while they minded nothing else but to exaggetate their Quarrels, Threats, Emulation. Hatred and Enemies, and earnestly each of them pursued his particular Ambition in a Tyrannical manner, than indeed the Lord, than I say, according to the voice of the Prophet J●…emy, he covered the Daughter of Zion with a cloud of his anger, and 〈◊〉 down from Heaven unto earth the beauty of Israel; and remembered not his footstool in the day of his anger. And so the Pious Historian Pathetically goes on, and deplores the Calamities that 〈◊〉, to the loss of all that stock of Reputation, Advantage, Liberty and Safely, which Christian people had by true Piety and adhering strictly to the Rules of their Profession formerly acquired and enjoined, but had now forfeited and smarted deservedly under Dioclesian's persecution. And it was a severe one, the longest too that ever happened, ten years from his beginning of it and continued by others: by which 〈◊〉 one might have thought the Church would have been sufficiently winnowed, and nothing left but the pure Wheat, whereas it proved quite contrary, and the holiest and most constant of the Christians b'ing blown away by Martyrdom, it seemed by the succeeding times as if nothing but the Chaff and the Ta●…es remained. But there was yet such a Seed le●…, and notwithstanding the defection of many, so internal a virtue in the Religion itself, that Dioclesian could no longer stand against it, and tired out in two years' time, was glad to betake himself from rooting out Christianity, to gardening and to sow Potherbs at Salona. And he with his partner Maximi●…s, resigned the Empire 〈◊〉 Galer●…s and Constan●…, the excellent Father of a more glorious and Christian Son, Constantine the G●…a, who in due season succeeded him, and by a chain of God's extraordinary providences seemed to have been 〈◊〉 down from Heaven to be Emperor of the whole World, and as I may say, the Universal Apostle of Christianity.  
It is 〈◊〉 pressible the virtue of that Prince, his Care, his Indulgence, his Litera●…y his own Example, every thing that could possibly tend to the promotion and encouragement of true Religion and Piety. And in order to that he though 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not do better▪ neither indeed could he, then to show a, 〈◊〉 respect o●… the Clergy and Bishops, providing largely for their subsistence and they too on their part behaved themselves worthy of their High 〈◊〉 are known to make right use of the advantages of his Bounty to the same ends that they were by him intended. For if the Apostle 〈◊〉 Tim. 5. 17. re●…uires that an Elder, provided he rule well, be accounted worthy of Double Honour, especially those who lab●…ing in the Word and Doctrine, it excludes not a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 any further proportion, and indeed these cannot be too high a value 〈◊〉 upon such a Pe●…son: and God forbid too that any measure of wealth should render a Clergy man Uncanonical. But alas, Bishops were already grown another Name and Thing, then at the Apostles Institution; and had so 〈◊〉 their 〈◊〉, that Paul would have had much difficulty by all the marks in the 〈◊〉 Tim. 〈◊〉. to have known them. They were ill enough under persecution many of them, but that long and sharp Winter under Dioclesian, being seconded by so warm a Summer under Constantine, produced a Pestilence, which as an Infection that seizes sometimes only one sort of 〈◊〉▪ Diffused itself 〈◊〉 remarkably thorough the whole body of the Clergy. From his reign the most sober Historians date that New Disease which was so generally propagated then, and ever since transmitted to some of their Successors, that it hath given reason to inquire whether it only happened to those men as it might to others, or where not inherent to the very Function. It showed itself first in ambition, then in Contention, next in Imposition, and after these Symptoms broke out at last like a Plaguesore in open Persecution. They the Bishops who began to vouch themselves the Successors of Christ, or at least of his Apostles, yet pretended to be H●…irs and Executors of the Jewish Hiah-Priests and the Heathen Tyrants, and were ready to move the Will. The Ignorant Jews and Infidels understood not how to Persecute, had no Commission to meddle with Religion, but the Bishops had studied the Scriptures, knew better things, and the same, which was Cruelty and Tyranny in the Heathens, if done by a Christian and Ecclesiastical hand, was hallowe●… to be Church-Government and the care of a Diocese. But that I may not seem to speak without book or outrun the History, I shall return to proceed by those degrees I newly mentioned whereby the Christian Religion was usurped upon, and those things became their crime which were their duties.  
The first was the Ambition of the Bishops, which had even before this taken its rise when in the intervals of the former Persecutions the Piety of the Christians had laid out ample provisions for the Church, but when Constantine not only restored those which had been all 〈◊〉 under Dioclesian, but was every day adding some new Possession, Privilege, or Honour, a Bishopric became very 〈◊〉, and was not only a Good Work but a Good Thing, especially when there was now no danger of paying as it was usual, formerly their First-fruits to the Emperor by Martyrdom. The Arts by which Ambition c●…mes, are Calumny, Dissimulation, Cruelty, Bribery, Adulation, all applied in their proper places and seasons; and when the man hath attained his end he ordinarily shows himself then in his colours, in Pride, Opiniastry, Contention, and all other requisite or incident i'll Qualities. And if the Clergy of those times had some more dextrous and innocent way then this of manaing their Ambition, it is to be lamented inter Artes 〈◊〉, or lies enviously hid by some musty Book-worm in his private Liberary. But so much I find that both before and then and after, they cast such Crimes at one another, that a Man would scarce think he were reading an History of Bishops, but a Legend of Devils: and each took such are to blacken his adversary, and he regarded not how he smutted himself thereby and his own Order, to the Laughter or Horror of the bystanders. And one thing I remark particularly, that as Son of a Whore is the modern Word of Reproach among the Laity, of the same use then among the Clergy was Heretic. There were indeed Heretics as well as there are Bastards, and perhaps it was not their fault, (neither of 〈◊〉 could help it) but the Mother's o●… the Fathers, but they made so many Heretics in 〈◊〉 days, that 〈◊〉 hard to think they really believed them so; but adventured the Name only to pick a Quarrel And one thing that makes it very suspicious, is, that in the Ecclesiastical History the Ringleaders of any Heresy for the most part accused of having a mind to be a Bishop, though it was not the way to come to it. As here was the damnable Heresy of the Novatians, against which Constantine, not withstanding his Declaration of general Indulgence at his coming in, was shortly after so incensed, that he published a most severe Proclamation against them; Cognoscite jam per legem hanc que in me sancita 〈◊〉 O Nova iam etc. prohibiting all their meetings, not only in Public but in their own Private Houses, and that all such places where they assembled for their worship, should be razed to the ground without delay or controversy, etc. Eus. l. 3. c. 62. de vita Constantini. Now the story the Bishops tell of Novatus the Author of that Sect. Euseb. l. 6. c. 24. is in the words of Cornelius the Bishop of Rome, the very first line. But that you may know that this brave Novatus did even before that affect to be a Bishop (a great crime in him) that he might conceal that petulant Ambition, he for a better cover to his arrogance, had got some Confessors into his Society, etc. and goes on calling him all to naught, but then, saith he, be came with two Reprobates of his own Heresy into a ●…uite, the very lest, Shire of Italy and by their means seduced three most simple high shoes Bishops, wheedling them that they must with all speed go to Rome and there meeting with other Bishops all Matters should be reconciled. And when he had got thither these three Silly Fellows, as I said, that were not aware of his cunning, he had prepared a company of Rogues like Himself, that treated them in a private room very freely, and having thwacked their bellies and heads full with meat and drink, compelled the poor drunken Bishops by an imaginary and vain Imposition of Hands, to make Novatus also a Bishop. Might not one of the same Order now better have concealed these things had they been true, but such was the discretion. Then he tells that one of the three returned soon after, repenting it seems next morning, and so he received him again into the Church unto the Laic Communion. But for the other two he had sent Successors into their places. And yet after all this ado, and the whetting of Constantine, contrary to his own Nature and his own Declarations against the Navatians, I cannot find their Heresy to have been other then that they were the Puritans of those times, and a sort of Non-conformists that could have subscribed to the Six and thirty Articles, but differed only in those of Discipline: and upon some inormities therein separated, and (which will always be sufficient to quality an Heretic) they instituted, Bishops of their own in most places. And yet afterwards in the times of the best Homotusian Emperors, a sober and strictly Religious People did so constantly adhere to them, that the Bishops of the Church too found meet to give them fair quarter; for as much as they differed not in Fundamentals, and therefore were of use to them against Heretics that were more dangerous and diametrically opposite to the Religion. Nay in so much, that even the Bishop of Constantinople, yea of Rome, not withstanding that most tender point and interest of Episcopacy, suffered the Novatian Bishops to walk cheek by joul with them in their own Diocese; until that, as Secretary l. 7. c. 11. the Roman Episcopacy having as it were passed the bounds of Priesthood, slipped into a Secular Principality, and thenceforward the Roman Bishops would not suffer their Meetings with Security, but, though they commended them for their Consent in the some Faith with them, yet took away all their Estates. But at Constantinople they continued to far better, the Bishops of that Church embracing Novatians and free liberty to keep their Conventicles in their Churches. What, and to have their Bishops too, Altar against Altar? A Condescension which as our Non-conformists seem not to desire or think of, so the Wisdom of these times would, I suppose, judge to be very unreasonable, but rather that it were fit to take the other course, and that whatsoever advantage the Religion might probably receive from their Doctrine and party, 'tis better to suppress them, and make havoc both of their Estates and Persons. But however the Heretics in Constantine's time had the less reason to complain of ill Measure, seeing it was that the Bishops meated by among themselves. I pass over that controversy betwixt Cecilianns, the Bishop of Carthage and his adherents, with another set of Bishops there in afric, upon which Constantine ordered ten of each party to appear before Mil●…iades the Bishop of Rome and others to have it deceived. Yet after they had given sentence, Constantine found it necessary to have a Council for a review of the business, as in his Letter to Chrestus the Bishop of Syracuse, Euseb. l. 10. c. 6. Wrensas several have formerly separated from the Catholic Heresy, (for that word was not yet so ill natured but that it might sometimes be used in its proper and good Sense:) and then relates his Commission to the Bishop of Rome and others; But for as much as some having been careless of their own salvation, and forgetting the reverence due to that most holy Heresy (again) will not yet lay down their enmity, nor admit the sentence that hath been given, obstinately affirming that they were but a few that pronounced the Sentence, and that they did it very precipitately, before they bade duly inquired of the matter: and from hence it hath happened that both they who ought to have kept a brotherly and nuanimous agreement together, do abominably any flagitiously descent from one another, and such whose minds are alienated from the most holy Religion, do make a mockery both of it and them. Therefore 1, etc. have commanded very many Bishops out of innumerable places to meet at Arles, that what ought to have been quieted upon the former Sentence pronounced, may now at least be determined, etc. and you to be one of them, and therefore I have ordered the Perfect of Sicily to furnish you with one of the public Stage-Coachers and so many Servants etc.  
Such was the use then of Stage Coaches, Post Horses, and Councils, to the great disappointment and grievance of the many: both Men and Horses and Leather being hackneyd-jaded and worn out upon the errand of some contentious and obstinate Bishop, So went the Affairs hitherto, and thus well disposed and prepared were the Bishops to receive the Holy Ghost a second time at the great and first general Council of Nice, which is so much Celebrated.  
The occasions of calling it were two. The first a most important question in which the Wit and Piety of their Predecessors and now their successively had been much exercised and taken up: that was upon what day they ought to keep Easter, which though it were no point of Faith that it should be kept at all, yet the very calendiny of it was controverted with the same zeal, and made as heavy a do in the Church as if both parties had been Heretics. And it is reckoned by the Church Historians as one of the chie●… felicities of Constantine's Empire to have quieted in that Council this main controversy. The second cause of the assembling them here was in seed grown, as the Bishop had ordered it, a matter of the greatest weight and consequence to the Christian Religion, one Arrius having as is related, to the disturbance of the Church, started a most pernicious opinion in the point of the Trinity. Therefore from all parts of the Empire they met together at the City of Nice, two hundred and fifty Bishops, and better, saith Eusebius, a goodly company, three hundred and eighteen say others, and the Animadverter too, with that pithy remark, pa. 23. Equal almost to the number of servants bred up in the b●…se of Abraham. The Emperor had accommodated them every where with the posts, or laid Horses all along for the convenience of their journey thither, and all the time they were ●…heir supplied them abundantly with all sorts of provision at his own charges. And when they were all first assembled in Council, in the great Hall of the Imperial Palace, he came in having put on his best clothes to make his guests welcome; and saluted with that profound humility as if they all had been Emperor, nor would sit down in his Throne, no it was a very little and low stool, till they had all beckoned and made signs to him to sit down. No wonder if the first Council of Nice run in their heads ever after, and the ambitious Clergy, like those who have been long a thirst, took so much of Constantinus kindness, that they are scarce come to themselves again after so many Ages. The first thing was that he acquainted them with the causes of his summoning them thither, and in a grave and most Christian discourse exhorted them (to keep the peace or) to a good agreement as there was reason. For (saith Ruffin L. 1. c. 2. the Bishops being meet here almost of all parts, and as they use to do, bringing their quarrels about several matters along with them, every of them was at the Emperor, offering him Petitions, laying out one another's faults, (for all the good advice he had given them) and were more ●…tent upon these things then upon the business they were sent for. But he, considering that by these scold and Bicker the main affair was frustrated, appointed a set-day by which all the Bishops should bring him in whatsoever complaint they had against one another. And they being all brought, he made them that high Asiatic compliment▪ God hath made you Priests, and hath given you power to judge me, and therefore it is in you to judge me righteously, But you cannot be judged by any men. It is God only can judge you, and therefore reserve all your quarrels to his Tribunal. For you are as Gods to me, and it is not convenient a man should judge of Gods, but he only of whom it is written, God sta●…deth in the Congregation of the Gods, and discerneth in the midst of them. And therefore setting these things aside, apply your minds without any contention to the concernments of God's Religion. And so without opening or reading one Petition commanded t●…m all together to be burnt there in his presence. An action of great Charity and excellent Wisdom, had but some of the words been spared. For doubtless, though they that would have complained of their brethren, grumbled a little; yet those that were accusable were all very well satisfied: and those expressions, you can judge me righteously, and you cannot be judged by any man, and God only can judge you. You are Gods to me, etc. were so extremely sweet to some of the Bishop's palates, that they believed it, and could never think of them afterwards▪ but their teeth wa●…ered▪ and they ruminated so long on them that Constantine's Successors came too late to repent it. But now the Bishops, having missed of their great end of quarrelling one with another, betake themselves though somewhat aukwardly to business. And it is necessary to mind, that as shortly as possible for the understanding of it, I give a curiory account of Alexander and Arrius, with some few others that were the most interessed in that general and first great revolution of Ecclesiastical affairs, since the days of the Apostles. This Alexander was the Bishop of Alexandria, and appears to have been a pious old Man, but not equally prudent, nor in Divine things of the most capable, nor in conducting the affairs of the Church, very dextrous; but he was the Bishop. This Character that I have given of him, I am the more confirmed in from some passages that follow, and all of them pertinent to the matter before me. They were used Sozom l. 2. c. 16. at Alexandria to keep yearly a solemn Festival to the memory of Peter one of their former Bishops, upon the same day he suffered. Martyrdom, which Alexander having Celebrated at the Church with public Devotion, was sitting after at home expecting some guests to dine with him, Sozom. l. 2. c. 16. As he was alone and looking towards the Sea side he saw a pri●…y way of the Boys upon the beach, at an old Recreation, imitating it seems the Rites of the Church and office of the Bishops, and was much delighted with the sigh●…●…s long as it appeared an innocent and harmless representation: but when 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 them at last how they acted, the very administration of the Sacre●… Mysteries, he was much troubled, and sending for some of the chief of his Clergy, caused the Boys to be taken and brought before him. He asked them particularly what kind of sport they had been at, and what the words, and what the actions were that they had used in it. After their fear had hindered them a while from answering, and now they were afraid of being silent, they con●…essed that a Lad of of their play-fellows, one Athanasius, had baptised some of them that were not yet initiated in those Sacred Mysteries: Whereupon Alexander inquired the more accurately what the Bishop of the game had said, and what he did to the boys he had baptised, what they also had answered or learned from him▪ At last, when Alexander perceived by them that his Pawn Bishop had made all his removes right; and that the whole Ecclesiastical Order and Rites had been duly observed in their interlude, he by the advice of his Priests about him approved of that Mo●…k Baptism and determined that the boys, being once in the simplicity of their minds dipped in the Divine Grace, ought not to be rebaptized, but he perfected it with the remaining Mysteries, which it is only lawful for the Priests to administer. And then he delivered Athanasius and the rest of the boys that had acted the parts of Presbyters and Deacons to their Parents calling God to witness that they should be educated in the Ministry of the Church, that they might pass their lives in that calling which they had chosen by imitation. But as for Athanasius, in a short while after Alexander took him to live with him and be his Secretary, having caused him to be carefully educated in the Schools of the best Grammarians and ●…hetoricians: and he grew in the opinion of all that spoke with him a discreet and eloquent person, and will give occasion to be more than once mentioned again in this Discourse, I have translated this in a manner word for word from the Author. This good natured old Bishop Alexander that was so far from Anathemising, that he did not so much as whip the boys for profanation of the Sacrament against the Discipline of the Church, but without more doing, le●… them, for aught I see, at liberty to regenerate as many more Lads upon the next Holiday as they thought convenient: He Socr. l c. 3. being a man that lived an easy and gentle life, had one day called his Friests and the rest of his Clergy together, and fell on Philosophying divinely among them, but something more subtly and curiously (though I dare say he meant no harm) then was usual, concerning the Holy Trin●…ty. Among the rest, one Arrius a Priest too of Alexandria was there present, a Man who is described to be a good Disputant, and others add, (the Capital accusation of those times) that he had a mind to have been a Bishop and bore a great pique at Alexander, for he having been preferred before him to the See of Alexandria: but more are silent of any such matter, and Soz m l. 1. c. 14. saith he was in a great esteem with his Bishop. But Arrius Socr. l. 1. c. 3. hearing her discourse about the Holy Trinity and the Unity in the Trinity conceived that, as the Bishop stated it, he had reason to suspect he was introducing afresh into the Church the Heresy of Sabellius the African who Fate●…atur unum esse Deum & eta in unam essentiam Trinitatem adducebat, ut assereret in nullam esse vere subjectam proprietatem personis, sed nomina maturi pro eo atque usus poscant, ut nunc de illo ut patre, nunc ut filio, nunc ut spiritu sancto disseratur: and thereupon it seems Arrius argued warmly for that opinion which was directly contrary to the African, driving the Bishop from one to a second, from a second to a third, seeming absurdity; which I studiously avoid the relation of, that in all these things I may not give occasion for men's understandings to work by their memories, and propagate the same errors by the same means they were first occasioned. But hereby Arrius was himself blamed as the maintainer of those absurdities which he affixed to the Bishop's opinion, as is usual in the heat and wrangle of Disputation. Whereas Truth for the most part lies in the middle, but men ordinarily seek for it in the extremities. Nor can I wonder that those ages were so fertile in what they called Heresies, when being given to meddling with the Mysteries of Religion further than humane apprehension or divine revelation did or could lead them, some of the Bishops were so ignorant and gross, but others so speculative, acute and refining in their conceptions, that, there being moreover a good fa●…t Bishopric to boot in the case, it is rather admirable to me how all the Clergy from one end to t'other, could escape from being or being accounted Heretics. Alexander hereupon Soz. l. 1. c. 140. instead of stilling by more prudent Methods this new Controversy, took, doubtless with a very good intention, a course that hath seldom been successful: makes himself judge of that wherein he had first been the Party, and calling to him some others of his Clergy, would needs sit in public to have a solemn set Disputation about the whole Matter. And while Arrius was at it Tooth and Nail against his opposers, and the Arguments flew so thick that they darkened the Air, and no Man could yet judge which side should have the victory; the good Bishop for his part sat hay now hay, neither could tell in his Conscience of a long time which had the better of it; but sometimes he leaned on one side and then on the other, and now encouraged and commended those of one party, and presently the contrary, but at last by his own weight he cast the Scales against Arrius. And from thence forward he excommunicating Arrius for obstinacy, and Arrius writing in behalf and his followers to the Bishops, each one stating his own and his adversaries case with the usual candour of such men in such Matters; the Bishops too all over began to divide upon it, and after them their people. Insomuch that Constantine out of a true paternal Sense and care, found necessary to send a very prudent and eminent Person to Alexandria, to try if he could accommodate the matter, giving him a Letter to Alexander and Arrius; how discreet, how Christianlike, I never read any thing of that nature equal to it! It is too long for me here to insert, but I gladly recommend my Reader to it in the 20 Eus. de vitâ Const. c. 67. where he begins I understand the foundation of the controversy to have been this, that thou Alexander didst inquire of thy Priests concerning a passage in the Scripture, nay didst ask them concerning a frivolous quillet of a question what was each of their opinions: and thou Arrius didst inconsiderately babble what thou neither at the beginning couldst conceive, and if thou hadst conceived so, oughtest not to have vented, etc.  
But the Clergy having got this once in the wind, there was no beating them off the scent. Which induced Constantine to think the convening of this Council the only remedy to these Disorders. And a woeful ado he had with them when they were met to manage and keep them in any tolerable decorum. It seemed like an Ecclesiastical Cockpit, and a man might have laid wagers either way: the two parties contending in good earnest either for the truth or the victory, but the more unconcerned, like cunning Betters, sat judiciously hedging, and so ordered their matters that which side soever prevailed, they would be sure to be the Winners. They were indeed a most venerable Assembly, composed of some holy, some grave, some wise, and some of them learned Persons: and Constantine had so charitably burnt the accusations they intended against one another, which might otherwise have depopulated and dispirited the Council, that all of them may be presumed in one or other respect to have made a great Character. But I observe Soz. l. 1. c. 16. that these great Bishops, although they only had the decisive voices, yet thought fit to bring along with them certain men that were cunning at an Argument, to be auxiliary to them when it came to hard and tough Disputation; beside that they had their Priests and Deacons ready at a dead lift always to assist them: So that their understandings seemed to be sequestered, and for their daily Faith, they depended upon what their Chaplains would allow them. And in that quality Athanasius there waited upon Alexander, being his Deacon, (for as yet it seems Archbishops nor Arch-deacons were invented.) And it is not improbable that Athanasius having so early personated the Bishop, and seeing the declining age of Alexander, would be careful that Arrius should not step betwixt him and home upon vacancy, but did his best against him to bar up his way, as it shortly after happened; Athanasius succeeding after the Council in the See of Alexandria. In the mean time you may imagine that Hypostasis, Persona, Substantia, Subsistentia, Essentia, Coessentialis, Consubstantialis, Ante saecula Coaeternus, etc. were by so many disputants picked to the very bones, and those too broken afterwards to come to the marrow of Divinity. And never had Constantine in his life so hard a task as to bring them to any rational results: meckly and patiently, Euseb. L. 3. c. 13. de vitâ Const. listening to every one, taking each Man's opinion and without the acrimony with which it was delivered, helping each party where they disagreed, reconciling them by degrees when they were in the fiercest Contention, conferring with them a part courteously and mildly, telling them what was his own opinion of the matter: Which though some exceptious persons may allege to have been against the nature of a Free Council, yet truly unless he had taken that course, I cannot imagine how possibly he could ever have brought them to any conclusion. And thus this first, great, General Council of Nice, with which the world had gone big so long, and which looked so big upon all Christendom, at last was brought in bed, and after a very hard labour delivered of Homoousios.  
They all subscribed to the New Creed, except some seventeen, who it seems had rather to be Heretics than Bishops. For now the anathemas were published, and whoever held the contrary was to be punished by Deprivation and Banishment, all Arrian books to be burned, and whoever should be discovered to conceal any of Arrius his writings, to die for it. But it fared very weil with those who were not such fools as to own his opinion. All they were entertained by the Emperor at a magnificent Feast, received from his hand rich Presents, and were honourably dismissed, with Letters recommending their great Abilities and performance to the Provinces, and enjoining the Nicene Creed to be henceforth observed. With that stroke of the Pen: Socr. l. 1. c. 6. For what threo hundred Bishops have agreed on, (a thing indeed extraordinary) ought not to be otherwise conceived of then as the decree of God Almighty, especially seeing the Holy Ghost did sit upon the minds of such and so excellent men, and opened his divine will to them. So that they went I trow with ample satisfaction; and, as they could not but take the Emperor for a very civil, generous, and obliging Gentleman, so they thought the better of themselves from that day forward. And how budge must they look when they returned back to their Dioceses, having every one of them been a principal limn of the Aecumenical, Apostolical, Catholic, Orthodox Council! When the Ca●…achrestical titles of the Church and the Clergy were so appropriate to them by custom, that the Christian people had relinquished or forgotten their claim; when every Hare that crossed their way homeward was a Schismatic or an Heretic, and if their Horse stumbled with one of them, he incurred an Anathema. Well it was that their journeys laid so many several ways, for they were grown so cumbersome and great, that the Emperor's highway was too narrow for any two of them, and there could have been no passage without the removal of a Bishop. But soon after the Council was over, Eusebius the Bishop of Nicomedia, and Theognis the Bishop of Nice, who were already removed both by banishment and two others put in their places, were quickly restored upon their petition: wherein they suggested the cause of their not Signing to have been only, because they thought they could not with a safe conscience subscribe the Anathema against Arrius, appearing to them both by his writings, his discourses, and Sermons that they had been auditors of, not to be guilty of those errors. As for Arrius himself, the Emperor quickly wrote to him. It is now a considerable time since I writ to your Gravity to come to my Tents, that you might enjoy my countenance; so that I can scarce wonder sufficiently why you have so long delayed it: therefore now take one of the public Coaches and make all speed to my Tents, that, having had experience of my kindness and affection to you, you may return into your own Country. God preserve you most dear Sir. Arrius hereupon (with his comarade Euzoius) comes to Constantine's Army, and offers him a petition, with a confession of Faith that would have passed very well before the Nicene Council, and now satisfied the Emperor Socr. l. 1. c. 19 & 20. insomuch that he writ to Anathasius, now Bishop of Alexandria, to receive him into the Church: but Anathanasius was of better mettle than so and absolutely refused it. Upon this Constantine writ him another threatening Letter: When you have understood hereby my pleasure, see that you afford free entrance into the Church to all that desire it: for if I shall understand that any who desires to be admitted into the Church should be either hindered or forbidden by you, I will send some one of my Servants to remove you from your Degree, and place another in your stead. Yet Athanasius stood it out still, though other Churches received him into Communion: and the Heretic Novatus could not have been more unrelenting to lapsed Christians then he was to Arrius. But this, joined with other crimes which were laid to Athanasius his charge, at the Council of Tyre, (though I suppose indeed they were forged) made Athanasius glad to fly for it, and remain the first time in exile. Upon this whole matter it is my impartial opinion that Arrius or whosoever else were guilty of teaching and publishing those errors whereof he was accused, deserved the utmost Severity which consists with the Christian Religion. And so willing I have been to think well of Athanasius and ill of the other, that I have on purpose avoided the reading, as I do the nameing, of a book that I have heard tells the story quite otherwise, and have only made use of the current Historians of those times; who all of them tell it against the Arrians. Only I will confess, that as in reading a particular History at adventure a Man finds himself inclinable to favour the weaker party, especially if the Conqueror appear insolent; so have I been affected in reading these Authors: which does but resemble the reasonable pity that men ordinarily have too for those who though for an erroneous conscience suffer under a Christian Magistrate. And as soon as I come to Constantius, I shall for that reason change my compassion and be doubly engaged on the Orthodox party. But as to the whole matter of the Council of Nice, I must crave liberty to say, that from one end to the other, though the best of the kind, it seems to me to have been a pitiful humane business, attended with all the ill circumstances of other worldly affairs, conducted by a spirit of ambition and contention, the first and so the greatest Aecumenical blow that by Christians was given to Christianity. And it is not from any sharpness of humour that I discourse thus freely of Things and Persons, much less of Orders of men otherwise venerable, but that where aught is extolled beyond reason and to the prejudice of Religion, it is necessary to depreciate it by true proportion. It is not their censure of Arianism, or the declaring of their opinion in a controverted point to the best of their understanding, (wherein to the smallness of mine they appear to have light upon the truth, had they likewise upon the measure,) that could have moved me to tell so long a story, or bring myself within the danger and aim of any captious Reader, speaking thus with great liberty of mind but little concern for any prejudice I may receive, of things that are by some men I dolized. But it is their Imposition of a new Article or Creed upon the Christian world, not being contained in express words of Scripture, to be believed with Divine Faith, under Spritual and Civil Penalties, contrary to the Privileges of Religion and their making a Precedent followed and improved by all succeeding ages for most cruel Persecutions, that only could animate me. In digging thus for a new Deduction they undermined the fabric of Christianity; to frame a particular Doctrine they departed from the general Rule of their Religion; and for their curiosity about an Article concerning Christ, they violated our Saviour's first Institution of a Church not subject to any Addition in matters of Faith, nor liable to Compulsion either in Belief or in Practice. Farr be it from me in the event as it is from my Intention, to derogate from the just authority of any of those Creeds or Confessions of Faith that are received by our Church upon clear agreement with the Scriptures: nor shall I therefore, unless some men's impertinence and indiscretion hereafter oblige me, pretend to any further knowledge of what in those particulars appears in the ancient Histories. But certainly if any Creed had been Necessary, or at least Necessary to have been Imposed, our Saviour himself would not have left his Church destitute in a thing of that moment. Or however, after the Holy Ghost, upon his departure, was descended upon the Apostles, and They the Elders and Brethren (for so it was then) were assembled in a legitime Council at Jerusalem, it would have seemed good to the Holy Ghost and them to have saved the Council of Nice that labour, Or at least the Apostle Paul 2 Cor. 12. 2. and 4. who was caught up into Paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for any man to utter, having thereby a much better opportunity than Athanasius to know the Doctrine of the Trinity, would not have been wanting, through the abundance of that revelation, to form a Creed for the Church, sufficient to have put that business beyond controversy. Especially seeing Heresies were sprung up so early, and he foresaw others, and therefore does prescribe the method how they are to be dealt with, but no Creed that I read of.  
Shall any sort of men presume to interpret those words, which to him were unspeakable, by a Gibberish of their Imposing, and force every man to Cant after them what it is not lawful for any man to utter? Christ and his Apostles speak articulately enough in the Scriptures, without any Creed, as much as we are or aught to be capable of. And the Ministry of the Gospel is useful and most necessary, if it were but to press us to the reading of them, to illustrate one place by the authority of another, to inculcate those duties which are therein required, quickening us both to Faith and Practice, and showing within what bounds they are both circumscribed by our Saviour's Doctrine. And it becomes every man to be able to give a reason and account of his Fa●…th, and to be ready to do it, without officiously gratifying those who demand it only to take advantage: and the more Christians can agree in one confession of Faith the better. But that we should believe ever the more for a Creed, it cannot be expected. In those days when Creeds were most plenty and in fashion, and every one had them at their fingers-ends, 'twas the Bible that brought in the Reformation. 'Tis true, a man would not stick to take two or three Creeds for a need, rather than want a Living, and if a man have not a good swallow, 'tis but wrapping them up in a Liturgy, like a wafer, and the whole dose will go down currently; especially if he wink at the same time and give his Assent and Consent without ever looking on them. But without jesting, for the matter is too serious. Every man is bound to work out his own Salvation with fear and trembling, and therefore to use all helps possible for his best satisfaction: hearing, conferring, reading, praying for the assistance of God's Spirit; but when he hath done this, he is his own Expositor, his own both Minister and People, Bishop and Diocese, his own Council; and his Conscience excusing or condemning him, accordingly he escapes or incurs his own internal Anathema. So that when it comes once to a Creed, made and I●… posed by other men as a matter of Divine Faith, the Case grows very delicate; while he cannot apprehend, though the Imposer may, that all therein is clearly contained in Scripture, and may fear being caught in the expressions to oblige himself to a latitude or restriction, further than comports with his own sense and judgement. A Christian of honour, when it comes to this once, will weigh every word, every syllable, nay further, if he consider that the great business of this Council of Nice was but one single Letter of the Alphabet, about the inserting or omitting of an jota. There must be either that exactness in the Form of such a Creed, as I dare say, no men in the world ever were or ever will be able to modulate: or else this scrupulous private judgement must be admitted, or otherwise all Creeds become mere instruments of Equivocation or Persecution. And I must conf●…ss, when I have sometimes considered with myself the dulness of the Non-conformists, and the acuteness on the contrary of the Episcoparians, and the conscienciousness of both; I have thought that our Church might safely wave the difference with them about Ceremonies, and try it out upon the Creeds, which were both the more honourable way, and more suitable to the method of the ancient Councils, and yet perhaps might do their business as effectually. For one that is a Christian in good earnest, when a Creed is Imposed, will sooner eat fire then take it against his judgement. There have been Martyrs for Reason, and it was manly in ●…hem: but how much more would men be so for reason Religionated and Christianized! But it is an inhuman and unchristian thing of those Faith-stretchers, whosoever they be, that either put men's Persons or their Consciences upon the torture, to rack them to the length of their Notions: whereas the Bereans are made Gentlemen and Ennobled by Patent in the Acts, because they would not credit Paul himself, whose writings now make so great a part of the New Testament, until they had searched the Scripture daily whether those things were so, and therefore many of them believed. And therefore, although where there are such Creeds, Christians may for peace and conscience-sake acquiesce while there appears nothing in them flatly contrary to the words of the Scripture: yet when they are obtruded upon a man in particular, he will look very well about him and not take them upon any Humane Authority. The greatest Pretence to Authority is in a Council. But what then? shall all Christians therefore take their Formularies of Divine Worship or Belief, upon trust, as writ in Tables of Stone, like the Commandments, delivered from Heaven and to be obeyed in the instant not considered: because three hundred and eighteen Bishops are met in Abraham's great Hall, of which most must be servants and some children, and they have resolved upon't in such a manner? No, a good Christian will not, cannot atturn and indenture his conscience over; to be Represented by others. It is not as in Secular matters, where the States of a Kingdom are deputed by their fellow Subjects to transact for them, so in spiritual: or suppose it were, yet 'twere necessary, as in the Polish constitution, that nothing should be obligatory as long as there is one Dissenter, where no Temporal Interests, but every man's Eternity and Salvation are concerned. The Soul is too precious to be let out at interest upon any humane security, that does or may fail, but it is only safe when under God's custody, in its own Cabinet. But it was a General Council. A special general indeed if you consider the proportion of three hundred and eighteen, to the body of the Christian Clergy, but much more to all Christian Mankind. But it was a general Free Council of Bishops. I do not think it possible for any Council to be free that is composed only of Bishops, and where they only have the Decisive Voces. Nor that a Free Council that takes away Christian Liberty. But that, as it was founded upon Usurpation, so it terminated in Imposition. But 'tis meant that it was Free from all external Impulsion. I confess that good meat and drink, and lodging, and money in a Man's purse, and coaches and Servants, and horses to attend them, did no violence to them, nor was there any false Article in it. And discoursing now with one and then another of them in particular, and the Emperor telling them this is my opinion, I understand it thus, and afterwards declaring his mind frequently to them in public; no force neither. Ay! but there was a shrewd way of persuasion in it. And I would be glad to know when ever and which free general Council it was that could properly be called so: but was indeed ameer Imperial or Ecclesiastical Machine, no free agent, but wound up, set on going, and let dow by the direction and hand of the Workman. A General Free Council is but a word of Art, and can never happen but under a Fifth Monarch, and that Monarch too, to return from Heaven. The Animadverter will not allow the second General Council of Nice to have been Free, because it was over awed by an Empress, and was guilty of a great fault (which no Council at liberty he saith could have committed) the Decree for worshipping of Images. At this rate a Christian may scuffle however for one point among them, and choose which council he likes best. But in good earnest I do not see but that Constantine might as well at this first council of Nice, have negotiated the Image worship, as to pay that superstitious adoration to the Bishops, and that Prostration to their Creeds was an Idolatry more pernicious in the consequence to the Christian Faith, then that under which they so lately had suffered Persecution. Nor can a council be said to have been at liberty which laid under so great and many obligations. But the Holy Ghost was present where there were three hundred and eighteen Bishops, and directed them or three hundred. Then, if I had been of their counsel, they should have sat at it all their lives, lest they should never see him again after they were once risen. But it concerned them to settle their Quorum at first by his Dictates; otherwise no Bishop could have been absent or gone forth upon any occasion, but he let him out again: and it behooved to be very punctual in the Adjournments. 'Tis a ridiculous conception, and as gross as to make ●…m of the same Substance with the Council. Nor needs there any strong argument of his absence, than their pretence to be actuated by him, and in doing such Work. The Holy Spirit! If so many of them when they got together, acted like rational Men, 'twas enough in all reason and as much as could be expected.  
But this was one affectation, among many others, which the Bishops took up so early, of the stile, privileges, powers, and some actions a●…d gestures peculiar and inherent to the Apostles, which they misplaced to their own behoof and usage: nay, and challenged other things as Apostolical, that were directly contrary to the Doctrine and Practice of the Apostles. For so because the Holy Spirit did in an extraordinary manner preside among the Holy Apostles at that Legitime Council of Jerusalem, Acts. 15. they, although under an ordinary Administration, would not go less whatever came on't: nay, whereas the Apostles, in the drawing up of their Decree dictated to them by the Holy Spirit, said therefore no more but thus: The Apostles, Elders, and Brethren, send greeting unto the Brethren of, etc. Forasmuch as, etc. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and us to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things: that ye abstain from, etc. from which if ye keep yourselves, you shall do well. Fare ye well.  
This Council denounces every invention of its own; (far from the Apostolical modesty, and the stile of the Holy Spirit) under no less than an Anathema. Such was their arrogating to their inferior degrees the style of Clergy, till custom hath so much prevailed, that we are at a loss how to speak properly either of the name or nature of their function. Whereas the Clergy, in the true and Apostolical sense, were only those whom they superciliously always call the Laity: The word Clerus being never but once used in the New Testament, and in that signification, and in a very unlucky place too, Peter 1. 5. 3. where he admonishes the Priesthood, that they should not Lord it or domineer over, the Christian People, Clerum Domini or the Lord's Inheritance. But having usurped the Title, I confess they did right to assume the Power. But to speak of the Priesthood in that style which they most affect, if we consider the nature too of their Function, what were the Clergy then but Laymen disguised, dressed up perhaps in another habit? Did not St. Paul himself, being a Tentmaker, rather than be idle or burdensome to his People, work of his trade, even during his Apostleship, to get his living? But did not these, that they might neglect their holy vocation, seek to compass secular employments, and Lay Offices? Were not very many of them, whether one respect their Vices or Ignorance, as well qualified as any other to be Laymen? Was it not usual as oft as they merited it to restore them, as in the case even of the three Bishops, to the Lay-communion? And whether, if they were so peculiar from others, did the Imposition of the Bishop's hands, or the lifting up the hands of the Laity confer more to that distinction? And Constantine, notwithstanding his compliment at the burning of the Bishop's papers, thought he might make them and unmake them with the same power as he did his other Lay-Officers. But if the inferior degrees were the Clergy, the Bishops would be the Church: although that word in the Scripture-sense is proper only to a congregation of the Faithful. And being by that title the only men in Ecclesiastical councils, then when they were once assembled they were the Catholic Church, and, having the Holy Spirit at their devotion, whatsoever Creed they light upon, that was the Catholic Eaith, without believing of which no man be saved. By which means there rose thenceforward so constant persecutions till this day, that, had not the little invisible Catholic Church and a People that always searched and believed the Scriptures, made a stand by their Testimonies and sufferings, the Creeds had destroyed the Faith: and the Church had ruined the Religion. For this General council of Nice and all others of the same constitution, did, and can serve to no other end or effect, then particular order of menby their usurping a trust upon Christianity, to make their own Price and Market of it, and deliver it up as oft as they see their own Advantage.  
For scarce was Constantine's Head cold, but his Son Constantius, succeeding his Brothers, being Influenced by the Bishops of the Arrian Party, turned the wrong side of Christianity outward, inverted the Poles of Heaven, and Faith (if I may say so) with its Heels in the Air, was forced to stand upon its Head, and play Gambols, for the Divertisement and Pleasure of the Homoiousians. Arrianism was the Divinity then in Mode, and he was an ignorant and ill Courtier, or Church man, that could not dress, and would not make a new Suit for his Conscience in the Fashion. And now the Orthodox Bishops (it being given to those Men to be obstinate for Power, but flexible in Faith;) began to wind about insensibly, as the Heliotrope Flower that keeps its ground, but wrists its Neck in turning after the warm Sun, from daybreak to Evening. They could look now upon the Synod of Nice with more indifference, and all that pother that had been màde there betwixt Homoousios and Homoiousios, etc. began to appear to them as a Difference only arising from the Inadequation of Languages: Till by degrees they were drawn over, and, rather than lose their Bishoprics, would join, and at last be the Headmost in the Persecution of their own former Party. But the Deacons, to be sure, that steered the Elephants, were thoroughpaced; Men to be reckoned and relied upon in this or any other occasion, and would prick on to render themselves Capable and Episcopable, upon the first Vacancy. For now the Arrians in grain, scorning to come behind the Clownish Homoousians, in any Ecclesiastical Civility, were resolved to give them their full of Persecution. And it seemed a piece of Wit rather than Malice, to pay them in their own Coin, and to Burlesque them in earnest, by the repetition and heightening of the same Severities upon them, that they had practised upon others. Had you the Homoousians a Creed at Nice? We will have another Creed for you at Ariminum, and at Seleucia. Would you not be content with so many several Projects of Faith consonant to Scripture, unless you might thrust the new word Homoousios down our throats, and then tear it up again, to make us confess it? Tell us the word, ('twas Homoiousios) we are now upon the Guard, or else we shall run you thorough. Would you Anathemize, Banish, Imprison, Execute us, and burn our Books? You shall taste of this Christian Fare, and as you relish it, you shall have more on't provided. And thus it went, Arrianism being Triumphant, but the few sincere or stomachful Bishops, adhering constantly, and with a true Christian Magnanimity, especially Athanasius, thorough all Sufferings unto their former Confessions; expiated so in some measure, what they had committed in the Nicene Council.  
Sozom●…ne, l. 4. c. 25. First tells us a story of Eudoxius, who succeeded Macedonius, in the Bishopric of Constantinople; that in the Cathedral of Sancta Sophia, being mounted in his Episcopal Throne, the first time that they Assembled for its Dedication, in the very beginning of his Sermon to the People (those things were already come in Fashion) told them: Patrem i●… esse, Filium 〈◊〉 pium; at which when they began to bustle, Pray be quiet, saith he; I say, Patrem impium esse, quia Colit neminem, Filiem vero Pium quia colit Patrem; at which they then Laughed as heartily, as before they were Angry. But this I only note to this purpose, that there were some of the greatest Bishops among the Homoiousians, as well as the Homoousians, that could not reproach one another's Simplicity, and that it was not impossible for the Many, to be Wiser and more Orthodox than the Few, in Divine Matters. That which I cite him for as most Material, is, his Remark upon the Imposition then of contrary Creeds: Which verily, faith he, was plainly the beginning of most great Calamities, for as much as hereupon there followed a Disturbance, not unlike those which we before recited over the whole Empire; and likewise a Persecution equal almost to that of the Heathen Emperors, seized upon all of all Churches. For, although it seemed to some more gentle for what concerns the Torture of the Body, yet to prudent Persons it appeared more bitter and severe, by reason of the Dishonour and Ignominy. For both they who stirred up, and those that were afflicted with this Persecution, were of the Christian Church. And the Grievance therefore was the greater and more ugly, in that the samethings which are done among Enemies, were Executed between those of the same Tribe and Profession: But the Holy Law forbids us to carry ourselves in that manner, even to those that are Without, and Alien's. And all this Mischief sprung from making of Creeds, with which the Bishops, as it were at Tilting, aimed to hit one another in the Eye, and throw the opposite Party out of the Saddle. But if it chanced that the weaker side were ready to yield, (for what sort of Men was there that could better Manage, or had their Consciences more at command at that time than the Clergy?) Then the Arrians would use a yet longer, thicker, and sharper Lance for the purpose, (for there were never Vacancies sufficient) that they might be sure to run them down, over, and thorough, and do their Business. The Creed of Ariminum was now too short for the Design, but, saith the Historian, they affixed further Articles like Labels to it, pretending to have made it better, and so sent it thorough the Empire with Constantius his Proclamation, that whoever would not Subscribe it, should be banished. Nay, they would not admit their own beloved Similis Substantia, but, to do the Work throughly, the Arrians renouneed their own Creed for Malice, and made it an Article; Filium Patri tam substantia, quam Voluntate, Dissimilem esse. But that is a small matter with any of them, provided thereby they may do Service to the Church, that is their Party. So that one (seriously speaking) that were really Orthodox, could not then defend the Truth or himself, but by turning old Arrian, if he would impugn the new ones; such was the Subtlety. What shall I say more? As the Arts of Glass Coaches and Perriwags illustrate this Age, so by their Trade of Creed-making, than first Invented, we may esteem the Wisdom of Constantine's, and Constantius his Empire. And in a short space, as is usual among Tradesmen, where it appears Gainful, they were so many that set up of the same Profession, that they could scarce live by one another. Socr. l. 2. c. 32. Therefore uses these words: But now that I have tandem aliquando, run through this Labyrinth of so many Creeds, I will gather up their number: And so reckons Nine Creeds more, besides that of Nice, before the death of Constantius, (a blessed Number.) And I believe, I could for a need, make them up a Dozen, if Men have a mind to buy them so. And hence it was that Hilary, than Bishop of Poitiers, represents that state of the Church pleasantly, yet sadly, Since the Nicene Synod, saith he, we do nothing but write Creeds. That while we fight about words, whilst we raise Questions about Novelties, while we Quarrel about things doubtful, and about Authors, while we contend in Parties, while there is difficulty in Consent, while we Anathematise one another, there is none now almost that is Christ's. What a Change there is in the last years Creed? The first Decree commands, that Homoousios should not be mentioned. The next does again Decree and Publish Homoousios. The third does by Indulgence excuse the Word Ousia, as used by the Fathers in their simplicity. The fourth does not Excuse, but Condemn it. It is come to that at last, that nothing among us, or those before us, can remain Sacred or inviolable. We Decree every Year of the Lord, a new Creed concerning God: Nay, every Change of the Moon our Faith is altered. We repent of our Decrees, we defend those that repent of them; we Anathemize those that we defended, and while we either condemn other men's Opinions in our own, or our own Opinions in those of other Men, and bite at one another, we are now all of us torn in pieces. This Bishop sure was the Author of the Naked Truth, and 'twas he that implicitly condemned the whole Catholic Church, both East and West, for being too presumptuous in her Definitions.  
It is not strange to me, that Julian, being but a Reader in the Christian Church, should turn Pagan: Especially when I consider that he succeeded Emperor after Constantius. For it seems rather unavoidable that a Man of great Wit, as he was, and not having the Grace of God to direct it, and show him the Beauty of Religion, through the Deformity of its Governors and Teachers; but that he must conceive a Loathing and Aversion for it, Nor could he think that he did them any Injustice, when he observed that, beside all their Unchristian Immorality too, they Practised thus, against the Institutive Law of their Galilean, the Persecution among themselves for Religion. And well might he add to his other Severities, that sharpness of his Wit, both Exposing and Animadverting upon them, at another rate than any of the Modern Practitioners with all their Study and Inclination, can ever arrive at. For nothing is more punishable, Contemptible, and truly Ridiculous, than a Christian that walks contrary to his Profession: And by how much any Man stands with more advantage in the Church for Eminency, but disobeys the Laws of Christ by that Privilege, he is thereby, and deserves to be the more Exposed. But Julian, the last Heathen Emperor, by whose Cruelty it seemed that God would sensibly Admonish once again the Christian Clergy, and show them by their own Smart, and an Heathen Hand, the nature and odiousness of Persecution, soon died, as is usual for Men of that Employment, not without a remarkable stroke of God's Judgement.  
Yet they, as if they were only sorry that they had lost so much time, upon his death strove as eagerly to redeem it, and forthwith fell in very naturally into their former Animolities. For Jovianus being chosen Emperor in Persia, and returning Homeward, Socr. l. 3. c. 20. the Bishops of each Party, in hopes that theirs should be the Imperial Creed, straight to Horse, and Road away with Switches and Spur, as if it had been for the Plate, to meet him; and he that had best Heels, made himself cocksure of winning the Religion. The Macedonians, who dividing from the Arrians, had set up for a new Heresy concerning the Holy Ghost, (and they were a Squadron of Bishops) Petitioned him that those who held, Filium Patri dissimilem, might be turned out, and themselves put in their places: Which was very honestly done, and above-board. The Acacians, that were the refined Arrians, but, as the Author saith, Had a notable faculty of addressing themselves to the Inclination of whatsoever Emperor, and having good Intelligence that he balanced rather to the Consubstantials, presented him with a very fair Insinuating Subscription, of a considerable number of Bishops to the Council of Nice. But in the next Emperor's time they will be found to yield little Reverence to their own Subscription. For in matter of a Creed, a Note of their Hand, without expresting the Penalty, could not it seems Bind one of their Order. But all that Jovianus said to the Macedonians, was; I hate Contention, but I lovingly embrace and reverence those who are inclined to Peace and Concord. To the Acacians, who had wisely given these the precedence of Application, to try the truth of their Intelligence, he said no more (having resolved by sweetness and persuasions to quiet all their Controversies) but, That he would not molest any Man whatsoever Creed be followed, but those above others he would Cherish and Honour, who should show themselves most forward in bringing the Church to a good Agreement. He likewise called back all those Bishops who had been Banished by Constantius and Julian, restoring them to their Sees. And he writ a Letter in particular to Athanasius, who upon Julian's death, had entered again upon that of Alexandria, to bid him be of good Courage. And these things coming to the Ears of all others, did wonderfully assuage the Fierceness of those who were Inflamed with Faction and Contention: So that, the Court having declared itself of this Mind, the Church was in a short time in all outward appearance peaceably disposed; the Emperor by this Means having wholly repressed all their Violence. Verily, concludes the Historian, the Roman Empire had been prosperous and happy, and both the State and the Church (he puts them too in that Order) under so good a Prince, must have exceedingly flourished, had not an Immature death taken him away from managing the Government. For after seven Months, being seized with a mortal Obstruction, he dparted this Life. Did not this Historian, trow you, deserve to be handled, and is it not, now the Mischief i●… done, to undo the Charm, become a Duty, to Expose both him and Jovianus? By their ill chosen Principles what would have become of the Prime, and most necessary Articles of Faith? Might not the old Dormant Heresies, all of them safely have Revived?  
But that Mortal Obstruction of the Bishops, was not by his death (nor is it by their own to be) removed. They were glad he was so soon got out of their way, and God would yet further manifest their intractable Spirit, which not the Persecution of the Heathen Emperor Julian, nor the Gentleness of Jovianus the Christian, could allay or mitigate by their Afflictions or Prosperity. The Divine Nemesis executed Justice upon them, by one another's Hand: And so heinous a Crime as for a Christian, a Bishop, to Persecute, stood yet need, as the only equal and exemplary Punishment, of being Revenged with a Persecution by Christians, by Bishops▪ And whoever shall seriously consider all along the Succession of the Emperors, can never have taken that Satisfaction in the most judicious Representations of the Scene, which he may in this worthy Speculation of the great Order and admirable conduct of Wise Providence, through the whole contexture of these Exterior, seeming Accidents, relating to the Ecclesiasticals of Christianity.  
For to Jovianus succeeded Valentinian, who in a short time took his Brother Valens to be his Companion in the Empire. These two Brothers, did as the Historian observes, Socr. l. 4. c. 1. (alike, and equally take care at the beginning, for the Advantage and Government of the State) but very much disagreed, though both Christians, in matter of Religion: Valetinianus the Elder being an Orthodox, but Valens an Arrian, and they used a different Method toward the Christians. For Valentinian (who chose the Western part of the Empire, and left the East to his Brother) as he embraced those of his own Creed, so yet he did not in the least molest the Arrians: But Valens not only Laboured to increase the number of the Arrians, but Afflicted those of the contrary Opinion with grievous Punishments. And both of them, especially Valens had Bishops for their purpose. The particulars of that heavy Persecution under Valens, any one may further satisfy himself of in the Writers of those Times: And yet it is observable, that within a little space while he pursued the Orthodox Bishops, he gave Liberty to the 〈◊〉 (who were of the same Creed, but separated from them, as I have said, upon Discipline, etc.) and caused their Churches, which for a while were shut up, to be opened again at Constantinople. To be short, Valens (who outlived his Brother, that died of a natural Death,) himself in a battle against the Goths, could not escape neither the fate of a Christian Persecutor. For the Goths having made Application to him, he, saith Socrates, not well foreseeing the Consequence, admitted them to Inhabit in certain places of Thracia, pleasing himself that he should by that means, always have an Army ready at hand against whatsoever Enemy; and that those Foreign Guards would strike them with a greater Terror, more by far than the Militia of his Subjects. And so, slighting the ancient Veterane Militia, which used to consist of Bodies of Men raised proportionably in every Province, and were stout Fellows that would Fight Manfully; instead of them he levied Money, rating the Country at so much for every Soldier. But these new Inmates of the Emperors soon grew Troublesome, as is customary, and not only infested the Natives in Thracia, but Plundered even the Suburbs of Constantinople, there being no armed Force to repress them: Hereupon the whole People of the City cried out at a public Spectacle, where Valens was present neglecting this matter, Give us Arms and we will manage this War ourselves. This extremely provoked him, so that he forthwith made an Expedition against the Goths: But Threatened the Citizens if he turned in safety, to be Revenged on them both for those Contumelies, and for what under the Tyrant Procopius, they had committed against the Empire, and that he would Raze to the Ground, and Blow up the City. Yet before his departure, out of fear of the Foreign Enemy, he totally ceased from persecuting the Orthodox in Constantinople. But he was killed in the Fight, or Flying into a Village that the Goths had set on fire, he was there burnt to ashes: to the great grief of his Bishops, who, had he been Victorious, might have revived the Persecution. Such was the end of his Impetuous Reign and rash Counsels both as to his Government of State, in matters of Peace and War, and his Manage of the Church by Persecution.  
His death brings me to the Succession of Theodosius the Great, than whom no Christian Emperor did more make it his business to Nurse up the Church, and to Lull the Bishops, to keep the House in quiet. But neither was it in his power to still their Bawling, and Scratching one another, as far as their Nails (which were yet more tender, but afterwards grew like Talons) would give them leave. I shall not further vex the History, or the Reader, in recounting the Particulars; taking no delight neither myself in so uncomfortable Relations, or to reflect beyond what is necessary upon the Wolfishness of those which then seemed, and aught to have been, the Christian Pastors, but went on scattering their Flocks, if not devouring; and the Shepherds smiting one another. In his Reign, the second General Council was called, that of Constantinople, and the Creed was there made which took its name from the place: The rest of their business, any one that is further curious, may observe in the Writers. But I shall close this with a short touch concerning Gregory Nazianzen, then living, than whom also the Christian Church had not in those times (and I question whether in any succeeding) a Bishop that was more a Christian, more a Gentleman, better appointed in all sorts of Learning requisite, seasoned under Julian's Persecution, and exemplary to the highest pitch of true Religion, and Practical Piety. The eminence of these Virtues, and in special of his Humility (the lowliest but the highest of all Christian Qualifications) raised him under Theodosius, from the Parish-like Bishopric of Nazianzum, to that of Constantinople, where he filled his place in that Council. But having taken notice in what manner things were carried in that, as they had been in former Councils, and that some of the Bishops muttered at his promotion; he of his own mind resigned that great Bishopric, which was never of his desire or seeking, and, though so highly seated in the Emperor's Reverence and Favour, so acceptable to the People, and generally to the Clergy, whose unequal Abilities could not pretend or justify an envy against him; retired back far more content to a Solitary Life to his little Nazianzum. And from thence he writes that Letter to his Friend Procopius, wherein, p. 814. upon his most recollected and serious reflection on what had fallen within his observation, he useth these remarkable words: I have resolved with myself (if I may tell you the Naked Truth,) never more to come into any assembly of Bishops: for I never saw a good and haypy end of any Council, but which rather increased then remedied the mischiefs. For their obstinate Contentions and Ambition are unexpressible.  
It would require too great a Volume to deduce, from the death of Theodosius, the particulars that happened in the succeeding Reigns about this matter. But the Reader may reckon, that it was as stated a Quarrel betwixt the Homoousians, and the Homoiousians, as that between the Houses of York and Lancaster: And there arose now an Emperor of one Line, and then again of the other. But among all the Bishops, there was not one Morton, whose industrious Brain could or would (for some Men always reap by Division) make up the fatal Breach betwixt the two Creeds. By this means every Creed was grown up to a Test, and, under that pretence, the dextrous Bishops step by step hooked within their Verge, all the business and Power that could be catched in those Turbulences, where they mudled the Water and Fished after. By this means they stalked on first to a Spiritual kind of Dominion, and from that encroached upon and into the Civil Jurisdiction. A Bishop now grew terrible, and, (whereas a simple Layman might have frighted the Devil with the first words of the Apostles Creed, and I defy thee Satan) one Creed could not protect him from a Bishop, and it required a much longer, and a double and treble Confession, unless himself would be delivered over to Satan by an Anathema. But this was only an Ecclesiastical sentence at first, with which they marked out such as sinned against them, and then whooped and hollowed on the Civil Magistrate, to hunt them down for their Spiritual Pleasure. They crept at first by Court Insinuations and Flattery into the Prince's favour, till those generous Creatures suffered themselves to be backed and ridden by them, who would take as much of a free Horse as possible: but in Persecution the Clergy as yet, wisely interposed the Magistrate betwixt themselves and the People, not caring so their end were attained, how odious they rendered him: And you may observe that for the most part hitherto, they stood crouching and shot either over the Emperor's back, or under his belly. But in process of Time they became bolder and open-faced, and Persecuted before the Sun at Midday. Bishops grew worse, but Bishoprics every day better and better. There was now no Eusebius left to refuse the Bishopric of Antiochia, whom therefore Constantine told, That he deserved the Bishopric of the whole World for that Modesty. They were not such Fools as Ammonius Parotes', I warrant you, in the time of Theodosius. He, Socr. l. 6. c. 30. being seized upon by some that would needs make him a Bishop, when he could not persuade them to the contrary, cut off one of his Ears, telling them that now, should he himself desire to be a Bishop, he was by the Law of Priesthood incapable: but when they observed that those things only obliged the Jewish Priensthood, and that the Church of Christ did not consider whether-a Priest were sound or perfect in limb of Body, but only that he were entire in his manners; they returned to seize on him again: But when he saw them coming, he swore with a solemn Oath, that, if to Consecrate him a Bishop they laid violent hands upon him, he would out out his tongue also; whereupon they, fearing he would do it, desisted. What should have been the matter, that a man so Learned and Holy, should have such an aversion to be promoted in his own Order; that, rather than yield to be a Compelled or Compelling Bishop, he would inflict upon himself as severe a Martyrdom, as any Persecutor could have done for him? Sure he saw something more in the very Constitution, than some do at present. But this indeed was an Example too Rigid, and neither fit to have been done, nor to be imitated, as there was no danger. For far from this they followed the precedent rather of Damasus, and Ursinus, which last, Socr. l. 4. c. 24. In Valentinian 's time, persuaded certain obscure and abject Bishops (for there were it seems of all sorts and sizes) to create him Bishop in a Corner, and then (so early) he and Damasus, who was much the better Man: waged War for the Bishopric of Rome, to the great scandal of the Pagan Writers, who made Remarks for this and other things upon their Christianity, and to the Bloodshed and Death of a multitude of the Christian People. But this last I mentioned, only as a weak and imperfect Essay in that time, of what it came to in the several Ages after, which I am now speaking of, when the Bishops were given, gave themselves, over to all manner of Vice, Luxury, Pride, Ignorance, Superstition, Covetousness, and Monopolising of all secular Employments and Authority. Nothing could escape them: They meddled, troubled themselves and others, with many things, every thing forgetting that one, only needful. Insomuch that I could not avoid wondering often that, among so many Churches that with Paganick Rites, they dedicated to Saint Mary, I have met with none to Saint Martha. But above all, Imposition and Cruelty became inherent to them, and the power of Persecution was grown so good and desirable a thing, that they thought the Magistrate scarce worthy to be trusted with it longer, and a mere Novice at it, and either wrested it out of his hands, or gently eased him of that and his other burdens of Government. The Sufferings of the Laity were become the Royalties of the Clergy; and, being very careful Christians, the Bishops, that not a word of our Saviour's might fall to the Ground, because he had foretold how Men should be Persecuted for his Names sake, they undertook to see it done effectually in their own Provinces, and out of pure zeal of doing him the more Service of this kind, enlarged studiously their Dioceses beyond all proportion. Like Nostradamus' his Son, that to fulfil his Father's prediction of a City in France, that should be Burned; with his own hands set it on fire. All the calamities of the Christian World in those Ages, may be derived from them, while they warmed themselves at the Flame; and, like Lords of Misrule, kept a perpetual Christmas. What in the Bishop's name is the matter? How came it about that Christianity, which approved itself under all Persecutions to the Heathen Emperors, and merited their Favour so far, till at last it regularly succeeded to the Monarchy, should under those of their own Profession be more distressed? Were there some Christians then too, that feared still lest Men should be Christians, and for whom it was necessary, not for the Gospel reason that there should be Heresies. Let us collect a little now also in the conclusion what at first was not particularised, how the reason of State and Measure of Government stood under the Roman Emperors, in aspect to them. I omit Tiberius, mentioned in the beginning of this Essay. Trajane, after having persecuted them, and having used Pliny the second in his Province to that purpose, upon his relation that they lived in conformity to all Laws, but that which for bad their Worship, and in all other things were blameless, and good men, straight by his Edict commanded that none of them should be farther enquired after. Hadrian, in his Edict to Minutius Fundanus, Proconsul of Asia, commands him that, If any accuse the Christians, and can prove it, that they commit anything against the State, that then he punish them according to the crime: but if any man accuse them, merely for calumny and vexation, as Christians, then t'saith let him suffer sored, and take you care that he ●…eel the smart of it. Antoninus Pius writ his Edict, very remarkable if there were place here to recite it, to the States of Asia assembled at Ephesus; wherein he takes notice of his father's command that, unless the Christians were found to act any thing against the Roman Empire, they should not be molested and then commands that, if any man thereafter shall continue to trouble them, tanquam tales, as Christians, for their Worship, in that case he that is the Informer should be exposed to punishment, but the accused should be free and discharged. I could not but observe that among other things in this Edict, where he is speaking, It is desirable to them that they may appear, being accused, more willing ●…dy for their God then to live, he adds. It would not be amiss to admonish you concerning the Earthquakes which have, and do now happen, that when you are afflicted at them, you would compare our affairs with theirs. They are thereby so much the more encouraged to a confidence and reliance upon God, but you all the while go on in your ignorance, and neglect both other gods, and the Religion towards the immortal, and banish and persecute them unto death. Which words of that Emperors, fall in so naturally with what, it seems, was a common observation about Earthquakes, that I cannot but to that purpose take further notice, how also Gregory Nazianzen, in Or. 2d. contra Gentiles, tells, besides the break in of the Sea in several places, and many fires that happened, of the Earthquakes in particular, which he reckons as Symptoms of Julian's Persecution. And to this I may add. Socr. l. 3. c. 10. who in the Reign of Valens, that notorious Christian Persecutor, saith, at the same time there was an Earthquake in Bythinia, which ruined the City of Nice, (that same in which that general Counsel was held under Constantine) and a little after there was another. But although these so happened, the minds of Valens and of Eudoxius, the Bishop of the Arrians were not at all stirred up unto Piety, and a right opinion of Religion: For neverthless they never ceased, made no end of persecuting those who in their Creed dissented from them. Those Earthquakes seemed to be certain indications of tumult in the Church. All which put together, could not but make me reflect upon the late Earthquakes, great by how much more unusual, here in England, thorough so many Counties since Christmas, at the same time when the Clergy, some of them, were so busy in their Cabals, to promote this (I would give it a modester name then) Persecution, which is now on foot against the Disfenters; at so unseasonable a time, and upon no occasion administered by them, that those who comprehend the reasons, yet cannot but wonder at the wisdom of it. Yet I am not neither one of the most credulous nickers or applyers of natural events to human transactions: but neither am I so secure as the Learned Dr. Spencer, nor can walk along the world without having some eye to the conjunctures of God's admirable Providence. Neither was Marcus Aurelius (that I may return to my matter) negligent as to this particular. But he, observing, as Antoninus had the Earthquakes, that in an expedition against the Germans, and Sarmatians: his Army being in despair almost for want of water, the Melitine (afterwards from the event called the Thundering) Legion, which consisted of Christians, kneeled down in the very heat of their thirst and fight, praying for rain, which posture the enemies wondering at, immediately there broke out such a thundering and lightning as together with the Christian valour, routed the adverse Army, but so much rain fell therewith, as refreshed Aurelius his Forces that were at the last gasp for thirst, he thence forward commanded by his Letters; that upon pain of death none should inform against the Christians, as Tertulian in his Apology for the Christians witnesses. But who would have believed that even Commodus, so great a Tyrant otherwise, should have been so favourable as to make a Law, that the informers against Christians should be punished with Death? Yet he did, and the Informer against Apollanius was by it executed. Much less could a man have thought that, that prodigy of cruelty Maximine, and who exercised it so severely upon the Christians, should, as he did, being struck with God's hand, publish when it was too late Edict after Edict, in great favour of the Christians. But above all, nothing could have been less expected than that, after those Heathen Emperors, the first Christian Constantine should have been seduced by the Bishops, to be, after them, the first occasion of Persecution, so contrary to his own excellent inclination: 'Twas then that he spoke his own mind, when he said, Eus. de vitâ Consti. 60. You ought to retain within the bounds of your private thoughts those things, which you cunningly and subtly seek out concerning most frivolous questions. And then much plainer, c. 67. where he saith so wisely. You are not ignorant that the Philosophers all of them do agree in the profession of the same Discipline, but do oftentimes differ in some part of the opinions which they dogmatise in: but yet, although they do descent about the Discipline that each several Sect observeth, they nevertheless reconcile themselves again for the sake of that common Procession to which they have concurred. But against compulsion in Religious matters so much every where, that it is needless to insert one passage. And he being of this disposition, and universally Famous for his care and countenance of the Christian Religion. Eusebius saith these words: While the people of God did glory and heighten itself in the doing of good things, and all fear from without was taken away, and the Church was fortified as I may say, on all sides by a peaceable and illustrious tranquillity, than Envy lying in wait against our prosperity, craftily crept in, and began first to dance in the midst of the company of Bishops: so goes on, telling the History of Alexander and Arrius. I have been before large enough in that relation, wherein it appeared that, contrary to that great Emperors pious intention, whereas Envy began to dance among the Bishop's first, the good Constantine brought them the Fiddles. But it appeared likewise how soon he was weary of the Bal, and toward his latter end, as Princes often do upon too late experience, would have redressed all and returned to his natural temper. Of the other Christian Emperors I likewise discoursed, omitting, that I might insert it in this place, how the great Heathen Philosopher Themistius, in his Consular Oration, celebrated Jovianus for having given that toleration in Christian Religion, and thereby defeated the flattering Bishops, which fort of men, saith he wittily, do not worship God, but the Imperial Purple.  
It was the same Themistius that, only out of an upright natural apprehension of things, made that excellent Oration afterward to Valens, which is in Print, exhorting him to cease Persecution: wherein he chances upon, and improves the same notion with Constantine's, and tells him: That he should not wonder at the Dissents in Christian Religion, which were very small, if compared with the multitude and crowd of Opinions among the Gentile Philosophers; for there were at least three hundred differences, and a very great dissension among them there was about their resolutions, unto which each several Sect was as it were necessarily bound up and obliged: and that God seemed to intend more to illustrate his own glory by that divers and unequal variety of Opinions, to the end every each one might therefore so much the more reverence his Divine Majesty, because it is not possible for any one accurately to know him. And this had a good effect upon Valens, for the mitigating in some measure his severities against his fellow Christians. So that after having cast about, in this Summary again, (whereby it plainly appears that according to natural right and the apprehension of all sober Heathen Governors, Christianity as a Religion, was wholly exempt from the Magistrates jurisdiction or Laws, farther than any particular person among them immorally transgressed, as others, the common rules of human society) I cannot but return to the Question with which I begun. What was the matter? How came it about that Christianity, which approved itself under all Persecutions to the Heathen Emperors, and merited their favour so far, till at last it regularly succeeded to the Monarchy, should, under those of their own profession, be more distressed? But the Answer is now much shorter and certainer, and I will adventure boldly to say, the true and single cause then was the Bishops. And they were the cause against reason. For what power had the Emperors by growing Christians, more than those had before them? None. What obligation were Christ an Subjects under to the Magistrate more than before? None. But the Magistrates Christian authority was, what the Apostle described it while Heathen, not to be a terror to good works, but to evil. What new Power had the Bishops acquired, whereby they turned every Ponti●… into a Gaiaphat? None neither? 2 Cor. 10. 8. Had they been Apostles, The Lord had but given them Authority for edification, not for destruction. They, of all other, aught to have Preached to the Magistrate, the terrible denunciations in Scripture against usurping upon and persecuting of Christians. They, of all others, ought to have laid before them the horrible Examples of God's ordinary Justice against those that exercised Persecution. But, provided they could be the Swearers of the Prince to do all due Allegiance to the Church, and to preserve the Rights and liberties of the Church, however they came by them, they would give him as much scope as he pleased in matter of Christianity, and would be the first to solicit him to break the Laws of Christ, and ply him with hot places of Scripture in order to all manner of Oppression and Persecution in Civils and Spirituals. So that the whose business how this unchristian Tyranny came and could entitle itself among Christians, against the Christian privileges, was only the case in Zech. 13. 6. 7 And one shall say unto him, what are these wounds in thy hands? then he shall answer, those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends. Because they were all Christians, they thought forsooth they might make the bolder with them, make bolder with Christ, and wound him again in the hands and feet, of his members. Because they were friends they might use them more coarsely, and abuse them, against all common civility, in their own house, which is a Protection to Strangers. And all this to the end that a Bishop might sit with the Prince in a Junto, to consult wisely how to preserve him from those people that never meant him any harm, and to secure him from the Sedition and Rebellion of men that seek, nor think, any thing more but to follow their own Religious, Christian Worship. It was indeed as ridiculous a thing to the Pagans to see that work, as it was afterwards in England to strangers, where Papists and Protestants went both to wrack at the same instant, in the same market, and when Erasmus said wittily, Quid agitur in Augliâ? Consulitur he might have added though not so elegantly Comburitur) de Religione. Because they knew that Christian Worship was free by Christ's institution, they procured the Magistrate to make Laws in it concerning things unnecessary; As the Heathen Persecutor Julian introduced some bordering Ragan Ceremonies, and arguing with themselves in the same manner as he did, Soz. l. 5. c. 16. That if Christians should obey those Laws they should be able to bring them about to something further which they had designed. But if they would not, than they might proceed against them without any hope of pardon, as breakers of the Laws of the Empire, and represent them as turbulent and dangerous to the Government. Indeed, whatsoever the Animadverter saith of the Act of Seditious Conventicles hero in England, as if it were Anvilled after another of the Roman Senate, the Christians of those Ages, had all the finest tools of Persecution out of Julian's Shop, and studied him then as curiously as some do now Machiavelli. These Bishops it was who, because the Rule of Christ was incompatible with the Power that they assumed, and the Vices they practised, had no way to render themselves necessary or tolerable to Princes, but by making true piety difficult, by Innovating Laws to revenge themselves upon it, and by turning Makebates between Prince and People, instilling dangers of which themselves were the Authors. Hence it is that having awakened this jealousy once in the Magistrate against Religion, they made both the Secular and the Ecclesiastical Government so uneasy to him, that most Princes began to look upon their Subjects as their Enemies, and to imagine a reason of State different from the Interest of their People: and therefore to weaken themselves by seeking unnecessary & grievous supports to their authority. Whereas if men could have refrained this cunning, and from thence forcible, governing of Christianity, leaving it to its own simplicity, and due Liberty, but causing them in all other things to keep the King's and Christ's peace among themselves and towards others, all the ill that could have come of it would have been that such kind of Bishops should have proved less implemental, but the good that must have thence risen to the Christian Magistrate and the Church, then and ever after, would have been inexpressible.  
But this discourse having run in a manner wholly upon the Imposition of Creeds, may seem not to concern (and I desire that it may not reflect upon) our Clergy, nor the Controversies which have so unhappyly vexed our Church, ever since the reign of Edward the Sixth unto this day. Only, if there might something be picked out of it towards the Compromising of those differences (which I have not from any performance of mine the vanity to imagine) it may have use as an Argument a Majori ad Minus, their disputes having risen only from that of Creeds, ours from the Imposition only of Ceremonies, which are of much inferior consideration. Faith being necessary, but Ceremonies Despensable. Unless our Church should lay the same weight upon them as the Animadverter has done thorough his whole Studious Chapter on that Subject, and because p. 34. this is the time of her settlement, that there is a Church at the end of every Mile, that the Sovereign Powers spread their wings to cover and protect her, that Kings and Queens are her Nursing Fathers and Nursing Mothers, that she hath stately Cathedrals, there he so many arguments now to make Ceremonies Necessary: which may all be answered with one Question that they use to ask Children. Where are you proud? But I should rather hope from the wisdom and Christianity of the present guides of our Church, that they will (after an age and more, after so long a time almost as those Primitive Bishops I have spoke of, yet suffered the Novatian Bishops in every Diocese) have mercy on the Nation, that hath been upon so slender a matter as the Ceremonies and Liturgy so long, so miserably harassed. That they will have mercy upon the King, whom they know against his natural inclination, His Royal Intention, his many Declarations, they have induced to more Severities, than all the Reigns since the Conquest will contain if summed up together: who may, as Constantine among his Private Devotions put up one Collect to the Bishops. Euseb. de vitâ Const. c. 70. Date igitur mihi Dies tranquillos & Noctes curarum expertes. And it runs, thus almost altogether verbatim in that Historian. Grant, most merciful Bishop and Priest that I may have calm days, and nights free from care and motestation, that I may live a peaceable life in all Godliness and honesty for the future by your good agreement; which unless you vouchsafe me, I shall waste away my Reign in perpetual sadness and vexation. For as long as the people of God stands divided by so unjust and pernicious a Contention, how can it be that I can have any ease in my own Spirit. Open therefore by your good agreement the way to me, that I may continue my Expedition towards the East; and grant that I may see both you and all the rest of my people, having laid aside your animosities, rejoicing together, that we may all with one voice give laud and glory, for the Common good agreement and liberty, to God Almighty for ever. Amen. But if neither the People, nor his Majesty enter into their consideration. I hope it is no unreasonable request that they will be merciful unto themselves, and have some reverence at least for the Naked Truth of History, which either in their own times will meet with them, or in the next age overtake them: That they, who are some of them so old that, as Confessors, they were the Scars of the former troubles, others of them so young, that they are free from all the Motives of Revenge and Hatred, should yet join in reviving the former persecutions upon the pretences, yea even themselves in a turbulent, military, and uncanonical manner execute Laws of their own procuring, and depute their inferior Clergy to be the Informers. I should rather hope to see not only that Controversy so scandalous abolished, but that also upon so good an occasion as the Author of the Naked Truth hath administered them, they will inspect their Clergy, and cause many things to be corrected, which are far more ruinous in the Consequence than the dispensing with a Surplice. I shall mention some too confusedly, as they occur to my Pen, at present, reserving much more for better leisure. Methinks it might be of great edification, that those of them who have ample possessions should be in a good sense. Mult as inter opes inopes. That they would inspect the Canons of the ancient Councils, where are many excellent ones for the regulation of the Clergy. I saw one, looking but among those of the same Council of Nice, against any Bishops removing from a less Bishopric to a greater, nor that any of the Inferior Clergy should leave a less living for a fatter. That is methinks the most Natural use of General or any Councils to make Canons, as it were By-Laws for the ordering of their own Society, but they ought not to take out, much less forge any Patent to invade and prejudice the Community. It were good that the greater Churchmen relied more upon themselves, and their own direction, not building too much upon stripling Chaplains: that men may not suppose the Master (as one that has a good Horse or a Fleet-hound) attributes to himself the virtues of his Creature. That they inspect the Morals of the Clergy: the Moral Heretics, do the Church more harm than all the Non-conformists can do, or can wish it. That before they admit men to subscribe the Thirty nine Articles for a Benefice, they try whether they know the meaning. That they would much recommend to them the reading of the Bible. 'tis a very good book, and if a man read it carefully, will make him much wiser. That they would advise them to keep the Sabbath: if there were no morality in the day, yet there is a great deal of prudence in the observing it. That they would instruct those that came for Holy Orders and Livings, that it is a terrible vocation they enter upon, but that has indeed the greatest reward. That to gain a Soul is beyond all the acquists of Traffic, and to convert an Atheist more glorious than all the Conquests of the Soldier. That, betaking themselves to this Spiritual Warfare, they ought to disentangle from the World. That they do not ride for a Benefice as if it were for a Fortune or a Mistress, but there is more in it. That they take the Ministry up not as a Trade, and, because they have heard of Whittington, in expectation that the Bells may so chime that they come in their turns to be Lord Mayors of Lambeth. That they make them understand, as well as they can, what is the Grace of God. That they do not come into the Pulpit too full of Fustian or Logic, a good life is a Clergy man's best Syllogism, and the quaintest Oratory: and till they outlive them they will never get the better of the fanatics, nor be able to preach with Demonstration of Spirit or with any effect or Authority. That they be Lowly minded, and no Railers.  
And particularly, that the Archdeacon of Canterbury being in ill humour upon account of his Ecclesiastical Policy, may not continue to revenge himself upon the innocent Walloons there, by ruining their Church which subsists upon the Ecclesiastical Power of His Majesty and so many of His Royal Predecessors.  
But these things require greater Time, and to enumerate all that is amiss, might perhaps be as endless as to number the People: nor are they within the ordinary sphere of my Capacity, and our Exposer will think I have forgot him, I shall take my leave of him for the present, being only troubled to find out a Compliment for so civil a Person. It must be thus.  
I will not say as Popilius said to Antiochus, nor as Demosthenes said to Eschines, nor as the most Learned P. Aerodius, or the Jesuit Gaspar Schottus said to the Animadverter, nor as Dolubella said to Cicero, nor as the Christian Cicero said to the English Parliament, nor as the Roman Centurion said to the Roman Ensign: but I will say something like what Leonas (that presided from Constantius at the Council at Seleucia, when they made an endless Disputing to no purpose) said to them: not, Abi●…e igitur & in Ecclesiâ nugas agite, but, good Mr. Exposer, what do you Loitering like an idle Scholar, and Animadverting here in Town? get you home again, or it were better for you, and Expose and Animadvert, as long as you will, at your own College.  
But as to a new Book fresh come out, Entitled, the Author of the Naked Truth stripped Naked (to the Fe●…, or to the skin) that Hieroglyphical Quibble of the Great Gun, on the Title Page, will not excuse Bishop Gunning. For his Sermon is still expected.  
But to the Judicious and Serious Reader, to whom I wish any thing I have said, may have given no unwelcome entertainment, I shall only so far justify myself, that I thought it no less concerned me to vindicate the Laity from the Impositions that the Few would force upon them, then him to defend those Impositions on behalf of the Clergy. And moreover I judged myself most proper for the work, it not being fit that so slight a Pamphlet as his should be answered by any Man of great abilities. For the rest I take the Naked Truth to have been part of that effect which Reverend Mr. Hooker foretold Praef. to E●…l. Policy. p. 10. The time will come when Three words, uttered with Charity and Meekness, shall receive a far more blessed reward, than Three thousand Volumes written with disdainful sharpness of Wit. And I shall conclude with him in his close. I trust in the Almighty that with us Contentions are now at the highest float, and that the day will come (for what cause is there of Dispair) when the Passions of former enmity being allayed, men shall with ten times redoubled tokens of unfeignedly reconciled Love, show themselves each to other the same which Joseph and the Brethren of Joseph were at the time of their Interview in Egypt. And upon this condition, let my Book also (yea myself if it were needful) be burnt by the hand of the, Animadverter.   
FINIS.